Biden Reminds Everyone That Black Justices Can Be Just As Smart As Rich Ones

WASHINGTON, D.C.—As Biden prepares to nominate a woman of color to the Supreme Court, he took the time to remind the country that black Justices can be just as smart as rich ones.

“Listen, folks, black Justices can be just as smart, articulate, and clean as the rich ones,” said Biden to reporters. “Just because they mostly stock the spaghetti sauce on the shelves in the ladies department of the department store and hang out with bad dudes like Corn Pop doesn’t mean they can’t be judges too! Come on folks! This ain’t complicated! If I haven’t nominated you for SCOTUS, then you ain’t black!”

Biden went on to say that he will choose a SCOTUS Justice based on qualifications, as long as those qualifications belong to someone with very dark skin and a female body.

“Mixed race judges don’t qualify,” said Biden, insisting they “aren’t black enough.”

It is so far unclear whether Biden will also nominate black men who identify as women, or whether he knows what a SCOTUS Justice is or even where he is right now.

“I’m proud to be the first President in history to get one of them blacks on the Supreme Court,” said Biden. “Clarance Thomas doesn’t count. He’s a bit too uppity for my taste.”

Biden then saluted his framed portrait of Robert Byrd and took a nap.

Babylon Bee subscriber Cody Pierce contributed to this report. If you want to get involved with the staff writers at The Babylon Bee, check out our membership options here!


Exclusive: The Babylon Bee Has Obtained Biden’s List Of Possible SCOTUS Nominees

Amy Schneider’s Winning Streak Ended After Being Asked To Name The Gender That Has Two X Chromosomes

Polite Canadian Truck Drivers Ask Evil, Tyrannical Government To ‘Please Restore Our Freedoms If You Don’t Mind, Eh’

New Minnie Mouse Pantsuit Design Includes Baton For Beating Uyghur Prisoners

Biden Commits To Picking A Diversity Hire For SCOTUS Since That Worked So Well With His VP

EDITORS NOTE: This political satire column by The Babylon Bee is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Rep. Ilhan Omar’s Husband Accuses Iranian Dissident of Islamophobia

Rep. Ilhan Omar keeps throwing a nonstop pity party for herself as the bigot who constantly claims to be the victim.

Omar is actually powerful and privileged and has risen to a position of power in the country she makes no secret of hating.

Meanwhile, Masih Alinejad is an actual dissident. Alinejad lives in exile and has been a courageous activist against the Islamist regime, encouraging protests, boycotts, and celebrating women who refuse to bow to mandatory hijabs. Her family members have been arrested and Iran’s regime plotted to kidnap her.

And here’s Rep. Omar’s (current) husband accusing her of Islamophobia for an op-ed warning that Omar’s Islamophobia bill “might be creating precedents that could undermine our freedom to speak out.”

“So this lady doesn’t want to combat Islamophobia because she doesn’t like Muslims. Understood!” Tim Mynett, the political consultant currently playing the role of Omar’s husband, tweeted.

As Hillel Neuer of UN Watch pointed out, “Ilhan Omar’s husband just accused journalist Masih Alinejad of not liking Muslims—even though she was born a Muslim in Iran, and in the editorial (which he seems not to have read) mentions her hijab-wearing mother among “many relatives who are pious Muslims I love and respect.”

But the one thing that Omar and her gang know how to do is falsely accuse people of Islamophobia. This entire exchange proves Alienjad’s point.

Omar and her ilk can’t be trusted not to use false accusations of Islamophobia to silence critics and just anyone who disagrees.



DC imam: Texas synagogue hostage crisis was ‘arranged by the Zionists’ to give Muslims ‘a bad name’

Three American Iran Nuke Deal negotiators quit talks over weak stance of Biden administration

RELATED VIDEO: Robert Spencer on OAN on the Fallout from Afghanistan

EDITORS NOTE: This Jihad Watch column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

The Hunt for the ‘Gay Gene’ Continues

A recent Australian study revives interest in a largely discredited theory.

When it was released in 2011, Lady Gaga’s “Born This Way” was the hottest song of the year, topping the charts in 25 countries. It became a gay anthem, with its message that “No matter gay, straight, or bi’, lesbian, transgender life / I’m on the right track, baby”.

That was more than a decade ago.

Whatever has happened to the notion that gays and lesbians are “born this way”, that their sexual orientation is not a matter of choice, but of genetic hard-wiring? The biological model of homosexuality has gone very quiet lately.

There could be a few reasons.

First, with the legalisation of same-sex marriage around the world, homosexuality has been normalised; discrimination has been banned. Just as the debate over the origin of Covid-19 has faded into the background as the disease becomes endemic, endless disputations over an endemic psychological condition seem less urgent.

Second, the transgender movement is sucking the oxygen out of the debate over a biological origin for homosexuality. The whole idea of fluidity is that gender is a choice: you can be whoever or whatever you want to be. Arguing in favour of a fixed sexual orientation has become old-fogeyish.

Third, a major investigation of the question in the leading journal Science in 2019 found that there was no single “gay gene” — which had been the holy grail of this research for decades. The question was still open, according to the researchers, but it appeared that the genetic component to homosexuality was very small. “Same-sex sexual behavior is influenced by not one or a few genes but many,” they wrote. It was the ultimate bad hair day for biological explanations.

Fourth, the search for a biological explanation was a double-edged sword. If a gay gene did exist, it could be detected with rapidly improving testing technology for embryos. Parents might abort a potentially gay offspring. Better not to know at all.

Nowadays, the only place where the biological explanation survives and thrives may be in legislature chambers when “gay conversion therapy” is outlawed. “The consensus in the medical community is ‘yes, we are born that way’,” as one Californian radio station put it. “We can’t change who we are, and we shouldn’t even try.”

But it’s hard to argue that we can’t change unless sexual orientation is genetic. So the hunt for a genetic basis goes on.

The latest development is an article by Australian researchers which appeared a few days ago in The Journal of Sex Research, a leading peer-reviewed academic journal. They used population data from The Netherlands to contend that “having a greater number of older brothers increases the probability of a person entering a same-sex union at some point in their lives”.

In effect, they are proposing, not a genetic cause, but a hormonal one. “This effect has been attributed to a mother’s immune reaction to proteins produced by a male foetus,” they wrote. “The proteins enter the mother’s bloodstream and trigger the production of antibodies that influence the sexual development of subsequent children. These maternal antibodies accumulate over successive pregnancies with male foetuses, which means men with more older brothers are more likely to experience same-sex sexual attraction.”

It’s an ingenious hypothesis – and one that has been proposed before. It’s called the fraternal birth order effect.

What the Australian researchers contribute to the debate is statistical, not medical or genetic. The hormonal explanation is entirely speculative. They found a correlation between the number of older brothers Dutch men born between 1940 and 1990 had and whether they entered a same-sex marriage or civil partnership.

The authors insist that a biological explanation is still important so that gays and lesbians will be fully accepted in society. “People who view sexual orientation as a product of biological factors (such as hormones or genetics) are more likely to support sexual minorities and their civil rights, compared to those who view it as a product of social factors or individual choice,” they write.

MercatorNet asked Dr Paul Sullins, an American sociologist who has written extensively about homosexuality, for a quick assessment of the Australian study. He responded that: “even if the fraternal birth order idea unexpectedly found convincing evidence, it would only explain part of the genetic basis of a minority of male homosexuals. It would not, by itself, re-establish the discarded hypothesis that homosexuality is largely or wholly innate.” Furthermore, he told MercatorNet:

“The idea it embodies is one of a number of early speculations about a possible genetic basis for homosexuality, which included cousin genetics, childhood gender nonconformity, different proposed ‘gay genes’ or genome sequences, lack of exposure to certain hormones in utero, finger length, and other notions long on creativity and hopeful credulity but short on evidence.

“Virtually all of these ideas are dismissed today outside a few true believers in one or more of them due to the advance of solid twin and GWAS [genome-wide association study] evidence showing pretty conclusively that a) the genetic basis for homosexuality is small compared to environmental contributions and b) what genetic association there is is diffuse, unrelated to any particular discoverable cause.”

It remains to be seen if the Australian study will make a splash. The authors allude to a 2006 Danish study which was also based on population-level data. It found no association between homosexuality and fraternal birth order. In fact, it apparently found the opposite: straight men had a greater number of older siblings. “Heterosexual marriage was significantly linked to having young parents, small age differences between parents, stable parental relationships, large sibships, and late birth order,” the Danish authors wrote.

The hunt for the gay gene continues. Slowly.


Michael Cook

Michael Cook is the editor of MercatorNet. More by Michael Cook

RELATED ARTICLE: We live in a culture of decadent mercy

EDITORS NOTE: This MercatorNet column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Angel Families: Mayorkas, Biden Criminally Aiding Illegal Aliens

Angel Families, whose loved ones have been killed by illegal aliens, have released a statement slamming Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas and decrepit President Joe Biden — declaring them criminal accomplices to illegal immigration.

In a speech last week, the open-borders enthusiast Mayorkas stated that Biden’s national immigration agenda centered around “justice and equity” for illegal aliens with the administration’s so-called “sanctuary country” orders shielding most illegal aliens from arrest and deportation.

Angel Families with Advocates for Victims of Illegal Alien Crime (AVIAC) blasted Mayorkas and Biden in response. “No one is or should be above the law,” the statement read:

When it comes to the 15-30 million individuals who entered the country illegally, refused to leave when their visa expired or were denied asylum, and disappeared into the country, they are considered by the president, every Democratic legislator (and some Republicans) most of the media and many state and local governors and state legislators and particularly DHS Secretary Mayorkas to be above the law…

But since the start of the Biden administration, even those who have committed additional crimes are protected. DHS Secretary Mayorkas made it very clear that being here illegally is not a crime…

The truth is that this administration and Mayorkas, in particular, decided to open the borders and possibly even worse to protect those who have already committed crimes. As of this writing, DHS has refused to release the statistics on internal enforcement deportations. Spoiler Alert: They will be atrocious.

The Angel Families add that they have “called for [Mayorkas’s] resignation, firing, and impeachment” as they consider the DHS chief and Biden “criminals as well.”

“Those who protect [Mayorkas], and his policies shouldn’t be held above the law either,” they rightly conclude.

Alejandro Mayorkas

13 Known Connections

No More Immigration Raids at “Protected Areas” & “Sensitive Locations”

In an October 12, 2021 memo issued to the Citizenship & Immigration Services (CIS) and Customs & Border Protection (CBP) agencies, Mayorkas announced that the DHS would now end all mass immigration-enforcement operations at worksites in the United States. Asserting that such operations should target employers of illegal migrants, rather than the migrants themselves, Mayorkas wrote: “The deployment of mass worksite operations, sometimes resulting in the simultaneous arrest of hundreds of workers, was not focused on the most pernicious aspect of our country’s unauthorized employment challenge: exploitative employers. These highly visible operations misallocated enforcement resources while chilling, and even serving as a tool of retaliation for, worker cooperation in workplace standards investigations.”

In an October 27, 2021 memo, Mayorkas ordered immigration officers to likewise refrain from arresting any illegal aliens at additional “protected areas” and “sensitive locations” like food banks, homeless shelters, churches, hospitals, schools, playgrounds, childcare centers, school bus stops, and places where disaster or emergency relief is provided. “When we conduct an enforcement action—whether it is an arrest, search, service of a subpoena, or other action—we need to consider many factors, including the location in which we are conducting the action and its impact on other people and broader societal interests,” Mayorkas told immigration officers in the memo. “For example, if we take an action at an emergency shelter, it is possible that noncitizens, including children, will be hesitant to visit the shelter and receive needed food and water, urgent medical attention, or other humanitarian care.”

In response to Mayorkas’ memo, Federation for American Immigration Reform president Dan Stein said in a statement: “The [ICE] agency still exists, but it has been stripped of all of its functions with regard to the enforcement of immigration laws. Nearly all illegal aliens are already off-limits to enforcement due to a Sep. 30 memo, and as a result of Mayorkas’ ‘expanded and non-exhaustive list of protected areas,’ where ICE agents are [not] permitted to do their work, the secretary has essentially nullified an entire body of constitutionally enacted laws.”

To learn more about Alejandro Mayorkas, click here.

EDITORS NOTE: This Discover the Networks column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

“Increased Immigration Flows” Under Biden Cause Record-Breaking Court Backlog

The Biden administration’s controversial open border policies are slamming the overwhelmed U.S. Immigration Court system, creating the largest backlog of cases in history. A new report issued by Syracuse University’s Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC) reveals that the backlog is “growing faster than ever, burying judges in an avalanche of cases.” At the end of December pending cases reached a shocking 1,596,193, according to government figures obtained by TRAC under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). To put things in perspective, researchers point out that if every person with a pending immigration case gathered, it would surpass the population of Philadelphia, the nation’s sixth-largest city. Migrants with open cases will wait nearly five years for a court decision determining their status in the U.S.

While the system has seen backlogs under past administrations of both political parties, it has never experienced anything this dire. In fact, the TRAC report states that “a disturbing new trend has emerged during the Biden administration that demands attention: since the start of the Biden administration, the growth of the backlog has been accelerating at a breakneck pace.” For instance, at the start of the George W. Bush administration, the backlog stood at 149,338 and it grew “substantially” under Barack Obama. The problem “only accelerated” under Donald Trump but nothing compares to Biden. In recent months the rate of backlogs in the nation’s Immigration Court system has “exploded,” the TRAC report states, supporting the assessment with government data. Between October and December 2021, the quarterly growth in the number of pending Immigration Court cases shattered records.

In that short period, the backlog increased by nearly 140,000 cases, the government records obtained by TRAC show. “Even during the most dramatic growth in pending cases during the Trump administration, the largest 3-month increase in the backlog only once approached 100,000 in the June-August 2019 period,” the report says. The backlog fluctuated up and down in the following year until it skyrocketed in the last few months of 2021 under Biden. Researchers call it a “dramatic acceleration in the growth of the backlog.” The alarming government figures suggest that Immigration Courts “are entering a worrying new era of even more crushing caseloads— all the more concerning since no attempt at a solution has yet been able to reverse the avalanche of cases that Immigration Judges now face,” the TRAC report states.

The COVID-19 pandemic has played a role in the crisis because it caused a partial court shutdown, but researchers found that the key problem is the “recent deluge of new cases filed by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS).” Immigration enforcement has been limited dramatically under the Biden administration, which has also issued a policy to allow more new immigrants into the U.S., thus the unprecedented and expanding backlog. The dramatic increase in court cases began around June and will inevitably get worse if the administration does not make changes. “If the current pace during the first quarter of FY 2022 of newly arriving Notices to Appear (NTAs) continues, the Court will receive 800,000 new cases – at least 300,000 more than the annual total the Court has ever received during its existence,” TRAC estimates.

The U.S. Immigration Court system operates under the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR), which functions under the attorney general. There are 60 immigration courts throughout the nation and around 580 judges that conduct removal hearings or determine if a migrant can remain in the U.S. In its 2022 budget submission to Congress, the DOJ requests $891,190,000 for the EOIR. In the document, the agency lists “increased immigration flows,” particularly family units, unaccompanied alien children and putative asylum seekers from Central America, among the EOIR’s biggest external challenges.

EDITORS NOTE: This Judicial Watch column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Misdiagnosing COVID: Where Biden and the Media Got It Wrong

The U.S. Supreme Court dropped the hammer on the president’s vaccine mandate almost two weeks ago, but the administration must have had a hard time saying goodbye. It took 12 full days, but OSHA, the government’s Occupational Safety and Health Administration, finally got around to shutting down the private employer “jabs for jobs” rule it never had the grounds to write. A defeated Biden formally withdrew his “emergency temporary standard” this week — which, as it turns out, was never an emergency, but thanks to the justices, it sure was temporary.

If only America could take back the other 365 days of bad COVID policy, Rep. Greg Murphy (R-N.C.) said on “Washington Watch.” “We all talked at the beginning about ‘follow the science.’ The sad thing is… with this particular administration… it’s become political science rather than real science.” And, like a lot of Americans, Murphy is upset that our country is now paying for it. As part of the GOP Doctors Caucus in the House, he sent a letter to the head of NIH, Acting Director Lawrence Tabak, about the dangerous side effects of the administration’s far-Left policies.

The group of almost 20 members asked for specific data from the agency on the “adverse reactions” of the COVID lockdowns. As the collection of doctors points out, the government’s decision took a mental and physical toll on children (not to mention setting American students back scholastically). It held cardiac and cancer patients hostage while they waited for the care they needed during the elective surgery stoppage. Then, there were psychological effects of closing businesses and firing people based on their vaccination status. Our country witnessed a rise in domestic violence — and, as we all saw, violence in general.

“Let’s see how many years of life lost we had because of our actions of COVID,” Murphy argued. “Let’s look at the lockdowns. Let’s look at people being kept away from families, their churches, their friends, and the depression that ensued, subsequent substitutes that ensued [like drug abuse]… I want to help restore faith in medicine to the American public,” he said. “I also want real answers… In my opinion, I think we should have had a much more selective approach of helping those who are at high risk rather than just a shotgun approach to everybody.”

In his mind and the rest of the caucus, we owe it to the American people to stop and think about the “short- and long-term ramifications of this administration’s restrictive, repressive, and often damaging COVID-19 policies.” So much of what’s been done in the last two years as part of the government’s virus response would fall in the category of abnormal. But unfortunately, what we’re not hearing in the media is a discussion of what went right, what went wrong, and what needs to be the done as we address future pandemics.

Senator Ron Johnson (R-Wisc.) is doing his best to correct that, hosting a special event this past Monday called “COVID-19: A Second Opinion.” Bringing together the best doctors, the discussion centered around ways the public had been misled. They covered a lot of ground — from vaccine mandates to comorbidities of the virus — and, not surprisingly, they got very little attention from the liberal media. “They can’t afford to be proven wrong,” the senator said Tuesday on “Washington Watch.”

“Eight hundred eighty-nine thousand Americans have perished in COVID, and of course, we’ve been listening collectively to a group of public health officials — many of [whom] don’t practice medicine. Few, if any, of them have ever treated a COVID patient. And so, what I tried to do is provide the American public with [the truth] coming from doctors who have actually had the courage and compassion to treat thousands of COVID patients. They expose themselves to the virus. They’ve treated patients successfully using cheap, generic, widely available drugs that have been around for decades with an incredibly strong safety profile… And that’s really not who the legacy media has listened to.”

All the Biden administration wants to do is send people home afraid, he argued. Force them to isolate and maybe take some Tylenol. And just pray you don’t get really sick. “They are the ones who suppress this [information], who have kept people from accessing early treatment… So this is a travesty that has occurred. I hope Americans start waking up.”

RELATED ARTICLE: NY Nurse recordings reveal possible botched administration of COVID Vaccine on Children

EDITORS NOTE: This FRC-Action column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Biden Considers Starting World War III To Distract From Domestic Failures

WASHINGTON, D.C.—Faced with plummeting poll numbers and the realization that a rambling, semi-coherent, two-hour press conference failed to turn things around, President Biden is apparently considering a new strategy to save his floundering presidency: start World War III.

Deploying troops, warships, and aircraft to confront Russia over Ukraine is the first step in the new plan to escalate a regional conflict into a global clash between superpowers. Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Milley said, “It’ll be great. Everyone likes a good war, right? Certainly everyone I know—all the generals and defense contractors and Washington elites—they all love a good war. It’s a win-win! Unless we lose. Don’t include that last part.”

“It’s a very sound political strategy,” an unnamed source within the administration told this reporter. “When the nukes start flying and half of Europe is in flames, who’s going to care anymore about a little inflation or a shortage of COVID tests? Plus we showed with Afghanistan that we have absolutely no idea how to end a war. I’m sure starting one has got to be way easier.”

Jen Psaki was quoted as saying, “Frankly, I’m so tired of answering questions about the failed immigration policy and the failed Build Back Better bill and the failed voting rights bill and the failed COVID policy and the failed economic policy and ‘didn’t the stock market collapse today?’—anyway, it’ll be nice to talk about a failed war for a change.”

Those willing to give their lives to defend Ukraine and boost Biden’s poll numbers can report to their nearest recruiting station.

As part of a bold new marketing strategy to promote inclusivity and appeal to less than 1% of the population, Mars, Incorporated has introduced a new M&M character who identifies as a Skittle.

Subscribe to The Babylon Bee on YouTube


Biden Puts 8,000 Troops On Alert In Case Peter Doocy Retaliates

8 Important Life Lessons Your Child Will Learn In Their Public School

Report: Terrible Schools Most Likely To Resist School Choice

Man Wears Mask Into Walmart, Not Because Of COVID But Because It’s Walmart

DoorDash Introduces New ‘Wife Mode’ Where It Will Recommend All Her Favorite Restaurants For Her To Reject

EDITORS NOTE: This political satire column by The Babylon Bee is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

FLORIDA: New Radio Station For and By Seniors


For seniors, by seniors – the only radio show specifically targeting seniors, the largest voting block in Florida.

MONDAYS – 4:00 PM – Tan Talk Radio 1340-AM 106.1-FM – Clearwater, FL, USA or Stream the Live Broadcast:


Columnist TIM BRYCE, and Financial Advisor BERKLY BADGER


The decline of Nonprofits & Religious Institutions, Education, Morality, Food, Politics, Finance, Medicare & Social Security, Medical issues, Insurance, Retirement, Music, Comedy, Reunions, Technology, Election Registration and more.

©Tim Bryce. All rights reserved.

Biden’s Border Crisis: The Sovereignty That Should Be Respected Is Our Own

The Democrats are suddenly head-over-heels in love with national sovereignty.  When asked why Americans should care about Ukraine, the White House Deputy National Security Advisor said, “Because it goes to a very fundamental principle of all nations, which is that our borders should be inviolate, that our sovereignty should be respected.”  Nancy Pelosi is pushing a new bill called the Defending Ukraine’s Sovereignty Act to guarantee “Ukraine’s sovereignty, independence and territorial integrity.”  Too bad these Democrat fools don’t feel the same way about their own country.

To them, sovereignty doesn’t matter when it comes to the U.S. southern border.  Sovereignty can take a hike.  Border agents encountered a record 178,840 illegal aliens in December, thanks to Joe Biden’s open borders policies.  This added to the record 2 million illegal aliens encountered at the southern border last year.  The number coming from beyond Central America is up 4-fold.  Deadly fentanyl coming across?  No problem.  Military-age males from terror-prone countries lost in the shuffle?  It’s nothing to worry about.  Reconquista, baby?  We deserve it, sovereignty be damned.

This is the way the Democrats and the Biden administration think.  Our open southern border is a product of their closed minds.  To them, it’s ideology first, not America first.  What was it our DHS Secretary said recently?  Just because somebody is in the country illegally doesn’t mean they should be deported.  They get to stay, under the current regime.  ‘Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion’ trump national sovereignty any day, in the Secretary’s view.  All bow down to the new god of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion.  Put your ideological blinders on; equity and inclusion for foreigners is the only thing worth thinking about.

But here’s what fealty to the new god has wrought just recently:  Illegal aliens can present their deportation and arrest warrants as acceptable forms of identification to board domestic flights.  How insane is that?  Just as insane as California loaning millions of dollars to illegal aliens to keep their businesses afloat during the pandemic, not to mention letting them open businesses in the first place.

A seventh-grader in Connecticut died of a fentanyl overdose in a school gymnasium.  I blame the Biden administration.  A Muslim from Britain got a tourist visa and attacked a Jewish synagogue in Texas.  Apparently, he was not in U.S. databases despite being on a U.K. terrorist watch list.  Again, Democrats are to blame.  The Obama administration erased important terrorist databases.  (Phil Haney, you are not forgotten.)  Joe Biden had ended the more rigorous vetting of visa applicants ordered by former President Trump which had emphasized data sharing with foreign countries.

That’s what happens when you don’t care about border enforcement or your own sovereignty.  Things are so bad under Biden, a candidate for Arizona Attorney General who lives 90 miles from the border is telling her kids, if intruders come into the house, shoot them.  This is what happens when you let your country be overrun.  No American should have to live like that.    So, if you crazy Democrat open borders fools are gonna yak about sovereignty, kiss me like you mean it.

Visit The Daily Skirmish

©Christopher Wright. All rights reserved.

Ukraine Invites Kyle Rittenhouse To Guard Their Border

KIEV, UKRAINE—As Russian troops increased their threat to Ukraine’s sovereignty and independence, the Ukrainian military showed their tactical prowess by asking Kyle Rittenhouse to come and guard their border with Russia.

“Yo, Kyle, hope all is well. Hey listen, our citizens are under threat from Putin and his d-bag army,” texted Ukrainian Minister of Defense, Sergei Ukrainovich to America’s national hero, Kyle Rittenhouse. “Could u do us a solid and come guard our border? Bring ur AR-15 lol thx.”

While some praised the move as militarily brilliant as well as based, citing the fact that no military has the capacity to withstand the freedom-spewing courage of Mr. Rittenhouse, U.S. Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin criticized the move, citing Kyle Rittenhouse’s status as a cis-white male, and reminding everyone that guarding Ukraine would require him to CROSS STATE LINES.

“President Biden is weighing the deployment of troops to Ukraine,” said Secretary Austin, “But we’re asking for more time while the President looks for a bathroom scale large enough to do so.”

Eyewitnesses inside the Kremlin say Putin responded to Ukraine’s bold defensive move by tearing off his shirt, grabbing his Kalashnikov, and riding a bear toward the Ukrainian border.

Welcome to “Hate Me, Date Me!” with AOC, the game where you can tell Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez just how much you hate her — and she’ll draw her own conclusions about how much you want to date her. Which lucky bachelor will she pick?

Subscribe to The Babylon Bee on YouTube


10 Things You Could Have Purchased With Your College Money

Biden Administration Mounts Daring Mission To Evacuate Hunter’s Remaining Cash From Ukraine

In Landmark Case, Judge Rules Man Can Be Held Responsible For Wrongs Committed In Wife’s Dream

‘Doctor Who’ Ratings Saved As The Doctor Regenerates Into Dr. Jordan Peterson

EDITORS NOTE: This political satire column by The Babylon Bee is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

VIDEO: Fatigue Identified as Major Side Effect of COVID Over-regulation

Thousands of Americans gathered yesterday in Washington, D.C. to protest the federal government’s increasingly unreasonable COVID mandates. One year into President Joe Biden’s term, he has done the opposite of his promise to “shut down the virus, not the country.” Fatigue is a common symptom of COVID-19, but it’s a universal symptom of the ridiculous mask and vaccine mandates that have long outlived their prudence and propriety. As other countries prepare to move on with their lives, President Biden insists that Americans must remain in a prison of our own making.

Strangely, it’s Europe that is leading the way to freedom this time. On Wednesday, British Prime Minister Boris Johnson told the House of Commons that all the country’s COVID restrictions would end this upcoming Thursday. “We must learn to live with COVID in the same way we live with the flu,” added the health secretary. “They have realized that all of these policies that are aimed at slowing the spread of COVID have failed,” said Stanford Professor of Medicine Jay Bhattacharya on “Washington Watch.” COVID “spreads very rapidly despite our best efforts to keep people apart.” Citizens in Great Britain, Spain, and Portugal will once again have the freedom to make their own health decisions. For once, here’s a European trend the U.S. needs to imitate.

Nothing could be further from the contemplation of Biden’s mandarins. Biden failed to excite confidence when challenged in a rare press conference to explain the definition of “fully vaccinated.” Officially, two doses is considered sufficient, but some administration officials advise three doses. Biden sidestepped the question and replied, “every time I speak of it, I say, if you’ve been vaccinated, get your booster shot.” Bhattacharya explained he can’t easily answer that question because it has become “more than just a medical question.” Many cities and states have imposed vaccine mandates for employment and for patronizing restaurants, museums, and libraries. These “essentially make people that are not fully vaccinated second-class citizens,” he said. If the administration redefines “fully vaccinated” to include a booster shot, they create a huge number of second-class citizens with “the snap of a finger.” So it’s a calculation about how much tyrannical invasion of their daily lives the American people are willing to accept.

Underlying Americans’ skepticism of Biden’s vaccine push is the vaccine’s waning effectiveness — both over time and against new variants. “The protection that the booster provides against Omicron is less than the protection that it provided against Delta,” said Bhattacharya. A newly released CDC study from May to November found natural immunity outperforming vaccination alone “by early October,” even before the Omicron variant. It’s not just one study, said Bhattacharya. “The scientific evidence on this is absolutely overwhelming.” Yet the less effective the vaccine becomes, the more President Biden seeks to punish those who resist it.

“Tell people about the scientific evidence. Don’t use it to manipulate people,” Bhattacharya said. “Public trust, once lost, is almost impossible to get back. And public health relies on public trust.” Yet our public health agencies seem to prefer imitating the legacy media in crying “wolf” for a short-sighted advantage.

Meanwhile, “much of Europe is opening up,” said Bhattacharya. “The U.K. is leading the way. There’s no reason the United States shouldn’t be.” Vaccine and mask mandates are far greater violations of personal freedom than a tax on tea. “The right thing is to protect vulnerable people while letting people who are at low risk… just go on with their lives,” he said. The federal government insists people stop living to avoid dying, but that is a false choice Americans should reject.


EXCELSIOR! NY State Supreme Court judge STRIKES DOWN governor’s mask mandate

FULL REPORT: The Spectacular Failure of COVID Shots 

DoD whistle-blowers on vaccines – 500% increase in miscarriages, 300% increase in cancer, 1000% increase in neurological

Natural immunity was more effective than vaccines alone against delta variant, CDC study shows

Missouri AG sues over 30 school districts for enforcing mask mandates

EDITORS NOTE: This FRC-Action column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

POLL: 60% of Americans Would Vote FOR ANYONE but Biden if Election Held Today

My takeaway – 40% (and I think that is inflated) of America is mentally ill.

Poll finds 60 percent would vote against Biden if election was held now

By: Mark Moore, NY Post, January 23, 2022:

Six in 10 Americans would vote for someone other than President Biden if the 2024 presidential election was held today — a rate higher than his predecessors Barack Obama and Donald Trump, according to a poll released Sunday.

Asked if the election were held today, 60 percent said they would “probably” or “definitely” vote for someone else, compared to 36 percent who said they would “definitely” or “probably” re-elect Biden, the survey by Fox News shows.

Fifty-two percent said they would vote for someone other than Trump if it were February 2020, and 51 percent said they would select somebody other than Obama if it were August 2011.

The survey also shows the deep dissatisfaction Americans feel for Biden’s handling of the economy, the COVID-19 pandemic, border security and foreign policy.
Joe Biden.
Only 36 percent said they would “definitely” or “probably” re-elect President Biden.
Rick Loomis/Getty Images

The president’s job disapproval rating is at 52 percent, a slight rise from last month, but a 9 percentage point increase from April, while his approval rating is trending in the opposite direction — from a high of 56 percent in June to 47 percent in this poll.

Asked about Biden’s handling of the economy, 58 percent to 41 percent disapprove. When it comes to the COVID-19 pandemic, 52 percent to 46 percent disapprove; 59 percent to 37 percent disapprove of his handling of border security; and 54 percent to 41 percent disapprove of his handling of foreign policy.
2024 poll.
60 percent said they would “probably” or “definitely” vote for someone else other than President Biden in 2024.
Fox News

As bad as Biden’s approval ratings are, Vice President Kamala Harris’ are worse.

The survey found that 54 percent of Americans disapprove of the job she is doing, and only 43 percent approve.

In June, her approval rating was at 50 percent and her disapproval rating was 47 percent.

Vice President Kamala Harris’ approval ratings are even worse than President Biden’s.

But the overall discontent with the Biden administration doesn’t translate into a significant advantage for congressional Republicans in the 2022 midterm elections.

Forty-four percent said they would vote for the Republican candidate if the election were held today, compared to 43 percent who would go with the Democratic candidate.

Republicans get high marks from voters on their ability to deal with taxes, the federal budget deficit, immigration, crime, and the economy, while Democrats get good grades on climate change, racism, health care, the pandemic and education.
Barack Obama.

Some 51 percent said they would select somebody other than former President Barack Obama if it were August 2011.

But most Americans — 85 percent — said their top concern was inflation and higher prices, above all other issues.

Concerns over high crime came came in second with 81 percent, followed by political divisions at 78 percent, the coronavirus pandemic at 72 percent, North Korean missile tests at 68 percent, the standoff between Ukraine and Russia at 62 percent, migrants at the southern border at 59 percent, voter suppression at 58 percent and voter fraud at 53 percent.

Forty-three percent of Americans believe inflation and high prices will still be plaguing the nation for “more than a year,” while 44 percent think coronavirus will continue to be a major issue for “more than a year.”
Donald Trump.

The poll shows 48 percent blame the federal government’s policies for inflation. Forty-two percent say it’s the result of coronavirus and 9 percent blame both equally.

The poll surveyed 1,001 registered voters between Jan. 16-19.

It has a plus/minus 3 percentage points margin of error.


WATCH Mike Pompeo: There Is One Primary Reason That Putin Is Acting Aggressive During Biden Admin

China flies dozens of warplanes near Taiwan

Republican Rep: We Might ‘Begin To See’ China Invade Taiwan ‘After The Olympics’

China Joins Russian In Ukraine Crisis, As Biden May Deploy Troops To The Area Tensions Dramatically Escalate

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Quick note: Tech giants are shutting us down. You know this. Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Adsense, Pinterest permanently banned us. Facebook, Google search et al have shadow-banned, suspended and deleted us from your news feeds. They are disappearing us. But we are here. We will not waver. We will not tire. We will not falter, and we will not fail. Freedom will prevail.

Subscribe to Geller Report newsletter here — it’s free and it’s critical NOW when informed decision making and opinion is essential to America’s survival. Share our posts on your social channels and with your email contacts. Fight the great fight.

Follow me on Gettr. I am there, click here. It’s open and free.

Remember, YOU make the work possible. If you can, please contribute to Geller Report.

Here’s PROOF That Reducing ‘Transwomen’s’ Testosterone Levels Does Not Eliminate Their Edge Over Real Women in Sports

As most know, there’s a contentious debate over whether it’s fair to let men who claim they’re female compete in women’s sports. It’s a debate driven more by emotion than reason, as so many things are.

If a fellow claiming female status trounces woman athletes in a fairly high profile competition — as University of Pennsylvania swimmer “Lia” Thomas (birth name “Will”) did recently — the story makes headlines and raises ire; if such a man falters, as Thomas did quite suspiciously and conveniently even more recently, the story disappears. And each side in the debate often claims vindication based on the most recent result. Yet there is a way to definitively and irrefutably (within the realm of reason) prove that one side is correct.

Sports governing bodies will generally say that a man claiming a Made-up Sexual Status (MUSS or, to use the misnomer, “transgender identity”) may compete with women if he reduces his testosterone levels to the normal female range and maintains this hormonal profile for a certain period of time, perhaps a year, prior to competition. This standard is based on the presupposition that current and recent levels of testosterone — the main male sex hormone and a “naturally occurring steroid” (performance enhancing substance) — constitute the only factor determining whether a man enjoys an athletic advantage.

Now, the number of MUSS men competing in women’s sports is perhaps too small to provide a scientifically meaningful set of data with which to test this hypothesis. Yet it still can be tested because there actually is a trove of data on the relative athletic performances of males and females with identical hormonal profiles. These people are called children.

As MedPage Today wrote last July reporting on a study, “Between the ages of 6 and 10, youths saw similar testosterone levels regardless of sex.” (Prepubescent boys and girls also both have low levels of estrogen.) Consequently, if the MUSS agenda testosterone-suppression theory is correct, young lads should not surpass their female age-mates in sports. But what do the data say?

Examining 10-and-under national records in the aforementioned Thomas’s sport, swimming, reveals that in every case but one, the boys’ individual times are faster. Admittedly, the gap is generally quite narrow at such ages — especially in swimming, which may have the smallest intersex performance disparity of any “physical” sport (e.g., not auto racing or target shooting). But it’s consistently there.

Some may point out here that the average age at which boys enter puberty is now 10 (yes, really; the age has been dropping) and that this may confuse the matter a bit. Yet reviewing eight-and-under swimming records, in this case from the Southern Arizona Aquatic Association, reveals a similar picture: The boys’ individual records are faster in every instance.

The story is the same with 10-and-under and 8-and-under track and field records, though the gap is somewhat greater. Despite prepubescent boys and girls having the same testosterone levels, the boys’ records are better without exception.

Prepubescent boys also have something interesting in common with MUSS men who’ve suppressed their testosterone production: Their bodies once produced high levels of the hormone — in young lads’ case in the womb — but do so no longer. But there’s a difference, too: A MUSS man might have lived with corresponding female-range testosterone levels for a year or less.

Eight-year-old boy athletes have lived with those levels for eight years.

Yet they still outperform their eight-year-old female counterparts. They obviously enjoy advantages either, A, relating to permanent changes induced by earlier testosterone exposure (pelvis width, etc.); and/or, B, relating to less well known qualities bestowed by the male genotype (XY).

Given this, is it even remotely reasonable claiming that grown, low-T MUSS men don’t have an athletic advantage over their female counterparts?

There’s still more to consider. Relative to the two groups’ respective female counterparts, prepubescent boys lack some advantages that MUSS men enjoy and have some disadvantages MUSS men don’t. For example, not having experienced male adolescence — including exposure to high testosterone levels for those many years — they never developed the associated musculature and skeletal size, the latter of which changes not a whit with testosterone reduction. Moreover, since girls enter puberty approximately two years earlier and thus begin developing sooner, boys are generally shorter and slightly lighter than they are by middle childhood’s end.

Nonetheless, there’s still an athletic performance gap between the two groups, favoring the boys.

Given this, does it not follow that an intersex sports performance gap favoring MUSS men over women would not only exist, but be even greater?

Conclusion: Testosterone suppression surely does rob a male athlete of much of his sex-bestowed advantage. Yet it’s clear that it doesn’t rob him of all such advantages.

None of this will matter to emotion-driven people so in thrall to the sexual devolutionary agenda that rationality will seem risible. But to those who’ll yield to reason, it closes the case on the question of MUSS men in women’s sports perhaps as well as Columbo ever could.

Contact Selwyn Duke, follow him on MeWe or Parler, or log on to

©Selwyn Duke. All rights reserved.

Dr. Robert Malone, Knight in Shining Armor or Controlled Opposition?

“The best way to control opposition is to lead it ourselves.” –  Vladimir Lenin

“A body of men holding themselves accountable to nobody ought not to be trusted by anybody.” –  Thomas Paine

“When once a Republic is corrupted, there is no possibility of remedying any of the growing evils but by removing the corruption and restoring its lost principles; every other correction is either useless or a new evil.” –  Thomas Jefferson

“Unthinking respect for authority is the greatest enemy of truth.” – Albert Einstein

“The ideal subject of totalitarian rule is not the convinced Nazi or the dedicated communist, but people for whom the distinction between fact and fiction, true and false, no longer exists.” –  Hannah Arendt

“Controlled opposition” is a protest movement that is actually being led by government agents. Nearly all governments in history have employed this technique to trick and subdue their adversaries, and America is no different.  We have plenty of them; they are widely employed in every arena of society, they even run organizations claiming to be constitutional conservatives and too often they fool most of the electorate.

Not since 1860 has America been so polarized as it is today.  Back in the 1950s, it was mere nuance that separated the Left from the Right.  Everybody loved Mom, baseball, apple pie, babies and the flag.  Not so much anymore.

Countless physicians, scientists, PhDs and journalists have exposed the menacing and murderous COVID jabs and risked their licenses, their livelihoods and their families to save the lives of their patients and fellow citizens.  One of those brave warriors, is Dr. Peter McCullough who has openly stated that the C-19 virus is a bioweapon and the “vaccines” represent “phase two” of that bioweapon.

The majority of physicians are following the NIH, CDC and FDA protocols and protecting themselves rather than their patients.  Physicians and scientists who abide by the Hippocratic oath and medical freedom are against the experimental mandated jabs, but there are some who are seemingly playing both sides of the fence.

Watch this Dec. 18, 2021 12-minute Bitchute video on mass psychosis by Dr. Malone, and his Jan. 14, 2022 five-minute YouTube video on “Fear Porn.”

Both of these videos are professionally done and tell the truth as we know it.  Yet, they smack of political ads as though the doctor is seeking a particular office.

Dr. Robert Malone

Doctors Robert and Jill Malone live in Madison, VA – just outside of Charlottesville. They own Cielo Azure Lusitanos, a specialized Lusitano horse breeding farm.  These handsome equines are truly magnificent creatures.  The good doctor’s brilliant career has given them a life of luxury and pleasure.

Dr. Malone and mRNA

Dr. Malone, an American virologist and immunologist is a man on a mission who appeared virtually out of nowhere and has taken center stage with countless interviews.  His name has become a household word as a knight in shining armor out to save the world.  But is he?

On his website, twitter and linked In, Dr. Malone credits himself with being the inventor of the mRNA “vaccines,” but Dr. Katalin Karikó and her collaborator Dr. Drew Weissman, along with Moderna founder Derrick Rossi, are more commonly credited with laying the groundwork for mRNA inoculations.  The price paid by both BioNTech and Moderna to license the University of Pennsylvania patent on the modified mRNA base by Kati Karikó and Drew Weissman was $75 million.

It all started when Malone was at the Salk Institute in 1987 and 1988. There, he pioneered in-vitro RNA transfection and also in-vivo RNA transfection (in frog embryos, as well as mice).  In 1989, Malone published a paper titled “Cationic liposome-mediated RNA transfection.”  While this paper is an example of his important contribution to the then-emerging field, it does not make him the inventor of mRNA jabs.

Malone’s research may have been important, but scientific breakthroughs don’t always boast a sole “inventor.” Many scientists are responsible for the technology.  Dr. Malone did not invent the mRNA “vaccines,” but instead the “vaccine technology platform.”

Malone’s Curriculum Vitae

The 17-page curriculum vitae of Dr. Malone tells the story of his many achievements, but the big story is that it shows he is more knowledgeable than anyone else about COVID, the medical industry and government.  He understands the bioweapon and spike protein inside and out.  Please view his history.

Joe Rogan interviewed Dr. Robert Malone for three hours.  If you haven’t listened to it, I’d urge you to take the time, even if you do it piecemeal.  Following is a portion of how Dr. Malone described himself to Rogan within the first eight minutes.

“For the last, I guess, about 20 years I’ve been focused on actually doing stuff, regulatory affairs, clinical development, getting necessary training, etc., completed a fellowship at Harvard University Medical School as a global clinical scholar to round out my CV. I’ve run over 100 clinical trials, mostly in the vaccine space, but also in drug repurposing.

“I’ve been involved in every major outbreak since AIDS; this is kind of what I do.  I’ve won literally billions of dollars in federal grants and contracts. I’m often brought in by National Institutes of Health to serve as a study section chair for awarding $80 to $120 million dollar contracts in vaccines and biodefense.

“I’ve spent countless hours at the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), at the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) meetings. I have multiple friends at the CDC and I work closely with the defense threat reduction agency and it’s one of my favorite clients, teaming partners. I work with the chem biodefense group; there’s other branches but this is not the branch that funded the Wuhan Labs; that’s another branch of Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA).

“I’ve got many friends in the intelligence community so I’m kind of a pretty deep insider in terms of the government. (He has bragged about his deep intel connections.) I know Tony Fauci personally; I’ve dealt with him my whole career. Then we had this particular outbreak, and I was tip of the spear on bringing the Ebola vaccine forward that we now call the Merck Ebola vaccine.  I’m the one that got Merck involved.”  (The emblem/seal for the United States Special Command is literally the “tip of the spear.”)

Early in his career, Dr. Malone created the technology platform that is now the basis of the company called INOVIO Pharmaceuticals.  He stated on the Rogan interview that INOVIO used pulsed electrical fields and they have one of the DNA vaccines for Covid.  When 9/11 happened, the investors pulled back and he went to work for a company called Dynport Vaccine Company. They had the prime systems contract as government speak for all the biodefense products for the Department of Defense (DOD) for advanced development which is to say clinical trials through licensure.

Dr. Malone also claims that early on he took two C-19 jabs and has had terrible adverse effects from it.  However, with all the knowledge he had about this inoculation, I have to wonder if he really took it.

Salk Polio Vaccine

Malone scientifically trained at UC Davis, UC San Diego, and at the Salk Institute Molecular Biology and Virology laboratories as well as spending time in 1989 at Salk working on mRNA vaccines, gene therapy, transient gene therapy and as a drug (the latter two terms coined by Dr. Malone).

The Salk polio vaccine comes in two types: the Salk vaccine, made with a killed virus and the Sabin vaccine, made with a live but weakened, or attenuated, virus.  By 1959, the Salk vaccine had covered 90 countries.  In 1961, Sabin’s live oral polio vaccine came into use.

America’s first polio vaccine led to a growing vaccine crisis.  Cutter and Wyeth’s polio vaccine was reported to have paralyzed and killed several children. It was soon discovered that some lots of Salk polio vaccine made by Cutter and Wyeth had not been properly inactivated, allowing live poliovirus into more than 100,000 doses of vaccine.  (Sound familiar?)

Between 1954 and 1963, close to 98 million Americans received polio vaccinations contaminated with a carcinogenic monkey virus, known as Simian Virus 40 (SV-40). The vaccine caused cancers not only in those who received the vaccine, but it is genetically passed to offspring.

Sanofi Pharmaceuticals was the first worldwide leader in the production of the Salk polio vaccine.  The French drug giant has been convinced of the messenger RNA technology’s promise.

There is a tangled history of mRNA “Vaccines.”  Researchers at the human-genetic-therapies division of the pharmaceutical firm Shire in Lexington, Massachusetts, reasoned that unmodified mRNA could yield a product that was just as effective if the right ‘cap’ structures were added and all impurities were removed. They continued to advance the technology at Translate Bio in Cambridge, to which Shire later sold its mRNA portfolio.  The 2022 Moderna and Pfizer forecasts are $30 billion and $56 billion respectively.

In August 2021, Sanofi announced plans to acquire Translate for $3.2 billion.  US government grants and money distributed by the White House’s Operation Warp Speed to accelerate the development, manufacture and distribution of Covid-19 vaccines were $11 billion. Several recipients failed to come up with the goods by 2021, including Sanofi and GlaxoSmithKline.  Blackrock, owned and run by Democrat Larry Fink, has ownership of 377,284,263 shares of GlaxoSmithKline.

Sanofi Pharmaceuticals is listed on page 31 of The Horrible History of Big Pharma and tells why we cannot leave pharmaceutical companies in the driving seat of the Covid-19 response.


Dr. Malone worked with the World Health Organization (WHO) as well as the initial set up of the licensing deal of the Ebola vaccine to Merck & Co. Inc. Pharmaceuticals.

According to Dr. Fauci’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), currently there are no licensed vaccines to prevent Ebola virus disease. However, multiple investigational Ebola vaccines have been tested in numerous clinical trials around the world. NIAID has supported the development of various candidates, including the rVSV-ZEBOV vaccine developed by Merck. This candidate has been administered to people at risk of Ebola virus disease in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) and was previously tested in NIAID-supported clinical trials in West Africa.  Link

Variants/Ebola, China and the DOD

In an interview, Dr. Malone stated, “In my experience, the DOD people who have been involved in this all the way through, are not comfortable with what’s going on and they have been very clear and straightforward to me when I’ve spoken to them, including the colonel who was in charge of the “operation warp speed” project for Moderna.  He called me months ago, set up a zoom, and was very, very plainspoken with me about what he observed.”

Dr. Malone knows the DOD people and spends a lot of time with them and I would bet the DOD knows exactly what is going on in China right now regarding news of a newer variant related to Ebola. Is there a hemorrhagic fever virus going on there or not?  I would guess both Malone and the DOD already know especially since Malone worked with WHO regarding Merck vaccines for Ebola which he brought to fruition.  He has bragged about his deep connection to the intelligence community.

That alone should give anyone pause.

In early January 2022, Dr. Malone was on Steve Bannon’s War Room where he warned of a new disease spreading across Communist China that appears to be an “Ebola-like hemorrhagic fever” super virus caused by mutations arising from mass vaccinations.  “The truth is this (Sars-CoV-2) is not an extremely lethal virus. This is nowhere near Ebola,” Malone commented.

Malone also mentions the fact that Steve Bannon is exposing what is going on in China and whatever the pathogen is, not only is it on the doorstep of Beijing, but three large cities have been shut down because of it threatening the Olympic games.  Listen here to radio host Jeff Rense interview a scientist regarding Dr. Malone and Ebola.

Here comes a new epidemic of fear, the very psychosis that keeps people and school children in their worthless masks.

Malone said, “The governments, together with the Gates Foundation and the World Economic Forum, have performed a series of war game studies over the last 20 years.  They have gotten increasingly sophisticated in those war game studies, but they’ve kind of been biased towards authoritarian outcomes in all these studies, and they brought in other countries for training in how these war games should be run and how they should respond to the threat of a pandemic.

“The number one thing is that they’ve all had some poor assumptions that the pandemic threat agent is extremely lethal.”

Surely, they knew COVID was a very treatable virus, but they used fear and the hospital protocols to engineer a deadly outcome worldwide, especially in America. Only their lethal COVID jabs would save the people!  Until then, they let us die.  Money, depopulation and totalitarian control were the ultimate objectives.

This was all planned and the stakeholders know what is going to happen before they even roll it out.  Yes, planned and executed on the American populace as well as worldwide and for over 20 years.

The CCP COVID Pandemic was predicted over a decade ago by the Rockefeller Foundation.

Their intention was clear: to use the opportunity of the scenario or crisis to shape a “better future” or transform the world into their likeness – a New World Order global totalitarian dictatorship. The Lock Step scenario is described as “a world of tighter top-down government control and more authoritarian leadership, with limited innovation and growing citizen pushback” and is based on a pandemic of a virus (an influenza strain) which infects nearly 20% of the world population and kills 8 million people in 7 months. 

People were growing weary and hateful about masks, so the snakeholders decided to lift that requirement.  Yet, fear has paralyzed rational thinking.  The psychosis of fear is now so embedded that any new variant leads the masses to once again don their face diapers and keep their distance from others.

Vax the Vulnerable

Those who have listened to Dr. Malone believe him to be a saint when he tells people not to allow their children to be jabbed with this “vaccine.”

On Malone’s website, he states his mission, “My mission is to ensure vaccine safety, make sure that children are protected, stop and/or limit the vaccine mandates, to identify and teach about lifesaving treatments for COVID-19 and other pandemics. My goal is to save lives.”

However, that hasn’t stopped him from continually repeating that “the most vulnerable” should be injected.

And why did he tweet the following only six months ago? Surveillance, tracing and testing?  Really Dr. Malone?  Those statements match the NIH, CDC and FDA.

In an October 2021 interview, while in Hawaii, Dr. Malone said, “The breakthroughs on the Delta virus continue to evolve.  It’s fascinating that we’re seeing the Delta virus moving into the population and it will move through Hawaii. There’s no question that it will.  It’s strange that it’s moving from the south into the heavily vaccinated northern states.  The people who are ending up in the hospital once again are the elderly and high-risk populations.  The CDC info that was leaked to the Washington Post a month ago shows that the current vaccines are leaky, that there’s no way they can stop the spread of Delta virus.  The only way that it can even be slowed is with as much vaccination as possible and use of masks.”

What Malone just stated is the party line, the exact line of the stakeholders!

In a previous article, I mentioned Steve Bannon’s November 26th show, where Peter Navarro stated, “There has to be an end immediately to the universal vax policy.  It’s very clear and Dr. Malone can talk about the science of this, and that we are running the risk of creating vaccine resistant mutations. They are proliferating. That could wind up doing great harm to people around the world who, ironically, are vaccinated.  That policy is not working.  The Malone/Navarro doctrine is to vaccinate only the most vulnerable targets. Always remember that we are not really vaccinating people, that is not a vaccination.”

In their Washington Times article of January 12, 2022, Peter Navarro and Dr. Robert Malone are still pushing this vax for the “most vulnerable.”  Who are they…the elderly, often referred to as “useless eaters” by the proponents of depopulation and genocide?  They are the ones most likely to die from this gene therapy jab that attacks the immune system and destroys the ability of the T-cells to fight future invaders.

The most vulnerable Americans are living too long and they’re a drain on Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security. They are also the last generation, mostly baby boomers, who were taught our Constitution and what this country went through to gain her independence and truly become the greatest nation of freedom and liberty.

Depopulation is the goal under UN Agenda 21/30, but the desire to rid our land of the Baby Boomers and replace them with illegal aliens is the ultimate goal and Robert Malone is apparently all for it.  Illegal aliens are allegedly given Ivermectin when they cross the border and are not required to be “vaccinated.”


You may want to listen again to the two Malone videos in the opening salvos of this article.  Will Dr. Malone be chosen for a particular position?  Will he replace Anthony Fauci?  Will he be a presidential advisor? Is he truly the knight in shining armor or is he “controlled opposition?”

Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves.  Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles?  Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit; but a corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit.  Matthew 7:15-17

©Kelleigh Nelson. All rights reserved.

Biden Says Russia Can Invade Ukraine So Long As They Avoid Hunter’s Gas Company

WASHINGTON, D.C.—In a surprise move, President Biden gave Russia the green light to launch an invasion into Ukraine, with the small caveat that they don’t blow up the oil company paying for Hunter’s art lessons.

“I looked Vladimir straight in the eye,” said President Biden in a haunting whisper. “I told him, I said – ‘Vlady boy, I know you’re going to invade Ukraine. I know, because every major news network in the world says so. So let’s get one thing straight. I’m okay with it. I don’t like Ukrainians with all their borscht, it upsets my tummy. But that oil company pays Hunter $50K a month, and do you know how expensive art lessons are these days, Vlad? You lay one finger on Burisma’s boardroom, and so help me I will nuke Stalingrad.'”

Ukrainian officials were reportedly caught off guard, and a little perturbed, by President Biden’s approval of them being invaded. “I thought we were friends. I gave him all that borscht,” said President Zelensky. “What even is a ‘minor invasion’? Is this some American term I don’t know? I thought I heard him say that before about a woman named Tara Reade. Get me my translator!”

Elsewhere, Chinese officials announced they were happy to hear that President Biden would be in support of their performing a “minor invasion” into Taiwan. Afghanis thanked President Biden for allowing the Taliban to only perform a minor takeover, and January 6th rioters asked to have their breaking into the Capitol re-classified as a “minor incursion”.


San Francisco Store Clerk Confused As Shopper Actually Tries To Pay For Merchandise

‘Not On My Watch’: DeSantis Signs Executive Order That Green M&M Must Still Be Sexy In Florida

9 Offensive Candies That Need To Get Woke Immediately

‘The Misinformation Is Coming From Inside The Building,’ Whispers Terrified CNN Misinformation Team Member

EDITORS NOTE: This political satire column by The Babylon Bee is republished with permission. All rights reserved. A Babylon Bee subscriber contributed to this report. If you want to get involved with the staff writers at The Babylon Bee, check out our membership options here!