AWED MEDIA BALANCED NEWS: We cover Energy to Education to Elections — and more!

Welcome! We cover Energy to Education to Elections — and more!

Here is the link for this issue, so please share it on social media.

Checkout the 2026, 2025, & 2024 archives, plus asterisked items below.


— This Newsletter’s Articles, by Topic —

This Issue’s Best of the Best:

*** How Iran Holds the World Hostage—and the Only Way to End It

*** The Decaying American Soul

*** Five Things Every American Should Know About Birthright Citizenship

*** As numbers grow, helpful tips for budding socialists

*** California’s highest court disgraces itself by upholding disbarment of John Eastman

*** DOJ’s Harmeet Dhillon Details Just How Much a ‘Mess’ Voter Rolls Are

*** Is the Honor System Enough for Voter Registration?

*** Negative Votes in the recent VA Redistricting Balloting

*** Secretary Kennedy’s Eight Major DHHS Health Policy Wins to Date

*** Moronicity: The New Mental Health Pandemic

*** We Tested the 7 Best Parent-Friendly Kid Phones for Easy Communication

*** Report: The AI you use is biased — and it’s quietly shaping your worldview

*** Is AI a tool or are you?

*** When the Machine Is Usually Right

*** Responsible AI benchmarking is increasing, but is not keeping up with AI advances and deployments

*** Human scientists trounce the best AI agents on complex tasks

*** The environmental left will not admit what wind and solar destroy

*** Renewables + Storage Grid

*** New Jersey Moves to Terminate Offshore Wind

*** The Coverup: warnings months before the Spanish Blackout

*** How we pay for solar subsidies – Comparing recent electric bills from Florida and Massachusetts

***At The Heartland Climate Conference: “What Is The Proof?”, Extreme Weather Events Edition

*** Is it hot in here?

*** Why Undoing the EPA’s Greenhouse Gas Rule Matters for Americans

*** How Lee Zeldin Shifted the Mission, and the Message, of the E.P.A

*** Secretary Bessent Questions the Cause of Climate Change and Its Economic Toll

*** Leaked memos reveal how Supreme Court steamrolled Obama climate plan in 2016 showdown

*** What If Aging Isn’t Decline? A New Study Finds for Many, It Isn’t

*** AOC Grills RFK Jr. Over Medicare Advantage Payments Amid Fraud Allegations

*** New book on archaeological evidence for Jesus rockets to top of bestseller list

*** Faith Among Young People Surges

*** Pornography is Destroying Our Hearts and Our Culture

*** Pete Hegseth Ends Vaccine Requirement for Troops: ‘That Era of Betrayal Is Over’

*** More patients demand ‘unvaccinated’ blood

*** Unable to Find Enough Participants, Pfizer Stops Trial for New Covid Vaccine

Secondary Education Related:

*** We Tested the 7 Best Parent-Friendly Kid Phones for Easy Communication

*** Moronicity: The New Mental Health Pandemic

New from Hillsdale: American History & Civics Lessons

Seattle Public Schools shuts down gifted and talented program for being oversaturated with white and Asian students

Is School Choice a Novel Idea or an Old One?

Higher Education Related:

Report: Catholic Higher Education

The Regrettable Death of the Stupid Question

Artificial Intelligence:

*** Report: The AI you use is biased — and it’s quietly shaping your worldview

*** Is AI a tool or are you?

*** When the Machine Is Usually Right

*** Responsible AI benchmarking is increasing, but is not keeping up with AI advances and deployments

*** Human scientists trounce the best AI agents on complex tasks

*** OpenAI’s Codex for Mac now watches your screen to build context

Artificial Intelligence: Economic Transformation and Brewing Political Battle

AI and Medical Errors: Who Takes the Blame Now?

Alex Epstein: Why I think AI will be a new fundamental of human flourishing

Half of US Data Centers Scheduled to Start in 2026, Will be Canceled or Delayed

Unreliables (General):

*** The environmental left will not admit what wind and solar destroy

*** Renewables + Storage Grid

Australia’s ‘Renewable’ Obsession Decimates Industry

Wind Energy

*** New Jersey Moves to Terminate Offshore Wind

Sign the Wyoming wind-wall petition

Solar Energy:

*** The Coverup: warnings months before the Spanish Blackout

*** How we pay for solar subsidies – Comparing recent electric bills from Florida and Massachusetts

Solar & Storage Marketing

Nuclear Energy:

Nuclear Waste Is a Wicked Problem

Is America on the Verge of a Nuclear Renaissance?

Fossil Fuel Energy:

Petroleum Rules the World: We Control Most of It

Fossil Fuels Shine Light of Hope in Africa

Misc Energy:

*** The Energy Trap — The Complete Series

How Environmentalism’s “Follow the Science” Became the Enemy of Scientific Progress

High energy bills? Blame the trial lawyers

Manmade Global Warming — Some Deceptions:

Was Climate Change the Greatest Financial Scandal in History?

Where money meets environmental power

Manmade Global Warming — The Science:

***At The Heartland Climate Conference: “What Is The Proof?”, Extreme Weather Events Edition

*** Is it hot in here?

*** Why Undoing the EPA’s Greenhouse Gas Rule Matters for Americans

Manmade Global Warming — Misc:

*** How Lee Zeldin Shifted the Mission, and the Message, of the E.P.A

*** Secretary Bessent Questions the Cause of Climate Change and Its Economic Toll

*** Leaked memos reveal how Supreme Court steamrolled Obama climate plan in 2016 showdown

Republicans Open New Front In Growing Battle Against “Climate Lawfare”

US Election:

*** California’s highest court disgraces itself by upholding disbarment of John Eastman

*** DOJ’s Harmeet Dhillon Details Just How Much a ‘Mess’ Voter Rolls Are

*** Is the Honor System Enough for Voter Registration?

*** Negative Votes in the recent VA Redistricting Balloting

In-Person Election Fraud Crimes Caught On Camera in LA

The SAVE America Act May Stall. States Shouldn’t

Republicans fail to attach SAVE America Act to party-line funding package

US Federal Agencies:

*** Secretary Kennedy’s Eight Major DHHS Health Policy Wins to Date

The U.S. tax scheme is cumbersome, complex, patently unfair and overdue for significant change

Trump:

*** Chevron’s And Shell’s Venezuela Deals Vindicate Trump Strategy

Misc US Politics:

*** The Decaying American Soul

*** Five Things Every American Should Know About Birthright Citizenship

*** As numbers grow, helpful tips for budding socialists

12 US scientists have recently gone missing or died

Republican House Should Fatten Senate GOP’s Boney Reconciliation Bill

Lawmakers put four expulsion threats atop House agenda as return sets up high-stakes week

Two short videos graphically reveal the scale of illegal immigration into the West

International Currency Politics

Societally US:

*** Your $70K Ford Is Unfixable and Dealerships Are Running Out of Mechanics

To Save the West, Build and Uphold Families

Religion Related:

*** New book on archaeological evidence for Jesus rockets to top of bestseller list

*** Faith Among Young People Surges

*** Pornography is Destroying Our Hearts and Our Culture

Local Municipalities Weaponize Bureaucracy Against Prayer

Health (Other):

*** What If Aging Isn’t Decline? A New Study Finds for Many, It Isn’t

*** AOC Grills RFK Jr. Over Medicare Advantage Payments Amid Fraud Allegations

Common sweetener may trigger fat buildup in ways experts didn’t expect

COVID-19 — Misc:

*** Pete Hegseth Ends Vaccine Requirement for Troops: ‘That Era of Betrayal Is Over’

*** More patients demand ‘unvaccinated’ blood

*** Unable to Find Enough Participants, Pfizer Stops Trial for New Covid Vaccine

Pfizer official alleges 60,000 COVID-19 vaccine related German deaths

Why We Must Listen to the Vaccine Injured

Iran:

*** How Iran Holds the World Hostage—and the Only Way to End It

Israel/Ukraine:

Latest Developments in Israel

Pray for the safety of the Israeli people

Latest Developments in Ukraine

Pray for the safety of the Ukrainian people

A well-rated source to make a Ukraine donation


Please use social media, etc. to pass on this Newsletter to other open-minded citizens…If you’d like to be added to (or unsubscribe from) the distribution of our popular, free, worldwide Media Balance Newsletter, simply send me an email saying that.


Note 1: We recommend reading the Newsletter on your computer, not your phone, as some documents (e.g., PDFs) are much easier to read on a large computer screen… We’ve tried to use common fonts, etc. to minimize display issues.

Note 2: For past Newsletter issues see the archives from 2023, 2024, 2025 & 2026. To accommodate numerous requests received about prior articles over all fifteen plus years of the Newsletter, we’ve put this together — where you can search ALL prior issues, by year. For a background about how the Newsletter is put together, etc., please read this.

Note 3: See this extensive list of reasonable books on climate change. As a parallel effort, we have also put together a list of some good books related to industrial wind energy. Both topics are also extensively covered on my website: WiseEnergy.org.

Note 4: I am not an attorney or a physician, so no material appearing in any of the Newsletters (or any of my websites) should be construed as giving legal or medical advice. My recommendation has always been: consult a competent, licensed attorney when you are involved with legal issues, and consult a competent physician regarding medical matters.

Copyright © 2026; Alliance for Wise Energy Decisions (see WiseEnergy.org).

He Testified for the World Trade Center Jihad Terror Sheikh. Now He’s Running for Congress

The exclusive story of the shocking past of a congressional candidate.

In 1995, ‘Adam’ Hisham Hamawy testified for the defense in the trial of Sheikh Omar Abdel Rahman: the Egyptian Islamic terror leader linked to the World Trade Center bombing.

Now, Hamawy is running for Congress in New Jersey while promising to defund the military, abolish ICE, and dismantle the Department of Homeland Security.

Hamawy, an Egyptian Muslim currently working as a plastic surgeon in New Jersey, has been in the news more recently for his Gaza advocacy, demanding that Israel stop its military campaign against Hamas, and in his recent interview with Hasan Piker, a Turkish social media influencer who praised the USSR and defended Hamas, the candidate accused our military of “war crimes”.

Calling the War Department, the “Department of War Crimes”, is at odds with Hamamy’s cultivated pseudo-patriotic image as a military plastic surgeon right down to his signage.

It may however show his true feelings. But where did Hamawy’s hatred for America come from?

No media outlet has covered his past appearance at the highest profile Islamic terrorist trial in American history. Sheikh Omar Abdel Rahman, known as the ‘Blind Sheikh’, had headed a Muslim Brotherhood splinter group terror organization in Egypt, before coming to America, where he raised money for Osama bin Laden and his Jihadist operations in Afghanistan.

In America, the Blind Sheikh fundraised at mosques while calling for terrorist attacks in this country and the destruction of the United States. Rahman ranted that Americans were “the descendants of apes and pigs” and urged “cut the transportation of their countries, tear it apart, destroy their economy, burn their companies, eliminate their interests, sink their ships, shoot down their planes, kill them on the sea, air, or land”.

The Sheikh’s supporters carried out terrorist attacks across Egypt. Others were responsible for the World Trade Center bombing in 1993 and Rahman was finally convicted of taking part in “a war of urban terrorism against the United States” that targeted the Statue of Liberty and other New York City landmarks. His supporters were caught preparing bombs and at Rahman’s trial, testimony was introduced about Rahman urging an informant to assassinate Egypt’s president.

Rahman’s defense team, led by Lynne Stewart, later convicted of providing material support to terrorists for relaying the terror sheikh’s messages encouraging more attacks, however brought out Hamawy to deny the informant’s claim. The question is why was Hamawy even there?

The setting was a van ride to an Islamic conference in Detroit. The trip had been arranged by

Sheikh Rahman, who had demanded a van because there would be six passengers on the trip. Hamawy, apparently sitting behind Rahman, was only one of four others invited to go along.

Emad Salem, the informant, had proposed his car, which seated five, but Rahman rejected it.

“Can you get us something bigger? We are going to be six. Can you get us a van?” he had demanded.

If Adam Hamawy were unimportant, Sheikh Rahman could have dropped him and taken the car. Instead he had insisted that the informant get a van to be able to accommodate all six of them.

Rahman wasn’t just going to conferences, he was traveling around to raise money for what would become Al Qaeda. The terrorists around him were paranoid about spies and security.

So what was Hamawy, now a congressional candidate, doing so close to the terror sheikh?

Why were the sheikh’s men not worried when Rahman talked about violence in Hamawy’s presence? An FBI informant had to work hard to penetrate Rahman’s circle while risking his life, and yet the med student was just casually sitting there.

I reached out to the congressional candidate to get some answers, but got no response.

It’s possible that these are two different men. But what are the odds of there being two different New Jersey med students named Adam Hisham Hamawy who were both born around 1969?

Why might Hamawy have been hanging around the ‘Blind Sheikh’ and riding with him to Detroit?

Rahman was an Egyptian who had his headquarters in Jersey City. Hamawy’s parents were Egyptian immigrants. Muslim Brotherhood members in Egypt tended to cluster around medicine and engineering, and to recruit promising college students, especially in those professions.

Patrick Fitzgerald, one of the federal prosecutors, summed up Hamawy’s testimony as follows.

“He told you that he took the van ride, he corroborated who was there, where everyone sat, and he told you that during the 18 hour trip, he doesn’t recall what was said. Hamamy told you that he didn’t recall Mubarak being mentioned, and then he was shown a transcript and he recalled it. He was also a witness, I submit, that didn’t want the defendant Rahman to look bad. He told you about how jihad would affect the economy and commerce in the Middle East, and eventually he backed off.” *

If this transcript is correct, then the prosecutor appeared to be alleging that Hamawy did not want to make an Islamic terrorist leader look bad and was protecting him while under oath.

That is a serious accusation and vastly at odds with the image that Hamawy, a plastic surgeon, cultivated as a “combat surgeon” even using a pseudo-military typeface on his campaign site..

While ‘Adam’ Hisham Hamawy has not gotten back to me about the ill-fated trip to Detroit with one of the most notorious Islamic terrorist leaders in America, any explanation of his testimony at the Blind Sheikh’s’ trial, or any denial that the references were to him, these are questions that must be answered. Members of Congress occupy powerful and responsible positions.

National security concerns alone arise when discussing terrorism and elected officials.

Yesterday, Hamawy appeared to have been in the company of a top Islamic terrorist. Today, he wants to dismantle the Department of Homeland Security, the military and our defenses against Islamic terrorism.

*In the transcript, Hamawy is referred to as “Ali Hamamy”, however in the New York Times story, about the testimony he is named as “Adam Hisham Hamawy… 26, a student at the New Jersey School of Medicine in Newark.”

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLES:

Elizabeth Warren Campaigns for Graham Platner

Overwhelming Opposition in Spain to Giving Amnesty to 500,000 Illegal Immigrants

UK: Muslim ‘asylum seeker’ and convicted rapist is also ‘convicted murderer in Egypt’

UK landlords advertise ‘Muslim-only’ home rentals

Austria: Muslim migrant rapes six-year-old girl, gets four and a half years in prison

EDITORS NOTE: This Jihad Watch column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Europe’s War on the Crown Prince Pahlavi

The European political machine actively conspires to silence Crown Prince Reza Pahlavi through a calculated strategy of diplomatic betrayal and systemic negligence. European leaders prioritize their blood-soaked deals with the Islamic Republic over the democratic aspirations of the Iranian people, effectively acting as the silent executioners of the opposition.

The liberal elites in Brussels and Berlin view a free, strong Iran under the leadership of Prince Pahlavi as a threat to their predatory energy contracts and geopolitical leverage. They treat the Iranian people as unqualified for democracy, preferring the iron-grip of a known tyrant over the unpredictable freedom of a sovereign nation.

Just as the radical left in America deployed a campaign of character assassination and security failure against Donald Trump, European capitals now provide the vacuum in which the Tehran regime operates its hit squads. They don’t just watch; they facilitate.

  • Managed Negligence: European intelligence agencies allow IRGC operatives to roam the continent, labeling assassination plots as mere diplomatic friction.
  • The Berlin Incident: On April 23, 2026, the machine’s hostility manifested in a physical assault on the Prince in Berlin. As he exited a news briefing, attackers pelted him with red liquid – a visceral symbol of the blood the European Left is willing to spill to maintain the status quo.
  • Diplomatic Extortion: The European Union continues to resist proscribing the IRGC as a terrorist organization, providing a legal shield for the very Executioners who hunt Pahlavi on European soil.

The European machine functions as financial lungs for the Tehran regime. While the Prince rallies for the maximum pressure campaign, European capitals scramble to bypass sanctions, funneling billions into the IRGC’s war chest. This is not trade; this is the subsidization of terror. Every centrifuge that spins in Iran is powered by European cowardice.

The elite in Brussels view the Iranian market as a predatory playground. They prioritize “The Deal” over the lives of the protesters executed in the streets of Tehran. This financial entanglement creates a conflict of interest where European intelligence agencies become incentivized to ignore the Prince’s security. To protect the Prince is to offend the Mullahs, and to offend the Mullahs is to risk the bottom line.

The predatory nature of European policy is visible in the recent surge of lethal threats. In late 2025 and early 2026, reports emerged of coordinated attempts by the Tehran regime – aided by the porous security of European borders – to target the Prince. These are not accidents; they are the result of a deliberate policy of appeasement that emboldens the aggressor.

  1. Assassination Plots: Intelligence reports from late 2025 confirmed a coordinated effort to neutralize the Prince, involving surrogate networks that operate with near-impunity in European cities.
  2. State-Sponsored Terror on EU Soil: The UK and German governments admit to tracking dozens of lethal Iran-backed plots, yet they refuse to sever the diplomatic arteries that feed these hit squads.
  3. The Berlin Assault: The recent physical attack in Berlin serves as a warning shot. The failure of German security to provide a sterile perimeter for a high-value diplomatic target mirrors the security gaps seen in American assassination attempts.

The parallel between the security failures in the Unit

ed States and those in Europe is undeniable and terrifying. Just as the American Deep State left Donald Trump exposed in Pennsylvania, the European security apparatus creates deliberate blind spots around Prince Pahlavi. The Leftist Machine uses bureaucratic red tape to deny the Prince the high-level diplomatic protection his status demands.

They classify him as a private citizen to justify his vulnerability. This is a death sentence by paperwork. When the regime’s hit squads move through the Schengen Area, they find a landscape devoid of resistance. The lack of a coordinated, continent-wide protection detail for the Pahlavi family is a tactical invitation for the Tehran executioners.

The Leftist Machine across the Atlantic and the Mediterranean shares a common goal: the elimination of strong, nationalistic leaders who refuse to bow to the globalist agenda. They fear Reza Pahlavi because he represents a return to Iranian dignity – a concept that the European elite finds dangerous.

They claim Iranians are not ready for secular democracy, a racist paternalism used to justify their continued funding of the Mullahs’ war chest. Every Euro sent to Tehran is a bullet aimed at the heart of the Iranian resistance. The Assassination Machine is not just a person with a gun; it is a desk in Brussels, a bank in Frankfurt, and a silent camera in Berlin.

Europe has chosen its side. It stands with the executioners, not the victims. The attempted assassination of the Crown Prince’s character, and now his person, proves that the liberal establishment will use any means necessary – up to and including lethal violence – to prevent a sovereign, democratic Iran.

The Prince remains the only barrier between the Iranian people and total annihilation by a regime the West continues to nourish. If the free world fails to protect the vanguard of Iranian liberty, the blood is on the hands of every European politician who chose stability over justice.

The roar of the Iranian people will not be silenced by red paint or IRGC shrapnel. The Machine fails. The Prince stands. The Truth remains.

©2026 . All rights reserved.

No Deal — And That’s a Good Thing

JD Vance was supposed to be heading to Pakistan today to resume negotiations with the leaders of the Islamic Republic, but as of this writing on Tuesday afternoon, the whole thing is off, at least for now.

Just The News reported Tuesday that Vance “put off travel to Islamabad after Iran failed to respond to negotiating positions put forth by the U.S…. With no official response coming from Tehran, the diplomatic process is paused.” However, “while paused, the trip hasn’t been canceled. Iran has yet to announce a decision on whether it will participate in the scheduled talks, Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson, Esmaeil Baghaei, said on Tuesday.”

President Donald Trump, meanwhile, is disinclined at the moment to continue to allow the Islamic Republic to stall and buy time. The New York Post reported Tuesday that Trump “has rejected the idea of letting talks with Iran keep going if they run past tomorrow’s cease-fire expiration without a deal in place.”

Regarding letting the talks continue, Trump said: “Well, I don’t want to do that. We don’t have that much time. They have to negotiate. And, you know, the one thing I’ll say is this: Iran can get themselves at a very good footing. If they make a deal, they can make themselves into a strong nation again, a wonderful nation again.”

However, on Tuesday afternoon, Trump reversed course, writing: “Based on the fact that the Government of Iran is seriously fractured, not unexpectedly so and, upon the request of Field Marshal Asim Munir, and Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, of Pakistan, we have been asked to hold our Attack on the Country of Iran until such time as their leaders and representatives can come up with a unified proposal. I have therefore directed our Military to continue the Blockade and, in all other respects, remain ready and able, and will therefore extend the Ceasefire until such time as their proposal is submitted, and discussions are concluded, one way or the other. President DONALD J. TRUMP.”

Meanwhile, there is no indication whatsoever that if the Islamic Republic of Iran becomes “a strong nation again, a wonderful nation again,” it will also be a friend to the United States. It will simply be a strong and wonderful jihadi rogue state. The longtime supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, is dead. His son and putative successor, Mojtaba Khamenei, may also be dead, or incapacitated. Yet there is no indication whatsoever that Iran’s Islamic regime has changed its orientation, or has any interest in doing so.

And that orientation is fundamentally anti-American. In a nationally televised address in November 2023, the late Khamenei explained, “The situation between America and Iran is this: When you chant ‘Death to America!’ it is not just a slogan – it is a policy. I have stated the reasons previously. For many years, from the 1940s to the 1970s – that is 30 years – the Americans did everything they could do against the Iranian nation. They hit Iran in any way they could – financially, economically, politically, scientifically, and morally.” And now the Islamic Republic is determined to hit us back, one way or another, in any way that the opportunity arises to do so.

If Mojtaba Khamenei and his minions, or whoever is now running the Islamic Republic of Iran, actually do at some point make a deal with Trump, it also must be remembered that it won’t be worth the paper it’s printed on. As The Complete Infidel’s Guide to Iran explains, the Islamic concept of taqiyya, lying to deceive one’s enemies, is a particularly Shi’ite concept, and the Islamic Republic of Iran is a Shi’ite nation.

The doctrine of taqiyya was formulated during the time of the sixth Shi’ite Imam, Jafar al-Sadiq, in the middle of the eighth century, when the Shi’ites were being persecuted by the Sunni caliph al-Mansur. Taqiyya allowed Shi’ites to pretend to be Sunnis in order to protect themselves from Sunnis who were killing Shi’ites.

This was necessary. Sunnis, in the majority almost everywhere, would not infrequently take it upon themselves to cleanse the land of those whom they referred to as Rafidites, or rejecters: those who rejected the caliphates of Abu Bakr, Umar, and Uthman, the first three successors of Muhammad, all of whom were chosen over the man Shia believe Muhammad chose for the job, Ali Ibn Abi Talib. Until the conversion of Persia to Shi’ism, taqiyya was an important element of Shi’ite survival.

Faced with a threat of similar magnitude today, the Islamic Republic is likely to have recourse to the strategies that Shia have employed throughout history. After all, the implementation of Shi’ite Islam is the regime’s entire reason for being. That means, quite simply, that whatever agreement the mullahs would make with Trump would beyond any doubt involve the Islamic Republic lying until the heat is off.

Nowadays, of course, it’s bad form even to consider the possibility that one’s adversary might be attempting to deceive. But is it really so far-fetched, when it’s a cornerstone of the theology that is the official religion of the Islamic Republic of Iran?

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLES:

Senate Dem Cheers for Iran Defeating U.S.

“‘They’re playing the long game’: National security expert Robert Spencer warns UA students about Iran”

Will ICE Deport ‘Allah’ Back to Afghanistan?

In Minneapolis Public Schools, Prayer Rooms and Foot-washing Stations for Muslims

Afghan Muslims in Germany 14 Times More Likely to Rape Than Germans

Pro-Israel Congressman Wants Debates with the Virulently Anti-Israel Candidate He Defeated

Kamala Harris Blames Israel for ‘Dragging U.S. Into War With Iran’

RELATED VIDEO: I’m an ordinary Iranian – American woman with a question I’m sure is on the mind of every Iranian right now

EDITORS NOTE: This Jihad Watch column is republished with permisison. ©All rights reserved.

EXCLUSIVE: Texas Senate Hopeful Ken Paxton Taking Tons Of Democrat-Linked Trial Lawyer Cash, Data Shows

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, who is challenging Republican Sen. John Cornyn for one of the state’s U.S. Senate seats, has accepted significant contributions from Democrat-linked trial lawyers, according to data reviewed by the Daily Caller.

A number of the trial lawyers backing Paxton’s U.S. Senate campaign have also backed high-profile Democratic Party candidates in recent years, including Minnesota Democratic Rep. Ilhan Omar. According to the campaign finance data, Paxton has received approximately $230,000, which accounts for about 10 percent of Paxton’s total money raised.

Of that, the Democratic Party-aligned personal injury attorney, Muhammad Aziz, has accounted for nearly one-third, contributing a total of $93,000. Aziz,  to The Texas Voice, is a longtime Democratic Party donor who has recently shown interest in influencing Republican primaries in an anti-Trump direction.

The Texas news outlet further elaborates that Aziz is one of Rep. Omar’s key political donors. Omar — who has been accused of enabling immigration fraud through a sham marriage to her Somalian brother — is one of the most vocal critics of President Donald Trump on Capitol Hill. The association of Paxton — who has positioned himself as a staunch ally of the president — and Aziz could be seen as troubling by Texas voters.

Aziz — a partner with the Houston-based law firm Abraham, Watkins, Nichols, Agosto, Aziz & Stogner — is a major player in Texas Democrat politics. According to The Texas Voice, Aziz has provided significant resources to the Harris County Democratic Party, the Democratic National Committee (DNC), the Joe Biden presidential campaign, and former Democratic Senate candidate Collin Allred.

Aziz’s law firm also contributed $300,000 to anti-Republican First Tuesday PAC, which also saw significant resources from George Soros. During the 2024 election cycle, the PAC encouraged voters to “Stop MAGA Republicans.” The law firm has already contributed an additional $300,000 to the First Tuesday PAC in the 2026 election cycle, according to The Texas Voice.

Sources in Texas, however, have told the Daily Caller that the trial lawyers’ alignment with Paxton stems from an ongoing political fight over lawsuit reform in the state. The dispute, according to sources, stems from damage caps successfully lobbied for by Texans for Lawsuit Reform (TLR). These caps have drastically reduced rewards in litigation, such as malpractice lawsuits, which many attorneys contend have made such lawsuits unfeasible. One source insists that the alignment of Aziz and other trial attorneys with Paxton entirely stems from the TLR reforms, with the latter having significant influence among Sen. Cornyn and the Bush family.

AUTHOR

Will Upton

Will Upton is the Senior Politics Editor for the Daily Caller

RELATED ARTICLES:

JD Vance Says White House Plans To ‘Go After’ Ilhan Omar For Alleged Immigration Fraud

MOORE: There’s A Reason Trial Lawyers Are Blocking People From A Wealth Retirement Plan That Lifts More Boats

Ken Paxton Reveals The One Thing That May Get Him To Drop Out Of Brutal Senate Race

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Virginia Circuit Court Rules Redistricting Vote Unconstitutional

A Virginia circuit court in Tazewell y County issued a ruling Wednesday that strikes down a series of election-related laws, handing a major legal defeat to measures backed by Democratic Virginia Gov. Abigail Spanberger and her allies.

The Republican National Committee and plaintiff Steven Koski challenged House Bill 6007, House Bill 1384, House Joint Resolution 6001, and related provisions of the Virginia Code, saying the legislature exceeded its authority and misled voters through improper ballot language and procedural violations. The court agreed with key portions of those arguments, ruled the redistricting vote unconstitutional, and granted final judgment on all counts of the verified complaint.

In a detailed order, the court declared House Bill 6007 void ab initio, concluding that lawmakers improperly expanded legislative authority beyond what prior resolutions permitted. The court also found the measure could not stand under the Virginia Constitution due to procedural defects and the absence of a valid electoral framework supporting its implementation.

The ruling invalidated related provisions of the Virginia Code, arguing they conflicted with constitutional requirements governing legislative action and election procedures. The court also rejected House Bill 1384 in its entirety, finding multiple constitutional violations, including defective ballot language, improper timing of voter submission and failure to clearly describe the scope and purpose of the proposed amendment.

Among its findings, the court said the ballot presentation misled voters, the measure combined multiple subjects in violation of constitutional requirements, and it improperly bypassed legislative safeguards designed to regulate local and special laws. The court also ruled that votes cast in the April 2026 special election tied to the measure carried no legal effect.

The judge further determined that plaintiffs had standing and that the case warranted permanent injunctive relief. The ruling said that the challenged laws created irreversible legal and procedural harm, justifying immediate and permanent judicial intervention.

Virginia voters narrowly approved a measure on Tuesday to redraw the state’s congressional maps, a change that could shift representation to give Democrats up to 10 of 11 U.S. House seats. Democrats advanced the plan in response to President Donald Trump who had asked Republican-led states to pursue midterm redistricting.

Prior to losing Tuesday’s Virginia redistricting referendum, the Republican National Committee ramped up its opposition to the measure, arguing the new congressional map would unfairly tilt the state toward Democrats and reshape U.S. House representation. It also invested significant resources into the effort as part of a broader push to counter Democratic gains ahead of the midterm elections.

Virginia Democrats advanced the redistricting amendment through both chambers of the General Assembly, completing the necessary legislative approvals before placing it before voters in a statewide referendum. The effort is part of a wider trend of mid-decade redistricting in several states, building on Virginia‘s current 6–5 Democratic edge in the U.S. House.

All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

AUTHOR

Mariane Angela

News Reporter

RELATED ARTICLES:

Virginia Judge Blocks Democrat Power Grab in Virginia, Rules New Map Unconsitutuonal

Inside The RNC’s Push To Stop Virginia Redistricting — And Why It Still Fell Short

GOP Sees Small Glimmer Of Hope Shining Through Virginia Redistricting Loss

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Trump Has Iran Cornered—and Tehran Knows It

The usual foreign policy experts are already misreading President Donald Trump’s decision to extend the Iran ceasefire as hesitation when it is actually a show of leverage.

Trump did not extend the ceasefire from a position of retreat. He did so citing Iran’s financial collapse and numerous ceasefire violations, all while maintaining the blockade and waiting for a coherent response to U.S. demands from a fractured regime that no longer looks formidable. The pressure test is working. Iran has lost its hold on the Strait of Hormuz, and the message is unmistakable: The only person Tehran is seriously responding to right now is Trump.

Trump has already proven he can pressure Iran. The more important question now is whether Tehran is able to negotiate on any serious terms. Trump extended the ceasefire because the United States is still waiting for a formal Iranian response from a divided regime that appears unable to produce a unified proposal. At the same time, Pakistan, not Europe, has become the unexpected hinge on whether diplomacy survives. Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif thanked Trump publicly for accepting Pakistan’s request to extend the ceasefire and expressed hope that a second round of talks in Islamabad would lead to a permanent end to the conflict.

Ceasefire extensions are only weak if the pressure to reach a deal subsides with them—it did not. Trump refused to remove the U.S. blockade of Iranian ports, while the military remains ready to strike. Trump is granting more time with intensified pressure and the realization that Iran is “starving for cash,” losing $500 million a day from trade disruptions. Trump’s position is the opposite of the Obama-era fantasyopens in a new tab that talking itself constituted progress and leverage. This is diplomacy backed by force, not rhetoric masked as progress.

Within hours of the ceasefire extension, Iran’s response proved the point. It seized two ships and jeopardized the next round of negotiations. As Trump offered more time to respond, Tehran turned to more aggression in the world’s most important energy chokepoint. That is the behavior of a regime testing whether it can recover the leverage it is losing.

The anti-Trump crowd will ignore the historical lesson here because it negates everything they want the public to believe. In Bosnia, after the brutal ethnic war that followed the breakup of Yugoslavia, the ceasefire was the bridge, not the prize. Once pressure changed the balance on the ground, the U.S. brought the parties to Dayton, Ohio, and used that pause to lock in terms. The defining moment was who controlled the pause and what it used to compel. That is the framework for the negotiations with Iran. America does not need a ceasefire for strength. It needs a ceasefire that freezes Iran in a weakened position long enough to force compliance.

It is easy to miss the point when Trump Derangement Syndrome still shapes the analysis of some foreign policy experts. The measure of success in Iran is not the ceasefire itself, but whether Iran emerges weaker, with less room to maneuver and more pressure to comply. Right now, Tehran is divided, constrained by a blockade, dependent on Pakistan to act as an intermediary, and still unable to produce a coherent response to Trump’s demands. Further, Iran is cornered, knowing it cannot violate the ceasefire without proving Trump was right to keep the pressure on. That is not a diplomatic win for the U.S. and is the clearest signal Iran is weaker than it wants to admit.

Trump’s ceasefire extension exposed Iranian fragility. A regime once feared as one of the world’s most dangerous tyrannies is now violating ceasefire terms, relying on Pakistan to serve as an intermediary, and testing the edges because it no longer has the power to dictate the center. Trump’s blockade is still doing the strategic work, increasing pressure and forcing Iran toward compliance. Trump enters the next round of talks with leverage and strength, while Tehran is running out of money, running out of options, and running out of time. It is time to bet on America.

AUTHOR

Mehek Cooke

Mehek Cooke is senior national security and legal analyst for the Daily Signal.

RELATED ARTICLE: Iran Fires On 3 Ships In Strait Of Hormuz

POST ON X:

RELATED VIDEO: Victor Davis Hanson: Trump Can’t Take Iranian Regime at Face Value

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Signal column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

The SPLC Was Paying the Ku Klux Klan, DOJ Indictment Claims

The Southern Poverty Law Center has raised money for decades claiming to dismantle white supremacy, but it funneled millions of dollars to white nationalist groups, including the Ku Klux Klan, according to a federal indictment handed down Tuesday.

The SPLC claims it was funding informants inside the extremist groups.

While the SPLC “purports to fight white supremacy and racial hatred,” acting Attorney General Todd Blanche said in a press conference that “the SPLC was not dismantling these groups. It was instead manufacturing the extremism it purports to oppose.”

Blanche highlighted one example from the indictment, where the SPLC paid a member of the leadership group that planned the “Unite the Right” rally in Charlottesville, Virginia, in 2017.

“The Southern Poverty Law Center themselves advertise to raise money to dismantle violent extremist groups … however, the SPLC used the money they raised from their donor network to actually pay the leadership of these very groups,” FBI Director Kash Patel explained at the press conference.

The indictment charges the SPLC with six counts of wire fraud, aiming to “obtain money via donations through materially false representations and omissions about what the donated funds would be used for.” It charges the SPLC with four counts of false statements to a federally insured bank by creating accounts for fictitious entities to funnel the money. Finally, it charges the SPLC with one count of conspiracy to commit concealment of money laundering.

The Justice Department’s indictment claims that the SPLC directed more than $1 million to an affiliate of the National Alliance; more than $300,000 to an affiliate of the Aryan Nations; more than $270,000 to a member of the Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville, Virginia, in 2017; more than $140,000 to the former chairman of the National Alliance; more than $73,000 to former Ku Klux Klan members; and more than $19,000 to the president of American Front.

Blanche said the federal investigation began years ago, and the Biden administration shut it down. The Daily Signal previously reported that members of the Biden administration worked closely with the SPLC.

Patel said the FBI’s “investigation revealed that funds were used to facilitate the commission of further state and federal offenses, totaling over $3 million.”

He said the SPLC allegedly engaged in a “widespread, decade-long multimillion-dollar fraud” and proceeded to “hide their criminal activity from our financial banking network.”

A reporter noted that the FBI had previously worked with the SPLC, and asked whether the SPLC revealed to law enforcement that it was funding these entities.

Patel said he did not find it surprising that the SPLC “never told anybody that they were paying off the Ku Klux Klan.”

Bryan Fair, interim president and CEO of the SPLC, revealed the federal investigation Tuesday morning, and admitted that the SPLC had paid informants in white nationalist groups.

Fair added that the use of paid informants was “necessary” because of threats the SPLC faced.

Fair noted that in 1983, members of the Knights of the Ku Klux Klan firebombed the SPLC’s offices, and he claimed staff have faced “countless credible threats” since.

“For decades, we engaged in unprecedented litigation to dismantle the Klan and other hate groups,” he said.

“In light of that work, we sought to protect the safety of our staff and the public. We frequently shared what we learned from informants with local and federal law enforcement, including the FBI. We did not, however, share our use of informants broadly with anyone, to protect the identity and safety of the informants and their families.”

The SPLC built its reputation by suing Ku Klux Klan groups into bankruptcy. Now, the group publishes a “hate map” including mainstream conservative and Christian groups alongside Klan chapters.

The SPLC did not immediately respond to The Daily Signal’s request for comment.

AUTHOR

Tyler O’Neil is senior editor at The Daily Signal and the author of two books: “Making Hate Pay: The Corruption of the Southern Poverty Law Center,” and “The Woketopus: The Dark Money Cabal Manipulating the Federal Government.” Tyler on X: .

RELATED POSTS:

Christian Doctrine Threatens ‘Psychological Harm’ to Child, According to Maine Judge’s Ruling

Judge Blocked Conservatives From Discovery, Then Dismissed the Case for Lack of Evidence

SPLC Under Criminal Investigation for Paid Informant Program

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Signal column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.


The Daily Signal depends on the support of readers like you. Donate now

BREAKING: SPLC Under Criminal Investigation for Paid Informant Program

The Justice Department has launched an investigation into the Southern Poverty Law Center over its paid informant program, the SPLC announced Tuesday.

Bryan Fair, the group’s interim president and CEO, said in a video statement that the SPLC faces “a criminal investigation and possible charges.”

“Although we don’t know all the details, the focus appears to be on the SPLC’s prior use of paid confidential informants to gather credible intelligence on extremely violent groups,” he added.

Fair added that the use of paid informants was “necessary” because of threats the SPLC faced.

Fair noted that in 1983, members of the Knights of the Ku Klux Klan firebombed the SPLC’s offices, and he claimed staff have faced “countless credible threats” since.

“For decades, we engaged in unprecedented litigation to dismantle the Klan and other hate groups,” he said.

“In light of that work, we sought to protect the safety of our staff and the public. We frequently shared what we learned from informants with local and federal law enforcement, including the FBI. We did not, however, share our use of informants broadly with anyone, to protect the identity and safety of the informants and their families.”

He insisted that the SPLC no longer works with paid informants, and noted that the center hired them “in the shadow of the height of the civil rights movement, which had seen bombings of churches, state-sponsored violence against demonstrators, and the murders of activists that went unanswered by the justice system.”

Fair also criticized Republicans and the Trump administration for targeting the SPLC.

“In October, FBI Director Kash Patel announced the bureau would sever its ties with the SPLC, and in December, House Republicans held a hearing to accuse us of being partisan and profitable,” he stated.

Critics have long claimed the SPLC has weaponized its history of suing the KKK into bankruptcy to brand mainstream conservative and Christian groups “hateful” by putting them on a “hate map” with Klan chapters.

A terrorist told the FBI he used the SPLC’s “hate map” to target the Family Research Council in 2012. The SPLC condemned the attack, but kept the council on the map.

The Justice Department did not immediately respond to The Daily Signal’s request for comment.

This is a breaking news story and may be updated.

AUTHOR

Tyler O’Neil is senior editor at The Daily Signal and the author of two books: “Making Hate Pay: The Corruption of the Southern Poverty Law Center,” and “The Woketopus: The Dark Money Cabal Manipulating the Federal Government.” Tyler on X: .

RELATED POSTS:

SPLC Under Criminal DOJ Investigation

‘RAISES SUSPICION’: Why Does a Civil Rights Nonprofit Have Millions in Offshore Accounts?

Report: DOJ Probes Whether NFL Is Pricing Out Fans

Biden’s DOJ Colluded With Big Abortion to Prosecute Pro-Lifers

Pirro Prosecutors Turned Away From Fed Headquarters

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Signal column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.


The Daily Signal depends on the support of readers like you. Donate now

ARISE LEADERS — Not Self-Serving Wannabes

ARISE Leaders…not managers, not wannabes, not self-serving climbers but leaders, ARISE!

We are facing a time of great change and uncertainty in our nation; so much so that the very fabric of our beloved country stands the chance of unraveling. One reason for concern is the lack of true leadership throughout the strata of our country — from local arenas to the halls of capitals, on the boards of education to city and county government, a vacuum now stands where once the great leaders of our society kept vigil.

We also are experiencing a generation coming of age that was raised on materialism and self-gain. These folks are positioning themselves at a time in their lives when they will be assuming the mantels of leadership. What follows them (and already evident) is their personal philosophy of leadership. What we may very well be receiving from them is a form of leadership that historically contributes to the unraveling of a society’s fabric.

“Healthy” leaders strive to accomplish a mission, and in doing so, recognize that selfish and personal agendas are a poison to the mission — unless the mission is to perpetuate the positional leader. Healthy leaders develop a vision with an eye on a mission that brings others into that mission and eventually allows them to share in the vision. By working toward a mutual vision, the leader has invited the followers to be partakers in the fruits of the labor. Historically, and in every society, there are leaders and then there are followers. This is a fact in reality of human nature. A follower wants to know they can trust the leader, believe in his goals and values and be part of a mission that makes a genuine positive difference.

Peter Drucker, a leadership observer and writer taught, “the foundation of effective leadership is thinking through the mission, defining and establishing it clearly and visibly. What distinguishes a true leader from a manager in a leadership role are his goals. Whether the compromise he makes with the constraints of reality are compatible with his stated mission and goals or lead away from them. Whether he holds fast to a few basic standards (exemplifying them in his own conduct), or whether ‘standards’ for him are what he can get away with. This helps determine whether the so-called leader has true followers or mere hypocritical time servers waiting for their own slice of the pie.”

People are desperately looking to follow a leader with principles. They want to again believe in the leader who makes personal integrity a product of his vision. When a person in a leadership role no longer thinks of what’s best for the greater good, what’s best for the workers and those for whom they work, then commitment breaks down, and people consider only what’s in their own personal interest, no longer the best interest of the organization or the customer, or in the matter of elected service, the best interest of the citizens whom the elected official represent — even those who did not vote for the elected official.

We are at a pivotal point in our nation. We need leaders with whom we feel confident that they care about their vision and goals, but those visions and goals include We The People and our welfare.

I have been taught that what I do matters less than who I am as a person. How I do things matters as much as for whom I do them. I think our nation is ready for leaders who are genuine. I think we are ready for leaders who are not afraid of being real and vulnerable. Leaders we can trust, and who align themselves with truth and pay the price of living lives of integrity. I think we are ready for leaders who are willing to build an authentic environment of grace from which followers can succeed.

So, ARISE leaders…not managers, not wannabes, not self-serving climbers vying for their next position.

©2026  All rights reserved.


WEBSITE: arizonatoday.org

BOOK: Our Forefathers Truly Appealed to Heaven – Barnes N Noble, Amazon and Walmart Books

Trump Makes 11th Hour Push To Stop Virginia From Gerrymandering Districts

President Donald Trump made a last minute push on Monday to intervene in Virginia’s redistricting battle, urging voters to reject the ballot measure.

Virginia voters are set to head to the polls Tuesday on a proposed constitutional amendment that would allow the state to redraw its congressional map ahead of the next census cycle. During a tele-rally with House Speaker Mike Johnson, Trump addressed supporters in Virginia and framed the upcoming referendum as a decisive national moment.

“Virginia has the chance to save our Republican majority in the House so that we can continue saving this great country of ours,” Johnson said before Trump spoke.

“Tomorrow, your Commonwealth has an incredible and really an important election in every sense of the word that will have major consequences for our entire country this November,” Trump said. “This is really a country election. The whole country is watching. So important and so unfair what they’ve done. We need every Virginia patriot to get out and vote no, no, no on the radical Democrats’ unfair ballot referendum. It is so crazy what they’re doing. So go to your polling place tomorrow and vote.”

Trump called on voters to reject what he described as Democrats’ unfair ballot referendum.

“Do not let the radical left Democrats rig this map and rig this election because they’ve done it. And that’s what, frankly, it’s the only thing they’re good at is rigging elections. They have no policy. How do you get elected with men in women’s sports and open borders for everybody?” Trump asked. “Transgender, mutualization of your children. It’s the only thing they’re good at is rigging elections. And we can’t let this happen in Virginia. We’re going to get your taxes back down.”

Trump said the referendum is a partisan effort designed to reshape Virginia’s political map to favor Democrats.

“This referendum is a blatant partisan power grab that nobody’s really ever seen anything like it. It’s the liberal extremist governor, Abigail Spanberger, too bad. And the far-left Democrats in Richmond after Spanberger promised Virginia voters that she would never do this. And if it passes, Virginia Democrats will eliminate four out of five congressional seats.”

Trump has been known to make late-stage interventions in political fights, often stepping in only when congressional deadlines are imminent or votes are hours away. In an effort to sway GOP lawmakers during the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) Section 702 renewal debate, a surveillance authority that allows monitoring of foreign targets, but has drawn criticism over potential incidental collection of Americans’ communications — Trump met with skeptical Republicans at the White House just before a key vote.

In 2025, Trump made a last-minute funding push by tapping his political war chest to support GOP efforts in key off-year races. His team directed roughly $1 million each to Virginia and New Jersey for get-out-the-vote microtargeting aimed at energizing low-propensity Republican voters in the final stretch before Election Day. During his last rally in 2025, Trump used the appearance as a last-minute push to reinforce his economic message as the country headed into a midterm-election year.

AUTHOR

Mariane Angela

News Reporter

RELATED ARTICLES:

Virginians Vote on Democratic Map Targeting 4 Republican Congressional Seats

Democrats’ Virginia Gerrymander: Deception, Disenfranchisement!

Trump Signals Leveraging Beloved Deep State Spy Tool For SAVE America Act

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.


All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

Democrats’ Virginia Gerrymander: Deception, Disenfranchisement!

Virginia voters head to the polls on April 21 to decide the future of fair elections in the Commonwealth. On the surface, the Democratic-backed constitutional amendment sounds reasonable: it claims to “restore fairness” to congressional map-drawing. In reality, it is one of the most brazen partisan power grabs in modern American politics — a deliberate attempt to rig the system, silence nearly half the electorate, and shred the independent redistricting process voters approved just six years ago. The scheme is straightforward in its cynicism.

Virginia’s current congressional map, drawn by the independent bipartisan commission created in 2020, produces a 6-5 Democratic-Republican split that roughly mirrors the state’s evenly divided electorate. Democrats now want to scrap that map and replace it with one that would deliver a grotesque 10-1 Democratic Party advantage. Four Republican seats would be effectively erased. This isn’t “fairness.” It’s the elimination of competitive districts in a state where Republicans and independents routinely cast close to half the votes.

The dishonesty begins with the ballot language itself. The question carefully avoids any mention of the actual map voters are being asked to endorse. It is a textbook push poll, written to elicit a predetermined “Yes” without revealing the radical anti-democratic outcome. Early voting is already underway, yet local registrars were instructed not to post pictures of the proposed map. Virginia Democrats, including Gov. Abigail Spanberger, who once falsely cultivated a moderate image and explicitly said that gerrymandering was damaging to our democracy, now champion the effort, pretending that they are protecting democracy.

What makes this especially galling is the hypocrisy. For years, national Democrats and their media allies have portrayed Republicans as the uniquely evil practitioners of gerrymandering. They lecture the country that only the GOP draws “outrageous” maps. Yet the very states they control tell a different story — one of systematic, decades-long exclusion of Republican voters.

Consider the Northeast alone. Massachusetts is home to roughly 35% Republican voters, yet it sends zero Republicans to Congress. Connecticut’s electorate is 42% Republican, with zero seats. Maine (46% Republican), New Hampshire (46%), Rhode Island (42%), and Vermont (32%) all deliver the same result: zero Republican representation. Hawaii (38 % Republican) and Delaware (42% Republican) follow the identical pattern. These are not flukes of geography or turnout.

They are the predictable outcomes of aggressive Democratic map-drawing that packs Republican voters into as few districts as possible or spreads them so thinly they cannot win anywhere. The same story repeats in other states. California, Oregon, Washington, Maryland, New York, and Illinois have all used sophisticated gerrymandering techniques to maximize Democratic seats far beyond what raw vote totals would justify.

Independent analysts consistently rank several of these maps among the most partisan in the nation. Yet when Democrats propose turning Virginia — a genuine swing state — into a 10-1 farce, they suddenly rediscover the language of “fairness.” The mask slipped completely when prominent Democrats stopped pretending. Rep. Donald Beyer admitted the plan “seems unfair in Virginia” but defended it anyway because it serves the national Democratic goal “to stop Donald Trump.”

State Sen. Louise Lucas, D-Dist.18, the plan’s chief architect, was even more direct. Responding to a fellow Democrat who called the scheme “extremely anti-democratic,” she declared that anyone opposing it “doesn’t share our values as Democrats. In other words, the issue was never fairness. It was grabbing political power.

This episode reveals something deeper and more troubling about today’s progressive politics: a willingness to abandon democratic norms the moment they become inconvenient. The 2020 redistricting reform passed with overwhelming bipartisan support precisely because Virginians were tired of politicians choosing their voters instead of the other way around. Democrats now propose suspending that reform for the 2026 midterms, ramming through their gerrymander, and then — they solemnly promise — restoring the independent commission afterward. The idea that newly elected Democrats would voluntarily vote themselves out of safe congressional seats is laughable on its face.

Power seized through procedural chicanery is almost never relinquished. And since Abigail Spanberger lied to Virginians about her not supporting a gerrymandering ploy, we should not believe their claims that this gerrymandering plan is only temporary. A recent Roanoke College poll shows Virginians are not fooled: 62% want to keep the bipartisan commission process. That public skepticism is heartening, but it must translate into action.

The left’s enthusiastic support for this Virginia scheme, despite its obvious hypocrisy and despite the mountain of evidence that one-party Democratic monopolies already exist across much of the country, exposes their true priorities. Principles are flexible; power is not. Moral lectures about democracy are reserved exclusively for Republicans. When Democrats hold the map-drawing pen, different rules apply. Virginia has long prided itself on political maturity and competitive districts that force candidates to appeal beyond their base. Competitive elections produce better policy and more accountable government.

Handing one party a 10-1 lock disenfranchises roughly half the state’s voters, rendering their ballots structurally meaningless in congressional races. It turns representative democracy into a managed and fake democracy — the very outcome the 2020 reform was designed to prevent. On April 21, Virginians have a chance to send a clear message that transcends party labels. Reject the lies. Reject the power grab. Reject the cynical attempt to turn Virginia into just another one-party fiefdom. Vote no on the redistricting amendment and preserve the independent process that puts voters — not politicians — in charge.

The integrity of our elections and the principle of equal representation are worth defending. Virginia’s voters have always risen to that challenge. This April 21 should be no different.

©2026 . All rights reserved.

Virginia Dems Sign Onto National Popular Vote Compact. It’s All About Power, Not Democracy.

Day after day, new Virginia Gov. Abigail Spanberger and her fellow Democrats demonstrate how much of their agenda is simply about securing power.

Spanberger signed a bill Monday that added the Commonwealth of Virginia to the National Popular Vote Compact, which is a misguided and downright unconstitutional attempt to get around the Electoral College in presidential elections.

The compact, which has now enlisted 18 states and the District of Columbia, would make the state’s Electoral College votes be whatever the national popular vote is, potentially nullifying democracy in the name of democracy.

I’d like to note that this move is awful for several reasons, the first one being that the National Popular Vote idea is a toxic one that undermines America’s federal, constitutional system.

The Electoral College really is the best method for a country as large and diverse as the U.S. to choose presidents. It ensures that the only truly “national” election for an office as important as the presidency relies on a consensus of states and the varied polities represented by the states.

The Electoral College ensures that the interests of the American people aren’t just represented by states like California and Texas, but by Wyoming and Delaware too.

I chose that mix of modern red and blue states for a reason.

The Left has pushed particularly hard for the Electoral College’s abolition in recent years because they believe switching to a popular vote favors them.

That sort of held until 2024 when President Donald Trump won the election and the popular vote too.

There is a perception that big states are blue and small states are red, but that’s not true.

The electoral map is mixed and constantly evolving. The idea that giving small states a slight comparative advantage favors Republicans isn’t true when you consider tiny, deep blue states like Rhode Island.

The electoral map is, as always, in flux.

Changing the system that has been remarkably effective since the beginning to serve the temporary interests of one party is foolish and shortsighted. Adding more “democracy” to our presidential elections is hardly a guarantee that we will have better presidents.

Fortunately, the Founders created a system not reliant on pure democracy. They made one that prevents large-scale constitutional changes without a massive amount of buy-in from the states the Left seemingly wants to bypass.

But more democracy for the sake of democracy is not really what this is about. This is about the fortunes of the Democratic Party and the Left in particular right now.

They look at America and see an electoral map that looks increasingly stacked against them.

Blue state uninhabitability for middle-class Americans means that the states with Democratic majorities are bleeding electoral votes, and the situation will soon be much worse.

As David Marcus, a Fox News columnist, sagely put on X, the following information is almost certainly why Virginia Democrats are “going for broke” with power grabs.

Big, blue states are getting less “big.” Red states are reaping the benefits. And that means that without a switch to something like a national popular vote their electoral road to the White House looks increasingly steep.

This National Popular Vote move is very on brand for Spanberger and the new Democrat majority in Virginia. They’ve spent much of their early days in power passing as many far-Left laws as possible, most notably focusing on changes to ensure that their current majority becomes permanent.

That’s why, despite Spanberger saying years ago that gerrymandering is “detrimental to our democracy,” she’s signed off on one of the most extremely partisan redistricting plans in the country.

Democrats did this while essentially bypassing a Virginia constitutional amendment that established a bipartisan redistricting commission.

Spanberger’s popularity has tanked, but it seems the reasoning is that popularity doesn’t matter so much if the game can be jerry-rigged to keep themselves in power. It’s not the worst bet, though these schemes often have a way of backfiring.

The moves accrue little benefit to effective governance in Virginia, of course. But they do deliver maximum benefits to Democrat politicians who undoubtedly hope that they can make the commonwealth a one-party state and yet another lab of left-wing social engineering à la California.

That Virginia Democrats signed off on the National Popular Vote Compact stems from similar reasoning.

They need to solidify wins now. The “affordability” message was just election-time sloganeering. The party is just as radical as ever. And now that it’s pulled off a win, the party won’t let the lie go to waste.

Both the ruthless redistricting plan and the National Popular Vote sign off demonstrate that the Democrats aren’t going to change their policies to win over voters. Instead, they intend to change the system so they won’t have to.

AUTHOR

Jarrett Stepman is a columnist for The Daily Signal. He is also the author of “The War on History: The Conspiracy to Rewrite America’s Past.” Send an email to Jarrett. Jarrett on X: .

RELATED POSTS:

DOJ’s Harmeet Dhillon Details Just How Much of a ‘Mess’ Voter Rolls Are

Virginia’s New ‘Centrist’ Governor Goes Full California on Day One

Spanberger Polls Below Majority Support as Virginia Holds Redistricting Vote 

Spanberger Is ‘Taking Credit’ for Youngkin’s Economic Deals

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Signal column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.


The Daily Signal depends on the support of readers like you. Donate now

Fed UP? — Begin Running toward the Battle!

May I begin this commentary with heart-felt appreciation for the many emails I received thanking me for my last column, “I’m Fed UP — are You?

So many kind remarks, so many encouragements to keeping going, and several asking, “what are we going to do about it?” Prayerfully this commentary will be a step toward answering that question. But may I remind you our freedom was fought by a minority of the colonists, about 1/3 while another third supported Mother England and the remaining third were content in their self-made bubble. This fact is not too far removed from where I think we are presently.

So…I encouraged each reader to seriously consider NOT waiting for another to start running toward the battle in your community, city, county or state. Others shall follow once they see someone running toward the battle and not remaining complacent. A well planned and funded assault on our small towns and communities, on otherwise content cities and schools is well underway. How many truly consider what is taking place on the Parks and Recreation Board, or Library Board, School Board, Town Council or City Council? The Marxists are moving quickly to fill these otherwise “boring and insignificant” positions. How about Planning and Zoning board? Look around and I pray you come to realize the socialists and Islamic foot soldiers are moving in these directions.

What can you do? Stand and put together a few sincerely patriot friends who are not timid to ask the below mentioned questions I submit for your consideration. Stand and ask in a polite but most strong no-nonsense manner what I have given to you. It does not matter if the candidate claims to be a conservative. Ask away and strongly state you want an answer not political rhetoric or word salad. I have given you five questions with a sense of answer…ask at the candidate’s speech or “Meet N Greet.” You want answers that are clear and spell out the candidate’s true beliefs and values. Anything less is what has contributed to our being in the position we now face. Run toward the battle!

Question #1. What is the proper role of government?

An answer. Our Founders were clear that government was to reflect the will of the people. It is the people who give government its authority.

Question #2. As an elected (or appointed) official, you will be required to take an oath to uphold and preserve the Constitution of the United States. When was the last time you took a serious look at the Constitution? Can you identify one or two areas where the Constitution is being violated today?

Question #3. What are your views about public debt? What is your opinion of using debt and how it should be paid off?

An answer. Our Forefathers warned about debt; it should be paid by the generation that created it!

Question #4. What is your view on unalienable rights stated by Jefferson in the Declaration?

An answer. These are rights given by our Creator. They cannot be taken by man without coming under the judgement of God. The candidate’s answer will tell you much about his/her philosophy, values and adhering to our founding principles.

Question #5. Share your thoughts on: “Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.”
An answer. Solutions should be based on morality and virtue.

Elected leaders at all levels seem to have misplaced the truth that government derives its powers by consent of the governed; by We the People. So very many elected officials clearly appear to have misplaced, or outright ignored, that our Forefathers sought for elected office those who would represent the citizens first, not their own careers, and they would accomplish this as “Servant Leaders.”

©2026 All rights reserved.


WEBSITE: arizonatoday.org

BOOK: Our Forefathers Truly Appealed to Heaven – Barnes N Noble, Amazon, Walmart Books

Mamdani, Hochul Agree to Tax on Luxury Second Homes in New York City

Fox News:

Anyone who thought that Governor Hochul. Hochul, the organ grinder’s monkey, would perhaps moderate Zohran Mamdani was sorely mistaken. Hochul is all in on Mamdani’s taxation policies. What wealthy individual would want to invest or live in New York City at this point? The message is unmistakable: they won’t keep bankrolling a city that treats them like suspects and shakes them down at every turn.Expect the once Big Apple to go bankrupt before Mamdani is done.

New York isn’t just losing residents—it’s bleeding the very people who pay the bills. The exodus of wage earners is at record highs, and the old hedge—keeping a pied-à-terre while earning elsewhere—is collapsing. The message is unmistakable: they won’t support a city that treats them like suspects and robs them blind. Close the second home, cut the ties, and move on. What was once a world capital risks becoming a monument to a once great city.

Celebrating: “When I ran for mayor, I said I was going to tax the rich. Well, today, we’re taxing the rich.” The plan will allow New York to tax second homes that are not the owners primary residents. It will certainly be one more reason to encourage the wealthy to wash their hands and find another market for their real estate investments. Fox News: New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani celebrated a proposal to tax luxury second homes owned by the ultra-wealthy, a plan expected to generate at least $500 million annually. Earlier in the day, New York Gov. Kathy Hochul unveiled a pied-à-terre tax on luxury second homes in New York City valued at $5 million or more, allowing the city to impose an annual surcharge on ultra-wealthy nonresidents. The proposal is projected to generate at least $500 million annually, according to Hochul.

New York Times:

Mamdani is celebrating because he effectively pushed Hochul two or three steps further left, yielding to socialist mayor’s agenda. New York Times: Another factor in the proposal’s favor is that it is not being considered as a stand-alone bill; Ms. Hochul intends to include it in the state budget. Under that scenario, the tax proposal will not be voted on separately. It will instead be largely hashed out in closed-door negotiations between the governor and the leaders of the Senate and Assembly. That will make it harder for the tax’s opponents, including the Real Estate Board of New York, a powerful industry group, to lobby effectively against the proposal.

Hochul, Mamdani reach deal for tax on luxury second homes in New York City

By NY1, April 15th, 2026

Gov. Kathy Hochul and Mayor Zohran Mamdani have reached a deal that will add a new tax on luxury second homes in New York City in an effort to reduce part of the city’s budget gap.

The tax would apply to one – to three-family homes, condominiums and co-ops worth $5 million or more and owned by homeowners with a primary residence outside the five boroughs, City Hall said in a press release.

Read more.

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLE: Mamdani’s ‘Free’ Grocery Stores Will Charge New Yorkers Twice Over

POSTS ON X:

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.