FAUCI EXPOSED: Fauci’s Diary Revealed — Market Not Origin of COVID

Well, well, well. Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul’s investigation into former COVID czar Dr. Anthony Fauci is yielding some fascinating results.

Paul has uncovered entries in Fauci’s journal that reveal the doctor’s true feelings about a range of issues. Mostly importantly, Fauci’s journal entries contradict what he said publicly about the origins of COVID-19. Publicly, Fauci maintained support for the animal spillover explanation of the virus’s origins, and downplayed the possibility of a lab leak. But now we know that, in his journal, Fauci admitted in January 2020 that the initial outbreak of COVID did not occur at a wet market, but rather that COVID had been spreading in China for weeks prior.

Fauci wrote on Jan. 26 that the first infection was in December and not connected to the market. “Now we know the market was not the source, it was the amplifier.”

And that is a huge admission. Because only one a few days later, on Feb. 1, Fauci participated in a conversation with 12 scientists about the origins of COVID. That conversation would eventually lead to Proximal Origins, a scientific paper that, per Fauci’s interference, strongly endorsed animal spillover as the origins of COVID, and not a lab leak.

Now, in this call, Fauci admits that just two of the scientists of the 12 thought that animal spillover was likely. The rest “felt deliberate insertion was possible.” That means, contrary to the later suggestion that Fauci was just some neutral arbiter and most of the scientists he consulted sided with the wet market theory, we now know that behind closed doors, the vast majority of experts leaned toward lab leak from the beginning — and Fauci himself knew the Hunan Seafood Market was not where the first outbreak occurred. Yet soon thereafter, Fauci would press top scientists to rule out the lab leak.

©2026 Conservative Commandos Radio Show and AUN-TV. All rights reserved.