Tag Archive for: fake news

PODCAST: “Junk Science vs. Real Science” and the Corrupt Media

For years, you’ve been one of the most vocal critics of what you call “junk science” — research that’s politically motivated, poorly designed, or deliberately misleading.

A lot of people hear that phrase but don’t fully understand how widespread the problem is or how it shapes public policy. So how do you define “junk science,” and what are the biggest red flags that the public should watch for when politicians or activists claim something is “settled science”?

©2026 . All rights reserved.

EXCLUSIVE: New Media Network Combats Anti-American Spin by Featuring Veterans, Law Enforcement

FIRST ON THE DAILY SIGNAL—Proud American Studios, a new media network, aims to counter the Left’s pervasive bias by highlighting the voices of patriotic Americans who served in the military and law enforcement—a particularly resonant mission amid the recent demonization of immigration enforcement in Minneapolis.

“The recent media coverage out of Minneapolis is a textbook example of why we built Proud American Studios,” Michael Koscielniak, a retired officer with Homeland Security Investigations and the president of the new media company, told The Daily Signal in a statement Thursday.

“Homeland Security officers and agents are on the ground every day enforcing our nation’s immigration laws and removing violent criminals to keep our communities safe,” he added. “These officers deserve their side of the story told in an honest and dignified way.”

Defending ICE in Minneapolis

Proud American Studios released the first episode of its podcast “The Forum” on Saturday ahead of its official launch on March 21. The episode highlights the struggles that the oft-demonized Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents, alongside other federal agents, have faced in the field, and criticize the left-leaning commentators and Democrats who demonize their efforts.

“To be straight with you, it pisses me off,” Koscielniak says in a teaser clip for the first episode. “These guys are coming their to do their jobs, and when political candidates or political individuals take this position, they make the jobs of the federal agents and all the other first responders on scene much more difficult. It incites people.”

Darcy Leutzinger, who served 27 years as a special investigations executive lieutenant in the Warren, Michigan, police department, explains the difference between how the law and the media treat an officer after an officer-involved shooting.

“The officer can use deadly force based on what they knew at that time, not what they were judged on later, not videotapes, not slowed down video or hindsight, it’s what they saw based on their perception at that time and that’s all they had,” Leutzinger says. “The media wants everybody tried in the media.”

“It’s one thing to bring a firearm to a protest, it is even more of an issue when you actually want to agitate and confront federal law enforcement within accordance of their duties,” Trey Lindsey, a 20-year veteran of the U.S. Navy who served 13 years with SEAL Team 6, says in the video. Lindsey founded Gallowglass Guardian Group, a tactical, security, and defense consulting company based out of Dallas.

Proud American Studios

“After decades of serving on the front lines protecting this nation, the men and women of Proud American Studios are united in building a patriotic multimedia company that honors the American values,” Koscielniak told The Daily Signal. “Proud American Studios’ mission is to confront misinformation, elevate frontline voices, and deliver fact-driven multimedia that cuts through the noise and challenges false narratives promoted by liberal media outlets.”

Proud American Studios plans to release short video clips, longer podcast episodes, and even full-length documentaries. It has multiple projects in pre-production, including documentaries on President Donald Trump, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and the rise of radical Islam in America; along with movies about the 12-day war between Israel and Iran, and how Homeland Security Investigations has hunted Chinese spies and money launderers.

In addition to news commentary, Proud American Studios plans to produce what it calls “micro-series” videos: short action videos highlighting the heroism of law enforcement. Subscribers can access the content for $99 annually or $17.76 per month, Koscielniak told The Daily Signal.

Dean Cain

Dean Cain, an actor, writer, and producer best known for his role as Superman in the 1990s TV series “Lois & Clark: The New Adventures of Superman,” has joined the project and will be a regular on the podcast “The Homeland.”

“I’m truly honored and excited to be joining Proud American Studios on the ‘The Homeland’ podcast on March 21,” Cain told The Daily Signal in a statement Thursday. “It’s a privilege to work alongside the men and women who have dedicated their lives to protecting this country.”

“Their experience, sacrifice, and commitment to America deserve to be heard, respected, and supported, and I’m proud to be part of that mission,” Cain added.

AUTHOR

Tyler O’Neil is senior editor at The Daily Signal and the author of two books: “Making Hate Pay: The Corruption of the Southern Poverty Law Center,” and “The Woketopus: The Dark Money Cabal Manipulating the Federal Government.” Tyler on X: .

RELATED POSTS:

Federal Officer Shoots Illegal Alien After Being Attacked With Snow Shovel

Elon Musk Weighs in on Minnesota ICE Operation

Minnesota Sheriffs Credit Tom Homan With This Key Change

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Signal column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.


The Daily Signal depends on the support of readers like you. Donate now

The Washington Post Is Being Gutted

Journalists cry foul while Bezos cries financial bleeding. 

This week, the Washington Post announced dramatic layoffs that will sharply reduce the size of its newsroom and affect nearly every department. International, metro, sports, editing, and specialty desks are all being cut as the paper attempts to stem mounting financial losses.

The reaction from journalists and labor unions was swift and emotional. Statements accused ownership of abandoning the paper’s historic mission. Some went further, arguing that the Post’s owner, Jeff Bezos, should step aside if he is no longer willing to “invest” in the institution.

That framing may be comforting inside the newsroom. It is also deeply misleading.

Because the reality facing the Washington Post is not unique. It is not the result of one owner’s priorities. And it is not the product of a single bad year.

It is the reality confronting every print-based news organization in America.

The myth of “investment” in legacy media

When unions and journalists say Bezos should keep “investing,” what they really mean is continuing to subsidize structural losses indefinitely.

That is not an investment. That is life support.

The Washington Post has reportedly lost close to $100 million in recent years. Its daily circulation has collapsed from roughly 250,000 in 2020 to under 100,000 today. Digital subscriptions surged briefly during election cycles and political flashpoints, then evaporated just as quickly when trust eroded.

No serious business model can survive on the assumption that a wealthy owner will absorb unlimited losses forever.

At some point, math asserts itself.

The uncomfortable truth journalists avoid

Most coverage of the Post’s downsizing treats the problem as a technological issue. Advertising moved online. Social media fragmented attention. Readers no longer consume news the way they once did.

All true. Still incomplete.

What is almost never discussed is the collapse of reader trust, particularly in daily publications that increasingly confuse reporting with persuasion.

Millions of readers do not want to pay money to be lectured. They do not want to open a news app and be told, implicitly or explicitly, that they are morally defective, politically dangerous, ignorant, or part of a fascist fringe simply because they hold dissenting views.

That fatigue cuts across ideology. It applies to the left and the right.

People are willing to tolerate bias when it is honest and labeled. What they reject is bias injected into supposedly neutral reporting, especially when they are asked to pay for it.

That problem is routinely understated, and it matters more than most newsroom leaders will admit.

Why people tolerate bias online but not in print

One of the great ironies of modern media is that people flock to online news even when they know it is slanted.

Why?

Because they are not being billed for it.

If a reader disagrees with an editorial frame on X, Substack, YouTube, or an independent blog, they can leave instantly. There is no subscription guilt, no sunk cost, no sense of being trapped in a moral scolding they paid to receive.

Legacy newspapers ask readers to open their wallets for a product that increasingly blends news with judgment. In a competitive market with endless alternatives, that is a losing proposition.

The internet did not just break the advertising model. It broke the patience model.

The monopoly mindset never adjusted

For decades, large metro papers operated as near-monopolies. If you lived in a city, you had one dominant paper. Classifieds paid the bills. Scarcity protected authority.

That world is gone.

Yet many newsrooms kept the same staffing levels, the same international footprint, the same institutional assumptions, long after the economic foundation disappeared.

The Washington Post’s leadership finally acknowledged this when it admitted the paper was still structured like a monopoly newspaper in a non-monopoly world.

That recognition came late, but it is not wrong.

Bezos is not the story. The system is.

It is convenient to personalize the crisis by pointing at Bezos. It avoids harder questions about journalism itself.

But even if Bezos sold tomorrow, the next owner would face the same facts:

  • Shrinking readership
  • Fragmented attention
  • High labor costs
  • Low willingness to pay
  • Deep skepticism toward ideological framing

No owner, billionaire or otherwise, can reverse those forces with sentiment alone.

The real question is not who owns the Washington Post. It is whether legacy journalism is willing to relearn humility, separate reporting from advocacy, and rebuild trust with readers who no longer accept lectures disguised as news.

Until that happens, layoffs will continue. Not just in Washington, but everywhere.

What Legacy Media Forgot About Trust

At Christian Action Network, we report the facts. We lay out what happened, who was involved, and why it matters. Do we lean in a political direction? Of course we do.

The difference is that our readers know that from the start. We do not hide our worldview, and we do not deceive readers by smuggling perspective into reporting while pretending to be neutral.

We are explicit about our position and disciplined about our facts.

That discipline is not optional. Our work is scrutinized relentlessly by legacy media outlets eager to find even the smallest factual error. The microscope they hold over us is unforgiving, and it forces rigor.

Each of our stories is fact-checked by three separate agencies before we post. We pass the truth threshold because we have to.

People voluntarily support Christian Action Network because they trust us.

That trust was earned through transparency, accuracy, and honesty about perspective. Much of legacy media lost that trust while refusing to acknowledge that paying subscribers now hold them to the same standard they once imposed on others.

The layoffs we are witnessing are not a mystery. They are the market’s verdict on credibility, and credibility cannot survive where humility has been replaced by moral pretense.

AUTHOR

Martin Mawyer

Martin Mawyer is the President of Christian Action Network, host of the “Shout Out Patriots” podcast, and author of When Evil Stops Hiding. For more action alerts, cultural commentary, and real-world campaigns defending faith, family, and freedom, subscribe to Patriot Majority Report.

©2026 . All rights reserved.


Please visit the Patriot Majority Report substack.

Lying Mamdani Invents Budget Emergency to Justify Massive Tax Hikes

In Michael Bloomberg’s final year as mayor in 2013, New York City actually had a balanced budget. However, under the Marxist mayor Bill De Blasio, New York City’s budget deficit exploded. And continued under Mayor Eric Adams.

Now the Communist Zohran Mamdani is in charge of New York City. And he want’s to do what every Communist does. Steal money from the producers. Be prepared for New York City’s to eventually go bankrupt, since Mayor Mamdani will drive out the individuals and corporations that generate the tax revenue.

Horrible.

Lying Mamdani’s phony budget crisis is cover to raise taxes on New Yorkers to pay for his ‘free stuff’ agenda

Mayor Zohran Mamdani assembled the City Hall press corps Wednesday to announce his shock at finding a $12 billion budget hole . . . that everyone worth his salt has been flagging for a year.

Heck, a hole that Mayor Eric Adams warned about in 2023 at the height of, and as a result of, the migrant crisis.

Mamdani’s pretend budget crisis (more threatening than the Great Recession, he claims) is designed purely to gin up support for soak-the-rich tax hikes to fund his promised billions in new spending.

(Or, if the city’s lucky enough, to give him an excuse for failing to deliver on his promises.)

He’s trying to avoid an outright break with Gov. Kathy Hochul, but wants his allies in the Legislature to bully her into OK’ing state corporate and personal-income tax hikes even though she knows that could threaten her re-election hopes.

Read more.

New York Mayor Mamdani says city must hike taxes on wealthy to fill $12 billion deficit

  • New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani said the Big Apple’s wealthiest residents must pay more in taxes to help close a looming budget deficit that tops $12 billion.
  • Mamdani, a Democrat, downplayed fears from some of the city’s business elite that tax hikes will lead to capital flight.
  • He pointed to potential budget savings, citing the Adams administration launching a “basically unusable” AI chatbot that reportedly cost about $600,000 to develop.

By CNBC, Jan 28th, 2025

New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani on Wednesday said the city’s wealthiest must pay more in taxes to help fill the staggering budget deficit of more than $12 billion that he was left by his predecessor.

“This is at a scale that’s actually greater than what we saw here in New York City during the Great Recession,” Mamdani said of that budget hole during an interview with CNBC “Squawk Box” co-anchor Andrew Ross Sorkin at City Hall.

Read more.

AUTHOR

POSTS ON X:

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

The Deep State Agenda

Unveiling the Hidden Forces Behind the Subjugation of the Unsuspecting Denizens of Planet Earth.

WATCH: Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem reveals how taxpayer-funded NGOs have been twisted into a shadow government

For an unsuspecting planet like ours, a dark and malevolent force looms large in the deep dark shadows: the Deep State (DS). This clandestine network of power-hungry elites (sometimes referred to as the military-industrial complex and freemasons), in collaboration with establishment politicians in the Western world, is orchestrating a gradual erosion of liberty and freedom, paving the way for the establishment of a New World Order (NWO). “On Jan. 17, 1961, President Dwight Eisenhower warned the nation about what he described as a threat to democratic government. He called it the military-industrial complex, a formidable union of defense contractors and the armed forces.” President John F. Kennedy also warned the Americans of these secret societies.

Join me as I delve into the hidden truths and expose the sinister agenda unfolding in our time.

A Brief History of the Deep State

Deep within the annals of history, obscured by the veils of secrecy and deception, lies the deep dark origins of the Deep State. Its roots can be traced back to the ancient orders and enigmatic societies that have shaped the course of human civilization. From the Illuminati’s clandestine gatherings to the Knights Templar’s ancient mysteries, the Deep State’s origins emerge from the murky depths of secrecy and power.

Whispers of a global cabal manipulating the strings of power date back centuries, with the powerful elite maneuvering their pawns across the grand chessboard of history. These shadowy figures are believed to have held sway over empires, kingdoms, and republics alike, orchestrating events behind the scenes to advance their nefarious agenda. From the whispered corridors of power to the secluded chambers where the world’s most influential individuals gather, the Deep State has carefully cultivated its influence and control.

Over time, the Deep State’s machinations have evolved, adapting to the changing landscape of geopolitical dynamics. The global elite, those puppet masters at the pinnacle of power, established their dominion over financial institutions, multinational corporations, and intelligence agencies. With a web of influence extending its tendrils into every aspect of society, the Deep State has grown in strength, subverting democracies and eroding the very foundations of liberty.

The Deep State in the 20th and 21st Centuries

As the 20th century unfolded, the Deep State’s grip tightened. There have been pivotal moments, such as the formation of the Federal Reserve in the United States, as evidence of the Deep State’s insidious control. Then there is the creation of a supranational organization like the United Nations, acting as a mere facade for the hidden forces at play.

As we delve into the deep, dark origins of the Deep State, we see glimpses of ancient societies, secret rituals, and hidden knowledge passed down through generations. It was all about a hidden hand manipulating the course of humanity, insidiously guiding us toward a future devoid of freedom and self-determination.

While mainstream voices dismiss these facts as baseless fantasies, it is for common folks like us to question the world we inhabit. Are we truly free, or are we merely puppets dancing on the strings of the Deep State? The answers lie in the shadows, waiting to be unveiled by those who dare to delve into the depths of the conspiratorial abyss.

The Puppet Masters

At the heart of this nefarious plot lies a select group of influential figures who wield immense control in a global and political landscape. These shadowy puppet masters, driven by insatiable greed and thirst for power, manipulate politicians like marionettes to further their own sinister agenda. They exploit the trust placed in them by the unsuspecting populace to implement policies that serve their interests while eroding the fundamental rights of citizens.

While the Deep State extends its reach across the planet, its collusion with certain Western politicians, elected or not, having powers to formulate policies, is a matter of grave concern. These politicians, who present themselves as champions of democracy and liberty, are nothing but pawns in the grand scheme orchestrated by the Deep State. Through backroom deals, secret societies, and covert alliances, these Western leaders willingly embrace the agenda of the New World Order, betraying the very foundations of freedom they claim to uphold.

The Erosion of Liberty

Under the watchful eye of the Deep State, the cherished principles of liberty and freedom on our beloved planet, and especially in the United States,s are gradually eroding. Draconian laws are enacted under the guise of security, while surveillance systems invade every aspect of citizens’ lives. Free speech is stifled, dissent is crushed, and information is tightly controlled, creating an environment of fear and oppression. With its vast influence, the Deep State shapes public opinion and manipulates the narrative to further its own agenda, leaving the people defenceless against its encroachment.

New World Order

The ultimate goal of the Deep State is the establishment of an NWO, where power is concentrated in the hands of the global elites. Under the guise of unity and global governance, the Deep State seeks to strip away the sovereignty of nations and exert total control over every aspect of human existence. The NWO will crush individual freedom, suppress dissent, and impose a uniformity that stifles creativity and diversity.

Secret Societies

Behind the facade of democracy, the Deep State exercises surreptitious control over political processes across nations. Politicians, particularly those in the Western world, are mere pawns in the grand chessboard of the Deep State’s manipulation. These hidden forces pull the strings from the shadows, steering policies and decisions to align with their self-serving interests. Indeed, the Deep State operates behind the scenes, manipulating political processes and decision-making to further its own interests. Even involved in the dark world of Human trafficking and pedophilia, i.e., Epstein Island.

The Deep State’s insidious agenda revolves around the gradual erosion of individual liberties and the establishment of a tyrannical world order as revealed during the COVID pandemic. They operate with the explicit goal of undermining democratic principles by imposing restrictive measures and curtailing personal freedoms.

Global Elites

At the core of the DS lies the global elites—an exclusive and influential group of individuals who pull the strings of power. As mentioned earlier, these groups possess vast wealth and wield immense influence, and are believed to manipulate world events to further their own interests. Their control extends beyond national boundaries, transcending governments and institutions to forge a global system that perpetuates their dominance. They are indeed a new small group of wealthy and influential individuals, sometimes referred to as the global elite ‘psychopaths,’ and are the driving force behind the Deep State. It is a fact, maybe known or not known to the common public, that these individuals use their wealth and power to manipulate world events and consolidate their control over governments and institutions.

Shadowy Organizations and Shadow Governments

The existence of the Deep State is often attributed to shadowy organizations (shadow governments) that operate covertly. Secret societies, intelligence agencies, and international bodies (United Nations) are commonly depicted as players in this clandestine network. These organizations are believed to collaborate in secret, utilizing their covert activities to exert undue influence over national and international affairs, thus advancing the Deep State’s hidden agenda.

JFK’s Speech about Secret Societies

The more we dig into the mysteries surrounding these secret societies, the interconnectedness of stealthy control, freedom suppression, the global elite, and shadowy organizations becomes apparent. The tentacles of this hidden power structure extend their reach across the planet, ensnaring politicians, manipulating policies, and tightening their grip on the denizens of planet Earth.

The struggle for freedom and individual liberties is a call to action for those who dare to question, refuse to accept the status quo, and strive to expose the truth concealed behind the veil of deception. The inhabitants of our planet, and especially the citizens of the US, must wake up to the reality of the existence of these secret societies. They must unite, resist, and reclaim their God-given rights before the machinations of the global elites and their NWO come to fruition.

Conclusion

As we uncover the shocking truths behind the Deep State’s grip on affairs on our planet, it becomes clear that the erosion of liberty and freedom is not confined to the US alone. The struggle against the Deep State and the New World Order is a universal battle for the preservation of individual rights and democratic values. It is up to the awakened inhabitants of Earth to resist, expose the hidden machinations, and reclaim their liberty before it slips away forever.

©2026 . All rights reserved.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Islamophobiacs Help Incite Leftist Protestors in Minnesota

How Campus Anti-Israel Activism Collapsed Into a Single Front

RELATED VIDEO: Hollywood’s ‘Willful Ignorance’ Towards Communist Crimes Was Decades in the Making

Trump on Ilhan Omar attack: ‘She probably had herself sprayed,’ as likelihood grows that she staged attack

Omar is under a cloud lately for her highly suspicious financial dealings, and could even be indicted. What better time to play the victim card? But this incident reeks of inauthenticity. She appears to make eye contact with her attacker just before he gets up, as if she is signaling to him that the time for the attack had come. She walks toward him after he sprays the liquid on her, instead of running away, as any person undergoing an unexpected attack would be likely to do. And she calmly continues her speech, without any apparent concern for the possibility that the substance could be lethal and that she should go wash it off.

Both leftists and Muslims in the U.S. have demonstrated a strong affinity for claiming victimhood, demanding special privileges or consideration in light of the alleged threat they’re experiencing from “MAGA extremists” or “Islamophobes.” They play the victim card with extreme skill in a variety of contexts, attempting to intimidate their critics into silence and give themselves a patina of nobility all in one fell swoop. Omar’s spraying incident, as transparently fake as it is, is one of the clumsiest examples of this technique, but it’s understandable, after having been coddled for years, that Omar would assume that she could get away with anything, no matter how flimsy.

“‘Staged’ trending on X as MAGA distance themselves from Ilhan Omar attack,” by Charlie Jones, Mirror, January 28, 2026:

Conspiracy theories about an attack on Democrat lawmaker Ilhan Omar are spreading like wildfire on social media as MAGA fanatics try and distance themselves from the worrying incident.

A man sprayed an unknown substance on Omar before being tackled to the ground Tuesday during a town hall in Minneapolis. Thankfully, Omar appears unhurt.

In the immediate aftermath of the attack, the term ‘staged’ started trending on X, with many prominent MAGA accounts claiming it was a setup by Omar’s team.

Donald Trump himself poured fuel on that fire when he responded to a question about the attack saying: “No. I don’t think about her. I think she’s a fraud. I really don’t think about that. She probably had herself sprayed, knowing her.”

The attack came hours after President Donald Trump criticized Omar as he spoke to a crowd in Iowa, saying his administration would only let in immigrants who “can show that they love our country.”

“They have to be proud, not like Ilhan Omar,” he said, drawing loud boos at the mention of her name.

Footage from the meeting shows the man sitting in the front row before getting up and approaching the Congresswoman. Just before that Omar had called for the abolishment of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and for Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem to resign or face impeachment.

The audience cheered as the man was pinned down and his arms were tied behind his back. In the video of the incident, someone in the crowd can be heard saying, “Oh my god, he sprayed something on her.”

Police identified the man as 55-year-old Anthony Kazmierczak with details about the suspect still emerging.

There was a strong, vinegar-like smell after the man pushed on the syringe, according to reporters at the scene. Photos of the device, which fell to the ground when he was tackled, showed what appeared to be a light-brown liquid inside. There was no immediate word from officials on what it was.

Omar, who appeared rattled after the incident, said she didn’t know what the liquid was but continued speaking at the podium…

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLES:

Apple Cider Vinegar Sprayed At Ilhan Omar Appears to Be Staged Hoax

U.S. announces $15,000,000 reward for info on Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps oil sales as death count climbs

Hamas refuses to disarm, claims it needs weapons for ‘defense against occupation’

Murderous Antisemitism Among Medical Personnel

How Qatar Corrupts Georgetown and Many Others

France: Journalist arrested and debanked for criticizing Islam

Islamic Republic of Iran records highest oil production in 46 years, with China driving exports

The Islamic Republic of Iran in the Dock

EDITORS NOTE: This Jihad Watch column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Mainstream Media Refuse to Report the Full Facts on ICE Protests, so Americans Must Rely on X Indies

Want to view one of the many resistance training videos being used by protest organizers in Minneapolis? You won’t find it on The New York Times or The Washington Post. Forget USA Today. And don’t even bother searching for it on NBC, MSNOW, CBS, ABC, or CNN. The mainstream media isn’t interested in reporting that side of the biggest domestic protests since the George Floyd riots of 2020.

But independent journalist Cam Higby has not only made public “Documenting and Responding to ICE,” a training video hosted by a Chicago political activist, Jill Garvey, he also infiltrated the Signal organization that is coordinating, supplying, and directing the chaos on Minneapolis streets.

Higby has posted names of the members of the eight sub-groups within Signal, extensively quoted the group’s internal communications, and documented in detail how members track ICE movements then direct protestors to specific locations where ICE law enforcement officials most likely are trying to remove an illegal immigrant who could be a hardened, violent criminal from the streets.

To appreciate how deeply Higby has infiltrated and documented Signal, check out his X home, then search on “MINNEAPOLIS SIGNAL INFILTRATED.” There you will find multiple posts like this one that documents how the protestors relay tag and other information on an ICE vehicle located in one of the protest areas. Higby’s infiltration has been so effective that Signal’s operators were forced to take counter-measures that temporarily limited their ability to continue operations. Unfortunately for them, those counter-measures came after Higby exposed the most relevant facts about their structure and operations.

To appreciate the logistical depth and detail of the organization behind the Minneapolis chaos, check out this “pop-up Leftist supply depot” videoed and reported by Gunther Eagleman, AKA David Freeman. You want milk, here it is. You need hand warmers, gotcha covered. How about some hot coffee? Or donuts? Crackers? Water? It’s all there and somebody is paying for it.

This is the kind of organized, equipped and strategically directed opposition to federal law enforcement that George Wallace, standing in the “school house door” at the University of Alabama in 1963, could only dream of having at his disposal. Ditto another avowed hard-core segregationist determined to stop federal law enforcement, Arkansas Governor Orval Faubus, when 101st Airborne troops escorted nine young black students into Little Rock’s Central High School in 1957. And imagine the death and destruction former Confederate Calvary General Nathan Bedford Forrest could have wreaked across the Reconstruction period had he access to Signal-level insurrection sophistication and funding?

In fact, Signal is not something new. To the contrary, Signal duplicates and refines what Eric Schwalm, a former U.S. Special Forces warrant officer, saw happening time and again with highly sophisticated, organized, and funded insurgencies overseas:

“From Anbar to Helmand, the pattern is familiar: spotters, cutouts, dead drops (or modern equivalents), disciplined comms, role specialization, and a willingness to absorb casualties while bleeding the stronger force slowly. What’s unfolding in Minneapolis right now isn’t ‘protest.’ It’s low-level insurgency infrastructure, built by people who’ve clearly studied the playbook. … This isn’t spontaneous outrage. This is C2 (command and control) with redundancy, OPSEC hygiene, and task organization that would make a [Special Forces] team sergeant nod in recognition. Replace ‘ICE agents’ with ‘occupying coalition forces’ and the structure maps almost 1:1 to early-stage urban cells we hunted in the mid-2000s.”

And Schwalm is worried because Signal isn’t in Afghanistan or Iraq or Gaza, it’s right here in America:

“The most sobering part? It’s domestic. Funded, trained (somewhere), and directed by people who live in the same country they’re trying to paralyze law enforcement in. When your own citizens build and operate this level of parallel intelligence and rapid-response network against federal officers — complete with doxxing, vehicle pursuits, and harassment that’s already turned lethal — you’re no longer dealing with civil disobedience. You’re facing a distributed resistance that’s learned the lessons of successful insurgencies: stay below the kinetic threshold most of the time, force over-reaction when possible, maintain popular support through narrative, and never present a single center of gravity.”

Whatever you think of the Minneapolis situation, it could only happen in a limited number of locations in America. How many? Well, Kevin Bass analyzed media reports on anti-ICE incidents around the nation for the past year and found nine counties that accounted for two-thirds of all such violent confrontations.

The nine are all connected to deep-blue big cites with far-Left Democratic mayors and with long-standing sanctuary status, including Minneapolis, Portland, Seattle, Los Angeles, Chicago, San Francisco, Denver, New York, and Newark. Statistically, those nine counties turned out to be 590 times more likely to experience violent anti-ICE confrontations than all of the remaining 3,134 counties in the United States! Coincidence?

Even given all of the preceding facts, however, there is evidence the Signal operation is not perfect, as seen in this video snapshot on X of a “protestor” who, in the midst of a chaotic demonstration, suddenly finds himself able to lift himself out of his wheelchair to pick something up from the street. Either the age of miracles continues or Signal is sending false signals.

AUTHOR

Mark Tapscott

Mark Tapscott is senior congressional analyst at The Washington Stand.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Anti-ICE Rioters See Full Moon, Bird, While Mobbing Hotel Reportedly Housing Federal Agents

Healthcare Worker Appears To Encourage Drugging ICE Agents In Videos

John Fetterman Bucks Democrats On ICE As Country Barrels Toward Likely Shutdown

Democrats Plan To Shutdown ICE Funding Has Already Been Foiled

EDITORS NOTE: This Washington Stand column is republished with permission. All rights reserved. ©2026 Family Research Council.


The Washington Stand is Family Research Council’s outlet for news and commentary from a biblical worldview. The Washington Stand is based in Washington, D.C. and is published by FRC, whose mission is to advance faith, family, and freedom in public policy and the culture from a biblical worldview. We invite you to stand with us by partnering with FRC.

No Such Office Exists Mr.! Ref: Department of Defense

Mr Weaver,

As a journalist and a person allegedly qualified to report the news for the Hill surely you understand that when you report a story and make quotes such as —

Senate Republicans are growing increasingly uneasy with the Pentagon’s investigation into Sen. Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.) after Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth announced his office is escalating its probe into him.

You don’t mention the names of these Senate Republicans and well — I am unable to locate the Office of the Secretary of Defense to verify your story regarding the soon to be court martialed Captain Mark Kelly. I did find Secretary of War Pete Hegseth, he is a pretty good friend of mine.

Just to clue you in considering your degree is in the Arts and not journalism — no such Defense Office exists and no such position exists in the Pentagon Ref: Office of the Secretary of Defense.

Please visit: Secretary of War | U.S. Department of War

I am not sure why the Hill hired you; perhaps it’s your dynamic personality not so much your journalistic integrity. But low IQ folks like you that disrespect the office of War created to protect our republic and the disrespect you have for our military folks seem to be the latest trend in the media hiring these days.

Senior Chief Geoff Ross
Surface Warfare — Air Warfare
U.S. Navy Retired

Copy to:

Secretary of War Pete Hegseth

©2025 . All rights reserved.

The Leaks Begin

It’s a bit amusing to listen to the fake news media speculate that Trump is somehow “losing it” and in “cognitive decline.”

Here is a president who not only masters all the tools of our national government, but has deployed them to achieve his policy goals in ways no president in modern history has ever done.

But there is one thing that worries me about the Trump White House: the resurgence of leaks.

Remember: it was leaks at the White House by pro-Ukraine national security staffers that led to the first impeachment hoax against the president.

Is there a new cabal inside the White House once again trying to subvert this president?

We know that Trump has never ceased to anger — even terrify — the Deep State. And we know that the Deep State, by definition, is all over Washington, including the White House.

Once again, the transcript of a classified phone call involving Ukraine made its way to the media. Is there another Eric Ciamarelli lurking inside the National Security Council?

Ciamarelli was the Deep State CIA operative on the NSC staff in 2019, who allegedly leaked the Trump-Zelenskyy transcript that Democrats used to impeach Trump the first time.

This time it was the transcript of a call between US negotiator Steve Witkoff and Putin’s top foreign policy advisor, Yuri Ushakov, that made its way into the anti-Trump media.

The transcript, as it surfaced in Bloomberg, showed Witkoff “coaching” Ushakov on how Putin should talk to Trump, advising him to congratulate Trump for the success of the Hamas-Israel negotiation and then suggest they use that model to resolve the Russia-Ukraine war.

That sent the pro-Ukraine lobbyists spiraling into hysteria.

William B. Taylor, the former US Ambassador to Ukraine who became a key witness against the president in the impeachment hearings, said the transcript “shows how Witkoff sabotaged a meeting between President Trump and President Zelenskyy by suggesting Putin call Trump the day before the Zelenskyy meeting.”

He said pretty much the same thing about Trump at the impeachment hearings.

Taylor would have failed the test Secretary of State George Schulz famously put to prospective ambassadors, asking them to point to the country they represented on the globe. If they pointed to any other country than the United States, they were toast. Taylor would have pointed to Ukraine.

A second major leak appeared in the Wall Street Journal, this time of a phone call between President Trump and Japanese prime minister, Sanae Takaichi.

The new Japanese prime minister reportedly infuriated the Chinese communists on November 7, when she told parliament that a Chinese attack on Taiwan could trigger a Japanese military response.

In the call with President Trump on Tuesday, the president reportedly told her to “dial down the volume” to avoid further escalating tensions between Washington and Beijing.

Both of these leaks originated in the White House, most likely from NSC area experts who were sitting in on the calls, either directly or remotely (as was the case with Ciamarelli in 2019).

My bet is that Marco Rubio, who like Henry Kissinger before him, runs the NSC in addition to Foggy Bottom, is furious over the leaks and is actively seeking to find out who was responsible.

And he should be. Loose lips sink ships, or in this case, can sink the presidency.

I discuss the leaks, the status of the Russia-Ukraine negotiations, as well as the current state of play inside the Iranian leadership, on this week’s Prophecy Today Weekend.

As always, you can listen live at 1 PM on Saturday in the Jacksonville, Florida area on 104.9 FM or 550 AM or by using the Jacksonville Way Radio app. You can listen to the podcast later here.

Yours in freedom.

©2025 . All rights reserved.


Website: kentimmerman.com

Ken Timmerman’s 14th book of non-fiction, THE IRAN HOUSE: Tales of Revolution, Persecution, War, and Intrigue, can be ordered by clicking here or by viewing my author’s page, here. 

Raising Olives in Provence, can be ordered by clicking here.

Dem Congressional Candidate Believes Men Can Give Birth: A Reflection of the Party at Large?

Tennessee Democratic District Representative Aftyn Behn (D) believes men can give birth. Now, she’s running for a congressional seat.

Her opinion became apparent during a 2020 episode of her podcast “Grits.” She followed up her use of the term “birthers” by stating that “men and women … can give birth.” As Breitbart summarized, “She made the comment before discussing a book by pro-abortion feminist Jenny Brown called Birth Strike, which argues that women should refuse to have children as a way to collectively bargain with the government and achieve their political aims.”

Behn has also openly supported transgenderism for children. She called the Supreme Court ruling in the United States v. Skrmetti case, which upheld a Tennessee law protecting minors from sex change drugs, a “gut punch to transgender youth and their families.” As she further stated, “This 6-3 ruling only emboldens the far-right’s relentless attack on transgender rights, pushing us further into a dangerous future where politics — rather than science — dictates the lives of our most vulnerable.”

The list goes on. In 2023, Behn said she previously “ran on an unabashed progressive campaign platform of standing up for trans kids and standing up for reproductive access,” emphasizing that she will “never compromise on values of abortion access or trans kids.” Similar sentiments have been made toward support for drag queens who have encouraged children to attend their “shows.”

After a trans-identifying individual opened fire at Nashville’s Covenant School in 2023, a Christian elementary school, she directed her sympathy not to the victims of the shooting, but to trans-identifying people. As she put it, having a “partner” with “a trans son” allegedly made the aftermath of that deadly shooting “incredibly upsetting for us. In the wake of the Covenant shooting, and the disclosure that the Covenant shooter was trans, I was pulled into a chat with other trans organizers and activists across the state that were fearful of their lives.” Reportedly, this shooting motivated her to run for political office to fight “every day” for “protections for trans kids and our trans communities.”

“Remember,” she posted on Facebook, “you come for my trans community, I come for you.”

It turns out, Behn is an example of what the Democratic Party looks like these days. And it’s left many conservatives wondering: how might this affect the upcoming 2026 midterm elections?

According to a recent popularity poll conducted by NPR/PBS News/Marist, roughly 55% of American adults said they would vote for a Democrat in the midterms if they were held today. In contrast, only 41% said the same about Republicans. As The Washington Stand previously reported, “The 14-point lead is the largest Democrats have held since 2017, in the first year of President Donald Trump’s first term.” And yet, this same poll that found a majority in favor of Democratic candidates also found that Democrats are, by and large, the ones blamed for the recent government shutdown, which now marks the longest in U.S. history.

So, why the support for a party that was blamed for the shutdown and, many argue, hold to highly controversial opinions? Matt Carpenter, director of Family Research Council’s political arm, FRC Action, answered this question in a comment to The Washington Stand.

“Despite being historically unpopular,” he said, “the Democratic Party can depend on their base to be enthusiastic to vote. This is not unusual. Typically, the party out of power benefits from their base being highly motivated to turn out. Add to this their recent successes in the 2025 elections, and the Democratic Party base believes congressional majorities are within reach. So far, neither an unpopular agenda, nor a dysfunctional and leaderless party, have dampened the enthusiasm of the Democratic base.” On the other hand, he added, “Republicans in Congress … have the blame (fairly or not) for voters’ sense that the economy is not strong, the added burden of actually governing and making difficult decisions, and the political reality of needing Democratic support for almost anything to pass the Senate, where they hold a bare majority.”

This is the current political landscape, and as Carpenter argued, “The greatest predictor of an election outcome is incumbency; the next greatest is redistricting.” When it comes to the potential outcomes of the 2026 midterms, Carpenter found it important to understand what’s starting to shift now that will likely have ripple effects into the future. “So far,” he said, “this cycle we have 46 members who have announced their retirement from Congress — 38 in the House and eight in the Senate — and a mid-decade redistricting fight between blue and red states. This means the advantage of incumbency will be missing in 46 races, and for those running for a seat in the House, there’s a good chance their district has been redrawn — or could be redrawn — to reflect the partisan leaning of their state government.”

“Aside from incumbency and redistricting,” he continued, “campaign fundraising is the next most important factor, generally the side that raises the most money prevails in close races — this is especially true in the Senate.” Carpenter summarized the roadmap for Republican success: “For the GOP to retain their majorities in Congress, they will need to retain as much of their advantages in incumbency, redistricting, and fundraising as possible, because the Democrat base is fired up to vote. So far, the advantages in all three seem to give the Democrats an edge.”

He acknowledged that the midterms are 11 months away, “and a lot — including how motivated each party’s base is — could change between now and then.” That said, he gave some advice for Christians and conservatives who want to be forward thinking. As he put it, “The most important thing a Christian can do is pray and then make a plan to vote. Studies show that when someone makes a plan to vote, they are almost guaranteed to vote. That means checking your voter registration status, finding your precinct, knowing when the polls are open, choosing when and how you’ll vote, and — most importantly — researching the candidates and initiatives on your ballot so you know how you’ll be voting.” All of this can be done through FRC Action’s website.

“Once you’ve done all that,” Carpenter added, “talk about the issues coming up in the midterms with your church small group, and like-minded friends, neighbors, family, co-workers, etc. In other words: encourage others you know to also make a plan to vote.” Carpenter highlighted a sober reality: “Unfortunately, studies … show a great degree of apathy among Christians when it comes time to vote. There are millions of Christians who believe, wrongly, that their vote doesn’t matter, or won’t count, or they don’t take the time to research the candidates. They miss out on the opportunity to vote for leaders who will stand up for the values they care about.”

To push back against those with this mindset, Carpenter concluded: “Proverbs 21:1 says, ‘The king’s heart is a stream of water in the hand of the Lord; he turns it wherever he will.’ Every believer should pray for conviction and wisdom in stewarding their vote and then share what they are learning with those around them.”

AUTHOR

Sarah Holliday

Sarah Holliday is a reporter at The Washington Stand.

EDITORS NOTE: This Washington Stand column is republished with permission. All rights reserved. ©2025 Family Research Council.


The Washington Stand is Family Research Council’s outlet for news and commentary from a biblical worldview. The Washington Stand is based in Washington, D.C. and is published by FRC, whose mission is to advance faith, family, and freedom in public policy and the culture from a biblical worldview. We invite you to stand with us by partnering with FRC.

Democrats’ Epstein Gamble Backfires as New Document Release Expose Their Own Ties

For years, Democrats and their allies in the corporate media have seized on every opportunity to embarrass, undermine, or politically wound President Donald J. Trump. From the Russia collusion hoax — a narrative that collapsed under scrutiny — to the endless stream of negative coverage, the liberal media establishment has never hidden its bitterness over Trump’s resilience and historic comeback.

Now, they appear ready to weaponize the Jeffrey Epstein case in the same way they used the Russia narrative during Trump’s first term. For months, Democrats were agitating for the release of the remaining Epstein files, convinced that doing so would deliver a blow to Trump. The media echoed this drumbeat, framing the release as yet another opportunity to tarnish his image.

But the tables have turned.

With President Trump committed to full transparency — and with both the House and Senate having approved the release of the documents — the political winds have shifted dramatically. The emerging evidence suggests that Democrats may be far more entangled in the Epstein sphere than they expected. If there were anything in those files that could incriminate Trump, President Joe Biden’s Justice Department would have weaponized it long ago, especially during the peak of the election season when Democrats were desperate to boost Vice President Kamala Harris.

Instead, what we are seeing is deeply uncomfortable for the left.

Newly released documents reveal that during Michael Cohen’s February 2019 House Oversight testimony, Democrat Del. Stacey Plaskett exchanged messages with Epstein before, during, and after her questioning. Epstein coached her on what to ask — even instructing her to focus on Trump’s longtime assistant, Rhona Graff. When she finished, he texted back: “Good work.”

This alone should alarm anyone concerned about foreign influence, undue pressure, or shadowy connections in congressional proceedings.

Additionally, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries is now facing scrutiny after a 2013 email surfaced in which Jeffrey Epstein was invited to a Democratic dinner — raising questions about whether Jeffries sought political or financial support from Epstein.

These revelations undercut the narrative that Democrats tried to build. Instead of harming Trump, the truth appears to be swinging the spotlight squarely back onto the Democratic establishment.

The fear inside Democratic circles is obvious. They set out to weaponize the Epstein case against Trump, but now the blowback threatens to engulf their own ranks. If this political gamble ultimately exposes hypocrisy, hidden alliances, and quiet favors, Democrats may come to regret ever turning this into a Trump-centered spectacle.

And when all is said and done, I firmly believe President Trump should consider legal action against news networks and individuals who recklessly labeled him a “pedophile” in an attempt to smear his character. Free speech does not cover deliberate defamation. Actions must have consequences.

In the end, the truth is catching up — and it is not falling on Trump.

©2025 . All rights reserved.

RELATED VIDEO: Rep. Byron Donalds: Hakeem Jeffries accepted campaign money from Jeffrey Epstein in 2013

BBC’s Bias Exposed: Trump’s Vindication and the Embarrassment of a Trusted Institution

For years, I’ve watched the corporate media twist facts, frame narratives, and hide behind “anonymous sources.” It’s a dangerous trend — one that erodes public trust and gives room for propaganda under the guise of journalism.

The use of unnamed sources was one of the key weapons used against President Donald Trump. Remember the so-called Russian collusion story? For years, major outlets — guided by shadowy sources and partisan motives — insisted that Trump and his family were guilty. Congressman Adam Schiff became a regular guest on prime-time news, declaring Trump compromised by Moscow.

But when the dust settled, the entire story collapsed. Investigations revealed no evidence of collusion. Even former intelligence officials acknowledged that the Obama-era intelligence apparatus laid the groundwork for what turned out to be a politically motivated hoax. The media didn’t just get it wrong — they helped spread a lie.

Now, the BBC — long viewed as a symbol of trustworthy journalism — has been caught in a similar scandal. Recent resignations among senior BBC executives followed reports that the network deliberately edited Trump’s 2020 speech to make him appear responsible for the January 6th “insurrection.”

A Telegraph report by Associate Editor Gordon Rayner exposed how a BBC consultant’s internal dossier warned management of growing left-wing bias in its coverage. Among the examples was the manipulation of Trump’s remarks — a calculated edit that changed the meaning of his words entirely.

Had these distortions gone unchallenged, they could have fueled even more legal and political persecution of Trump. Fortunately, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld that a sitting president retains immunity for official actions, preventing further misuse of power driven by media hysteria.

The lesson is simple: when journalism becomes activism, truth dies. The BBC’s fall from grace should serve as a warning to every newsroom that thinks ideology can replace integrity.

Whatever course President Trump chooses regarding the BBC, one fact stands firm — the truth has finally caught up with those who tried to rewrite it.

©2025 . All rights reserved.

RELATED ARTICLES:

BBC BUSTED: Trump Hit Job Sparks Resignations and Trump Lawsuit for Billions

BBC’s Trump deception is a stain on all of Britain — and it’s just one bit of its bias

MEDIA INTIFADA: BBC Newsroom Descent to Hamas Mouthpiece, ‘Platforming Antisemitism’

EVIL NEVER SLEEPS

The issue is never the issue. The issue is always the Revolution.

What does that really mean? Well, it means that no matter what the event is: whether it is a peaceful protest, violent riot, murder, church service, mainstream media reporting, or mosque service, the issue is always: How can we overthrow the Western world? That is the goal of the Revolution.

The big difference between the Islamists and the Westerners is that the Westerner does not care whose God you pray to as long as you are satisfied. The Westerners believe that it is your choice and you should be able to choose your religion, or no religion, as you desire. The only requirement is that you do not inflict your wishes upon everyone else. Westerners do not care what you do behind closed doors. Islamists believe you MUST conform to Allah’s wishes from a thousand years ago or you will be taxed, called a dhimmitude or lied to, called a taqiyya, or killed, called jihad. Our constitution says that the government cannot choose a national religion. It is up to We The Individual to choose our own faith. Westerners do not force anyone to believe a certain way. We just hope you believe in something.

The Islamists on the other hand believe that there is only one God for the world and that is Allah. They believe it is their job to introduce you and after a while demand you follow the path of Allah. Should you choose not to believe in Allah, they call you an infidel and feel they have the right to tax you, lie to you or terminate your life. Yes, they have the right to kill non-believers. According to the Quran, their holy book, in order to convert an infidel, the ends justify the means.

Could that be why Obama and now the legislators and the media lie to get their way?

The westerners/Americans believe that our country is so wonderful and so full of opportunity that everyone who comes here should want to assimilate and want to become an American.

The Islamists believe that their religion is so wonderful that everyone should want to be a Muslim. By constantly focusing on the failings of the West, instead of the good, they breed hatred.

The evil Westerners must be irradiated and purged from society. So, killing a non-believer is easy. After all, their death as a martyr will bring them close to Allah and the virgins that wait for them. 10 years ago, there were 1.2 million Muslims in America. Today there are 5 million.

In 2015, the cry from CAIR (Council on American-Islamic Relations) was, “We will place the Muslim flag on the White House”. Once that happens, the Constitution will be out, and Sharia will be the law of the land. Will you stand by and watch or act as that happens? Islamists cannot pledge to America or take an oath based on the US Constitution. Why are you not asking:

Why are they in our government?

Islamists are in our government, because cowards were afraid to stand up to the Marxist, AKA socialist, AKA communist. These cowardly legislators are more afraid to be called Islamophobic (a made up word) or racist. Without oversight of demanding allegiance to America. Communists and Islamists are lying to get elected! Dual citizenship is NOT allegiance to America. Mamdani is a citizen of Uganda. How is he the Mayor of NYC?

The Marxist/Communists feel that the Utopia that they present, where by you will own nothing and they will be happy should be desired by everyone. After all, they are providing free stuff. They believe that everyone should want, desire and must have the Utopia that they present. History shows that in this perfect world, nothing really works.

How will the “free” stuff get paid for, we ask? Tax the Rich, is the answer. The useful idiots have not yet learned that the rich do not pay taxes. The rich pass on the taxes to the poor. That is how they stay rich. The Rich are always one step ahead of the rest of us.

Since history has been neglected, no one realizes these failed tired Communist plans have been around from the 30s through today. They haven’t worked every time they have been tried. But, not to worry, this time will be different. The interesting thing about these groups, which have now come together in a red-green alliance, is that their agenda is all based on lies. They must lie in order for others to buy into their programs and therefore the ends justify the means.

Why are we paying taxpayer money to NGOs that want us dead?

On the Florida East Coast the NGOs are busy holding meetings to get money and support for those poor immigrants. Only problem is, that they never say illegals. They lump legal and illegal together, hoping you won’t notice.

A listener sent me this:

There is a meeting in Boca at the West Boca library for people who are “frustrated with the chaos” coming from the Florida State Capitol and Washington DC, concerning the treatment of our hard working immigrant population”. October 24, between 1:30-3:30 at the West Boca library. On SR 7- between Clint Moore and Yamato.

Another one—Immigrants in Crisis

The GOP was asleep at the wheel for this election. They are allowing the Islamists to take over. Can an Islamist be a good American? Is the GOP afraid, doesn’t care or doesn’t know how to run a decent campaign? The “advisors” blew a great opportunity by handing NYC, NJ and VA to the Marxists Islamists. They just gave it all away. I wonder how long it will take for any sane democrat to have buyer’s remorse? Little by little, the Islamists/Marxists expose exactly what they intend to do. Is anyone listening? Is anyone paying attention?

Listen Speaker: Abdullah H. Hammond, the Mayor of Dearborn, Michigan. Meeting Date: September 9, 2025. This was a Dearborn City Council meeting.

This clip addresses the Council on American Islamic Relations in Florida, aka CAIR Florida. It addresses the ability to engage and take over every community. This exposes what their real goals are. You saw how they have taken over and destroyed the Middle East, Minnesota and Michigan. Now they want to do the same by Implementing Sharia on 30A, which is comprised of towns along the Gulf of America in the FL Panhandle, all the way from Pensacola to Jacksonville.

Who will educate our children?

Listen to the anger and threats from the new mayor of NYC Zohran Mamdani. Very different from the politician on his stump speeches.

So, let’s get back to the original question: Can an Islamist be a good American?

Kat Stansell, my guest in segment 1 has the answer!

Why is the Democrat Party sponsoring its demise? Democrats Are Seeming To Self-Destruct

America is in the middle of a cultural revolution. The Islamists have joined with the Marxists/Communists/Progressives and all America hating groups with one goal in mind – to destroy Western culture. They follow the teachings of Chairman Mao. Remember Anita Dunn political strategist who served as a senior advisor to Joe Biden and Barack Obama currently serving as a senior adviser to the Future Forward PAC.[5]. Mao was her favorite political philosopher. Dunn is married to Robert Bauer, former partner at Perkins Coie. Everything is connected.

The color for this revolution is yellow. Followers can now be identified. Will they follow Mao into the mass graves once this revolution is over since they can be easily identified. Mao killed 60 million people. Many were followers.

You can read some Lessons for America from Chairman Mao’s Cultural Revolution on Dr. Dan’s Freedom Forum. Dr. Dan and I will discuss the color revolution in segment 2.

Evil Never sleeps. Will you fiercely defend America’s founding principles such as the protection of individual rights, the rule of law, freedom of speech, election integrity, the free market system, equal opportunity and meritocracy? Will you defend freedom of religion? Or will you stand by and watch, doing nothing – as the haters of America take over our country?

Is America worth saving?

If not you, who? If not now, when?

Do you think they will stop at NYC?

©2025 . All rights reserved.

USA Today’s Kathy Palmer Another Joe Biden Marxist Propaganda Fake News Reporter

Kathryn “Kathy” Palmer is another Joe Biden Marxist fake news propagandist who is bored out her tiny mind so she is writing columns in the Fake News USA Today rag that President Trump is made false claims on October 12th suggesting that Comrade Biden (the installed corrupt former President) placed FBI Agents in the crowd who were actually let into the Capitol Building by the Capitol Police.

This Marxist reporter who no doubt voted for Biden, claims that we had an insurrection in our republic on Jan. 6, 2021 describing a violent mob swarming the U.S. Capitol in an effort to stop the peaceful transfer of power after Biden fraudulently stole during the 2020 presidential race. She goes on to mention this occurred while Trump was still in office. Imagine that.

She goes onto describe in her words “The riot led to several deaths, including a demonstrator who was shot as she tried to reach fleeing lawmakers”

This Maxist reporter Comrade Kathy Palmer fails to write the truth or omits the truth that this unarmed demonstrator was a military air force veteran let into the Capitol Building by the Capitol Police and was subsequently shot in the head at point blank range by a member of Biden’s Secret Service detail. So you could say she was assassinated much like Charlie Kirk. Same ideology right? Either support left wing Communism or you will be killed.

This sniveling Marxist Propaganda stenographer for the Communist Democrat Party also fails to mention in her bullXXXX story that FBI Director Kash Patel confirmed that the-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi whose Congressional District is the human feces sidewalk capital of the world in San Francisco – rejected President Trump’s offer to send in National Guard Troops on for security on Jan 6th 2021.

Pelosi did this through her oversight of Capitol security even though she was given plenty of time in advance. Pelosi, via the House Sergeant at Arms who reports directly to Comrade Pelosi shutdown multiple offers of National Guard deployments additional support from Trump much like today in Communist Blue States trying to stop Trump from protecting citizens with our National Guard.

There is no mention by this bottom feeding cockroach stenographer Kathy Palmer that Pelosi’s daughter the woke maggot Alexandra Pelosi was very busy making video footage at this so-called insurrection for her 2022 HBO documentary — “Pelosi in the House”. You would think she would be running for her life right?

No mention by this fraud reporter of the threats made by Comrade Pelosi, the low life Marxist who threatened to punch out President Trump. No, not a word. Trump was gracious as to not send a secret service detail over to her office to investigate her sorry ass.

You see people like Kathy Palmer who claim to be reporters are in fact Communist sympathisers, all part of the George Soros funded Democrat assault on our republic. Nasty low life people. Satanic.

The good news is the American people are wise to their crap which is why the phrase or acronym FAFO is coming true.

Go WOKE and you go BROKE.

Perhaps USA Today should change its name to PRAVDA PROPAGANDA FOR WOKE LOW IQ MAGGOTS. In fact the Editor In Chief at USA Today Caren Bohen looks like she fell out of the ugly tree and hit every branch on the way down. She should get a walk-on role in the next Predator action movie.

©2025 . All rights reserved.

The Southern Poverty Law Center is Biased — and Extraordinarily Wealthy

The Southern Poverty Law Center is perhaps most notorious for its “hate map,” which not only neglects to track extremist groups on the left, but also lumps mainstream conservative and religious organizations right alongside some of the most reprehensible neo-Nazis and white supremacists in the country.

For this, it has been regularly and rightly criticized.

The controversial activist group has also become phenomenally wealthy, with an endowment rivaling prominent universities and annual revenues exceeding some of the most well-known charities in the country.

Recent visitors to its website may have noticed the following fundraising appeal: “Urgent: This is an all-hands-on-deck moment. With so much at stake for American families, we need your help to stop the attacks on our most basic rights. Please rush your emergency donation today.”

Prospective donors who clicked on the prompt to “Give Now” were urged to make a one-time contribution of between $35 and $250, or a recurring monthly commitment of between $15 and $50.

The organization’s “urgent” pleas for an “emergency” cash infusion from small-dollar donors is puzzling, because the group literally appears to have more money than it knows what to do with. Its most recent Form 990 for the fiscal year ending in October 2024 disclosed an astonishing $786.7 million in net assets, much of which is parked in public and private equity funds. Its three-quarters-of-a-billion-dollar endowment has more than doubled just since 2016.

For context, this makes the SPLC wealthier than many colleges and universities, including in the group’s home state of Alabama. Samford University, the largest private school in the state with over 6,000 enrolled students, reported just $547.8 million total net assets in 2024. Tuskegee University, which enrolled about 3,000 students, reported $550.6 million in net assets that same year.

The SPLC’s net assets are not too far behind those of the Auburn University Foundation, which had just over $1 billion as of 2024.

Revenue is another method of measuring the SPLC’s riches. As of August 2025, a ProPublica search for all 501(c)(3) charities located in Alabama placed the SPLC at No. 17 in most recent available annual revenue — behind ten hospitals/health care providers, two private universities (Samford and Tuskegee), two housing providers, one private foundation, and the SEC collegiate athletic conference.

The organization’s total revenues in 2024 were $129 million, mostly from contributions and grants. This was down from a record-breaking haul of $169.8 million the year before. To put that number in perspective, the combined 2023 revenue of Alabama’s eight regional food banks associated with Feeding America — which collectively serve the entire state — was $183.6 million. In 2023, the SPLC brought in nearly $48 million more than the United Way of Central Alabama.

Well-known nonprofits that brought in less money — as measured by total revenue—than the SPLC in 2023 include:

Incredibly, the total 2023 revenues of the professional footballbaseball and basketball halls of fame put together were just 35 percent of those of the SPLC. The famous Field Museum in Chicago, which welcomed more than 1.1 million visitors in 2023, had less than two-thirds the revenue of the SPLC. The National World War II Museum in New Orleans had less than half. The Georgia Aquarium — the largest in the country at over 11 million gallons of water — reported less revenue than the SPLC that year.

There is another important consideration to all of this as well. Like these groups, the SPLC is organized as a 501(c)(3) charity, incentivized by the American public with tax-exemption and the ability to accept tax-deductible contributions. Unlike them, its activities are highly controversial and divisive — two descriptors not generally associated with the word “charity.”

Of course, the SPLC is far from alone in making biased or spurious accusations of extremism. That is, regrettably, almost par for the course in our current overheated political environment. What truly sets the group apart is how phenomenally wealthy it has become in doing so. Even assuming a hypothetical online benefactor considering an “emergency donation” to the SPLC fully agrees with everything the group does, why should he or she lob a few more hard-earned dollars to the summit of its mountain of money?

If nothing else, there is a major opportunity cost involved — one those across the ideological spectrum can appreciate. How many cash-strapped nonprofits nationwide could use some of the hundreds of millions of dollars warehoused in the SPLC’s investment accounts to make a genuine positive difference in the lives of others? That is, after all, the ultimate purpose of charity.

This essay was originally posted by The Hill.

AUTHOR

 Robert Stilson

Robert runs several of CRC’s specialized projects. Originally from Indiana, he has a B.A. from Hanover College and a J.D. from University of Richmond School of Law, where he graduated magna cum laude.

EDITORS NOTE: This Capital Research Center column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.