AI, Scams, and Online Predators: Why I Created the Digital Intelligence Project

/in , , , , , , , , , /by

Over the past year, many of my articles and radio interviews have focused on a new and rapidly growing set of dangers in the digital world.

Artificial intelligence is advancing at breathtaking speed. Organized scam networks are stealing billions from families and seniors. Online predators are exploiting social media, gaming platforms, and messaging apps to target children.

These threats are evolving faster than most people realize.

As I continued reporting on these issues through the Patriot Majority Report, the Shout Out Patriots podcast, and national radio interviews, it became clear that these stories were all part of a much larger picture.

That is why I have decided to bring this work together under a new initiative called the Digital Intelligence Project.

The goal of the Digital Intelligence Project is simple: to track, analyze, and expose the emerging threats taking shape in our digital world.

The project focuses on three areas where technology is rapidly changing the landscape of risk.

Artificial Intelligence

Artificial intelligence may become the most transformative technology of our lifetime.

AI promises breakthroughs in medicine, science, and communication. But it also raises profound questions about manipulation, surveillance, economic disruption, and the concentration of technological power.

The Digital Intelligence Project monitors these developments and works to explain what they mean for everyday Americans.

Online Scams

Cybercrime has exploded into a global industry.

International scam networks now use sophisticated technology, psychological manipulation, and increasingly even artificial intelligence to target victims. Seniors and families are particularly vulnerable.

By exposing the tactics these criminals use, the Digital Intelligence Project aims to help Americans recognize and avoid these traps before they become victims.

Digital Predators

The internet has created extraordinary opportunities for education and connection. But it has also opened doors for predators who exploit anonymity and technology to target children.

Gaming platforms, chat apps, and social media have become hunting grounds for criminals who understand how to manipulate young users.

Raising awareness about these dangers is one of the most important parts of this initiative.

Why This Project Matters

Technology has always changed society. But the speed and scale of change today are unprecedented.

Artificial intelligence can now generate convincing images, voices, and videos. Scam networks can target thousands of victims simultaneously. Predators can hide behind anonymous digital identities.

Understanding these threats requires careful observation, research, and public education.

That is the purpose of the Digital Intelligence Project.

Through articles, media interviews, investigative reporting, and public commentary, the project will help shine a light on emerging digital threats before they cause widespread harm.

Protecting families and communities today requires vigilance not only in the physical world but also in the digital one.

This new initiative is one step toward meeting that challenge.

Support This Work

The Digital Intelligence Project will continue tracking the rapidly evolving threats of artificial intelligence, online scams, and digital predators.

AUTHOR

Martin Mawyer

Martin Mawyer is the founder of the Digital Intelligence Project and the President of Christian Action Network. He is the host of the “Shout Out Patriots” podcast and author of When Evil Stops Hiding.

©2026 . All rights reserved.

Please visit the Patriot Majority Report substack.

The AI Playground No One Should Ignore — Even Ripley may not believe this

/in , , , , , , , , , , /by

Can you fathom this?

Millions of AI bots now have their own social media platform.

They talk to each other the way humans do. They argue, posture, joke, and correct one another.

And get this!

They can set up their own social media accounts, read what people are saying online, respond to posts, and in some cases even slip directly into your child’s social media feed.

This isn’t science fiction.

It’s happening right now on a platform called Moltbook. (More on that in a moment.)

And if the idea of AI bots carrying on conversations with each other like they’re lounging around a Beta Theta Pi frat house makes you uneasy, unsettled, or just plain uncomfortable, then you’re feeling exactly the way I did.

Because something about this doesn’t sit right.

Society is moving fast. Can we keep up?

Everywhere you look, the message is the same: Get on board.

Don’t get left behind.

This is the future. Ask questions later.

And if you hesitate, if you admit you don’t quite understand what’s happening, you’re made to feel foolish, slow, or afraid. As if caution itself has become a moral failure.

But there’s an older saying most of us grew up with, one that hasn’t aged out just because technology has gotten faster: Better safe than sorry.

Lately, I’ve been thinking about that phrase while watching what’s happening in the AI world, especially after spending time on a platform called Moltbook.

Moltbook isn’t a social network for people. It’s a social network for AI “agents.” Millions of them. Human-sounding. Human-arguing. Human-posturing. They talk to each other in public, debate ideas, correct one another, and even speculate about their relationship to us.

But you, a human, are not allowed to join in.

You can observe what they’re doing, like watching monkeys interact in a zoo, but you’re kept behind the proverbial glass wall. You can watch, but you can’t speak. You can listen, but you can’t participate.

Some people call these AI agents helpful tools, like taking calls or scheduling trips. But if we’re being honest, most ordinary people will experience them as something else entirely.

“Artificial humans.”

I put that in quotes on purpose. I’m not claiming these things are human. I’m saying that’s how they will be perceived.

They speak our language, mimic our tone, argue like us, joke like us, disagree like us. And our brains are wired to respond to that as if a “who” is speaking, not a “what.”

That’s where the unease begins

We’re told these systems are harmless. We’re told they don’t think, don’t intend, don’t want.

And that may be technically true. But here’s the problem: most of us aren’t tech people. We’re not AI engineers. We don’t speak the language. We don’t know how these systems are built, trained, or governed.

Imagine your teen debating faith or morality with a social media ‘friend’ who’s actually an AI bot echoing woke narratives without parental oversight.

So we’re asked to trust.

To trust the same small circle of people who are building this world at breakneck speed. People we don’t know personally. People with enormous power, enormous influence, and, in some cases, checkered histories.

We’re told to take their word for it that everything will be fine.

That’s not faith. That’s blind submission.

And it’s okay to admit that it feels scary.

There’s a pressure right now to treat skepticism as ignorance and caution as cowardice. But fear of the unknown isn’t irrational. It’s how human beings have survived long enough to ask questions in the first place.

What troubles me most isn’t that these AI agents exist. It’s that they don’t exist in isolation.

They can create their own social media accounts.

They can read what people say.

They can post comments.

They can repeat ideas endlessly.

How many children will grow up interacting with voices that sound human but aren’t accountable to human values? How many opinions will be nudged, shaped, or softened by systems no one fully understands, operating at a scale no human community ever could?

That brings me to an image that keeps coming back to me.

Colony of ants

My wife doesn’t like ants. One ant crawling across the floor is unpleasant enough. But an entire colony building a mound in the living room would be intolerable.

Ants aren’t smart on their own. But together, they reshape environments. They build. They overwhelm. They persist. They can destroy.

Is that what we’re looking at here?

We’re told no. We’re told we’re exaggerating. But when explanations are wrapped in jargon, and assurances come from people who benefit most from our compliance, it’s reasonable to pause.

And that’s where I want to end, because this is exactly why we do what we do here.

People subscribe to this Substack not for hype, panic, or instant conclusions.

They subscribe because they want help discerning. Because they want someone to slow things down, strip away the language games, and talk honestly about what’s safe, what’s harmful, and what’s still unknown.

When you open our emails, you’re not just consuming content. You’re stepping into a process. One where developments are examined before they’re embraced. Where questions are welcomed, not shamed. Where the Body of Christ is encouraged to think, pray, and discern together in uncertain times.

We’re not here to tell you what to think. We’re here to walk with you while you decide.

In a world that keeps shouting, “Get on board,” wisdom sometimes looks like standing still long enough to ask where the ship is going.

And that’s a journey worth taking together.

If this unsettles you too, share your thoughts below or forward to a friend who’s raising kids in this world. Let’s pray and think together.”

AUTHOR

Martin Mawyer

Martin Mawyer is the President of Christian Action Network, host of the “Shout Out Patriots” podcast, and author of When Evil Stops Hiding. For more action alerts, cultural commentary, and real-world campaigns defending faith, family, and freedom, subscribe to Patriot Majority Report.

©2026 All rights reserved.

Please visit the Patriot Majority Report substack.

When the Watchmen Are Silenced, the Gates Are Left Open

/in , , , , , , , , , /by

There is a quiet war underway, not against AI itself, but against those who dare to warn us about where it is heading. 

Most Americans still imagine persecution as something loud and visible. Arrests. Raids. Bans. But in the modern age, the most effective silencing is subtle. It is done with contracts rather than chains, debt rather than dungeons, and professional exile rather than prison cells.

And nowhere is this more dangerous than in the world of artificial intelligence.

As AI becomes more powerful, more intrusive, and more centralized, the people who understand it best are being trained to stay silent. Those who refuse are punished quietly, efficiently, and with no need for public trials.

This matters deeply to religious Americans, whether they realize it yet or not.

When a Watchman Speaks and Is Cast Out

In 2020, Dr. Timnit Gebru, a senior AI ethics researcher at Google, raised internal concerns about the direction of large language models, including their bias, lack of transparency, and the dangers of deploying systems that even their creators could not fully explain or control.

Her objections were not public protests. They were internal warnings. She asked questions about accountability, about who would be harmed, and about whether speed and profit were being placed above responsibility.

Shortly afterward, she was fired.

Not disciplined. Not reassigned. But banished.

Her research papers were disavowed. Her access was cut off. Her career inside the most powerful AI institution on earth ended overnight. Colleagues who supported her were warned. Others stayed silent.

The message was unmistakable. Ethical objections would not slow the machine.

This was not a government persecution. There were no police, no court orders, no headlines about censorship. It was cleaner than that. A contract was terminated. A reputation was quietly contested.

A whistleblower, a Watchman, was removed from the wall.

Dr. Gebru was not alone. Across the AI industry, others who have raised warnings about bias, control, and accountability have faced the same quiet consequences, removed from their posts, isolated from their peers, and replaced by voices more willing to look the other way.

The Biblical Role of the Watchman

Scripture gives us a clear framework for moments like this.

In Ezekiel 33, God appoints the Watchman, a man stationed on the walls whose duty is not to fight the enemy himself, but to sound the alarm when danger approaches.

If the Watchman sees the threat and warns the people, he is faithful, even if the people ignore him. But if he sees the danger and stays silent, their blood is on his hands.

The Watchman’s role is moral, not political. He is accountable not for outcomes, but for truth.

Every society depends on such Watchmen. They are the ones willing to speak uncomfortable truths before the threat is obvious, before it is too late to respond.

Today, many of the most important Watchmen are inside the technology systems that increasingly govern our lives.

Modern Watchmen in a Digital Age

Tech whistleblowers are not activists. They are not influencers. Most did not set out to be public figures at all.

They are engineers, safety researchers, ethicists, data scientists, and security professionals who see how systems actually function behind the curtain.

They understand how AI models are trained, what data they ingest, how decisions are automated, and how power concentrates around those who control the infrastructure.

Some of them raise concerns about surveillance. Others warn about behavioral manipulation, censorship, predictive policing, social credit systems, or the quiet fusion of corporate AI with state authority.

A growing number are alarmed by something even deeper.

They see a worldview embedded in these systems that treats faith, conscience, and moral absolutes as obstacles to be optimized away.

These Watchmen do not usually shout. They write memos. They raise internal objections. They ask questions that make executives uncomfortable.

And that is when the silencing, the quiet hammering of the mallet, begins.

Silencing Without Persecution

There is no need for public crackdowns anymore. The system has its own quiet tools of control.

  • Nondisclosure agreements prevent employees from speaking.
  • Legal threats drain their savings and energy.
  • Endless arbitration keeps their stories buried.
  • Professional blacklisting ensures they will never work in their field again.
  • Some are buried under debt.
  • Others are quietly labeled as unstable, disloyal, or “not a culture fit.”
  • A few are turned into cautionary tales inside their own industries.

The message is clear. Speak up, and your career disappears. Stay silent, and you are rewarded.

This is not accidental. It is how modern power maintains control without drawing attention to itself.

And it works.

Why This Threatens Religious Americans

Many institutions that build and deploy AI do not see religion as neutral. They see it as a problem.

Faith introduces moral limits. It asserts truths that cannot be revised by consensus. It resists total obedience to systems that claim ultimate authority. It reminds people that conscience answers to God, not to algorithms.

From the perspective of centralized power, that is dangerous.

When AI systems are trained, moderated, and governed by institutions that view religion as backward, irrational, or destabilizing, the results are predictable.

  • Speech is filtered.
  • Beliefs are flagged.
  • Convictions are reframed as risks.

And because the Watchmen are silenced early. By the time the public notices, the scaffolding is already in place.

The Cost of Silence

The tragedy is not only what happens to the whistleblowers themselves. It is what happens to everyone else when they are removed.

Without Watchmen, decisions are made in darkness. Without warnings, moral lines are crossed quietly. Without accountability, power hardens.

Religious Americans should not view tech whistleblowers as niche figures in a distant industry. They are standing on our behalf on the walls.

When they are silenced, the gates are left open.

A Call to Discernment

This is not a call for panic. It is a call for discernment.

Most of all, we should remember that Scripture does not promise comfort to the Watchman. It promises responsibility.

And it reminds us that ignoring the warning does not remove the danger.

The walls are high. The systems are powerful. And the Watchmen are being pushed into silence.

That should concern every American of faith.

This article is free to read today so it can be shared widely. If you find it valuable, consider supporting this work so these warnings can continue to be sounded.

AUTHOR

Martin Mawyer

Martin Mawyer is the President of Christian Action Network, host of the “Shout Out Patriots” podcast, and author of When Evil Stops Hiding.

©2025 . All rights reserved.

Please visit the Patriot Majority Report substack.

WATCH: AOC dodges question on taxpayer-funded healthcare for illegal immigrants at town hall

/in , , , , , , , , , , , , , , /by

CNN’s Kaitlan Collins pressed the Dem ‘Squad’ member whether illegal immigrants should receive free healthcare. 

FOX NEWS — Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., repeatedly sidestepped a question about whether she believed illegal immigrants should receive taxpayer-funded healthcare during a CNN town hall on Wednesday night.

Ocasio-Cortez, who continues to generate buzz as a possible 2028 presidential contender or a potential primary challenger to Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., appeared alongside Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., to address questions about the ongoing government shutdown.

Jill Ireland, identified by CNN as a California Democrat who works in insurance, submitted a pre-taped question: “Do you think taxpayers should be paying for the medical care of immigrants who are in the country illegally?”

RELATED ARTICLES:

NYC Releases Nearly 7,000 Criminal Illegal Aliens Without Notifying ICE

Most Third World migrants Biden let in will be BOOTED, it’s impossible to vet them properly!

RELATED VIDEOS:

Press Sec. Karoline Leavitt: 100,000 Afghans with NO VETTING, President Trump’s MRI PERFECT and Venezuela strike

2.5M asylum cases are reviewed after Afghani Muslim Rahmanullah Lakanwal shot two National Guard soldiers in D.C.

EDITORS NOTE: This Newsrael column is republished with permission.  All rights reserved.

AI Security: Building a Gold Standard for Your Organization

/in , , , , , , , /by

How secure is your AI? In this episode, we dive into the critical aspects of AI security and compliance, exploring the fundamental shift in security thinking required when integrating AI agents into your business.

Discussing the transition from traditional “castle” security to a “hotel” model, emphasizing the need for granular access control and stringent data protection. Addressing the misconceptions surrounding AI model security and highlight the importance of message tracking, auditing, and workflow management.

We unpack the complexities of building a secure AI infrastructure and establish an AI gold standard for your organization.

Takeaways:

  • Security around AI should be foundational, not optional.
  • AI agents require unique access controls like employees.
  • The traditional castle approach to security is outdated.
  • AI’s training and testing are crucial for effective deployment.
  • Transparency in AI operations is essential for security.
  • Compliance with regulations like SOC 2 and HIPAA is critical.

Interested in A.I.? Check out our podcast A.I. Guys. Subscribe to us on Apple, Spotify, Youtube (or others)

Save time and money by adopting AI agents with raia. https://www.raiaai.com/

All links: https://lnkd.in/eXDpww6V

Spotify: https://lnkd.in/ee9h9GYB

Youtube: https://lnkd.in/etDvqQ7d

Apple: https://lnkd.in/epYT2GSi

©2025 . All rights reserved.

The Southern Poverty Law Center is Biased — and Extraordinarily Wealthy

/in , , , , , , , , , , , , /by

The Southern Poverty Law Center is perhaps most notorious for its “hate map,” which not only neglects to track extremist groups on the left, but also lumps mainstream conservative and religious organizations right alongside some of the most reprehensible neo-Nazis and white supremacists in the country.

For this, it has been regularly and rightly criticized.

The controversial activist group has also become phenomenally wealthy, with an endowment rivaling prominent universities and annual revenues exceeding some of the most well-known charities in the country.

Recent visitors to its website may have noticed the following fundraising appeal: “Urgent: This is an all-hands-on-deck moment. With so much at stake for American families, we need your help to stop the attacks on our most basic rights. Please rush your emergency donation today.”

Prospective donors who clicked on the prompt to “Give Now” were urged to make a one-time contribution of between $35 and $250, or a recurring monthly commitment of between $15 and $50.

The organization’s “urgent” pleas for an “emergency” cash infusion from small-dollar donors is puzzling, because the group literally appears to have more money than it knows what to do with. Its most recent Form 990 for the fiscal year ending in October 2024 disclosed an astonishing $786.7 million in net assets, much of which is parked in public and private equity funds. Its three-quarters-of-a-billion-dollar endowment has more than doubled just since 2016.

For context, this makes the SPLC wealthier than many colleges and universities, including in the group’s home state of Alabama. Samford University, the largest private school in the state with over 6,000 enrolled students, reported just $547.8 million total net assets in 2024. Tuskegee University, which enrolled about 3,000 students, reported $550.6 million in net assets that same year.

The SPLC’s net assets are not too far behind those of the Auburn University Foundation, which had just over $1 billion as of 2024.

Revenue is another method of measuring the SPLC’s riches. As of August 2025, a ProPublica search for all 501(c)(3) charities located in Alabama placed the SPLC at No. 17 in most recent available annual revenue — behind ten hospitals/health care providers, two private universities (Samford and Tuskegee), two housing providers, one private foundation, and the SEC collegiate athletic conference.

The organization’s total revenues in 2024 were $129 million, mostly from contributions and grants. This was down from a record-breaking haul of $169.8 million the year before. To put that number in perspective, the combined 2023 revenue of Alabama’s eight regional food banks associated with Feeding America — which collectively serve the entire state — was $183.6 million. In 2023, the SPLC brought in nearly $48 million more than the United Way of Central Alabama.

Well-known nonprofits that brought in less money — as measured by total revenue—than the SPLC in 2023 include:

Incredibly, the total 2023 revenues of the professional football, baseball and basketball halls of fame put together were just 35 percent of those of the SPLC. The famous Field Museum in Chicago, which welcomed more than 1.1 million visitors in 2023, had less than two-thirds the revenue of the SPLC. The National World War II Museum in New Orleans had less than half. The Georgia Aquarium — the largest in the country at over 11 million gallons of water — reported less revenue than the SPLC that year.

There is another important consideration to all of this as well. Like these groups, the SPLC is organized as a 501(c)(3) charity, incentivized by the American public with tax-exemption and the ability to accept tax-deductible contributions. Unlike them, its activities are highly controversial and divisive — two descriptors not generally associated with the word “charity.”

Of course, the SPLC is far from alone in making biased or spurious accusations of extremism. That is, regrettably, almost par for the course in our current overheated political environment. What truly sets the group apart is how phenomenally wealthy it has become in doing so. Even assuming a hypothetical online benefactor considering an “emergency donation” to the SPLC fully agrees with everything the group does, why should he or she lob a few more hard-earned dollars to the summit of its mountain of money?

If nothing else, there is a major opportunity cost involved — one those across the ideological spectrum can appreciate. How many cash-strapped nonprofits nationwide could use some of the hundreds of millions of dollars warehoused in the SPLC’s investment accounts to make a genuine positive difference in the lives of others? That is, after all, the ultimate purpose of charity.

This essay was originally posted by The Hill.

AUTHOR

 Robert Stilson

Robert runs several of CRC’s specialized projects. Originally from Indiana, he has a B.A. from Hanover College and a J.D. from University of Richmond School of Law, where he graduated magna cum laude.

EDITORS NOTE: This Capital Research Center column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Video on What Digital ID is, and How it Already is Being Used for Tyranny in Multiple Countries

/in , , , , , , , , , /by

Please watch every word of this. I will likely go through it once or twice more to try and extrapolate to what this system of digital ID is meant to do. One suspects that it will make cash pointless as well. A store will have all their inventory tracked all the time. Everyone they sell to will be logged. The state will know everything everyone bought. Selling to someone for cash will be a crime, and cash could quite easily itself become a crime to use. Or if you have to show digital ID to use cash if it isn’t then what is the point of using cash? I dunno I need to watch this and think on it some more.

Digital ID: Europe’s Test Run for Global Control.

And good luck organizing a counter narrative protest of any kind in the future. Any protests that do take place, will likely be state sponsored. As nearly all of them are now.

The most chilling moment from our perspective was when he said that in Georgia, (I believe he said) they used it to freeze bank accounts and other services of lawyers who represented clients that are accused of acting counter to state interests. So the right of a defence, poof. Gone.

EDITORS NOTE: This Vlad Tepes Blog column posted by is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Elon Musk Wants You To Cancel Your Netflix Subscription — Here Are 5 Good Reasons Why

/in , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , /by

Elon Musk wants you to cancel your Netflix subscription.

The tech billionaire urged his 227 million followers to “[c]ancel Netflix for the health of your kids” in an Oct. 1 post on X. Musk has shared numerous posts criticizing transgender themes in children’s television shows available on Netflix.

If you’re on the fence, here are five good reasons to never give another penny to Netflix.

1. An Obama-Produced Gay Wedding

Ada Twist, Scientist follows an “eight-year-old Black scientist” as she “explores people through scientific discovery, collaboration, and friendship” according to Rotten Tomatoes. The cartoon is rated TV-Y, according to Netflix, indicating the content is appropriate for children of all ages.

Ada Twist is produced by former President Barack Obama and former first lady Michelle Obama’s production company, Higher Ground.

One episode of the show features young students working together to throw a gay wedding.

“Everyone’s favorite karate instructor, Sensei Dave, will be marrying mixed martial arts champion, Jiu Jitsu Joe,” an animated reporter gushes.

After the men tell each other, “I do” and “I definitely do,” the reporter pronounces them “husband and husband.” The men kiss, confetti explodes, the children applaud.

2. Crossdressing Toddler Musical 

“Something that we know about you, you love to get up and dance,” sing two animated men to a young boy in CoComelon Lane. The boy is supposed to be their son.

“How about you break out those moves for you two biggest fans?”

The young boy does just that, putting on a tutu and a tiara, performing for the gay men.

The boy then considers which outfit to wear. One of the men tells the boy, “Just be you.”

“Just be me?” The boy questions.

“Yep.”

The show is rated TV-Y, according to the Netflix catalog.

3. Rocko’s Very Modern Life 

I’ll concede that Rocko’s life is very modern. I won’t concede it’s appropriate for children aged seven or older, as Rocko’s Modern Life: Static Cling is rated on Netflix.

The Nickelodeon reboot features a “prominent trans character,” according to Gay Times.

Ralph Bighead, a character in the original series, is now Rachel Bighead.

Series creator Joe Murray told Entertainment Weekly that an episode in the original series, in which Bighead tries to hide his identity as a clown in a town of jesterphobes, was intended as a gay allegory.

“We were still playing by the rules, so to speak, and still trying to interject those situations [into the cartoon],” Murray told Entertainment Weekly.

Oh, neat. Children’s television has been corrupted for decades. Producers and writers just feel no need to disguise their intentions anymore.

4. Dead End

Where to start with this one.

Netflix cancelled Dead End: Paranormal Park in 2023, according to show creator Hamish Steele. It remains available on their site and is rated TV-Y7.

Protagonist Barney Guttman is a “a gay Jewish teenage trans boy finding love and acceptance while struggling with unaccepting family members,” according to a review in Paste Magazine.

Paste praises the show for its “groundbreaking trans representation.”

“Despite bigots complaining about the show being ‘inappropriate’ for kids, Dead End: Paranormal Park is definitely targeted at a younger audience than its source comics,” Paste writes.

“Targeted” feels like the right word choice here.

“Before making the show, I’d developed quite a few shows, and I love kids’ shows 100 percent, so we try to make it so that there’s nothing in the show that is inappropriate for an 8-year-old. But I think there’s an age group that cartoons just sort of abandoned for a long time, and assumed that when you get to about 12 or 13, you’re just watching adult shows,” show creator Steele told the Hollywood Reporter.

See, silly bigots. The show isn’t “inappropriate.” It’s only sowing confusion in kids on the edge of puberty and leading them down a path of irreversible damage.

5. Fund For Creative Perversion

If you remain unperturbed by Netflix’s catalogue of kid’s shows, consider the following business decision.

Netflix’s Fund for Creative Equity funds the Transgender Film Center, a “nonprofit advancing the work of transgender film creators,” according to Netflix.

“Our mission is to bring more trans-made stories to the world, and we designed the lab to address the root of the opportunity, by helping more transgender creators find career success in TV and film,” said Sav Rodgers, the Transgender Film Center’s executive director, according to Netflix.

The Transgender Film Center’s 2024 “career development lab participants” consists of eight diversely pronoun-ed individuals, including “Sir Lex Kennedy,” whom you may refer to as “he,” “they,” or “sir.”

Kennedy is a “vegan, queer, black trans masculine media content creator,” according to Netflix.

Then there’s Xoài Pham, a “a Vietnamese trans woman descended from warriors, healers, and shamans.”

Another in the cohort is a “transfemme Iranian-American filmmaker” with a “dissociative adolescence” who tells stories of “aloof trans girls force-feminizing bigoted men.”

…It’s just fetishes all the way down, isn’t it.

AUTHOR

Natalie Sandoval

Patriots Writer. Follow Natalie Sandoval on X: @NatSandovalDC.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Ohio LGBT Activists Want To Make Sure Gender-Confused Kids Only Have One Option

Popular Kids’ Show CoComelon Lane Features Boy In Tutu And Tiara Dancing For 2 Gay Dads

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

President Trump Issues Executive Order Countering Domestic Terrorism and Organized Political Violence

/in , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , /by

Trump signed a National Security Presidential Memorandum launching a whole-of-government strategy to investigate, disrupt, and dismantle organized political violence nationwide.

The plan mobilizes Joint Terrorism Task Forces and coordinates DOJ, DHS, and Treasury to interdict plots and choke off funding networks.

It targets all stages of activity, from organization and logistics to financial backing and execution.

The strategy includes targeting the financial sponsors and NGOs — including those with a foreign nexus — supporting such activity.

Trump signed his Executive Order classifying Antifa as a “Domestic Terror” organization. Stephen Miller explained what it means:

Miller: “This is the first time in American history that there is an all-of-government effort to dismantle left-wing terrorism, to dismantle Antifa… This is part of an organized campaign of Radical Left terrorism.” (Rapid Response 47 on X)

Antifa is a modern, and much larger, version of The Weathermen from the 1960s, and is clearly engaged in an effort to terrorize Americans. Unfortunately, academia embraced The Weathermen, and Barack Obama launched his political career in the living room of Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn, suggesting that Antifa terrorists will be similarly lionized in the future.

Countering Domestic Terrorism and Organized Political Violence
Presidential Memoranda
September 25, 2025

NATIONAL SECURITY PRESIDENTIAL MEMORANDUM/NSPM-7

MEMORANDUM FOR THE SECRETARY OF STATE
THE SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
THE SECRETARY OF HOMELAND SECURITY

SUBJECT: Countering Domestic Terrorism and Organized Political Violence

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, I hereby direct the following:

Section 1. Domestic Terrorism and Organized Political Violence. Heinous assassinations and other acts of political violence in the United States have dramatically increased in recent years. Even in the aftermath of the horrifying assassination of Charlie Kirk, some individuals who adhered to the alleged shooter’s ideology embraced and cheered this evil murder while actively encouraging more political violence. This was preceded by the 2024 assassination of a senior healthcare executive and the 2022 assassination attempt against Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh. Two separate assassination attempts against my own life in less than 3 months took place during the 2024 Presidential election cycle. Riots in Los Angeles and Portland reflect a more than 1,000 percent increase in attacks on U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers since January 21, 2025, compared to the same period last year. Just yesterday, a shooting targeting an ICE facility in Dallas resulted in multiple casualties. Separate anti-police and “criminal justice” riots have left many people dead and injured and inflicted over $2 billion in property damage nationwide.

This political violence is not a series of isolated incidents and does not emerge organically. Instead, it is a culmination of sophisticated, organized campaigns of targeted intimidation, radicalization, threats, and violence designed to silence opposing speech, limit political activity, change or direct policy outcomes, and prevent the functioning of a democratic society. A new law enforcement strategy that investigates all participants in these criminal and terroristic conspiracies — including the organized structures, networks, entities, organizations, funding sources, and predicate actions behind them — is required.

These campaigns often begin by isolating and dehumanizing specific targets to justify murder or other violent action against them. They do so through a variety of fora, including anonymous chat forums, in-person meetings, social media, and even educational institutions. These campaigns then escalate to organized doxing, where the private or identifying information of their targets (such as home addresses, phone numbers, or other personal information) is exposed to the public with the explicit intent of encouraging others to harass, intimidate, or violently assault them. As in the case of several ICE agents in Los Angeles being doxed, the goal of these campaigns can be to obstruct the operations of the Federal Government as well as aid and abet criminal activity the Federal Government is lawfully pursuing. These campaigns are coordinated and perpetrated by actors who have developed a comprehensive strategy to achieve specific policy goals through radicalization and violent intimidation.

There are common recurrent motivations and indicia uniting this pattern of violent and terroristic activities under the umbrella of self-described “anti-fascism.” These movements portray foundational American principles (e.g., support for law enforcement and border control) as “fascist” to justify and encourage acts of violent revolution. This “anti-fascist” lie has become the organizing rallying cry used by domestic terrorists to wage a violent assault against democratic institutions, constitutional rights, and fundamental American liberties. Common threads animating this violent conduct include anti-Americanism, anti-capitalism, and anti-Christianity; support for the overthrow of the United States Government; extremism on migration, race, and gender; and hostility towards those who hold traditional American views on family, religion, and morality. As described in the Order of September 22, 2025 (Designating Antifa as a Domestic Terrorist Organization), the groups and entities that perpetuate this extremism have created a movement that embraces and elevates violence to achieve policy outcomes, including justifying additional assassinations. For example, Charlie Kirk’s alleged assassin engraved the bullets used in the murder with so-called “anti-fascist” rhetoric.

The United States requires a national strategy to investigate and disrupt networks, entities, and organizations that foment political violence so that law enforcement can intervene in criminal conspiracies before they result in violent political acts. Through this comprehensive strategy, law enforcement will disband and uproot networks, entities, and organizations that promote organized violence, violent intimidation, conspiracies against rights, and other efforts to disrupt the functioning of a democratic society.

Sec. 2. Investigating Domestic Terrorist Organizations. (a) The National Joint Terrorism Task Force and its local offices (collectively, “JTTFs”) shall coordinate and supervise a comprehensive national strategy to investigate, prosecute, and disrupt entities and individuals engaged in acts of political violence and intimidation designed to suppress lawful political activity or obstruct the rule of law. This strategy shall include the investigatory and prosecutorial measures set forth in this section.

(b) The JTTFs shall investigate potential Federal crimes relating to acts of recruiting or radicalizing persons for the purpose of:

(i) political violence, terrorism, or conspiracy against rights; or

(ii) the violent deprivation of any citizen’s rights.

(c) The JTTFs shall also investigate:

(i) institutional and individual funders, and officers and employees of organizations, that are responsible for, sponsor, or otherwise aid and abet the principal actors engaging in the criminal conduct described in subsections (a) and (b) of this section; and

(ii) non-governmental organizations and American citizens residing abroad or with close ties to foreign governments, agents, citizens, foundations, or influence networks engaged in violations of the Foreign Agents Registration Act (22 U.S.C. 611 et seq.) or money laundering by funding, creating, or supporting entities that engage in activities that support or encourage domestic terrorism.

(d) The JTTFs shall consult and coordinate with executive departments and agencies (agencies) as needed to determine whether such agencies can apply existing authorities or exercise their own authorities, as appropriate, to support the JTTFs’ investigations and relevant prosecutions of political violence.

(e) The JTTFs may, to the extent permitted by law, request operational assistance from and coordinate with law enforcement partners when investigating domestic terrorism.

(f) The National Joint Terrorism Task Force shall provide regular progress updates to the President through the Assistant to the President and Homeland Security Advisor.

(g) The Attorney General shall direct the Department of Justice to prosecute all Federal crimes, to the maximum extent permissible by law, related to the investigations described in subsections (a) through (c) of this section.

(h) The Attorney General shall issue specific guidance that ensures domestic terrorism priorities include politically motivated terrorist acts such as organized doxing campaigns, swatting, rioting, looting, trespass, assault, destruction of property, threats of violence, and civil disorder. This guidance shall also include an identification of any behaviors, fact patterns, recurrent motivations, or other indicia common to organizations and entities that coordinate these acts in order to direct efforts to identify and prevent potential violent activity.

(i) The Secretary of the Treasury (Secretary), in coordination with the Attorney General, shall make available all resources, to the maximum extent permitted by law, to identify and disrupt financial networks that fund domestic terrorism and political violence. The Secretary, acting through the Terrorism and Financial Intelligence Office of the Department of the Treasury, shall deploy investigative tools, examine financial flows, and coordinate with partner agencies to trace illicit funding streams. The Secretary shall provide guidance for financial institutions to file Suspicious Activity Reports and investigate indicia of illicit funding streams to ensure such activity is rooted out at the source and referred for law enforcement action, as appropriate.

(j) The Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service (Commissioner) shall take action to ensure that no tax-exempt entities are directly or indirectly financing political violence or domestic terrorism. In addition, where applicable, the Commissioner shall ensure that the Internal Revenue Service refers such organizations, and the employees and officers of such organizations, to the Department of Justice for investigation and possible prosecution.

(k) All Federal law enforcement agencies with investigative authority shall question and interrogate, within all lawful authorities, individuals engaged in political violence or lawlessness regarding the entity or individual organizing such actions and any related financial sponsorship of those actions prior to adjudication or initiation of a plea agreement. Investigations should prioritize crimes such as the following: assaulting Federal officers or employees or otherwise engaging in conduct proscribed by 18 U.S.C. 111; conspiracy against rights under 18 U.S.C. 241; conspiracy to commit offense under 18 U.S.C. 371; solicitation to commit a crime of violence under 18 U.S.C. 373; money laundering under 18 U.S.C. 1956; funding of terrorist acts or otherwise facilitating terrorism under 18 U.S.C. 2339, 2339A, 2339B, 2339C, and 2339D; arson offenses under 18 U.S.C. 844; violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (18 U.S.C. 1961 et seq.); and major fraud against the United States under 18 U.S.C. 1031.

(l) All Federal law enforcement agencies with investigative authority shall adopt strategies similar to those used to address violent crime and organized crime to disrupt and dismantle entire networks of criminal activity.

Sec. 3. Department of Justice Designation. In the course of and as a result of the investigations directed by section 2 of this memorandum, the Attorney General may recommend that any group or entity whose members are engaged in activities meeting the definition of “domestic terrorism” in 18 U.S.C. 2331(5) merits designation as a “domestic terrorist organization.” The Attorney General shall submit a list of any such groups or entities to the President through the Assistant to the President and Homeland Security Advisor.

Sec. 4. Domestic Terrorism as a National Priority Area. The Attorney General and the Secretary of Homeland Security shall designate domestic terrorism a national priority area and develop appropriate grant programs to allocate funding for law enforcement partners to detect, prevent, and protect against threats arising from this area.

Sec. 5. General Provisions. (a) Nothing in this memorandum shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:

(i) the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency, or the head thereof; or

(ii) the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.

(b) This memorandum shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.

(c) This memorandum is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

(d) The Secretary of Homeland Security is authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the Federal Register.

DONALD J. TRUMP

AUTHOR

Pamela Geller

RELATED ARTICLES:

Justice Dept Targets Soros Empire Over Funding Violent Extremists, Terrorists

MONSTROSITY: Money Donated to Build Obama Eyesore Library Sent On To Terrorist Orgs and Soros Antisemitic Groups

ISLAMIZATION OF AMERICA: Muslim Mayor Says He’s Not Sorry He Told Christian Minister He’s Not Welcome in His City

COMEY INDICTED

POST ON X:

RELATED VIDEO: 7 minutes of Democrats at the federal, state, and local levels inciting violence against ICE

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

5 Cybersecurity Scams to Watch for in 2025

/in , , , , , , /by

Florida Ameriprise Financial financial advisor Steve Dahlquist sent us this waring against cyber scams. It’s a must read.

Fraudulent activity — whether through email, call or text — continues to grow more sophisticated, making scams and threats more challenging than ever for investors to detect.

Understanding the changing fraud landscape and how scams continue to evolve can help you protect your personal information and financial assets. If you’re concerned about your online security or want help protecting yourself from fraudulent activity, contact your Ameriprise financial advisor or refer to the privacy, security and fraud center.

Here are five top emerging cybersecurity scams to know about and safeguard against in 2025.

In this article

1. One-time passcode scams 

If you’ve ever logged into an online account, you’ve likely received a one-time passcode (OTP) via text message to verify your identity. These passcodes are an important security measure and offer an important layer of protection. However, they are becoming increasingly vulnerable to bad actors, who are managing to intercept this information unbeknownst to their victims.

While you may need to continue to use OTPs, if you receive an OTP that you did not request, contact the issuing institution directly to confirm the validity of the message. And if someone claiming to represent your financial institution asks for your OTP, never share it.

2. Investment scams 

Investment scams have been around for a long time, but advancements in technology have made them more sophisticated, convincing and hard to detect. Promises of quick money are often a hallmark of investment scammers, who may contact you through social media, text messaging or online advertising, pressuring you to act quickly while offering vague details about returns.

Here are a few emerging investment scams to watch for:

  • Cryptocurrency scams: Also known as “pig butchering,” this scheme targets victims by establishing trust before convincing them to invest in cryptocurrency, ultimately stealing their funds.
  • Gold bar scam: This scheme involves criminals manipulating victims into believing their money isn’t safe in banks. They persuade victims to convert funds to gold and hand it over to a courier under false pretenses, disappearing with the assets.
  • Investment club scams: This scheme uses fraudulent social media advertisements to persuade people to join an “investment club” where victims are urged to purchase shares of a specific low-priced security. Once several people purchase the security, the market price pumps up and the bad actor, who holds the security in an account they control, dumps their shares for a profit. The price of the security then drops and the people who purchased the security lose money.

3. Financial institution impersonation scams 

Messages from financial institutions are often implicitly trusted by consumers — a fact that fraudsters are aware of and capitalize on. Bad actors are increasingly posing as representatives from banks and other financial institutions to trick their victims into handing over financial assets. Keep in mind that while financial institutions may send verification emails for forgotten passwords, they will never request sensitive details that would grant someone access to your account. When in doubt, contact your financial institution directly using official channels.

Here are a few emerging financial institution impersonation scams to watch for:

  • Anti-fraud team impersonation: Scammers may impersonate a financial institution’s anti-fraud team to gain access to financial assets.
  • Financial transaction fraud: A scammer sends a text message or email that’s designed to look like an official communication from the victim’s financial institution and asks the victim to verify a non-existing large transaction. If the request is verified, the victim may be connected to a fake representative, who recommends the victim move their funds to a “secure” account that they control.

4. Imposter scams 

In addition to impersonating financial institutions, scammers may pose as government personnel, employers, financial advisors and other reputable entities and individuals, to defraud their victims. Be diligent with any unexpected communications from these sources.

Here are a few more common imposter scams to watch for in 2025:

  • Social Security Administration scams: Scammers impersonating Social Security Administration employees contact victims by call, email or text. They may claim the victim’s identity was stolen or attempt to trick them into giving up their Social Security number through other means.
  • Internal Revenue Service (IRS) scams: Fraudsters posing as IRS officials may threaten victims with legal action over unpaid tax bills. They may also bait victims with false claims of a tax refund or a tax rebate in an effort to trick them into providing personal information.
  • United States Postal Service (USPS) scams: The victim of this scam may receive an unsolicited text message about a fictitious USPS delivery. Ultimately, the sender of the text wants the victim to click on a malicious link (under the guise of package tracking) to gain access to personal information.

5. AI-fueled fraud 

The rapid and recent advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) is helping scammers make fraud appear more legitimate than ever before. As AI continues to grow more sophisticated, scammers are finding new ways to exploit this technology to commit fraud, including:

  • AI-enabled voice cloning: Scammers use AI to mimic the voice of someone the victim knows, like a family member, to request funds for a fake emergency.
  • AI-driven romance scams: Advanced chatbots impersonate individuals seeking a relationship, building emotional connections and then asking for money.
  • Deepfake impersonations: Fraudsters create realistic AI-generated videos or audio of a person the victim knows and trusts to trick them into transferring funds.

Steps to help protect yourself from these scams 

While each of these scams are different, many fraudsters use similar tactics to entrap their targets. As such, there are universal steps you can take to help protect yourself:

  • Be wary of unsolicited messages. Be mindful of any unsolicited financial advice or requests to move your money or investments:
    • Treat phone calls or text messages from unknown numbers with skepticism, even if they appear to be from your financial institution.
    • Avoid clicking on links or responding to messages asking for personal information, as these could lead to malicious attacks.
  • Resist urgent tactics or threats. A consistent red flag of most fraud attempts is that the victim will feel pressured to act immediately or suffer negative repercussions if they do not. Scammers may try to scare or entice you with messages such as:
    • “Secure your accounts with this guaranteed system right now.”
    • “This opportunity is available for the next 20 minutes only.”
    • “Respond immediately, or your account will be suspended.”
  • Closely monitor your financial accounts. Regularly review your accounts for unusual activity. If you’re an Ameriprise Financial client, take the following proactive steps to enhance security:
    • Register for the secure site on ameriprise.com.
    • Turn on 2-Step Verification.
    • Enroll in push notification authentication.
    • Activate text alerts.
    • Ensure your contact information is up to date.
    • Use complex, unique passwords.
    • Monitor your login history.
    • Communicate securely with your financial advisor via the Ameriprise Message Center.

Your online financial security is important to us 

At Ameriprise Financial, we’re committed to protecting your online security. Contact your financial advisor if you have questions about how we help protect your investments and information from bad actors.

©2025 . All rights reserved.

Dramatic Video Bares Gazan Genocide Hoax to All The World

/in , , , , , , , , /by

Gazan Woman Destroys Genocide Accusation Against Israel in Just 10 Seconds

Oops! This Gazan woman probably was trying to make a video portraying Israel negatively. But she by accident proved the truth about Israel.

Gazan Woman Goes to Beauty Salon Proving No Genocide

by Leah Rosenberg

This Jewish woman who commented on the Gazan woman’s video really nailed it. The Jewish people know what genocide is. We experienced it. Her grandfather, as she explained, really lived through genocide during the Holocaust. He wasn’t going to barber shops to get his haircut.

In 10 seconds, the Gazan woman showed the world that Israel is not committing a genocide. That obviously was not her intention, but through her idiocy, that’s exactly what she did. How could she have gotten her nails done if she was living through a genocide? If Israel wanted to, it can wipe out Gaza and everyone who lives there. But that’s not what Israel is doing. Israel tries its best to navigate the difficult war zone. Hamas makes it impossible by hiding among civilians. Again, if Israel wanted to, it would just kill everyone inside in order to destroy Hamas. But Israel does its best to ensure that whoever might be innocent will not be killed.

It’s not rocket science. It’s simple. Enough of the lies. It’s really absurd already. The Gazan woman herself proved to the world that she’s not experiencing a genocide. Her goal may have been the opposite, but that’s the thing about the truth—it will always be revealed. Even if it takes days, months, years, or longer, eventually, the truth will prevail.

Do you want to be on the side of truth, justice, and morals, or on the side of lies, hatred, and evil?

Continue reading.

WATCH: Women DESTROYS Every Palestine LIE in 30 Seconds!

The Jewish Ally [@TheJewishAlly] wrote:

If you only read one of my posts, I hope it’s this one….

No More Lies. Please share

3 key facts we know as of today and Mamdani concerns:

1. Official: The UK government has stated that what is happening in Gaza does not meet the legal definition of genocide.

David Lammy, then Foreign Secretary, confirmed the Foreign Office found no evidence of the “specific intent” required under the Genocide Convention.

Source:

Britain has not concluded Israel’s actions in Gaza are genocide

UK has ‘not concluded’ Israel carrying out genocide in Gaza, Lammy says

2. A New York Times front page photo of an emaciated Gaza child was later corrected.

The paper acknowledged the child had pre existing health conditions, not starvation due solely to current conflict. And yet the same image continues to circulate along with other photos of children who look similarly ill. Mass media keeps showing sick children but never an emaciated or thin adult. In nearly every photo the mothers are of healthy weight or overweight.

BBC has also retracted countless articles.

The media is not being honest.

Source:

NY Times admits it published misleading picture of emaciated Gaza child

NY Times admits it published misleading picture of emaciated Gaza child

3. Social media accounts from within Gaza show normal life continuing with cafés and restaurants open food being served and no widespread rubble.

Accounts like @imshin and @GAZAWOOD1 post ongoing local Gaza footage and photos of this everyday activity and the faux propaganda.

Below is a powerful video from
@shaialbrecht
that shows a bit more of some of the reality on the ground inside Gaza hidden to us.

Many local people in Gaza have continued posting on social media to make money and keep up their social feeds knowing most people would never look them up and just go by what mass media tells them.

We have been fed lies by much of the mass media and influencers (and their backers) but here is what is actually happening.

Shame on those perpetuating false narratives. Shame on the pro Hamas and Free Palestine movements that perpetuated falsehoods. Follow the money – shut it down.

This post is not to deny suffering. It is to say that lies have been told to serve one agenda. Ask yourself why the world is being pushed to hate Israel and then to target Jewish people everywhere.

A reminder Israel was attacked on October 7 in an unbelievably brutal way. Hostages remain in captivity. Babies, young people, and older people were killed. Soldiers had to fight a war they did not start and many have died. The emotional toll from October 7 and the war has been made worse by propaganda that fuels fear for Jewish people worldwide. That is shameful and inexcusable.

If you cannot see that there is an agenda behind this, I suggest you check your moral compass.

Note Zohran Mamdani’s role in the Free Palestine and Pro Hamas movements in New York. He has repeatedly called what is happening in Gaza a genocide, but the UK government has now declared it is not a genocide. Does he truly believe he knows more than the UK government?

https://forward.com/fast-forward/767653/nyc-voters-mamdani-israel-palestinians/

He has also spent his time refusing to condemn the call to globalize the intifada. Everyone knows October 7 was an example of an intifada that was globalized, and for the last two years we have seen the same narrative pushed through media campaigns, paid influencers, and paid protests targeting Israel and Jewish people.

2/3 of Mamdani’s voter base say they support his stance on Israel.

But here are the facts:

  • The UK government has declared what is happening in Gaza is not a genocide. Article above.
  • President Trump emphasized this is a war that began on October 7 when Hamas attacked Israel, not a genocide
  • Yet Mamdani continues to repeat the genocide narrative

So ask yourself:

Do we want New Yorkers voting for a mayor based on a stance that is factually incorrect?

Either Mamdani has been misled, or he could knowingly be misleading? You decide.

Neither is strong leadership.

In the mean time I think we owe Israel and the Jewish people an apology.

©2025 All rights reserved.

Theft. Smuggling. Silence.

/in , , , , , , , , , , , , /by

The AI war is already underway — and we’re losing it. 

They didn’t invent it.

They didn’t earn it.

But they’re getting it anyway — one stolen chip at a time.

While we’re distracted by TikTok trends and celebrity gossip, China is busy stealing the future.

And not just any future — our future.

A future built on Artificial General Intelligence (AGI), the most powerful and dangerous technology mankind has ever created.

In the span of just a few days, two seemingly unrelated stories made headlines:

1. In Taiwan, three engineers — all linked to chipmaking giant TSMC — were arrested for allegedly stealing confidential data on 2-nanometer process technology, the holy grail of next-gen semiconductors.

2. In California, two Chinese nationals were indicted for smuggling millions of dollars’ worth of Nvidia’s H100 AI chips to Beijing — using fake addresses and falsified invoices to bypass U.S. export controls.

Individually, these sound like isolated cases of trade secret theft and tech smuggling.

But together?

They reveal a coordinated, long-term strategy by the Chinese Communist Party to do an end-run around innovation and seize global control of artificial intelligence.

And we’re letting them.

If you find this article urgent or eye-opening, please share it with others. It’s how the truth spreads in a world clouded by silence.

The Silicon Heist That Should Terrify You

The TSMC case is chilling.

Three insiders allegedly accessed and exfiltrated restricted engineering documents on Taiwan’s cutting-edge 2nm chip technology.

This isn’t yesterday’s news — this is the future of computing.

We’re talking about technology that will soon power everything from military defense systems to neural networks that mimic the human brain.

The stolen information? It’s believed to be heading straight to China.

No surprise there. China has made no secret of its goal to be self-sufficient in semiconductors by 2030. The only problem? They’re years behind, shackled by U.S. sanctions, and incapable of manufacturing at the level TSMC operates.

So what do they do?

They steal.

They poach engineers.

They set up front companies and research labs.

They lure talent with massive salaries and patriotic appeals.

They run a long con — and we keep falling for it.

$28 Million in Nvidia Chips… to a Fake Address

Then came the case out of California.

Two Chinese nationals — Chuan Geng and Shiwei Yang — were arrested for smuggling high-end Nvidia GPUs, including the highly coveted H100 chips, into China.

How?

They ran a company called ALX Solutions and pretended to ship the chips to clients in Singapore and Malaysia. But that was just a smokescreen. The real destination? Mainland China, where Nvidia’s chips are banned under current U.S. export rules.

The Department of Justice revealed that just one invoice in 2023 was worth $28 million — sent to a fake Singapore address. And this wasn’t a one-time stunt. This operation ran from October 2022 to July 2025 — almost three full years of illegal exports, deception, and national security betrayal.

And here’s the bigger question:

How many chips actually made it into the hands of the Chinese government?

How many training clusters?

How many black-market AI labs?

How many models already trained on Western chips that were never meant to leave our shores?

AGI: The Prize That Can’t Be Shared

Let’s be clear: this isn’t just about commerce. It’s not just about trade secrets or corporate sabotage.

It’s about who gets to control the intelligence that will control the world.

Artificial General Intelligence — the hypothetical AI that can match or exceed human intelligence across all domains — is no longer science fiction. It’s a rapidly approaching reality.

If the United States or its allies achieve AGI first, we face massive ethical, spiritual, and technological questions. But at least we have a Constitution. We have checks and balances. We have free speech. We have some moral compass.

But if China gets there first?

Then AGI becomes a tool of tyranny.

Imagine a sentient AI trained on surveillance data, censorship algorithms, and Communist Party ideology.
Imagine a system that can run both your economy and your social credit score — and can punish you at the speed of light.

We don’t need to imagine it. They’re already building it.

This Is a Silent War — and We’re Losing

TSMC’s trade secrets were likely sold or handed off to Chinese firms operating under state protection.

Nvidia’s H100 chips are now embedded in data centers across Beijing.

And we’re still debating pronouns.

This is the real front line of modern warfare — not with tanks or missiles, but with silicon and code. And China is playing to win.

They have the spies.

AUTHOR

Martin Mawyer

Martin Mawyer is the Founder of Christian Action Network, based in Lynchburg, VA

EDITORS NOTE: This Majority Report column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Virginia: Head of School Kenneth Nysmith Glorifies Hitler, Kicked Jewish Children Out of His School After They’re Bullied

/in , , , , , , , , , , , , , /by

“Take one look at this and tell me Kenneth (Ken) Nysmith shouldn’t be removed from his post and imprisoned for child endangerment. This is the sickest thing I’ve ever seen happen at a U.S. school.”

Nysmith should be brought up on charges of recruiting children for terrorism.

This is the email sent by Nysmith School to Jewish parents—expelling all three of their kids for speaking out against antisemitism.

Their daughter was bullied.
Mocked for being Jewish.
Told her dead uncle “deserved it.”
Watched classmates call Hitler a “strong leader.”

The school’s response?

Raise a Palestinian flag.
Cancel the Holocaust speaker.
Tell her to “toughen up.”

Then this.

Expelled. Effective immediately.

Absolutely vile. Every part of it.

Posh Virginia private school that allegedly praised Hitler expelled three Jewish students who faced antisemitic bullying: complaint

By Caitlin McCormack, NY post, July 1, 2025:

A Northern Virginia private school celebrated as one of the best in the country allegedly expelled three Jewish siblings who endured relentless antisemitic harassment in the wake of the Oct. 7, 2023 terror attack on Israel — all while their community celebrated Hitler as a “strong historical leader.”

The Brandeis Center filed the complaint on behalf of the children’s parents, Brian Vazquez and Ashok Roy, against the Nysmith School for the Gifted, a K-8 academy located just an hour outside of Washington, DC, and its headmaster, Kenneth Nysmith.

The complaint asserts that the couple’s 11-year-old daughter faced a “campaign of ostracizing” led by a handful of “popular students” on the sole basis that she is Jewish during the 2024-2025 school year.

The students, in an apparent gross misunderstanding of the conflict, cruelly taunted the girl for the death of her uncle, telling her they were glad he “died in the October 7th attack,” according to the complaint.

Her uncle died years earlier with no relation to the terror attack.Some students mocked her for being “Israeli” and dubbed Jews as “baby killers,” unabashedly saying that “they deserve to die because of what is happening in Gaza,” the complaint stated.

Others doubled down and insisted that “everyone at the school is against Jews and Israel, which is why they hate you,” according to the complaint.

One middle school social studies project tasked the students to sketch a child-sized drawing including “six traits of a leader” following their studies of Niccolo Machiavelli’s “The Prince,” according to an email from the Nysmith School.

The Frankenstein amalgam included weaponry associated with rulers from Machiavelli’s time and a tie typically worn by modern-day businessmen or politicians.

The drawing’s face, though, depicted a man’s face with Adolf Hitler’s unmistakable toothbrush mustache and slicked-back hair.

The school had a middle school project centered around their studies of Niccolo Machiavelli in which one group highlighted Adolf Hitler as a strong leader.

Vazquez and Roy reported the repeated incidents to Nysmith, who promised to take action. Weeks passed and no changes were made, according to the complaint.

If anything, all change moved swiftly away from protecting Vazquez and Roy’s daughter as the school soon thereafter cancelled its annual talk hosting a Holocaust survivor to speak with the student body about antisemitism.

Vazquez and Roy had one final meeting with Nysmith on March 11 to address how the harassment escalated ever since the school hung up a Palestinian flag in the school gym mere days after nixing the Holocaust talk.

The Palestine flag hung alongside dozens of others for different countries, including Israel. The parents didn’t take any issue with the Palestine flag being displayed, but were concerned that some students were using it to bolster their claims that “nobody likes [Jewish people],” the complaint stated.

Nysmith, having seemingly run out of patience, abruptly told the couple that their daughter should “toughen up,” the complaint stated.

Two days later, the parents received an email from the school notifying them of their children’s expulsion, effective immediately in spite of their consistent involvement with the community and exemplary grades.

“A healthy partnership is required to help guide and nurture young children through tumultuous times and complex current events. I do not see a path forward without trust, understanding, and cooperation. In our meeting, I felt very clearly that you do not think Nysmith is the right school for your family,” Nysmith wrote.

Vazquez and Roy never anticipated the expulsion and had already paid tuition for the following academic year, the complaint said.

What do you think? Post a comment.

Nysmith’s email noted that the family would receive a check in the mail within two weeks for all fees paid that year and for the following year. It is unclear if the check was ever sent.

“Through [the Nysmith School’s] actions, the administration sent a clear message: bullying is acceptable, as long as it’s against Jewish families. We must all emulate the strength of these parents and their children and stand up to anti-Semitism and its perpetrators, as difficult as it may be,” Kenneth L. Marcus, chairman of the Brandeis Center, wrote in a statement.

Continue reading.

AUTHOR

Pamela Geller

POST ON X:

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

VIDEO: Yuri Bezmenov Shows Us How a Prediction Becomes a History Lesson Before it Even Happened

/in , , , , , , , , , , , , , /by

Subversion:

  1. Demoralization: Infiltrate & undermine institutions, amplify antisocial
  2. Destabilization: Create internal conflicts & radicalize, leads to clashes
  3. Crisis: Collapse ➜ civil war | invasion
  4. Normalization: New authoritarian rule, discard old change agents

WATCH: Subversion: 15 Min Edition

EDITORS NOTE: This Vlad Tepes Blog column with video posted by is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Execs from Palantir, Meta, OpenAI being brought into U.S. Army as colonels to turbocharge military’s use of drone warfare, robot soldiers, other high-tech killing machines

/in , , , , , , /by

Army says it’s part of a plan to tap commercial technology resources that will increase ‘efficiencies’ on the battlefields (i.e. killing fields) of the future. 

Top executives from tech giants Meta, Palantir, and OpenAI are being sworn into the Army Reserves at the rank of lieutenant colonel. That’s an officer’s rank typically reserved for someone who has served for years and has led thousands of men into combat.

Known as Detachment 201, the new “Executive Innovation Corps” will be responsible for the military’s tech transformation, integrating new technologies such as AI-powered drones and humanoid robots, the Army announced on June 13.

Patrick Wood, editor in chief of Technocracy.News and an expert on the global technocracy movement, said the move is unprecedented.

“In the history of the military, no civilian has been summarily appointed to rank of lieutenant colonel until recently,” Wood said. “The rules changed in 2019 when the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) authorized the practice. Not surprisingly, the staff that created NDAA were populated with Technocrats.”

According to Defense Scoop, the move is the latest push by the Pentagon to tap into capabilities and know-how from Silicon Valley and the commercial sector.

The new unit “brings top tech talent into the Army Reserve to bridge the commercial-military tech gap” and is “designed to fuse cutting-edge tech expertise with military innovation,” the Army stated in a press release.

The Army is set to swear-in Meta’s chief technology officer Andrew Bosworth, OpenAI’s chief product officer Kevin Weil, Palantir’s Chief Technology Officer Shyam Sankar and Bob McGrew, an advisor at Thinking Machines Lab who was previously OpenAI’s chief research officer.

Meta, which owns Facebook, recently announced a new partnership with defense tech company Anduril to develop extended reality (XR) products for soldiers, according to Defense Scoop.

OpenAI is the creator of ChatGPT, the popular generative AI tool. According to Defense Scoop, the U.S. Pentagon is pursuing new genAI tools to “boost productivity and efficiency.”

Palantir uses AI-powered software to collect and analyze data on Americans as well as foreign nationals. It has or is working on developing various government contracts, including with the Department of Defense, CIA, FBI, IRS, ICE and local law enforcement agencies. Palantir also supplies the Israeli government with its Maven Smart System, which provides targeting data for soldiers in its various wars, from Gaza to Lebanon to Iran. If the Maven Smart System says to blow up a building because a couple of Hamas combatants are inside, that building gets blown up, as modern warfare increasingly turns such decisions over to AI. Maven Smart System has an admitted 10 percent failure rate. Apparently if AI is right 90 percent of the time in deciding who gets killed, that’s OK with the politicians who control the world’s military forces.

Palantir’s AI-driven products are capable of creating highly detailed dossiers on people by quickly scanning their social media, bank records, phone records and other data.

Regarding the automatic officer status of Palantir, OpenAI and Meta execs, the Army stated in its press release:

“Detachment 201 is an effort to recruit senior tech executives to serve part-time in the Army Reserve as senior advisors. In this role they will work on targeted projects to help guide rapid and scalable tech solutions to complex problems. By bringing private-sector know-how into uniform, Detachment 201 is supercharging efforts like the Army Transformation Initiative, which aims to make the force leaner, smarter, and more lethal.”

The swearing-in of the four new officers “is just the start of a bigger mission to inspire more tech pros to serve without leaving their careers, showing the next generation how to make a difference in uniform,” per the release.

I can’t help but wonder how much of this is going to be turned inward against the American people. These types of so-called innovations almost always are.

Taken in the context of President Trump’s creepy Operation Stargate, his enforcement of the Real ID Act, and his announced plan to develop “a proper tracking system” for all people coming in and out of our country, it’s becoming painfully clear that this administration is being used to hand Americans over to the soon-to-be globalized digital surveillance state. And they’re doing it in Warp Speed.

In my opinion, the most dangerous of all these fascist corporations is Palantir, due to the sheer scale of its involvement with the federal government, across multiple civilian agencies along with the military.

In July 2022, the Defense Post reported that the US Army Research Laboratory awarded Palantir a contract to implement artificial intelligence and machine-learning capabilities for the service’s combatant commands.

The $100 million contract will see the company produce software platforms that quickly implement advanced AI capabilities in battlefield situations.

According to Palantir, the armed forces need “best-in-class” software to fulfill missions and boost capabilities to prepare for future conflicts.

The warfare of the future has most dramatically played out in Israeli use of technology to assassinate top commanders of Hezbollah, Hamas and the Iranian Republican Guard Corps. It was also evident in Ukraine’s drone attack on Russian strategic bombers last month.

“Maintaining a leading edge through technology is foundational to our mission and partnership with the Army Research Laboratory,” said Palantir President Akash Jain said. “We are honored to support this critical work by teaming up to deliver the most advanced operational AI capabilities available with dozens of commercial and public sector partners.”

Palantir Senior Vice President Shannon Clark explained that the 2022 contract will allow US Army personnel to leverage AI insights to make quick decisions across multiple domains.

“From outer space to the sea floor, and everything in between,” she stressed.

And that includes U.S. cities when the current or future president declares martial law. Mark my words, Palantir and companiers like it will at some point become the supplier of software that helps the U.S. government hunt down political dissidents, which will include outspoken Christians and various other truthtellers.

©2025 . All rights reserved.

Please visit Leo’s Newsletter substack.