Dr. Welner, on Fox & Bill Bennett, Decries Lies About Mass Shootings and Crisis Incidents, Issues Multi-Pronged Homeland Proposal to Mitigate Risk.
Dr. Welner’s early appearance on “Fox and Friends” laid out the distinctions from workplace mass killing, and raised the importance of learning more of how a woman taking up destructive spectacle crime (which happens regularly overseas) related to how Muslim identity is expressed in America. Dr. Welner relied on his extensive experience in evaluating mass shooting incidents, workplace risk assessment, and risk assessment and other Jihadi psychology and criminology issues.
Dr. Welner added, in an appearance later that hour on “Fox & Friends,” that the hallmarks of how far one would go for their faith, demonstrated in a woman leaving an infant behind, bore the hallmarks of ISIS’ modus operandi. He encouraged the government and press to be straightforward about terrorist motivation, adding that being forthright was essential to devising public safety plans ahead.
Former Secretary of Education Bill Bennett, in his nationally broadcast program“Morning in America,” praised Dr. Welner for focusing the discussion on the core cause and not allowing a false narrative to take hold in the press. Dr. Bennett then invited Dr. Welner onto “Morning in America” yesterday to discuss Dr. Welner’s proposals for mitigating Islamist risk in America. Dr. Welner asserted that it was necessary to dismiss a number of oft-repeated false assertions as deliberate manipulations by informed authorities seeking to avoid addressing violence risks and risk factors of potential perpetrators, specifically:
- Islamist terror is not Islam
- Adherents to Radical Islamist thinking are very few in number
- America is responsible for creating intense Muslim hostility towards this country
- We are not at war with Islam
- Frank discussion of Islamist terrorism endangers American Muslims
In their extended discussion, Dr. Welner proposed a number of policy prescriptions for mitigating risk. Dr. Welner’s recommendations, which have since been re-published by the Investigative Project for Terrorism and the New English Review, include:
- Flipping the paradigm to focus on how American Muslims can actively defuse national anxieties of Americans who witness Islamist terrorism, rather than Americans’ alleviating anxieties of attacks on Muslims, which are altogether rare
- Branding America and how it has helped Muslims around the world
- Promoting Muslim attitudes reflecting loyalty to America first
- Encouraging mosque, parental, and family responsibility to self-police communities in order to root out radical nihilists who recruit others and ensnare young people
- Financially support Muslim institutions’ efforts to root out terrorism from within communities
- Promote humor and the arts to promote the marginalizing, reform, and self-regulation of Islamist intolerance
- Retake the campuses from rejectionist Islam, prevent access of radical leadership
- Retake the prisons from intolerant imams who groom new and alienated adherents and feed angry violent wannabees into the community
- Ban investment by governments and large donors promoting radical Islam from American media, campaigns, and academic institutions
- End American backdoor funding and support of countries and entities that collaborate with Islamist terror
- Expose and root out Islamist contributions to political candidates and to media entities
- Full security screening of federal employees in sensitive positions who do not currently undergo security clearance
- End exclusion of Jewish Arabic speakers by American intelligence services, who are available but not relied upon for gathering human intelligence