The first rule of Muslim atrocities in the UK is that you’re not supposed to talk about them. Not long ago the Starmer regime unleashed a ruthless purge against anyone who mentioned that a Muslim terrorist had stabbed a bunch of little girls, declaring that it was a national emergency to shut down any speech on the matter.
But the topic of Pakistani Muslim ‘grooming gangs’ and the atrocities they committed against huge numbers of young English girls, and the role the authorities played in covering that up, has once again come to the surface.
The British authorities not only enabled and covered up for the Muslim rape gangs, but they arrested the parents and girls as young as 12 for even mentioning it. This level of treasonous horror is something that may not be discussed, but Musk suddenly began discussing it.
And the media is freaking out because the Starmer regime can’t simply send a few ‘lesbian nana’ bobbies to raid Musk’s digs the way they can most ordinary people in the UK.
Here’s a headline sample of the freakout.
Musk accused of ‘politicising’ rape of young girls in UK to attack Starmer – The Guardian
UK Right Warns Trump Allies That Musk’s Posts Have Gone Too Far – Bloomberg
Keir Starmer must slap Elon Musk down – before someone gets killed – The New European
Ministers hit back at Elon Musk as tech billionaire steps up attack on Keir Starmer over grooming gangs – Evening Standard
Elon Musk Faces Fury Over Support for Jailed Fascist Leader – – The Daily Beast
In a regime built on lies about Islam, no one is prepared for the subject to be aired in public. The UK authorities, across the spectrum, have been complicit in allowing Islam to dominate the UK. It’s past time for a reckoning.
Part of the outrage here has been directed at Safeguarding Minister Jess Phillips for rejecting requests for an inquiry into the Pakistani Muslim sex grooming gangs.
Despite her vocal opposition to violence against women and girls, Phillips may be worried about opening herself up to allegations of Islamophobia after nearly losing her seat to a pro-Gaza independent candidate last year.
Islam.
British politicians have been bribed, suborned, corrupted and intimidated into remaining quiet about Islamization. Those young girls paid the price.
http://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.png00Jihad Watchhttp://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.pngJihad Watch2025-01-05 05:25:362025-01-05 05:40:42Media Freaks Out Over Musk’s Muslim Rape Gang Tweets
It’s refreshing to see all this finally getting some notice. We have been covering this unsavory gang of pro-jihad Jew-haters, thugs and creeps for over twenty years. If Chikli wants more information, he can scroll through this archive.
“Chikli: CAIR leader praised October 7 massacre, called Gaza ‘concentration camp,’” Jerusalem Post, December 20, 2024:
Diaspora Affairs and Combating Antisemitism Ministry Minister Amichai Chikli escalated his campaign against the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) on Thursday, exposing the organization’s alleged ties to Hamas and sharing a damning quote from its executive director, Nihad Awad, about the October 7 Hamas-led massacre in Israel.
In a series of posts on X, Chikli wrote: “The time has come to discuss @CAIRNational, its origins, and the hidden ideology behind its self-definition as a ‘human rights organization.’ Let’s begin.” He continued by linking CAIR’s establishment to the Palestine Committee, a Hamas-affiliated network in the US, and cited FBI wiretaps from a 1993 meeting in Philadelphia where plans to create CAIR were allegedly finalized.
Chikli directly quoted Awad’s remarks about the October 7 attack that left over 1,200 Israelis dead: “The people of Gaza only decided to break the siege, the walls of the concentration camp, on October 7. And yes, I was happy to see people breaking the siege… walking free into their land, which they were not allowed to walk in.” Chikli labeled the statement as an endorsement of terrorism and a vivid illustration of CAIR’s true agenda.
The statement has drawn widespread condemnation…
The White House, in response, disavowed CAIR’s involvement in any federal programs, particularly its previous role in discussions surrounding combating antisemitism….
http://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.png00Jihad Watchhttp://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.pngJihad Watch2024-12-23 05:51:412024-12-23 06:03:56Israeli minister exposes CAIR’s Hamas ties and its top dog’s applause of Oct. 7 massacre
The FBI used to fight terrorists. Now it aids and abets them.
People recently noticed the FBI awarding a diploma to a student from ‘Palestine’.
A little digging turned up the fact that the FBI had been promoting the man in question, Husham Abu-Aisha, on its social media for a while as the epitome of all that it idealizes.
Husham is a member of the Palestinian Authority’s forces, which are essentially terrorist operations that also conduct some policing. A member of a terrorist group’s forces getting training at the FBI raises serious questions.
The rhetoric about the actually nonexistent genocide of “Palestinians” is so overheated that it is driving the psychically marginal to violence.
“Mentally ill Calif. school shooter fired at kids as ‘countermeasure’ for US involvement in ‘genocide of Palestinians’: note,” by Alex Oliveira, New York Post, December 5, 2024:
The mentally ill gunman who shot and wounded two kindergarteners at a small California school Wednesday wrote that he was deploying a “countermeasure involving child executions” in response to “America’s involvement with genocide and oppression of Palestinians,” in a twisted note he left behind.
The shooter who turned the gun on himself after opening fire in the playground of the Feather River School of Seventh-Day Adventists was identified Thursday as Glenn Litton, a 56-year-old homeless man who was sprung from jail just two days before the shooting, according to police.
Litton, who was pronounced dead at the Oroville school, had a long history of mental health issues, alarming criminal behavior, and past stints in prison, Butte County officials said at a press conference Thursday.
Glenn Litton, 56, was identified as the shooter who opened fire at a playground at the Feather River School of Seventh-Day Adventists, shooting two kindergarteners before turning the gun on himself.
Cops believe his deranged writings — in which he called himself a lieutenant of “the international alliance” — stemmed from his compromised mental state.
“Countermeasure involving child executions has now been imposed at the Seventh Day Adventist school in CA, U.S. by the international alliance,” he wrote in the disturbing note recovered by investigators.
“I, Lieutenant Glenn Litton of the alliance carried out countermeasure in necessitated response to America’s involvement with genocide and oppression of Palestinians along with attacks towards Yemen.”
Butte County Sheriff Kory Honea characterized those writings as delusions coming from his mental illness, saying he “pulled information from various sources, and it all came together in his mind to create a reality that is false.”
Litton – who attended a separate Seventh Day Adventist school when he was young – critically wounded two boys, 5 and 6, who attended the school of just 35 students.
Days before the attack, the shooter had scheduled a meeting with the Feather River School’s principal and arrived for the meeting Wednesday using a false name under the pretense of enrolling his grandson in the school.
But he had no grandson, police noted, and shortly after the meeting he stormed into the school’s playground and opened fire on students as they returned to class….
http://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.png00Jihad Watchhttp://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.pngJihad Watch2024-12-07 06:37:022024-12-07 06:55:30California: Man shoots and critically wounds two kindergarten children as ‘countermeasure’ to U.S. ‘involvement with genocide of Palestinians’
One of Obama’s little pseudo-intellectual gimmicks was very visibly holding topical books to send a signal ahead of a policy intifada. One of those infamous moments came when he was showing off Fareed Zakaria’s “The Post-American World”.
That’s not something Biden does.
Biden’s not much of a reader and he hasn’t bothered with that kind of posturing before, but then shortly after forcing a ceasefire on Israel using an arms embargo, he was photographed while ‘pulling an Obama’.
President Biden was photographed exiting the Nantucket Bookworks bookstore in Massachusetts with a copy of an anti-Israel screed by Obama’s old pal Rashid Khalidi who had been a terrorist spokesman. Was Biden really planning to read through ‘The Hundred-Year War on Palestine: A History of Colonialism and Resistance’ which slurs Israel as an ‘apartheid state’ and describes Islamic terrorism against Jews as ‘resistance’?
After the Oct 7 attacks, Khalidi defended Hamas, claimed that its members really wanted peace and that Hamas had opened “a door that the United States, Europe and Israel slammed shut”.
“If you can’t go to the International Criminal Court or do a BDS,” Khalidi argued, “then you pick up a gun.”
Khalidi was so toxic that the Los Angeles Times had permanently buried a video of Obama’s toast for the former terror spokesman.
So why is Biden showing off a copy of Khalidi’s hate tract?
Regular readers know I’ve been highly skeptical of past claims that Obama is controlling Biden. I’ve written plenty about the role that Obama has played, largely through his associates and more importantly through the ‘unity’ deal he brokered to secure the nomination for Biden in 2020, but all of that relied on empowering various figures in the administration. Biden had mixed feelings about Obama (at least back when his mind functioned) and he had plenty of loyalists around him. Obama was and had been old news for a while.
The Biden administration did not have Obama’s fingerprints all over it.
The Kamala campaign had more obvious Obama fingerprints all over it and if you look at it from a cultural perspective, it’s pretty easy to spot.
Ditto for Biden toting around a copy of the book Obama would be showing off if he were still in the White House.
The Biden administration is toast. It’s mostly of value to the folks who want to use the remaining days to accomplish whatever destructive political goals they have in mind. The careerists have checked out. No one sees a future for this administration and that leaves a pretty clear field for Obama and his allies.
And what do they want?
Obama’s exit strategy involved going after Israel in 2016 in order to force another realignment. Carrying around an anti-Israel book is a topical signal that another realignment on Israel is about to be forced. It’s not how Biden’s people would normally signal this. It’s how Obama’s people would. We know their objective.
It’s the diplomatic recognition of an Islamic terrorist state inside Israel.
http://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.png00Jihad Watchhttp://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.pngJihad Watch2024-12-03 06:40:402024-12-03 06:46:58Obama Signals He Controls Biden and He’s Coming for Israel
In Trump’s first term, Jews were declared to be a minority group protected by Title VI of the Civil Rights Act. And now, just weeks away from beginning his second term, Trump has laid down the law, in a speech he just gave at a rally against antisemitism in Washington. American universities that fail to combat antisemitism on their campuses should expect severe repercussions, including the loss of accreditation and of federal research contracts. More on Trump’s determination to stamp out campus antisemitism can be found here: “Trump to universities: Stamp out antisemitism or lose accreditation,” by Mathilda Heller, Jerusalem Post, November 14, 2024:
All American universities must end campus antisemitism or they will lose accreditation, President-elect Donald Trump promised during a rally against antisemitism in Washington.
To “defeat antisemitism and defend Jewish citizens in America,” Trump said he would inform every college president that if they do not “end antisemitic propaganda,” they would lose accreditation and federal support.
He did not say they “may lose” accreditation. Trump said they will lose accreditation, and their share of the billions of dollars in federal support that universities receive. A double blow to their finances and reputation.
“We will not subsidize the creation of terrorist sympathizers, and we’re not going to do it – certainly [not] on American soil,” he said.
Trump added that once in the Oval Office, he would inform all educational institutions that if they permit violence or harassment against Jewish students, they will be “held accountable for violations of the civil rights law.”
“It’s very important – Jewish Americans must have equal protection under the law, and they’re going to get it,” he said. “At the same time, my administration will move swiftly to restore safety for Jewish students [on campuses] and Jewish people on American streets.”…
Those wet-behind-the-ears stormtroopers will no longer be allowed to harass and attack Jewish students. They won’t be able to march around the campus, entering lecture halls to disrupt classes taught by Jews and Israelis, or entering campus buildings in order to vandalize them, as they did on April 28 to Hamilton Hall at Columbia University, in an attempt to pressure the administration to divest from Israeli companies, and to cut institutional ties to Israeli academic institutions. If universities do not take forceful action against those who are fomenting a climate of antisemitism — something that very few of them did this past year — then they stand to lose their accreditation, which means their students would no longer have access to federal financial aid. In addition, earning a degree earned from an unaccredited school can also hold little value to employers and disqualify someone from attending graduate school. In addition, the federal government funds billions of dollars in research projects conducted at universities; that money could dry up if not enough is done to fight antisemitic acts on campus.
Many universities have shown themselves incapable of dealing with the surge in antisemitism on their campuses since October 7, 2023. Deploring antisemitic acts, declaring sympathy with Jewish students, promising solemnly to do better, is not enough. Nor are those slap-on-the-wrist punishments, where a handful of the worst offenders are suspended from campus for a term, and then that suspension is immediately lifted. Columbia University administrators considered caving to the demands of anti-Israel students, including agreeing to financial divestment from Israel-linked companies, as the just-released report from the House Committee on Education and the Workforce makes clear. And at Columbia, after dozens of marches by those screaming about “genocide in Gaza,” the harassing of Jewish students, the seizure of campus buildings, the setting up of tent encampments, a grand total of four students received temporary suspensions. “Harvard cut language condemning Oct. 7 attack as ‘violence,’ reference to hostages from statement on massacre, House GOP report shows,” by Josh Christenson, New York Post, October 31, 2024:
Harvard University President Claudine Gay and other administrators intentionally cut language condemning Hamas’ Oct. 7, 2023 massacre of more than 1,200 civilians as “violence” and references to their Israeli hostages from an official statement after the brutal attack, a stunning House committee report revealed Thursday.
The GOP-led House Education and Workforce Committee in a 122-page report found that the Ivy League university leaders made “an intentional decision” to water down their Oct. 9 statement that still failed to condemn Hamas’ attack, according to documents, some of which were obtained via subpoena.
“We denounce this act of terror,” reads an earlier draft of the statement that was jettisoned.
Then-Harvard Law School Dean John Manning, who has since become the school’s provost, successfully lobbied against adding more language that referenced the hundreds of hostages taken by Hamas.
“The violence hits all too close to home for many at Harvard,” states the earlier draft. “Some members of our community have lost family members and friends; some have been unable to reach loved ones, and others fear that their loved ones may have been taken hostage.”
On many campuses, including Harvard, Columbia, the University of California at Berkeley, the University of Michigan, Jewish students have reported a climate of widespread antisemitism that has been tolerated by administrators. Lawsuits accusing Harvard University of tolerating antisemitism and making it unbearable for Jewish students to study there are ongoing.
Now Trump has set down the law, threatening to take away both accreditation, which would means no student access to federal financial aid, and research funds, from colleges and universities that fail to deal adequately with antisemitism. A new sheriff is in town.
http://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.png00Jihad Watchhttp://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.pngJihad Watch2024-12-03 06:23:272024-12-03 06:26:11Trump Lays Down the Law on Anti-Semitism in Universities
Lindsey Graham’s warning puts the spotlight particularly on America’s neighbor, the anti-Israel Justin Trudeau and his foreign minister Melanie Joly (who once posted a picture of herself arm-in-arm with jihadist Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas).
The world continues to be divided in two: those in support of the red green axis of evil and those in support of freedom.
“We will crush you”: Graham threatens allies with sanctions over Netanyahu arrest warrant”, by Griffin Eckstein, Salon, November 23, 2024:
Republican South Carolina Senator Lindsey Graham wants a forceful response to American allies who might comply with an international court order to arrest Israeli leaders Benjamin Netanyahu and Yoav Gallant.
The International Criminal Court issued arrest warrants for the prime minister and former defense minister for “intentionally direct[ing] attacks against the civilian population of Gaza” on Wednesday. The United States is not a member of the ICC and the Biden administration dismissed the warrants as “outrageous” on Thursday.
The 124 member nations of the ICC could well arrest the Israeli leader and Gaza war architect if they set foot on their soil, a possibility Sen. Graham rebuked in on Friday while stopping by Fox News’ “Hannity.”
“If you are going to help the ICC, as a nation, enforce the arrest warrant against Bibi and Gallant, the former Defense Minister, I will put sanctions on you as a nation,” Graham warned. “You’re gonna have to pick the rogue ICC versus America.”
Graham added that he’s “working with Tom Cotton” on an act that would sanction any nation who aided in the arrest of “any politician in Israel.”…
http://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.png00The Geller Reporthttp://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.pngThe Geller Report2024-11-26 07:58:162024-11-26 08:01:45Lindsey Graham threatens allies with sanctions over Netanyahu arrest warrant: ‘We will crush you’
The morally obtuse, the dimwits, the historically ignorant, the antisemites are all out in force again this fall on campuses from sea to shining sea. But there are signs of university administrators becoming fed up, and determined to crack down on those who actually harass and physically attack Jewish students, vandalize university buildings, and call for the destruction of the only Jewish state and the expulsion, or killing, of its Jewish population. One of the students who has been firmly dealt with is one Prahlad Iyengar, a doctoral student at MIT who published a manifesto calling for “violence” by anti-Israel demonstrators. For his pains, he has been banned from the campus. That could lead to his expulsion. More on his case, and on other campus follies, can be found here: “‘Time to Begin Wreaking Havoc’: MIT Student Calls for Violence to Oppose Israel, ‘Escalate for Palestine,’” by Dion J. Pierre, Algemeiner, November 6, 2024:
The Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) has reportedly banished from campus a student who penned an article which argued that violence is a legitimate method of effecting political change and, moreover, advancing the pro-Palestinian movement.
First reported on Tuesday by the MIT Coalition Against Apartheid (CAA), an anti-Israel group associated with National Students for Justice in Palestine (NSJP), the school’s decision — as of yet unconfirmed by MIT officials — stands to reverse an impression that MIT lacks the resolve to punish students who use the campus to break university rules while holding raucous demonstrations against the world’s lone Jewish state.
Titled “On Pacifism,” the article — published in the MIT student publication Written Revolution and flanked by images of members of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP), an internationally designated terrorist group — argued that activists have failed to stop Israel’s war against Hamas and sunder the US-Israel relationship because of “our own decision to embrace nonviolence as our primary vehicle of change.”
All those chants calling for an end to the Jewish state, all those takeovers and vandalizing of university buildings, all the bullying of Jewish students, have not been enough to change policy in Washington. What is required to have an impact, this MIT student says, is real “violence.” We’ve “achieved nothing” because that “genocidal war in Gaza” goes on. Only when we use violence — only when we start to beat up Jewish students, pro-Israel faculty, and campus police — will we get results. He doesn’t explain exactly how such violence will convince others to go along with a pro-Hamas policy. We are left to guess.
The author, PhD candidate Prahlad Iyengar, continued, “One year into a horrific genocide, it is time for the movement to begin wreaking havoc, or else, as we’ve seen, business will indeed go on as usual … As people of conscience in the world, we have a duty to Palestine and to all the globally oppressed. We have a mandate to exact a cost from the institutions that have contributed to the growth and proliferation of colonialism, racism, and all oppressive systems. We have a duty to escalate for Palestine, and as I hope I’ve argued, the traditional pacifist strategies aren’t working because they are ‘designed into’ the system we fight against.”
In a statement distributed by the CAA, Iyengar accused MIT of weaponizing the disciplinary system to persecute him….
“Weaponizing the disciplinary system” just “to persecute him”? What a blend of conceit and persecution complex. MIT has only decided that someone who calls for violence on campus is a physical threat to both students and faculty, and the university has a perfect right to remove him from that campus. Nothing has been “weaponized.” Nor is Prahlad Iyengar being selected for “persecution.’”
Apparently Prahlad Iyengar also thinks that history teaches that “protest movements throughout history” have only succeeded when they abandoned nonviolence as a tactic. What can he be thinking of? Not Mahatma Gandhi’s peaceful protests against the British rulers of India that won that country’s independence. Not the civil rights movement in America led by Martin Luther King, that insisted on nonviolence. Not Nelson Mandela’s campaign to end apartheid in South Africa. Does Iyengar not realize how it was precisely the tactic of non-violence that was responsible for the success of all of those movements?
The pro-Hamas student group Coalition Against Apartheid (CAA) is now calling on students to harass David Randall, an associate dean, until he “relents and revokes” Iyengar’s punishment. There is the threat. There is the violence. By calling so pointedly for Randall to be targeted for harassment — you can use your imagine as to what that harassment could include, from threatening phone calls day and night, hacking of his computer, garbage strewn on his lawn, vandalizing his walls with slogans about “Free Palestine” and “Stop the Genocide,” even screaming at him whenever he appears on campus outside his office — his life can be made most unpleasant. One hopes that because it called for harassing an associate dean for performing his duties, the CAA at MIT will be permanently shut down.
In September, during Columbia University’s convocation ceremony, Columbia University Apartheid Divest (CUAD), a group which recently split due to racial tensions between Arabs and non-Arabs, distributed literature calling on students to join the Palestinian terrorist group Hamas’s movement to destroy Israel.
How amusing it was to see Palestinian students feeling discriminated against by their “non-Arab brothers,” who apparently would not let them arrogate to themselves all the leadership roles in the pro-Hamas protests at Columbia University.
University administrators who until now have been doing far too little, and sometimes nothing, about the pro-Hamas bullyboys who last year storm-trooped their way across campuses, yelling at, surrounding and holding briefly captive, and even assaulting, Jewish students, vandalizing university buildings, scribbling their antisemitic slogans on walls, calling for “violence” as the only way to get their messages across, are now encountering a new atmosphere, an unwillingness by those in Washington who supply universities with so much support to tolerate their inaction. The MIT doctoral student Prahlad Iyengar has now been banned from campus — a harbinger, one hopes, of punishments to come. Let’s hope that his banning is followed up by his permanent expulsion from MIT. And may other pro-Hamas students, and not only at MIT, begin to worry that with Trump’s return to office, and with the massive and devastating report on antisemitism on campuses that has been compiled by the House Committee on Education and the Workforce and just been released, there will be no more tolerance for those who spread their hatred of Jews and of Israel on campuses. Pull down your tent encampments, put away your bullhorns, roll up your Palestinian flags, and return to your studies, all you Hamas supporters — that is, if you care to graduate.
http://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.png00Jihad Watchhttp://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.pngJihad Watch2024-11-16 06:48:472024-11-16 06:55:30The Anti-Israel Brigades Are Out In Force On Campuses Again, But For How Long?
UNRWA shouldn’t get another penny of American aid. Neither should the UN as a whole.
“Did a former UNRWA teacher help organize the Amsterdam pogrom?,” by Ohad Merlin, Jerusalem Post, November 10, 2024:
The organized violent antisemitic rampage which took place in Amsterdam Thursday night shocked many in the European continent and beyond. Now, several days later, more and more information regarding the events and the organizers began to flow, with findings pointing to a PGNL, a Hamas-affiliated group active in the Netherlands, as a main organizer of the anti-Israel protests in the country.
The Network Contagion Research Institute (NCRI) published an exposé showcasing how, on November 6, local authorities decided to cancel a preplanned protest against the Maccabi Ajax FC football game scheduled for 19:00 on November 7. However, the organizers did not give up and posted an invite to a new protest, which cautioned attendees to arrive in small groups, conceal Keffiyehs and Palestinian flags, and openly specified “This is a direct clash with our enemy (IOF and Mossad). Even if we do not get our desired location, we will not give up”; warning those under 18 not to attend the protest and calling to “prepare ourselves to deal with grave violence.”
NCRI’s exposé highlighted that one of the main planners of these protests is an organization innocently named “The Palestinian Community in the Netherlands” (Palestijnse Gemeenschap In Nederland – PGNL), a group which organizes protests and “actions” across the Netherlands, with active groups on instant messaging apps such as WhatsApp and Telegram.
According to a report by the European Leadership Network (ELNET) released last month, PGNL forms part of the Hamas-affiliated network in the Netherlands and Europe, as it was led for years by Amin Abu-Rashid, a designated Hamas official who was arrested by Dutch authorities in mid-2023 following accusations of transferring funds to Hamas. The ELNET report highlights that, in addition to organizing many of the recent pro-Hamas protests in the Netherlands, PGNL has hosted the late former Hamas official Ismail Haniyeh in 2007 over a video conference, and hosted an event saluting former Hamas leader Sheikh Ahmed Yassin in 2016.
Following Abu-Rashid’s arrest, PGNL is led nowadays by Ayman Nejmeh, who appeared in the NCRI exposé as an administrator at one of PGNL’s instant messaging app groups. Nejmeh is a Syrian-born activist who described himself on his Facebook profile as a former UNRWA teacher, and who spoke at a pro-UNRWA rally in February. However, at some point in the past couple of days, Nejmeh decided to delete his affiliation with UNRWA from his Facebook profile for unknown reasons. In any case, Nejmeh himself has posted pro-Hamas content in the past on his Facebook page as well, including a picture of an al-Qassam militant.
Also according to the ELNET report, another leader at PGNL is Ahmed Skineh, who held close ties to aforementioned Hamas official Amin Abu-Rashid, and who is involved in many pro-Hamas organizations, including those designated by Israel or recognized by European authorities as acting on behalf of Hamas. These include the UK-based Palestinian Return Centre, the Popular Conference for Palestinians Abroad, and the European Palestinian Council for Political Relations, led by US-designated Hamas official Majed al-Zeer….
http://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.png00Jihad Watchhttp://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.pngJihad Watch2024-11-13 10:30:292024-11-13 10:35:57Of Course: Former UNRWA Teacher Helped Organize the Amsterdam Pogrom
In Michigan, Donald Trump went on November 1 to Dearborn, Michigan to court Arab voters. He has apparently enrolled in this outreach effort his daughter Tiffany’s father-in-law, Lebanese-American Massad Boulos. Could it be that when he says he wants Israel to hurry up and “finish the job,” he means that he wants Israel to end the fighting now, both with Hamas in Gaza and Hezbollah in Lebanon? Israel still has to deal with the thousands of Hamas combatants who have managed to regroup in northern Gaza, as well as obtain the release of the hostages who are still alive. In Lebanon, it will still take a few months to end the threat from a much tougher foe, Hezbollah. One hopes Trump doesn’t mean to hasten the IDF to end hostilities before its goals have been achieved, but he needs to make this perfectly clear.
More about both Trump, and Bill Clinton, speaking in Michigan, can be found here: “Role reversal: Trump stumps for Arab votes, Bill Clinton speaks truth to state with large Arab pop.,” by Herb Keinon, Jerusalem Post, November 3, 2024:
Even in a US election campaign full of surprises – remember President Joe Biden bowing out mid-campaign in favor of Vice President Kamala Harris – last week’s role reversals in Michigan had some observers scratching their heads.
One of those head-scratching moments was when former president Donald Trump showed up on Friday for a campaign stop in Dearborn, Michigan, the largest Arab-majority city in America in a state with an estimated 200,000 Arab voters.
The significance of the Muslim vote in Michigan is greatly exaggerated. There are 8.45 million registered voters in the state. Only 200,000 of them are Muslim. But you would hardly know that from the breathless reports about the power of the Muslim vote. That’s exactly what Muslims in America want the world to think.
Why was this a head-scratching moment? It is one thing for Trump to go to the grave of the late Lubavitcher Rebbe, Menachem Mendel Schneerson, as he did in October, and make a play for Jewish voters, even though he knows that historically, Jewish voters have favored his opponents by wide margins and vote heavily for Democrats.
But there was still a certain logic to it: after all, he is unapologetically pro-Israel, and when he was president, he took a number of extremely significant steps that helped Israel….
Trump did more for Israel than any President in history. He moved the American Embassy to Jerusalem. He recognized Israel’s annexation of the Golan Heights,signing on March 25, 2019 a proclamation stating that “the United States recognizes that the Golan Heights are part of the State of Israel.” He withdrew from the Iran deal and reimposed sanctions on Israel’s most dangerous enemy, Iran. Trump cut the annual US aid to the Palestinian Authority (PA) – $500 million – claiming that its purpose had been to facilitate a peace process, but since the Palestinians refused to negotiate, it no longer made sense to fund them. Trump closed the PLO office in Washington. In addition, he cut the annual US contributions to UNRWA, claiming that the agency was corrupt and perpetuated the Palestinian refugee problem, and in its schools, was indoctrinating pupils with hostility to Israel and to Jews. Most important, perhaps, was Trump’s rejection of Obama’s claim that Israeli settlements in the West Bank are illegal and the main obstacle to peace. He was especially offended by a resolution initiated by Obama at the UN Security Council in December 2016, when Trump was already president-elect. The UN resolution (2334) stated that Israel’s settlement activity constituted a “flagrant violation” of international law and had “no legal validity.” On November 18, 2019, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo declared that “the establishment of Israeli civilian settlements in the West Bank is not, per se, inconsistent with international law.”
What was as surprising for some as Trump’s whistle-stop in Dearborn was a speech former president Bill Clinton, a Kamala Harris surrogate, gave two days earlier at a church in Muskegon Heights, Michigan, a three-hour drive away.
What was surprising, or rather, counterintuitive, was that in the heart of Michigan, with both candidates chasing after the Arab and Muslim vote, Clinton gave a vigorous defense of Israel’s war in Gaza.
What was striking about Bill Clinton’s speech?
Two things were striking about Clinton’s nine-minute discussion about Israel in the speech that went viral among Jews and pro-Israel supporters and triggered angry blowback by anti-Israel activists and pro-Palestinian organizations.
The first was Clinton’s honesty. He stood up and essentially put to lie the narrative of Palestinian victimhood popular among some progressive and pro-Palestinian supporters in Michigan.
Clinton said that when he was president, Yasser Arafat was offered a state on 96% of the West Bank and Gaza, could choose from inside Israel where he wanted to take the remaining four percent, and was offered a capital in east Jerusalem, including control of two of the four quarters in the Old City.
“And they said no,” the former president declared.
Part of the reason, Clinton said, was that “Hamas did not care about a homeland for the Palestinians; they wanted to kill Israelis and make Israel uninhabitable. Well, I got news for them: They [the Jews] were there first before their [the Muslims’] faith existed. They were there in the times of King David, and the southernmost tribes had Judea and Samaria.”…
Here’s what I think: If Trump becomes president for a second time, he would again be as supportive of Israel as he was the first time. Muslims who are counting on Trump to be less favorable to Israel will be greatly disappointed. And Clinton — well, that speech he delivered to an audience of Muslims and Arabs was most welcome. It’s too bad it took three decades — since the disastrous Oslo Accords that he helped to fashion — for the scales to fall from his eyes.
http://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.png00Jihad Watchhttp://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.pngJihad Watch2024-11-05 08:18:582024-11-05 08:24:16Topsy-Turvydom In Michigan: Trump Courts Muslims, Bill Clinton Angers Them
She’s complicit not with dead Nazis, but with live ones dedicated to killing Jews today.
“I don’t understand how we got so toxic and just so divided and so bitter,” Barack Obama wondered at a Kamala rally in Wisconsin.
A day later the Kamala campaign began accusing Trump of being Hitler.
As October surprises go, a Democrat accusing a Republican of being Hitler is as surprising as pint size witches and ghosts showing up on your doorstep on October 31. Ever since FDR accused Wendel Wilkie of using “Hitler tactics” back during the 1940 election, calling your opponent Hitler has been a rite of passage since even before Joe Biden was born.
Goldwater, Reagan and both Bushes, were accused of Hitlerism, Nazism or fascism.
No Democrat was too respectable to get in the game including MLK who claimed, “we see danger signs of Hitlerism in the candidacy of Mr. Goldwater.”
Barry Goldwater was half Jewish, a WWII vet and a lifetime member of the NAACP who helped found the NAACP’s Arizona chapter, and seemingly the worst possible candidate for ‘Hitlerism’.
Except for Trump who has Jewish family members and is performing so well among Jewish, Latino and black voters that his opponent and her media have to compare him to Hitler.
There was a time when comparing your opponent to Hitler was a mostly harmless form of watering down some of the most horrific events of the twentieth century for political gain.
These days however it’s all too easy to find an influential political movement championing the extermination of the Jews with a foothold inside the Kamala campaign and the Democrats.
If the Jews all gather in Israel, it will save us the trouble of going after them worldwide, Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah boasted. And the Islamic terrorist group proved it was serious about killing Jews outside Israel with terrorist attacks like the bombing of the AMIA Jewish community center in Buenos Aires which murdered 86 people.
These days you can spot Hezbollah flags flying at any respectable anti-Israel rally. Including the ones that Vice President Kamala Harris and Gov. Tim Walz have defended and are complicit in. Harris, Walz and the party have praised the mobs waving Hamas and Hezbollah flags, chanting in support of the Houthis and assaulting Jewish students, and they want to claim the role of the Allies fighting Hitler when they’re at best the Quislings who are aiding and abetting the Nazis.
Kamala privately met with Dearborn Mayor Abdullah Hammoud to urge him to support her campaign. Hammoud had spoken at a rally that included chants of “Death to Israel” and calls for Jews to be returned “back to Poland.”
Hammoudwas introduced by Osama Siblani as “the greatest mayor in the United States of America.” “Mr. Bush believes Hezbollah, Hamas and other Palestinian factions are terrorists, but we believe they are freedom fighters,” Siblani had previously told the Washington Post.
Osama had bragged, “If the FBI wants to come after those who support the resistance done by Hezbollah, then they better bring a fleet of buses. I for one would be willing to go to jail.”
“Our martyrs are heroes, our leaders are great,” Osama Siblani said after the death of the Hezbollah leader “And first among them, their leader, the great Sayyed, Hassan Nasrallah.”
Osama had previously met with Ms. Chávez Rodríguez, Kamala’s campaign manager, as part of a delegation to win over the votes of the Hezbollah community in Dearborn, Michigan.
The Biden-Harris administration and the Harris-Walz campaign are complicit with Nazis. Not historical ones or dead ones, but actual movements dedicated to killing Jews today.
After a year in which American Jews have been assaulted, terrorized and threatened, forced out of campuses and systematically discriminated against, Kamala failed to call out those parts of her base that are responsible for it, sometimes condemning the acts, but never the movements.
When mobs wave Hamas flags in front of the White House and openly identify themselves as Hamas supporters, Kamala, Democrats and the media carefully look the other way. When they do that, they’re looking away from public support for the worst massacre of Jews since the Holocaust by a Muslim Brotherhood movement that got its start being funded by Nazi Germany.
Vice President Kamala Harris and her people refuse to stop meeting with Nazis, Nazi supporters and their political allies, but want to play the game of calling everyone else “Hitler”. This not only trivializes the Holocaust, but ignores an actual attempt to exterminate that is going on today.
“Throughout history, Allah has imposed upon the [Jews] people who would punish them for their corruption. The last punishment was carried out by Hitler. By means of all the things he did to them—even though they exaggerated this issue—he managed to put them in their place. This was divine punishment for them. Allah willing, the next time will be at the hand of the believers,” Muslim Brotherhood ‘spiritual guide’ Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi wished.
Qaradawi, the Qatari backed leader of the Brotherhood, hoped that Islamists would carry on the work of the Nazis. The Obama administration helped the Brotherhood seize power, reached out to Qaradawi and his National Security Council met with Qaradawi’s deputy.
The same people telling us that Trump is Hitler met with actual Nazis who are not shy about announcing their desire to kill all the Jews.
If Kamala wants to find Nazis, she needn’t look far, just as far as the nearest mirror.
“The black man cannot take anymore, he is now looking to burn.”
Kamala has claimed that she was a “daughter of the civil rights movement,” but as the latest Freedom Center Investigates article showed, she was actually the daughter of a racist hate group.
Donald Warden had a message, “the time has come to break with white America.”
After the Watts riots, Warden, who would later convert to Islam and take the name Khaled Al-Mansour, released an album titled “Burn, Baby Burn”, celebrating the riots and looting. “The black man cannot take anymore, he is now looking to burn,” he warned.
Warden’s vehicle for spreading his hate was the Afro American Association. And that was where Kamala’s parents met. The ‘Association’ had been created to study “Black Identity.” It banned white people and even non-black ones from joining. With only one exception. Kamala’s mother.
Here you can watch a brief clip of Khaled/Donald in action.
This is Khalid Abdullah Al-Mansour, who brought together Kamala’s parents at his Afro-American Association: a prototype of the Black Panthers.
— Daniel Greenfield – “Hang Together or Separately” (@Sultanknish) October 22, 2024
If the name rings a bell, it’s because Al-Mansour, who converted to Islam and befriended a Saudi leader, had raised money for Barack Obama’s Ivy League education and solicited recommendation letters for him to go to Harvard.
Kamala was the product of parents who met in a racist and radical hate group.
http://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.png00Jihad Watchhttp://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.pngJihad Watch2024-10-29 09:05:052024-10-29 09:30:07Meet the Racist Who Brought Kamala’s Parents Together
In the bias and malevolence of its coverage of the IDF and Israel, the New York Times has few equals in the American mainstream media. Just now it has been reporting on those, both Palestinians and soldiers, who accuse the IDF of using Palestinians as human shields in Gaza. More on the Times’ credulous coverage of this story can be found here: “Double Standards as New York Times Accuses IDF of Using Palestinians as Human Shields,” by Simon Plosker, Algemeiner, October 22, 2024:
Replete with a headline designed to tarnish Israel’s entire military, The New York Times recently published an investigation alleging that IDF soldiers were using Gazans as human shields during operations in the Gaza Strip.
The idea seems to be that the IDF uses Palestinians to accompany them when they first enter an area, and to go first into buildings that may be booby-trapped, before the IDF soldiers go in, or they are made to walk alongside IDF tanks, as a putative protection against attack by Hamas. No one has produced any evidence to support such charges.
In order to make its case, The New York Times says it “interviewed 16 Israeli soldiers and officials who knew about the practice, as well as three Palestinians, on the record, who were forced to take part in it.”
While the small number of Palestinians are named, the Israelis are not. It is always problematic to present anonymous testimony in a story where we don’t know the motivations behind those who are talking to the journalists.
Why were the 16 Israeli soldiers not named? Could it be because they knew their claims were doubtful, and didn’t want to be exposed? Some of them may have been far-left peaceniks, trying to arouse public anger in Israel against the IDF, in the hope of forcing the government to agree to an immediate ceasefire. Some may have genuinely misunderstood what the Palestinians present at IDF operations were doing. A Palestinian accompanying an IDF patrol might be voluntarily aiding the IDF to locate Hamas operatives and weapons, in the hope of sparing his home or hometown from being massively shelled.
Two of the Israelis, however, were connected to The New York Times through Breaking the Silence, whose motivations are very clear.
The organization, which was founded in 2004 by former IDF soldiers who are highly critical of Israel, claims to “expose the public to the reality of everyday life in the Occupied Territories” using testimonies that are purported to be “meticulously researched” while “all facts are cross-checked with additional eyewitnesses.”…
“Breaking the Silence” is a group of former IDF soldiers who are critical of Israel, and want to “expose the public to the reality of everyday life in the Occupied Territories.” The very fact that they use the phrase “Occupied Territories” indicates their embrace of the Palestinian cause, and their willingness to blacken the image of the IDF. A number of soldiers who have provided testimonies of IDF misconduct to Breaking the Silence turn out to have been paid to provide their stories; one wonders how much was real, and how much was made up by these soldiers in order to receive payments from the group.
Yet when it comes to New York Times coverage of and investigations into the IDF, it’s impossible to ignore the Gray Lady’s wider agenda that continuously seeks to delegitimize Israeli self-defense against the terrorists who are currently attacking it from multiple fronts.
For example, only days ago, the paper published an article that accused Israel of committing war crimes and “shooting children at point-blank range.” That story also relied on questionable testimonies and even more questionable X-rays purporting to show IDF bullets lodged in the heads of Palestinian children. The very authenticity of the X-rays was called into question, as the entire story was torn apart online….
Forensic experts who examined the X-ray photographs of dead children’s heads with bullets lodged in them concluded that they were fakes. For more on that particular scandal, in which The New York Times credulously accepted the Palestinian story, and refused to accept the scathing testimony of experts that debunked the claims of “65 Palestinian doctors and nurses,” see here.
Hamas’ policy of embedding its operatives, and hiding its weapons, within areas populated by civilians, is central to its war making. It does everything it can to increase civilian casualties, because it knows that their deaths will aid its propaganda campaign against Israel. As Yahya Sinwar said, the deaths of Palestinian civilians are the “necessary sacrifices” that must be made in fighting the Zionist enemy.
http://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.png00Jihad Watchhttp://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.pngJihad Watch2024-10-28 04:56:422024-10-28 05:05:36The New York Times’ Double Standards
“Free Palestine, this is genocide!” she shouted outside the Greek restaurant.
A woman in New Jersey in the United States started tearing up Greek flags in a restaurant, shouting, “Free Palestine, this is genocide.”
She realised after explanations from the shocked employees that the flags were not of Israel but of Greece.
The incident happened in Montclair, New Jersey, outside a Greek restaurant. After the woman realised her mistake, she apologised and said she felt ashamed….
Is a longtime Kamala friend part of a Hamas family?
“I say this as someone who’s known her since 1997: She’s trying,” Hala Hijazi assured a panel at an anti-Israel DNC event that once she was president, Kamala would crack down on Israel.
Hijazi, a Jordanian immigrant who has roots in Gaza, is close to Kamala and they both came up through the ranks together. The Muslim official and fundraiser had worked as a special assistant to former San Francisco Mayor Willie Brown whom she described as a “mentor”.
Hala Hijazi was there for all of Kamala’s races, raising money for her Senate campaign, promoting an event co-hosted by Willie Brown, and promising that one day Kamala would be in the White House. And she can be seen posing in 2004 at the Bimbo’s club with Kamala, who had just begun her political career as San Francisco’s DA, and Obama, running for Senate.
After obtaining American citizenship in 1994, the Muslim immigrant quickly began climbing the political ladder, working for Willie Brown, becoming a ‘human rights’ commissioner, and getting to know everyone in Democratic politics. Hijazi’s social media feed is decorated with photos of her posing with Bill Clinton, Hillary, Pelosi, the Obamas, and above all else, Kamala.
“I’ve raised over $12 million for the Democratic Party,” Hijazi boasted at the anti-Israel panel.
Along the way, Hijazi visited Saudi Arabia by invitation of the royal family, advocated for the Iran Deal, which allowed the Islamic terrorist state to develop its ballistic missile and nuclear program, and condemned efforts to stop Muslim terrorists from coming to America.
And repeatedly denounced the Jewish State. A 2012 Free Beacon article by Adam Kredo profiled Hijazi as an “Obama bundler”, while noting her frequent attacks on Israel.
In old letters to the editor in 2009 when Hamas first attempted to use tunnels to invade Israel, Hijazi, who described herself as a “Muslim Palestinian-American”, claimed that the blockade of Hamas lacked “any moral justification and humanity” and denounced Israel for “destroying places of worship and education.” She had claimed elsewhere that for the Israeli government, “one death of an Israeli soldier equals a thousand Palestinian children.”
After the Hamas massacres of Oct 7, Hijazi relaunched her activism, claiming shortly afterward that 40 members of her family had been killed by Israeli bombing campaigns against Hamas. At the DNC, Hijazi claimed that over 100 members of her family had been killed in the fighting. She provided no further details, but did hold up a photo of a military age man.
A recent report by the Israeli N12 channel revealed that a Hamas official had privately admitted that 80% of the Arab Muslim settlers killed in the Gaza campaign were Hamas members or their families. It’s unknown who Hijazi’s family members are or what their relationship to Hamas may be, but they lived in which Gaza City was a stronghold of Hamas and, if true, the high death toll among her family members would raise the possibility of their links to Islamic terrorist groups.
The Hijazis are a prominent family in Gaza City and their members include Nizar Hijazi: the Hamas appointed mayor. Hijazi is a relatively common name, but a number of Hamas figures, including former commanders Hisham Hijazi, Muwaman Hijazi and Akram Hijazi, shared it.
It’s unknown if any of them are related to Hala Hijazi.
Al Jazeera, the state media arm of Qatar, a sponsor of Hamas, claimed that 141 people from the Hijazi family had died in the fighting. Reports out of Gaza claim that multiple airstrikes hit members of the Hijazi family, not only in Gaza City, but in Rafah and elsewhere. These repeated incidents are unlikely to be a coincidence which raises the distinct possibility that someone close to a presidential candidate is from a Hamas family.
Members of Hala’s family in America engaged in anti-Israel activism including what appears to be her sister who headed a chapter of the Hamas-linked American Muslims for Jerusalem. Hamas terrorists with the last name Hijazi have been fighting Israel going back decades and while it is a common last name, Arab societies are defined by such large interrelated families.
No one in the media was however interested in following up.
Hala Hijazi’s claims quickly made their way to her friend Kamala who took the lead in pulling the Biden-Harris administration away from Israel. In Dubai, Kamala broke with the initial pro-Israel position, complaining that “too many innocent Palestinians have been killed” and set limits on what Israel could do against Hamas.
Her source for this was Hijazi.
On November 2, Kamala Harris told members of the British press that, “I have a friend, who I talked with recently, who has family in Gaza and has lost a number of the members of her family — innocent civilians.” Politico described this as “Harris has suggested that conversations with friends have influenced her thinking about the war.” Either way it was clear that Hijazi was influencing her friend even in the initial weeks of Israel’s response to the Oct 7 attacks.
Hijazi, who had bragged of becoming “a trusted source” for politicians, was succeeding in moving her old friend of over two decades into the anti-Israel camp.
Halal Hijazi has been reluctant to discuss Islamic terrorism or the actual causes of the war. She claims to be an interfaith activist and a “moderate”, but she can also be found moderating an event at the Islamist Zaytuna College in 2019 with Hamza Yusuf and Salam Al-Marayati.
Yusuf, a founder of Zaytuna, had described Judaism as a “most racist religion” and at a cop-killer benefit two days before 9/11 warned that “this country is facing a very terrible fate.”
“I am a citizen of this country not by choice but by birth. I reside in this country not by choice but by conviction in attempting to spread the message of Islam in this country. I became Muslim in part because I did not believe the false gods of this society, whether we call them Jesus or democracy or the Bill of Rights,” Yusuf had admitted.
Salam Al-Marayati had defended Hamas and Hezbollah, and individual terrorists and claimed that Israel was behind 9/11. Among the terrorist attacks he defended was the Hezbollah bombing of the Marine Barracks which killed over 200 American military members.
Marayati had analogized Islamic terrorists to “American freedom fighters hundreds of years ago [who] were also regarded as terrorists by the British.”
Other Zaytuna College faculty include Hatem Bazian, a founder of the anti-Israel campus movement, who targeted Jews during his career, spewed antisemitic hate, described Jewish history as imaginary, and fundraised for a Hamas-linked charity. Bazian had co-founded Students for Justice in Palestine whose chapters have celebrated the Oct 7 attacks.
At the anti-Israel DNC panel, Hijazi claimed that, “I’m a long time Democrat, moderate Democrat”, but there was nothing moderate about her ties to Zaytuna and Yusuf.
Hala Hijazi joined a podcast with Hamza Yusuf to discuss “The Hundred Years War on Palestine”. Yusuf described Hijazi as a “dear friend and her father was a dear friend and they’re from Gaza”.
“She’s been just advocating for decades now, at least a few decades, and has worked in the Democratic Party in particular. But I think she really understands the ins and outs of how this system works,” Yusuf said.
Hijazi described herself as being part of a family that had “been in Gaza for generations”, claimed that she had “been doing this work for 25 years” and laid out her philosophy that America as “this country is built on two numbers, number of votes and numbers of dollars raised.”
Hijazi’s career certainly appears to have been built on that cynical premise.
“It’s a critical time in our country’s history to show our power,” Hijazi urged and then laid out a plan to build up Muslim power over Americans.
The Obama and Biden bundler advised Muslims to start at the bottom, focus on school board races “because they end up running for mayor, assembly and state senate.”
Muslim parents should consider getting “our little children to start thinking about being a journalist or working for the government” to create a pipeline for anti-Israel PR.
Hijazi strategically told Muslims to start befriending non-Muslims, blacks and Latinos to cultivate allies because “this is where we are at a disadvantage where the other folks, that’s what they’re doing. This is where we are at a disadvantage, where the other folks that’s what they’re doing. They’re everywhere. And they look like they’re the hospitable ones and the righteous ones.”
Who are the “other folks”? Presumably the Jews.
In more strategic benevolence, Hijazi told Muslims to start doing “philanthropy”. Research had shown, she claimed, that the Jewish and Muslim communities “were the most giving and generous communities in this country. And the problem with us is that we’re mostly giving it to Muslims organizations and mosques. And to Muslim causes. But we also need to start showing our power and our strength by giving money also elsewhere so that we can cultivate those relationships. And again, all this is political, like again, everything we’re doing is political.”
Charity was the most political of all.
“We need to start doing more with the American Red Cross or the American Cancer Society. You guys say, well that’s not politics, but it is. This is where a lot of these major sponsors, fundraisers and donors to buildings and to City Hall and to politicians are also the chairs of these organizations.”
This may shed some light on why Hijazi is on the board of directors of the American Red Cross in Northern California.
Building political power, Hijazi explained, was about building relationships that could suppress criticism of the Hamas mobs.
“In San Francisco, we have regular meetings with the District Attorney’s office, we have regular meetings with the police chief, we have regular meetings with the FBI, we have regular meetings with the Attorney General. So when someone like me sees a crazy post by an elected official, I can call them on their cell phone and say, ‘Hey, do you understand that either you or your staff just tweeted something racist, Islamophobic’, and calling our protesters pro-Hamas protesters is an abomination to anything democratic.”
Denouncing the Hamas mobs in the streets was an example of the kind of thing that Hijazi and her allies could get politicians to suppress.
“Whether it started on October 7 or starting tomorrow, you guys need to start now,” she urged Muslims.
“They,” she said, meaning the Jews, “they have an ADL, and AIPAC and JCRC”.
Muslims needed to build up their power over American cultural and political life.
But Hala Hijazi’s closeness to Kamala Harris raises questions not only for Jews but for all Americans. The Muslim bundler had fumed over the Trump administration’s efforts to keep Muslim terrorists out of America, and furiously denounced a minority of patriotic Democrats who had voted for the American Security Against Foreign Enemies Act that required vetting Syrians and Iraqis for terror ties before allowing them to penetrate the United States of America.
What sort of influence would Hijazi’s friend exercise over a Kamala Harris administration? And how many Americans and Jews will die because of it just as they are dying now in Israel?
http://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.png00Jihad Watchhttp://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.pngJihad Watch2024-10-13 04:35:222024-10-13 04:38:33Meet Kamala’s ‘Palestinian’ Best Friend Who Changed Her Mind on Israel
