Tag Archive for: Red-Green-Rainbow Troika

Kamala’s ‘Jew Ban’

Against a “Muslim Ban,” for a “Jew Ban.”

“On Holocaust Memorial Day, Trump restricted refugees from Muslim-majority countries. Make no mistake — this is a Muslim ban,” Kamala Harris angrily tweeted in 2017.

This year the Biden-Harris administration implemented a ‘Jew Ban’ less than a week after Holocaust Memorial Day and after the worst massacre of Jews since the Holocaust.

Unlike the Muslim Ban, the Biden-Harris ‘Jew Ban’ had nothing to do with immigration security. It was buried in Biden’s innocuously named ‘Executive Order 14115 – Imposing Certain Sanctions on Persons Undermining Peace, Security, and Stability in the West Bank.”

Who was sanctioned for undermining peace, security, and stability in the West Bank?

The PLO’s ‘Palestinian Authority’ has conducted unity negotiations with Hamas under the auspices of Russia and the CCP in Beijing and Moscow. It promotes and funds Islamic terrorism against Jews through its propaganda outlets, terror groups and its ‘Pay to Slay’ policy. Despite that the Biden-Harris administration has poured hundreds of millions of dollars into its territories.

The administration allows organizations like Samidoun which were named as terror front groups by Israel to operate through tax-exempt nonprofits in the United States. Radical groups like the International Solidarity Movement and Torat Tzedek which have been involved in local clashes and violence, some deadly, received money from tax-exempt charities like the New Israel Fund and the Middle East Children’s Alliance with no interference from the Biden-Harris government.

Instead the individuals targeted under Executive Order 14115 during its inception had two things in common: they were pro-Israel and Jewish. Starting in March, the Biden-Harris administration has rolled out sanctions on Jewish Israeli farmers, ranchers, bakers and housewives at the same time as Brazilian drug dealers, Chinese fentanyl manufacturers and Russian oligarchs.

The baffling list of Jews sanctioned by Joe Biden and Kamala Harris included the proprietors of a goat farm who sell cheese, a baker who shot an Islamic terrorist in 2016 and a mother of 8 who worked with survivors of sexual assault and led protests against aid to Hamas.

The ‘Jew Ban’ was so badly implemented that it shut down the bank accounts and credit cards of a man with a similar name to an activist protesting the Biden-Kamala Hamas aid trucks.

A week ahead of Holocaust Remembrance Day, the Biden-Harris administration then announced a secondary wave of sanctions against Jewish groups that had fundraised for the victims of the regime’s first wave of sanctions in its ‘Jew Ban’. Opposing the ‘Jew Ban’ was enough to get one sanctioned under the ‘Jew Ban’ for ‘undermining peace’.

A month before, a ‘Palestinian Authority’ security officer had opened fire on a Jewish school bus. The PA will not only continue paying his salary but it celebrated the attack.

The Palestinian Authority’s media boasted of “more than 2,750 acts of resistance against the occupation that have led to the killing of 12 Israelis”, “159 shooting operations” including the murder of two Jewish brothers stuck in traffic which it described as “continuing the path and keeping its spark burning will be carried out by blasting bullets into heads.”

The Biden-Harris administration did not believe this qualified as undermining peace. Not only did it leverage no sanctions on those responsible, but continued its diplomatic support for the PLO.

It was not until June that Arin Al-Usud, an Islamic terrorist group tied to Hamas and Islamic Jihad, that the PLO saw as a rival group was finally sanctioned. The use of the EO 14115 sanctions on a terrorist group instead of the appropriate Foreign Terrorist Organization designation that would treat support for terrorism as a serious crime classed Israeli civilians with terrorists and seemed largely aimed at trying to make the ‘Jew Ban’ look more ‘diverse’.

In August, the Biden-Harris ‘Jew Ban’ rolled on with the addition of Yitzhak Levi Filant: the security coordinator for an Israeli village that has frequently come under attack by Islamic terrorists. Security coordinators were the front line of defense during the Islamic terrorist attacks of Oct 7 and a good one can make the difference between massacre and a dead terrorist.

The Biden-Harris had already amply made clear which of these was its preferred outcome.

Since the onset of the ‘Jew Ban’, 8 Jewish men and women have been sanctioned by the the Biden-Harris administration along with 2 Jewish farms and 4 nonprofit groups.

And only one Islamic terror group.

100% of the individuals and 85% of the organizations sanctioned under the Biden-Harris ‘Jew Ban’ are Jewish.

Jerome Marcus, the president of the Deborah Project, called it “An Executive Order That Targets Jews” in an article at the Jewish Journal, asking, “Should U.S. Presidents be able to freeze your bank account if they disagree with your views on foreign policy, or if anti-Israel groups ask them to?” he asked. “Their internet and email are canceled,  they have no access to their credit cards and thus can’t pay for basics like insurance and daily life activities. Their life is essentially unraveled. And once they’re sanctioned, they can’t hire a lawyer to defend them.”

lawsuit filed by Marcus, Eugene Kontorovich of the George Mason University Scalia Law School and other attorneys on behalf of Texans for Israel and American Jews living in Israel challenged the constitutionality of Biden’s ‘Jew Ban’ who fear losing their bank accounts and livelihoods if they defend themselves against Muslim violence.

“The White House is putting the lives of American Jews living in the West Bank at risk and denying them the Fifth Amendment’s guarantee of equal protection under the laws,” Kontorovich warned in a Wall Street Journal op-ed.

The lawsuit noted that the Biden-Harris administration has made it “clear that it considers the mere act of Jews residing in or making pilgrimage to sites in the West Bank as an obstacle to peace.’ In fact, the Administration has even called visits of Jews to their holy sites ‘provocative.’”

And who in the Biden-Harris administration is behind the ‘Jew Ban’?

Michael Doran, the Director of the Center for Peace and Security in the Middle East, described a shadowy “interagency team of targeteers”  led by the International Economics Directorate at the National Security Council. Doran named Ilan Goldenberg, Kamala’s former pro-terrorist Middle East advisor and her current ‘liaison’ to U.S. Jews  as playing “a very enthusiastic role”.

Kamala’s close advisor who helped set her anti-Israel policy had previously advocated for a deal in which “Hamas would retain some of its military capabilities” and argued that “half the root causes are Israeli actions, in terms of — especially just focusing on Gaza, on the blockade. And the other half is Hamas’ choice to use violence and arm itself in response.”

The ‘Jew Ban’ is not just coming out of the Biden-Harris administration, but one of Kamala’s close advisors who represents her to the Jewish community appears to be its capo.

Kamala had campaigned against a Muslim ban in the name of “Holocaust Memorial Day” and “Anne Frank” only to then come to power and implement a ‘Jew Ban’ around Holocaust Memorial Day. The ‘Jew Ban’ is everything that Kamala accused the Muslim Ban of, but wasn’t, it’s shameful, unconstitutional and un-American. It’s also a foreshadowing of things to come.

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLES:

Federal Agency Funds Campus Event Celebrating Islamic Terror and Oct 7

The Palestinian Web of Lies

‘The Palestinian Delusion’: ‘The most important book on the Jihad against Israel in existence’

RELATED VIDEO: The Islamophobia Scam

EDITORS NOTE: This Jihad Watch column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Irangate: Iran’s Plan to Stop Trump and Elect Kamala

Unlike Russiagate, Irangate is real and has roots in the White House.

In the last two months, Iran set up fake news sites to defame Trump and promote Kamala, hacked the Trump campaign and tried to pass stolen documents to the Harris-Walz campaign and its media allies, and finally plotted to assassinate former President Trump and his officials.

These rather definite statements of Iran’s intentions in the presidential election have been dismissed with generic Russiagate buzzwords that describe the Islamic terrorist state as being out to “destabilize and sow chaos”. When Iran hacked the Trump campaign, we were told that it was to “sow chaos” and now that Trump has been briefed on the assassination threats, once again it’s been described as a plot to “destabilize and sow chaos” in the United States.

But if Iran is out to only “sow chaos,” then why isn’t it trying to assassinate Biden or Kamala?

Where are the Iranian agents soliciting useful idiots to take a shot at current administration officials rather than former Trump administration officials? And why didn’t Iran hack into the Kamala campaign and then email the stolen files to the Trump-Vance campaign?

Iran isn’t trying to “sow chaos” which is a meaningless buzzword the intel community seem to have come up with to project its own nation building paradigm abroad onto American politics.

The Islamic Republic is out to win. And it defines winning as Trump’s political defeat or death.

America’s leading middle eastern enemy actively interfering in a presidential election ought to be bigger news than it is. The Clinton campaign spun Russia’s awkward efforts to recruit black nationalists into backing its Syria agenda after the election into the great Russiagate hoax complete with British ex-secret agents, micturating hookers in Moscow hotel rooms, secret bank internet connections and a multi-year investigation fronted by a senile former FBI boss.

The revelation that Iran is trying to stop Trump and elect Kamala by any means occasions no more from the White House and the intel community than a reluctant briefing and some boilerplate prose about sowing chaos as if there is no motive or agenda to these activities.

No one has brought ‘Irangate’ into being even though there’s more than enough materials.

After September 11, Joe Biden suggested, “this would be a good time to send, no strings attached, a check for $200 million to Iran.”

Biden urged restoring an American diplomatic presence to Tehran where our diplomats had been held hostage and cutting off Radio Liberty broadcasts undermining the Iranian regime.

Biden’s 2008 presidential campaign was backed by Iran Lobby figures and he believed that Iranian support was so vital to his campaign that he attacked Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama for being insufficiently pro-Iran, and used his vote against designating the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), the key player behind Hamas, Hezbollah and the murder of hundreds of American soldiers, as a terrorist organization to argue that he would make a better president.

For Iran.

After being part of an administration that provided Iran with the massive sanction relief and clearance that enabled it to build a massive missile arsenal and nuclear program, Biden left office and misappropriated classified documents involving Iran that he took home with him.

Biden stayed loyal to the Iran Lobby and it to him. Iranian hackers with the IRGC tried to interfere in the 2020 presidential election to stop Trump and aid Biden.

In the 2020 election, Jamal Abdi, the executive director of National Iranian American Council (NIAC) Action, often described as the Iran Lobby, was exposed as one of Biden’s biggest bundlers, and NIAC claimed its members had run phone banks and donated $385,000 to him.

NIAC Action had endorsed Biden and celebrated the election outcome by declaring that, “our long, national nightmare is almost over. AP has called the race for Joe Biden”.

Iran’s president cheered Biden’s election win by expressing the hope that “the next American administration will surrender to the Iranian nation.” The Islamic terror state leader was not to be disappointed. The Biden-Harris administration offered billions in sanctions relief to Iran while attempting to restore the failed nuclear deal with the terror state. It dropped support for the Saudi campaign against the Houthis in Yemen which allowed the Iran-backed terrorists to arm up and terrorize shipping in the Red Sea leading to 9 months of fighting in what has been described as the “most intense combat since World War II” for the U.S. Navy.

The Biden-Harris administration was filled with Iranian sympathizers and lobby figures, including Rob Malley, Biden’s envoy to Iran, under FBI investigation for mishandling classified information, whose actions were illegally covered up by State Department figures. It even brought in Ariane Tabatabai, an Iranian immigrant who had worked with the Iranian government to advise it and spread its propaganda, before working with Malley on the Iran negotiations, to act as a senior adviser to the Office of the Under Secretary of State for Arms Control, exactly where Tehran would have wanted her, before making her a Pentagon Chief of Staff.

Over the next four years, the Biden-Harris administration gave Iran everything it wanted from endless sanctions relief to a hostage trade that not only freed Iranian agents but allowed them to remain and continue their activities inside the United States.

This year the Biden administration was still at it, warning the British and French not to censure Iran at a vote in the UN’s International Atomic Energy Agency despite its nuclear violations

When the chopper carrying Iran’s previous president crashed, the Biden administration sent its condolences and Deputy UN Ambassador Robert Wood stood for a moment of silence in the memory of the leader of a regime that had recently been responsible for killing U.S. soldiers.

The Biden-Harris administration now not only allowed sanctioned Iranian figures into the country but warned journalists away from filming outside the hotel where the Iranian delegation was staying. What did their cameras catch? The former head of NIAC, the Iran Lobby group linked to the Biden-Harris administration, entering the hotel. Is it any wonder that when Iran hacked the Trump campaign, it sent the materials to Harris-Walz staffers who did not report it to the FBI?

There is no shortage of materials for a theory of ‘Irangate’. The Biden-Harris administration has been even better for Iran that the previous low-water marks set by Carter and Obama.

Iran is not trying to “sow chaos” but to swing a presidential election in favor of its candidate.

The Islamic regime has also had a longtime obsession with Trump ever since he approved the operation that took out the IRGC’s deadly terror boss Qasem Soleimani. Even with Trump out of office, the official website of Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei published a video simulating a drone strike on Trump’s home with the message, “Revenge is Inevitable”

Unlike Russiagate, Irangate is real and has been taking place out in the open for us to see.

An enemy of the United States is doing everything possible to stop a free election from taking place. It already used fake news, hacking and assassination plots to stop Trump.

Those tactics are likely to pick up as Election Day approaches.

Facing defeat in Gaza and Lebanon, Iran is not about to give up. And the most troubling question at the heart of Irangate that needs to be asked is how much support do Iran’s agents have inside this country, and inside the Biden-Harris administration and the intel community.

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLES:

Worried About Kamala’s Views on Israel? You Should Be

US Envoy, UN Mission ‘Leaders’ No-Shows for Netanyahu speech

Thousands of Iraqi Rioters Storming US Embassy in Baghdad

Iranian IRGC Deputy Commander and Other Senior Terrorist Officials Killed in Israeli Airstrike in Lebanon

RELATED VIDEO: Kamala: ‘Abolish the term Radical Islamic terror’

EDITORS NOTE: This Jihad Watch column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Jihad mass murder rewarded: ‘State of Palestine’ takes seat in UN General Assembly

The message to the “Palestinians” is clear: murder more Jews, and you’ll get even more of what you want. The “State of Palestine” is, after all, only a stepping-stone to the total eradication of Israel and a new genocide of the Jews.

“‘State of Palestine’ takes seat in UN General Assembly despite lack of full membership,” Times of Israel, September 11, 2024:

UNITED NATIONS — Palestinians took a seat among member states at the UN General Assembly on Tuesday, a new right accorded to the Palestinian Authority’s delegation despite it not being a full member of the body.

In May, an overwhelming majority of the General Assembly asserted that Palestinians deserved full membership, a move that has been blocked by the United States, which along with Israel says recognition of Palestinian statehood must come through a peace agreement.

The General Assembly granted the delegation certain new rights in a resolution, which still excludes it from being able to vote or be a member of the Security Council.

Starting with the 79th General Assembly session, which began Tuesday, the Palestinians can submit proposals and amendments, and sit among member states.

The Palestinian Authority’s envoy to the United Nations, Riyad Mansour, took his place on Tuesday afternoon at a table marked “State of Palestine” between Sri Lanka and Sudan.

“This is not merely a procedural matter. This is a historic moment for us,” said Egyptian Ambassador Osama Mahmoud Abdelkhalek Mahmoud….

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLES:

Teachers’ Union In Great Britain Wants an End to Support For ‘Apartheid’ Israel

The BBC’s Biased Coverage of Israel

‘Legacy of a Stateswoman’: Dianne Feinstein’s Fantastic Wealth on Display at Auction

RELATED VIDEO:  Biden Regime Sent $10 Billion to Iran After Oct. 7

EDITORS NOTE: This Jihad Watch column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

The Murdered Hostages and the Western Cheerleaders For Hamas

As the six murdered hostages are being buried in Israel, Brendan O’Neill has some furious words for Western antisemites who have been cheerleading their murderers in Hamas. He rounds on them here: “The deaths of these hostages shame the Western conscience,” by Brendan O’Neill, Spiked, September 1, 2024:

…Now this is resistance. Unprepared, unarmed, these six young people did what they could to resist the anti-Semitic savagery of the invading army from Gaza. They repelled its grenades, rescued some of its intended targets, tended to the victims of its racist sadism. They didn’t ask for war, they didn’t expect war, they didn’t deserve war. But when it came, brutishly intruding on their kibbutzim and parties, they took action that helped to minimize the Jewish people’s suffering. It is a testament to Western radicals’ swirling moral disarray and their detachment from civilisational values that they referred to the racist invaders of Israel as the ‘resistance’, and the Jewish heroes who fought back as ‘colonizers’.

But this goes beyond foolish ‘left’ apologism for Hamas. It goes beyond excuse-making for terror. There is a case to be made that the self-styled progressive conscience of the West has not been complacent in the face of Hamas’s barbarism, but complicit. Many in the West played an active role in justifying the kidnapping of people like Goldberg-Polin, Lobanov, Gat, Sarusi, Yerushalmi and Danino. They actively bolstered the kidnappers’ claims to be resistance fighters, and they actively prevented the raising of awareness of the kidnap victims, particularly through the destruction of posters featuring their faces. They were more than bystanders to a pogrom – they were unpaid PR men for the pogromists….
Kamala Harris has questions to answer here. She’s issued a welcome, angry statement on the slaughter of the six hostages, describing it as ‘an outrage’. And yet for months she sternly instructed Israel not to launch a ‘major military operation’ in Rafah. There will be ‘consequences’, she warned. It is now known that in Rafah, an American citizen was being held captive. Now killed. Is this the first time in history an American leader warned of ‘consequences’ over the rescue of an American rather than over the kidnap of an American? As National Review summarises it, ‘Kamala Harris warned Israel of “consequences” if it invaded Rafah, where Hamas just murdered an American hostage’.

Here’s the only question that matters right now: are Jewish lives worth fighting for? Some of us think they are. Others, from the top of politics to the frenzied anti-Semites on the streets, seem to think otherwise. It is tempting to see the West’s moral disorder over Israel-Hamas as a consequence of that old problem, ‘the sleep of reason’, the sleep of our conscience. But in truth, the West’s conscience has been wide awake, and excitable, and noisy, and it has sided not with kidnapped Jews, but with their kidnappers. Let us hope the memory of the six slain will be a blessing – and let us hope their deaths will be a lesson for a West that seems utterly morally lost.

Brendan O’Neill is enraged at the “morally lost” in the West who have chosen to sympathize not with the six murdered Israelis, but with the Hamas killers who murdered them, just as for the last eleven months of the war in Gaza, so many in the increasingly antisemitic West have expressed their support not for the embattled Jewish state, but for those who would, if they could, wipe that state off the face of the earth. His savage indignation is exactly what is called for.

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLES:

NYC: Muslim Charged in Mass Shooting Plot at Jewish Center to “Kill as Many Jewish People as Possible” Linked to Islamic State on Anniversary of October 7th

The Only People Starving in Gaza Were the Jewish Hostages

Israel: ‘Palestinian’ car bomb was intended for jihad attack on school bus

Hamas-linked CAIR top dog: ‘We can have in ten years, at least 40-50 members of the U.S. Congress’

London Provides New Bus Service For Jews

German: Machete-wielding Muslim migrant screaming ‘Allahu akbar’ threatens to murder cops at police station

In Judea and Samaria, UNRWA teaches ‘Palestinian’ kids to kill Jews

RELATED VIDEO: This Week In Jihad with David Wood and Robert Spencer (Las Vegas Jihad Edition)

EDIOTR NOTE: This Jihad Watch column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Harris’ head of Arab-American outreach: ‘Zionists’ are ‘controlling a lot’ of American politics

The Democrat party has normalized and mainstreamed hatred of Jews, while claiming to stand against antisemitism from the “far right.”

“Kamala Harris’s New Arab Outreach Director Said ‘Zionists’ Are ‘Controlling’ American Politics,” by Adam Kredo, Washington Free Beacon, August 29, 2024:

Kamala Harris’s newly appointed head of Arab-American outreach once accused Zionists of “controlling” American politics, echoing an anti-Semitic trope that suggests Jews nefariously manipulate global affairs.

“The Zionists have a strong voice in American politics,” Brenda Abdelall, an Egyptian-American lawyer and former Department of Homeland Security official, said in a 2002 interview with the New York Sun while attending the American Muslim Council’s annual convention. “I would say they’re controlling a lot of it.”

Abdelall, whom Harris tapped earlier this week to help galvanize Arab voters, made the remarks after a speaker at the event, anti-Israel professor Jamil Fayez, said that “Zionists are destroying America.” Responding to his remarks, Abdelall said that while “‘destroying’ is a harsh word,” supporters of the Jewish state do control American politics.

The American Muslim Council’s 2002 confab also provided attendees with a chance to meet anti-Semitic former congresswoman Cynthia McKinney (D., Ga.), who famously blamed Jews for the 9/11 terror attack and attended a 2009 Holocaust-denial gathering in London. Her father similarly blamed Jews when she lost her congressional seat shortly after the 2002 conference. “Jews have bought everybody. Jews. J-E-W-S,” he said.

Abdelall’s appointment comes as Harris works to appease members of her party’s liberal flank who want her to more aggressively confront the Jewish state and undermine its war on Hamas, including by cutting off arms sales. Harris has praised pro-Hamas campus protesters as “showing exactly what the human emotion should be, as a response to Gaza.” In March, she accused Israel of stoking “humanitarian catastrophe.”

Abdelall joins several other Harris campaign advisers who have a history of pressuring Israel and advocating increased relations with Iran. They include Harris’s national security adviser, Phil Gordon, who is the subject of a congressional probe into his ties to a member of an Iranian government influence network. Ilan Goldenberg, Harris’s liaison to the Jewish community, has faced scrutiny for his ties to the anti-Israel group J Street, as well as championing closer ties to Tehran….

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLES:

The Media’s Lies About ‘Settler Violence’

Austria: Muslims who plotted jihad massacres at Taylor Swift concerts wanted to kill ‘tens of thousands’

IDF Attempt to Persuade Gazans to Move Out of Harm’s Way is Proof of ‘Genocide’

Glazov Gang: Zeek Arkham on ‘My Mom Made Sure We Got to School Every Day – No Excuses’

Taliban calls on UN and others who criticized morality law to ‘refrain from criticisms that insult Islamic values’

RELATED VIDEOS:

This Week In Jihad with David Wood and Robert Spencer (Festival of Diversity Edition)

Gold Star family members blamed Harris for the deaths of their loved ones

EDITORS NOTE: This Jihad Watch column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Arab-Americans Denounce Black Americans For Supporting Kamala

Arab-Americans on social media have been denouncing black Americans for supporting Kamala Harris. Apparently those Arab-Americans don’t like Kamala because she is not sufficiently pro-Hamas. And they believe that black Americans are not entitled to exercise agency, but must follow the diktat of the superior Arabs. In response, black Americans have brought up that little matter of the Arab enslavement of black Africans that claimed many more victims than the Atlantic slave trade. These black Americans are discovering what any black African could tell them: the Arabs are the worst anti-black racists in the world. More on this Arab-Black war of words can be found here: “‘Token Ethnic President’: Pro-Hamas Crowd Launches Racist Verbal Assault on Black Americans Over Harris Support,” by Dion J. Pierre, Algemeiner, August 16, 2024:

Anti-Zionist activists recently launched a barrage of racist attacks against African Americans on social media, triggering an exchange of insults as well as arguments over the Arab world’s role in enslaving Black Africans.

“Black people also wear a uniform and get on a plane and come to our countries and kill us!” one influencer said in a compilation of TikTok posts shared by pro-Israel activist Hen Mazzig. “You vote the same f—king melanated [sic] f—king people to government that sign papers to kill us. I don’t want to hear it anymore!”

Those “black people” who “wear a uniform” refers primarily no doubt, to Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin, who is black, and who has visited our ally Israel to signal American support in its war in Gaza. However, I don’t recall him “signing papers to kill” Palestinians.

“Keep Palestinians names out of your f—king mouths when you’re trying to defend your decision for voting for Kamala,” another said, referring to Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris, who is Black.

My, how coarse and dismissive these Arab-Americans can be, how dripping with contempt for black Americans who choose to support Kamala Harris.

TikTok user “Dan1ahan” charged that Black Americans “switched up 180 on Palestinians and people who are Palestinian activists the second we have a Black woman running for office,” describing the alleged betrayal as “disgusting.” Touching on the upcoming US presidential election, one Arab woman said all Black people want is a “token ethnic president” in office.

Black TikTok influencers descended on the platform in droves to denounce the comments, with several announcing that they intended not only to remove Gaza-related content from their profiles but also to cease engaging in anti-Zionist activity entirely. The conversation escalated in subsequent posts, touching on the continuance of Black slavery in the Arab world and what a young woman called “voracious racism” against African Americans….

The unpleasant truth comes out: slavery was abolished very late in Arab countries. It was officially abolished in Saudi Arabia and Yemen in 1962, in Oman in 1970, and in Mauritania in 1981, and only under terrific Western pressure. There was never internal pressure to outlaw slavery in Muslim lands because Muhammad himself, the Perfect Man and Model of Conduct, bought, sold, and traded slaves. That is why there never was a Muslim William Wilberforce. What’s more, black Africans are still enslaved today by Arabs in Mauritania (over 870,000), Mali (200,000) , and Niger (130,000). Black Africans who have in the last few years gone to Libya, hoping to make it to Europe by boat, when they are unable to pay the smugglers, have found themselves being sold bat auction in nine Libyan cities. The largest slave auction is in Tripoli.

“Zionist imperial puppet,” “imperial and blackface,” and “from the river to the sea, Palestine will be free” were among the chants yelled by members of the Student Coalition for Palestine (GWSCP) outside the building — a clamoring which could be heard throughout the Elliot School. Thomas-Greenfield was at GWU to speak at an event held to encourage Black youth to pursue careers in foreign affairs. GWSCP protested her appearance because she had vetoed multiple UN Security Council resolutions calling for a ceasefire in Gaza, where Israel has been waging a military campaign against Hamas following the terrorist group’s Oct. 7 massacre of Israeli civilians.

In a pamphlet distributed to everyone who showed up to the event, the students accused Greenfield of being a “puppet,” alluding to the fact that she is a Black woman holding a distinguished presidential appointment. GWSCP seemed to suggest that the color of Greenfield’s skin excluded the possibility that she is an agent of her own destiny.

“For as long as we have been here, we have resisted these systems of oppression, but the United States of Amerikkka [sic] has always used Black bodies as puppets to carry out repression and dissent,” the pamphlet said. It also compared Greenfield to Black enslaved persons who had been assigned, against their will, to work as overseers of other enslaved persons on cotton plantations….

These Arab-Americans drip contempt of Linda Greenfield, calling her a “puppet”— presumably of the white establishment or perhaps, they are thinking, of the “Zionists” who they insist call the shots in Washington.

Why do these Arab-Americans and their supporters harass this black woman, screaming at her to resign, clapping in her face to intimidate her? Could they not have treated her with respect? What was her offense? She had invited the American ambassador to the UN to speak.

That same month, at Vanderbilt University in Tennessee, anti-Zionists occupying an administrative building verbally abused a Black officer, whom they accused of betraying his racial identity. “Shame on you!” they shouted at him. Someone else said, “You are Black in America, and you’re not standing with the marginalized people of the world. What does that make you?”

How was that black officer at Vanderbilt “betraying his racial identity”? By not complying with what Arab-Americans wanted, which was for him to stand aside and let them continue to occupy an administrative building. Blacks must always do what Arab-Americans demand.

This war on social media between black Americans and the Arab-Americans who denounce blacks for supporting Kamala Harris has just begun. It can only widen and deepen, as more people on both sides join in the furious exchanges. Here’s hoping that black Americans, exposed to the contempt for them expressed by Arab-Americans, will end their support for the Palestinians and stick to their own issues. They might even reconsider the more than a century of unwavering Jewish support for civil rights, and renew those old alliances.

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLES:

Should We Just Leave Hunter Biden Alone?

Glazov Gang: Kamala Thinks 2Pac is Still Alive

India: US-made M4 rifles used by the Taliban or abandoned by US soldiers recovered during anti-terror ops

Afghanistan: Taliban kills female YouTuber, then invents a story to cover up the murder

RELATED VIDEO: Deep State Planning To Assassinate Trump And Frame Iran, Triggering World War 3

EDITORS NOTE: This Jihad Watch column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

By Ignoring the Bidenites’ Advice, the Israelis Managed to Eliminate Many Hamas Jihadis

The New York Times insists that if Israel rejects the Bidenites’ advice to pull out of Gaza, it does so at its peril: “NYT admits US officials were wrong about the IDF in October, and wrong about Rafah, but thinks they are right now,” Elder of Ziyon, August 15, 2024:

So these officials were completely wrong in October. They were also wrong about Israel’s taking Rafah, which they now admit is exactly what destroyed Hamas’ supply lines from Egypt – and cost far fewer casualties thna they had confidently predicted.

By ignoring warnings from the Americans not to seize Rafah because of worries over civilian casualties, the IDF managed to kill a great many terrorists who had fled to the southernmost city in the Strip both from Gaza City and from Khan Yunis. Its control of Rafah has also made it easier for the IDF to control the Kerem Shalom crossing and to seize the Philadelphi Corridor, control of which has allowed the IDF to locate and destroy many tunnels bringing smuggled weapons from Egypt into Gaza.

But the US wants to send a message to Israel, and the New York Times is more than happy to do their bidding:

William J. Burns, the C.I.A. director, is due in Qatar on Thursday. Brett McGurk, President Biden’s Middle East coordinator, has headed to Egypt and Qatar. Amos Hochstein, a senior White House adviser, landed in Lebanon. One of the messages the officials are expected to deliver is that there is little more Israel can accomplish against Hamas.

Which is the entire point. This article isn’t reporting; it is a mouthpiece for Biden administration talking points.

If you look at what Israel has actually been doing, you would see that its success is not diminishing, but increasing. As it gathers more intelligence from captured terrorists and taking materials it discovers, it is getting more and more accurate than when it started….

Consistently, Israel has gotten better and better at targeting the terrorists. The entire reason that the Palestinians made up huge casualty lies about the airstrike on the Al Taabin school is becase [sic] it was a triumph of intelligence, taking out over 30 terrorists gathered in the mosque – a proportional attack by any definition of the term under international law….

In its latest statement on the airstrike, the IDF has now identified by name 38 Hamas terrorists killed at the command-and-control center functioning inside the Al Tabin school. That means in that operation at most 55 civilians were killed, and the ratio of civilian-to-combatant deaths was 55:36, or 1:5:1, an unheard-of ratio in the annals of warfare.

Many Hamas commanders, and leaders of its “political” wing, too, are being systematically eliminated by the IDF. Ismail Haniyeh, head of Hamas’ “political wing,” was recently blown up in at a Tehran guesthouse. Hamas’ military commander in Gaza, Muhammad Deif, was killed on July 13. A deputy commander of the Al-Qassam Brigades, Marwan Issa, was killed in March. And dozens of other high-ranking Hamas combatants have also been killed, as the IDF continues its relentless campaign of targeted assassinations.

Those in Washington who predicted last October that an Israeli invasion of Gaza to destroy Hamas would not succeed were proven wrong. Those who then insisted that the IDF should refrain from entering Rafah because it could not possibly evacuate more than a handful of its estimated one million inhabitants were proven wrong again. In May, the IDF managed in a matter of weeks to move 950,000 people out of the city.

Now the Bidenites are urging Israel to end its war in Gaza because, they claim, there is not much more of Hamas to destroy, and the IDF needs to avoid further civilian casualties. Neither is correct. Though the IDF has had a stunning success in dismantling Hamas, killing at least 17,000 of its combatants, there remain roughly the same number who, if not seriously wounded, are still capable of fighting, and they need to be smashed as a fighting force even if they cannot be entirely eliminated. As for civilian casualties, in the last three months Hamas has continued to claim roughly 38,000-39,000 casualties, as usual without distinguishing between civilians and Hamas operatives. The IDF has over the past nine months honed its ability to minimize civilian casualties, having ever greater success in warning people away from places about to be targeted, by making greater use of precision weapons, and by relying less on airstrikes and more on ground troops in its operations.

When Hamas recognizes reality, and agrees to the deal that Israel now is willing to accept, this war in Gaza will stop, and the IDF can turn its full attention to much more threatening enemies — Hezbollah and its puppet-master Iran. The IDF high command has not forgotten the Talmudic injunction: “If someone comes to kill you, rise up and kill him first.”

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLE: Kamala’s Jewish Liaison: Biden Pretended to Support Israel Only to Stab it in the Back

RELATED VIDEO: This Week In Jihad with David Wood and Robert Spencer (Who The F*** Is Allah Edition)

EDITORS NOTE: This Jihad Watch column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Iran is Helping the Kamala Campaign

The Mullahs create pro-Kamala site, hack Trump accounts, leak materials to media.

With headlines like “Harris Surges Ahead: A New Era of Democratic Enthusiasm and Opportunity” and “Former Friend Exposes JD Vance’s Radical Transformation: A Study in Political Opportunism”, you might mistake NioThinker for another mainstream media outlet.

Only the occasional odd word choice and convoluted bit of grammar hints that the digital media site flowing with enthusiasm for Kamala and contempt for Trump isn’t really American.

Classified as part of Iran’s ‘Storm-2035’ network: NioThinker is an enemy operation.

Why is an Islamic terrorist state spending its time putting up articles like “Trump Silent After Fox News Poll Favors Harris in Swing States” and “Pelosi Can’t Stop Laughing At Trump’s Choice’ Of J.D. Vance For VP”. Like everything else Iran does, it’s a strategic choice.

Iran has been boosting Biden-Harris while doing everything possible to undermine Trump.

Last month, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI), the FBI and the Department of Homeland Security, held a briefing for the media during which “officials alluded to but stopped short of directly stating Tehran’s opposition to Trump” while falsely claiming that the “U.S. government has not detected any foreign hacking, interference or tampering with election machines and websites”. The month before, an Iranian team had compromised a user account of a “county-level government in a swing state.”

And, much more seriously, the Microsoft Threat Analysis Center (MTAC) revealed that “a group run by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) intelligence unit—sent a spear-phishing email to a high-ranking official of a presidential campaign from a compromised email account of a former senior advisor.”

The campaign was the Trump campaign.

The IRGC, the hub of Iran’s Islamic terrorist operations, stole the vetting file for J.D. Vance and began contacting media outlets. The Iranians offered Politico a “variety of documents from [Trump’s] legal and court documents to internal campaign discussions.” An agent told the Washington Post to, “consider me as an anonymous resource who has access to djtfp24 campaign.”

Around the same time that Iran’s intelligence operatives were trying to help the Biden-Kamala campaign, Iran was also plotting an even more direct intervention in the presidential election.

In late June, federal law enforcement and intelligence agencies learned of a plot by Iran to allegedly assassinate former President Trump. Earlier this month, Asif Merchant, a Pakistani Muslim, was charged with a plot to “recruit individuals to carry out his plot to assassinate U.S. government officials.” Acting on behalf of Iran, Merchant met in New York and discussed plans to kill those who are hurting the “Muslim world.”

The Muslim agent claimed that “there would be ‘security all around’ the person” and suggested using a political protest as a cover for the killing. The Iranian plan would have moved forward in September putting it on track for a pre-election assassination.

But if Iran is still struggling to carry out a successful assassination, its character assassinations are improving. From launching a digital media site as the “go-to destination for insightful, progressive news” to hacking the Trump campaign and feeding the results to the media, Iran has come to understand that its best odds of stopping Trump is by allying with the Left.

From Hamas to Qatar, Iran’s allies have effectively made our media their own.

Politico and other media outlets did not report on their contacts with the Iranian regime agents who warned the media outlet, “Don’t be curious about where I got them from. Any answer to this question, will compromise me and also legally restricts you from publishing them.”

Did the media make use of any material from the vetting file in the hit pieces on Vance?

Politico did not clearly rule that out. Neither did any other major media outlet. It’s not clear if any of the Iranian haul of stolen documents has been appearing in media stories already.

CNN told employees not to “download or otherwise try to access any hacked material until you’ve been in touch with your manager, S&P, legal and our security teams”. Rather than rule out using the material, CNN wanted it to go through security and legal clearance.

Former BuzzFeed editor Ben Smith, who had made the decision to publish the Clinton campaign’s faked Steele dossier (and last year wrote ‘I Would Publish the Steele Dossier Again’), argued that ” journalists can/should report seriously on real documents, but should also to foreground the hackers’ motives.” Smith, at least, is willing to use the Iranian documents.

And what are Iran’s motives?

According to the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI), Iran is targeting Trump to “avoid an outcome they perceive would increase tensions with the United States.” This is as positive a way as possible of saying that an enemy nation is intervening in the presidential election to harm the candidate it opposes and to aid the campaign of the candidate it supports.

And it’s not the first time that Iran has interfered in presidential elections to stop Trump.

During the 2020 election, Iranian hackers had tried to pass themselves off as members of the Proud Boys in a false flag operation designed to increase Democrat turnout and generate an election backlash to President Trump. One example of the Iranian campaign involved sending emails to “tens of thousands of registered voters” that threatened them “with physical injury if they did not change their party affiliation and vote for President Trump.” In a clear statement of preference, the National Iranian American Council (NIAC), often described as the Iran Lobby, had endorsed Biden, run phone banks for him and donated money to his campaign.

The two track Iranian plan to either kill or defeat Trump is everything that the media falsely claimed about Russia and the 2016 election. Except this time it’s real and they are on board.

Media outlets spent months keeping quiet about the Iranian hack. If they contacted the FBI or the Trump campaign, it has not been mentioned in their stories. And if they refused to use the materials handed to them by enemy agents, that too is something they failed to make clear.

The same media that blamed foreign interference for the 2016 election has become an agent of foreign interference in the 2024 election. Iran has chosen its allies and its enemies.

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLES:

U.S. Intelligence Community Now Prioritizes ‘Hurt Feelings’ Over Counterterrorism

Introducing Mark Pocan, A New Member of the Squad

Walz’s Minnesota administration gave $2,000,000 to Muslim group fundraising for al Qaeda-linked charity

Biden Regime Demands Jews Stop Praying at Site of Temple

Unburdened

EDITORS NOTE: This Jihad Watch column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Kamala Harris Denounces IDF Attack on Hamas Command-and-Control Center

On August 10, the IDF fired three precision missiles at one part of the Al-Tabeen school in Gaza that was being used as a command-and-control center by Hamas. The IDF had a list with the names of 19 Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad members that it knew were at the center and were killed in the attack. Among those 19 was the military commander of Hamas’ central camps in Gaza. At once, Hamas began issuing its claims as to casualties. First, it did not admit that any part of the school had a military use. It claimed that several of the 19 Hamas combatants the IDF said it had killed at the school had, in fact, been killed weeks before at other locations. Second, Hamas gave out figures to the media that as the day passed were constantly increased without explanation. Hamas said that 50 people had been killed, then 70, then 80, then it stopped at 93.

WATCH: IDF statement regarding the strike on the Al-Taba’een School building in Gaza City

These are the figures, remember, put out by Hamas, which has a long record of lying about civilian casualties. Remember the claim that the IDF had killed “500 civilians” in what Hamas called the “massacre at Jenin”? It turned out that not 500, but 52 people had been killed in Jenin, and at least 45 of them were revealed to be Hamas combatants, not civilians. Then there was Hamas’ report about an Israeli airstrike on the Al-Ahli Hospital in Gaza. That turned out to be not an Israeli airstrike, but a Palestinian Islamic Jihad missile launched toward Israel, that had misfired and fell to earth inside Gaza, not on the hospital itself, but on a parking lot next to the hospital, killing not 500 people, but 50.

Hamas has a long history of exaggerating civilian casualties, yet when it claimed 50, then 70, then 93 casualties from the IDF’s latest attack on a Hamas command-and-control center, the world accepted these figures without the slightest hesitation, despite Hamas’ long record of exaggerating civilian deaths. The IDF protested that the kind of precision munitions it had used made it extremely unlikely that so many people had been killed. Furthermore, the IDF released before-and-after photos showing that only a small part of the school compound that was being used as a mosque had been hit. The photographs showed that only that area of the prayer hall where men — not women and children — could congregate had been hit.

But the world’s media, and many of its political leaders, from Kamala Harris (as Jihad Watch initially reported here) to Emmanuel Macron to the EU’s Josep Borell, were not about to listen to the IDF’s careful explanation of why the “school” — or one small part of it — was targeted. They didn’t want to hear the IDF’s explanation of what precision munitions were used in the attack, of such small size that they could not possibly have killed as many people as Hamas claims. They paid no attention to the photographic evidence released by the IDF that showed that only one small part of the makeshift mosque in the school compound had been hit. Their minds were made up to engage yet again in Israel-bashing; don’t confuse them with facts.

But let’s for the sake of argument make the worst possible case against the IDF. Let’s assume that there were only 19 casualties from the ranks of Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad — the ones whose names and photos were released by the IDF. And then, despite the fact that we have no reason to believe Hamas’ figures, given its record of exaggeration, let’s accept the terror group’s figure of a total of 93 people who died at the school compound. Of those 93, at least 19 were known Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad combatants. That leaves 74 dead whom Hamas wants the world to believe, without any evidence, were all civilians, and chiefly “women and children” — even though the IDF has released photographic proof that the part of the prayer hall that was hit was limited to adult males. The civilian-to-combatant ratio would then be 74-to-19, or slightly less than 4:1.

Is that, as Kamala Harris insists, “far too many” civilian casualties? Is she right to demand that such attacks “must stop”? The 4:1 civilian-to-combatant ratio is better than that achieved by the Americans in any war except that in Iraq, where a 3:1 ratio was attained. And it is far better than the 9:1 civilian-to-combatant ratio that the UN itself says is the average ratio attained, on average, in all the wars fought since 1945. So it is wrong to describe the latest attack as causing a “disproportionate” number of civilian casualties.

And again, we must remind ourselves that among those killed there may well have been many more Hamas and PIJ combatants than the nineteen Israel has positively identified. Similarly, the figure of 93 deaths reported by Hamas has not been proved, and if the past is any guide, Hamas is certain to be greatly exaggerating that figure, for the obvious purpose of whipping up an international condemnation of the IDF. It seems to have worked. Israel is indeed being denounced for these “93 deaths of mostly women and children.” But that is no reason for the rest of us to accept Hamas’ claims, or to refuse to listen to the IDF’s meticulous explanation of the target chosen (“a command-and-control center”), the precision weapons used to cause the least collateral damage, and the likely number of casualties, both civilians and combatants, at the school compound being used by Hamas as a military base.

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLES:

Killing of Hamas top dog highlights question for US: Who’s in charge?

Leftist voters demand Harris force Israel to allow Hamas to survive, or she won’t get their votes

Hamas murders Israeli hostage, injures two others

RELATED VIDEO: JCPA Wartime Briefing: How Iran Sees Israel & US the latest events in the Middle East

EDITORS NOTE: This Jihad Watch column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Biden regime names Mohamed Elsanousi of Hamas-linked ISNA to US Commission on International Religious Freedom

“The Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) was established in July 1981 by U.S-based members of the Muslim Brotherhood with a background as leaders of the Muslim Students Association (MSA). As author and terrorism expert Steven Emerson puts it, ISNA “grew out of the Muslim Students Association, which also was founded by Brotherhood members.” Indeed, Muslim Brothers would dominate ISNA’s leadership throughout the Society’s early years. Striving “to advance the cause of Islam and serve Muslims in North America so as to enable them to adopt Islam as a complete way of life,” ISNA was highly dependent upon Saudi funding during its early years.” — from Discover the Networks

From the Investigative Project on Terrorism:

In its latest filing before the federal district court in Dallas on behalf of the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) and its affiliate organization, the North American Islamic Trust (NAIT) in the Hamas-terrorism financing case, the ACLU has made a noteworthy admission.

Rather than deny that there is copious evidence tying ISNA and NAIT to Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood, the brief argues that such evidence is merely dated. In a curious footnote on page 7, the reply states:

Assuming the authenticity of documents’ dates, the most recent documents to mention either ISNA or NAIT are dated 1991, Gov. Exhs. 3-3 and 3-85, but the majority of the documents are older. Almost all of the numerous exhibits that purport to show financial transactions and that contain any mention of ISNA or NAIT are dated 1988 and 1989 (there are two dated 1990), almost a decade before the majority of the overt acts the government alleges in support of its conspiracy charges against the HLF defendants.

So ISNA and NAIT are not saying that the documents tying their organizations to Hamas are “inauthentic,” but that the problem with the evidence is just that it is old. Then, even more curiously, the reply goes on to argue something that the government has not even alleged:

Even if the “evidence” provided some basis for alleging criminality against petitioners, the government’s discussion of it shows the government utterly fails to grasp the singular weight and consequence that an official accusation of criminal conduct carries in our criminal justice system and in our society.

But, of course, the government has not charged ISNA or NAIT with criminal conduct, or the two groups would be indicted in their own right, rather than un-indicted co-conspirators who worked with the Holy Land for Relief and Development (HLF), the defendant and alleged Hamas-front. The reply brief then, as Shakespeare might write, “doth protest too much.”

“Biden’s Muslim Brotherhood-connected Religious Freedom Commissioner,” by Ben Poser, JNS, August 6, 2024:

The Biden administration recently announced its appointment of Mohamed Elsanousi, director of the Network for Religious and Traditional Peacemakers, to the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom.

The White House may not know that judging by his actions instead of his words, Elsanousi is an advocate for neither peacemaking nor religious freedom.

The Sudanese-born Elsanousi spent 12 years as director of community outreach and interfaith relations for the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA), a long-standing Muslim Brotherhood front group. He has hardly repudiated this connection, displaying it as a credential on his official Peacemakers network bio. His bio also boasts of a bachelor’s degree in “Sharia and Law” from the International Islamic University in Pakistan.

ISNA is not a minor Brotherhood operation. It is cited as the very first on a list of 29 organizations named in the Brotherhood’s “Explanatory Memorandum” outlining its plans for the future.

The 1991 manifesto, discovered by an FBI search warrant in 2004, describes such organizations as part of “a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and ‘sabotaging’ its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God’s religion is made victorious over all other religions.”

Founded in 1981, ISNA was directly connected to the infamous Holy Land Foundation, shut down in 2007 and deemed at trial to be the Brotherhood’s foremost American-based funder of Hamas—an outgrowth of the Brotherhood itself.

A close ally of ISNA is the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), exposed in the same trial as another prominent Hamas money-laundering enterprise. CAIR’s leader, Nihad Awad, has openly said: “I am in support of the Hamas movement.”

Not surprisingly, despite its use of humane buzzwords and avoidance of hateful language, Islamic institutions tied to ISNA have nurtured jihad against Americans.

One example is the Islamic Society of Boston, founded the same year as ISNA by convicted terrorist conspirator Abdurahman Alamoudi with the late Muslim Brotherhood “spiritual leader” Yusuf al-Qaradhawi as a board member. When the ISB began construction on its “sister” mega-mosque, the Islamic Society of Boston Cultural Center, its 2003 tax exemption filing named ISNA as its parent organization.

Since then, both the ISB and ISBCC have produced 14 (known) associates, former members and students who are at large, dead, in prison or have been deported for involvement in terrorism….

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLES:

Washington state imam: ‘ Oh Allah, annihilate the plundering Zionists. Oh Allah, do not spare a single one.’

Gazans Who Plead ‘Save Us From Hamas’

Journalists Who Are Jihad Terror Group Supporters

“Hamas is coming”? No, Hamas is here

EDITORS NOTE: This Jihad Watch column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Kamala’s Counsel Defended Hamas Supporters Harassing Jewish Students

Meet one of Kamala’s top lawyers: an Afghan immigrant who protected terrorists.

After 9/11, Nasrina Bargzie, an Afghan Muslim immigrant, was interviewed by law enforcement over troubling comments on the War on Terror reported by her friends.

Today she’s the Deputy Counsel to Vice President Kamala Harris.

After coming to America from a wealthy family in Kandahar, later a stronghold of the Taliban and Al Qaeda, Nasrina Bargzie was raised in Concord, CA, one of the state’s hubs for Afghan migrants, and quickly got involved in anti-American and pro-terrorist activism.

In 2001, while attending college, she was interrogated by the FBI about comments she had made to her friends. It’s unknown what she said, but it was enough to scare her friends, in one of the most liberal parts of the country, to apparently report her to law enforcement.

Next year, she wrongly received a law school scholarship intended for women who had suffered persecution under the Taliban even though she had left long before they came to power.

“I would like to do something that would affect Afghanistan,” Nasrina told a local paper.

Berkeley Law School was a hub of anti-American and anti-Israel activities and by the time she graduated, Nasrina was prepared to embark on her career of attacking both countries.

She became a legal fellow at the ACLU and joined its lawfare machine to dismantle our national security defenses against Islamic terrorism. In 2008, she posted about “wearing orange” at the Today Show in solidarity with the Al Qaeda, Taliban and other terrorists being held at Gitmo.

Nasrina also complained that “murder charges” had yet to be filed against the heroic Marines who bravely fought for their lives against terrorists in the streets of Haditha during the Iraq War.

In 2011 she joined the Asian Law Caucus and went to war against Jewish students facing antisemitic harassment. In 2010, Jessica Felber, a Jewish student, had been assaulted by a leader of the Students for Justice in Palestine campus hate group, and filed suit against UC Berkeley for tolerating an atmosphere of hate by activists linked to terrorist organizations. .

Nasrina Bargzie accused Jewish students and organizations of “organized legal bullying” for suing universities. She ridiculed the idea that calling for the destruction of Israel was “threatening” and co-signed a petition claiming that the lawsuit by Jewish students was “threatening” the speech of Berkeley Students for Justice in Palestine and the Berkeley Muslim Students Association.

Jewish students, she argued, were the “aggressors” and rejected the idea that there was anything “anti-Semitic” about the campus hate groups and their ties to Islamic terrorism.

Nasrina Bargzie was so desperate that she presented a request to the UN Human Rights Commission, a group often stocked with Islamic terrorist states, to intervene and stop the Department of Education from investigating “allegations of anti-Semitism on several campuses”.

The appeal to the UN was made on behalf of her Asian Law Caucus, CAIR, a group with a long history of supporting Hamas and other Islamic terrorist groups, the National Lawyers Guild, a group with a Communist origin which has been complicit in antisemitic violence, and American Muslims for Palestine which has been sued over accusations of its ties to Hamas.

Hatem Bazian, the co-founder of Students for Justice in Palestine and the godfather of campus antisemitism, would later thank Nasrina and others, for “being constantly engaged in everything related to Palestine”. Alongside her was Zahra Billoo, the local head of CAIR, with whom Nasrina Bargzie had co-signed the letter, who would defend Hezbollah and Hamas.

Nasrina would work together with Biloo and CAIR, whose leader praised the Oct 7 attacks, on their next major project. While Nasrina had claimed that the antisemitic harassment of Jews on campuses was just “freedom of expression”, when ads against Islamic terrorism were taken out on San Francisco buses, Nasrina and CAIR rallied to fight against freedom of expression.

After the American Freedom Defense Initiative (AFDI) took out ads addressing the roots of Islamic terror, Nasrina Bargzie claimed that “the ads are offensive and terrible” and admitted that “people just started calling and texting me… ‘What are we gonna do about this?’”

CAIR and Bargzie convinced local Democrats, including DA George Gascon, to condemn the ads which called for support for Israel and spoke out against Islamic terrorism.

Fresh from that victory, Bargzie and CAIR worked to protect Muslims accused of terrorism by restricting the police department’s relationship with the FBI. It was then that Bargzie revealed that she had been interrogated by the FBI and “was asked by the agent about her family history and background.” Information about those questions and history has not been forthcoming.

Members of the Bargzie family have told different stories about why they came to America, after traveling from Afghanistan to Pakistan. According to a Glamour magazine profile of Kamala’s staffers, “my father and uncle were prisoners of war who disappeared.”, and she told the San Diego Union Tribune that he was “executed.” However according to her younger sister Humah, also an activist and a lawyer,  “He said ‘I’ll see you tomorrow’ when he left the house, but he never came back.” His disappearance, she told another magazine, “for the most part, remains a mystery.” Did Nasrina lie about what happened to her father? And did her family?

What happened to Abdul-Khaliq Bargzie, a wealthy landowner from Kandahar, remains a mystery, but he may have been aligned with the Jihadist Islamist Mujahideen. Whatever the truth may be, Nasrina blamed the Communists rather than Islamists for his disappearance, and this may have strongly affected her activism for Islamist terrorists and terrorist supporters.

Despite having grown up in America, Nasrina Bargzie maintained close ties with her homeland, serving as president of the Afghan-American Bar Association, along with other Afghan groups, donating money back to her country and writing of her love for the ‘Pashto’ language.

By 2019,  she was described as representing “seventeen different Afghan human rights organizations.” Despite that, or perhaps because of it, she joined the Biden-Harris team, vetting incoming hires. And then she entered an administration already full of staffers with foreign allegiances, ties to foreign governments and even terrorist sympathizers.

In 2021, Nasrina became Kamala’s Deputy Counsel and then in 2022, as many members of the vice presidential team fled, she rose to the position of Deputy Counsel. She’s been named one of the “fabulous four”: the four employees most loyal to Kamala who stayed on. And as a corollary, she’s one of the four whom Kamala favors and is the most likely to promote.

Nasrina came out of some of the same legal and political circles as Kamala Harris. She worked for the ACLU at the same time as Kamala’s sister Maya held a prominent role at the local ACLU. Maya also worked closely with CAIR and played a key role in Kamala’s presidential campaign.

No one in the FBI seems to have asked about Nasrina Bargzie’s original comments or the family history that troubled the government at the time. Nor has there been any mention of her work with pro-terror groups such as CAIR or her appearance on a panel with MPAC’s Salam Al Marayati who has defended Islamic terrorists. But the implications of a woman who has spent much of her career undermining our national security, attacking Jews and defending terrorist sympathizers is troubling for Americans, for Jews, Christians and for all people of goodwill.

Nasrina Bargzie resents America despite everything it has done for her. After benefiting from the Refugee Resettlement program, she blamed America for having created the refugees. In a Kamala Harris administration, she would be equipped to continue degrading our counterterrorism efforts, making life easier for Islamic terrorists and harder for Americans.

Occupying a prominent position in a Kamala administration, one of her top lawyers would be able to continue her campaign against American Jews and for the Hamas supporters attacking them.

AUTHOR

 

RELATED ARTICLES:

Kamala’s Sister Defended Hamas-Linked CAIR

Harris enraged as Israel takes out 19 jihadis in Hamas command room hidden inside mosque at school complex

Jewish Neighborhood in NYC: Jewish Man Stabbed by Terrorist Screaming Jew-Hating Slurs and ‘Free Palestine’

Walzing with Hamas

EDITORS NOTE: This Jihad Watch column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Tim Walz repeatedly hosted Muslim cleric who celebrated Oct. 7 jihad massacres and shared pro-Hitler website link

Zaman and his ilk play Walz and his ilk as if they were cheap fiddles, and the people being manipulated have no idea of what is happening.

Tim Walz repeatedly hosted Muslim cleric who celebrated Oct. 7 and shared pro-Hitler website link

by Gabe Kaminsky, Washington Examiner, August 9, 2024:

Democratic vice presidential nominee Tim Walz, on at least five occasions as governor of Minnesota, hosted a Muslim cleric who celebrated Hamas‘s Oct. 7 attack last year on Israel and promoted a film popular among Neo-Nazis that glorifies Adolf Hitler, the Washington Examiner found.

The imam, Asad Zaman of the Muslim American Society of Minnesota, joined other Muslim leaders in May 2023 for a meeting about mosque security with Walz’s gubernatorial office in Minnesota. Zaman also spoke at a May 2020 event to call for peaceful protests with the governor during the riots in Minnesota sparked after George Floyd’s death. In April 2019, the cleric delivered an invocation before Walz’s state address — just months after Zaman called for an end to a government shutdown at a press conference with Walz in January 2019.

Zaman, moreover, attended a May 2019 event that Walz hosted for Ramadan, social media posts show.

Walz’s ties to Zaman could serve as problematic baggage for the Minnesota governor as he campaigns with Vice President Kamala Harris, the Democratic presidential nominee. News of the ties also comes after a Washington Free Beacon report this week found Walz spoke at a 2019 event with an antisemitic scholar who has defended terrorism against Israel.

Zaman, who is from Bangladesh, said on Oct. 7 of last year that he “stands in solidarity with Palestinians against Israeli attacks.” That day, which saw 1,200 Israelis murdered by Hamas terrorists, he also shared an image of a Palestinian flag on Facebook in response to a post by Yusuf Abdi Abdulle, director of the Islamic Association of North America, declaring that “Palestine has the right to defend itself.” The Biden-Harris administration, Abdulle wrote in the post, was “on the wrong side of history” in “supporting the extremist Zionist regime and its illegal settlements.”

Zaman, meanwhile, has used his Facebook page over the years to share official Hamas press releases, blog posts on antisemitic websites slamming Jews, and, in one 2015 instance, a link to a piece on a website for a pro-Hitler film called The Greatest Story Never Told….

Continue reading.

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLES:

SHARIA: UK Police Commissioner Threatens to Extradite, JAIL American Citizens Over Online Posts: ‘We’ll Come After You’

High Level Military Group Concludes That the IDF is ‘the Most Moral Army in History’

Tlaib reposts doctored image of fake poll claiming half of Israelis support rape of jihadis

Glazov Gang: Transgenders, Pap Smears and Prostate Exams

Pro-Israel Progressives and the Other Kind

RELATED VIDEO: Kamalagate: The Harris Deception That Doomed Dozens of J6ers.

EDITORS NOTE: This Jihad Watch column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Jimmy Carter’s Animus Toward Israel

Jimmy Carter’s grandson, Jason Carter, said this Monday about his grandfather: “This is a good man who has done remarkable things with his life and has taken the opportunities that he was given and used them to do good.” Back in 2016, Rabbi Shmuley Boteach pointed out several reasons to disagree with this assessment, including Carter’s fondness for the Palestinians, as well as his animus toward Israel and its American abettors:

In a recent interview with the Los Angeles Times, Mr. Carter again laid responsibility for U.S. bias against the [supposedly] destitute, depressed and (consequently) violent Palestinians on American policy makers’ helplessness, over the last 30 years, against the menacing tactics of the powerful American-Israel Political Action Committee (AIPAC).

AIPAC, that all-powerful Jewish lobby, as Carter clearly sees it, is a danger, with those “menacing tactics,” whom no one can apparently stand up against. In truth, AIPAC has no “menacing tactics,” but is largely informational: it disseminates information about Israel, and sometimes sponsors trips to that country; it urges its members to support candidates who share AIPAC’s concerns but does not contribute to any political campaigns itself. It is far outspent, in Washington, by the Saudis and other Gulf Arabs who do have small armies of well-paid lobbyists at their disposal, and are also well-versed in contributing to presidential centers and libraries.

However, it seems that AIPAC’s real fault was its failure to outdo the Saudi’s purchases of the former president’s loyalty. “There has not been any nation in the world that has been more cooperative than Saudi Arabia,” the New York Times quoted Mr. Carter June 1977, thus making the Saudis a major factor in U. S. foreign policy.

Carter apparently took no notice of the $100 billion the Saudis have spent around the world to promote Wahhabi (Salafist) Islam. And twenty-four years later, when 15 out of the 19 hijackers on 9/11 were Saudis, Carter still continued both to praise the Saudis, and deplore the behavior of Israel.

Evidently, the millions in Arab petrodollars feeding Mr. Carter’s global endeavors, often in conflict with U.S. government policies, also ensure his loyalty.

It’s hard to know if Carter’s animus to Israel reflected all the money that Arab sources supplied to him, to his peanut farm, to his friend Bert Lance, and to his presidential center and library. Was there not a pre-existing antisemitism which then was reinforced by the receipt of all that Arab money? His dislike of Israel was difficult to conceal during the Camp David negotiations.

Many will remember Carter’s behavior during the Camp David negotiations with Anwar Sadat and Menachem Begin. He hero-worshipped Sadat, who in his view, could do no wrong. For Begin, on the other hand, Carter exhibited a palpable want of sympathy, even a visceral physical dislike for the homely Israeli leader. He was cruelly impatient with the anxieties Begin expressed about threats to the Jewish state’s survival. While pressing Begin to make concession upon concession to Sadat, Carter erupted that he was “sick and tired of hearing about the Holocaust.” Carter and National Security Adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski exhibited a clear distaste for Begin, while setting up Sadat as a veritable Prince of Peace, even though it was Begin who was making “sacrifices for peace” by giving back the entire Sinai, while Sadat gave up nothing, and only had to graciously accept what Begin, under American duress, offered. The great sacrifices Begin made to obtain a peace treaty with Egypt were never acknowledged by Carter. When else in history has a nation victorious in war ever had to sue for peace, as Israel did with Egypt at Camp David? On what theory did Carter think an aggressor state deserved to have every last bit of territory from which it had launched such aggression? For Begin was pressured to give back the entire Sinai, from which Egypt had launched attacks on Israel in 1948, 1967, and 1973.

Carter has said that Israel should give up all of the West Bank, which he calls “occupied territory.” He seems never to have read the Mandate for Palestine, for if he had done so, he would have discovered that Israel has a legal claim to all of the West Bank which was, according to the Mandate, part of the territories originally assigned to the future Jewish state. But had he done so, would it have mattered? He has for decades been set in his virulent anti-Israel ways, that appeals to history and international law are unlikely to cause him to rethink his deep dislike of the Jewish state.

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLES:

Jimmy Carter’s Misreading of UN Resolution 242, and Its Implications for Israel

Jimmy Carter’s Love for Dictators and Jihadis

Jimmy Carter’s Friendly Visits with Assad and Hamas

EDITORS NOTE: This Jihad Watch column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

WaPo: Israel and Hamas accept Biden regime plan in which neither would rule Gaza

This would be a capitulation on Israel’s part. Israeli authorities repeatedly vowed to destroy Hamas altogether. Instead, “neither Hamas nor Israel would rule Gaza.” But with the Biden regime so intent on saving Hamas that it is abandoning Israel, it may be the best the Israelis can get.

Opinion: A Gaza cease-fire agreement appears within reach

by David Ignatius, Washington Post, July 10, 2024:

After months of agonizing negotiation, the Biden administration appears close to a cease-fire deal that would halt major fighting in Gaza, release some Israeli hostages and surge humanitarian aid to desperate Palestinian civilians.

A senior U.S. official told me Wednesday that “the framework is agreed” and the parties are now “negotiating details of how it will be implemented.” To forge the deal, Middle East adviser Brett McGurk and CIA Director William J. Burns have been shuttling among regional capitals since November….

Israel and Hamas have both signaled their acceptance of an “interim governance” plan that would begin with Phase 2, in which neither Hamas nor Israel would rule Gaza. Security would be provided by a force trained by the United States and backed by moderate Arab allies, drawn from a core group of about 2,500 supporters of the Palestinian Authority in Gaza who have already been vetted by Israel. Hamas has told mediators that it is “prepared to relinquish authority to the interim governance arrangement,” a U.S. official said.

As security expands in postwar Gaza, the peace plan envisions a third phase, with what the U.N. resolution describes as a “multi-year reconstruction plan.”…

Continue reading.

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLES:

The war against the Jews

Israeli defense contractor taking Canada to court after military contract disqualification

After spending $230,000,000 of taxpayer money on Gaza aid pier, Biden regime is removing it

Hezbollah, The Drug Trafficking Criminal Organization

Biden regime halts release of Tajik Muslim migrants into U.S. over jihad terror fears after hundreds already let in

RELATED VIDEO: French leftists & Muslims cooperating to throw Jews out of France

EDITORS NOTE: This Jihad Watch column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

New York Times hires another hater of Israel to cover Israel

Yet there are still people who think these are news organizations, and don’t realize what they really are: extremely well-heeled, sophisticated propaganda mills, buttressed by the full weight of the approval of the Western intelligentsia, which sends bogus ideologically based “fact checkers” such as NewsGuard to defame, discredit and destroy all dissent.

NY Times Hires Another Anti-Israel Extremist to Cover Israel

by Gilead Ini, CAMERA, July 5, 2024

The New York Times has a type.

It hired a reporter who once said she can’t bring herself even to look at Israelis, and who admitted that her objectivity “got thrown out the window.”

It hired another who in college was an apologist for Hamas and Hezbollah, denying that the terror organizations are terror organizations, that they are fundamentalists, and even that they have murdered Israeli civilians.

It hired another not long after she expressed outrage that Israel struck a Hamas commander after the terror group fired a barrage of rockets toward Israeli civilians — and even charged that the strike amounted to “murder.”

Shortly after the Oct. 7 massacre, the newspaper commissioned a journalist who had posted on social media, “How great you are, Hitler.”

So it is unfortunate, but hardly surprising, that the New York Times has hired Bora Erden to cover the Israel-Hamas conflict. Erden was a committed anti-Israel activist prior to joining the Times last October. In May 2021, after Hamas rocket attacks into Israel and a consequent round of fighting, Erden signed a letter supporting what was termed the “Palestinian struggle against Israeli colonial rule and its apartheid system.”…

Continue reading.

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLES:

UK: New Muslim MPs have ties to Hamas and other jihad groups, call for BDS

Palestinian Authority Again Shows How ‘Moderate’ It Is

French-Israelis call on Jews to flee France and join them

UK: New Labour prime minister claims ‘urgent’ need for Gaza ceasefire

Canada: Pro-Hamas demonstrators smash windows at McGill University, scream ‘Globalize the intifada’

The Remarkable Story of Yaron Avraham: From Muslim to Jew

RELATED VIDEO: Trump Challenges Biden to a New Debate

EDITORS NOTE: This Jihad Watch column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.