Tag Archive for: leftists

Who is Adam Schiff?

Sen. Adam Schiff, a California Democrat, is a slimy, deceitful criminal who has infested the halls of the House and now the Senate like a venomous parasite, sucking the lifeblood from American democracy while enriching himself through brazen fraud and treasonous schemes.

With his beady eyes and perpetual smirk, Schiff isn’t just a politician — he’s a walking indictment, a master manipulator who has weaponized lies, leaks, and law-breaking to claw his way to power.

Forget the polished resume; Schiff is a fraudster extraordinaire, guilty of orchestrating the Russia collusion hoax, committing mortgage fraud on a massive scale, leaking classified secrets, and rigging investigations like Jan. 6 to bury his enemies. He deserves not a Senate seat, but a federal prison cell, stripped of his ill-gotten gains and exposed for the traitor he is.

Schiff’s crowning abomination is his starring role in the Russia collusion hoax — the most colossal act of political sabotage in U.S. history, a fabricated witch hunt designed to cripple President Trump and steal the will of the American people.

He spearheaded this sham from the House Intelligence Committee, peddling bogus claims of Trump-Russia ties that were pure fiction, cooked up by Deep State operatives, Obama cronies, and CIA hacks.

Then Schiff lied relentlessly to the American public, vowing he had “more than circumstantial evidence” of collusion, only for the Mueller report to expose it all as a colossal nothingburger.

He amplified Hillary Clinton’s dirty dossier, leaked classified intel to smear Trump, and turned congressional hearings into kangaroo courts.

This wasn’t incompetence; it was calculated treason, a sustained assault on the presidency that wasted millions in taxpayer dollars and divided the nation. Schiff knew it was a hoax — he admitted as much in declassified docs — but he pushed it anyway to boost his career, landing him in the Senate while patriots suffered.

For this alone, he must face justice: indictment, trial, and a hard time in a federal pen.

But Schiff’s crimes don’t stop at political sabotage; he’s a financial crook too, neck-deep in mortgage fraud that reeks of greed and deception.

Federal investigators are closing in on him for falsifying bank documents and property records to snag sweetheart loan terms on his Potomac, Maryland, mansion. From 2003 to 2019, Schiff claimed this 3,420-square-foot luxury pad as his “primary residence” on five Fannie Mae loans, locking in low rates meant for actual homeowners — not jet-setting politicians.

At the same time, he milked a $7,000 tax break on his tiny Burbank, California, condo by swearing that it was his primary home, too.

Two primaries? That’s not clever; that’s felony-level fraud — wire fraud, mail fraud, bank fraud, and false statements to institutions, each carrying years behind bars. The FHFA slammed him with a criminal referral, and grand juries are weighing charges.

Trump nailed it: “Shifty Schiff is a scam artist,” guilty as hell and headed for prison.

He even voted in California while claiming Maryland residency, adding voter fraud to his rap sheet. No excuses — this is outright theft from the system he pretends to uphold.

Schiff’s rap sheet explodes further with leaks of classified information, turning national security into his personal slush fund for smears.

He doled out secrets to journalists during the Russia farce, fueling media hysteria and endangering lives.

Then there’s his Jan. 6 circus: As a key player, he doctored evidence, suppressed truths, and framed Trump supporters in a RICO-style sham investigation.

He twisted Trump’s Ukraine call paraphrase into “treason,” but it was Schiff who committed the real betrayal by lying under oath and abusing power.

Add his ties to shady figures like Ed Buck — Democrat donor and convicted meth-fueled sex predator — and Schiff’s circle reeks of corruption. He’s no victim; he’s the predator, dodging accountability while preaching morality.

Beyond these, Schiff advocates suppression of dissent, pressuring tech firms to censor content on elections and health, framing opposition as threats. His interventions during COVID stifled debate, aligning with authoritarian controls. Public outcry on X labels him a criminal, with other notable handles affirming the charge.

Adam Schiff embodies everything rotten in Washington: a hypocritical thug who weaponizes government against foes, inducing institutional decay, executing fraud, leaks, and manipulations that demand eradication, and all the while lining his pockets.

He lied about Russia to overthrow an election, defrauded banks for personal gain, leaked secrets like a sieve, and rigged probes to silence dissent. No “maybe” or “alleged” — these are facts, demanding swift retribution. Lock him up, strip his pension, prosecute him relentlessly, confiscate his holdings, bar him from public life, and above all, make him an example. America demands it: Schiff to prison now!

©2025 . All rights reserved.

Leftist Jews Ally with Suit-Wearing Jihadists in New Group [Part One] by Andrew Harrod

Anwar Khan “has been doing outreach to the Jewish community on behalf of the Muslim community for decades,” stated former American Jewish Committee (AJC) official Robert Silverman at Washington, DC’s Newseum on December 3. His praise for Khan, the director of the Hamas ally Islamic Relief USA (IRUSA), typified the unsettling leftist Jewish ignorance of jihadist threats at this launch event for the Inter Jewish Muslim Alliance (IJMA).

Silverman addressed an audience that ultimately grew during the daylong conference to about 50. This included his fellow IJMA organizer, Microsoft External Affairs Director Suhail Khan, a “conservative” political operative with deep, longstanding personal Muslim Brotherhood (MB) ties. Other faces familiar to this author included the Gülenist Rumi Forum’s public relations director, Jena Luedtke, and the Iraqi-American co-founder of the American Islamic Congress, Zainab al-Suwaij.

Silverman’s association with the dubious Khan replicated Silverman’s experience as the first director of the Muslim-Jewish Advisory Council, previously rightly mocked as the “Wolf-Sheep Advisory Council.” Therein the left-leaning American Jewish Committee (AJC) had joined with the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA), a nefarious MB-legacy organization, supposedly to combat hate crimes and other manifestations of bigotry. An IJMA statement distributed among the conference handouts and now available at IJMA’s new website proclaimed that IJMA members wanted, “as a Muslim-Jewish alliance, to counter voices of hatred and bigotry within our own communities.”

Yet the day’s proceedings demonstrated a decidedly one-sided view of prejudice among Jews and Muslims, as indicated by the seminar’s first presentation by Elana Hain from the Shalom Hartman Institute (SHI) of North America. “Antisemitism is converging on Jews from both the right and the left,” she correctly noted, but while “everybody in this room knows about antisemitism on the right,” leftist antisemitism “is much harder to talk about.” Today “what we are seeing on the progressive left is a type of conversionist antisemitism that says, ‘Jew, we will accept you if you disavow your commitment to the state of Israel.’” She noted particularly that “my spouse works on a college campus, and I have seen how Jewish students are increasingly unwelcome in progressive spaces.”

However true, Hain’s remarks surprisingly contained not a single reference to antisemitism involving Muslims or Islam. Excerpts from three publications (see herehere, and here) in her handout included several dubious allegations of Donald Trump’s presidential candidacy and administration inciting antisemitism. By contrast, “Muslims” appeared only once in a Tablet article’s reference to hate crimes, even though the American Interest article she quoted briefly discussed “Islamic antisemitism” in an uncited paragraph. Meanwhile, internet searches of the Tablet for “Islamic antisemitism” find numerous articles (e.g. here).

Hain’s blind spot seemed particularly disturbing given the annual conference in Chicago of the viciously anti-Semitic American Muslims for Palestine (AMP) just days before (November 28-30). The conference featured inflammatory condemnations of Israel’s right to exist from prominent American Muslims. This included former Women’s March leader Linda Sarsour, Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) Executive Director Nihad Awad, and CAIR San Francisco chapter leader Zahra Billoo.

This author accordingly presented to Hain an audience question noting the AMP conference and that AJC CEO David Harris has previously called for “trifocal lenses” to confront antisemitism from the “far left, the far right, and the jihadists.” She responded that she was “including in progressive antisemitism” the “antisemitism that comes from the Muslim community around Israel.” She added that she had not devoted particular study to Islamic antisemitism and suggested that Muslim conference attendees might be better qualified to discuss this topic.

Just as Hain only circuitously referenced Islamic antisemitism, she similarly indulged questionable tropes commonplace among many Muslims. For example, without any indication of whether Jews or others had any valid objections to Islamic beliefs and/or behaviors she used the Orwellian phrase “Islamophobia.” Conflicts between Israel and Palestinians should not “lead to antisemitism or ‘Islamophobia,’” she said, as if irrational Jew-hatred were the same as critical inquiry into Islam.

Audience member Imam Abdullah Antepli, a leader of SHI’s Muslim Leadership Initiative (MLI), reflected Hain’s remarks with questions about “Islamophobic elements within the Jewish community.” “Within this organized anti-Muslim campaign in the United States, there are so many visible Jews,” he stated. Jews have a “fear of losing the state of Israel” and “when many Jews meet Muslims, that fear is all that they see,” she responded while again not explaining why such perceptions are meritless (consider Israel, Muslims, and Britain’s Labour Party).

Hain also equated Jewish national liberation in Israel with baseless claims that “Palestinians” represent a unique, historical nation and not merely a local collection of Levantine Arab communities. The statement “there is no such thing as a Palestinian people” is equally false as “Jews don’t have a history in that region” of Israel, she said. This is “mutual denial of peoples’ actual historical experiences,” notwithstanding numerous modern “Palestinian” fictions.

A veiled female Muslim audience member from the Sisterhood of Salaam Shalom, a group obsessed with all real and imagined “white supremacy,” prompted more historical revisionism from Hain. The Muslim claimed that historically the term “antisemitism” encompassed prejudice against both Jews and Muslims, and Hain suggested that antisemitism could include both “Judeophobia” and “Islamophobia.” In reality, the German publicist Wilhelm Marr invented the word “antisemitism” in 1879 in order to impart a scientific veneer to his rabid Jew-hatred.

The appeasing Hain, who called the leftist American rabbi Jill Jacobs a “colleague and a friend,” paralleled the reaction to Islamic antisemitism of the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), an IJMA sponsor. As Islamic antisemitism scholar Andrew Bostom has documented, ADL global surveys of antisemitism in recent years have identified Muslims as world leaders in prejudice against Jews. Yet the ADL has minimized such facts.

While Hain acted conciliatory towards Muslims, they often show little reciprocity, as a following article will analyze. Conference speakers after her like the radical “Islamophobia” expert Wajahat Ali were far more direct in their accusations of bigotry against various Jews while exhibiting little interest in the anti-Semitic milieus of conference participants like ISNA members.

RELATED ARTICLES:

CAIR attacks Trump’s defense of Jews on campus on grounds of “free speech”

True Tales from the Annals of Adult-Onset Islam

EDITORS NOTE: This Jihad Watch column is republished with permission. All rights reserved. The views are those solely of the author.