Democrats’ Virginia Gerrymander: Deception, Disenfranchisement

Virginia voters head to the polls on April 21 to decide the future of fair elections in the Commonwealth. On the surface, the Democratic-backed constitutional amendment sounds reasonable: it claims to “restore fairness” to congressional map-drawing. In reality, it is one of the most brazen partisan power grabs in modern American politics — a deliberate attempt to rig the system, silence nearly half the electorate, and shred the independent redistricting process voters approved just six years ago. The scheme is straightforward in its cynicism.

Virginia’s current congressional map, drawn by the independent bipartisan commission created in 2020, produces a 6-5 Democratic-Republican split that roughly mirrors the state’s evenly divided electorate. Democrats now want to scrap that map and replace it with one that would deliver a grotesque 10-1 Democratic Party advantage. Four Republican seats would be effectively erased. This isn’t “fairness.” It’s the elimination of competitive districts in a state where Republicans and independents routinely cast close to half the votes.

The dishonesty begins with the ballot language itself. The question carefully avoids any mention of the actual map voters are being asked to endorse. It is a textbook push poll, written to elicit a predetermined “Yes” without revealing the radical anti-democratic outcome. Early voting is already underway, yet local registrars were instructed not to post pictures of the proposed map. Virginia Democrats, including Gov. Abigail Spanberger, who once falsely cultivated a moderate image and explicitly said that gerrymandering was damaging to our democracy, now champion the effort, pretending that they are protecting democracy.

What makes this especially galling is the hypocrisy. For years, national Democrats and their media allies have portrayed Republicans as the uniquely evil practitioners of gerrymandering. They lecture the country that only the GOP draws “outrageous” maps. Yet the very states they control tell a different story — one of systematic, decades-long exclusion of Republican voters.

Consider the Northeast alone. Massachusetts is home to roughly 35% Republican voters, yet it sends zero Republicans to Congress. Connecticut’s electorate is 42% Republican, with zero seats. Maine (46% Republican), New Hampshire (46%), Rhode Island (42%), and Vermont (32%) all deliver the same result: zero Republican representation. Hawaii (38 % Republican) and Delaware (42% Republican) follow the identical pattern. These are not flukes of geography or turnout.

They are the predictable outcomes of aggressive Democratic map-drawing that packs Republican voters into as few districts as possible or spreads them so thinly they cannot win anywhere. The same story repeats in other states. California, Oregon, Washington, Maryland, New York, and Illinois have all used sophisticated gerrymandering techniques to maximize Democratic seats far beyond what raw vote totals would justify.

Independent analysts consistently rank several of these maps among the most partisan in the nation. Yet when Democrats propose turning Virginia — a genuine swing state — into a 10-1 farce, they suddenly rediscover the language of “fairness.” The mask slipped completely when prominent Democrats stopped pretending. Rep. Donald Beyer admitted the plan “seems unfair in Virginia” but defended it anyway because it serves the national Democratic goal “to stop Donald Trump.”

State Sen. Louise Lucas, D-Dist.18, the plan’s chief architect, was even more direct. Responding to a fellow Democrat who called the scheme “extremely anti-democratic,” she declared that anyone opposing it “doesn’t share our values as Democrats. In other words, the issue was never fairness. It was grabbing political power.

This episode reveals something deeper and more troubling about today’s progressive politics: a willingness to abandon democratic norms the moment they become inconvenient. The 2020 redistricting reform passed with overwhelming bipartisan support precisely because Virginians were tired of politicians choosing their voters instead of the other way around. Democrats now propose suspending that reform for the 2026 midterms, ramming through their gerrymander, and then — they solemnly promise — restoring the independent commission afterward. The idea that newly elected Democrats would voluntarily vote themselves out of safe congressional seats is laughable on its face.

Power seized through procedural chicanery is almost never relinquished. And since Abigail Spanberger lied to Virginians about her not supporting a gerrymandering ploy, we should not believe their claims that this gerrymandering plan is only temporary. A recent Roanoke College poll shows Virginians are not fooled: 62% want to keep the bipartisan commission process. That public skepticism is heartening, but it must translate into action.

The left’s enthusiastic support for this Virginia scheme, despite its obvious hypocrisy and despite the mountain of evidence that one-party Democratic monopolies already exist across much of the country, exposes their true priorities. Principles are flexible; power is not. Moral lectures about democracy are reserved exclusively for Republicans. When Democrats hold the map-drawing pen, different rules apply. Virginia has long prided itself on political maturity and competitive districts that force candidates to appeal beyond their base. Competitive elections produce better policy and more accountable government.

Handing one party a 10-1 lock disenfranchises roughly half the state’s voters, rendering their ballots structurally meaningless in congressional races. It turns representative democracy into a managed and fake democracy — the very outcome the 2020 reform was designed to prevent. On April 21, Virginians have a chance to send a clear message that transcends party labels. Reject the lies. Reject the power grab. Reject the cynical attempt to turn Virginia into just another one-party fiefdom. Vote no on the redistricting amendment and preserve the independent process that puts voters — not politicians — in charge.

The integrity of our elections and the principle of equal representation are worth defending. Virginia’s voters have always risen to that challenge. This April 21 should be no different.

©2026 . All rights reserved.

Trump says ‘cancel’ concert for America ’s 250th birthday

President Trump on Saturday called for the cancellation of the concert celebrating America’s 250th birthday after multiple artists withdrew from performing at the upcoming Great American State Fair on the National Mall.

Trump wrote on Truth Social that there should be “a giant MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN RALLY, for 250, instead of having overpriced singers, who nobody wants to hear, whose music is boring, and yet who do nothing but complain.”

“Cancel it, just like I canceled my involvement with the failing and unsafe to be in Kennedy Center, because a Highly Conflicted, Crooked Federal Judge, said that I should not be allowed to spend my time and money in order to MAKE THE CENTER GREAT AGAIN, actually, far greater than it ever was before!” the president added.

©2026  All rights reserved.

DOJ Exposes California Voter Registration Fraud Scheme

Federal prosecutors in California have secured a guilty plea in a voter registration fraud case involving allegations of improper payments tied to voter registration forms and ballot petition signatures. Brenda Lee Brown Armstrong, 64, of Marina del Rey, admitted in a plea agreement to participating in a 20-year effort involving the collection and submission of voter registration forms and petition signatures across California.

Federal filings state the activity extended across multiple ballot initiative campaigns and included repeated handling of election-related paperwork over an extended period of time. According to prosecutors, Armstrong operated within a paid signature-gathering structure in which compensation was tied to the number of valid petition signatures submitted.

©2026 . All rights reserved.

Trump Admin Scores Huge Legal Victory

The Trump administration secured a legal victory after a federal appeals court sided with its push to access Social Security data as part of its government efficiency efforts. The ruling came from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, which overturned a lower court decision that had blocked the Department of Government Efficiency, known as DOGE, from accessing sensitive records.

The case centers on whether DOGE personnel can review non-anonymized data held by the Social Security Administration. According to the court’s decision, judges vacated a preliminary injunction issued in 2025 that had restricted access to the data. That injunction had been put in place by a district court, which ruled that allowing access could violate privacy protections.

The Trump administration challenged that ruling, first seeking relief from the appeals court and later taking the issue to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court had already allowed access to proceed temporarily while the case moved forward through the legal system. Friday’s decision now strengthens the administration’s position. The Fourth Circuit determined that the plaintiffs failed to meet the legal standard required to justify blocking the policy at this stage.

Specifically, the court found that the groups challenging the policy did not demonstrate “irreparable harm.” That is a key requirement when courts consider whether to grant emergency relief like a preliminary injunction. The judges said any potential harm could be addressed later through legal remedies. Those could include damages under the Privacy Act or a permanent injunction if the policy is ultimately found unlawful. Because of that, the court concluded that immediate intervention was not warranted, per the Conservative Brief. The decision does not fully resolve the case. Instead, it sends the matter back to the lower court for further proceedings on the broader legal questions.

©2026 . All rights reserved.

Louisiana Voters Reject Cassidy

On Saturday, incumbent U.S. Senator Bill Cassidy (R-LA) finished in a distant third place in the Louisiana Republican primary with only 24% of the vote. He missed the runoff, likely ending his political career. It was a stinging defeat for the longtime politician and two-term U.S. Senator. Of course, a motivating factor for Republicans was his vote to convict President Donald Trump of impeachment charges following the January 6, 2021, U.S. Capitol protests. However, another clear reason Cassidy lost overwhelmingly was that his policies are not in sync with those of Louisiana Republican voters.
Cassidy is much more moderate than most Louisiana Republican voters. For example, he voted for massive bills sponsored by the unpopular Biden administration, including the “Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act.” Another area that cost Cassidy political support involved his stances on crucial healthcare issues. As Chairman of the U.S. Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (HELP), Cassidy has been holding virtual town hall meetings and field hearings on various issues. One hearing was focused on “making healthcare affordable for families, featuring perspectives from employers, patients, and providers.”

According to Senator Cassidy’s office, “The witnesses applauded Cassidy’s leadership and echoed his call to empower patients. As the first physician to chair the HELP Committee, Cassidy is a longtime champion of empowering patients and lowering health care costs for families.” Unfortunately, the reality is very different from the Senator’s press release. In the view of Darren Grubb, spokesperson for Medicare Advantage Majority, the hearing included no substantive discussion of the serious healthcare issues faced by seniors in Louisiana and nationwide.

With approximately 35 million Americans enrolled in Medicare Advantage today and an estimated 45 million by 2030, rising healthcare costs are a major concern to an ever-growing segment of the country. Grubb believes that “Healthcare costs are top of mind for seniors and their families, especially heading into the midterm elections, as Americans are facing rapidly rising cost-of-living challenges.” Grubb noted his appreciation that the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) adjusted “the final Medicare Advantage rate…to better reflect the real-world pressures” from rising healthcare costs. However, seniors are still at risk of losing a substantial number of important services because the rate increase was only a fraction of the overall increase in healthcare costs.

Nationally, healthcare costs are increasing 7.2%, topping $5 trillion for the first time in 2024. Unfortunately, CMS will increase 2027 payments to insurers carrying Medicare Advantage plans by only 2.48%. This disparity is the reason that Humana recently announced it would cut benefits. “All insurers are likely to cut back on benefits, but Humana will be cutting back the most,” said Kevin Gade, chief operating officer at Bahl and Gaynor. In a recent call to investors, Humana CEO Jim Rechtin said cuts would have to be made to “reach profit targets.”

Congress should use this opportunity to improve the Medicare Advantage payment rate. Instead, Congress is still considering Senator Cassidy’s “No UPCODE Act,” which is alive in committee. Cassidy’s bill has been heavily criticized by senior advocates for harming Medicare Advantage by increasing consumer costs and reducing services. A coalition of more than 60 organizations “representing providers, community groups, minority health advocates, and aging services leaders from across the country” sent a letter to Congress voicing “serious concerns” with the “No UPCODE Act.” These organizations warned that Cassidy’s bill “would undermine care coordination, reduce in-home health assessments, and compromise the preventive and supplemental benefits that millions of seniors count on.”

Among the millions of Americans who benefit from in-home care are seniors and individuals with disabilities who are managing chronic conditions. Cutting Medicare Advantage will also harm beneficiaries in rural areas, where access to healthcare is more limited.

©2026 . All rights reserved.

Can the SAVE America Act be Saved?

  • Broadcast announces pressure on Leader Thune to pass SAVE America Act via talking filibuster.
  • Method suggests recessing nightly, debating until exhaustion, needing 50+ votes for passage.
  • Thread provides download links for broadcast and shares many political hashtags/links.

Let’s put renewed pressure on Senate Majority Leader John Thune. The Senate has been back from vacation since April 13, but he hasn’t spent one minute on the SAVE America Act. Remember, the Senate can pass the bill without 60 votes and without changing the rules. It’s simple but strenuous: Assemble all Republicans on the floor. Start the debate and do not ‘adjourn’ every day, but instead ‘recess’ each night. That seems a minor point, but it is the only way to make it work.

The Talking Filibuster: How It Works

Historical engraving of the United States Senate in the 19th century showing a senator delivering a floor speech — the original talking filibuster tradition
The United States Senate — where the “talking filibuster” was born. A senator holds the floor, speaks until exhausted, and gives way only when the debate ends. This is the tradition Majority Leader Thune can invoke today to pass the SAVE America Act by simple majority.

Each Senator is allowed to give only two speeches. Some will talk for a day or so — until they must end their speech for a meal or the bathroom. Most Democrat Senators won’t be able to last more than a few hours. So it could be over in a week or two.

Once they exhaust their vocal cords, a vote is held and the Act can pass with just 50 votes plus the Vice President.

Why Pressure from Constituents Matters

A few RINOs and Never-Trumper Senators won’t vote for it. So we need to make sure every other possible Senator will support it.
Note that a strong Majority Leader can pressure his Senators to do almost anything. “Don’t support it? Pity you’ll lose your membership on the Agriculture Committee…” That’s how the Democrats always have near-100% unity to pass their bills and oppose anything a Republican proposes. It’s not pretty, but it’s the way the Senate works.

“The elections are just months away—we can’t wait. Start the talking filibuster. Use your influence to get 50 Senators onboard.”

— THE MESSAGE TO DELIVER TO MAJORITY LEADER THUNE

©2026 . All rights reserved.

Democrat Rep. Ayanna Pressley ripped for calling evictions an ‘act of violence’

A House Democrat is facing backlash for comparing evictions to violence, despite appearing to benefit from rental income tied to her husband’s growing real estate portfolio. “Eviction is an act of violence,” Rep. Ayanna Pressley, D-Mass., said in a video posted to social media Thursday. “And we have to do everything to prevent it.”. “It degrades the health of communities. There is great stigma associated with it,” she continued. “Housing is a human right.”
Pressley, a progressive lawmaker and member of the “Squad,” has long advocated for rent cancellation legislation and pushed for an eviction moratorium during the COVID-19 pandemic. She introduced legislation Wednesday that would prevent evictions from being factored into credit reporting and fund legal assistance for those at risk of eviction.

Her sales pitch is falling flat with supporters of free markets and conservatives. “Great. When can I move into your house for free?” journalist Brad Polumbo wrote in response to Pressley’s statement. “The only violence in this statement is what Ayanna Pressley is doing to the meaning of words and the English language,” conservative commentator Steve Guest added.

A spokesperson for Pressley emphasized the congresswoman’s perspective on evictions in a statement to Fox News Digital. “Evictions are destabilizing life events with devastating consequences for the physical, financial, and mental wellbeing of those being evicted, who are disproportionately women and families with young children,” the spokesperson said. Pressley, a four-term lawmaker, has previously faced charges of hypocrisy for pushing rent-relief policies while appearing to profit from her husband’s status as a landlord.

©2026 . All rights reserved.

WATCH: The Vienna Café that Refused to Boycott Israel at Eurovision

The Vienna café that refused to boycott Israel at Eurovision. After most Vienna venues refused to host Israel’s Eurovision delegation, a non-Jewish Austrian couple opened their café as an unofficial Israeli embassy, declaring it a public stand against rising antisemitism in Europe.

As part of a local initiative in Austria, cafés were invited to host different Eurovision delegations. But when it came to Israel’s delegation, no café initially agreed to participate.

That’s when the local Jewish community stepped in — and Lisa and Johannes answered the call.

WATCH: No One Wanted to Host Israel’s Eurovision Team — Until This Couple Stepped In | KAN 11

Please forward the message with family, friends, on your social media site as a democratic act compassion.

©2026 . All rights reserved.

Immigrants caught illegally voting in New Jersey elections

Four noncitizens have been caught voting in New Jersey, according to federal prosecutors.

Some of the illegal votes were cast in federal elections nearly six years ago but are only now coming to light, according to the U.S. Attorney’s Office for New Jersey. Officials said three suspects voted in the 2020 and 2024 presidential elections.

U.S. Attorney Robert Frazer said the four immigrants lied on their voter registration forms when they claimed they were citizens. Officials say all four suspects were green card holders, who are not citizens and are not allowed to vote in federal elections. Despite their status, they successfully registered to vote in New Jersey and were able to cast ballots.

“As alleged, the defendants broke federal law by voting in elections they were not eligible to participate in, and then made false statements under oath to conceal that conduct,” said Frazer.

Federal charges of false statements and citizenship fraud. According to federal prosecutors, each immigrant then applied to become a U.S. citizen and lied on their forms. The application process includes a form that requires each person to certify that they have never voted in a federal election.

“Under President Trump and Secretary Mullin, HSI is committed to ensuring integrity in our election systems and ensuring that American citizens — and only American citizens — are electing American leaders,” said ICE Director Todd M. Lyons.

Breakdown of New Jersey voter fraud suspects. David Neewilly, 73, of Atlantic County, is charged with voting by an alien in a federal election, which carries a maximum sentence of one year in prison, and false statements in relation to naturalization, which carries a max sentence of five years.

Jacenth Beadle Exum, 70, of Bergen County, is charged with false statements in relation to naturalization and false statements in relation to naturalization/procurement of citizenship or naturalization unlawfully. The latter charge carries up to 10 years in prison. Prosecutors said that Exum’s visa had expired in December 2000, nearly 26 years ago.

Idan Choresh, 43, of Monmouth County, is charged with voting by an alien in a federal election, false statements in relation to naturalization, and procurement of citizenship or naturalization unlawfully.

Abhinandan Vig, 33, of Monmouth County, is charged with the procurement of citizenship or naturalization unlawfully.

All four individuals had their applications for citizenship rejected after the investigations.

©2026 . All rights reserved.

‘Could Have Been a Lot Worse’: Vance Thanks Secret Service After WHCD Attempted Shooting

Vice President JD Vance described his experience at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner Saturday night, where a shooter attempted to assassinate the president and other Cabinet officials.

“I’m sitting up there on the stage with some journalists and obviously with the president of the United States a few seats to my right, and there’s a lot of commotion. You kind of hear some loud noises,” he told Fox News’ Will Cain on Wednesday. “I had no idea what it was. And before I had any idea what was going on, I started seeing people sort of duck under their tables or respond to what was going on far in the back of the ballroom. And then an agent comes and whispers in my ear, basically says, sir, we have to leave.”

Vance said he heard an agent was shot and worried that the man was injured or worse. The agent was shielded by a bulletproof vest.

“The thing that I really gained an appreciation for is the amazing job the agents of the Secret Service do,” Vance said. “You saw they went right to me, they went right to the president of the United States. They put their lives in harm’s way.”

The suspected shooter, Cole Tomas Allen, 31, was charged Monday with attempting to assassinate the president of the United States. He also faces charges of transporting a firearm across state lines and discharging a firearm during a crime of violence.

Vance said he has gotten used to having a security detail over the past two years, but the incident renewed his appreciation.

“I just feel very grateful to them and very grateful for what they do, and frankly, grateful to God that that agent who was shot was not seriously hurt,” he said. “It could have been a lot worse, but the law enforcement did a great job well, and we should all be grateful for that.”

Vance called for an end to Americans inciting violence upon political opponents.

“The political violence right now is coming not exclusively, but largely from one side of the aisle,” he said. “The president has now faced three serious attempts on his life in just the past year and a half. Of course, Butler, Pennsylvania; there was a situation at Mar-a-Lago that the media didn’t really cover,” he said. “And then, of course, there was the White House Correspondents’ Association Dinner.”

“So, I think really, it’s incumbent upon everybody, but particularly those who are driving some of the narratives that Donald Trump has somehow invited this violence upon himself, that killing your political opponents is somehow justified if you’re engaged in that kind of rhetoric,” he continued, “you need to check yourself.”

AUTHOR

Elizabeth Troutman Mitchell

Elizabeth Troutman Mitchell is the White House correspondent for the Daily Signal.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Southern Poverty Law Center Gets Taste of Its Own Debanking Medicine

Dems Enraged by Callais Ruling

Supreme Court Appears Open to Trump Ending TPS for Haitians and Syrians

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Signal column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

No Kings explained for people who think they’re fighting fascism. A King Goes to Congress!

500 groups. Three billion dollars in revenue. Pre-printed signs stacked and shipped before you even knew what you were supposed to be mad about.

That is not a spontaneous uprising. That is infrastructure.

That is planning. That is money. That is message discipline.

And that is what you walked into on Saturday. You looked around, saw the crowd, saw the slogans, felt the energy, and told yourself this was democracy. “No Kings.” It sounded clean. It sounded righteous. It felt like you were part of something organic.

But the signs were ready before your outrage was.

That should bother you.

Because you are not living under a king. You are living in a constitutional republic with elections, term limits, and a press that has spent years attacking the most powerful figures in the country without consequence. No one is being arrested for calling a president a fascist. No one is being silenced for dissenting.

That is not tyranny.

And yet you are being told it is.

You are being trained to see normal functions of a country as authoritarian. Loving your country becomes suspicious. Wanting a secure border becomes immoral. Believing parents should have a say in their children’s lives becomes dangerous. Asking basic questions about elections becomes taboo.

That is not clarity. That is conditioning.

Every country on Earth enforces its borders. Most require identification to vote. That is not controversial anywhere else. It is only controversial here because you have been told it should be.

And you believed it.

©2026 . All rights reserved.

Gunman at correspondents’ dinner charged with trying to assassinate Trump

Federal prosecutors on Monday brought attempted assassination charges against the man accused of opening fire one floor above the ballroom of the White House Correspondents’ Dinner and writing a manifesto saying he was targeting President Trump and his administration.

Prosecutors updated the charges against Cole Tomas Allen, 31, of Torrance, California, who wore a blue prison jumpsuit during his arraignment at U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. He briefly answered Judge Matthew Sharbaugh’s questions about his identity and legal rights but otherwise did not speak.

Mr. Allen is also charged with the transportation of a firearm and using a firearm during a violent crime. An initial charge of assault of a federal officer was dropped. He will remain in federal custody on the three charges. A detention hearing is scheduled for Thursday. Mr. Allen is accused of attempting to breach a security checkpoint around 8:40 p.m. Saturday and shooting a Secret Service agent in a lobby area one floor above the Washington Hilton’s ballroom, where the president, vice president and several of the Cabinet secretaries were seated. The annual dinner draws more than 2,000 people.

©2026 . All rights reserved.

RELATED VIDEO: TRUMP UNLOADS: POTUS Slams CBS Anchor For Reading Sick Manifesto On TV — ‘You’re a Disgrace’

Noem Not Finished, Iran Nearly Finished

During the Shield of the Americas summit in Florida on Saturday, outgoing Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Kristi Noem thanked President Donald Trump for appointing her to a newly created role after she was ousted from overseeing the agency.

Noem, who is moving to the newly created position of special envoy for the Shield of the Americas, showed no ill feelings toward the president and said she was proud of her work at DHS, arguing the department had secured the border and eliminated public safety threats.

“I do want to thank the president for creating this and for giving me the honor and the opportunity to serve as a special envoy to this region, to the Western Hemisphere,” Noem said during the summit at Trump National Doral outside Miami.

©2026 . All rights reserved.

Democrats’ Virginia Gerrymander: Deception, Disenfranchisement!

Virginia voters head to the polls on April 21 to decide the future of fair elections in the Commonwealth. On the surface, the Democratic-backed constitutional amendment sounds reasonable: it claims to “restore fairness” to congressional map-drawing. In reality, it is one of the most brazen partisan power grabs in modern American politics — a deliberate attempt to rig the system, silence nearly half the electorate, and shred the independent redistricting process voters approved just six years ago. The scheme is straightforward in its cynicism.

Virginia’s current congressional map, drawn by the independent bipartisan commission created in 2020, produces a 6-5 Democratic-Republican split that roughly mirrors the state’s evenly divided electorate. Democrats now want to scrap that map and replace it with one that would deliver a grotesque 10-1 Democratic Party advantage. Four Republican seats would be effectively erased. This isn’t “fairness.” It’s the elimination of competitive districts in a state where Republicans and independents routinely cast close to half the votes.

The dishonesty begins with the ballot language itself. The question carefully avoids any mention of the actual map voters are being asked to endorse. It is a textbook push poll, written to elicit a predetermined “Yes” without revealing the radical anti-democratic outcome. Early voting is already underway, yet local registrars were instructed not to post pictures of the proposed map. Virginia Democrats, including Gov. Abigail Spanberger, who once falsely cultivated a moderate image and explicitly said that gerrymandering was damaging to our democracy, now champion the effort, pretending that they are protecting democracy.

What makes this especially galling is the hypocrisy. For years, national Democrats and their media allies have portrayed Republicans as the uniquely evil practitioners of gerrymandering. They lecture the country that only the GOP draws “outrageous” maps. Yet the very states they control tell a different story — one of systematic, decades-long exclusion of Republican voters.

Consider the Northeast alone. Massachusetts is home to roughly 35% Republican voters, yet it sends zero Republicans to Congress. Connecticut’s electorate is 42% Republican, with zero seats. Maine (46% Republican), New Hampshire (46%), Rhode Island (42%), and Vermont (32%) all deliver the same result: zero Republican representation. Hawaii (38 % Republican) and Delaware (42% Republican) follow the identical pattern. These are not flukes of geography or turnout.

They are the predictable outcomes of aggressive Democratic map-drawing that packs Republican voters into as few districts as possible or spreads them so thinly they cannot win anywhere. The same story repeats in other states. California, Oregon, Washington, Maryland, New York, and Illinois have all used sophisticated gerrymandering techniques to maximize Democratic seats far beyond what raw vote totals would justify.

Independent analysts consistently rank several of these maps among the most partisan in the nation. Yet when Democrats propose turning Virginia — a genuine swing state — into a 10-1 farce, they suddenly rediscover the language of “fairness.” The mask slipped completely when prominent Democrats stopped pretending. Rep. Donald Beyer admitted the plan “seems unfair in Virginia” but defended it anyway because it serves the national Democratic goal “to stop Donald Trump.”

State Sen. Louise Lucas, D-Dist.18, the plan’s chief architect, was even more direct. Responding to a fellow Democrat who called the scheme “extremely anti-democratic,” she declared that anyone opposing it “doesn’t share our values as Democrats. In other words, the issue was never fairness. It was grabbing political power.

This episode reveals something deeper and more troubling about today’s progressive politics: a willingness to abandon democratic norms the moment they become inconvenient. The 2020 redistricting reform passed with overwhelming bipartisan support precisely because Virginians were tired of politicians choosing their voters instead of the other way around. Democrats now propose suspending that reform for the 2026 midterms, ramming through their gerrymander, and then — they solemnly promise — restoring the independent commission afterward. The idea that newly elected Democrats would voluntarily vote themselves out of safe congressional seats is laughable on its face.

Power seized through procedural chicanery is almost never relinquished. And since Abigail Spanberger lied to Virginians about her not supporting a gerrymandering ploy, we should not believe their claims that this gerrymandering plan is only temporary. A recent Roanoke College poll shows Virginians are not fooled: 62% want to keep the bipartisan commission process. That public skepticism is heartening, but it must translate into action.

The left’s enthusiastic support for this Virginia scheme, despite its obvious hypocrisy and despite the mountain of evidence that one-party Democratic monopolies already exist across much of the country, exposes their true priorities. Principles are flexible; power is not. Moral lectures about democracy are reserved exclusively for Republicans. When Democrats hold the map-drawing pen, different rules apply. Virginia has long prided itself on political maturity and competitive districts that force candidates to appeal beyond their base. Competitive elections produce better policy and more accountable government.

Handing one party a 10-1 lock disenfranchises roughly half the state’s voters, rendering their ballots structurally meaningless in congressional races. It turns representative democracy into a managed and fake democracy — the very outcome the 2020 reform was designed to prevent. On April 21, Virginians have a chance to send a clear message that transcends party labels. Reject the lies. Reject the power grab. Reject the cynical attempt to turn Virginia into just another one-party fiefdom. Vote no on the redistricting amendment and preserve the independent process that puts voters — not politicians — in charge.

The integrity of our elections and the principle of equal representation are worth defending. Virginia’s voters have always risen to that challenge. This April 21 should be no different.

©2026 . All rights reserved.

Erika Kirk Ditches TPUSA Event Last Minute – JD Vance Explains Why

Vice President JD Vance stood before a crowd of young conservatives at the University of Georgia on Tuesday, but the person who was supposed to be beside him was nowhere to be found.

Erika Kirk, the CEO of Turning Point USA, did not attend the event after receiving what those close to her described as serious threats against her safety.

Turning Point USA spokesperson Andrew Kolvet took the stage in her place, wasting no time in explaining the situation to the crowd gathered for the nonprofit’s tour designed to fire up young conservative voters ahead of the midterm elections. “I’m going to address it right at the front, Mr. Vice President, I’m on stage here instead of our friend Erika Kirk because unfortunately she has received some very serious threats in her direction,” Kolvet told the audience. “It’s a terrible reflection on the state of reality and the state of the country,” he added.

Vance confirmed that Kirk had personally contacted him before the event to discuss the threats, and the situation nearly derailed the rally entirely. “I love Erika, and I know that she did get some threats,” Vance said. “About two hours ago… I was a little worried that we were going to have to cancel the event because Erika was not going to come, and she was very worried about it.” Vance consulted with the Secret Service before ultimately deciding to move forward with the event. No details about the specific nature of the threats have been publicly disclosed. The Daily Mail reached out to the White House seeking comment.

Kirk’s rise to the top of Turning Point USA came under devastating circumstances. Her husband, Charlie Kirk, was assassinated on September 10 at Utah Valley University while engaging with students on campus. Erika stepped into the CEO role in the immediate aftermath of his death.

©2026 . All rights reserved.