Tag Archive for: Palestinian jihad

Netanyahu Insists: No Palestinian State West of the Jordan

In the face of the Trump administration signifying support for a UN Security Council Resolution, drafted largely by the Americans, that recognizes a “path to statehood for the Palestinians,” Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu wanted to reassure the Israeli public that there would never be a Palestinian state “west of the Jordan River.” His formulation left open the possibility of a Palestinian state east of the Jordan River, on territory that was originally intended to be part of the Palestine Mandate but instead, at the insistence of Great Britain, became the Emirate of Transjordan, and later, the Arab State of Jordan. Netanyahu was simply reaffirming the policy he has proclaimed for his entire political life — that of opposition to a “Palestinian state.” But he was now saying it in a different political climate. After the October 7, 2023 Hamas attacks, 80% of the Israeli public — a historic high — is now against a Palestinian state. At the same time, more countries in the West — including France, the U.K., Spain, and Norway — are choosing to recognize a “state of Palestine.” More on Netanyahu’s reaffirmation of a policy opposing a Palestinian state, which he described as “firm and unchanged,” can be found here: “Israel’s opposition to Palestinian state remains ‘firm and unchanged,’ Netanyahu tells cabinet,” by Keshet Neev, Jerusalem Post, November 16, 2025:

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu affirmed Israel’s opposition to a Palestinian state and commitment to demilitarize Hamas, during his opening remarks at the Sunday government meeting.

The meeting included a discussions with ministers on the issue of a Palestinian state. Ron Dermer took part in the meeting, despite his resignation from his role as strategic affairs minister last week.

The statements came after a recent wave of remarks from politicians and far-right lawmakers, calling on Netanyahu to clarify Israel’s stance regarding the establishment of a Palestinian state.

“A Palestinian state, our opposition to a Palestinian state on any territory west of the Jordan River remains firm and unchanged,” Netanyahu said at the meeting.

“I have been pushing back against these attempts for decades, doing so in the face of pressure from abroad and from home. So I do not need reinforcements, tweets, or lectures from anyone,” he added….

Netanyahu has never wavered in his opposition to a Palestinian state, as he reminded the right-wing members of his cabinet who had called for his “clarification.”

On Friday, the US, Qatar, Egypt, the UAE, Saudi Arabia, Indonesia, Pakistan, Jordan, and Turkey issued a joint statement expressing support for a US-drafted UN Security Council resolution under consideration that would “offer a pathway to Palestinian self-determination and statehood.

This is the first time that the Trump administration has come out so clearly in favor of “a pathway to Palestinian self-determination and statehood,” and that is why Netanyahu felt the need to assert, yet again, that Israel would never permit it.

Additionally, a Palestinian state was mentioned in a UN Security Council draft from Thursday, discussing the International Security Force that is meant to govern Gaza.

That UN Security Council draft was the handiwork of the Americans, who are not going to veto their own resolution.

It could be argued that there is still a long way to go, and many obstacles, before Palestinian statehood could possibly be a reality. The Palestinian Authority would have to stop supporting terrorism, which means it would have to end its Pay-For-Slay program, and rewrite its schoolbooks that today glorify terrorists and terrorism. The future PA-run state of Palestine would likely have to agree to be disarmed, just as Hamas will be forcibly disarmed in Gaza, almost certainly by the IDF, as no one else has yet shown a willingness to do the job. There would have to be a provision for the 520,000 Israelis now living in Judea and Samaria. What status would they have in a “state of Palestine”? Would they be forced to move back into a much smaller Israel, now squeezed back within the 1949 armistice lines, leaving the Jewish state with a nine-mile-wide waist from Qalqilya to the sea? Or would they remain where they are, living in Israeli enclaves within, but not a part of, a state of Palestine? Or would they become citizens of “Palestine”?

So many questions, which those who now recognize a “state of Palestine” have not dared to even try to answer.

But one question has received a firm and unambiguous answer from the prime minister of Israel: No, a thousand times no, to a state of Palestine west of the Jordan River. And the Israeli public overwhelmingly agrees. Will the Trump administration support its most loyal ally, still fighting for its survival on seven fronts against implacable jihadists, or will it continue its folly of trying to appease the Arabs by seeming to favor the possibility of a 23rd Arab state?

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLES:

Muslim Illegal Alien With Terror Ties Was Allowed to Drive a Truck

What Can Be Done About the Arson Attacks on Churches in Europe?

Police turn off Canadian National Anthem as Palestinian flag is raised over Toronto City Hall

Arson Attacks on Churches in Germany at Record High

Canada: ‘One Touch’ for processing refugee claims instead of human interviews deemed risk to national security

Not just Nigeria: Across Africa, Christians are burned, face forced conversions, murder, beheadings

RELATED VIDEO: Importance of MBS state visit to United States of America

EDITORS NOTE: This Jihad Watch column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Speaker Johnson: Judea and Samaria Belong to Israel

While much of the world prattles on about a “two-state solution” that will supposedly bring about a permanent peace between Israel and the Palestinians, in America, influential Republicans recognize that Judea and Samaria, as a matter of historic right and of international law, must belong to Israel. Speaker of the House Mike Johnson, in a recent visit to the city of Ariel, which lies beyond the 1949 armistice lines (known as the Green Line), repeated his support for Israel retaining these territories, and deplored the use of the term “West Bank,” which was invented by the Jordanians in 1950 in order to efface the Jewish connection to the land that the toponyms Judea and Samaria made clear. More on Mike Johnson’s visit, and the increasing support in the Republican Party for Israel to retain all of Judea and Samaria, can be found here: “Republican recognition grants Israel historic chance to cement West Bank sovereignty – editorial,” Jerusalem Post, August 5, 2025:

US Speaker of the House Mike Johnson’s decision to stand in the Samaria city of Ariel on Monday and declare that “Judea and Samaria… must remain an integral part” of Israel was far more than a private photo op. It marked the clearest sign yet that today’s Republican leadership is steadily erasing the Green Line from United States policy toward the Jewish state.

Johnson’s visit capped a string of high-level steps taken since President Donald Trump returned to the White House in January. On his first afternoon back in the Oval Office, Trump revoked Executive Order 14115 and lifted financial sanctions that the previous administration had imposed on a handful of what they called “extremist settlers” accused of West Bank violence.

Less than two weeks later, Sen. Tom Cotton introduced the RECOGNIZING Judea and Samaria Act, a bill that would bar federal agencies from using the term “West Bank” in official documents, replacing it with the biblical term favored by Israel’s settler movement.

People who try to undermine the use of the place names “Judea and Samaria” scoffingly refer to them as “biblical terms,” but surely that long usage, going back thousands of years, does not weaken, but strengthens the Jewish claim to those territories. And curiously, those who decry use of the terms “Judea and Samaria” because they are “biblical” have no problem with using the place name “Gaza,” which is no less “biblical” a toponym.

In February, the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) adopted a resolution urging Washington to “recognize Israel’s sovereignty over Judea and Samaria.”

On the same day, House Foreign Affairs Committee chairman Brian Mast circulated an internal memo instructing Republican staffers to follow suit in all committee correspondence.

The place names Judea and Samaria were in continuous use for 3,500 years until 1950, when Jordan, which had seized those territories in the 1948 war, stopped using those terms so redolent of Jewish history, and instead concocted a new term — the “West Bank.” Their aim was the same as that of the Romans some 2,000 years before, when they renamed the Kingdom of Judah as “Palestine.” Now House Speaker Johnson, Senator Tom Cotton, and Congressman Brian Mast all say “West Bank” should be abandoned and the historic names of “Judea and Samaria” be brought back into circulation.

Diplomats followed politicians. In a June interview with Bloomberg, US Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee abandoned the long-standing American goal of an independent Palestinian state, suggesting instead that any eventual Palestinian entity be established “elsewhere in the Arab world.”…

The Israelis are prepared to give the Arabs in Judea and Samaria the freedom to rule themselves, but not to rule over the 700,000 Jewish Israelis who live there, on state and waste lands, as well as on lands bought from Arab landowners at exorbitant prices. Nor would the Palestinian Arabs possess a military that could threaten Israel. They would have a “state-minus.” As Prime Minister Netanyahu has repeatedly said, “I think Palestinians should have all the powers to govern themselves, but none of the powers to threaten us.”

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLES:

Israel Must Make It Clear That It Has a Right to Retain All of Judea and Samaria

The media front in the war on civilisation

‘Palestinians’ say ‘two-state solution isn’t our goal, our goal is caliphate and only caliphate’

Tommy Robinson Arrested for Posting ‘F____ Hamas’ on X

David’s Sling Proves It Can Handle a Wide Range of Threats

Iran executes man accused of leaking information to Israel about nuclear scientist killed in Israeli strike

Pakistani Businessman Jailed in London for Threatening Virgin Atlantic Air Hostess with Gang-Rape and Terrorism

The Jaranwala Case: A Comprehensive Analysis of Religious Violence in the Islamic Republic of Pakistan

Nigeria: Muslims murder seventeen Christians in jihad raid on village in Plateau state

RELATED VIDEO: Mohammed Hijab’s Legal Jihad Edition

EDITORS NOTE: This Jihad Watch column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

U.S. Imposes Sanctions on Both PA and PLO Members

Better late than never:, the American government will now impose sanctions on both members of the Palestinian Authority and on the PLO as an organization. More on this welcome news can be found here: “US to sanction Palestinian Authority, PLO members, State Dept. confirms,” by Guy Alster, Reuters, July 31, 2025:

The United States will impose sanctions on several members of the Palestinian Authority and the Palestine Liberation Organization, the State Department said on Thursday.

The State Department announced it had reported to Congress that neither the PLO nor the PA complied with their commitments under the PLO Commitments Compliance Act of 1989 and the Middle East Peace Commitments Act of 2002.

The offenses listed included “taking actions to internationalize its conflict with Israel” through the International Criminal Court and International Court of Justice, as well as supporting and glorifying violence, particularly in textbooks, and the pay-to-slay program.

The move prevents those targeted from receiving visas to travel to the United States, the statement said. “It is in our national security interests to impose consequences and hold the PLO and PA accountable for not complying with their commitments and undermining the prospects for peace.”

The State Department did not confirm which individuals would be sanctioned.

These sanctions on PA and PLO officials come after the State Department imposed sanctions on more than 115 Iran-linked individuals and entities. Their assets in the U.S. may be frozen and they be prohibited from entering the United States. This might extend to Iranian diplomats currently assigned to the U.N. It will certainly make the life of Iranian officials much more difficult. Foreigners who serve as apologists for, and agents of, Iran, while living in this country, such as the sinister Trita Parsi, a Swedish citizen, are likely to have their visas revoked.

The US has already imposed sanctions on Iranian-linked individuals and on the UN’s Special Rapporteur for Conditions in the Occupied Palestinian Territories, Francesca Albanese. The UN now says that the American government has no power to deny the antisemitic Albanese from entering the US. The American State Department does not agree; it has no intention of allowing Albanese, who has been carrying on a campaign at the UN against both Israel and America, to visit, or live, or work in the US. We’ll see who wins that diplomatic tug of war.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio is smiting the enemies of this country and of Israel hip and thigh as has never been done by any administration before. He’d be an excellent presidential candidate in 2028.

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLES:

SANCTIONING SAVAGES: Trump Slaps Sanctions on Palestinian Authority; Blocks Officials from Traveling to UN for ‘Palestinian State’

Marco Rubio’s War on Lawfare

France: Man sentenced to one year in prison for burning a Qur’an in front of a mosque

Hamas publishes video of emaciated Israeli hostage

UN admits that 87% of its 2,010 food trucks in Gaza were ‘intercepted’ by crowds or armed gunmen

Imam at funeral of slain NYPD officer uses platform to slander Israel

UK: English Channel crossings so far in 2025 pass 25,000 – faster than any year ever

Asylum Seekers in London Have Extraordinary Benefits Lavished on Them

Croatia: Muslim migrants from UK gang-rape woman, Daily Mail calls attackers ‘three Brits’

EDITORS NOTE: This Jihad Watch column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Another Hamas Propaganda Victory: The Truth Behind the Tampa ‘Businessman’ Killed in Judea and Samaria

A Palestinian-American man from Tampa, Florida, was killed near the Jewish community of Ateret in Judea and Samaria (also known as the West Bank) this month, prompting yet another round of sympathetic coverage in U.S. media outlets. News reports described him as a “beloved businessman,” the owner of an ice cream parlor, a harmless young man who liked comedy and beaches. What they did not report, however, is far more telling — and more damning.

Let’s start with the so-called ice cream business.

The victim has been widely described as the owner of “Ice Screamin,” a supposed dessert shop. But a check of business records shows otherwise. There are two other individuals tied to the business. Only one of them, Ibrahim Mujahid, appears to have a meaningful entrepreneurial history. Mujahid previously operated Rani Express, a transportation and warehousing company in Georgia that is now defunct. He also operates Caring Angels, a home care service in Minnesota that is still in business.

That’s the real owner of “Ice Screamin.” Not the man killed in Judea and Samaria. Which explains why every news profile has skipped the usual “humble beginnings to business success” narrative. There’s no inspiring small business story. The man in question was no upstanding, hardworking American entrepreneur.

It gets worse.

Nearly every outlet has failed to report that the incident took place in Ateret, a Jewish “settlement.” This is true—and completely ignored also is the fact that Ateret has existed since 1981, long before the victim was even born. Yet the press claims that this man was killed while he was “defending his land.” But where is this land? Did this Palestinian own land within the Jewish settlement? Is there a deed? Proof of purchase? Coordinates? Or are we once again expected to accept such claims on faith, simply because they come wrapped in keffiyeh-colored pathos?

This incident is being used precisely as Hamas intended: to paint every defensive Israeli action as an unjustified killing, and every Palestinian casualty as a peaceful victim of “settler violence.” It’s media theater — an information operation dressed up as local tragedy. Hamas, or those working in tandem with it, have perfected this script.

And of course, the Hamas-linked Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR)  has predictably leaped to the microphone. CAIR has made a public show of outrage over the death of an American citizen. But let’s be clear: CAIR has shown no comparable concern for the Americans who are currently being held hostage by Hamas. No press conferences. No letter-writing campaigns. No breathless appearances on CNN. Evidently, not all American lives are worth the same level of outrage — at least not when it’s Hamas doing the killing.

That’s what this story is — a Hamas narrative dressed in the language of American civil rights and entrepreneurship. And the Western media, as always, plays along.

Don’t be fooled.

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLES:

The two ‘Palestinians’ supposedly killed by ‘Israeli settlers’ were carrying out coordinated jihad terror attack

JIHAD IN AMERICA: Senator Ted Cruz Introduces Legislation to Designate Muslim Brotherhood a Terrorist Organization

Did Israeli ‘Settlers’ at Sinjil Really ‘Brutally Beat a Palestinian to Death’? 

Over 350 Muslim Religious Leaders Endorse Oct. 7 Massacres

Syria’ Kaleidoscope of Death

Iran, Israel, the Jinn, and Other ‘Occult Forces’

India Delhi High Court Stays Release of Film About a Jihad Murder After Muslim Groups Complain

Jihadist Movements in Turkey: Evolution, Threats, and Responses

Syria: Israel vows to protect Druze communities in violent outbreak with Bedouins

EDITORS NOTE: This Jihad Watch column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

WASHINGTON, D.C.: Keffiyeh-wearing gunman screaming ‘Free Palestine’ murders Israeli diplomat and companion outside Jewish Museum

What did the leftists and jihadis who ratcheted up the anti-Israel hysteria to unprecedented levels think would be the outcome? This. This is exactly what they wanted to happen, and there will be more of it.

“Report: Shooter of Embassy Workers in Washington Wore Keffiyeh, Shouted ‘Free Palestine,’” Ynet News, May 21, 2025:

The news site ‘Jewish Insider’ reported that the shooter who attacked two embassy employees outside the Jewish museum in Washington was wearing a keffiyeh and shouted ‘Free Palestine’ before striking them.

“Israeli embassy staff among two killed in shooting outside Jewish Museum in Washington,” by Sarah Moskowitz, Jerusalem Post, May 22, 2025:

A man and a woman were shot and killed in front of the Capital Jewish Museum in Washington on Wednesday night, NBC News reported. At least one of those killed was a staff member at the Israeli embassy.

Two Israeli embassy staff were shot at close range, Axios reporter Barak Ravid said on X, citing an Israeli embassy spokesperson.

The shooting occurred in front of the museum where an event was being held by the American Jewish Committee.

The FBI Joint Terrorism Task Force is currently investigating the incident, ABC News reported.

At least one of the people shot is believed to be a member of the Israeli embassy staff, according to reports from US media.

Law enforcement sources said that police are questioning a person of interest.

ABC added that US Attorney General Pam Bondi and Interim US Attorney for the District of Columbia Jeanine Pirro arrived at the scene shortly after the shooting took place.

“Praying for the victims of this violence as we work to learn more,” Bondi shared on X/Twitter.

‘Act of antisemitic terror’
Israeli Ambassador to the United Nations Danny Danon reacted to the incident on X, calling it an “act of antisemitic terror.”

“Harming diplomats and the Jewish community is crossing a red line….

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLES:

Two Israeli Diplomats Dead Outside Capital Jewish Museum in D.C.

Two people murdered at Jewish museum in Washington, D.C.

Bloody Attack in Germany: Muslim migrant injures several people with a knife outside a bar

Canada: Hamas supporters scream ‘Death to Canada, Death to the United States, Death to Israel’

Only in California: Hijab-clad Muslima who gave National Socialist salutes is OnlyFans model

Universities Should Not Be Accepting Money from Qatar, a Hamas-Supporting Plutocracy

Germany plans to bring large numbers of ‘Palestinians’ from Gaza into the country

Hamas-linked CAIR Defends a Pro-Hamas Activist

Pro-Hamas Group Swears It Has ‘Nothing To Do’ With Former Member Accused Of Murdering Israeli Embassy Workers

EDITORS NOTE: This Jihad Watch column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Biden: No Money for Flood Victims, $336,000,000 for ‘Palestinians’

Over $1 billion in aid for the terrorists since Oct 7.

Plenty of people have seen the short clip of Biden replying that there’s no more money left for Hurricane Helene victims.

BIDEN: “We’ve given everything that we have.”

“Are there any more resources the federal government could be giving them?”

BIDEN: “No.”

But there’s always more money for Hamas and the PLO who are occupying parts of the West Bank and Gaza.

After just wasting over $200 million on a failed Gaza aid pier, the Biden-Harris admin is dispatching over $300 million more in “humanitarian aid” to prop up Islamic terrorists.

The real devil however is in the details.

Today’s funding brings the total U.S. humanitarian assistance announced for the Palestinian people to more than $1 billion since October 2023.

Kill over 1,000 people, get over $1 billion. What Islamic terror group wouldn’t take that deal?

There’s always money for Islamic migrants and terrorists, but there’s never enough money for Americans.

AUTHOR

EDITORS NOTE: This Jihad Watch column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Jihad mass murder rewarded: ‘State of Palestine’ takes seat in UN General Assembly

The message to the “Palestinians” is clear: murder more Jews, and you’ll get even more of what you want. The “State of Palestine” is, after all, only a stepping-stone to the total eradication of Israel and a new genocide of the Jews.

“‘State of Palestine’ takes seat in UN General Assembly despite lack of full membership,” Times of Israel, September 11, 2024:

UNITED NATIONS — Palestinians took a seat among member states at the UN General Assembly on Tuesday, a new right accorded to the Palestinian Authority’s delegation despite it not being a full member of the body.

In May, an overwhelming majority of the General Assembly asserted that Palestinians deserved full membership, a move that has been blocked by the United States, which along with Israel says recognition of Palestinian statehood must come through a peace agreement.

The General Assembly granted the delegation certain new rights in a resolution, which still excludes it from being able to vote or be a member of the Security Council.

Starting with the 79th General Assembly session, which began Tuesday, the Palestinians can submit proposals and amendments, and sit among member states.

The Palestinian Authority’s envoy to the United Nations, Riyad Mansour, took his place on Tuesday afternoon at a table marked “State of Palestine” between Sri Lanka and Sudan.

“This is not merely a procedural matter. This is a historic moment for us,” said Egyptian Ambassador Osama Mahmoud Abdelkhalek Mahmoud….

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLES:

Teachers’ Union In Great Britain Wants an End to Support For ‘Apartheid’ Israel

The BBC’s Biased Coverage of Israel

‘Legacy of a Stateswoman’: Dianne Feinstein’s Fantastic Wealth on Display at Auction

RELATED VIDEO:  Biden Regime Sent $10 Billion to Iran After Oct. 7

EDITORS NOTE: This Jihad Watch column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Video: Robert Spencer and Hank Hanegraaff discuss The Palestinian Delusion

The people of Palestine are caught in the crosshairs of the only significant religious system in the history of the human race with a sociopolitical structure of laws that mandate violence against the infidel. While much has been made about the state of Israel and the several shades of Zionism that play a role in its complicated history, it is impossible to accurately assess the Israeli-Palestinian conflict without understanding the most important factor of them all—Islam.

While there are people of other faiths (such as Christians) that live in the land called Palestine—I have close, personal friends among them—the majority of the people occupying this territory are Muslims and all of the citizens are led by Hamas, a militant Islamic organization with connections throughout the Islamic world that undoubtedly and unabashedly desire the destruction of all Jews along with the death of America and ultimately the West. This cannot be overstated and any intentions of a peaceful resolution to this conflict are in direct contradiction with the ideology of Islam—most notably Jihad against the infidel.

Make no mistake—in a time of civilizational crisis—Islam is at the heart of this clash of civilizations. In times like these, where honest information is in short supply, it is imperative that lean on the counsel of experts in our pursuit of discernment, which is precisely why Hank Hanegraaff, the host of the 𝘉𝘪𝘣𝘭𝘦 𝘈𝘯𝘴𝘸𝘦𝘳 𝘔𝘢𝘯 broadcast and the 𝘏𝘢𝘯𝘬 𝘜𝘯𝘱𝘭𝘶𝘨𝘨𝘦𝘥 podcast, is joined by Robert Spencer one of the, one of the world’s leading experts on Islam, on this episode of the 𝘏𝘢𝘯𝘬 𝘜𝘯𝘱𝘭𝘶𝘨𝘨𝘦𝘥 podcast to discuss what he deems “The Palestinian Delusion.”

Topics discussed include:

  1. Why is it so difficult to discuss Islam without being labeled hateful, bigoted or Islamophobic? (12:22); how and when did Islam begin to call for religiously mandated warfare? (14:56);
  2. What is meant by the protest chant, “From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free”? (19:38);
  3. How important is the Levant? (21:48);
  4. Is Islam anti-Semitic and anti-Christian? (24:55);
  5. The end of the world according to Islam (27:53);
  6. “Welcoming the stranger” and the emphasis on hospitality in Islam (34:26);
  7. Is there any real hope for a two-state solution between Israel and Palestine? (40:28);
  8. The history of the Palestinian flag and nationality (44:29);
  9. The history of the Arab-Israeli Peace Process and the Camp David Accords (52:21);
  10. “The right of conquest” has been recognized throughout history (1:01:11);
  11. The dangers of Christian Zionism and the influence of John Hagee (1:07:03);
  12. Understanding the PLO, Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood (1:15:52);
  13. Obama vs. Israel (1:23:50);
  14. Why did Obama and the subsequent Biden administration go so soft on Iran? (1:29:21);
  15. Why have we seen a surge in support for Palestine? (1:32:53);
  16. The rise of anti-Semitism since October 7th (1:35:18); is there a solution to the Israel-Palestinian conflict? (1:37:17);
  17. Why was Robert Spencer fired in 2011? (1:40:01);
  18. Robert Spencer’s upcoming book Muhammad: A Critical Biography (1:45:10).

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLES:

Biden-Harris Administration Stonewalls Investigation Into Massive Aid Going to Gaza

Hamas top dog calls for ‘attacks of self-sacrifice for Allah,’ that is, jihad suicide bombings

Islamic Republic of Iran: Father murders his 17-year-old daughter to restore the family’s honor

How the Media, As So Often, Misstates What Israel Does

German and French interior ministers discuss ‘how we can counter the terrible acts of violent Islamists’

EDITORS NOTE: This Jihad Watch video is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

A Palestinian Visits Auschwitz, Tells Jews ‘You Belong Here’

The first Palestinian to have visited a Nazi concentration camp was the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, Hajj Amin el Husseini, the leader of the Palestinian Arabs from the 1920s to the 1940s, who spent the war years in Berlin. He had a nice chat with Hitler on November 28, 1941, captured in a famous photograph here. Al-Husseini expressed to Hitler his enthusiasm for the Final Solution. He was befriended by Heinrich Himmler, and there is some evidence, not conclusive, that the Mufti may have been taken to Auschwitz by Himmler, or possibly by another person he had befriended, Adolf Eichmann, to see how swimmingly things were proceeding there. It is certain that the Mufti visited the concentration camp at Tebbin, for there are numerous photographs of him at the site together with high Nazi officials, as can be seen here.

As his contribution to the Nazi war effort, Hajj Amin el Husseini is known to have raised several Waffen SS battalions consisting of Bosnian Muslims. He also broadcast pro-Nazi propaganda to the Arab world throughout the war.

In January 2020, in quite a different spirit to that exhibited by the Mufti, a group of 25 Muslim faith leaders visited Auschwitz, in what was at the time called a “groundbreaking” visit. “To be here… is both a sacred duty and a profound honor,” the Saudi head of the Muslim World League said during a tour of Nazi death camp with members of the American Jewish Committee.

Now another Palestinian has just been in the news for his visit to Auschwitz, not undertaken In the spirit of sympathy for the victims that the delegation of Muslim faith leaders exhibited but, rather, in a triumphant mode, demanding that Jews everywhere “return” to where they belong — that is, to the Nazi death camps. Robert Spencer wrote about this briefly here, and more on this latest example of a Palestinian expressing murderous antisemitism can be found here: “Palestinian man visits Auschwitz, publicly calls on Jews to return there ‘where they belong,’” Jerusalem Post, May 2, 2024:

A video was posted on X earlier this week that showed footage of a Palestinian man visiting the Auschwitz-Birkenau Holocaust Memorial Museum, where he called on Jews to return to the site of the extermination camp, a place he claimed where they belonged.

Footage of the man can be seen walking through the Auschwitz memorial, calling to free Palestine.

“From these ghettos from which the Zionists came, I say Allah have mercy on all the Palestinians and our martyrs. Free Palestine,” he exclaimed….

These were not ghettos, but death camps. And so very few survived them. But that doesn’t bother the unnamed Palestinian who filmed his visit. He only sees these as places from where “the Zionists came” to inflict pain on poor Palestinians. And he wants “the Zionists” — the Jews — ideally to return to Auschwitz where they can be dealt with appropriately, that is, put to death. But if that is not possible, then at least the Jews must leave the land they stole from the Palestinians and go back, he says “to your countries.”

Though the campus brats accuse Israel of a “genocide” in Gaza, the only “genocide” that has been attempted was that carried out by Hamas on October 7, when 3,000 Hamas operatives smashed into Israel from Gaza, in cars, on motorbikes, and on paragliders, and proceeded to rape, torture, mutilate, and murder 1,200 Israeli men, women, and children. A great many Palestinians — 82% — have expressed approval of what Hamas did on that day. Now we have a Palestinian, cheerfully videotaping himself as he tours Auschwitz, so that his fellow Palestinians, and indeed all Muslims, can see him calling for “the Zionists” — he means “the Jews” — to “all [be returned] to the concentration camps” where, Allah willing, they can be put to death.

Would any of the thousands of campus nitwits now chanting “Say No To Genocide” care to comment on this Palestinian’s heartfelt desire to send Jews back where he knows they belong — to Auschwitz?

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLES:

California imam: ‘Every ounce of fear that you put in their hearts by your lawful protests is rewarded by Allah’

UK: John Cleese says Britons shouldn’t be afraid to say ‘some cultures are superior to others’

MIT: Pro-Hamas protester tears down American flag, throws it in the garbage

UCLA: ‘The real axis of evil are Britain, Israel, and the USA’

Germany: Knife-wielding Muslim migrant terrifies kindergarten children

German teacher: ‘At the end of the lesson, they expect me to convert to Islam’

UN Accuses Israel of Denying Aid as Hamas Fires on Aid Crossing

POST ON X:

EDITORS NOTE: This Jihad Watch column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

The World Prepares to Recognize a Hamas Palestinian State

A “Palestinian” state will be a state of the terrorists, by the terrorists and for the terrorists.


Hamas, Islamic Jihad, the PLO’s Palestinian Authority and the other Islamic terrorist groups who make up the official “Palestinian” leadership have been invited for unity talks in Moscow.

The terrorist unity talks scheduled by the Putin regime for the end of February are a homecoming for a “Palestinian” movement invented by Soviet propagandists. Mahmoud Abbas, the long-serving dictator of the PA, wrote his Holocaust denial thesis while studying at Moscow’s Patrice Lumumba University which had trained a generation of third world terrorists.

The invitation to Moscow comes from Putin’s Deputy Foreign Minister Mikhail Bogdanov. Materials from a KGB defector revealed that Abbas had worked for the KGB under Bogdanov. Back then Abbas had the KGB codename “mole”, these days, his code name is “president”.

Some of the same ex-Soviet operatives who helped set up and fund the PLO, the PFLP and the rest of the “Palestinian” movement are now trying to unite them all under one single banner.

While the State Department in D.C. and British Foreign Secretary Lord Cameron are talking about immediately recognizing a “Palestinian” state as soon as they can force Israel to stop its campaign to destroy Hamas, the Palestinian Authority is trying to bring Hamas into the state.

The media claimed that Abbas had visited Qatar to hold talks with the Islamic tyranny’s leaders on a “ceasefire”. In reality, the Palestinian Authority leader had been meeting with the Qatari regime, another state sponsor of Hamas, to pursue unity talks with the fellow terror group.

Putin’s relationship with Iran makes Moscow, like Doha, home turf for Hamas. Some weeks after Oct 7, top Hamas leaders had flown out to Moscow to meet with Bogdanov after the Russian official had previously chatted with leaders of the terror group in their home base in Qatar.

In 2006, Putin had reacted to the Hamas takeover of Gaza by declaring that “we are maintaining our contacts with Hamas and intend, in the near future, to invite the leadership of this organisation to Moscow” and emphasized that, “we have never called Hamas a terrorist organisation.” Putin invited Hamas leader Khaled Mashal, who recently claimed that “the Russians told us they would study our Oct. 7 attack in their military academies.”

A week after the Oct 7 attacks, Hamas stated, “we in the Islamic Resistance Movement (HAMAS) appreciate Russian President Vladimir Putin’s position on the ongoing Zionist aggression against our people and his opposition to the siege of Gaza”.

After Oct 7, Putin and China’s Xi had blocked a UN condemnation of the Hamas atrocities. Now Russia is working on uniting its old PLO friends and its new Hamas friends. But Russia and Qatar are not alone. The Biden administration and the European Union are all pushing for a “Palestinian” state after they force a ceasefire. And that state will inevitably include Hamas.

“Russia has invited all Palestinian factions who will be meeting on the 26 of this month in Moscow. We will see if Hamas is ready to come to the ground with us,” Palestinian Authority Prime Minister Mohammad Shtayyeh informed the Munich Security Conference. “We are prepared to engage. If Hamas is willing to join us, that’s positive. We need Palestinian unity,”

“One should not continue focusing on October 7,” he warned attendees at the forum.

“Hamas is an essential part of the Palestinian political map. Israel’s talk of eliminating Hamas will not happen and are not acceptable to us,” Shtayyeh had told Qatar’s Doha Forum in December around the same time that the PA was holding unity talks with Hamas in Doha.

After the Oct 7 attacks, Biden claimed that, “the vast majority of Palestinians are not Hamas. Hamas does not represent the Palestinian people.” In reality, polls show that Hamas would easily win any current election, as it won the last set of “Palestinian” elections in 2006, leading Abbas and his Fatah faction to seize total control of the West Bank and reject any future elections. Hamas was able to take over Gaza leading to the two “Palestinian” statelets.

In January, Abbas’ spokesman had promised to “hold general elections, and if Hamas wins, the president will hand over the [Palestinian] Authority.”

With polls showing that Hamas would handily win an election, If Abbas is serious this time, that means recognizing a “Palestinian” state will mean creating a Hamas state inside Israel.

Hamas and the Palestinian Authority had been holding unity talks on and off, including four months before the Oct 7 attacks, and quickly began holding them again afterward.

The current proposal, like previous ones coming out of the unity talks, places Palestinian Authority officials up front, so that terrorists can receive foreign aid from America and the EU, while Hamas officials maintain an official subsidiary role but continue to control Gaza.

In the past, Hamas had been able to siphon foreign aid through UNRWA, but as it now faces the possibility of utter destruction in Gaza, it may be more willing to accept the proposal being advanced by Qatar, Russia, the EU and the Biden administration. While Russia and Qatar may be more publicly supportive of their Hamas allies, all the proposals come down to a government of “technocrats” serving as the public face of the Palestinian Authority and Hamas.

Shtayyeh is an example of one of those “technocrats”, academics with experience in extracting foreign aid and telling foreign diplomats what they want to hear, but with no actual political power, who were put into place to act as a cover for the Arafat and Abbas regimes. A similar puppet regime of technocrats subsidiary to Afghanistan’s warlords had operated in Kabul before it fled the Taliban. The Taliban and the Biden administration have resurrected a version of its “technocrats” to administer the funds going from the United States to Afghanistan.

The current plan is to blame Oct 7 entirely on Yahya Sinwar, the leader of Hamas in Gaza, and a few of his cronies, to demand their expulsion, and then to make a deal with the “moderate” Hamas leaders in Doha before putting the plan for a “Palestinian” state in overdrive. But the Moscow summit is a warning that any such state will never be anything other than a terror state.

The primary difference between the Qatari and Russian positions, and the Biden and EU position, is plausible deniability. Qatar and Russia want Hamas out front, while Biden and the EU prefer it out back. And we already know from Afghanistan how that will end up working out.

The Qataris negotiated our deal with the Taliban that would have made the Islamic terrorist group a part of a multilateral government. Americans died to maintain that State Department fiction as the Taliban were advancing to take over the entire country. Hamas had its chance to be part of a multilateral government with other Islamic terrorists and each time it chose to try and take everything. Biden and the EU may want to keep Hamas in the background, but history tells us that, like the Taliban, it will eventually seize power and dominate any “Palestinian” state.

It’s difficult to know whether Secretary of State Blinken and the State Department personnel who pretended until the last moment that the Taliban were not trying to take over Afghanistan, but only to take a stronger position in the negotiations for a united government really believed that. It’s also difficult to know whether they truly believe that their proposed “Palestinian” state will be anything other than a terrorist state that will eventually fall into the hands of Hamas.

But we know that not only Qatar and Russia, but the Biden administration and the EU, have urgently fought against any Israeli move into Rafah that would finish off Hamas in Gaza.

It’s obvious why Qatar or Russia’s Bogdanov are condemning an attack on Rafah, but the Biden administration has introduced a draft UN resolution calling for a ceasefire, and from Biden on down have warned Israel against going into Rafah. The internal reasoning is probably similar to the one that guided Nixon and Kissinger during another October war 50 years ago.

During the Yom Kippur War, Secretary of State Henry Kissinger had told Soviet Ambassador Anatoly Dobrynin that “my nightmare is a victory for either side.” He warned that without negotiations and a deal, “the Israelis [will] have pushed the Arabs out of every territory and “If we do nothing by Tuesday, Wednesday at the latest, Arabs will have been defeated.”

“I do not mean to imply that he wanted Israel to lose the war, he simply did not want Israel to win decisively. He wanted Israel to bleed just enough to soften it up for the post-war diplomacy he was planning,” Admiral Elmo Zuwalt, the former head of the Navy, wrote in his memoir.

The Biden administration also wanted Israel to defeat Hamas, but not to defeat it too much.

The administration is worried that if Israel wins in Rafah, it will win too much and be much less interested in its diplomatic solution of creating a “Palestinian” state which it believes is the real solution to the conflict. And it needs Hamas to provide pressure on Israel to create such a state.

The same failed idea that has haunted the region for decades is that Islamic terrorism can only be defeated by giving the terrorists some, but not all, of what they want. Much as it did not occur to the State Department that the Taliban would want everything, it refuses to believe that Hamas would want everything. And every time the negotiations fall apart, history is rewritten again.

In an article published in early October, National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan described the negotiations that had brought peace between Hamas and Israel. “We have de-escalated crises in Gaza,” he boasted. The online version of the article has been edited to remove those words.

Since December, Sullivan has taken to warning Israel to “transition” to a new “phase” of the war in which it stops its military campaign and goes back to occasional drone attacks on Hamas leaders. And then he and the rest can get started building their “Palestinian” state. And when Hamas takes over again, more articles will have to be edited and more bodies will be buried.

The Biden administration, the European Union (for now only being held off by Hungary), Russia and the rest of the international community are preparing to reward Oct 7 with a terrorist state. A ‘Palestinian’ state will be a state of the terrorists, by the terrorists and for the terrorists.

The 10/7 attacks reminded Israelis of what Americans had known and forgotten after 9/11.

The Israeli soldiers battling in Gaza are not just fighting for their country, but to remind America and the world that it is possible to defeat Islamic terrorists, instead of negotiating with them. A victory there will show everyone that we can all fight and win, instead of surrendering to Islam.

A lot is riding on that battle for Israel, for America, Europe and the free world. That is why the leaders of the international community and the diplomats of the world are fighting to save Hamas. What happens in the next weeks will hand the Islamic terrorists and their enablers either one of their greatest defeats or their greatest victory: a Hamas ‘Palestinian’ state.

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLES:

Biden Regime Warns Israel Not to Interfere With Hamas Members Stealing Aid

Biden’s Strikes Against the Houthis Haven’t Touched a Fraction Of Their Arsenal

Hamas Supporters Protest Chinese New Year Parade

How the Media Misreported the Hezbollah-Israel Exchanges of Fire

UK: Ministry of Justice hosts speaker who said ‘Jews need to get in the queue behind Muslims’

France: 11-year-old Muslim boy arrested for glorifying terrorism and threatening to murder a teacher

EDITORS NOTE: This Jihad Watch column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Biden Regime Considered Sanctioning Israeli Cabinet Members

The Biden regime is desperate to stop Israel’s campaign against Hamas.

The Biden administration has a plan for the Hamas-Israel war. It’s the same plan that past administrations have unleashed on Israel. Pressure Netanyahu or whoever is in office into ignoring voters and conservative members of his coalition, push him into making a deal with the Islamic terrorists, and go back to advocating for a terrorist state. The problem is that things fundamentally changed in Israel on Oct 7 even if they didn’t change in D.C.

When the Biden administration wanted Israel to stop its offensive at the end of 2023, it didn’t get its wish. Now it’s fighting to keep Israel from going into Rafah and finishing off Hamas in its last stronghold.

So the Biden administration has ramped up a pressure campaign, much of it under the radar, but that is playing out across various fronts. The administration has enabled the “monitoring” of Israeli attacks on Hamas for “human rights violations” in a way that may trigger a shutoff of arms sales. It also tested the waters by sanctioning four Israeli Jewish activists for allegedly harassing terrorists and their supporters.

This was a trial balloon and it looks like the Biden administration is preparing to escalate.

The United States is considering imposing sanctions on Israel’s Finance Minister Bezalel Smotich and National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir, the Wall Street Journal reported on Thursday.

According to the report, the US was preparing a package of sanctions that would include actions taken against the two far-right ministers who are influential members of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s cabinet.

The sanctions were considered amid exacerbated tensions between the US and Israel due to Washington’s insistence that Israel refrain from carrying out a full-fledged invasion of Rafah in the southern Gaza Strip.

Sanctioning cabinet members of an allied government would be unprecedented, but apparently, that was Plan A and still on the backburner.

Last month, the U.S. administration was considering enacting a package meant to send a message of discontent to Israel.

The package, U.S. officials said, would have included a reversal of two Trump-era policies: one that allows products made in Jewish settlements in the Israel-occupied West Bank to be labeled as being “Made in Israel,” and another that upended longstanding U.S. policy that the West Bank settlements violate international law.

U.S. officials said they were also considering imposing sanctions on two influential members of Netanyahu’s right-wing government: Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich and National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir.

Taken together, U.S. officials said, the package could have sent a strong message of discontent. But, in the end, the Biden administration only enacted sanctions against four largely unknown Israeli settlers, once again tempering the Biden administration’s response.

Leaking this to the media however, makes it clear that the Biden administration is preparing to escalate to stop Israel’s campaign against Hamas.

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLES:

Betrayed: Biden Regime Proposes Anti-Israel ‘Ceasefire’ Resolution at United Nations Security Council

American Association of University Professors Calls On Israel to Leave Hamas Standing

The Zombie Foreign Policy Establishment Can’t Process Oct. 7

The Muslims of France: The Skyrocketing Threat to European Civilization

EDITORS NOTE: This Jihad Watch column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Biden Administration Has No Idea Who Should Run A Palestinian State

The Bidenites are making their insidious plans to pressure Israel to accept a Palestinian state, by agreeing to be squeezed back within the 1949 armistice lines, with a nine-mile-wide waist from Qalqilya to the sea. Israel is already, with 8,630 square miles, among the tiniest countries in the world; its current size — before the reductions the Bidenites are planning — is 8,630 square miles. The 22 Arab states are spread across 5 million square miles — that is, they are 632 times as large as Israel. Now the administration wants to shrink Israel further still, in order to create a 23rd Arab state. Washington has been planning — plotting might be a more accurate word — with Egypt, Jordan, Lebanon, Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Pakistan — what territories Israel will be forced to give up if there is to be “peace” in the Middle East, which can only be achieved, the Bidenites devoutly believe, through a “two-state solution.” After all, why would everyone call it a “solution” unless it were exactly that? The Bidenites look forward to forcing Israel to remove its “settlers” from the West Bank, as was done in Gaza in 2005. They don’t seem to realize that there are half a million so-called settlers living in the West Bank. It was difficult enough to uproot 8,000 Israelis from Gaza in 2005; the notion that the Israeli government would uproot 500,000 Israelis from their towns and cities in Judea and Samaria (a/k/a the West Bank) is hallucinatory. And unlike the Bidenites, the Israelis know that their claim to retain that territory is solidly based on the Mandate for Palestine which, in turn, was based on 3500 years of the Jewish people’s connection to, and presence in, the Land of Israel.

Given its planning the lineaments of a “Palestinian state,” one would expect that the Bidenites would have a clear idea of who, in their view, should be chosen to run that state. But one would be wrong. A recent exchange in Congress between Rep. Brian Mast and Bonnie Jenkins, a high-ranking member of Blinken’s State Department, shows that the Bidenites have no idea as to who will run this Palestinian state. More on this telling exchange can be found here: “Biden admin official repeatedly won’t say who’d run Palestinian state,” JNS, February 16, 2024:

Rep. Brian Mast (R-Fla.) pressed Bonnie Jenkins, U.S. under secretary of state for arms control and international security, repeatedly at a House hearing about who would run the Palestinian state, for which the Biden administration is calling.

“Have you analyzed that objectively?” he asked Jenkins, of the policy of a Palestinian state.

No I have not, if I understand your question,” she said, testifying on Feb. 14 before the House Foreign Affairs Committee on “AUKUS implementation and challenges to international security and arms control in the 21st century.”

You might not, because I can’t believe that you would answer it in that way,” Mast said.

Jenkins then said she had assessed it.

Who would you assess would lead that Palestinian state?” Mast asked. “Pick a group. You can name a group, but I’m saying Hamas, Palestinian Authority, Palestinian Islamic Jihad, Fatah, some other group. Who would lead it?”

I think that has to be something that’s considered. I don’t think I’m in a position to say,” Jenkins said….

She hasn’t the faintest idea who might be fit to lead that Palestinian state. It’s not because she is out of the loop; she’s an under secretary at the State Department. Her ignorance and indecision reflect that of the Bidenites above her, who are so preoccupied with preventing the IDF from entering Rafah and finishing off Hamas, and with their plan to then squeeze Israel back within the 1949 armistice lines, that they have not done the very thing they accuse the Netanyahu government of not doing — which is preparing for “the day after.”

Mast continued to press the State Department official. “What group that does not receive military support from, say, Iran do you assess would lead that state?” he asked….

Mast is making an important point: every Palestinian terror group —Hamas, Palestinian Islamic Jihad, PFLP — receives aid from Iran. Perhaps he wanted to hear her name the Palestinian Authority, which does not receive aid from Iran, but is colossally corrupt — Mahmoud Abbas and his two sons Yasser and Tarek have accumulated a family fortune of $400 million — and deeply unpopular, with 80% of Palestinians ruled by the Authority saying that they want Abbas to resign.

When Mast asked Jenkins to say, without naming who would run the Palestinian state, whether there has been an assessment of who would run it, the official said, “Put it this way. There will be an assessment of this question with within the U.S. government.”

Or put it this way: the Bidenites have been making pronouncements about the need for a “Palestinian state” and pushing forward, with Arab states but not Israel, with plans to create that state. But not only do they have no idea who would or should run it; they haven’t even begun to do an “assessment” of the possible candidates. It simply hasn’t come up.

He moved on to another line of questioning. “Do you assess that a Palestinian state would be more likely to be designated as a major non-NATO ally, like Israel or Egypt, or would you assess that they would have to be labeled a state sponsor of terror?” he asked.

Jenkins said she couldn’t answer the question.

You are in the position to answer if you have assessed whether that would be the case,” Mast said. “You came here, sitting before Congress saying you are here representing the idea that there should be a Palestinian State. You said you looked at it objectively, which you probably didn’t. And I’m asking if you assessed that. So you can answer whether you assessed something or not.”…

Jenkins was there, before a congressional committee, to make the case for a Palestinian state. Yet she had no idea as to possible candidates being assessed for their fitness to govern that state, or even whether such an assessment had been begun. She is remarkably ill-informed, or rather, her bosses are themselves ill-prepared to discuss what group or individual should be in charge of that Palestinian state.

Jenkins made quite a spectacle of herself. She could not answer the simplest of questions about a future Palestinian state. She did not offer any guidance as to what groups might be considered suitable by Washington to run that state. She did not even know if the Bidenites were “assessing” those who might be considered. She had no thoughts as to whether a group that is supplied weapons by Iran, such as Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad, could still be eligible to run the new state. When Representative Mast asked what she thought about creating a state for people who had just committed atrocities, she was unable to answer, claiming “I just don’t feel like I’m in the position right now that I can answer those type of questions. This is a question for the U.S. government.” Mast reminded her that she was part of the U.S. government and, he might have added, she had been sent to testify before Congress on precisely “those type of questions” about a future Palestinian state.

She is no different from her bosses, Joe Biden and Antony Blinken, except that she is willing to admit to her ignorance, while they are not. This administration does not know where to put its hands and feet. No good can come of this.

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLES:

Netanyahu urges pressure on Qatar, which Hamas is ‘dependent on’ financially

Biden Caused Afghanistan Catastrophe by Siding With State Department

UK: Islamic State flags flown at London pro-Hamas rally

The Graves of Academe: Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion at the University of Michigan (#567)

London Muslim Mayor Picks Tranny Hookers Over Queen

Netherlands: Police attacked, cars ablaze as rival Eritrean gangs battle it out in The Hague

Rashida Tlaib Has Now Gone Beyond All Decency

EDITORS NOTE: This Jihad Watch column is republished with permission. All rights reserved.

Netanyahu Rejects Biden’s ‘Diktat’

The Bidenites are working with Muslim Arab states to impose a Palestinian state upon Israel. But Netanyahu is unwilling to go along. More on this can be found here: “‘Israel Outright Rejects International Dictates’: Biden Creating Plan For Palestinian State, Netanyahu Pushes Back: Report,” by Jack Elbaum, Algemeiner, February 16, 2024:

In a statement on Thursday [February 15], the White House said Biden “raised the situation in Rafah [during a call with Netanyahu], and reiterated his view that a military operation should not proceed without a credible and executable plan for ensuring the safety of and support for the civilians in Rafah.”

Look, the IDF of course will have a “credible and executable plan” for “ensuring the safety of and support for civilians.” It did exactly that in Gaza City, when it dropped six million leaflets directing its inhabitants to flee south, beyond the Wadi Gaza. 900,000 of the city’s one million inhabitants followed those directions. The IDF did the same before its assault on Khan Younis in southern Gaza, when it dropped both leaflets and sent messages showing Gazans the precise neighborhoods where they would be safe. Despite the efforts of Hamas to maximize civilian casualties, Israel’s warnings to civilians to leave areas about to be targeted has kept the civilian-to-combatant ratio to 9:5, a ratio that no other army has managed to achieve, and this is especially impressive given he conditions of urban warfare. It is insulting for Biden to lecture Israel on this matter. He should instead have announced that “I have every confidence that the IDF will do its utmost to minimize civilian deaths in Rafah as it did in Gaza City and Khan Younis.

In response to these reports and the conversation he had with Biden, Netanyahu wrote that “Israel outright rejects international dictates regarding a permanent settlement with the Palestinians. Such an arrangement will be reached only through direct negotiations between the parties, without preconditions.”

Netanyahu has no intention of accepting a diktat from the likes of Biden and Blinken.. He’ served in Sayeret Matkal, the IDF’s most elite unit. His brother Jonathan died while leading a mission to rescue Jews held hostage in Entebbe. Don’t try, Bidenites, to push him around; he won’t have it.

He added, “Israel will continue to oppose the unilateral recognition of a Palestinian state. Such recognition in the wake of the October 7 massacre would give a huge reward to unprecedented terrorism and prevent any future peace settlement.”…

Netanyahu has thrown down the gauntlet. He has no intention of going along with any Munich-like appeasement of the “Palestinians” and their main backer, Iran. After October 7, the people of Israel realized that the “two-state solution” was no solution at all; even the Israeli “peace parties” had their eyes opened on that day; there is no going back to their naïve former hopes of a peace based on a treaty. In Islamic jurisprudence, treaties with Infidels can be broken whenever the Muslims feel themselves sufficiently strong to overwhelm the other side; the model for all such Muslim treaty-making-and-breaking is the Treaty of Hudaibiyya, that Muhammad made with the Meccans in 628 A.D. That “truce treaty” was supposed to have lasted for 10 years. But after 18 months, Muhammad sensed that his forces were strong enough to take on the Meccans; breaking the treaty, he ordered his forces to attack the Meccans; they did so, and prevailed. That has been the model for all treaty-making by Muslims with Infidels ever since. Do you think Biden, or Blinken, or Sullivan, has ever heard of the Treaty of Hudaibiyya? You know the answer to that.

In northern Gaza, to placate the Bidenites, the IDF decreased its use of airstrikes and relied more on its ground troops. This led to an increase in IDF casualties. After that result, the IDF is unlikely to change its tactics in southern Gaza to please Washington.

Dismissing Biden’s warnings about entering Rafah, the IDF will indeed carry out its own plan to rid the southernmost city of Hamas operatives, then continue for a month or so of mopping-up of Hamas remnants throughout the Strip. At that point, having destroyed Hamas and rescued all of the hostages — that is, all those whom Hamas has not murdered — the IDF can make demands of its own. It will not allow Qatar, the financial backer of Hamas, to have any role in deciding who should rule in Gaza, much less in a “Palestinian state” that Israel, once it has been victorious in Gaza, will be in an even better position to reject than it is now.

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLES:

Netanyahu: ‘Those who want us to desist from the Rafah operation are telling us we should lose’

Does Biden Really Believe That Destroying Hamas Will ‘Jeopardize the Prospect of Peace’?

Why Does Biden Think the Palestinians Deserve a State?

France: Attendees at Bataclan concert, where Islamic terrorists massacred non-Muslims, cheer Islamic terrorists

Canada’s ‘Islamophobia czar’ defends antisemitic pro-Hamas rally at Mount Sinai hospital

Video: Jewish leftist goes to ‘Palestinian’ area to protect Arabs from ‘settler violence,’ Arabs steal her car

Qatar Prime Minister: Hamas Shouldn’t Be Expected to Free Hostages for ‘Ceasefire’

Hamas suspends all hostage negotiations and ceasefire talks, demands aid

EDITORS NOTE: This Jihad Watch column is republished with permission. All rights reserved.

Maryland: Muslim Teacher Says She’s Victim of Racism After She’s Suspended for Calling for Israel’s Disappearance

A Muslim elementary school teacher in Maryland has filed a discrimination complaint after being suspended for using the phrase “From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free” as her email signature. More on the outraged, and outrageous, Hajur El-Haggan, can be found here: “Muslim school teacher says she’s victim of racism after being suspended for using ‘From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free’ as her email signature,” by Emma Richter, DailyMail.com

A Muslim school teacher in Maryland said that she is a victim of racism after she was suspended for using ‘From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free’ as her email signature.

Hajur El-Haggan, a math teacher at Argyle Middle School, was placed on administrative leave in November after she was told that her chosen signature was not allowed.

This was her school email, not her personal account. Students, parents, and fellow teachers would all be subjected, in their email correspondence with her, to this message: “From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free.”

This phrase is a call for the establishment of a Palestinian state on all the land from the river Jordan to the Mediterranean Sea, and for the disappearance of the Jewish state. All of its Jewish inhabitants would be expelled or killedRightly understood, it is a call for ethnic cleansing, and the replacement of the only Jewish state by a twenty-third Arab one. It is understandable that the principal would not want one of his teachers displaying such a sentiment on a school account.

The Muslim and Arab-American teacher has since gone on to file a discrimination complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and the Maryland Commission on Human Rights against Montgomery County Public Schools.

‘I have co-workers who have “Black Lives Matter” in their email signatures, or links to their pronouns and what they mean. My quote does not fall into a different category,’ El-Haggan told KUTV.

She is wrong. Her quote is in a different category. “Black Lives Matter” does not call for ethnic cleansing or the destruction of a state and its people. Phrases about pronouns that have to do with self-identification as non-binary, similarly, are not a threat to the existence of anyone. “From the river to the sea” is such a threat; it means politicide accompanied by ethnic cleansing.

The complaint stated that after she was reprimanded by the school’s principal about her email signature, she offered to take it down, but they [sic] proceeded to tell her that she would still be suspended.

Even if El-Haggan had taken down that email signature, that would not have changed the fact that she supports the disappearance of Israel, and the removal of all of the Jews living now “between the river and the sea.” Isn’t that the real “racism” that is involved here, and not her suspension? She was not suspended because she is a Muslim Arab, but because of her support for the ethnic cleansing of Jews “from the river to the sea.”

The discrimination complaint, which has also been filed with the local Fair Employment Practices Agency, said that El-Haggan and her colleagues at the school ‘hold certain personal and political views regarding various social injustices.’…

Would a teacher who had made known his, or her, support for the KKK, or for neo-Nazi groups, be allowed to continue as a teacher? El-Haggan’s views are not merely “political,” but rather, a call for the destruction of a country and the ethnic cleansing — some might even say the attempted “genocide” — of its people.

The complaint also noted that besides El-Haggan, other teachers in the middle school ‘expressed opinions about various political and social matters.’…

But none of her fellow teachers called for what amounts to ethnic cleansing. 

‘Just like here in America, we have “From sea to shining sea,” it’s no different. It’s a call for freedom, peace, basic rights, and humanity and coexistence,’ El-Haggan said….

No, Ms. Al-Haggan. They are not the same. “From sea to shining sea” is merely the geographical description of a country — America — that is being celebrated as “beautiful/from sea to shining sea.” “From the river to the sea” is not a call for “freedom, peace, basic rights, and humanity and coexistence,” but rather, a malevolent call for the destruction of a state and its people.

The complaint also said that that three days before she was placed on leave, the Palestinian flag in her car that said ‘Free Palestine was cut off of her vehicle and written on….

Did she promptly report this act? It would be strange – should raise a skeptical eyebrow – if she had not done so. Or was this claimed attack dreamed up later to support her lawsuit, suggesting that she was living in a hostile, anti-Palestinian, racist environment?

The phrase ‘From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free’ has long been seen as a call for destruction by the Jewish population, but for the Palestinian community and their supporters, it has been seen as a peaceful call for liberation.

No, that phrase is not seen as a “peaceful call for liberation” by the Palestinians. They know exactly what it means — the destruction of the Jewish state and the expulsion, or killing, of its Jewish population. In this hoped-for future state of “Palestine,” only Israeli Arabs would be allowed to remain.

There is speech that is beyond the pale. Calling for the destruction of a state and its people, because of their religion, is such speech. It is reasonable for the Montgomery County School Board to want to protect its students from such speech, directed at the only Jewish state, just as it would want to protect them from teachers found to endorse the KKK or neo-Nazis. El-Haggan and her lawyer hope to convince the judge that “from the river to the sea” is an innocuous call for “peace and liberation.” It is not. And the lawsuit will be determined by whether or not the judge, or possibly members of a jury, understand its malevolent significance.

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLES:

Islamic Terror Group Killed 32 Hostages in Gaza, 20 More Reported Dead

Canadian Union of Public Employees toolkit for York University TA’s supports Palestine as ‘feminist issue’

Germany’s New Naturalization Law Will Shorten Time for Muslim Migrants to Acquire the Right to Vote

UK: Muslim migrant jihadi allowed to stay in country, referred to mental health team after each violent offense

Turkey revives plan to convert another historic Byzantine church into a triumphal mosque

Islamic Republic of Iran: Christians charged with ‘deviant propaganda activities contrary to the holy Islamic law’

Muslim migrant says he came to France ‘because of the money they give us’

Iran-linked ‘suicide plane’ kills at least 6 Kurdish fighters on Syrian base housing US troops

EDITORS NOTE: This Jihad Watch column is republished with permission. All rights reserved.

Pro-Palestinian Rioters Force Partial Evacuation of White House

The “March on Washington for Gaza” on Saturday [January 13th, 2023] boiled over into violence at the White House, as thousands of pro-Palestinian demonstrators stormed the security fence and forced the evacuation of “non-essential employees” from the building. It was not immediately clear whether or not that included Joe Biden, or if he was in the White House at the time.

Porter Anderson of PubPerspectives tweeted Saturday evening, referring to Priscilla Alvarez (@priscialva) and Jim Acosta (@Acosta) of CNN: “@priscialva tells @Acosta that she and others were evacuated at the @WhiteHouse when temporary security fencing took some damage, an official ‘also telling me that objects were thrown over that fence. There was enhanced security’ during the pro-#Palestinian demonstration in #DC. ‘They had prepared for this march to intensify over the course of the afternoon.’”

The demonstration was ugly from the beginning. NBC reported that “people in the U.S. capital held aloft signs questioning President Joe Biden’s viability as a presidential candidate because of his staunch support for Israel in the nearly 100-day war against Hamas.” They held up signs reading: “No votes for Genocide Joe,” “Biden has blood on his hands,” and “Let Gaza live.” NBC adds that “vendors were also selling South African flags as protesters chanted slogans in support of the country whose accusations of genocide against Israel prompted the International Court of Justice in the Hague, Netherlands, to take up the case.”

The hard-left Common Dreams, meanwhile, noted that “As part of a worldwide day of action protesting the ongoing military assault on Gaza by Israel, activists in Washington, D.C. left a pile of bloodied baby doll parts outside the White House on Saturday as they denounced U.S. complicity in the military campaign that has left over 23,000 Palestinians dead, including over 10,000 children and babies.” Where does Common Dreams get that figure, that 10,000 children and babies have been killed in Gaza? From Hamas. Yet Hamas has been caught lying more than once about the numbers of civilians killed, and of course Common Dreams says nothing about how Hamas deliberately launches attacks from civilian areas in order to draw retaliatory fire that it can exploit for propaganda purposes.

Impervious to the facts, however, as are all leftists, Jodie Evans of CodePink cried: “Biden is hiding inside the White House protected by a fence, military police, and snipers on the roof while the children in besieged Gaza are left unprotected from Israel’s genocidal bombing that kills five children every hour. That’s around 117 children murdered daily!”

This business about Israel committing genocide is an outrageous libel, as British barrister Malcolm Shaw demonstrated at the International Court of Justice in the brilliant speech he delivered in Israel’s defense. But the rioters at the White House were way beyond rational appeal, and it is clear that nothing whatsoever will placate them short of a full repudiation of Israel from the Biden White House. Since they are part of the Biden regime’s far-left base, they may just get that.

Among the participants in the march were Students for Justice in Palestine, which called the Oct. 7 jihad massacres in Israel “a historic win for the Palestinian resistance,” as well as the Hamas-linked Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), whose cofounder and longtime executive director, Nihad Awad, said that the Oct. 7 attacks made him “happy.”

The Biden regime is now caught between a rock and a hard place. Its base is increasingly open about its hatred for Israel and determination to see it destroyed (that’s what “From the River to the Sea” means: if there is no Israel from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea, then there is no Israel at all). Yet at the same time, most American Jews still support the Democrats, and the regime doesn’t want to alienate them, either. Old Joe and his henchmen have tried to placate both sides, sending $10 billion to Iran, Hamas’ financier, and $100 million to Gaza while professing support for Israel’s defensive action, but the demonstrators at the White House made it abundantly clear on Saturday that no half-measures or playing both ends against the middle would be acceptable. The Biden regime is going to have to repudiate Israel, or there will be violence. The message that was being sent, as the non-essential personnel fled the People’s Mansion, was unmistakable.

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLES:

CAIR Top Dog’s Cheering for Hamas Is Too Much Even for the Biden Regime

Maine man who converted to Islam and then tried to kill three cops while screaming ‘Allahu akbar’ pleads guilty

UK: Muslim leader at pro-jihad rally says ‘We must normalize massacres,’ then claims he was misunderstood

France: Muslim brandishing broken bottles screams ‘Allahu akbar, I’m going to kill a cop,’ is hospitalized

RELATED VIDEO: Dennis Prager interviews Dr. Andrew Bostom about Muslim antisemitism and its Islamic rootedness

POSTs ON X:

EDITORS NOTE: This Jihad Watch column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.