Tag Archive for: government waste

Rand Paul Releases Report Detailing $1,000,000,000,000 In Gov’t Waste. Here Are The Worst Offenders

Republican Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul released a report on Monday outlining more than $1 trillion in government waste from the past year.

WATCH: Rand Paul exposes Biden admin for wasting $1 trillion

The 2024 “Festivus” report highlighted various instances of wasteful government spending from the federal government, including a pickleball complex in Las Vegas and a cabaret show on ice. This year marks Paul’s 10th annual report.

“This year, I am highlighting a whopping $1,008,313,329,626.12,” Paul wrote in the report. “That’s over $1 trillion in government waste, including things like ice-skating drag queens, a $12 Million Las Vegas pickleball complex, $4,840,082 on Ukrainian influencers, and more! No matter how much money the government has wasted, politicians keep demanding even more.”

The Department of the Interior (DOI) spent $12 million on a Las Vegas Pickleball Complex, according to the report. The DOI also spent $720,479 on wetland conservation projects for ducks in Mexico.

“I have a lot of problems with federal spending, and now it’s time to hear all about them,” Paul wrote in the report.

The National Endowment for the Arts (NEA) awarded the Bearded Ladies Cabaret a $10,000 grant to support a cabaret show on ice skates focused on climate change, according to the report. The NEA also spent $365,000 to promote circuses in city parks, the report states.

The State Department spent $500,000 to expand the U.S. Embassy in Ethiopia’s #USInvestsInEthiopians social media campaign to a larger national public relations campaign, according to the report. The State Department also sent $253,653 to Bosnia to fight “misinformation,” spent $2.1 million for Paraguayan Border Security, and spent $3 million for ‘Girl-Centered Climate Action’ in Brazil, according to the report.

The Department of Health and Human Services spent $419,470 to determine if lonely rats seek cocaine more than happy rats, the report states.

The National Science Foundation spent $288,563 to ensure bird watching groups have safe spaces, also known as “Affinity Groups,” according to the report.

President-elect Donald Trump announced on Nov. 12 that he had picked Vivek Ramaswamy and Elon Musk to co-chair a new Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), aimed at cutting down on wasteful government spending.

“As always, taking the path to fiscal responsibility is often a lonely journey, but I’ve been fighting government waste like DOGE before DOGE was cool, Paul wrote in the report. “And I will continue my fight against government waste this holiday season.”

Many Americans have faced steep costs amid high inflation throughout President Joe Biden’s term, with inflation hitting a peak of 9.1% in June 2022. While inflation rates have eased some since June 2022, prices still remain high, with the consumer price index (CPI), a measure of the price of everyday goods, experiencing a year-over-year increase of 2.7% in November, according to a Dec. 11 report from the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

Some experts have attributed massive government spending under the Biden-Harris administration to fueling inflation rates. The national debt was at $36.16 trillion as of Tuesday, according to U.S. Treasury Fiscal Data.

A spokesperson for Paul did not immediately respond to a request for comment from the Daily Caller News Foundation.

AUTHOR

Ireland Owens

Contributor.

RELATED ARTICLE: Bah Humbug! Biden’s Christmas Gift To America Is Going To Burn A Hole In Household Budgets

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.


All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

DOGE Will Seize ‘Historic Opportunity’ to Downsize, ‘Delete’ Federal Government

The two business leaders President-elect Donald Trump has tasked with downsizing the federal bureaucracy say they are “not going to squander” the 2024 election mandate and plan to slash wasteful spending, eliminate unnecessary jobs, and possibly abolish whole federal agencies.

Last Tuesday, Trump called on Tesla founder Elon Musk and 2024 Republican presidential hopeful Vivek Ramaswamy to head the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). The leaders have said everything is on the table.

“We expect mass reductions. We expect certain agencies to be deleted outright,” Ramaswamy told Mario Bartiromo on the Fox Business “Sunday Futures.” The department will oversee “massive cuts in federal contractors and others who are over-billing the federal government. So, yes, we expect all of the above, and I think people will be surprised by … how quickly we’re able to move with some of those changes given the legal backdrop the Supreme Court has given us.” Earlier this year, the Supreme Court overturned a judicial activist ruling establishing the “Chevron deference,” which gave the federal authority vast powers to regulate the private sector.

President Trump has repeatedly promised to abolish the Department of Education, a Carter-era agency many conservatives believe acts as a pay-off to teachers’ unions. “One other thing I’ll be doing very early in the administration is closing up the Department of Education in Washington, D.C. and sending all education … back to the states,” said the president-elect in an online video. “They’ll do a much better job of it. You can’t do worse. We spend more money per pupil, by three times, than any other nation, and yet we’re absolutely at the bottom.”

The president cited many education officials’ hostility to Christian precepts as one reason to return education to state, local, and parental control. “The Marxism being preached in our schools is also totally hostile to Judeo-Christian teachings, and in many ways, it is resembling an established new religion,” insisted Trump in an “Agenda47” video. “My administration will aggressively pursue potential violations of the Establishment Clause and the Free Exercise Clause of the Constitution. That’s very simple.”

“Additionally, on day one, we will begin to find and remove the radicals, zealots, and Marxists who have infiltrated the federal Department of Education, and that also includes others,” he declared. “Joe Biden has given these lunatics unchecked power — I will have them fired and escorted from the building. And I will tell Congress that any appropriations bill I sign must reaffirm the president’s ability to remove defiant employees from the job. It’s all about our children.”

Oklahoma Superintendent of Public Instruction Ryan Walters told “Washington Watch with Tony Perkins” that, “when [Trump] eliminates the federal Department of Education, it is going to be tremendous for our states.”

After Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) called proposals to close agencies such as the Department of Education “horrifying,” Ramaswamy stood firm on principle. “Will entire agencies be deleted? Answer: yes,” the founder of Strive Asset Management posted on social media.

Critics say DOGE can begin by reeling in the record-breaking $1 trillion in improper payments made by the Biden-Harris administration, according to the government watchdog group OpenTheBooks.com. Federal guidelines define improper payments as payments “made by the government to the wrong person, in the wrong amount, or for the wrong reason.”

DOGE will also pare down or eliminate pork-barrel spending and federal boondoggles. On Monday, the official DOGE account on X shared a video of Senator Rand Paul (R-Ky.) revealing some of the most outrageous federal grants of the last year, including:

  • $100,000 to study if tequila or gin makes sunfish more aggressive;
  • Nearly $1 million to study if cocaine makes Japanese quail more sexually promiscuous;
  • $1.5 million to encourage video gaming in New York. “We might be better off spending $1.5 million to discourage kids from playing video games,” quipped Paul;
  • $2 million for a kelp and shellfish nursery in Maine; and
  • $750,000 to study whether astronaut Neil Armstrong said it was “one small step for man” or “one small step for a man.” (Armstrong contended to his dying day that he said “a man,” but the study was inconclusive.)

Budget hawks have long held that federal government overreach has created so many duplicative, unnecessary, and indefensible funding streams that the term “government waste” has nearly become redundant. The late Senator William Proxmire gave out “The Golden Fleece Award” every month between March 1975 and December 1988 to highlight wasteful government spending. The late Senator Tom Coburn, who preceded Senator James Lankford (R-Okla.) in office, issued an annual “Wastebook” to compile the year’s worst examples of frivolous federal spending. Senator Rand Paul most recent “Festivus Report,” released late each December, catalogued $900 billion in wasteful spending. Citizens Against Government Waste’s 2024 “Congressional Pig Book” listed 8,222 “egregious” earmarks costing taxpayers $22.7 billion.

Even departments performing undeniably constitutional functions of government can become bloated and inefficient, say lawmakers. “The Department of Defense has never passed an audit since they were required to pass an audit, and no one ever gets held accountable,” Rep. Warren Davidson (R-Ohio) told “Washington Watch with Tony Perkins” on Monday. “Every year, they’re rewarded with more money and more responsibility.”

Pro-life and pro-family advocates hope “draining the swamp” will also promote the cause of the unborn and the natural family. The Biden-Harris administration spent at least $4.1 billion during its first three years promoting the LGBTQ agenda overseas, often in nations with strong religious and cultural opposition to homosexuality. For instance, a $1 million grant advanced the “social inclusion of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and intersex (LGBTQI+) people” in Nigeria, Uganda, and Ukraine. USAID boasted that it requested the “largest-ever budget request, $2.6 billion, to advance gender equity and equality around the world” in 2022.

Any effort to downsize government must include “the insane waste of our tax dollars going to Planned Parenthood (roughly 700 million last year). Abortion has the single largest death toll of any condition, disease, genocide, or act in history, and the American people literally fund it,” explained Kristan Hawkins of Students for Life. The federal government directly funds some abortions through Medicaid, as well as some other federal programs. For instance, the city of St. Louis spent COVID relief funds to promote abortion.

As part of its government spending reforms, the incoming Trump administration plans to reclaim tens of billions of dollars in unspent funds allocated by the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA), which President Joe Biden signed on March 11, 2021. The island territory of Guam had not spent more than one-third of the money received from ARPA as of May. The City of Chicago alone has $300 million in unspent COVID-19 relief funds from ARPA, or 56% of the $540 million in COVID relief funds it received from the bill. Former Speaker of the House Paul Ryan’s hometown of Janesville, Wisconsin, (population 66,102) still has $760,000 unused funding from the Biden-era legislation.

Trump tapped Elon Musk, who fired approximately 80% of staffers after he bought the social media platform Twitter, now known as X, or about 6,000 employees, yet the company continued to operate effectively. Supporters hope he will do the same in the federal workforce — where firing or even changing the working conditions of federal employees requires navigating a mound of red tape and labor negotiations. Almost 80% of federal employees and managers agreed federal rules “discourage the firing of poor performers” in a Government Business Council survey; only 11% said poor performers were fired. Those singled out for termination may appeal through the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB), with the average appeal lasting 93 days.

Trump, who often found his policies stymied by “The Resistance” inside his own administration, hopes firing uncooperative workers will allow him to deliver on the will of the voters. In October 2020, President Trump issued an executive order making it easier to fire career bureaucrats, who often resist or slow the implementation of the administration’s policies. President Joe Biden rescinded the “Schedule F” order upon taking office, and in April the Biden-Harris administration’s Office of Personnel Management released a final rule making it even harder to fire federal workers.

Ramaswamy has said he plans to end telework for federal employees. But the president of the largest federal workers union, the American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE) Everet Kelley, takes the position that any labor condition “changes must be negotiated with the union through the normal collective bargaining process.”

The two unlikely agency leaders have less than two years to enact the president-elect’s government downsizing plans. “Our work is done by July 4, 2026. Unlike every other government project, we don’t want this one to last,” said Ramaswamy.

Trump proposed Musk lead the commission during a speech to the New York Economic Club in September. “I will create a government efficiency commission tasked with completing a complete financial and performance audit of the federal government and making recommendations for drastic reforms,” then-candidate Trump announced. Musk promptly replied he would serve and added, “No pay, no title, no recognition is needed.” The department’s acronym, DOGE, is a play on the name of a meme depicting a Shina Ibu dog.

Ramaswamy said that while DOGE will meticulously remove every layer of unnecessary bureaucracy, they respect the many good men and women caught in the downsizing process. “We recognize that the federal bureaucracy is the enemy, while also acknowledging there are millions of good people who work within it. And yes, it’s absolutely possible to dismantle that bureaucracy unsparingly, while also respecting the individual human beings as we do it,” continued Ramaswamy.

Meanwhile, the Biden-Harris administration is speeding up the spending process, as its time draws short. President Biden has said he plans to “make every day count” in his lame-duck session, and the Biden-Harris administration has begun expediting federal spending before President-elect Trump can return to office. Administration regulators plan to finalize yet another federal rule transferring student debt from borrowers to taxpayers by December 2, although courts have struck down every previous student loan “forgiveness” program as unconstitutional. The Department of Energy extended a $544 million “loan” to expand and support the failing electrical vehicle industry.

But DOGE can dodge these hurdles, pare back the administrative state, and return the federal government to democratic control, insists Ramaswamy.

“If we don’t downsize the federal government now, it’s never going to happen,” warned Ramaswamy. “This is a historic opportunity. We’re not actually going to squander this.”

AUTHOR

Ben Johnson

Ben Johnson is senior reporter and editor at The Washington Stand.

EDITORS NOTE: This Washington Stand column is republished with permission. All rights reserved. ©2024 Family Research Council.


The Washington Stand is Family Research Council’s outlet for news and commentary from a biblical worldview. The Washington Stand is based in Washington, D.C. and is published by FRC, whose mission is to advance faith, family, and freedom in public policy and the culture from a biblical worldview. We invite you to stand with us by partnering with FRC.

Americans Can’t Afford Gas, Congress Just Gave Itself a 21% Raise

The $1.5 trillion omnibus bill has plenty of inflationary spending, and the honorable members of the legislature didn’t leave themselves out.

As part of the $1.5 trillion omnibus spending bill released Wednesday, the $5.9 billion fiscal 2022 Legislative Branch funding portion would substantially boost the office budgets of House members to pay staff more…

This legislation would provide $774.4 million for the Members Representational Allowance, known as the MRA, which funds the House office budgets for lawmakers, including staffer salaries. This $134.4 million, or 21 percent, boost over the previous fiscal year marks the largest increase in the MRA appropriation since it was authorized in 1996, according to a bill summary by the House Appropriations Committee. For paid interns in member and leadership offices, the House would get $18.2 million.

It’s not technically a pay hike for congressmembers, but, in particular House members, are notorious for putting family members on the payroll. And for using staffers to run their errands and handle assorted personal projects for them.

In August, Speaker Nancy Pelosi announced staffers’ salaries could exceed those of lawmakers. Members in both the House and Senate, with the exception of leadership, make an annual salary of $174,000. Staffers can make up to $199,300.

That’s convenient since it can act as a pay hike without the negative press.

MRAs tend to be between $1.2 and $1.4 million. A massive MRA increase has all sorts of political and potentially personal benefits. It’s also completely indefensible during an economic crisis.

House Dem leaders are cheering the disgusting pork sandwich as a victory for diversity.

House Majority Leader Steny H. Hoyer (MD-05) and House Democratic Caucus Chair Hakeem Jeffries (NY-08), released the following statement this morning on the inclusion of a 21% increase in Member Representational Allowance (MRA) funding in the Fiscal Year 2022 Omnibus legislation.

Leader Hoyer and Chair Jeffries have long advocated for this increase to the MRA in order to ensure that Members, leaders, and committees can attract and retain the best and brightest to help them serve the American people while promoting a more diverse workforce.

Is there any obscenity that can’t be justified in the name of diversity?

“We join in thanking Chairwoman DeLauro and Ranking Member Granger as well as the Members on the Appropriation Committee for producing a bipartisan omnibus package that includes this increase in office budgets so that Congressional staff pay can be a priority and enhance this institution’s ability to deliver For the People.”

For the People.

Ask not what Congress can do for you, ask what you can do for Congress.

COLUMN BY

RELATED VIDEO: Nancy Pelosi Comforts Zelensky With an Offer of Help From … Billie Jean King

RELATED ARTICLES:

Biden: ‘Putin just decides he’s gonna invade Russia’

Capitol Police Funding Went From $375,000,000 to $602,000,000

Canada: Trudeau rejects Zelensky’s request for no-fly zone over fears of Russian escalation, says he’s heartbroken

Saudis, Emiratis Alarmed by U.S. Capitulation to Iran

EDITORS NOTE: This Jihad Watch column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Biden’s Handlers Want You to Cough Up $6.4 Billion to Resettle 94,000 Afghans in the U.S.

My latest in PJ Media:

Old Joe Biden’s handlers have asked Congress for $30 billion, which means that you better brace yourselves for significant tax increases in the near future. According to NBC News,  $23.6 billion of this is slated to go to deal with the devastation from Hurricane Ida and other natural disasters; the other $6.4 billion, meanwhile, is to cover the expenses of resettling 94,000 Afghans in the United States. And really, now, what could possibly go wrong?

NBC explained that “the U.S. anticipates bringing 64,000 Afghans to the U.S. by the end of this month and 30,000 over the next 12 months, the official said. Of the funding for the refugees, $2.4 billion will go to pay for the Defense Department’s operations overseas where the Afghans are being held and processed. An additional $1.7 billion will go to the Department of Health and Human Services to provide funding and resources to the Afghans to help them set up a new home in the U.S.”

This U.S. taxpayer money would also “go to support transportation costs between overseas processing sites and the United States, security screenings, humanitarian assistance, public health screenings and vaccinations. The administration official said Afghans ‘will receive similar benefits to refugees.’ After 12 months in the U.S., the Afghans will be eligible to apply to become LPRs — lawful permanent residents — and receive so-called ‘green cards.’”

And of course all of the applicants will get those green cards no matter what they have done, up to and including slitting the throat of a woman for committing the crime of having a job, as an Afghan migrant did a few days ago in Germany. What are Western authorities going to do — deport them back to Afghanistan? With the Taliban reaching new lows in human rights abuses practically every day, there is zero chance of that. The Afghan evacuees are here to stay.

While this may thrill naïve multiculturalists and Catholic bishops, there are good reasons to temper our enthusiasm about all this. Let’s assume, although we don’t really have any good reason to do so in light of the Biden administration’s refusal to admit the reality of the global Islamic jihad, that the security screenings this $6.4 billion will pay for are completely, one-hundred-percent effective. Does that mean that the people who will soon be our neighbors will have no trouble whatsoever adjusting to American society?

Consider, for example, the fact that according to a Pew Research Center survey in 2013 (and there is no reason to think anything has changed since then), 73% of Afghans believe that Islamic law, Sharia, is not devised by human beings, but is the perfect and unalterable law of Allah. There are plenty of people in America now who believe that, but fully 99% of the Afghans surveyed stated that they believed Sharia should be the law of the land. Might any of them be among Biden’s handlers’ 94,000 evacuees? Might they have difficulty accepting a secular republic in which the government derives its authority not from Allah, but from the consent of the governed?

There is more. Read the rest here.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Afghanistan: Taliban bring back their Ministry for Propagation of Virtue and Prevention of Vice

Taliban Paint Over George Floyd Mural in Kabul

White Muslim CNN Contributor Claims His ‘White Card’ Was Revoked After 9/11

Why Leftists Hate Clint Eastwood So Much

France: Jihadi begins trial by professing Islamic faith, former president says jihadis just want to ‘divide us’

EDITORS NOTE: This Jihad Watch column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Federal Government Imposes Up to $14,000 in ‘Hidden Taxes’ on Households Every Year, New Report Reveals

Most Americans pay close attention to how much of their money is taken in taxes each year. But there’s another, less obvious way the federal government imposes financial costs on citizens—and according to a new report, it amounts to trillions annually.

The fiscally-conservative Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI) just released its annual “Ten Thousand Commandments” report, which documents the “size, scope, and cost of federal regulations, and how they affect American consumers, businesses, and the U.S. economy at large.” Report author Clyde Wayne Crews explains how we face a “hidden tax” from the economic burden of our massive regulatory state. After all, tens of thousands of new regulations are imposed every year.

The report estimates the economic costs of federal regulation at an astounding $1.9 trillion annually.

To put that abstract sum in context, it’s nearly as much as the federal government collects in income and corporate taxes in a year. And a country that produced $1.9 trillion in output would be the 8th largest economy in the world (excluding the US). $1.9 trillion is more in economic output than Brazil or Italy produce in an entire calendar year.

Much of this $1.9 trillion in “hidden taxes” is ultimately borne by everyday Americans. To understand why, simply remember that regulations increase the costs associated with production. An unnecessary environmental regulation, for example, may force companies to take more cost-intensive steps during the production process. Ultimately, this leads to higher prices at the check-out line.

The CEI report explains that if we assume the costs all ultimately fall on consumers, then it equates to up to $14,368 in annual costs per US household.

This is a huge hit to the wallet. $14,368 in annual regulatory costs amounts to roughly 23 percent of the average household’s spending budget. It’s more than the typical household spends on food, transportation, healthcare, or anything except housing.

Oh, and don’t forget the $88 billion in taxpayer money spent by federal agencies each year just to administer, implement, and police these regulations.

The takeaway here is broader than just the financial impact of federal regulation, as significant as that may be. It’s yet another reminder that, as economist Frédéric Bastiat famously identified, the costs of government go beyond the obvious, what is “seen,” and extend to the “unseen.”

Of course, when it comes to the ever-expanding federal government, the most obvious cost is what the politicians in Washington, DC take from us in taxes every year. But this new report further proves that the unseen, hidden costs of the federal government’s growing involvement in economic life are even more drastic than what comes directly out of our paychecks.

EDITORS NOTE: This FEE column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Going Postal, Again: The USPS is in the red for the eighth straight year by DOUG BANDOW

The United States Postal Service (USPS) lost $5.5 billion last year. That is the eighth annual loss in a row and the third-highest ever. The only silver lining is that the loss was below the red-ink tsunami of $15.9 billion in 2012.

Why does the federal government deliver the mail? Why does it have a monopoly over delivering the mail?

Admittedly, the Postal Service is one of the few government programs with actual constitutional warrant. The Constitution authorizes Congress to establish post offices. And early American politicians rushed to take advantage of their opportunity, creating the Post Office Department in 1792.

Alas, one-time revolutionaries turned the system into a fount of federal patronage. Local postmasters became perhaps the president’s most important appointments, at one time accounting for three-quarters of all federal employees. The postmaster general actually was a member of the cabinet from 1829 to 1971.

With politics rather than service as the post office’s priority, Congress took the next step and approved the Private Express Statutes, which prevented anyone from competing with the government in delivering first-class mail. And Uncle Sam enforced his monopoly, fining would-be competitors, including celebrated libertarian author Lysander Spooner.

The feds continue to prosecute anyone with the temerity to compete with the USPS, even threatening the Cub Scouts for once offering to deliver Christmas cards.

Believing that Americans existed to serve the USPS left the system ill-equipped to adapt to changing circumstances. In 1971, Congress turned the Post Office Department into the semi-independent USPS. That removed its direct role in politics, but the USPS still is exempt from taxes and regulations, including local parking restrictions. Congress retained its control over postal policies and, of course, preserved the system’s delivery monopoly.

But banning competition could not preserve the postal market. The number of pieces of mail peaked in 2001 and continues to fall despite a rising population. Mail pieces dropped from 213 billion in 2006 to 155 billion last year, and the number is expected to decline to 130 billion by 2020. The USPS’s last profitable year was 2006. Since then, losses have run between $2.8 billion and $15.9 billion. The Postal Service has maxed out its borrowing from Uncle Sam and missed four retiree program payments. With characteristic understatement, the Government Accountability Office observed, “Given its financial problems and outlook, USPS cannot support its current level of service and operations.”

The postal unions insist that nothing is wrong — at least, nothing that a federal bailout wouldn’t solve. They reserve particular ire for the requirement that the USPS prefund workers’ retirement. Had this rule not been in place, noted former postmaster general Patrick Donahoe, the Postal Service would have earned money last year.

But prefunding protects taxpayers. Washington’s unfunded (government) retirement liability is about $800 billion and growing every year. That no other agency is required to prefund is unfair to taxpayers, not the Postal Service, since every agency should have to set aside sufficient money to fulfill its financial promises. With the Postal Service earning too little to pay and with nothing left of its federal credit line, the USPS has defaulted four times over the last three years on its mandated contributions.

Even Donahoe acknowledged that prefunding is appropriate. He contacted me after I wrote about the issue a couple of years ago and disputed only the amount the USPS should set aside. He said he asked postal workers what they thought of an unfunded system in light of Detroit’s bankruptcy, when city coffers were empty.

The unions may simply assume that Congress would bail them out if need be. Legislators normally can be counted on to do the wrong thing, but with the unfunded liability for Social Security and Medicare around $100 trillion, there won’t be a lot of cash available when the big retirement bills come due. Tens of millions of elderly retirees have the edge in fighting with postal workers over a diminishing public pot. The postal workers shouldn’t bet their retirement on winning that political battle.

There’s no other obvious way for the USPS to become solvent. Over the last half-century, the postal authorities raised rates 50 percent faster than the rate of inflation. Pushing hikes even faster in the future would encourage more people to use alternatives. Squeezing postal consumers would work only for truly essential first-class delivery services, but what are they? Bills are paid online; digital magazines and greeting cards go instantly and inexpensively. Junk mail trumps online spam only in the ability to blanket every address in a neighborhood.

The USPS has reduced costs through facility closures and staff reductions despite strong opposition. Cuts in compensation, retirement benefits, and workforce levels and improvements in productivity also are obvious responses, but they must overcome union opposition. Proposals for reducing services abound: end Saturday delivery, cut delivery to just three or four days a week, close more post offices, stop door-to-door delivery (with neighborhood “cluster boxes”). All of these anger consumers, encouraging them to go elsewhere — including to Federal Express and UPS, which offer better options for packages. Irritated workers and customers also complain to Congress, creating political roadblocks for the USPS.

Odder ideas involve offering services that already are widely available, such as check cashing and photocopying. Perhaps the strangest, from the Greeting Card Association, is to transform post offices into “centers of continuous democracy” and offer “community bulletin boards, licenses, permit applications, [and] citizen polling/opinion gathering.” In other words: a bizarre mix of political activism and government regulation, with no obvious way to raise the billions annually needed to balance the books.

Instead of attempting to save an unnecessary political monopoly, Congress should look abroad, where numerous countries, some pushed by the European Union, have introduced competition and innovation into their postal markets. Even such unlikely states as Indonesia, Russia, and Sweden have pursued postal liberalization.

The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, made up of wealthy industrialized states, including the United States, reported that such reforms have yielded “quality of service improvements, increases in profitability, increases in employment and real reductions in prices.” Only in the supposed laissez-faire paradise of America — where a union-led “Grand Alliance to Save Our Public Postal Service” just formed to ensure that whatever has been will forever be — do such ideas seem radical.

Even President Barack Obama appeared to get it. A few years back, he admitted, “It’s the post office that’s always having problems.” In contrast, “UPS and FedEx are doing just fine.” That suggests an obvious solution.

Better management and less politics would help. In fact, revenue was up a bit last year, much of it for package delivery, despite the bigger loss. But over the long term, the USPS cannot escape from a seeming death spiral of bigger losses, higher rates, poorer services, fewer customers, bigger losses, and so on.

Uncle Sam should get out of the postal business. Privatize the USPS and drop the federal first-class monopoly. No one can say for sure what would happen. But if history is a guide, innovative entrepreneurs would be more likely to find cost-effective solutions than will today’s mix of politicians and bureaucrats.

ABOUT DOUG BANDOW

Doug Bandow is a senior fellow at the Cato Institute and the author of a number of books on economics and politics. He writes regularly on military non-interventionism.