A Modest Proposal

I have often wondered about people who express themselves under cover of anonymity.  I suspect that despite the bravado to support his vulgarity, he prefers secrecy lest he be recognized by family and friends.  He is properly deserving of shame.  He suggests that an incredible evil befall the world.

In response to my essay, “Endangered Species,” I received a reply from someone signed Kelvin Throop, who is R.A.J. Phillips’s literary character known for his acerbic memos.  His/her identity, therefore, remains anonymous.  And no wonder, inasmuch as s(he) expresses a theory for settling the strife in the Middle East that is taken from the worst inhumanity of Islam and Hitler’s fascism.  It is presented as an objective, modest proposal of conveniently disappearing an entire people.

We see the first sign of aggression in his opening statement, in which he devalued the target people – he thanked me for calling to his attention the similarity between Jews and polar bears.  He chooses to be unaware of the enormous and unprecedented accomplishments of such a small, scattered nation over 4,000 years.  While Throop’s ancestors were tribal pagans, sacrificing to idols, dwelling in caves or tents, and living in a state of constant infighting and chaos, the Jews were bringing monotheism, morality, and meaning to the history of humanity.

The Jews established the Sabbath for humans with comparable respect to animals, abolished slavery, and created the first human settlement in Jerusalem around 3500 BCE, which became the capital of the Jewish kingdom in 1000 BCE.   They brought us universal literacy and education; the sabbatical year; equality and justice for men and women; value to individuality and every human life; the right to a fair trial; the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness; limited government powers; and charity, all the requirements for an altruistic concept of world peace.  Today, Israelis are industrious, innovative, and leaders in science, engineering, mathematics, the arts and entertainment, earning a remarkable number of Nobel Prizes in every major field.

American President John Adams said, “I will insist that the Hebrews have done more to civilize man than any other nation.  If I were an atheist, and believed in blind eternal fate, I should still believe that chance had ordered the Jews to be the most essential instrument for civilizing the nations.”  He understood that it was the Jews who first set us on the road to civilization by challenging the prevailing notion of “blind eternal fate” with a sense of purpose based on mutual respect, justice and kindness.

Throop’s disposition and conclusions reveal his desire to rid the world of Jews by forcing their cohabitation (his word was derogatory) with their sworn enemy, which is precisely what Mohammed and his disciples have done  since 622 AD.  The Koran reveals itself as being no common prayer book, but a tome of illuminating chapters, 114 of which (suras) are a preoccupation with and inspiration for killing Jews because they rejected the cruelty of Mohammedanism.  Islamic laws command not only that Muslims maraud and murder, but that they interbreed with chosen survivors in order to annihilate all traces of their existence.  This method worked to substantially increase the Islamic population while decreasing the non-Muslim populations of many countries in the Middle East, North Africa, the Horn of Africa, Africa’s Sahel region, and Central Asia, and now in Europe, bringing only misery.  The identity of most of these peoples – Jews, Christians, Zoroastrians, Mithraists, Manicheists, Nestorians, Polytheists and more – have even been expunged from the annals of history as though they never existed.

What do we know about the 1400-year Islamic slave trade?  At least 80 to 90 percent of the captured 28 million slaves died en route to the slave market; a low estimate of 112 million never reached land.  Twice as many women as men were sent to the Middle East for sexual slavery, whereas twice as many men as women went to the Americas for agricultural work.  The male slaves in the Middle East were castrated and children of female slaves were killed at birth, whereas America’s slaves could marry, and their descendants became citizens of Brazil and the US.

Our wise antisemite, Throop, cannot comprehend that Jews, successful or failed, communist or capitalist, black or white, will not be erased, but will survive as Jews in the face of the world’s desertion or brutality —  today, as they have through millennia.  In spite of the persistence of the genociders, Israel has 6.5 million Jews, but this should be compared with 1.6 billion Muslims in the surrounding lands.  A comparison of the land masses is similar, with a mere 8,000 sq. mi. for the Jews and 7.386 million sq. mi. for the Muslims.

Islam feeds upon hate, and hate feeds upon itself.  The Palestinians have eschewed every offer for a separate Palestinian state because their purpose is another Islamic state on Israeli soil.  This is Islamic holy war, to remove Jews from their land and from history.  The Palestinians are regarded as outcasts by their brethren whose surnames and heritage they share.  The commonality, their raison d’etre – the only justification for their existence – is Israel’s destruction, Jewish annihilation by conquest or inbreeding.  Unsurprisingly, Lebanese “Palestinians” pledge allegiance to “Palestine” with the Nazi salute.”

Throop’s repulsive suggestion echoes that of the Nazi fascists, particularly Heinrich Himmler’s psychopathic obsession with a blue-eyed, blond super-race, Aryans.  Germany seriously diminished its young male population by sending its viable workforce and potential fathers to fight two world wars; by deliberately exterminating Jews, Romani, homosexuals and blacks as part of Hitler’s Final Solution; and by Germany’s Nuremberg Laws that forbade intermarriage.  This depopulation left Himmler in the position of creating the Lebensborn Project (1935) to generate racially pure children by having SS officers mate with girls and women within Germany and from occupied countries, particularly in Scandinavia (Norway), in special “breeding clinics” to produce Aryan babies.

To protect the pregnant, unmarried women from the social stigma, their identities were suppressed, and they lived secluded in comfortable Lebensborn homes – ten in Germany, nine in Norway, two in Austria, and one each in Belgium, Holland, France, Luxembourg, and Denmark – furnished from the dwellings of Jews who had been sent to Dachau.  The newborn Aryans were specially baptized in keeping with the Nazi ideology, relinquished to the SS for indoctrination, and given to elite families to raise.  Had Nazism triumphed, the unique identities of the surrounding peoples would have been absorbed into the Nazi behemoth, exactly as Throop suggests for Israel.

By 1939, Himmler’s program was ailing, and locals were critical of the immorality, but the nightmare only increased.  In 1942, Hitler encouraged the SS to fraternize with non-German women, inviting them to the Lebensborn homes for privacy and safety.  Soldiers began kidnapping light-eyed, blond children of “racially good” countries, some orphaned, some forcibly stolen, and sending them to Lebensborn centers to forget their families and become Germanized.  As many as 100,000 were stolen from Poland alone, and those who were not racially pure or could not be Nazified, were often beaten and transferred to concentration camps for execution.

At the end of the war, May 1, 1945, one day after Hitler’s death, Americans discovered 300 children, ages 6 months to 6 years.  They were either returned to their birth families or, if too Germanized to be repatriated, put up for adoption.  The estimate was that the program included the theft of hundreds of thousands of children, of which only 25,000 were returned to their families.  Some were too Germanized to leave their adoptive families, while others, thousands, who could not accept the forced identities, were also exterminated.  When the Nazi regime collapsed, the children became social outcasts who suffered from horrible stigmatization and disgrace throughout their lives – leading to severe humiliation, rape, depression, alcoholism, criminality, drug abuse, and suicide.

During the program’s ten-year operation, an estimated 20,000 children were born in Lebensborn homes (10,000 in Norway), although names were changed, and secret records destroyed.  The resulting depopulation put Germany in a position of having to acquire a foreign workforce, to accept males from a culturally disparate, hostile Islamic culture.  Sweden may never return to its peaceful days after ceding its safety, security, and national identity.

Throop and his ilk would force this nightmare scenario onto the Jews of Israel, but we should be warned: what starts with the Jews never ends with the Jews.  These theorists cannot tolerate individuality or true diversity.  They must crush humanity into one coagulated mass.

Although the despots and methods may be new, America is faced with the same ideology of destruction and depopulation.  Our country has become the new battleground for intentional depopulation by Islam, Fascism, Communism, and globalists:

  • The invasion of foreign cultures with destructive practices of drugs, violence, rape, child-trafficking, and sexual slavery;
  • The divisiveness advanced in our schools that sows tribal hatred, racial violence, denial of G-d and country, and diminished white masculinity;
  • The incorporation of Critical Race Theory to our degraded, feminized military; denigrating patriotism, and providing brainwashing reading materials;
  • Bill Gates’s open declaration to depopulate an overcrowded world, proposing 350,000 to be killed daily, using scare tactics that include an unknown virus and gene-therapy injections to be administered by government decree;
  • Launching a COVID-19 fear campaign to the populace, using quarantines and masks for the healthy, followed by mRNA vaccines that may edit genes through “retro-integration,” with DNA damage passed on to future generations, its potentially catastrophic consequences to impact fertility.

The scene is ever-changing, and the players have innocuous names and revamped methods, but the old malignancy persists beneath the surface. The goal is always destruction of identity or, failing that, extinction.

Share if you care…

©Tabitha Korol. All rights reserved.

4 replies
  1. Kelvin Throop
    Kelvin Throop says:

    I cannot understand how you know so much about what my ancestors were like 4,000 years ago. I myself do not know anything about any of them before 1841. But you know what kind of house they lived in, what their religion was, and how they got along with their neighbors.

    It was your idea to compare the issues of Jews and polar bears. I only drew the logical conclusion that both are not independent species. Both can interbreed with closly related members of their own species with only slightly differing characteristics. And both would gain by doing so,. If a bear population with white fur cannot hunt so well as one with brown fur in a warming world with vanishing snow, mating with brown bears is the way to preserve their genes and enable them to leave descendents.

    Likewise, if Jews are as badly outnumbered as you say, their best chance for leaving descendents is to mate with members of the dominant majority around them. Since they are of the same species, there is no reason they could not.

    And I said nothing about “forcing” anyone to do anything. I suggested offering a fiancial incentive for intermarriage. How does that equate to forcing anything? It looks as if you are projecting your own authoritarianism onto my non-authoritarian suggestion.

    I have nothing against either Jews or polar bears. In fact, some of my best friends are bears.

  2. Kelvin Throop
    Kelvin Throop says:

    If the girl in your story was my daughter, I would have been very proud of her. She was having her first chance to speak to an adult audience and she took the opportunity to advocate for compassion and the protection of the natural world upon which we all depend. I have never attended a Bat Mitzvah and do not know if it would be appropriate to applaud, but if I had been there, I would have congratulated her on her showing such concern for the other species with whom we share this world. On the other hand, you have the gall to criticize her for showing the very traits you like to claim for your one small unimportant segment of one single species. Frankly, I think the Jewish people should be proud of her and ashamed of you.

    My advocacy of assimilation holds not only for Jews. I would give the same advice to the children of Amish people who are brought up in a restrictive culture that does not offer the opportunities for personal freedom the mainstream American culture provides. I also think the same applies to children born on American Indian reservations, where the social conditions are among the worst in the country. They would be better off being raised in the off-reservation world, even if that is a painful idea to some tribal traditionalists. In fact, having once had to do an emergency emotional repair job on a 10 year old whose vegan hippy parents had made him horribly guilt-stricken at the mere thought of eating a hotdog, I have little sympathy for cults of any kind, not only Jews.

    Factually, people thousands of years ago did not “worship idols”. They had certain holy places, springs, groves, certain large trees, mountains, etc., not “idols”. The claim that all non-Jews were “idol-worshipers” was a canard invented by the early Christians to defame the Romans, whose pictorial representations of the gods as idealized humans were misunderstood by the Jewish Christians as being worship of the pictures themselves.

    I note that among the many accomplishments you claim for the Jews, many of which were by people who were not believing or practicing Jews, but rather secular individuals who merely happened to have some Jewish ancestry, you include “monotheism”. Since I do not follow either monotheism or polytheism, I fail to see what is better about one or the other. What difference does it make if someone believes in monotheistic Judaism, Christianity or Islam or polytheistic Hinduism? They are both delusional systems to anyone who does not belong to one or the other and I see no reason to regard either of them as superior.

    You are not as familiar with Islam as you think you are. Like the Bible, the Quran contains many passages that contradict other passages in the same book. And, like the Bible, most Muslims, no matter how devout, do not really live by their teaching in their daily lives anyway. Modern Western society is not based on the Bible, and modern Islamic societies do not live by the teachings of Islam. There are plenty of passages in the Bible that call upon the followers of God to destroy enemy people, their women, their children, and even their domestic animals.

    The Quran also in one passage tells believers to deal justly with the Jews because “they are people of the Book ” and speaks highly of Jews. ,And in fact, historically, Jews have always been better off in Muslim countries than in Christain ones. It was the Ottoman Empire that gave refuge to Jews fleeing the Inquisition. I once met a Turkish man who spoke Old Spanish and he told me he grew up in Istanbul speaking that ancient form of Spanish at home because his family came from Spain 500 years ago to escape from the Inquisition. The historical fact is that antisemitism in the West was the result of centuries of anti-Jewish preaching by the Catholic Church, which was always the worst enemy of the Jews, who were seen as a rival faith.

    Many Jews, including some of the most devout among them, are very much opposed to the State of Israel, considering it a travesty of Judaism to have a secular nation-state on the Westphalian model. There are many Jews, including some of the most faithful, who consider Jewishness to be a matter of theological commitment, not mere genealogy and consider Judaism to be a universal ideology, not a matter of genealogy, and regard the existence of Israel as negating that universalist character. The phrase they sometimes use is, “To be a light to all nations”. There are also many progressive-minded Jews who are ashamed of the intolerant actions of the Isreali government, and strongly oppose it. In fact, the uncritical support for Israel by the most public Jewish organizations is the main driving force behind the antisemitism you are so concerned about. If not for the reactionary colonialist project to establish a nation-state in the Middle East for Europeans of Jewish ancestry in flagrant disregard of the native people who had always lived there, antisemitism would have died away by now.

    • Dr. Rich Swier
      Dr. Rich Swier says:


      My conclusion about your ancestors was purely deduction, and I am pleased to elucidate. Unless you believe you were created in a lab in 1841, we can be assured that your DNA has been transmitted from prehistoric times. And it was out of that era of world chaos that only the Jews emerged with laws by which to live morally, righteously, and amicably. If your heritage was more intelligent than it appears, then something happened to produce someone who thinks as you do, subtly trying to insult a highly intelligent people by comparing them with animals, and by attempting to “inbreed” them with the barbarous of the human species. Your intent to denigrate did not go unnoticed. The technique is called projection, and it is commonplace in Islam, and your unsubstantiated opinions are not worthy of continued discussion.

      I most certainly did not compare Jews with polar bears; you used my reference as an additional affront to the Jewish people. This was not a logical conclusion, but a display of antisemitism. Had you read my essay correctly, you would have understood that I disagreed with the Bat Mitzvah (the girl)’s request for support for animals in the wild when, in fact, science indicates that they are thriving. I suggested that the donations would have been better used to save humans, specifically Jews, because the girl is Jewish and because Jews are being attacked worldwide by other people – such as yourself – who have no other outlet of value than to hate Jewish people. History has shown that Jews are not a belligerent people, so that the reason has to be envy for all the accomplishments wrought by the Jewish people for the rest of the world.

      Your claim that interbreeding is a “logical conclusion” only has validity for a person who considers mere physical survival to be sufficient and who disregards the spiritual, ethical and moral aspirations of a people. For this reason, to suggest that Jews and Muslims should interbreed shows woeful ignorance.

      if you know anything about Islamic history, you will note that they follow their Koranic dictates to slaughter all non-Muslims, including Jews, Christians, Zoroastrians, etc., until the entire world submits to Islam. To suggest that Muslims will suddenly be peaceful reveals your obliviousness of world history; there is no evidence to indicate that Muslims can ever live in peace. They have always been, are now, and always will be a violent people unless the Koran is rewritten, and their imams take it upon themselves to teach them to live peaceably.

      The Jewish worldview and ethic, cherishing all life and never imposing its will on others, is diametrically opposed to the Islamic worldview, yet you suggest that they toss this aside and melt forever into the cruel and dominating culture of Islam. It’s not going to happen, thankfully. The Jews will continue to represent the highest values known to mankind, based upon the Holy Bible.

      Jews are badly outnumbered “as I say?” You had the audacity to assume otherwise without doing some research on your own? You have joined the other murderers to assume it best to remove the Jews from the face of the earth for no better reason than they don’t agree with the dominant majority. Instead of making some constructive suggestion of how both Jews and Muslims might live together in peace, you recommend that the minority be bred out of existence simply because they are the minority and not the “dominant” majority. In so doing, you expose your own people to attacks by the more violent of our species. Beware of what you suggest.

      The proposal that the Jews could throw their venerated heritage and history into the garbage can for a few pieces of silver tells me that you value you own beliefs that cheaply. But the Jews are different, very different. Your best friends, the bears, acknowledged, you apparently lack human interaction and companionship and your mind remains closed. your mentality has not evolved to where you might live and communicate with those who observe Judaism, and I am not your chump. I hope that you may find a new source from which you might learn and benefit.

      Tabitha Korol

  3. Kelvin Throop
    Kelvin Throop says:

    Thank you for doing so much to educate people regarding God’s Law. I have learned a great deal from you, and try to share that knowledge with as many people as I can. When someone tries to defend the homosexual lifestyle, for example, I simply remind them that Leviticus 18:22 clearly states it to be an abomination … End of debate.

    I do need some advice from you, however, regarding some other elements of God’s Laws and how to follow them.

    1. Leviticus 25:44 states that I may possess slaves, both male and female, provided they are purchased from neighboring nations. A friend of mine claims that this applies to Mexicans, but not Canadians. Can you clarify? Why can’t I own Canadians?

    2. I would like to sell my daughter into slavery, as sanctioned in Exodus 21:7. In this day and age, what do you think would be a fair price for her?

    3. I know that I am allowed no contact with a woman while she is in her period of Menstrual uncleanliness – Lev.15: 19-24. The problem is how do I tell? I have tried asking, but most women take offense.

    4. When I burn a bull on the altar as a sacrifice, I know it creates a pleasing odor for the Lord – Lev.1:9. The problem is my neighbors. They claim the odor is not pleasing to them. Should I smite them?

    5. I have a neighbor who insists on working on the Sabbath. Exodus 35:2 clearly states he should be put to death. Am I morally obligated to kill him myself, or should I ask the police to do it?

    6. A friend of mine feels that even though eating shellfish is an abomination, Lev. 11:10, it is a lesser abomination than homosexuality. I don’t agree. Can you settle this? Are there ‘degrees’ of abomination?

    7. Lev. 21:20 states that I may not approach the altar of God if I have a defect in my sight. I have to admit that I wear reading glasses. Does my vision have to be 20/20, or is there some wiggle-room here?

    8. Most of my male friends get their hair trimmed, including the hair around their temples, even though this is expressly forbidden by Lev. 19:27. How should they die?

    9. I know from Lev. 11:6-8 that touching the skin of a dead pig makes me unclean, but may I still play football if I wear gloves?

    10. My uncle has a farm. He violates Lev.19:19 by planting two different crops in the same field, as does his wife by wearing garments made of two different kinds of thread (cotton/polyester blend). He also tends to curse and blaspheme a lot. Is it really necessary that we go to all the trouble of getting the whole town together to stone them? Lev.24:10-16. Couldn’t we just burn them to death at a private family affair, like we do with people who sleep with their in-laws? (Lev. 20:14)

    I know you have studied these things extensively and thus enjoy considerable expertise in such matters, so I’m confident you can help.

    Thank you again for reminding us that God’s word is eternal and unchanging.

    Your adoring fan.


Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *