Tag Archive for: immigration

California Gov Hopefuls Throw Newsom Under The Bus After He Skips A City Where Kids Were Shot

Multiple Democratic California gubernatorial candidates called out Democratic California Gov. Gavin Newsom on Wednesday evening for not personally going to Stockton after a mass shooting killed three children and one adult.

massacre erupted at a children’s birthday party Saturday evening in Stockton, killing two 8-year-old girls, a 14-year-old boy and a 21-year-old man, and injuring others. Despite the tragedy and media attention, Newsom did not go to the scene.

When asked by KCRA Political Director Ashley Zavala about the governor’s decision, three Democratic gubernatorial candidates and one Republican criticized Newsom’s absence.

“I believe the governor, he should have gone down to Stockton. I exchanged messages with the mayor of Stockton and she told me how horrible this is for her community and the fear of retaliation and what that was going to mean for her and her community. And this is an area in the Central Valley that already feels like their flyover country,” Democrat candidate Ian Calderon said.

“Nobody cares about us. You fly over us. You only come here when you’re campaigning. They can’t continue to feel like that. And they need to know that they can have a relationship with the governor and the state that when something significantly tragic like this happens,” Calderon added.

Democratic candidate Antonio Villaraigosa also answered Zavala’s question, saying he “showed up” during his tenure as mayor of Los Angeles from 2005 to 2013.

“I’ll tell you what I did when I was mayor. I always showed up. I showed up when a cop was shot. I showed up when families lost loved ones,” Villaraigosa said. “Actually, when I was a council member, I went to every single homicide in the two years that I was a council member in my district. When I was mayor, there were too many, but we reduced it to 1950 levels, as I said. But I think it’s important to show up. And I’m not criticizing anyone. I don’t know where he was at. But I could tell you for me, you show up.”

A third Democratic candidate, Betty Yee, emphasized the importance of demonstrating support for a community that has “lost loved ones and lost community members” and starting a conversation about why the incident happened. When Zavala pressed Yee on whether she would have gone to the scene if she were governor, Yee immediately responded yes.

Newsom’s office did not respond to the Daily Caller News Foundation’s request for comment.

Riverside County Sheriff and Republican gubernatorial candidate Chad Bianco also criticized the governor, questioning why Newsom has not called for an end to the violence or demanded accountability.

“Why isn’t the leader of the state there saying that this absolutely must stop and that the perpetrators will be held accountable? As the governor of California, I absolutely would make sure that I was there. I would make sure that I’m there for the families and we will be doing everything we can to make sure that California is the safest state in the country,” Bianco said.

“This selfishness of our elected officials that they only do things that benefit themselves, and sometimes they don’t have the ability to sacrifice or sacrifice their own ambitions, his vacation or his political speech that he was going to give in another part of the country, because a community in California was suffering, it says a lot,” Bianco added.

According to the San Joaquin County Sheriff’s Office, authorities received reports of a shooting shortly before 6 p.m. and confirmation that 14 people had been struck by gunfire and four were deceased. By Tuesday, the four killed were confirmed as 8-year-old Journey Rose, 8-year-old Maya Lupian, 14-year-old Amari Peterson and 21-year-old Susano Archuleta, with the total number of injured rising to 17, according to CBS News.

AUTHOR

Hailey Gomez

West Coast Reporter

RELATED ARTICLES:

Several Mass Shooters Have Taken Psychiatric Drugs. RFK Wants Answers

Young Democrats Torch Own ‘Weak’ Party, Young Republicans More Loyal, Poll Shows

California Democrats Are Rallying Behind ‘The Whiteboard Warrior’ For Governor

Democrat Rep Whose Trump Impeachment Flopped Now Seeks To Impeach Hegseth Over Drug Boat Strikes

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.


All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

Is it time to prepare for civil war? Glenn Beck’s answer might surprise you …

He is right and we must win and keep the House and Senate in 2026 and the Presidency and Congress in 2028.

We have been in a Civil War declared on us by the left since Barak Hussein Obama declared he would “fundamentally transform” the USA back in 2007-08. His intent was to change our Constitutional Republic into a Socialist/Communist state like they now have in western Europe. Had Clinton succeeded him this would have happened — temporary reprieve by Trump until COVID hoax and then more of same with Biden/Obama 3. Had Harris been elected we would have been there but thank God Trump beat the rig.

So far the war has largely been one of words including TDS where conservative Biblical and Constitutional values and logical, factual ideas are countered with insults, word salads, unreasonable emotion, personal attacks and stupid leftis hills to die on espoused below.

Actually, you could say, the current Civil War really started with LBJ’s “Great Society” leading to a welfare state and all its bad impacts but then Obama really cemented our path to socialism/communism which now infects close to 50% of our population; most of our colleges and universities; all of entertainment industry including pro sports and all of our big cities and red states under the control of Democrats.

Of course, cowardly establishment RINOs have not helped much. Trump’s MAGA/MAHA & America First and grassroots activism are the antidote to this leftist poison. The antidote to establishment RINOs has got to be primarying them out and replacing them with true coservative Republicans who stay true to their word and not to special interests/PACs plying them with campaign donations.

Look at the un-American hills to die on the Democrats have picked:

  • Defund the police and replace them with social workers
  • Force social engineering onto our military e.g. CRT/DEI/Climate Change/LGBTQ , etc. rather than combat readiness and deployability (fortunately Trump and Hegseth are whittling away at these but they still exist)
  • Invasion of our borders by illegal aliens (again Trump and ICE are chipping away at this)
  • Lawfare & Injustice by leftist Judges including injunctions against everything Trump does
  • School Districts/Boards more into indoctrination than education of children
  • Men in women’s sports
  • Mutilation of children declared to have gender dysphoria with sex change procedures
  • Denigration of both Christianity and Judaism replacement with secular humanism/atheism
  • Decline of Biblical morals and values
  • Continued emphasis on US as a systemic racist country and use of “revisionist history” to try to destroy American Exceptionalism with lies about “white supremacy”. “white privilege” “racism” etc.
  • Abortion on Demand
  • Criminals like narco terrorists should be protected not stopped or killed as necessary and so forth.

What did I miss?


Is it time to prepare for civil war? Glenn Beck’s answer might surprise you …

‘The likelihood of going into a civil war is higher than any other time in my lifetime.’

As the gap between the right and left continues to widen, whispers that we’re on the verge of civil war are rumbling across the nation. Some people are even wondering if they should start preparing.

Is this wisdom or folly?

Glenn Beck’s answer: Both.

“We must win the midterms, and we must win 2028,” Glenn emphasizes.

©2025 . All rights reserved.

Rubio Announces Visa Restrictions on Anyone Carrying Out ‘Violations of Religious Freedom’

The State Department has announced new restrictions on visas for anyone who is seen to be supporting or conducting violations of religious freedom.

“The United States is taking decisive action in response to the atrocities and violence against Christians in Nigeria and around the world,” Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced Wednesday.

The department “will restrict U.S. visas for those who knowingly direct, authorize, fund, support, or carry out violations of religious freedom,” Rubio said in a statement. The policy will also, in some cases, restrict visas of family members who are known to have carried out violations of religious freedom.

The policy is in response “to the mass killings and violence against Christians by radical Islamic terrorists, Fulani ethnic militias, and other violent actors in Nigeria and beyond,” according to the State Department. While Nigeria is the only nation the new policy specifically names, it will also apply to “other governments or individuals engaged in violations of religious freedom.”

President Donald Trump designated Nigeria a “Country of Particular Concern” in October in response to persecution of Christians in the African nation. Trump has also tasked Rep. Riley Moore, R-W.Va., Rep. Tom Cole, R-Okla., and the House Appropriations Committee to look further into the issue of the persecution of Christians in Nigeria and report their findings.

Moore and a group of lawmakers held a roundtable in the District of Columbia on Tuesday aimed at discussing the further investigation of the persecution of Christinas in Nigeria.

The U.S. “cannot stand by while such atrocities are happening in Nigeria, and numerous other countries,” Trump said.

It is estimated that more than 50,000 Christians have been killed in Nigeria since 2009, and about 7,000 in the first half of 2025 alone, most at the hands of either Boko Haram or Muslim Fulani militants.

The persecution of Christians in Nigeria has not only gained the attention of lawmakers in Washington, but also celebrity rapper and songwriter Nicki Minaj.

Minaj has been vocal in her support of Trump’s actions to address the situation in Nigeria and has called for action “to defend Christians in Nigeria, to combat extremism and to bring a stop to violence against those who simply want to exercise their natural right to freedom of religion or belief.”

AUTHOR

Virginia Allen is a senior news producer for The Daily Signal and host of “The Daily Signal Podcast” and “Problematic Women.” Send an email to Virginia. Virginia on X: .

RELATED POSTS:

Trump Admin Dramatically Scales Back Work Permits For Asylum Seekers

19 Countries Blocked From Immigrating to US 

Ted Cruz Calls to Hold Nigerian Government Accountable for Christian Persecution

Christian Persecution in Nigeria Demands American Response  

Trump Put a Spotlight on Persecution of Christians in Nigeria. What Happens Now?

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Signal column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.


The Daily Signal depends on the support of readers like you. Donate now

NYC Releases Nearly 7,000 Criminal Illegal Aliens Without Notifying ICE

New York has released almost 7,000 criminal illegal immigrants back onto the streets since Donald Trump returned to the White House, without notifying the Immigration and Customs Enforcement office. The Department of Homeland Security on Monday revealed to the New York Post that these dangerous offenders were granted bail, parole or simply released back into the community with no warning to the agency.

The individuals released include those convicted of serious crimes. Federal authorities are now demanding New York Attorney General Letitia James guarantee that a further 7,113 who remain in custody will be handed over at the end of their sentences.

©2025 . All rights reserved.

Gov’t Watchdog Scorched Biden Afghan Refugee Screening in 2022, Warned of ‘National Security’ Risks

Former President Joe Biden’s Afghan refugee screening process was blasted in 2022 by a devastating report by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Inspector General (IG) for lacking such basic information as a list of individuals who lacked “sufficient identification documents” and warned as a result of individuals being admitted into the country “who pose a risk to national security and to the safety of local communities.”

The report provides important context for officials and members of Congress as they assess and respond to the November 26 terrorist attack on the streets of the capital that killed one West Virginia National Guardsman and critically injured a second one.

The attacker, it was quickly determined in the aftermath, was a 29-year Afghan refugee admitted into the U.S. in the wake of the American military withdrawal from Afghanistan in 2021. That refugee is one of more than 79,000 Afghans brought into this country under Biden.

Between August 2021 and July 2022, the DHS Operation Allies Welcome (OAW) program brought more than 79,000 Afghans from that war-torn country that was taken over by the Islamic terrorists known as the Taliban. Of the total, almost 29,000 of the Afghans brought into the United States by the Biden administration program were males, including many of military service ages.

The IG report found two crucial flaws in the OAW screening and vetting process, flaws that DHS officials roundly denied existed in their response to the watchdog’s analyses.

First, the U.S. Customs and Border Patrol (CBP) officials involved in the screening and vetting “did not always have critical data to properly screen, vet, or inspect Afghan evacuees. … We determined some of the information used to vet evacuees through U.S. Government databases, such as name, Date of Birth (DOB), identification number, and travel document data, was inaccurate, incomplete, or missing.”

As a result, the report said, “CBP also admitted or paroled evacuees who were not fully vetted into the United States.”

The precise number of such individuals could not be determined with the available information, according to the IG report, but evidence was overwhelming that “DHS paroled at least two individuals into the United States who posed a risk to national security and the safety local communities and may have admitted or parole more individuals of concern.”

The identities of the two particular individuals were not included in the report.

A major obstacle to U.S. efforts to properly screen and vet Afghans, the report stated, was the fact “it is customary in Afghanistan for some individuals to have only one name. It is not always part of the Afghan culture to record or know exact DOBs. In Afghanistan, even though national legislation requires registration of children at birth, years of conflict decimated the administrative mechanisms and the social institutions supporting them.”

Consequently, whenever an Afghan told CBP officials they did not know their DOB, the official entry was January 1 of the estimated year of birth. “For example, if an evacuee stated he/she was 20 years old, the DOB most likely assigned was January 1, 2001,” the report explained.

The IG’s investigators reported they found 417 records with no known first name, 242 records with no last name, 7,800 records had invalid or missing document numbers, and 11,110 records with the January 1 DOB.

The investigators also reported encountering 36,400 records based on what was described as a “facilitation document.” But CBP officials were unable to “define or provide an explanation for this document type Travel Document Data,” and 36,400 records had “facilitation document” as the document type. However, during the audit, CBP could not define or provide an explanation for this document type, indicating potential inaccuracies.”

A second major flaw in the screening and vetting process was the fact “DHS did not have formal screening and vetting policies to support OAW” at the outset of the program, as the U.S. military withdrawal was launched.

“Instead, during the initial months of OAW, DHS officials said screening and vetting requirements were decided on an ad hoc basis. DHS and CBP did not have standardized formal policy documents and instead could only provide informal flowcharts, meeting minutes, and draft documents,” the report said.

The final conclusion of the IG’s investigators was that “the safety and the security of the American people is the highest priority for the U.S. Government. Preventing criminals, suspected terrorists, or other nefarious actors from entering the United States requires thorough screening and vetting. CBP’s use of incomplete or inaccurate data would not have yielded positive matches from intelligence databases if the individuals had derogatory records under a different name or DOB. Therefore, DHS and CBP cannot be sure they properly screened, vetted, and inspected all evacuees.”

The DHS response to the 2022 report was to reject it entirely, including the IG recommendation that all questionable individuals be re-screened and vetted.

“DHS responded that it was proud of its OAW efforts and highlighted multiple agencies involved in the screening and vetting of the Afghan evacuees. The OIG acknowledges the interagency efforts supporting this unprecedented event to screen and vet all evacuees. However, DHS’s response does not address the concerns of this audit and the recommendations which are aimed at reviewing the execution of OAW’s efforts and improving future, similar OAW efforts,” the IG concluded.

On Feb. 13, 2024, then-DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas was impeached by the U.S. House of Representatives for “high crimes and misdemeanors” in his administration of U.S. immigration policies. Mayorkas thus became the first presidential cabinet member to be impeached by the House. The impeachment was not upheld by the Senate.

The 2022 IG assessment was first reported in the aftermath of the attack on the guardsman by veteran conservative investigative journalist Richard Pollock on Substack.

AUTHOR

Mark Tapscott

Mark Tapscott is senior congressional analyst at The Washington Stand.

RELATED VIDEO: Gov. Walz under fire as $1B Minnesota social services fraud scandal widens

EDITORS NOTE: This Washington Stand column is republished with permission. All rights reserved. ©2025 Family Research Council.


The Washington Stand is Family Research Council’s outlet for news and commentary from a biblical worldview. The Washington Stand is based in Washington, D.C. and is published by FRC, whose mission is to advance faith, family, and freedom in public policy and the culture from a biblical worldview. We invite you to stand with us by partnering with FRC.

Betrayed American Workers Expose Dark Underbelly Of H-1B Visa Scheme

They were promised lucrative and stable careers if they “learned to code” and earned a degree in software engineering.

Instead, many Americans in the tech industry have been left disillusioned as they face mass layoffs and chronic unemployment — a crisis they say stems from an addiction to cheap foreign labor pipelines that are made accessible through programs like H-1B, and are touted by companies as a way to hire the “best and brightest.”

“At this point, I’m doing something else,” Jonathan, a cybersecurity professional who is leaving the industry entirely out of frustration, told the Daily Caller News Foundation. “My career is basically dead in the water because of these problems.”

Jonathan lost his job in the industry in November 2024 and in the months since, he’s submitted well over 200 applications for tech-related positions in the Seattle area, but received a grand total of zero offers — despite five years of experience and purportedly demonstrating high competency in every interview assessment thrown his way.

He wished to be identified only by his first name out of fear of retribution from past and potential employers, as did most of the seven tech employees who spoke with the DCNF.

Controversy surrounding the H-1B program, which very publicly split President Donald Trump’s inner circle shortly before he began his second term, has once again shot onto the national scene as the White House gives mixed signals on the program’s benefits. The issue has proven divisive for the Republican leader, who was elected to office on a pro-worker platform, but also has powerful allies in the tech world.

When reached for comment, the White House referred to recent statements made by press secretary Karoline Leavitt.

“The president does not support American workers being replaced,” Leavitt told a group of reporters earlier in November. “The president has a very nuanced, common-sense opinion on this issue … but ultimately [he] wants to see American workers in those jobs… There’s been a lot of misunderstanding of the president’s position.”

‘Disillusioned’

Public data suggests that many American engineers are being passed over for foreign workers.

Throughout 2025, major technology companies such as Microsoft, Meta, Amazon and Intel underwent layoffs — continuing what has been a years-long trend in the industry. The workers interviewed by the DCNF were not employed at these specific tech companies.

Roughly 428,000 tech workers lost their job between 2022 and 2023, and a total of 384 tech companies handed pink slips to roughly 124,000 workers in 2024, according to the Institute for Sound Public Policy (ISPP).

While H-1Bs have an outsized influence on the tech world, workers across all major industries are impacted by imported foreign labor.

The flow of H-1B workers into the U.S. has largely kept apace despite these mass layoffs, with the ISPP finding that the number of H-1B visa workers has grown 80% since the Great Recession low in 2011. Experts estimate that nearly 660,000 H-1B workers were living in the U.S. in October 2024.

Established by Congress in 1990, the H-1B program was originally intended to utilize “highly specialized” foreign labor, according to the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. Although it’s a nonimmigrant visa, H-1B holders can eventually become eligible to apply for legal permanent residence, allowing them to stay in the country indefinitely.

The tech industry dominates the use of H-1Bs, with tech companies accounting for nearly 70% of H-1B petitions annually, according to Nation Connections, a site dedicated to helping individuals navigate immigration laws in different countries.

Other American-born tech workers have shared similar experiences to Jonathan’s, and have stayed silent due to fear of retaliation.

“I do feel kind of disillusioned with the industry,” said Riley, who graduated with a software engineering degree in 2021. “Software engineers have a higher unemployment rate right now than art history majors.”

Art history majors have a 3% unemployment rate, according to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, which compiled data released in February. Computer engineering majors, on the other hand, currently suffer from a 7.5% unemployment rate.

Riley said he noticed a monumental shift in the hiring practices of an Austin-based company he worked at for several years. He claims the company — which had faced consistent complaints from engineers about pay — increasingly staffed its engineering departments with employees from South America and eventually established an office in Colombia to better utilize the continent’s workforce.

“I believe that that was done in order to, you know, reduce their labor costs so that they could get engineers without negotiating with [the American-born engineers] or caving to their demands,” Riley said.

Jonathan described a similar situation after the California-based company he worked for introduced an India development center. Roughly six months after the center was launched, he said the company stopped hiring outside of India altogether. About a year after he left, Jonathan’s former coworker informed him that around half of the company’s security personnel was let go.

“You’re going to lose advancement opportunities, you’re going to have HR problems and you’re going to be not a team player if you don’t advocate with open arms the idea of an Indian development center being opened up to your company or a billion H-1Bs flooding the market,” Jonathan said about the situation he was facing and the continued pressure to not speak out.

‘We’re All In The Process Of Being Replaced’

India stands far above any other nation as the top source of foreign labor, making up 72% of all H-1B recipients between October 2022 and September 2023, per a March 2024 report from the Department of Homeland Security.

“We’re all in the process of being replaced,” John, who worked for an insurance company in Connecticut, told the DCNF.

John said there were around 350 IT employees — all purportedly American — at his company when he first began in 2006. Throughout his decade at the company, he claims they were all steadily booted out in favor of foreign workers.

“Most of the time they had them train their Indian replacements before they left as a condition of receiving their severance,” he told the DCNF. “So what I saw over a period of time was a whole bunch of lives being destroyed.”

“A lot of the younger kids can’t find employment,” John said of the industry. “They spent a whole bunch of money learning all of this stuff — computer programs, cloud platforms, this that the other thing — but they can’t find work.”

The tech employees who spoke to the DCNF are struggling to find work in the U.S. at a time when college debt has skyrocketed to historical highs. Roughly 44 million Americans owe more than $1.7 trillion in student debt, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures. Engineering degrees in general are consistently ranked as one of the costliest to earn.

Like his coworkers before him, John was ultimately “replaced” and handed a severance agreement that forbids him from discussing the matter publicly.

“Coming home to western Washington from Alaska, I assumed that finding a better-paying job would be no issue — we are home to some of the nation’s largest tech companies,” Luke Hawthorne told the DCNF. “I spent nearly a year over 2022 and 2023 searching for my current job, a job which pays me about the same as I was making before.”

While Hawthorne still considers himself lucky to be employed, he said his current salary “doesn’t even approach” the threshold it takes to afford a home in his area of Washington State. His home state’s software developer workforce grew by more than 16% through H-1B certifications over just a 9-month period, with 83% of these positions approved at or below Washington State’s median wage, according to public data he analyzed and shared with the DCNF.

“The ‘best and brightest’ argument simply doesn’t square with how the program is being used,” Hawthorne said. “Another important aspect of it is that you aren’t competing just with the new arrivals, but with all of the tech workers who have been replaced — I have friends with talent and experience who have been out of work for years.”

Many of the tech workers who spoke to the DCNF have since become involved with U.S. Tech Workers, an advocacy group that highlights the plight of American employees negatively affected by the H-1B program and pushes Washington, D.C., for change.

Trump, who has implemented some of the most hawkish immigration policies since returning to office, has appeared to give mixed signals on the issue as major players within his own inner circle disagree over reform.

The president’s coalition appeared fragmented in the weeks leading up to his second presidential inauguration, with business magnate Elon Musk touting H-1Bs in December 2024 and Vivek Ramaswamy suggesting that the U.S. needs foreign talent because American culture “venerated mediocrity over excellence.” Georgia GOP Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, a former a top Trump ally who is resigning from Congress, said in November she would introduce legislation completely phasing out the H-1B program, accusing tech companies of abusing the system at the expense of Americans.

Trump initially appeared to side with the pro-H-1B faction, declaring in December 2024 that he was “a believer” in the visa program. In what appeared to be a major shift into the pro-American worker camp, Trump in September signed a proclamation slapping a $100,000 fee on all new H-1B applications, but opponents of the program have criticized the fee’s limitations and workarounds. Earlier in November, Trump once again publicly touted the need for H-1Bs to import foreign workers.

As Washington, D.C., continues to debate the value of H-1Bs, American tech workers say they’ve been left out to dry.

“I graduated college seven years ago and I remember in high school them telling us, ‘learn to code and you’ll have a good job,’” Joseph Ibrahim, an unemployed tech worker based in Florida, told the DCNF. “Well, it turns out they outsource the coding jobs also, not just the manufacturing jobs.”

Ibrahim got a degree in information systems, business analytics and information systems, but has been struggling to find work since April. Unlike many of the tech workers who spoke to the DCNF, he had no problem being identified by his full name.

“What are they gonna do?” Ibrahim asked. “They’re already not hiring me.”

“You know, if I went into college and on the pamphlet, there were like, ‘pros and cons of studying something in computer science: you may have to train your replacement at some point in your career,’ I would have never studied this,” he said.

AUTHOR

Jason Hopkins

Immigration Reporter

RELATED ARTICLE: Major Democrat Donor Has Sizeable Stake In Pot Company Raided By ICE

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.


All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

Voter Fraud Case in Minnesota Ties Somali Communities with Registering Fake Democrat Voters

Voter fraud case in Minnesota ties Somali communities with registering fake Democrat voters.

Fake names and addresses were created for hundreds of voter applications submitted to election offices in 13 unnamed counties, including Ilhan Omar’s district.

“Paid by an UNNAMED foundation to help register voters.” ‌

Two individuals pled guilty to submitting 600 fraudulent voter registration applications across 13 Minnesota counties, including Rep. Ilhan Omar’s district. Charging documents reveal they were paid by an unnamed foundation, likely connected to Somali nonprofits that receive state grants for voter outreach. Patterns suggest these groups have historically been involved in similar voter registration fraud cases.

A significant voter fraud case emerged in late October 2025, where two Somali-American individuals, Abdullahi Ahmed and Mohamed Ahmed, pleaded guilty in federal court to submitting approximately 600 fraudulent voter registration applications across 13 Minnesota counties. These applications included fabricated names, addresses, and personal details, designed to register fictitious voters predominantly affiliated with the Democratic Party.

The scheme targeted urban and rural areas, including Hennepin County, which encompasses Minneapolis and U.S. Rep. Ilhan Omar’s congressional district—a heavily Somali-American enclave.According to charging documents from the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Minnesota, the defendants were compensated by an unnamed foundation for their work in “voter outreach.” This foundation, which receives substantial funding from state grants aimed at civic engagement in immigrant communities, has ties to Somali nonprofits. Prosecutors noted that the operation exploited Minnesota’s voter registration system, where applications can be submitted on behalf of others through community drives, but the defendants crossed into fraud by inventing identities.

Both individuals face up to five years in prison and fines, with sentencing pending as of December 1, 2025.This case has amplified discussions about election integrity in Minnesota, a state with a history of close races and a large Somali diaspora (estimated at 80,000-100,000 residents, the largest in the U.S.). Critics, including Republican lawmakers like Rep. Steve Drazkowski, argue it exemplifies systemic issues in absentee and registration processes, potentially inflating Democratic voter rolls in key districts. On X (formerly Twitter), the story went viral in late November 2025, with posts from accounts like @WallStreetApes and @ThePatriotOasis garnering tens of thousands of views and shares, often framing it as “election theft” funded by taxpayer dollars.

Broader Context: Patterns of Alleged Fraud in Minnesota’s Somali CommunitiesThis incident is part of a larger wave of fraud allegations tied to Minnesota’s Somali-American population, particularly under Democratic Gov. Tim Walz’s administration (2019-present). While community leaders emphasize that these are isolated crimes not representative of the entire group—which has contributed significantly to Minnesota’s economy, politics, and culture through entrepreneurs, legislators, and activists—federal and state probes have uncovered repeated schemes exploiting public programs. (GROK)

Click here  and  here to view a breakdown of key cases.

Total estimated losses from these schemes exceed $1 billion since 2016, per federal estimates, straining Minnesota’s budget amid high taxes and welfare dependency (90%+ of Somali households rely on aid.)

A group of Minnesota Department of Human Services employees echoed this in a November 2025 statement, claiming Walz retaliated against fraud reporters.

This is going on for some time: MASSIVE VOTER FRAUD IN MINNESOTA

Stephen Miller: “The Democrat Party, via the Biden-Harris Terrorist Administration devised a scheme to import illegal aliens into the country by the millions — granting them ‘parole,’ which gives them work permits, which gives them Social Security numbers, which gives them access to the voting booth — and finally hooking them on welfare like Hunter Biden hooked on drugs, all with the sole purpose of participating in U.S. elections and ultimately overthrowing the Constitutional Republic of the United States.”

AUTHOR

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Why I [Also] Left The Left

A long time ago, in 2006, my son Seth wrote an article ––Why I left the Left–– for RealClearPolitics.com.

When President George W. Bush’s “brain” Karl Rove read it, OMG he invited Seth to lunch at the White House! That was many years after I personally left the Left, but I couldn’t think of a more apt title for this article.

I’m not sure what motivates people to become politically active. In my case, it was reading and hearing and watching events and people who infuriated me, and what I learned about myself is that anger, at least in my case, is not only energizing, but mobilizing.

I vividly remember my first political awakening. When my husband Steve and I and our three children––Seth, the oldest, was in kindergarten––moved to a community on Long Island that was convenient for his business travels by both car and plane, our then-apolitical selves had no idea that the town was a quite-infamous bastion of ultra-leftism.

Even though we had three kids under five, one of the first things we did when we moved into our new digs was to sign up to host a NY Times-sponsored Fresh Air child for several weeks––a Black child from New York City’s poorest neighborhoods, the motive being to provide a kind of suburban summer-camplike treat, which we did for three years.

So, when a vote came up to invite 75 Black children from a school in the neighboring borough of Queens, NY, to be bussed daily to our nationally reputed stellar school system, both Steve and I voted in favor of that proposal. Steve had been a star basketball player on our high school team in New Haven, where he, the only white guy, was affectionately called “the lightbulb” by his teammates.” And I, the co-captain of the cheerleading squad with a Black girl, knew firsthand that what would come to be known as “diversity” was a good thing.

WHAT???

But, to our shock, the referendum was defeated!

That was when I attended my first schoolboard meeting.

Chairing the meeting was the president of the school board, a handsome, articulate and wealthy business owner who presided over the packed-hall meeting with a grim––okay, furious—demeanor.

“The community has spoken,” he intoned with all due solemnity. “But the community is wrong.” His opinion was greeted with wild applause which echoed and affirmed his stern disapproval.

“Therefore,” he continued, “We are going to ignore this vote, and we are going to issue an invitation to the principal of [X school] to let us bus those 75 students to our town to give them the superior education all of our own students benefit from.”

Ummm…

Full disclosure here. I was a chronic truant in high school and never went to college but blissfully married my high school sweetheart (who I met at age 14), who did go to college, and we lived a truly beautiful and fun and fabulous life on the Dartmouth campus––in Sachem Village––for four years, along with 47 other married couples.

But still, when Mr. School Board President said he planned to ignore––actually violate––the vote of the citizens of our town, a little red flag went up in my uneducated head and I said to myself, “I don’t think that’s the way democracy works.” I thought that if a vote didn’t go your way, you worked harder the next time to convince potential voters that your candidate or your idea was the way to go.

And yet, arrogant as he was, and confident that he could get away with this violation, Mr. School Board President never counted on the response of the principal in Queens.

And what did that principal say? He said that he too read the newspapers and monitored the results of the election and that he didn’t want to send his students to a community that didn’t want them!

Kapow! That is called putting Mr. School Board President in his place!

LETTUCE?

Neither Steve nor I were as informed as were the voters from our parents’ generation, but following in their footsteps, we registered as Democrats and cast our first votes for the Democrat John F. Kennedy in 1960. And then, after his brutal assassination, for the Democrat Lyndon B. Johnson.

Just a few years later, in 1970, about three or four Lefty neighbors told me that Cesar Chavez, a labor organizer in California, had called for a boycott of lettuce and that I should not buy even one head of lettuce until the strike was over and Chavez’s demands for better pay and working conditions for the lettuce-picking farm workers were met.

It sounded reasonable to me, and I felt quite virtuous as I entered my local supermarket and studiously avoided the lettuce section to go straight to tomatoes. But guess what I saw? The children of those finger-wagging leftists buying lettuce for their parents!

SWAMPS?

A few years later, in 1973, Steve and I moved to another home in the same community. One of the neighbors who welcomed me said that I had “moved to the right neighborhood.”

Whaddaya mean? I asked.

“We think right,” she said.

It took me more than a month to figure out that “thinking right” meant thinking like a liberal.

I figured that out when a property developer/builder suggested to the board of directors in our small enclave that he construct some low-income housing in the vast lush fields and streams that lay directly adjacent to our homes.

Again, Steve and I had no objection, but the formidable liberal/leftist/progressive factions in our community––those who championed affordable housing, melting-pot communities, and “fairness” to all––immediately formed an SOS (Save Our Swamps) committee to stop any possibility of low-income people from coming within an inch of their hallowed ground.

THE TURNING POINT

Only three years later, Jimmy Carter ran for president and hearing, seeing, witnessing his uncontrolled virulent anti-Semitism––that he strongly and aggressively maintained until his dying day at age 100––made him the first Democrat I ever voted against…for all time!

At that time, leaving the Left was easy, a no-brainer. But after that, it became even easier. And in recent history, voting for a Democrat has become equivalent to voting for anyone endorsed by arch anti-Semite Louis Farrakhan or Communist poster boy, Vladmir Putin!

I had always been––and continue to be––a one-issue voter, namely the safety and security of Israel.

No, Tucker Carlson and Candace Owens and Nick Fuentes and Matt Gaetz and all you other obsessive Jew-and-Israel haters, this is not dual loyalty!

This is the knowledge that one of the tiniest populations of people on earth––and one of the most contributory to mankind––needs the friendship and support of the most powerful nation on earth, the kind of morally-driven support for an important ally of staunch Western values that has been given to Israel by President Harry Truman who first recognized the state of Israel on May 18, 1948, as well as by President John F. Kennedy, President Lyndon Johnson President Richard M. Nixon, President Ronald Reagan, President George W. Bush, and the undisputed Winner, President Donald J. Trump!

JUST ONE SIMPLE QUESTION

Over the past couple of months, I have had two funny and very revealing experiences. The first was when I joined a thread on Facebook of people who were clearly informed about American politics. As I became more familiar with this group, I learned that all 14 of them were graduate-school friends who had earned PhDs in International Relations from a quite prestigious school.  And all of them were liberals!

Finally, I weighed in. This is what I asked, verbatim: “I’m not going to ask you 12 or 10 or 7 or 5 or even 2 questions. I’m only going to ask you one question: What have Democrats ever done in history to improve our country?”

Surprisingly, three out of the 14 on this thread answered me. And astoundingly, they all had the exact same answer! They said Social Security. They had to go back ninety years––to August 14, 1935––to think of that one single, solitary thing!

And not long after, a nice guy came to my door with a flyer that urged me to vote for the Democrats running for election in our county and state this month. Again, I asked him the exact same question. And again, he had the exact same answer: Social Security!

When I pointed out to him the ancient genesis of this benefit, this very earnest Progressive/socialist told me with pride that Democrats had also initiated the welfare system and food stamps.

IMPOVERISHED

Clearly, the liberals/leftists/progressives among us believe fervently in the nanny state, the state of perpetual dependency, the state of tolerance for all, including the burgeoning masses of anti-Semitic racists, anti-Americans, nihilists, and even admirers of the murderous jihadists of Hamas, to which countless campus and pro-jihadist demonstrations testify.

It still astounds me that there are so many of this species that either cannot see or refuse to acknowledge the rank hypocrisy of their thinking, no better demonstrated then this recent and damning example from the clinically deranged dames on The View.

EMPOWERED

Bottom line, why I left the left is because the leftists/liberals/progressives of the 20th and 21st centuries hate the America I love and cherish and thank God for every day for blessing me to be born in this magnificent country, with all of its:

  • extraordinary freedoms,
  • unlimited opportunities,
  • deep respect for law and order,
  • exceptional tolerance for the differences among us,
  • historical and deserved respect for the patriots in the police departments and military services who put their lives on the line every minute of every day and night––for decades on end––to protect our safety and security.

For everyone who cherishes this laundry list of blessings, the best thing you can do is to leave the Left yourself!

©2025 . All rights reserved.

‘Cascade Of Systemic Failures’: Minnesota State Employees Blast Walz For ‘Massive Fraud’ In Social Services

Minnesota state employees accused Democratic Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz of bearing full responsibility for massive fraud that drained the state’s social services programs, claiming he retaliated against whistleblowers who tried to sound the alarm.

“Tim Walz is 100% responsible for massive fraud in Minnesota,” the employees wrote in a statement posted to social media. They described a “cascade of systemic failures” and alleged Walz “systematically retaliated against whistleblowers using monitoring, threats, repression, and did his best to discredit fraud reports.”

The accusations come as federal prosecutors pursue cases involving more than $1 billion in stolen taxpayer funds across three separate schemes. Prosecutors have secured 59 convictions so far in fraud tied to pandemic feeding programs, housing assistance and autism therapy services.

The whistleblowers claimed agency leaders appointed by Walz “willfully disregarded rules and laws to keep fraud reports quiet” and were “not qualified for their jobs, instead getting leadership jobs via Tim Walz’s friendship.” Staff who witnessed fraud were “shutdown, reassigned and told to keep quiet,” according to the statement.

The employees named several officials they say have escaped accountability, including Shireen Gandhi, Jess Geil, Jodi Harpstead, Natasha Merz and Eric Grumdahl.

Walz has denied that concerns about racism allegations slowed his administration’s response. He told the New York Times his administration “erred on the side of generosity” during the pandemic and pointed to new fraud prevention measures.

President Donald Trump has drawn national attention to the scandal, calling Minnesota “a hub of fraudulent money laundering activity” and Walz “seriously retarded” in a Truth Social post. Asked by reporters if he stood by the remark, Trump replied, “Yeah, there’s something wrong with Walz.”

The whistleblowers said they are now appealing to federal authorities for help. “We can’t fight fraud in Minnesota alone,” they wrote.

AUTHOR

Mark Tanos

Contributor

RELATED ARTICLES:

Tim Walz Is Elbows-Deep in Minnesota’s Fraud Scandal

Trump Stands By Calling Tim Walz ‘Seriously Retarded’ Over Somalian Welfare Scandal

Trump Terminates Protected Status Of Minnesota Somalis Over ‘Fraudulent,’ ‘Terrorizing’ Activities

DHS Reportedly Flagged Thousands Of Afghans For ‘National Security’ Concerns Who Were Brought Into Country By Biden

RELATED VIDEO: Gov. Walz under fire as $1B Minnesota social services fraud scandal widens

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Global Jihad It’s Not Just a Slogan

Q: What does the word Islam mean?

A: The word Islam literally means “submission” or “surrender” in Arabic, referring to submission to Allah…. under Islamic/Sharia law.

WHAT ARE THE JIHADIST GOALS?

  1. Large and ever-increasing numbers of hostages
  2. Extreme durations of captivity
  3. Extreme public fear
  4. Extreme submissiveness to terror
  5. Building a worldwide caliphate that dictates all aspects of life under extreme penalties imposed by Sharia law, including death, flogging, amputations, public humiliations, forced conversion to Islam

Global Jihadist Dogma —Will you leave the disbeliever to sleep safely at home while the Muslim women and children shiver with fear of the roars of the crusader airplanes above their heads day and night? How can you enjoy life and sleep while not aiding your brothers, not casting fear into the hearts of the cross worshippers, and not responding to their strikes with multitudes more? So O muwahhid wherever you may be, hinder those who want to harm your brothers and state as much as you can. The best thing you can do is to strive to your best and kill any disbeliever, whether he be French, American, or from any of their allies …

Strike their police, security, and intelligence members, as well as their treacherous agents. Destroy their beds. Embitter their lives for them and busy them with themselves. If you can kill a disbelieving American or European – especially the spiteful and filthy French – or an Australian, or a Canadian, or any other disbeliever from the disbelievers waging war, including the citizens of the countries that entered into a coalition against the Islamic State, then rely upon Allah, and kill him in any manner or way however it may be. Do not ask for anyone’s advice and do not seek anyone’s verdict. Kill the disbeliever whether he is civilian or military, for they have the same ruling. Both of them are disbelievers …

… Rig the roads with explosives for them [the disbelievers]. Attack their bases. Raid their homes. Cut off their heads. Do not let them feel secure. Hunt them wherever they may be. Turn their worldly life into fear and fire. Remove their families from their homes and thereafter blowup their homes … … If you are not able to find an IED or a bullet, then single out the disbelieving American, Frenchman, or any of their allies. Smash his head with a rock, or slaughter him with a knife, or run him over with your car, or throw him down from a high place, or choke him, or poison him … … If you are unable to do so, then burn his home, car, or business. Or destroy his crops. If you are unable to do so, then spit in his face …

WATCH: ‘While Israel Slept’ | Jerusalem Dateline

The kidnap gangs, jihadists and separatists wreaking havoc in Nigeria

Nigeria is currently grappling with a spate of mass abductions. But the vast country – bigger than France and Germany combined – also faces many other security challenges.

Recent attempts by US President Donald Trump and his supporters to frame the insecurity purely as the persecution of Christians overlooks the complexity of Africa’s most-populous nation.

There are more than 250 ethnic groups in Nigeria, which is roughly divided into a mainly Muslim north, a largely Christian south, with intermingling in the middle – and the government says people of all faiths have been victims of attacks.

There are criminal gangs in the north-west, an Islamist insurgency in the north-east, clashes over land in central regions and separatist unrest in the south-east – leaving the 400,000-strong army and the police force of 370,000 officers overstretched.

Here’s a breakdown of the main armed groups and flashpoints:

‘Bandits’ – kidnap gangs

These criminal gangs, known locally as “bandits”, are largely composed of people from the Fulani ethnic group, who traditionally make their living by raising animals. They have traded their pastoral tools for assault rifles, which have flooded Nigeria – and other states in the region – since Libya descended into anarchy following the overthrow in 2011 of long-time strongman Muammar Gadaffi by Nato-backed forces.

The gangs are not known to be motivated by any religious or political ideology, but see kidnapping people for ransom as a quick and easy way to make money rather than walking for miles with their livestock in search of water and grazing land.

They typically move in large numbers on motorcycles, which makes them highly mobile and allows them to strike quickly and escape before the security forces can respond – a tactic used during two recent school abductions.

There is no centrally organised leadership – each gang, often drawn from one family or a specific community, tends to be loyal to its own leader. The police have placed bounties on some of the notable leaders, including Ado Aleru and Bello Turji, and in 2022 the government designated the bandits as “terrorists” in a bid to stem their violence.

Aleru is from Yankuzo town – an area in the north-western state of Zamfara which has been a hub for bandit activity over the last three years.

The gangs, which sometimes fight one another, also travel to neighbouring states and central regions to carry out kidnappings. They also prey on their local communities and are indiscriminate in their ransom demands. In some areas, they tax residents.

Younger bandits, some in their teens, are increasingly taking to TikTok to show off their ransom money, guns and motorcycles – and have garnered thousands of followers.

Continue reading.

©2025 All rights reserved.

SOURCE:

Fear Thy Neighbor: Radicalization and Jihadist Attacks in the West

RELATED VIDEO: This is a war against the Jewish people

Rioting Terrorist Mobs Attack Ice Agents in NYC, Masked Thugs Attack Cops

A mob of roughly 150 anti-ICE agitators swarmed a federal building in lower Manhattan, shoving against barricades and screaming at NYPD officers as agents prepared to enforce immigration law. Masked protesters in helmets and balaclavas tried to overwhelm police lines, snarling “you are corrupt” while officers ordered them to back up. Two were hauled off in cuffs as the crowd raged—an explosive snapshot of a city where far-left activists now riot to protect illegal migrants and obstruct federal law enforcement doing its job.

Police begged them to back up; they refused. The chaos ended with arrests — and with a clear picture of a city where law enforcement is demonized for doing its job while extremists rally to defend illegal immigration at any cost.

This is what civil war looks like.

Imagine when jihad Mamdani gets in.

Utter CHAOS is breaking out against federal agents in NYC as anti-ICE rioters STORM the barricades

Their lives are in danger.

WE NEED MASS ARRESTS NOW or they will keep doing this.

ICE agents have been trapped in an NYC parking garage for OVER AN HOUR now, as anti-ICE “protestors” block the exit

WHY IS THIS BEING ALLOWED?

Rioters should NOT be able to obstruct operations

USE FORCE, remove them, and arrest them ALL!

Anti-ICE protesters Throw Trash and Garbage Cans to block ICE Agents Cars in Lower Manhattan, Arrests and Pepper spray.

150 ICE protesters flock to lower Manhattan government building after reports of agents rounding up illegal migrants

By Rich Calder, NY Post, Nov. 29, 2025:

More than 150 anti-ICE protestors descended on a lower Manhattan government building Saturday and clashed with police after reports that federal agents are planning to round up illegal migrants in the area later this weekend.

NYPD officers and federal officers pushing back protestors away from a federal law enforcement garage.More than 150 anti-ICE protestors descended on a lower Manhattan government building Saturday and clashed with police after reports that federal agents are planning to round up illegal migrants in the area later this weekend. William Farrington

Protesters push against a metal barricade, with one wearing a helmet and balaclava and another a black face mask and red-and-white patterned scarf.At least two protesters were arrested during the clash. William Farrington

At least two protesters were arrested as of 1 p.m., police sources said.

Video showed some protestors screaming “you are corrupt” and ignoring NYPD officers’ pleas to “back up” behind barricades authorities had set up.

Continue reading.

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLES:

Mamdani Assembles Transition Team of Terrorist Defenders and Jew Haters

HOLIDAY HELL: Masked Muslims STORM Christmas Market, Hurl Smoke Bombs at Christian Families

Dearborn: Entire Muslim Crowd Chants “Death to America”

POSTS ON X:

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Mamdani Assembles Transition Team of Terrorist Defenders and Jew Haters

The absolute worst of the worst.

Zohran Mamdani ran for office promising New Yorkers free everything. And then he asked them to give him $4 million to fund his transition team. In a fundraising video, Mamdani claimed that he only had $1 million to keep paying his “incredible team” for the next 50 days.

He also had to “vet the 50,000 resumes we’ve received” for that incredible team.

Now we know where those millions for Mamdani’s “incredible team” are actually going.

Mamdani has brought on 400 people to his transition team across 17 committees including a committee on community organizing, on worker justice, and on immigrant justice. Despite the claims that the Muslim socialist needed millions of dollars to go through tens of thousands of resumes, the ‘team’ is mostly drawn from his political allies in the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA), Islamists and other people who were already involved in his campaign.

The Mamdani transition team has a disproportionate number of Arabs and Muslims on it.

For example, the Committee on Arts and Culture includes 5 people from the Muslim world, the Committee on Community Organizing features 6 people from the Muslim world, the Committee on Community Safety has 3 , the Committee on Government Operations has 4, the Committee on Immigrant Justice has 8, the Committee on Legal Affairs has 6, and the Committee on Small Businesses has 4.

And the transition team includes some of the most extreme figures in New York City politics.

During his campaign, Zohran Mamdani had lied and claimed that, despite his past statements calling for the defunding of the police, he was no longer interested in police defunding.

But Mamdani’s ‘public safety’ committee will include Alex Vitale, the author of ‘The End of Policing’ who had called for eliminating the police, legalizing many crimes and using social services to deal with other offenses. Vitale had claimed that “police are violence workers”, described police as “the natural enemy of the working class” and urged that “if you don’t want racism and violence, don’t get the police involved.”

Unsurprisingly, for the transition team of a politician whose signature issue was validating Islamic violence and hatred against Jews through moral inversion, Mamdani’s transition team stands out for the sheer number of members who hate Jews.

That includes Hassaan Chaudhary, a fellow Indian Muslim who headed up Muslim outreach for Mamdani, who had praised Iranian dictator Ahmadinejad for his call to eliminate Israel, and used “Jew” as an insult. Also on the Mamdani transition team is ousted Women’s March leader Tamika Mallory, who had celebrated Farrakhan, and accused Jews of being behind slavery.

Mamdani’s legal committee includes Tahanie Aboushi, a BDS supporter, close friend of Linda Sarsour, and ‘Palestinian’ ‘civil rights’ lawyer whose father was sentenced to 22 years in prison. As Middle East Forum noted, she was involved in an organization that a Hamas front group tried to direct funds to.

Also on the legal committee is Baher Azmy of the Communist founded Center for Constitutional Rights who represented various ‘war on terror’ detainees and is one of the lawyers for Mahmoud Khalil, a foreign national who served as a key figure in the campus terrorist protests with a stated mission of “the total eradication of western civilization”.

Another member of the legal committee is Ramzi Kassem who had claimed that 9/11 was due to the “resentment these terrorists felt towards the United States” as a result of “our country’s policies” and that “the legacy of 9/11 ought to be recounted primarily through the stories of Muslims the world over who have largely paid the price of American power and prosperity.”

Kassem’s clients included Ahmed al-Darbi, an Al Qaeda terrorist and the brother-in-law of one of the hijackers who flew a plane into the Pentagon, and who was himself a key figure in the bombing of an oil tanker.

“Terrorism is but one of many reactions to oppression and dispossession and not their cause,” Kassem had argued.

While at Columbia University, Kassem co-founded Turath, an association of Muslim students, and then Qanun at Columbia Law. A fellow student described these hateful groups as having brought “under the guidance of Mr. Kassem… speakers to this campus that support violence against American and Israeli civilians… defended the genocidal program of Hamas.”

Also on the legal committee is Afaf Nasher, the executive director of CAIR’s New York chapter. CAIR’s founder had celebrated Oct 7.

Hassan Naveed, another member of Mamdani’s transition team, had been fired by the Adams administration from his former role of heading up the New York City’s Office for the Prevention of Hate Crimes over the rise of hate crimes during his tenure, who sued claiming that he was fired because of ‘Islamophobia’. According to Naveed, who sued the city for $1 million (and under Mamdani is likely to get it, at taxpayer expense), Mayor Eric Adams had engaged in “discriminatory conduct against Muslims, Arabs, Palestinians and those perceived to be affiliated with these identities” by comparing pro-Hamas rallies to KKK rallies.

The culture committee of the transition team includes Suroosh Alvi, a Canadian ‘journalist’ with Vice, who interviewed Hamas figures, and promoted false claims of ‘genocide’.

On Oct 7, as Hamas was murdering Jews, Lumumba Akinwole-Bandele, of the Malcolm X Grassroots projects, tweeted ‘solidarity’ for Gaza. He’s a member of the transition team.

Also joining the Mamdani transition team is Waleed Shahid, a Bernie Sanders and AOC ally, who claimed that Muslims had been “politically silenced or scared to organize or protest the ‘wars on terror’” and has battled to stop Israel’s campaign against Hamas. Shaheed’s wife, Emily Mayer, heads If Not Now, an anti-Israel BDS hate group that targets Jewish groups.

Other members of the transition team include Christine Marinoni, the girlfriend of Hollywood actress Cynthia Nixon, both of whom engage in anti-Israel activism, supposedly at the behest of Aboushi.

While the Mamdani team pretended that it needed millions of dollars to gather resumes from tens of thousands of people volunteering to fix the city, the truth is that its committees are an incestous collection of radical activists circling around the DSA and allied movements. Many members of the committees have come out of anti-Israel and pro-terrorist organizing.

Mamdani raised $4 million to build a team of the same old radicals he already knew, who have nothing but contempt and hatred for America and for New York City, and who plan to destroy it under the guise of implementing policies that they know are unworkable and insane.

Take Alex Vitale who had written an entire book calling for the elimination of the police. When asked what his solution to violent crime was, he replied that “will we need some kind of state agency that is capable of defending people from violence and exploitation? Yes. Might it look a lot like police look today? Possibly.” Why abolish the police just to replace them with the police?

But the radical Mamdani ally had described the police as a threat to “radical socialist oriented politics” that “will be used to stop us” and claimed that abolishing the police “creates political space for us to do what we need to do.”

This was never about free buses or government supermarkets. It’s not really about defunding the police or any of the other transparently unworkable promises, it’s about the revolution.

And the ‘revolution’ is about seizing power and destroying New York City and America.

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLES:

American Jews Overwhelmingly Distrust Zohran Mamdani

The Marxist-Islamic World War Against Western Civilization

The Muslim Brotherhood and the Islamist Threat

Afghan Muslim ‘Refugees’ Have Killed 55 People, Wounded 92 in the U.S.

U.S. Muslim lawyer: ‘We don’t want dialogue, two-state solution, and all that. Zionism needs to be dismantled.’

‘From Dearborn to New York, only one nation under God’

Islamic Republic of Iran: Matchmaking platform lets parents sign up children as young as 13 for marriage

RELATED VIDEO: This is a war against the Jewish people

EDITORS NOTE: This Jihad Watch column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

NBC Justifies Cold Blooded Shooting of Two National Guard Troops

NBC host Ken Dilanian slammed for ‘justifying’ shooting in Washington D.C. Only a Democrat could consider those enforcing the law and keeping the peace controversial or legitimate targets of violence. And blood is on the Democrat media axis cloven hooves who put a target on the National Guard and ICE.

How much longer are we to sit by and watch these destroyers incite to murder and mayhem?

The group Win Without War placed billboards near bases like Fort Bragg, with messages like ‘Don’t let them make you break the law’ and a link to resources on military rights from veteran groups and lawyers. This follows a video by six Democratic veteran lawmakers, including Senators Elissa Slotkin and Mark Kelly, stressing that service members must refuse orders violating the law or Constitution, backed by military law under the Uniform Code of Military Justice. Critics call it seditious, especially after two Guard members were shot in a targeted attack near the White House on November 26, while supporters say it honors troops by upholding the law. The effort highlights tensions as Guard units continue deployments.

NBC anchor Ken Dilanian was met with outrage after he attempted to justify the shooting of two National Guard officers near the White House.

Only a Democrat could consider those enforcing the law and keeping the peace controversial or legitimate targets of violence. How much longer are we to sit by and watch these destroyers incite to murder and mayhem?

As one commenter pointed out: “This is just an escalation of the violence that the democrats have displayed on the streets of America since the George Floyd protests. Here we have a civilian engaged in combat with our uniform military troops. Every time a sandwich is thrown, a lawful order is disobeyed, a crowd assembles without a permit, or traffic is disrupted a strong inappropriate response needs to occur. Nothing that has occurred in the last few years is civil disobedience. It is criminal activity, rioting, and mayhem. It must be called what it is.”

How much longer are we to sit by and watch these destroyers incite to murder and mayhem?

Mind you, this is their legal corespondent.

FOX: Dilanian appeared during the network’s breaking news coverage and was asked about the environment in D.C. since President Donald Trump deployed the National Guard earlier this year. He responded by noting how the National Guard’s presence has been normalized, and it was no longer seen as controversial after D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser embraced the deployment.

He then pivoted to the political climate around the country.

The White House is taking aim at MS NOW correspondent Ken Dilanian over his initial reaction to Wednesday’s shooting of National Guard troops in Washington D.C.

Dilanian appeared during the network’s breaking news coverage and was asked about the environment in D.C. since President Donald Trump deployed the National Guard earlier this year. He responded by noting how the National Guard’s presence has been normalized, and it was no longer seen as controversial after D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser embraced the deployment.

He then pivoted to the political climate around the country.

“Of course, you know, there’s so much controversy happening in the United States right now with ICE, who are also wearing uniforms and wearing masks,” Dilanian told MS NOW’s Katy Tur. “And so there’s — you don’t know — people walking around with uniforms in an American city. There are some Americans that might object to that. And so apparently this shooting has happened.”

MS NOW correspondent Ken Dilanian was slammed by critics for his commentary about the shooting of National Guardsmen in Washington D.C. (Screenshot/MS NOW)

Tur and Dilanian also questioned the legality of the National Guard deployment in D.C., citing a federal judge’s ruling that it was unlawful, which the Trump administration is appealing.

“@KDilanianMSNOW, two heroes were just shot protecting our nation’s capital — and this is your takeaway?” the White House wrote on X.

“Democrats have relentlessly demonized these Patriots, calling them ‘illegal’ and even suggesting THEY might start shooting Americans. Get help. You are beyond sick,” the White House added.

“Of course, you know, there’s so much controversy happening in the United States right now with ICE, who are also wearing uniforms and wearing masks,” Dilanian told MS NOW’s Katy Tur. “And so there’s — you don’t know — people walking around with uniforms in an American city. There are some Americans that might object to that. And so apparently this shooting has happened.”

“MS NOW is about to have to rebrand again. This is truly disgusting,” Turning Point USA spokesman Andrew Kolvet reacted.

NY Post: Critics are lambasting MS NOW correspondent Ken Dilanian for seemingly suggesting the suspect who critically injured two National Guardsmen near the White House was reacting to “controversy” surrounding uniformed Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers in American cities.

Dilanian, a justice and intelligence correspondent for the network, pitched his two cents on the devastating shooting while on-air Wednesday afternoon.

“[O]f course, you know, there’s so much controversy happening in the United States right now with ICE, who are also wearing uniforms and wearing masks. And so there’s, you don’t know, people walking around with uniforms in an American city. There are some Americans that might object to that. And so apparently this shooting has happened,” he said during an MS NOW breaking news report.

The shooting, which law enforcement officials said was a targeted “ambush,” critically wounded two National Guardsmen, including one who was believed to be shot in the head.

Many online users struggled to fathom Dilanian’s contrarian perspective that brushed over the severity of the flagrant attack.

“You do realize two people were murdered? Surely you know this,” one user wrote on X.

“Leave it to MS FakeNews to victim blame,” another added.

“This is an insane take and no pushback. You can’t hate the media enough,” one user wrote.

“A day before Thanksgiving, two families have lost their loved ones. How dare you say this?” another blasted.

After the shooting, President Trump ordered 500 additional National Guard troops be sent to Washington, DC. There are already more than 2,000 stationed in the nation’s capital.

Continue reading

AUTHOR

 

RELATED ARTICLES:

The White House’s rapid response team slammed Dilanian’s comments on social media.

Screaming “ALLAHU AKBAR!,” Muslim Migrant Shoots Two DC National Guard Troops Near White House

RELATED VIDEO: National Guard shooter Rahmanullah Lakanwal was a member of Afghanistan’s notorious “Death Squads.”

POST ON X:

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Trump Announces Female National Guardsmen Shot In D.C. Has Died

President Donald Trump announced that one of the two West Virginia National Guardsmen who was shot Wednesday in Washington, D.C., succumbed to her wounds Thursday.

West Virginia National Guard Specialist Sarah Beckstrom and West Virginia Air National Guard Andrew Wolfe were allegedly attacked at the Farragut West Metro Station in Washington, D.C., roughly a mile from the White House by Rahmanullah Lakanwal, an Afghan national who entered the United States in September 2021 after the American withdrawal from Afghanistan. Beckstrom’s wounds were described as fatal on Thursday, according to The New York Times, as confirmed by her father before her passing.

WATCH: President Trump: ‘National Guard member Sarah Beckstrom has sadly passed away’

“Sarah Beckstrom of West Virginia, one of the guardsmen that we’re talking about, highly respected, young, magnificent person, started service in June of 2023 outstanding in every way. She’s just passed away,” Trump said as he was about to call servicemembers for Thanksgiving.

Both National Guardsmen were in critical condition since the Wednesday shooting. Beckstrom’s father told the Times he was at the hospital with her.

“I’m holding her hand right now,” Gary Beckstrom said. “She has a mortal wound. It’s not going to be a recovery.”

“All we need right now are prayers for my son,” a man at Wolfe’s Martinsburg, West Virginia, family home said when contacted by the Times Thursday.

Beckstrom’s death means that Lakanwal, currently facing three counts of assault with intent to kill, will now face “murder in the first degree,” something U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro of the District of Columbia vowed would be the case if either Bergstrom or Wolfe died from their wounds during a Thanksgiving Day press conference.

“As we stand here today, the charges that are appropriate right now are three accounts of assault with intent to kill. He will be charged with possession of a firearm during a crime of violence. He faces 15 years under the assault with the intent to kill,” Pirro told reporters. “We intend to continue monitoring what the charges will be depending upon the well-being of the guardsmen. We are praying that they survive and that the highest charge will not have to be murder in the first degree. But make no mistake, if they do not, that will certainly be the charge: Murder in the first degree.”

Journalist Julio Rojas allegedly reported Lakanwal shouted “Allahu akbar!” before opening fire on the National Guardsmen with a Smith and Wesson revolver. Upon coming under attack, one National Guardsman who didn’t have a firearm stabbed Lakanwal with a pocketknife, while an armed National Guardsman shot the suspected gunman multiple times, according to Rojas.

AUTHOR

Harold Hutchison

Media Reporter

RELATED ARTICLES:

Trump Says We Must Reevaluate Afghan Refugees Following Shooting Of National Guardsmen

Jeanine Pirro Provides Shocking Detail About 2 National Guardsmen Shot In DC

Legacy Media Goes From Ignoring To Endorsing Illegal Immigrant Crime

Deport All Afghans

Afghan Muslim migrant gets 15 years prison for plotting jihad massacre on U.S. Election Day

Leftist protester named ‘Jihad’ charged with assault and robbery after brawl at Berkeley Turning Point USA rally

IMPORTING JIHAD: Biden’s Unvetted Hijrah Leads to Coldblooded National Guard Shooting

RELATED VIDEO: National Guard shooter Rahmanullah Lakanwal was a member of Afghanistan’s notorious “Death Squads.”

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.


All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

What Democrats Have Recently Said About National Guard

Amid the tragic news that 2 National Guard members had been shot in Washington, D.C., Wednesday, social media users drew attention to recent comments by Democrat lawmakers on President Donald Trump’s use of the National Guard to combat crime in cities across America.

Washington, D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser referred to the attack as a “targeted shooting.”

“What we know is that this is a targeted shooting, one individual who appeared to target these guardsmen. That individual has been taken into custody,” said Bowser, who announced Tuesday she would not be seeking reelection.

Sen. Elissa Slotkin went on TV last Sunday and claimed that National Guardsmen were going to start shooting at American civilians,” posted Greg Price, who formerly served as a rapid response manager for the Trump White House.

In an interview Sunday, Slotkin, D-Mich., defended her decision to appear in a video with other Democrats that urged military members to not follow “illegal orders” from the Trump administration.

“So, for me, my primary concern is the use of U.S. military on American shores, on our city—in our cities and in our streets. We’ve seen now the courts overturn the deployment of U.S. military into our streets, including here in Washington, D.C,” Slotkin said on ABC program “This Week.”

“When you look at these videos coming out of places like Chicago, it makes me incredibly nervous that we’re about to see people in law enforcement, people in uniform military get nervous, get stressed, shoot at American civilians,” she added.

“It is very—a very, very stressful situation for these law enforcement and for the communities on the ground.”

Slotkin’s office did not immediately respond to a request for comment about her remarks on “This Week.” In an X post Wednesday, she called the shooting “heartbreaking.”

Price also highlighted remarks by Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker, a Democrat, made on Aug. 31. “J.B. Pritzker claimed that President Trump’s deployment of the National Guard was an ‘attack on the American people’ and will be used to ‘stop the 2026 elections,’” wrote Price.

Trump sent National Guard troops to Chicago in October.

Priztker’s office did not immediately respond to a request for comment. On X, he posted that Wednesday’s attack was “unacceptable violence.”

Steve Guest, who formerly worked for Sen. Ted Cruz and the Republican National Committee, highlighted remarks made by California Gov. Gavin Newsom, a Democrat.

“Democrats from Elissa Slotkin to Gavin Newsom need to watch their dangerous rhetoric,” wrote Guest. “Last month, Gavin Newsom said that National Guard troops in cities were ‘right out of the dictator’s handbook.’”

Newsom’s office did not immediately respond to a request for comment. On X, Newsom posted, “There must be zero tolerance for violence — of any kind — against the brave men and women in uniform who selflessly serve our communities and our country.”

Trump, who pledged on Truth Social Wednesday that the shooter “will pay a very steep price,” first brought the National Guard to Washington, D.C. in August. Secretary of War Pete Hegseth announced Wednesday more National Guard troops would be coming to D.C.

“This happened just steps from the White House and it will not stand and that’s why President Trump has asked me—and I will ask the secretary of the Army to the National Guard—to add 500 additional troops, National Guardsmen, to Washington, D.C.,”  said Hegseth.

This article has been corrected to reflect that Muriel Bowser is not seeking reelection.

AUTHOR

Katrina Trinko is the editor-in-chief of The Daily Signal. Send an email to Katrina. Katrina on X: .