VIDEOS: Social network Gab.ai launched to combat Facebook/Twitter censorship

Gab.ai is a social network that empowers anyone to create, consume, distribute and monetize their work under the auspices of free speech.

Their Mission: To put people first and to foster discourse without hindrance and proscription, as is occurring throughout the online community.

andrew-torba-gab-ceo

Gab.ai CEO Andrew Torba

The CEO of Gab.ai is Mr. Andrew Torba, who has fought long and hard for the cause of free speech. Mr. Torba explained his vision of a free society through technology, stating:

If I had to pick a single event that pushed me over the edge to take action, I would have to say it was the suppression of conservative sources and stories by the incredibly biased Facebook Trending Topics team.

At Gab we welcome anyone who wants to speak freely.

One of our new users today is Kassy Dillon, a conservative influencer, who has experienced the censorship of Twitter directly. We are actively reaching out to influencers from all backgrounds who are searching for an alternative. We welcome everyone and want to encourage open, honest, and authentic discourse on the internet.

Gab.ai’s co-founder, Ekrem Büyükkaya, is a Muslim Turkish Kurd with team members including people of Russian Jewish ancestry, East Asian-Americans and an Indo-Canadian of Hindu beliefs.

Gab’s Chief Communications Officer Utsav Sanduja in an email notes,

“Here on Gab, we believe in a pluralistic ethos of mutual respect and toleration of each other’s views. For us, the underlying philosophy of Gab can be summed up in John Milton’s Areopagitica: “Give me the liberty to know, to utter, and to argue freely according to conscience, above all liberties.”

At present the Gab.ai organization, which began on August 2016, has around 43,000 active users with 107,556 in wait list signups and 1.2 million gabs sent. The site is ranked 38,030 globally in regards to activity and has over 11,938,464 pageviews.

CLICK HERE TO JOIN GAB.AI

Here are introductory videos of what Gab is all about and how it works:

New Free Speech Platform To Replace Twitter/FB Revealed

Getting Started With Gab

Support for Trump Fed by Near-Universal Frustration that Government Ignores the People

WASHINGTON, Nov. 17, 2016 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ — While there is much post-election interest in a small demographic of voters who shifted from voting for Barack Obama to Donald Trump, an in-depth study conducted in the midst of the election finds that Trump’s victory was buoyed by a broad-based, nearly universal crisis of confidence in how the federal government makes decisions.

The central critique voters express is not about policy or ideology: it is that government ignores the people – both their interests and their views – in favor of special interests, campaign donors, and their parties. Among Trump supporters, these views are especially intense.

The study of 2,411 registered voters was conducted by University of Maryland’s Program for Public Consultation (PPC), fielded by Nielsen Scarborough and released today by Voice Of the People.

A remarkable nine-in-ten voters agreed that ‘Elected officials think more about the interests of their campaign donors than the common good of the people.’ There were, however, differences in intensity. Among all voters 63 percent agreed strongly, while among Trump supporters, 72 percent agreed strongly, and among the half of Trump supporters who said they were not only dissatisfied with government but angry, 85 percent agreed strongly. Similar numbers agreed that ‘Members of Congress think mostly about their party, not what is good for the country.’

This profound dissatisfaction with government has reached new heights in response to longstanding trend line questions. Asked whether government ‘is run for the benefit of all the people’ or is ‘pretty much run by a few big interests looking out for themselves’ in the 1960s only a minority said that it was run by big interests. In recent years this number has risen to eight-in-ten. In the current study this leapt to an unprecedented 92 percent. Among angry Trump supporters, 99 percent said the government is run for big interests, rather than the people.

“Trump effectively mirrored back to voters what they have been saying for years, that they feel like they are being ignored in a system dominated by special interests,” said PPC Director Steven Kull, who directed the survey. “That he said he was self-financing and was denounced by leaders in his own party, strengthened his claim that he was independent and capable of shaking up the system.”

Trump has stated, “We are fighting for every citizen that believes that government should serve the people, not the donors and not special interests.” And, “I am working for you.”

As a value in itself, and as an antidote to the influence of special interests, 85 percent of voters said that the people should have more influence. Asked how much influence the people do have, the mean response was 3.5—2.4 among angry Trump supporters. Asked how much influence the people should have on a scale of 0 to 10 the mean response was 8.0.

More than eight-in-ten said that there is not an adequate system in place for the voice of the people to be heard in Congress. Equally large numbers say that elections are not an adequate system and that the ‘government should make an active effort in between elections to find out how the people view the issues the government is dealing with.’

To that end, nearly eight-in-ten, including both Clinton and Trump supporters, favored establishing large representative, scientifically-selected citizen advisory panels to get briefed on the issues government is facing and provide their recommendations directly to Congress.

This public demand for a greater voice, which PPC has been studying for more than 15 years, led to the establishment of Voice Of the People, and its campaign effort to create a citizen advisory panel, called a Citizen Cabinet, in every congressional district and state.

Other ideas for reforming government also received robust support. More than eight-in-ten favored reducing the amount of money flowing into politics. Three quarters favored having citizens or judges do congressional redistricting to counter political gerrymandering. Large majorities agree that members of Congress stay in office too long because there are no term limits.

Asked to, ‘Imagine the Founders of the American republic were somehow able to observe how the U.S. government is operating today’ and to say how well they would think ‘the U.S. government is fulfilling the vision they had’ more than eight-in-ten said not very well (35 percent) or not well at all (49 percent). Among Trump supporters the numbers saying not well at all was even higher at 69 percent.

“At present the American people are questioning the legitimacy of the U.S. system of government,” Kull added. “Unless elected officials find a way to restore voter confidence that their views count more than special interests, their frustration is likely to boil over in a variety of ways.”

The report can be found at: http://vop.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Dissatisfaction_Report.pdf

The questionnaire can be found at: http://vop.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Dissatisfaction_Quaire.pdf

ABOUT VOICE OF THE PEOPLE

Voice Of the People is a nonpartisan organization that uses innovative methods and technology to help give the American people a more effective voice in government.

As a Jew, I Stand with Stephen Bannon

The left is bankrupt, morally and literally. The Democrats are out of power — completely. The House, the Senate, the Oval — Republican. Last Tuesday, Republicans made historic gains in the nation’s state legislatures. The GOP now controls 68 out of 98 partisan state legislative chambers — the highest number in the history of the party. Republicans currently hold the governorship and both houses of the legislature in 23 states (24 if Sean Parnell wins re-election in Alaska), while Democrats have that level of control in only seven.

The enemedia has one task now and one task only. It’s the one and only thing they’re are good at. Lie, defame, destroy — and it’s Trump and his people in their sights. Create fear and loathing fueled by false narrative. But we are on to those jackals. My colleagues and I are on the wall and will take this fight to them.

“PAMELA GELLER: AS A JEW, I STAND WITH STEVE BANNON,” BREITBART NEWS, NOVEMBER 15, 2016:

I am fortunate to say that I have known and worked with Steve Bannon ever since the tragic passing of Andrew Breitbart. While he was at Breitbart, he would ask me to write articles on pressing issues — usually several times each week. Longtime readers who are deeply familiar with my work know that I am a fiercely proud Jew and unapologetic Zionist. As long as I have known Steve, he has been an unabashed supporter of Israel, and of those of us who fight against Jew-hatred and racism. Unequivocally.

He is whip-smart, courageous, bold, and loyal.

Now the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) is claiming that he is anti-Semitic? What? He partnered with Andrew Breitbart — a Jew. He partnered with Larry Solov, another Jew, after Breitbart died. He worked with me — a Jew. He gave proud and fierce Zionists such as Aaron Klein a platform to speak and advance the cause of the Jewish people and the Jewish state. Breitbart Jerusalem was launched under Bannon’s tenure with the Breitbart organization.

The ADL haters’ attacks on Steve Bannon make him an honorary Jew. The ADL has a consistent record of attacks on proud Jews and Zionists. The ADL has attacked Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Joan Rivers, and even Israel itself. The ADL should be sued for fraud. They raise money on the premise that they “fight antisemitism.” On the contrary, they fuel and align with the world’s most vicious Jew-haters. The ADL gave an award to Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, despite his long record of anti-Semitic statements.

I have crossed swords for years with this vicious leftist “Jewish” organization — starting with their refusal to recognize the Armenian genocide. If a group claiming to represent the Jews fails to recognize the template, the mass slaughter that inspired Hitler, then we have failed to learn anything from history. In whitewashing the Armenian genocide, the ADL is as culpable as the Islamic perpetrators.

Meanwhile, the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) claimed that Bannon was “the main driver behind Breitbart becoming a white ethno-nationalist propaganda mill.” The SPLC is a well-funded group that works furiously to silence dissent and impose a totalitarian straitjacket on the public discourse on these issues, only allowing voices that toe their propaganda line about Islam being a religion of peace and Muslims as the victims, rather than the perpetrators, of terrorism.

The SPLC uses it hate group listings to demonize conservatives and anyone who dissents from its statist, authoritarian agenda. Its hate group list is so tendentious and politically motivated that the SPLC was removed from a government website’s listing of resources on hate groups.

The ill-gotten wealth of the SPLC amounts to tens of millions of dollars, while those whom they target, the supporters of freedom, are meagerly financed by average Americans who want freedom preserved in this country.

As for what Bannon’s ex-wife said in their divorce papers, don’t even go there. People are at their worst during a divorce. They will say anything and do anything to get the kids, the money, the house, whatever. It is all wild mudslinging, and I accuse “journalists” such as Jake Tapper of committing defamation and libel in their rage over the fact that that quisling crook Hillary lost and lost big.

I did a BBC interview Monday afternoon in Bannon’s defense. It was supposed to be a Trump interview, but it was all Bannon, and the BBC was gunning for him. I took them apart — it will be interesting to see what they run.

The establishment media and establishment leftist organizations such as the SPLC and the ADL, as well as the DNC, are trying to do to Trump and Bannon what they successfully did to Allen West’s chief of staff, Joyce Kaufman, shortly after West was elected to Congress in 2010: ignite a media firestorm that forces him to change the personnel of his staff to suit his enemies. West blinked and fired Kaufman.

Trump must hold firm. He has been on the receiving end of the most vicious smears and libels. That’s why my money is on him. He won’t take the bait.

The good news is that the people know. The people know the enemedia and what their agenda is. It won’t work. Not anymore.

 

Oregon: One Anti-Trump Rioter Caused $200,000 In Damages In One Night

American Military News reports:

The Portland Police Department is searching for a man that reportedly caused $200,000 in damages while participating in the anti-trump rallies taking place in the city on Thursday night. Over 25 arrests were made that night. However, this suspect has become a person of interest after going on a rampage at Toyota of Portland on Northeast Broadway Street.

According to police 19 vehicles were severely damaged. One dealership worker told reporters:

“They started throwing bricks through windshields. The cars are totaled, I believe in peaceful protest but this is ridiculous. We’re a nation that needs to come together and heal.”screen-shot-2016-11-14-at-3-43-19-pm

The carnage took place on the third consecutive night of protests. Police state that the protests started peacefully at Pioneer Courthouse Square and quickly spiraled out of control. Portland Police told reporters that the man pictured below is responsible for up to $200,000 worth of damages throughout the city.

Read more…

screen-shot-2016-11-14-at-3-33-00-pm

WWL TV in New Orleans reports:

A number of buildings were damaged or vandalized Wednesday night, as a group of Anti-Trump protesters made its way through downtown streets and the French Quarter.

Burning an effigy, made in the image of Donald Trump, and marching down the streets, hundreds of protesters chanted and shouted, very emotional and upset over President-Elect Donald Trump’s victory.

Windows at the Chase Bank in the Capital One Building on St. Charles Ave were reported smashed around 7 pm.

Read more and watch the video report…

These Democrats are eating their own communities. They are attacking those who most likely voted for Hillary Clinton. Prophetic and pathetic.

The Left’s Orwellian Tactics: Yearnings for a Thugocracy

Since the election of Donald Trump to be America’s next President, large groups of protestors and rioters have fanned out around the United States, smashing windows, damaging property and physically attacking other people to express their anger of Trump’s victory.

Their conduct in the aftermath of the election of a president is unprecedented but, given the riots launched by “Black Lives Matter” not a huge surprise.

The central theme of the anti-Trump demonstrators is to equate his calls for border security and effective immigration law enforcement with racism and bigotry.

Undoubtedly some of the demonstrators, particularly the non-violent demonstrators, are truly concerned about racism. However, they are grossly misinformed and are tragically being exploited and manipulated by the globalists and immigration anarchists, having been convinced by the decades of lies told about immigration by our politicians and pundits.

Our immigration laws as we will see, have absolutely nothing to do with xenophobia or racism.

During the first Republican presidential debate Fox News correspondent Bret Baier opened the debate by asking all of the Republican candidates on stage to raise their hand if they would not support any Republican candidate who would win the primaries and possibly run as a third party candidate.

Trump was the only candidate on stage to raise his hand.  Trump’s reaction was reported on by news media across the country, typical of those reports was “Trump tells Republicans in 2016 debate he may not support GOP nominee.”

None of the reporters thought, however, to ask the Democratic candidates if they would support the Constitution of the United States if a Republican won the general election.  Perhaps those reporters should have.

For decades, politicians from both political parties have acceded to the demands of the globalists who see in our nation’s borders impediments to great wealth for the elite to be derived by driving down wages and working conditions for Americans by making them compete with Third World workers who bring with them Third World expectations of wages and working conditions.

Organizations such as the U.S. Chamber of Commerce have, though massive campaign contributions, pushed the United States to increase the number of countries enrolled in our Visa Waiver Program even though this removes a vital layer of security that the 9/11 Commission reported was essential to national security.

The Chamber of Commerce is one of the most Anti-American organizations.  It is hell-bent on flooding America with cheap foreign labor for all industries including high tech industries.  The Chamber of Commerce is also eager to flood America with unlimited numbers of foreign tourists and foreign students and have found (bought) allies in both political parties.

The Democratic Party, however, is additionally motivated to oppose commonsense measures to secure our nation’s borders and enforce our nation’s immigration laws, seeing in a flood of Third World foreign nationals, potential future voters who would support their party’s candidates.

This is why many cities and states, particularly those controlled by the Democratic Party have created “Sanctuary Cities” that incentivizes illegal immigration thereby undermining national security, public safety, public health and the ability of Americans to find decent jobs.

In my article, “Sanctuary Cities Endanger – National Security and Public Safety” I noted that such cities operate in violation of Title 8 U.S.C. § 1324, a statute comprehended within the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA).

Here are the relevant portions of this section of law:

Harboring —Subsection 1324(a)(1)(A)(iii)
makes it an offense for any person who—knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that an alien has come to, entered, or remains in the United States in violation of law, conceals, harbors, or shields from detection, or attempts to conceal, harbor, or shield from detection, such alien in any place, including any building or any means of transportation.

Encouraging/Inducing —Subsection 1324(a)(1)(A)(iv) makes it an offense for any person who—encourages or induces an alien to come to, enter, or reside in the United States, knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that such coming to, entry, or residence is or will be in violation of law.

Conspiracy/Aiding or Abetting —Subsection 1324(a)(1)(A)(v) expressly makes it an offense to engage in a conspiracy to commit or aid or abet the commission of the foregoing offenses.

Trump’s goals of securing America’s borders and enforcing  our immigration laws are an anathema to the goals of the globalists and so they accuse Trump and those who support his immigration enforcement plans by creating a false narrative linking immigration enforcement with racism and xenophobia.  These lies have incited demonstration and riots.

Title 8, United States Code, Section 1182, is the section of law included in the INA that enumerates the categories of aliens who are to be excluded the United States.

The grounds for exclusion are oblivious as to race, religion or ethnicity but deem as excludible aliens who suffer from dangerous communicable, diseases or extreme mental illness.

Additionally, convicted felons, human rights violators, war criminals, terrorists and spies are to be excluded as well as aliens would like become public charges or those aliens who would seek unlawful employment, thus displacing American workers or driving down the wages of American workers who are similarly employed.

Aliens who violate our immigration laws therefore must be seen as a potential threat to national security, public health and public safety and/or to the livelihoods of American workers.

For unscrupulous politicians, however, the truth is an impediment that must be overcome.

My recent article,“Jimmy Carter: Originator Of The Orwellian Term ‘Undocumented Immigrant’ How the former president manipulated immigration enforcement policy to influence elections” was predicated on a news report published by CBS on September 15, 2016, Jimmy Carter: The U.S. is seeing a ‘resurgence of racism’” in which, just weeks before this year’s presidential election, Carter apparently laid the foundation for the demonstration and riots.

Carter was the first president to use immigration law enforcement (or the lack thereof) as a political tool to gerrymander Congressional districts and Electoral College votes.

During his administration Carter became the first president to implement Orwellian Newspeak about immigration, demanding that INS (Immigration and Naturalization Service) personnel refer to “Illegal Aliens” as “Undocumented Immigrants” threatening noncompliant officials with extreme disciplinary consequences.

By insisting that all foreign national present in the United States be referred to as “Immigrants” it became a simple matter, especially over time, to alter the public’s understanding of our immigration laws and their significance for national security, public safety and the general safety and well-being of America and Americans.

Inasmuch as we are a “Nation of immigrants” anyone who opposes the presence of “immigrants,” irrespective of their immigration status, are “Anti-Immigrant.”

The news media describes immigration anarchists who oppose secure borders and oppose effective immigration law enforcement, as being “Pro-Immigrant,” while accusing those who support securing our borders and enforcing our immigration laws of being “Anti-Immigrant.”

The official report, “9/11 and  Terrorist TravelStaff Report of the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States” focused specifically on how international terrorists entered the United States and embed themselves as they went about their deadly preparations.

The preface of this report begins with the following paragraph:

“It is perhaps obvious to state that terrorists cannot plan and carry out attacks in the United States if they are unable to enter the country. Yet prior to September 11, while there were efforts to enhance border security, no agency of the U.S. government thought of border security as a tool in the counterterrorism arsenal. Indeed, even after 19 hijackers demonstrated the relative ease of obtaining a U.S. visa and gaining admission into the United States, border security still is not considered a cornerstone of national security policy. We believe, for reasons we discuss in the following pages, that it must be made one.”

On November 10, 2016 the New York Post reported, “Is the city about to scrub records of undocumented immigrants?

The city’s municipal ID program anticipated that Republicans might control Congress after this year’s elections, leading Mayor de Blasio on Thursday to say he’s looking to safeguard records submitted by undocumented immigrants “in light of what’s happened.”

The reference was to Donald Trump’s stunning victory, which gave Republicans control of the White House and both houses of Congress.

The municipal ID program, which was enacted in January 2015, includes a one-time provision giving the mayor power to scrub the data of cardholders on or before Dec. 31 just in case of such an eventuality.

Mayor de Blasio’s municipal ID’s help illegal aliens do business in the New York City and is yet another component of the sanctuary policies of New York City that effectively shield illegal aliens from detection by federal authorities.

Those identity documents fly in the face of commonsense the findings of the 9/11 Commission and also provide illegal aliens with a level of credibility that they should not have.

Demonstrators who may think they are rooting for the “underdog” need to wake up.  They are protesting the very laws that were enacted to protect them, their families, Americans irrespective of race and the lawful immigrants who came to America seeking freedom, peace and opportunities.

EDITORS NOTE: This column originally appeared in FrontPage Magazine.

Why the Democratic Rust Belt in Northeastern Pennsylvania voted for Trump

The Weekend edition of The Wall Street Journal (WSJ), November 12-13, 2016 presented the latest in a series of articles on The Great Unraveling.   Formerly Democratic rust belt counties, devastated by economic and social decline that swung the electoral victory for President-elect Donald Trump, “The Places that Made Trump President.”  The WSJ characterized these areas as:

Rust Belt counties facing declines in manufacturing, shrinking populations, rising immigration and fraying social fabric moved heavily toward the Republican candidate and his message of national restoration

This latest in the WSJ series dealt with counties in the devastated hard coal and industrial areas of Northeastern Pennsylvania from Scranton south from the New York Line on I-81 across the Delaware River along the spine of the Poconos.   We knew the area well from stops on our journey south to Florida in Wilkes Barre, Hazelton and Saylorville, where former all of Islamist Turkish President Erdogan, Sheikh Fetulleh Gulen is ‘holed up’ in his compound.

We asked two cousins, former residents of the area, American ex-pat in Paris, France, noted European commentator and author Nidra Poller and lawyer activist, Debra Glazer in Irvine, California for their recollections of growing up in these Northeastern Pennsylvania rustbelt communities.

Nidra Poller

I had the privilege of experiencing the Great Depression! Though I was born in 1935, the Depression had never ended in Jessup, PA. They distributed very small apples to the schoolchildren (and I always prefer very small apples) and caned grapefruit. Those who came from affluent families brought their own sugar to sweeten the grapefruit.

We had so few material possessions… young people today couldn’t even imagine how we lived. And we had a store! I suppose we belonged to the middle class.

Our mother z”l (if blessed memory) made my clothes…turning my father’s worn out suits into itchy tweed and his shirts into blouses.

We’ll see what the dispossessed voters of 2016 think in 2019. Can a president, Trump or otherwise, undo the consequences of the entire postwar economic and social development of the US?

Debra Glazer

All through the 1970s and even into the 1980s, I would do much of my clothing; shoe and purse shopping at the various outlets in town (remember Leslie Fay, London Fog, Suburban Casuals, Old Mill, David Crystal Izod, and Rex Shoes?). My mother and I (and my cousins) spent hours going from place to place, stretching from Dickson City, Scranton, and down to Wilkes-Barre. These were real no-frills outlets, often times situated within the factory walls, with merchandise that had mostly tiny imperfections or that were a season old. All those sewing and piece goods jobs disappeared to China and elsewhere.

Then Scranton launched into the telemarketing craze. Many of those annoying dinner-time calls originated from workers sitting in the old, converted Globe, Scranton Dry Goods, or Samters downtown department stores, until the FCC intervened (thankfully) with the do-not-call lists.

When I was a young girl, Scranton had over 100,000 populations, with a strong and large Jewish community, a spanking JCC and many thriving synagogues.  Today, it’s mostly the Orthodox Jewish community that is holding its own, while the other Jewish denominations in town suffer from an aging membership. Almost all of my Jewish high school friends are no longer in Scranton, as there was little for those of us without family businesses to come back to after college.  The overall population dwindled, the poorly educated or blue-collar workers stayed behind, city services crumbled, bankruptcy loomed from time to time, and corruption reigned in NE PA.  Although Scranton boasts several decent universities (the Jesuit University of Scranton and the Catholic Marywood College), those institutions expanded their campuses while causing the erosion of the property tax base. It was really sad for me to go back home when I would visit my aging parents. The Wilkes-Barre/Scranton Avoca Airport is a gorgeous building, built with loads of federal funds, but almost no airlines service there and if they do, flights are often canceled at the last minute. If one really needs to get somewhere, one is usually forced to drive to Newark, Philadelphia, NY, or even Allentown airports.

So yes, I can see that those folks I grew up with were the backbone of the Trump victory, maybe less so in Scranton because of the Hillary and Biden connections, but still much more than expected in this Democratic stronghold.

Here are selections from the latest WSJ article on what motivated the residents of the rust belt counties in Northeastern Pennsylvania to vote for President-elect Donald Trump in 2016:

WILKES-BARRE, Pa. — Tamika Shupp twice voted for Barack Obama as the candidate best equipped to shake up Washington. This year she chose Donald Trump for the same reason.

“Obama tried to do well, and it didn’t turn out how we thought,” said Ms. Shupp as she prepared Polish dumplings at Mom & Pop’s Pierogis in this Rust Belt city. Mr. Trump should do better, she figures, by cracking down on illegal immigration and upholding American values like hard work.

Mr. Trump “is going to be another Obama,” said the 43-year-old Ms. Shupp. She considers both men to be agents of change. As for the crude remarks Mr. Trump made during the campaign, especially concerning women, Ms. Shupp said she dismissed them as bragging and “shoptalk,” and she didn’t believe the women who accused him of sexual assault.

[…]

Foreign competition largely wiped out the area’s dress and shoe industries. Many in the county bitterly remember pencil maker Eberhard Faber moving a plant to Mexico in the mid-1980s and other manufacturers closing factories. A plan in the mid-2000s to capitalize on computer-network technology and turn the county into “Wall Street West” proved a bust after few financial firms moved back-office processing to the area. The Greater Wilkes-Barre Chamber of Commerce is hatching a new plan to attract businesses by involving the local colleges in recruitment efforts, but the program is too new to have much effect so far.

The unemployment rate in Luzerne County, now 6.2%, has generally exceeded the national average since 2000, and manufacturing employment in the county is down by around one-third since 2000. Many of the jobs that remain are low-wage service ones in local hospitals, colleges, chain restaurants and stores. Median income, after accounting for inflation, has been flat in Luzerne County since 2000.

Young people are leaving the region in search of jobs elsewhere, leaving an older, more conservative group of voters. In Luzerne, the population has remained steady since 2000, at about 320,000, but the number of people age 25 to 44 fell by about 10,000, according to Moody’sAnalytics.

The weak economy has, over the decades, contributed to a tattering of the county’s social fabric. Church attendance is down since 2000, opioid addiction is up, and civic organizations like the Rotary Club and the Masons have trouble recruiting young members, say local residents. Of the four Evangelical Lutheran churches in Wilkes-Barre in 2000, says Rev. Peter Kuritz of Good Shepherd Lutheran Church, one closed and two other don’t have full-time pastors.

Meanwhile, the county’s Hispanic population has climbed nearly 10-fold since 2000, to 31,000, adding a layer of ethnic tension to a place where 84% of the population is non-Hispanic white.

“There’s a sense that the new residents don’t look like us or sound like us,” says Rev. Kuritz. “People feel it’s not like it used to be.”

The region had been drifting from its New Deal Democratic roots for years, and Mr. Trump took full advantage with its working-class voters. They had long been sympathetic to conservative arguments on issues such as gun control and abortion, while skeptical of the GOP’s perceived catering to the wealthy. Mr. Trump’s brand of populism bridged that divide.

County GOP leaders say they looked to boost turnout by shifting two paid workers to Hazleton, a city that gained national prominence by passing an ordinance penalizing landlords for renting to illegal immigrants, which was later blocked by the courts. “Immigration is a big issue there,” says Luzerne County Chairman Ron Ferrance. “There are so many passionate people” who were ready to make phone calls and canvass for Mr. Trump, who takes a hard line on immigration, he says.

Bill O’Boyle, a veteran reporter and columnist for Wilkes-Barre’s Times Leader, says he figured Mr. Trump was a lock to win Luzerne County when he compared the turnout at political rallies. The area has long been a stopover for presidential campaigns.

“You had Hillary Clinton, 500 people. Teddy Cruz, 300 people. Bernie Sanders, 1,500 people. And then Donald Trump, 11,000. How could those crowds not mean something?”

Nineteen-year-old Jasmine Castillo, who makes tacos at the family’s food truck in Wilkes-Barre’s downtown, says her family’s life has become worse as Mr. Trump’s popularity soared. People now tell her to speak English when she speaks Spanish, and to go back across the border, though she is an American citizen. Someone left feces outside her father’s kitchen-cabinet business, she says.

“People feel empowered now” to make insults and threats against Hispanics, she says. “It’s terrifying.”

Martha Wallace, whose family owns a small manufacturer of crucifixes and other Catholic jewelry, says, “Trump drummed up the enthusiasm, just like Obama drummed up the enthusiasm last time.” Her 7-year-old son has declared himself “a Trump man.” Her 16-year-old daughter also supports Trump. “I’ve encouraged her to dream big,” Ms. Wallace says.

Ms. Wallace says she is worried about the future of the U.S. economy and the threat of terrorism, and is counting on a Trump presidency to ease her fears about both. “We hope some of Trump’s economic policy will make it easier for us compete and still stay true to always being a ‘Made in the USA’ company,” she says.

For Mr. Trump’s supporters, expectations are so high it reminds them of what they once felt for President Obama.

WILKES-BARRE, Pa. — Tamika Shupp twice voted for Barack Obama as the candidate best equipped to shake up Washington. This year she chose Donald Trump for the same reason.

“Obama tried to do well, and it didn’t turn out how we thought,” said Ms. Shupp as she prepared Polish dumplings at Mom & Pop’s Pierogis in this Rust Belt city. Mr. Trump should do better, she figures, by cracking down on illegal immigration and upholding American values like hard work.

Mr. Trump “is going to be another Obama,” said the 43-year-old Ms. Shupp. She considers both men to be agents of change. As for the crude remarks Mr. Trump made during the campaign, especially concerning women, Ms. Shupp said she dismissed them as bragging and “shoptalk,” and she didn’t believe the women who accused him of sexual assault.

[…]

Foreign competition largely wiped out the area’s dress and shoe industries. Many in the county bitterly remember pencil maker Eberhard Faber moving a plant to Mexico in the mid-1980s and other manufacturers closing factories. A plan in the mid-2000s to capitalize on computer-network technology and turn the county into “Wall Street West” proved a bust after few financial firms moved back-office processing to the area. The Greater Wilkes-Barre Chamber of Commerce is hatching a new plan to attract businesses by involving the local colleges in recruitment efforts, but the program is too new to have much effect so far.

The unemployment rate in Luzerne County, now 6.2%, has generally exceeded the national average since 2000, and manufacturing employment in the county is down by around one-third since 2000. Many of the jobs that remain are low-wage service ones in local hospitals, colleges, chain restaurants and stores. Median income, after accounting for inflation, has been flat in Luzerne County since 2000.

Young people are leaving the region in search of jobs elsewhere, leaving an older, more conservative group of voters. In Luzerne, the population has remained steady since 2000, at about 320,000, but the number of people age 25 to 44 fell by about 10,000, according to Moody’sAnalytics.

The weak economy has, over the decades, contributed to a tattering of the county’s social fabric. Church attendance is down since 2000, opioid addiction is up, and civic organizations like the Rotary Club and the Masons have trouble recruiting young members, say local residents. Of the four Evangelical Lutheran churches in Wilkes-Barre in 2000, says Rev. Peter Kuritz of Good Shepherd Lutheran Church, one closed and two other don’t have full-time pastors.

Meanwhile, the county’s Hispanic population has climbed nearly 10-fold since 2000, to 31,000, adding a layer of ethnic tension to a place where 84% of the population is non-Hispanic white.

“There’s a sense that the new residents don’t look like us or sound like us,” says Rev. Kuritz. “People feel it’s not like it used to be.”

The region had been drifting from its New Deal Democratic roots for years, and Mr. Trump took full advantage with its working-class voters. They had long been sympathetic to conservative arguments on issues such as gun control and abortion, while skeptical of the GOP’s perceived catering to the wealthy. Mr. Trump’s brand of populism bridged that divide.

County GOP leaders say they looked to boost turnout by shifting two paid workers to Hazleton, a city that gained national prominence by passing an ordinance penalizing landlords for renting to illegal immigrants, which was later blocked by the courts. “Immigration is a big issue there,” says Luzerne County Chairman Ron Ferrance. “There are so many passionate people” who were ready to make phone calls and canvass for Mr. Trump, who takes a hard line on immigration, he says.

Bill O’Boyle, a veteran reporter and columnist for Wilkes-Barre’s Times Leader, says he figured Mr. Trump was a lock to win Luzerne County when he compared the turnout at political rallies. The area has long been a stopover for presidential campaigns.

“You had Hillary Clinton, 500 people. Teddy Cruz, 300 people. Bernie Sanders, 1,500 people. And then Donald Trump, 11,000. How could those crowds not mean something?”

Nineteen-year-old Jasmine Castillo, who makes tacos at the family’s food truck in Wilkes-Barre’s downtown, says her family’s life has become worse as Mr. Trump’s popularity soared. People now tell her to speak English when she speaks Spanish, and to go back across the border, though she is an American citizen. Someone left feces outside her father’s kitchen-cabinet business, she says.

“People feel empowered now” to make insults and threats against Hispanics, she says. “It’s terrifying.”

Martha Wallace, whose family owns a small manufacturer of crucifixes and other Catholic jewelry, says, “Trump drummed up the enthusiasm, just like Obama drummed up the enthusiasm last time.” Her 7-year-old son has declared himself “a Trump man.” Her 16-year-old daughter also supports Trump. “I’ve encouraged her to dream big,” Ms. Wallace says.

Ms. Wallace says she is worried about the future of the U.S. economy and the threat of terrorism, and is counting on a Trump presidency to ease her fears about both. “We hope some of Trump’s economic policy will make it easier for us compete and still stay true to always being a ‘Made in the USA’ company,” she says.

For Mr. Trump’s supporters, expectations are so high it reminds them of what they once felt for President Obama.

Mr. Ferrance, the Republican county chairman, says he realizes voters expect Mr. Trump to deliver. “If it’s the status quo, people will be upset,” he says. “People want him to govern in the spirit of what he said” during the campaign.

He figures there is some wiggle room in some of Mr. Trump’s more controversial stances, such as his repeated claim that the U.S. would build a wall across the U.S.-Mexican border and make Mexico pay for it. Maybe, he says, Mr. Trump could argue that job growth caused by tougher trade policy would be a way of having Mexico “pay.”

It is ironic that in the eight years of the Obama Administration that Vice President Biden, who grew up in Scranton, Pennsylvania,  hadn’t recognized the economic and social devastation in Northeastern  Pennsylvania and developed programs to alleviate  and revitalize the communities.  But then Democrat Presidential candidate characterized those in Wilkes Barre who showed up at rallies as ‘deplorables.”

Now the residents of Northeastern Pennsylvania and other rust belt communities in the U.S. are banking on the Trump Administration to deliver on the promises he made at those rallies that gave them, once again, “hope.”

EDITORS NOTE: This column originally appeared in the New English Review.

Secretary of State John Kerry agrees U.S. will take Australia’s imprisoned ‘refugees’

U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry testifies at the Senate Foreign Relations Committee while on Capitol Hill in Washington, April 8, 2014. Kerry squarely blamed Russian agents on Tuesday for separatist unrest in eastern Ukraine, saying Moscow could be trying to lay the groundwork for military action like in Crimea. REUTERS/Larry Downing (UNITED STATES - Tags: POLITICS)

Secretary of State John Kerry

Think about this! In 2013 Australia, being invaded by boat people from mostly Muslim countries, declared anyone arriving illegally by boat would be turned back or sent to offshore islands like Nauru where they could submit asylum claims.

Those rejected refuse to go back to their home countries, so guess what! The Obama Administration has agreed to take over a thousand of them to your towns and cities as full-fledged refugees with all the benefits of our welfare system available to them.

How many of our illegal Mexicans and Central Americans is the prosperous country of Australia going to take off our hands?

We told you this was in the works, here, yesterday.  And, now here is news from Aljazeera that we are going to do this. (If their asylum claims have been rejected by Australia they are NOT refugees by definition.)

Australia has reached a resettlement deal with the United States for refugees being held in offshore prisons after trying to reach the country by boat.

The Obama administration had agreed to resettle refugees among a group of almost 1,300 people held at on the island nations of Nauru and Papua New Guinea. Rights groups have been scathing about conditions at the prison camps.

Another 370 who came to Australia for medical treatment and then refused to return to the islands would also be eligible.

[….]

US Secretary of State John Kerry confirmed that the US had “agreed to consider referrals” from the United Nations refugee agency, UNHCR.  [If we are doing this and are sending Homeland Security people to screen the refugees, why does the UN have to have its nose in this business? Are they getting a cut of your tax dollars as middlemen?—ed]

[….]

US Department of Homeland Security officials are expected in Australia this week to begin assessing refugees.

Turnbull would not say how many refugees the US might take, but said the most vulnerable would be given priority. [And, prosperous Australia can’t take the most vulnerable???—ed]

More here.

See our Australia category by clicking here. And, if you are interested in learning more about this practice—of the US taking illegal aliens off the hands of other countries—see our Malta archive as well.

Australia is always in the top three countries from which readers arrive at RRW.

RELATED ARTICLES:

What should Trump do about refugees on January 21, 2017

Donald Trump, please try to stop this now! We are about to take 1,800 failed asylum seekers that Australia has rejected

Poughkeepsie: Church World Service official spins about refugee Islamic terrorists

Drain the Media — They are ‘Polluted Vehicles’

A copy of the Newsweek magazine with the cover photo of Hillary Clinton with the headline “Madam President” is now selling on eBay for as high as $595.

The biggest story the media is not covering is how the media has failed the American people.

Thomas Jefferson in a letter to Barnabas Bidwell, dated 1806 wrote “As for what is not true, you will always find abundance in the newspapers.”

The media has been reporting what is not true and has failed to cover reality. Despite its failure to tell the truth and report the facts, Americans understood that they were being duped and lied to by the media. Americans understood that the media is “rigged.”

I have been watching the media reactions to the historic victory of Donald J. Trump, the 45th President of the United States. The same pundits, pollsters and talking heads that lied to the American people still have their jobs, with the exception of Donna Brazile, who was let go by CNN when WikiLeaks reveled that she gave the Clinton campaign advance notice of presidential debate questions.

The same political pundits and pollsters who failed to accurately predict the winner late into the night of November 8th, still have their jobs as “contributors” to the major news networks. A very few, like University of Virginia pollster Larry Sabato, have confessed their mea maxima culpa (a Latin phrase meaning “through my great fault”).  The rest have failed to, like Sabato, acknowledge having done a great wrong and more importantly they have failed to correct their wrong.

The media is in tears and cannot comprehend how it’s efforts to turn the race for the White House in favor of Hillary Clinton and the Democrats failed.

The reason: The American people do not trust the media.

Jillian Assange wrote on November 8th, 2016:

The right to receive and impart true information is the guiding principle of WikiLeaks – an organization that has a staff and organizational mission far beyond myself. Our organization defends the public’s right to be informed.

Now they, the main stream media, continue to wrongly report on the violence in the streets, the hate exhibited by Democrats, the refusal of even President Obama to accept Donald Trump as a man who can lead America into the future. The main stream media is no longer main nor a stream. Rather it is a swamp that needs to be drained.

The real truth tellers were citizen journalists like WikiLeaks and James O’Keefe from Project Veritas.

I close with anther quote by Thomas Jefferson:

“Nothing can now be believed which is seen in a newspaper.  Truth itself becomes suspicious by being put into that polluted vehicle.”
I would add to the list of “polluted vehicles” magazines, radio, Google, Facebook, Twitter and perhaps the worst, television news and commentary programs.

Trump-Pence Win represents ‘an American Revolution 2.0’

WASHINGTON, D.C. /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ — Former presidential candidate Gary Bauer called Donald Trump and Mike Pence’s historic win “an American Revolution 2.0 as frustrated voters across the country, struggling under the heavy load of taxes, debt and disastrous polices said ‘No More,’ and elected a President and Vice President committed to making America great for all its citizens, rather than those who profit from government and American decline.”

The chairman of the Campaign for Working Families made the following statement:

“This election is the first step toward freeing Americans from the tyranny of political correctness and unchecked political power. Using their votes, Americans who live and work on Main Street overcame the combined resources of the media, the entertainment industry and corporate and political elites. They rejected four more years of more scandals and failed big government policies. The commonsense values of the American people prevailed today. Now the hard work of making Washington work for the people, not the politicians and their special interest, begins in earnest.”

Bauer served all 8 years of the Reagan Administration, as under secretary of education and as President Reagan’s chief domestic policy advisor, later running in the 2000 Republican presidential primaries. The Guardian called Bauer “one of the leading campaigners in the U.S. on pro-life and pro-traditional family issues.”

Mr. Trump is going to Washington! Who are the winners and losers?

On January 10, 2016 I wrote:

If you Google the words “Trump” and “insurgency” you will get over 650,000 links to articles and commentary. I recently said to a friend that Donald Trump has gone from being a candidate for the Republican Party nomination for President to the leader of a movement.

Can this movement now be called an insurgency?

The definition of an insurgency is a “rebellion against an existing government by a group not recognized as a belligerent.”

Is it Trump who created an insurgency or is Trump following the lead of a growing insurgency that was already taking place? I have written that Trump leads his followers by following their lead. The movement began during the Presidency of Bill Clinton and continues today. It is a struggle between the individualist and the collectivist.

Donald John Trump is now the President elect. He is headed to Washington, D.C. to drain the swamp, as he has said so many times.

While the pundits will be sifting through the votes to find out what happened, perhaps it is better to look at what will happen next. One way to do this is to see who the winners and losers in this election are.

The Winners:

  1. The American people.
  2. Working families.
  3. Christians and Jews.
  4. The U.S. Military and veterans.
  5. The unemployed and underemployed.
  6. Main street businesses.
  7. Manufacturing.
  8. American energy producers.
  9. America’s allies.
  10. Gun owners.
  11. Law enforcement.
  12. The “new” Republican Party.

The Losers:

  1. Those who wish America harm, both foreign and domestic.
  2. Government.
  3. Career politicians and special interests.
  4. Washington, D.C. insiders.
  5. Unions.
  6. The Obama administration.
  7. Islamic supremacists both foreign (Iran, ISIS, al Qaeda) and domestic (Council on America Islamic Relations, ISNA, Muslim Students Association, etc.).
  8. Illegal aliens.
  9. The anti-Second Amendment lobby.
  10. Environmentalists.
  11. Domestic terrorist groups (e.g. Black Lives Matter)
  12. Globalists and the United Nations.
  13. Wall Street, investment bankers and the Federal Reserve.
  14. Common Core advocates.
  15. Republicans who did not support and/or vote for their candidate.
  16. Hollywood, California.
  17. Those committing voter fraud.
  18. The main stream media.
  19. Pollsters.
  20. The Democratic Party, Democratic National Committee (including Hillary and Bill Clinton) and George Soros.

Others will be added to both lists as time goes on. This is just a quick overview of what it will take to Make America Great Again!

RELATED ARTICLES:

The People Have Spoken: Change Must Start Now

Key Numbers That Explain Trump’s Win

Election Results Show There Is No One ‘Hispanic’ Vote

FLORIDA SHOCK: Trump Outperforms Romney by 130,000 in Early Voting

DRUDGE FLASH REPORT: TRUMP Outperforming Romney in FL and NC by HUGE MARGINS

Via The Drudge Report:

FLORIDA SHOCK: TRUMP OUTPERFORMS ROMNEY BY 130,000 IN EARLY VOTING!
Mon Nov 07 2016 12:03:12 ET
**World Exclusive**

Data obtained by the DRUDGE REPORT shows presidential underdog Donald Trump outperforming Republican 2012 election results in Florida.

Mitt Romney went into Election Day down 161,000 in absentee ballots and early voting. He ended up losing the state by 74,000.

This time, in a dramatic surprise twist, Trump is only down 32,500! And Republicans tend to outvote Democrats on Election Day in Florida.

As reported yesterdayRepublicans have a 16 point advantage over Democrats on Election Day turnout.

And The Drudge Report has TRUMP up 142,000 votes over Romney in North Carolina early voting.

Michael Moore video supporting Donald J. Trump for President goes viral

Carolyn Serrano, Corporate Vice-President of www.RestoreAmericanLiberty.com, Inc. in an email writes:

Dear friends of RestoreAmericanLiberty.com,

We only have TWO days left to save America.  Watch the video below, ironically made by Michael Moore, of all people.  He gave this talk to Democrats as a means of mobilizing them for election day.  BUT IT HAS BACKFIRED ON HIM, and become a stellar ad for Donald J. Trump.

Help us send this video EVERYWHERE in the next 48 hours.  Post it to your FACEBOOK page please.

Do not be concerned about the bad language.  Remember who is using it.

We’re counting on your help when it matters most.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Amnesty Would Cost Taxpayers Trillions, National Academy of Sciences Report Indicates

What’s Causing the Surge of Illegal Immigration? Lawmakers Want Answers and Action

Meet the 4 Siblings Behind the Designs of This New Pro-Life Apparel Company

VIDEO: Hispanic Hillary voter tries to attack him in Reno — Trump supporters shout ‘USA’

In yet another incident of a Hillary Clinton supporter being arrested by the police, we see Jay Z’s violent foul mouthed rant leading to violence in Reno, Nevada.

The man detained by police was Austyn Crites, a University of Chicago graduate, who’s name appears multiple times in the WikiLeaks Global Intelligence Files. According to the first video (below) by a citizen journalist Crites is described as a “Mexican” after an analysis of his Facebook page.

trump-assassin-7-statement

trump-statement-assassin

With just two days before the election and the nation on high alert for a possible terrorist attack from ISIS, it is time for Americans to understand that we need a president that will heal the nation from eight years of racial, ethnic and gender divide under President Obama.

A nation divided cannot long stand.

Trump’s Path to the White House

If one were to seriously contemplate the outcome of next week’s presidential election by considering nothing more than the daily deluge of the top eight or ten polling organizations, it would surely make one’s head explode.  But there are two factors which make the state and national polls more than a little suspect: the “enthusiasm factor” and the minority vote.

There is no doubt that the crowds that show up for Trump rallies are significantly larger than those that attend Clinton rallies.  If Clinton is able to attract 1,000 people to a campaign rally in a major city, Trump would draw 10,000, or more.  The same is true of the Tim Kaine and Mike Pence rallies.  On one occasion in the past week, Donald Trump drew some 12,000 at a rally in the upper Midwest, while just 30 people showed up for a Kaine rally in South Florida.

A photograph now circulating on the Internet shows a jam-packed crowd at a Clinton rally.  The wall behind the dais is festooned with a large American flag, along with banners proclaiming “Clinton-Kaine” and “Stronger Together.”  However, upon closer inspection it is easy to see that the photograph of the crowd has been “constructed.”  One female member of the crowd appears at least thirteen times in the photo, another woman appears at least five times, and a young man in a T-shirt appears six times.  There are additional multiple photos of other individuals.

Pundits tend to agree that there is a legitimate “enthusiasm factor” in the Trump and Clinton campaigns, but they tend to downplay the magnitude, predicting that it is likely to be no more than two percentage points.  I disagree.  I would estimate that the number of people who hesitate to express their support for Trump… either to pollsters or to friends, relatives, and co-workers… represents at least two percent of his potential voters, while the number of people in various pro-Democrat constituencies who plan not to vote for Hillary, but who try to avoid the stigma of being anti-Hillary, represent at least two percent of her supporters.

Within the minority community, we have not seen a presidential election in the past fifty or sixty years in which there was less enthusiasm for the Democrat candidate and more enthusiasm for the Republican candidate than there is in the 2016 campaign.  No Republican candidate in living memory has been willing to publicly challenge black voters in the same way that Trump does, asking unabashedly, “What in the hell do you have to lose?”

Inasmuch as blacks represent approximately thirteen percent of the US population, it is easy to see how they would have provided nearly thirteen percent of the Obama vote in 2008 and 2012.  However, it is important to note that, in 2000 and 2004, when Obama was not on the ballot, blacks provided only eleven percent of the total Democratic vote.  The New York Times has reported that, while blacks represented twenty-five percent of the early votes in Florida in 2012, Obama’s last campaign, they represent only fifteen percent of the early votes to date in 2016.  A number of reports published just four days before the 2016 election, tell us that Trump is now attracting some twenty percent of the black vote nationwide.

Mega TV, a San Juan-based network with studios in Key West and Miami, has reported that, in the past two months, in response to Obama’s announced intention to normalize relations with the Castro regime in Cuba, Trump’s support within the Cuban-American community has grown by twenty percentage points.  These developments in the minority community cannot be good news for the Clinton campaign.

Swing states aside, if Clinton wins (electoral votes in parentheses) the twenty-two blue states of California (55), Connecticut (7), Delaware (3), District of Columbia (3), Hawaii (4), Illinois (20), Maine (4), Maryland (10), Massachusetts (11), Michigan (16), Minnesota (10), Nevada (6), New Hampshire (4), New Jersey (14), New Mexico (5), New York (29), Oregon (7), Pennsylvania (20), Rhode Island (4), Vermont (3), Washington (12), and Wisconsin (10), she will have 257 electoral votes, just thirteen votes short of an electoral majority.

However, if Trump wins the twenty-three traditionally red states of Alabama (9), Alaska (3), Arizona (11), Arkansas (6), Georgia (16), Idaho (4), Indiana (11), Kansas (6), Kentucky (8), Louisiana (8), Mississippi (6), Missouri (10), Montana (3), Nebraska, (5), North Dakota (3), Oklahoma (7), South Carolina (9), South Dakota (3), Tennessee (11), Texas (38), Utah (6), West Virginia (5), and Wyoming (3), he will have just 191 electoral votes, seventy-nine votes short of an electoral majority.  Trump would then have to win the electoral votes of Colorado (9), Florida (29), Iowa (6), North Carolina (15), Ohio (18), and Virginia (13) in order to be elected.  Of these, if he were to lose only Colorado’s nine votes, he could still win election with 272 electoral votes.

But this is not an election that lends itself well to electoral norms.  As matters now stand, just three days before the General Election, it appears as if Trump might win the electoral votes of Nevada (6) and New Hampshire (4), with an outside chance of winning Pennsylvania’s twenty electoral votes.  If he could do that, he could afford to lose both North Carolina and Virginia to Clinton and still win election with 274 votes, four votes more than a simple majority.

It is a close enough contest to prevent any but the most reckless gamblers from betting the house or the farm on the outcome.  If Clinton should manage to win the 257 blue state electoral votes, along with the thirteen electoral votes of Virginia, she would have 270 electoral votes, a simple majority in the Electoral College.  But even then, all is not lost.  On the first Monday after the second Wednesday in December… December 19, 2016… the members of the Electoral College will meet in their respective state capitals to cast their votes for president and vice president.  It is then that the 538 members of the Electoral College will have an opportunity to fulfill the purpose of the Electoral College as intended by the Framers, and as described in Federalist Paper No. 68.

The Founders had some very specific reasons for creating the Electoral College.  Aside from their insistence that the president and vice president be elected by the states, and not by a direct vote of the people or by the state legislative bodies, their primary concern was that a foreign power might one day attempt to achieve through corruption and political intrigue, that which they could not achieve on the battlefield.  As Alexander Hamilton wrote in Federalist Paper No. 68, “These most deadly adversaries of republican government (cabal, intrigue, etc.) might come from many quarters, but chiefly from the desire in foreign powers to gain an improper ascendant in our councils.  How could they better gratify this than by raising a creature of their own to the chief magistracy of the Union?” Does this not describe Hillary Clinton’s tenure as Secretary of State and the activities of the Clinton Foundation?

And although the Founders felt it imperative that the “sense of the people” should be a principal factor in the selection of presidents and vice presidents, they were uncomfortable with the notion of placing that responsibility in the hands of Congress because of the prospect… if not the probability… of undue influence being placed on the selection process because of long-standing friendships and/or alliances in Congress.

The alternative they settled on was the Electoral College, an independent body consisting of citizens selected solely for the purpose of selecting the president and vice president… the manner in which presidential electors were chosen being left solely and exclusively to the legislatures of the various states.  Neither the governors of the states, nor the courts, federal or state, were given any jurisdiction whatsoever in the selection process.

As Hamilton wrote in Federalist Paper No. 68,

It was equally desirable, that the immediate election should be made by men most capable of analyzing the qualities adapted to the station, and acting under circumstances favorable to deliberation, and to a judicious combination of all the reasons and inducements which were proper to govern their choice.  A small number of persons, selected by their fellow-citizens from the general mass, will be most likely to possess the information and discernment requisite to such complicated investigations.”

In other words, it is the constitutional duty of the 538 members of the Electoral College to select from among their fellow citizens, a president and vice president who are qualified to hold those offices and who are in possession of the “qualities adapted to the station.”  The pool from which they must choose are individuals who are, a) natural born citizens, b) at least 35 years of age, and c) residents of the United States for at least 14 years.  And while twenty-four states have laws requiring electors to vote only for those candidates receiving a majority of the popular vote within their respective states, it is impossible to believe that electors should ever be required to vote for a president or a vice president who clearly does not possess the honesty, the integrity, or the public trust necessary to such high office… especially one who is judged by a substantial majority of citizens to be corrupt and untrustworthy.

In the present case, Hillary Clinton won just 60.4% of the 4,707 delegates to the Democratic National Convention.  Her principal opponent, Senator Bernie Sanders (D-VT) won primaries and caucuses in twenty-three states, winning 39.6% of the delegates… making it reasonable to assume that roughly 40% of the Democratic members of the Electoral College are Sanders supporters.

If Hillary Clinton should manage to eke out what would result in a slim victory in the Electoral College on November 8, Republicans would have forty-one days in which to convince enough Sanders partisans in the Electoral College to write in Bernie Sanders’ name on their electoral ballots… throwing the election into the House of Representatives where Donald Trump would be certain to prevail.  The stakes are far too great not to pull out all the stops.  As Yogi Berra once said, “It ain’t over ‘til it’s over.”

Republican leaders only need to develop a bit of backbone.

RELATED VIDEO:

Inaccuracy of Polls send Gold and Silver Soaring predicting a Trump Presidency

LOS ANGELES, Calif. /PRNewswire/ — On June 25th 2015 an opinion piece entitled “What’s the Matter with Polling?” by Cliff Zukin was published in the New York Times. In it, Mr. Zukin detailed how the rapid adoption of cell phones and rapidly diminishing numbers of survey respondents has hindered the ability of public opinion researchers to conduct accurate polling.

Millennials, who represent 56% of America’s eligible voters, are one of the largest demographics in the U.S. who are slipping through the cracks with most public opinion polls. Since 85% of Millennials own a cell phone instead of a landline, Millennials cost twice as much to reach since regulatory restrictions prohibit calling cell phones – not landlines – with an autodialer.

The generational shift from landlines to cell phones, combined with the Millennials’ waning desire to take surveys, is rendering opinion polls worldwide unreliable and making it ever more difficult to predict outcomes in politics and financial markets. Just last week, when every poll in Colombia had predicted the passing of a referendum vote for peace with the rebel guerrilla army, FARC, 50.22% of Colombians rejected the peace deal and sent the Colombian peso plunging.

413518logoHere at home, most recent polls predict that Secretary of State Clinton will win the election and that belief has been priced into the markets in much the same way that ‘Bremain’ was priced into markets prior to the ‘Brexit’ vote. Jack Hanney, a senior partner with the nation’s leading gold IRA dealer, Patriot Gold Group, states that the “Associated Press and Reuters polls got the Brexit referendum wrong and they’re going to get the U.S. presidential election wrong too.” His logic is supported by recent political polls that incorrectly forecasted elections in Turkey, Scotland, Canada and Greece.

Jim Rickard, author of the book “Currency Wars: The Making of the Next Global Crisis,” goes one step further than Hanney to say that “Trump will win, the Dow will drop over 1,000 points and gold will gain $100 overnight.” These sentiments are shared by many leading political and precious metal analysts who are hedging their bets as it’s widely believed that if Trump does pull a Brexit-style upset, gold and silver will move up as much as 20% within a week from today.

In a country whose government was founded 238 years ago to protect every citizen’s right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, who’d have predicted living in the constant state of fear created by terrorism, systemic corruption, rising inequality and economic recession? If nothing else, the sad state of affairs in America today demonstrates that any outcome is possible. And the polls are no different.

Take heed of the recent warnings from the Huffington Post and Wall Street Journal: “the world will look so different six months from now” that Americans should “prepare themselves for the recession [and] hide in gold.”

RELATED ARTICLES:

S&P 500’s 9-day losing streak longest since December 1980

Market Indicator Gives Trump An 86% Chance Of Winning The Election