I bet there are so many more of these stories in the Western world we aren’t even aware of at all. It’s practicly a fluke when we run across them in local news outlets in various countries.
Another indicator that the problem is the Muslims far less so than the problem is the termites when someone drives a truckload of termites up to your log cabin and dumps them there with a generous starter pack of sawdust and a map to the types of wood they will find in your home. Especially when the same person who drove them there makes it a criminal offence to call out the termites as the creatures eating your home. You can mention the home is being eaten, but it is increasingly a defacto as well as de jure criminal offence, let’s call it “entomophobia” to speak the literal truth of what you see and hear with your own senses.
French authorities have once again narrowly prevented a mass-casualty terror attack on national soil. On April 2, 2025, three young men, aged 19 to 24, were arrested and charged in connection with a foiled bombing plot in northern France. At least one of the suspects had pledged allegiance to the Islamic State and constructed a functioning explosive vest. According to the National Anti-Terrorism Prosecutor’s Office (PNAT), the men intended to carry out a coordinated attack using improvised explosive devices.
This latest case highlights a growing trend in France: the domestic radicalization of young men either born in or welcomed into the country under France’s decades-long open-border migration policy, combined with the state’s inability or unwillingness to meaningfully counter Islamic indoctrination.
Details of the Plot
The arrests were announced by PNAT on April 6, following confirmation from Le Parisien. According to the investigation, led by the General Directorate of Internal Security (DGSI), the ringleader—identified as Morad M, just 19 years old—was living in a youth residence in Dunkirk. Authorities say he had pledged allegiance to the Islamic State (ISIS) and used social media to call for the killing of “unbelievers.”
Upon searching his home, investigators discovered a homemade explosive vest, reportedly wired and operational, along with a fire-starting device. A second suspect, 21 years old, is believed to have supplied a fake firearm intended for use during the attack. Both men have been charged with participation in a terrorist criminal association and possession of incendiary or explosive substances. They are now in pre-trial detention.
A third suspect was charged with failure to report a terrorist crime and placed under judicial supervision.
This cell had reportedly discussed multiple potential targets, although no specifics have been released to the public. The plot follows the March arrest of a 17-year-old minor in Haute-Savoie, also charged with preparing a terrorist act under the direction of PNAT.
A Predictable Outcome of State Policy
Despite repeated assurances from the Macron administration that radicalization is being monitored and managed, the emergence of yet another ISIS-inspired plot involving French residents—one a minor, the others barely into adulthood—raises urgent questions about the effectiveness of France’s counterterrorism, immigration, and integration policies.
The suspects in this case were not foreign fighters returning from conflict zones. They were living in France, radicalized inside its borders. This is a direct indictment of the parallel societies and ideological enclaves allowed to fester under France’s failed multicultural experiment.
Instead of requiring full cultural integration, the French state has, for years, prioritized “inclusion” at the expense of national cohesion, empowering radical ideologies to thrive in marginalized urban zones. Combined with generous housing and welfare provisions, the state has enabled a climate of entitlement without assimilation—fertile ground for jihadist ideology.
Left-Wing Leadership and the Suppression of Dissent
France’s left-leaning leadership continues to treat terror plots as isolated incidents, often without acknowledging the clear and consistent ideological patterns. Political leaders rarely address the systemic failures enabling these plots: mass migration from conflict zones, the proliferation of radical networks, and the shielding of extremist ideology behind laws against “Islamophobia.”
Instead, government institutions have increasingly targeted journalists, researchers, and citizens who raise concerns about these developments—branding them as xenophobic or “far-right.” The result is a political culture where criticizing Islam, Islamic jihad, and jihadis invites legal risk, while pledging loyalty to ISIS leads to monitored housing and judicial leniency.
A Turning Point for France?
The foiled attack in Dunkirk should serve as yet another wake-up call—not just for law enforcement, but for France’s policymakers. The facts are unavoidable:
- Islamic terrorists continue to operate within French borders.
- The primary vector is not foreign infiltration, but domestic radicalization enabled by state inaction.
- Open-border policies and integration failures are directly contributing to the threat.
If the French Republic wishes to survive as a sovereign, secular nation, it must move beyond rhetoric and enact serious structural reforms. Without decisive leadership, the state’s tolerance for ideological subversion will continue to place its own citizens at risk. And next time, authorities may not be fast enough to prevent the explosion.
his is desirable for communists as they seek the deracination of all identity and perhaps especially Jewish identity. For those who doubt it, read Karl Marx’s book, The Jewish Question.
The Jewish component of the revolution would also be similar to people with dark skin joining BLM, although there are far fewer of them than there are white leftists in that Marxist organization. Same goes for feminism. Feminism is where communist women use their sex as a sword and a shield to destroy women as an identity. If you don’t believe that, check out the Women’s current US Pro billiards tournament that has two men playing each other for the championship.
Additionally:
A couple of items for those who will inevitably think that “The Jews” are responsible for the mass immigration of Muslims. I will concede one aspect of that. Some of the most famous dialectical engineers against the West are of Jewish heritage. But communist Jews, are not Jews. They are communists who use their Jewish heritage and perceived identity as both a sword to deconstruct Western civilization for communism, and a shield to protect themselves from blowback, with the additional bonus of also creating antisemitism. This is desirable for communists as they seek the deracination of all identity and perhaps especially Jewish identity. For those who doubt it, read Karl Marx’s book, The Jewish Question.
The Jewish component of the revolution would also be similar to people with dark skin joining BLM, although there are far fewer of them than there are white leftists in that Marxist organization. Same goes for feminism. Feminism is where communist women use their sex as a sword and a shield to destroy women as an identity. If you don’t believe that, check out the Women’s current US Pro billiards tournament that has two men playing each other for the championship.
Also, the fact that many many people of Jewish heritage are now afraid to tell their names or show any ethnic heritage in public might suggest that if indeed Jews as Jews are responsible for bringing mass Islamic migration to Europe, they have to be the stupidest people on Earth. In every instance including the video linked above, when a major Jihad attack is planned in the West, a Jewish target is included or planned. Often the sole target. And this includes the major attack in Bombay some years ago, where a significant portion of the total resources of the ISI sponsored terrorist group went across town to attack and kill a small Orthodox Jewish outpost. Had they not done that, the attack would have taken far more casualties in the downtown areas where the main attack was. In other words, they were ready to sacrifice efficiency and the degree to which the attack would be spectacular just to get a few Jews across town.
So yes. Do people like Barbara Learner Spectre or George Soros connect their Jewish heritage to their part of the planned destruction of the West? Most certainly. That is the dialectic. But it is their communism that motivates those efforts. And the fact that ANTIFA and for that matter, BLM are mostly white males doesn’t even get an honourable mention. And why? Because the deracination of White people is taking place in every major institution already. The “Residential schools” mass line narrative attack being just one good example from Canada. But like the Jews, blacks and women who use their identity as a dialectical accelerant, their whiteness and maleness or other aspects of their identity have nothing to do with it, It is their communist indoctrination and beliefs that do. The Jewish people who fight this thing, often even on behalf of Christianity and individualism don’t seem to factor into the math for the antisemites.
What the thinker thinks the finder finds, I think is the expression. A literary way of describing confirmation bias.
EDITORS NOTE: This Vlad Tepes Blog column with video posted by Eeyore is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.
