Tag Archive for: State Department

3 Lessons from Secretary Rubio’s Speech about Leftist Terrorism

Secretary of State Marco Rubio recently gave a Reaganesque speech to a room full of representatives from 67 different countries, urging them to join the United States in our efforts to cease the mounting, worldwide terrorist network that stems from the leftist ideologies of Marxism, socialism, and communism.

The following are three critical points that he made.

1. Too Many Dismiss Leftist Terrorism as a Right-Wing “Conspiracy Theory”

Since 2001, most of the world has rightly recognized the evil of Islamist terrorism; however, they deny the existence of leftist terrorism. Thankfully, the current Trump administration recognizes this horrific reality. In its 2026 counterterrorism strategy, it names the following three major types of terrorism: “narcoterrorists and transnational gangs; legacy Islamist terrorists; and violent left-wing extremists, including anarchists and anti-Fascists.”

Ignoring — or even justifying — leftist terrorism severely weakens nations’ security and makes millions of people around the world more vulnerable. Rubio said, “Even today, the very idea that far-left terrorism could be a serious threat is treated as a right-wing fever dream, or worse, as a dangerous fascist conspiracy. It’s treated this way by many in the press, by many in academia and our universities, and by many of our legacy institutions. You will no doubt see the dogma rear its head in the coverage of this very conference.” He was right: Here is just one such example.

Rubio explained that, in the United States, “so many people in positions of power have repeatedly dismissed acts of violence and even terrorism as legitimate forms of political expression so long as they served a left-wing cause.

“It is why during those George Floyd … riots in the summer of 2020, as criminals and extremists burned and looted their way through … America’s great cities and nearly brought the country to its knees, city governments all across the country simply refused to prosecute the people conducting these acts of violence and terror. It is the reason for the now infamous image — and you all recall this — of a news anchor from a very prominent agency — a news anchor standing in a neighborhood consumed in flames; meanwhile the chyron on the bottom read that the protests were ‘mostly peaceful.’ This was something worse than a double standard. Left-wing violence was not just excused; it was treated as sacrosanct, a protected class unto itself. That era has to end.”

Thankfully, more countries’ leaders (regardless of whether they agree with the Trump administration on other issues) are realizing the growth of leftist terrorism because, sadly, they are witnessing firsthand the loss of lives due to this evil. Rubio cited specific examples:

“You came here — you are here — because two weeks ago, a 72-year-old woman was burned on over 80% of her body in her own home in Greece, and she died, executed by a firebomb because her daughter dared to stand for office. You are here today because for five days this winter the lights went out in Berlin, the longest blackout in the city since the Second World War, sparked by an attack that left tens of thousands of households without power in the freezing cold and left an 83-year-old woman dead.

“You are here, and you came, because a month after that Berlin blackout, a French 23-year-old succumbed to traumatic brain injuries, beaten to death on the streets of Lyon by a group of far-left militant thugs. You are here because your political leaders are being attacked and stabbed and shot in your streets, because your businesses have been bombed, because your railways have been sabotaged, because your police officers have been beaten and burned. You are here because this is real, and it is getting worse, and it can no longer be denied, and it can no longer be ignored, because it is time to crush this evil forever.”

2. Far-Left Terrorism Is Nothing New: Remember Examples from the Last 60 Years

Secretary Rubio then reminded the world leaders that, collectively, we have suffered the horrors of leftist terrorism over the last six decades: “The simple fact is none of this that I’ve just described is new. Far-left political terrorism is not a recent-day, modern novelty. It is not a fiction manufactured by conservative politicians. For most of the modern era, it was, in fact, the dominant form of political violence.”

He listed examples that our neighbors in the Western Hemisphere have experienced: kidnappings, bombings, assassinations, and executions; terror of the Tupamaros, of the Montoneros, of the FARC, of the ELN; “the inhuman savagery of Peru’s Shining Path; the Maoist fanatics who massacred the peasant villages of Peru, hacking pregnant women and newborn infants to death with axes and machetes; you remember the tens of thousands of Marxist guerrillas trained to kill in Castro’s terrorist camps.”

He next named horrific leftist terrorist acts that Europe experienced over the years: “machine gun massacres of Italy’s Red Brigades, which held the five-time prime minister captive for 55 days before subjecting him to a revolutionary, so-called ‘people’s trial’ and executing him in 1978”; “the Red Army Faction’s nearly three-decade campaign of bombings, kidnappings, and assassinations in Germany, murdering dozens and injuring hundreds more”; and “the 17 November organization in Greece, the Marxist extremists that terrorized Athens for more than a quarter century, including, by the way, shooting my country’s CIA station chief dead outside of his home in front of his wife as they were returning home from a Christmas party.”

Finally, he described the leftist terrorist acts that Americans remember: the Weather Underground, which bombed the Pentagon, the State Department, and the Capitol; “the Black Liberation Army, which staged armed robberies and executed police officers at point-blank range; the Symbionese Liberation Army, which shot a public school superintendent to death with cyanide-packed hollow-point bullets. In one 18-month period between 1971 and 1972, the FBI counted some 2,500 bombings on American soil, a rate of nearly five a day. The overwhelming share of that violence came from left-wing extremists. Between 1970 and 1980, 93% of terrorist attacks in the West came from the far extremist Left.”

3. Today, We Face an Evil Driven by Hatred for Civilization Itself: The Free World Must Fight Them Together

Ultimately, Rubio explained, the world is facing a “new wave” of leftist terrorism. We have not seen this many plots and attacks in decades. Over the past year, Germany has seen a 40% increase leftist violence while Greece has seen an 80% increase.

And in America, we have experienced assaults on immigration officers; “a transgender shooter opening fire on Catholic elementary school students as they pray, his gun marked with slogans like, ‘Where is your God now?’; a health care executive executed in cold blood in the streets; multiple assassination attempts on a sitting president; and the murder of the greatest conservative activist of a generation, a man who happened also to be a husband and the father of two young children, shot and killed while speaking to a crowd of students.”

Rubio then pushed back on a notion that is often floated around: that communism “sounds good in theory, but it never works in practice”:

“That’s actually not true. Communism does not sound good in theory. The world it envisions for all of us is small, flat, grey, leveled of all exception, drained of all that is good and noble in the human soul. The world it envisions is a world without courage, a world without creativity or ambition, a world without heroes or glory or great causes to strive towards, a world without miracles, without myths, without men who rise above the rest to do incredible and extraordinary things. And the world communism envisions is a world without God.

“For these architects of revolutionary violence, the towering achievement of our civilization — for them it’s an unbearable humiliation, a reminder of what they cannot do and a reminder of what they cannot be. So they choose instead to destroy. They attack pipelines; they attack railroads; they attack power grids and laboratories, the physical embodied symbols of power and invention and achievement. This is the nature of the terrorism we face today. They despise the West because the West is great.”

In addition, leftist terrorists have a complex, international network: “Today’s far-left terrorists can raise money in one country; they can host their communications in a second country; they can receive training in a third country; they can recruit militants in a fourth country, and then together strike a target in a fifth country. And so, we have no choice but to confront this menace together. We will either cooperate across our borders or the terrorists will continue to exploit the gaps between them.”

Thankfully, he explained, the Trump administration is building an international partnership to defeat these terrorists, to disrupt Antifa terror networks and their allies, and designate violent far-left extremist groups.

“We can — and we must — identify and map this threat and rebuild our counterterrorism architecture to defeat it. Just as we have done together before, now we must do it together again. Through intelligence and information sharing, through coordinated law enforcement strategy, through financial targeting and disruption, we will dismantle these networks brick by brick. It is time for the people of the civilized world to defend ourselves, to stand united against this encroaching darkness, and fight — fight for what is ours.

“It is easy to destroy great things; it is far more difficult to make them. The enemies of civilization are only capable of the former. They are only capable of destroying great things. All they know is destruction. But we have built great things together. We have done it time and again. We know what we must do, and now we must do it.”

AUTHOR

Kathy Athearn

Kathy Athearn is a correspondence writer at Family Research Council. She studied Political Science and Religion at Hope College, was a Witherspoon Fellow at FRC, and is passionate about helping Christians contribute a biblical worldview to the public sphere.

EDITORS NOTE: This Washington Stand column is republished with permission. All rights reserved. ©2026 Family Research Council.


The Washington Stand is Family Research Council’s outlet for news and commentary from a biblical worldview. The Washington Stand is based in Washington, D.C. and is published by FRC, whose mission is to advance faith, family, and freedom in public policy and the culture from a biblical worldview. We invite you to stand with us by partnering with FRC.

SCOOP: How Trump Admin Is Taking Leftist Terrorism Crackdown Worldwide

President Donald Trump’s administration is ramping up global efforts to track and prevent leftist terrorism following the April attempt on his life in Washington, State Department officials told the Daily Caller News Foundation.

The U.S. government now treats left-wing political violence as a global problem requiring a transnational response rather than isolated incidents, according to State Department spokesperson Tommy Pigott and two other department officials. The gunman arrested at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner in an alleged attempt to kill Trump reflects rising insurrectionist trends from the left that the West must take seriously, the administration believes.

“From the United States to Germany to Spain, left-wing terrorists have targeted democratically elected political leaders in an attempt to undermine the will of the people, destabilize societies, and intimidate members of the public,” Pigott told the DCNF. “The State Department is actively tracking the rise in far-left political violence and is committed to identifying and disrupting terrorist networks that wage terror campaigns in service of a revolutionary political project.”

A State Department official familiar with the operations pointed to several recent incidents to establish the problem: masked attackers beating a German right-wing politician in 2019, an Italian anarchist group mailing a bomb to a defense contractor in 2022, a leftist anarchist caught preparing bombs to kill 50 people in the United Kingdom in 2023 and other cases. Most recently in Europe, French authorities charged alleged adherents of a leftist group with beating a right-wing activist to death in a February brawl.

The European Union found 21 attacks linked to leftist ideology in 2024, rivaling 24 attacks from jihadists, the State Department official noted. The fact that leftist extermists increasingly make common cause with “pro-Hamas, Muslim Brotherhood, and Iranian-aligned groups” makes matters worse for the West, the official said.

Trump’s State Department has pursued greater collaboration with other countries to counter the threat, the official told the DCNF. State Department leaders convened with foreign partners to improve data-sharing with the U.S. and prompted them to use tools similar to the department’s “Rewards for Justice” program to seek information from the public, the official said.

The State Department will also strategize with allies to counter terror networks such as Antifa at a May workshop in the Netherlands and host an international Washington summit on “The Resurgence of Political Terrorism” in July, according to the employee.

Trump’s administration previously globalized its efforts by hitting four European Antifa-aligned groups with terrorism sanctions and offering cash rewards for information on their funding. At home, the Department of Justice won 16 convictions in America’s first Antifa terrorism trial over a July 2025 attack on a Texas immigration detention center.

“This kind of targeted political violence is not unique to the United States but is a global phenomenon and a preferred tactic of radical far-left and anarchist networks,” a State Department counterterrorism expert said, referring to the D.C. shooting.

“These networks inspire and recruit violent actors to not only intimidate, maim, or kill high-profile individuals but to interrupt supply chains, sabotage critical infrastructure, and otherwise exhaust law enforcement capacity through criminal and terrorist acts,” the analyst said. “Such actions all serve the same purpose: to break down law and order, undermine the foundations of Western societies, and incite insurrection against elected governments.”

AUTHOR

Hudson Crozier

DCNF Crime and Extremism Reporter

RELATED ARTICLES:

Trump’s Many Brushes With Death Unrivaled In US Presidential History

First American Antifa Terrorism Trial Reaches Verdicts

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.


All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

Rubio Kicks Out Relatives Of Late Iranian Commander Soleimani Living In America

Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced Saturday that two relatives of the late Qasem Soleimani had their green cards revoked and were in custody.

Soleimani, a notorious commander of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), a crucial figure in providing advanced IED components that were used against American troops in Iraq and Afghanistan, was killed in a Jan. 2020 strike. The State Department said Soleimani’s niece and her daughter had been living a “lavish lifestyle in Los Angeles.”

“Last night, the niece and grandniece of deceased Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps Major General Qasem Soleimani were arrested by federal agents following Secretary of State Marco Rubio’s termination of their lawful permanent resident (LPR) status,” a statement released Saturday said. “Hamideh Soleimani Afshar and her daughter are now in the custody of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. As identified by both press reporting and her own social media commentary, Soleimani Afshar is an outspoken supporter of the totalitarian, terrorist regime in Iran.”

“While living in the United States, she promoted Iranian regime propaganda, celebrated attacks against American soldiers and military facilities in the Middle East, praised the new Iranian Supreme Leader, denounced America as the ‘Great Satan,’ and voiced her unflinching support for the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, a designated terror organization,” the statement continued.

President Donald Trump announced that the United States military commenced Operation Epic Fury in a video posted on Truth Social early in the morning of Feb. 28.

“The Trump Administration will not allow our country to become a home for foreign nationals who support anti-American terrorist regimes,” Rubio said in a Saturday post on X.

Rubio called for the visas of foreign students who supported Hamas to be revoked during an Oct. 17, 2023, appearance on “The Ingraham Angle” while commenting on pro-Hamas demonstrations that took place at multiple universities and colleges in the days after the Oct. 7, 2023 attack by Hamas that killed over 1,200 people in Israel.

“The law says if you are a supporter of a terrorist organization you shouldn’t even have a visa,” Rubio told Fox News host Laura Ingraham during that appearance. “So now, once you get that visa, if you identify yourself as a Hamas supporter, then you should have your visa canceled and you should be removed from the country.”

AUTHOR

Harold Hutchison

Media Reporter

RELATED ARTICLE: Trump Offers No New Details In Primetime Address About Iran War

RELATED VIDEO: Secretary of State Marco Rubio Kicks Out Relatives Of Late Iranian Commander Soleimani Living In America

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.


All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

How Trump Went From Campaigning Against War To Snatching Nicolas Maduro

Americans woke up Saturday to stunning news: after promising to end wars on the campaign trail, President Donald Trump sent the military into Venezuela to capture the country’s president and bring him to stand trial in the United States.

The conflict with Venezuela escalated quickly, as the administration moved from striking alleged narcoterrorist drug boats to surrounding Venezuela with warships and ultimately executing a decisive nighttime raid of Nicolas Maduro’s residence.

For the most part, the administration has been tight-lipped about its true motivations for initiating the conflict. Trump and administration officials have repeatedly pointed to Maduro’s hand in helping cartels smuggle drugs into the United States, an explanation that critics said was insufficient to justify the scale of the U.S.’s involvement.

White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles admitted as much in an interview with Vanity Fair, insinuating the drug boat strikes had something to do with regime change.

Keen observers who have studied Trump’s foreign policy, including some who have worked directly with the administration, theorized various triggers, from a fixation on the Monroe Doctrine to the influence of Marco Rubio.

A former administration official argued that the United States has to correct years of poor foreign policy that allowed threats to American safety and security to go unchecked.

“I think that they’re getting America back to a foreign policy that is actually focused on what matters to the American people’s physical safety,” the former official told the Caller. “I understand where some of the frustrations are coming from but it’s going to take a lot of time and effort and energy to untangle the mess that previous generations of foreign policy elites have made.”

“The Trump doctrine, if you will, is not about no war, but it’s about bringing military force to only the circumstances where you know the American people stand to benefit,” William Thibeau, the director of the American Military Project at The Claremont Institute, told the Caller.

Melissa Ford Maldonado, Director of the Western Hemisphere Initiative at the America First Policy Institute, told the Caller that Trump’s positioning on the Venezuela issue signifies a new Monroe Doctrine.

“The Western Hemisphere is our first line of defense. I believe the administration knows that, and that’s why they’ve chosen to put the Western Hemisphere front and center of U.S. foreign policy,” Ford Maldonado said.

The administration was already putting the screws to Venezuela long before striking the first alleged drug trafficking boat. Trump announced a secondary 25% tariff on any country buying Venezuelan oil as a part of his “Liberation Day” tariff policy in April.

Several months later, in August, Trump raised the bounty on Maduro to $50 million. Airstrikes began the same month, and a few weeks later the military began building up its presence in the Caribbean.

In November, the president told reporters he wouldn’t rule out “anything” when it came to the conflict with Venezuela, including potentially sending in ground troops. The president explained that Venezuela “dumped hundreds of thousands of people into our country from prisons.”

The same day, his administration designated the Venezuelan-based Cartel de los Soles (Cartel of the Suns) as a Foreign Terrorist Organization (FTO). The State Department said it would use “all available tools to protect our national security interests and deny funding and resources to narco-terrorists.” A month later, he would designate fentanyl as a weapon of mass destruction.

Ford Maldonado told the Caller that she could only speculate about the administration’s reasoning for going after Venezuela, but said she thought it was meant to send a message that the president is willing to protect his people from cartels and drugs — whether its on U.S. soil or not.

“I think they recognize that the stability, security, and prosperity of the United States is tied to what happens in our neighborhood. What happens in the region directly affects American security,” she added.

The biggest question remaining ahead of Saturday’s incursion was whether the administration’s ultimate goal was to remove Maduro from power. Operation Absolute Resolve ended the speculation as videos showed the deposed Venezuelan president being perp walked by federal officials in New York City.

The former official speculated that Secretary of State Marco Rubio was likely a big proponent of taking out Maduro.

“It absolutely is [about regime change] for Marco Rubio. I oppose regime change in Venezuela, but considering Marco’s history, his family history, you can understand why he feels this way,” the former official told the Caller.

“I really liked working with the State Department, and I actually came to really respect Secretary Rubio, but he absolutely is the chief proponent of regime change. I think other people in the admin are definitely more skeptical, but he does want this,” the former official added.

While on the campaign trail, Trump promised to end foreign conflicts and pull America out of unnecessary entanglements. Trump has faced some backlash from his supporters who feel his actions in Venezuela are evidence that he is spending too much time on foreign policy rather than domestic issues. The president justified his actions during an interview with Politico, arguing that those who feel that way aren’t really his supporters.

“I do think the MAGA base is willing to be patient with President Trump’s implementation of his foreign policy agenda. It’s common sense to understand a difference between military action in the Middle East for liberal ideological ends, and military action in America’s backyard to secure resources and check our adversaries,” Thibeau told the Caller, adding that the “Trump Doctrine” has never been about pacification.

“I do think a reasonable wariness of endless war does animate the MAGA base, so I don’t think patience is infinite, especially if future involvement requires the prolonged commitment of American boots on the ground,”

Following Operation Absolute Resolve, Trump started touting his foreign policy as the “Don-roe Doctrine,” a nod to President James Monroe’s foreign policy that established that the Western Hemisphere was no longer open to European colonization.

Touting the new title, Trump argued that “foreign adversaries in our region” were “acquiring menacing offensive weapons that could threaten U.S. interests and lives, and they used those weapons last night.”

“All of these actions were in gross violation of the core principles of American foreign policy, dating back more than two centuries, and not anymore,” the president said on Saturday after the mission was complete. “All the way back, it dated to the Monroe Doctrine. And the Monroe Doctrine is a big deal, but we’ve superseded it by a lot, by a real lot. They now call it the ‘Don-roe Doctrine.’”

Even before Trump pointed to the Monroe Doctrine, Ford Maldonado used the historical document to explain to the Caller how she thought the administration was approaching the conflict.

“That doctrine reflected a defensive posture, not an imperial posture. The U.S. was protecting Latin America from predatory outside powers, particularly European empires, at a time when many nations in the region were newly independent,” she told the Caller.

“The message was essentially ‘mind your own business, and we’ll mind ours,’ while the U.S. ensured the hemisphere wasn’t recolonized or dominated by foreign powers. That framework later expanded with the Roosevelt Corollary, and I think the president is invoking elements of both today,” she said.

AUTHOR

Reagan Reese

White House Correspondent

RELATED ARTICLE: Trump Says US ‘Going To Run’ Venezuela After Nabbing Maduro

RELATED VIDEO: Absolutely No one Saw THIS coming… | Victor Davis Hanson

EDITORS  NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

EXCLUSIVE: Trump Official Responds To Daily Beast Article Dismissing Her As Mere ‘Beauty Salon Owner’

Assistant Secretary of State for Consular Affairs Mora Namdar is responding to attacks on her qualifications after she was confirmed to a major role in the Trump administration.

The Daily Beast posted an article on Dec. 26 about Namdar’s appointment and confirmation with the headline, “Trump Hires Beauty Salon Owner to Decide Who to Ban From U.S.” In an exclusive interview with the Daily Caller, Namdar explained her involvement in the beauty business and what qualifies her for her new position.

“My career in policy really began, believe it or not, when I was a teen,” Namdar told the Caller, noting she started taking college classes at age 12. The daughter of Iranian immigrants, Namdar was raised in Dallas, Texas.

“I’ve always been academically inclined as my grandmother was a literature professor and I had a love of reading and books from a very young age,” she added.

Namdar told the Caller she was attending middle school in Texas where she was given the opportunity to take the SAT because she was excelling in school. Scoring better than most high schoolers, Namdar was invited to begin college classes at Southern Methodist University in Dallas.

“One of the first college classes I took at 12 was Poli-Sci 101, and I just fell in love with it and knew that I was going to do probably law and probably policy from there on out, ” Namdar said, adding that she later attended SMU as undergraduate student.

“I did a double major, triple minor. So it’s Political Science, International Affairs, and minors in Philosophy, Fine Art and Human Rights,” she told the Caller, adding that she speaks fluent Farsi.

While at SMU, Namdar said that she helped start up the Human Rights department and was the inaugural graduate from the program.

Following the Sept. 11, 2000 terrorist attack on the United States, Namdar told the Caller her foreign policy beliefs took shape and inspired the next steps in her career.

“The ideas of peace through strength really were solidified for me, and that became a core tenet of my policy thinking and sort of policy analysis, and I carried that through with me to law school at American University, where I did a JD and MA concurrently,” Namdar told the Caller. “So the law degree, and then Master’s in International Affairs, and I started the National Security Law brief.”

The National Security Law Brief is the nation’s first student-run law school publication that “focuses on the rapidly evolving field of national security law.” Namdar’s writings for the publication caught the attention of the government, specifically a piece from 2011 titled “Deciphering the Iranian Paradox – It’s Not Left Wing, It’s Not Right Wing, It’s the Right Thing: No Engagement, No War, The Time Has Come to Support the Will of the Iranian People.”

“I pointed out that you have this anti-American regime in Iran, you have a pro-American population, and you have an opportunity to sort of do what’s best for national security and human rights concurrently, and it happens to align in the same way. And that got me first recruited into government,” she told the Caller.

Namdar went on to work for Voice of America as a special adviser on national security and policy for two years and then she established her own law firm as an attorney.

Prior to her confirmation as assistant secretary of state for consular affairs, Namdar served as the senior bureau official for the Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs where she supported “the Gaza Peace plan, Middle East stabilization, countering the Iranian regime’s malign influence, supporting human rights, promoting investment in America and American technology, promoting U.S. strategic messaging, internet freedom and more.”

In her new role, Namdar will oversee visa approvals and revocations as well as passport issuance. It’s a job she previously did during the first Trump administration on an interim basis.

While working as an attorney, Namdar started her beauty salon business, something she told the Caller she never expected to take off in the way it did. She realized there was a need for a chic place for professionals like herself to go and get their hair and makeup done with ease.

The business now has three locations and Namdar told the Caller she continued to run her law practice while growing the salon.

“It was a fun, creative side outlet from the very busy and very intense work that I was doing at my firm,” she told the Caller, adding that every part of the brand has been trademarked internationally.

Namdar told the Caller that she isn’t a licensed esthetician and has never been the one doing the beauty services at her salons.

“The implication there is you can only be good at one thing,” Namdar told the Caller of criticism related to her businesses. “So if you’re good at developing a business, then you should only be good at developing a business. If you’re good at policy, should only be good at policy. If you’re good at law, you’re only good at law. But I just don’t subscribe to that level of thinking.”

AUTHOR

Reagan Reese

White House Correspondent

RELATED ARTICLE: US Shuts Down ‘Performative’ Gaza Ceasefire At UN It Says ‘Legitimizes’ Hamas Narratives

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

State Dept. to Classify Gender Transitions for Children, Abortion as Human Rights Abuses

President Donald Trump and his administration are preparing to officially classify state-funded abortion, gender transition procedures for minors, and a host of other left-wing policies as human rights violations.

In its next annual Country Reports on Human Rights Practices, the U.S. State Department will update what qualifies as a human rights violation, according to The Daily Signal. State Department officials will now record other nations’ gender transition procedures for children, government-funded abortions or abortion drugs and the annual number of abortions committed, arrests or “official investigations or warnings” targeting free speech or laws targeting “hate speech,” affirmative actions and diversity policies in the workplace, permitting mass immigration into other countries, policies coercing euthanasia and assisted suicide, religious liberty violations, and “medical abuses” such as forced organ-harvesting and report those instances as human rights violations.

“In recent years, new destructive ideologies have given safe harbor to human rights violations,” principal deputy State Department spokesperson Tommy Pigott told The Daily Signal. “The Trump administration will not allow these human rights violations, such as the mutilation of children, laws that infringe on free speech, and racially discriminatory employment practices, to go unchecked. We are saying enough is enough.”

The State Department records the human rights violations of all United Nations member states and all nations receiving foreign aid and submits those records to Congress annually. Earlier this year, the State Department adjusted its human rights violation reporting to leave out “LGBTQI rights,” which made frequent appearances in State Department reports under the previous administration, and focused greater attention on threats to freedom of speech in Europe.

The new State Department approach to human rights comes as the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has released a 410-page report determining that gender transitions for children, referred to by transgenderism advocates as “gender-affirming care,” are based on “very low-quality evidence” and pose “potential or plausible harms” to children.

In comments to The Washington Stand, Joy Stockbauer, policy analyst at Family Research Council’s Center for Human Dignity, said, “It is so encouraging to see the Trump administration recognize abortions and transgender procedures for what they are: horrific affronts to human dignity, and violations of human rights.” She continued, “Under President Trump’s leadership, this policy sends a strong message that the United States, which leads the free world, will stand up for all human life.” Stockbauer added, “I pray that the administration continues to protect life both domestically and abroad, including by permanently terminating all avenues through which the United States funds abortions using taxpayer dollars within our own borders.”

Laura Hanford, a visiting fellow at the Heritage Foundation and a primary drafter of the International Religious Freedom Act of 1998, told TWS, “The last administration distorted the historic mission of the State Department’s Human Rights infrastructure and Human Rights Report to aggressively advance gender ideology and abortion as so-called ‘rights.’” She explained, “Billions of dollars were poured into promoting this agenda. Obama and Biden removed the religious freedom section from the Human Rights Report and added an LGBTQ section, demonstrating their ideological priorities.”

“This new directive restores the appropriate focus on the established rights of religious freedom and free speech, and clearly takes a position against harm to the most vulnerable,” Hanford continued. “This includes protecting children from invasive and permanent procedures that are not evidence-based but ideological, as demonstrated in the recent HHS report on pediatric gender medicine, among multiple systematic reviews conducted by other nations,” Hanford noted. “It includes the unborn, whose right to life has always been championed by presidents on the right side of history. And it includes the vulnerable targets — even children — of the abhorrent state-sanctioned practice of ‘euthanasia.’”

AUTHOR

S.A. McCarthy

S.A. McCarthy serves as a news writer at The Washington Stand.

RELATED ARTICLES:

What Park East told us about mayor-elect Mamdani

Illegal Immigrants Fined $1.8M File Lawsuit against Trump Admin’s Immigration Agenda

Iran Contemplates Capital Evacuation amid Terror, Nuclear Obsessions

EDITORS NOTE: This Washington Stand column is republished with permission. All rights reserved. ©2025 Family Research Council.


The Washington Stand is Family Research Council’s outlet for news and commentary from a biblical worldview. The Washington Stand is based in Washington, D.C. and is published by FRC, whose mission is to advance faith, family, and freedom in public policy and the culture from a biblical worldview. We invite you to stand with us by partnering with FRC.

Foreign Nationals Face Visa Loss for Mocking, Celebrating Charlie Kirk Assassination

The U.S. State Department is taking the “America first” principle seriously and barring foreigners who celebrated the murder of an American patriot from entering the country.

Following the assassination of conservative activist and Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk last month, the State Department announced that it would begin canceling and revoking visas for foreign nationals who publicly mocked or celebrated Kirk’s death. On Tuesday, the Department asserted that it is following through on that pledge. “The United States has no obligation to host foreigners who wish death on Americans,” the Department’s official social media page posted, along with a list of examples of foreigners whose visas have been canceled or revoked.

One Argentine national posted that Kirk “can rest in f****** piss,” adding, “i do not give a f*** about the death of a person who devoted his entire life spreading racist, xenophobic, misogynistic rhetoric. It’s hot as f*** where this man currently is and it’s deserved.” Referring to the TPUSA event at a Utah college campus where Kirk was slain, a South African national whined that conservatives are “hurt that the racist rally ended in attempted martyrdom…” He continued, “Charlie Kirk won’t be remembered as a hero. He was used to astroturf a movement of white nationalist trailer trash!” A Mexican national said that Kirk died as a racist and misogynist, asserting that “there are people who deserve to die. There are people who would make the world better off dead.” A German national posted that “when fascists die, democrats don’t complain.” A Paraguayan national called Kirk a “son of a b****” who “died by his own rules.”

After each example shared, the State Department wrote, “Visa revoked.” The Department affirmed, “Aliens who take advantage of America’s hospitality while celebrating the assassination of our citizens will be removed.”

In comments to The Washington Stand, Lora Ries, director of the Heritage Foundation’s Border Security and Immigration Center, said, “Receiving or having a U.S. visa is a privilege, not a right. As the Biden years showed us, millions of people from all over the world want to come to the U.S. So, the U.S. can and should be very choosy about who gets to come here and to stay here.” Ries added, “Those who cheer the assassination of an American are not welcome in America and should have their visa revoked or denied. Good for the State Department for exercising this authority.”

Essica Vaughan, director of policy studies at the Center for Immigration Studies, told TWS, “There are a number of good reasons for the State Department to revoke these visas. First, these individuals are here at our discretion; they have no right to be here, and there are grounds for expelling them if they hold views that are hostile to our nation or to Americans.” She added, “Most importantly, the social media posts they wrote are hateful and potentially constitute a threat of violence toward Americans who expressed support for Charlie Kirk or horror at his assassination.” Vaughan continued, “I cannot imagine traveling to a foreign country and inserting myself in their political affairs like this, or expressing this kind of animosity toward the host citizens. In a lot of countries, this behavior would lead to imprisonment. We should just kick them out. They have crossed a line of acceptable behavior.”

The State Department also recently revoked the visas of at least 50 Mexican government officials, citing concerns over apparent ties to drug cartels. Former acting Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) Administrator Derek Maltz told The Daily Wire, “Travel to America, the greatest country in the world, is a privilege, not a right. Travel visas for individuals are not automatic and I’m glad to see that the State Department is scrutinizing them at a new level.” He added, “Nobody should be surprised that this administration is looking outside the box and will use all capabilities to make it difficult for the cartels to continue to kill Americans at record levels.”

The move comes as the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has made public that Mexican drug cartels have placed bounties on the heads of DHS agents, especially Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers, and have enlisted street gangs in American cities like Chicago to track and attack ICE personnel. “These criminal networks are not just resisting the rule of law, they are waging an organized campaign of terror against the brave men and women who protect our borders and communities,” DHS Secretary Kristi Noem said in a statement. “Our agents are facing ambushes, drone surveillance, and death threats, all because they dare to enforce the laws passed by Congress. We will not back down from these threats, and every criminal, terrorist, and illegal alien will face American justice.”

According to DHS, Mexican cartels are offering $2,000 for doxing federal agents, $5,000 to $10,000 for kidnapping or assaulting agents, and up to $50,000 for the assassination of “high-ranking” DHS officials. Spotter networks have been set up in areas like Chicago’s Pilsen and Little Village, where armed gang members positioned on rooftops spy on and track the movements of ICE and other federal law enforcement agents, relaying information to other gang members and allies and coordinating ambushes. These attacks are bolstered by Antifa militants, who stage protests and riots and have attempted to use lethal force against ICE agents on numerous occasions.

AUTHOR

S.A. McCarthy

S.A. McCarthy serves as a news writer at The Washington Stand.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Trump And Kash Patel Give Major Update On Sweeping Crime Crackdown

DHS Calls Out Media ‘Smears’ After Illegal Aliens Allegedly Ram Border Patrol Car

‘We Need to Pray’: Expert Warns of China’s Escalating Crackdown on Christians

EDITORS NOTE: This Washington Stand column is republished with permission. All rights reserved. ©2025 Family Research Council.


The Washington Stand is Family Research Council’s outlet for news and commentary from a biblical worldview. The Washington Stand is based in Washington, D.C. and is published by FRC, whose mission is to advance faith, family, and freedom in public policy and the culture from a biblical worldview. We invite you to stand with us by partnering with FRC.

Trump Admin May Have Eyes On New Regime Change War

The United States is reportedly planning to target drug traffickers in Venezuela, raising questions about the possibility of regime change in the country.

U.S. military officials are considering attacking drug traffickers in the coming weeks within the borders of Venezuela, four sources told NBC News.

“We’ll see what happens. Venezuela is sending us their gang members, their drug dealers and drugs. It’s not acceptable,” the White House told NBC, referencing a previous statement from Trump.

The report follows rising tensions over drugs and the mobilization of U.S. forces in the Caribbean.

Throughout September, President Donald Trump authorized striking several boats allegedly carrying drugs and drug traffickers.

“BE WARNED — IF YOU ARE TRANSPORTING DRUGS THAT CAN KILL AMERICANS, WE ARE HUNTING YOU!” Trump declared in a Truth post on September 15, attaching a video of the second boat strike. “The illicit activities by these cartels have wrought DEVASTATING CONSEQUENCES ON AMERICAN COMMUNITIES FOR DECADES, killing millions of American citizens. NO LONGER.”

The attacks sparked the ire of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro.

Maduro responded to the first strike on Sept. 2 by flying two F-16 fighter jets over a U.S. Navy destroyer two days later, according to Time magazine.

Maduro claimed the U.S. was seeking “to intimidate and seek regime change,” and that the U.S. was “looking for a military incident,” according to the Associated Press.

Trump has denied regime change in Venezuela is a goal of his administration, Time reported Sept. 6.

“We’re not talking about that,” he told reporters.

Maduro helped spearhead the Cartel of the Suns, a drug-trafficking group, and has a $50 million bounty for his arrest, according to the Department of State.

Republican representatives have warned that Maduro could face consequences.

In an interview published Sept. 13, Republican Florida Rep. Mario Díaz-Balart said Maduro has three options: leave now, end up in prison for the rest of his life or end up like Iranian Gen. Qasem Soleimani, which he describes as “basically being reduced to dust in a plastic bag.”

“Those are the three options that Maduro, the Maduro regime and those around them have,” Díaz-Balart added.

Florida Republican Rep. Carlos Gimenez posted in August that “Maduro’s days are numbered.”

The U.S. planned to deploy 10 F-35 fighter jets to the U.S. territory of Puerto Rico, bolstering its already strong presence in the area, sources told Reuters in September.

“So we’re not going to have a cartel, operating or masquerading as a government, operating in our own hemisphere,” Secretary of State Marco Rubio said in a mid-September interview with Fox News.

“The President of the United States made clear that he’s not going to allow cartels, that cartel or any other cartel, to operate with impunity in our hemisphere and send drugs towards the United States. And he’s going to use the U.S. military and all the elements of American power to target cartels who are targeting America.”

U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth deemed Maduro “effectively a kingpin of a drug narco state” and added that he “should be worried” in an interview with Fox News.

“The Trump administration has carefully constructed a policy rationale that this is not ‘regime change’ for the sake of exporting democracy to the world’s benighted peoples,” former National Security Council and U.S. State Department official, José Cárdenas, told Newsweek.

“It is a national security initiative meant to eliminate a source of tons of cocaine from entering the United States. Main Street, USA, can identify with that,” he continued.

Trump recently detailed his plans to crack down on drug traffickers in his address to the United Nations (UN).

“We’ve recently begun using the supreme power of the United States military to destroy Venezuelan terrorists and trafficking networks led by Nicolás Maduro,” Trump said at the United Nations General Assembly. “To every terrorist thug smuggling poisonous drugs into the United States of America, please be warned that we will blow you out of existence.”

“Maduro is not the legitimate leader of Venezuela; he’s a fugitive of American justice who undermines regional security and poisons Americans and we want to see him brought to justice. The U.S. is engaged in a targeted counter-drug cartel operation,” State Department Principal Deputy Spokesperson Tommy Pigott told The Daily Caller in a Statement.

AUTHOR

Derek VanBuskirk

Reporter

RELATED ARTICLES:

Hegseth Declares War On Fat Generals

Philadelphia Raises Chinese Communist Flag

Schumer’s Bid To Shut Down Government Exposes Democratic Fissures

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Trump Admin Puts Multi-Million Dollar Bounty On Vicious Haitian Gangster Nicknamed ‘Barbecue’

The State Department put a $5 million bounty on a notorious Haitian gangster nicknamed “Barbecue” who was indicted for allegedly funneling money from the U.S. to his gang’s coffers, the agency announced Tuesday.

The federal government will pay the bounty to anyone willing to provide information that leads to Jimmy “Barbecue” Cherizier’s arrest in any nation. The bounty follows the Department of Justice (DOJ) issuing an accompanying Tuesday indictment against Cherizier alleging that he violated U.S. sanctions on Haiti by funneling money to his gang with the help of Bazile Richardson, a U.S. citizen.

“The Department of State is offering a reward of up to $5 million for information leading to the arrest and/or conviction of Jimmy Cherizier, the leader of Foreign Terrorist Organization Viv Ansanm,” Senior Bureau Official Chris Landberg of State’s Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs said in a statement. “The State Department will continue to apply its tools, including rewards programs, to combat the scourge of transnational organized crime and its violence — especially to stop the worst of the worst criminal ringleaders threatening the people of our hemisphere.”

Cherizier is the leader of Viv Ansanm, a U.S.-designated terrorist organization and powerful gang alliance operating in the Haitian capital of Port-au-Prince, according to the DOJ. The organization formed to unite the nation’s gangs to oppose the government, igniting a brutal, protracted conflict that has killed and displaced thousands of Haitians.

The leader, with the help of his confidant Richardson, allegedly solicited money transfers from Haitian nationals living in the U.S., according to the DOJ. After allegedly laundering the money through intermediaries, Chierzier would use the funds to purchase weapons and pay his gang soldiers.

Richardson was arrested July 23 in Texas, and is currently awaiting his trial, according to the DOJ.

Cherizier is believed to be responsible for multiple human rights violations in Haiti, including the La Saline Massacre in 2018, which killed 71 people and destroyed well over 400 homes in the capital. From January to March, over 250 people were killed, 66 injured and more than 3,000 residents were uprooted by gang attacks in Port-au-Prince, according to the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, citing United Nations (UN) data.

Gangs now control over 90% of the nation’s capital, according to the UN.

“Cherizier and a U.S. associate sought to raise funds in the United States to bankroll Cherizier’s violent criminal enterprise, which is driving a security crisis in Haiti,” Assistant Attorney General for National Security John A. Eisenberg said in a statement. “The National Security Division does not tolerate criminal gang fundraising in the United States, and will continue to pursue those who enable Haiti’s violence and instability.”

AUTHOR

Wallace White

Defense Reporter

RELATED ARTICLE:

Haitian Government Reportedly Partnering With Erik Prince To Fight Gangs

Democrat Who Said She Is Guatemalan Before American Calls ICE ‘Terrorist Organization’

Trump Administration Considers Immigration Ban on Muslim Brotherhood and Other Islamic Groups

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.


All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

Watchdog Sues State Department to Force Release of Docs on Van Hollen El Salvador Junket to Aid MS-13er

Judicial Watch is asking a federal court to order the U.S. Department of State to turn over all official documents concerning Democratic Senator Chris Van Hollen’s (Md.) recent trip to El Salvador to aid deported illegal immigrant and accused MS-13 gang member and human trafficker Kilmar Abrego Garcia.

In a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) suit filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, the nonprofit government watchdog told the court that on April 22, 2025, it filed a request with the State Department for “any and all records concerning, regarding, or relating to the April 2025 visit to El Salvador by Senator Chris Van Hollen. This request includes, but is not limited to, all related agendas, briefing materials, and records of communications.”

The State Department acknowledged receiving the Judicial Watch FOIA request and assigning it a processing number. In a May 29, 2025 email, the government told Judicial Watch that its Van Hollen request was “In Process.” But then just four minutes after sending the “In Process” email, Judicial Watch received another email from the State Department saying its request processing was “closed.”

Judicial Watch told the court that it “has received no further communication from the State Department regarding the request” since the “closed” email.

The federal FOIA law requires federal agencies and departments to provide all official documents requested by any individual citizen or group of citizens within 20 business days, except those covered by a series of exemptions such as personal privacy, protecting commercial secrets, and national security considerations.

The law further requires officials to explain to a requester which documents it opted to withhold and why each of those documents was covered by an exemption. If a particular requested document cannot be found or is thought to have been lost or destroyed, officials are also required to provide an explanation for such circumstances.

To date, the State Department has not explained why it closed the Judicial Watch request without providing any documents or a required explanation for its actions.

In its suit, Judicial Watch asked the court to “(1) order Defendant to search for any and all records responsive to Plaintiff’s FOIA request and demonstrate that it employed search methods reasonably likely to lead to the discovery of records responsive to Plaintiff’s FOIA request; (2) order Defendant to produce, by a date certain, any and all nonexempt records responsive to Plaintiff’s request and a Vaughn index of any responsive records withheld under claim of exemption; (3) enjoin Defendant from continuing to withhold any and all non-exempt records responsive to Plaintiff’s FOIA request; [and] (4) grant Plaintiff an award of attorneys’ fees and other litigation costs reasonably incurred in this action …”

Judicial Watch has filed thousands of FOIA requests and obtained critically important documents that exposed waste, fraud, prevarication, coverups, and criminal wrongdoing in countless federal government scandals since the nonprofit’s founding in 1994.

Van Hollen’s April 17 trip to El Salvador was paid for with taxpayer dollars. The day before the senator departed for the Latin American country to which Department of Homeland Security (DHS) officials had deported Garcia, federal immigration officials released documentation that Garcia was associated with MS-13, one of the most violent and murderous of the many Latin and South American criminal gangs.

Garcia has since been returned to America where he is being held pending further litigation in his case in a federal prison in Tennessee.

The Judicial Watch suit seeking to force the State Department to release the Garcia documents comes as something of a surprise since that agency has an above-average record for responding promptly to simple FOIA requests, according to data maintained by foia.gov.

On average, the State Department responds as required by the FOIA law within 15.49 days of receiving a request judged not to be complex or to require a time-consuming and costly search for older documents that may be difficult to locate in official archives. But the department’s record is much worse when requests are considered complex, requiring an average of 564 days.

The Washington Stand recently reported, based on official data compiled by Open the Books, that many federal agencies and departments are guilty of taking hundreds more days than required by the FOIA law to respond to requesters.

Government-wide, the average response time for simple requests of 836 days was compiled by the Commerce Department’s Office of the Undersecretary for Economic Affairs. The second-longest wait time among federal departments and agencies was 811 by the Department of Veterans Affairs’ Office of Enterprise Integration.

Third among the longest wait times was the Federal Labor Relations Authority (FLRA) at 367 days. The fourth-longest average wait was registered by the U.S. Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board at 360 days, followed in fifth by the Executive Office of the President in the White House at 350 days.

The five federal agencies with the fastest average turnaround time in responding to simple FOIA requests include the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) at one day, the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA) at 1.69 days, followed by the Job Corps, the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals and the U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) at two days. The average response time for all federal departments and agencies for complex requests was 267 days.

AUTHOR

Mark Tapscott

Mark Tapscott is senior congressional analyst at The Washington Stand.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Judicial Watch Sues State Dept for Records on Sen. Van Hollen’s Visit to Deported Illegal Alien in El Salvador

Criminal Aliens Infiltrate U.S. Through Program to Help Abused, Neglected or Abandoned Kids

EDITORS NOTE: This Washington Stand column is republished with permission. All rights reserved. ©2025 Family Research Council.


The Washington Stand is Family Research Council’s outlet for news and commentary from a biblical worldview. The Washington Stand is based in Washington, D.C. and is published by FRC, whose mission is to advance faith, family, and freedom in public policy and the culture from a biblical worldview. We invite you to stand with us by partnering with FRC.

State Department Begins Sending Bureaucrats To The Unemployment Line

The State Department notified its staff Thursday that it is beginning its wide-spread layoffs, according to a notification obtained by the Daily Caller.

The Supreme Court allowed President Donald Trump to move forward with his executive order directing agencies to prepare “large-scale reductions” in the workforce in a ruling Tuesday. The State Department began prepping in April for a reorganization that would close 132 offices, representing a 17% reduction, a senior official shared with the Caller at the time. Deputy Secretary of Management and Resources Michael Rigas notified officials on Thursday that the “Reduction in Force” would soon be underway, according to a document obtained by the Caller.

“Once notifications have taken place, the Department will enter the final stage of its reorganization and focus its attention on delivering results-driven diplomacy,” Rigas wrote.

The mass firings were to be underway as soon as Friday, Semafor first reported

As a part of the reorganization, redundant offices within the State Department will be removed including those that did not “align with President Trump’s priorities and [the dept’s] national interests,” a senior State Department official previously told the Caller.

In the transition, 137 offices will be put in another location within the Department “to consolidate/increase efficiency,” the official told the Caller.

In the weeks to come, Under Secretaries will communicate with their “family organizations” and host “town halls,” the memo writes.

“On behalf of Department Leadership, we extend our gratitude for your hard work and commitment to executing this reorganization and for your ongoing dedication to advancing U.S. national interests across the world,” Rigas wrote.

“Secretary Rubio, at the direction of President Trump, has undertaken a historic reorganization of the State Department, which was thoughtfully and deliberately executed by department leadership. The America First State Department will better serve the American people,” a senior State department official told the Caller about Thursday’s announcement.

In a similar move, the State Department ended a program that for decades has given benefits and funds to low-performing diplomats rather than phasing them out of the department, according to a memo previously obtained by the Caller on July 2. Under the Annuity Exception, Foreign Service members were able to remain on the State Department payroll beyond their scheduled departure from the administration, the internal memo explained.

AUTHOR

Reagan Reese

White House Correspondent. Follow Reagan on Twitter.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Rubio Slaps Sanctions On UN Palestine Envoy After ICC ‘Lawfare’ Stunt

Deep State Steps Out of the Shadows, Using Their Regime Change Skills to Destroy Trump Presidency,“ CIA’s Simple Sabotage”

RELATED VIDEOS:

Radical leftist USAID shut down for good

‘ELIMINATIONIST RHETORIC’: Miller Blasts Dems for Putting ICE Agents in Danger

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. All rights reserved.

EXCLUSIVE: Trump Admin Hopes To Bring ‘Thousands’ Of Refugees From South Africa By Late Summer

The Trump administration hopes to begin taking in thousands of Afrikaner refugees from South Africa by the end of this summer, a State Department official told the Daily Caller Friday.

In February, President Donald Trump signed an executive order promoting resettling Afrikaner refugees in the U.S. In early May, 59 Afrikaners arrived in the U.S. before a meeting later in the month between Trump and South African President Cyril Ramaphosa. The official told the Caller that the number of Afrikaner refugees is expected to rise sharply “towards the second half of summer.”

“We won’t be talking about dozens of arrivals, but hundreds and perhaps thousands,” the official said.

Although the official said he does not have an exact time frame, he said he “would feel confident in saying that … towards the second half of summer, we’ll start to massively scale this up.”

The official said that there is a backlog of over 50,000 refugee applications, and they expect that this number will “continue to rise.”

Trump’s EO accused South Africa of showing “disregard” for the rights of its citizens through “countless government policies designed to dismantle equal opportunity in employment, education, and business, and hateful rhetoric and government actions fueling disproportionate violence against racially disfavored landowners.”

The order cut off aid to South Africa and announced that the U.S. will “promote the resettlement of Afrikaner refugees escaping government-sponsored race-based discrimination, including racially discriminatory property confiscation.”

“Everyone who has been admitted to the United States thus far … has demonstrated a persecution claim,” the official told the Caller. “People have suffered attacks on their farms that were racially motivated.”

The official said nine Afrikaner refugees arrived in Atlanta on Friday morning, following the first wave. Many advocates for refugee settlement have inexplicably changed their tune when the Afrikaners are involved. Episcopal Migration Services, the Episcopal Church’s refugee service, decided to begin winding down its partnership with the federal government when Trump started promoting Afrikaner resettlement. The Church World Service, another Christian group, said it was willing to assist the Afrikaners but claimed they had received preferential treatment over other applicants.

AUTHOR

Derek VanBuskirk

Reporter.

RELATED ARTICLE: The TRUTH About What’s Happening In South Africa

RELATED VIDEO: President Trump stuns the world forcing South Africa’s President to watch a video of his people yelling ‘k*ll White people’

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

U.S. State Department Closes Censorship Office

Big Brother is no longer watching Americans from Foggy Bottom. Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Wednesday announced “the closure of the State Department’s Counter Foreign Information Manipulation and Interference (R/FIMI), formerly known as the Global Engagement Center (GEC),” an office which “spent millions of dollars to actively silence and censor the voices of Americans they were supposed to be serving.”

The State Department censorship office had “cost taxpayers more than $50 million per year,” according to the agency. It placed all 30 full-time staff on leave, eliminated all 50 full-time positions, and notified Congress of R/FIMI’s dissolution, with total savings of $65 million annually.

“GEC was supposed to be dead already,” Rubio declared in an op-ed for The Federalist. As TWS previously reported, the legislative authority for GEC expired on December 23, 2024, after the Republican-controlled House of Representatives “declined to enact several proposals to extend the GEC’s mandate,” according to the Congressional Research Service obituary.

Instead, the Biden administration merely staged a funeral and put the censorship apparatus into hiding. “When Republicans in Congress sunset GEC’s funding at the end of last year, the Biden State Department simply slapped on a new name. The GEC became the Counter Foreign Information Manipulation and Interference (R-FIMI) office with the same roster of employees. With this new name, they hoped to survive the transition to the new administration,” Rubio related. “Today, we are putting that to an end. Whatever name it goes by, GEC is dead. It will not return.”

President Barack Obama first “directed the Secretary of State to establish the GEC by executive Order” in March 2016 “to carry out U.S.-government-sponsored counterterrorism communications to foreign publics.” Congress later expanded that mission to include “counter[ing] foreign state and non-state propaganda and disinformation efforts,” as well as leading and coordinating inter-agency counter-propaganda efforts.

Progressive operatives lurking in the bureaucracy twisted this mission into a license to suppress any domestic political speech they disliked, even before the Biden administration made it official policy. Rather than censor Americans’ speech directly, which would raise obvious First Amendment concerns, GEC and other federal agencies “effectively outsourced to the newly emerging censorship-industrial complex” to private proxies, according to a report published by the U.S. House Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government — as if that made the First Amendment problems go away.

Through a so-called Election Integrity Partnership (EIP), the GEC collaborated with private institutions to “monitor and censor Americans’ online speech in advance of the 2020 presidential election,” the report continued.

“Twitter, Facebook, Google, and other companies developed a formal system for taking in moderation requests from every corner of government, from the FBI, the DHS, the HHS, DOD, the Global Engagement Center at State, even the CIA,” testified journalist Matt Taibbi, after reporting on the Twitter files. “For every government agency scanning Twitter, there were perhaps 20 quasi-private entities doing the same thing, including Stanford’s Election Integrity Partnership, NewsGuard, the Global Disinformation Index, and many others — many taxpayer-funded.”

In fact, the GEC was responsible for much of that taxpayer funding, a U.S. House Committee on Small Business (HCSB) report found, providing start-up capital through a murky sub-award to NewsGuard, an American tech company that rates the trustworthiness of news outlets with a manifestly leftward bias. The HCSB report concluded that the GEC had “circumvented its strict international mandate by funding, developing, then promoting tech start-ups and other small businesses in the disinformation detection space to private sector entities with domestic censorship capabilities.”

But the GEC had problems beyond its ravenous appetite to censor domestic speech. A 2022 inspection by the State Department Office of the Inspector General (OIG) faulted the GEC for a poor internal structure, conflict with other units within the State Department, and competition with “counter-disinformation efforts housed in other government agencies” that did a better job of executing what should have been its main mission: countering propaganda from hostile foreign actors.

The problems with the GEC weren’t going to disappear simply by changing the office’s name. “Over the last decade, Americans have been slandered, fired, charged, and even jailed for simply voicing their opinions,” wrote Rubio. “That ends today.” Thus, for the second time in four months, the State Department has declared an end to its office engaging in domestic censorship. This time, it seems that the GEC is dead for good.

AUTHOR

Joshua Arnold

Joshua Arnold is a senior writer at The Washington Stand.

EDITORS NOTE: This Washington Stand column is republished with permission. All rights reserved. ©2025 Family Research Council.


The Washington Stand is Family Research Council’s outlet for news and commentary from a biblical worldview. The Washington Stand is based in Washington, D.C. and is published by FRC, whose mission is to advance faith, family, and freedom in public policy and the culture from a biblical worldview. We invite you to stand with us by partnering with FRC.

U.S. State Department Mulls Closing 27 Embassies and Consulates

The U.S. State Department is formulating plans to close 10 embassies and 17 consulates, reported The New York Times, based upon an internal memo. The plan, which expands on one circulated in an earlier March memo, is part of an internal budget-cutting campaign, which aims to reduce the State Department operations budget by as much as 20%.

The memo proposed shuttering six embassies in Africa (Central African Republic [C.A.R.], Eritrea, Gambia, Lesotho, the Republic of Congo and South Sudan), two in Europe (Luxembourg and Malta), one in the Caribbean (Grenada), and one in the Indian Ocean (the Maldives), according to the Times. However, the official State Department list of embassies does not list a U.S. embassy in Grenada.

The memo also proposed closing all five U.S. consulates in France, two out of five U.S. consulates in Germany, and both branch offices of the embassy in Bosnia and Herzegovina, the Times said. It also proposed closing the consulates in Thessaloniki, Greece; Florence, Italy; Ponta Delgada, Portugal; and Edinburgh, Scotland, plus four outside of Europe: Douala, Cameroon; Medan, Indonesia; Durban, South Africa; and Busan, South Korea.

The U.S. operated 271 diplomatic missions overseas (embassies and consulates) in 2023, according to the Lowy Institute’s Global Diplomacy Index. These proposals therefore represent a 10% cut to the number of U.S. missions.

The Times complained that closing embassies “would hinder the work of large parts of the federal government,” especially the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), which usually posts its officers at embassies under a diplomatic cover. “Embassies house officers from the military, intelligence, law enforcement, health, commerce, trade, treasury and other agencies,” they explained. They especially fretted over “ceding vital diplomatic space to China,” which according to the Lowy Institute operates 274 overseas missions.

But diplomatic influence cannot be measured simply by counting the number of foreign missions a nation operates. There are many important factors, including how a nation uses the diplomatic missions it has. (In that respect, the U.S. is never going to leverage its overseas missions as far as China, which has operated secret police stations even inside the U.S. to keep tabs on its own citizens.)

The point is, if some U.S. missions see little to no use, or are more of a liability than an asset, then they should be shut down. And suggesting “then we’ll have less than China” is not a good argument for keeping them open.

There are already at least 25 nations without an official U.S. embassy in-country, TWS found. The U.S. embassies in six nations (Afghanistan, 2021; Belarus, 2022; Sudan, 2023; Syria, 2012; Venezuela, 2019; and Yemen, 2015) have suspended operations entirely due to dangerous conditions persisting there. Meanwhile, the American embassy to Guinea-Bissau is located in neighboring Senegal, the embassy to Libya operates out of Tunisia, and the embassy listed for Iran is really the Swiss embassy.

For 16 other nations, the U.S. has no embassy listed at all. This includes six Caribbean island nations (Antigua and Barbuda, Dominica, Grenada, St. Kitts and Nevis, St. Lucia, and St. Vincent and the Grenadines), which all use the U.S. embassy in Barbados. It also includes four Pacific island nations (Kiribati, Nauru, Tuvalu, and Vanuatu) and one African island nation (Sao Tome and Principe). Rounding out the list are three tiny European nations (Andorra, Liechtenstein, and Monaco), and two nations with whom the U.S. has no formal relations (Bhutan and North Korea).

The clever reader will likely notice a theme to nations lacking U.S. embassies: most are tiny nations with small populations, small economies, and therefore little business to transact with the U.S. What little business there is can more easily be conducted through an embassy in a neighboring country than by establishing a whole new embassy, requiring infrastructure, staff, vetting procedures, etc.

The embassy closures proposed by the State Department largely continue this theme: Lesotho and Gambia are entirely surrounded by another country, while Luxembourg, Malta, and the Maldives are small (and, for two out of three, also islands). It’s less obvious why the State Department chose certain consulates to shutter, but it could be for the same reason: little work to do that could not be handled more easily somewhere else.

The most notable embassies to be closed are those in the relatively larger nations of C.A.R., South Sudan, and Republic of Congo. The first two are landlocked, impoverished nations that have little intercourse with the U.S.; C.A.R. ranks among the world’s most repressive countries, while South Sudan has little infrastructure or civic stability. The Republic of Congo is better off, but perhaps the State Department noticed that the U.S. operated another embassy only four miles away (as the crow flies), across the river in the Democratic Republic of Congo.

It is also notable that so many proposed consulate closures are in Europe. This could reflect a downturn in European tourism, likely due to lingering effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, resulting in fewer Americans requiring consular services.

This could also reflect the Trump administration’s wariness about European countries that have retreated from certain fundamental freedoms. “The threat that I worry the most about vis-à-vis Europe is not Russia; it’s not China; it’s not any other external actor,” Vice President J.D. Vance said in February. “What I worry about is the threat from within: the retreat of Europe from some of its most fundamental values, values shared with the United States of America.”

This raises another factor the State Department must consider: the potential threats to U.S. diplomatic missions. The 2012 attack on America’s consulate in Benghazi, Libya, which resulted in four American deaths, dramatically underscores the real risk associated with operating far-flung diplomatic missions in hostile corners of the globe, with only a handful of staff.

So far this year, the State Department has seen an unusually high number of resignations (about 700), including 450 career diplomats. For the safety of America’s own diplomats, it makes sense to consolidate our diplomatic missions, so that America operates no more than it can fully staff.

With staffing cuts and budget cuts, it makes sense for the State Department to trim away the least important overseas missions, too. And, once those reductions are made, a slimmer State Department — and the U.S. taxpayers who fund it — will benefit for years to come.

AUTHOR

Joshua Arnold

Joshua Arnold is a senior writer at The Washington Stand.

RELATED ARTICLE: Newsham: “The Elites, Wall Street, The Business Class, They Have Funded The Build Up Of The CCP.”

EDITORS NOTE: This Washington Stand column is republished with permission. All rights reserved. ©2025 Family Research Council.


The Washington Stand is Family Research Council’s outlet for news and commentary from a biblical worldview. The Washington Stand is based in Washington, D.C. and is published by FRC, whose mission is to advance faith, family, and freedom in public policy and the culture from a biblical worldview. We invite you to stand with us by partnering with FRC.

U.S. State Department Paying For Play Where God Is Bisexual And Communists Are Good In Bid To Push LGBT Rights Abroad

The Biden-Harris administration is paying to put on a play that portrays God as bisexual, sharply criticizes former President Ronald Reagan and paints communists in a positive light, all in an effort to push gay rights on Southeastern Europeans, federal grant records show.

Earlier in September, the State Department greenlit funding for a showing of Tony Kushner’s 1991 play “Angels in America: A Gay Fantasia on National Themes” in North Macedonia, with the agency claiming the production will raise awareness about “LGBTQ+ issues” in the country, federal grant records revealThe play follows multiple storylines, among them the ghost of convicted communist spy Ethel Rosenberg antagonizing dying conservative lawyer Roy Cohn and a gay man having sexually explicit visions of heaven as he struggles with AIDS.

Prior Walter, the man with AIDS, begins to have prophetic visions in his hospital room after his lover, Louis Ironson, abandons him, according to the play’s text.

In one such vision, he finds that angels have “eight vaginas” and are “equipped as well with a bouquet of phalli” and that the universe was created by God “copulat[ing] ceaselessly” with these hermaphroditic beings. Ejaculate from angels “fuels the Engine of Creation,” the play recounts.

Walter recounts these visions to a man named Belize, a former drag queen who is tending to him as a nurse.

The State Department has committed $20,000 to staging the play in Macedonia, according to grant records. An additional $10,500 in non-federal funding has also been allocated for the production.

“In the Manichaean world of Angels in America, everything Reagan stood for (capitalism, etc.) is evil,” a National Review critic wrote of the play’s HBO adaptation in 2003. “The most vocal Republican in the film is Roy Cohn — the unscrupulous gay lawyer who denied his sexuality and AIDS diagnosis to his death. In Cohn, a man ultimately undone by his own lies and hypocrisy, Kushner finds his embodiment of Reagan’s administration.”

Angels in America portrays Cohn, a real lawyer who was deeply involved in the conservative movement and helped Reagan get elected, as a bigoted hypocrite prone to outbursts of anger.

Cohn was instrumental in the prosecution of Julius and Ethel Rosenberg, who were convicted in 1951 of spying for the Soviet Union and executed in 1953. Activists long maintained that the Rosenbergs were innocent, however, documents released by the government in the 90s proved that the couple was involved in a Soviet espionage operation.

Rosenberg, portrayed positively in the play, antagonizes Cohn throughout the story, telling him on his deathbed that she “take[s] pleasure in [his] misery.” She later guides Ironson, who is a secular Jew, through a funeral prayer for Cohn, who also had Jewish ancestry, symbolically forgiving him.

“We have no system of universal health care, we don’t educate our children, we can’t pass sane gun control laws, we elect presidents like Reagan,” Kushner wrote in his play’s afterword, blaming those purported problems on “individualism.” A gay character, at one point in the play, asks “if [Reagan] didn’t have people like me to demonize where would he be?”

“Kushner strips Reagan of any merit, and reduces him fictionally to an anti-gay crusader,” the National Review critic wrote of the play.

The State Department’s production of an anti-Reagan, pro-LGBT play is not its first exercise in using theatrics for the purposes of social engineering as it spent $120,000 in 2023 to “improve communication at the level of the local community on the social issue of LGBTQ rights and domestic violence via participatory theater” in the African nation of Chad.

The new grant isn’t even the State Department’s first theatrical operation in North Macedonia, as it paid to teach the country’s residents about environmental issues through theater and dance in 2023, federal grant records show.

“Culture — from music to sports to theater — is a vital component of the United States’ people-to-people diplomacy efforts in Chad and around the world and supports broader U.S. foreign policy goals,” a spokesperson for the department told the Daily Caller News Foundation at the time.

The State Department did not respond to the DCNF’s request for comment.

AUTHOR

Robert Schmad

Contributor.

RELATED ARTICLE: Biden Admin Funding Theatrical Productions To Teach Africans About LGBTQ Rights

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.


All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.