Tag Archive for: sedition

Iranian-Run, Soros-Funded Billboards Urge Soldiers to Disobey Orders

This is not only sedition; it’s a national security threat.

Billboards are popping up outside Fort Bragg and Camp Lejeune urging soldiers to disobey orders. “Marines: Not what you signed up for?” asks one. “Did You Go Airborne Just To Pull Security for ICE?” asks another one. The website urges soldiers to use encryption and offers ‘counselling’ on ‘disobeying immoral orders’. The organizations offering ‘counselling’ to soldiers include the National Lawyers Guild: a Communist organization which also defends Antifa.

The billboards are promoting a system that, in its own words, is “built to connect active duty, national guard, and reserve members of the military with key resources on responding to unlawful orders”. What that means is members of the military will be potentially discussing their orders with members of radical leftist groups sympathetic to America’s enemies.

This is not only sedition; it’s a national security threat.

‘Win Without War’, the group behind the ads, had been created as a front group full of young photogenic diverse figures by the Center for International Policy (itself created by the Institute for Policy Studies, to oppose the Vietnam War and any resistance to Communism) which has sponsored trips by members of Congress to Cuba, and is funded by Soros and the Rockefellers.

The radical leftist group also announced that it’s standing with the ‘Sedition Six’ in urging troops to disobey orders and circulating a letter stating that “we the people have their backs.”

Who is “we the people”? An Iranian immigrant who defends Iran and hates America.

The ads were tweeted by Sara Haghdoosti: an Iranian immigrant who heads up Win Without War. Haghdoosti, the author of a teen novel about ‘Islamophobia’, told MoveOn.org that “I moved to the U.S. to help start Berim, a new organization to amplify Iranian voices, get people outside of Iran engaged, and change foreign policy.”

Berim, meaning “Let’s Go” in Farsi, was billed as helping Iranian ‘social entrepreneurs’, in practice the organization served as a pro-Iran pressure group, urging Obama to meet with Iran’s leader (as part of a petition started by Haghdoosti), lobbying Congress to oppose sanctions and any action against Iran’s nuclear program. Berim cosigned letters alongside NIAC, known to many as a key part of the ‘Iran Lobby’, defending Iran’s nuclear program against America.

While Berim pretended to be a ‘grassroots’ group, it was closely intertwined with a network of leftist organizations opposed to America which became obvious when Win Without War ‘acquired’ Berim and Haghdoosti eventually became the executive director of Win Without War.

Like a lot of leftist anti-war groups, Win is opposed to America, Israel, and our other allies and supportive of our enemies. And that includes dismantling our weapons and defending theirs.

Sara Haghdoosti had claimed that opposing Iran’s nuclear weapons was a “racist trope” and revealed that President Trump’s ‘Muslim Ban’ would have prevented her mother from coming to visit her in America. At the same time, she has urged the dismantling of our nuclear defenses.

The incitement to treason ads escalated Win’s campaign to wreck the military into personally targeted attacks at the chain of command. Win is not a group focused on illegal aliens so it isn’t targeting soldiers because it cares about ICE, but because it wants to weaken our armed forces.

And the prime beneficiaries of such a campaign are in Haghdoosti’s homeland in Iran.

That an Iranian immigrant who has lobbied for our enemies and against our national defense can run an organization that is registered as a 501(c)(4) and a 501(c)(3) urging soldiers to disobey orders shows just how out of control the network of radical leftist groups has gotten.

Win Without War’s treasonous activities are heavily subsidized by George Soros and his son Alex through their Open Society networks. Win received $1 million from the Soros network in 2024 as part of $2.2 million over the years and its Center for International Policy parent had received $300,000 in startup costs to create the front group to undermine America.

Win is just part of a larger network of interchangeable organizations. The Center for International Policy had been set up by yet another front group of a front group whose trail ultimately led to the Soviet Union. Win has been funded not only by Soros, but other key leftist funding hubs including the Ford Foundation, Ploughshares and the Rockefeller Brothers Fund. Ploughshares had funded Haghdoosti’s Berim as part of Obama’s Iran Deal echo chamber.

After being pipelined through MoveOn.org, Haghdoosti is returning to the group where her husband Ilya Sheyman, also an immigrant, had served as its executive director to become its program director. Sheyman, who ran for Congress as a young ‘community organizer’ with Howard Dean’s backing on an Occupy Wall Street platform, now runs a political consulting firm with another MoveOn alum. Haghdoosti is still pitching her teen novel about ‘Islamophobia’.

Americans may not be living the American Dream anymore, but it’s still possible for two foreigners to live the dream of a million dollar Victorian house in a mostly white area, a lavish wedding and a career track of working to destroy America and the rest of the free world.

Haghdoosti is not the real issue. It’s the radical system that has become so arrogant that it can put out billboards targeting American soldiers through an organization run by an Iranian immigrant who defends her homeland and attacks America. The network of organizations and activists behind front groups like Win Without War are arrogant and they have reason to be.

No matter what they’ve done until now, nothing has touched them. Will that finally change?

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLES:

Hamas-linked CAIR: Elimination of deportation protection for Somalis in Minnesota is part of ‘Israel first’ campaign

New York City: Pro-Hamas agitators harass Black Friday shoppers at Zara store in Manhattan

Enraged at Trump, Somali Muslims in Minnesota say they’re ‘a backbone of the state’

DOT DROPS THE HAMMER: Sean Duffy Warns Tim Walz To Revoke Illegals Commercial Licenses Or Lose Highway Funding

EDITORS NOTE: This Jihad Watch column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Stop Dragging the U.S. Military Into Anti-Trump Politics

One of the great strengths of the United States has always been the clear separation between civilian politics and military professionalism. Presidents change, parties rotate in and out of power, and political arguments flare up—but the armed forces remain steady, disciplined, and loyal to the Constitution.

Today, however, many Americans are becoming increasingly uneasy. They worry that certain Democratic lawmakers, driven by intense political hostility toward former President Donald Trump, may be crossing lines that could unintentionally sow discord within the ranks of the U.S. military.

This concern is not about disagreement. Democrats and Republicans have always disputed policy. That is the heartbeat of a healthy democracy. The issue arises when political rhetoric touches the military chain of command—one of the most sensitive pillars of national stability.

Recent comments by several Democratic lawmakers—including individuals with military or intelligence backgrounds such as Mark Kelly, Elissa Slotkin, Jason Crow, Chris Deluzio, Maggie Goodlander, and Chrissy Houlahan—have sparked controversy. Their public discussions about resisting what they describe as potential “illegal orders” from President Trump have been interpreted by critics as blurring the line between necessary constitutional caution and political messaging that could create confusion within the armed forces.

To be clear: elected officials absolutely have the right to warn against unlawful directives from any president. That safeguard is part of the American system. But when members of Congress make statements that can be read as urging the military to distrust or pre-judge the commander in chief, they risk undermining the unity, discipline, and non partisanship that America depends on.

President Trump responded forcefully, calling such rhetoric “seditious.” The lawmakers in question then portrayed themselves as victims, accusing Trump of incitement. But they have largely dismissed concerns about the potential implications of their own messaging.

Even if these Democrats intended to promote constitutional vigilance, the perception created is dangerous. When military officers hear politicians imply that the armed forces should be prepared to question the legitimacy of presidential orders based solely on political fears, the seeds of division can be planted—whether intentionally or not.

With Secretary of War Pete Hegseth now reportedly investigating the matter, the stakes could not be higher. America cannot afford even the appearance of political parties attempting to shape military loyalty.

At a time when global adversaries are eager to exploit any sign of internal weakness, U.S. leaders—on both sides—must treat military cohesion as sacred. Political disagreements should never spill into the chain of command. No hatred for a political figure, Trump included, should ever justify messaging that risks confusion or distrust among the men and women who defend the nation.

Democrats, like all political actors, must remember that presidents come and go, but the nation remains. The military is not a tool for partisan battles. It is a national institution that deserves protection from political chaos.

America needs its leaders to rise above resentment, reject rhetoric that threatens unity, and reaffirm their commitment to safeguarding the integrity of the armed forces. The country is stronger when political fights stay in the political arena—not in the barracks.

©2025 . All rights reserved.

RELATED VIDEO: Democrats want U.S. military to commit treason and DEFY orders from Trump and Hegseth

Democrats’ ‘Shadow Cabinet’ Is The Very Definition of Sedition

Not only are Democrats denying the results of the 2024 election (which they jailed Americans for in the wake of the 2020 steal) but they are publicly plotting to form a “shadow government” to defy and undermine President Trump’s authority.

WATCH: Democrats are now creating a shadow government to go against President Trump

A Democratic ‘Shadow Cabinet’ Lacks for Logic in the American Republic

The day George Washington muttered that he would never again go to Congress for advice.

By: DEAN KARAYANIS, NY Sun, Nov. 15, 2024:

Congressman Wiley Nickel, Democrat of North Carolina, is urging his party to “appoint a shadow cabinet to fight back against the worst excesses of a second Trump administration.” He’s borrowing the idea from the Britain’s parliamentary system, but it would be a poor fit for our republic, eroding the will of the people which invests executive power in only one president at a time.

“Across the Atlantic,” Mr. Nickel wrote in a Washington Post op-ed on Monday, “the British have something we don’t: a team from the opposition that mirrors the government’s cabinet members. They watch the cabinet closely, publicly challenging, scrutinizing, and offering new ideas.” That these ideas were rejected in the election escapes mention.

A prime minister isn’t chosen in a nationwide vote, and parliamentary systems have multiple parties rather than America’s two. The U.K. prime ministers sometimes form governments — including a cabinet — in coalition with smaller parties and serve only so long as they have support. In 2022, Prime Minister Truss stepped down after just fifty days. It was the shortest tenure in British history.

The American system is different by design. Presidents are elected to four-year terms, exercising co-equal power with the legislative and judicial branches. Their cabinets, while not laid out in the Constitution, perform a function it authorizes while a shadow cabinet would be created out of whole cloth to undermine the president, who is the sole individual vested with the executive power.

To ensure the nation spoke with a unified voice abroad, the Constitutional Convention empowered the Senate to offer “advice and consent” on foreign policy and appointments but didn’t lay out a mechanism for doing so. The job of putting this concept into action, as with so many things, fell to President Washington.

On August 22, 1789, four months after taking the oath of office, Washington met with senators in person, asking for their input on treaties with the Creek and Cherokee nations. The author of “The Cabinet: George Washington and the Creation of an American Institution,” Lindsay Chervinsky, laid out the difficulty that led the first president to create the cabinet.

Washington, seeking the Senate’s input, “carefully crafted” a statement of his aims in his proposed negotiations. When his vice president, John Adams, read it to the senators, Ms. Chervinsky writes that he was met with “awkward silence.” Senator William Maclay recorded that “his colleagues were so intimidated by” the great general “that they cowered in shameful silence.”

Maclay suggested that committees break off to discuss Washington’s remarks. The president, feeling he’d wasted his time, “lost his temper, stood up, and shouted, ‘This defeats every purpose of my coming here!’” Heading to his carriage, he “muttered under his breath that he would never return for advice.” He did go back two days later, having promised to do so, but never again.

All American presidents since have followed this precedent in letting their cabinet secretaries — based on Washington’s counsels of war during the Revolution — fulfill the Senate’s role. The first cabinet had four secretaries: State, Treasury, War, and Attorney General. The number has since grown to fifteen.

Cabinet secretaries are nominated by the president and confirmed by the Senate. The shadow body Mr. Nickel proposes wouldn’t face such scrutiny. Its members would be partisan appointees tasked with siphoning off the power the president has earned. Much like Democrats giving Speaker Pelosi the title of “speaker emerita” in 2022, a shadow cabinet would claim an unearned mandate.

In Ms. Pelosi’s case, her invented title doesn’t just infringe on the power of Speaker Johnson, chosen to lead by the House majority. It also undermines her own party’s minority leader, Congressman Hakeem Jeffries. His predecessor remaining in office even after losing the majority makes it difficult for him to chart a new direction for the Democratic caucus as he is no longer its sole voice.

“We can’t let,” Mr. Nickel wrote, “Donald Trump’s radical agenda go unanswered or unopposed.” Of course, no losing party is expected to end their opposition or silence their voices. The American people, though, saw Trump’s plans and judged them preferable to the Democratic alternative. The existing mechanisms for resisting them work just as well now as they have since Washington’s day.

Continue reading.

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLE: President Trump Sues New York Times, CBS and Other Major Media Outlets for $10B For “False and Defamatory Statements”

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Islamic State Operating In Fort Walton Beach, Florida

Last weekend I was invited to Fort Walton Beach, Florida to give a presentation on Islamic terrorist events not only throughout the world, but also in the military community of Fort Walton.  It has always been my policy that I will not say anything negative about anyone or any organization unless I have first hand evidence to support my claim.

On 8 Jan 2016, I went to the Islamic Da’wah Center of Fort Walton Beach, 6 Hollywood Blvd SW, Fort Walton Beach, FL 32548.  Keep in mind the term Da’wah means to spread the ideology of Islam.  In essence it is missionary work.  My friends in Fort Walton and the surrounding area are surrounded by ISIS  [Islamic State] members/supporters who are living, working, and spreading the very same ideology as ISIS advocates in Syria and around the world.

ISIS would be proud of the Imam of the Fort Walton Beach mosque.  Worshippers are provided numerous booklets, manuals, brochures, DVD’s and 500 plus page books promoting an Islamic caliphate worldwide and under Shariah law.  The books go into detail about physical Jihad being conducted throughout the world.  The Imam gave me a few pieces of material for me to better understand ‘Pure Islam’.  Much of the material was published in Saudi Arabia and Pakistan.  Again, ISIS would feel very comfortable praying in this mosque with an Imam who thinks as they do.

In this short article I will not spend hours and hours explaining why certain pieces of Islamic material are dangerous, but instead I will name some of the people, organizations, and manuals.  I request you research and read for yourselves why the materials are dangerous to you and your families.  Fiqh Us Sunnah, Riyadh Saliheen, Sahih Muslim, Abu Mawdudi, Ali Al Timmimi, Siraj Wahhaj, Zaid Shakir, and of course the national organization of the Muslim Brotherhood operating inside America which is CAIR.  CAIR leaders are Muslim Brotherhood and desire to overthrow the government of America and kill anyone who stands in their way.

I have written extensive articles on the various books mentioned.  Many are on my website.

The manuals at this mosque advocate:

  1. Sedition and treason against America
  2. Killing anyone who they determine to oppose their goals
  3. Child marriages
  4. Slavery
  5. Abuse and rape of girls and women

This is just a sampling. I will be submitting a significant incident report on my findings and it will be posted in the next few days.

I rate this mosque a 9 on a scale of 1 -10, with 10 being the highest threat level.

There is a very high likelihood that someone from this mosque will actually be engaged in physical Jihad against innocent people in the near future. Local authorities must monitor this mosque for activities equivalent to ISIS, shut the mosque down, prosecute the leaders for sedition and treason, and further investigate the members of the mosque.  The IRS approved non profit status must be removed.

Readers of this article are the one’s who can make this happen.  Put the pressure on your elected officials and senior law enforcement to stop ISIS from operating.  Request your Christian and Jewish leaders to put additional pressure on elected officials.

The most disturbing finding during my research at this mosque was that out of the 45 Muslim men attending prayers, at least 10 are active duty U.S. military members, and there were several U.S. government civilians attending.  There are tens of thousands of ISIS operating inside America and 100’s of thousands of their supporters.

If we can’t control their illegal activities how do we expect our government to control tens of thousands of more refugees?  The answer is they can’t.

I respectfully ask for your assistance for me to conduct firsthand research at hundreds of more mosques in America.  The results will be provided to you directly.

EDITORS NOTE: If you desire to help David fund this research please contact him at davegaubatz@gmail.com, or phone 276-229-1056, or donate through PayPal using ID pdgaubatz@yahoo.com . To reach Dave Gaubatz | davegaubatz@gmail.com | http://www.wearenotafraid.blogspot.com
davegaubatz@gmail.com.