In the long-suffering U.K., another Muslim migrant has just been found responsible for child sex offenses, involving upskirting, indecent photographs, and voyeurism. These offenses are not nearly as grave, of course, as the offense of a 54-year-old man having sexual intercourse with a 9-year-old girl. Abusali Rahman, the sad sack, really wanted to look under girls’ dresses to catch sight of knickers, or ideally, of pudenda sans knickers, and managed to photograph a number of them; which photos he presumably would take home and masturbate to. He has also pleaded guilty to one count of making and sharing with others “obscene photographs” (presumably, in addition to the upskirting photos), of four counts of publishing an obscene article, of three counts of making indecent photographs of children, and of voyeurism. A ghastly fellow, but, of course, not as ghastly, I hasten to repeat, as a 54-year-old man having sexual congress with a 9-year-old girl.
More on Rahman can be found here: “Sick ex-supply teacher admits 21 child sex offences at schools across North West,” by Dan McDonald, GB News, May 29, 2026:
A sick former supply teacher has admitted to 21 child sex offences at schools across the North West of England.
Abusali Rahman, 36, who lives in Salford, pleaded guilty to the charges at Bolton Crown Court on Thursday.
The extensive list of offences took place between December 2023 and June 2025, with 13 schoolgirls targeted in a number of different schools.
Rahman – a British national of Bangladeshi ethnicity – pleaded guilty to 12 counts of taking indecent photographs of children by upskirting, four counts of publishing an obscene article and three counts of making indecent photographs of children.
He also admitted to single counts of voyeurism and distributing an indecent photograph of a child.
Emma Kehoe, defending, told the court that Rahman was aware he will receive a prison sentence, adding: “He was going through a mental health crisis at the time.”
How does she know this? No psychiatric examination has yet been carried out on him. She knows it because, like so many Muslims whose guilt cannot be denied, he claims to have been going through a “mental health crisis.” She’s a defense lawyer and clings to this claim in order to make the verdict less harsh.
Could Abusali Rahman be both perpetrator and at the same time a victim? He’s so far from the nurturing environment of his native Bangladesh. In that world, young girls are fair game, and not just for what the Infidels call “indecent photographs.” Rahman has been so lonely, living among people consumed with Islamophobia and racism. Is the pathos of his life so hard to understand? Has he really done any harm by taking a handful of photographs? He needs companionship, even if only of the two-dimensional kind. Was it really so terrible for him to take a few photographs of which its subjects were unaware? Give Rahman a second chance. He promises on a cross-my-heart and hope-to-die basis, never to do it again.
Just kidding. M’lud, please throw the book at him.
https://drrichswier.com/wp-content/uploads/Abusali-Rahman-Greater-Manchester-Police.jpg360640Jihad Watchhttp://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.pngJihad Watch2026-06-01 05:39:252026-06-01 05:44:28Abusali Rahman, One More Proof That ‘Diversity’ Is Not ‘Our Strength’
A Georgetown University professor is under fire for telling people who share concerns about Muslim “rape gangs” to “get over it.”
Professor Jonathan A. C. Brown, chair of Islamic Civilization at Georgetown, posted the dismissive remark twice on X in response to users discussing a link between Islam and an escalating crisis of rape gangs in the United Kingdom, archived versions of the now-deleted posts show.
One post by Independent Member of Parliament Rupert Lowe reads: “There is a link between the rape gangs and one particular religion — we have seen it again and again and again at our inquiry. That religion is Islam. As a country, we must have the courage to face up to that fact.”
There is a link between the rape gangs and one particular religion – we have seen it again and again and again at our inquiry.
That religion is Islam.
As a country, we must have the courage to face up to that fact.
Brown responded to Lowe’s post with “get over it.” When another user said Brown’s comment was “absurdly evil,” the professor repeated the cold remark, writing “Get over it” a second time.
There is something absurdly evil about saying “get over it” in context with gang rape, torture and murder for religious reasons
Something like this would never be said about any other group for lesser crimes https://t.co/MqzJVg15R5
Brown has since made his account private, and the comments have been deleted.
A Georgetown student who spoke to the Daily Caller News Foundation called on the professor to be removed from the university, saying Brown is “fundamentally at odds with Georgetown’s core values.”
“Professor Jonathan Brown’s recent remarks continue a troubling pattern of reckless, incendiary, and dangerous statements that he has made without remorse,” Shae McInnis, president of Georgetown’s College Republicans chapter, told the DCNF. “Just last June, he stated that Iran should bomb U.S. military bases, and now he suggests that people should get over rape gangs. Comments like these reflect a worldview fundamentally at odds with Georgetown’s core values and are a disgrace to our academic community. The university should take decisive action and remove him from his position.”
The DCNF reported on Brown’s comments in June, when he called for Iran to do a “symbolic strike” on the U.S. in retaliation after President Donald Trump announced attacks on Iran’s nuclear sites.
“I’m not an expert, but I assume Iran could still get a bomb easily,” Brown said on social media at the time. “I hope Iran does some symbolic strike on a base, then everyone stops. I’m surprised this is what these FDD/Hasbara people have been auto-erotically asphyxiating themselves for all these years.”
Brown’s justification of rape and other horrific events in the name of Islam date back even further. In 2017, the Daily Caller reported on Brown openly supporting Islamic supremacism and defending slavery and rape.
Georgetown did not respond to the DCNF’s request for comment.
All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.
https://drrichswier.com/wp-content/uploads/Georgetown-University-Protest-DC.jpg326640The Daily Callerhttp://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.pngThe Daily Caller2026-04-20 04:06:542026-04-20 04:13:42Professor Of Islamic Civilization Says ‘Get Over It’ To Concerns About Rape Gang Crisis
Ted, a recently deported British citizen who grew up in the United States, went viral for his Friday interview with The Telegraph.
In the interview, Ted (not his real name) maintains that he deserved to be deported.
“Unlawful presence after learning that I was unlawfully present, right? I’m not making excuses. I should have been deported,” Ted said, speaking of his arrest. “There is an illegal immigration crisis in America, and any president that wants a lawfully ordered nation has the right and the duty and the obligation to enforce deportation.”
Ted’s remarks quickly garnered attention online, with right-wing commentators generally praising his integrity. The Telegraph posted a brief clip of its discussion with Ted to X with the caption: “Immigrants sent to the UK by the US say they lack support to survive in a strange land.”
🗣️ ‘ICE deported me to Britain – it’s a dump’
Immigrants sent to the UK by the US say they lack support to survive in a strange land.
Ted told the Daily Caller he “wasn’t terrifically satisfied with the way that The Telegraph tweeted [his] portion of their segment.”
“The title they used for the tweet was, or the caption they used for the tweet was something like, ‘People deported from the U.S. to the U.K. are unhappy with the benefits they’re receiving,’ and that’s never been my position. I haven’t taken taxpayer money. I’m not asking for Keir Starmer to help me resettle. So I don’t understand why they use the caption for the entire piece where there were other people who were maybe more in line with that, and then applied it to just my segment, but for the people who actually watched, I think they were sort of pleasantly surprised by the fact that I was taking ownership of being responsible for my own deportation,” Ted said.
I asked Ted to elaborate on other major misconceptions in The Telegraph’s coverage.
“Major misconceptions … That I’m like a Trump loyalist, MAGA cultist, staunch Republican, and that does not encapsulate the nuance of my political positions at all.”
“I would also say, because I was included in that, in that piece with the other two, that the misconception was I was dissatisfied with the amount of stuff I’m getting, or that I think I’m entitled to more, and then also because they included the clip from my TikTok that my most viral Tiktok of last year, referring to the U.K. in rather offensive manners.”
The Telegraph quoted Ted as saying, in that viral TikTok, “Now I’m in the United Kingdom and this country sucks and has made me more America First, because you see that outside of London, all of England is a Third World country, a dump. I hate it here and I’m excited and ready to go back to the United States.”
Ted continued: “It seems, the impression that’s given from what The Telegraph put out is, ‘Here is a guy who hates the place he is and is un-self-aware of the fact that he is a criminal who is privileged, who is honored to be in the U.K.,’ and that’s not what I think at all.”
Ted told the Caller that immediately following his deportation he made a social media profile.
“I was discussing the circumstances of my deportation and my political opinions, sort of taking the position that as someone who is deported, in the midst of all that was going on with the [Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)] protests and all that, I wanted to say something like, ‘Hey, I was deported, and I think it was justified.’ I’m not here saying, ‘I hate Trump. I hate ICE.’ I did reside unlawfully in the United States for a period of time which warranted my deportation.”
https://drrichswier.com/wp-content/uploads/Recent-Deportee.jpg328640The Daily Callerhttp://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.pngThe Daily Caller2026-03-19 07:09:472026-03-19 07:22:48‘I Was Deported And I Think It Was Justified’: Recent Deportee Who Went Viral Says Outlet Got His Story All Wrong
And still the world……blames the Jews. It’s a societal sickness, a madness.
In his own chilling words, would-be Muslim terror mastermind Walid Saadaoui boasted of his twisted desire to massacre British Jews, saying he wanted to ‘run rivers of their impure blood’ — with any murdered Christians ‘a bonus’.
The Tunisian-born former hotel entertainer, who was allowed to live in this country after marrying a British holidaymaker, said a knife would not be enough to satisfy his lust for what he saw as ‘revenge’ for Israel’s military operations in Gaza.
Telling a fellow extremist known as Farouk that ‘only the automatic gun’ would be capable of inflicting the slaughter he was planning, Saadaoui said: ‘I want to kill as many as possible.
‘Jews have reason to be fearful,’ top police officer says. Jewish communities in the country ‘put up with a way of life that nobody else has to put up with’, a police chief has said.
Sir Stephen Watson, the Chief Constable of Greater Manchester Police, said Jews ‘have more justification to be fearful than anybody else’, which needed to be addressed.
This is the moment a jihadist caught plotting the ‘worst ever’ terror attack on British Jews pledges allegiance to ISIS, saying they are ‘real Muslims’.
In a chilling reminder of how rising anti-Semitism since the October 7 massacre is fuelling violence against Jewish communities in the UK, migrants Amar Hussein and Walid Saadaoui had sought to buy a stash of firearms and over 900 rounds of ammunition.
But what police chiefs described as their ‘genuinely chilling’ plot was foiled by an ‘exceptionally brave’ undercover operative (UCO) sent to infiltrate the terror cell.
As the ‘committed terrorists’ were today jailed for a total of 63 years, the moment Hussein admitted he was an ISIS supporter was revealed.
Further new footage shows detectives finally telling Saadaoui that he has been duped, and that the man he regarded as an armourer and fellow terrorist has in fact been secretly recording all their conversations.
Jailing both men for life today, Mr Justice Mark Wall ordered Saadaoui to serve a minimum of 37 years and told Hussein he would spend at least 26 years in prison before being eligible for parole.
The judge commended the UCO for his bravery in bringing the pair to justice, saying: ‘His is a dangerous and difficult job and he undertook it with great skill and patience.
‘He has potentially saved very many lives by risking his own.’
Fuelled by a twisted desire to exact revenge for Israel’s military response to the Hamas atrocity on Britain’s streets, the extremists planned to gun down participants at a march against anti-Semitism in Manchester.
Harpreet Sandhu KC, prosecuting, told Preston Crown Court that the case had fallen between two other attacks on the Jewish community – one at a synagogue in Manchester and the other on Bondi Beach in Sydney – but stressed it ‘could have been very much more serious.’
‘I say this to demonstrate how widely affected the Jewish community and the world would have been had these terrorists’ ambitions been realised,’ the barrister added.
‘Had the preparations for mass murder been enacted, the defendants would have committed one of the deadliest attacks involving firearms in the UK’s history and certainly the worst firearms attack against the Jewish community.’
Tunisian-born Saadaoui – a former hotel entertainer who once ran an Italian restaurant in Great Yarmouth – and Hussein – who claimed to be a former Iraqi soldier and told police he was ‘proud’ to be a terrorist – planned to target schools and synagogues in the Manchester’s Jewish community.
The jihadists had spent six months in contact with ‘Abu Bilal’, unaware he was an undercover operative (UCO).
The UCO, who gave evidence under the pseudonym Farouk, duped them into believing a cache of assault rifles, handguns and hundreds of rounds of ammunition was being transported to the UK via a cross-Channel ferry.
He first engaged with Saadaoui online, then began meeting him in person, telling his bosses he believed ‘a lot of people’ would be killed if they failed to intervene.
Police were so worried about the UCO’s safety they established a huge armed operation to protect him.
Armed officers followed the UCO as he travelled with the men from Greater Manchester to the White Cliffs National Trust nature reserve near Dover, posing as tourists to observe the security checks at the port below, where the weapons were to be imported from France.
Assistant Chief Constable Rob Potts said the UCO ‘put himself in significant danger each time he met with two would-be terrorists. At any point he could have become a target himself.’
But he managed to conceal his identity and, unbeknown to the plotters, the apparently deadly arsenal consisted of deactivated guns.
Dramatic bodycam footage showed the moment officers pounced and arrested Saadaoui as he arrived for the handover in the car park of a Lancashire spa hotel on May 8, 2024, with a brief pursuit ensuing before he was dragged to the ground.
Simultaneously, Hussein was arrested at his electrical business.
Under questioning, Hussein – who told detectives he was ‘proud’ to be a terrorist – was asked if he supported ISIS, the bloodthirsty terrorist group also known as Islamic State.
Admitting he does, Hussein tells police: ‘All Muslims, they are hypocrites, but ISIS, they are real Muslims, they make Sharia.’
He later added: ‘I’m proud, be terrorist here, I’m proud. It’s not from us, god sent to us. We are army from god.’
At his own interview, Saadaoui is finally informed that he has been duped by ‘Abu Bilal’ and that he was in fact working undercover for counter-terror police.
The UCO was so convincing that initially, arrogant Saadaoui failed to believe them, adding: ‘I’ll still call him my mate cause I’ve bonded with him, he was a good guy.’
Breathing heavily at the bombshell news, he can be seen sticking to his story, telling detectives: ‘Whether he’s undercover or not, I was not expecting any guns to come over, I was not involved in any planning of harming people, and what I’ve said to you is true.’
https://drrichswier.com/wp-content/uploads/Muslim-Migrants-Caught-Plotting-to-Kill.jpg357640The Geller Reporthttp://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.pngThe Geller Report2026-02-15 04:35:422026-02-15 04:40:20Moment Muslim Migrants Caught Plotting to Kill ‘As Many Jews as Possible’ in UK’s ‘Worst Ever’ Terror Attack
Poland, a nation where Catholicism remains the dominant faith and ethnic homogeneity is among the highest in Europe, stands out as a model of stability, prosperity, and social cohesion in an increasingly fragmented world.
Poland consistently ranks among Europe’s safest countries, with a Crime Index of around 29 on Numbeo in 2025. This is far below levels in France (55.4), the United Kingdom (48.3), or Sweden (48). This safety largely stems from Poland’s homogeneity. Over 97 percent of Poles were born in Poland, while just 2.6 percent were foreign-born residents as of 2024.
Studies on social capital show that ethnic and cultural uniformity fosters higher interpersonal trust, stronger community ties, and lower crime rates. If close-knit communities can act as powerful buffers against crime, the same is true for an entire country with deep ties. The citizens build trust, support, and shared expectations that discourage bad behavior. These social bonds have long-lasting, positive effects that are passed down over generations.
Visitors and residents alike note clean, orderly streets and low fear of crime, a stark contrast to many Western European countries plagued by rising violence and disorder. Poland’s shared Catholic heritage serves as a common moral framework that promotes personal responsibility and neighborly solidarity, minimizing the social frictions that fuel criminality elsewhere. And while self-identified Catholics have declined to around 71 percent of the population in recent censuses, the country’s cultural fabric is still deeply woven with Catholic traditions that emphasize family, community, and moral order.
I have just spent some time in Poland and am now enjoying a glass of Champagne in the LOT lounge at Warsaw airport, waiting for my delayed flight. Here are a few reflections from Poland:
1. All those videos about Polish Christmas markets and cities are right: Poland is extremely… https://t.co/0cZIixWUPW
Economically, Poland is Europe’s standout performer. Its GDP growth is projected at 3.5 percent for 2026, outpacing the European Union (EU) average of around 1.4 percent.
Poland’s social policies remain proudly conservative, prioritizing family, tradition, and national sovereignty. Generous child benefits support high birth rates relative to European peers, while restrictive abortion laws and slower adoption of progressive reforms reflect enduring Catholic influence. This stands in contrast to Western Europe’s rapid secularization and social liberalization. A unified culture makes these policies sustainable. High-trust societies can maintain traditional norms without fear of cultural erosion, fostering the social cohesion needed for family-oriented programs.
Strict immigration controls, like welcoming contributors who are culturally similar while rejecting mandatory EU quotas, preserve their unity. In an era when many nations grapple with division, declining trust, and stagnation, Poland shows that preserving cultural and ethnic connectedness, anchored in a Catholic moral tradition, delivers tangible benefits. Poles enjoy safer streets, thriving economies, and resilient families.
The most incredible thing about their country is that they haven’t once apologized for their homogeneity. Their embrace of continued cultural traditions is an example for the rest of the world to follow. It’s not only okay for countries to protect their cultural identity, but an absolute must if they want to survive.
https://drrichswier.com/wp-content/uploads/Poland-a-nation-where-Catholicism-remains-the-dominant-faith.jpg350640The Daily Callerhttp://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.pngThe Daily Caller2026-01-14 05:50:132026-01-14 05:57:13ROOKE: Country Mostly Made Of Catholics Shows Rest Of World How It’s Done
I began writing about the persecution of British journalist Tommy Robinson several years ago during President Trump’s first term in office (2017-2021). An article I wrote in July 2019, “The Humanitarian Hoax of Tommy Robinson’s Conviction: The Death of Free Speech,” became Hoax 38: The Humanitarian Hoax of Tolerism, in my 2020 release, The Book of Humanitarian Hoaxes: Killing America with ‘Kindness’ (pp. 169-173). The importance of Tommy Robinson cannot be exaggerated or overstated. Tommy Robinson is the Everyman who represents decency, and the unified voices of millions of men and women around the world who have two explicit demands. First, that their western governments uphold the Judeo-Christian values and norms upon which their nations were founded. Second, that their governments reject the anti-western values and norms of sharia-compliant Muslim immigrants who are inundating and destabilizing their countries.
We are a world at war: Globalism vs. Nationalism. Demography is destiny, and the globalist elite are waging war on independent nation states by tactically using Islamic population jihad to overwhelm and collapse western countries from within, in order to strategically impose globalism’s own dystopian, planetary Unistate. I am reposting my July 2019 article so that we can examine the politics and policy changes made in the last six years and determine the progress of globalism’s War on Nationalism.
The Humanitarian Hoax of Tommy Robinson’s Conviction: The Death of Free Speech – hoax 38
The Humanitarian Hoax is a deliberate and deceitful tactic of presenting a destructive policy as altruistic. The humanitarian huckster presents himself as a compassionate advocate when in fact he is the disguised enemy.
The conviction of journalist Tommy Robinson is a humanitarian hoax that has destroyed free speech in England and threatens free speech worldwide. What does this have to do with America?
Tommy Robinson is a British journalist who has been reporting on Muslim rape gangs throughout England that have been raping little English school girls with impunity for decades. The savagery of their acts, and that British authorities are covering up this massive atrocity against the innocent, is extremely destabilizing to British society. Civilized people reject the protection of perpetrators at the expense of victims.
For civilized people, Tommy Robinson is the heroic whistleblower who exposed the horror of Muslim rape gangs and their unspeakable acts of barbarity in England. British society experiences enormous confusion and cognitive dissonance because British authorities protect Muslim rape gangs and embolden them by prohibiting the reporting of their heinous acts of savagery. Why is this happening?
Let’s sort this out by examining the reasons in numerical order.
1. Tolerism
Tolerism is defined by Howard Rotberg in his 2014 book, Tolerism: The Ideology Revealed, as “excessive leniency to opinions of certain groups, and excessive intolerance to the opinions of other groups.” Rotberg explains that the breakdown of Western society is a direct result of Leftist tolerists who insist that tolerance is more valuable than justice.
The once free Britain has reduced itself to a dhimmi nation by tolerating its sharia compliant Muslim population at the expense of its native Christian population. Make no mistake, there is an Islamic religious war being waged worldwide that seeks to eliminate competing religions and establish a global Islamic caliphate ruled by religious sharia law. Britain’s leaders are tolerists insisting that tolerating Muslim rape gangs in the name of cultural diversity is more important than justice for its victims. Tolerism is Britain’s fatally flawed political ideology providing victory to the Muslim Brotherhood, the multi-national organization that has declared Islamic religious war on the West.
Populism rejects the twisted logic of political tolerism and embraces the commonsense warning of Austrian/British 20th century philosopher Sir Karl Popper:
If we extend unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not prepared to defend a tolerant society against the onslaught of the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them. . .. We should therefore claim, in the name of tolerance, the right not to tolerate the intolerant.
The British court’s decision values tolerance over justice. Why would they do that?
2. Leftist/Islamist Alliance
In America the Leftist/Islamist alliance is trying to destabilize and overthrow duly elected populist President Donald Trump [[45]. POTUS is the consummate whistleblower in America, exposing the staggering malfeasance of the Washington swamp and the Leftists, Islamists, and globalists who live there.
Leftists in America ignore, “Islamic tenets of misogyny, homophobia, antisemitism, pedophilia, gang raping non-Muslim little girls, female genital mutilation, and wife beating as long as these sharia-compliant Muslims are anti-American anti-Trumpers. Any anti-American anti-Trump Islamist is welcomed into the Leftist tribe because they are all warriors in the Culture War against America. America-first President Donald Trump is the existential enemy of the Culture War and the target of the Leftist/Islamist alliance.”
In England, the Labor party is equivalent to the Leftist Democrat party in America, both prefer globalism to national sovereignty. In England, the Labor/Islamist alliance is trying to destabilize England and create chaos to subvert the will of the people and stop the implementation of BREXIT.
So, what do President Trump [45] and journalist Tommy Robinson have in common? Tommy Robinson is the whistleblower in England and an existential enemy of the leftist Labor party that prefers tolerism to justice.
Everyman Tommy Robinson and President Trump [45] are claiming, in the name of tolerance, the right not to tolerate the intolerant.
3. Tolerism vs Justice
What is the goal of tolerism in England and America? Why do Leftists in America and Labor in England ignore the obvious violations of the laws and norms in their Judeo-Christian countries and surrender their culture to the savagery and barbarism of Islamic sharia norms?
Tolerism is a paradox because tolerists selectively decide what to tolerate. Whistleblowing and truth-telling about Muslim rape gangs is not tolerated––it is criminalized. So, a two-tier system of justice is established that prohibits anti-Muslim speech and protects anti-Christian and antisemitic speech. Why?
If you want to know the motive, look at the result. The effect of this egregious double standard is that anti-Christian burning of churches, and antisemitism including defacing synagogues is rampant and unpunished in England. If the British courts continue to protect sharia compliant Muslim perpetrators and their criminal acts at the expense of native Britains, social chaos will result. Remember, seismic social change requires social chaos.
Everyman Tommy Robinson and President Trump [45], each in his own way, is exposing the truth of tolerism and its global anti-American, anti-British attacks on our sovereignty and shared Judeo-Christian norms. Their separate efforts continue to unravel the ongoing deceitful multi-national efforts fomenting the social chaos necessary to impose a globalized New World Order.
Sir Karl Popper warned us about tolerism. George Orwell warned us that, “During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.”
4. Freedom of Speech
Every tyrannical regime the world has ever known begins its reign of terror by eliminating freedom of speech. Lenin did it, Trotsky did it, Hitler did it, now Leftists in England and in America are doing it by disingenuously relabeling free speech as hate speech. There is no freedom without freedom of speech which is why speech is universally the first freedom eliminated by despots.
The same tolerist Culture War being waged against America by the Leftist/Islamist alliance is attacking England. Leftism and Islamism have common cause to destroy the status quo even though their ultimate objectives will make them inevitable enemies. The Islamists are fighting for a global religious Islamic caliphate. The Leftists/Labor are fighting to destroy the national sovereignty and cultural identities of their respective countries in preparation for socialism in America, and a unified European State in England.
The irony, of course, is that members of the Leftist/Labor/Islamist alliance are all useful idiots for the globalist elite who finance and foment their lawlessness. The alliance members are just too arrogant to realize they are participating in their own destruction.
Seismic social change requires social chaos. The Leftist/Labor/Islamic alliances in the United States and England are providing the necessary social chaos for the globalists who fully intend to impose a New World Order––an internationalized planetary Unistate ruled by themselves under the lethally corrupt auspices of the United Nations. There is no humanitarianism in the conviction of whistleblower Tommy Robinson. His conviction is part of the coordinated attack on free speech and a free and sovereign England imposed by the globalist elite using tolerism and the unholy Labor/Islamist alliance.
July 8, 2019, will be recorded as the day free speech died in Britain, the day Tommy Robinson was convicted for reporting the crime of Muslim rape gangs in England. The only law that Tommy Robinson broke was the Islamic supremacist sharia law forbidding criticism of Islam. Islamic sharia law does not consider the raping of little English school girls to be a crime––the prohibition is against criticizing and reporting it. England has reduced itself to a grotesque dhimmi nation willing to sacrifice its own little girls and boys in a globalist power grab that requires social chaos.
The humanitarian hoax of tolerism that convicted Tommy Robinson must not be allowed to silence him permanently. Hopefully, populist President Donald Trump [45] will grant Tommy Robinson humanitarian asylum in the United States where he can continue to expose the realities of an Islamicized England. Britain is, after all, the proverbial canary in the expansionist Islamist coal mine.
In fact, President Trump 45 did not grant Tommy Robinson political asylum, and for the last six years Tommy Robinson has been arrested, persecuted, prosecuted, and imprisoned in England. Why? What is his crime? Tommy Robinson tells the inconvenient truth about active Muslim rape gangs being protected by Britain’s progressivegovernments for decades.
Tommy Robinson is the once and future paradigm of political prisoning in Britain. He is a victim of the two-tier system of political justice in western countries where leftist/globalist progressivegovernments protect anti-western sharia-compliant immigrants at the expense of law-abiding citizens.
In 2025, President Trump 47 is busy dismantling the radical, anti-American, leftist/globalist progressivecapture of America’s government institutions implemented by the Obama/Biden administrations. It is a Herculean task that is being vigorously opposed by the enemies of American freedom.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio, announced on August 12, 2025, that the Trump administration is advancing plans to designate the Muslim Brotherhood as a foreign terrorist organization, citing its ties to Hamas and other extremist factions. Recognition of the Muslim Brotherhood as a terrorist organization is one of the most important initiatives in reestablishing our Judeo-Christian infrastructure, protecting our constitution, and preserving our national sovereignty.
The innocence of children is being attacked by Muslim rape gangs in England, by anti-American Marxist indoctrination in progressive American government schools, by progressive policies in Canada, and by progressiveenemies of the State in Israel. Everything is connected, and the globalist elite are swinging progressivism’scoordinated wrecking ball to collapse western civilization by destroying its Judeo-Christian infrastructure, including its morality which protects the individual, individual sovereignty, the innocence of children, and the sovereignty of the nation state.
Tommy Robinson is Everyman’s commitment to the protection of children living in western nations. We in America are not in the business of telling the communist and sharia-compliant nations of the world how to live their lives, but we can and must protect Western civilization first by protecting the innocence of its children. We are living in an era of stupefying universal deceit when even the existence of objective reality is being challenged. We are at a turning point in history. We the people in America, in Britain, in Canada, and in Israel, can resurrect our nations and save our souls by making our countries moral again.
Globalism is a replacement ideology, and its incremental progress is toward establishment of the globalist elite’s dystopian world government, where individual and national sovereignty is replaced with planetary feudalism. In the globalist Unistate the people’s future is humanity’s feudal past. The globalist war is a war of attrition. My generation of American patriots is dying. My children’s generation of millennials is transitional. It is my grandchildren and great-grandchildren who are the primary targets of the globalist elite. And it is the globalist elite who are funding and fomenting worldwide proxy wars to destroy the innocence of the western world’s precious children.
Make no mistake, the rape of little English school girls is the key to understanding the globalist elite and their wrecking ball, and Tommy Robinson is globalism’s existential enemy in England. Muslim rape gangs are funded, fomented, and protected by the globalist elite, because the globalist elite are in the business of soul murder. Any society that can ignore the intentional destruction of innocent children is already dead. But the English people can Make Britain Moral Again (MBMA), the Americans can Make America Moral Again (MAMA), the Canadians can Make Canada Moral Again (MCMA), and the Israelis can Make Israel Moral Again (MIMA).
We the people of the world must stand together and say NO! We are the mothers, fathers, grandmothers, grandfathers, uncles, aunts, friends, and neighbors who must protect the innocence of children. We are the family of man who must stand together and fight for the children, because the children cannot protect themselves. Elon Musk is correct––Tommy Robinson is the key to understanding the entire globalist megalomaniacal scheme to impose one world government––and it is not just Britain’s soul that is in lockdown. America’s soul is teetering on collapse. The western world must recognize that progressivism’s multiculturalism is the seismic humanitarian hoax that advances globalism’s population jihad, population replacement, the destruction of children’s innocence, and western societal collapse––one rape at a time.
We must reject progressivism’s moral relativism and state unequivocally: Right and wrong exist. Raping little girls and boys is simply wrong. It is wrong anywhere and everywhere and anytime it happens in the world. Period. Now, that wasn’t so hard, was it?
Space Is No Longer the Final Frontier––Reality Is is available in paperback, hardback, and ebook formats on barnesandnoble.com, amazon.com, and directly from Ingram in paperback.
https://drrichswier.com/wp-content/uploads/tommy-robinson-smiling-e1529407570347.jpeg371640Linda Goudsmithttp://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.pngLinda Goudsmit2025-08-30 11:32:212025-08-30 11:37:55The Persecution of Tommy Robinson
President Donald Trump said point-blank Monday that London Mayor Sadiq Khan is a “nasty person” while sitting right next to United Kingdom Prime Minister Keir Starmer.
Trump told reporters in Turnberry, Scotland, that he plans to visit London, England, even though he believes Khan has done a “terrible job” as mayor. Starmer defended the London mayor by calling him a “friend,” though Trump still did not hold back.
“I’m not a fan of your mayor. I think he’s done a terrible job, the mayor of London. [He] is a nasty person,” Trump said. “I think he’s done a terrible job, but I would certainly visit London, yeah,” Trump continued.
Starmer chimed in to say that Khan is “a friend of mine, actually.”
WATCH:
Trump and Khan have held longstanding resentments against each other since his first term. In 2019, Khan compared Trump to the “fascists of the 20th century” in an op-ed where he lamented the president’s visit to the United Kingdom. In response, Trump called the London mayor a “stone cold loser” and criticized his handling of the city’s problems.
Khan, who denounced Trump’s views on Islam as “ignorant” in May 2016, suggested that his proposed policies to restrict the number of Muslims coming into the U.S. from the Middle East would lead to more attacks against the U.S.
Following the 2024 election, Khan stated that Trump’s victory means that “progress is not inevitable” and that many Londoners would fear for “democracy and women’s rights.”
“The lesson of today is that progress is not inevitable. But asserting our progressive values is more important than ever — re-committing to building a world where racism and hatred is rejected, the fundamental rights of women and girls are upheld, and where we continue to tackle the crisis of climate change head on,” Khan said.
In response to Trump’s most recent jab, a spokesperson for Khan stated that they are “delighted” to show him how “diversity makes [London] stronger,” according to The Independent.
“Sadiq is delighted that president Trump wants to come to the greatest city in the world. He’d see how our diversity makes us stronger, not weaker; richer, not poorer. Perhaps these are the reasons why a record number of Americans have applied for British citizenship under his presidency,” the spokesperson said.
The mayor has accused Trump of singling him out on the world stage because he is Muslim, according to The Independent.
All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.
http://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.png00The Daily Callerhttp://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.pngThe Daily Caller2025-07-28 15:44:142025-07-28 15:50:26Trump Calls London Mayor A ‘Nasty Person’ Right To Keir Starmer’s Face
Anyone who doubts Tommy’s explanation for why he was imprisoned just needs to look at all the people jailed for telling the truth about the Southport stabbings. The UK is a nascent Orwellian state. But it is maturing as one very quickly.
Note that Great Britain is now charging Tommy for all their legal costs for sending him to jail. I was not aware that was a thing outside of the Soviet Union.
Tommy has launched FightTheMail.com — a campaign to hold the media accountable and stand up for free speech. This isn’t just about one man. It’s about pushing back against a system that protects powerful interests and punishes dissent.
http://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.png00Vlad Tepes Bloghttp://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.pngVlad Tepes Blog2025-05-27 12:38:282025-05-27 13:16:07UK: Tommy Robinson’s First Interview After Being Released from Prison
Each era is granted its mass hysteria. Granted, a dancing plague is mild compared to “convincing young girls to cut off healthy body parts” — but signs point to reality reasserting itself.
Look no further than a recent judgment from Britain’s Supreme Court, ruling that men who self-identify as “trans women” are not to be legally regarded as women. The court “holds that the terms ‘man,’ ‘woman’ and ‘sex’ in the EA 2010 refer to biological sex,” reads their press summary.
Males with 5ARD are not female.
Trans-identified people remain protected under UK law.
The Supreme Court has confirmed that trans-identified men are not entitled to women’s sex-based rights.
I’m sorry you don’t have better talking points. pic.twitter.com/ulYG15MgUt
The ruling is hardly a wholesale repudiation of the nonsensical logic which underpins transgender theory. The court draws a distinction between sex and gender, tacitly claiming the latter can be “reassigned” via surgery, and acknowledges “transsexual people” as a protected class.
“On the one hand, women have historically suffered from discrimination in our society and since 1975 have been given statutory protection against discrimination on the ground of sex,” reads the judgment. “On the other hand, the trans community is both historically and currently a vulnerable community.”
Regardless, even the obvious assertion that “men are not women” would have been difficult to eke out of a judiciary during the height of transgender mania.
Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson infamously claimed she could not define the word “woman” in her confirmation hearing.
“Can I provide a definition? No, I can’t,” said Jackson in response to Republican Tennessee Sen. Marsha Blackburn. “Not in this context, I’m not a biologist.” Britain’s Supreme Court will be stunned and pleased to know they’ve acquired a bachelor’s degree in biology overnight. As will the billions of common-sense human beings who are capable of drawing this fundamental distinction.
Such common-sense people are fed up.
One of Donald Trump’s most effective campaign ads during his 2024 presidential run spoke to this fatigue: “Kamala is for they/them, President Trump is for you.” Some Democrats, like Democratic Gov. of California Gavin Newsom, appear to be distancing themselves from the contentious issue. Others employ a higher-risk strategy in response to the American people: closing their eyes and covering their ears and whistling really loudly.
Transgenderism was supposed to be the next great frontier of civil rights. It has amounted to nothing more than a puzzling historical footnote with a tragic human cost.
http://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.png00The Daily Callerhttp://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.pngThe Daily Caller2025-04-17 15:44:442025-04-17 15:44:44The UK Knows What A Woman Is — When Will Democrats Figure It Out?
A British jury convicted United Nations Judge Lydia Mugambe on Thursday of forcing a Ugandan woman into domestic servitude after luring her to the U.K. under false pretenses.
Mugambe, who also serves as a high court judge in Uganda, brought the victim to Britain under the guise of securing her a job in a diplomatic household — only to make her work as an unpaid maid and nanny. She confiscated the victim’s passport and visa, leaving her trapped until she was able to contact a friend, who alerted authorities, according to a Thames Valley Police statement.
“Lydia Mugambe used her position to exploit a vulnerable young woman, controlling her freedom and making her work without payment,” Eran Clutliffe, an attorney for the Crown Prosecution Service’s Special Crime Division, said.
The 49-year-old judge, who was studying for a doctorate at the University of Oxford at the time, according to her profile on the U.N.’s website, was found guilty on four charges, including forced labor, an immigration offense and conspiracy to intimidate a witness. Mugambe is also listed on Columbia University’s website as a fellow in their human rights program. Prosecutors argued she “exploited and abused” the victim’s lack of knowledge about her rights to keep her in a state of servitude.
Mugambe leveraged her connections within the Ugandan High Commission in London to secure a visa for the victim, presenting it as an official employment opportunity, according to court testimony. Instead of placing the woman in a diplomatic household, however, Mugambe brought her to her private residence and forced her to work without pay.
The case shocked observers, with audible gasps heard in the courtroom as the verdicts were delivered at Oxford Crown Court, according to the Associated Press. Mugambe reportedly appeared distressed and unwell following the decision, prompting the judge to clear the courtroom.
Mugambe, who was appointed to a U.N. international court in May 2023, denied all changes. She is now scheduled for sentencing on May 2.
All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.
http://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.png00The Daily Callerhttp://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.pngThe Daily Caller2025-03-14 12:14:172025-03-14 12:17:25Columbia University Human Rights Fellow Convicted For Having A Slave
The documentary filmmaker Hoyo Films paid hundreds of thousands of pounds to a Hamas-linked family for a BBC documentary. It’s a major scandal, and more about it can be found here: “BBC Apologizes for ‘Unacceptable’ Mistakes With Gaza Documentary, Admits Palestinian Interviewees’ Ties to Hamas,” by Shiryn Ghermezian, Algemeiner, February 28, 2025:
Deborah Turness, the CEO of BBC News and Current Affairs, sent an e-mail to staff on Thursday that included a statement about the documentary, remarks which were publicly shared on Friday by a BBC spokesperson.
In the statement, the BBC said it takes complete editorial responsibility for the film and admitted that the corporation and Hoyo Films, the production company behind the documentary, have made “unacceptable” flaws in the making of the documentary. “BBC News takes full responsibility for these and the impact that these have had on the Corporation’s reputation. We apologize for this.”
The spokesperson added that the BBC was not informed in advance by Hoyo Films about Abdullah’s family connection to Hamas….
The BBC suspected something was wrong, something involving Hamas, which is why it repeatedly asked Hoyo Films about whether any of those involved in making the film were linked to Hamas. But when Hoyo Films refused to answer, the BBC ought at that point have pulled the film before it was shown. It did not, but instead heedlessly decided to show it. Only after the propaganda film was released, and the damage done to Israel, did Hoyo Films admit that it had known all along about the family connection to Hamas of the young narrator. Clearly, Hoyo Films wanted that film to be shown no matter what. In fact, it seems to have deliberately chosen Al-Yazouri to be the narrator, not despite, but because of, his link to Hamas. No doubt that Hamas connection made it easier to shoot the film, with Hamas eager to collaborate. Will the BBC now investigate those on its staff responsible for commissioning this “documentary” and why they let it be aired when they had reason to believe that the narrator was connected to Hamas? Will those investigators look into why such large sums were given by Hoyo Films to the Hamas-linked Al-Yazouri family?
Hoyo Films told the corporation that it paid Abdullah’s mother “a limited sum of money” for narrating the film by way of his sister’s bank account, according to the BBC. Hoyo Films “assured BBC” no payments were given to Hamas members or its affiliates “either directly, in kind, or as a gift,” and the corporation is “seeking additional assurance” about the film’s budget. The BBC said it will initiate a full audit of the film’s expenses and is asking Hoyo Films for financial accounts to help with the audit….
Hoyo Films describes the amount it paid to Abdullah’s mother as “a limited sum of money.” This is a lie; it paid her hundreds of thousands of pounds, an enormous amount, most of which ended up in the coffers of Hamas. Who at Hoyo Films decided to pay such large amounts, and who at the BBC may have known about them, and approved such a transfer of wealth from British license-payers to Hamas terrorists?
Much too late, the BBC realized that Hoyo Films’ “assurances” about no payments going to Hamas members or its affiliates “either directly, in kind, or as a gift” were lies. It may even find, after an audit, that such emoluments went not just to the Al-Yazouri family, but to others connected with Hamas who helped Hoyo Films with its “documentary,” as members of the camera crew. These are the people who selected, or staged, the most heartrending views of children searching through the rubble of their destroyed dwellings, or carrying off food and water from the aid trucks, or even shown as wounded victims of Israeli airstrikes, being rushed into hospitals in the arms of their parents.
The propagandistic value of this film to Hamas was enormous, and the production company’s refusal to warn the BBC about the Hamas link to the main narrator and two of its camera crew should make it ineligible to receive future commissions for other films from the BBC.
For years — decades — those who report on Israel and the Palestinians for the BBC have, without exception, been deeply biased against the Jewish state. They include John Simpson, Jeremy Bowen, Lyse Doucet, Barbara Plett Usher (who wept for “the old man” when Arafat died), and Yolande Knell. But at least they were not paying off terrorist organizations to supply them with material that would make Israel look bad. In this case, however, the BBC had hired Hoyo Films to produce a documentary about children living in Gaza that turned out to be narrated by a Hamas-linked 13-year-old. The “documentary” itself was a vehicle for Hamas propagandists, with the tear-jerking sights of children poking in the rubble of Gaza, of wounded toddlers screaming as they were rushed into hospitals, or were shown being held by their desperate or grieving parents. Now the British government has committed itself to investigating the BBC for its failures, from showing the film even without receiving any assurances from Hoyo Films that no one connected to Hamas had any role in the making of the film, to not investigating the enormous sums paid by Hoyo Films to a Hamas- linked family, sums that were charged to the BBC and thus, ultimately, came from the license fees British taxpayers are required to pay the BBC. The BBC’s coverage of Israel and the Palestinians — and not just in this latest incident — will now face a day of reckoning.
http://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.png00Jihad Watchhttp://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.pngJihad Watch2025-03-04 05:39:292025-03-04 05:43:32BBC Produces a Propaganda Film for Hamas
Elon Musk ignited a political firestorm in Britain after accusing Prime Minister Keir Starmer of complicity in the “rape of Britain” Friday, reanimating a years-old debate over organized child sexual exploitation by predominately Muslim Pakistani men.
Musk has ravaged Starmer and other U.K. officials in a barrage of tweets over the past week, primarily accusing Starmer of inadequately prosecuting rape gangs during his tenure as director of public prosecutions (DPP) from 2008 to 2013. The SpaceX founder also attacked Safeguarding Minister Jess Phillips, who he said “deserves to be in prison,” for blocking a government-led inquiry into child sexual exploitation by gangs in Oldham, a northern England town.
“Starmer was complicit in the RAPE OF BRITAIN when he was head of Crown Prosecution for 6 years,” Musk wrote. “Starmer must go and he must face charges for his complicity in the worst mass crime in the history of Britain.”
Starmer was complicit in the RAPE OF BRITAIN when he was head of Crown Prosecution for 6 years.
Starmer must go and he must face charges for his complicity in the worst mass crime in the history of Britain.
The recent flurry of attacks mark the world’s richest man’s latest incursion into international political affairs, with Musk now focusing in particular on the United Kingdom’s decades-long struggle to curb the proliferation of “grooming gangs” primarily comprised of Pakistani-descended men who mainly target native Briton girls for sexual exploitation, The Telegraph reported in an analysis of the persistent issue.
The most infamous cases involving these gangs occurred in northern England towns like Oldham, Telford and Rotherham — the severity of which has been whitewashed for fear of accusations of Islamophobia, according to The Telegraph.
“To protect ‘community relations’, the British state has gone to immense lengths to cover it up,” he wrote. “Reports have been blocked and deliberately kept out of the public eye. Any connection with ethnicity, immigration, or Islam was downplayed … the evidence that British Pakistani men were over-represented among the perpetrators was spiked to avoid uncomfortable truths.”
Musk Starmer and the Labour government with operating a two-tiered justice system, suggesting in a meme Thursday that the prime minister prosecutes “rape and violent crime” with leniency while instead focusing on policing online speech. He also said the Labour Party “opposes a national inquiry on the mass rape of little girls in Britain for one reason only: It will show that they were complicit.”
The prime minister defended his prosecutorial record as DPP in a press conference Monday, saying he “brought the first major prosecution of an Asian grooming gang in this particular case” and “changed the whole prosecution approach.” While largely avoiding mentioning Musk by name, Starmer also condemned the spread of what he called “lies and misinformation” from detractors who are “interested in themselves” rather than the victims.
Starmer also defended Phillips in the press conference, insisting she has done “a thousand times more than they’ve even dreamt about when it comes to protecting victims of sexual abuse throughout her entire career.” Phillips blocked a Tory-led motion Thursday to hold a public inquiry into the historic sexual abuse in Oldham because it was for “Oldham council alone” to decide whether one was necessary, according to The Telegraph.
Musk’s attacks are not limited to the Labour Party alone, however. The Tesla CEO also called for Nigel Farage, the architect of Brexit and the leader of the Reform Party, to be replaced as party leader because he “doesn’t have what it takes.”
The Reform Party needs a new leader. Farage doesn’t have what it takes.
The comments come hours after Farage referred to Musk as a “friend” in an interview with the BBC’s “Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg” program.
“Well, this is a surprise!” Farage wrote in response to Musk. “Elon is a remarkable individual but on this I am afraid I disagree. My view remains that Tommy Robinson is not right for Reform and I will never sell out my principles.”
Well, this is a surprise! Elon is a remarkable individual but on this I am afraid I disagree.
My view remains that Tommy Robinson is not right for Reform and I never sell out my principles. https://t.co/V7iccN6usS
The rift between Farage and Musk seems to stem from Farage’s longstanding attempt to distance his political movement from Tommy Robinson, a longtime British anti-immigration activist currently imprisoned for contempt of court after “repeating false claims against a Syrian refugee,” according to the BBC.
Musk has repeatedly called for Robinson’s release and characterized his imprisonment as politically motivated, while Farage cited UKIP’s “obsess[ion] with Islam and Tommy Robinson” in a letter published in The Telegraph announcing his departure from the party in 2018 after 25 years.
Musk has also recently commented on political affairs in Germany, writing that “AfD is the only hope” for the country on Dec. 21, 2024.
The United Kingdom’s Cabinet Office told the Daily Caller News Foundation it had “nothing further to add to the PM’s words earlier today.”
All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.
http://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.png00The Daily Callerhttp://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.pngThe Daily Caller2025-01-07 14:20:022025-01-09 05:51:16Musk Completely Derails UK Political Establishment, Accuses PM’s Party Of Covering Up Muslim Rape Gangs
Elon Musk now opposes Nigel Farage, following seemingly friendly talks with the Reform UK leader at Mar-a-Lago. After those discussions, the Reform Party released this statement:
“We learned a great deal about the Trump ground game and will have ongoing discussions on other areas,” it added. “We only have one more chance left to save the west and we can do great things together. Our thanks also to President Trump for allowing us to use Mar-a-Lago for this historic meeting. The special relationship is alive and well.”
But then in a blow to Farage, Musk has now called for him to be replaced.
“Elon Musk turns on Nigel Farage and calls for new leader of Reform,”by Peter Walker, Guardian, January 5, 2024:
Elon Musk has called for Nigel Farage to be replaced as Reform UK leader hours after Farage described the billionaire businessman as “a hero”, in what is likely to be a preview of how a chaotic Donald Trump presidency could affect British politics.
Farage, who is also the de facto owner of Reform, “doesn’t have what it takes”, Musk said on X, the social media platform he owns, less than three weeks after the pair held seemingly warm talks at Trump’s Florida home. “The Reform party needs a new leader,” he wrote.
Musk, 53, who has sent a mass of largely misleading posts in recent days about a series of aspects of UK politics, appeared to endorse Rupert Lowe, the Great Yarmouth MP, as a possible replacement, saying statements he had read from Lowe “make a lot of sense”.
Later, Lowe backed Farage, posting on X: “Nigel is leader of Reform. He made Brexit happen, and for that I will always be grateful….
Farage himself connected Musk’s turning on him to Tommy Robinson:
Farage, 60, indicated Musk’s statement could be connected to a disagreement about Tommy Robinson, the jailed far-right anti-Islam agitator whom Musk has characterised as a political prisoner, but whom Farage condemns.
“Well, this is a surprise!” Farage wrote on X after Musk’s tweet. “Elon is a remarkable individual but on this I am afraid I disagree. My view remains that Tommy Robinson is not right for Reform and I never sell out my principles.”
Farage has distanced himself from Robinson, saying:
“I never wanted Tommy Robinson to join UKIP ….I don’t want him to join Reform UK; and he won’t be.”
Farage also claimed that Tommy Robinson is not a political prisoner:
Mr Musk “sees Robinson as one of these people that fought against the grooming gangs…But of course the truth is Tommy Robinson’s in prison not for that, but for contempt of court….We’re a political party aiming to win the next general election. He’s not what we need.”
It does appear that Musk may have soured on Farage due to the latter’s views on Robinson, at least in part, given the strength of Musk’s support for Robinson:
But leadership material involves more than a single issue. It involves resilience and know-how on multiple issues including economics, national security, the rule of law, and protection of Western interests and freedoms. There is also another possible and related reason for Musk’s deciding that Farage was lacking, which carries deeper implications than Farage’s lack of support for Tommy Robinson:
This view isn’t unique to Farage. Far too many politicians of every political stripe feel that they must prove to their countries and to the world that they are not “Islamophobic.” Yet it isn’t possible to prove such a thing to the collective Muslim world unless you ultimately are willing to give up all speech deemed offensive to Islam, in accordance with Islamic blasphemy laws, as well as to turn against Israel in favor of the “resistance” from the River to the Sea, and allow pro-Hamas thugs to “globalize the intifada.” Islam is about Sharia expansion, conquest, and dhimmitude, and the Muslim vote is dependent on it. The more you surrender, the more you will be expected to surrender. It is only necessary that Westerners stand firmly and without apology against any doctrine equally that threatens Western values and freedoms. For all his talk about not alienating Muslims, Farage’s own immigration policies and his latest defence of Musk for the latter’s attack on the UK government’s response to Muslim rape gangs will ultimately cause Farage to alienate Muslim groups.
More will likely come to light about Musk’s statement against Farage, but in the meantime, Reform MPs are now reportedly rallying behind Farage.
http://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.png00Jihad Watchhttp://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.pngJihad Watch2025-01-07 08:13:372025-01-07 08:17:05Musk says Farage should be replaced as leader of Reform. Was it over Tommy Robinson or Farage’s views on Islam?
The first rule of Muslim atrocities in the UK is that you’re not supposed to talk about them. Not long ago the Starmer regime unleashed a ruthless purge against anyone who mentioned that a Muslim terrorist had stabbed a bunch of little girls, declaring that it was a national emergency to shut down any speech on the matter.
But the topic of Pakistani Muslim ‘grooming gangs’ and the atrocities they committed against huge numbers of young English girls, and the role the authorities played in covering that up, has once again come to the surface.
The British authorities not only enabled and covered up for the Muslim rape gangs, but they arrested the parents and girls as young as 12 for even mentioning it. This level of treasonous horror is something that may not be discussed, but Musk suddenly began discussing it.
And the media is freaking out because the Starmer regime can’t simply send a few ‘lesbian nana’ bobbies to raid Musk’s digs the way they can most ordinary people in the UK.
Here’s a headline sample of the freakout.
Musk accused of ‘politicising’ rape of young girls in UK to attack Starmer – The Guardian
UK Right Warns Trump Allies That Musk’s Posts Have Gone Too Far – Bloomberg
Keir Starmer must slap Elon Musk down – before someone gets killed – The New European
Ministers hit back at Elon Musk as tech billionaire steps up attack on Keir Starmer over grooming gangs – Evening Standard
Elon Musk Faces Fury Over Support for Jailed Fascist Leader – – The Daily Beast
In a regime built on lies about Islam, no one is prepared for the subject to be aired in public. The UK authorities, across the spectrum, have been complicit in allowing Islam to dominate the UK. It’s past time for a reckoning.
Part of the outrage here has been directed at Safeguarding Minister Jess Phillips for rejecting requests for an inquiry into the Pakistani Muslim sex grooming gangs.
Despite her vocal opposition to violence against women and girls, Phillips may be worried about opening herself up to allegations of Islamophobia after nearly losing her seat to a pro-Gaza independent candidate last year.
Islam.
British politicians have been bribed, suborned, corrupted and intimidated into remaining quiet about Islamization. Those young girls paid the price.
http://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.png00Jihad Watchhttp://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.pngJihad Watch2025-01-05 05:25:362025-01-05 05:40:42Media Freaks Out Over Musk’s Muslim Rape Gang Tweets
For the first time, the Reform UK Party has surpassed the oldest political party in membership numbers, becoming the second largest party in the UK. Reform UK now has more members than the 131,680 Conservative base.
Reform UK had merely 40,000 members in June, when Farage returned as its leader.
The Conservative Party has also seen “a number of significant Conservative defections to its ranks.” That’s because the Conservatives went too far left under the misguided idea that it would gain support from more centrist liberals. The left has become so radical and woke that many Western voters are finally waking up to the fact that Western countries are losing their freedoms, its collective common sense, and the rule of law.
There’s still a long way to go in Britain. Labour membership was at 366,604 in March 2024; since then, however, its leader Keir Starmer has become “more unpopular after five months than any other PM in over 40 years.”
“Reform membership overtakes Conservative Party membership for first time,” by Millie Cooke, Independent, December 26, 2024:
Membership of Reform UK has surpassed that of the Conservatives, Nigel Farage’s party has claimed, making it the second-largest political party in the UK.
A digital counter on the Reform website showed a membership tally before lunchtime on Boxing Day ticking past the 131,680 figure declared by the Conservative Party during its leadership election earlier this year.
Mr Farage said it was a “historic moment”, as he posted on X: “The youngest political party in British politics has just overtaken the oldest political party in the world.
“Reform UK are now the real opposition.”…
http://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.png00Jihad Watchhttp://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.pngJihad Watch2024-12-28 15:12:452024-12-28 15:19:34UNITED KINGDOM: Reform Party becomes second largest, overtakes Conservatives for the first time ever
