Tag Archive for: social media

My 2¢ on Apple and AI: A perspective you will hear nowhere else!

Full disclosure: I’ve been a supporter of Apple for 45± years now.

Here’s an interesting bit of background: for a short time, I was actually an Apple employee! I called on Apple retail dealers (like Sears) in upstate NY and gave them technical assistance. It was an interesting gig.

As an employee, Apple assigned me an email (my first): “aaprjohn@…” which I still have today. What does it mean? Apple Authorized Product Representative. (BTW, I also bought shares of Apple stock – $$$.)

I was subjected to slings and arrows like “IBM will squash Apple like a bug,” “Apple will soon be out of business,” “Microsoft is the real leader in the computer industry,” etc. All of it was nonsense — and I said so at the time.

The stories about the IBM and MS connection have several fascinating aspects to it — too many to go into here. But here’s a tidbit…

How many people use MS Word or MS Excel (aka MS Office)? So what was the origin of MS Office? The Apple Mac! When MS Office was originally released, it was a Mac-only product! PC’s at the time didn’t have the power or interface to take advantage of MS Office. It was later ported to Windows.

The stories regarding IBM are also revealing. In the 1960s and 1970s, IBM was the world’s computer behemoth. Everyone else was like a bird on an elephant.

When desktop computers were first proposed, IBM had to make a momentous decision: 1) to get behind this radical change, or 2) to continue to push their forte, mainframe computers. They chose #2.

All the geniuses at IMB (they had some 300,000 employees) decided that: a) desktop computers would never have the power to do real work, so b) the future would be that everyone would have a terminal (monitor) in their home/office, connected to a powerful, regional mainframe computer.

This key decision had worldwide implications that still reverberate today.

Briefly, IBM also knew that they had to have some desktop machine, but because they didn’t really believe in it, they offered woeful hardware (IBM PC), and outsourced the software (pathetic DOS, to Bill Gates). The end product was really bad, but people robotically bought it because it said “IBM”.

Apple followed a visionary path: to make a powerful computer that was easy to use. I put my money where my mouth was, so my first computer was an Apple Lisa (the predecessor to the Mac) — clearly enormously better than the IBM PC. Yes, it was more expensive, but what is the value of your time?

Anyways, my point here is something no one else in the world seems to have noticed. In the late 1970’s the question was desktop computer or mainframe?

Right now we have a similar technical choice regarding Artificial Intelligence: desktop computer or enormous regional data centers.

Almost everyone is following the 1970’s IBM failed strategy. Meanwhile, a slew of red flags have gone up, but it seems full steam ahead.

(As an aside, there are a lot of similarities between data center issues and wind project issues (economic, environmental, etc.). In both cases, governments largely ignored the negative impacts on local communities.)

The Bottom Line

Now (finally) to my punchline…

Regarding AI Apple is one of the very few companies that is not following the crowd. See their current (very different) thinking: herehereand here.

My question: Is it wise to bet against Apple again?

©2026 All rights reserved.


Here is other information from this scientist that you might find interesting:

I urge all readers to subscribe to AlterAI — IMO the absolute best AI option for subjective questions.

I will consider posting reader submissions on Critical Thinking about my topics of interest.

My commentaries are my opinion about the material discussed therein, based on the information I have. If any readers have different information, please share it. If it is credible, I will be glad to reconsider my position.

Check out the Archives of this Critical Thinking substack.

C19Science.info is my one-page website that covers the lack of genuine Science behind our COVID-19 policies.

Election-Integrity.info is my one-page website that lists multiple major reports on the election integrity issue.

WiseEnergy.org is my multi-page website that discusses the Science (or lack thereof) behind our energy options.

Media Balance Newsletter: a free, twice-a-month newsletter that covers what the mainstream media does not do, on issues from climate to COVID, elections to education, renewables to religion, etc. Here are the Newsletter’s 2026 Archives. Please send me an email to get your free copy. When emailing me, please make sure to include your full name and the state where you live. (Of course, you can cancel the Media Balance Newsletter at any time!)

Meta Faces 29-State Trial That Could Reshape Instagram and Facebook

Aug 18 (Reuters) — A coalition of states suing Meta Platforms over claims Facebook and Instagram were designed in ways that harmed young users’ mental health will begin making its case on Tuesday in California federal court in a trial that could reshape some of the most popular apps on the planet.

Attorneys for Colorado, California, New Jersey and Kentucky, who are leading a bipartisan group of 29 states, will give their opening statements before an eight-person jury in Oakland that is serving expressly in an advisory capacity for U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers, who will ultimately decide the case.

The trial will test the four states’ allegations that Meta designed Facebook and Instagram to be addictive to children and teens and misled consumers about the safety of the platforms for young users. It will also address the claims of all 29 states accusing Meta of improperly collecting and using children’s personal data while they used the company’s platforms in violation of federal law.

Attorneys for Meta are expected to tell the jury that the company has made a huge effort to keep kids safe online. The company has argued that it has not made misleading statements about safety and the states have failed to present any evidence of actual harm to their residents.

Meta founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg is expected to testify during the multiweek trial, as is Instagram head Adam Mosseri.

Biggest Test Yet 

In terms of potential damages and implications for Meta, experts have said the trial is the biggest test yet of youth social media litigation and comes amid a broader reckoning across the globe over social media’s effects on young users.

Meta has said the penalties could be as high as $1.4 trillion, near the company’s market cap of $1.5 trillion. The attorneys general have yet to specify what they are seeking in penalties, but said at a hearing last week that the amount could be closer to $200 billion.

The attorneys general of Colorado, Kentucky, California and New Jersey are also asking the judge to issue an order forcing the company to implement age restrictions, eliminate infinite scroll and make other changes to its platforms nationwide.

In a statement ahead of the arguments, a Meta spokesperson said the states’ claims are unsubstantiated and the company stands by its record of creating strong protections for teens.

“The AGs offer no proof anyone in their states was misled, claim benign features like having an additional Instagram account somehow harmed their residents, and attempt to penalize Meta for industry-wide challenges like age verification,” the spokesperson said. “Rather than sticking to the facts or the law, the states have instead decided to chase an outlandish payout.”

A Multistate Investigation

The states’ lawsuit, which was filed in 2023, stems from a multistate investigation into Instagram and Facebook’s impact on young users. The investigation was announced following disclosures by Meta whistleblower Frances Haugen, who testified before a U.S. Senate committee in 2021 that the company knew its products could harm young users and how to make them safer, but chose not to make those changes in favor of pursuing higher profits.

The states are expected to present a trove of internal documents and research from Meta, as well as testimony from former Meta employees and experts.

Meta and other social media companies like Snap Inc, TikTok parent ByteDance and YouTube parent Alphabet are facing growing pressure from lawmakers and in the courts. The states’ lawsuit is among thousands of cases filed against the companies by states, municipalities, school districts and individuals over allegations that their products harm young users.

Meta has said the flood of litigation could seriously impact its business and financial results.

(Reporting by Diana Novak Jones, Editing by Alexia Garamfalvi and Nia Williams)

AUTHOR

Reuters

EDITORS NOTE: This Washington Stand column is republished with permission. All rights reserved. ©2026 Family Research Council.


The Washington Stand is Family Research Council’s outlet for news and commentary from a biblical worldview. The Washington Stand is based in Washington, D.C. and is published by FRC, whose mission is to advance faith, family, and freedom in public policy and the culture from a biblical worldview. We invite you to stand with us by partnering with FRC.

While the West Surrenders to Islam, Iran Is Fighting to Break Free From It

The Awakening of Persia: Why Iran Stands Alone Against Islam

Enough is enough. Iran’s soul is not defined by Islam. Its spirit cannot be caged by  a barbarian ideology imposed upon the civilisation of Iran. For generations, this cult has fractured the nation, dimmed its brilliance, and chained its people to shadows. Islam has brought only division, oppression, and shadows — never peace.

Telling Iranians to celebrate Islam is like asking someone to cherish the very weapon that scarred them, simply because they later polished it.

Iran is not the land of clerics and fanaticism. It is the land of Zarathustra, the legacy of Cyrus the Great — a civilization built on dignity, wisdom, and leadership long before desert chaos swept in from Arabia. It’s time to reclaim that greatness.

The day will come when Western nations look toward Iran — the nation that broke free from Islam’s grip. Doubt it now, but history will prove it. I’ve tried to awaken America for decades, but America resists salvation. Welcome back to Persia.

While the streets of major European capitals and American cities echo with endless apologies, accommodations, and systemic catering to Islamic orthodoxy, a profound, historic rebellion is quietly brewing in the heart of the Middle East. Western governments, blinded by institutional guilt, cultural relativism, and political correctness, bend over backward to appease an ideology that fundamentally opposes Western liberal values. Leaders in London, Paris, Berlin, and Washington fall over themselves to fund, protect, and normalize religious dogmatism, believing they are championing diversity. In reality, they are importing and nurturing the very intolerant systems that their own Enlightenment fought centuries to escape.

Every major Western nation bows to the altar of political sensitivity, too paralyzed by fear of backlash to address the authoritarian core of Islamic governance. They tolerate the intolerable, normalize the regressive, and silence domestic critics under the guise of progressivism.

Yet, across the globe, one nation-and one nation alone-stands as the living, breathing antidote to this global capitulation. That nation is Iran.

To understand modern Iran, one must look past the turbulent veneer of the 1979 Islamic Revolution and the iron-fisted tyranny of the mullahs. The current regime does not represent the soul of the Iranian people; it is an occupying ideological force holding an ancient culture hostage.

For over fourteen centuries, Iranians have endured an identity crisis born from conquest. The Arab invasion dismantled the mighty Sasanian Empire, replacing a civilization of philosophy, science, art, and light with a system of absolute religious submission. Zoroastrianism-the ancient Iranian faith centered on Good Thoughts, Good Words, and Good Deeds-was systematically suppressed, replaced by a theology that many contemporary Iranians view as fundamentally foreign to their national ethos.

Today, the citizens of Iran are waging a silent, daily war against their oppressors. From underground Christian conversions and secular defiance to massive nationwide protests led by brave women burning mandatory headscarves, the Iranian populace is rejecting the Islamic Republic from the ground up. They are proving, with every act of resistance, that Islam is a garment forced upon them at sword-point, not a heritage chosen by their hearts.

When we strip away the dark theology imposed upon the nation, what remains is the immortal spirit of Persia. This is the land that gave the world the Cyrus Cylinder-widely celebrated as the world’s first declaration of human rights. It is the birthplace of astronomical innovation, breathtaking architecture, poetry that speaks of universal human love, and an administrative genius that united millions under a banner of cultural and religious tolerance.

To ask an Iranian to tie their national identity to the clerics ruling Tehran is a profound historical insult. It is asking a proud lion to celebrate the cage it was born in. The current regime relies on terror, censorship, and ideological indoctrination precisely because it knows that the moment freedom returns, the entire Islamic superstructure will collapse like a house of cards.

Look at the West today. Decades of institutional surrender have left American and European societies fractured, defensive, and culturally confused. Leaders preach tolerance while eroding the foundational pillars of free speech and individual liberty. Having spent four decades watching the systematic degradation of Western political courage, it becomes painfully clear: America does not want to be saved. It is sleepwalking into its own cultural dissolution, trading its heritage for the hollow applause of globalist appeasers.

Meanwhile, Iranians are paying in blood to undo the damage of religious totalitarianism. They are the only people on earth who have lived under a pure, unadulterated Islamic theocracy for decades-and because of that, they are the only people who truly see it for what it is. They have lived through the nightmare, tasted the poison, and rejected the cureless disease.

History moves in cycles. Empires rise, fall, and occasionally rise again from the ashes of their own destruction. The day is coming when the dark cloud hanging over Tehran will lift, swept away by an unstoppable wave of secular nationalism, cultural renaissance, and historical reclamation.

When that day arrives, the dynamic will flip entirely. A free, secularized Persia-liberated from the shackles of religious fanaticism-will emerge as the most advanced, enlightened, and culturally vibrant nation in the region. Disillusioned citizens from the West, fleeing societies crushed by their own moral cowardice and cultural surrender, will look eastward.

They will look to the land that dared to stare down theocratic tyranny and win. Welcome to Persia.

©2026 . All rights reserved.

Tech Time with Thomas | How MCP Connects AI to Your Business

In this episode of Tech Time with Tommy, Rich and Thomas go deep on one of the biggest challenges in agentic AI, getting AI to work inside the systems businesses already use every day. They break down MCP in plain English, explain why it matters, and show how AI is moving beyond simple chat into real operational workflows. If you have been wondering what it actually looks like to connect AI to your business, this episode gives you a clear and practical view.

The conversation covers the difference between APIs and MCP, why MCP acts like an AI-friendly wrapper around existing software, and where the real risks and opportunities show up when agents start reading from and writing to business systems. Tommy walks through a live example using JIRA and TLDV, showing how an agent can prioritize tickets, create issues, reason through next steps, and potentially coordinate across multiple tools. Rich and Thomas also dig into bigger ideas like multi-agent orchestration, human-in-the-loop approvals, reasoning models, dynamic workflows, and why the future of work may shift from static files and dashboards to AI-generated interfaces, markdown, and HTML-native workspaces.

WATCH: Tech Time with Thomas | How MCP Connects AI to Your Business

If you are exploring how to make AI useful across your organization, this episode is packed with practical insight and forward-looking ideas. Let us know what part of the agentic stack you want us to unpack next, and subscribe for more conversations on real-world AI implementation.

©2026 . All rights reserved.


A.I Guys Substack:https://substack.aiguyspod.com/

RAIA AI Website: https://www.raiaai.com/ 

All links: https://lnkd.in/eXDpww6V

Spotify: https://lnkd.in/ee9h9GYB

Youtube: https://lnkd.in/etDvqQ7d

Apple: https://lnkd.in/epYT2GSi

Microsoft Stops Discriminating Against Conservatives

FIRST ON THE DAILY SIGNAL—Microsoft has stopped systematically excluding conservative nonprofits from its corporate generosity program, the Daily Signal has learned.

The tech giant—the fourth-largest company in the world by market capitalization—has directed its corporate generosity platform, Benevity, to stop relying on the Southern Poverty Law Center’s “hate map” to filter out nonprofits. Critics say the SPLC unfairly condemns mainstream conservative and Christian nonprofits by putting them on this map with chapters of the Ku Klux Klan. The SPLC maintains that these nonprofits vilify people typically for their immutable characteristics.

“Microsoft’s decision is a major victory against ideological blacklisting in employee gift-matching programs and an important win for conservative and religious organizations,” Tim Schwarzenberger, director of corporate engagement at Inspire Investing, told the Daily Signal in a statement Tuesday.

According to a report exclusively provided first to the Daily Signal, Microsoft disclosed the move away from the SPLC in response to a shareholder proposal.

Inspire Investing, a Christian financial adviser that focuses on “Biblically Responsible Investing,” had filed a shareholder proposal asking Microsoft to evaluate the risks associated with excluding religious organizations from its employee gift-matching program and the use of third-party ideological screening.

“During engagement, Microsoft confirmed that it had removed the SPLC filter from its Benevity platform in late 2025,” the report states. “As a result, otherwise eligible IRS-recognized 501(c)(3) organizations are no longer subject to that additional ideological screening within Microsoft’s employee gift-matching program.”

SPLC Backlash

The SPLC publishes a “hate map” that critics say conflates mainstream conservative and Christian organizations with genuinely extremist groups. Critics note the map includes Moms for Liberty, Alliance Defending Freedom, and Focus on the Family.

In 2012, a since-convicted terrorist told the FBI he used the SPLC’s map to target the Family Research Council in an attempted mass shooting. The SPLC condemned the attack but kept the council on the map.

FBI Director Kash Patel officially cut the bureau’s ties with the SPLC following the assassination of Charlie Kirk.

In April, a federal grand jury indicted the SPLC for wire fraud and bank fraud for allegedly funneling money to Klan members, propping up the hate threat in order to raise money by claiming to oppose it. The SPLC says the payments involved informants identifying threats, but prosecutors dispute that claim.

1792 Exchange, a nonprofit dedicated to bringing ideological balance back to public companies, and Alliance Defending Freedom called on corporate generosity platforms to stop using the SPLC.

The Daily Signal reached out to the SPLC for comment but did not receive a response by publication time.

What Is Benevity?

Corporate generosity platforms such as Benevity connect employers to a host of nonprofits. Benevity connects “nearly 1,000 enterprise companies” to a network of 513,000 nonprofits. Benevity acknowledged in 2021 that it uses the SPLC to vet almost “2 million nonprofits.”

Benevity maintains that the SPLC “hate map” is an optional filter, not a default setting.

Thanks to shareholder activism from 1792 Exchange, Bowyer Research, The Heritage Foundation, and others, a growing list of companies has directed Benevity to stop using the SPLC. The list includes American Express, AT&T, Mastercard, McDonald’s, Nvidia, and Salesforce.

Companies use other corporate generosity programs as well and have directed them to stop using the SPLC list.

DoorDash directed the platform Deed to stop using the SPLC for this purpose. Verizon directed CyberGrants, another such platform, to stop using the SPLC for its employee giving.

The Daily Signal reached out to Benevity for comment but did not receive a response by publication time.

Implications of Microsoft’s Decision

Schwarzenberger, the Inspire Investing director, told the Daily Signal that Microsoft’s decision “demonstrates that even one of the world’s largest companies can administer its employee gift-matching program using objective charitable standards without relying on additional ideological screening imposed by outside advocacy organizations.”

He also noted that Microsoft is “part of a broader trend we’ve seen across corporate America as companies reevaluate employee gift matching, strengthen charitable neutrality, and give employees greater freedom to support lawful IRS-recognized charities consistent with their convictions.”

This trend “has the potential to redirect millions of dollars in matching gifts to otherwise eligible charitable organizations that may have previously been excluded under additional ideological screening criteria.”

Schwarzenberger said he hopes Microsoft’s “leadership encourages others across corporate America to do the same.”

The Daily Signal reached out to Microsoft for comment but did not receive a response by publication time.

AUTHOR

Tyler O’Neil

Tyler O’Neil is senior investigative reporter at the Daily Signal and the author of two books, “Making Hate Pay: The Corruption of the Southern Poverty Law Center” and “The Woketopus: The Dark Money Cabal Manipulating the Federal Government.” Follow on X Tyler2ONeil.

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Signal column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Huckabee: Americans Fail to Grasp the Threat of Iran

Conflict between Iran and the U.S. has resumed, despite the efforts of President Donald Trump to secure peace in the troubled region. According to the U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM), the U.S. military conducted “a new wave of offensive strikes against Iran” on Sunday, successfully striking “dozens” of targets. At issue is Iran’s continued closure of the Strait of Hormuz, a critical passage for the shipment of oil globally. “The Strait of Hormuz is a vital maritime corridor for global trade. Iran does not control it,” a statement from CENTCOM read. “U.S. forces are postured and prepared to ensure that freedom of navigation remains available to commercial shipping despite Iran’s continued unwarranted aggression, harassment, threats, and arbitrary declarations.”

Over the past year, the U.S. involvement in the Middle East has largely centered on Iran’s threats against Israel. This time, however, Israel does not appear to be a party to the conflict, which, as U.S. Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee pointed out in an interview on “This Week on Capitol Hill” on Saturday, is probably a good thing. “Israel has not been engaged in it, and it’s probably smart that Iran does not fire missiles toward Israel because they would be compelled to fire them back,” Huckabee said, following a meeting with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. He also warned that Iran is more than just a threat to Israel, but also to the U.S.

“You have to separate Hezbollah from the mothership of Iran, and the reason that’s so important is because Iran has been supplying funds and weapons and strategy” to the Middle Eastern paramilitary organization, Huckabee said. He noted that cutting Iran off from Hezbollah would destabilize the latter and severely limit the threat that Hezbollah could pose. Furthermore, he pointed out that Hezbollah is active across the Western hemisphere and has actually killed more Americans than Israelis. “When the U.S. and people in America say, ‘Well, it doesn’t affect me,’ they have no idea what they’re talking about. Of course it affects them,” the ambassador insisted. “If you can step on the oxygen hose and keep Hezbollah from getting all of this oxygen from Iran, you do a lot to really upend terror…”

“One of the ways in which, again, Americans, I think, fail to grasp the threat of Iran — for 47 years they’ve been saying they’re going to kill us. Now, when people tell you that same thing over and over for that many years, you’re wise to believe them and you’re foolish to ignore them,” Huckabee added. He pointed out that recent reports from Israeli intelligence suggest that Iranian operatives inside the U.S. are plotting to assassinate the president.

On Sunday, U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations and former National Security Advisor Mike Waltz confirmed that Iranian operatives are actively plotting to assassinate the president. “I won’t get into specific intelligence, but this regime — going all the way up to the Ayatollah — has plotted to kill President Trump for many years,” Waltz stated. “They have operatives here in the United States. Plots are ongoing. But our intelligence community, the FBI, our law enforcement entities are absolutely on top of it,” he added. “But make no mistake that the Iranian regime is trying to kill President Trump and those around him.”

According to Waltz, the Iranian regime is attempting to “use the global economy as some type of leverage” by blocking the Strait of Hormuz and preventing safe passage for commercial craft. “What Iran is doing is in violation of international law,” the ambassador said. “Regardless of whether you’re a party to some conflict, you cannot start shooting in all directions, attacking your neighbors, attacking civilian shipping, civilian infrastructure, throwing mines in international waterways, and acting like the irresponsible, genocidal regime that many have always accused it of being.” He noted that Iranian officials claimed that opening fire upon commercial ships over the weekend was a mistake, an error on the part of junior officers. However, Waltz questioned why those junior officers were not disciplined by a military regime renowned for dictatorial autocracy. He asked, “At the end of the day, where’s the discipline and the public apology if that’s the case?”

In the meantime, this growing divide on Israel here at home misses a fundamental point, Perkins insisted. “Israel is also, despite reports to the contrary, a stabilizing force in the Middle East. But what we see on the horizon with Iran as really kind of the strongman — or at least the big nuisance there in the Middle East being curtailed — that vacuum is going to be filled by someone, some country, some leader. I think Israel has the potential to be an even greater stabilizing force [when that happens],” he told Huckabee.

Perkins attributed the drift in the church away from Israel to “biblical illiteracy.” Huckabee agreed, reminding viewers that standing with Israel is “scriptural.” “I mean, I could give you a lot of geopolitical reasons. I could give you humanitarian reasons. I could give you historic reasons. I could give you economic reasons. And all of those are important, and all of them should weigh in,” the ambassador emphasized. “But the ultimate reason for evangelicals is because we’re people of the book.”

American Christians need to recognize “the important role that Israel plays [and] recognize Genesis 1:23 as a biblical mandate,” the ambassador said. “And some of it is the fear of some pulpits, [and] pastors who are afraid of their own congregations — afraid to offend them, afraid to upset them. But if you upset them because you’re preaching the Scripture, because you are faithfully delivering the Word of God, then you’re not in trouble in a bad way. If that gets you in trouble,” he insisted, “then you should be in trouble. The prophets of old were willing to get in trouble with the people, because they didn’t want to be in trouble with God. If that’s my choice, I’ll be in trouble with a congregation any day not to be in trouble with the Creator God of the universe,” Huckabee said.

AUTHOR

S.A. McCarthy

S.A. McCarthy serves as a news writer at The Washington Stand.

RELATED VIDEOS:

Victor Davis Hanson: The US Needs to Hit Iran Harder to End the War

IRANIAN CROWN PRINCE REZA PAHLAVI: “The people of Iran will not settle for anything less than the complete collapse of this regime.”

TRUMP CRANKS UP THE PRESSURE ON IRAN

EDITORS NOTE: This Washington Stand column is republished with permission. All rights reserved. ©2026 Family Research Council.


The Washington Stand is Family Research Council’s outlet for news and commentary from a biblical worldview. The Washington Stand is based in Washington, D.C. and is published by FRC, whose mission is to advance faith, family, and freedom in public policy and the culture from a biblical worldview. We invite you to stand with us by partnering with FRC.

California Scheming? Golden State’s Glacial Vote Count Bolsters Case for SAVE America Act

The polls closed in California on Tuesday at 8 p.m. local time. As of Saturday, nobody knows which two candidates will be competing in November for governor or Los Angeles mayor.

Indeed, mail-in ballots postmarked by Election Day may stumble in for seven days until June 9—and still be counted. Thus, weeks could pass before these major political contests are settled. Counties have until July 3 to report their official results to the secretary of state.

It was not always this way. By 5 a.m. on March 6, 2013, 100% of precincts had totaled the previous day’s ballots. Nine hours after voting ended, Angelenos knew the final two mayoral rivals. (Gil Garcetti prevailed.) As of Friday, only 71% of ballots had been tabulated in Los Angeles and just 68% statewide.

Escargot can count votes more swiftly than Californians. Pundit Nate Silver calls this “failed state shit.” He observed this week via X: “The fact that California elections often can’t be resolved for weeks is kind of insane and not common in other electoral systems around the world.”

Silver and Eli McKown-Dawson elaborated, “Colombia held a presidential election on Sunday [May 30], and 99.98% of the result was in on Monday morning. Japan also counts most of its votes overnight. And in the UK (not exactly a poster child for state capacity), you can generally expect to have calls for all 650 parliamentary seats the morning after the election.”

California Counts

President Donald Trump is not amused.

“The Dumocrats are at it again!” Trump roared Thursday via Truth Social. “They are trying to STEAL THE GOVERNOR OF CALIFORNIA PRIMARY, AND THE MAYOR OF LOS ANGELES, PRIMARY, AWAY FROM TWO GREAT REPUBLICAN CANDIDATES. Here we go with the very late and massive numbers of MAIL IN BALLOTS.”

Trump continued: “There’s BIG cheating by the Dumocrats in California. Votes are all tied up. May not be in for weeks. Under investigation by the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Los Angeles. Why the vote counting DELAY???”

Trump echoes conservative complaints that GOP candidates in tight races too often triumph only on Election Night. Thanks to magic ballots, these Republicans wane, and the Democrats wax and then win. Magic ballots rarely favor Republicans.

Confidence Corrodes

Californians are experiencing either corruption or the appearance of corruption. Neither “I am being robbed” nor “I think I am being robbed” yields deep sleep. If Democrats are using this slovenly process to slouch toward a stuffed-ballot-box defeat of Steve Hilton, Spencer Pratt, or both, the perpetrators must be handcuffed at once.

But even if California’s count is purer than St. Francis of Assisi and merely looks crooked, millions of Americans will conclude that someone is cheating, and the entire system is rigged. Such suspicions corrode confidence in elections and the republic that they serve.

Winners easily respect their leaders and institutions, but even citizens who lose elections can accept opponents who succeed, fair and square.

But when voters feel cheated at the polls, then the whole structure starts to reek. “That’s not my mayor” and “That’s not my governor” become battle cries as America slides toward Civil War 2.0.

SAVE America Act

California’s pathetic performance offers yet another reason for the U.S. Senate to pry its collective butt out of the proverbial Barcalounger and pass the SAVE America Act already.

Catapulting mass mail-in ballots atop the ash heap of history and limiting them to the sick, the infirm, and those absent on Election Day (as the SAVE America Act requires) would go far toward ending this nightmare. And, to be accepted, all ballots must arrive before polls close (as the U.S. Supreme Court soon might decide.)

With these two reforms, California (and other states) could manage a much shorter stack of mail-in ballots. They could be counted every Election Day, with normal ballots. Winners and losers would emerge before the cocks crow at dawn.

To the Republican-led Senate: Scrap mass mail-in ballots. Pass the SAVE America Act. Make Election Night Great Again!

AUTHOR

Deroy Murdock

Deroy Murdock is a Manhattan-based Fox News contributor and a contributing editor with The American Spectator.

RELATED ARTICLES:

How California’s Election Procedures Turn Early Leads Into Late Losses

‘They’re Crooked’: Spencer Pratt’s Bruising Mayoral Loss Raises Election Integrity Concerns

CALIFORNIA BIG CHEAT: Third Place Unknown Now Getting First Place in Late Ballots From Areas With Large Homeless Populations

About The Media Freakout on Voter ID in Ohio

Voter Fraud Convict Tries Political Comeback, Lands In Hot Water Over Anti-Military Remarks

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Signal column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

How Christians in Cuba Are Engaged in Civic Resistance under The Current Regime

In his seminal work “The Politics of Nonviolent Action,” political scientist Gene Sharp cataloged 198 methods of nonviolent action. Wherever tyranny existed, the American scholar found a hopeful and creative form of civic resistance emerging from diverse populations. Through sit-ins, musical performances, and countless other forms of expression, men and women across the globe voiced their dissent against specific policies or systems.

Among these methods, Sharp included the “protest or support assembly.” He classified it as a method of “protest and persuasion,” aimed at making public support — or opposition — to a specific cause visible, while seeking to mobilize citizens and exert pressure on opponents without resorting to violence.

In Cuba, the long history of resistance against totalitarianism has involved recourse to both violence and peaceful demonstrations. And within this civic landscape, the protest or support assembly has carved out a space — one that is currently being championed by young Christians.

There are precedents. In April 2021, evangelical leader Marcos Antonio Perdomo was interrogated by the National Revolutionary Police (PNR) in Santiago de Cuba. He was reprimanded for continuing to hold worship services, thereby defying the Castro regime’s COVID-19 lockdown orders.

In solidarity with Perdomo, a group of some twenty believers gathered outside the Micro 9 Police Station and remained there until he emerged from the building.

Recently, there has been a surge in such displays of solidarity; their primary inspiration is a movement of young evangelical and libertarian influencers in Cuba that first emerged in late 2025.

The Christian content creators — Anna Bensi, Ernesto Ricardo Medina (of El4tico), Iván Daniel Calás, and David Espinosa — and, on the other side, the four members of the widely followed program Fuera de la Caja (Outside the Box), did not initially know one another. However, the thematic overlap in the issues they address eventually led them to collaborate, both on-camera and behind the scenes. The discourse of the Cristario axis — a blend of “Christian” and “libertarian” — is anti-socialist and pro-free market; it champions Cuba’s Christian heritage and envisions a future free from the leftist propaganda that has dominated the country for nearly seven decades. They represent a sort of crystallization of the “New Right” concept articulated by political scientist Agustín Laje: sovereigntists, patriots, conservatives, and libertarians united against totalitarian ideologies.

Since late 2025, this group has engaged in public education through videos disseminated via Facebook profiles and YouTube channels, covering topics such as the separation of powers, public service, totalitarianism, and religious and financial freedom; they have also dispelled myths surrounding the much-maligned concept of capitalism. This activity has placed them squarely under the regime’s microscope.

In an unfortunately familiar cycle — one seemingly lifted straight from the socialist political police’s playbook — repression begins in concentric circles radiating outward from the targeted individual.

First, the victim is “interviewed” and warned to abandon their dissident discourse; next, an attempt is made to recruit them as an informant for the intelligence apparatus; should they refuse to compromise, threats inevitably follow. The next circle to be targeted consists of friends and family members, who receive summonses and threats, pressured to “counsel” their loved one.

Thus, in April, the political police summoned Yusleidy Bosques — mother of Karel Daniel Hernández, a member of the group Fuera de la Caja (Outside the Box) — to the National Revolutionary Police (PNR) station located at Infanta and Manglar in Havana.

Caridad Silvente and Elmis Rivero (a U.S. citizen) — the mother and sister, respectively, of Anna Bensi — were also summoned and subjected to intimidation regarding the repercussions Bensi would face if she continued posting criticisms of the socialist system. Subsequently, both Silvente and Bensi were held under house arrest for a month and placed on the blacklist of “regulated” individuals — those barred from leaving the country.

However, alongside this subsequent wave of repression came a surge of solidarity. By my count, five solidarity gatherings took place within a span of seven weeks (from March 11 to April 25, 2026). On each occasion — during a summons issued to a member of the Eje Cristario or a family member — each woman gathered friends, followers, and leaders or brethren in the faith outside the police stations where the interrogations were taking place, remaining there until the interrogated individual emerged.

The solidarity assemblies held during this period were characterized by public prayers offered on behalf of the summoned individual, performed in circles formed directly in front of the police stations — all of which were located in Havana. Furthermore, each gathering was documented through selfies and photographs, which were uploaded immediately to social media; this revealed a shift in attitude regarding resistance to the totalitarian state — no longer marked by cautious apprehension, but rather by an openly displayed courage.

Another noteworthy element is that, from the very first assembly on March 11 (when Silvente went to the PNR Station in Alamar) to the one held on April 25 (the Bosques gathering at Infanta and Manglar), the number of participants steadily increased. While images from the first event show nine people gathered, the final assembly drew 19 attendees — an event that even featured a sort of bicycle caravan carrying a portion of the participants as they made their way to the police station.

Could these assemblies grow to become events involving dozens or even hundreds of citizens?

The regime shifted its strategy regarding summonses to police stations in May. Early that month, Castroist henchmen interrogated Amílcar Andrés Bravo — father of Abel and Bety, the young members of the Fuera de la Caja (Outside the Box) collective — but this time, the interrogation took place at his workplace: the Cuban Sports Research Center. Had the military authorities changed the location of the interrogation to prevent another solidarity assembly — one that might have been even larger than previous ones?

Alfredo G. Fominaya Roig, a student at the Pentecostal Theological University of Cuba, has participated in three of the recent solidarity assemblies held in Havana. Having himself become a influential figure — particularly through his Facebook profile — he has faced threats due to the videos he posts criticizing the regime.

The first solidarity assembly he attended was held in support of Anna Bensi, even though he knew her only through social media.

Alfredo recalls how the regime attempted to sabotage an assembly organized in support of the young woman. He was unable to attend another of the content creator’s summonses (on April 12) because the political police had — in a move described as “simultaneous and malicious” — issued a summons to David Espinosa; consequently, many people were already en route to support him in a different part of Havana.

Reflecting on the solidarity assemblies he has attended, he notes that while each offered a distinct experience, they shared certain common nuances. “The one constant is that we pray before the person who was summoned goes inside,” he says. “Then, during the wait, conversations spring up — along with mutual understandings, shared affinities, and friendships that grow increasingly solid with each passing time.”

Alfredo believes that “the dictatorship, in its attempt to sever that connection, has only succeeded in making us more united and stronger.”

These gatherings conclude only when the summoned individual emerges from the police station, where they are greeted “with joy and a keen curiosity to hear about their latest encounter with those Orwellian dogs,” recounts the young man affiliated with the Assemblies of God. In his case, he attended for the first time because he had asked a friend to let him know when the next solidarity assembly took place. He had seen photos of people gathered at a previous one and told himself that he was one of them. “In hard times, I couldn’t help but be where those who thought the same way I did were.”

The example of others who had come before him — spread through an open channel like social media — combined with ideological alignment and, most importantly, shared faith as a unifying bond, drew Alfredo to more than one of these acts of resistance. It remains to be seen whether the courage of others proves contagious and activates the civic responsibility of other Cubans during this decisive hour for the island.

AUTHOR

Yoe Suarez

Yoe Suárez is The Washington Stand’s international affairs correspondent. He is an exiled journalist, writer, and producer who investigated in Havana about torture, political police, gangs, government black lists, and cybersurveillance. A graduate of Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, he was a CBN correspondent, and has written for outlets like The Hill and Newsweek. He has appeared on Vox, Univision, and Deutsche Welle as an analyst on Cuba, security, and U.S. foreign policy.

RELATED ARTICLE:

EDITORS NOTE: This Washington Stand column is republished with permission. All rights reserved. ©2026 Family Research Council.


The Washington Stand is Family Research Council’s outlet for news and commentary from a biblical worldview. The Washington Stand is based in Washington, D.C. and is published by FRC, whose mission is to advance faith, family, and freedom in public policy and the culture from a biblical worldview. We invite you to stand with us by partnering with FRC.

Personal AI Agents vs Enterprise AI Agents, What Businesses Need to Know

What happens when an AI workflow that works perfectly for one person falls apart at the business level? In this episode of The AI Guys, Lee and Rich break down the real difference between personal AI agents and enterprise AI agents, and why that gap matters more than most companies realize.

They unpack how personal agents can boost individual productivity through tools like email access, browser control, and lightweight automations, while enterprise agents demand shared context, deeper system integrations, structured workflows, governance, and scalability. The conversation also covers why quick AI wins can create false confidence, how to spot the iceberg effect before it hits, and what teams should evaluate before choosing whether to build, buy, or expand an agentic solution.

If you are experimenting with AI inside your company, this episode will help you separate hype from real operational strategy.

WATCH: Personal AI Agents vs Enterprise AI Agents, What Businesses Need to Know

Subscribe for more practical AI conversations, and check out the links below for more from The AI Guys.

A.I. Guys substack: https://substack.aiguyspod.com/

RAIA AI website: https://www.raiaai.com/ 

All links: https://lnkd.in/eXDpww6V

Spotify: https://lnkd.in/ee9h9GYB

Youtube: https://lnkd.in/etDvqQ7d

Apple: https://lnkd.in/epYT2GSi

©2026 All rights reserved.

Tech Time with Thomas | Build an AI Live Chat Support Agent for Your SaaS

In this episode of Tech Time with Thomas, Thomas Hall and Lee Dixon build a no-code AI live chat support agent for a salon software platform using Raia AI. The goal is simple: give customers a fast, helpful support experience on your website without forcing your team to manage another support tool or build a custom system from scratch.

Thomas walks through the full setup, including creating the support agent, adding guardrails, configuring escalation logic, customizing the live chat widget, embedding it on a website, and passing logged-in user data through the SDK for a more personalized experience. He also shows how the agent can escalate frustrated users, notify the support team, and smoothly hand conversations over to a human inside Copilot when needed.

WATCH: Tech Time with Thomas | Build an AI Live Chat Support Agent for Your SaaS

If you are looking for a practical way to add AI-powered support to your SaaS product, this episode is a great blueprint. Subscribe for more Tech Time with Thomas builds, and check the links below and more more content.

©2026 All rights reserved.

Visit RAIAAI.com: https://www.raiaai.com/

All links: https://lnkd.in/eXDpww6V

Spotify: https://lnkd.in/ee9h9GYB

Youtube: https://lnkd.in/etDvqQ7d

Apple: https://lnkd.in/epYT2GSi

When the Virtual World Becomes the Real World

I spent more than 40 years watching how environments shape soldiers. Put a man in a foreign culture long enough, and his instincts begin to change — his sense of danger, his habits, even what he considers normal. What American parents are watching happen to their children follows the same pattern.

Gen Z entrepreneur Adnan Alkhalili describes his own upbringing as “scarily online.” By his early teens, he was waking in a dark room, rarely going outside, living on processed food and energy drinks just to function. At 14, he said he felt like a man in his 70s with nothing left to live for. Today, working with hundreds of college students, he says he has yet to meet a young person untouched by this lifestyle. His full account appears in a recent interview on American Thought Leaders.

Parents recognize the pattern even when they can’t name it: the teenager who is always tired but never rests well, the child who prefers a screen to a conversation, the household where everyone is present, but no one is truly engaged.

Young people today are not simply online. Many now retreat into digital worlds designed to capture their attention, build habits, and connect them with strangers — often as an escape from real-life challenges. What used to be ordinary boredom — a normal condition of growing up, is now filled instantly, leaving almost no space for reflection, sustained effort, or growth. Young people themselves call the condition “brain rot,” and the term fits.

Parents are not simply competing with a phone. Tristan Harris, a former design ethicist at Google, has pointed out that smartphones are shaped by thousands of engineers constantly refining how to keep users engaged. When a parent asks a teenager to put the phone down, that request goes up against one of the most sophisticated persuasion systems ever built.

A California jury answered that charge on March 25, 2026, finding Meta and YouTube liable for deliberately designing their platforms to addict children, awarding $6 million in damages — the first verdict of its kind in more than 2,000 pending cases. The legal argument tracks exactly what parents witness at home: these are not neutral tools but engineered environments, and internal Meta documents shown at trial confirmed the company knew the harm it was causing.

Neuroscientist Dr. Jared Cooney Horvath testified before Congress that Gen Z is the first generation in modern history to underperform their parents across every key cognitive measure — attention, memory, literacy, numeracy, and general IQ — despite more years of schooling than any generation before them.

Artificial intelligence has compounded the problem by giving students a way to bypass the work of thinking entirely. A RAND Corporation study found student use of AI for schoolwork jumped from 48 to 62% in just seven months, with 67% acknowledging it is weakening their critical thinking. As I described in a recent column, a middle schooler I interviewed summed up the calculation plainly: why spend hours struggling when a machine produces the answer in minutes?

A college student I spoke with put the deeper problem in a sentence that stayed with me: “I’ve seen people consult AI like a pastor.” A generation already shaped by an escapist digital world is now turning to machines not just for answers but for guidance on identity and meaning. As I examine at length in “AI for Mankind’s Future,” unchecked reliance on algorithmic systems erodes the very human judgment it was meant to supplement. These systems have no conscience, no moral responsibility, and no accountability before God or man — and for all their fluency, they cannot be wise.

The fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom” (Proverbs 9:10). Information is not wisdom, and speed is not judgment. A child who never learns the difference will not discover it on a screen.

This is a national concern, not just a family one. In “The New AI Cold War,” I argue that future competition will depend as much on the character and discipline of a nation’s people as on its technology. A generation that avoids struggle, depends on shortcuts, and cannot sustain independent thought will not maintain a capable military, a productive economy, or a stable society. Defense analysts who have identified excessive screen immersion as a strategic liability have it exactly right.

Alkhalili calls for restoring what the body and mind were designed to receive — light, movement, nourishment, and real human connection. He launched a grassroots campus effort he calls Touch Grass Together, not with lectures but with simple physical activities: snowball fights, jumping into piles of leaves, anything that puts bodies in motion and in the same space.

After significant weight loss, Alkhalili saw his anxiety and OCD symptoms recede — experience that underscored a truth the virtual world obscures: the body and mind are inseparable, and when one is neglected in a sedentary, screen-dominated life, the other suffers.

Scripture understood this long before smartphones existed. From the beginning, human beings were created to live within God-ordained limits — to work and steward creation (Genesis 2:15), to observe rhythms of labor and rest (Exodus 20:9–10), and to be shaped through the discipline and struggle that produce maturity (Hebrews 12:11). Life itself unfolds within divinely ordered seasons and boundaries (Ecclesiastes 3:1). Remove those conditions, and something essential in a person does not develop as God intended.

Parents are the first line. Clear household limits — no devices at meals, no screens before bed, an expectation that effort precedes shortcuts — communicate something technology cannot: that some things require human work and will not be outsourced. More consequential than any rule, though, is presence. Where parents disengage, the screen takes their place.

Pastors need to address this with the same directness they bring to any other threat to spiritual formation. This is not a side issue; it is shaping how young people think, relate to authority, and understand where truth comes from. Policymakers, meanwhile, need to move beyond symbolic phone bans and confront the structural incentives that make these platforms addictive by design. Removing a phone from a classroom does not fix a platform engineered to recapture that student’s attention the moment school ends.

Alkhalili said it simply: we must maintain our humanity. The digital world resists that at every turn because it profits from the alternative. “Whoever walks in integrity walks securely” (Proverbs 10:9). That security has never come from an algorithm, and it never will.

AUTHOR

Robert Maginnis

Robert Maginnis is a retired U.S. Army lieutenant colonel, senior fellow for National Security at Family Research Council, and the author of 14 books. His latest, “The New AI Cold War,” releases in April 2026.

EDITORS NOTE: This Washington Stand column is republished with permisison. All rights reserved. ©2026 Family Research Council.


The Washington Stand is Family Research Council’s outlet for news and commentary from a biblical worldview. The Washington Stand is based in Washington, D.C. and is published by FRC, whose mission is to advance faith, family, and freedom in public policy and the culture from a biblical worldview. We invite you to stand with us by partnering with FRC.

The Child Predator Problem Inside Roblox

States Are Taking Action. But a Parent’s Intuition Remains the Final Line of Defense 

To millions of children, Roblox looks like a colorful universe of games and imagination. Players build worlds, customize avatars, and explore endless digital playgrounds with friends.

But to a growing number of investigators, Roblox represents something else entirely. It is a massive digital environment where predators can hide behind cartoon avatars and quietly search for vulnerable children.

That concern has now reached the courtroom in both Nebraska and Louisiana.

Nebraska Attorney General Mike Hilgers recently filed a lawsuit against Roblox Corporation, accusing the platform of misleading parents about the safety of its environment while predators exploit the system to put countless children in danger.

Although Nebraska’s full court filing has not yet circulated widely online, reports about the case suggest that investigators discovered disturbing examples of user-created worlds accessible to children.

Strip clubs. Yes, children under 13 have access to digital strip clubs on the platform.

And if that’s not shocking enough, kids can visit “Epstein’s Island.” They can even engage in Sean “Diddy” Combs experiences, which are known to include “freak offs.”

The lawsuit also alleges that predators have used Roblox’s in-game currency, Robux, to both lure and manipulate children. By offering digital gifts or rewards, stalkers can gradually build trust before steering conversations toward inappropriate behavior.

This pattern is well known among researchers studying online grooming.

How Grooming Begins in Gaming Platforms

Unlike traditional social media, gaming platforms offer predators an easy slide into a child’s world by creating a tunnel of supposedly shared experiences, which make conversations feel natural and harmless.

“Problems with mom? Me too!” “You like Sponge Bob? He’s my favorite!”

Predators extend this conversation by playing a game with a child, offering tips, helping them win challenges, or giving them Robux (virtual currency). Over time, the predator establishes a friendly relationship.

Only later does the manipulation begin.

Below are Roblox images presented in the State of Louisiana’s court filings.

IMAGE ONE

IMAGE TWO

IMAGE THREE

IMAGE FOUR

Then Pied Piper Phase

This is when the predator lures the child away from the main game environment and into private chat channels, voice chats, or outside messaging platforms. Once the conversation leaves the monitored space, it becomes much harder for parents or moderators to detect what is happening.

In some cases, the manipulation escalates into coercion or blackmail.

One reason gaming platforms pose unique risks is the anonymity they offer.

Users interact through avatars rather than real identities. A predator can present himself as another child, making it extremely difficult for young users to recognize danger.

Roblox alone hosts millions of user-generated environments. Each day, new games and digital worlds appear on the platform. Monitoring every interaction in such a vast system is an enormous, and possibly, an impossible task.

Critics argue that this scale allows deviants to operate in dark corners where oversight becomes a distorted game of hide-and-seek. The moderators are ‘it,’ but every time they find a predator, the ‘hider’ simply vanishes and reappears in a new corner of the platform, starting the cycle over again.

Organized Predator Networks

Investigators increasingly warn that the problem is not limited to lone predators like John Wayne Gacy. While Gacy required a physical crawl space to hide his crimes, the anonymity of gaming platforms creates “virtual crawl spaces” where bad actors operate in plain sight.

Decentralized networks like the group “764” — a neo-Nazi, Satanic subculture — have gained notoriety for weaponizing these digital environments. Unlike traditional predators, these groups use collective grooming, coercion, and “sextortion” to manipulate minors into self-harm or even violence.

The challenge for law enforcement is the extreme portability of these networks. When one account is flagged, members simply migrate to a new server or encrypted channel, turning the platform into a hunting ground where the predators are always one step ahead of police or platform oversight.

The Corporate Responsibility Question

The controversy surrounding Roblox raises a deeper issue confronting the technology industry:

Are companies truly capable of policing digital environments that contain hundreds of millions of users?

Roblox has invested heavily in moderation, deploying AI filters like Sentinel and thousands of human reviewers.

Roblox has consistently stated that it invests hundreds of millions in safety and continually improves its systems, but critics argue these efforts are fundamentally outmatched by the scale of the problem.

Yet, the platform’s very architecture — private messaging, user-created “experiences,” and a complex digital economy — serves as a double-edged sword. These same features that drive engagement also provide the camouflage predators use to bypass safeguards.

Critics argue this is a fundamental design flaw: safety is often at odds with the bottom line.

Historically, the industry has prioritized user growth and revenue over restrictive security, a choice some liken to a child shunning spinach for candy. This tension has now reached a boiling point in the courtroom.

What Parents Should Understand

The Roblox controversy serves as a warning about the broader digital environment children now inhabit.

Gaming platforms combine social media, chat systems, and virtual economies in ways that previous generations never experienced. While many children use these platforms safely, predators understand how to exploit their design.

Parents should be aware of several warning signs.

Children who receive unexpected gifts of digital currency may be interacting with strangers, attempting to build trust. Conversations that move quickly into private chat channels should raise concern. And any request for secrecy is a major red flag.

Understanding how these platforms function is essential to protecting young users.

When Evil Stops Hiding

This rise of organized predator networks exploiting digital environments is a central theme I explore in my book, When Evil Stops Hiding, which examines how technology has created new avenues for age-old human evils.

For parents, the lesson is clear. The dangers facing children today do not only exist in dark alleys or suspicious neighborhoods.

They are increasingly hidden behind avatars, usernames, and digital worlds that look harmless on the surface.

AUTHOR

Martin Mawyer

Martin Mawyer is the President of Christian Action Network, host of the “Shout Out Patriots” podcast, and author of When Evil Stops Hiding. For more action alerts, cultural commentary, and real-world campaigns defending faith, family, and freedom, subscribe to Patriot Majority Report.

©2026 . All rights reserved.


Please visit the Patriot Majority Report substack.

DOJ Review of Voter Rolls Uncovers Alarming Names—and It’s Only the Beginning

The Justice Department is finding thousands of noncitizens and dead people on voter rolls as it pursues more state election records, said Harmeet Dhillon, the assistant attorney general for civil rights, in an interview.

“We’re finding tens of thousands of noncitizens on the voter rolls, hundreds of thousands of dead people on the voter rolls, and duplicate registrations between states,” Dhillon said on “Just the News, No Noise.”

Dhillon based her claim on a review of only 16 Republican-leaning states, such as Florida and Texas, that voluntarily complied with the Justice Department’s request for the election records.

The administration is suing 29 states for the records, seeking to ensure that states are complying with the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 and the Help America Vote Act of 2002. Those laws require states to update their voter registration lists and ensure they are free of names of dead people, or people who no longer reside in jurisdictions where they are registered to vote.

This comes in light of several prosecutions of noncitizens for illegal voting.

This week, Immigration and Customs Enforcement and the FBI announced the arrest of Mahady Sacko, an illegal alien from Mauritania, for voter fraud in Philadelphia. ICE asserted he had been illegally voting in the United States since 2008.

Sacko entered the U.S. near Miami, and an immigration judge ordered him removed. Sacko exhausted all appeals, and the Board of Immigration Appeals upheld his removal on Nov. 14, 2002—over two decades ago.

In December, Joe Ceballos resigned as mayor of Coldwater, Kansas, after being arrested for voting multiple times, though he was not a citizen. The Department of Homeland Security announced removal proceedings but Ceballos, a legal permanent resident from Mexico, voted in multiple elections, according to the agency, and faced state charges.

The lawsuits contend the Justice Department has the authority to request and review election records under the Civil Rights Act of 1960.

The DOJ has sued both red and blue statesMost recently, the Justice Department sued Utah, Oklahoma, Kentucky, West Virginia, and the Democrat-leaning New Jersey.

The Justice Department has also sued major Democrat-leaning states, such as California and New York, for voter rolls, as well as battleground states such as Arizona and Georgia.

“It’s really frustrating that we’re being prevented from doing our job,” Dhillon said.

The Justice Department could have a tough road ahead, noted J. Christian Adams, president of the Public Interest Legal Foundation, an election integrity group that has sued states for information on “dirty voter rolls.”

Adams is a former lawyer in the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division.

“It’s decades-old news,” Adams told The Daily Signal of dead voters and noncitizens on voter lists. “Good luck doing anything about it.”

He noted that in cases by the foundation, both the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals and the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled states can’t be compelled to clean up voter rolls if they are already making an effort. The Supreme Court declined to hear the cases.

“It’s one thing to get data, it’s another thing to enforce cleaning up the rolls,” Adams said.

A Justice Department spokesperson did not respond to The Daily Signal by publication time to provide more details about the number of ineligible voters found on the voter lists so far.

AUTHOR

Fred Lucas is chief news correspondent and manager of the Investigative Reporting Project for The Daily Signal. He is the author of The Myth of Voter Suppression: The Left’s Assault on Clean Elections. Send an email to Fred. Fred on X: .

AI Dealing SaaS Companies The Final Blow?

The SaaS industry is facing its most disruptive moment in decades, and AI is the reason why. In this episode, Lee Dickson and Rich Swier break down exactly how artificial intelligence is dismantling the traditional SaaS business model, from per-seat licensing to the rise of usage-based pricing, and why the biggest horizontal players like Salesforce and HubSpot are already losing the battle.

They explore how vibe coding is empowering customers to build their own custom interfaces on top of existing SaaS platforms, bypassing the need for seat licenses entirely. From API gatekeeping and the coming death of free data access to why vertical market software companies have a real moat and what they need to do right now to protect it, this conversation cuts through the noise and gets to the core of what’s actually shifting in the market.

If you’re a SaaS founder, product leader, or operator trying to understand where the next five to ten years are heading, this episode will challenge how you think about pricing, personalization, and the true value of domain expertise in an AI-first world. The companies that survive won’t be the ones with the most features. They’ll be the ones who own the API and know their vertical cold.

WATCH: AI Dealing SaaS Companies The Final Blow?

A.I. Guys Substack: https://substack.aiguyspod.com/

RAIA AI WEBSITE: https://www.raiaai.com/ https://www.raiaai.com/

All links: https://lnkd.in/eXDpww6V

Spotify: https://lnkd.in/ee9h9GYB

Youtube: https://lnkd.in/etDvqQ7d

Apple: https://lnkd.in/epYT2GSi

LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/feed/hashtag…

©2026 . All rights reserved.

Are Smartphones Allowed in Your Schools?

The answer regarding Alpha Schools. 

This is another one of my guest posts. This one is from MacKenzie Price, the founder of Alpha Schools. (See a prior commentary of mine for more info.)

She has a Substack (Future of Education) where she answers questions posed to her regarding Alpha Schools. I think this question has broad interest — and her answer is somewhat unique…


Phones in schools are tricky. Everyone thinks the answer is either “ban them completely” or “let kids figure it out.” Both are wrong.

The “ban-everything” crowd acts like we can pretend smartphones don’t exist. Good luck with that. These kids will have phones in their pockets for the rest of their lives. Shielding them completely just delays the problem.

The “hands-off crowd” is worse. “Kids are digital natives, they’ll adapt.” But they won’t. They’ll just get addicted faster. Being born around technology doesn’t mean you know how to use it well. Rather it means you’re more vulnerable to it.

Here’s what actually works: treating phones like what they are…

Powerful tools that require training.

Think about it this way. Phones are like giving a kid a chainsaw. Incredibly useful tool in the right situation. Also can absolutely wreck you if you don’t know what you’re doing.

So, at Alpha, here’s how we approach cell phone use with our students.

K through 5: No phones at school. Phones aren’t evil, but little kids have zero capacity to self-regulate with something designed by engineers to hijack attention. The average child gets their first smartphone at age 10. We’re not pretending that’s not happening. We’re just not letting it happen inside our walls during learning time.

Middle School: Where the training starts. Students check their phones in every morning. During academics, phones stay locked away. But (and this is the part people miss) students earn phone time in the afternoons. It’s supervised and low stakes. We’re not hiding the thing. We’re teaching them to use it without losing themselves to it.

Research shows that at least 50% of teens feel addicted to their phones. We’re trying to interrupt that pattern before it sets in.

High School: More freedom, more responsibility, and more consequences. At this age, students are older and more mature — so we treat them like it. We trust them more, allow them more agency. But if someone starts missing assignments, getting distracted during learning blocks, or struggling to stay focused, then boom. Phone jail. They’re back to checking phones at the front desk like they did in middle school. (And what high schooler wants to be treated like a middle schooler!?)

Alpha’s Guides are Key

Our guides play a huge role in this development. I think that’s the secret ingredient nobody talks about — not rules, but relationships. Instead of ruling over high schoolers (who are perfectly capable of making good choices, by the way) with an iron fist about phone usage, our guides engage with them directly:

  • How are you using your phone?
  • Does it help you or does it pull you away?
  • Is it a tool in your hands or is it running you?
  • How does scrolling on your phone make you feel, really?
  • Are you proud of that?

This is a level of technology-coaching that, unfortunately, not many people will have in their lifetime.

So we make sure that Alpha students do.

The average American “tween” (ages 8-12) spends 5 hours and 33 minutes on their phone daily, not including school or homework. For teens (13-18), it skyrockets to 8 hours and 39 minutes. These numbers are shocking. And we’ve all watched a kid disappear into a screen.

It’s scary. No one wants that to be their kid.

Our whole philosophy is pretty simple: phones are distracting (obviously), but they’re also not going away. So instead of pretending they don’t exist, we’re teaching kids how to actually use them well. Focus first, then learn to integrate technology in a healthy way.

Alpha has been doing this longer than most schools have even been talking about it: before all the studies and bans and congressional hearings and think pieces, before everyone suddenly discovered that maybe handing a 12-year-old unlimited internet access isn’t ideal.

But I think banning phones entirely is ridiculous. They exist! They’re useful!

It’s up to us to guidecoach, and teach our kids how to use powerful things without hurting themselves.

©2026 All rights reserved.


Here is other information from this scientist that you might find interesting:

I offer incentives for you to sign up new subscribers!

I also consider reader submissions on Critical Thinking about my topics of interest.

My commentaries are my opinion about the material discussed therein, based on the information I have. If any readers have different information, please share it. If it is credible, I will be glad to reconsider my position.

Check out the Archives of this Critical Thinking substack.

C19Science.info is my one-page website that covers the lack of genuine Science behind our COVID-19 policies.

Election-Integrity.info is my one-page website that lists multiple major reports on the election integrity issue.

WiseEnergy.org is my multi-page website that discusses the Science (or lack thereof) behind our energy options.

Media Balance Newsletter: a free, twice-a-month newsletter that covers what the mainstream media does not do, on issues from climate to COVID, elections to education, renewables to religion, etc. Here are the Newsletter’s 2025 Archives. Please send me an email to get your free copy. When emailing me, please make sure to include your full name and the state where you live. (Of course, you can cancel the Media Balance Newsletter at any time – but why would you?