Kamala Harris’ quote ‘what can be, unburdened by what has been’ is pure Marxism

One of the viral videos of Harris is a chant she does about becoming and being and so on. It is likely it is a lot more sinister than mere cackling idiocy, which she would have the uninitiated believe. Her father was an Ivy league Marxist prof. She cannot, not know this material, and she cannot have achieved her political heights by sleeping her way to the top. I know of far, far better looking women that couldn’t even sleep their way to the middle and with greater effort. She got where she is because she is part of a Marxist cabal that are central to organizations in Washington and elsewhere.

From Stephen Coughlin on June 29 of this year:

My awareness of the “Counterspell Group” is recent. Not sure who runs it so I’ll follow it with a discerning eye. See what you know in its X-feeds and take the time to convert to knowing what you see and make the call yourself.

There is the shocking epiphany many reach, for me accidentally, that, for example, Marxism is hardwired to Hegel along theosophical lines, and Hegel executed a convert form of Hermetic Alchemy. In turn, one can than hardwire this into the ongoing “gold, silver, base metal” triangle of Plato’s Republic understood along the metaphysical lines established in Plato’s Timaeus. It’s a covert (initiate) theosophy.

In the pre-modern world, there was a concept of time that emphasized a sharp and severe distinction between “Being” and “Becoming,” the lack of awareness of which means you cannot understand either Plato or the Bible. (“I Am” Being/God created time and space “Γένεση” [Genesis] – becoming. That, for example, ‘God [Being] so loved the world, he put his only son in Becoming.) This concept has all but been erased from modern awareness and as such has deracinated the West from its own roots.

The dialectic arises directly out of this distinction. Hence, to understand Marxist nature of Harris’s “what can be, unburdened by what has been,” one must first recognize that its Marxist authority derives from the dialectical nature of the statement.

Removing “I Am” – Being – from the equation – everything that has become to this day must be negated in pursuit of everything to come tomorrow. Tomorrow’s reality is premised on today’s destruction (dialectical negation), which only exists to move history forward in a perpetual state of destruction of all that is (perpetual revolution) for all that will be. This is accomplished through praxis (doing it without saying so). This practice assumes eternal existence of perpetual becoming that negates, through mere praxis, Aristotle’s Act (Pure Being) and Potency (unrealized Act that can become) distinction thus negating both Maimonides and Aquinas without having to ever say they did.

Thus, Harris’s statement becomes THE justification for the complete destruction of all institution that currently exist (the ones she took an oath to ‘support and defend’. It fits precisely with the Frankfurt School’s “Aufheben der Kultur” (Destroy the Culture). The term “aufheben” connects the Marxist with the Hegelian with the alchemical notion of the dialectic – in which the movement of history forward is the process of converting man from base metal to silver to gold – a real practice from which the term “chemistry” is derived but which also serves as the hardwired metaphor for man’s hermetic pursuit of a transhuman perfection as mankind “ascends” to the gold standard. “Ascended beings” – or the X-Men.

But of course, all the dialectic does is negate. Cultures that adopt it get destroyed. In this regard, the branded name for this dialectic of destruction – “Aufheben der Kultur” is “Cancel Culture.” One does not have to be a practitioner of metaphysics to recognize the perennial form. In this instance, that Marxism is hardwired to Hermetic Alchemy by way of the dialectic. HARDWIRED! For those who get uncomfortable concerning the esoteric nature (and occult is the theological term for esoteric) of the Marxist equation, you either have to deal with it – account for it – or stay on the porch.

BTW – What’s the difference between alchemist turning base metal into gold and Federal Reserves creating money out of loans backed by nothing? My sense is that “Counterspell Group” may be seeking to expose this relationship. In this instance, the Marxist nature of Harris’s claim is that “what can be, unburdened by what has been” is simply an initiate form of aligning her vision with the Marxist “Cancel Culture.” Know what you see!

WATCH: If you dismiss variables you assume are unimportant you miss the entire picture

WATCH: It’s not Word salad it’s Marxism

In a May 31, 2017 Communist Party USA column titled Test your Marxist IQ! Scott Hiley And Alvaro Rodriguez wrote:

In the 1970s, Marxist feminists launched the Wages for Housework movement, which demanded a wage, paid by capital, for all the labor involved in keeping wage workers ready to work:  cooking, cleaning, childbearing and rearing, etc.  What was their aim in demanding wages for housework?

a. To supplement the income of single-earner families

b. To give homemakers a sense of accomplishment and pride

c. To weaken capital by depriving it of unpaid labor

d. To end the sexual division of labor between home and factory

(Check your answer here.)

According to Marx’s “General Law of Capitalist Accumulation,” as capitalist firms grow…

a. the productivity of labor increases, and workers’ standard of living decreases.

b. the productivity of labor remains stable, but workers’ standard of living rises.

c. machines replace human labor, resulting in a shorter work day.

d. unemployment decreases, resulting in a rise in wages.

(Check your answer here.)

In the Marxist understanding of society, what is the State?

a. The state is an just an administrative organization independent of economic classes.

b. The state is a coercive and repressive force created to maintain the ruling class in power.

c. The state is a neutral body above classes and whose purpose is to keep the peace.

d. The state is a political organ created by a democratic process.

(Check your answer here.)

Do you think Kamala Harris would pass this test with a 100%. We do!

©2024. Dr. Rich Swier. All rights reserved.

RELATED ARTICLE: Did Lead Harris Staffer Help Burn Innocent Person to Death in 2020?