Tag Archive for: FEATURED

Elephant Pees In Front Of Press At Texas GOP Convention

An elephant peed in front of the press at the 2026 Texas Republican Party Convention in Houston, according to footage posted Friday.

WATCH: Elephant Pees In Front Of Press At Texas GOP Convention

Lauren McGaughy, Texas politics correspondent for The New York Times, recorded footage of multiple people leading an elephant through a gap between throngs of attendees and posted it on X. The convention is set to take place from June 11 to June 13.

“They just led an elephant through the @TexasGOP convention and it took a giant pee right near the press area,” McGaughy wrote.

Footage shows at least three people directing the elephant through the gap as spectators watch and record in the background. Music and speaking can be heard as the elephant, decked in a banner reading, “Unity Drives Victory,” suddenly comes to a halt and people start shouting. The camera moves downward to show the animal peeing on the floor. A woman starts laughing as the elephant resumes walking forward.

The convention comes days after Republican Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton won the May 26 GOP Senate primary runoff against incumbent Republican Sen. John Cornyn in a landslide a week after President Donald Trump backed his candicacy. Paxton secured a 28-point margin of victory with 63.8% to 36.2%, The New York Times reported with over 95% of the vote counted. Republican Gov. Greg Abbot and Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick both secured primary wins March 3, according to The Texas Tribune.

On Friday, incumbent Republican Party of Texas Chair Abraham George lost his seat to his ex-running mate, Republican Party of Texas Vice Chair D’rinda Randall, the outlet reported. George congratulated Randall on her victory on X.

The elephant first took off as a Republican Party symbol during the American Civil War, though political cartoonist Thomas Nast’s 1874 “Harper’s Weekly” cartoon was central in popularizing it, according to History.com.

AUTHOR

Justin Bailey

Associate Editor

RELATED ARTICLES:

Ken Paxton Ousts John Cornyn In Runoff Landslide After Securing Trump’s Endorsement

Trump Announces U.S. Airstrikes Killed Tren De Aragua Leader

RELATED VIDEO: Bill Essayli Calls California a “Fraudster’s Paradise”

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

EXCLUSIVE: Multiple Sources Confirm GOP Senator Attempted IVF Expansion during NDAA Negotiations

As negotiations in the Senate continue over funding for the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for fiscal year 2027, sources familiar with the situation tell The Washington Stand that an amendment that would have implemented the unrestricted use of highly controversial in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatments into basic health care for military servicemembers was put forward by a Republican in a closed-door executive session, before it was ultimately dropped.

Sources confirmed Thursday that Senators Dan Sullivan (R-Alaska) and Tammy Duckworth (D-Ill.) offered competing amendments during a closed-door executive mark-up session for the NDAA that would have expanded servicemembers’ access to IVF treatments at the expense of taxpayers as part of the military’s Tricare health insurance program, without fully addressing pro-life concerns. The Sullivan amendment reportedly was shopped around to Republican offices, but failed to garner support because it was not clear that it protected frozen embryos, most of whom are discarded or experimented upon. The language of the proposed Duckworth amendment was said to be almost identical to language first put forward in an amendment she offered during last year’s NDAA markups. A source conveyed to TWS that during the session, Duckworth told those in the room that she and Sullivan agreed to withdraw their competing amendments and, as a compromise, to offer Duckworth’s language from last year. That amendment would have enabled Tricare coverage for “fertility-related care,” an open-ended term that could include “other information, referrals, treatments, procedures, testing, medications, laboratory services, technologies, and services facilitating reproduction as determined appropriate by the Secretary of Defense.”

The attempt by a GOP lawmaker to quietly fund IVF treatments with taxpayer dollars behind closed doors comes in the wake of the Trump administration’s efforts last year to “lower costs and expand access” to IVF by attempting to help lower the cost of fertility drugs used by women for egg retrieval. But pro-life advocates say that IVF procedures involve a host of ethically and morally problematic outcomes.

Based on CDC data and estimates from the Heritage Foundation, in 2021 alone, approximately 4.1 million embryonic children were created via IVF in the U.S., but just over 97,000 babies were born as a result, amounting to just 2.3% of the embryos created. Unused embryos are routinely discarded or frozen indefinitely. While actual figures are unknown, the number of destroyed embryos is estimated to be over one million per year, and at least 1.5 million embryonic children remain indefinitely frozen.

In addition, experts note that the open-ended language of policies like the Duckworth amendment leaves the door open for cloning, including the creation of human-animal hybrids known as chimeras. Other concerns include the lack of parental rights amid the unregulated IVF industry, in which embryos have been discarded without parental consent, the exploitation of women through surrogacy’s health risks, and the fact that the underlying causes of infertility are not addressed through IVF procedures. Experts point to restorative reproductive medicine (RRM), including NaPro TechnologyFEMM, and the Billings Ovulation Method as far more effective and ethical methods of treating infertility.

While the IVF amendments allowing unrestricted IVF usage for servicemembers at taxpayers’ expense have been defeated for now, experts say that pro-life advocates must be especially vigilant that the Trump administration and Republican lawmakers who claim to be pro-life refrain from putting forward policies that harm preborn children and undermine human dignity.

“It is disappointing that, behind closed doors, Republicans continue to try to expand taxpayer-funded IVF coverage despite the fact that they have been educated, year after year, about the problems, and especially the problems with expanding IVF from service-related injuries to all servicemembers and their dependents,” FRC Senior Director of Government Affairs Quena González told TWS, responding to the source. “Not only would it be immensely expensive, but it would involve taxpayer-funded creation, storage, and ultimately destruction of human lives.”

He continued, “And this is the proverbial camel’s nose under the edge of the tent. Using the NDAA to start this experiment in the military before expanding to universal coverage of IVF is particularly sneaky because, at this stage, the NDAA is being negotiated behind closed doors to protect military secrets and national security concerns. It is concerning to learn that some Republicans are using a legitimate process to hide from public accountability and cut deals on harmful language behind closed doors.”

As González underscored, “Millions of Americans would object to expansive taxpayer funding of IVF, when better alternatives exist to actually treat (rather than artificially bypass, at great human cost to all involved) the underlying causes of infertility. The military is a fighting force to deter tyrants and protect America, not a social laboratory. Military spouses and families, and the millions of Americans who fund their healthcare, deserve better.”

When asked for comment, a spokesperson for Sullivan’s office replied to TWS, “As a pro-life senator, this is a very important issue for Senator Sullivan. He believes that there is no greater gift than parenthood and understands that some families need IVF treatment to have children. However, there are significant pro-life concerns regarding IVF treatment, many of which Senator Sullivan shares. He has worked with pro-life groups on legislation in the NDAA for years. In the current NDAA, he was trying to find a path forward on this issue that takes into account those pro-life concerns. When it was clear that Democrats would block the proposal because of pro-life provisions in the proposal, he withdrew the amendment.”

EDITOR’S NOTE: This article was updated with a statement from Senator Dan Sullivan’s office, and additional clarifications to the markup proceedings, and a clarification that Sullivan’s measure was dropped rather than “defeated” in the original version.

AUTHOR

Dan Hart

Dan Hart is senior editor at The Washington Stand.

EDITORS NOTE: This Washington Stand column is republished with permission. All rights reserved. ©2026 Family Research Council.


The Washington Stand is Family Research Council’s outlet for news and commentary from a biblical worldview. The Washington Stand is based in Washington, D.C. and is published by FRC, whose mission is to advance faith, family, and freedom in public policy and the culture from a biblical worldview. We invite you to stand with us by partnering with FRC.

Iran: ‘If they respect Iran’s interests and act accordingly, the war will end; otherwise, it will continue’

What’s going on between the U.S. and the Islamic Republic of Iran is not at all clear. Trump has announced that the two sides were on the brink of a deal many, many times:

He has tried to give the impression that the leaders of the Islamic Republic have taken such a beating that they are begging for a deal.

However, the Iranian leadership is consistently behaving as if it is the victor and the Americans are the ones who are begging for a deal:

That same attitude is clear in these reports from the state-controlled Mehr News Agency. Mohammad Mokhber, advisor to the supreme leader, said: “If they respect Iran’s interests and act accordingly, the war will end; otherwise, it will continue.” This is not how a defeated combatant speaks. They know how desperate Trump is for a deal, and they know they’re in the driver’s seat.

“Iran says proposed deal not finalized amid US backtracking,” Mehr News Agency, June 12, 2026, 1:16 p.m.:

TEHRAN, Jun. 12 (MNA) – Tehran says it remains steadfast on its principled redlines as authorities review a proposed understanding, firmly rejecting speculation a final deal has been reached despite Washington backtracking on recent military threats.

Following claims made by US President Donald Trump on Thursday about an imminent deal between Tehran and Washington, an informed source told Tasnim News Agency that the text of the understanding has not been approved up to this moment.

Meanwhile, Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei confirmed that major sections of a potential understanding are close to completion. However, he rejected media speculations regarding a finalized agreement.

“Textually, the text has almost been finalized in its major parts. The problem is that the contradictory positions of the United States have always caused turbulence and disruption in this process,” Baghaei stated.

According to Tasnim, Washington recently attempted to alter the 14-point text proposed by Iran. However, American military and diplomatic pressure failed to force any concessions.

The report said the US has now announced through a Qatari mediator that there is no need for America’s recent amendments. Iran entirely rejected the new changes after Trump tried to shift Tehran’s positions through both military threats and Qatari mediation.

Any proposed text still requires review and finalization by relevant Iranian institutions. Until then, all other news and speculations are invalid, noted Tasnim.

The diplomatic retreat follows a sudden reversal by the US president. Hours after threatening to strike Iran “VERY HARD TONIGHT” and seize its strategic Kharg Island, Trump abruptly canceled the scheduled bombings.

“Based on the fact that discussions with the Islamic Republic of Iran have been brought to the highest level of Iranian leadership and approved, I have, as President of the United States of America, canceled the scheduled strikes and bombings against Iran this evening,” Trump claimed via social media.

He alleged that “final points” were approved by all involved parties, though he stressed that the illegal US naval blockade on Iranian ports would remain in place.

Iranian officials swiftly dismissed the notion of surrender, emphasizing that Tehran will determine the terms of any resolution.

Mohammad Mokhber, advisor to the Islamic Revolution Leader, told CNN that the “war will continue” until Washington “respects” Tehran’s interests.

“If they respect Iran’s interests and act accordingly, the war will end; otherwise, it will continue,” Mokhber said….

“Major parts of agreement finalized despite US contradiction,” Mehr News Agency, June 12, 2026, 10:40 a.m.:

TEHRAN, Jun. 12 (MNA) – Iran’s foreign ministry spokesman says major sections of an agreement to end war has been finalized despite Washington’s contradictory positions and repeated acts of military aggression aimed at disrupting diplomatic process.

Speaking in an interview late on Thursday, Esmaeil Baghaei rejected media speculations regarding an agreement and reaffirmed Iran’s resolute and principled stance.

“Textually, the text has almost been finalized in its major parts. The problem is that the contradictory positions of the United States have always caused turbulence and disruption in this process,” Baghaei stated.

He emphasized that the Islamic Republic entered the diplomatic process with goodwill and full responsibility, while American officials have repeatedly shifted positions, raised unrealistic new demands, and even carried out military attacks during the negotiations.

Baghaei noted that since the declared ceasefire in April, both the US and the Israeli regime have repeatedly violated the truce.

In the latest attacks, American forces targeted Iran’s southern infrastructure and struck two water reservoirs in Sirik.

“While they speak of diplomacy and negotiations, they simultaneously resort to force, illegal actions, and criminal behavior,” he said.

The official made it clear that Iran has shown, both in diplomacy and on the battlefield, that it will never submit to the conditions and demands of the other side.

“Iran has proven in practice that its red lines are the interests and welfare of the Iranian nation, and there will be absolutely no compromise in this regard,” Baghaei stressed.

“Had the Islamic Republic intended to retreat from its principled positions under pressure and threats, it would have done so one and a half years ago. We have proven that we stand firm,” he added….

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLES:

Trump Calls Off Further Iran Strikes, Postpones Next Round of Bombings, Says Iran Deal ‘Approved,’ ‘All Wrapped Up’

NEXT WAVE: U.S. Launches Fresh Strikes on Iran, Hits IRGC Command and Control Center

SJP-Linked Students Indicted Over Plot to Target Children of University President

UN Blames Hamas for Torture and Public Execution of Gazans

Moroccans Running Amok in Spain

Turkish President Erdogan: Israel’s ‘aggression’ poses ‘a ‌threat to the whole world and must be stopped’

RELATED VIDEO: Benjamin Netanyahu: The Iranian Islamic regime threatens Israel, America and Europe

EDITORS NOTE: This Jihad Watch column is republished with permisson. ©All rights reserved.

Left-Wing Billionaire Spends $200,000,000 Of Own Money To Become Governor Only To Lose To Fox News Host

Billionaire climate activist Tom Steyer came in third in the California gubernatorial primary despite pouring hundreds of millions of his own dollars into his campaign.

Steyer, a Democrat, self-funded his failed campaign for governor $213 million, according to CalMatters. One week after polls closed, outlets called that former Fox News host Steve Hilton, a Republican backed by President Donald Trump, had edged out Steyer for the second spot in the November general election.

Former Biden-era Secretary of Health and Human Services Xavier Becerra clinched a runoff spot days earlier with a first-place finish in the all-party primary. Like Steyer, Becerra is a Democrat.

Steyer has spent the most a candidate has ever spent of their own money on a California gubernatorial campaign since digital campaign finance records were first recorded back in 1999, CalMatters reported. Former eBay CEO Meg Whitman set a record for personal wealth spent on a California gubernatorial campaign when she spent $140 million of her own money on her failed 2010 run.

During the 2026 midterms, candidates have spent more of their own personal fortune on campaigns across state and congressional offices than ever before, the outlet reported.

Steyer has a net worth of $2.4 billion, according to Forbes. He founded and ran Farallon Capital Management, a San Francisco-based hedge fund, for 26 years, before he sold his stake in 2012 and got involved in politics.

Steyer’s campaign emphasized around affordability, planning to lower the cost of housing and electricity in California. The climate activist planned to lower electricity costs by breaking utility company monopolies. He also cofounded an investing firm, Galvanize Climate Solutions, which promotes “energy transition.”

The billionaire’s campaign manager called him a “progressive changemaker” in a May press release. He had plans to “build 1 million homes over four years and fundamentally transform affordability” in California, according to his website.

Steyer was an unsuccessfully candidate for the Democratic presidential nomination in 2020.

In May, Steyer praised a biological male track and field athlete who took two girls’ state titles in 2025.

AUTHOR

Faith Miller

Contributor

RELATED ARTICLES:

COUNTING UNTIL THEY WIN: They Did it – Spencer Pratt OUT, Mamdani-Socialist Unknown Secures Spot in LA Mayoral Election

Mamdani-Backed Congress Candidate Defends Joining Oct. 8 Rally Celebrating Hamas Atrocities

Republican’s Bid To Succeed Newsom Hangs On By Thread With Race Called One Week After Election

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.


All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

Who Are the 13 Patriots Honored in Freedom Plaza?

With America’s 250th Independence Day less than a month away, President Donald Trump is honoring the heroes who fought to bring forth this great nation, erecting statues of the often-overlooked patriots in Washington, D.C.’s Freedom Plaza. The U.S. Department of the Interior (DOI) erected 13 statues last week, part of a temporary display commemorating the 250th anniversary of the signing of the Declaration of Independence. At the center of the display is a statue of Caesar Rodney, one of the signers of the declaration, surrounded by 12 Revolutionary War soldiers, ranging from freed slaves to physicians, from teenagers to retirees, from pastors to spies.

“Diverse as they were, what this eclectic group had in common was a strong patriotism and love for their country — a fierce patriotism that hated tyranny,” the DOI said in a statement announcing the display. “These stories reinvigorate the spirit of patriotism and sacrifice that gave birth to the most prosperous, most stable, and most benevolent nation in the history of the world. Although the names represented by these statues are largely unknown today, they have never been lost to history,” the statement continued. “These twelve heroes are waiting for a new generation to rediscover, appreciate, and be inspired by their courage, sacrifice, and faith.”

Who are the patriots commemorated in Freedom Plaza?

Caesar Rodney

Perhaps the best-known name on the list, Rodney was a Delaware lawyer and militia officer. Born in modern-day Kent County in Delaware, Rodney was the grandson of William Rodney, who accompanied William Penn to the colonies and represented Delaware politically in the early 18th century. When he was 18 years old, Rodney’s father, a wealthy plantation owner, died, and his son’s care and education were entrusted to Delaware Supreme Court Justice Nicholas Ridgely, who ensured that Rodney received a formal classical education.

Following in the footsteps of his deceased father and Ridgely, the young Rodney became involved in Delaware politics, serving as Kent County Sheriff, a judge in the colonial courts, and an officer in the Delaware militia during the French and Indian War. While Rodney showed interest in several Delaware women during his early adulthood, he soon withdrew from courtship altogether and remained a bachelor for the remainder of his life, likely due to a disease (believed to have been a form of skin cancer) that severely damaged the flesh of his face. Later in life, Rodney would wrap his head and face in bandages and handkerchiefs to cover up scarred skin and open sores.

At the time, Delaware was divided politically between the elitist, Anglican “Court Party” and the more populist “Country Party,” which eventually advocated for American independence, while the Court Party supported British rule. Despite his affluence, wealth, education, and Anglican faith, Rodney, along with his younger brother Thomas, aligned himself with the Country Party, a minority faction in Kent County. This set Rodney in opposition early on to George Read, a Court Party-affiliated Delaware representative in both the First and Second Continental Congresses. Read repeatedly advocated for reconciliation with Britain and initially opposed independence, but once the colonists decided to sever ties with Britain, Read exerted all of his intellectual and political prowess to help establish the United States of America.

Famously, when the Second Continental Congress was voting on the matter of independence, Read was opposed, while the only other Delaware representative present, Thomas McKean, was in favor. The deadlock would have kept Delaware from joining the cause and thus kept the decision for independence from being a unanimous one among the colonies. On July 2, 1776, Rodney was managing militia duties and fighting Loyalist rioters when he received word from McKean about the vote. Despite illness, Rodney quickly mounted a horse and rode through the night, through a thunderstorm, to cast the deciding vote in Philadelphia. He and McKean were joined by Read in signing the Declaration of Independence.

Throughout the Revolutionary War, Rodney served as a brigadier general in the Kent County militia and a major general in the Delaware militia, suppressing Loyalist rebellions and supplying George Washington with troops, weapons, munitions, supplies, and funding. Rodney and Washington became close friends and carried on a lengthy correspondence throughout the course of the war. Later, Rodney served as the wartime governor of Delaware. Following the war, he served as both a Delaware legislator and a Delaware Supreme Court justice, before passing away on June 26, 1784, at age 55. Rodney was beloved and honored by the people of Delaware, who named him Speaker of the Legislative Council in his final year of life. Even though he was bedridden from his cancer, fellow legislators gathered in his home to conduct their business and allow him to be a part of it.

Joseph Warren

Sometimes called the “forgotten Founding Father,” Warren was a Boston physician and a leader in the Massachusetts militia who gave his life fighting at Bunker Hill. Born in Massachusetts more than three decades before the Revolutionary War began, Warren studied medicine as a young man and soon became one of the colony’s best-known and most respected physicians. His patients included John Adams and his family and John Hancock and his family.

In the 1760s, amid the Stamp Act crisis, Warren emerged as a fierce advocate for American liberty, aligning himself with Hancock and Samuel Adams and organizing protests and demonstrations throughout Boston. He also authored the Suffolk Resolves in 1774, which proved to be critical in furthering the revolution, rallying patriots, and even influencing the Declaration of Independence. It was Warren who, as president of the Massachusetts Provincial Congress, sent Paul Revere on his notorious midnight ride.

At the age of 34, Warren led patriot militiamen against the British at Bunker Hill. Rallying his men, he was struck in the head by a British musket ball. As the British took the hill, they mutilated Warren’s body before hastily burying him. News of Warren’s death prompted Adams, then in Philadelphia, to lead the Continental Congress to form a Continental Army led by Washington.

Simon Knowles

One of the youngest soldiers of the Revolutionary War, Simon Knowles was only 15 years old when he signed up to fight in the Continental Army. Knowles’s father fought in the Battle of Bunker Hill, where he was critically wounded and later died of his injuries. A month later, the young Knowles joined a Massachusetts militia regiment and, shortly afterwards, the Continental Army to fight for the nation for which his father had given his life.

Knowles served through the remainder of the Revolutionary War, nearly eight years. He crossed the Delaware River with Washington, participated in the attack on Trenton, the Battle of Princeton, the Saratoga campaign, and the conclusive Battle of Yorktown. At the time, most terms of enlistment in the Continental Army were only one year long, while terms of enlistment in militias were generally only six months. Knowles continually reenlisted, until he finally achieved the goal for which his father had fought and died: winning the independence of the United States of America.

After the war, Knowles moved to what is today Northport, Maine, which had been part of Massachusetts until 1820. He married a young woman named Lydia, raised several children with her, and lived and worked as a farmer until his death in 1834. His descendants today include The Daily Wire podcast host and author Michael Knowles. His gravestone reads, simply, “Solider of the Revolution.”

Samuel Whittemore

While Knowles may have been among the youngest soldiers of the Revolution, Whittemore holds the distinction of being the oldest. At the age of 78, Whittemore signed up to fight in the Continental Army, becoming a Massachusetts military legend. In 1775, Whittemore ambushed a group of British grenadiers. Armed with a musket, pistol, and sword, he shot and killed three before charging the remaining troops with his sword. The British responded by shooting Whittemore in the face, stabbing his body with bayonets repeatedly (at least six times and as many as 14 times), and clubbing his head with the butts of their rifles. Miraculously, the 78-year-old patriot not only survived, but dragged himself to a doctor and proceeded to live for another nearly 20 years. Whittemore was 96 years old when he passed away in 1793.

While this story has earned the Continental Army’s oldest recruit status as a legend, Whittemore was active in support of the patriot cause long before the signing of the Declaration of Independence. A farmer and former British dragoon who had seen service in King George’s War and the French and Indian War, Whittemore was a Massachusetts politician and a vocal opponent of the Stamp Act who advocated that the colonial legislatures introduce viewing galleries in a bid to increase transparency — and hold accountable elected representatives who voted against the will of the people.

Whittemore was elected to multiple positions representing his town of Cambridge in Massachusetts politics, including being entrusted with authoring multiple letters to the British government and to the colonial leaders of other Massachusetts towns, negotiating with British authorities, and representing Cambridge at revolutionary conventions.

Caesar Glover

Kidnapped as a child in Africa and sold into slavery, Caesar Glover was purchased by John Miles in Marblehead, Massachusetts. Following Miles’s death, he was purchased by merchant Jonathan Glover, who allowed the enslaved Glover to enlist in the Continental Army, where he fought under his master, a captain, and the celebrated Colonel Henry Jackson. He left the Continental Army in 1778, after having served three years, and was awarded his freedom.

Glover settled in Boston, where he worked as a wharf laborer near Beacon Hill. He married a woman named Susannah Hill in 1801, and they had one daughter together before Hill died of tuberculosis in 1817. At the age of 76, unable to work and providing for his 48-year-old daughter, Glover applied for a soldier’s pension, which he was awarded and which sustained him through the remainder of his life. Glover passed away in 1822, having not only fought for America’s independence, but earned his own.

Jude Hall

Another enslaved patriot, Jude Hall, earned a reputation as one of the longest-serving black soldiers in the Continental Army. Likely born into slavery in New Hampshire, Hall enlisted with the Continental Army in 1775, fighting in the Battles of Bunker Hill, Ticonderoga, Trenton, Hubbardton, Saratoga, Monmouth, and more. Like Knowles, Hall reenlisted again and again, serving until 1783, when the Treaty of Paris officially ended the Revolutionary War.

Having won his freedom fighting, Hall returned to New Hampshire, built a home, married, and raised a family. Three of his sons, tragically, were kidnapped and sold into slavery in the largely British-controlled West Indies. Hall died in 1827, but left a legacy as a black patriot unwilling to die a slave. Three of his grandsons later fought in the Civil War.

James Armistead Lafayette

Born into slavery in Virginia, Armistead was 21 years old when, with his master’s encouragement, he became a spy for the Marquis de Lafayette. The young slave pretended to be a runaway in order to infiltrate British ranks. He relayed critical information to Lafayette regarding the treachery and movements of former Continental Army officer Benedict Arnold, who had defected to the British and was wreaking havoc on colonial Virginia. Having been taught by his master to read and write, Armistead became employed by the British as a courier and often overheard officers discussing plans, strategies, troop movements, and even the state of supplies or weaponry. All of this he reported back to the Continental Army.

Once Arnold was forced to flee Virginia, Armistead stayed behind to spy on Lord General Charles Cornwallis, delivering written reports to Lafayette and other officials with the Continental Army. Information collected and reported by Armistead proved crucial in the American victory at Yorktown, where Cornwallis admitted defeat and surrendered.

While a Virginia law granted freedom to slaves who had served in the Revolutionary War, it was amended to only extend freedom to those who had carried firearms, leaving Armistead still enslaved. However, his master lobbied the Virginia government to recognize the enslaved spy’s freedom, and Lafayette himself personally testified in support of Armistead’s liberty. Upon receiving his freedom, Armistead added “Lafayette” to his name, in honor of the French general. Twenty-seven years later, when Lafayette was touring the U.S. at the invitation of President James Monroe, he spotted his faithful spy in a crowd in Richmond. The French commander halted his carriage, leapt into the crowd, and rushed to embrace Armistead.

Armistead purchased land in Virginia and ran a farm with his wife and several children. He also purchased several slaves. There is some dispute over where — Virginia or Baltimore, Maryland — and when — 1830 or 1832 — Armistead died, but Virginia erected a historical marker at the site of the historic New Kent County courthouse honoring Armistead’s service.

Jack Sisson

A slave from Rhode Island, Jack Sisson was as devoted to the cause of freedom as the most ardent of colonial patriots. In 1777, Sisson volunteered to join the Rhode Island militia and Lieutenant Colonel William Barton’s daring raid on British-held Newport and aided in the capture of British Lieutenant General Richard Prescott, who was exchanged for the return of captured Continental Army General Charles Lee. Sisson served as the pilot for one of the boats used to reach Prescott’s residence and, upon reaching the British officer’s quarters, he used his head to smash the door open.

Sisson then joined the Continental Army and fought in several battles, including the Battle of Rhode Island and the Battle of Yorktown, and was awarded his freedom by the end of the war. Sisson’s heroics in the capture of Prescott led his fellow patriots to write songs in his honor. He died in 1821.

Peter Salem

Born into slavery in 1750 in Massachusetts, Salem was freed by his master prior to enlisting in the Continental Army. He first served in the local militia, where he fought at the Battles of Lexington and Concord and Bunker Hill. At the Battle of Bunker Hill, Salem was credited with killing British Major John Pitcairn, and he is depicted in the painting “The Death of General Warren at the Battle of Bunker’s Hill” by John Trumbull, who personally witnessed the battle. Salem continued fighting for the Continental Army until the war’s end, including fighting at the Battles of Saratoga and Stony Point.

Following the war, Salem returned to Massachusetts and settled in Leicester, where he worked as a cane weaver and received a military pension. He died in 1816.

Salem Poor

Also born into slavery in Massachusetts, Salem Poor purchased his own freedom in 1769 for £27 (the equivalent of roughly $8,600 today) and, six years later, joined the Massachusetts minutemen. He fought at Bunker Hill and is credited with killing British Lieutenant Colonel James Abercrombie. When patriot soldiers were forced to retreat, Poor was one of those who volunteered to cover the retreat, risking capture and death to ensure that his comrades escaped to safety. He was the only soldier present whom patriot officers singled out for commendation.

Poor continually reenlisted with the Continental Army, serving until 1780. He fought in the Battles of Saratoga and Monmouth and camped with Washington at Valley Forge. Following the war, Poor fell on financial difficulty, due at least in part to the debts of his second wife. He lived for a time in the Boston Almshouse and died in poverty in 1802, at the age of 55. In 1975, ahead of America’s bicentennial celebration, his likeness was included on a commemorative postage stamp.

Peter Muhlenberg

Born in Pennsylvania, Peter Muhlenberg was 30 years old when the Revolutionary War broke out. As a youth, Muhlenberg was sent to Germany for a classical education, including studying Latin. Back in colonial Pennsylvania, he served briefly in the British infantry and in the German dragoons, where he was nicknamed “Teufel Piet” (Devil Pete). He later studied at the Academy of Philadelphia (today the University of Pennsylvania) and was ordained a Lutheran minister in 1768. He moved to Virginia, where he was required to be ordained an Anglican cleric to preach, even though his congregation was Lutheran.

A member of Virginia’s House of Burgesses, Muhlenberg was made a colonel of the Continental Army’s Virginia Line once war began. He was the youngest commander in the Virginia Line and had less experience than any of the other seven colonels, with the exception of Patrick Henry. While preaching in his church in 1776, Muhlenberg read from Ecclesiastes:

“To every thing there is a season, and a time to every purpose under the heaven: A time to be born, and a time to die; a time to plant, and a time to pluck up that which is planted; A time to kill, and a time to heal; a time to break down, and a time to build up; A time to weep, and a time to laugh; a time to mourn, and a time to dance; A time to cast away stones, and a time to gather stones together; a time to embrace, and a time to refrain from embracing; A time to get, and a time to lose; a time to keep, and a time to cast away; A time to rend, and a time to sew; a time to keep silence, and a time to speak; A time to love, and a time to hate; a time of war, and a time of peace.”

Upon reading “a time of war, and a time of peace,” Muhlenberg is reported to have shed his clerical robe, revealing his colonel’s uniform beneath. “And this is the time of war,” he said, leaving his pulpit and walking down the aisle. He was followed by 162 men who enlisted in his regiment. Muhlenberg and his men first saw action in Georgia and South Carolina before joining Washington’s army in the north, whereupon Muhlenberg was promoted to the rank of brigadier general. Muhlenberg saw service in the Battles of Brandywine, Germantown, and Monmouth, after which he was assigned to train and lead militia units in Virginia. Muhlenberg also fought in the Battle of Yorktown under Lafayette. He was tasked with defending the Continental Army’s right flank and manning the two trenches the patriots used to move their artillery close enough to damage Cornwallis’s lines.

After the war ended, Muhlenberg settled again in Pennsylvania, where he was elected as Benjamin Franklin’s deputy in the Supreme Executive Council of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. He was also elected to the first and third U.S. Congresses as Pennsylvania’s at-large representative and was later elected to the fifth U.S. Congress. President Thomas Jefferson later appointed Muhlenberg the supervisor of revenue for Pennsylvania and customs collector for Philadelphia, a post he held until his death. The Lutheran minister, patriot soldier, and Pennsylvania politician died on his 61st birthday in 1807.

James Caldwell

Another preacher-turned-soldier, James Caldwell was born in Virginia in 1734, the youngest of seven children of Scots-Irish and French descent. After studying at the College of New Jersey (now known as Princeton University), Caldwell rejected the 500-acre farm he had inherited in favor of becoming a preacher. He led a Presbyterian congregation in Elizabethtown, New Jersey, before joining the New Jersey militia as a chaplain.

Caldwell was known as “the fighting parson” due to his vocal, active status as a patriot partisan. At the Battle of Springfield, when patriot troops ran out of wadding for their muskets, Caldwell famously handed them pages from an Isaac Watts hymnal, instructing the soldier, “Give ‘em Watts, boys!” In 1780, Loyalists burned down both his home and his church. British soldiers later shot and killed his wife Hannah, who was holding their three-year-old child, during the Battle of Connecticut Farms, while Caldwell was stationed with the Continental Army in Morristown, New Jersey. Less than two years later, Caldwell was shot and killed by James Morgan, a sentry in the Continental Army, when he refused to allow Morgan to inspect a package he was carrying. Morgan was hanged for murder, and it was alleged that he had been bribed by Loyalists to kill the vociferous chaplain. Caldwell’s nine orphaned children were raised by family friends.

Naphtali Daggett

An academic and educator, Naphtali Daggett nonetheless managed to give his life for his country. Born in Massachusetts in 1727, Daggett graduated from Yale College (now Yale University) at the age of 21 and became the pastor of a Presbyterian congregation in Smithtown, Long Island. Several years later, he was persuaded to return to Yale to assist Yale President Thomas Clapp. At the age of 29, Daggett became Yale’s first professor, the Livingstonian Professor of Divinity. When Clapp resigned in 1766, Daggett became president pro tempore of Yale, an office he held until 1777, when he returned to preaching.

British forces, led by New York’s royal governor General William Tryon, raided New Haven in 1779. Having torched several nearby Connecticut towns — namely, Danbury, Fairfield, and Norwalk — New Haven raised a militia, comprised predominantly of Yale students and led by Daggett, to defend the town. The professor and preacher led militiamen in firing upon the British, and managed to significantly delay their advance, but he was eventually left as the only survivor of the militia. Daggett mounted a horse and rode out to confront the approaching British, but was captured. When the British were dissatisfied with Daggett’s conscripted service as a guide to Connecticut, they stabbed him with bayonets and left him for dead. He survived, but died from his wounds the following year.

Independence Day 250

The brave heroes honored by the president in Freedom Plaza, more than 250 years after the Revolutionary War began, stand as a testament to the American spirit. Men like Rodney, Warren, and Daggett were influential intellectuals who boldly risked (and, in Warren’s and Daggett’s cases, gave up) their lives for love of their country. Their political and academic posts, their burgeoning careers and lucrative livelihoods meant nothing to them without liberty, without the opportunity to govern themselves independently of the British crown.

Knowles and Whittemore stand as proof that no one is too young or too old to love their country and to fight for the principles which he holds dear. Muhlenberg’s and Caldwell’s stories stand as a reminder to Christian leaders that being a good shepherd sometimes means fending off wolves when they come prowling. The lives of Glover, Hall, Armistead, Sisson, Salem, and Poor also confront the popular progressive narrative that America’s founders were racists, white elites fighting against invasive tax provisions. Instead, these patriots fought alongside their fellow Americans in support of the proposition that “all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”

AUTHOR

S.A. McCarthy

S.A. McCarthy serves as a news writer at The Washington Stand.

EDITORS NOTE: This Washington Stand column is republished with permission. All rights reserved. ©2026 Family Research Council.


The Washington Stand is Family Research Council’s outlet for news and commentary from a biblical worldview. The Washington Stand is based in Washington, D.C. and is published by FRC, whose mission is to advance faith, family, and freedom in public policy and the culture from a biblical worldview. We invite you to stand with us by partnering with FRC.

Fraud and Waste in America’s School Districts

Fraud in American public school districts is predominantly an internal issue, with 97% of cases involving trusted staff or volunteers rather than external hackers.  The most common method is cash theft (62% of cases), often skimmed from activity fees and fundraisers before records are created, while less frequent digital payment fraud accounts for the majority of total financial losses.

Common fraud schemes exploit weaknesses in procurement, payroll, and enrollment verification:

  • Asset Misappropriation: Includes “ghost employees” on payroll, time theft, and embezzlement via fraudulent expense reports or personal use of district credit cards.
  • Procurement Fraud: Involves bid rigging, shell companies invoicing for non-existent goods, and kickbacks where vendors pay officials to secure inflated contracts.
  • Enrollment Manipulation: Districts or individuals inflate student counts with “phantom enrollments” or falsify residency addresses to illegally secure higher state per-pupil funding.

Detection and consequences rely on annual independent audits and the separation of duties, yet significant gaps remain at the individual school level where oversight is often lax. Recent investigations highlight the scale of the problem, such as a 2025 NYC report identifying $2 million in fraud across 150 substantiated cases and the $400 million phantom enrollment scandal involving California charter schools. Beyond direct financial loss, fraud drains resources through costly external audits, staff replacements, and the erosion of community trust.

Education watchdog warns schools to watch for fraud as new year approaches

InvestigateTV — With the school year fast approaching, the U.S. Department of Education’s watchdog agency is issuing a warning: fraud in schools is real, costly, and often targets the nation’s most vulnerable students.

Assistant Inspector General of Investigations Jason Williams with the U.S. Department of Education’s Office of Inspector General (OIG) said federal education funds—intended for more than 100,000 schools across the country—are at risk of being misused or outright stolen.

“If they have access to funds, if there’s no separation of duties—people get greedy,” Williams said. “And then that’s when we find fraud.”

Williams said in many cases, the losses amount to millions of taxpayer dollars, often earmarked for children.

“These are elementary school kids. These are children with disabilities. These are our vocational rehab programs,” he said. “You’re taking that money away from them and they can’t use it for their education.”

He explained that oversight of federal funds varies among school districts.

“When you look at the controls that are in place, sometimes they’re lax,” he explained. “In some districts, you know, you have one person that’s also doing the purchasing but they’re also paying the credit card bill—and that’s what we call separation of duties. When these things aren’t in play, these things happen.”

Williams said warning signs can include duplicate invoices, missing equipment, lack of receipts or other documentation, and unusual vendor or purchasing activity.

Of the many fraud cases his office has investigated, Williams often recalls one particular case out of California.

“This particular district, 61 percent of their student population was eligible for Title 1, so it’s a very low-income district,” he shared. “He stole 16 million dollars over a number of years. He just pled guilty and he’s on his way to prison.”

Anyone that suspects fraud or theft in their school district should contact the OIG.

People can report fraud, waste or abuse to their hotline.

Largest Annual Spike in Public School Spending in Over 20 Years

Average U.S. public school spending per pupil in elementary and secondary schools rose 8.9% to $15,633 in fiscal year (FY) 2022 from the previous year, according to the U.S. Census Bureau’s most recent Annual Survey of School System Finances data.

All nine states in the Northeast region ranked in the top 14 for current per pupil spending and seven were in the top 10.

While statistics are not adjusted for inflation or cost-of-living differences, this change marks the largest year-to-year percentage increase in over two decades.

States with the highest per pupil spending:

    • New York ($29,873).
    • District of Columbia ($27,425).
    • New Jersey ($25,099).
    • Vermont ($24,608).
    • Connecticut ($24,453).

States with the lowest per pupil spending:

    • Utah ($9,552)
    • Idaho ($9,670).
    • Arizona ($10,315).
    • Oklahoma ($10,890).
    • Mississippi ($10,984).

All nine states in the Northeast region ranked in the top 14 for current per pupil spending and seven were in the top 10.

Sixteen of the 20 states with the lowest per pupil spending were in the South or West. Iowa, Missouri, Indiana and South Dakota were the remaining four states.

Among the nation’s 100 largest school systems by enrollment, the New York City School District in New York ($35,914) spent the most per pupil in FY 2022, followed by Washington Schools in the District of Columbia ($27,425); San Francisco Unified in California ($23,654); Atlanta School District in Georgia ($22,882); Los Angeles Unified in California ($21,940); and Detroit School District in Michigan ($21,771).

Federal Revenue Increased Significantly From FY 2021 to FY 2022

The New York City School District ($38.5 billion) and Los Angeles Unified ($12.5 billion) — both among the highest-spending districts — received the most combined federal, state and local revenue of the 100 largest school systems by enrollment.

New York City School District received 6.6% of its FY 2022 revenue­ from federal sources; 29.8% from state sources; and 63.6% from local sources. In contrast, Los Angeles Unified received 19.2% of its FY 2022 revenue from federal sources; 54.5% from state sources; and 26.3% from local sources.

The national average of revenue received from federal sources was 13.6%; 43.7% from state sources, and 42.7% from local sources. (Figure 1)

(This screenshot is part of a larger dashboard to be published April 25th at: How Did COVID-19 Affect School Finances? (census.gov))

Federal revenue increased 39.6% from FY 2021 to FY 2022 and 47.6% from FY 2020 to FY 2021. These increases were largely the result of the legislative response to COVID-19, such as the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act; Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act 2021 (CRRSA); and the American Rescue Plan (ARP) Act.

Food Services and Transportation Expenses Rebound

While Instructional Salaries ($266.4 billion) continued to account for the largest category in current spending nationwide, there was a significant increase from FY 2021 to FY 2022 in both Food Services and Transportation expenditures as schools returned to in-person learning.

The decrease in FY 2020 and FY 2021 from prior years was a direct cause of distance learning prompted by the COVID-19 pandemic (Figure 2).

This screenshot is part of a larger dashboard to be published April 25th at: How Did COVID-19 Affect School Finances? (census.gov))

AUTHOR

Kaylee Anesta

Kaylee Anesta is a survey statistician in the Census Bureau’s Education Finance Branch in the Economic Reimbursable Surveys Division.

The Bottom Line

The average cost of public education in the United States varies by metric and year, with recent data indicating significant spending per student.

National Averages

Per Pupil Spending: According to the U.S. Census Bureau, public school spending per student averaged $15,633 in fiscal year 2022, an 8.9% increase from the previous year.

Total Expenditures: The National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) reported that total expenditures for public elementary and secondary schools were $927 billion in 2020–21, amounting to an average of $18,614 per pupil.

Current Expenditures: Of the total per-pupil cost, $16,280 (87%) is allocated to current expenditures such as salaries, benefits, and supplies, while the remainder covers capital outlay and debt interest.

Variation by District Spending varies drastically between districts, with the highest-spending districts costing significantly more than the national average.

Rank District Spending Per Pupil
1 New York City Public Schools $28,828
2 Boston School District $27,793
3 Rochester City School District $24,832
4 New Rochelle City School District $24,542
5 Newburgh City School District $24,257

In contrast, some of the largest districts by enrollment, such as Miami-Dade County and Clark County, spend approximately $8,000 to $9,000 per student, though total budget figures often include non-instructional costs not directly attributable to per-pupil calculations.

Is it time to call for a state or federal audit of your school district?

©2026 . All rights reserved.

The 56 Signers of the Declaration of Independence

In a quick reading of my book “Our Forefathers Truly Appealed to Heaven,” I demonstrated how the founding, developing and the eventual birth of this exceptional nation was directed by God, not man.

The 56 who signed the Declaration of Independence each, when it was his time to step forward and append his signature, bowed his head in prayer at his desk. This simple yet profound act by each man was not some mere polite gesture to God, or nowadays photo-op to appear good and humble. This volunteer gesture was affirming a commitment to the principle that God ordained the establishment of this county, and it is He that must be the central plan for any government. How far we have slipped!

Each of the thirteen colonies sent their best men to Philadelphia, to the then called State House, we now know as Independence Hall. All 56 delegates to the Constitutional Convention were among the best and the brightest the colonies had to offer. All were financially successful, 24 were lawyers, 9 owned very large and productive plantations. On June 11th a committee was assigned to draw up the Declaration of Independence. The intent was clear — to tell the King of England the colonists had enough of his tyrannical rule, mandates and forced occupation of their houses by British Troops.

The 56 men of the convention did not participate in bigotry or demagoguery. All were committed to the cause of freedom, and all knew the very cost for the same. Thomas Jefferson wrote the Declaration for the small committee, and he finished it in 17 days from which the Continental Congress adopted it in July 1776.

King George was livid! He pronounced that ALL colonists who went along with this Declaration of Independence from England as traitors to the Crown, and punishment would be swift with public hanging. In part because of this threat, the names of all signers to the Declaration were kept silent for six months. Each of these men knew what was about to happen, but they pledged their sacred oath to uphold and preserve the words on the document they would sign. They further pledged prior to signing, their lives one for the other, their fortunes to keep this sacred document, and they pledged their personal honor. 56 men made this pledge openly in that room, one to another prior to taking the quill into their hand and placing ink to paper signing their full name. 56 men knew they were risking everything of value. They knew if they won their independence, they would still face years of struggle economically and socially. If they lost the war for independence, they knew they would face public hanging.

They each pledged their personal honor. They each pledged their fortune. They each pledged their sacred oath as gentlemen one to another. Think about that for a moment. What if today’s elected officials did likewise? What if today’s elected officials understood the privilege and the full personal cost to them individually to steer this nation in the right direction, not in the most politically prudent path but for the good of all in this nation? What if today’s elected officials pledged in writing and in speech openly to put aside self-interest in pursuit of national interest and gave permission to be held accountable if they altered? These 56 signers did just that. And what was the cost?

Carter Braxton of Virginia — a wealthy planter and farmer, also a merchant trader saw his ships at sea all sunk. To pay his debts, he lost his home and land and died in rags.

Thomas Lynch, Jr. — was a third-generation large rice plantation owner, socially respected. After signing the stress caused his health to fail, and he and his wife sailed to France so he could regain his health, but the ship sunk, and he and his wife were never heard from again.

Thomas McKean of Delaware — was so sought after by the British Army he had to leave his home and belongings, but then he had to move five times in five months staying ahead of being captured. He then served in the Continental Congress without pay while his family lived in poverty and in hiding.

Messrs. Ellery, Kilmer, Paul, Wynette, Walton, Hayward, Rutledge Middleton — each of these signers had their homes vandalized beyond repair, as well as their own lives and families.

Thomas Nelson, Jr. of Virginia — raised $2 million to pay the cost of our oldest ally, the French and their navy fleet so they could come to the colonies and help us. After the Revolution War, he paid ALL funds back which were given to him. His entire estate was depleted, and he was never reimbursed by our new government. This signer also pleaded with General Washington to fire upon his homestead to kill British General Cornwallis who had taken possession of his home. The home and property were destroyed.

Francis Hopkinson of New Jersey — had his home seized by the Hessians.

Francis Lewis — had his home and possessions destroyed. His wife was imprisoned where she died alone within a couple of months.

Richard Stockton — was captured and seriously beaten multiple times. His health was destroyed, and he died at 51. His estate was ransacked completely.

Thomas Hayward, Jr. — was captured when Charleston, Virginia fell to the British.

John Hart — barely escaped from his very ill and dying wife’s bedside. Their 13 children had to flee in all directions to keep from being captured. His farm and all his land were destroyed. He lived in caves and forests until after the Revolution War when he returned to his home only to find his wife dead, children gone, property and all possessions destroyed. He died only a few weeks later of exhaustion and a broken heart.

Lewis Morris — had a very similar experience as his friend and co-signer John Hart.

Phillip Livingston — died within a few months of the war due to the stress and hardships he experienced.

John Hancock — was one of the wealthiest men in all the colonies. He stood one night on the outskirts of Boston and pleaded to have Boston burn to destroy the British hold even though for this happen, Hancock said, “burning this beloved city to the ground will cause John Hancock to become a beggar, but it will serve the public good.”

Of the 56 signers, and besides what I have previously described, 5 were captured and tortured by the British, and several others were not long to survive. 12 had their homes from Rhode Island down to Charleston severely ransacked and burned; 2 signers lost their sons serving in the Continental Army. One signer had his son captured and beaten severely almost to death, and 9 other signers died in the war.

The 56 signers of the Declaration of Independence were successful men, not irresponsible, nor were they wild-eye fanatics or political tyrants, nor were they malcontents looking to gain power and position. These were men who found liberty far more important than political position or financial gain at the public’s expense. These were men who had flaws like all men and women. But these men placed service to their new nation just below their submission (cooperation) with God’s Word written in the Bible. In no other nation’s founding documents can we find so many declarations of allegiance to God. Where have men, and women, like these gone? They don’t seem to be around much anymore in public life. There are a few, to be sure, but they are greatly outnumbered by people with agendas our Forefathers would hardly recognize, and the 56 signers of the Declaration of Independence most sincerely would not recognize.

©2026 All rights reserved.


WEBSITE: arizonatoday.org

BOOK: Our Forefathers Truly Appealed to Heaven – Barnes N Noble, Amazon

Support joining me to distribute thoughtful commentary: https://arizonatoday.org/support-arizona-today/

Why Hamas-Linked CAIR Has a Problem with Memorial Day

Memorial Day, a federal holiday held the last Monday in May, is the nation’s foremost annual day to mourn and honor its deceased service men and women.[1]

The Hamas-linked Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIRR) has a problem with Memorial Day. There are instances of inattention to the actual date of Memorial Day, unopposed criticism of the U.S. military on Memorial Day by some CAIR officials, and years of apparent indifference to the Day itself. Consider the following:

When is Memorial Day?

On November 9, 2006, CAIR issued the following press release:

DC: MUSLIM VETERANS TO LAY MEMORIAL DAY WREATH. The Muslim American Veterans Association (MAVA) will conduct a wreath-laying ceremony at the Vietnam Memorial in Washington, Area 5 in Washington, D.C., on 11 November at 0700 A.M.[2]

November 11, 2006, was Veterans Day, honoring all U.S. military veterans, especially those still alive. CAIR apparently did not know the difference between Memorial Day and Veterans Day.

I could not find another mention of CAIR and Memorial Day until 2014.

Memorial Day 2014

On May 22, 2014, CAIR issued the following press release:

The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), the nation’s largest Muslim civil rights and advocacy organization, today marked the upcoming Memorial Day holiday with the release of a video featuring American Muslim veterans expressing pride in serving their nation through military service and sacrifice. In the 44-second video, three CAIR representatives describe their service in the Army and Navy:

“My name is Dawud Walid. I’m executive director of the Michigan chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations, or CAIR, and I served honorably in the Navy. “My name is Sakinah Mujahid. I’m on CAIR’s Minnesota board of advisors and I served 13 years in the Army. “My name is Wilfredo Ruiz. I am an attorney with CAIR’s Florida office and I am a former officer in the U.S. Navy. “American Muslims serve our nation’s military and have died for our freedoms.” 

The video ends with the tag line: “On this Memorial Day, CAIR honors all who served our country.”[3] So far so good.

However, on May 23, Zahra Billoo, the Executive Director of CAIR’s San Francisco Bay Area chapter, tweeted that she:

“struggles with Memorial Day each year. How does one balance being pretty staunchly anti-war while honoring those who died in the military”

She also quoted Dawud Walid, who said:

If one dies in an unjust war in which we illegally invaded and occupied a sovereign nation, should that person be honored?[4]

Billoo also retweeted “hateful anti-American comments” by Remi Kanazi, a Palestinian poet, writer, and political organizer.[5]

It was reported that:

CAIR-St. Louis Executive Director Faizan Syed came to her [Billoo’s] defense, retweeting a message claiming that the U.S. army “often murders innocent women and children.”[6]

Other CAIR officials had no criticism of any of these comments.

Memorial Day 2015

Billoo “again slandered the U.S. military and said servicemen often ‘murder’ innocent civilians.”[7] CAIR officials had no criticism of this.

Memorial Day 2016

Billoo stated “that she is ‘proud’ to stand by her inflammatory comments.”[8] Later that year Billoo equated the U.S. military with ISIS.[9] CAIR officials had no criticism of this.

Memorial Day 2017

This year CAIR took a different approach to Memorial Day. On May 26, 2017, CAIR

…released a video message marking Memorial Day from Gold Star father Khizr Khan in which he urges all Americans to “recommit ourselves to unity, liberty, justice, and finally – to an end to all wars.[10]

CAIR must have considered this video as compensation for previous Memorial Day issues placing CAIR in a poor light, and as a years-long pay-it-forward, because in an internet search I was unable to find any mention of CAIR and Memorial Day until 2025.

Memorial Day 2025

On May 27, 2025, one day after Memorial Day, CAIR posted an article titled, “Honoring Muslim American Veterans on Memorial Day.”[11] CAIR was reaching back into the archives, because this article had been written by Craig Considine for the Huffington Post on May 27, 2013.[12] Why would CAIR post a Memorial Day article one day after Memorial Day? Perhaps because Considine’s article started out, “On May 27th, Americans will celebrate Memorial Day…” and whoever posted the article didn’t realize that it had been written in 2013, when Memorial Day was on May 27th.

Memorial Day 2026

Instead of trying again in 2026, CAIR apparently decided to lay low and ignore Memorial Day. On Memorial Day, May 25, I went to the websites of the following CAIR organizations: CAIR (National), CAIR California, CAIR Chicago, CAIR Michigan, CAIR Minnesota, CAIR New York, and CAIR Texas. At each website I took screen shots of the various webpages, allowing some overlap to show continuity, to see if there was any mention of Memorial Day on any of these websites. There was no mention of Memorial Day on any of these websites. Those screen shots, listed by CAIR organization, are found in Appendix 1.[13]

I also checked the Facebook page posts for these CAIR organizations on and around May 25. There was no mention of Memorial Day.

Conclusion

Is Memorial Day important to CAIR? Is it even relevant to CAIR? From what we have seen, the answer to both questions is “No.” So, here are some things to think about.

In 1919, Theodore Roosevelt stated:

We should insist that if the immigrant who comes here does in good faith become an American and assimilates himself to us he shall be treated on an exact equality with every one else, for it is an outrage to discriminate against any such man because of creed or birth-place or origin. But this is predicated upon the man’s becoming in very fact an American and nothing but an American. If he tries to keep segregated with men of his own origin and separated from the rest of America, then he isn’t doing his part as an American. There can be no divided allegiance here. . . We have room for but one language here, and that is the English language, for we intend to see that the crucible turns our people out as Americans, of American nationality, and not as dwellers in a polyglot boarding-house; and we have room for but one soul loyalty, and that is loyalty to the American people. .[14]

CAIR touts itself as an organization representing Muslims in America. So, who are the Muslims CAIR is representing? Here are some considerations.

The majority of Muslims in the United States are not native-born Americans. A survey was taken between July 17, 2023, and March 4, 2024, and found that 59% of adult Muslims in the United States had been born outside the United States.[15]

Muslims in the United States are generally considered to be devout in their adherence to Islam, and the mosque is where they learn about their faith from imams. A 2020 study found some interesting facts about imams in the United States:

  1. Over half (55%) of imams had a BA, MA, or PhD in Islamic studies from an overseas university. Only approximately 6% of all imams had a degree in Islamic studies from an American university or institution.
  2. 68% of the imams were born abroad and 32% were born in the US. 78% of full-time paid imams were foreign born.
  3. Of those imams born abroad, almost half were from Arab countries, with Egypt being the origin of most Arab imams.[16]

So Muslims in the United States are going to mosques and learning their religion mostly from imams born outside the United States. And as I wrote about in an earlier article, there are some common themes being taught in those mosques:

  1. Hostility toward Israel and calls for its destruction;
  2. Hostility toward Jews and Christians and calls for their death;
  3. Great antipathy toward the United States;
  4. The lauding of designated foreign terrorist organizations and individual terrorists;
  5. Praise for the October 7, 2023, attack on Israeli civilians and the subsequent fighting by Hamas.[17]

And the doctrines of Islam are not compatible with the Judeo-Christian heritage of the United States. I wrote about this in a brochure titled Islamic Doctrine and Muslim Immigration to the United States.[18] I concluded:

How can Muslim immigrants assimilate into a society of non-Muslims toward which their religion teaches such hatred and violence, and the intent to destroy? The reality is that they can’t. That is why Muslims already in the United States seem to stay mainly socially separated from non-Muslim Americans. So, where does their “one sole loyalty” truly lay? As we can see above, it is not with Jewish and Christian Americans.

This is why CAIR has a problem with our Memorial Day.

AUTHOR

Dr. Stephen M. Kirby is the author of six books and numerous articles about Islam. His latest book is Islamic Doctrine versus the U.S. Constitution: The Dilemma for Muslim Public Officials.


REFERENCES

[1]           https://www.cem.va.gov/history/Memorial-Day-history.asp

[2]           https://www.cair.com/press_releases/dc-muslim-veterans-to-lay-memorial-day-wreath/

[3]           https://www.cair.com/press_releases/cair-marks-memorial-day-with-video-featuring-muslim-veterans/

[4]           Ryan Mauro, “CAIR Officials on Memorial Day: Do U.S. Troops Merit Honor?” Clarion Project, May 26, 2014, https://clarionproject.org/2014/05/26/cair-officials-memorial-day-do-us-troops-merit-honor/. Also see Fox News video, “Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) Officials Question Honoring U.S. Troops,” May 26, 2014, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=90Xcvdx59dE.

[5]           Jim Hoft, “CAIR Officials on Memorial Day: Do Fallen Troops Really Merit Honoring?”, Gateway Pundit, May 27, 2014, https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2014/05/cair-officials-on-memorial-day-do-fallen-troops-really-merit-honoring/.

[6]           Ryan Mauro, “CAIR Denounces US Military on Memorial Day,” Islamist Watch, May 27, 2015, https://www.meforum.org/islamist-watch/cair-denounces-us-military-on-memorial-day.

[7]           Ryan Mauro, “CAIR Official Stands By Memorial Day Criticism of US Troops,” Islamist Watch, May 29, 2016, https://www.meforum.org/islamist-watch/cair-official-stands-by-memorial-day-criticism.

[8]           Ibid.

[9]           https://canarymission.org/individual/Zahra_Billoo

[10]         https://www.cair.com/press_releases/cair-releases-memorial-day-video-from-gold-star-father-khizr-khan-urging-end-to-all-wars/

[11]         https://www.cair.com/american_muslim_news/honoring-muslim-american-veterans-on-memorial-day/

[12]         https://www.huffpost.com/entry/lets-honor-muslim-america_b_3339838

[13]         https://drive.google.com/file/d/1usnFzL7lYZ9LckA9ShELWNJB-yV-LcQU/view?usp=sharing

[14]         Immigrants – Assimilation ofhttps://www.theodoreroosevelt.org/content.aspx?page_id=22&club_id=991271&module_id=339518

[15]         https://www.statista.com/statistics/1493666/religious-background-of-us-immigrants/

[16]         Dr. Ihsan Bagby, The American Mosque 2020: Growing and Evolving, Report 1 of the US Mosque Survey 2020, June 2, 2020, https://ispu.org/report-1-mosque-survey-2020/.

[17]         Stephen M. Kirby, “What is Going On at Muslim American Mosques and Events?” Jihad Watch, March 10, 2025, https://jihadwatch.org/2025/03/what-is-going-on-at-muslim-american-mosques-and-events. I also wrote about what to do with the green card-holding imams preaching these themes: “Time for Some Green Card-Holding Muslim Leaders to be Deported,” Jihad Watch, March 19, 2025, https://jihadwatch.org/2025/03/time-for-some-green-card-holding-muslim-leaders-to-be-deported.

[18]         https://islamseries.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/islamic-doctrine-amd-muslim-immigration-to-the-united-states.pdf

EDITORS NOTE: This Jihad Watch column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

RINO TRAITORS: Senate Kills Voter ID Bill One Day After California Election Chaos

The Senate just voted down the SAVE America Act, blocking a measure that would have required voter ID and proof of citizenship for federal elections nationwide.

Let that sink in. Imagine, the day after Americans watched California’s primary results being dragged through yet another counting fiasco.

Republican NO votes: Tillis, Murkowski, McConnell, and Collins.

Washington keeps telling Americans to trust the system while refusing to adopt the most basic election safeguards supported by an overwhelming majority of voters. Public backing from polls showing 80%+ approval for voter ID.

That’s the real story.

The Senate voted 48-50 against waiving budget rules for Sen. Lindsey Graham’s amendment to add SAVE America Act provisions to an immigration funding bill, falling short of the 60 votes needed. The act requires documentary proof of U.S. citizenship like a birth certificate or passport for federal election registration, plus photo ID at polls and curbs on absentee voting. Public backing from polls showing 80%+ approval for voter ID. Sen. Mike Lee plans another attempt soon amid GOP divisions and midterm pressures.

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLE: California Faces Election Fraud Investigations Amid Major Vote Count Delays

RELATED VIDEO: Why is California still counting ballots?

POSTS ON X:

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

In Iran, a Reign of Terror

The reign of terror in the Islamic Republic of Iran deepens. Eighty percent of political prisoners executed in the world during the last year were from Iran. Anyone deemed an enemy of the state can be summarily executed without a trial. Ethnic minorities are targeted, too. So are homosexuals. And now the European Parliament  has called on Iran to end its executions and release political prisoners.

More on this reign of terror, and the ineffectual European efforts to end it, can be found here: “European Parliament Slams Iran Over Surge in Executions, Brutal Repression,” by Ailin Vilches Arguello, Algemeiner, May 21, 2026:

European lawmakers have stepped up pressure on Iran amid mounting alarm over the country’s human rights situation, marked by a surge in executions, mass arrests, and an intensifying security crackdown, warning of what they described as a growing campaign of repression.

On Thursday, the European Parliament in Strasbourg, France, adopted a resolution — 516 votes in favor, 14 against, 92 abstentions — calling on the Islamist regime to immediately halt executions, release political prisoners, and hold officials accountable for alleged human rights violations.

The newly adopted resolution also voiced deep concern over escalating pressure on women, civil society activists, and religious minorities, warning of a widening climate of intimidation, surveillance, and systematic restrictions on basic freedoms across the country….

Since March 17, at least 36 people have been executed in Iran on political charges.

Earlier this year, the Human Rights Activists News Agency (HRANA), an independent monitoring group, released a report outlining a deeply troubling human rights situation all across the country over the past 12 months, citing crackdowns on protesters, harassment of activists, threats to minorities, executions of children, violations of women’s rights, and dire prison conditions.

According to HRANA’s Statistics and Documentation Center, 78,907 people were arrested on ideological or political grounds from March 2025 to March 2026, highlighting a pervasive climate of repression across the country.

But the report warned that the number of arrests was likely much higher, given the difficulty of tracking such cases — especially earlier this year during recent nationwide anti-government protests, which security forces violently crushed, leaving thousands of demonstrators tortured or killed.

HRANA reported in February that over 7,000 protesters, including hundreds of children, were killed during the protests, with an additional nearly 12,000 cases still under verification. Multiple reports have put the death toll at over 30,000, and US President Donald Trump claimed the figure was over 40,000….

The larger figure, of over 40,000 killed on Jan. 8 and 9, comes from Iran International, a well-informed  group of Iranians in exile who base that number on reports from inside Iran.

On women’s rights, HRANA reported that 105 women were murdered, including seven so-called “honor killings” — murders committed under the pretext of preserving family honor — and documents 68 cases of rape or sexual abuse.

Some women have been killed, such as Mahsa Amini, simply for not wearing their hijabs correctly. Other women have been killed for such “crimes” against the family honor as being out with an unrelated male.

Members of the ethnic minorities, like the Kurds and Azeris, can also be killed for supposedly posing a threat to rule by the dominant Persians. Political dissidents deserve death as they are a threat to the regime. Homosexuals are hung for their crimes against nature.

The fanatics in Iran will not stop. They are determined to crush any conceivable dissent, and to strictly enforce the Sharia. The European Parliament’s denunciation is sloughed off in Tehran. The only way to end the reign of terror is to change the regime, as the Israelis had initially insisted must be done. But Trump has decided that that is no longer one of his war aims; he will be content if he can obtain a guarantee from Iran to give up its 440 kg. of uranium enriched to a just-below weapons-grade level of 60%. Still worse, he has cut Israel out of the negotiations. Meanwhile, the miserable people of Iran will have to endure their torment, until that moment when the economic collapse of the country becomes so severe that millions of Iranians will again take to the streets, and this time their numbers will overwhelm those of the Basij and the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps who are sent out to crush them.

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLES:

Iran, Russia Sign $25 Billion Nuclear Cooperation Deal

Islamic Republic of Iran foreign minister: ‘This war will end only when it ends in Lebanon as well’

Israel’s Former UN Ambassador: Replace UN With a League of Democracies

UK: Record 467 Muslim councillors elected across England in recent local elections

Houston: Muslim uses fake boarding pass to get past TSA and onto Los Angeles-bound flight

RELATED VIDEO: IRGC Chief Hossein Salami just issued another threat against the United States

EDITORS NOTE: This Jihad Watch column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

America’s Founding Fathers: A Legacy of Service

As our nation celebrates its birth next month, I want to recognize the legacy of our Founding Father, General George Washington, who fought the battles for freedom on his knees in prayer to our Almighty Heavenly Father.

The legacy of our nation’s fathers and their service truly began with the Founding Fathers of our country. When I reflect on the journey of faith and leadership, I think of what our first President of the United States sought to achieve through independence, liberty, and freedom. These enduring principles formed the foundation of our nation, and today, our leaders remain entrusted with defending them on the battlefield of freedom.

General George Washington’s steadfast faith and leadership helped shape a nation founded on sacrifice, conviction, and trust in God. His example as both general of the Army and then president of the United States reminds us that true leadership is built upon character, courage, and unwavering purpose.

Recognizing the life of George Washington, our nation’s first president, and his powerful faith, which led to freedom, the following can be told from the best-selling author, Ron Chernow, in his book titled “Washington, A Life.”

“During the French and Indian War, Col. Washington had 4 bullets through his coat and 2 horses shot from under him and yet escaped unhurt. The heroic youth was being groomed by God for higher things, for some important service to his country.

“With a sovereign faith in leadership by example, Washington believed that courage and cowardice originated from the top of an army.

“On July 2, 1776, Washington tried to rouse his men with impassioned words. ‘The time is now near at hand which must probably determine whether Americans are to be free men or slaves… The fate of unborn millions will now depend, under God, on the courage of this army.’

“He made Solomon-like solutions, making him the first chief executive a dozen years before he was officially elected to the post.

“At Valley Forge, PA, Washington addressed the ‘essential rights and liberties of the present generation and of millions yet unborn.’ General and then President Washington was continually concerned about the ‘generations yet to come.’

“Washington’s job as commander in chief was much a political as a military task, and he performed it brilliantly, functioning as de facto president of the country. His stewardship of the army had been a masterly exercise in nation building. In defining the culture of the Continental Army, he had helped to mold the very character of the country. In the end, he had managed to foil the best professional generals that a chastened Great Britain could throw at him.

“An American planter was chosen by us to command our troops and continued during the whole war. This man sent home to you, one after another, five of your best generals, baffled, their heads bare of laurels, disgraced even in the opinion of their employers.

“After taking the oath at the first inauguration, Washington, with devout fervency, in reverential manner, bowed down and kissed the Bible, adding ‘So help me God.’

“The fact remains that the ‘Almighty Being’ had overseen America’s birth. ‘No people can be bound to acknowledge and adore the invisible hand, which conducts the affairs of men, more than the people of the United States.’

“Just as Washington had proved at the end of the war that he did not lust for power, so his departure from the presidency elevated his moral standing in the world.”

George Washington proved that our nation’s strongest trailblazers also bowed their heads in reverence and humility to God. It is paramount that today’s leaders learn from the leaders of our past.

With this, I am reminded of the powerful hymn that was written during the Civil War and is still used today, “The Battle Hymn of the Republic,” and the lyrics “Mine eyes have seen the glory of the coming of the Lord; He is trampling out the vintage where the grapes of wrath are stored; He hath loosed the fateful lightning of His terrible swift sword: His truth is marching on.”

These powerful words not only ring true yesterday, but they also remain true now and will continue to ring true forever. They serve as a powerful reminder that the faithful fathers of this nation have always led on the battlefield of freedom, the battlefield of faith, and the battlefield of family.

Honoring our nation’s heritage does not just mean respecting those who came before us. It also provides a roadmap for future generations.

Having watched my grandfather and my father-in-law, the love of God and the love of service continue to leave a lasting legacy today. My grandfather told stories about his service in the United States Army during World War II, and my father-in-law told stories of service in the United States Marine Corps during the Vietnam War era, an era in U.S. history that was not regarded or respected by the American people for service in a war that was dismissed and unwelcome.

My grandfather finished his furlough and reported to a center in Washington, D.C., where he was processed and prepared to deploy overseas. From there, he traveled to New York, where he was, with very little ceremony, herded aboard a troop transport, a “Liberty Ship.”

Down in the hold of the ship, he made ready, as best he could, for the trip to Europe. He was classed as one of the “replacements.” That meant he was to fill the ranks made vacant by the wounded and dead. His hammock was in a tier of four or five. He was somewhere in between, with one hammock above and two below. He had just enough room to swing himself and his duffel bag in under the one above. They were too crowded to turn over. The hold, built originally to haul other commodities, was filled to capacity with American GIs. The whistle sounded, and they felt the ship quiver as it pulled away from the dock. Up on deck, as they watched the New York City skyline slowly disappear over the horizon, a lonely feeling settled over them. They settled down, sprawling on the deck wherever they could find a place, and, at dusk, made their way, one by one, below to the hammocks in the hold which would be “home” for the next 14 days.

After arriving in Europe, my grandfather wandered through town looking for his half-track and something to eat. Finally, he found it parked along the street, but the driver was nowhere to be seen. He hunted down a “K” ration, debated a moment whether he should sit in the half-track and eat it and then catch a catnap among the blankets that were strewn all over the floor, or whether he should hunt down the driver. He decided upon the latter course.

After looking in several houses, he found the driver asleep on a bed in one of the bedrooms of a brick house. After recounting to him the escapades of the squad since they left him, he ate a bite and flopped on another bed in another room. Before long, they were rudely interrupted by an explosion just outside the house, which shook the house and sent him sprawling on the floor. After regaining composure, my grandfather crept to the window and peeked out. In the street sat the half-track, split almost in two. The shell that landed on the vehicle had lit in the driver’s seat on fire and all but demolished the vehicle. As it was examined closer later, he shuddered to think what he would have looked like if he had followed his first inclination to take a nap there. The steel armor plating on the sides of the machine was peppered with shrapnel holes, and the blankets where he would have been lying were torn to shreds.

This is just one of untold many instances where service men and women were faced with death and harm during World War II but escaped by the hand of God’s Providence.

The stories that bound our country together in the past must now be remembered and retold to bring unity once again.

Today, America faces division within our homes, workplaces, communities, and even our churches. We are searching for leaders who will not compromise truth for popularity. We are searching for fathers this Father’s Day who will boldly lead their families, defend their faith, and instill a love for the red, white, and blue.

Yet that generation of steadfast leadership is becoming increasingly rare. As many of our friends who served on the frontlines of Iraq and Afghanistan came home to their families and their children, however, many did not return home from the battlefields, and it is our duty to carry their stories, their legacy, and their hope for a better future for their children. As we raise our children, let us raise the American flag and remember their footsteps so their sacrifice will never be in vain. It is our duty to carry their stories, their legacy, and their hope for a better future for their children.

Now more than ever, our nation needs faithful fathers, courageous leaders, and patriots willing to stand firm for faith, family, and freedom. The legacy they leave behind will shape the future of this nation for generations to come.

Eden Gordon Hill is founder and owner of Eden Gordon Media, LLC, as well as a weekend radio host at WMAL’s “The All-American Book Club,” veteran spouse, former Trump appointee, and advocate for faith, family, and freedom.

James E. Gordon, of Oxford, Pa., is a former local elected official and historian.

AUTHORS

Eden Gordon Hill and James E. Gordon

EDITORS NOTE: This Washington Stand column is republished with permission. All rights reserved. ©2026 Family Research Council.


The Washington Stand is Family Research Council’s outlet for news and commentary from a biblical worldview. The Washington Stand is based in Washington, D.C. and is published by FRC, whose mission is to advance faith, family, and freedom in public policy and the culture from a biblical worldview. We invite you to stand with us by partnering with FRC.

CHEATING IN CALIFORNIA: Dems Trying to Steal Election Results, Percentage Counted Drops, Democrat Ballot Dump Changes Race, Trump Announces Investigation

This morning, CA was at 58% counted

15 hours later… now it’s 56% counted

The percentage of votes counted actually fell over a 15-hour period as newly reported mail ballots heavily favored Democrats, prompting President

Trump to announces a federal investigation into the prolonged counting process.

President Trump is monitoring the situation in California.

A late mail-in ballot drop just came in and Republicans LOST it by a LOT, and the total votes remaining to count WENT UP

CALIFORNIA IS INSANE

California Gov ballot drop, LA, per VoteHub:

🔵 Xavier Becerra: 26,434 (35.4%)
🔵 Tom Steyer: 22,025 (29.5%)
🔴 Steve Hilton: 12,759 (17.1%)
🔴 Chad Bianco: 3,449 (4.6%)

Only 55% COUNTED per NBC

California elections are a DISGRACE!

Becerra is moving toward taking 1st place over Hilton (R), while Steyer also gains

Governor Ron DeSantis: California keeps dumping votes. Odds are shifting because the vote dumps always seem to go one way.

Count until you get the result you want?

At 1:05 AM President announced the U.S. Attorney’s office in LA is looking into why it is taking so long/delayed to count votes.

In a post on Truth Social, Trump attacked the Democrats and accused them of trying to “STEAL” the two races “AWAY FROM TWO GREAT REPUBLICAN CANDIDATES.”

In a follow-up post, Trump again accused the Democrats—derisively calling them “Dumocrats”—of “BIG cheating” and claimed votes were “all tied up,” and results may not be in “for weeks.”

The President then said that the voting process is “under investigation” by the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Los Angeles.

Trump claims Dems ‘trying to steal’ California primaries, launches probe into sluggish vote counts

By Chris Bradford, NY Post, June 4, 2026:

President Trump claimed the Democrats are “trying to steal” the California gubernatorial and the Los Angeles mayoral primaries – and launched a probe into the state’s sluggish vote count.

Trump fumed Thursday over how votes in California are trickling in two days after polls closed – and the results of the elections may not be known for several weeks due to the vast amount of mail-in ballots that need to be processed.

“The Dumocrats are at it again,” Trump raged on Truth Social.

“They are trying to STEAL THE GOVERNOR OF CALIFORNIA PRIMARY, AND THE MAYOR OF LOS ANGELES, PRIMARY, AWAY FROM TWO GREAT REPUBLICAN CANDIDATES. Here we go with the very late and massive numbers of MAIL IN BALLOTS.”

California’s vote count often stretches beyond Election Day because officials must verify signatures, process millions of vote-by-mail ballots, and conduct required audits before certifying results.

State law gives county election officials up to 30 days after an election to complete the official canvass, count every valid ballot, and perform post-election checks to ensure accuracy.

Results started trickling in shortly after polls closed Tuesday, but those numbers can change as additional ballots are processed.

Early in-person votes and mail-in ballots that came in during the first weeks of voting will be released as the state’s initial results.

Because California accepts vote-by-mail ballots that can be postmarked by Election Day and received later, final results in close races may not be known for days or even weeks.

Only 56% of the vote has been counted statewide in California — and Steve Hilton, a former aide to ex-British Prime Minister David Cameron, leads the way.

The top two candidates, irrespective of party, will progress and face off against each other in November’s general election.

A social media post from Donald J. Trump alleging election cheating by Democrats in California and that vote counting is under investigation.

Trump accused the Democrats of cheating in a fiery Truth Social post.

Hilton has received 27.6% of the vote and has a two percentage point lead over Democrat Xavier Becerra.

Billionaire Tom Steyer, founder of the San Francisco hedge fund Farallon Capital, is trailing in third place — despite pumping in $215 million of his own cash into the race.

Hilton, who has been endorsed by Trump, has said California has lost its way under Democratic leadership as he bids to become the state’s first Republican governor in 15 years.

But he faces an uphill task if he makes it to the general election as Democrats make up 45% of registered voters compared to Republicans’ 25%.

Los Angeles Mayoral candidate Spencer Pratt speaks to the media outside Don Antonio’s restaurant.

He is pledging to lower prices on everything from gas to housing, reduce income taxes, create a loan program for first-time homebuyers, and freeze in-state tuition at public colleges.

Meanwhile, ex-reality TV star Spencer Pratt is still waiting to find out if he will progress to November’s mayoral election in Los Angeles.

Incumbent Karen Bass will be on the ballot, having qualified for the run-off, but Pratt is currently in second place on 29.9% of the vote.

He is ahead of progressive Democrat Nithya Raman — who is currently on 22.8%.

Far-left candidate Raman sobbed during an impassioned speech Tuesday but she could end up in the run-off if a large trove of progressive mail-in ballots swing towards her.

“Don’t count Nithya Raman out yet,” Zev Yaroslavsky, the director of the Los Angeles Initiative at UCLA Luskin, told the Los Angeles Times.

“Pratt has an edge … but it’s not free from doubt at this point.”

Trump’s opposition to mail-in voting is well-documented. Last August, he wrote, “ELECTIONS CAN NEVER BE HONEST WITH MAIL IN BALLOTS/VOTING.”

“I am going to lead a movement to get rid of MAIL-IN BALLOTS,” he said.

Ahead of the 2020 election, Trump claimed “universal mail-in voting” would lead to the most “INACCURATE & FRAUDULENT Election in history.”

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLE: California’s Slow Roll Vote-Counting Is an Outrage

POSTS ON X:

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Over 870,000 Inactive Voters on the Rolls in California

New York Post: The layers and layers of corruption in the Golden State make it difficult to see how things could get better. This lawsuit starts in Orange County: Orange County Supervisor Don Wagner, the Republican candidate for secretary of state, joined the American Independent Party of California in suing incumbent Secretary of State Shirley Weber, alleging that 873,092 inactive voter registrations are still on the rolls. The complaint, filed through conservative voting watchdog organization Judicial Watch, claimed the Democrat Weber is in violation of federal law that requires most inactive voter registrations to be removed after two general federal elections. Instead, more than 800,000 registrations have remained inactive and on the rolls for at least three elections — with 151,202 on the rolls after at least four consecutive elections, the suit claims. The lawsuit also alleges that the state takes no effective action to require counties to fix the issue, citing admissions by California officials.

Judicial Watch: “Judicial Watch’s federal lawsuit confirms California has a dirty voting rolls crisis – with thousands of old names on the rolls going back at least 10 years,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “Dirty voting rolls can mean dirty elections. And California and its counties must take immediate steps to clean the over 870,000 dirty names on the voting lists”.

California is slowly counting the votes in its closely watched June 2 gubernatorial contest, with results showing Republican Steve Hilton and Democrat Xavier Becerra at the top of the heap. But we know how these things roll.

With roughly half of the votes counted by 2 am ET on June 3, Hilton, a former Fox News host endorsed by Trump, stood in first with about 27%, followed by Becerra, a former Biden administration official, holding roughly 26%.

Bombshell lawsuit exposes 873,000 ‘ghost’ voters in California

By Titus Wu, NY Post,June 2, 2026:

As voters hit the polls Tuesday to make their picks in this year’s primary races, a fresh lawsuit against California’s secretary of state is calling into question whether hundreds of thousands of unqualified voters are still eligible to head to the ballot box.

Orange County Supervisor Don Wagner, the Republican candidate for secretary of state, joined the American Independent Party of California in suing incumbent Secretary of State Shirley Weber, alleging that 873,092 inactive voter registrations are still on the rolls.

The complaint, filed through conservative voting watchdog organization Judicial Watch, claimed the Democrat Weber is in violation of federal law that requires most inactive voter registrations to be removed after two general federal elections.

Instead, more than 800,000 registrations have remained inactive and on the rolls for at least three elections — with 151,202 on the rolls after at least four consecutive elections, the suit claims.

The lawsuit also alleges that the state takes no effective action to require counties to fix the issue, citing admissions by California officials.

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLES:

Hilton, Pratt Lead California Races, June 2 Primary Takeaways

Pratt on Track for LA Mayor Showdown With Bass

Dem Senator Insists Party Hasn’t Gone Far Enough Left In Desperate Grab For Relevance

RELATED VIDEOS:

Victor Davis Hanson: Trouble in Paradise…Newsom’s California ‘Experiment’

Hakeem Jeffries: Either MAGA extremists are going to break the country or we’re going to break them. And our goal is to break them.

POSTS ON X:

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. All rights reserved.

California, Iowa, N.J. Primary Results Show Trump Hold on GOP Still Strong, Dems Still in Disarray

November’s rapidly approaching elections will decide which party controls Congress, as well as determining who holds consequential governorships and mayoralties. On Tuesday, the American people drew one step nearer to November’s showdown, casting their ballots in primary elections in California, Iowa, Montana, New Jersey, New Mexico, and South Dakota.

President Donald Trump has exerted sweeping influence over the GOP primaries this year, with his endorsements toppling incumbent U.S. senators with decades of congressional experience — Senators Bill Cassidy (R-La.) or John Cornyn (R-Texas), for example — and high-profile congressmen who have weathered contentious primary challenges in the past, like Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.). Tuesday night demonstrated that the president’s sway over the Republican Party is still strong, but not absolute: one candidate he endorsed lost his primary.

Here are the most notable results from this week’s primary races.

California

Golden State residents cast their ballots Tuesday in a contentious jungle primary to choose California’s next governor. While Democrat Xavier Becerra, the radically pro-abortion U.S. Health Secretary under former President Joe Biden, has been considered the favorite to win, he is so far stuck in second place, trailing Trump-endorsed Republican Party strategist Steve Hilton.

With roughly 60% of votes counted as of Wednesday morning, Hilton is in the lead with 27.8% (1,386,083 votes), followed by Becerra at 25.4% (1,266,483 votes). Democrat billionaire Tom Steyer (19.6% or 978,654 votes) and Republican law enforcement official Chad Bianco (11.3% or 565,655 votes) are unlikely to proceed to the final election, while former Rep. Katie Porter (D-Calif.) has been safely eliminated from the running, garnering less than 5% of the vote. With more than 40% of the vote yet to be counted, no two candidates have formally advanced to the next round of voting.

Another California race that has captured national headlines is the primary for the Los Angeles mayoral election, where Trump-aligned Republican and former reality television star Spencer Pratt is challenging both incumbent Mayor Karen Bass (D) and her openly-socialist protégé, city councilwoman Nithya Raman. Bass, who has roundly been faulted for the city’s incompetent failure to respond to the Palisades fires last year, which destroyed the homes of many Los Angeles-area residents, including Pratt, will be advancing to the final round of voting, having scored more than one third (34.8%) of the vote so far, although less than two thirds (63.1%) of the votes cast have been counted. Pratt is close behind with just over 30% of the vote, leading Raman by more than eight points.

Iowa

Senator Joni Ernst (R-Iowa) announced last year that she would not seek reelection in 2026, opening the field for Republicans to fight for her soon-to-be vacant Senate seat. Armed with a Trump endorsement, Rep. Ashley Hinson (R-Iowa) handily won the Republican primary to succeed Ernst, and will face Democratic state senator Josh Turek in November. The GOP contest for the governor’s mansion, however, proved more surprising. Local farmer and businessman Zach Lahn won the nomination on an “Iowa First” campaign, narrowly defeating Trump-endorsed Rep. Randy Feenstra (R-Iowa). Lahn won the nomination with a lead of fewer than 1,700 votes.

New Jersey

Garden State Republicans conducted a robust primary race to settle on a challenger to face Senator Cory Booker (D-N.J.) in November. Former deputy mayor of Tabernacle township Justin Murphy won the nomination, defeating physician Robert Lebovics, State Trooper Richard Tabor, and former journalist Alex Zdan. Despite raising more than $100,000 in campaign funding — and spending nearly $78,000 — Lebovics placed fourth in the race, securing just over 10% of the vote.

A Democratic primary to find a replacement for outgoing Rep. Bonnie Watson Coleman (D-N.J.) settled on a candidate who has been linked to Islamist extremist organizations, including al-Qaeda. Adam Hamawy, born in Egypt, was endorsed by far-left Reps. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.), Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.), Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.), and openly-socialist Senator Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.).

According to the New York Post, Hamawy volunteered with the Benevolence International Foundation in Bosnia, which has been linked to al-Qaeda and terrorist Osama Bin Laden. Hamawy also developed and maintained a lengthy friendship with the “Blind Sheik,” Islamic leader Omar Abdel-Rahman. When Abdel-Rahman was put on trial for conspiracy after his followers bombed the World Trade Center in 1993, Hamawy defended the Islamic leader in court, under oath. Abdel-Rahman was convicted and died in federal prison.

AUTHOR

S.A. McCarthy

S.A. McCarthy serves as a news writer at The Washington Stand.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Dem Senator Insists Party Hasn’t Gone Far Enough Left In Desperate Grab For Relevance

Christian Family Fled Communism for America, Killed in Crash by Allegedly Unqualified Bus Driver

Growing Israel-Hezbollah Conflict Complicates U.S.-Iran Negotiations

Dem Senator Insists Party Hasn’t Gone Far Enough Left In Desperate Grab For Relevance

RELATED VIDEO: Hilton on Hannity: We can do ‘amazingly well’ if we have ‘common sense

EDITORS NOTE: This Washington Stand column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved. ©2026 Family Research Council.


The Washington Stand is Family Research Council’s outlet for news and commentary from a biblical worldview. The Washington Stand is based in Washington, D.C. and is published by FRC, whose mission is to advance faith, family, and freedom in public policy and the culture from a biblical worldview. We invite you to stand with us by partnering with FRC.

Test Yourself: 10 Questions About America’s Spiritual Roots

How well do you think you know the Judeo-Christian roots of our nation? 

About 25 years ago, for the first time, I met author/speaker William J. (Bill) Federer, who knows them very well. I have interviewed him multiple times since. Bill is the author of the classic book, America’s God and Country, which contains quotes from the settlers and founders of America, documenting beyond a reasonable doubt that this nation was uniquely shaped by the Bible.

The first time we met, we got into a long discussion, marveling at how the more you dig into our nation’s history, the greater you see the role of the Scriptures in helping with the creation of the nation. Our convictions on same have only grown stronger.

The facts of America’s Christian heritage—a few of which I plan to marshal in this particular column (and perhaps later ones) in honor of America at 250—are just the tip of the iceberg.

In 2014, the Supreme Court grappled with an issue: If a town opened up with prayer (a long-standing American tradition), was it OK if they prayed in the name of Jesus? A majority of the court (not reliably conservative in those days) answered, “Yes.” One source of their reasoning came from Bill’s book.

The case is Greece v. Galloway, 2014, in which the Supreme Court wrote: “The first prayer delivered to the Continental Congress by the Rev. Jacob Duché on Sept. 7, 1774, provides an example: “….All this we ask in the name and through the merits of Jesus Christ, Thy Son and our Saviour, Amen.” W. Federer, America’s God and Country 137 (2000).”

How well do you know anything about our nation’s Christian roots? See if you can get any of these correct.

 

  1. When the settlers of various northern colonies created a joint document in 1643, the New England Confederation, what did they say was the purpose of all their settlements?
  2. The document states, “…we all came into these parts of America with one and the same end and aim, namely, to advance the Kingdom of our Lord Jesus Christ and to enjoy the liberties of the Gospel in purity with peace.”

 

  1. Who said that the founders achieved independence upon “the general principles of Christianity”?
  2. John Adams said this in a letter to Thomas Jefferson, June 28, 1813.

 

  1. Where in the Constitution is the phrase, “the separation of church and state”?
  2. Those words are not in the Constitution, which says in the First Amendment, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.”

 

  1. What is the source of the phrase “the separation of church and state”?
  2. A private letter that President Thomas Jefferson wrote to the Baptists of Danbury, Connecticut, January 1, 1802. The Supreme Court used that letter in 1947 (in Everson v. Board of Education) to interpret the Constitutional phrase of no “establishment of religion.”

 

  1. How does Thomas Jefferson end his letter to the Danbury Baptists of 1802, which gave us the phrase, “the separation of church and state”?
  2. He asks them to pray to God for him, and he promises to pray to God for them. If the “separation of church and state” absolutists were correct, the source of the phrase violates “the separation of church and state.”

 

  1. Who was Los Angeles reportedly named after?
  2. Mary, the Mother of Jesus. The original name of this Catholic mission was “The Town of Our Lady the Queen of the Angels of the Porciúncula River.” Los Angeles means “the angels.”

 

  1. All of the Ivy League schools but one were founded by Christians for Christian purposes. Name the one.
  2. Cornell was founded in the 1840s (with no explicit Christian purpose). By the time Cornell was created, Harvard had been operating (Christianly) for 200 years.

 

  1. What did George Washington do after he took the oath of office with an open Bible?
  2. He leaned over and kissed the holy book.

 

  1. What was the Christian denomination of the majority of the members of the Constitutional Convention?
  2. Author John Eidsmoe says that 27 of the 55 men were members of the Church of England or the Anglican Church (at a time when the denomination was faithful to core Christian doctrines).

 

  1. Which of the original 13 colonies said in its charter of 1632 that its Catholic founder was animated with “a laudable, and pious Zeal for extending the Christian Religion”?
  2. The Charter of Maryland.

 

And on it goes. All of these questions and answers show just a small taste of how important Christianity was to the founding of this country. No wonder President Andrew Jackson once remarked: the Bible is “the rock on which this republic rests.”

©2026 All rights reserved.

RELATED VIDEO: Does the Revolution still matter?