Tag Archive for: FAA

FAA Reportedly Considering Replacing Verizon With Musk’s Starlink For $2 Billion Air Traffic Control Contract

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is considering canceling its $2.4 billion air traffic control communications system contract with Verizon and instead enlisting Elon Musk’s satellite company, sources told The Washington Post.

The potential shift to Starlink, the satellite communications infrastructure under SpaceX, comes after a December General Services Administration (GSA) report highlighting an “urgent” need to modernize the FAA’s dated systems. The SpaceX founder has repeatedly criticized the FAA and suggested Verizon’s systems contributed to recent deadly aviation incidents — though he later issued a correction clarifying that Verizon’s systems haven’t yet been implemented and that L3Harris, a defense contractor, operates the “ancient system” currently running air traffic control infrastructure.

“Correction: the ancient system that is rapidly declining in capability was made L3Harris. The new system that is not yet operational is from Verizon,” Musk wrote.

Verizon also emphasized that the “FAA systems currently in place are run by L3Harris and not Verizon,” and that the company was at “the beginning of a multi-year contract to replace antiquated, legacy systems” in a statement to the Daily Caller News Foundation.

The telecommunications company announced its partnership with the agency through the FAA Enterprise Network Services (FENS) contract in 2023, an initiative meant to modernize air traffic control systems and communication between agency offices — though the FAA said in an X post Monday it has considered switching to Starlink “since the prior administration.” The FAA also said SpaceX employees are already working with the agency to update its aging communications infrastructure and testing Starlink systems at “non-safety critical” facilities in Atlantic City and Alaska. Some SpaceX employees already have FAA email addresses, according to The Washington Post.

“Alaska has long had issues with reliable weather information for the aviation community,” the agency wrote. “That is why the FAA has been considering the use of Starlink since the prior administration to increase reliability at remote sites, including in Alaska. This week, the FAA is testing one terminal at its facility in Atlantic City and two terminals at non-safety critical sites in Alaska.”

Starlink expects to install 4,000 satellite terminals at these sites over the next 12 to 18 months, according to Bloomberg.

Democratic lawmakers including California Sen. Adam Schiff and Massachusetts Sen. Ed Markey have raised ethical concerns ahead of the potential partnership, with Schiff arguing in a Feb. 10 letter to White House chief of staff Susie Wiles that Musk’s financial interests in the contract create serious ethical issues. Markey wrote a similar letter to the FAA on Wednesday.

“Mr. Musk holds substantial financial interests in private companies, including Tesla, Inc., SpaceX, The Boring Company, xAI, X Corp and Neuralink,” the senator wrote. “Mr. Musk’s companies have also been the subject of at least 20 recent investigations by federal agencies, which heightens the risk that Mr. Musk may seek to use his new position to shield his companies from federal scrutiny.”

Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy defended the development in a Fox News column on Feb. 19, stating the integration of SpaceX infrastructure in air traffic control systems is “just the start” of the modernization effort.

“The Government Accountability Office stated that among the FAA’s 138 systems, 51 are unsustainable and the agency doesn’t plan to complete modernization projects for some of these systems for at least 10 years,” Duffy wrote. “Additionally, the FAA doesn’t yet have plans to modernize other systems in need — three of which are at least 30 years old … Despite the obvious need for reform, partisans are certain to criticize this upcoming SpaceX visit, manufacturing illusory controversy rather than welcoming progress.”

The FAA and SpaceX did not respond to the DCNF’s requests for comment.

AUTHOR

Thomas English

Contributor.

RELATED ARTICLE: ‘Accident Waiting To Happen’: Feds Ignored DC Death Trap For Years Despite Dozens Of Near Misses With Planes, Choppers

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.


All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

‘Accident Waiting To Happen’: Feds Ignored D.C. Death Trap For Years Despite Dozens Of Near Misses With Planes, Choppers

Washington’s Reagan National Airport has suffered countless near misses between aircrafts over the last few decades, many reported by pilots themselves, an issue the FAA has done little to solve, according to a Daily Caller review of public documents.

Just a few moments away from touching down at Washington Reagan National Airport (DCA) on Jan. 29, an American Airlines passenger jet collided with a military helicopter. There were no survivors. The most fatal crash in several decades has caused aviation experts and administration officials alike to parse through public information and determine how something so catastrophic happened. Was the helicopter too high? Did the airplane take the wrong approach? Did Air Traffic Control (ATC) give proper alerts?

Days after the crash, the FAA temporarily banned all mixed helicopter and fixed-wing flying aircrafts from flying over the Potomac River near the airport. New FAA guidance now allows some emergency helicopters to pass near the D.C. airport and requires civilian planes to hold when they are in the area.

But those changes only happened now, despite the fact that for years prior to the crash, helicopters and airplanes have been passing within feet of each other at DCA, causing pilots to make evasive maneuvers to avoid catastrophe. Pilots have been angrily reporting these incidents to an anonymous, public database, but little was done to address the issue until the tragedy last month.

“THIS HELI CONFLICT … AT DCA IS AN ONGOING PROB. HERE IS AN ACCIDENT WAITING TO HAPPEN,” a pilot furiously asserted after a January 2016 near miss.

The issue has become so frequent that pilots reported feeling that complaining about the incidents was useless and unlikely to spur any action. As such, they started treating the near misses as practically inevitable at the Washington, D.C. airport.

“Complacency is a killer,” one commercial pilot, who requested anonymity to speak freely about the reported incidents and the DCA crash, told the Caller.

The Daily Caller reviewed public reports pilots and air traffic control have filed through the Aviation Safety Reporting System (ASRS) between 1988 to 2025 while working at DCA. The reports address all sorts of aviation issues and are supposed to help the FAA “disseminate information to the proper authorities who can investigate and determine if action is warranted.”

The Caller looked specifically at self-reported airborne conflicts and near misses between aircrafts near Washington Reagan National Airport and found there had been 220 such incidents from 1988 to 2025. Of those, 30 have been between helicopters and airplanes, marking an almost annual occurrence.

By comparison, nearby Dulles National Airport has had 181 self-reported airborne conflicts and near misses between aircrafts in the same time period. Just five have been between helicopters and airplanes.

“Anyone can [self] report it for any reason, but usually it’s because pilots get afraid and they said, ‘Holy shit that was too close.’ Traffic was issued too late, or I didn’t see that issue report,’” Michael Pearson, a former air traffic controller and ATC training instructor, told the Caller of the ASRS reports.

The commercial pilot added, “Usually you are pretty pissed if you are willing to write the report and submit as an ASR. It’s not an ‘Oh, that was interesting’ moment. It’s a ‘Hey, this is a problem’ moment.”

The near miss reports cite numerous issues that pilots and ATC have faced over the last several decades at DCA. Some airplane pilots wrote that they never received any alert from the ATC of a helicopter flying just feet below the plane as it landed.

“Helicopter traffic was heading up the Potomac while we were on the river … visual approach did not alert us to the oncoming traffic,” a pilot wrote in January 2022.

Others were notified of the close aircraft only after it had passed by.

“After there was action taken to make a correction from the close call, we were then informed by DCA tower of close traffic,” a pilot recounted in July 2015, “although at that point it would have been too late.”

In other instances, pilots and ATC reported that helicopters flying near the DCA runways had climbed far higher than they were supposed to, putting them dangerously close — sometimes just 200 feet — from the airplane.

Even a helicopter potentially tasked with transporting the vice president has reportedly experienced a near miss in the last decade. In May 2017, a helicopter and airplane pilot reported an “an unsafe situation involving VIP movements.” It is not confirmed if the vice president — at the time, Mike Pence – was in the helicopter at the time, but the report notes that the craft was en route to the Naval Observatory.

One air traffic controller for the Potomac Consolidated TRACON wrote that they were holding airplanes in the sky during a presidential movement, but the controllers at DCA nonetheless launched two departures at the presidential aircraft “less than a mile and no altitude, converging.” The report suggests that towers need to coordinate better during VIP movements.

“How is it we on approach are not allowed to run arrivals yet they have the authority to release airplanes right at presidential aircraft?” the controller at Potomac Consolidated TRACON vents in his report.

DCA’s airport is one of the most difficult landings for pilots in the country. With congested airspace, short runways, frequent restricted airspace and landings right along the water, the reports showed that pilots found themselves having a difficult time juggling an already-tight landing zone with possible helicopter presence near the runways. Pilots were especially frustrated with the fact that helicopters are allowed to pass below airplanes, near runways, as commercial airplanes are descending to land.

“I cannot imagine what business is so pressing that these helicopters are allowed to cross the path of airliners carrying hundreds of people! I do not understand why they are not crossed IN-BETWEEN arrivals,” a pilot angrily wrote in 2013 after his aircraft came within just 200 feet of a helicopter. The pilot added that ATC only called out the traffic one time — and that the helicopter was several hundred feet above where he should’ve been. Upon landing and making a call up to the tower, the pilot wrote that it took some “prodding” to even get an explanation from ATC on why his aircraft nearly grazed the helicopter.

“The FAA allows these aircrafts to operate in this environment and we have no choice, but to accept it and deal with it,” the pilot added.

Of the self-reported incidents the Caller reviewed, many pilots described coming within a few hundred feet of helicopters while descending into the Washington airport. Some near misses took place while planes were trying to land on Runway 33, the runway that the crashed American Airlines craft was set to land on. The Washington Post reported that Runway 33’s landing route takes jets within 15 feet of the top of the Route 4 helicopter corridor.

“The width of the Potomac [helicopters] are allowed to … pass [below airplanes]. But it’s kind of insane. Honestly, they should not, they shouldn’t have those routes that close to descending airplanes,” Pearson told the Caller.

A report from March 2015 details an airplane and a helicopter coming just a few hundred feet apart as the aircraft lined up to land on Runway 33. The pilot notes in his report that while starting to land, they spotted a helicopter that was close in altitude and climbing. The report explains that the pilot made a decision to abort the landing ahead of getting an alert that the other aircraft was too close to the plane.

After landing on a different runway, the pilot spoke to the tower about the near miss, learning that the helicopter had climbed far beyond where it was supposed to be.

“The tower supervisor I spoke with told me a few things that explained what may have happened. Number one, he said that the helicopters operating in that area should NEVER be above 200 feet. According to him, the helicopter was at 800 feet, clearly not where he was supposed to be,” the pilot writes, noting that he had his airplane climbed to 2,000 feet to avoid a crash.

“[The tower supervisor] also explained that ATC may have taken their eyes off the helicopter for a second because they would never expect those helicopters to do something that egregious. That seems plausible given the fact that I’ve never seen a helicopter in that area at that altitude. He suggested that it was most probably a deviation on the part of the Pilot of the helicopter, and a loss of aircraft separation that was also the fault of the helicopter pilot,” the report states.

Another 2015 report details a severe incident where the ATC failed to communicate another aircraft’s activity in the airplane’s path during its landing — just 400 feet from the ground.

“This occurred about 400 feet off the ground to the point where the pilot monitoring had to take the controls to make a correction in order to prevent it from becoming a midair collision,” the captain of the landing aircraft wrote.

“After there was action taken to make a correction from the close call, we were then informed by DCA tower of close traffic, although at that point it would have been too late,” the pilot added.

In May of 2013, another self report details another near miss while attempting to land on Runway 33. In this incident, the airplane pilot writes that, despite ATC asking the helicopter if it had the aircraft in sight and to maintain visual separation, the chopper made a turn that looked to be directly in the path of the airplane.

The turn caused the captain of the airplane to make a “hard turn” to avoid the helicopter.

Pearson explained to the Caller that one issue that is contributing to the near misses is that military and commercial pilots cannot hear each other because they are on different radio systems. Nearly all of the self-reported near misses reviewed by the Caller make a reference to Traffic Alert and Collision Avoidance Systems, which alert the plane and ATC if two aircrafts are on a collision course. These, Pearson told the Caller, are specifically designed to not be inhibited at low altitudes.

“Military and civilian traffic together adds a challenge. Part of our situational awareness is hearing what’s going on on the radio. When ATC transmits to the [military] guys we can hear them but can’t hear the [military] guys because they are on UHF and we are on VHF,” a commercial pilot told the Caller.

“A lot of accidents have been avoided by hearing another aircraft say something and it raising a red flag to you that you can bring to the attention of a controller,” the pilot continued to the Caller.

Several of the reports reviewed by the Caller cited the different radio frequencies as concerns for their near misses. Others said they had trouble understanding the helicopter pilots even if they were on the same frequency. Additional self reports made notes of the busy airport and the pressure to push airplanes in and out as quickly as possible as reasons for near misses.

“I understand DCA is a busy airport, I was based there for years. The military low-level helicopter traffic that routinely is in the DCA traffic area complicates matters,” a captain of a major carrier wrote in 2015. “But this is probably the most dangerous airport in the United States, strictly based on the fact the controllers are pushing, pushing, pushing, in an attempt to handle the traffic they have.”

Lack of communication between aircrafts and ATC regarding helicopters in the area of landing dates back to 1988, according to the Caller’s review of reports.

Pilots have also been expressing concern about the lack of separation between craft for decades.

“Non-standard separation over the river seems to be the norm for DCA for some reason. I have not encountered this type of [operation] at any other U.S. airport,” a pilot wrote in 2006.

The pilot details the difficult approach  at DCA and points out that his aircraft received several notifications through Traffic Alert and Collision Avoidance Systems. He opted to continue his landing, believing he had the two offending helicopters in sight, but later realized they had come within 200 feet of his plane. At the time, their Traffic Alert and Collision Avoidance Systems had also been inhibited because of low altitude.

“I have to question the wisdom of DCA [tower] letting helis fly in the [approach] path of one of the country’s highest profile airports, particularly on an [approach] as challenging as this one,” the pilot wrote.

And just two years ago, one air traffic controller flagged that control tower was short staffed, causing the individual to take on multiple roles at once. This contributed to a near miss between two military helicopters.

“I was working two positions combined of both helos/Local Control when the event happened,” the air traffic controller wrote.

A pilot summed up the general frustration with so many close calls after a 2006 incident: “Why does the tower allow such nonsense by the military in such a critical area? This is a safety issue, and needs to be fixed.”

Early reports about the Jan. 29 crash suggest several of the problems identified by pilots flying into DCA over the years contributed to the incident: a helicopter flying above altitude, limited visibility, a tight landing on Runway 33, and poor communication.

“Accidents are rarely result of a single failure but rather a series of failures that all have to line up. We refer to it as the swiss cheese model in the industry. ATC staffing, air space design, equipment limitations, night conditions. All the holes lined up that night. Plug one hole and everyone goes home to their families,” the commercial pilot explained.

As for the FAA, the agency did not have any explanation for why these reports were ignored for years, telling the Caller that its “reports are one of many data sources we use to identify system-level safety risks, which we can communicate through Safety Alerts for Operators.” It did not say whether any of the DCA reports over the decades had led to changes in DCA protocol or safety alerts to operators at the airport.

AUTHORS

Reagan Reese And Amber Duke

Contributors.

RELATED ARTICLE: ‘Bowing To Wokeness Since 2010’: Fmr Air Traffic Controller Says Short Staffing Is ‘Attributable To Obama Admin’

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permisssion. ©All rights reserved.

ROOKE: While Hurricane Victims Suffer, Kamala Makes Time For Podcast Famous For Giving Girls Blowjob Advice

While American citizens are desperately trying to stay alive and rebuild their communities from Hurricane Helene, Vice President Kamala Harris was interviewed by a podcast host famous for teaching young women how to be sluts.

The Harris campaign confirmed that, while Americans were fighting for their lives in storm wreckage, she sat down for a pre-taped interview set to air next week with the Call Her Daddy podcast, featuring host and creator Alex Cooper, who typically talks to various celebrities and “experts” about sexually charged topics, like how to give the perfect blowjob.

THEY ARE READY FOR A CALL HER DADDY PARTY😂🔥👏🏼 The most savage way to deck out your pad. Welcome to slut camp, Cooch Gobbler and Gluck Gluck is on the menu, a sofia mugshot photo wall, you’re just a hole. LET’S GOOOOO😂😂👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼 #respect pic.twitter.com/34kiCacWnd

— Call Her Daddy (@callherdaddy) September 8, 2019

Naturally, one might ask: Why is the Democrat nominee for president sitting down with the nation’s leading whore-pod, and how is this connected to hurricane victims?

While the death toll in North Carolina continues to rise, residents see their family members hanging in trees, and aid is actively being blocked by FEMA, Kamala Harris decided to film an episode of “Call Her Daddy”

Call Her Daddy is primarily a sex and relationship podcast. pic.twitter.com/mnC16HrVl4

— Ashley St. Clair (@stclairashley) October 4, 2024

The answer is that when desperate Americans called her for help, Harris was too busy with Call Her Daddy to answer. The Biden-Harris response to the devasting natural disaster has been an undeniable failure. People living in the Carolinas, Tennessee and Georgia are still stranded without food, running water, electricity or medications. The administration says it’s doing all it can to help Americans living in the devastated areas. Still, residents and emergency responders claim the federal government’s response is not just lacking, but wholly inadequate. (ROOKE: Walz Solidifies Harris Policy Position That Would Transform Country As We Know It)

The heroes on the ground even report that the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) are impeding rescue efforts. Starlink founder Elon Musk announced Friday that federal agencies prevented him from delivering internet capabilities to the area.

So, while all of this is happening in real America, it seems the only thing Harris is focused on is ensuring that she secures the women’s vote. Call Her Daddy was Spotify’s number two podcast in 2023 and the most listened-to among women. Harris will reportedly talk about “reproductive rights and abortion, along with other issues important to women in the upcoming election,” Axios reported. (ROOKE: Democrats’ ‘New Masculinity’ Will Keep Turning Away Critical Voting Bloc)

A recent episode featured actress Heather McMahan discussing blowjob techniques and “hall passes” (a euphemism for infidelity). These types of discussions are not a one-off. Most of her episodes are about sexual positions, cheating and threesomes. It’s a one-stop shop for women to praise degenerate sexuality.

THE TIME OUT 💦🔥 New sex position!! Any man that initiates this move is 10/10 getting a call back and will be remembered as a sex master. GUARANTEED!! listen > https://t.co/NExjby1kz8 pic.twitter.com/PrcG5Qg262

— Call Her Daddy (@callherdaddy) August 21, 2019

Meanwhile, men, a demographic Harris struggles with, are listening to podcasts that talk about national security, health, science and economics. One can only wonder if Harris is too scared to go on shows popular with men, like The Joe Rogan ExperienceThe Huberman Lab and The Tucker Carlson Show, because the topics discussed on these podcasts are too complex. She wouldn’t be able to cackle her way through tough questions about why Hurricane Helene victims were left to rot while she fundraised in sunny California.

It’s clearly much easier for a vapid woman with no substantive thought in her brain to talk about sex work. But Harris isn’t just any vapid woman — she’s running to be the next president of the United States. She wants to hold the most important elected office in our country (arguably the world). Her decision to tape an hour-long episode on a whore-pod to discuss abortion is not only insulting to Americans living in the Carolinas, Tennessee and Georgia, but it’s also a stark reminder that our country is run by people who hate it.

NEW EPISODE 89- A man does coke off Hannah’s tit, Alex lies about Chlamydia, and The Flirting Bible is revealed. Talking being Division 1 athletes, and also their love for f*cking athletes! GO LISTEN ENJOY> https://t.co/GL6i61Cp5u @honey pic.twitter.com/5AjYDSjru0

— Call Her Daddy (@callherdaddy) July 23, 2020

Democrats are desperate to make this election about the ability of women to murder their children. They need women to come out to vote in droves with one topic on their minds: abortion. Harris’s appearance on Call Her Daddy is the perfect way to distract American women from her abject failure with the economy, illegal immigration, safety, and most recently hurricane relief. This shouldn’t be that hard, considering most female voters rank abortion as their number one issue in this election cycle.

SpaceX engineers are trying to deliver Starlink terminals & supplies to devastated areas in North Carolina right now and @FEMA is both failing to help AND won’t let others help. This is unconscionable!!

They just took this video a few hours ago, where you can see the level of… pic.twitter.com/abpOsfNenF

— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) October 4, 2024

While it’s probably not that big of a shock that former San Francisco Mayor Willie Brown’s ex-girlfriend chose to talk about abortion on the nation’s top blowjob podcast, it’s undeniable that Americans deserve better, especially from someone who wants to be president. Harris seems to have forgotten that Democrat women aren’t the only ones affected by her leadership. While leftists want abortion over competent governing, the rest of the nation would rather her focus on issues at home.

At any other time in our nation’s history, a presidential candidate doing this would be disqualifying. But once again, Harris shows us that she is incapable of handling the basic requirements of the presidency. So, instead of getting a one-on-one, hard-hitting interview, Americans will hear her laugh about sex and abortion.

AUTHOR

Mary Rooke

Commentary and analysis writer.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Kamala Sends $157,000,000 to Lebanon After Claiming No Money for U.S. Hurricane Victims

WATCH: New Daily Caller Documentary ‘Selling Sex’

‘Absolutely Repulsive’: Harris Campaign Spending Good Chunk Of Cycle Rubbing Elbows With Celebs, Big Money Donors

Kamala Harris Struggles To Speak After Teleprompter Appears To Stop Working

Vulnerable Dem Sen Faces Worse Electoral Odds Than Previously Realized In Key Swing State

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Federal Aviation Administration Grounds All Domestic U.S. Flights

All domestic flights in the U.S. were grounded overnight Wednesday into the morning due to a technical error. Some flights gradually started to resume shortly before 9:00 am (eastern time).

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) worked overnight to restore a system that allows air traffic control to alert pilots when there are potential hazards on their flight path. Normal air traffic operations resumed just before 9am on Tuesday while agents continued to look into the original cause of the issue, according to an update from the FAA.

“We are performing final validation checks and reloading the system now. Operations across the National Airspace System are affected,” the FAA wrote on Twitter. “We will provide frequent updates as we make progress.”

Roughly an hour after their initial tweet, the FAA sent an update to followers, announcing that the agency had “ordered airlines to pause all domestic departures until 9am Eastern Time,” to allow for research to be done on the “integrity of flight and safety information.”

Delays for arriving and departing domestic flights are likely to be substantial Wednesday, just a few short weeks after a significant winter bomb cyclone disrupted tens of thousands of flights through the holiday season.

Twitter users were quick to express concerns over the total shutdown of domestic travel, with the CEO of Evercontact writing, “This is alarming. There should be an independent audit on such a large-scale incident. Is it due to obsolete equipment? is it a hack? Human error? Accountability is key to restoring trust in an industry that can’t allow mistakes!”

The FAA then retweeted a post from White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre, who noted that “there is no evidence of a cyberattack at this point, but the President directed the Department of Transportation to conduct a full investigation into the causes.” She furthered that the FAA would continue to provide regular updates.

AUTHOR

KAY SMYTHE

News and commentary writer.

RELATED ARTICLE: Amtrak Trolls Southwest Airlines For Highly Questionable Free Ukulele Giveaway

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

The Malaysian Air MH17 Missile Attack: A Chilling Prod to Airline Security

The destruction of Malaysian Air Flight MH17 over the Ukraine by a Russian SA-11“Buk”air defense missile on July 17, 2014 took the lives of 298 passengers and crew on board from more than 11 countries. While the largest contingent was 154 Dutch nationals, there were significant numbers of Australian passengers and more than 98 participants in an international AIDS conference in Australia, among them leading researchers and a World Health Organization official. 80 children lost their lives. One Australian family lost relatives on both Flights MH17 and MH370. The Boeing 777-200ER was a sister aircraft to Flight MH370 that disappeared on March 8, 2014 under mysterious circumstances with the loss of 12 Malaysian crew members and 227 passengers from 14 nations.

That act allegedly by Russian separatists in eastern Ukraine may have been a blunder by Russian President Putin that brought Western approbation at the UN Security Council debates on July 18th.  The possible complicit involvement of Russia in the missile attack on MH17 is reminiscent of the shoot down by Russian fighters of Korean Air Line Flight 007 from New York to Seoul on September 1, 1983 with the 269 men, women and children on board.  Also recall the accidental missile attack by the USS Vincennes guided missile cruiser that destroyed Iran Air 655 on July 3, 1988 during the Tanker War of 1984-1988 in the Persian Gulf, with the loss of 290 on board, including 66 children and 16 crew.

BUC SA-11 SystemThe Downing of MH17

The alleged Russian SA-11 missile attack on MH17 raised the matter of airline security in an era with increased threats to international civil aviation from irredentist and terrorist forces. Those threats are not only in the Middle East and Eastern European conflict zones, but elsewhere, including the Western Hemisphere.

The Malaysian Air dispatcher and the flight captain could have judiciously altered the flight plan of MH17 to avoid the no-fly zone over the eastern Ukraine. They could have used more southerly routes followed by major air carriers to reach destinations in South Asia. Instead they chose to fly above the contested eastern Ukraine no-fly zone at an altitude of 33,000 feet. By doing so, they exposed the flight to a missile attack from a mobile SA-11 missile battery similar to one used to down a Ukrainian military transport and fighters. By foolishly opting to economize fuel consumption on a shorter and more dangerous flight plan, they may have inadvertently triggered the deadly attack.  The two Malaysian Air disasters in 2014, MH370 in March and MH17 in July, have claimed the lives of 537 passengers and crew. Under the international Montreal convention, formerly the Warsaw convention of 1929 regarding aviation liability, surviving families may be entitled to $175,000 in compensation. That would translate to $94 million if Malaysian Air  is found liable.

The result was, in the words of a former National Transportation Safety Board investigator, the creation of “the world’s largest crime scene” 30 miles from the Russian border. The area patrolled by separatist militia with little respect for the remains of the deceased passengers has seriously complicated recovery and forensic investigations by NTSB and FBI agents. Standard recovery procedures have been severely compromised by looters, and the forensic operation has become chaotic. Ukraine’s government accused pro-Russian rebels of removing 38 bodies from the scene of the crash and of trying to destroy evidence. The Russian separatists have made it difficult for the Organization for Security Cooperation in Europe monitors to even approach the massive debris field.

Finding the MH17 black box and data recorder may be difficult if it has been removed from the scene, and other means may have to be used to corroborate the SA-11 missile attack. Certain data from the INMARSAT system drawn from the ill-fated flight’s engines may at least confirm altitude and flight conditions at the time of missile impact.

The Malaysian Air Flight MH17 incident sends a wake-up call to the Montreal-based UN International Civil Aviation Organization, and major country airways safety groups. These include the Federal Aviation Administration in Washington.

SkyShield SystemThe Elbit SkyShield/C-MUSIC Anti-Missile Defense System

The incident may also lead other airlines to consider the ground-breaking anti-missile defense systems that Israel’s airlines, El AlArkia, and Israir are now installing on the Jewish nation’s civil aviation fleet. The SkyShield/Commercial Multi-Spectral Infrared Countermeasures (C-MUSIC) laser system was certified for use in February 2014 and was announced by Elbit Systems, Ltd. (Elbit) of Haifa, the major Israeli defense contractor that developed it.

SkyShield/C-MUSIC has the ability to deflect the guidance systems of incoming man-portable air defense systems (MANPADS), using advanced laser technology and thermal imaging to deflect incoming threats by means of jamming their guidance system, usually well before the pilot of the plane may even be aware a threat is on its way. It has the potential of also protecting the plane from high altitude surface-to-air missiles (SAMs) like the SA-11 and the more sophisticated Russian S-300 systems, which have been sold to both Syria and Iran.

Israel’s program to develop this civil aviation missile defense system was prompted by a close call in Mombasa, Kenya, when a terrorist fired a MANPAD at an Israeli Arkia Boeing 757 with 261 passengers aboard in November 2002. That led to an Israeli government-sponsored development program that chose Elbit to develop the Sky Shield system. We understand that, despite the Arab Boycott of Israel, that both Qatar Airways and Emirates Airways have reached out to Elbit seeking information on the Sky Shield system for protection of their air fleets.

According to Jane’s Defence Weekly, the Israeli government ran a series of live-fire trials of the SkyShield missile protection system in February 2014. Brigadier General Eytan Eshel, head of research and development at the Defense Ministry was very satisfied with the experiment, saying, “SkyShield has been validated under the most complex and sophisticated testing conditions ever conducted in Israel and … included a wide variety of threats that the SkyShield system would have to tackle in order to protect passenger aircraft. It is now ready to protect Israeli airlines . . . . The capabilities are extraordinary.”

Watch this brief Elbit YouTube video on how the SkyShield System operates:

MANPADThe Air Defense Threat that the Elbit SkyShield System addresses

There are potentially multiple terrorist threats from MANPADS and mobile air defense missiles that could attack civilian airliners in commercial air lanes over international waters. A 2012 Defense News report pointed out more than 20,000 MANPADS went missing from the arsenals of the late Libyan dictator Gaddafi. Less than 5,000 of those have been recovered. Some of those have been interdicted in transit across Egypt, destined for Hamas in Gaza, and Salafist and al Qaeda affiliates in the Sinai. The Islamic State, formerly ISIS, may have picked up MANPADS and air defense missile systems during its blitz-like conquest of both Syria and Iraq. Not only is the region awash in weapons in the bazaar of weapons-trafficking that now exists in the Middle East, but IS has been systematically looting the stores of American weapons that had been left for the Iraqi military by the departing US forces.

An ex-CIA covert operations officer, who goes by the nom de guerre “Beowulf,” considers a MANPAD attack on vulnerable US and foreign airlines a plausible scenario in the near term. As co-author Freedman commented, “only Israel’s national airline EL AL has fully equipped its fleet” with pods capable of deflecting MANPADS. Freedman observes that Israel is particularly vulnerable to MANPAD attack, as Ben Gurion Airport, Israel’s primary international airport, is only kilometers away from the disputed West Bank, from where many of the attacks against Israel emanate. Having participated in a number of MANPADS threat exercises with DHS, the Coast Guard, FBI, TSA and other national security agencies, she underscores the seriousness of the concern. “MANPADS are a largely under-rated threat here in the US. But the threat is as real here as it is in the Middle East. MANPADs are relatively easy to acquire, transport discretely, and deploy from almost anywhere.”

In a US Aviation and Space Technology Weekly article on February 2014, Dr. Rachel Ehrenfeld discussed the MANPAD threat. She pointed out that while the US has spent hundreds of millions of dollars on development of a counter-measure, Israeli defense systems company Elbit has successfully developed and installed the light weight Multi-Spectral Infrared Countermeasure system (MUSIC) for both aircraft and helicopters. Israelis are well respected for the speed and efficiency with which they are able to develop cutting edge technology, outperforming most high tech development around the world, and developed this highly sophisticated system within three years.

Ehrenfeld was asked why the American commercial aviation industry has resisted adopting what Israel’s El Al has done to protect its air fleet and passengers:

Despite the alarming spread of MANPADS, U.S. aviation security experts argue that the threat to America’s civil aviation fleet posed by MANPADS is minimal. They say the cost of equipping passenger aircraft with MANPAD countermeasure devices–estimated at $43 billion–is prohibitive and unjustified. However, if a single missile found its way to Hezbollah operatives in Mexico, was then smuggled into the U.S. and fired at any of the 7,000 aircraft comprising the U.S. civilian fleet it would be devastated. Then, U.S. government officials and airline executives could not claim they were unaware of the threat. They could be held responsible for hundreds of deaths.

The downing of MH17 has brought the threat of attacks against commercial airliners to a new level. Because shoulder-fired MANPADS generally have a target detection range of about 6 miles, and an engagement range of 4 miles, aircraft flying above 20,000 feet are relatively safe from them. But the use of a sophisticated SA-11 missile by Ukrainian/Russian separatists has changed the game. MH17 was reported to be flying at 33,000 feet, and was brought down by a SAM. The Israeli SkyShield/C-MUSIC system was developed to defend against multiple threats posed by MANPADS. Three general types of MANPADS use command line of sight, laser guided, and infra-red seeking technology. Whether SkyShield/C-MUSIC can also effectively deflect the longer range SAMs, such as the SA-11 or the S-300, using radar technology to hone it on its target, is not currently known.

However, the technology is already in place and this new threat is not likely to go unnoticed by Israel’s defense industry. Following the downing of MH17, improvements to SkyShield/C-MUSIC will undoubtedly provide a new standard of security for the entire airplane industry.

EDITORS NOTE: This article originally appeared on The New English Review. The featured image is courtesy of the UK Daily Mail.