Tag Archive for: OPINION

Why Most AI Projects Fail Before They Start

Most people and businesses believe that implementing AI is a simple process: you input your data, and an AI magically generates value. However, this episode breaks down this misconception, highlighting the significant work that exists in the “missing middle.” This middle piece is a deep dive into data science, a non-glamorous, but vital step that is often overlooked. AI, while it may seem intuitive, is fundamentally driven by mathematics and requires clean, organized, and properly formatted data to function efficiently. This is the main reason why many AI projects fail before they even start—because they skip this critical, time-consuming phase of data preparation and normalization.

Lee and Rich introduce three foundational “laws” of AI to help listeners reframe their understanding of its true nature. The first law is simple: what you put in is what you get out. An AI agent is only as good as the data it is trained on. This means that a project with an ambiguous scope and low-quality data will inevitably produce poor results. The second law is that what is being used is getting better. They stress that AI is an iterative tool that learns through use, and continuous reinforcement learning is necessary for it to become truly effective. The final law is a reminder not to judge AI by human standards. AI does not think, it mimics; expecting it to behave like a human will only lead to frustration, as its purpose is to process information and complete tasks in a mathematically efficient way, not to replicate human common sense or intuition.

We also discuss the common budget and expectation issues that can derail an AI project. Arguing that many businesses are “hungover” from previous, large-scale tech implementations that promised a lot but delivered minimal return on investment. This has created a natural resistance to another big investment. However, they clarify that AI doesn’t require a monolithic investment. Instead, it should be viewed as an iterative, phased process. The most significant benefit of AI is not replacing humans, but rather accelerating a business by addressing the human capacity issues that cap efficiency at around 60-70%. AI should be seen as a great accelerator that allows employees to reclaim time from mundane tasks and focus on high-value work, which is the ultimate goal of any worthwhile investment in technology.

Key Takeaways:

  • The “missing middle” of AI refers to the essential and often-overlooked data science work required to prepare data for a model.
  • The first law of AI is, “what you put in is what you get out,” meaning the quality and relevance of your training data directly impacts the AI’s performance.
  • The second law of AI is, “what is being used is getting better,” emphasizing that continuous use and human feedback are crucial for an AI’s improvement.
  • The third law of AI states that you should not judge it by human standards, as it is a mathematical mimicry tool, not a human replacement.
  • Many companies are hesitant to invest in new technology due to bad experiences with previous large-scale, high-cost tech implementations.
  • AI projects should be approached iteratively, with a reasonable scope and phased training, rather than as a single, large investment.
  • The primary purpose of AI is not to replace humans, but to serve as a great accelerator, boosting human productivity and freeing up time.
  • The most significant return on investment comes from using AI to automate work and unlock human potential from repetitive tasks.
  • A consumer’s experience with easy-to-use models like ChatGPT can create unrealistic expectations for building a custom, business-specific AI.
  • The human plus AI combination is currently the most powerful force in innovation, as humans provide context and intuition to the AI’s raw processing power.

Interested in A.I.? Check out our podcast A.I. Guys. Subscribe to us on Apple, Spotify, Youtube (or others)

RAIA Website: https://substack.aiguyspod.com https://www.raiaai.com/

All links: https://lnkd.in/eXDpww6V

Spotify: https://lnkd.in/ee9h9GYB

Youtube: https://lnkd.in/etDvqQ7d

Apple: https://lnkd.in/epYT2GSi

©2025 . All rights reserved.

Israel Moves to Sue New York Times for $10 Billion for The Blood Libel They Spread

Israel  considering sing New York Times and the journalists who blood libel-ed Israelfor $10 BILLION for the blood libel it spread, says Israeli analyst Bardugo Jacob.

This needs to happen. The New York Times has been defaming, smearing and libeling Israel for years now and set the template for worldwide Jew hating press.

The NY Times’ Non-apology for Its Nasty Blood Libel

Nearly 25 years ago, HonestReporting began its mission by taking on The New York Times over a photo it published of a young man — bloodied and battered — crouching beneath a club-wielding Israeli policeman….

·   

Nearly 25 years ago, HonestReporting began its mission by taking on The New York Times over a photo it published of a young man — bloodied and battered — crouching beneath a club-wielding Israeli policeman. The caption identified him as a Palestinian victim of recent riots — with the clear implication that the Israeli soldier was the one who beat him.The effort to fix the incorrect reporting started with the boy’s father writing a letter to the Times, explaining the truth about his son, a Jewish student from Chicago who was pulled from his Jerusalem taxi by a mob of Arabs who beat and stabbed him and his friends. A half-hearted correction was issued about “an American student in Israel” — not a Jew beaten by Arabs. Only after additional public outrage did the Times reprint Tuvia Grossman’s picture — this time with the proper caption — along with a full article detailing his near-lynching at the hands of Palestinians.Fast forward to last Thursday, when the Times put on its front page a moving photo of a skeletal child, Muhammad Zakariya Ayyoub al-Matouq, cradled in his mother’s arms. The photo, taken by a photographer for a Turkish news agency, looked like a gut-wrenching snapshot of starvation in Gaza.The underlying message was that Israel was deliberately starving Gazan children.It took five days of pressure from the Israeli consulate in New York and organizations like HonestReporting for the Times to admit their mistake.“After publication of the article, The Times learned from his doctor that Mohammed also had pre-existing health problems,” an editor’s note added to the article said.A New York Times spokeswoman issued this statement on Tuesday night:

Children in Gaza are malnourished and starving, as New York Times reporters and others have documented. We recently ran a story about Gaza’s most vulnerable civilians, including Mohammed Zakaria al-Mutawaq, who is about 18 months old and suffers from severe malnutrition. We have since learned new information, including from the hospital that treated him and his medical records, and have updated our story to add context about his pre-existing health problems. This additional detail gives readers a greater understanding of his situation. Our reporters and photographers continue to report from Gaza, bravely, sensitively, and at personal risk, so that readers can see firsthand the consequences of the war.”

In other words, the New York Times ran a picture without properly checking the truth behind it. The Times continues to stand behind the underlying message against Israel that it tried to convey by running the photo in the first place.

Instead of being self-critical about its reporters and photographers who got the story wrong, the Times praised their bravery and sensitivity.

No, New York Times, the new information does not merely add context about Mohammed’s pre-existing health problems. It proves that the way he looks has nothing to do with Israel and the war that began with the October 7 massacre.

Thank you for your non-apology, but the damage of this blood libel has already been done. It has been weaponized and used to demonize Israel around the world, resulting in dangerous policy changes by the leaders of France and the United Kingdom and the president of the United States saying “That’s real starvation. I see it, and you can’t fake that.”

The New York Times’ lies about the photograph and the resulting international condemnation of Israel led to Hamas hardening its positions in negotiations to end the war. There are up to 20 live Israeli hostages, who are actually known to be starving, whose horror has been prolonged by the irresponsibility of the Times and other media outlets that ran the photo without doing their due diligence.

There have also been antisemitic incidents throughout the world since the photo ran, and the connection between the rapid rise in anti-Jewish violence and its connection to dishonest reporting since October 7, 2023, has been well documented.

Instead of running a front-page apology online and in print and showing true accountability, the Times hid its correction by posting it on its PR account, which has 89,000 followers on X, not its regular account with 55 million followers.

The Times also has not taken back another incorrect report, published Saturday, claiming in a headline that is shameful since it’s not satirical: “No Proof Hamas Routinely Stole U.N. Aid, Israeli Military Officials Say.”

The article quotes unnamed, anonymous “military sources.” Even after official IDF spokesperson Nadav Shoshani said and proved that the opposite was true, there has still been no admission from the Times that it made yet another dangerous mistake. There has been no statement by the newspaper’s spokeswoman and no editor’s note.

But at least with its statement about the photo, The Times did somewhat more than nothing to update its readers. Other media outlets have not even done that.

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLES:

Another Photo. Another Lie.

FBI Investigating Brutal Assault on Kosher Restaurant, Attackers Screamed “Kill all the Jews” While Beating Jewish Diners

REAL GENOCIDE: Muslims Slaughter Scores of Christians in the Congo

Muslim Candidates and the Threat to American Freedom

‘JEW EXCLUSION ZONE’: UCLA Will Pay Over $6 Million to Settle Lawsuit Over Anti-Semitic Discrimination: “Disgusting Breach of Civil Rights Against Students”

Harvard Offers to Pay $500 Million to Settle With Trump Administration

ABSOLUTE DISGRACE: Humiliated Starmer Lashes Out By Declaring Support for Terror State

RELATED VIDEO: President Donald J. Trump on the idea of creating a Palestinian state

POSTS ON X:

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

I’m A Senior Trump Official, And I Hope A Long Shutdown Smokes Out The Resistance

The Daily Caller is taking the rare step of publishing this anonymous op-ed at the request of the author, a senior official in the Trump administration whose identity is known to us and whose career would be jeopardized by its disclosure. We believe publishing this essay anonymously is the only way to deliver an important perspective to our readers. We invite you to submit a question about the essay or our vetting process here.

As one of the senior officials working without a paycheck, a few words of advice for the president’s next move at shuttered government agencies: lock the doors, sell the furniture, and cut them down.

Federal employees are starting to feel the strain of the shutdown. I am one of them. But for the sake of our nation, I hope it lasts a very long time, till the government is changed and can never return to its previous form.

The lapse in appropriations is more than a battle over a wall. It is an opportunity to strip wasteful government agencies for good.

On an average day, roughly 15 percent of the employees around me are exceptional patriots serving their country. I wish I could give competitive salaries to them and no one else. But 80 percent feel no pressure to produce results. If they don’t feel like doing what they are told, they don’t.

Why would they? We can’t fire them. They avoid attention, plan their weekend, schedule vacation, their second job, their next position — some do this in the same position for more than a decade.

They do nothing that warrants punishment and nothing of external value. That is their workday: errands for the sake of errands — administering, refining, following and collaborating on process. “Process is your friend” is what delusional civil servants tell themselves. Even senior officials must gain approval from every rank across their department, other agencies and work units for basic administrative chores.

Process is what we serve, process keeps us safe, process is our core value. It takes a lot of people to maintain the process. Process provides jobs. In fact, there are process experts and certified process managers who protect the process. Then there are the 5 percent with moxy (career managers). At any given time they can change, clarify or add to the process — even to distort or block policy counsel for the president.

Saboteurs peddling opinion as research, tasking their staff on pet projects or pitching wasteful grants to their friends. Most of my career colleagues actively work against the president’s agenda. This means I typically spend about 15 percent of my time on the president’s agenda and 85 percent of my time trying to stop sabotage, and we have no power to get rid of them. Until the shutdown.

Due to the lack of funding, many federal agencies are now operating more effectively from the top down on a fraction of their workforce, with only select essential personnel serving national security tasks. One might think this is how government should function, but bureaucracies operate from the bottom up — a collective of self-generated ideas. Ideas become initiatives, formalize into offices, they seek funds from Congress and become bureaus or sub-agencies, and maybe one day grow to be their own independent agency, like ours. The nature of a big administrative bureaucracy is to grow to serve itself. I watch it and fight it daily.

When the agency is full, employees held liable for poor performance respond with threats, lawsuits, complaints and process in at least a dozen offices, taking years of mounting paperwork with no fear of accountability, extending their careers, while no real work is done. Do we succumb to such extortion? Yes. We pay them settlements, we waive bad reviews, and we promote them.

Many government agencies have adopted the position that more complaints are good because it shows inclusion in, you guessed it, the process. When complaints come, it is cheaper to pay them off than to hold public servants accountable. The result: People accused of serious offenses are not charged, and self-proclaimed victims are paid by you, the American taxpayer.

The message to federal supervisors is clear. Maintain the status quo, or face allegations. Many federal employees truly believe that doing tasks more efficiently and cutting out waste, by closing troubled programs instead of expanding them, “is morally wrong,” as one cried to me.

I get it. These are their pets. It is tough to put them down and let go, and many resist. This phenomenon was best summed up by a colleague who said, “The goal in government is to do nothing. If you try to get things done, that’s when you will run into trouble.”

But President Trump can end this abuse. Senior officials can reprioritize during an extended shutdown, focus on valuable results and weed out the saboteurs. We do not want most employees to return, because we are working better without them. Sure, we empathize with families making tough financial decisions, like mine, and just like private citizens who have to find other work and bring competitive value every day, while paying more than a third of their salary in federal taxes.

President Trump has created more jobs in the private sector than the furloughed federal workforce. Now that we are shut down, not only are we identifying and eliminating much of the sabotage and waste, but we are finally working on the president’s agenda.

President Trump does not need Congress to address the border emergency, and yes, it is an emergency. Billions upon billions of hard-earned tax dollars are still being dumped into foreign aid programs every year that do nothing for America’s interest or national security. The president does not need congressional funding to deconstruct abusive agencies who work against his agenda. This is a chance to effect real change, and his leverage grows stronger every day the shutdown lasts.

The president should add to his demands, including a vote on all of his political nominees in the Senate. Send the career appointees back. Many are in the 5 percent of saboteurs and resistance leaders.

A word of caution: To be a victory, this shutdown must be different than those of the past and should achieve lasting disruption with two major changes, or it will hurt the president.

The first thing we need out of this is better security, particularly at the southern border. Our founders envisioned a free market night watchman state, not the bungled bloated bureaucracy our government has become. But we have to keep the uniformed officers paid, which is an emergency. Ideally, continue a resolution to pay the essential employees only, if they are truly working on national security. Furloughed employees should find other work, never return and not be paid.

Secondly, we need savings for taxpayers. If this fight is merely rhetorical bickering with Nancy Pelosi, we all lose, especially the president. But if it proves that government is better when smaller, focusing only on essential functions that serve Americans, then President Trump will achieve something great that Reagan was only bold enough to dream.

The president’s instincts are right. Most Americans will not miss non-essential government functions. A referendum to end government plunder must happen. Wasteful government agencies are fighting for relevance but they will lose. Now is the time to deliver historic change by cutting them down forever.

The author is a senior official in the Trump administration.


RELATED ARTICLES:

Remember When Obama And Clinton Shut Down Government For Their Own Pet Projects?

New Facts Indicate Mueller Destroyed Evidence, Obstructed Justice

EPA Employees Who Watched Porn, Harassed Women And Got Promoted

Trump’s Shutdown Differs Greatly From Obama’s

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column with images is republished with permission. The views and opinions expressed in this commentary are those of the author and do not reflect the official position of The Daily Caller.