Tag Archive for: freedom of information act

Government Data Shows Federal Agencies Take Years to Respond to ‘Simple’ Information Requests

Citizens filing simple information requests to a key Department of Commerce office must wait on average 836 days — more than two years — before getting responses, and there is no guarantee that what is provided by the government’s reply will be complete or credible, according to a new report based on federal data.

The report is being published July 17 by Open the Books (OTB), the Illinois-based non-profit government transparency watchdog, using data compiled by foia.gov. An advance copy of the report was obtained by The Washington Stand.

The average response time for simple requests of 836 days was compiled by the Commerce Department’s Office of the Undersecretary for Economic Affairs. The second-longest wait time among federal departments and agencies was 811 by the Department of Veterans Affairs’ Office of Enterprise Integration.

Third among the longest wait times was the Federal Labor Relations Authority (FLRA) at 367 days. The fourth longest average wait was registered by the U.S. Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board at 360 days, followed in fifth by the Executive Office of the President in the White House at 350 days.

The five federal agencies with the fastest average turnaround time in responding to simple FOIA requests include the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) at one day, the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA) at 1.69 days, followed by the Job Corps, the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals and the U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) at two days.

The average response time for all federal departments and agencies for complex requests was 267 days.

The report was compiled, OTB said, because “as the size and scope of the administrative state grows, decision-making processes become more opaque even as those decisions impact our lives more fundamentally than ever. So, our ability to check their work has become more critical than ever before.”

“Although agencies are required by law to respond within 20 days, in practice many require extensions for months or even years, citing big backlogs of records requests,” OTB continued. “When FOIA wait times stretch to months and years, it becomes impossible for We the People to hold agencies accountable.”

The 1966 Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) guarantees American citizens access to copies of all government documents except those covered by a handful of reasonable exemptions such as national security, personal privacy, active law enforcement investigations, and protecting commercial business secrets.

Another exemption, Exemption Five or the “pre-decisional” or “deliberative process” exemption, allows virtually all documents produced prior to a decision to be withheld. Critics of how the government has administered the FOIA have for years criticized the frequency with which Exemption Five is used by civil servants to deny providing access to requested documents.

Federal agencies are required to acknowledge all requests within 20 days of being received, but there are no limits on how much time can be consumed in gathering requested documents via extensions. Citizens submitted 1,501,432 FOIA requests in 2024, while federal employees completed processing on 1,499,265. The total received for 2024 represents a 25.15% increase, year over year.

More than 50,000 FOIA requests have been submitted by OTB to federal, state, and municipal governments since the foundation’s 2007 founding in order to put all official spending on the internet and available to all citizens with access to a computer.

As an illustration of the long wait times, OTB filed a FOIA request in May 2023 with the HHS Administration for Children and Families (ACF).

“Open the Books has been waiting for records from one of these agencies, the [ACF], since May 2023. As our auditors previously reported, an office within ACF has spent billions on all manner of aid to migrants, including those who crossed illegally, those who enjoyed relaxed entry rules under the Biden administration, and even some children. The spending included anything from help with small business startups to savings for home and auto loans. The majority of the spending was done through third-party nonprofits who took grants from ACF and distributed them as aid,” OTB said.

Lengthy waiting times for FOIA responses also often result in expensive litigation. In its dealings with HHS on multiple requests for government documents, OTB has experienced particular difficulties in seeking documents from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and has had to resort to litigation.

“Open the Books partnered with Judicial Watch to sue [NIH] over redactions to its data on royalties from pharmaceutical companies paid out to agency scientists. The litigation has since forced NIH to produce thousands of pages of documents, which we’ve used to delivered blockbuster reports on the connections between federal scientists and the private sector. Three years later, litigation is still ongoing.”

AUTHOR

Mark Tapscott

Mark Tapscott is senior congressional analyst at The Washington Stand.

EDITORS NOTE: This Washington Stand column is republished with permission. All rights reserved. ©2025 Family Research Council.


The Washington Stand is Family Research Council’s outlet for news and commentary from a biblical worldview. The Washington Stand is based in Washington, D.C. and is published by FRC, whose mission is to advance faith, family, and freedom in public policy and the culture from a biblical worldview. We invite you to stand with us by partnering with FRC.

Biden-Harris Admin Accused Of Deceiving America On Its Way To Freezing Gas Exports

The Biden-Harris administration may have based its decision to freeze certain liquefied natural gas (LNG) export projects upon a major act of deception, according to a government watchdog group.

The Department of Energy (DOE) announced the pause on new and pending approvals for certain LNG export terminals in January, stating that it must conduct a review of potential environmental, economic and security impacts of LNG exports to ensure that approving new capacity is still in the public interest. An ongoing Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) legal battle between the agency and an independent group called Government Accountability and Oversight (GAO) reveals that the administration may have actually conducted — or started to conduct — such a review in 2023 before effectively burying it because it may have been producing politically inconvenient conclusions, according to GAO.

If GAO is correct, the Biden-Harris administration essentially deceived the public in an election year to institute a policy that undermines American geopolitical interests, chills investment in domestic energy projects and greatly pleases the well-funded environmentalist lobby which is spending big to help Democrats in this election cycle. The DOE did not respond to multiple requests for comment for this story.

Biden Allies Sue To Block Major Natural Gas Export Project https://t.co/w9C8gBVwYV

— Daily Caller (@DailyCaller) June 1, 2024

GAO filed a narrowly-tailored FOIA request with DOE in June seeking any LNG export study transmitted by the National Energy Technology Lab (NETL) to the DOE’s Office of Fossil Energy and Carbon Management between Jan. 1, 2023 and Oct. 31, 2023. The group also requested any emails transmitting those documents from NETL to the same DOE sub-office.

The FOIA request has since become the subject of a GAO lawsuit against the DOE. During the legal battle, the DOE eventually conceded that there are 97 documents, totaling thousands of pages, in its possession that potentially meet the parameters GAO set forth in its request targeting studies about LNG exports.

Moreover, the federal government has delayed the process by “asking for timeline extensions, ignoring deadlines, filing motions to stay adjudication and seeking to further delay by consolidating several individual GAO FOIA actions into one complex case,” Chris Horner, one of GAO’s attorneys, told the Daily Caller News Foundation.

“GAO has already won in the key sense that it forced a stonewalling DOE to at long last admit that, yes, there is a 2023 study meeting that description, it was sent to the senior political appointees in the Biden-Harris DOE, and has disappeared into the ether,” Horner told the DCNF. “The page volume that DOE admits to confirms that this study was indeed very far along—why else would it have made it to the top politicals—and possibly, as we were informed, completed before being buried.”

The freeze was widely seen as part of the Biden-Harris administration’s climate crusade. Economically and geopolitically, the freeze has heightened uncertainty for would-be investors in major infrastructure projects while empowering LNG production in foreign countries with lower environmental standards, such as Russia and Qatar.

Notably, NETL has previously conducted reviews of the emissions impacts of LNG exports in 2014 and 2019, finding both times that American LNG exports to Asia and Europe do not create more lifecycle emissions than regionally-mined coal when used to generate power.

Republicans and other critics — including some Democrats — charge that the moratorium is also undermining U.S. interests by inhibiting America’s ability to exert influence and potentially degrading long-term energy security in Europe and Ukraine, which the U.S. has given $175 billion amid its war with Russia.

AUTHOR

Nick Pope

Contributor.

RELATED ARTICLE: The Entire Push To Halt New Natural Gas Exports Traces Back To One Ivy League Prof And His Shaky Study

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.


All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.