Tag Archive for: R-Texas

EXCLUSIVE: Islamification Becomes Public Enemy No. 1

Rep. Randy Fine, R-Fla., told the Daily Signal that a recent campaign poll of his found many of his constituents view the rise of “Islamification” and Islamic rule as a top concern.

As stated by Fine, respondents prioritized the issue above topics such as abortion, health care, and the conflict involving Iran.

“I had to fight with my pollster, because no one ever asks about the rise of radical Islam in America, and I wanted it placed in my survey,” Fine said. “It was one of the largest issues people rated. My constituents believe it concerned them more than the war in Iran, abortion, and more.”

Separately, he referenced remarks by New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani, claiming the mayor had expressed sympathy for a Hamas sniper. The mayor in February also called for a broader acceptance of the “Prophet Mohammed” on Islamic migration.

“Look, the history of Islam is one of conquest,” Fine said, describing why he believes the issue resonates with certain voters.

Rep. Keith Self, R-Texas, told the Daily Signal that concerns raised by Fine are among the reasons he co-founded the Sharia-Free America Caucus. Self said the group aims to educate lawmakers and the public about what he described as the risks of Sharia law.

“We are educating ourselves, our constituents, and our wider audience,” Self said. “We believe in the values of this country, [and] we believe in capitalism and our Christian foundations. We are a very forgiving country.”

Self argued that without continued focus on the issue, the perceived threat could grow.

“[We see] the rape gangs uncovered in the U.K., killing your daughter because she dishonored the family, and more,” Self said. “We do not want that to come to America.”

A recent report from Rupert Lowe MP noted that at least 250,000 Christian white girls in the United Kingdom have been raped in the 21st century, 83% of whom have been victims of Islamic rape gangs. According to testimonies outlined in the report, the survivors revealed that their rapists believed they had a religious duty to conduct the act.

“Our efforts will continue,” Self added. “We continue to grow slowly. We will have a planning session soon to outline what we think we can encourage governors to do—things we will recommend to governors and states to ask for their help, because they can do more than us in most cases.”

States like Texas and Florida have taken initiatives that the federal government has failed to take, such as designating the Council on American-Islamic Relations as a terrorist organization for its controversial financial trail and involvement in advocating for Sharia.

States like Indiana could soon follow, Indiana state Rep. Andrew Ireland told the Daily Signal.

Self also said he believes some individuals exploit constitutional protections to avoid scrutiny.

“If awareness on this issue is not raised, both by voters and by politicians, radical Islamists will continue to hide behind this freedom of religion, freedom of speech curtain,” he said.

“That is to be expected. They are going to go on the offensive because they think they got the upper hand,” Self added.

He concluded that the issue is “more important than ever,” asserting that the threat “is spreading right now.”

“The videos of Imams openly preaching treason are gaining traction,” Self said. “They are on the offensive, make no mistake about it.”

AUTHOR

Pedro Rodriguez 

Pedro Boccalato Rodriguez-Aparicio is a journalism fellow at the Daily Signal. Follow on X pedrobrodrigue7.

RELATED ARTICLES:

‘ASK MERCY OF GOD’: Republicans Slam Dems Over Endorsement of Leftist Group Under Federal Indictment

Communists and Jihadists Won in NYC Because No One Voted

Texas proposes change to high school social studies curriculum to teach about ‘Mohammed’s brutal military campaigns’

RELATED VIDEO: Anni Cyrus: “I’m Willing to Die To Stop Islam From Taking Over America.”

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Signal column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Ken Paxton Ousts John Cornyn In Runoff Landslide After Securing Trump’s Endorsement

Republican Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton defeated incumbent Sen. John Cornyn in a Senate runoff Tuesday, one week after receiving President Donald Trump’s backing.

Paxton won the race by a landslide 28-point margin, 63.8% to 36.2%, after receiving a late-minute May 19 endorsement from Trump, the Associated Press reported with more than 95% of the vote counted. The race advanced to a runoff after neither candidate received a majority of the votes during the primary.

After winning the GOP nomination Paxton will face Democratic nominee State Rep. James Talarico in the November general election. The nonpartisan Cook Political Report rates the race “Lean R.”

Cornyn won a plurality of the vote in the March 3 primary edging out Paxton by roughly 1.5 percentage points. However, he failed to secure a majority needed to avoid a runoff with his challenger. Cornyn received endorsements from former Republican Texas Gov. Rick Perry and outgoing Republican Texas Rep. Michael McCaul, the former chair of the House Foreign Affairs Committee and the House Homeland Security Committee.

Republican Texas Rep. Wesley Hunt — who came in a distant third in the primary — and former Trump adviser Steve Bannon endorsed Paxton.

Both candidates expressed their support for Trump, hoping to receive his backing. Ahead of the runoff, Trump said he would endorse one candidate and encourage the other to drop out.

Polls showed Paxton with a sizable nine-point lead, 51% to 42.7%, against Cornyn, according to Global Strategy Group.

Paxton said in March that he would “stay in the race” regardless of who Trump endorsed. Trump said it would be “very bad for him” to refuse to drop out.

“Well, that’s bad for him to say,” Trump said. “That is bad for him. So maybe, maybe that leads me to go the other direction.”

Previous reports suggested that Trump planned to endorse Cornyn, The Atlantic reported in March.

Cornyn did not commit to supporting Paxton if he defeated him in the runoff during an interview with “The Hill Sunday.” He previously accused Paxton of being ethically unfit to run for office, while Paxton argued that the 74-year-old Cornyn is too old to serve another term.

Paxton is embroiled in a long list of ethical and personal controversies, which include a proposed plea deal that would have allowed a man who admitted to sexually abusing a young boy to serve only one day in jail. His wife, Republican Texas state Sen. Angela Paxton, filed for divorce in July 2025 over an extramarital affair.

The Texas House voted to impeach Paxton in 2023 on 20 articles, alleging that he misused his office to aid Nate Paul, a wealthy real estate developer and political donor. The state Senate acquitted Paxton in Sept. 2023.

Trump railed against Cornyn on Truth Social for not fighting “hard enough” to pass the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act, which would require individuals to provide documentation proving their citizenship before voting.

Cornyn is among those who lost their primary races to Trump-backed candidates. Republican Kentucky Rep. Thomas Massie and Republican Louisiana Sen. Bill Cassidy lost their primary races in May after Trump aggressively waged war against them for opposing his agenda. Cassidy voted to convict Trump during his second impeachment in 2021, while Massie voted against the One Big, Beautiful Bill Act and opposed the Iran war.

All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

AUTHOR

Nicole Silverio

Capitol Hill Reporter

RELATED ARTICLES:

Paxton Defeats Cornyn in Texas Senate Primary

Pro-Life Ken Paxton Wins Texas Republican Senate Primary

The Establishment Spent $150 Million to Stop Ken Paxton — and Failed

Texas Voters Show Notorious Trump-Heckling Democrat The Door In Key Primary

Mayes Middleton Defeats Chip Roy In Texas Attorney General Primary Runoff

EXCLUSIVE: Texas Senate Hopeful Ken Paxton Taking Tons Of Democrat-Linked Trial Lawyer Cash, Data Shows

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Texas GOP Hopes That Latinos Flocking To Trump Could Get Them 5 Seats In Redistricting

Texas Republicans are banking on the GOP’s gains among Hispanic and Latino voters in recent elections, seeking to create four Republican-leaning, majority-Hispanic districts in the state in their mid-decade redistricting proposal.

State Republicans on Wednesday unveiled plans for a new congressional map that, if enacted, would likely flip five Democratic seats in the 2026 midterm elections — four of them being majority-Hispanic congressional districts. President Donald Trump has been urging Texas Republicans to redraw the state’s congressional maps ahead of the 2026 midterms in an attempt to widen the GOP’s narrow majority in the House of Representatives.

“Republicans have been steadily increasing their support with Hispanic voters in Texas, so they no doubt are confident that redistricting could help them gain seats,” Hans A. von Spakovsky, manager of the Election Law Reform Initiative and a senior legal fellow at the Heritage Foundation’s Edwin Meese III Center for Legal and Judicial Studies, told the Daily Caller News Foundation. “President Trump’s share of their vote in Texas rose from 34% in 2016 to 41% in 2020 to 55% in 2024. He went from getting a minority of the Hispanic vote to [getting] a majority of the vote in just eight years.”

Trump’s 2024 performance among Hispanic voters in Texas, according to exit polls, was several percentage points better than his performance among Hispanic and Latino voters nationwide. Additionally, Trump’s vote share among Texas Hispanics was only one point lower than his vote share among all 2024 voters in the Lone Star State.

In the 2024 election, 48% of Hispanics nationwide voted for Trump — the highest ever recorded percentage for a Republican presidential nominee — up from 36% in the 2020 presidential election, according to a Pew Research report released in June. Trump notched 56.3% of the overall 2024 vote in Texas to former Vice President Kamala Harris’ 42.4%.

“Everything we know about Latino voters tells us that they are highly persuadable and have in the last few election cycles made decisions based on who they believe will address their economic concerns and priorities,” Melissa Morales, president of Somos Votantes, a Democratic-aligned group that focuses on Latino voters, told Politico on Thursday.

Republicans currently hold 25 of Texas’ 38 House seats, with Trump notably carrying 27 of those districts in the 2024 presidential election, the Texas Tribune reported on Wednesday.

Two Democrats — both of them Hispanic moderates representing border districts — won their 2024 reelection bids in seats Trump carried that cycle. Democratic Texas Rep. Henry Cuellar won reelection by six points despite Trump carrying his district by seven and Democratic Texas Rep. Vicente Gonzalez won by under three points despite Trump winning his district by five.

“Republican gains with Hispanic voters in Texas are not just a single-cycle phenomenon,” Kyle Kondik, managing editor of Sabato’s Crystal Ball, the University of Virginia Center for Politics’ nonpartisan newsletter on American campaigns and elections, told the DCNF. “Back in 2020, Trump made significant gains, for instance, in heavily Latino South Texas even while losing overall to [former President] Joe Biden. Four years later, those gains continued. I think there is definitely the possibility of a swing back to Democrats to some extent in the context of the 2026 midterm — the non-presidential party often does well in such elections — but in the longer term there probably are reasonable signs of optimism for Republicans with these voters.”

“In terms of the new map draft, I don’t really think Republicans even need further gains with Latinos to realize their maximal gain — it has 30 seats that voted for Trump by 10 points or more, so it’s designed to elect 5 more Republicans than the current map,” Kondik added. “Now, the 2024 presidential result in these districts is probably more of a high water mark than a durable, every-election phenomenon, and Democrats do better, for instance, in the South Texas seats than Harris did in the presidential race. But I don’t think there’s much risk that Republicans spread themselves too thin on this map — maybe they don’t win all 30 seats in 2026, but I also don’t see them doing worse than the 25 seats they already hold.”

National Republican Congressional Committee (NRCC) Spokesman Christian Martinez said Thursday in a statement provided to the DCNF that “Hispanic communities are sick and tired of radical Democrats turning their backs on them time and again.”

“They are forcefully rejecting the far-left agenda that resulted in years of open borders, skyrocketing prices, and woke insanity like men in girls’ sports,” Martinez added. “Republicans are the party of common sense, and Hispanic voters know it.”

AUTHOR

Ireland Owens

Reporter

RELATED ARTICLES:

CNN’s Harry Enten Says Texas Redistricting Could Make ‘Huge Difference’ For GOP In Midterms

Biden’s Post-Presidential Fall From Grace Even Sadder Than You Think

ROOKE: There’s A Deeper Reason For Trump Resurrecting The Presidential Fitness Test

Lefties Rage At Dem Senator Elissa Slotkin Who Skipped Key Israel Vote To Go On Colbert

‘RIP Democracy:’ Left-Wing Protesters Drop Coffin On Wisconsin GOP Rep’s Doorstep

RELATED VIDEO: CNN admits Texas redistricting wiil make “HUGE DIFFERENCE” in control of the House.

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.


All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

Trump Adds These 20 Names to His List of Supreme Court Candidates

President Donald Trump publicly added 20 names Wednesday to his list of candidates for the Supreme Court, including six women, three Senate Republicans, and a state attorney general. Also new to the list are prominent government lawyers who haven’t served as judges.

“Every one of these individuals will ensure equal justice, equal treatment, and equal rights for citizens of every race, color, religion, and creed,” Trump said in making the announcement at the White House. “Together, we will defend our righteous heritage and preserve our magnificent American way of life.”

For the most part, the president’s 20 new Supreme Court prospects follow the traditional pattern in which federal appeals court judges, also known as circuit judges, are considered for the high court.

Currently, all but one of the nine justices were circuit judges before being nominated to the Supreme Court. Only Justice Elena Kagan never had been a judge before.


How are socialists deluding a whole generation? Learn more now >>


When running for president in 2016, Trump adopted a list of potential Supreme Court nominees from recommendations by The Heritage Foundation and the Federalist Society. He has appointed two justices who were on that list: Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh.

“The names I know are really good people, but I’m not familiar with everyone,” John Malcolm, director of the Meese Center for Legal and Judicial Studies, told The Daily Signal. “It’s an impressive list. Not everyone was on my list, but many were.”

In his announcement of the names, Trump laid out the stakes if the high court were to shift back toward the liberal side.

“Unfortunately, there is a growing radical left movement that rejects the principle of equal treatment under the law,” Trump said, adding:

If this extreme movement is granted a majority on the Supreme Court, it will fundamentally transform America without a single vote of Congress. Radical justices will erase the Second Amendment, silence political speech and require taxpayers to fund extreme, late-term abortion.

They will give unelected bureaucrats the power to destroy millions of American jobs. They will remove the words ‘under God’ from the Pledge of Allegiance. They will unilaterally declare the death penalty unconstitutional, even for the most depraved mass murderers. They will erase national borders, cripple police departments, and grant new protections to anarchists, rioters, violent criminals, and terrorists.

Here’s a look at Trump’s new contenders for the high court.

Politicians

Trump’s additions include four elected officials, which has been a rare occupation for nominees.

Former Justice Sandra Day O’Connor had been an Arizona state senator before becoming a state judge. But going from elected office directly to the Supreme Court is rare.

The most notable example is President Dwight Eisenhower’s naming of California Gov. Earl Warren as chief justice in 1953.

The politicians on Trump’s list are:

Kentucky Attorney General Daniel Cameron, a Republican first elected in 2019. Cameron, 34, is the state’s 51st attorney general. He was previously legal counsel to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky. He earned his law degree, cum laude, from the University of Louisville Brandeis School of Law.

Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., first elected to the House in 2014. Cotton, 43, was an Army captain who served in Afghanistan and Iraq, Cotton received his law degree from Harvard Law School.

Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, first elected in 2012. A former solicitor general of Texas, he has argued cases before the U.S. Supreme Court. A law clerk to former Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist, Cruz, 49, received his law degree, magna cum laude, from Harvard Law School.

Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., elected in 2018. Hawley, 40, previously was Missouri’s attorney general and an associate professor at the University of Missouri School of Law. He also was a lawyer with the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty. A former clerk for Chief Justice John Roberts, Hawley received his law degree from Yale Law School.

A fourth Senate Republican, Mike Lee of Utah, was on Trump’s 2016 list.

Federal Appeals Judges

If history is a guide, one of these new names—all Trump appointees—is the most likely to become a Supreme Court justice if the president gets second term, since circuit judges tend to be the farm team for the high court.

Here are the new appeals court judges on the list:

Peter Phipps, 47, of Pennsylvania, on the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals since July 2019. Phipps also served as a U.S. district judge for the Western District of Pennsylvania. He was senior trial counsel in the federal programs branch of the Justice Department’s Civil Division. He received his law degree from Stanford Law School.

Allison Jones Rushing, 38, of North Carolina, on the 4th Circuit since March 2019. She clerked for Justice Clarence Thomas and then-Judge Neil Gorsuch on the 10th Circuit. She received her law degree, magna cum laude, from Duke University School of Law.

Lawrence VanDyke, 47, of Nevada, confirmed by the Senate last December to serve on the 9th Circuit. VanDyke previously was deputy assistant attorney general for the Environment and Natural Resources Division of the Justice Department. He also was solicitor general of both Nevada and Montana, defending the policies of those states before the U.S. Supreme Court. He received his law degree, magna cum laude, from Harvard.

Bridget Bade, 54, of Arizona, on the 9th Circuit since April 2019. Bade was both a U.S. magistrate judge and an assistant U.S. attorney for the District of Arizona. She received her law degree, cum laude, from Arizona State University’s Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law.

Stuart Kyle Duncan, 48, of Louisiana, on the 5th Circuit since April 2018. Previously general counsel of the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, he also argued cases before the U.S. Supreme Court as solicitor general of Louisiana. He received his law degree from the Paul M. Hebert Law Center at Louisiana State University and his LL.M from Columbia University Law School.

James Ho, 47, of Texas, on the 5th Circuit since December 2017. He was solicitor general of Texas and clerked for Justice Clarence Thomas. He received his law degree with high honors from the University of Chicago Law School.

Gregory Katsas, 56, of Virginia, on the District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals since December 2017. Katsas was both deputy assistant and deputy counsel to the president, as well as the Justice Department’s assistant attorney general for the Civil Division. He clerked for Thomas both at the U.S. Supreme Court and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. He received his law degree, cum laude, from Harvard.

Barbara Lagoa, 52, of Florida, on the 11th Circuit since December 2019. Previously a justice on the Supreme Court of Florida, she also was an assistant U.S. attorney for the Southern District of Florida. Lagoa received her law degree from Columbia.

Other Government Officials

Former Chief Justice William Rehnquist, like Kagan, was solicitor general of the United States—the No. 4 official at the Justice Department—before ascending to the high court.

Trump’s new candidates include these top-ranking government lawyers and officials:

Paul Clement, 54, of Virginia, U.S. solicitor general during the George W. Bush administration from 2005 through 2008, when he argued more than 100 cases before the high court. He previously clerked for Justice Antonin Scalia and received his law degree, magna cum laude, from Harvard.

Steven Engel, 46, of Washington, D.C., assistant attorney general for the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel, which advises the president, since November 2017. He previously was deputy assistant attorney general in that office.  A former clerk for Justice Anthony Kennedy, he received his law degree from Yale.

Noel Francisco, 51, solicitor general from September 2017 to July 2020. He previously served in the Office of Legal Counsel as deputy assistant attorney general and as associate counsel to the president. A former clerk for Scalia, he received his law degree with high honors from the University of Chicago.

Christopher Landau, 56, of Maryland, U.S. ambassador to Mexico since August 2019. Landau clerked for Scalia and for Thomas, both at the Supreme Court and the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. He received his law degree, magna cum laude, from Harvard.

Kate Todd of Virginia, former deputy assistant and deputy counsel to President George W. Bush. She clerked for Thomas and received her law degree, magna cum laude, from Harvard.

Federal District Judges

District judges rarely are appointed to the Supreme Court, but two Trump appointees made his expanded list.

Martha Pacold, 41, on the bench of the Northern District of Illinois since August 2019. She previously was deputy general counsel of the Treasury Department. A former clerk to Thomas at the Supreme Court, she received her law degree with honors from the University of Chicago.

Sarah Pitlyk, 43, on the bench of the Eastern District of Missouri since December 2019. Previously special counsel at the Thomas More Society, she clerked for Kavanaugh at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.  She received her law degree from Yale Law.

State Supreme Court Justice

O’Connor served as an Arizona state judge before President Ronald Reagan nominated her in July 1981 to become the high court’s first female justice.

Trump’s new list includes one state Supreme Court justice: Carlos Muniz, 51, of the Florida Supreme Court, appointed by Gov. Ron DeSantis in January 2019.

Muniz previously was general counsel to the U.S. Department of Education and served in various positions in Florida state government, including as deputy attorney general and chief of staff to then-Attorney General Pam Bondi. He received his law degree from Yale.

COLUMN BY

Fred Lucas

Fred Lucas is chief national affairs correspondent for The Daily Signal and co-host of “The Right Side of History” podcast. Lucas is also the author of “Abuse of Power: Inside The Three-Year Campaign to Impeach Donald Trump.” Send an email to Fred. Twitter: @FredLucasWH.

RELATED ARTICLES:
Voter Fraud Cases Emerge in Battleground States of North Carolina, Georgia

Restoring a Culture of Life: How the Administration Is Stopping Abortion and Infanticide

Are ‘Nice White Parents’ to Blame for Failures in the Education System?

Problematic Women: Diamond and Silk Discuss Black Lives Matter


A Note for our Readers:

Democratic Socialists say, “America should be more like socialist countries such as Sweden and Denmark.” And millions of young people believe them…

For years, “Democratic Socialists” have been growing a crop of followers that include students and young professionals. America’s future will be in their hands.

How are socialists deluding a whole generation? One of their most effective arguments is that “democratic socialism” is working in Scandinavian countries like Sweden and Norway. They claim these countries are “proof” that socialism will work for America. But they’re wrong. And it’s easy to explain why.

Our friends at The Heritage Foundation just published a new guide that provides three irrefutable facts that debunks these myths. For a limited time, they’re offering it to readers of The Daily Signal for free.

Get your free copy of “Why Democratic Socialists Can’t Legitimately Claim Sweden and Denmark as Success Stories” today and equip yourself with the facts you need to debunk these myths once and for all.

GET YOUR FREE COPY NOW »


EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Signal column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.