Qatar paid more than $61,000 for Mayor Bowser’s trip to Doha.
During the pandemic, we already found out that D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser likes the nightlife, but her travel took her to an Islamic terror state as part of an ‘in-kind donation’.
7News has discovered that the nation of Qatar paid $61,930 for Mayor Bowser and four staff members to fly to the Middle East in 2023.
But not before Bowser tried covering it up.
As far as 7News has been able to discover during our ongoing investigation, Mayor Bowser doesn’t turn in any travel expense records at all.
First, Susana Castillo, the Mayor’s Director of Communications, told 7News in a July 9, 2024, email that the trip was paid for by the D.C. Chamber of Commerce.
That wasn’t true. Neither was this.
Days later, Castillo told 7News over the phone that the U.S. Conference of Mayors picked up the tab. The Conference of Mayors had no comment and told us to talk to the mayor’s office.
And then it gets worse.
Then comes a letter, 7News obtained through a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request dated March of this year from the nation of Qatar to the mayor’s office.
It shows the nation of Qatar paid more than $61,000 for Mayor Bowser’s trip to Doha in 2023, which included travel expenses for four staff members.
Qatar called it an “in-kind donation”.
Followed by yet another retroactive cover-up.
Now comes this letter, from February, sent to officials in Qatar amid our investigation. In the letter, the mayor’s office asks for a breakdown of the mayor’s 2023 trip expenses and the total tab covered by the Middle Eastern country.
Bowser’s office explains that such “donations” must be properly recorded, and a donation agreement will have to be executed.
7News would like to know why the mayor’s office is asking to create a Donation Agreement in 2025 for a trip she took in 2023. A situation that directly violates Mayor Bowser’s memorandum on rules of conduct governing donations requires that each donation be submitted and approved by the Office of Partnerships and Grant Services before the city can enter into a Donation Agreement.
All of this is being done with Qatar, an Islamic terrorist state, the state sponsor of Hamas, with ties to other Islamic terrorist groups, and which harbored the 9/11 mastermind.
Qatar has been buying influence in the United States and clearly Mayor Bowser was happy to go along.
http://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.png00Jihad Watchhttp://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.pngJihad Watch2025-05-03 14:00:462025-05-05 05:12:47D.C. Mayor Hid ‘In-Kind Donation’ from Islamic Terror State
Lawfare may now be about to have its finest hour. For UNRWA could face a potential loss of one billion dollars in a lawsuit brought against it by relatives of people murdered by Hamas, the terror group with which some UNRWA staff, we know now, had such close ties, while the organization itself permitted its facilities in Gaza to be used as command-and-control centers, and as places to hide both combatants and weapons. Several hundred staff members of UNRWA were discovered by the IDF, from documents it seized in Gaza, to be full-fledged Hamas members; dozens of UNRWA staff accompanied the 6,000 Hamas operatives who smashed into Israel on October 7, 2023, and they participated in the atrocities committed that day, of rape, torture, mutilation, and murder. UNRWA allowed Hamas to build its tunnels right under its buildings, including its main Gaza headquarters; it knew about the Hamas tunnel network, but revealed nothing to the IDF.
Now that lawsuit may proceed, because the US DOJ has rejected UNRWA’s claim to be immune from lawsuits in the U.S. The immunity from such a suit extends to the UN and its “subsidiary organs,” but according to the DOJ, does not extend to UNRWA, which is classified as a mere “affiliate or instrumentality” of the UN. Having had UNRWA’s claim to immunity from suit in American courts dismissed, the plaintiffs can now proceed with their lawsuit. More on this threshold victory, one with such potentially damaging consequences for UNRWA, can be found here: “DOJ strips UNRWA of immunity, clears way for lawsuit over Oct. 7 attack,” Jerusalem Post, April 25, 2025:
The US Department of Justice submitted a letter on Thursday [April 24] arguing that the UN Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA) is not entitled to immunity from lawsuits in the United States.
This filing is part of an ongoing case in which the families of over 100 victims of the October 7, 2023 Hamas-led attack are seeking $1 billion in damages, alleging that UNRWA supported Hamas by allowing its facilities to be used for weapons storage, the construction of tunnels and command centers, and the transfer of funds to the group through employee payments in US dollars.
The lawsuit, filed last June in the Southern District of New York, accuses UNRWA, which coordinates much of the aid to Gaza, of enabling Hamas’s operations. The plaintiffs argue that the agency’s activities played a direct role in facilitating the October 7 attacks.
Previously, in September, the Department of Justice under the Biden administration had contended that UNRWA was immune from prosecution in US courts, citing that the UN itself had not waived immunity. This stance blocked the lawsuit from advancing….
Quite something, isn’t it, that the Biden administration took the side of Hamas’ loyal helpmeet in Gaza, UNRWA, arguing that it was immune from being sued in an American court. Why were the Bidenites so determined to block the lawsuit by relatives of those whom Hamas had murdered? What can conceivably explain such sympathy for the devil? Was the anti-Israel animus of Biden’s appointees that profound?
Dozens of UNRWA staff members took part in Hamas’ atrocities committed inside Israel on October 7, 2023. Hundreds of UNRWA staff have been discovered to be members of Hamas. UNRWA collaborated with Hamas in providing the use of its buildings, especially its schools, as places to hide both men and weapons and from which to launch rockets at Israel. UNRWA did nothing to prevent Hamas from building tunnels under its buildings, including a massive tunnel dug right under UNRWA’s Gaza headquarters, with UNRWA’s full knowledge. At no time did UNRWA cooperate with the IDF in pointing out buildings that Hamas was using; nor did it help the IDF locate tunnels. UNRWA was fully committed to protecting Hamas from the IDF.
Now that UNRWA’s claim to enjoy immunity to lawsuit in American courts has been denied, the case can now proceed. May it end in UNRWA losing and left penniless. That most public loss should raise in the minds of many a question: why, alone among the hundreds of millions of refugees created since World War II, are the “Palestinian refugees” uniquely allowed to pass on their status as an inherited trait, to their children, grandchildren, great-grandchildren, and so on ad nauseam? Isn’t it time to end this privileged treatment of the “Palestinians,” and make them subject to the same rules as very other group of refugees? And no matter what the final verdict, the trial itself will be a public relations nightmare for the organization, as its many ties to Hamas are laid bare and held up for public inspection. UNRWA is about to enter a well-deserved world of woe.
http://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.png00Jihad Watchhttp://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.pngJihad Watch2025-04-30 05:49:442025-04-30 05:53:11U.S. Department of Justice Says UNRWA Can Be Sued In American Courts
Harvard has until recently been receiving $2.2 billion in federal funding, largely for research grants for medical research. The Trump administration has now withheld that amount, and promises it will continue to withhold that sum as long as Harvard does not explain how it is now, and how it intends in the future, to protect Jewish students on campus from manifestations of antisemitism. A second request from the government is that Harvard end its DEI programs that make race and ethnicity, not merit, the bases upon which decisions as to admission and faculty hiring and promotion are made. These requests seem eminently reasonable to me, but not to the grand panjandrums in Massachusetts Hall.
The historian Victor Davis Hanson takes Harvard to task for its refusal to comply with those requests from the administration, and if Harvard continues with its refusal, he suggests that the university should at least end its reliance on $2.2 billion in federal grants when it has so much money — more than $50 billion — in its endowment, that could easily fund whatever programs the federal government’s cuts would now endanger.
More on Victor Davis Hanson’s suggestion to Harvard can be found here: “Opinion: Harvard could go full Hillsdale College and set itself free,” by Victor Davis Hanson, Tribune Content Agency, April 20, 2025
Harvard University has rejected various demands of a presidential commission on antisemitism.
The task force wants to persuade Harvard to ensure Jewish students on its campus are no longer harassed, or else lose its federal funding.
Harvard retorts that it won’t be bullied by Washington.
Among its other requirements, the Trump administration also warned Harvard to cease using race as a criterion in its admissions, hiring and promotion, contrary to law….
Despite all of Harvard’s platitudes, its classrooms are still being disrupted. Jewish students remain fearful.
And what would Obama say if, for example, African-American students at Harvard were harassed on campus by masked disrupters?
Or Black studies classes were crashed by students wearing scarves over their faces as they vented their hatred? Would he press the Trump administration to force Harvard to honor federal civil rights protections?
Remember, Harvard is a private university with a largely untaxed endowment of over $50.2 billion. Yet again, it still receives some $2.2 billion — now suspended — in federal funds.
The administration task force is not forcing Harvard to run its university according to its version of federal dictates.
Instead, the Trump commission is simply warning Harvard that if, in addition to its huge sources of private funding, it still wishes continuance of some $2.2 billion in public money from the federal government, then it must comply with existing laws and executive orders.
Does Harvard remember the embarrassing testimony of its former president, Claudine Gay?
She failed to assure a congressional committee that Harvard had taken action against openly hostile antisemitic student protesters during its growing protest movements.
Claudine Gay also turned out to be a serial plagiarist, whose scholarly works consisted of four short articles, at least two of which contained large bits written by, but not credited to, others. Claudine Gay is black; might DEI explain her otherwise incomprehensible appointment as Harvard’s president? And why, one wonders, after she was forced to resign in disgrace, did Harvard agree to continue to pay her the presidential salary she had been receiving of $900,000 a year?
Apparently Harvard does not care enough about the wellbeing and safety of its Jewish students to assure them, and the federal government that has asked for such information, of all the ways it is now, or will in the future, be combatting antisemitism on its campus.
And Harvard cares so little for the notion — now so truly brave and even revolutionary — that merit alone should determine which students are admitted, and which faculty are hired, and then promoted. Apparently Harvard thinks it is worth the loss of $2.2 billion in federal money so as to be able to discriminate on the basis of race and ethnicity. What a victory!
A man firebombed the Pennsylvania governor’s residence while Gov. Josh Shapiro and his family were inside. The man in question had a hammer and planned to assault him with it. His motive was that
Shapiro “needs to know that he ‘will not take part in his plans for what he wants to do to the Palestinian people.’”
Rather than clearly speak out about what happened, Gov. Shapiro instead launched into a strange word salad.
“I know that there are people out there who want to ascribe their own viewpoints as to what happened here and why. I know there are people out there who want to adopt their own political viewpoints, or their own worldview as to what happened and why. I choose not to participate in that,” he said at a press conference.
Then he boldly took a stand and condemned ‘violence’. In general. On all sides.
“I said after the assassination attempt on the president in Butler, I said in Altoona after we captured the individual who shot and killed a U.S. health care CEO, and I said on Sunday that this kind of violence has no place in our society, regardless of what motivates it.”
“This is not how we resolve our differences. This kind of violence has no place in our society — and it must be condemned by everyone, from both political parties.”
There’s nothing wrong with denouncing violence in general, but Shapiro is being deliberately evasive here. He’s not condemning violence in general, he’s trying not to deal with the stated motives of the man who tried to kill him because those motives have a good deal of popularity within his own political party. So instead he’s reduced to ‘bothsidesing’ his own attempted murder to avoid calling attention to the motive.
The closest Gov. Shapiro came to addressing what the motive was saying that no one would intimidate him from practicing his faith. But much of this came down to Shapiro issuing general condemnations not grounded in anything.
“This kind of violence is becoming far too common in our society, and I don’t give a damn if it’s coming from one particular side or the other, directed at one particular party or another, or one particular person or another. It is not OK, and it has to stop. We have to be better than this.”
Weirdly, it fell to Rep. Hakeem Jeffries, who has his own iffy history with antisemitism, to actually issue a specific condemnation. “Political violence of any kind is never acceptable, and it is especially unconscionable to attack a Jewish family during the first night of Passover.”
Halie Soifer, the CEO of the Jewish Democratic Council of America, who has recently been advocating for campus Hamas supporters, bizarrely attacked Trump over the assault.
“Nearly four days after Gov. Shapiro was targeted in an act of political violence — reportedly due to his position on Israel — Trump hasn’t clearly condemned it,” Soifer complained.
The thing is that Gov. Shapiro still hasn’t condemned it.
The study will cover the period between 1150 and 1850, when Islam had no influence on European civilization except as a constant existential threat. This is wasted money that will be spent on fantasy and provide evidence of nothing more than modern Europe’s capitulation.
“‘The European Qu’ran [sic]’: Falsifying European History With Funding from the EU,” by Hélène de Lauzun, European Conservative, April 16, 2025:
The European Union is preparing to provide €10 million in funding for a scientific research project aimed at highlighting the contribution of the Qu’ran [sic] and the Muslim religion to European civilisation. The influence of the Muslim Brotherhood is evident behind this undertaking.
The objective of this programme, entitled ‘The European Qur’an,’ the idea of which was launched six years ago and which is due to last until 2026, is to “challenge traditional perceptions of the Qur’anic text and well-established ideas about European religious and cultural identities” through travelling exhibitions, conferences, and book publications. The starting point of the project’s initiators is that the influence of Islam on European culture is greatly underestimated. “Our project is built on the conviction that the Qur’an has played an important role in the formation of medieval and early modern European religious diversity and identity and continues to do so,” reads the website homepage. The project aims to cover a chronological span of seven hundred years, from 1150 to 1850, from the Iberian Peninsula to Hungary.
All of this could be part of a field of scientific research (almost) like any other, if a clearly militant design were not at work in the background, as revealed by an investigation conducted by the French conservative newspaper Le Journal du Dimanche: several academics involved in the process are notoriously close to the Muslim Brotherhood.
The French academic Florence Bergeaud-Blackler, known—and persecuted—for her work on the entryism of the Muslim Brotherhood into both academic and political circles, warns against this organisation, which has gradually established itself as an essential “institutional interlocutor,” particularly in its interactions with European programmes, as she explains in an interview with Le Figaro….
http://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.png00Jihad Watchhttp://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.pngJihad Watch2025-04-19 06:08:212025-04-19 06:12:58EU to provide $11 Million to Highlight the Contribution of the Qur’an and Islam to European Civilization
Now that a judge ruled that Columbia U’s Mahmoud Khalil can be deported, and Momodou Taal who urged taking a cue for Hamas has self-deported, Democrats and the media are swarming to defend another one of these foreign students being shoved to the exit.
Mohsen Mahdawi, also of Columbia U, presumably anticipating his own ‘Shalom’ message, went off to an immigration officie in Vermont in the hopes of getting ‘naturalized’, instead he was asked to leave America.
Democrats are furious.
Sen. Bernie Sanders and Sen Peter Welch along with Rep. Becca Balint, claimed that booting Mahdawi was “immoral, inhumane and illegal.”
According to his lawyers, Mahdawi, a so-called “Palestinian” is also a “committed Buddhist who believes in “non-violence and empathy as a central tenet of his religion.”
According to reality, Mahdawi told 60 Minutes that he could empathize with the Hamas atrocities of Oct 7. He also wrote a poem celebrating a terrorist that contained the words, “I will breathe home… / And fill my shame / And clean my gun / And collect my packages, my bombs / And embrace my gun…”
This won’t stop Democrats or the media from fighting for him because this is what they support.
http://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.png00Jihad Watchhttp://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.pngJihad Watch2025-04-18 09:13:522025-04-18 13:02:41Dems Rally for ‘Non-Violent’ ‘Palestinian’ Columbia Student Who Writes About Collecting Bombs
Oh, dear. The administration’s stormtroopers are running wild through the land, smashing the storefronts of businesses owned by Democrats, closing down every school that does not display the Ten Commandments, abducting all foreigners who didn’t register as Republicans, and whisking them away to a re-education camp in Alaska.
That, at least, seems to be the view of Marianne Hirsch, a Columbia University professor who grew up in Communist-ruled Romania, in a piece she has just published in The Forward. America today reminds her of life under the dictator Nicolae Ceaușescu, as you can see here: “Columbia Prof. Marianne Hirsch: Mahmoud Khalil Arrest Reminds Me of Growing Up Under Authoritarianism,” Democracy Now!, April 10, 2025:
Columbia University professor Marianne Hirsch’s new article in The Forward is titled “I grew up under a terrifying authoritarian regime. Mahmoud Khalil’s arrest is right out of their playbook.” She tells Democracy Now! that seeing footage of the ICE arrests of Khalil and Tufts University student Rumeysa Ozturk “brought back these feelings of terror that I had as a child.” Hirsch grew up in Romania under the authoritarian regime of Nicolae Ceaușescu and says she sees parallels between the climate of fear she was raised in and the repression of speech and protest on campuses today. Hirsch, who is Jewish, condemns the “anticipatory capitulation” of universities, like Columbia, to the Trump administration’s threats to pull funding and says “the reason for this was never to fight antisemitism, but it was to decimate academia.”
Ignoring Hirsch’s hysteria — which is only a slight exaggeration from what Mahmoud Khalil’s lawyers have been claiming — we should look at what the government has now said, in the two-page letter by Secretary of State Mario Rubio submitted to the court that contributed to the decision that the government had a right to revoke his green card and deport him. The letter (or memorandum) submitted by Secretary Rubio invoked a 1952 law, the McCarran-Walter Act, that gave the federal government the authority to keep out, or to deport, foreigners whose presence would compromise an important foreign policy goal of the American government. Rubio’s memo, which was undated, was released by Khalil’s legal team on Thursday, the day after the Trump administration submitted it in an immigration court filing. It does not accuse Khalil of any crime. But Rubio writes that Khalil’s continued presence in the U.S. would have “potentially serious adverse foreign consequences, and would compromise a compelling U.S. foreign policy interest.”
What are those “adverse foreign consequences”? Well, Khalil’s noisy support for Hamas, a designated terror organization, and a threat to our ally Israel, is one such “adverse consequence.” It undermines support for the war on terrorist groups such as Hamas. When Khalil led students to chant “From the river to the sea/Palestine shall be free,” he was calling for the obliteration of the Jewish state and the expulsion, or murder, of its Jewish population. The survival of Israel is one goal — a major one — of American foreign policy that Mahmoud Khalil seeks to undermine. When the campus brownshirts scream “Intifada Everywhere,” they are no longer expressing just anti-Israel animus, but calling for the destruction of Jews everywhere.
More on the letter submitted by Secretary Rubio can be found here: “Trump administration lays out its evidence for deporting activist Mahmoud Khalil,” by Joel Rose and Adrian Florido, NPR,
…Khalil and his lawyers also dispute the charge of antisemitism.
“What is the antisemitism?” Van Der Hout said during a Zoom meeting with reporters on Thursday. “It is criticizing Israel and the United States for the slaughter that is going on in Gaza, in Palestine. That’s what this case is about.”
“What is the antisemitism?” one of Khalil’s lawyers indignantly asks. How about the wild charge by the protesters, led by Khalil, who insist that the Jewish state is “committing ethnic cleansing and genocide” — a charge that has only one purpose, to whip people up enough so that they engage in anti-Israel and antisemitic behavior. This charge of “genocide” is not rational criticism, but an antisemitic canard intended to blacken the image of the one Jewish state, and constitutes as well an incitement to violence against Jews. After all, if the Jewish state commits “genocide,” and Jews everywhere support Israel, that must mean they support “genocide.” So, of course, Khalil and his followers want to “Globalize the Intifada.”
At the very least, those protesters on the Columbia campus should not be allowed to scream their hatred of Israel at Jewish classmates, shouting them down if they tried to say a word in support of Israel, temporarily holding hostage Jewish students who had merely been walking to class, roughing others up, and attempting to shut down any classes taught by Israeli or Jewish professors, and invading and then vandalizing campus buildings. And that is exactly what happened on the Columbia campus, with Mahmoud Khalil leading the protesters in their chants as they denounce Israel’s “genocide” and call for Israel’s destruction, and egging them on to do still more, such as harassing Jewish students, disrupting classes taught by Israeli professors, even encouraging students to enter and vandalize campus buildings. And through all this mayhem, interruption of classes, destruction of university property, antisemitic chants calling for Israel to be destroyed and replaced by a 23rd Arab state, the leader of the pack on Morningside Heights has been Mahmoud Khalil, now pretending to be a “martyr for the cause of freedom of speech,” though he was eager to have his demonstrators silence, by shouting down, anyone trying to express a pro-Israel sentiment.
http://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.png00Jihad Watchhttp://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.pngJihad Watch2025-04-13 04:36:252025-04-13 04:42:16Marco Rubio’s Letter on Mahmoud Khalil
You just can’t keep Boston’s first Muslim illegal alien city councilwoman down. Not even being arrested by the FBI or pleading guilty for taking kickbacks inside a city hall bathroom was going to keep Tania Fernandes Anderson from going to work each day.
Some members of Congress are complaining that they can’t come to vote in person, but they have no excuse. If the first Muslim illegal alien criminal councilwoman can still come to work after pleading guilty, then so can anyone. (Until they’re locked up.)
But a politician who was accused of planning to “use the money from the scheme to pay a fine issued following an ethics investigation” was never just going to go quietly into the Beantown night.
Embattled Boston City Councilor Tania Fernandes Anderson dodged news cameras Wednesday during her first City Council hearing since she agreed to plead guilty to federal corruption charges.
“Sorry, I can’t speak with you guys, thank you,” Fernandes Anderson said after telling reporters she would take questions after a city council hearing.
They should have brought an envelope and invited her into a bathroom.
The District 7 councilor appeared in the council chamber a day after the plea agreement was announced, hinting in the meeting that a resignation is on the way.
“I do hope that the conversations for my district, as I’m building out a transition plan,” said Fernandes Anderson, in part, during the hearing.
A transition plan to a cell?
Fernandes Anderson, who represents Roxbury, Dorchester, Fenway and part of the South End refused to resign when she was arrested back in December.
Big of her to go ahead and build a transition plan.
“I’ve been hearing since she was arrested that people had been feeling a lack of trust in government,” Councilor At-Large Erin Murphy explained. “The public is asking for elected officials to be more responsible and I do believe that we should be held to higher standards.”
Or you know at least the same standard as normal people.
Anderson, a BLM supporter who called the Hamas atrocities of Oct 7, a “military operation”, may now have the opportunity to plan her transition out of government.
http://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.png00Jihad Watchhttp://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.pngJihad Watch2025-04-12 12:03:252025-04-12 12:07:31First Muslim Illegal Alien Boston Councilwoman Comes to Work After Pleading Guilty to Corruption Charges
Dismantling USAID is worth little if we continue sending money to some of its biggest contractors.
I will have a more extensive article on this subject later in the week, but suffice it to say that the UN’s World Food Program headed by Cindy McCain is a deeply dishonest and dangerous organization.
Even USAID’s watchdog questioned the lack of oversight in the massive funding going to the group which has repeatedly lied about a fake famine inside Israel, in Gaza, and which operates in enemy terror states.
Now, after an initial announcement that the WFP’s funding was pulled, it’s being put back.
The US Agency for International Development (USAID) reversed course Tuesday and restored several of the World Food Programme’s lifesaving humanitarian aid contracts after canceling them over the weekend, a source familiar told CNN.
The reversal comes after the World Food Programme warned Monday that the cuts could “amount to a death sentence for millions of people facing extreme hunger and starvation.” The UN agency said it had received notice from the Trump administration “indicating that funding for emergency food assistance in 14 countries has been terminated.”
According to the source familiar, USAID restored its funding for WFP programs in Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, Jordan, Ecuador and Somalia.
Most of those are Islamic terror states. The good news is they don’t seem to include the funding for programs in Afghanistan and Yemen, but it’s still terrible.
The WFP has a long history of ‘crying famine’ and claiming that cutting off money to it will kill millions.
It lied about the famine in Gaza. Before that there were similar lies about a famine in Yemen. The supposed famines in Syria and Afghanistan likewise remain dubious. Terrorists fake famines to make money. From us.
Dismantling USAID is worth little if we continue sending money to some of its biggest contractors, vendors and affiliates like the UN’s WFP. Funding the WFP doesn’t save lives. Considering that WFP continues doing business in Islamic terror states, funding the WGP is more likely to cost lives.
http://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.png00Jihad Watchhttp://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.pngJihad Watch2025-04-12 05:06:092025-04-12 05:12:11U.S. Should Not Fund United Nations’ ‘Food Programs’ in Islamic Terror States
When even Republican senators are too afraid to host a Christian film, it’s not just a cancellation—it’s a crisis of courage.
We expected backlash. We expected protests. We even expected the mainstream media to attack our film.
But what we didn’t expect—and what shocked us to the core—was being canceled by one of our own, a move that left us all in disbelief.
This June, our Christian Action Network was scheduled to premiere our new documentary, Stolen Rainbow, in the Senate Hart Office Building. We had submitted the request, received a positive response from Senator Rick Scott’s office, and were preparing to launch the film just steps from the U.S. Capitol.
Then—without warning—Senator Rick Scott pulled the plug.
Let me be clear: this wasn’t a misunderstanding, this wasn’t a double booking, and it certainly wasn’t because of a lack of space.
Here’s what we received from Elli Dalton, Sen. Scott’s scheduler, on March 14 in response to our room request:
“Thank you for sending this request. I will work on this and circle back with any availability!”
Though not using the word “approved,” that response is effectively a green light. Anyone familiar with Senate building operations knows that finding a room for a June event with that much notice is not an issue. After that message, we began preparing for the screening.
But three weeks passed. No updates. No room number. No response.
So, we followed up. And that’s when the door slammed shut.
On April 3, we received this:
“I’m so sorry, we do not expect to be able to accommodate this room request. We will let you know if anything changes but I suggest reaching out to a different office. I apologize for the inconvenience.”
No explanation. No clarification. And most telling of all: no mention of room unavailability.
We replied graciously, even offering flexibility in the timing—any day, any month.
But we never heard back. We were ghosted like a 16-year-old girl on prom night.
This was not a scheduling issue.
This was a decision—and a deliberate one. A decision that could have been communicated weeks earlier.
Instead, they left us rotting like an overripe banana and then had the audacity to suggest we “reach out to a different office,” something they could easily have told us back in March, giving us more time to reach “a different office.”
So What Happened?
Let me be blunt: Stolen Rainbow isn’t “hateful,” “homophobic,” or “extremist.” It’s a factual, hard-hitting documentary that exposes how the LGBT movement hijacked the rainbow, rewrote history, and pushed a radical agenda that’s targeting America’s children under the false flag of love and inclusion.
It’s bold—but it’s the truth.
And apparently, the truth is now too dangerous for the U.S. Senate.
It’s packed with facts, testimony, and courage—exactly the kind of message that will panic both activist groups and (apparently) Republican senators.
It’s no stretch to believe that political pressure—perhaps even from within his own office—pushed Senator Scott to revoke our reservation. But instead of standing strong, he chose silence, safety, and walking away from the fight.
And by doing so, he handed the radical left exactly what they wanted: a Christian voice silenced on Capitol Hill.
The GOP’s Culture War Retreat?
Senator Scott’s actions raise a bigger question: What’s happening to the conservative movement?
When even Republican senators refuse to host a film exposing the LGBT agenda—when they quietly step back rather than stand up—who’s left to defend truth?
The message to Christians is loud and clear: Don’t count on Capitol Hill.
If the Senate Won’t Hear It, We’ll Take It to the People
We’re not quitting. If Senator Scott won’t host Stolen Rainbow, then we’ll find a venue that will. A different Member of Congress. A theater. A church. A public square.
We will show this film.
Because if the rainbow has been stolen, we’re going to take it back—one heart, one screen, one stand at a time.
But we can’t do it alone. We need your help to make this happen.
Help Us Stand Where Others Backed Down
We’re working now to reschedule the premiere—possibly at a nearby venue in Washington, D.C.—and to launch a bold nationwide campaign to ensure this film reaches families, pastors, and educators across America.
If you’re tired of Christian voices being silenced—even by so-called conservatives—then stand with us. We’re not giving up. We’re taking Stolen Rainbow directly to the people.
But we need your help to do it.
Click the donate button below to help us reschedule the premiere, launch a national campaign, and make sure this film is seen—loudly and unapologetically—across America.
Because if we don’t speak up now… who will?
AUTHOR
Martin Mawyer
Martin Mawyer is president of the Christian Action Network, which he founded in 1990. Located in Lynchburg, VA, CAN was formed as a non-profit educational organization to protect America’s religious and moral heritage. He is the author of several books, including You Are Chosen: Prepare to Triumph in a Fallen World.
http://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.png00Majority Reporthttp://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.pngMajority Report2025-04-11 13:55:532025-04-11 14:29:14Why Senator Rick Scott Shut Down Our Christian Film About the LGBT Agenda
In surprising news, the newspaper that published a list of Jewish members of Congress with yellow marks over their names during the Iran Deal vote (not in 1939 but in 2015) thinks fighting antisemitism is a bad idea.
Or at least leftist antisemitism and antisemitism from its Islamist allies.
The Times promotional headline for its op-ed by Wesleyan president Michael S. Roth is ‘Trump’s Crusade Against Antisemitism Is Extremely Bad for the Jews’. The op-ed on the site has the slightly less ironic title ‘Trump Is Selling Jews a Dangerous Lie’.
I said slightly less ironic because as “the first Jewish president of a formerly Methodist university”, Roth is the one selling Jews a dangerous lie.
Roth defends Hamas supporters who terrorized campuses and called for the murder of Jews as activists and graduates. His argument basically boils down to “First they came for the antisemites, then they came for the Jews.”
“Abductions by government agents; unexplained, indefinite detentions; the targeting of allegedly dangerous ideas; lists of those under government scrutiny; official proclamations full of bluster and bile — Jews have been here before, many times, and it does not end well for us,” Roth contends.
There’s a number of problems here, but the most obvious one is that they already came for the Jews.
Threatening the Jews that they’ll be next after the Hamas supporters is a lot like saying, “First they came for the Nazis, then they came for the Jews”. The Nazis are a bigger threat than whoever they undefined ‘they’ are.
Rather than address antisemitism on the Left and on campus, Roth throws in Candace Owens (described as a Trump supporter even though she turned on him a while back), Nick Fuentes (ditto) Andrew Tate, and even Elise Stefanik, misattributes and misquotes multiple conservative figures, and wrongly insists “Shalom Columbia” is derogatory toward Jews.
And much of the op-ed is spent insisting that the handful of Jewish people who oppose Israel are equivalent to those who support it thereby actually doing what he wrongly accuses Trump of doing in Charlottesville, insisting on bothsideism.
Roth virtually offers no examples of leftist antisemitism, especially on campuses, that might have occasioned Jews to feel that “there is a great temptation for Jews to embrace anyone who denounces antisemitism, regardless of the moral contradictions.” Is he too unwilling or too afraid to do so?
“In the second and first century B.C., the Jewish kingdom of Judea aligned itself with Rome to protect itself from the domination of Greek culture. Rome obliged, and conquered Judea for itself,” Roth concludes. That’s bad history, but worse still, Roth is missing the point. He means it as a critique of Jews supporting Trump, but he might consider what if it’s really a critique of Jews supporting the Left?
http://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.png00Jihad Watchhttp://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.pngJihad Watch2025-04-11 06:53:512025-04-11 06:58:52New York Times: Fighting Antisemitism is Bad for the Jews
The pro-Hamas brownshirts at the University of Chicago noisily insist that they are only exercising its “right to free speech” when they demonstrators chant “From the river to the sea/Palestine will be free,” which, rightly understood, is a call for the destruction of Israel and its replacement by a 23rd Arab state. They are exercising their “right to free speech” when they harass Jewish students who are walking across the campus, or when they try to disrupt classes taught by “Zionist” professors. They call the arrest of Mahmoud Khalil by the government a violation of this Hamas collaborator’s “right to free speech.” But they are not about to accord the same “right to free speech” to pro-Israel groups on campus such as Maroons For Israel. More on this double standard can be found here: “Palestinian Supporters at My School Don’t Want Free Speech; They Want to Silence Jews,” by Joachim Sciamma, Algemeiner, March 26, 2025:
On March 11, 2025, University of Chicago students took to the quad, just as final exams were beginning, to oppose the arrest of Columbia University encampment organizer Mahmoud Khalil.
Khalil is accused of distributing pro-Hamas propaganda, including material labeled from the “Hamas Media Office.” The University of Chicago student demonstrators invoked our school’s principles in defense of freedom of expression — labeling the arrest a violation of Khalil’s right to free speech.
Unfortunately, these protestors only agree with free speech when it is content they agree with….
Consider the following example: In February 2025, Israel confirmed that civilian hostages, Ariel, Kfir, and their mother, Shiri Bibas, had been murdered in Hamas captivity. Ariel was 4 years old, and his little brother was 9 months old when they were kidnapped….
Although the Bibas family’s true cause of death has been proven by forensic evidence, some of my peers at the University of Chicago still believe the terrorist propaganda that they perished at the hands of Israel.
In response to the murders, Maroons for Israel — the pro-Israel student organization on campus, of which I am the President– placed a University-approved installation on the Swift quadrangles in memory of Kfir Bibas on Monday, March 3.
By Friday, March 7, it was defaced; as far as we can tell, it was vandalized in broad daylight….
And that’s not the first time their hypocrisy has been on display. Last November, our approved banner explaining the danger of “globalize the intifada” rhetoric was dismantled and left in a dumpster.
Also, during an encampment on campus last spring, our approved installations were destroyed every evening, like clockwork, and every morning we had to rebuild them….
These students are also disrupting speaker events, and attempting to shut down opinions they disagree with. They called for the boycott of what they labelled “Zionist classes.” They invoke the principle of free speech when it suits them, but show open disdain for it otherwise….
Those anti-Israel “free speech” advocates tore down pro-Israel installations put up on the University of Chicago campus, not once, but every night. They defaced and tore pieces from posters with photographs of 4-year-old Ariel and 9-month-old Kfir Bibas, both of them murdered — strangled — by Hamas operatives. They pulled down the banner of a pro-Israel group explaining what the sinister slogan “globalize the Intifada” means, and left it in a dumpster. They want students to boycott “Zionist” classes. They want “free speech” for themselves, but wish to silence every possible expression of pro-Israel sympathies. The motto of these anti-Israel and antisemitic campus groups is the same everywhere, from Columbia to Berkeley: “Free Speech For Me, But Not For Thee.”
http://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.png00Jihad Watchhttp://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.pngJihad Watch2025-03-31 06:54:402025-04-03 05:31:17At the University of Chicago, Free Speech for Me, But Not for Thee
The story of the Trump administration’s detention of Badar Khan Suri, an Indian national at Georgetown University, for having ties to the terror group Hamas can be found here: “US seeks to deport pro-Palestinian Georgetown University student,” Reuters, March 20, 2025:
US President Donald Trump’s administration has detained an Indian man studying at Washington’s Georgetown University and is seeking to deport him after deeming him a harm to US foreign policy, the student’s lawyer said on Wednesday.
The US Department of Homeland Security accused Badar Khan Suri of ties to the Palestinian terror group Hamas and said he had spread Hamas propaganda and antisemitism on social media, according to a statement it shared with Fox News….
After the Trump administration arrested Columbia graduate student Mahmoud Khalil for his ties to terrorism, Muslims and far-left activists accused it of violating Khalil’s free speech rights. But free speech had nothing to do with it. Khalil was arrested for supporting the aims of Hamas, a terrorist group. He led chanting mobs on the campus, who surrounded and held captive some Jewish students, screaming in their faces, while happily harassing and roughing up others. These Jewish students testified that as a result of such violence, they lived “in fear.” At a deportation hearing for Mahmoud Khalil, the administration will have an opportunity to prove its case, presenting the evidence it has amassed on Khalil’s support for Hamas and its stated aim of obliterating the state of Israel. In the end, despite the noisy protests in his favor by an alliance of far-left and Muslim activists, I think he will indeed be deported. The only question is where? He was born in Syria, and no doubt the new jihadist regime would be willing to take him in. Or, if he wants to live more luxuriously, he could ask to be sent to Qatar which, like Mahmoud Khalil himself, is a devout supporter of Hamas. Mahmoud Khalil’s links to Hamas consist of his parroting Hamas propaganda, both orally, as he led assembled mobs of protesters chanting anti-Israel and antisemitic slogans, including “From the river to the sea/Palestine will be free” and “Intifada Now” around the Columbia campus, and in writing, with the antisemitic leaflets his group wrote and left around the campus, including flinging them into a classroom where an Israeli professor was trying to teach.
The latest candidate for deportation is Badar Khan Suri:
Suri is a postdoctoral fellow at Georgetown’s Alwaleed Bin Talal Center for Muslim-Christian Understanding, which is part of the university’s School of Foreign Service. His arrest was first reported by Politico….
The Saudi-funded Alwaleed Bin Talal Center for Muslim-Christian Understanding was founded by John Esposito — the name of its greatest benefactor, Alwaleed Bin Talal, was added later — who is an energetic defender and promoter of Islam. The Center is devoted to persuading Christians that they have nothing to fear either from Muslims or from the faith of Islam, and Christians are encouraged to believe that Islam and Christianity are compatible, whereas Judaism remains worrisome for both.
Suri’s wife, Mapheze Saleh, is a US citizen, said his lawyer. Saleh is from Gaza, according to the Georgetown University website, which said she has written for Al Jazeera and Palestinian media outlets and worked with the foreign ministry in Gaza. Saleh has not been arrested, the lawyer added.
Suri’s wife writes for Al Jazeera, the pro-Hamas news channel funded entirely by the government of Qatar. Qatar has provided refuge to several of the top Hamas leaders, including Khaled Meshaal and the late Ismail Haniyeh, and given huge financial support to Hamas as well, some $1.8 billion to date. Saleh has not been detained, or threatened with deportation, as yet; she enjoys a higher degree of protection, against deportation, as a U.S. citizen, than her husband.
Pro-Palestinian protesters are antisemitic if they call for the destruction of the only Jewish state, and the expulsion or killing of all of its Jewish inhabitants, so that it can be replaced by a 23rd Arab state. They are antisemitic if they surround and hold captive, however briefly, Jewish students, while screaming such slogans as “Intifada Now” at Jewish — not Israeli but Jewish — students. They are antisemitic if they harass and even pummel Jewish students who simply had the misfortune to be walking across the campus while a protest was going on.
Now one protester has self-deported back to India. Ranjani Srinivasan, a 37-year-old Indian student in a doctoral program in urban planning at Columbia University, self-deported after her visa was revoked by the US Department of State on March 5. The State Department cited security concerns related to her involvement in alleged activities “supporting Hamas” and was a “terrorist sympathizer.”
Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, in a post on X, called Srinivasan a “terrorist sympathizer,” saying that those who “advocate terrorism and violence” must not stay in the US.Now she’s gone for good, well aware that the evidence that would have been presented in a deportation hearing would be damning, and once on the public record, could end her chances of future employment, both in the U.S. and in her native India. She could, of course, always find work in Qatar, where support for Hamas is considered a distinct plus.
These deportation efforts ought to scare the wits out of those students — and non-students who ever since October 8, 2023 have found their way onto various campuses to join in the anti-Israel and antisemitic fun — who have had a high old time of it during the last year on their campuses, harassing Jewish students, calling for Israel’s destruction, demanding “Intifada Now” all over the world, invading and vandalizing campus buildings by scrawling antisemitic slogans on the walls, and praising what they call the “resistance” by Hamas on October 7. Now they are entering a world of woe, entirely of their own making. After a half-dozen of these deportations are successfully carried out, we’ll see just how quiet our campuses can become.
After our reporting, all employees at the VOA have been placed on administrative leave and many of the affairs of the Agency of Global Affairs Media are being wound down. I have mixed feelings about this. There was a time when we broadcast a true voice of freedom, but increasingly we are funding media outlets that, like most media outlets, are hostile to America and the cause of freedom. I’ve heard terrible things about the Persian language VOA being infiltrated by Iran regime supporters. And the VOA’s decision to push anti-Trump propaganda on Americans was a profound violation of its charter and mission.
I believe America should have a “voice” to represent our message abroad, but the current system that was set up during the Cold War may no longer be salvageable. Anything infected by the media is simply a dead end.
USAID provided funding to set up a Mujahadeen propaganda network known as the Afghan Media Resource Center. The terror media network, which reportedly required all personnel to “sacrifice for holy jihad”, operated under the auspices of the United States Information Agency (USIA): the parent organization of Voice of America.
One of the points I made in my reporting on VOA’s growing extremism was that Democrats had repeatedly pushed it to report critically on the United States.
President John F. Kennedy had told Voice of America staffers that their mission was to “paint us ‘with all our blemishes and warts,’ all those things about us that may not be immediately attractive.” Taxpayers should not be paying to have an arm of the government telling the rest of the world that America is a terrible place. And certainly not sending that message to Americans.
Memorials to the Bibas children trigger leftist outrage.
No sooner had Israel lowered the bodies of the two murdered Bibas children into their graves, than radical leftists began accusing Jews of “white supremacy” for mourning them.
The Empire State Building and a number of other national landmarks had changed their colors to orange to honor the two redheaded children, 9-month-old Kfir and 4-year-old Ariel, and people of conscience, Jewish and non-Jewish, had adopted orange to memorialize them.
“This is just white nationalism,” accused ‘Séamus’ Malekafzali, the son of an Iranian Marxist, who is published at The Nation.
“Just make the hair blonde instead of red and it immediately becomes identifiable as Nazi-style racial supremacist propaganda by modern day Nazis, Zionists,” agreed Emma Vigeland, a veteran of The Young Turks who co-hosts the left-wing Majority Report with Sam Seder.
“Propagandists are fetishizing the red hair of two dead white kids,” Caitlin Johnstone, an Australian self-described ‘journalist’, complained. “Look at any photo of the Bibas kids and you will see children who look just like the white children you’ll see in any western nation.”
“I swear, if I hear one more person cry about the Bibas family, I’ll lose my mind,” Aidan Simardone, a Canadian immigration lawyer published in TheNew Arab, Counterpunch and the Soros-Koch Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft, ranted. “This is White supremacy”.
“Getting angry over the Bibas family reveals your white supremacy,” an account calling itself the Palestine News Network sneered. “The obsession with the hair color of the Bibas children is pure white supremacy”, another self-proclaimed social media ‘writer’ and ‘filmmaker’ argued.
The last name ‘Bibas’ is of Middle Eastern origin and is common among Sefardi Jews. Yarden Bibas, the father of the two murdered children, was descended from Jewish refugees who fled Yemen. The family used to joke that the two children were the “first Yemenite redheads.”
If a family descended from the Yemeni Jewish community, a middle eastern population which goes back over 2,500 years, are white supremacists, then so is every single Jew in the world. If mourning the Bibas children is white supremacy, then the same is true for any Jewish child.
And that is the point. It’s not about the hair. Those who condemn the mourning for the Bibas children would condemn the mourning of any murdered Jewish child as more ‘white supremacy’.
Biblical figures like Esau and King David were believed to have red hair and even Mohammed, the founder of Islam, was described as having red hair. Some Muslims dye their hair or beards red in imitation of their prophet. If red hair is white supremacy, then Islam is white supremacy.
Islamists and their secular socialist allies use the red hair of the Bibas children to argue that they were colonists, that they never belonged in the region and therefore deserved to die. This was what the Islamic State did when it massacred and enslaved the Yazidis who were guilty of being non-Muslims and having blonde hair and blue eyes. Yazidi survivors described slave markets at which ISIS Jihadis offered to pay more for girls with blonde hair and blue eyes.
Were those raped girls in the hands of Hamas’ Iraqi cousins also ‘white supremacists’?
The critical race theory premise that people with blond or red hair are white supremacists, and that those with darker hair and skin are oppressed victims entitled to commit genocide meets its bloodiest test in the middle east where indigenous minorities like the Jews and Yazidis, some of whom have light colored hair, face genocide from the conquering Arab Muslim majority.
Legitimizing the murder of Jewish children for their race as opposition to white supremacy means that the Nazis were the only true opponents of white supremacy and the Holocaust was social justice in action, instead of the vilest thing people associate with ‘white supremacy’.
Declaring the Jews to be a non-native race that must be ethnically cleansed from the region is what the National Socialists did. It’s what the Democratic Socialists are doing now to Israel. The Democratic Socialists of America and other pro-Hamas socialists not only support a new Holocaust, but also at the hands of the old allies of the Nazis who took part in the last one.
Hamas emerged from the Muslim Brotherhood. The Nazis had financed the Brotherhood and the key documents of both the Egyptian group and its Gaza branch that created Hamas contain Nazi ideology alongside the traditional Islamic antisemitism. Hitler’s Mufti brought a diverse collection of African and Arab soldiers to fight for the Nazis as part of the ‘Free Arabian Legion.’
‘White supremacy’ was surprisingly diverse even back in the days of the Third Reich.
The only difference between Hamas and the Nazis is their perceived races and the perceived races of their victims. It isn’t the Jews mourning the murdered Bibas children who are ‘racializing’ them, it’s the apologists for Hamas to whom red hair proves they’re the wrong race.
But if red hair didn’t make Mohammed, who began the Islamic genocide of the region’s more diverse indigenous peoples, a ‘white supremacist’ why does it make the Bibas children ‘white supremacists’? The victims of Hamas on Oct 7 included redheads and blondes, and people with black skin and hair, much as the six million Jews in the Holocaust included every hair color.
Along with Aryan looking blonds with blue eyes like my father who was able to ‘blend in’.
The real issue was never hair or eye color; it was Jewishness. The red hair of the Bibas children like the Aryan blond hair and blue eyed criteria are only pretexts for racializing and killing Jews.
Socialists, national or democratic, who tear down the posters of murdered children, desecrate their memorials and denounce Jews for mourning their own children have labeled any opposition to the murder of Jews as “white supremacy”.Only killing Jews isn’t white supremacy.
Their new definition of “white supremacy” is opposing another Holocaust.
The ultimate Jewish crime in Israel is not any of the catalog of lies, smears, conspiracy theories, historical revisionism and ceaseless moral inversion that form the case for ‘Palestine’, a fictional entity consisting of a genocidal population of colonists, it’s the Jewish refusal to be murdered.
It’s not about red hair, but about red blood.
The radical left has inverted anti-Nazism to mean Nazism, opposition to genocide to mean genocide, and opposition to hate to mean hate. White supremacy, it declares, is that not only do the Jews refuse to die, but that they still dare to mourn their beloved dead.
http://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.png00Jihad Watchhttp://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.pngJihad Watch2025-03-09 05:17:062025-03-09 05:29:41Mourning Dead Jewish Children is ‘White Supremacy’
