Tag Archive for: meta

Open-Source AGI Fantasy Is Ending. Meta Just Proved It.

Mark Zuckerberg once promised open-source superintelligence. We objected. Here’s what followed. 

For months, we warned that making advanced artificial intelligence open source was a dangerous idea.

Not because we oppose innovation.

Not because we fear technology.

But because some technologies, once released, cannot be recalled, regulated, or contained.

AGI, short for Artificial General Intelligence, is the point at which artificial intelligence becomes smarter than humans, able to reason, plan, persuade, and act across nearly every domain. Some researchers openly call this superintelligence.

In the wrong hands, such a system could cause global harm on a scale the world has never faced before.

So the idea of making that kind of intelligence open source, freely available to anyone — criminals, rogue nations, extremist groups, or drug cartels — was not bold. It was reckless.

Yet Mark Zuckerberg publicly promised that Meta’s superintelligence lab would release its most powerful AI systems openly once they reached that level.

At the time, warnings like ours were dismissed as alarmist. Open-source AI was framed as inevitable, virtuous, even morally superior. Anyone raising concerns was told they did not “trust the community” or did not understand progress.

Then, quietly, something changed.

Meta’s Quiet Reversal

In December 2025, reporting confirmed that Meta was backing away from its open-source posture for its next-generation AI systems, pivoting toward a closed, proprietary model strategy.

The same company that once lectured the world about the moral necessity of open-source AI suddenly began acting as if openness was a liability.

No press conference.

No apology.

Just behavior.

That matters more than words.

Why This Matters

We are not claiming Meta changed course because of us. That would be unserious.

What we are saying is this:

The industry is now behaving as if the dangers we warned about were real.

And behavior is often the most honest admission.

Companies do not reverse course lightly, especially when they have invested years of reputation and rhetoric into a position. When they do, it is usually because the risks are no longer theoretical.

What We Warned About Then

Long before this pivot, we argued that open-source AGI posed risks fundamentally different from open-source software:

  • Irreversibility. Once released, frontier models cannot be pulled back.
  • Scale. Harm scales instantly, globally, and asymmetrically.
  • Misuse certainty. Abuse is not hypothetical; it is inevitable.
  • No accountability. When damage occurs, no one is legally responsible.

We went further than most commentators. We mocked up what real governance might look like, including legal liability for open-source AGI misuse.

That framing was unpopular. It still is.

But it is increasingly hard to ignore.

What Changed

Nothing magical happened in December.

What changed was recognition.

Recognition that:

  • AI is no longer just software.
  • Intelligence itself is becoming infrastructure.
  • And infrastructure decisions are governance decisions, whether anyone voted on them or not.

Open-source idealism collides with reality when the stakes become civilizational.

Why You Should Be Paying Attention

We do not wait for consensus before speaking. We do not wait for official permission to raise uncomfortable questions. And we do not measure truth by applause.

Our role is not to predict the future perfectly. It is to identify the direction of power before it becomes obvious and too late to stop.

Sometimes that means sounding the alarm early, when it is least welcome.

History tends to sort out the rest.

If you want analysis that waits until everyone agrees, there are plenty of places to find it.

If you want analysis that pays attention to what comes before the pivot, you’re in the right place.

AUTHOR

Martin Mawyer

Martin Mawyer is the President of Christian Action Network, host of the “Shout Out Patriots” podcast, and author of When Evil Stops Hiding. Follow him on Substack for more action alerts, cultural commentary, and real-world campaigns defending faith, family, and freedom.

©2025 . All rights reserved.


Please visit the Patriot Majority Report substack.

Meta’s X-Rated Secret Exposed in Court

How Silicon Valley protected predators while pretending to protect children.

When people talk about protecting kids online, Silicon Valley executives usually picture themselves as the heroes. They give congressional speeches. They release glossy “safety reports.” They hold press events to show how much they care.

But according to newly unsealed testimony, the world’s biggest social media company quietly tolerated one of the evilest crimes imaginable.

Not once. Not twice. But sixteen times!

The unredacted filing from a national child-safety lawsuit reveals that Meta had a policy that allowed accounts to commit the “trafficking of humans for sex” up to sixteen violations before facing suspension.

Only the seventeenth violation triggered action.

This detail did not come from conspiracy theorists or angry parents. It came from Meta’s former head of safety and well-being, speaking under oath.

If a convenience store clerk ignored a shoplifter just once, they would be fired. Meta looked the other way over a dozen times, and only then did they consider doing something.

A system built for engagement, not safety

The testimony gets worse. The former safety leader said Instagram did not even have a clear way for users to report child sexual abuse material. Despite raising the issue repeatedly, she was told it would be too much work to fix and to review reports.

Too much work to stop child predators?
Never too much work to push through paperwork?

And that is the heart of the story. Whenever Meta studied ways to make teens safer, the company repeatedly abandoned the reforms if they hurt engagement numbers.

When you boil it down, the company protected the addictive machinery, not the children caught inside it.

A child-safety crisis created in Silicon Valley

These revelations were revealed in a sweeping lawsuit filed by school districts, attorneys general, and parents who say Big Tech is fueling a youth mental-health crisis by designing platforms that are dangerous by nature.

Meta’s response has been predictable. Their spokesperson called the allegations “misleading” and insisted the company has made “real changes.”

If the testimony is accurate, the “real changes” came far too late, only after the public began asking questions that lawmakers should have asked ten years earlier.

Families have been told again and again that Meta is on their side. They were told the company was working to protect teens, block predators, and reduce harmful content.

Yet behind the curtain, executives were protecting engagement metrics, image filters, and corporate profits.

Children were left unprotected.

Human trafficking was given sixteen warnings.

And Silicon Valley kept cashing in.

AUTHOR

Martin Mawyer

Martin Mawyer is the President of Christian Action Network, host of the “Shout Out Patriots” podcast, and author of When Evil Stops Hiding.

©2025 . All rights reserved.


Please visit the Patriot Majority Report substack.

Subscribe for more action alerts, cultural commentary, and real-world campaigns defending faith, family, and freedom.

‘You Can’t Use This Feature Right Now’ — How Meta’s Facebook Censors Americans using the ‘Spam Scam’

“Facebook was not originally created to be a company. It was built to accomplish a social mission – to make the world more open and connected.” — Mark Zuckerberg

“By giving people the power to share, we’re making the world more transparent.” — Mark Zuckerberg

“The thing that we are trying to do at facebook, is just help people connect and communicate more efficiently.” — Mark Zuckerberg


We, like every other news outlet, use social media to spread our stories globally. Among those social media sites is Meta’s Facebook.

On Facebook we have over 10,000 followers. These followers have friended us because they want to hear our messages and learn the truth. Our followers, like us, believe in the First Amendment’s right to freedom of speech.

Facebook has come up with a new way to censor us. We call it the — “Spam Scam.”

When we try to share any post on our Facebook page to with our friends more than 2 times we get the following message:

You Can’t Use This

Feature Right Now

We limit how often you can

post, comment, or do other

things in a given amout of

time in order to help protect

the community from spam.

You can try again later.

Learn More.

Spam is the new tool to censor freedom of speech. We are on 12 social media sites, the largest being Twitter (X).

Facebook is the only social media site that uses the Spam Scam to censor us.

Don’t believe us?

Just go to your Facebook page and try to share this column with your friends more than 2 times and see what message suddenly pops up.

Leave us a comment about your experience with Facebook and it’s Spam Scam.

©2025 . All rights reserved.

‘Direct And Blatant Attack On Our Country’: Trump Announces End To Trade Talks With Canada

President Donald Trump announced Friday he is ending trade talks with Canada over the northern neighbor’s decision to impose a digital service tax on American technology companies.

Trump called Canada’s decision “a direct and blatant attack on our Country” in a Truth Social post.

“They are obviously copying the European Union, which has done the same thing, and is currently under discussion with us, also. Based on this egregious Tax, we are hereby terminating ALL discussions on Trade with Canada, effective immediately,” Trump also wrote.

Canada is reportedly going ahead with the tax despite its inclusion in the Group of Seven (G7) agreement in which President Trump agreed to remove Section 899, also known as the revenge tax proposal, from his “Big Beautiful” tax billaccording to Bloomberg.

The tax will require digital services companies like Meta to pay 3 percent of the digital services revenue they make on Canadian users above 20 million Canadian dollars ($14.6 million) in a calendar year, according to Bloomberg.

Canada’s tax will apply retroactively to 2022 and the country’s Finance Department says the first payments will be due from digital companies Monday, Bloomberg reported.

Canadian Finance Minister Francois-Philippe Champagne hinted that the tax may be a potential piece of leverage in trade negotiations.

“Obviously all of that is something that we’re considering as part of broader discussions that you may have,” he told Bloomberg.

Trump concluded his Truth Social post with indications that the U.S. will retaliate.

We will let Canada know the Tariff that they will be paying to do business with the United States of America within the next seven day period,” he wrote.

Industry leaders applauded Trump’s move.

“This tax unfairly singles out American firms while local competitors skate by. Whether it’s Brussels or Ottawa, President Trump is right to call them out and force this to change,” John Czwartacki, co-founder and principal at Public Policy Solutions said in a statement provided to the Daily Caller

“Canada is once again seeking to discriminate against U.S. technology companies, this time with a European-style digital services tax,” Michael Lucci, the founder and CEO of State Armor, also said in a statement.  

“This is not how allies and partners should treat one another. Canada is not holding up their end of our partnership, and President Trump is right to stand up for American interests,” Lucci concluded.

AUTHOR

Robert McGreevy

Reporter.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Trump FDA Reveals Canada Will Play Major Role In Bringing Drug Prices Down

Senate GOP Slashes Spending In ‘Big, Beautiful’ Bill As Fiscal Hawks Push For More Cuts

Thom Tillis Announces Retirement Hours After Trump Threatened To Field Primary Challenger

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Execs from Palantir, Meta, OpenAI being brought into U.S. Army as colonels to turbocharge military’s use of drone warfare, robot soldiers, other high-tech killing machines

Army says it’s part of a plan to tap commercial technology resources that will increase ‘efficiencies’ on the battlefields (i.e. killing fields) of the future. 

Top executives from tech giants Meta, Palantir, and OpenAI are being sworn into the Army Reserves at the rank of lieutenant colonel. That’s an officer’s rank typically reserved for someone who has served for years and has led thousands of men into combat.

Known as Detachment 201, the new “Executive Innovation Corps” will be responsible for the military’s tech transformation, integrating new technologies such as AI-powered drones and humanoid robots, the Army announced on June 13.

Patrick Wood, editor in chief of Technocracy.News and an expert on the global technocracy movement, said the move is unprecedented.

“In the history of the military, no civilian has been summarily appointed to rank of lieutenant colonel until recently,” Wood said. “The rules changed in 2019 when the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) authorized the practice. Not surprisingly, the staff that created NDAA were populated with Technocrats.”

According to Defense Scoop, the move is the latest push by the Pentagon to tap into capabilities and know-how from Silicon Valley and the commercial sector.

The new unit “brings top tech talent into the Army Reserve to bridge the commercial-military tech gap” and is “designed to fuse cutting-edge tech expertise with military innovation,” the Army stated in a press release.

The Army is set to swear-in Meta’s chief technology officer Andrew Bosworth, OpenAI’s chief product officer Kevin Weil, Palantir’s Chief Technology Officer Shyam Sankar and Bob McGrew, an advisor at Thinking Machines Lab who was previously OpenAI’s chief research officer.

Meta, which owns Facebook, recently announced a new partnership with defense tech company Anduril to develop extended reality (XR) products for soldiers, according to Defense Scoop.

OpenAI is the creator of ChatGPT, the popular generative AI tool. According to Defense Scoop, the U.S. Pentagon is pursuing new genAI tools to “boost productivity and efficiency.”

Palantir uses AI-powered software to collect and analyze data on Americans as well as foreign nationals. It has or is working on developing various government contracts, including with the Department of Defense, CIA, FBI, IRS, ICE and local law enforcement agencies. Palantir also supplies the Israeli government with its Maven Smart System, which provides targeting data for soldiers in its various wars, from Gaza to Lebanon to Iran. If the Maven Smart System says to blow up a building because a couple of Hamas combatants are inside, that building gets blown up, as modern warfare increasingly turns such decisions over to AI. Maven Smart System has an admitted 10 percent failure rate. Apparently if AI is right 90 percent of the time in deciding who gets killed, that’s OK with the politicians who control the world’s military forces.

Palantir’s AI-driven products are capable of creating highly detailed dossiers on people by quickly scanning their social media, bank records, phone records and other data.

Regarding the automatic officer status of Palantir, OpenAI and Meta execs, the Army stated in its press release:

“Detachment 201 is an effort to recruit senior tech executives to serve part-time in the Army Reserve as senior advisors. In this role they will work on targeted projects to help guide rapid and scalable tech solutions to complex problems. By bringing private-sector know-how into uniform, Detachment 201 is supercharging efforts like the Army Transformation Initiative, which aims to make the force leaner, smarter, and more lethal.”

The swearing-in of the four new officers “is just the start of a bigger mission to inspire more tech pros to serve without leaving their careers, showing the next generation how to make a difference in uniform,” per the release.

I can’t help but wonder how much of this is going to be turned inward against the American people. These types of so-called innovations almost always are.

Taken in the context of President Trump’s creepy Operation Stargate, his enforcement of the Real ID Act, and his announced plan to develop “a proper tracking system” for all people coming in and out of our country, it’s becoming painfully clear that this administration is being used to hand Americans over to the soon-to-be globalized digital surveillance state. And they’re doing it in Warp Speed.

In my opinion, the most dangerous of all these fascist corporations is Palantir, due to the sheer scale of its involvement with the federal government, across multiple civilian agencies along with the military.

In July 2022, the Defense Post reported that the US Army Research Laboratory awarded Palantir a contract to implement artificial intelligence and machine-learning capabilities for the service’s combatant commands.

The $100 million contract will see the company produce software platforms that quickly implement advanced AI capabilities in battlefield situations.

According to Palantir, the armed forces need “best-in-class” software to fulfill missions and boost capabilities to prepare for future conflicts.

The warfare of the future has most dramatically played out in Israeli use of technology to assassinate top commanders of Hezbollah, Hamas and the Iranian Republican Guard Corps. It was also evident in Ukraine’s drone attack on Russian strategic bombers last month.

“Maintaining a leading edge through technology is foundational to our mission and partnership with the Army Research Laboratory,” said Palantir President Akash Jain said. “We are honored to support this critical work by teaming up to deliver the most advanced operational AI capabilities available with dozens of commercial and public sector partners.”

Palantir Senior Vice President Shannon Clark explained that the 2022 contract will allow US Army personnel to leverage AI insights to make quick decisions across multiple domains.

“From outer space to the sea floor, and everything in between,” she stressed.

And that includes U.S. cities when the current or future president declares martial law. Mark my words, Palantir and companiers like it will at some point become the supplier of software that helps the U.S. government hunt down political dissidents, which will include outspoken Christians and various other truthtellers.

©2025 . All rights reserved.


Please visit Leo’s Newsletter substack.

Big Tech’s Invisible Hand: How Google and Meta Manipulate Our Elections

In an era where information is power, two corporate giants – Google and Meta – act as gatekeepers to the digital world, wielding their unprecedented market dominance to shape consumer habits and manipulate the very foundation of democracy: our elections. Let’s be honest: these tech behemoths are not neutral players. They are massive monopolies with clear political agendas, using their unmatched market power to control electoral outcomes. From Google’s biased search results to Meta’s curated feeds, evidence is mounting that Big Tech is tipping the scales – and nothing will change until we strip them of their unchecked influence.

The idea that Google and Meta possess monopolistic power is hardly controversial. Google controls over 90% of the global search engine market, while Meta’s empire – spanning Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp – commands a staggering share of social media traffic. Together, they create a duopoly that influences what billions of people see, read, and think daily. However, this dominance is not just a business achievement; it functions as a political weapon. These companies have the tools, the data, and the motive to sway voters, and they aren’t hesitant to use them.

Consider Google as an example. In 2019, psychologist Dr. Robert Epstein testified before Congress that manipulating Google’s search algorithm could have shifted at least 2.6 million votes toward Hillary Clinton in the 2016 U.S. presidential election. Epstein, a former editor-in-chief of Psychology Today and a self-described liberal is not a fringe conspiracy theorist; he is a respected researcher who has dedicated years to studying Big Tech’s influence. His findings suggest that by subtly altering search result rankings – burying unfavorable stories or boosting preferred narratives – Google can sway undecided voters without leaving a trace. In a close race, even a slight nudge can tip the scales. And with no oversight, no accountability, and no transparency, who can stop them?

Meta, meanwhile, engages in a similar practice. Its platforms operate on algorithms that prioritize content based on obscure criteria, often amplifying divisive or ideologically biased posts while suppressing others. During the 2020 election cycle, Facebook faced accusations of selectively limiting conservative pages and ads while promoting progressive messaging. Internal leaks and whistleblower accounts – such as those from former employee Frances Haugen – uncover a company culture rife with ideological bias, where decisions regarding “misinformation” and “hate speech” conveniently align with left-leaning priorities. When you control the flow of information to over 3 billion users, that’s not just influence; that’s the power to reshape reality.

Why does this matter? Because elections are not just about votes; they are about perception. If Big Tech can shape people’s views, they can influence who wins. Their incentives are clear. Silicon Valley’s workforce and donor class overwhelmingly lean left – Google employees donated to Democrats over Republicans by a 20-to-1 margin in 2020, according to OpenSecrets. Meta’s Mark Zuckerberg has funneled hundreds of millions into “election integrity” initiatives that critics argue disproportionately benefit progressive turnout efforts. These are not accidents; they are patterns. The agenda is not hidden; it is embedded in the system.

But Big Tech doesn’t operate in isolation. Mainstream media and educational institutions – many of which are funded or influenced by leftist titans like George Soros – amplify this distortion. Outlets such as CNN, MSNBC, and The New York Times echo narratives that align with Big Tech’s curation, while universities produce graduates steeped in progressive orthodoxy. For instance, Soros’s Open Society Foundations have invested billions in media and academic projects that advocate globalist, anti-conservative frameworks. Together, this trifecta – tech, media, and academia – creates a stranglehold on public discourse, drowning out dissent and shaping worldviews to fit a singular mold.

So, why are Google and Meta doing this? The answer isn’t comforting. It’s not just about ideology—though that’s a factor—it’s about control. These companies thrive on predictability, and a populace divided or aligned with their preferred outcomes ensures their dominance remains unchallenged. A conservative wave emphasizing deregulation and antitrust scrutiny threatens their empire. By manipulating the system, they protect their profits and power. It’s a self-perpetuating cycle: influencing elections, securing favorable policies, and tightening their grip.

The evidence keeps piling up, and it’s more than any patriot can bear. From Google’s suppression of Tulsi Gabbard’s ads in 2019 – right after she criticized Big Tech – to Meta’s last-minute censorship of the Hunter Biden laptop story in 2020, the examples are blatant and chilling. Each revelation uncovers another layer of a system that is rotten to its core. And yet, the question remains: if they’re capable of this, what else are they hiding? The truth feels overwhelming, a betrayal of the free society we believed we had.

But despair isn’t an option; action is. We can’t allow these monopolies to hold our democracy hostage. The first step is to break their power. Antitrust enforcement must be strengthened: Google’s search engine must be separated from its ad business, Meta must be required to divest Instagram and WhatsApp, and strict transparency must be mandated for algorithms. Second, we need election safeguards: prohibit Big Tech from microtargeting political ads and mandate real-time disclosure of content moderation decisions. Finally, conservatives must create alternatives – platforms, media, and institutions that Silicon Valley’s elite can’t co-opt.

This isn’t about silencing Big Tech; it’s about leveling the playing field. They’ve had their turn rigging the system; now it’s time to take it back. The stakes couldn’t be higher. Every election they manipulate is a step toward a future where our votes don’t count, and our voices are mere echoes in their machine. We’ve seen the agenda, felt the betrayal, and understand what’s at risk. The fight starts now – because if we don’t act, nothing will change, and the invisible hand of Big Tech will tighten its grip until freedom becomes just a memory.

©2025 . All rights reserved.

RELATED VIDEO: i24NEWS Hebrew channel set to launch on June 30

The Rise of MAGA Marks the End of Corporate Wokeness

This has been quite an anti-woke week. More and more companies are finding they are losing market share. It looks like the end of wokeness is on the way. How can I say that? Easy. Larry Fink CEO of the criminal enterprise Blackrock just announced that Blackrock will no longer participate in the ESG Green scam. Why did that happen? Money honey. It was always about the money. Fink realized with Trump in office, his firm will have a hard time convincing MAGA to be globalists. They might not invest. He will lose profit,

Mark Zuckerberg is also following suit, He announced that Facebook (Meta) will restore freedom of speech. No more biased fact checkers. I guess he didn’t like Musk ‘s hands in Zuckerberg’s pocket. X was becoming a hit again. Zuckerberg could sit around and let Musk win. The new election is giving him the chance to reimagine META. And so he did.

WATCH: Mark Zuckerberg announces sweeping changes to Facebook and Instagram to move toward Free Speech

I find it so interesting to see all of the woke CEO’s run to Mar-A-Largo. Make no mistake, if a Dem gets in office, they will change their stripes again. I do not trust them but if the result is free speech lets get the truth out.

There are so many thing happening all at once it will be hard to keep track.
so pick you passion and follow that. Find the legislators in your state on that committee and make sure they know who you are and follow your ideas, their campaign promises. Don’t let them forget. Let them know you are watching them. Watch President Trump. He is a great teacher. He believes everything is negotiable. Who knows we might wind up with Greenland, Panama Canal and have a very different relationship with Canada. Don’t be afraid to ask, if you don’t ask, you don’t get. Call your senator. Tell them to advance and vote for every one of Trump’s picks. Trump has ever right to work with the people he chooses. I don’t want to hear about qualifications. Just look at Biden chosen ones. No qualifications there and yet they were voted in. Also no excuses to slow walk anyone. They must do their jobs and get it done quickly.

Just think: East Palestine, The Francis Scott Key Bridge, The summer of Love, Hawaii, Hurricane Helene and the CA fires, the glaring in your face incompetence of this administration is more proof of the failure of progressive policies. Let us pray for the families who suffer but remember these tragedies and prepare for the future. We know what doesn’t work, lets not repeat if. Prepare in your local community, time to deep 6 those progressive policies in your local community. After all we know this government will not help even though Biden is leaving, we still have remnants locally of his failures.

As the green policies fail, Joe continues his scorched earth for America. His hatred is showing. Banning off shore drilling, banning gas furnaces, more money to Ukraine, more to Israel, emptying Gitmo, enticing illegals with free stuff, banning cigarettes, encouraging gangs and drugs, pushing transgenderism on kids, vaccines, inflation, lies about job numbers, Afghanistan and poor education. I could go on and on but we all lived this bad movie and it is days away from the finale. It can’t come soon enough. I do pray for the people in CA. President Trump is right the green policies have destroyed this once beautiful state. As the people rebuild and they will, I hope they have learned that poor leadership following insane policies is a bad mix. Maybe this will be their turning point.

The green scam will become more evident as AI needs electricity to operate. Solar and wind are not ready for prime time. As were are being told fossil fuel and nuclear are bad, watch while the criminals use it themselves. Bill Gate is buying and reactivating 3 mile island. plenty of cheap energy for him, none for us. The area of Alaska, Tx, Mt combined is the size of Joe’s off shore ban on drilling. We were energy independent before Joe and we will be again. But watch those law suits roll in. Energy is power. and cheap energy give the people power. These criminals don’t want us to have power. They want high prices so we will beg for government hand outs.. Petroleum is used in almost everything we do. When gas is high so is everything else. Lets look for Presidents Trump’s executive orders and make sure our legislators support them.

©2025 . All rights reserved.

RELATED ARTICLE: The cost of Facebook’s now-repudiated censorship

Big Tech Bends The Knee To Donald Trump

Multiple Silicon Valley CEOs congratulated President-elect Donald Trump on his win Tuesday night, from Jeff Bezos to Mark Zuckerberg.

Many of the CEOs congratulating Trump have faced accusations of left-wing bias and censorship, and their companies experienced backlash from conservatives. But despite Silicon Valley’s historically left-wing bent, multiple tech CEOs praised Trump on Wednesday.

Jeff Bezos congratulated the next president on “an extraordinary political comeback.” Bezos owns The Washington Post, which did not issue an endorsement for the 2024 presidential election. The refusal to endorse Kamala Harris reportedly cost the paper hundreds of thousands of subscribers and triggered backlash amongst its own staff.

Bezos previously wrote an op-ed detailing why “Americans don’t trust the news media anymore.”

That was only Bezos’s second tweet this year. In July, he tweeted in support of Trump after an assassination attempt at his rally in Butler, Pennsylvania.

However, The Post and Amazon both have a history of left-wing bias.

The Post recently ran an article titled “Trump embraces violent rhetoric, suggests Cheney should have guns ‘trained on her face’” in reference to the false claim that Trump wanted Liz Cheney put in front of a firing squad.

Amazon’s Alexa previously expressed support for Harris over Trump for president, although the company claimed it was an error. Amazon has also censored books written by conservatives.

In one instance, it removed a book critical of the transgender movement from its online store in 2021. The book, “When Harry Became Sally: Responding To The Transgender Moment” was a bestseller. The Biden-Harris administration also pressured Amazon to censor books skeptical of the COVID-19 vaccine, according to emails obtained by the House Judiciary Committee.

Notably, Amazon CEO Andy Jassy also issued a statement congratulating Trump on his victory.

“We look forward to working with you and your administration on issues important to our customers, employees, communities, and country,” Jassy stated.

Other big names congratulating Trump included Apple CEO Tim Cook, Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg, and Google and Alphabet CEO Sundar Pichai.

“Congratulations President Trump on your victory!” Cook stated in a post. “We look forward to engaging with you and your administration to help make sure the United States continues to lead with and be fueled by ingenuity, innovation, and creativity.”

“Congratulations to President Trump on a decisive victory,” Zuckerberg stated on Instagram Threads. “We have great opportunities ahead of us as a country. Looking forward to working with you and your administration.”

Both Meta and Google have come under fire for censorship and left-wing bias.

Facebook collaborated with the FBI to censor the Hunter Biden laptop story. It also bowed to pressure from the Biden-Harris administration to censor certain COVID-19 views. Mark Zuckerberg admitted the government pressured Meta, and he expressed regret in a letter to House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan.

“I believe the government pressure was wrong, and I regret that we were not more outspoken about it,” Zuckerberg wrote. “I also think we made some choices that, with the benefit of hindsight and new information, we wouldn’t make today.”

Zuckerberg also did not issue an endorsement in the presidential election and reportedly identifies as a libertarian.

Google CEO Sundar Pichai echoed Zuckerberg’s endorsement, congratulating Trump on his “decisive victory.”

Trump stated on Joe Rogan’s podcast that Pichai called him after he visited a McDonald’s in Pennsylvania.

Trump suggested in August that Congress could “shut down” Google over its alleged bias and censorship of conservatives.

That same month, Pichai testified to the House Oversight Committee’s Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government on Google’s censorship of information regarding Trump’s first attempted assassination.

Google’s parent company, Alphabet, told the committee the autocomplete search results did not show results pertaining to Trump when users searched for “President Donald” because of a software “bug.”

Other prominent Silicon Valley congratulations came from Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman.

AUTHOR

Eireann Van Natta

General assignment reporter.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Jeff Bezos Slams Washington Post, Offering Glimmer Of Hope For Media

Hundreds Of Thousands Reportedly Cancel WaPo Subscriptions After Decision Not To Endorse Harris

Amazon Confirms They Shut Off A Man’s Smart Home Because A Random Guy Said He Was Racist

EXCLUSIVE: GOP Reps Probe Zuckerberg, Meta For Hiding ‘Political And Social’ Content From Users’ Feeds

Google Takes Massive Hit As Federal Judge Rules It Violated US Antitrust Law

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

ROOKE: Harris Campaign’s 11th Hour Looks Like A Nightmare

With just eight days left in the presidential election, there are clear signs that Vice President Kamala Harris is on unsteady ground.

Democrats started whispering to their friends in the corporate press about their election-day fears that Harris could lose to former President Donald Trump.

“A growing number of top Democrats tell us privately they feel Vice President Harris will lose — even though polls show a coin-toss finish 11 days from now,” Axios reported. “Democrats admit they tend to be hand-wringing, bed-wetting, doomsdayers. But what’s striking is how our private conversations with Democrats inside and outside her campaign reveal broad concern that little she does, says — or tries — seems to move the needle.”

It’s never a good sign when Democrats (even anonymously) tell the media their candidate is going to lose and that nothing she does “seems to move the needle.” The polling shows that while the election is still close and could go either way, Trump has a shot to win not only the Electoral College vote but also the popular vote.

The RealClear polling average has Trump up just 0.2% in the national poll, the first time he’s led since Harris first entered the race. EmersonNY Times/Sienna and CNN all have polls showing that Harris and Trump are tied for the popular vote. Meanwhile, The Wall Street Journal and Forbes polls both show that Trump wins the popular vote by two points.

A Republican presidential candidate hasn’t won the popular vote since former President George W. Bush in 2004. Trump’s support was on full display Sunday in Manhattan when voters turned out in droves, occupying block after block in dark blue New York City wearing MAGA hats and other Trump gear to hear him speak.

The media did their usual dog and pony show, attempting to connect Trump’s Madison Square Garden rally to the Nazi Party rally held there in 1930. Outside of Harris’ staunch supporters, regular voters see this rhetoric for what it is — Democrat propaganda. It’s hard to make people believe the lie that “Trump is a Nazi” when there are supporters from every race and religion in the crowd.

To make matters worse for Harris, CNN reported that executives from major Big Tech firms, like Apple, Meta, Google, and Amazon, have all recently knocked on Trump’s door.

Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg talked with Trump after he survived his first assassination attempt in July. Apple CEO Tim Cook reportedly called Trump to discuss his company’s legal issues in Italy. Google CEO Sundar Pichai contacted Trump about his dominance in Google’s algorithm after his appearance at the Pennsylvania McDonald’s, the former president said. Amazon CEO Andy Jassy even called Trump to “check in,” the outlet reported.

“There are some that seem to be waking up to the fact that, like, ‘Holy sh*t, this guy might get elected again. I don’t want to have him, his administration, going after us,’” a person close to Trump told CNN. “What he’s saying out loud, I think they hear, and they’re taking it seriously.”

Jeff Bezos, the billionaire owner of Amazon and The Washington Post, blocked his outlet’s editorial team from endorsing Harris for president. Robert Kagan, a member of the opinions section who resigned in protest, told CNN Friday, “This is obviously an effort by Jeff Bezos to curry favor with Donald Trump in the anticipation of his possible victory.”

The New York Post reported this morning that Bezos attended a call with reporters upset over his decision to stay out of the race, giving them a “mandate to add more conservative voices to its opinion section.”

While it’s impossible to predict the outcome of the 2024 election, it has to terrify Democrats to see their national popularity slipping to a man they claim is a threat to (big D) democracy.

Harris is heading into Nov. 5 without the popular vote lead she needs to help push her over the line in critical swing states, without the explicit support from corporate media outlets and with the knowledge that even Big Tech CEOs are lining up outside Trump’s office to “check-in.”

AUTHOR

Mary Rooke

Commentary and analysis writer.

RELATED ARTICLES:

ROOKE: These Are The Early Results That Will Tell Us The Winner On Election Night

ROOKE: Media Hit On Trump Accidentally Confirms Harris Has Major Election Problem Brewing

Walz Reportedly Had Romantic Relationship With China’s Wang In His 20’s

Republicans Ask Supreme Court To Block Some Provisional Ballots In Swing State For People With Mail-In Errors

‘Americans Don’t Trust The News Media’: Bezos Speaks Out After WaPo Chose Not To Endorse Harris

New York Voter Delivers Two-Word Response When MSNBC Asks If ‘Threat To Democracy’ Attack On Trump Resonates

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved,

Why did Zuckerberg come clean on his collusion with feds to silence the voices of conservative Americans?

Mark Zuckerberg says he suddenly “regrets” that his company, Meta, bowed to the Biden regime’s pressure to censor content on Facebook, saying in a letter that the interference was “wrong” and he plans to push back if it happens again.

Should we take him seriously? Is this a genuine mia culpa?

According to an article in Politico, Zuckerberg aired his grievances in a letter Monday to the House Judiciary Committee in response to its investigation into content moderation on online platforms. Zuckerberg detailed how senior administration officials leaned on the company to censor certain posts about Covid-19, including humor and satire, and “expressed a lot of frustration” when the social media platform resisted.

Zuckerberg wrote:

“I believe the government pressure was wrong, and I regret that we were not more outspoken about it. I feel strongly that we should not compromise our content standards due to pressure from any Administration in either direction — and we’re ready to push back if something like this happens again.”

Zuckerberg also expressed regret in the letter for his company’s disgusting effort to memory-hole content related to coverage by the New York Post about Hunter Biden ahead of the 2020 election. This is the story, you will remember, that the FBI falsely warned may have been planted as “Russian disinformation.”

“It’s since been made clear that the reporting was not Russian disinformation, and in retrospect, we shouldn’t have demoted the story,” he wrote.

Republicans on the committee, led by Ohio Rep. Jim Jordan, celebrated the letter in a long series of posts on X, calling it a “big win for free speech.”

But is it? What, if anything, is Congress going to do about this revelation of guilt, which proves what we already knew about how the government outsources its violations of the First Amendment to its partners in the private sector known as Big Tech.

Robert F. Kennedy has an active lawsuit against the federal government and has explained to Tucker Carlson in a recent interview just how involved the feds were in monitoring the social media platforms and then pressuring them to delete or downplay information that the government didn’t want American citizens to know. It didn’t even matter if the information was true. In fact, it was the truth about Covd and the 2020 election that the government feared the most.

In the video below, fast-forward to the 15:47 mark and listen for the next five minutes or so.

<

If you look at Zuckerberg’s history, he tends to play ball with whatever government holds the reins of power. He cooperates with Chinese communists as easily as he does American globalists. Whatever he needs to do to keep raking in the billions.

Perhaps this is why Zuckerberg decided to come clean at this moment in time. He knows RFK Jr. has teamed up with Trump and the super-lawyer RFK will bring the receipts to the table regarding government censorship if given half a chance. What if Trump wins and makes RFK his attorney general? If Trump wins, Zuckerberg can now say he’s come clean and changed course. This is Zuckerberg covering all his bases. He is no friend of the First Amendment.

©2024. Leo Hohmann. All rights reserved.

RELATED ARTICLE: Facebook Founder Confesses Censorship of Conservatives Was Ordered by Biden-Harris Admin.


Please visit LeoHohmann.com for:

Investigative reporting on globalism, Christianity, Islam, Judaism and where politics, culture and religion intersect.

Facebook to lift ban on word ‘shaheed,’ ban had ‘adverse human rights impact’ on ‘Palestinians’

Shaheed (شهيد ) — a term used in Islam for Muslims who died while fulfilling a religious commandment, including jihad.


“The review found in March that Meta’s rules on ‘shaheed’ failed to account for the word’s variety of meanings and resulted in the removal of content not aimed at praising violent actions.”

This is a lot of hooey, for in an Islamic context, being a martyr doesn’t mean simply dying for one’s faith. The Qur’an promises paradise to those who “kill and are killed” for Allah (9:111). That’s what being a martyr involves: killing infidels. This is particularly the primary meaning during the present war. Facebook is just bowing to its far-left pro-jihad base, while continuing to censor foes of jihad terror into oblivion.

Meta to end ban on the word ‘shaheed’ on oversight board’s recommendations

Reuters, July 2, 2024:

Meta Platforms (META.O), opens new tab said on Tuesday it would lift its blanket ban on the word “shaheed”, or “martyr” in English, after a year-long review by its oversight board found the social media giant’s approach was “overbroad”.

The company has been criticized for years over its handling of content involving the Middle East, including in a 2021 study Meta itself commissioned that found its approach had an “adverse human rights impact” on Palestinians and other Arabic-speaking users of its services.

Those criticisms have escalated since the onset of hostilities between Israel and Hamas in October.

The oversight board, which is funded by Meta but operates independently, started its review last year because the word accounted for more content removals on the company’s platforms than any other single word or phrase….

The review found in March that Meta’s rules on “shaheed” failed to account for the word’s variety of meanings and resulted in the removal of content not aimed at praising violent actions….

C0ntinue reading.

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLES:

Taliban praise stance of Biden regime toward its rule as ‘commendable’

Albany, New York: Muslim migrant rapes 15-year-old girl, cops wait over a month to inform the public

The UN’s Francesca Albanese, Antisemite and Grifter

Macron Shocks French Jews

After Oct 7, the Israeli Right is 60% of the Country, the Left is 13%

Pro-Hamas Protesters Angry at Face Mask Ban on New York Subways

UK: Muslim plotted jihad massacre at hospital

RELATED VIDEO: This Week In Jihad with David Wood and Robert Spencer (Toronto Dyke March Edition)

EDITORS NOTE: This Jihad Watch column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Government Officials Have A Special Portal To Flag Facebook Posts For Censorship

The Department of Homeland Security has left open a special feature that allows government officials to flag Facebook posts for misinformation after scrapping a controversial advisory board tasked with developing guidelines for social media censorship, the Intercept reported Monday.

DHS announced plans for a Disinformation Governance Board to “develop guidelines, standards, guardrails to ensure that the work that has been ongoing for nearly 10 years does not infringe on people’s free speech rights, rights of privacy, civil rights, and civil liberties,” DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas told the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee in May, according to The Hill. While DHS shuttered the initiative after an onslaught of bipartisan opposition decrying the potential censorship, the Intercept found through an analysis of public and leaked documents that government efforts to police tech companies goes on.

Those activities include a Facebook portal only accessible by government and law enforcement representatives to formally request the platform kill or label alleged misinformation, according to the Intercept. A leaked set of slides contains instructions on how to operate the system, and the URL to access the site — facebook.com/xtakedowns/login — was still active at the time of publication.

“Platforms have got to get comfortable with gov’t. It’s really interesting how hesitant they remain,” a DHS official told a Microsoft representative in February, according to the Intercept.

The U.S. government has for years discussed the scope and scale of online content moderation the government should engage in, as well as how to compel social media platforms to flag or remove “misinformation,” “disinformation” and “malinformation,” the Intercept reported, citing meeting minutes and records appended to a lawsuit filed by Missouri Attorney General Eric Schmitt.

The department now considers rooting out misinformation online as a critical element of its overall mission, according to a draft of the 2022 Quadrennial Homeland Security Review reviewed by the Intercept.

While the document highlights counter-terrorism as DHS’s primary objective, it acknowledges that “misinformation and disinformation spread online” can exacerbate terrorist threats from “domestic violent extremists,” according to the Intercept. It calls for DHS to use advanced computer analytical software and hire experts “to better understand how threat actors use online platforms to introduce and spread toxic narratives intended to inspire or incite violence.”

However, DHS has defined the “critical infrastructure” threatened by domestic terrorists to encompass trust in government, public health and election security, according to the Intercept.

“No matter your political allegiances, all of us have good reason to be concerned about government efforts to pressure private social media platforms into reaching the government’s preferred decisions about what content we can see online,” Adam Goldstein, the vice president of research at the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, told the Intercept.

Agencies under DHS — Customs and Border Protection, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, the Science and Technology Directorate and the Secret Service — all have directives to combat misinformation online, the Intercept reported, citing a DHS Inspector General report from August.

Meta and DHS did not immediately respond to the Daily Caller News Foundation’s request for comment.

AUTHOR

MICAELA BURROW

Reporter.

RELATED ARTICLE: GOP Senators Release Documents Showing Biden Admin Lied About Disinfo Board

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved. Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.