93% of New Muslim Candidates Won’t Express Support for the U.S. Constitution

“It is not appropriate to label all, or even the majority of those, who question Islam and Muslims as Islamophobes.” – CAIR Report 2013, Legislating Fear: Islamophobia and its Impact in the United States, p. ix.

In January 2020, I wrote about the results of a survey I had done in which I presented four questions to eighty Muslim public officials across the United States; each question asked the Muslim public official to choose between following the U.S. Constitution/our man-made laws or Islamic Doctrine.  An eye-opening 93% of these Muslim public officials would not express support for the U.S. Constitution or our man-made laws.  Of the six who did express this support, only two allowed me to mention their name.[1]

I also submitted these same four questions to seven prominent Muslim Americans who have been publicly aspiring to reform Islam; I sent four similar questions, based on Canadian law, to six prominent Muslim Canadians who had also been publicly aspiring to reform Islam.  Of these thirteen aspiring reformers, only two Muslim Americans and one Muslim Canadian responded saying they supported man-made laws over the commands of Allah and the teachings of Muhammad.[2]

I then decided to submit the same four questions to 36 Muslim American candidates who appeared to be seeking public office for the first time.[3]

We shall first look at the four questions I used and then examine the variety of responses I received from those Muslims seeking public office.  I then list the Muslim candidates, by State, who did not respond.  This is followed by my concluding remarks.

The Questions

On February 10, 2020, I sent the following e-mail to a group of 36 Muslims who were running, or had been running, for public office at various levels of government across the United States; on February 17th I sent it again to the Muslims who had not initially responded:[4]

I have written extensively about Islam (six books and numerous articles and brochures) and think it important that non-Muslims gain a better understanding of Islam.

 If you are elected to public office you will take an oath of office that includes swearing, or affirming, to support the United States Constitution.  With that in mind, I am interested in your response, as a candidate who follows the religion of Islam, to the following questions:

No. 1:  Will you go on record now and state that our 1st Amendment right to freedom of speech gives the right to anyone in the United States to criticize or disagree with your prophet Muhammad, and will you also go on record now and state that you support and defend anyone’s right to criticize or disagree with your prophet Muhammad, and that you condemn anyone who threatens death or physical harm to another person who is exercising that right?

No. 2:  Our 1st Amendment guarantees freedom of religion in the United States. As part of that freedom, anyone in the United States has the right to join or leave any religion, or have no religion at all.  Will you go on record now and state that you support and defend the idea that in the United States a Muslim has not only the freedom to leave Islam, but to do so without fear of physical harm, and will you also go on record now and state that you condemn anyone who threatens physical harm to a Muslim who is exercising that freedom?

No. 3:  According to the words of Allah found in Koran 5:38 and the teachings of your prophet Muhammad, amputation of a hand is an acceptable punishment for theft.   But our U.S. Constitution, which consists of man-made laws, has the 8th Amendment that prohibits cruel and unusual punishment such as this.  Do you agree with Allah and your prophet Muhammad that amputation of a hand is an acceptable punishment for theft in the United States, or do you believe that our man-made laws prohibiting such punishments are true laws and are to be followed instead of this 7th Century command of Allah and teaching of Muhammad?

No. 4:  According to the words of Allah found in Koran 4:3, Muslim men are allowed, but not required, to be married to up to four wives.  Being married to more than one wife in the United States is illegal according to our man-made bigamy laws.  Do you agree with Allah that it is legal for a Muslim man in the United States to be married to more than one woman, or do you believe that our man-made laws prohibiting bigamy are true laws and are to be followed instead of this 7th Century command of Allah?

I look forward to your responses.

Support for the U.S. Constitution

Only three Muslim candidates clearly stated that they would support the U.S. Constitution/our man-made laws over Islamic Doctrine; they each gave me permission to use their name:

Deedra Abboudd (D), Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, Arizona

Iman-Utopia Layjou Bah (I), U.S. House of Representatives (AZ-2)

Rashid Malik (D), U.S. House of Representatives (GA-7)

Other Replies

I received various replies from five other Muslim candidates:

Leila Shukri Adan (D), U.S. House of Representatives (MN-5):  On February 17th Adan responded to my second e-mail:

Thank you so much for your email and for the reminder.  I am confirming receipt and will get back to you soon!

I have not heard back from Adan.

Muhammad Arif (D), United States Senate, Arizona:  Arif responded the same day to the February 10th e-mail.  He asked if we could meet for coffee or lunch to discuss the questions.  I explained that I lived too far away for that.  We exchanged several additional e-mails, and on February 11th he wrote:

Since you do not live in Arizona and I’m busy in my campaign because I have limited time … can I email you these answer [sic] next week … I apologize for delay [sic] because the questions I have to read carefully and answer in details [sic]

I replied that would be fine.  The “next week” came and went, and on February 22nd I sent him an e-mail asking when I could expect his responses.  I have not heard back from Arif.

Zainab Baloch (D), Mayor of Raleigh, North Carolina:  Baloch lost the 2019 general election to become the Mayor of Raleigh.  However, her subsequent social postings appeared to indicate that she was in politics for the long haul; she had written: “This isn’t a sprint, it’s a marathon.”  On February 17th she responded to my second e-mail:

I didn’t miss it [my first e-mail]. If I have time to respond to your harassing questions, I will. Have a great week!

I have not heard back from Baloch.

Ameena Matthews (D), U.S. House of Representatives (IL-1):  On February 24th, in reply to my second e-mail, I received the following from Dr. La’Shawn Littrice, Matthews’ Campaign Manager:

Hi, Steve. How are you?  I will forward this to Dr. Matthews and get it back to you by Wednesday [February 26th] of this week.

On February 28th I sent Littrice an e-mail asking her for an update.  I have not heard back from Littrice.

Reem Subei (D), Ohio State Senate:   In response to each of the two e-mails I sent Subei, I received the following form response:

Thank you for contacting Reem for Ohio. This campaign is about bringing justice and equality to all. Please click the link below to provide us with your preferred volunteering activity. Let’s build a system that works for everyone, because we all win when we all win. 

The link takes one to a form for volunteers to complete.  I have received no other response from Subei.

No Reply

These Muslim candidates did not reply:


Kaisar Ahmed (Nonpartisan) – San Bernardino County Board of Supervisors

Shahid Buttar (D) – U.S. House of Representatives (CA-12)

Fatima Shahnaz Iqbal-Zubair (D) – California State Assembly

Cenk Uygur (D) – U.S. House of Representatives (CA-25)


Iman Jodeh (D) – Colorado State House of Representatives


Madinah Wilson-Anton (D) – Delaware State House of Delegates


Nabilah Islam (D) – U.S. House of Representatives (GA-7)


Junaid “J” Afeef (D) – Kane County State’s Attorney

Rush Darwish (D) – U.S. House of Representatives (IL-3)

Mohammed Faheem (D) – U.S. House of Representatives (IL-8)

Sarah Gad (D) – U.S. House of Representatives (IL-1)

Inam Hussain (D) – U.S. House of Representatives (IL-8)

Moon Khan (D) – Circuit Court Clerk, DuPage County

Azam Nizamuddin (D) – Circuit Judge, Circuit Court of DuPage County

Abdelnasser Rashid (D) – Cook County Board of Review


Saafir Rabb (D) – U.S. House of Representatives (MD-7)


Ihssane Leckey (D) – U.S. House of Representatives (MA-4)

Nichole Mossalam (D) – Massachusetts State House of Representatives


Solomon Rajput (D) – U.S. House of Representatives (MI-12)


Dalia Al-Aqidi (R) – U.S. House of Representatives (MN-5)

Omar Fateh (D) – Minnesota State Senate

New Jersey

Alp Basaran (D) – U.S. House of Representatives (NJ-9)

New York

Tahanie Aboushi (D) – Manhattan District Attorney

Shaniyat Chowdhury (D) – U.S. House of Representatives (NY-5)

Mary Jobaida (D) – New York State Assembly

Badrun Nahar Khan (D) – U.S. House of Representatives (NY-14)

Zohran Kwame Mamdani (D) – New York State Assembly


Mohamud Jama (D) – Ohio State House of Representatives


These 36 Muslim Americans seeking public office would have to, if successful, take an oath of office that includes swearing (or affirming) to support the U.S. Constitution.  In theory then, one would think such Muslim Americans would be quite willing even now to express their support for that Constitution and our man-made laws.  The fact that 92% of them would not take this opportunity to express that support is troubling.

Troubling, but not surprising.  As we saw earlier, 93% of current Muslim public officials and 77% of aspiring Muslim reformers also declined to make such a choice.  This, in spite of the fact that anyone holding a public office in the United States is required to take an oath to support the U.S. Constitution and our man-made laws, and we regularly hear from aspiring Muslim reformers that Islamic Doctrine needs to be modernized and made more compatible with Western laws.  But when faced with specific choices, instead of glittering generalities, 91% of all the Muslims listed in these three categories would not express support for Western laws over Islamic Doctrine.

One might wonder if it is fair to ask Muslims to make such a choice.  It certainly is because of the irreconcilable conflict between major tenets of Islamic Doctrine and Western Laws, especially the U.S. Constitution.[5]

Here is an additional consideration.  In its 2020 ‘Muslim Vote Campaign’ the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) has included a questionnaire asking non-Muslim candidates and government officials whether or not they support specific “Muslim needs.”  CAIR explained:

CAIR’s 2020 questionnaire is an update to its 2016 questionnaire and provides sample questions for Muslims to ask local city council, mayoral, state legislative, gubernatorial, and congressional candidates running for office and government officials.

Candidate responses to CAIR’s election questionnaire will assist American Muslims in evaluating each candidate’s leadership criteria and their ability to unite and engage the community on policies and programs that meet Muslim needs.

The questions and the issues included in the questionnaire emphasize the American Muslim community’s concerns, as well as those of its civil rights, immigrant rights and worker rights allies.[6]

Here is a sampling of the issues about which the American Muslim community is concerned:[7]

1. Do you plan to address the rise in Islamophobia and hateful rhetoric towards Muslims in the United States?

2. Do you support the right of Muslim inmates to make religious accommodation requests for religious headwear, like hijabs, kufis, and other head coverings?

3. Do you support the right of Muslim inmates to make religious accommodation requests for copies of the Quran and other religious texts, prayer mats, prayer beads, and other religious items?

4. Do you support the right of Muslim inmates to make religious accommodation requests for modified meal schedules while fasting during Ramadan?

5. Do you support the right of Muslim inmates to make religious accommodation requests for daily congregational prayers and Friday religious services?

6. Do you support public school systems with significant Muslim populations in your congressional district and/or state closing for the Muslim holidays of Eid al-Fitr and Eid al-Adha, when many students or faculty would otherwise be absent?

The focus of CAIR’s questions is on the need for non-Muslims to accommodate certain Islamic religious teachings.  Since CAIR has turned the focus on certain Islamic religious teachings, it is only appropriate that the focus should now be turned on all Islamic religious teachings, especially those that are irreconcilably in conflict with the U.S. Constitution and our man-made laws.  Muslims running for and holding public office need to be asked about these conflicts and expected to publicly, categorically choose between the U.S. Constitution/our man-made laws and those contradictory teachings of their religion.

We need to pay heed to these words of Winston Churchill from 1940:

This is no time for ease and comfort.  It is the time to dare and endure.



Dr. Stephen M. Kirby is the author of six books about Islam. His latest book is Islamic Doctrine versus the U.S. Constitution: The Dilemma for Muslim Public Officials.


North Carolina: First Muslim woman to win elected office in the state flaunted hijab as campaign logo

Paterson, NJ: First Muslim Police Chief in US is Sworn in on the Qur’an

Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orbán vows to protect Europe from renewed mass Muslim migration

At AIPAC, Biden Disappoints (Part 1)

Muslim cleric: “Animosity towards the Jews is an obligatory religious duty, and one of the signs of the believers”

Protesters Push Arab Militaries Off Their Pedestal


[1]           Stephen M. Kirby, “93% of Muslim Public Officials Would Not Express Support for the Constitution They Swore to Uphold,” Jihad Watch, January 7, 2020, https://www.jihadwatch.org/2020/01/93-of-muslim-public-officials-would-not-express-support-for-the-constitution-they-swore-to-uphold.

[2]           Stephen M. Kirby, “The Adventures of Asking Muslim Reformers to Categorically Choose between Western Laws and Islam,” Jihad Watch, January 16, 2020, https://www.jihadwatch.org/2020/01/the-adventures-of-asking-muslim-reformers-to-categorically-choose-between-western-laws-and-islam.

[3]           I would like to thank Deplorable Kel for a majority of these names: https://deplorablekel.com/category/u-s-elections/2020-election/.

[4]           These questions were taken from Chapter 10 of my latest book, Islamic Doctrine Versus the U.S. Constitution: The Dilemma for Muslim Public Officials (Washington DC: Center for Security Policy Press, 2019); https://www.centerforsecuritypolicy.org/2019/12/03/csp-press-releases-primer-on-islamic-doctrine-versus-the-u-s-constitution/.

[5]           For details about this irreconcilable conflict see Islamic Doctrine Versus the U.S. Constitution: The Dilemma for Muslim Public Officials.  For ways in which Islamic Doctrine allows Muslims to appear to take an oath to support the U.S. Constitution and our man-made laws, see Chapter 1, “Taking the Oath of Office.”

[6]           “CAIR Launches 2020 ‘Muslims Vote’ Campaign with Release of Candidate Questionnaire, Calendar of Election Dates,” CAIR, January 21, 2020, https://www.cair.com/press_releases/cair-launches-2020-muslims-vote-campaign-with-release-of-candidate-questionnaire-calendar-of-election-dates/.

[7]           “Sample Questions for Candidates and Public Officials,” CAIR, 2020, https://d3n8a8pro7vhmx.cloudfront.net/cairhq/pages/1125/attachments/original/1579621884/2020_Sample_Questions.pdf?1579621884.

EDITORS NOTE: This Jihad Watch column is republished with permission. © All rights reserved.

32 replies
  1. Karen Rees
    Karen Rees says:

    Valid Oath of Office with unconditional support of the US Constitution and our laws or person can’t run for or hold any office in this United States.
    Live elsewhere if you can’t support the U S Constitution and U S Laws
    Do not attempt to change this great USA assimilate or leave and go to
    a country that embraces your beliefs

    BONNIE94118 SANDERS says:

    There is Freedom of religion here…But if you live here you should have better go by our laws outside of religion…

  3. Probably a leftie. Probably not.
    Probably a leftie. Probably not. says:

    Number 1:
    Do you support the first amendment to right of freedom of speech including criticism of the Christian God?

    Number 2:
    Do you support the right to freedom of religion and can a Christian choose to leave Christianity without fear of harassment or violence against them? Do you support their right to live their life as they so choose even if it flies in the face of the Bible?

    Number 3:
    According to Leviticus 20:13, the bible requires the stoning of men practicing homosexuality. Yet the 8th amendment prohibits any cruel and unusual punishment. In the book of Matthew this old testament law is upheld by Jesus.
    Do you condemn God, and the Bible, for this cruel and unusual punishment or would you choose to defy our modern punishment to uphold biblical law?

    Number 4:
    1st Timothy states that no woman will teach or have authority over a man and she must remain silent.
    Our constitution guarantees the right for all to vote and hold office in the 19th amendment regardless of sex. Do you uphold our manmade laws and defy a holy text written in the 1st and 2nd century?

    Some will choose to read my words as an attack. Feel free to do so as I’m not appealing to you.

    For the rest of you… Think about how the above would sound if it were turned on our Christian representatives. Would you really expect those representatives to respond to such a loaded set of questions?

    If not, then why would we expect anyone else to?

    • Kristine
      Kristine says:

      The questions you transposed do
      Not offend me and my answers to all of them is “I support the US Constitution.” Christianity has evolved unlike the Muslim religion.

    • Stephanie
      Stephanie says:

      yes I would. If you except an office here you should be willing to uphold those laws no matter what. If you are unable to do so then don’t run for office. That is the whole point of the constitution. It has to be protected at all costs.

  4. Marvis Bosarge
    Marvis Bosarge says:

    I Will Not Let Muslims Take America One Nation Under GOD And Our Religions And Our Laws And Our All Amendments America Has Them To Ever Change Or Delelete Or Refuse Our Laws Or Our Beliefs !!! They Should never Take God Out Of Our Country Or Be Allowed In Our Congress Or Senate And Take Their Muslim Rules And They Should never have been Allowed To Refuse To Take The Oaths Of America And Our Laws And Take A Oath On Their Koran Never Should that Be Allowed I believe That We Americans Need to All Get together and DEMAND ANY oF their Muslims Beliefs Ever ALLOWED In OUR Laws Or Whitehouse This Immediately Needs Be Take Them Out offices of Congress Or Leave AMERICA

  5. Royal A Brown III
    Royal A Brown III says:

    There is no such thing as a moderate Muslim and Muslims should not be allowed to hold any US public office that requires an Oath of Allegiance to our Constitution because they will always put Sharia first.

    Islam is a Satanic Cult posing as a religion for world conquest purposes. Islam = Conquest by Migration, High Birthrate, Rape, Terrorism, Non-Assimilation, & Sharia all aided by Taqiyya. Islam is not a religion but a geo-political, economic, militaristic, theocracy where Infidels must convert, become slaves or die. Sharia enslaves women including Muslim women. We Infidels (non-believers in Islam) must wake up to these facts.

    Taqiyya (taqiya, taqiyah, taqiyyah) is a form of Islamic deception. The Quran (16:106 and 3:28) allows Muslims to lie in order to protect themselves or to protect the Muslim community.Jun 10, 2015
    What Is Taqiyya? – YouTube

    Why Islam is evil by Pat Condell:

    Sharia law makes Islam much more than a religion. Its broad doctrine and application to non-Muslims make Islam a political entity, a government with goals of global dominion.

    Sunni Islam and Shia Islam both believe in a global ruler called caliph who will some day govern the world using Sharia law. more…
    The Islamic Grim Reaper
    Barbara J. Stock

    • Susan
      Susan says:

      The practice of Islam has no place in any democratic country. Likewise, no islamic person should ever be allowed into office. They are systematically overtaking OUR country and we are just sitting back and letting them.

    • Virginia McCants
      Virginia McCants says:

      Your post is right on the right track. Muslims can not be good Americans. Their ideology is in direct conflict to our Constitution. They don’t plan to take the oath to defend our country and it’s Constitution. The squad swore in on a Quran, that’s no good. They are doing exactly what they said they would do to take over our country. Apparently people aren’t paying attention! They are getting into the local, state and federal governments. They preach for free abortions for everyone except themselves, they intend to out populate all other people. Once they have certain goals they will strike. Obama opened the floodgates and placed them in areas of the country where they could take over certain districts. This was a very well payed out plan. I don’t believe any Muslims should be in our government, period. True Americans need to stand against all of them.

  6. Elizabeth Woods
    Elizabeth Woods says:

    Please read. It seems that we are all walking around in a fog. Read this. Yes it’s long and informative and yes it’s about our children’s future. Help save America. Read and for Heavens sake Vote for President Trump and Republican house and Senate.

  7. Mike
    Mike says:

    The fact that most all of them are running with a (D) shows you how hell-bent they are in the attempt to destroy the American way.

  8. Frank Livingston
    Frank Livingston says:

    Never Trust a Muslim, nor a fu’ing politician! I have been asking my POS senator for a few years now and cannot get a response to this: “Is the Muslim Brotherhood [Ikhwan] our friend or our foe? Please provide me with link(s) to the source material that provides you with your view on this.”
    If “We The People” do not get involved we will be destroyed!
    Here is the plan to destroy us!
    More about the Explanatory Memorandum (from Shariah: The Threat to America):

    The following Muslim Brotherhood document was entered into evidence in the U.S. v Holy Land Foundation trial and is a primary source threat document that provides new insights into global jihad organizations like the Muslim Brotherhood. These documents (covered extensively in chapter four) define the structure and outline of domestic jihad threat entities, associated non-governmental organizations and potential terrorist or insurgent support systems. The Memorandum also describes aspects of the global jihad’s strategic information warfare campaign and indications of its structure, reach and activities. It met evidentiary standards to be admissible as evidence in a Federal Court of law .

    In the original document, the first 16 pages are in the original Arabic and the second are English translations of the same. It is dated May 22, 1991 and titled “ An Explanatory Memorandum on the General Strategic Goal for the Group in North America” (Memorandum). The document includes an Attachment 1 that contains “a list of our organizations and the organizations of our friends.”

    The Memorandum expressly recognizes the Muslim Brotherhood (Ikhwan) as the controlling element of these organizations and expressly identifies the Muslim Brotherhood as the leadership element in implementing the strategic goals. The Memorandum is reproduced here in its official Federal Court translation, as Government Exhibit 003-0085 3:04-CR-240-G in U.S. v Holy Land Foundation, et al. with punctuation, line spacing and spelling intact.

    From the Explanatory Memorandum— the Muslim Brotherhood in America in its own words:

    “The process of settlement is a ‘Civilization-Jihadist Process’ with all the word means. The Ikhwan [Muslim Brotherhood] must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and “sabotaging” its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God’s religion is made victorious over all other religions.” https://www.centerforsecuritypolicy.org/2013/05/25/an-explanatory-memorandum-from-the-archives-of-the-muslim-brotherhood-in-america

  9. Priscilla Flach
    Priscilla Flach says:

    I don’t think anyone who’s belief system that is180° from Americans should be in any public office serving Americans. Especially those who Express their deep hatred for Americans. I think their here in great numbers out voting us and that’s why so many are able to win seats. We need to stop them altogether from being able to run in our elections period. They have an agenda and it’s not for the good of the people our its citizens.

  10. Larry J. Webb
    Larry J. Webb says:

    I do not agree with Muslims holding any kind of position in our government. Their mindset is 180 degrees different than ours and our Constitution.

  11. Gibran
    Gibran says:

    This is slyly written. The headline reads that virtually all Muslim candidates wont openly express support the constitution because the author knows most people will just read the headline only. But then you read the questions posed to these candidates it was if they would follow man made laws OVER God’s laws had they be given the choice. It was literally phrased to these so called candidates as if the laws of Islam would be broken if you follow the constitution, which they wouldn’t. You have to abide by the laws of the country that agree to live in. Upholding the constitution does not require a Muslim to do anything that violates their religion. Now if you want to talk about Islamic law in regards to a state That’s a whole different story that isn’t applicable or necessary for any Muslim living in a country that hasn’t been established or functions in that way.

  12. PT Johnson
    PT Johnson says:

    Ask Christians or Jews these questions (with a Christian/Jewish slant) in the way this dude does and you might be surprised at how they might answer. If you believe the Bible is “true” and a guide for your life, there are directives there that might cause you to hesitate in your answers. Peter, true to his Jewish prophetic heritage, said, “We must obey God rather than any human authority” (Acts 5:29). Jesus said, “My government is not like the governments of this world” (John 18:36). Then there is Psalm 2 where we here from God:
    “Why do the nations conspire
    and the peoples plot in vain?
    The kings of the earth rise up
    and the rulers band together
    against the Lord and against his anointed, saying,
    ‘Let us break their chains
    and throw off their shackles.’
    The One enthroned in heaven laughs;
    the Lord scoffs at them.”
    Any time you ask a truly religious person to pick between a secular government like the U.S. and God’s government, whose do you think they’re going to choose? The questions he sent to those folks were meant as a trap, a “gotcha!” His motive should be questioned as should the accuracy of his findings. He may be violating the 1st Amendment, at least its spirit, with his project to vilify a world religion and the people who profess it. It is un-American, unpatriotic, and bigoted.

    • George
      George says:

      Considering the intent of Islam is World Domination, by way of enslaving, converting or murdering all who deny Allah and his”prophet”, there is no bigotry, unamericanism or lack of patriotism in the authors submitted questions. A good question is, why to you so defend Islam?

  13. A. T. Hall
    A. T. Hall says:

    With Jihad active around the world today, which is in reality war, half measures as a response make little sense. Queen Isabella had the full solution.


Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *