The White House: 12/06/25 | Peace & Prosperity!

Check out the Media Offenders of the Week!

President Trump attended the first White House Christmas party where he paid his paid his respects to the National Guard, especially Guardsman Sarah Beckstrom and Guardsman Andrew Wolfe who were attacked last week. He lowered flags to half-staff in memory of Sarah, and welcomed Andrew’s family to the Oval Office.

In an incredibly busy week, the President signed the Medal of Honor Act, declared all Biden autopen orders null and void, hosted his ninth Cabinet Meeting, and the Institute of Peace was named after him. At the Institute, he welcomed President Kagame of Rwanda and President Tshisekedi of the Democratic Republic of the Congo to sign the Washington Accords, a major peace deal.

He also made two major announcements. The first was with the Dell Family who donated $6.25 billion to fund Trump Accounts for 25 million children. The second was with automakers to reset Biden’s Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) Standards.

To end the week, President Trump attended the National Christmas Tree Lighting and the FIFA World Cup Drawing to accept their inaugural 2025 FIFA Peace PrizeThe Village People marked the occasion with a special performance.

Vice President Vance joined the President for the Cabinet meeting and commented on fixing the affordability crisis left by the Democrats and joined NBC News’ Henry Gomez for an interview on the number of topics surrounding the Administration.

First Lady Melania Trump unveiled the White House Christmas decorations with the theme, “Home is Where the Heart is”, a gorgeous display with illustrations from artist Hervé Pierre. She also attended the The National Christmas Tree Lighting Ceremonyread to young children at the Children’s National Hospital, and celebrated seven additional children being reunited with their families in Ukraine. The First Lady and Second Lady Usha Vance visited Joint Base Andrews to assemble care packages for deployed troops.

TRUMP ADMINISTRATION WINS

 AFFORDABILITY | With affordability as the primary focus of the Trump Administration, this week it was reported that 31 states have gas prices averages below $3.00 per gallon, the median rent fell for the fourth straight month, and homebuyers are starting to notice a decline in prices — notably Pittsburgh had a typical $20,000 markdown (about 9%).

 IMMIGRATION | The Trump Administration has has paused all asylum adjudications and Special Immigrant Visas and USCIS has cracked down on the vetting process of aliens working in the United States to make American safer for every citizen, and prevent future tragedies like the shooting on our National Guard last week.

 TRUMP ACCOUNTS | On this Giving Tuesday, Michael and Susan Dell donated $6.25 billion to fund the Trump accounts of 25 million children under the age of ten with $250 each, money that will earn compounded interest until they turn 18.

 CAFE STANDARDS | Joe Biden’s fuel efficiency regulations would have raised the cost of a new vehicle by $1,000. President Trump’s action rolling back the standards will save Americans  $109 billion!

 2021 PIPE BOMBER CAUGHT | After fives years without an arrest after the Biden Administration dropped the ball, Brian Cole Jr. was arrested charged with placing the pipe bombs at the RNC and the DNC on January 5th, 2021, using previously collected evidence.

MAJOR EVENTS

President Trump and The First Lady Participate in the National Christmas Tree Lighting, Dec. 4, 2025

 IN THE NEWS

MORE NEWS ON THE WIRE

MARK TWAIN Presidential Message on Mark Twain’s 190th Birthday | 11/30/2025

  MEDIA BIAS OFFENDER OF THE WEEK

CLAIM:

The Washington Post’s Alex Horton and Ellen Nakashima published an article from two unnamed sources claiming Secretary Pete Hegseth ordered a Joint Special Operations commander to “kill everybody” during an anti-terrorist operation in the Caribbean Sea.

TRUTH:

The Department of War killed 11 narco-terrorists in a coordinated strike designed to “kill the narco-terrorists who are poisoning the American people.” This attack was the first in a series of lethal kinetic strikes against Designated Terrorist Organizations. The Washington Post published this unsubstantiated claim in an attempt to discredit the United States’ warfighters and inflame anti-American sentiment.

VISIT OUR NEW MEDIA BIAS OFFENDER PORTAL

 THE NUMBER OF THE WEEK

$1 BILLION

Minnesota fraudsters stole over $1 billion from Medicaid and CMS Administrator Dr. Mehmet Oz explains that, “they’ve never seen anything like this in Medicaid — and everyone from Gov. Tim Walz on down needs to be investigated, because they’ve been asleep at the wheel.” READ MORE.

PHOTO OF THE WEEK

©2025 . All rights reserved.

Sharia law makes Islam much more than a religion. Its broad doctrine and application to non-Muslims make Islam a political entity, a government with goals of global dominion.

Sunni Islam and Shia Islam both believe in a global ruler called caliph who will some day govern the world using Sharia law.

This report provides:

  • Definition of Sharia law and relationship to Muslim faith.
  • Countries governed by Sharia.
  • Provisions of Sharia that conflict with American laws.
  • Sharia violence espoused in American mosques.
  • Sharia in America.
  • What should our government’s response be to Sharia?

Definition of Sharia law and relationship to Muslim faith.

Muslim is defined as “a worshipper of Islam.”   Islam is a religion articulated by the Qur‘an. Sharia is the Islamic law which governs every aspect of a Muslims life. The instruction in the Quran and the examples set by the Islamic prophet Muhammad are the two main sources of inspiration for Islamic Sharia law.

According to the Encyclopedia of Islam “Within Muslim discourse, sharia designates the rules and regulations governing the lives of Muslims, derived in principle from the Kuran and hadith. In this sense, the word is closely associated with fiḳh [q.v.], which signifies academic discussion of divine law.”

Sharia governs secular law, including crime, politics and economics as well as prescribing religious conduct and ritual.  Sharia is the equivalent of federal and state statues combined with religious doctrine.  In countries where Sharia is the political code it rules over the lives of Muslims and non-Muslims alike.  Islamic judges interpret Sharia in countries and territories where it has official government status.  Several countries are governed entirely by Islamic Sharia law.  These countries will be described in the next section. \

The multi-governing aspects of Sharia mean that Islam is much more than a religion.  Islam is also a political entity with governmental code set by Sharia.  Its broad doctrine and application to non-Muslims make Islam a political entity, a government with goals of global dominion.

The first system of government established in Islam and represented the leader’s unity of the Muslim Ummah community was called Caliphate. Caliphate is the worldwide dominion by an Islamic sort of emperor called Caliph who is charged with enforcing Sharia law on all earthly inhabitants. Sunni Islam and Shia Islam both believe in a global ruler called caliph who will some day govern the world using Sharia law.

Sharia is the governing law or primary legislative doctrine in many countries including:  Aceh, Afghanistan, Algeria, Bangladesh, Chechnya, Egypt, Gambia, Indonesia, Iran, Iraq, Libya, Malaysia, Mauritania, Morocco, Nigeria, Oman, Qatar, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, Tunisia, West Java and Yemen.

LONDON Dailymail.co.uk July 28, 2011 “Islamic extremists have launched a poster campaign across the UK proclaiming areas where Sharia law enforcement zones have been set up.”

Communities have been bombarded with the posters, which read: ‘You are entering a Sharia-controlled zone – Islamic rules enforced.’ The bright yellow messages daubed on bus stops and street lamps have already been seen across certain boroughs in London and order that in the ‘zone’ there should be ‘no gambling’, ‘no music or concerts’, ‘no porn or prostitution’, ‘no drugs or smoking’ and ‘no alcohol’.

Hate preacher Anjem Choudary has claimed responsibility for the scheme, saying he plans to flood specific Muslim and non-Muslim communities around the UK and ‘put the seeds down for an Islamic Emirate in the long term’. In the past week, dozens of streets in the London boroughs of Waltham Forest, Tower Hamlets and Newham have been targeted, raising fears that local residents may be intimidated or threatened for flouting ‘Islamic rules’.

Choudary, who runs the banned militant group Islam4UK, warned: ‘We now have hundreds if not thousands of people up and down the country willing to go out and patrol the streets for us and a print run of between 10,000 and 50,000 stickers ready for distribution.’

EGYPT This picture, taken at a late 2011 protest in Egypt, has been making the rounds on various Arabic websites. Note the rope around the women, herding them like camels; note the man to the right holding the leash, walking them. This is a common “precautionary measure” to keep women from mixing with men during protests.

Egypt converted their public policy for all citizens to Sharia after the United States helped the Muslim Brotherhood organization called the Arab Spring to seize control of the country with the election of Mohammed Mursi.

Egyptian cleric Sheik Muhammad Sallah made the case for Sharia law. Appearing on Al-Hekma TV in Egypt on May 4, he said that if Egypt would simply force its citizens to live by the “Shari’a of Allah,“ it would become the ”mightiest nation in the world” and even more wealthy than Sweden.

PARIS – Friday in Paris. A hidden camera shows streets blocked by huge crowds of Muslim worshippers and enforced by a private security force.

This is all illegal in France: the public worship, the blocked streets, and the private security. But the police have been ordered not to intervene.

It shows that even though some in the French government want to get tough with Muslims and ban the burqa, other parts of the French government continue to give Islam a privileged status.

An ordinary French citizen who has been watching the Islamization of Paris decided that the world needed to see what was happening to his city. He used a hidden camera to start posting videos on YouTube. His life has been threatened and so he uses the alias of “Maxime Lepante. ” 

Muslim group targets Belgium for Islamic Sharia control. Abu Imran leader of the Islamic group Sharia4Belgium says “We need to be clear there is no difference between Islam and Sharia. Democracy is the opposite of Islam. We believe that Allah makes the laws. We believe that Sharia will be implemented world wide. And a Muslim who says he does not believe in Sharia he is not a Muslim.” Muslims account for twenty five percent of the population of Belgium’s capital Brussels and their population is projected to exceed fifty percent by 2030. Click here to CBN report.

RUSSIA Chechnya broke away from Russia in 1991 and continues to fight for independence.  Chechnya battles against Russian federal control with Sharia law as its most likely replacement.  Moscow has the largest Muslim population in Europe, with four mosques in the Russian capital city serving some two million people.  Russia is Iran’s strongest ally.

Provisions of Sharia that conflict with American laws.

Sharia law advocates many practices that conflict with the rights afforded under the United States Constitution and/or violate state and federal law including:  

  • Perjury, Muslims are permitted and prompted to lie (taqiyya) to non-Muslims.  See Note 1.
  • Discrimination, Muslims are permitted and compelled to discriminate against non-Muslims.  See Note 2.
  • Abolition of adoption rights otherwise granted under American laws.  Islam prohibits adopting children.  See Note 3.
  • Abolition of Wills, Inheritance Instruments and Last Testaments established under American laws.  See Note 4.
  • Abolition of certain interest income otherwise specified in loan, mortgage and other borrowing documents.  See Note 5.
  • Diminished rights of women in court.  It takes the testimony of two women to equal one man in Sharia court.  See Note 6.
  • Polygamy, Muslim men may marry up to four wives.  Muhammad married thirteen women in violation of the Qur’an which he inspired his prophets to write.  See Note 7.
  • Pedophilia, Muslim men can marry girls as young as 14.  However, Muhammad took a wife named Ayesha that was six years old.  See Note 8.
  • Muslim husbands are given the right to beat their wives as a form of discipline.  See Note 9.
  • Killing, torture, imprisonment and/or execution of blasphemers, infidels, Islamist apostates and non-believers.   See Note 10.
  • Vicious jihad against non-Muslims to establish Islam’s rule worldwide.  Muslims who cannot take on physical jihad must support it with their money.  See Note 11.

Sharia violence espoused in American mosques.

Study finds that Sharia minded Imams recommended studying violence-positive texts in 84.5% of United States mosques.

The study was conducted by Dr. Mordechai Kedar and David Yerushalmi, Esq. who are highly regarded experts on Sharia.  David Yerushalmi, Esq. who runs the American Freedom Law Center with Robert J. Muise, Esq. is called The Man Behind the Anti-Shariah Movement … by the New York Times.  Dr. Mordechai Kedar of Bar-Ilan University is an academic expert on the Israeli Arab population.

Survey abstract:  A random survey of 100 representative mosques in the U.S. was conducted to measure the correlation between Sharia adherence and dogma calling for violence against non-believers.  Of the 100 mosques surveyed, 51% had texts on site rated as severely advocating violence; 30% had texts rated as moderately advocating violence; and 19% had no violent texts at all.  Mosques that presented as Sharia adherent were more likely to feature violence-positive texts on site than were their non-Sharia-adherent counterparts.  In 84.5% of the mosques, the imam recommended studying violence-positive texts.  The leadership at Sharia-adherent mosques was more likely to recommend that a worshipper study violence-positive texts than leadership at non-Sharia-adherent mosques.  Fifty-eight percent of the mosques invited guest imams known to promote violent jihad.  The leadership of mosques that featured violence-positive literature was more likely to invite guest imams who were known to promote violent jihad than was the leadership of mosques that did not feature violence-positive literature on mosque premises.  Read more at Terrorismanalysts.com

Sharia in America.

If anyone doubts that Muslims have a strong interest in and plans for Islamizing America with Sharia all they have to do is consider the efforts of Islamic organizations in the United States.

Several Muslim Brotherhood front organizations including the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) and Islamic Circle of North America (ISNA) are vigorously fighting bills in congress and twenty state legislatures that would prohibit courts from considering provisions of foreign laws including Sharia if they are inconsistent with the United States and state constitutions.

CAIR, whose former name was “The Islamic Association of Palestine” issued this March 1, 2012 PRNewswire-USNewswire report: “The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) today released a community toolkit designed to assist those seeking to preserve America’s ideal of religious pluralism in the face of unconstitutional “anti-Sharia” bills that have been introduced in more than 20 states nationwide.”

The Islamic Circle of North America waged a billboard campaign in Kansas aimed at opposing legislation that would prohibit Kansas courts from considering Sharia law. Thankfully the Kansas Legislature approved the bill which was signed into law by Governor Sam Brownback. The Islamic Circle of North America web site has not updated their map below to report that Kansas passed the legislation.

The Islamic Circle of North America reports legislation to prohibit state courts from considering foreign laws including Islamic Sharia:

  • Failed in 14 states: Arkansas, Indiana, Iowa, Maine, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, New Mexico, North Carolina, Texas, South Carolina, Utah, West Virginia and Wyoming.
  • Passed in 4 states: Arizona, Louisiana, Oklahoma and Tennessee.
  • Stalled in 5 states: Alabama, Florida, Georgia, New Hampshire, New Jersey.

The best way to make sure that domestic law enforcement agencies do not detect the multitude of deviations from American law influenced by Sharia is to pressure law enforcement to stop looking at Muslims.

Islamists succeeded in influencing the Obama administration’s FBI to scrub 1,000 counter terrorism presentations and curricula on Islam.

FBI Director Mueller secretly met on February 8, 2012 at FBI headquarters with a coalition of groups including various Islamist and militant Arabic groups who in the past have defended Hamas and Hizballah and have also issued blatantly anti-Semitic statements.

At this meeting, the FBI revealed that it had removed more than 1000 presentations and curricula on Islam from FBI offices around the country that was deemed “offensive.” The FBI did not reveal what criteria was used to determine why material was considered “offensive” but knowledgeable law enforcement sources have told the IPT that it was these radical groups who made that determination. Moreover, numerous FBI agents have confirmed that from now on, FBI headquarters has banned all FBI offices from inviting any counter-terrorist specialists who are considered “anti-Islam” by Muslim Brotherhood front groups.

Judicial Watch, the public interest group that investigates and fights government corruption, has filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit (Judicial Watch v. Federal Bureau of Investigation and U.S. Department of Justice (No. 1:12-cv-01183)) against the Obama Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) seeking access to records detailing a February 2012 meeting between FBI Director Robert Mueller and Muslim organizations. Judicial Watch is also investigating the FBI’s subsequent controversial decision to purge the agency’s training curricula of material deemed “offensive” to Muslims.

The New York Times empowered the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) demand that the New York Police Department (NYPD) stop counter terrorist surveillance involving mosques and the Muslim Students’ Association.

The Muslim Students’ Association is “the mother ship of all the Muslim Brotherhood front groups” according to Jihadwatch.org.

Here is the Muslim Students’ Association pledge.  “Allah is my lord.  Islam is my life.  The Koran is my guide.  The Sunna is my practice.  Jihad is my spirit.  Righteousness is my character.  Paradise is my goal.  I enjoin what is right.  I forbid what is wrong.  I will fight against oppression.  And I will die to establish Islam.”

USA Today reports New York Police Department “spokesman Paul Browne provided a list of 12 people arrested or convicted on terrorism charges in the United States and abroad who had once been members of Muslim student associations, which the NYPD referred to as MSAs.”

Islamists (CAIR) demand that anti-terrorist expert be barred from training law enforcement officers.   The Council on American Islamic Relations wrote a letter calling on the Florida Department on Law Enforcement and other officials to stop allowing counter terrorist expert Sam Kharoba from training their officers.

Judicial board rebukes Pennsylvania Judge Mark Martin for ruling that it was ok for a Muslim immigrant to physically attack and choke an American citizen because the Muslim was unaware that Sharia law did not apply in Pennsylvania. Judge Martin’s flawed ruling underscores the legal calamity that public officials are inflicting on the rights afforded citizens under the United States Constitution by recognizing Sharia law.

Breitbart.com reports “Obama Administration Paves the Way for Sharia Law.” There is strong and open evidence of the Obama administration collaborating with Islamist activists to ensure the path toward sharia law is accelerated. In October 2011, at George Washington University, there was a meeting between DOJ officials and Islamist advocates against free speech who lobbied for: Cutbacks in U.S. anti-terror training; Limits on the power of terrorism investigators; Changes in agent training manuals; and a legal declaration that criticism of Islam in the United States should be considered racial discrimination.

What should our government’s response be to Sharia?

Elected officials across America are sworn in to office by vowing “I, do solemnly swear that I will support, protect, and defend the Constitution and Government of the United States and of the State.”  Most citizens would interpret that oath to mean that their elected officials in government should oppose the avocation of ideas that are antithetical to the constitution and the liberties it guarantees.

Many of the provisions of Sharia law are in conflict with the rights afforded under the United States Constitution.  Some of the practices advocated by Sharia violate state law.

It is just as much a violation of the oath of office for elected officials to embrace the Communist Manifesto as it is for them to accept provisions of Sharia law that conflict with our constitution.  And it would be just a treasonous to allow the Communist Party of the USA (CPUSA) to change American public policy as it would be to allow the Council on American Islamic Relations, Islamic Society of North America, Muslim Student Association or other Muslim Brotherhood front organizations in American to change this country’s constitutional liberties and rights to comply with Sharia.

The most common way that Sharia is birthed into a society is not by enactment from elected officials but by elected officials ignoring the Islamic laws’ application by practicing Muslims within their jurisdiction.  The Tampa Police Department’s ignoring the honor killing of Fatima Abdallah is one example.  The Hillsborough County School Board ignoring CAIR’s teaching students in Tampa about Sharia law is another example.  As the population of Muslims grow within that society and their political influence becomes stronger application of Sharia moves from acceptance by ignorance to adoption by their elected officials.

Florida Family Association is opposing Sharia in  America by:

  • Supporting legislation that prohibits courts from recognizing foreign laws including Islamic Sharia law.
  • Confronting public officials who violate their oath of office by embracing provisions of Sharia law that are inconsistent with American laws.
  • Exposing corporations that embrace or facilitate groups like CAIR (Council on American Islamic Relations) who support Sharia in America.

Sharia law footnotes.

Note 1:   Perjury, Muslims are permitted and prompted to lie (taqiyya) to non-Muslims.

  • Qur’an (16:106) –   Any one who, after accepting faith in Allah, utters Unbelief,- except under compulsion, his heart remaining firm in Faith – but such as open their breast to Unbelief, on them is Wrath from Allah, and theirs will be a dreadful Penalty.
  • Qur’an (2:225) –   Allah will not call you to account for thoughtlessness in your oaths, but for the intention in your hearts; and He is Oft-forgiving, Most Forbearing.
  • Qur’an (3:28) – Let not the believers Take for friends or helpers Unbelievers rather than believers: if any do that, in nothing will there be help from Allah: except by way of precaution, that ye may Guard yourselves from them. But Allah cautions you (To remember) Himself; for the final goal is to Allah.  Fictitious infidel friends are okay only if they achieve a greater purpose.

Note 2:  Discrimination, Muslims are permitted and compelled to discriminate against non-Muslims.

  • Qur’an (5:51) –  “O you who believe! do not take the Jews and the Christians for friends; they are friends of each other; and whoever amongst you takes them for a friend, then surely he is one of them; surely Allah does not guide the unjust people.”
  • Qur’an (3:28) –  “Let not the believers Take for friends or helpers Unbelievers rather than believers: if any do that, in nothing will there be help from Allah:”
  • Qur’an (9:23) – “O ye who believe! Choose not your fathers nor your brethren for friends if they take pleasure in disbelief rather than faith. Whoso of you taketh them for friends, such are wrong-doers”
  • Qur’an (53:29)  – “Therefore shun those who turn away from Our Message and desire nothing but the life of this world.”

Note 3:  Abolition of adoption rights otherwise granted under American laws.  Islam prohibits adopting children.

  • Qur’an (33:004) –   Allah has not made for any man two hearts in his (one) body: nor has He made your wives whom ye divorce by Zihar your mothers: nor has He made your adopted sons your sons. Such is (only) your (manner of) speech by your mouths.
  • Thereligionofpeace.com reports – So controversial was Muhammad’s desire to marry his adopted son’s wife that he had to justify it with a stern pronouncement from Allah on the very institution of adoption, which has had tragic consequences to this day.  Verses  33:4-5 are widely interpreted to imply that Islam is against adoption, meaning that an untold number of children in the Islamic world have been needlessly orphaned – all because Muhammad’s lustful desires for a married woman went beyond even what the other six wives that he possessed at the time and a multitude of slaves could satisfy.

Note 4:  Abolition of Wills, Inheritance Instruments and Last Testaments established under American laws.

  • Qur’an (4:011) –   Allah (thus) directs you as regards your Children’s (Inheritance): to the male, a portion equal to that of two females: if only daughters, two or more, their share is two-thirds of the inheritance; if only one, her share is a half. For parents, a sixth share of the inheritance to each, if the deceased left children; if no children, and the parents are the (only) heirs, the mother has a third; if the deceased Left brothers (or sisters) the mother has a sixth. (The distribution in all cases (‘s) after the payment of legacies and debts. Ye know not whether your parents or your children are nearest to you in benefit. These are settled portions ordained by Allah; and Allah is All-knowing, Al-wise.
  • Qur’an (4:012)   And unto you belongeth a half of that which your wives leave, if they have no child; but if they have a child then unto you the fourth of that which they leave, after any legacy they may have bequeathed, or debt (they may have contracted, hath been paid). And unto them belongeth the fourth of that which ye leave if ye have no child, but if ye have a child then the eighth of that which ye leave, after any legacy ye may have bequeathed, or debt (ye may have contracted, hath been paid). And if a man or a woman have a distant heir (having left neither parent nor child), and he (or she) have a brother or a sister (only on the mother’s side) then to each of them twain (the brother and the sister) the sixth, and if they be more than two, then they shall be sharers in the third, after any legacy that may have been bequeathed or debt (contracted) not injuring (the heirs by willing away more than a third of the heritage) hath been paid. A commandment from Allah. Allah is Knower, Indulgent.
  • Last Will and Testament form provided by Islamicbulletin.org

Note 5:  Abolition of certain interest income otherwise specified in loan, mortgage and other borrowing documents.

  • Qur’an (2:275) –  Those who devour usury will not stand except as stand one whom the Evil one by his touch Hath driven to madness. That is because they say: “Trade is like usury,” but Allah hath permitted trade and forbidden usury. Those who after receiving direction from their Lord, desist, shall be pardoned for the past; their case is for Allah (to judge); but those who repeat (The offence) are companions of the Fire: They will abide therein (for ever).
  • Qur’an (3:130) –  O ye who believe! Devour not usury, doubled and multiplied; but fear Allah; that ye may (really) prosper.
  • Qur’an (4:161) –  That they took usury, though they were forbidden; and that they devoured men’s substance wrongfully;- we have prepared for those among them who reject faith a grievous punishment.

Note 6:  Diminished rights of women in court.  It takes the testimony of two women to equal one man in Sharia court.

  • Qur’an (2:282) –  “And call to witness, from among your men, two witnesses. And if two men be not found then a man and two women”
  • Qur’an (2:228) –  “and the men are a degree above them [women]”

Note 7:  Polygamy, Muslim men may marry up to four wives.  Muhammad married thirteen women in violation of the Qur’an which he inspired his prophets to write.

  • Quran (4:3) –  “Marry of the women, who seem good to you, two or three or four; and if ye fear that ye cannot do justice (to so many) then one (only) or (the captives) that your right hands possess.”
  • NPR.org reported on May 27, 2008 that there are as many as 100,000 Muslims quietly practicing polygamy in the United States.  “No one knows how many Muslims in the U.S. live in polygamous families. But according to academics researching the issue, estimates range from 50,000 to 100,000 people.”  The number today is likely much higher given the dramatic increase in Muslim immigrants granted asylum in the United States by President Obama.

Note 8:  Pedophilia, Muslim men can marry girls as young as 14.  However, Muhammad took a wife named Ayesha that was six years old.

  • Quran (56:017) –  Round about them will (serve) youths of perpetual (freshness),
  • Quran, Surah 76:19  Allah promises fresh youths to Muslim men.  And round about them shall go youths never altering in age; when you see them you will think them to be scattered pearls. 
  • Quran, Surah 76:19 –  And round them shall go boys of theirs as if they were hidden pearls.
  • Muslim Pedophilia in the UK Ignored by Politically-correct Authorities The New American reported on August 29, 2014.   “Report author Alexis Jay cited appalling acts of violence between 1997 and 2013 in Rotherham, a town of some 250,000.  … The report described rapes by multiple perpetrators, mainly from Britain’s Pakistani community, and how children were trafficked to other towns and cities in the north of England, abducted, beaten, and intimidated.  ‘There were examples of children who had been doused in petrol and threatened with being set alight, threatened with guns, made to witness brutally violent rapes and threatened they would be next if they told anyone,” Jay said. “Girls as young as 11 were raped by large numbers of male perpetrators.’”

Note 9:  Muslim husbands are given the right to beat their wives as a form of discipline.

  • Qur’an (4:34) –  “Men are the maintainers of women because Allah has made some of them to excel others and because they spend out of their property; the good women are therefore obedient, guarding the unseen as Allah has guarded; and (as to) those on whose part you fear desertion, admonish them, and leave them alone in the sleeping-places and beat them; then if they obey you, do not seek a way against them; surely Allah is High, Great.”
  • Qur’an (38:44) – “And take in your hand a green branch and beat her with it, and do not break your oath…”  Allah telling Job to beat his wife (Tafsir).
  • Qur’an, Surah (8:012) –  Remember thy Lord inspired the angels (with the message): “I am with you: give firmness to the Believers: I will instil terror into the hearts of the Unbelievers: smite ye above their necks and smite all their finger-tips off them.”

Note 10:   Killing, torture, imprisonment and/or execution of blasphemers, infidels, Islamist apostates and non-believers.

  • Qur’an (5:33) –  “The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His messenger and strive to make mischief in the land is only this, that they should be murdered or crucified or their hands and their feet should be cut off on opposite sides…”
  • Quran (3:151) – “Soon shall We cast terror into the hearts of the Unbelievers, for that they joined companions with Allah, for which He had sent no authority”.
  • Quran (8:12)   “I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them”

Note 11:  Vicious jihad against non-Muslims to establish Islam’s rule worldwide.  Muslims who cannot take on physical jihad must support it with their money.

Fatwa 209643  Islamqa.info  Mohammad Al Munajjid, Al-Khobar, Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia

Praise be to Allah

The fuqaha’ are unanimously agreed that jihad in Allah’s cause (fi sabeel-Allah) using force and weapons is one of the things on which zakaah funds may be spent, as mentioned in Soorat at-Tawbah, where Allah, may He be exalted, says (interpretation of the meaning):

“As-Sadaqat (here it means Zakat) are only for the Fuqara (poor), and Al-Masakin (the poor) and those employed to collect (the funds); and for to attract the hearts of those who have been inclined (towards Islam); and to free the captives; and for those in debt; and for Allah’s Cause [fi sabeel-Allah] (i.e. for Mujahidoon – those fighting in the holy wars), and for the wayfarer (a traveller who is cut off from everything); a duty imposed by Allah. And Allah is All-Knower, All-Wise.” [at-Tawbah 9:60].

But they differed as to whether jihad other than with the sword is included in the general meaning of the words of Allah “and for Allah’s Cause”, based on the difference of opinion as to whether the phrase should be understood according to its broader linguistic meaning or the specific shar‘i understanding of the concept of “Allah’s cause”.

There are three different interpretations, starting with one that is very specific and gradually broadening the meaning:   

1. The first view is that the meaning of “Allah’s cause” is so specific that it does not include anything other than jihad by the sword and spear. This is the view of the majority of Hanafi, Maaliki and Shaafa‘i fuqaha’, and of Ibn Qudaamah among the Hanbalis. It is also regarded as more correct by the Council of Senior Scholars in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. See al-Buhooth al-‘Ilmiyyah, 1/73.

Ibn Qudaamah (may Allah have mercy on him) said:

This is the view of Maalik, Abu Haneefah, ath-Thawri, ash-Shaafa‘i, Abu Thawr, and Ibn al-Mundhir, and this is more correct, because the phrase “Allah’s cause” in general terms only refers to jihad. Every time “Allah’s cause” is mentioned in the Qur’an, what is meant by it is jihad, except in a few cases. So what is mentioned in this verse should be understood in accordance with that, because that is what the apparent meaning indicates.

©2025 . All rights reserved.

J6 PIPE BOMBER Was Anti-Trump Leftist Radical, FBI Chief Reveals Biden Regime ‘Sat On The Evidence”

If you wondered why, it took so long…..Biden admin ‘sat on the evidence’ in D.C. pipe bomb probe. And how is the media reporting this? By calling the perp a “White man.”

Remember when then FBI Director said Wray claiming the FBI couldn’t track the pipe bomber’s phone because service in area was down that night..

FBI Director Kash Patel slammed the Biden team for ‘sitting on evidence’ in D.C. pipe bomb case.

Julie Kelly said the suspected J6 pipe bomber had strong left-wing and Antifa ties, explaining exactly why the Biden Administration spent four years deliberately covering it up:

“It has been alleged by a news outlet that this individual anti-fascist ties, meaning Antifa. This will raise a lot of questions and could potentially answer more as to why Chris Wray’s FBI and Biden’s DOJ dropped it.

The Biden regime buried that information just like they destroyed all the Jan 6 committee evidence. Their criminality is obvious yet the media protects them.

The January 6th pipe bomber terrorist was…

  • a young black guy
  • radical anti-Trump activist
  • sued Trump & ICE & DHS
  • extreme racial justice advocate
  • works at his family bail bonds company that frees criminal aliens from ICE custody

It explains exactly why the FBI & DOJ could not “find” this guy for 4 years. The Biden FBI had mountains of evidence against Brian Cole. Receipts, cell data, license plate, photos and videos of the crime. They knew exactly who did it!

But Brian’s profile destroys their entire ‘MAGA white supremacist insurrection bomber’ narrative in one blow.

The FBI didn’t “fail” to catch him.

Leftists protected their own.

This is the biggest FBI cover-up scandal in history. What a nightmare…

Biden admin ‘sat on the evidence’ in DC pipe bomb probe, FBI chief claims

By Samuel Chamberlain, NY Post, Dec. 5, 2025:

FBI Director Kash Patel slams Biden team for ‘sitting on evidence’ in DC pipe bomb case

Joe Biden’s FBI was guilty of “sheer incompetence or complete intentional negligence” in allowing the DC pipe bomb case to languish for nearly five years before the arrest of a suspect Thursday morning, FBI Director Kash Patel has charged.

Brian Cole Jr., 30, of Woodbridge, Va., will make an initial appearance in DC federal court Friday afternoon to be formally arraigned on charges of planting pipe bombs outside the Democratic and Republican National Committees on Jan. 5, 2021, hours before the Capitol riot by supporters of President Trump.

“The prior administration sat on the evidence for four years,” Patel told “Fox News at Night” Thursday evening. “There wasn’t any production of new evidence from five years ago.”

g suspect Brian Cole Jr. seen in a Sept. 28, 2024, photo on his mom’s Instagram, over three years after the alleged attempted bombing.

“Here’s what we did — we went out to the country, brought in our experts, and Deputy Director [Dan] Bongino led the charge and said, ‘We are going to look at every single piece of evidence again.’”

According to a probable cause affidavit, investigators used bank and cell phone data to link Cole to the production and placement of the pipe bombs outside the party headquarters in DC’s Capitol Hill neighborhood — a process authorities say started in 2019.

“We looked at three million lines of evidence,” Patel told host Trace Gallagher. “We went back and looked at the cell phone tower data dumps. We went back and looked at the providers and what information they provided pursuant to search warrants at the time and asked questions, such as ‘Why weren’t all the phone numbers scrubbed?’ and ‘Why weren’t they connected?’ and ‘Why wasn’t there any geolocational data done?’

“Now that is either sheer incompetence or complete intentional negligence, neither of which is acceptable for this FBI. So, we changed that in the prior eight months, not on just this case, but everyone. And what that did was allow us to narrow the search down.”

  • a young black guy
  • radical anti-Trump activist
  • sued Trump & ICE & DHS
  • extreme racial justice advocate
  • works at his family bail bonds company that frees criminal aliens from ICE custody
  • The pipe bomb case was a top priority for Bongino, a former Fox News host who claimed on his eponymous podcast in 2024 that he believed the bomb plot was the work of “either a connected anti-Trump insider or this was an inside job.”

“I was paid in the past, Sean, for my opinions. That’s clear. And one day, I’ll be back in that space,” Bongino told his former colleague Sean Hannity Thursday night when confronted about his remarks. “But that’s not what I’m paid for now. I’m paid to be your deputy director, and we base investigations on facts.”

Bongino added that investigators are “pretty comfortable we have our guy.”

Read more.

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLES:

MASSIVE OBAMACARE IDENTITY FRAUD: 71 People Use One Social Security Number, Fake Identities, Dead People — AND THE SYSTEM APPROVES IT

Muslim Migrant Rapes Woman to Death On Church Steps After Nashville Freed Somali Rapist 16 Times

MASKED JIHAD MOB STORMS LA SYNAGOGUE: Antisemitic Terrorists Smash Glass, Terrorize Worshippers at Bridge-Building Event

Jihad Rep. Ilhan Omar’s Links to Billion Dollar Fraud Scam

IRAN TO HANG ABUSED CHILD BRIDE — WORLD MUST STOP THIS BARBARISM

RELATED VIDEO: SPECIAL: FBI Nabs Jan 6 Pipe Bomber Suspect After 5 Years

POSTS ON X:

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

EXCLUSIVE: Trump Admin Launching New Vetting Unit In Wake Of National Guard Attack

The Trump administration will be dramatically enhancing its screening of all foreign nationals with the launch of a new vetting center.

In response to a slate of high-profile arrests of Afghan men accused of committing or planning serious attacks on American soil, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) is establishing a specialized unit intending to markedly upgrade the country’s vetting procedures of migrants, according to a memo exclusively obtained by the Daily Caller News Foundation. The new vetting center will help federal officials identify terrorists, criminal aliens or other foreigners who pose a danger to the country.

“USCIS’ role in the nation’s immigration system has never been more critical,” Joe Edlow, the director of the agency, said in a public statement.

“In the wake of several recent incidents of violence, including a foreign national attacking National Guard service members on U.S. soil, establishing this vetting center will give us more enhanced capabilities to safeguard national security and ensure public safety,” Edlow continued.

The new vetting center, when fully operational, will “draw on the full spectrum” of screening capabilities and leverage state-of-the-art technology when reviewing immigration applications and petitions, according to the memo. Headquartered in Atlanta, the center will also be tasked with reviewing already-approved applications for foreign nationals and prioritizing applications from designated countries of concern.

Trump officials say the enhanced screening is necessary after four years of the Biden administration, which oversaw a historic border crisis and a chaotic military withdrawal from Afghanistan that sparked the importation of thousands of Afghan nationals.

“Under the Biden administration, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services was pushed to expedite the immigration and naturalization processes with little regard for how that affected national security and the safety of our communities,” Edlow stated. “We changed that approach on day one of the Trump administration.”

“Under President Trump, we are building more protective measures that ensure fraud, deception, and threats do not breach the integrity of our immigration system,” the USCIS director continued.

The Trump White House, which has long prioritized border security, has doubled down on security efforts since Rahmanullah Lakanwal, an Afghan national brought into the country in 2021 under humanitarian parole, allegedly killed one National Guard member and left another in critical condition in an ambush-style attack in Washington, D.C., hours before Thanksgiving Day.

Immediately after the attack, federal immigration officials dramatically restricted asylum applications for all foreign nationals and completely halted immigration processes for individuals hailing from 19 countries deemed to be “high-risk.” On Wednesday, USCIS announced it was scaling back the timeframe in which asylum seekers and other foreign nationals can have valid work permits in the U.S.

Including Lakanwal, three different Afghan nationals let into the country through the Biden-era Operation Allies Welcome program have been arrested within a week. The FBI arrested Mohammad Dawood Alokozay on Nov. 25 for allegedly making bomb threats in Fort Worth, Texas and Jaan Shah Safi was arrested by immigration officials on Wednesday for allegedly providing support to ISIS-K.

AUTHOR

Jason Hopkins

Immigration Reporter

RELATED ARTICLES:

Betrayed American Workers Expose Dark Underbelly Of H-1B Visa Scheme

Cartelville, USA: Documenting the Border Crisis

RELATED VIDEO: Arrest of Somali Immigrant fraudster

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.


All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

SCOTUS Approves Lone Star State’s New Congressional Maps

With the 2026 midterms looming, the U.S. Supreme Court is officially weighing in on the redistricting arms race between red and blue states. Late Thursday, the nation’s highest judicial authority disagreed with a lower court ruling and instead allowed Texas to implement new congressional district maps expected to take five seats in the U.S. House of Representatives from Democrats and hand them to the GOP.

A divided three-judge panel consisting of two federal district court judges and one appellate court judge ruled late last month that the new congressional district maps Texas planned were unlawful, charging the state legislature with remaking congressional districts on racial lines, rather than along political ones. Six of the Supreme Court’s nine justices reversed the lower court’s decision. “Texas is likely to succeed on the merits of its claim that the District Court committed at least two serious errors. First, the District Court failed to honor the presumption of legislative good faith by construing ambiguous direct and circumstantial evidence against the legislature,” the court’s majority wrote in a two-page order halting the lower court’s injunction. “Second, the District Court failed to draw a dispositive or near-dispositive adverse inference against respondents even though they did not produce a viable alternative map that met the State’s avowedly partisan goals.”

The Supreme Court’s progressive wing, comprised of Democrat-appointed Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Ketanji Brown Jackson, issued a 17-page dissenting opinion authored by Kagan and joined by Sotomayor and Jackson. “In enacting an electoral map slanted toward Republicans, did Texas predominantly use race to draw its new district lines? Or said otherwise, did Texas accomplish its partisan objectives by means of a racial gerrymander?” Kagan asked. “Texas largely divided its citizens along racial lines to create its new pro-Republican House map, in violation of the Constitution’s Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments,” she continued, noting the lower court’s decision. “Yet this Court reverses that judgment based on its perusal, over a holiday weekend, of a cold paper record. We are a higher court than the District Court, but we are not a better one when it comes to making such a fact-based decision.”

“That is why we are supposed to use a clear-error standard of review — why we are supposed to uphold the District Court’s decision that race-based line-drawing occurred (even if we would have ruled differently) so long as it is plausible,” she wrote. The clear-error standard of review is an appellate standard, under which “a finding is ‘clearly erroneous’ when, although there is evidence to support it, the reviewing court on the entire evidence is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed,” according to the Supreme Court in United States v. United States Gypsum Co. “Without so much as a word about that standard, this Court today announces that Texas may run next year’s elections with a map the District Court found to have violated all our oft-repeated strictures about the use of race in districting,” Kagan continued. “Today’s order disrespects the work of a District Court that did everything one could ask to carry out its charge — that put aside every consideration except getting the issue before it right. And today’s order disserves the millions of Texans whom the District Court found were assigned to their new districts based on their race.”

Justice Thomas Alito, joined by Justices Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch, responded to Kagan’s argument in a three-paragraph concurring opinion. “Texas needs certainty on which map will govern the 2026 midterm elections, so I will not delay the Court’s order by writing a detailed response to each of the dissent’s arguments. Instead, I offer two short points which for me are decisive,” Alito wrote. “First, the dissent does not dispute — because it is indisputable — that the impetus for the adoption of the Texas map (like the map subsequently adopted in California) was partisan advantage pure and simple.”

“Second, the clear-error standard of review does not apply here because the ‘trial court base[d] its findings upon a mistaken impression of applicable legal principles,’” Alito clarified. “Because of the correlation between race and partisan preference, litigants can easily use claims of racial gerrymandering for partisan ends. … To prevent this, our precedents place the burden on the challengers ‘to disentangle race and politics,’” he continued. “Thus, when the asserted reason for a map is political, it is critical for challengers to produce an alternative map that serves the State’s allegedly partisan aim just as well as the map the State adopted.” It is common, in such cases, for challengers to present an alternative map that achieves the stated partisan objectives without racially gerrymandering. However, Alito observed, the challengers in the Texas could not do so, “giving rise to a strong inference that the State’s map was indeed based on partisanship, not race.” He emphasized, “Neither the duration of the District Court’s hearing nor the length of its majority opinion provides an excuse for failing to apply the correct legal standards as set out clearly in our case law.”

In comments to The Washington Stand, FRC Action Director Matt Carpenter hailed the Supreme Court’s decision. “The Supreme Court handed Texas Republicans, and by extension Republicans in Congress, a huge victory in the redistricting war by restoring Texas’s congressional maps last night,” he said. “This emergency order from the highest court in the land does more than restore five new potentially red congressional districts, it signals that this court is unlikely to side with frivolous claims of racial discrimination in the gerrymandering process from leftwing lawyers like Marc Elias — whose legal group represented one of the plaintiffs in this case, and has gone to great lengths to hurt election integrity wherever it has advanced,” Carpenter continued. “This could have huge ramifications as we also expect a decision from the Supreme Court on Louisiana vs. Callais, a case with the potential to strike down Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, which would open up as many as 19 other congressional districts for redistricting.”

The Supreme Court only issued a stay on Thursday, halting a lower court’s injunction. However, the justices are deliberating over a similar set of circumstances, originating in Louisiana. In the dual cases of Louisiana v. Phillip Callais and Press Robinson v. Phillip Callais, since consolidated into a single case, the Supreme Court will consider Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act (VRA), which bars racial gerrymandering, and reconsider its own precedents on the issue. Congressional district maps drawn by Louisiana’s state legislature in 2022 only created one majority-black congressional district out of the state’s six, despite the fact that roughly one-third of the state’s population is black. In response to a lawsuit accusing them of racial gerrymandering, Louisiana legislators remade the maps, yielding two majority-black districts. Those remade maps, however, were subsequently challenged, also on racial grounds: this time, the argument was that the new maps were racial gerrymandering because they were explicitly redrawn along racial lines.

In the midst of oral arguments in October, a majority of justices appeared poised to render Section 2 toothless and dilute its own precedents on the issue. In a line of questioning that would have been almost equally applicable to the Texas case, Alito asked, “If registered, Democrats overwhelmingly vote for Democratic candidates, regardless of the candidate’s race. Is that bloc voting?” Querying the relationship between redistricting along political lines and redistricting along racial lines, he continued, “Likewise, if registered Republicans overwhelmingly vote for Republican candidates, that’s not bloc voting. … So if it happens to be that people of one race or another race overwhelmingly prefer one of the political parties, does that transform the situation into racial voting? Or is it still just partisan voting?”

Accusations of racial gerrymandering have often been used by progressive voting groups to challenge and block Republican-led redistricting efforts. The Supreme Court’s decision in the Texas case could potentially indicate which way the Justices may rule in the Louisiana matter. A decision to neuter Section 2 allows red states to move forward with partisan redistricting maps, eliminating over a dozen Democrat-held House seats.

AUTHOR

S.A. McCarthy

S.A. McCarthy serves as a news writer at The Washington Stand.

RELATED VIDEO: Ken Paxton Discusses the Monumental Texas Redistricting Win at the Supreme Court

EDITORS NOTE: This Washington Stand column is republished with permission. All rights reserved. ©2025 Family Research Council.


Partner with The Washington Stand to bring news from a biblical worldview to readers nationwide. From now until December 31, every gift will be doubled through our year-end Challenge Match.

The Washington Stand is Family Research Council’s outlet for news and commentary from a biblical worldview. The Washington Stand is based in Washington, D.C. and is published by FRC, whose mission is to advance faith, family, and freedom in public policy and the culture from a biblical worldview. We invite you to stand with us by partnering with FRC.

Senate To Confirm 97 More Trump Nominees After Democrat Blockade Fails

Republicans will confirm a bloc of eight dozen Trump nominees as soon as next week following an attempted blockade by Senate Democrats.

Republican leadership planned Thursday to kick-off the procedural process to confirm 88 of President Donald Trump’s nominees in a bloc vote, but were initially thwarted by Democratic Colorado Sen. Michael Bennet, who challenged the package for violating Senate rules. When Republicans refiled the package later on Thursday, the conference included an additional nine nominees, bringing the total to nearly 100.

Democrats blocked the group package because Sara Bailey — one of President Donald Trump’s nominees included in the package — was not eligible to be included.

When Republicans went nuclear in September to streamline the confirmation process over Democrats’ fierce objections, the conference did not allow cabinet-level positions or judicial appointments to be confirmed in a group package.

Bailey, a former Fox News contributor, has been tapped to serve as director of the Office of National Drug Control Policy, which is a senior-level position on par with a cabinet secretary.

Senate Majority Leader John Thune argued that Democrats’ delay tactics amounted to “Trump Derangement Syndrome” during remarks on the Senate floor Thursday.

“Democrats – and their base – still can’t deal with the fact that President Trump won last November,” Thune said on the Senate floor. “And so they have held up every single one – every single one – of his nominations in revenge.”

The new package includes former Republican New York Rep. Anthony D’Esposito, who has been appointed to serve as inspector general of the Department of Labor. Thirteen U.S. attorney nominees and dozens of lower-level executive branch nominees are also teed up for confirmation.

The Senate has confirmed 314 civilian nominees as of Thursday evening, according to a tally by the Senate Republican Communications Center.

The 97-member bloc would bring the Senate to more than 410 civilian confirmations in the first year of Trump’s second term.

“That far outstrips total confirmations by this point in President Biden’s term, and in President Trump’s first term as well,” Thune said Thursday.

Thune also said that Senate Republicans have virtually cleared the nominations backlog. Before Republicans changed Senate precedent to allow for certain nominees to be confirmed in groups, more than 150 of the president’s picks were awaiting floor consideration.

The Senate approved a 48-member nominations package in September and an additional 108 of the president’s picks in a single group vote in October.

Bennet celebrated his short-lived blockade of Trump’s nominees Thursday before Republicans added more individuals to the resolution.

“I will not allow unqualified nominees, this White House, or the President to undermine the rule of law and our national security,” the Colorado Democrat wrote in a statement posted to social media.

AUTHOR

Adam Pack

Reporter

RELATED ARTICLES:

Democrats Torpedo Bipartisan Talks With Take-It-Or-Leave-It Obamacare Plan

Gun Orgs Facing Trump DOJ ‘Opposition’ Aren’t Sure What To Make Of Its New 2A Division

Supreme Court Allows Texas To Use New Map

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.


All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

MASSIVE OBAMACARE IDENTITY FRAUD: 71 People Use One Social Security Number, Fake Identities, Dead People — AND THE SYSTEM APPROVES IT

A new watchdog investigation found large-scale systemic failures that allow fake identities, dead people, and massive improper use of Social Security numbers to receive Obamacare subsidies. GAO conducted covert operations which included creating fictitious identities. In fact, 100% of fake applicants were approved by Obamacare’s marketplace as recently as late 2024. 90% of fake applicants continue to receive coverage in 2025. The result: Wasteful federal spending on subsidies for enrollees who are not eligible. Harm and unexpected costs for consumers. Loss of access to medical providers and medications, higher copays and deductibles, or forced repayment.

Fake identities, dead people, and massive improper use of Social Security numbers to receive Obamacare subsidies.

Thieves and plunderers are robbing us blind. Legal plunder. We need a tea party moment.

Non-Partisan Watchdog Finds Consumer Harm and Tens of Billions of Taxpayer Dollars Wasted in Health Care Fraud in Affordable Care Act Plans

WASHINGTON, D.C. — In a new preliminary report published by the Government Accountability Office (GAO), waste, fraud, and abuse have run rampant through Affordable Care Act marketplace plans, worsening health care plans for Americans, all while enriching big insurance companies.

The new watchdog investigation finds large-scale systemic failures that allow fake identities, dead people, and massive improper use of Social Security numbers to receive Obamacare subsidies. As part of the analysis, GAO even conducted covert operations which even included creating fictitious identities that flooded health insurers with unjustified subsidies. In fact, 100 percent of fake applicants were approved by the ACA Marketplace as recently as late 2024, and 90 percent of fake applicants continue to receive coverage in 2025.

As the report notes, such practices can result in wasteful federal spending on subsidies for enrollees who are not eligible. Further, such practices can result in harm and unexpected costs for consumers. These can include loss of access to medical providers and medications, higher copayments and deductibles, or repayment of subsidies if income or other eligibility was misrepresented.

The GAO investigation was requested by Committee on Energy and Commerce Chairman Brett Guthrie (KY-02), Committee on Ways and Means Chairman Jason Smith (MO-08), and Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan (OH-04).

Congressman Jim Jordan (OH-04), Chairman of the House Committee on the Judiciary, said:

“For years, we were told we could keep our plan, keep our doctor, and premiums would go down. None of it happened. This new report confirms what we already knew: under Obamacare, hardworking Americans saw their premiums skyrocket and their healthcare choices shrink, all while fraud benefitted insurance companies. Obamacare was built on lies and broken promises that hurt families and drove up costs.”

Congressman Brett Guthrie (KY-02), Chairman of the House Committee on Energy and Commerce, said: 

“Republicans have consistently prioritized protecting patients and taxpayers by ridding our federal health programs of the waste, fraud, and abuse that ultimately drive up costs for patients. Republicans have sounded the alarm on the flawed structural integrity of Obamacare and how Democrats’ failed policies to temporarily prop up the program have exacerbated fraud, hurt patients, increased the burden on American taxpayers, and artificially masked the true health care affordability crisis plaguing Americans today. The concerning findings from GAO’s report further confirm that Republican efforts to strengthen, secure, and sustain our federal health programs are critical and necessary to ensure access to quality health care at prices Americans can afford.”

Congressman Jason Smith (MO-08), Chairman of the House Committee on Ways and Means, said:

“While Democrats defend waste, fraud, and abuse, Republicans are taking action to lower health care costs and protect care for all real, living Americans. GAO’s troubling report is the smoking gun that shows how this broken system, shielded by Democrat policies, has led to the federal government shoveling tens of billions of tax dollars to insurance companies through identity fraud and caused health care costs to skyrocket for all Americans. While Obamacare fraud is being confirmed by GAO, CMS, CBO and other outside reports, patients are suffering. They face higher health care costs and denied claims or delayed care when their providers struggle to verify which insurance is valid due to these fraud schemes. Rather than simply rubber stamp more bad spending and failed policies, we must take action to prevent further harm.”

GAO investigated the scope of improper payments and weakened program integrity within the ACA marketplace. Estimates based on analysis by both the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) and independent external research organizations indicate millions of enrollees in the ACA marketplaces may be enrolled improperly, costing taxpayers as much as $27 billion a year in improper payments and imposing a great deal of harm and distress on families and victims of alleged fraud.

BACKGROUND:

Investigators Created Fake Identities – and CMS Provided Taxpayer Subsidies

  • GAO created fictitious identities with fake or never issued SSNs and still got subsidized ACA coverage, meaning criminals and fraudsters can too.
  • 100 percent of fake applicants were approved in late 2024.
  • 18 out of 20 fake applicants are still receiving subsidized coverage for 2025.
  • CMS approved coverage even when no documents were requested or fake documents were submitted.
  • This includes fake citizenship eligibility documents confirming fraud concerns for illegal immigrants.
  • Brokers were able to bypass verification by calling the call center and submitting applications without the applicant present.
  • Monthly subsidies paid to health insurers on behalf of GAO’s fake identities exceeded $12,300 per month.

Shocking Misuse of Social Security Numbers Including a Single Social Security Number Used for Over 125 Policies for the Equivalent of 71 Years

  • One Social Security Number (SSN) was used for “71 years” of subsidized coverage.
  • In 2023, one single SSN was used on applications for over 125 insurance policies totaling over 26,000 days of coverage, the equivalent of 71 years.
  • 66,000 SSNs in 2024 had more than a years’ worth of subsidized coverage.
  • CMS does not block new applications using the same SSN and relies on a broken document-request process that often never works.
  • $21 billion in subsidies paid out with no evidence of tax reconciliation in 2023. That is 32 percent of all advanced premium tax credits (APTC) paid to identifiable SSN holders. No reconciliation means no accountability, no verification, and likely billions in improper payments.

Big Insurers Still Collecting Subsidies for Deceased Individuals

  • 58,000 SSNs receiving APTC matched Social Security death data.
  • At least 7,000 were dead before coverage even began, meaning the applications used SSNs of deceased individuals.
  • $94 million in taxpayer-funded subsidies were sent to health insurers on behalf of deceased individuals.

Explosive Growth in Unauthorized Plan Switches that Harm Consumers

  • Bad actors engaged in mass unauthorized enrollment activity to chase commissions, resulting in:
  • 160,000 likely unauthorized changes by three or more brokers in 2024.
  • CMS itself received 275,000 complaints in just eight months (Jan–Aug 2024) from Americans who were enrolled in or switched into plans without their consent.

Repeated Warnings Have Gone Unheeded by Democrats

  • GAO has repeatedly warned that Obamacare subsidies are and have been at risk of fraud structurally.
  • For 2015 enrollment, GAO found that federal and state marketplaces approved coverage for fictitious applicants, and nearly all of those fake identities stayed enrolled—even after submitting fictitious documents or no documents at all.
  • For 2016 enrollment, GAO again reported that CMS had failed to design basic eligibility safeguards, including controls to stop duplicate or overlapping subsidized coverage.
  • These weaknesses were supercharged after Democrats enacted and repeatedly extended Biden’s COVID-era subsidy expansions, which facilitated millions of fully subsidized fraudulent enrollments, and without corresponding fraud controls, created the perfect environment for criminals, identity thieves, and unscrupulous brokers.

With Stronger Integrity for Taxpayers, Republicans Have Taken Steps to Lower Premiums

  • Republicans are focused on restoring accountability and fairness to the health care marketplace through program integrity reforms that save taxpayers billions of dollars and drive down costs for everyone:
  • Full income and eligibility verification before subsidies are issued, ensuring assistance goes only to those who qualify.
  • Ending “anytime” enrollment abuse that fueled fraudulent sign-ups and drove premiums higher for everyone.
  • Closing loopholes that allowed illegal immigrants and other ineligible groups to access taxpayer-funded health benefits.

Even the Congressional Budget Office has found that these measures have already produced $185 billion in savings for taxpayers and reduced premiums by 0.6 percent. That’s real savings for working families.

Read more.

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLE: ABC, NBC, CBS Evening Newscasts Hides Tim Walz Massive Fraud Scandal

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio: ‘Radical Islam… seeks to expand and control more territories and more people’

“Radical Islam has shown that their desire is not simply to occupy one part of the world and be happy with their own little caliphate, they want to expand. It’s revolutionary in its nature. It seeks to expand and control more territories and more people … That’s a clear and imminent threat to the world and to the broader West, but especially the United States who they identify as the chief source of evil on the planet.” — Secretary of State Marco Rubio

WATCH: Secretary of State Marco Rubio: ‘Radical Isalm wants the West, not just a caliphate’

Rubio is right, but there is nothing “radical” about it. What he is describing is a mainstream Islamic imperative.

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLES:

Texas: Abbott moves to end Hamas-linked CAIR’s tax-exempt status for ‘sponsoring terrorism,’ destroying US values

Muslim Migrant Rapes Woman to Death On Church Steps After Nashville Freed Somali Rapist 16 Times

Pope denounces ‘fear’ of Islam, says ‘it is possible to live together, to be friends’

German Police Union Official Imagines Germany in 2050

Pope Leo Praises Turkey for Its Religious Tolerance

Anti-Israel Protesters Vandalize Memorial to Murdered 2-Year-Old

EU Iran Deal Negotiator Who Endorsed Islamization of Europe Busted for Corruption

In Lebanon, Pope Leo Calls ‘Palestinian State’ the ‘Only Solution’

EDITORS NOTE: This Jihad Watch column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

‘We Must Act Quickly’: Hill Leaders Push for Immediate Action on Nigeria

In a country halfway across the world, Agnes remembers the song her dad taught her when she was scared. And that was most of the time. While American children can’t sleep because of invisible monsters, in Nigeria, the nightmares are real life. Would tonight be the night the men attacked, burning, shooting, and killing? “In those moments,” she remembers, “my dad sang to us, ‘God will never forsake us. God will never abandon us. Even when there is suffering and persecution, God will never leave us.’” It is the song of millions of sons and daughters now, passed down through the years of grief — the nation’s unofficial heirloom.

Like so much of Africa, Nigeria’s story is one of constant violence, suffering, and mourning. While the government looks away, tens of thousands of Christians have been massacred, buried in mass graves that have taken over miles of desolate countryside. At the hands of Boko Haram or the Fulani herdsman, armed gangs roam across the country — kidnapping, beheading, and setting on fire anyone in their path. Some are held hostage in terror camps, others are forced into brutal marriages against their wills, raped by so many men they don’t know who their babies’ fathers are.

It is, most people who have been there will tell you, worse than genocide. Fred Williams, a missionary to Nigeria, has pleaded with the West to intervene. “Since [2001], the attacks have been relentless, continuous,” he stressed. “[These are] stories of carnage and killing and horror. … Thousands are being killed,” he insists. “I’m constantly in those villages. I have interviews. I have photos. Most of what is happening is too graphic to show the media. That is how bad it is,” he tells reporters.

Just days ago, a bride and her bridal party were kidnapped in the north, as another pastor and members of his congregation were put in cars and driven away. To where, no one knows. Nigerian President Bola Tinubu, who’s tried to absolve himself of the world’s criticism, arguing he’s done everything he can to protect Christians, declared a national “security emergency” last week, authorizing the police and army to recruit and train additional personnel. “There will be no more hiding places for agents of evil,” Tinubu vowed. But Nigerians have heard that before.

When 300 girls were abducted from a Catholic school last month and Nigerian leaders did nothing, parents started begging America to intervene. “We almost had a heart attack,” Peter Jagaba said emotionally of his daughter Paulina’s capture. Like the thousands of fathers who have walked this dread before him, he’s asking his government to get involved. “I want the Federal Government of Nigeria to bring back my daughter safe and alive,” Jagaba told The Wall Street Journal. “I’m also calling on the American government to help us — we need help from anywhere,” he said desperately.

President Trump, who’s become actively engaged in the crisis across Africa these last several weeks, has been open about his disgust with the country’s leaders. “I’m really angry about it,” Trump said during an interview in late November, arguing the Nigerian government has “done nothing” and that “what’s happening in Nigeria is a disgrace.”

He’s leaned on Congress to find ways that members can help the administration apply more pressure there, especially in stopping the bloodshed that’s claimed tens of thousands of innocent lives. On Tuesday, the House Appropriations Committee hosted a joint briefing to investigate the slaughter of Christians in Nigeria with Republicans, Democrats, and experts like former Congresswoman and U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom Chair Vicky Hartzler.

Together, they agreed, time is short. “The Nigerian government is trying to run out the clock,” longtime human rights advocate Rep. Chris Smith (R-N.J.) warned. “We cannot allow this to happen. We must act quickly and decisively to save more lives.”

To be a Christian, or even a moderate Muslim living in Nigeria, Smith explained, “means to be living under the constant threat of murder, rape, and torture by radical Islamist groups. … The most brutal and murderous anti-Christian persecution in the world — as well as the systemic targeting and killing of moderate Muslims who speak out against radical Islamists or refuse to conform with their extreme ideals — occurs in Nigeria, the ground zero of religious violence.” And while the Nigerian government has a “fundamental, constitutional obligation to protect its citizens,” he underscored, “the perpetrators of this persecution operate with complete impunity.” The United States, he promised, “is committed to standing firmly with the persecuted, no matter where in the world.”

Rep. Brian Mast (R-Fla.), chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, wanted people to understand the severity of what’s taking place 5,500 miles away. “This is not merely ‘inter-communal violence’ or a ‘resource conflict,’ as many claim. This is a targeted campaign of religious cleansing,” he argued. “Whether it is Boko Haram, Islamic State West Africa Province, or radicalized nomadic Fulani militants, the objective is to drive Christians out of their ancestral lands in the Middle Belt and impose a radical Islamist ideology, as has already happened across the northern states, where blasphemy laws are used to oppress.” He paused, adding solemnly, “I firmly stand with President Trump in his decision to redesignate Nigeria as a Country of Particular Concern. We must demand that the Nigerian government disarm these militias, return displaced families to their homes, and bring the perpetrators to justice.”

Brad Brandon, CEO and founder of Across Nigeria, agrees that putting the spotlight on the terrorism happening across the country is exactly what believers there desperately need. “The attention that’s happening here in the United States is something that many Nigerians have been waiting for and asking for,” he told Family Research Council President Tony Perkins on Wednesday’s “Washington Watch.” “Their government has been nonresponsive. … So to get the United States government involved, members of Congress involved, to see the media starting to talk about it — from Bill Maher to Nicki Minaj to President Trump, all of these people drawing attention to it — it’s a welcome change for Nigerians who are suffering under this persecution.”

Brandon pointed out the astonishing statistic that 70% of all Christians killed around the world are killed in northern Nigeria. “I’ve stood at the mass graves of friends of mine who’ve been buried, many, many times,” he said somberly. Then he paused, raising the one question that should motivate every leader act: “If the United States does not address this right now globally, who will?”

AUTHOR

Suzanne Bowdey

Suzanne Bowdey serves as editorial director and senior writer at The Washington Stand.

RELATED ARTICLE: Trump Admin Takes First Steps To Tackle ‘Religious Cleansing’

EDITORS NOTE: This Washington Stand column is republished with permission. All rights reserved. ©2025 Family Research Council.


Partner with The Washington Stand to bring news from a biblical worldview to readers nationwide. From now until December 31, every gift will be doubled through our year-end Challenge Match.

The Washington Stand is Family Research Council’s outlet for news and commentary from a biblical worldview. The Washington Stand is based in Washington, D.C. and is published by FRC, whose mission is to advance faith, family, and freedom in public policy and the culture from a biblical worldview. We invite you to stand with us by partnering with FRC.

Jack Smith Subpoenaed

The House Judiciary Committee has subpoenaed Jack Smith for all documents and communications from Jack Smith’s tenure as Special Counsel.

He is required to appear for a deposition at the Capitol on December 17.

Jack Smith is a criminal. He should be in prison.

Jack Smith subpoenaed for deposition with House Judiciary Committee

Subpoena includes sweeping demand for all documents and communications from Smith’s time as special counsel

By Ashley Oliver,  Fox News,  December 3, 2025 11:37am EST

House Judiciary Committee wants answers from Jack Smith on Trump prosecutions

House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, subpoenaed former special counsel Jack Smith on Wednesday for a deposition, escalating Republicans’ investigation into one of President Donald Trump’s top political foes.

Jordan directed Smith to appear before the committee on Dec. 17, according to a copy of the subpoena reviewed by Fox News Digital.

“Due to your service as Special Counsel, the Committee believes that you possess information that is vital to its oversight of this matter,” Jordan wrote in a letter accompanying his request.

The forthcoming deposition, which is set to take place behind closed doors, comes as House and Senate Republicans have zeroed in on Smith’s election-related investigation of Trump, describing it as a scandal that unnecessarily swept up hundreds of Republican lawmakers, GOP entities, Trump allies and media outlets as part of the probe.

Smith has repeatedly stood by his work as special counsel, which eventually involved bringing two sets of criminal charges against Trump over the 2020 election and over alleged retention of classified documents. Smith dropped both cases after Trump won the 2024 election, citing a Department of Justice policy that discourages prosecuting sitting presidents.

Smith has already offered to publicly testify before the House and Senate Judiciary Committees, but a source familiar with Jordan’s request said a deposition is the chairman’s preferred format because each party on the committee can question Smith for an hour at a time and build a better record. In a public hearing, lawmakers typically question a witness in five-minute intervals.

Peter Koski, an attorney for Smith, responded to the subpoena in a statement provided to Fox News Digital and reiterated that Smith offered six weeks ago to appear voluntarily in a public hearing setting.

“We are disappointed that offer was rejected, and that the American people will be denied the opportunity to hear directly from Jack on these topics,” Koski said. “Jack looks forward to meeting with the committee later this month to discuss his work and clarify the various misconceptions about his investigation.”

Jordan’s subpoena also included a sweeping demand for all documents and communications related to Smith’s time as special counsel, a request that comes after the DOJ told Smith’s lawyers in a letter on Nov. 12, reviewed by Fox News Digital, that it would make a “unique” accommodation to Congress by authorizing Smith to “provide unrestricted testimony to the Committee, irrespective of potential privilege.”

In a statement, committee ranking member Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., blasted Jordan for opting for a closed-door meeting with Smith, saying Republicans will “spin, distort, and cherry-pick his remarks through press leaks.”

“The American people deserve to hear the full unvarnished truth about Special Counsel Smith’s years-long effort to investigate and prosecute the crimes committed by Donald Trump and his co-conspirators,” Raskin said.

Read more.

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLES:

Downfall of Jack Smith

Corrupt Jack Smith Spied on Over 400 Republicans, ‘Entire Republican Political Apparatus’

HIJACKED REPUBLIC: Jack Smith Spied on Eight Republican Senators

Mad Dog ‘Special Counsel’ Jack Smith Resigns In Disgrace from the Department of Justice

Court: Fani Willis Must Turn Over Communications With ‘Get Trump’ Special Counsel Jack Smith, J6 Committee

IT’S OVER: Mad Dog Jack Smith Files MOTION TO DISMISS His Bogus Charges Against President Trump

Corrupt Jack Smith to Quit

Corrupt Jack Smith To VACATE All Remaining Deadlines in the DC  Trump Case

Trump Stalker-Prosecutor Jack Smith To Be Fired

Trump Wants Jack Smith Out From January 6 Case, Seeks His Dismissal

Mad Dog Jack Smith Files Superseding Indictment Against Trump In 2020 Election Case

Supreme Court Hands Huge Defeat To Jan. 6 Prosecutors And Jack Smith, “Improperly Charged Hundreds of Jan. 6 Protesters”

Judge Cannon Expands Hearing on Validity of Trump Special Counsel Jack Smith

Crooked, Corrupt Counsel Jack Smith Admits Prosecutors Misled Judge in Trump Case

Jack Smith Files More Evidence in Secret, Under Seal, Despite Team Trump Objections

Jack Smith’s Trump Case in DC has been REMOVED FROM THE COURT CALENDAR

Jack Smith’s Special Counsel Appointment Is Unconstitutional, Former Reagan Attorney General Ed Meese Tells Supreme Court

What Country Is This? Jack Smith Collected Images, Website Visits And Usage Data From Trump’s Cellphone

Dept of Justice: Special Counsel Jack Smith Sought Info On Anyone Who ‘Favorited Or Retweeted’ Trump Tweets

Jack Smith Runs to Judge Chutkan, Claims Trump Violated Terms of Release with Gun Photo

THE SET-UP: Biden White House Counsel Met With Jack Smith’s Special Counsel Just Weeks Before Trump Indictment

GOP Congressman Seeks Criminal Contempt Charges Against Jack Smith

Jack Smith Could Be Indicted For The Very Thing He Charged Trump With

HIJACKED REPUBLIC: President Trump Indicted (AGAIN) in Mar-a-Lago Classified Documents Hoax

POSTS ON X:

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Rubio Announces Visa Restrictions on Anyone Carrying Out ‘Violations of Religious Freedom’

The State Department has announced new restrictions on visas for anyone who is seen to be supporting or conducting violations of religious freedom.

“The United States is taking decisive action in response to the atrocities and violence against Christians in Nigeria and around the world,” Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced Wednesday.

The department “will restrict U.S. visas for those who knowingly direct, authorize, fund, support, or carry out violations of religious freedom,” Rubio said in a statement. The policy will also, in some cases, restrict visas of family members who are known to have carried out violations of religious freedom.

The policy is in response “to the mass killings and violence against Christians by radical Islamic terrorists, Fulani ethnic militias, and other violent actors in Nigeria and beyond,” according to the State Department. While Nigeria is the only nation the new policy specifically names, it will also apply to “other governments or individuals engaged in violations of religious freedom.”

President Donald Trump designated Nigeria a “Country of Particular Concern” in October in response to persecution of Christians in the African nation. Trump has also tasked Rep. Riley Moore, R-W.Va., Rep. Tom Cole, R-Okla., and the House Appropriations Committee to look further into the issue of the persecution of Christians in Nigeria and report their findings.

Moore and a group of lawmakers held a roundtable in the District of Columbia on Tuesday aimed at discussing the further investigation of the persecution of Christinas in Nigeria.

The U.S. “cannot stand by while such atrocities are happening in Nigeria, and numerous other countries,” Trump said.

It is estimated that more than 50,000 Christians have been killed in Nigeria since 2009, and about 7,000 in the first half of 2025 alone, most at the hands of either Boko Haram or Muslim Fulani militants.

The persecution of Christians in Nigeria has not only gained the attention of lawmakers in Washington, but also celebrity rapper and songwriter Nicki Minaj.

Minaj has been vocal in her support of Trump’s actions to address the situation in Nigeria and has called for action “to defend Christians in Nigeria, to combat extremism and to bring a stop to violence against those who simply want to exercise their natural right to freedom of religion or belief.”

AUTHOR

Virginia Allen is a senior news producer for The Daily Signal and host of “The Daily Signal Podcast” and “Problematic Women.” Send an email to Virginia. Virginia on X: .

RELATED POSTS:

Trump Admin Dramatically Scales Back Work Permits For Asylum Seekers

19 Countries Blocked From Immigrating to US 

Ted Cruz Calls to Hold Nigerian Government Accountable for Christian Persecution

Christian Persecution in Nigeria Demands American Response  

Trump Put a Spotlight on Persecution of Christians in Nigeria. What Happens Now?

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Signal column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.


The Daily Signal depends on the support of readers like you. Donate now

‘It’s about Keeping the Homeland Secure’: Trump Admin. Defends Lethal Strikes against Narco-Terrorists

Controversy is swimming around the Department of War, with Democratic lawmakers accusing President Donald Trump’s administration of committing war crimes in its strikes against Venezuelan narco-terrorists, while the president mulls over military action against the Venezuelan regime.

On September 2, the president and Secretary of War Pete Hegseth authorized a lethal drone strike against a narco-terrorist vessel transporting drugs from Venezuela to the U.S. The first drone strike reportedly killed 11 members of the Tren de Aragua (TdA) international criminal gang and foreign terrorist organization (FTO). However, a Washington Post report claimed that two TdA members survived the first strike and clung to the wreckage of their drug-shuttling vessel before Hegseth verbally ordered a second strike to kill the two survivors. That report has lawmakers demanding accountability.

In a series of interviews on Sunday, Senate Democrats circled Hegseth and the War Department like hungry sharks. Senator Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.) called for congressional investigations into the matter. “I hope it’s not true, what is being reported. That would be very disturbing,” he said regarding The Washington Post’s report. “If that is true, if what has been reported is accurate, I’ve got serious concerns about anybody in that chain of command stepping over a line that they should never step over. We are not Russia. We’re not Iraq,” he continued. Kelly, a former captain in the U.S. Navy, has found himself in hot water over the past two weeks following the release of a video in which he and a handful of other congressional Democrats called on American military servicemembers to disobey the president. Nevertheless, the senator accused Hegseth of wrongdoing. “I think there needs to be an inspector general investigation. Pete Hegseth, who is totally unqualified to be secretary of Defense, he fired a bunch of the IGs within the department. That makes this more challenging,” he said. “I don’t have a lot of confidence that he’s going to investigate that. That’s why in the Armed Services Committee in the Senate and the House, we’re going to have hearings. We’ll have public hearings. We’ll put people under oath. We need to get to the bottom of this.”

Senator Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) also charged Hegseth and the War Department with potential war crimes and possibly outright murder. “I think it’s very possible there was a war crime committed. Of course, for it to be a war crime, you have to accept the Trump administration’s whole construct here,” he said in a Sunday interview, referring to the Trump administration’s declaration that the U.S. is involved in an armed conflict with narco-terrorists. “I’m saying that it’s either murder from the first strike, if their whole theory is wrong, and I think, you know, the weight of the legal opinion here is that they have concocted this ridiculous legal theory. But even if you accept their theory, then it is a war crime, and so I do believe that the secretary of Defense should be held accountable for giving those kind of orders.”

Likewise, Senator Tim Kaine (D-Va.) echoed the “war crimes” narrative. “If that reporting is true, it’s a clear violation of the [Department of War’s] own laws of war, as well as international laws about the way you treat people who are in that circumstance. And so this rises to the level of a war crime if it’s true,” the Virginia Democrat said Sunday. “It’s time for Congress to rein in a president who is deciding to wage war on his own say so, which is not what the Constitution allows,” he added. Independent Senator Angus King (Maine), who caucuses with the Democrats, called the second strike “a stone-cold war crime” and “also murder.”

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt confirmed in a press conference Monday that the second strike did occur, but defended the move as lawful. “President Trump and Secretary Hegseth have made it clear that presidentially-designated narco-terrorist groups are subject to lethal targeting in accordance with the laws of war,” she said. She shared that the strikes were overseen by Admiral Frank M. Bradley, who was acting under Hegseth’s direction. “Admiral Bradley worked well within his authority and the law, directing the engagement to ensure the boat was destroyed and the threat to the United States of America was eliminated.”

Hegseth himself also defended the strikes as lawful, saying that they were “approved by the best military and civilian lawyers, up and down the chain of command.” Referring to The Washington Post report, he wrote in a social media post, “As usual, the fake news is delivering more fabricated, inflammatory, and derogatory reporting to discredit our incredible warriors fighting to protect the homeland. As we’ve said from the beginning, and in every statement, these highly effective strikes are specifically intended to be ‘lethal, kinetic strikes.’” The secretary of War continued, “The declared intent is to stop lethal drugs, destroy narco-boats, and kill the narco-terrorists who are poisoning the American people. Every trafficker we kill is affiliated with a Designated Terrorist Organization.” He further accused former president Joe Biden and his deputies of taking a “kid gloves approach, allowing millions of people — including dangerous cartels and unvetted Afghans — to flood our communities with drugs and violence. The Trump administration has sealed the border and gone on offense against narco-terrorists. Biden coddled terrorists, we kill them.”

The debate over the strikes against narco-terrorists comes as the president is reportedly considering military action against the Venezuelan government, which he has consistently accused of aiding, abetting, and even directing narco-terrorist actions against the U.S. and neighboring countries. In October, the president authorized the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) to begin conducting “covert operations” against the government of Venezuelan dictator Nicolás Maduro, prompting suspicion that the U.S. would soon begin conducting military strikes against Venezuelan-based narco-terrorists on land as well as at sea. According to the Miami Herald, the president pressured Maduro to resign and flee the country in a phone call that took place in late November. “You can save yourself and those closest to you, but you must leave the country now,” the president reportedly told the dictator. The U.S. would guarantee safe passage for Maduro and his family if he agreed to resign during the call, the Miami Herald reported, but Maduro refused, instead suggesting that he would hand legislative authority over to the opposition party but maintain command of the Venezuelan military.

The president was joined Monday night by Hegseth, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and top military commanders to discuss potential military action against Venezuela. Rear Admiral (Ret.) Mark Montgomery, a senior fellow and senior director at the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies Center on Cyber and Technology Innovation, appeared on “Washington Watch” Monday evening to preview potential actions the U.S. may take. “He’s trying his hardest to convince Maduro, who is not the legitimately-elected leader of Venezuela, to leave peacefully, or people around Maduro to encourage him aggressively to leave peacefully,” Montgomery said of the president’s strategy. He noted that the president recently declared the airspace over Venezuela to be “closed,” which the admiral interpreted as a warning to Maduro. “What the president here did was … signaling. He said, ‘I’m going to shut it down,’ and what he really meant was, ‘I’m going to occupy it with my forces at a time and place of my choosing,’ and I think that was a strong signal he was sending.”

“I think what’s really going to happen is we’re going to conduct airstrikes through that airspace. And when we do that, we will put out a notice to mariners saying, ‘Stay clear’ to everyone out of a certain area that’s much larger than the area we’re operating in, so [not to] give away our exact flight planning,” Montgomery anticipated. “And then we will probably begin to destroy the … the factories [on land], the storage units that are used by the narco-cartels for the production and distribution of cocaine from Venezuela to the United States and Europe,” he added. “I think we’ll conduct strikes against … the production and stowage of cocaine, we’ll also strike their military assets that could impact us, their aircraft and air defense systems, and their airfields.”

Montgomery explained that the president perceives the flow of drugs, chiefly fentanyl and cocaine, into the U.S. as a national security threat. The trafficking of fentanyl, which is fueled predominantly by China, is “a politically and militarily more touchy issue” than the flow of cocaine, which comes largely from Venezuela and Colombia. “President Trump did not run as the candidate who will bring you regime change, but I think what he ran as was the president that will bring you a secure homeland, and to him, a secure homeland means secure borders … but also part of that secure border is that we won’t allow illicit drugs in,” the admiral suggested. “We’ve been shooting ships coming out of Venezuela and coming out of Colombia — a total of 21 now — and destroying them. But that’s like shooting arrows instead of shooting the quiver. The quiver [is] the drug production facilities, and the ones in Venezuela, I imagine, are heavily targeted right now by the United States in preparation for an attack over the next few days.”

“We’re not going to stop cocaine flow the United States by sinking individual ships, small ships. It comes in by way too many paths,” Montgomery observed. The president is “saying, ‘Maduro, you’re a narco-terrorist, you run a narco-terrorist state. The state supports the narcotics cartels in the production and distribution of cocaine. I’m going to remove you and hopefully install the democratically elected leadership, and they will take a more aggressive attitude towards blocking drugs coming to the United States,’” the admiral continued. “But at its core, this is a Homeland Security issue to President Trump. It’s about keeping the homeland secure from drugs.”

AUTHOR

S.A. McCarthy

S.A. McCarthy serves as a news writer at The Washington Stand.

RELATED ARTICLE: The Problem with Oh-So-Trendy Socialism

EDITORS NOTE: This Washington Stand column is republished with permission. All rights reserved. ©2025 Family Research Council.


Partner with The Washington Stand to bring news from a biblical worldview to readers nationwide. From now until December 31, every gift will be doubled through our year-end Challenge Match.

The Washington Stand is Family Research Council’s outlet for news and commentary from a biblical worldview. The Washington Stand is based in Washington, D.C. and is published by FRC, whose mission is to advance faith, family, and freedom in public policy and the culture from a biblical worldview. We invite you to stand with us by partnering with FRC.

White House Launches “Media Bias” Portal to Expose Fake News

The White House just dropped a flamethrower on the Fake News Media: a new public database that catalogs the avalanche of lies, deliberate distortions, and manufactured hoaxes churned out by activist “journalists” and their failing outlets.

Now live at wh.gov/mediabias, the site lays bare the offending “journalists” and their outlets alongside the actual facts they attempted to bury, twist, or invent. Fully sortable and routinely updated, it ensures no hoax, no anonymously “sourced” fan fiction, and no partisan smear gets memory-holed again.

Coupled with the White House Rapid Response account on X, the Trump Administration is pushing back in real time to ensure the American people get the unfiltered truth — no ideological filter, no corporate spin, only the facts so they can decide for themselves. (White House.gov)

Much needed.

Visit the site at wh.gov/mediabias.

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLE: ABC, NBC, CBS Evening Newscasts Hides Tim Walz Massive Fraud Scandal

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Large Scale Voter Fraud Rocks Michigan

Serious questions are mounting in Michigan as state lawmakers raise alarms over what they describe as large-scale voter registration irregularities — including tens of thousands of new registrations flagged with invalid Social Security numbers and a voter roll that reportedly exceeds the state’s adult population by roughly half a million names.

State Sen. Johnson has publicly warned that Michigan’s election system is “wide open for abuse,” pointing directly to the Help America Vote Verification System (HAVV) — the database intended to confirm the accuracy of voter registration information.

According to Johnson, roughly 100,000 people registered to vote in Michigan last year, and 36% of them — about 36,000 applicants — submitted invalid four-digit Social Security number matches, yet were still allowed to complete registration.

“This should never happen,” he said. “If those numbers cannot be verified, the registration should not go through. Period.”

Johnson also claims Michigan’s voter rolls now contain around 500,000 more registered voters than the state has voting-age adults, raising renewed concerns about non-citizen registrations, outdated rolls, and potential systemic vulnerabilities.

“How many of those are non-citizens?” Johnson asked. “How many are unverifiable? How many shouldn’t be registered at all?”

Compounding the controversy, Johnson alleges that Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson has shared Michigan voter data with outside nonprofits, a move he argues gives partisan operatives unprecedented access to the state’s voter information.

“We know that Jocelyn Benson has shared Michigan voter data with nonprofits,” Johnson said. “Every Democratic operative in America has access to our voter data if they want it.”

State officials have not confirmed these claims, and Benson’s office has previously defended its data-sharing practices as legal and routine. But the numbers Johnson is presenting have intensified calls for a full audit of Michigan’s voter rolls, verification systems, and data distribution practices.

Large scale voter fraud taking place in Michigan

  • 36% of new voter registrations last year have invalid Social Security numbers but were allowed to complete voter registration anyway
  • Michigan has 500,000 more voters registered than we have voting age adults

“A state senator, Johnson has sounded the alarm about election insecurity in Michigan. Johnson points to the Help America Vote Verification System.

Last year, 100,000 people registered to vote in Michigan. 36% of them, 36,000 had invalid four-digit Social Security numbers and they were allowed to register anyway

Michigan has 500,000 more voters registered than we have voting age adults. How many of those are non-citizens?“

“We know that Jocelyn Benson, our Secretary of State, has shared Michigan voter data with nonprofits — Every Democrat operative in America has access to our voter data if they want it”

AUTHOR

POSTS ON X: 

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Gov’t Watchdog Scorched Biden Afghan Refugee Screening in 2022, Warned of ‘National Security’ Risks

Former President Joe Biden’s Afghan refugee screening process was blasted in 2022 by a devastating report by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Inspector General (IG) for lacking such basic information as a list of individuals who lacked “sufficient identification documents” and warned as a result of individuals being admitted into the country “who pose a risk to national security and to the safety of local communities.”

The report provides important context for officials and members of Congress as they assess and respond to the November 26 terrorist attack on the streets of the capital that killed one West Virginia National Guardsman and critically injured a second one.

The attacker, it was quickly determined in the aftermath, was a 29-year Afghan refugee admitted into the U.S. in the wake of the American military withdrawal from Afghanistan in 2021. That refugee is one of more than 79,000 Afghans brought into this country under Biden.

Between August 2021 and July 2022, the DHS Operation Allies Welcome (OAW) program brought more than 79,000 Afghans from that war-torn country that was taken over by the Islamic terrorists known as the Taliban. Of the total, almost 29,000 of the Afghans brought into the United States by the Biden administration program were males, including many of military service ages.

The IG report found two crucial flaws in the OAW screening and vetting process, flaws that DHS officials roundly denied existed in their response to the watchdog’s analyses.

First, the U.S. Customs and Border Patrol (CBP) officials involved in the screening and vetting “did not always have critical data to properly screen, vet, or inspect Afghan evacuees. … We determined some of the information used to vet evacuees through U.S. Government databases, such as name, Date of Birth (DOB), identification number, and travel document data, was inaccurate, incomplete, or missing.”

As a result, the report said, “CBP also admitted or paroled evacuees who were not fully vetted into the United States.”

The precise number of such individuals could not be determined with the available information, according to the IG report, but evidence was overwhelming that “DHS paroled at least two individuals into the United States who posed a risk to national security and the safety local communities and may have admitted or parole more individuals of concern.”

The identities of the two particular individuals were not included in the report.

A major obstacle to U.S. efforts to properly screen and vet Afghans, the report stated, was the fact “it is customary in Afghanistan for some individuals to have only one name. It is not always part of the Afghan culture to record or know exact DOBs. In Afghanistan, even though national legislation requires registration of children at birth, years of conflict decimated the administrative mechanisms and the social institutions supporting them.”

Consequently, whenever an Afghan told CBP officials they did not know their DOB, the official entry was January 1 of the estimated year of birth. “For example, if an evacuee stated he/she was 20 years old, the DOB most likely assigned was January 1, 2001,” the report explained.

The IG’s investigators reported they found 417 records with no known first name, 242 records with no last name, 7,800 records had invalid or missing document numbers, and 11,110 records with the January 1 DOB.

The investigators also reported encountering 36,400 records based on what was described as a “facilitation document.” But CBP officials were unable to “define or provide an explanation for this document type Travel Document Data,” and 36,400 records had “facilitation document” as the document type. However, during the audit, CBP could not define or provide an explanation for this document type, indicating potential inaccuracies.”

A second major flaw in the screening and vetting process was the fact “DHS did not have formal screening and vetting policies to support OAW” at the outset of the program, as the U.S. military withdrawal was launched.

“Instead, during the initial months of OAW, DHS officials said screening and vetting requirements were decided on an ad hoc basis. DHS and CBP did not have standardized formal policy documents and instead could only provide informal flowcharts, meeting minutes, and draft documents,” the report said.

The final conclusion of the IG’s investigators was that “the safety and the security of the American people is the highest priority for the U.S. Government. Preventing criminals, suspected terrorists, or other nefarious actors from entering the United States requires thorough screening and vetting. CBP’s use of incomplete or inaccurate data would not have yielded positive matches from intelligence databases if the individuals had derogatory records under a different name or DOB. Therefore, DHS and CBP cannot be sure they properly screened, vetted, and inspected all evacuees.”

The DHS response to the 2022 report was to reject it entirely, including the IG recommendation that all questionable individuals be re-screened and vetted.

“DHS responded that it was proud of its OAW efforts and highlighted multiple agencies involved in the screening and vetting of the Afghan evacuees. The OIG acknowledges the interagency efforts supporting this unprecedented event to screen and vet all evacuees. However, DHS’s response does not address the concerns of this audit and the recommendations which are aimed at reviewing the execution of OAW’s efforts and improving future, similar OAW efforts,” the IG concluded.

On Feb. 13, 2024, then-DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas was impeached by the U.S. House of Representatives for “high crimes and misdemeanors” in his administration of U.S. immigration policies. Mayorkas thus became the first presidential cabinet member to be impeached by the House. The impeachment was not upheld by the Senate.

The 2022 IG assessment was first reported in the aftermath of the attack on the guardsman by veteran conservative investigative journalist Richard Pollock on Substack.

AUTHOR

Mark Tapscott

Mark Tapscott is senior congressional analyst at The Washington Stand.

RELATED VIDEO: Gov. Walz under fire as $1B Minnesota social services fraud scandal widens

EDITORS NOTE: This Washington Stand column is republished with permission. All rights reserved. ©2025 Family Research Council.


The Washington Stand is Family Research Council’s outlet for news and commentary from a biblical worldview. The Washington Stand is based in Washington, D.C. and is published by FRC, whose mission is to advance faith, family, and freedom in public policy and the culture from a biblical worldview. We invite you to stand with us by partnering with FRC.