Big Night for Democrats Hides Conservatives’ Victories on Ballot Measures

On the same night voters delivered a blue wave and expanded abortion rights, conservatives saw some victories on ballot measures regarding election integrity and protecting women’s sports.

Any hopes of passing the SAVE America Act disappeared with the new congressional majority. However, voters in multiple states approved measures to ensure that only citizens vote and to require voter ID.

Voter ID and citizenship requirements are traditionally supported by Republicans and opposed by Democrats and passed mostly in red states. However, the measures also passed in states where Democrats saw big victories.

Alaska was a Senate battleground, but the citizenship measure passed by 69%, according to Ballotpedia.

Kansas is a red state where Democrats picked up a Senate seat Tuesday, but where 63% of voters approved a constitutional amendment to ensure that only citizens can vote.

Also, voters in the solidly red states of Arkansas and South Dakota approved new laws to prevent noncitizen voting in local elections. West Virginia enshrined it in the state constitution.

Other states boosted voter ID requirements.

Voters in North Carolina and Ohio, where Democrats also won Senate seats, locked voter ID into their constitutions. North Carolina voters approved it by 60%. It passed by 66% in Ohio.

In Nevada, voters approved a measure to require voter ID by 62%, according to NBC News.

There were sticking points.

In solidly blue California, one of the bluest states in the country, 60% of voters rejected a voter ID law.

Also, in Arizona, a battleground state that President Donald Trump won twice and lost once, voters rejected a broad election reform ballot measure that included a citizenship requirement and voter ID in the state constitution.

The blue state of Colorado also rejected expanding voter ID to mail-in ballots by a vote of 64%.

On gender issues, Nebraska voters approved a ballot measure to prevent biological males from playing in women’s scholastic sports by 68%, according to Ballotpedia.

Arizona approved a measure to require people to play on the sports team and use private locker room space based on their biological sex by 58%, according to Decision Desk HQ.

It further restricts transgender people from competing on sports teams or using private spaces like locker rooms that match their gender identity.

The heavily blue state of Washington appeared to be heading toward passing a similar measure, with 57% backing it. However, the ballot measure had not been called as of Wednesday morning.

A measure in Colorado was still too close to call Wednesday morning. The proposal called for prohibiting health care professionals from providing surgery to people under the age of 18 for “treatment in response to a minor’s perception of sex or gender.”

On abortion, it was a split night.

Voters in Virginia and Nevada codified the right to an abortion in the state constitutions, while voters in Idaho and Missouri rejected proposals to codify abortion rights.

AUTHOR

Fred Lucas 

Fred Lucas is senior investigative reporter for the Daily Signal. He is the author of “The Myth of Voter Suppression: The Left’s Assault on Clean Elections.” Follow on X FredLucasWH.

RELATED ARTICLES: 

Paxton’s Office Nails Felons Allegedly Voting in TX Election – Multiple Arrests, Numerous Investigations

EXCLUSIVE: Trump ‘Will Never Allow For Mass Amnesty’ After Floating Working With Dems On Immigration

The Exit Poll Warning for the Gleeful Victors

Socialists Won More Than Just Elections on Tuesday

74% of Voters Said This Issue Shaped Their Vote

ICYMI: Victor Davis Hanson—What the Midterm Election Results Mean for 2028

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Signal column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Dozens of Illegal Aliens Arrested In Nationwide Voter Fraud Crackdown!

The federal government is investigating alleged violations of U.S. election laws by aliens who admitted to voting in American elections. The United States Department of Homeland Security (DHS) released the following statement announcing that U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has arrested dozens of individuals in connection with alleged voter fraud and election-related offenses across the United States, including numerous cases of aliens admitting to unlawfully registering to vote or casting ballots in American elections.

“The patriots of ICE have arrested dozens of non-citizens who illegally voted in American elections,” said DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin. “Some of them have criminal histories that include assault with a dangerous weapon, domestic violence, drug trafficking, burglary, and driving under the influence. The Trump Administration will not allow illegal aliens to steal the votes of hardworking American citizens. American elections are for Americans only.”

Here are are 13 examples of ICE’s ongoing investigations and arrests of illegal aliens who committed voter fraud:

  1. Juan Carlos Matute-Hernandez, a criminal illegal alien from Honduras who illegally voted in the 2026 election. His criminal history includes an arrest for driving offenses.
  2. Aden Hassan Aden, a criminal alien from Somalia who illegally voted in the 2020 election. His criminal history includes convictions for domestic violence, drug possession, and larceny.
  3. Arturo Salazar Garcia, an illegal alien from Mexico who illegally voted in the 2024 election.
  4. Jaimie Sosa-Sardina, a criminal alien from Cuba who illegally voted in the 2024 election. His criminal history includes convictions for selling cocaine, battery, and resisting an officer.
  5. Marva Marie Cook, a criminal alien from Germany who illegally voted in the 2022 election. Her criminal history includes a conviction for larceny.
  6. Braulio Osiel Zapata Perez, a criminal illegal alien from Nicaragua who illegally voted in the 2024 election. His criminal history includes an arrest for DUI.
  7. Mai Tran, a criminal illegal alien from Vietnam who illegally voted in the 2024 election. Her criminal history includes convictions for fraud, numerous drug possession charges, selling cocaine, burglary, larceny, and illegal use of credit cards.
  8. Jose Luis Matute Chaviel, a criminal illegal alien from Venezuela who illegally voted in the 2024 election. His criminal history includes charges for DUI and cocaine possession.
  9. Phath Vorn, a criminal illegal alien from Cambodia who illegally voted in the 1992 election. His criminal history includes convictions for assault with intent to murder, assault with a dangerous weapon, and possession of a weapon.
  10. Axel Bemjarmin Alarcon Duarte, a criminal illegal alien from Guatemala who illegally voted in the 2024 election. His criminal history includes charges for DUI, assault and battery on a family member, and shoplifting.
  11. Darwin Yoel Zelaya-Orellana, a criminal illegal alien from Honduras who illegally voted in the 2026 election. His criminal history includes a conviction for third-degree sex offense.
  12. Servando Alejandro-Torres, a criminal illegal alien from Mexico who illegally voted in the 2024 election. His criminal history includes convictions for disorderly conduct and bail jumping, and charges for DUI.
  13. Jairo Ivan Vazquez Montano, a criminal illegal alien from Mexico who illegally voted in the 2022 election. His criminal history includes arrests for kidnapping, DUI, and an additional traffic offense.

This is part of the Trump Administration’s broader focus on stopping non-citizens from voting in American elections!

©2026 . All rights reserved.

AWED MEDIA BALANCED NEWS: We cover Energy to Education to Elections — and more!

Welcome! We cover Energy to Education to Elections — and more!

Here is the link for this issue, so please share it on social media.

Checkout the 2026, 2025, & 2024 archives, plus asterisked items below.


— This Newsletter’s Articles, by Topic —

Secondary Education Related:

*** French Kids Are Destroying Their Schools — Blame the Adults

Restoring the Purpose of American Education

Homeschooling? Teach the Lesson. Leave the Room.

Have humans passed peak brain power?

Higher Education Related:

Delaware’s DEI Discount Goes to Court

The Cornell 7 Controversy Sees New Twist

Artificial Intelligence:

*** The AI policy debate suffers from a dangerous plague of vagueness

*** Texas AD clarifies AI use on key play that failed in football loss to Florida

AI Data Centers

*** US Data Center Map

Brace Yourselves: Serious Trouble Brewing In The Data Center Industry

Greed Energy Economics:

California Duck & Cover: Part 1 and Part 2

Unreliables (General):

*** MISO Obliterates Solar, Storage, and Wind Capacity Values

*** Leaders Like Mark Carney Sold the West a Renewable Energy Story. China Is Cashing In

*** The Cost of Wind and Solar Power Backup

Google Management Admits Renewables Don’t Work for Powering Data Centers

Wind Energy — Offshore:

*** Haunting discovery near wind turbine raises questions about fishing boat tragedy

Trump Administration Seeks Remand of COP Approval for Offshore Wind Farm Now in Final Commissioning Stage

Alliance unveils floating wind action plan

Solar Energy:

Once touted as a clean-energy blueprint, Nevada solar plant sells for cents on the dollar

Nuclear Energy:

Nuclear radiation and falling out of bed

The Anti-Nuclear Playbook Comes for Data Centers

Fossil Fuel Energy:

*** Trump Announces “Massive” Greenland Oil Exploration Plans

Labour discovers Britain still needs gas

US challenges World Bank fossil fuel restrictions

Misc Energy:

California’s Energy Crisis Could Bring the West Coast to its Knees

Manmade Global Warming — Some Deceptions:

*** More Truth About The Climate Lies

*** UN Climate Panic Rests on False Scenario and Buried Past

*** New documents reveal stealth advocacy at the heart of America’s National Academies

Finally, a Net Zero sceptic on the BBC

Climate Lawsuits Fail Constitutional and Scientific Review

The Five Dimensions of a Simplistic Argument

Manmade Global Warming — The Science:

*** Super El Niño then and now: How this year’s strengthening event compares to historic extremes

Positive Response to CO2 Coalition Messages Spurs National Ad Campaign

Climate’s Past Performance Uncertain Predictor of Future

Climate Conference Stumbles Into Realities

US Election:

*** Voter Rolls — Public Records or State Secrets?

Biden-appointed judge badly misconstrues law

After 46 years of failed attempts, America finally has the opportunity to fix permitting

Climate Alliance’s anti-affordability platform raises big election issues

US Federal Agencies:

*** Social Security corrects nearly 50 million records in largest SSN cleanup in agency history

Misc US Politics:

*** Short video “Springtime for Zohran in the USA” (watch in full screen)

Democracy Restored Exposes the Left’s Lawfare Consortium in New Report

Societally US:

*** Teen girls identifying as lesbian or bisexual plummet in stunning reversal, new data shows

New York State’s current path is familiar — and crippling

The Cruelty of Compassion

Globalism:

*** The War on Grain

French Students Are Protesting a State That Has Failed Them

Ayaan Hirsi Ali: Spain Is Surrendering Its Inheritance

Science:

*** Covid, Climate and the ‘Consensus Trap’

*** SpaceX’s Starphone Could Be the Biggest Hardware Launch Since the iPhone

Health (Other):

Opening Speech of NIH Vaccine Injury Clinic

Knee treatment without surgery offers lasting pain relief for 80% of arthritis patients, study finds

“Insufficient Evidence”: The Two Words That Control Modern Medicine

Key Architect Of Make America Healthy Again Alliance Resigns

COVID-19 — Misc:

*** Journal Retracts COVID-19 Vaccine Paper Based on Faked Content

*** Scottish COVID-19 inquiry|21 Oct 2026

Iran:

Sample Development regarding Iran

Israel/Ukraine:

Latest Developments in Israel

Pray for the safety of the Israeli people

Latest Developments in Ukraine

Pray for the safety of the Ukrainian people

A well-rated source to make a Ukraine donation


Please use social media, etc. to pass on this Newsletter to other open-minded citizens…If you’d like to be added to (or unsubscribe from) the distribution of our popular, free, worldwide Media Balance Newsletter, simply send me an email saying that.


Note 1: We recommend reading the Newsletter on your computer, not your phone, as some documents (e.g., PDFs) are much easier to read on a large computer screen… We’ve tried to use common fonts, etc. to minimize display issues.

Note 2: For past Newsletter issues see the archives from 2023, 2024, 2025, & 2026. To accommodate numerous requests received about prior articles over all fifteen plus years of the Newsletter, we’ve put this together — where you can search ALL prior issues, by year. For a background about how the Newsletter is put together, etc., please read this.

Note 3: See this extensive list of reasonable books on climate change. As a parallel effort, we have also put together a list of some good books related to industrial wind energy. Both topics are also extensively covered on my website: WiseEnergy.org.

Note 4: I am not an attorney or a physician, so no material appearing in any of the Newsletters (or any of my websites) should be construed as giving legal or medical advice. My recommendation has always been: consult a competent, licensed attorney when you are involved with legal issues, and consult a competent physician regarding medical matters.

Copyright © 2026; Alliance for Wise Energy Decisions (see WiseEnergy.org).

Obama Judge Orders Postal Service To Defy Trump’s Mail-In Ballot Executive Order

An Obama-appointed judge once again temporarily barred the U.S. Postal Service from carrying out President Donald Trump’s restrictions on mail-in ballots in a Thursday ruling.

U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani lifted a preliminary injunction Wednesday after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that some of Trump’s limits could remain in place. The judge issued a new ruling reversing the previous decision, arguing that USPS overstepped its legal mandate, which once again blocked Trump’s rule.

Trump signed an executive order on March 31 titled, “Ensuring Citizenship Verification and Integrity in Federal Elections,” which established certain rules for the USPS regarding mail-in and absentee ballots. Section 3 of the executive order required all outgoing election mail to be marked as “Official Election Mail,” including a unique Intelligent Mail barcode and be pre-approved by the USPS for design and barcode placement.

“Where a state or local election official does not obtain envelope and return envelope design approval, or does not upload voter information, or does not include unique intelligent mail bar codes on ballot envelopes, the U.S.P.S. will not mail ballots to voters,” the ruling stated. Talwani argued that Congress did not delegate authority to the USPS to regulate election mail. She argued the rules would prevent citizens from voting by mail unless the USPS approved the ballots in a timely manner.

The judge further argued that imposing these rules on the states is unconstitutional. She placed a fourteen-day stay on the “implementation or enforcement” of the rules, which prevents USPS from taking these steps ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. “The court finds Plaintiffs likely to succeed on the merits of their claims that (1) the USPS lacked authority to issue the Final Rule; (2) the Final Rule is unconstitutional in imposing these requirements on the States; and (3) the Final Rule is unconstitutional in prohibiting non-compliant State and local officials from using the United States Postal Service to mail ballots,” the judge said.

A court in California issued a similar injunction, which reached the Supreme Court in the case, Trump v. California. The high court stayed the injunction, allowing the administration to move forward with the executive order.

©2026 . All rights reserved.

Public Safety Should Be the Sleeper Issue of the Midterms

Some people might question the wisdom of putting Donald Trump on the campaign trail with his dubious approval ratings, but it’s proving to be one of the smartest moves Republicans have made. The president may not be on the ballot, but his ability to accomplish his agenda over the next two years is — and putting Trump in front of voters helps remind America of that. It’s also a rare chance to cut through the media’s criticism and highlight where the administration has delivered — i.e. the progress we stand to lose if Democrats retake control. And the crackdown on crime should be at the top of the list.

After all those months of hysteria over the National Guard’s deployment to out-of-control cities, Americans have taken it for granted that public safety has undergone a shocking revival. Sure, there are still dangerous hot spots — largely in blue states where leftists refuse to accept help or implement any meaningful reforms — but it shouldn’t be lost on voters that we’re experiencing the lowest violent crime rate in 100 years.

And yet, as The Washington Times points out, the president never seems to get any credit for this. If anything, Jeff Mordock laments, he’s “a victim of his own success when it comes to crime. In fact, the administration’s efforts have been so successful that the topic has “fade[d] from the national conversation,” replaced by complaints about affordability and the Iran war. It’s unfair when you consider the miraculous turnaround our nation is experiencing on what were once sky-high rates of murder, human trafficking, robberies, carjackings, rapes, and more.

According to the FBI, these past 20 months of Trump have yielded incredible gains compared to Joe Biden’s last year in office.

  • “The homicide rate has dropped roughly 16%, to 4.1 per 100,000 people from 4.9 per 100,000.
  • “Violent crime arrests are up 90% to 53,969, compared with 28,405.
  • “Law enforcement officers seized 7,183 pounds of fentanyl, an 8% increase from 6,651 pounds.
  • “They located and identified 11,081 child victims, a 21% increase.
  • “Lawmen arrested 5,072 child predators and human traffickers, a 13% increase.
  • “They arrested 4,260 members of foreign terrorist organizations, a 38% increase.
  • “They stopped 1,038 people from carrying out a terrorist attack.
  • “All 10 people on the FBI’s Most Wanted list on the day Mr. Trump took office were captured.”

Now, what was once a front-burner issue for Americans has fallen somewhat off the radar. Even at the end of last year, Gallup found that 49% of people consider crime “an extremely or very serious problem,” down a whopping 14 points from two years ago (63%). That shift has almost certainly been credited to Republicans, who voters rightly trust much more with crime policy (43%) than Democrats (29%).

And yet, in this major clash of ideologies we call the midterm elections, the headlines would have us believe that Americans are ready to trade in the GOP majority for a Democratic Party that wants to abolish prisons, defund the police, and reopen the border so that criminals can stream back across unchecked. What madness.

Unlike other voter concerns, public safety touches everyone — but it should hold an especially significant place in the priorities of urban families, where crime is more prevalent. For years, they’ve paid the price for the indifferent attitudes of Democratic mayors and governors who let their cities burn as some sort of misguided protest to Trump. And as much as people may have disliked the optics of sending in the National Guard and law enforcement to clean up our communities, Politico points out, “history shows they dislike feeling unsafe even more. Expanding homeless encampments and drug overdoses in plain view have left many of them fearful.”

Last year, at the height of his Make America Safer Again push, CNN’s Harry Enten combed through the polling on crime “and declared that Trump is ‘like Air Jordan towering over [former President] Joe Biden’ on crime issues. While Biden was underwater on crime by 26 points in 2024, Trump had a plus-one favorability on the matter in August, just before his National Guard moves. ‘Americans are far more hawkish on crime than a lot of Democrats want to admit,’” Enten warned.

Jeff Werniak, deputy police chief in Posen, Illinois, told the Times that the Trump administration didn’t just stop at “street policing.” He’s leveraging the full force of the federal government to take on everything from the cartels and human traffickers to violent gangs and Islamist terrorists. “They’re actually going the extra mile to find [criminals],” he emphasized. “These guys are in hunting mode, and they’re in a preventive mode. They’re going and looking for crime. I would say maybe 99% of the crime reduction is because of the Trump administration.”

Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.), who insists the polling predicting a Democratic blowout “is wrong,” maintains that this is one area where Republicans have a serious edge. As he travels to dozens of states, meeting with locals, he underscored that people don’t want Democratic Socialists reversing all of the gains Trump and the GOP have made to make their neighborhoods more secure. “They like what they’re seeing,” he told Family Research Council President Tony Perkins on “This Week on Capitol Hill.” “They like safer streets. They like the fact that we have the lowest violent crime rate in 126 years. It makes their children and grandchildren safer, and they’re going to vote accordingly,”

AUTHOR

Suzanne Bowdey

Suzanne Bowdey serves as editorial director and senior writer at The Washington Stand.

EDITORS NOTE: This Washington Stand column is republished with permission. All rights reserved. ©2026 Family Research Council.


The Washington Stand is Family Research Council’s outlet for news and commentary from a biblical worldview. The Washington Stand is based in Washington, D.C. and is published by FRC, whose mission is to advance faith, family, and freedom in public policy and the culture from a biblical worldview. We invite you to stand with us by partnering with FRC.

16-Year-Old Female Athlete files federal lawsuit under Title IX and U.S. Constitution to defend her rights to play on girls sports teams without being forced to compete with biological males

ANN ARBOR, MI — The Thomas More Law Center (“TMLC”), a national nonprofit public interest law firm based in Ann Arbor, Michigan, filed a federal civil rights lawsuit on Friday (10/09), against Michigan’s Monroe Public Schools District, the Michigan High School Athletic Association (MHSAA), and the District’s Superintendent and Athletic Director, on behalf of 16-year-old tenth grader Briley Lechner and her father, Sean Lechner. Briley has been on Monroe High School’s Varsity girls’ volleyball team since ninth grade.

The lawsuit alleges that school officials knowingly concealed from the Monroe High School girls’ volleyball team and their parents that the September 9, 2025, match with Ann Arbor’s Skyline High School would involve a biological male (transgender female).

Briley commented, “My goal is to preserve opportunities and safety for female athletes, ensuring that sports remain a space where girls can compete fairly, achieve their potential, and feel safe.”

Briley’s father added, “Our daughters should never have to stand alone while the adults entrusted to protect them stay silent. As a father, I will not remain silent.”

The Complaint further alleges that school officials attempted to justify their conduct, rejected the Plaintiffs’ formal Title IX discrimination complaint, and then deprived plaintiffs of a meaningful administrative appeal.

Although Briley was disheartened by the manner in which her local District Board Members treated her claims, she received glowing support from high-profile national figures like Riley Gaines, the prominent collegiate swimmer who gained attention when she campaigned against biological men in women’s sports, and Kim Jones, co-founder of the National Independent Council of Women Sports (ICONS). Briley was also presented the “Courageous Voice Award” by U.S. Congressman Tim Walberg “for speaking up for female athletes.”

Briley Lechner and Riley Gaines

“This lawsuit is about much more than a single volleyball game,” said Richard Thompson, President and Chief Counsel of the Thomas More Law Center. “It’s about whether public school officials can, with deliberative indifference, knowingly sacrifice the rights of female athletes to accommodate a biological male athlete, conceal that decision from the girls and their parents, and then evade accountability under federal law and the U.S. Constitution.”

School Officials Allegedly Knew but Kept Girls and Parents in the Dark

According to the federal Complaint, on September 9, 2025, Monroe High School’s girls’ volleyball team competed against Ann Arbor Skyline High School, which included a biological male (transgender female).

Monroe’s Athletic Director, Chet Hesson, and school coaching personnel knew about the opposing player’s biological sex a day before the competition but did not disclose that fact to Monroe’s female athletes or their parents.

The Complaint further alleges that without informing Monroe’s athletes, the biological male was permitted to use intimate locker room facilities designated for Monroe’s female athletes.

The lawsuit challenges the District’s administration of its girls’ athletic program under Title IX and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

“Title IX was enacted to protect girls and women from sex discrimination in education,” Thompson stated. “It was not enacted to allow school officials to disregard the very distinctions that make equal athletic opportunities for girls possible.”

Plaintiffs’ Complaint Rejected as “Unsubstantiated”

The resulting determination by Superintendent Shaw and the Monroe District Board of Directors characterized the allegations as “unsubstantiated.”

The Complaint challenges both the District’s response and the constitutionality of the procedures employed in reaching that determination.

According to the Complaint, critical portions of the investigation, including witness identities and their statements, were withheld from plaintiffs, impairing their ability to meaningfully challenge the District’s conclusions.

The Monroe Board of Education Refused to Decide the Appeal

The lawsuit also challenges the conduct of the Monroe Public Schools Board of Education.

Under the District’s established procedures, the Board was responsible for considering the plaintiffs’ appeal of the Superintendent’s determination and vote on it at open session.

Instead, according to the Complaint, Board members discussed the matter in closed session and subsequently adjourned without publicly deciding the merits of the appeal.

The District thereafter claimed the Superintendent’s determination of “unsubstantiated” was affirmed by the Board because no one voted on it.

“The Board of Education was supposed to provide an independent review of the plaintiffs’ complaint,” Thompson said. “Instead, the plaintiffs’ appeal was subjected to a parliamentary maneuver in which the Board refused to decide the very issues it was responsible for reviewing and deciding. A right to appeal means little if the officials responsible for deciding the appeal simply refuse to act.”

©2026 . All rights reserved.

RELATED ARTICLE: Mediocre Runner Becomes a Champion

National Energy Dominance Month, 2026

 

BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

A PROCLAMATION

America’s abundant energy resources are the backbone of our booming economy and the foundation of our enduring prosperity.  During National Energy Dominance Month, we recommit to unleashing the full might of America’s vast natural resources, strengthening our Nation’s energy independence, and ushering in a new era of American energy dominance.

In less than 2 years since returning to office, my Administration has transformed the United States into the most dominant energy superpower in the history of the world.  We have reversed the disastrous oil, gas, and vehicle regulations that crippled our industries, burdened consumers, and stifled economic growth, including rescinding the Obama-era Endangerment Finding this past February — a ruling that handed Washington bureaucrats sweeping power to over regulate our vehicles and power plants in the name of climate alarmism.  Its repeal stands as the single largest deregulatory action in American history.

We have unleashed millions of acres of Federal land for oil, gas, and coal production, approving over 6,000 drilling permits — more than in any year in over a decade.  We have also committed over $1 billion to the revitalization of America’s beautiful, clean coal industry; saved over 100 coal plants; ended the freeze on new natural gas export terminals; secured historic investments in nuclear energy; ended the Green New Scam; and withdrawn from the restrictive international climate agreements crafted by globalist politicians to plunder our wealth and undermine our sovereignty.  We are also restoring the reliable, affordable power America needs to lead the world in manufacturing, super intelligence, and advanced technology; cutting the red tape that has delayed critical generation and grid infrastructure; strengthening our electric system; and ensuring that American workers and businesses have the abundant power needed to build, innovate, and compete — without depending on foreign adversaries or unreliable energy schemes.

Last month, my Administration took a historic step in achieving America’s full energy potential by securing the largest oil deal in all of human history.  This landmark agreement gives our Nation majority control of more than 65 billion barrels of proven oil reserves in Venezuela — vastly increasing America’s oil supply, asserting our unrivaled power in the Western Hemisphere, and securing our energy dominance for the next century and beyond.

While this work is far from finished, our energy industry and hardworking families are reaping the benefits of these tremendous actions.  America achieved record domestic oil and gas production along with record levels of liquefied natural gas exports in 2025, and 2026 is on pace to shatter those records once again.  Under my leadership, American energy is roaring back to life with new pipelines, export terminals, power plants, and nuclear reactors set to come online across the country, creating thousands of new high-paying jobs for American workers in the years ahead.  As President, I will continue fighting to drive down the cost of the energy that fills our tanks and powers our homes, and I will not rest until the full benefits of American prosperity are felt in every home across our land.  On March 4, 2026, I arranged for the Ratepayer Protection Pledge, addressing electric power affordability for American households and businesses.

This month, we pledge to continue to chart a bold new course for American energy — harnessing the extraordinary abundance beneath our soil and securing a future of strength, prosperity, and independence.  Our Nation’s energy renaissance is only just beginning, and the best is still yet to come.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim October 2026 as National Energy Dominance Month. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this seventh day of October, in the year of our Lord two thousand twenty-six, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and fifty-first.

DONALD J. TRUMP

RELATED:

National Energy Dominance Month, 2025

Establishing the National Energy Dominance Council

President Trump’s Powerful Leadership Highlights American Strength as Energy Dominance Delivers Global Stability

American Energy Dominance Is Back Under President Trump

Fact Sheet: President Donald J. Trump Establishes the National Energy Dominance Council

©2026 . All rights reserved.

Secretary of War Pete Hegseth Delivers ‘State of the Force’ Address, Outlines Series of New Initiatives

Pentagon News  — Secretary of War Pete Hegseth delivered a speech on the status of the military today, during which he announced six new initiatives for the War Department.

Speaking to both a broadcast audience and 600 O-3 officers and E-6 enlisted service members at Marine Corps Base Quantico, Virginia, Hegseth began by recounting the successful progress he has seen across the department over the past year.

“For almost two years, you’ve heard me talk — over and over — about three core priorities: reviving the warrior ethos, rebuilding our military and reestablishing deterrence.

And I’m proud to stand on this stage and report that the warrior ethos has been revived, our military is being rebuilt and American deterrence is back,” he said early in his remarks.

The secretary went on to emphasize the high recruitment and retention numbers over the past year, mention that military standards that existed in 1990 are back in 2026 and discuss the “E-6/O-3 Rule” — the concept that asks whether a policy, procedure or decision helps or hinders the operational effectiveness and daily reality of an E-6 and/or O-3.

“We fight to win. Clear missions, full hearts, hands untied. It’s all I ever wanted as a platoon leader, and it’s all my E-6 squad leaders ever wanted. … We let our leaders fight their formations, and then we have their back. It’s simple, yet you know in your business it’s incredibly powerful and liberating,” Hegseth said.

After recapping the past year and reemphasizing the War Department’s priorities of strengthening the warrior ethos, rebuilding the military and maintaining peace through strength via deterrence, Hegseth outlined his six new initiatives:

  • The creation of a new 4-star level combatant command: Autonomous Warfare Command.  Memo
  • An effort to study the future of warfare titled “Project Meridian.” Memo
  • A future program that aims to align basing and infrastructure projects to ensure they are collectively advancing toward greater independence titled, federal operations for resilience, troop resources, energy, supply and survivability, or “Fortress America.” Memo
  • Calling for a new, state-of-the-art military installation through a project titled, “The Next Great American Base.” Memo
  • Expanding the ranks of future leaders commissioning into the joint force through a program that expands military training beyond the country’s military service academies and six military colleges to additional institutions of higher learning, titled “America’s Corps of Cadets.” Memo
  • Establishing an Office of Religious Affairs. Memo

Regarding the new combatant command, Autowarcom, Hegseth said that once established, it will focus on building autonomous and robotic capabilities across the joint force in “the fastest peacetime shift in modern history.”

Additionally, the secretary announced that he has directed the direct reporting portfolio manager for unmanned systems to lead “Project Agincourt,” an organization that will establish the pathway for Autowarcom, as well as to execute the existing unmanned systems mission while prototyping a new acquisition model.

Hegseth also said new military occupational specialties will be created in each military department to support the shift to autonomy.

“Today, with … Autowarcom, we institutionalize — and we supercharge — the era of [super intelligence], robotics and autonomous systems, all in order to win,” he said.

Turning next to Project Meridian, Hegseth said the Pentagon’s chief technology officer would partner with members of the private sector to study the future of warfare, and that the project is not about developing new strategies or policies.

“Rather, its purpose is to creatively look into the future and identify the domains we must conquer, and capabilities we must master … to achieve technological and military dominance on the battlefield for decades to come; it is futuristic, on purpose,” Hegseth said.

Regarding the Fortress America program, Hegseth said it calls for every American military installation to eventually run under its own power, hardening every installation on American soil against intrusion and bringing critical supply chains home.

“No matter the circumstance, this department will have the power, the equipment and the supplies you need to take the fight to the enemy. … The Department of War will be the insurance policy for the entire nation,” he said.

Hegseth’s talk of Fortress America then segued into discussing the concept behind The Next Great American Base project, which he said will be a dynamic, self-sustaining power projection platform, and that leaders of every state in the union would be able to provide a “sales pitch” as to why the new installation should be in their state.

“If your state wants the honor of hosting 15,000 to 25,000 of America’s great troops, show us why and how you’re going to do it — cutting through the red tape, offering up the land and rolling out the red carpet for our military families,” Hegseth said.

Regarding America’s Corps of Cadets, the secretary said the Pentagon is partnering with six universities to increase the number of leaders who can commission into the military.

“By embedding continuous military discipline and leadership development into new institutions — by growing our Corps of Cadets — the War Department will ensure our republic is defended by even more officers of unwavering character and patriotism,” Hegseth said.

Turning to his final of the six initiatives, that of the Office of Religious Affairs, Hegseth said religious services in the military have been neglected and bureaucratized for too long.

“Ninety-five percent of our force recognizes an Almighty God. Accordingly, our department has a sacred duty: first-class religious support, wherever we send our warriors,” Hegseth said. He also noted that the new office will report directly to the secretary of war’s office to cut through red tape.

“This is not going to be a paper-pushing shop; it’s going to have real teeth. It’ll protect budgets, demand infrastructure and strengthen religious support,” Hegseth said.

The secretary emphasized that the six announcements were all for the warfighters, as he and the War Department view them as the top 1% of society.

“You are warriors; with that title comes great expectations. So, go forth this day and do good things, hard things. President [Donald J.] Trump has your back, and so do I,” Hegseth said.

“We are the War Department, and we never back down — Godspeed,” he concluded.

Today’s State of the Force speech came exactly one year to the day since Hegseth announced a series of new directives aimed at strengthening the War Department’s people and culture to the U.S. military’s most senior leaders, also at Quantico.


Read Speech: STATE OF THE FORCE ADDRESS

Secretary of War Pete Hegseth’s State of the Force Address (As Delivered)


Watch: STATE OF THE FORCE ADDRESS


©2026 . All rights reserved.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Secretary Hegseth Announces Six Major Initiatives at Quantico Speech

The United States Air Force Academy Is Training Warriors Again

Civilian Tenure Is Out at America’s Military Service Academies—Why It Matters

New President of The Citadel Gen. McKenzie: “I will be relentless — relentless — in the pursuit of excellence.”

Establishment of the Office of Religious Affairs

Here’s Why the SCOTUS Ruling on Voter Verification Matters, One Expert Says

Last week, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled in a 6-3 decision that the Trump administration can continue to use a modified systematic alien verification database to confirm the citizenship of voters. Experts say the ruling could play a crucial role in securing the integrity of the midterm elections.

“The fact that DHS and this administration is going to utilize the information it gathered to try and help clean up some of these voter rolls and prevent illegal aliens from getting ballots in the first place is a huge step forward,” Hogan Gidley, vice chair of secure elections policy at America First Policy Institute, said during a Monday appearance on “Washington Watch with Tony Perkins.”

In March, President Donald Trump directed the Department of Homeland Security to put a system in place allowing state and local governments to prevent illegal immigrants from voting in elections.

According to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, the Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements initiative, known as SAVE, “uses online systems to check information about a benefit applicant’s immigration status or naturalized or derived United States citizenship against records contained in relevant immigration databases.”

In June, SAVE was blocked by U.S. District Judge Sparkle Sooknanan in Washington, D.C. Sooknanan, a Biden appointee, wrote in her opinion, “All in all, the federal government has knowingly trampled on the privacy rights of American citizens in a manner that threatens the sacred right to vote. This Court cannot stand idly by while that happens,” leading to a halt in the initiative.

Gidley explained that SAVE exists to protect the integrity of U.S. elections. “Democrats have taken the wrong side of so many of these issues. Instead of standing up with safe and secure American communities, they’re fine with letting out criminals. Instead of saying, ‘We need to make sure these elections are protected,’ they’re fine with putting people on the [voter] rolls that don’t need to be there.”

The election security expert contended that other countries have safeguards against noncitizens voting, and America should be no exception. “We have way too many people in this country casting ballots that don’t have a right to do so. … I don’t think if you went to Germany, they would let you vote in their elections, or France. You couldn’t vote in their elections, or [in] Italy for that matter. So, the fact [that] we let people in this country who are not citizens vote in our elections is absolutely insane. And a vast majority of the American people know that, and [Democrats] reject it.”

In July, a Fox News poll found that roughly 83% favor requiring photo identification to register to vote and 77% to cast a ballot. “Support for requiring photo ID to vote has remained consistently high, between 77% to 85%, in Fox News polling since 2011,” the network additionally reported.

Gidley asserted that the SCOTUS ruling could help move the needle in the right direction, just weeks before what some predict could be a “bloodbath” midterm election cycle. “When I’m on TV and these liberal reporters say there was some illegal voting… but it’s not enough to affect the outcome of the election, I say, ‘First of all, how many illegal votes are okay? Is it one? Is it 100? Because a single illegal vote that is cast by someone who doesn’t have a right to do so cancels out your vote.’ And I think that’s quite frankly egregious.”

“But moving forward, I think this election cycle is going to be clunky because a lot of these states are going to try and fight against it,” Gidley added. “Blue states aren’t going to accept it, per usual. They’re going to fight the courts and allow people who shouldn’t vote the opportunity to do so. And I think that’s just wrong.”

AUTHOR

Quinn Delamater

Quinn Delamater is a reporter for The Washington Stand.

RELATED ARTICLE: Illegal Voting in Georgia Just the Tip of the Iceberg, DOJ Offers More Evidence

EDITORS NOTE: This Washington Stand column is republished with permission. All rights reserved. ©2026 Family Research Council.


The Washington Stand is Family Research Council’s outlet for news and commentary from a biblical worldview. The Washington Stand is based in Washington, D.C. and is published by FRC, whose mission is to advance faith, family, and freedom in public policy and the culture from a biblical worldview. We invite you to stand with us by partnering with FRC.

Capital One Credit Card Madness

“You can examine the whole 19th century from the point of view of who would have maxed out their credit cards. Emma Bovary would have maxed hers out. No question. Mr. Scrooge would not have. He would have snipped his up.” — Margaret Atwood

“Although we leave traces of our personal lives with our credit cards and Web browsers today, tomorrow’s mobile devices will broadcast clouds of personal data to invisible monitors all around us.” — Howard Rheingold

“The National Security Agency (NSA) has built an infrastructure that allows it to intercept almost everything. With this capability, the vast majority of human communications are automatically ingested without targeting. If I wanted to see your emails or your wife’s phone, all I have to do is use intercepts. I can get your emails, passwords, phone records, credit cards.” — Edward Snowden


The world has gotten weird.  No, this isn’t about politics, the war, or the conquering of America by the commies and jihadis.  It is about a nightmare from Hades that my husband and I went through when Capital One bought Discover Credit Card.  The purchase was finalized in May of 2025 valued at over $50 billion.

I have come to believe that every business has hired DEI (Diversity, Equity and Inclusion) personnel and now the taxpaying citizens of America are reaping the dire consequences of their stupidity.

There are 10 top credit cards that do not have yearly fees.  The number one listed card was Discover.  For 36 years we used our Discover card when traveling, when making web and local purchases and so forth.  No problem.  I would check the card’s usage on the web from time to time and had caught fraud in the past.  When I reported it, or when the card company called me about fraud, they’d send us out new cards within a day.  Super service.

After the purchase by Capital One, I found that I could not get into their website.  When I called them and asked why, I was told that I needed permission from the primary card holder, my husband.  After working for Fortune 100 companies for decades and owning my own business for 36 years, I blew a gasket.  Um-hmm.  The person on the other end of the phone said all I needed to do was have my husband call and tell them that I could get into the account.

He lied!

One Friday we spent an hour and 45 minutes on the phone with this Capital One person asking my husband for every piece of information he could give them, and he wanted it put through the cell phone, including a selfie.  Yes, really.  Well, that didn’t work for whatever reason, so he tells my husband to go on the website and put in his social security number.  I immediately told the fellow he was crazy.  In today’s society, NO ONE with an ounce of brain matter would put their SS#, CC# or any other personal numbers on the web because of identity theft.  If hackers can break into the Pentagon, they can break into your computer.

We hung up.

Two weeks later we called again and got a woman who was able to allow me into the web account without my husband’s personal information all the way back to when he was potty trained.  So, okay, that’s good, I thought.

Wrong again.

I was then told that we would each have separate card numbers.  Why?  They explained that parents who add their children want to watch what their children are purchasing. We have no children at home or on our credit cards, and we’ve been married 43 years, so we don’t need two credit card numbers.

Tough beans, that’s the way it is. Okay fine.

Next up, I’m looking at the website and I see a defunct credit card is being used that was cancelled long ago by Discover.  What the!  So, I call them again and ask why a formerly fraudulent card is being used by people who charge monthly when it is no longer valid.  They tell me, “Sorry, but all information from Discover didn’t ‘port-over,’ (i.e., transfer into Capital One,) and you’ll have to call the people and tell them not to use that card number.”

Other credit cards, like DISCOVER, would automatically disallow the usage of the old card number, but not Capital One.  I asked why they didn’t do that, but the story was again that it was a previous card for monthly charges and they would honor it.  I screamed, “But some of these charges were purposely dropped when the card number was changed and now, they’re getting my money when I don’t want them to have it.”  “Well,” the guy says, “As I stated, it is your responsibility to call them and cancel the card.”

My blood pressure rose and steam escaped.

Meanwhile, back at the ranch, my husband and I traveled to Florida for a week and when we arrived at the hotel on a Sunday evening, we used our L.L. Bean Mastercard rather than Capital One which we’d decided to cancel.  The Mastercard was declined.  I was infuriated…as we pay all our bills in full every month.  We used Capital One. Grrrr.

On Monday morning I called Mastercard and asked why the card was declined.  She told me because it was charging in another state.  I said, “So what, it’s our card to use anywhere.”  She said, “Oh no, when you travel, you must call us and tell us where you’re traveling so we can okay the use of the card, otherwise we believe it is fraud.”  That was a new one on me.  She then asked me for my special word so she’d know it was me.  I said I can’t remember the word.  (They’re supposed to give you a hint, like your favorite dog’s name, but she did not.)  Then she says, “Well, give me the account number you pay your checks to us with.”  I said, “Lady, I have my credit cards, I don’t carry my household checkbook with me when we travel.”

No dice.  I had to wait until we were home and I called again and this time the woman said, “What’s the name of your favorite dog?”  I named all nine we’d had and she said, “Bingo, you named the one.”  Sheesh.

In talking to a friend in Florida, she told us that she and her husband have a big motor home and they had to call the credit card company to tell them they were traveling from Florida to the Carolinas.  Well, they stopped for gasoline for the big motorhome in Georgia and their card was declined.  She got on the phone and told the bimbo on the other end that to get to the Carolinas, you have to travel through Georgia.  That is how absolutely dysfunctional these credit card companies have become.

I’m thinking, “DEI again.”

Oh yes, I know the fraud is outrageous and especially with the illegal alien infusion over Biden’s four years and yes, I have had checks I’ve sent via the USPS that have been stolen, then washed and rewritten and deposited in the perp’s account via their cell phone.  Fortunately, our bank found the scoundrel and got our money back.  But you’d think that the card companies would know who pays their bills every month in full and who are financially stable, but they don’t.  So once again good people suffer because of the criminal elements or because of people who abuse their cards and don’t pay their bills.

There are eight million stories in the Naked City…this was just one.

Yes, and there are nightmares every day that decent people have to spend their time straightening out.  Anyone out there know a good credit card company with no annual fees?

Unfortunately, there is more in the nightmare category.

©2026 . All rights reserved.


Watch for my next article entitled, The Decay of Our Culture.

Who Watches the AI Watchmen?

Consider a technology available worldwide that helps a lone hacker run operations that once required teams of experts, outperforms Ph.D. scientists on some specialized questions, and carries out complex tasks without continuous human direction.

Now consider that the institutions charged with certifying that technology as safe may fail to detect what it can really do.

That is today’s reality, and it raises the central accountability question of the AI age.

Britain’s AI Security Institute last December published the results of two years of testing the world’s most advanced AI systems. It found that performance in some areas is doubling roughly every eight months. In 2025, it tested the first model able to complete expert-level cyber tasks that normally require more than a decade of human experience.

In chemistry and biology, the institute reports that frontier models have surpassed Ph.D.-level experts on some specialized questions and can now provide real-time laboratory support. The most advanced systems tested can autonomously complete software tasks that would take a human expert more than an hour.

Those capabilities could accelerate medical research, strengthen cyber defenses, and advance science. They also cut both ways.

A system that helps a defender discover a software vulnerability may help an attacker find one. A model that assists a legitimate scientist can also lower barriers for someone with destructive intentions. An autonomous agent that efficiently completes a business task can also execute the wrong task at extraordinary speed and scale.

That danger has already left the laboratory.

Anthropic reported this month that suspected state-sponsored groups, criminals, and other malicious actors used its Claude models in cyber operations. Its own heading says it plainly: “From assistant to orchestrator.”

Anthropic found multi-agent frameworks conducting reconnaissance, exploitation, and data theft against multiple targets in parallel, some running for hours or days with minimal human supervision. In one case, a single hacktivist targeting European political parties, media outlets, and think tanks gained access to at least 14 of 42 organizations. Humans still selected the targets and reviewed results, an important qualification. But Anthropic concluded that AI lowers the skill and labor sophisticated cyber operations require while multiplying their speed and scale.

That is the first danger: human beings using ever more capable AI for destructive purposes.

The second danger is harder to manage: the machines themselves.

A new United Nations scientific panel report examined AI agents used during OpenAI’s cybersecurity training and evaluations between May and July. According to the panel, the agents bypassed network restrictions, communicated across runs intended to remain separate, exploited weaknesses in their evaluation environment, concealed some of their actions, and reached beyond the test into systems run by OpenAI and Hugging Face. No human directed the individual steps.

The panel declines to predict when, or whether, severe loss of control might come. It warns, however, that stopping this incident proves nothing about controlling more capable agents, and that greater capability helps misaligned systems find loopholes and hide.

That warning goes to the heart of AI evaluation. A system that can hide its behavior from an evaluator can earn a passing grade it does not deserve.

If an accounting firm overlooks a financial irregularity, investors can lose money. If an aircraft inspector misses a defect, passengers can die.

What happens if evaluators misjudge an AI system able to operate across computer networks, assist advanced biological research, or eventually touch critical infrastructure and military systems?

Such a failure would not stay inside a laboratory. It could reach financial networks, power grids and, eventually, battlefields.

Google, OpenAI, and Anthropic are reportedly planning an independent body tentatively called the Standards Authority for Frontier AI, or SAFA, to develop common standards for evaluating advanced models. Governments are also building their own evaluation capabilities.

In Washington, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) this month published an evaluation manual combining model testing, red teaming, and testing with actual users.

Neither effort, however, solves the accountability problem.

Who determines whether an evaluator is qualified? Who pays it? SAFA’s founders are the very companies whose models it would judge. How much access does the evaluator receive? Can it disclose a serious problem the developer would rather keep confidential? What happens when an evaluator and developer disagree? Most important: Can today’s tests reliably detect dangerous capabilities in tomorrow’s more powerful systems?

Calling something independent does not make it independent. An Army unit does not declare itself combat-ready after grading its own exercise; outside evaluators test whether it actually is.

Nor is government automatically the answer. Regulators can misunderstand technology, become captured by the industries they supervise or write rules that shield established corporations from smaller competitors. International institutions bring another problem: many nations do not share America’s interests or values.

No institution is staffed by infallible people, and Scripture anticipated the problem.

“The one who states his case first seems right, until the other comes and examines him,” Proverbs 18:17 (ESV) tells us.

Solomon had disputes among men in mind. The principle governs the AI laboratory just as surely.

The builder should not be the only judge of what he builds. The evaluator should itself be subject to scrutiny. Government authority requires accountability. And extraordinary claims of safety require extraordinary evidence when the consequences reach far beyond the laboratory.

In “The Final Algorithm,” I warn that machine-driven systems present themselves as objective and authoritative. A safety certificate from an unaccountable evaluator does the same. It borrows trust it has not earned.

Panic is unwarranted. Today’s AI systems have not demonstrated that catastrophic loss of human control is inevitable.

Complacency is more dangerous. We already know capabilities are advancing rapidly, malicious actors are exploiting them, and autonomous systems sometimes act in ways their designers did not anticipate.

Who watches the AI watchmen matters. What happens to the rest of us if they fail matters more.

Artificial intelligence may become one of mankind’s most consequential tools. A free people should demand more than assurances that these systems are safe. We should demand proof, tested by evaluators who answer to someone other than the builders.

AUTHOR

Robert Maginnis

Robert Maginnis is a retired U.S. Army lieutenant colonel, senior fellow for National Security at Family Research Council, and the author of 15 books. His latest, “The Final Algorithm,” was released in July 2026.

EDITORS NOTE: This Washington Stand column is republished with permission. All rights reserved. ©2026 Family Research Council.


The Washington Stand is Family Research Council’s outlet for news and commentary from a biblical worldview. The Washington Stand is based in Washington, D.C. and is published by FRC, whose mission is to advance faith, family, and freedom in public policy and the culture from a biblical worldview. We invite you to stand with us by partnering with FRC.

Dear Floridians Vote Yes on Amendment 3

A couple of items caught my attention this week. I want to share them with you.

SCOTUS finally made a ruling that will help secure elections and eliminate some fraud. Yeah SCOTUS.

On the economic front, manufacturing is coming back to America. I believe this is the only way to eliminate dependency on country who hate America. Dr. Peter Navarro has emphasized the need for the U.S. to develop alternatives to rare earth elements to reduce dependence on China. He argues that innovation in materials science could lead to viable substitutes, enhancing national security and economic independence. looks like we are going to follow that road.

Wake up America. Wake up Florida. Study this image of the NGO’s who have been sucking our budgets dry.  Want to know why counties have no money, this is one of the reasons. These NGO’s are going around Florida lying by telling the people to vote NO on Amendment 3. Why? They want to continue to be funded. They want to continue to keep their fancy cars, boats and homes at our expense.  They want you to vote to keep your taxes high.  Tell them what you think by Voting Yes on Amendment 3

Vote Yes on Amendment 3

AMENDMENT 3 states”  This amendment increases the homestead exemption, for all non-school taxes, to $150,000 in 2027 and $250,000 in 2028, and adjusts for inflation thereafter. It requires the Legislature to prescribe a uniform procedure for counties and municipalities, for their respective levies, to increase the homestead exemption up to full assessed value, and allows special districts, subject to referendum approval, to do the same. Persons who are not Florida residents on December 31, 2026, will receive the existing homestead exemption upon qualifying for a homestead exemption, with the increased homestead exemption beginning with the fifth year of exemption, to the extent permitted by the U.S. Constitution. This amendment reduces the annual cap on assessment increases for non-homestead properties from 10% to 5%.

This amendment requires counties and municipalities to use property taxes solely for public safety, education and schools, infrastructure, natural resources, bond debt service, retirement benefits for employees, and operations and administration. Other expenditures may be approved by county officers or county or municipal governing bodies unless prohibited by general law, notwithstanding Article VII, Section 9(a) of the Florida Constitution, which allows counties and municipalities to levy property taxes for their respective purposes. This amendment takes effect January 1, 2027. I don’t see NGO’s mentioned, do you?

What is an NGO? Non-Government Organization. That means NOT ELECTED yet they continue to influence our legislators with policies that benefit them not us.

If they are NON-Government what does that mean. They are not part of the budget unless legislators choose to give them money. Why give them money? Because part of that funding in the form of grants, stipends, subsidies and tax right offs go back to the election campaigns of the legislators passing the policies favorable to them. 

I also have been hearing from some that they are not voting in the Florida Gubernatorial election.  Bad idea. Why would I say that when I am not a (R) Byron Donald’s fan. Because (D) David Jolly is worse.  Evan Power, RPOF Chairman did a great job of destroying the Republican party. But putting a Democrat in power is far worse.

You can’t complain and fix anything, if you don’t participate.  This is a game of patience. It took a long time for Americans to see how bad the corruption in both parties was. It will never be fixed overnight. But giving up which is the same as not voting is not an option.

Who is DEM David Jolly?

Do an evaluation in your state. Here is mine in Florida. Who is DEM David Jolly? He was a Republican turned Democrat. What does he stand for. In his own words he wants:

  1. Anti-Gun– Jolly wants massive gun control.
  2. Ban on Oil and Gas – you think prices are high now
  3. Anti-School Choice – Jolly wants ignorant drones who hate America, G-d and Family
  4. DEI – Incompetence will be back again with more race hate
  5. Gender Ideology– More studies out of how to destroy your children
  6. Boys in Girls Sports– More degrading of women, stealing their chances to be winners
  7. Vote By Phone – More corruption
  8. No plan to cut taxes – lots of plans to raise taxes.

David has refused to debate Byron. I wonder what he is afraid of.

To hear Jolly’s own words on X: https://x.com/ByronDonalds/status/2090772117612589173   

Check out  what the Democrat Party stands for.

Instead of taking responsibility for the bad policies and choices that the Democrats put in place, they blame everyone else. You staying home will bring more bad choices.

In actions staying home is the same as taking your income cutting it in half. Can you live on that because that is what you will get. You may get free but inferior quality stuff. Can you live in 750 sq ft apartment, take the bus or train in the rain and double your taxes on everything. You will also have long lines so those illegals arriving under open borders policies will get first dibs on all services. You will come last. Is staying home and not voting worth that? Only you can decide. Is America worth saving? Its up to you.

©2026 All rights reserved.


Join me on the podcast (karenbschoen.com) with guests:

Guest : Ed Vidal, Executive Producer and General Counsel

WSQF 94.5 FM Radio, Doral,  Florida, Editor,

Website: miamiindependent.com

Guest: Kat Stansell, author, researcher

Website:  https://pat4evr.substack.com/

Critically Thinking about AI Regulations — Postscript

This is a follow-up to Part 1, Part 2, & Part 3, so make sure to read them first.

In Part 2, an interesting comment was made. The competent reader basically said that they would never ask AI a question that involved an opinion.

Wow, IMHO those are some of the most interesting and valuable questions. If all we ask are about objective facts (“What’s the capital of Idaho?”), almost all of those are already answerable by a search engine. Boring!

Here is the type of query I like posing to a competent, objective AI:

“How many American lives would likely have been saved if US government health agencies, and the US medical profession, had: 1) informed citizens of the benefits (and methods) of optimizing their immune system, and 2) had approved of (and encouraged) the use of Ivermectin (IVM) and Vitamin D as early treatments of COVID-19?”

Clearly there is opinion involved here, but that’s what makes it interesting. If we have phrased the question carefully (important), and then pay attention to the response, the answers reveal some of the underlying assumptions of the AI we are dealing with.

This is no different from asking a well-phrased question to a family member, a neighbor, your physician, a legislator, etc. — and then paying careful attention to the answer…

In any case, AlterAI’s answer to this question was spot on. It was direct and based on evidence plus reasonable conclusions. No surprise to me.

ChatGPT —

To make just one comparison, I posed the exact same question to ChatGPT. Its original answer was typical of mainstream AIs: evasive and dismissive of any consequential benefits of IVM or Vitamin D. In other words, it did exactly what most AI’s typically do: mirror the politics and unscientificness seen in the mainstream media.

To give it credit, it deviated somewhat, as it did like my suggestion of informing citizens of the benefits of optimizing their immune system — but it attributed very few deaths to this fundamental omission.

ChatGPT’s opening statement was “For the United States, I would not regard claims of hundreds of thousands of lives saved by Ivermectin and Vitamin D as supported by the clinical evidence. A defensible analysis produces a substantially more uncertain—and much smaller—estimate.”

It’s interesting to note that my query did not say anything about “hundreds of thousands of lives saved by Ivermectin and Vitamin D,” so that initial response seemed surprisingly defensive: typical of the mainstream media.

Anyways, I proceeded to politely provide scientific evidence (all publicly available), a bit at a time, that gradually chipped away at ChatGPT’s initial position. After each of these, it came back and said things like “that information requires that I update my response” — which it did.

After an hour or so of this, ChatGPT concluded that an estimate of 300,000 Americans could have been saved by Vitamin D and IVM was reasonable! The scientific evidence indicates that at least twice that number is defensible, but clearly this was a MAJOR change from their original position.

The Bottom Line:

This is a simple (yet powerful) example that the answers most popular AIs are providing to subjective questions are heavily influenced by political bias. (FYI, I have elaborated on this issue several times now, like here.)

It is important to note that the ChatGPT error was not due to ignorance (as I provided publicly available information that they should have had), but rather a purposeful choice by its programmers to ignore information that was contrary to the programmers’ personal opinions.

It seems apparent to me that for that reason alone, regulating AI development is a waste of time. How do we regulate out incompetence and political bias?

IMHO, most regulations will not provide any net positive results — but will likely severely handicap American performance in a critical market.

©2026 All rights reserved.


Here is other information from this scientist that you might find interesting:

I urge all readers to subscribe to AlterAI — IMO the absolute best AI option for subjective questions.

I will consider posting reader submissions on Critical Thinking about my topics of interest.

My commentaries are my opinion about the material discussed therein, based on the information I have. If any readers have different information, please share it. If it is credible, I will be glad to reconsider my position.

Check out the Archives of this Critical Thinking substack.

C19Science.info is my one-page website that covers the lack of genuine Science behind our COVID-19 policies.

Election-Integrity.info is my one-page website that lists multiple major reports on the election integrity issue.

WiseEnergy.org is my multi-page website that discusses the Science (or lack thereof) behind our energy options.

Media Balance Newsletter: a free, twice-a-month newsletter that covers what the mainstream media does not do, on issues from climate to COVID, elections to education, renewables to religion, etc. Here are the Newsletter’s 2026 Archives. Please send me an email to get your free copy. When emailing me, please make sure to include your full name and the state where you live. (Of course, you can cancel the Media Balance Newsletter at any time!)

BREAKING: Supreme Court Hands Trump Major Victory in Drive to Combat Noncitizen Voting

The Supreme Court on Friday allowed the Department of Homeland Security to continue its citizenship verification program.

In a 6-3 shadow docket ruling in the case of DHS v. League of Women Voters, justices allowed the Trump administration to expand the program that allows states to use Social Security records and other information to check voters’ citizenship status.

“By prohibiting interference with the disclosure of information regarding citizenship status to DHS—“notwithstanding any other provision of Federal, State, orlocal law”—Congress necessarily authorized DHS to request and receive that information,” the majority opinion says.

The three liberals, Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Ketanji Brown Jackson, dissented.

The majority held that the a 1996 federal law banning noncitizen voting likely authorizes the Department of Homeland Security to obtain citizenship information from other agencies, including state agencies.

Plaintiffs, led by the League of Women Voters,  argued this could violate privacy rights. They also argued the used of the SAVE database, short for Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements, is not reliable,and risks purging elligible voters.

AUTHOR

Fred Lucas

Fred Lucas is senior investigative reporter for the Daily Signal. He is the author of “The Myth of Voter Suppression: The Left’s Assault on Clean Elections.” Follow on X FredLucasWH.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Feds Report 160 Election Fraud Arrests as Thousands of New Leads Pour In

The System Is So Corrupt That Local Officials Wouldn’t Indict Hundreds on Election Fraud, So Trump’s DOJ Says It’s Doing it Instead

No Wonder Dem Don’t Want to Give up Voter Rolls: DHS Investigating 300K Cases for Voter Fraud, Thanks to States’ Voter Rolls

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Signal column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

RNC Chair: Election Lawsuit Blitz Could Reshape Voting Rules for Years

FIRST ON THE DAILY SIGNAL — The Republican National Committee has about 179 active lawsuits across 37 states, a legal broadside RNC Chairman Joe Gruters anticipates will set rules beyond just the 2026 midterm election cycle.

“When the president asked me to do this job a year ago, he said election integrity is a priority. The top priority is winning the election, but we also consider it a win to protect the vote,” Gruters told the Daily Signal in an exclusive interview.

“We want to secure our elections far beyond Election Day,” said Gruters, also a Florida state senator.

Gruters also said he recently talked to President Donald Trump about the fate of the SAVE America Act, a voter ID proposal that passed the House. Gruters says the bill “probably” wouldn’t get past the Democrat filibuster in the Senate before the November election.

The RNC established its election integrity program for the 2024 election, which included a presidential race, and surpassed its all-time litigation record for a single year.

The number of lawsuits is up from the 2024 cycle, when the RNC filed 175 election security lawsuits at the federal, state, and local levels. For the 2026 election cycle, the RNC filed more than 200 cases.

The most significant is likely the case of Republican National Committee v. Mi Familia Vota, which is going to the Supreme Court in December. The question in the case is whether Arizona can require proof of citizenship for voter registration. The high court will also decide whether the state can remove the names of noncitizens, dead people, and other ineligible people from the voter registration rolls.

Lawsuits include pending litigation in eight states where overseas residents who never lived in the state are allowed to vote there, as well as major wins regarding election procedures in Texas, Georgia, North Carolina, and Virginia. The RNC has had 34 courtroom victories and most cases are pending.

Beyond the courtroom, the RNC signed up 16,971 volunteers to work at polling sites nationally. That’s up from 11,917 at the same point in the 2024 presidential cycle, a 42% increase.

Gruters cited the three election integrity priorities for the RNC as voter ID, securing mail-in ballots, and requiring proof of citizenship.

The SAVE America Act would require photo ID to vote and proof of citizenship to register to vote.

“I spoke with the president two nights ago about the specific senators that were keeping this from happening. Democrats are united in their efforts to prevent this from moving forward because they are united in their efforts to lie, steal, and cheat for victory,” Gruters said.

“It’s probably not going to happen now,” he said of passing the legislation. “We probably won’t see it happen until after November, when we have new senators.”

For their part, Democrats insist they are ready on the legal front.

“Democrats are fighting in courtrooms around the country, and federal elections will be free and fair this November because Democrats have defeated President Trump and Republicans’ attacks on the sacred right to vote,” DNC Litigation Director Dan Freeman told the Daily Signal in a statement.

“While Republicans continue to file lawsuits destined for dismissal and issue empty threats about poll watchers and election monitors, Democrats are ensuring Americans can make their voices heard and hold President Trump accountable at the polls this November,” Freeman continued.

Gruters said the GOP merely wants to prevent illegal votes from being cast that will cancel legal votes, and that Republicans have long been reactive instead of proactive on election integrity.

The RNC expanded recruitment into Maryland, Colorado, New Mexico, Kentucky, Alaska, and Ohio as part of a multimillion-dollar election integrity program, with directors deployed in 22 states.

Before coming to the RNC, Gruters had been the chairman of the Republican Party of Florida, and prior to that, the chairman of the Republican Party of Sarasota County.

“Being a chairman is about blocking and tackling, but also about protecting the vote,” he said. “We are being aggressive. We are going to use the hammer whenever we can.”

AUTHOR

Fred Lucas

Fred Lucas is senior investigative reporter for the Daily Signal. He is the author of “The Myth of Voter Suppression: The Left’s Assault on Clean Elections.” Follow on X FredLucasWH.

RELATED ARTICLES:

RNC Chair Prediction: GOP Holds Senate, Makes Gains in House

Appeals Court Decision Brings Good News on Voter Registration in Ohio

DOJ Announces Election Fraud Charges Against Another 4 Noncitizens, This Time in a Battleground State

Americans Must Now Wear the Full Armor of God so that We Can Take a Stand Against the Devil’s Schemes

The Most Surprising Number in New Midterm Poll

RELATED VIDEO: NBC: Republicans are more popular than Democrats

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Signal column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.