Tag Archive for: RFK Jr.

‘Extinction-Level’: MAHA Warns Pesticide Immunity Provision Could Mirror Anger-Inducing Bill From 1980s

Critics are sounding the alarm over a provision in a House appropriations bill they say could shield pesticide manufacturers from legal liability — drawing comparisons to the 1986 law that granted similar protections to vaccine makers.

The rule, tucked into Section 453 of the House’s Fiscal Year 2026 Interior and Environment Appropriations Act, has sparked backlash from supporters of Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) movement. They argue it could mirror the fallout of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, which created a no-fault system protecting vaccine producers from injury lawsuits.

“If you don’t like what happened with vaccine indemnification, you’re really not gonna like what happens with pesticide and herbicide indemnification,” Dr. Robert Malone, a prominent and longtime critic of COVID-19 vaccine mandates, said in a July 24 video.

“If you aren’t mad now, you damn well should be,” Malone, who currently sits on the Centers for Disease Control’s (CDC) Advisory Committee for Immunization Practices (ACIP), added.

Kennedy himself acknowledged the follies of the 1986 Vaccine Act in an X post.

“The 1986 Vaccine Act gave vaccine makers immunity against lawsuits by children who suffer vaccine injuries,” he tweeted Wednesday in a scathing criticism of the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP), a program created by Congress in conjunction with the Vaccine Act.

However, despite the popular uproar, Kennedy Jr. has yet to publicly comment on Section 453.

The lack of coverage from MAHA reformers within the government has invoked sharp criticism.

“You get that Section 453 of the new Appropriations Bill — that would shield pesticide manufacturers from liability in U.S. courts — will undo ALL of the good from the MAHA healthy food campaign, right? Yet MAHA insiders haven’t said a word of protest. Makes you wonder,” Toby Rogers, Ph.D. and fellow at Brownstone Institute for Social and Economic Research, tweeted Wednesday.

Rogers did not lay the entirety of the blame at Kennedy Jr.’s feet, however.

“Secretary Kennedy understands that we need systemic change in order to improve the health of all Americans. We need to clean up our industrial food system to get rid of toxic chemicals and heal the soil, he told the Daily Caller.

“Unfortunately, in this administration, Secretary Kennedy has been siloed into working on just a few parts of the health system. That’s not going to work. The entire system is poisoning us and Section 453 will wipe out all of the good that MAHA has done in connection with food thus far,” Rogers also told the Caller.

He spoke of 453 in biblical terms.

“Section 453 + the 1986 Act are an extinction level event for the U.S. Together they represent the largest self-inflicted mass poisoning in human history. They reveal a level of depravity in our political system straight out of the Book of Revelations,” Rogers also tweeted.

Section 453, critics claim, would grant immunity to pesticide manufacturers from “failure to warn” lawsuits that consumers could file if chemicals within the pesticides and herbicides sicken them.

The text of the stipulation reads as follows:

“None of the funds made available by this or any other Act may be used to issue or adopt any guidance or any policy, take any regulatory action, or approve any labeling or change to such labeling that is inconsistent with or in any respect different from the conclusion of (a) a human health assessment performed pursuant to the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act … or (b) a carcinogenicity classification for a pesticide.”

While a causal observer may view the bill text as mundane, Rogers argued it was that ambiguity precisely that made the language so dangerous.

“The bill was clearly written by lobbyists for the pesticide and chemical industries. They knew exactly how to word the rider to gut existing safety laws while hiding their true intentions. Once again Congress is working on behalf of toxic industries and against the interests of the American people,” he told the Caller.

Republican Idaho Rep. Mike Simpson, who sits on the House Appropriations Committee as well as its environmental subcommittee, does not appear to believe Section 453 is as damning as the provision’s detractors.

“The provision does not address the substance of any health assessments and does not change current authority that States have to regulate the use and sale of pesticides within their own State,” a spokesperson for Simpson’s office told the Caller.

“The health and safety of Americans is a priority throughout our FY26 process,” the spokesperson added.

AUTHOR

Robert McGreevy

Author

RELATED ARTICLE: Idea Proposed By RFK Has Some In MAHA Scratching Their Heads

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Georgia Bill Sparks MAHA Concerns About Alleged Chinese Poison Chemicals

MAHA advocates are warning about a bill Georgia lawmakers passed in March that they allege would allow manufacturers of pesticides to escape liability for poisoning customers.

Senate Bill 144 would make it so “that a manufacturer cannot be held liable for failing to warn consumers of health risks above those required by the United States Environmental Protection Agency with respect to pesticides.”

Environmentalists and regenerative farming advocates warn that the bill would be detrimental to public health.

“Stripping our right to be able to sue if we have a different opinion than what the EPA has is really going to be catastrophic for public health, because then we have no recourse whatsoever,” Kelly Ryerson, the founder of American Regenerative and Glyphosate Facts, told the Daily Caller. Ryerson, a Stanford University MBA, has a certificate in public health policy from Stanford Business School.

The bill’s primary sponsor, Republican Georgia State Sen. Sam Watson, pushed back on the idea that the bill would prevent Americans from being able to sue manufacturers.

“It’s dealing with failure to warn, it’s not providing immunity,” Sen. Watson told the Caller. “It’s not preventing anyone to go after [manufacturers] because they thought that a product caused cancer. You can still do that, you just can’t do it for failure to warn of it causing cancer.”

Manufacturers that would be covered under Georgia’s bill include Bayer, who owns Monsanto, the maker of RoundUp. A Georgia jury is fresh off awarding a plaintiff over $2 billion in a judgement against Bayer after he blamed RoundUp for his non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma in a lawsuit.

RoundUp’s active ingredient is glyphosate, the most commonly used pesticide in the United States. The World Health Organization’s International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) said glyphosate likely causes cancer in 2015, labelling it as “probably carcinogenic to humans.”

“It says it’s likely and we saw that same report. It doesn’t say it does. It says that it suggests or it may be or probably or could cause,” Sen. Watson told the Caller.

The EPA reached a different conclusion. After a February 2020 review, the agency found “that there are no risks of concern to human health when glyphosate is used in accordance with its current label,” according to its website.

The IARC was accused of manipulating their data in 2017. A draft document of IARC’s 2015 study was unearthed and, according to Reuters, showed the agency dismissed and edited out conclusions contrary to their final report.

Watson claimed that the study which the IARC based its carcinogenic conclusion on also found a number of other common American lifestyle choices increased the risk of cancer.

“If you’ll keep reading in that study it also says that red meat is carcinogenic and night shift work is carcinogenic and a lot of other things that people do are carcinogenic. So, I mean, you need to read the whole study because one studies shift and dictate,” Watson told the Caller.

While the EPA did not concur with the IARC’s conclusion that glyphosate is a carcinogen, Ryerson alleged that the research they based that conclusion on was manipulated by Bayer/Monsanto.

Wisner Baum, a law firm which Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. once worked for, published a trove of documents that appeared to implicate Monsanto in ghostwriting a number of reports on glyphosate’s toxicity.

One email published by the firm allegedly shows that Monsanto commissioned scientist David Saltmiras and former Monsanto consultant Larry Keir to recruit respected names to write a review of glyphosate’s toxicity. “[E]ven though we feel confident that glyphosate is not genotoxic, this became a very difficult story to tell given all the complicated ‘noise’ out there,” the correspondence reads.

Keir’s name appears on the review that was eventually published, according to the documents obtained by Wisner Baum.

Other manufacturers that could benefit from the limited liability include Chinese chemical manufacturers. When ChemChina, a Chinese state-controlled chemical manufacturer, bought Swiss AgTech company Syngenta for $43 billion in 2017, it was forced by the U.S. Federal Trade Commission to divest its rights to the company’s paraquat chemical business in the U.S. to an American firm.

However, China is still the primary producer of paraquat used in the U.S. while America is the world’s biggest importer, according to global shipping tracker Volza. The U.S. imports from 4,000 to 5,000 tons of the product annually, making up over 10 percent of China’s export supply, according to agropages.com

Like glyphosate, the EPA found “no dietary risks of concern associated with paraquat when it is used according to the label.” But others have called it “the deadliest chemical in US agriculture.”

National Institutes of Health (NIH) studies have linked the chemical to Parkinson’s disease, finding that people who used paraquat were 2.5 times more likely to develop Parkinson’s. Over 50 countries have banned its use, including China.

Sen. Watson, a vegetable farmer who uses RoundUp himself, argued it’s China’s very stranglehold over the paraquat market that makes SB 144 so necessary.

“If the Chinese become the only manufacturer of a product, you can’t go after them. It’s very difficult to go after a Chinese manufacturer for any kind of negligence claim,” he told the Caller.

“So I feel like they’re already protected, which makes it even more important to keep manufacturers in the United States because those are the ones that we can have recourse if they here in the United States.”

Ryerson disagreed. “I actually don’t care who manufactures it,” she said. “I just don’t want it anywhere in our system.”

Additionally, 99 percent of glyphosate used in the U.S. originated from China in 2024, according to a Farm Business Network survey.

The bill now sits on Republican Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp’s desk for him to sign. “Our office has 40 days following the last day of the legislative session to conduct a thorough review of legislation that received final passage by the Georgia General Assembly. We will make an announcement upon the conclusion of that review process,” a spokesperson for Kemp’s office told the Caller.

Georgia’s legislative session ended April 4, giving the governor until May 14 to make a decision.

The bill represents a test of power for RFK Jr.’s Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) coalition. Self-proclaimed “MAHA moms” have been lobbying hard against its passage, imploring Kemp not to sign it. RFK, who tried and won cases on behalf of Monsanto victims in his past life as an attorney, has yet to publicly comment on the bill.

The Daily Caller reached out to HHS to get Secretary Kennedy’s thoughts on the bill but did not receive a response.

AUTHOR

Robert McGreevy

Reporter.

RELATED ARTICLES:

RFK Jr. Targets America’s Most Obese State For Aggressive MAHA Reforms

Top Maryland Dem Backs Green Energy Bill That Could Line His Own Company’s Pockets

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

‘Completely Unhinged’: Victor Davis Hanson Says Dems’ Fury Against Trump Nominees During Hearings Is Political Misstep

Hoover Institution Senior Fellow Victor Davis Hanson explained on Friday how Democratic senators’ attacks on President Donald Trump’s nominees during confirmation hearings are backfiring politically because of conservatives’ current ability to push their messages more effectively online.

Many Democratic senators have taken adversarial approaches to Trump’s cabinet nominees, including screaming at them, interrupting them and hurling accusations against them. Hanson, on “Victor Davis Hanson Show,” said that Trump’s nominees have all excelled at their hearings as they have come under fire from Democrats.

WATCH:

“The funny thing about all these nominees that some of the RINOs [Republicans in name only] in the party deprecated: Pete Hegseth, Pam Bondi, Kash Patel, man when they go before those people— Sean Duffy — they have all of the answers,” Hanson said. “They’re really impressive people and they go head-to-head. It’s kind of they have a wink and a nod, and I think their logic, I’m just suggesting this, I don’t have any confirmation, but their attitude — they go in very confident.”

“So, their attitude is basically, ‘I have 53 senator votes and you have none to stop me. You can’t stop me. Now you think you’re going to get [Republican senators Lisa] Murkowski and [Susan] Collins and maybe Mitch [McConnel]? I can still get confirmed,’” he continued. “‘So, I’m not going to kiss up to you in any way possible. In fact, the only thing I worry about is not getting 50 senators. And the only way I would not get 50 senators is to sell out Donald Trump, and I’m not going to do that. I’m not stupid, and I don’t want to anyway.’ And that gives them a lot of confidence.”

McConnell, Murkowski and Collins all voted against Hegseth’s confirmation to be secretary of defense, but Vice President J.D. Vance broke the tie to confirm him on Jan. 24. His confirmation followed a hearing that included Democratic Virginia Sen. Tim Kaine accusing him of infidelity and Democratic New York Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand lecturing him for eight minutes about women serving in the military.

“And then you get these people frustrated, like [Democratic Massachusetts Sen.] Elizabeth Warren. She’s come off as completely unhinged. And then they don’t understand the media that the left — polling right now — 37% — and I guess it was the latest Emerson poll, 37% said they approve of the Democratic Party,” Hanson added. “Do they understand how they drive that down when somebody like Elizabeth Warren just cuts off [Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) nominee Robert F. Kennedy Jr.] RFK, won’t let him answer a question, screams and yells.”

Hanson referenced how Warren pressed Kennedy to “commit” to not accepting compensation for any lawsuits against drug companies during his potential tenure at HHS and for four years after, which prompted a heated exchange. He asserted that immediately after the clash, “the right-wing blogosphere” noted that Warren and Independent Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders were the two senators who raised the most money in pharmaceutical contributions.

Senators on both sides of the aisle who critically questioned Kennedy at his Wednesday and Thursday hearings found their contributions from the healthcare industry and their personal investments in the pharmaceutical industry and companies that make highly processed food being highlighted on X, receiving millions of views.

The Democratic Party’s approval rating plunged to 31% among registered voters, according to Quinnipiac polling released Wednesday.

Sanders exploded at Kennedy during his Thursday confirmation hearing after the nominee accused him of corruption for accepting pharmaceutical industry donations. Hanson suggested Warren and Sanders are examples of “hypocrites that are defending big pharma against RFK,” saying “that doesn’t work” because of conservatives’ ability to push their agenda in part because of how billionaire Elon Musk has run social media platform X.

Hanson also said Democrats wrongly assumed attorney general nominee Pam Bondi was “just a blonde bimbo” and that they could “tear her apart.” He said that she instead “t[ore] them apart.” He similarly said they underestimated Hegseth.

“And then they see Pete Hegseth. And they go, ‘This guy is weird. He’s got the Jerusalem cross, you know, and he’s been married three times. And we’re just going to slice him up because I’m Senator Sanders and I’m Senator [Chuck] Schumer, I’m Senator Warren, I’m Senator Sheldon Whitehouse.’ And then he just destroys them,” Hanson said.

He also said Kennedy “destroyed” the Democratic senators while FBI Director nominee Kash Patel dealt with them “like carving a Christmas turkey.”

AUTHOR

Jason Cohen

Contributor.

RELATED ARTICLES:

RFK Jr. Turns Tables On Dems ‘Chuckling’ About His Claim That Americans Prefer Private Insurance

Dems Launch Massive Campaign To Attack Trump’s Tax Cut Proposals

Bishop Says Catholic Teaching Does Not Support ‘Open Border Policy’

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.


All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

Processed Food Stocks Drop After RFK Jr. Announcement

Major processed food corporations saw their stock take a dive Friday, a day after President-elect Trump picked Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to be secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS).

Nestle saw its stock reach a 52 week low Friday, according to CNBC. Nestle is one of the top ten companies in the processed food market, along with PepsiCo, Coca-Cola, Kraft-Heinz and General-Mills, according to market.us.

Similarly, PepsiCo Inc. saw its stock plunge almost 4% Friday, with Coca-Cola Co. decreasing by more than 1%.

Sugary drinks weren’t the only market hit — General Mills, which manufactures products like Bisquick, Cocoa Puffs and Cinnamon Toast Crunch, dipped more than 2%.

Meanwhile, Campbell Soup Co also decreased by almost 3%, and Kraft Heinz Co. reached a 52 week low. Kraft products include Heinz, Oscar Mayer, Jell-O, Lunchables, Kraft Mac & Cheese and Kool-Aid.

Trump announced Thursday that he would nominate Kennedy to direct the HHS.

“I am thrilled to announce Robert F. Kennedy Jr. as The United States Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS),” he tweeted. “For too long, Americans have been crushed by the industrial food complex and drug companies who have engaged in deception, misinformation, and disinformation when it comes to public health.”

Kennedy has been vocal about public health and the chemicals in America’s food. Food additives like potassium bromate, Titanium dioxide and Brominated vegetable oil (BVO) are banned in Europe but allowed in the U.S., CBS News reported.

“The Democrats, who claim to be all about health care have stood by watching other countries ban these poisons that make our kids sick,” RFK stated in a post online. “Enough is enough. President Trump and I are going to stop the mass poisoning of American children.”

AUTHOR

Eireann Van Natta

General assignment reporter.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Editor Daily Rundown: Trump Taps RFK For HHS Secretary

Pharma Stocks Take Nose Dive After Trump Announces RFK Jr. For HHS

RFK JR’s Family Slams Trump Endorsement As ‘Betrayal’

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Trump Adds RFK Jr., Tulsi Gabbard To His Transition Team

Former President Donald Trump has added former Democratic Rep. Tulsi Gabbard and Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to be part of his transition team after they both recently endorsed his bid for the presidency.

“As President Trump’s broad coalition of supporters and endorsers expands across partisan lines, we are proud that Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Tulsi Gabbard have been added to the Trump/Vance Transition team. We look forward to having their powerful voices on the team was we work to restore America’s greatness,” Trump senior adviser Brian Hughes said in a statement obtained by the Daily Caller.

Kennedy, who was running as an Independent, suspended his campaign Friday and endorsed Trump. Just days after, Gabbard, who has reportedly been helping Trump with debate preparation, also endorsed Trump, saying Monday that she believes Trump is the best person to keep us out of wars.

“He keeps us in his heart in the decisions that he makes. We saw this through his first term in the presidency, when he not only didn’t start any new wars, he took action to deescalate and prevent wars,” Gabbard said.

The former congresswoman compared Trump’s record on foreign conflict to Joe Biden and Kamala Harris, arguing that their administration had brought the country closer to war. She added that she was “confident” Trump would “do the work to walk us back from the brink of war.”

Kennedy first told Daily Caller co-founder Tucker Carlson about being asked to help with Trump’s transition team, saying they were discussing it.

“I’m going to work to get him elected,” Kennedy said to Carlson. “And I’m working with the campaign. We’re working on policy issues together. I’ve been asked to go onto the transition team and to help pick the people who will be running the government.”

WATCH: 

Also serving on Trump’s transition team are his sons, Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump, as well as the former administrator of the Small Business Administration Linda McMahon, businessman Howard Lutnick and Ohio Republican Sen. and Republican Vice Presidential nominee J.D. Vance.

“The 2024 GOP Platform to Make America Great Again is a forward-looking agenda that will deliver safety, prosperity and freedom for the American people. My administration will deliver on these bold promises,” Trump said in a statement. “We will restore strength, competence and common sense to the Oval Office. I have absolute confidence the Trump-Vance Administration will be ready to govern effectively on Day One.”

A source close to Trump told the Daily Caller that Kennedy will “definitely be on the campaign trail and doing media” ahead of the election.

AUTHOR

Henry Rodgers

Chief national correspondent.

RELATED ARTICLES:

EXCLUSIVE: House Oversight Targets TSA After Whistleblowers Revealed Federal Air Marshals Surveilled Tulsi Gabbard

EXCLUSIVE: Trump PAC Launches New Salvo To Hit Harris’s Biggest Weak Spot

James Carville Reveals ‘Number One Thing That Worries’ Him About Harris Campaign

RELATED VIDEO: President Trump told Dr. Phil he’d win California if ‘Jesus was the vote counter’

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

VIDEO: Pollsters Say RFK Jr. Endorsement ‘Could Have A Really Big Impact’ And ‘Help Trump’

Republican pollster Lee Carter and Democratic pollster Carly Cooperman on Friday said that independent candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s endorsement of former President Donald Trump could significantly boost his campaign.

Kennedy announced during a Friday speech that he would suspend his campaign and endorse Trump in states where he is not on the ballot, only withdrawing his name from consideration in key battleground states as not to spoil the vote. Carter and Cooperman, on “Your World With Neil Cavuto,” said that in such a close election, the votes that Trump could gain from Kennedy’s decision might boost his chances of defeating Vice President Kamala Harris.

WATCH:

“When you’re looking at these battleground states, we’re looking at averages where Donald Trump might be ahead by 0.2%, and just getting some of those votes could have a really big impact. And I think RFK Jr. knows this,” Carter said. “He was very, very keen to say, ‘I am withdrawing my name from these 10 states because I know it can have an impact.’ And so I think there is a very, very clear directive here.”

“It’s absolutely the case that the polls in these swing states show that with RFK removed, there is a small advantage that goes to Donald Trump. And in these states, every single vote really does matter. This makes a lot of sense,” Cooperman said. “Democrats are far more enthusiastic about Kamala Harris as their presidential candidate than they were about Joe Biden. And so you’re seeing much more coalescing among Democrats for Kamala, and therefore the support that RFK was getting in the most recent polls was certainly going to help Trump more so with him removed from it.”

Cooperman also noted “there is uncertainty” about what Kennedy’s supporters will do in November.

“It’s going to really depend, what are these voters going to do? Are they going to stay home or are they going to throw their support behind Donald Trump? I’m very curious now to see how RFK Jr. is integrated into Donald Trump’s campaign and what kind of role they’re going to talk about for him and how they might use this,” Carter added.

“I think Donald Trump’s got to return himself to sort of the underdog status that would help to get those RFK Jr. supporters on his side,” the Republican pollster said.

Kennedy’s support plunged to as low as 2% as of early August, according to an Economist/YouGov poll. Trump is presently beating Harris in the main battleground states by 0.1%, according to the RealClearPoltics average.

A “Morning Joe” panel sounded the alarm on Friday about how difficult it will be for Harris to beat Trump, with the race being so tight and the former president historically outperforming polls on election day.

“You got to look at states like North Carolina and Arizona and, of course, Georgia. Now, you may get a break with minority voting down in Georgia, but you could also come up short in Pennsylvania and not quite win in North Carolina,” former MSNBC host Chris Matthews said. “This could squeak. This could be the toughest election, because if Pennsylvania doesn’t go the Democratic way and North Carolina doesn’t go that way, it’s tough, it’s really tough.”

AUTHOR

Jason Cohen

Contributor.

RELATED ARTILES:

RFK Jr. praises MAGA as recalling ‘a nation brimming with vitality’

Third-Party Candidates Undermined Biden Among Disaffected Dems, But Harris Is A Different Story

Jon Stewart Pokes Fun At DNC For Lining Up Apparently Contradictory Speakers

Trump Hammered Voters’ Key Concerns In RNC Speech, Harris Hardly Mentioned Them

RFK Jr. Joins Trump Rally After Suspending His Campaign

RELATED VIDEO: A Populist Revolution Is Underway: Unpacking the Significance of RFK Jr.’s Endorsement of Trump

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.


All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

Watch My Interview with Robert F. Kennedy Jr. that YouTube Removed

After deciding to release my full podcast interview with Presidential Candidate, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., YouTube decided that the discussed topics didn’t fit within their allowable content.

YouTube removed my podcast interview with RFK Jr. due to COVID-19 “misinformation.”

This is not the first time I’ve been censored by a major platform and I’m sure it will not be the last. Not only do I fight to proclaim the suppressed stories around the world, but I try to use my very existence to keep accountable those in power with every move they make as it affects the freedoms that we strive to keep within our grasp.

Thanks to Elon Musk, you can still watch the full RFK Jr. episode on Twitter.

In addition to this interview, I have also published another episode with a former prison inmate who was recently released and tells the horrors she has had to endure – not because of her confinement! See that trailer here.

I also just finished another podcast interview with someone whom I admire and appreciate very much for his hard work in the journalistic world and the sacrifices he’s made to get the truth to the public! This interview will be published soon and will also be available exclusively to my paid subscribers.

Thank you for your support to this mission!

James O’Keefe

O’Keefe Media Group

Subscribe here and start enjoying new content!

SOURCE DOCUMENT: 5 March 1946 – Anglo-American Intelligence Agreement

RELATED VIDEO: “IF AMERICA FAILS .. there’s nowhere else to go”

RELATED TWEET:

EDITORS NOTE: This O’Keffe Media Group column and video is republished with permission. All rights reserved. © 2023 O’Keefe Media Group