BETHESDA, Md. /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ — As final GOP primary votes are cast in states from California to New Jersey, Law Professor Victor Williams issues a fulsome and unreserved endorsement of Donald Trump.
Professor Williams began his June 7 endorsement by championing Trump’s decision to expose the bias and conflict of interest demonstrated by federal judge Gonzalo Curiel. Williams states: “Donald Trump has again dared to speak truth to power.”
Former Attorney General Alberto Gonzaleshas also supported Trump’s right to challenge the judge’s bias. Gonzales reminds that a judge is ethically required not only to avoid conflicts but also to void even the appearance of impropriety.
Judge Curiel is a Member of the Leftist San Diego La Raza Lawyers Association. (La Raza is Translated and Politically Promoted as “the Race.”)
Judge Curiel is a longtime member/leader of the pro-illegal immigration group — San Diego La Raza Lawyers Association. The direct translation and self-promoted political meaning of La Raza by such groups is “the Race.”
(Since its founding, the leftist San Diegolawyers’ group has divisively self-branded as La Raza – “the Race.”)
The San Diego La Raza lawyers’ group claims as an affiliate the even more radical National Council of La Raza. And the national La Raza umbrella organization is virulently anti-Trump. La Raza groups nationwide are in obdurate opposition to Trump’s pledge to secure the nation’s southern border.
Victor Williams argues that in the Trump University class-action lawsuit, Judge Curiel has consistently demonstrated a prejudice against Trump. The judge’s latest ruling — effectuating a document dump to the media while noting Trump’s public positions — was obviously orchestrated to harm Trump’s campaign.
Donald Trump – the non-politician — dared to connect the dots to point out that the judge was being unfair. Professor Williams is adamant that the “La Raza” judge should be recused.
The double-dealing media and GOP political elites are (once again) apoplectic by such Trump truth-telling.
An Early Trump Supporter Became the Last Trump Competitor Standing; Professor Williams Now Goes All-In for Trump
Victor Williams is the Washington, D.C law professor who launched a spring 2016 “write-in” campaign for the GOP nomination in several late primary states.
(As the CPI/Daily Beast recently profiled, Williams finally left the Democratic Party after its shameful Irancapitulation. Williams became a Trump supporter in December 2015.)
Even after Cruz “suspended,” the law professor remained a formal candidate so as to play-out the resulting litigation. Williams v. Cruz is now before a New Jersey appellate court to resolve the “natural born Citizen” controversy.
With the primaries over, Williams gladly ends his “write-in” campaign.
A “Micro” Pro-Trump Super PAC: Williams’ Next Project
Victor Williams will soon launch his next disruptive project to support Trump. Professor Williams plans a “micro-focused, pro-Trump Super PAC.”
Williams’ presidential campaign garnered substantial free media exposure from the left and right with ultra-minimal expenditures. Not crossing the Federal Election Commission’s $5000 spent/raised filing threshold, Williams was not even required to make the initial FEC candidate filing.
With a $7.35 average individual contribution, Williams even beat Bernie Sander’s historically low individual donation-average.
However election law will allow Professor Williams’ independent, pro-Trump Super PAC unlimited contributions and expenditures (although with detailed FEC reporting).
Williams will raise and spend heavily for the campaign against Hillary Clinton – but he pledges continued cost effectiveness for this Super PAC. It is the Trump/Sanders 2016-campaign-frugality model.
Dear Janet Murguía
President and CEO
National Council of La Raza, NCLR
I am reading with interest lots of Latinos are now seeking U.S. citizenship so this way they can vote against Mr. Trump because they are unhappy that he will enforce US immigration laws and build a wall across our southern border.
On your website you claim to be non partisan but apparently it seems the predominant idea is that you register these fine folks as democrats to vote against Mr. Trump because they don’t like his belief that U.S. sovereignty should be protected.
Just my opinion. I hope its ok that I write to you English. I can write in Spanish if that will help you translate.
You also state that you will continue to focus on the issues and policies that matter to the Latino community across the country. You state “We will continue to prioritize voter registration—”
La Raza (NCLR) has registered 500,000 new voters to date—as well as pressing issues in immigration, education, employment and the economy, and health care.
We will turn our eyes and ears to 2016 to make sure that our voices are heard at the ballot box and on Capitol Hill.
Very good. We need these folks paying taxes to help fund the wall.
With this in mind if you are opposed to a wall across our southern border will you also lobby the Mexican government to tear down the wall they built between Guatemala and Mexico.
If people from Guatemala want to sneak into Mexico it is very difficult due to this border wall. I mean come on.
If people from Guatemala want to sneak into the USA for all the tax payer funded free stuff they first have to climb this dang wall in Mexico. Now that is not fair.
Will you also lobby the Mexican government to change their immigration laws to allow us Americans to enter into Mexico and collect Mexican welfare, Taco Bell food stamps, Mexican social security benefits, Nogales government housing, a free phone, free education for our kids and translators paid for by the Mexican government.
Much appreciate you help in this matter.
I will send a link to this column to the Mexican Embassy in Washington, D.C. to keep them in the loop.
Oh, and before you call me a racist my Colombian fiancée sends her regards to you all along with all her family in Bogota South America.
They have asked me to tell you to make sure you tell your Hispanic base if they want to come to the United States they need to get their asses in line at the U.S. Consulate offices then pass a police investigation and FBI check, pass a physical exam and learn to speak English and wait the 2 years like she did.
https://drrichswier.com/wp-content/uploads/Obama-with-illegal-gang-members-e1462184891965.jpg361640Geoff Rosshttp://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.pngGeoff Ross2016-03-08 06:46:472016-06-09 09:29:43Great news! La Rasa helps 500,000 Latinos to register to vote
It is comforting to know that the USCIS (US Citizen and Immigration Service) has rounded up all the criminal aliens in the US and screened all of the refugees entering the country and now has time to run a program as part of OBAMA’S TASK FORCE ON NEW AMERICANS to educate librarians across America on how to promote the joys of diversity to redneck boobs (they don’t say redneck boobs, but that is the implication).
Librarians can join a conference call tomorrow to get their indoctrination training. But please note: Press is not invited to the propaganda training program! Why the secrecy?
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) invites interested librarians to participate in a webinar on Tuesday, Oct. 27 from 2 to 3 p.m. (Eastern) to learn about the White House Task Force on New Americans. The Task Force is an interagency effort to develop a federal strategy to better integrate immigrants into local communities. During the presentation, representatives from the USCIS Office of Citizenship will cover the Task Force’s recent initiatives, with specific focus on the Building Welcoming Communities Campaign and the Citizenship Public Education and Awareness Campaign, and highlight ways that libraries can get involved.
To register for this session, please follow the steps below:
Once we process your registration, you will receive a confirmation email with additional details. If you have any questions regarding the registration process, or if you have not received a confirmation email within two business days, please email us at Public.Engagement@uscis.dhs.gov.
Note to media: This webinar is not for press purposes. Please contact the USCIS Press Office at (202) 272-1200 for any media inquiries.
We look forward to engaging with you!
About the featured photo of Cecilia Munoz is Obama’s director of domestic policy and is a former leader of La Raza (The race). She wants to be sure as Obama leaves office that they have changed the DNA of government so his plan to “seed” your communities with diversity goes on without them. This librarian outreach is part of the strategy to silence any local resistance…
Just a reminder that one of Obama’s architects of his PLAN TO SEED YOUR TOWNS WITH NEW AMERICANS is Cecilia Munoz.
Friday’s conference was titled “The New National Integration Plan: Making the Most of a Historic Opportunity.”
Muñoz, a former executive with the National Council of La Raza, said it was her job “to make sure we build this really into the DNA across the federal bureaucracy, at a leadership level, but much more importantly to make sure that when political appointees like me are no longer here this (immigration strategy) is built into what those agencies do and think about every day.”
Muñoz said it was important for the federal government to standardize, set benchmarks and “measure successes,” ensuring states and localities create the desired “welcoming communities” for immigrants and refugees.
How do you think they are going to “set benchmarks” and “measure successes” in your town? They will determine how diverse your town is and come with a big stick—a threat to withdraw federal money from city projects—if your community is not sufficiently diverse.
By the way, I’ve noticed in my travels lately that few people know anything about Obama’s Task Force on New Americans and the plan to “seed” your towns and cities with diversity. That is discouraging.
https://drrichswier.com/wp-content/uploads/munoz.jpg413620Ann Corcoranhttp://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.pngAnn Corcoran2015-10-27 08:27:172015-10-27 08:31:45Federal Propaganda: Training America’s Librarians on How to Spread Diversity
It was supposed to be a phone call for Obama administration ears only. But hear it the radio host did, she says. And what she heard should make your blood run cold — and perhaps your rage hot. Obama’s amnesty plan is to use illegal aliens as “seedlings,” said the federal officials. They will “navigate, not assimilate,” as they “take over the host,” create a “country within a country” and start “pushing the citizens into the shadows.”
Welcome to the “fundamental transformation” of America.
The above was alleged by WCBM radio co-host Sue Payne in an interview with talk giant Mark Levin last Thursday. Payne says that while at an immigration rally, she became privy to three conference calls in which 16 Obama administration officials — including Cecilia Muñoz, director of Obama’s White House Domestic Policy Council — discussed plans for what could only be called the final destruction of traditional America and the cementing of leftist hegemony. Muñoz, by the way, is perfectly suited to this task; she was once a senior vice president for the anti-American Hispanic lobbying organization the National Council of La Raza.
Oh, la raza means “the race” (I guess the whole “‘Hispanic’ is an ethnicity” thing doesn’t cut much ice with them).
Payne opened the interview by explaining that what Obama actually did on November 21 — the day he signed his supposed executive amnesty — was create the “Task Force on New Americans” (TFNA) for the purposes of implementing his legalization scheme. And it won’t be applied to just 5 million illegals, but “13 to 15 million to give protection [to] and move…on to citizenship,” reports Payne.
Payne then said that the illegals, labeled “seedlings,” would eventually “take over the host.” She continued, “And the immigrants will come out of the shadows, and what I got from the meetings was that they would be pushing the citizens into the shadows. They would be taking over the country; in fact, one of the members of the task force actually said that we would be developing a country within a country.”
To this nefarious end, the goal of the TFNA is to create a “welcoming feeling” in illegal-seeded localities, which would be redesignated “receiving communities.” They’d subsequently be transformed (fundamentally, I suppose) into what are labeled “emerging immigrant communities” — or as some would say, México Norte.
The officials also said, reports Payne, that for the seedlings to “grow” they needed “fertile soil” (a.k.a. your tax money). The officials stated that the legalized aliens needed to be redesignated as “refugees” and be given cash, medical care, credit cards for purchasing documents and — since many illegals will be older — Social Security so they can “age successfully within their country within a country,” to quote Payne. As she then put it, it’s “as if we were funding our own destruction here.”
Some may point out that Payne has no smoking gun (that we know of) in the form of, let’s say, a recording of the calls. But Levin vetted her and found her credible, calling the scheme “stunning” and reflective of “Mao’s China.” I believe her as well, but it doesn’t even matter. She simply confirms what I’ve been warning of for yearsandyearsoverandoveragain: The Left is importing their voters, engaging in demographic warfare and authoring the death of the republic.
Mind you, legal immigration itself is a sufficient vehicle for this. Ever since the Immigration Reform and Nationality Act of 1965, 85 percent of our immigrants have hailed from the Third World and Asia, thus growing leftist constituencies that vote for socialistic Democrats by approximately a four-to-one margin; in contrast and as Pat Buchanan pointed out, “[N]early 90 percent of all Republican votes in presidential elections are provided by Americans of European descent.” This, along with hatred and bigotry, is a major reason why Obama and his ilk want to destroy white America.
But liberals crave immediate gratification, and amnesty greatly accelerates this process. Legalize 15 million socialist voters clamoring for handouts, have them bring in relatives via chain migration — give them Social Security numbers which they can use to vote (as is Obama’s plan) — and tomorrow’s leftist dystopia is today. I predicted this in 2008, by the way, writing:
The coup de grace Obama will use against rightist opposition is mostly embodied in one word: amnesty. This, along with some other measures, will both grow the Hispanic voting block and ingratiate Obama to it. This will enable him to create a powerful coalition of blacks, young voters and Hispanics that, along with the older whites he will be able to retain, will constitute an insurmountable electoral force. And this is why amnesty has long been a dream of the Democrats. Even easier than brainwashing new voters (which the media and academia specialize in) is importing them.
Admittedly, I can be criticized since the above article is titled “How Obama Will Ensure His Victory in 2012.” But titles are hooks as much as anything else. And since I don’t have a crystal ball, just a not yet crystallized brain, I’d never claim to be able to perfectly predict timing. It also turned out that Obama and the 2009 to 2011Democrat House and Senate were preoccupied with instituting ObamaCare, and that the liberal legislators were perhaps too cowardly to face re-election having passed amnesty. Regardless, I have another prediction, one I hope you’ll take seriously:
The chances are slim to nil that Obama’s amnesty will be stopped legislatively.
Obama against John Boehner is the Beltway Brawler vs. the Beltway Bawler. Moreover, I suspect establishment Republicans — who just refused to defund Obama’s scheme — want executive amnesty. Why? Because the issue has been an albatross around their necks. And while they don’t have the guts or desire to really stand against Invasion USA, they also know voting for amnesty would mean electoral disaster. So, let Obama act unilaterally, huff and puff a bit with a wink and a nod while doing nothing of substance, and “Voila!” The issue is off the table with plausible deniability of complicity.
And the courts? They may uphold the recent injunction against Obamnesty, but there’s no saying Obama won’t ignore the courts (he assuredly understands that judicial review is a jurist invention). And, anyway, amnesty was always only a matter of time with today’s cultural trajectory. Yet this cloud does have a silver lining.
The Left was very successful boiling the frog slowly with the legal importation of socialist voters and the gradual transformation of our culture via entertainment, the media and academia. But liberals’ childish haste may have led to a tactical error. By going all in on executive orders and amnesty — by transitioning from evolutionary to revolutionary change and turning the burner up high — the Left risks rousing that frog from his pan. And how should it jump?
Obama said after the November Republican victory that it was his “profound preference and interest to see Congress act on a comprehensive immigration reform bill” (emphasis added), but otherwise he’ll work via executive orders. He also offered the GOP a deal: “You send me a bill that I can sign, and those executive actions go away.”
Translation: My preference is to follow the Constitution.
But my will be done — one way or the other.
How to respond? Question: what do you do when someone says “My preference is to follow the game’s rules, but if I can’t win that way, I’ll have to cheat”? You can:
Continue losing; be a Charlie Brown sucker who keeps thinking that this time Lucy won’t pull the football away.
Cheat right back (hard to do without judges in your pocket).
Stop playing the game.
Now, conservatives, consummate ladies and gentlemen that they are, consistently choose option one. Far be it from them to violate the “law” even when it’s unconstitutional and therefore lawless. But I prefer option three.
This means nullification. Note that the Constitution is the contract Americans have with each other. And what happens when one party subject to a contract continually violates it in order to advantage itself, aided and abetted by corrupt judges?
The contract is rendered null and void.
Remember, cheaters don’t stop cheating until forced to. Governors and their legislatures need to man-up and tell the feds, “You like acting unilaterally and unconstitutionally? Two can play that game.” And this means not just ignoring Obama’s amnesty dictates, but nullifying a multitude of other things as well.
The other option is demographic and cultural genocide and the politics attending that. The Left knows this, too. Obama noted that growing “diversity hinders conservative priorities,” wrote the DC last month. Congressman Kurt Schrader (D-OR) said recently that amnesty “will decide who is in charge of this country for the next 20 or 30 years.” And an ex-advisor to former Prime Minister Tony Blair confessed in 2009 that the goal of the British Labour Party’s massive culture-rending immigration was to “rub the Right’s nose in diversity and render their arguments out of date.”
Do you get it yet?
Defy and Nullify.
The alternative is to walk legally and quietly into that good night, going out not with a bang but a whimper, muttering something about 2016, the Supreme Court and pixie dust.
RELATED AUDIO: Mark Levin interviews Sue Payne on Feb. 26, 2015. The clip sheds light on the White House strategy with regards to “amnesty” and introduces terms like “White House Task Force on New Americans”, “Receiving Communities” and “Emerging Immigrant Communities”.
https://drrichswier.com/wp-content/uploads/illegal-europeans.jpg360640Selwyn Dukehttp://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.pngSelwyn Duke2015-03-05 05:46:382015-03-06 07:34:48Obama Amnesty Plan: Legalize Foreigners, “Take Over the Host,” Push “Citizens into the Shadows”
With this in mind if you are opposed to a wall across our southern border will you also lobby the Mexican government to tear down the wall they built between Guatemala and Mexico.
