VIDEO: Apocalyptic Iran — 9 Minimum Requirements!

/in , /by

Today is part 3 of a 5 part series on the absolute BAD deal that the United States of America is negotiating with the Islamic Republic of Iran regarding the nuclear weapon capability of Iran. Our big idea is that the U.S. must get at least 9 minimum requirements from Iran in order to agree to this critical deal that determines the stability of the Middle East and indeed the complete world.

We feature a video from the Clarion Project that presents the “Neville Brothers,” (Chamberlain, Clinton and Obama) as “successful” world negotiators who got duped by Germany, North Korea and Iran.

In addition we feature retired Admiral “Ace” Lyons as he implicates former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in the Benghazi disgrace, which furthered the growth of the Islamic State in the Middle East. Finally, we introduce a frightening survey conducted by the Center for Security Policy which reveals the level of violence that American Muslims are willing to advance in order to advance Islam in America.

You will not believe this survey!

RELATED ARTICLES:

Obama Administration says Iran’s chants of “Death to America” are “not helpful,” but won’t have impact on nuke talks

Uganda: Muslim in-laws poison mother of 11, who converted from Islam to Christianity

Obama laments “distorted impression” many Americans have of Muslims

Islamic State mints its own ‘Islamic Dinar’ coins

ISIS BLOWS UP ANCIENT Shrines in Palmyra, Syria

Obama and Hillary Compromised: Iran’s Nukes Fully Intact

/in , , /by

The Obama Administration says Iran’s chants of “Death to America” are “not helpful,” but won’t have impact on nuke talks.

Retired Admiral “Ace” Lyons says, “The core elements of the Iranian nuclear program are fully intact and have increased 20-40% since these sham negotiations started.

It all begins in 2008 when then candidate Sen. Barak Obama, according to Michael Levine, opened secret negotiations with the Ayatollah’s. The message was don’t sign any agreements with the Bush Administration you will get a better deal from me when I’m President, I am a friend of Iran. This borders on treason! Mind boggling.

Let’s talk about Benghazi. This is a Hillary scenario, Hillary is a pathological liar. Hillary’s emails – You know everyone of our enemies have hacked into her emails, they have the full book on her. She (Hillary Clinton) is totally compromised, she is damaged goods. There’s no way she can be allowed back into the White House.

  • 4:25 – Things were working out in Libya until she met with a Muslim Brotherhood operative at the Paris Westin Hotel for a 45 minute meeting. After that meeting Hillary canceled our negotiations with Gaddafi despite every military leader and intelligence experts advice not too.
  • 5:30 A few words on Christopher Stevens. DIA had 10 days warning the Benghazi attacks were going to happen. If you were SECDEF would you not put countermeasures in place to defend your Ambassador?
  • 7:50 If I had to speculate I’d say this was an operation that went terribly wrong. If you remember in the Summer of 2012 Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood President Mohammad Morsi came to DC with one main objective.

Morsi’s #1 objective was to get the release of The Blind Sheikh, currently sitting in a U.S. Federal Penitentiary for masterminding the first 1993 World Trade Center bombing.

My view was Benghazi was all about the kidnapping Christopher Stevens (Libya Ambassador) and exchanging him for the blind sheikh – when you put it all together nothing makes sense to me.

When you start analyzing all the email that are coming out now it lends more substance to this theory.

Admiral ‘Ace’ Lyons (Ret.) was the Commander Of The Pacific Fleet. He knows first hand our military capabilities and geo political strategic analysis. Admiral Lyons also has a clear understanding of how Washington DC politics works when it comes to national security matters.”

We owe a great deal of gratitude to Rabbi Jonathan Hausman for bringing Admiral Lyons (Ret.) to his Synagogue for his ongoing Lecture Series.

Iran is an enemy of the United States of America. When Iran chooses its time and place to announce they have a nuclear capability the world as we know it will forever change for the worse.

Just as Israel destroyed Sadam Hussein’s Osirak nuclear reactor in 1981 effectively buying the world three decades of a non-nuclear Middle East, It may be time for Israel to save the world again from a Nuclear Iran.

Islamic State Video: Slaughtering People in Revolting New Ways

/in , /by

Jihadis frequently tell us how much they love death. Austrian Muslim teenage girls who recently traveled to Syria for jihad announced: “Death is our goal.” Boko Haram leader Abubakar Shekau said: “I’m even longing for death, you vagabond.” A Muslim child preacher taunted those he has been taught to hate most: “Oh Zionists, we love death for the sake of Allah, just as much as you love life for the sake of Satan.” Jihad mass murderer Mohamed Merah said that he “loved death more than they loved life.”

Ayman al-Zawahiri’s wife advised Muslim women: “I advise you to raise your children in the cult of jihad and martyrdom and to instil in them a love for religion and death.” And as one jihadist put it, “We love death. You love your life!” And another: “The Americans love Pepsi-Cola, we love death.” That was from Afghan jihadist Maulana Inyadullah.

This idea comes from the Qur’an: Say, “O you who are Jews, if you claim that you are allies of Allah, excluding the people, then wish for death, if you should be truthful.” (62:6)

In their new video, the Islamic State shows how much it loves death, by lavishly depicting new and imaginative ways it brings death upon its enemies. “Sickening new ISIS video shows caged prisoners lowered into a swimming pool and drowned, shot with an RPG and blown up with explosive-filled ‘necklaces,’” by John Hall, MailOnline, June 23, 2015 (thanks to Anne Crockett):

Vile jihadis fighting for the Islamic State in Iraq have brutally murdered five prisoners by locking them in a metal cage and lowering them into a swimming pool.

Filmed in the ISIS stronghold of Mosul, the sickening seven minute long video uses expensive underwater cameras to film the terrified men as they sink below the surface with no hope of escape.

Shortly afterwards the cage is lifted back out of the water, with the dying men – who are understood to have been accused of spying – seen foaming at the mouth as they lie motionless on the floor of the cage, piled on top of one another.

Elsewhere in the video, ISIS militants are filmed brutally killing prisoners by locking them in a car and shooting them with a grenade launcher, while another group of jihadis chain a set of prisoners together with explosive necklaces which are then detonated.

The barbaric video is a new low for the terror group, whose catalogue of horrific filmed murders includes the savage beheading of several British and American hostages, the burning to death of Jordanian pilot Moaz al-Kasasbeh and numerous clips of people being shot and stoned to death.

The main section of the film begins with the stomach-churning sight of five men being locked in a tiny metal cage that has been suspended above a luxury swimming pool somewhere in the ISIS-held city of Mosul in Nineveh province.

Standing up straight with their legs bound, the men look reasonably calm until the moment the cage begins to be lowered into the pool.

As the water begins to enter, the victims start to panic, praying and pacing the tiny metal cell.

Once completely submerged, the video cuts to the high-tech underwater cameras, which show the men thrashing around until they appear to lose conciousness and fall to the floor.

The cage is then removed from the pool, with the dying men seen foaming at the mouths as they lie piled on top of one another under the blazing Iraqi sun….

RELATED ARTICLES:

Obama Administration says Iran’s chants of “Death to America” are “not helpful,” but won’t have impact on nuke talks

Uganda: Muslim in-laws poison mother of 11, who converted from Islam to Christianity

Obama laments “distorted impression” many Americans have of Muslims

Islamic State mints its own ‘Islamic Dinar’ coins

ISIS BLOWS UP ANCIENT Shrines in Palmyra, Syria

Apocalyptic Iran — EMP Bombs over America!

/in , /by

Sometimes our work takes us into areas that appear to be “science fiction,” but under careful analysis the facts rise to the level of science fact and the implication is catastrophic! It is just this case with the subject of Electro-Magnetic-Pulse bombs.

On this show Dr. Peter Pry, one of the world’s foremost experts on EMP technology walks us through some absolutely frightening scenarios which include Iran attacking both America and Israel with EMP’s thus destroying BOTH countries! Is this even remotely possible? Is Iran that crazy as to attack countries which have counter-strike capabilities?

Tune in, but get ready to have some sleepless night once you understand the dire situation before all freedom loving people.

RELATED ARTICLES:

AP reports U.S. is offering Iran nuclear technology
Nuclear Agreement Misleads About Iranian Breakout Time
‘Iran Supporting More than 100 Shiite Terror Groups’
Why People Become Islamic Extremists
Women’s ‘Rights’ in Iran: 5 Laws That Will Appall You

Islam a la Fiorina

/in , , /by

“There was once a civilization that was the greatest in the world.”

And so began a mythical, deceptive tale by Carly Fiorina, when she spoke in praise of Islam within a mere two weeks of their bombing the World Trade Center. The concern is not that she was attempting to deceive others, but that she, a person who aspires to the presidency of the United States, was herself deceived regarding the true nature of Islam, and that she has never retracted her statements.

“[Islam’s] armies were made up of many nationalities . . . [Islam] was able to create a continental super-state . . . within its dominion lived hundreds of millions of people, of different creeds and ethnic origins,” and “the reach of this civilization’s commerce. . .”*

As a religious leader, Mohammed converted few followers. As political and military leader, he was far more successful – torturing and beheading 700 stalwart Medinan Jews, raping and enslaving women, and conscripting the survivors for jihad (holy war). Thus he dominated different creeds and ethnic origins, replenishing his army with many nationalities, and increasing his wealth with booty.

“Within its dominion” is Fiorina’s euphemism for “living under domination.” All non-Muslims, slaves and women were treated with contempt, unequal under law but economically necessary. Although specific enmity was directed against Jews and Christians, the severe “jizya” tax was imposed on “infidels” as humiliation and punishment for rejecting Mohammed. This tax and many other discriminatory laws extended through the centuries to Nestorians, Syrians, and Romans of newly conquered empires, and further to animists, Buddhists, Hindus, Mongols, Greeks, and Armenians (the Armenian Genocide), who suffered torture and death.

Jews held trades and occupations that Muslims judged inferior – including “this civilization’s commerce,” diplomacy, banking, brokerage, espionage, working in gold and silver, and cleaning cesspools. The inevitable deterioration of relations between Muslims and the outside world meant more restrictions and social segregation for non-Muslims (dhimmis), but the subservient and useful survived.

“. . . its military protection allowed a degree of peace and prosperity that had never been known.”

“Peace,” as the absence of discord, existed, depending on the beneficence of the ruling caliphate and internal/external changes, but from the twelfth to thirteenth centuries onward, tolerance decreased; intellectual, social and commercial life depreciated, and ever-increasing restrictions and deprivation for dhimmis were imposed.

“And this civilization was driven more than anything, by invention. Its architects designed buildings that defied gravity.”

The inventions and contributions were made by victims of the Muslim jihadists who invaded the “infidel” world over 1400 years, enslaving, slaughtering, and plundering. Islam is antithetical to creativity, but based on envious resentment of the accomplishments of others. Their greatest achievement was their ability to expropriate every creative, innovative groundbreaking device of Islam’s victims and to fraudulently claim each as their own.

Fiorina’s reference to “buildings that defied gravity,” as in “air-borne,” surely defies logic, but she doubtless refers to the arches, which were already in use in prehistoric times by ancient Egyptians, Babylonians and Greeks. With the help of concrete made from lime and volcanic sand, Roman arches could support huge weight, and were soon adopted by Byzantine and Romanesque architects, evolving into the groundbreaking inventions of the Gothic arch and flying buttress in northern (Christian) Europe. Meanwhile, the Muslims also adopted the Syrian styles, followed with Greek, Byzantine and Persian, and later Chinese and Indian, architecture, to develop pointed, scalloped and horseshoe arches for mosques and palaces. Even the vaulted and hemispherical (domed) ceilings were invented by the non-Muslim Romans.

“Its mathematicians created the algebra and algorithms that would enable the building of computers, and the creation of encryption.”

The first positional numerical system was developed in 2nd millennium BCE Babylon, over 800 years before Islam; the first true “zero” was developed by mathematicians in the Indian Subcontinent. Persian and Arab mathematicians are believed to have adopted the Hindu-Arabic numerical system in India. The work of Italian scholar, Fibonacci, was crucial in bringing them to Europe and the world. Francois Viete, French lawyer, mathematician and privy councilor to Henry III and Henry IV, provided the step from “new algebra” to modern algebra.

Only an Islamist steeplechaser could leap from working with numbers to creating computers and encryptions centuries later. English polymath Charles Babbage, mathematician, philosopher, inventor, and mechanical engineer, conceived the first programmable computer (1830). Alan Turing laid the groundwork for computational science; Korad Zuse is credited as “the first freely programmable computer.”

The earliest form of cryptography is on stone in Egypt (190 BCE), long before Islam. Ciphers were used by the Spartan military and in the 2000-year-old Kamasutra of India. It wasn’t until the 9th century that Arab mathematicians and polymath Al-Kindi worked with cryptography.

“Its doctors examined the human body and found new cures for diseases.”

Arabs had no scientific traditions; their scientists were largely Jews who were forcibly converted as a result of Islam’s rampaging throughout the Near East, Egypt, and Libya. As a typical example, Jews and Berbers, who lived together harmoniously in North Africa, were overcome by 60,000 Islamic troops in 694, and the descendants of those who survived the massacre became “Arabic” philosophers and scientists.

A great physician, Egyptian Jew, Isaac Israel of Kairouan, immigrated to West Africa. His surviving works on logic, Aristotelian physics, and pharmacology became the standard for medical history, and it was from him that the greatest of “Arab” scientists, Avicenna (980-1037), drew inspiration. Known as the Aristotle of the East, Avicenna wrote in Arabic and became a vizier in Persia, but he was born near Bokhara, then heavily populated by Jews, and was probably of Jewish origin. Even so, physicians who attended lords and kings of Islam and Christendom were largely Jews.

“Its astronomers looked into the heavens, named the stars, and paved the way for space travel and exploration.”

Jewish savants were largely responsible for the invention and development of instruments and astronomical tables that facilitated world-girdling sea voyages. The Jerusalem Talmud (tractate Avodah Zarah, Ch.3, fol.,42c) strongly implies the spherical nature of the earth. The astrolabe, used by Islamic astronomers as a guide to the sky and to tell time by the position of heavenly bodies, was introduced into the Arab-speaking world by a “remarkable Jewish genius, Mashala of Mosul, the phoenix of his age.” Astronomical tables, compiled by the Jew, Joseph ben Wallar at Toledo (1396), and in Aragon by Judaic specialists, including Emanuel ben Jacob (aka Bonfils de Tarascon), were used with the astrolabe.

The Jews were among the most notable cartographers, the most advanced being a Jew forcibly converted to Christianity. Christopher Columbus’s cartographers and other companions may have been conversos. The most reputable astronomer of the day, Abraham Zacuto (1452-1515), instructed Columbus on using the perfected astrolabe, also used by Vasco de Gama and Amerigo Vespucci.

In all these areas, Fiorina makes the absurd leap from recognizing Muslims as merely a people who used a product to being an innovative people who “paved the way” for the future. She made a similar leap of dissonance when she made corrupt trade agreements with Iran in violation of US trade sanctions, resulting in 30,000 workers laid off at Hewlett-Packard, and jobs shipped to China. We could remark in passing that, at the same time, her salary and perks also leaped – they more than tripled.

“When censors threatened to wipe out knowledge from past civilizations, this civilization kept the knowledge alive and passed it on to others.”

How much creativity, ingenuity and innovation might we have had from those 400 million people slaughtered by jihadists over 1400 years? What greatness is Islam passing on to civilization now, beyond a high illiteracy rate, great intolerance and aggression? Their history is one of perpetual massacre, encouraged in their Qur’an and taught from early childhood. Their culture is one of unrest, riots and wars; and women’s fears of female genital mutilation, forced marriages, rape, and death for male honor. Their homes are microcosms of the greater tyrannical regimes.

Had Muslims the knowledge to be kept alive, how might it have been done? Of the 1.4 billion Muslims, 800 million are illiterate (60 percent cannot read). In Christendom, the adult literacy rate stands at 78 percent. Of the ten most literate countries, not one is Islamic. Muslims are the world’s poorest, weakest and illiterate. The combined annual GDP of 75 Muslim countries is under $2 trillion; America’s is worth $10.4 trillion. Muslims are 22 percent of the world population, yet produce less than five percent of global GDP, and diminishing all the time.

Over the past 105 years, 1.3 billion Muslims produced eight Nobel Laureates (only two won for physics and chemistry); compare this with a mere 14 million Jews (0.23% of the world population) who produced 170 Nobel Laureates.

Islam’s militaristic, supersessionist ideology that began 1400 years ago has remained unchanged. We know of no event that sparked the glory they claim, and no catastrophic event that might have forced a decline. Carly Fiorina is severely misinformed about the civilization that embraces our death and destruction and she confuses politically-correct theories for hard facts – no point from which to hold the highest-ranking position in the United States of America.

Iran Votes to Ban Access to Military Sites

/in , /by

Nothing to be concerned about. Barack Obama and John Kerry say they want peace. And they wouldn’t lie to us, would they?

RELATED VIDEO: Iranian Parliament Chants “Death to America” – Votes to Ban Nuclear Inspections

“Iran votes to ban access to military sites amid chants of ‘death to America,’” Associated Press, June 21, 2015 (thanks to Anne Crockett):

With some lawmakers chanting “Death to the America”, Iran’s parliament voted to ban access to military sites, documents and scientists as part of a future deal with world powers over its contested nuclear programme.

If ratified, the bill could complicate ongoing talks in Vienna between Iran and the P5+1 group of world powers – the US, Britain, France, Russia, China and Germany – as they face a self-imposed 30 June deadline for a final deal on the Islamic Republic’s nuclear ambitions. The talks are focused on reaching a final accord that curbs Iran’s nuclear program in return for the lifting of economic sanctions.

Of 213 lawmakers present on Sunday, 199 voted in favour of the bill, which also demands the complete lifting of all sanctions against Iran as part of any final nuclear accord. The bill must be ratified by the Guardian Council, a constitutional watchdog, to become law.

The terms stipulated in the bill allow for international inspections of Iranian nuclear sites, but forbid any inspections of military facilities.

The bill states in part: “The International Atomic Energy Agency, within the framework of the safeguard agreement, is allowed to carry out conventional inspections of nuclear sites.”

However, it concludes that “access to military, security and sensitive non-nuclear sites, as well as documents and scientists, is forbidden”. The bill also would require Iran’s foreign minister to report to parliament every six months on the process of implementing the accord.

Iran’s nuclear negotiators say they already have agreed to grant United Nations inspectors “managed access” to military sites under strict control and specific circumstances. That right includes allowing inspectors to take environmental samples around military sites.

But Iranian officials, including supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khameni, have strongly rejected the idea of Iranian scientists being interviewed.

In a statement on Sunday, the US state department said inspections remained a key part of any final deal.

All parties “are well aware of what is necessary for a final deal, including the access and transparency that will meet our bottom lines”, the statement said. “We won’t agree to a deal without that.”

RELATED ARTICLES:

Islamic Republic of Iran: 74 lashes, prison for eating in public during Ramadan

Obama rebuffs Israel’s last-ditch bid for nuclear constraints in Iran accord

NY Times: ISIS “is offering reliable, if harsh, security; providing jobs in decimated economics; and providing a rare sense of order”

Apocalyptic Iran — It’s a Bad Deal!

/in , /by

On June 30, 2015 the historic negotiations between the five Permanent members of the National Security Council (USA, Britain, France, Russia, China) plus Germany with Iran will come to a conclusion. Will this agreement to STOP Iran’s nuclear weapons program be a good deal or bad deal for the USA and Israel?

Our special guest Dr. Matthew Kroenig, nuclear expert currently at Georgetown University has some frightening news for all Americans, indeed all freedom loving people. This deal by the Obama Administration is a BAD DEAL and could result in catastrophic and possibly apocalyptic consequences. Joining Dr. Kroenig is Clare Lopez, from the Center for Security Policy.

This is a critically important show designed to prepare Americans to demand that the Obama Administration negotiates a GOOD deal not a BAD deal.

U.S.: Iran’s Support for Terror Undiminished

/in , , /by

Despite the fact that Iran’s global terror activities were “undiminished” between 2013 and 2014, the U.S. State Department is still entirely committed to pursuing a nuclear deal with Iran.

“We think it’s essential that we pursue those negotiations,” said Tina Kaidanow, the State Department’s coordinator for counterterrorism, as quoted in The Wall Street Journal. “None of that implies that we would be, again, in any way taking our eye off the ball with respect to what Iran is doing as a supporter of terrorism.”

Iran’s support for terror was documented in the State Dept.’s annual report on global terrorism, which was released Friday. The report says “Iran’s state sponsorship of terrorism worldwide remained undiminished,” which makes the State Dept. “very, very concerned,” according to Kaidanow.

While the June 30 deadline for the deal is now fewer than 10 days away, the release of the report shows, “Iran continued to sponsor terrorist groups around the world,” according to Kaidanow.

The report specifically mentions Iran’s continued support for the Shiite terror organization Hezbollah in Lebanon as well as those fighting with embattled Syrian President Bashaar al-Assad.

The Clarion Project reported last week that Iran is supporting more than 100 terrorist organizations in Syria and Iraq alone.

In an interview with The Atlantic, U.S. President Barack Obamas admitted that some of the money freed up the deal’s proposed sanction relief may up going towards terrorism, although he argued that Iranian government would have to make good on their commitments to improve the country’s economy.

“I don’t think …anybody in this administration said that no money will go to the military as a consequence of sanctions relief,” Obama said. “The question is, if Iran has $150 billion parked outside the country, does the IRGC automatically get $150 billion? Does that $150 billion then translate by orders of magnitude into their capacity to project power throughout the region? And that is what we contest …”

The report also showed that between 2013 and 2014, there was a significant rise in global terror attacks, causing an increase in over 80 percent of violent deaths from the previous year (which itself had seen a 43 percent increase from the year before). In addition, the report showed:

  • There was an average of 1,122 attacks per month
  • Kidnappings increased by one-third, with more than with 9,400 people taken hostage
  • The number of global attacks rose by 35 percent
  • 32,727 people were killed worldwide (versus 17,800 in 2013)
  • 34,700 people were injured in attacks in close to 95 countries
  • In Iraq alone,  10,000 people died in 3,360 attacks representing close to a third of all people killed in terror attacks worldwide

RELATED ARTICLES

Nuclear Agreement Misleads About Iranian Breakout Time
‘Iran Supporting More than 100 Shiite Terror Groups’
Why People Become Islamic Extremists
Women’s ‘Rights’ in Iran: 5 Laws That Will Appall You

EDITORS NOTE: The featured image is of members of the Iranian volunteer Basij militia. Photo: © Reuters.

Dems, Republicans and Experts Question Terms of Iran Deal

/in , , /by

Politicians and experts from across the political spectrum are calling into question the proposed nuclear agreement with Iran. The two primary issues – verifiability and the possibility of military dimensions (PMD) of the Iranian nuclear program – threaten to derail the agreement.

A report, “Verifying a Final Nuclear Deal with Iran,” written by the former deputy director of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Olli Henomen, states that for the agreement to be effective in real terms, verifiability must be a function of “unfettered,” “anywhere, anytime” access and not subject to any bureaucratic procedures which would give Iran time to alter the results of any inspections.

The report, signed by 20 foreign policy experts including Democrats and Republicans, criticizes the Obama administration for drawing up an agreement that essentially lets Iran remain a “nuclear threshold state,” specifically noting the fact that the agreement does not resolve any issues having to do with PMD and that sanctions relief will come without any of the above issues being resolved. In addition, the proposed verification provisions fall significantly short, meaning that there is no assurance that Iran’s nuclear program will stay contained within the limitations set out by the agreement.

Other damning reports recently released have come to the same conclusions:

  • A report titled “Necessary Safegurads for a Final Deal with Iran” by Eric Edelman – a career foreign service officer, ambassador and under-secretary of defense for policy — and the president’s former senior adviser Dennis Ross, says “it is uncertain whether the potential monitoring and verification regime adumbrated in the White House factsheet would be remotely sufficient for this task.”
  • Another report titled “Sunsets and Snapbacks: The Asymmetry Between an Expanding Iranian Nuclear Program and Diminishing Western Leverage” by Mark Dubowitz and Annie Fixler questions wisdom of  making an agreement with Iran before the issue of PMD is resolved, thereby giving up any leverage the West may have. In addition, the report makes the case that it is folly to believe that sanctions can realistically be “snapped back” once international companies have invested billions of dollars in Iran.  The report notes that “international sanctions regime took decades to put in place and to have an impact on Iran’s economy and decision making.” Any snap-backs, if possible, will not be felt immediately. Given that the breakout time to create a bomb is estimated at one year, snap-backs offer no real deterrance to Iran acquiring a nuclear weapon.

Meanwhile, the Iranian parliament voted to take away their power to veto of any nuclear agreement drawn up with world powers. In amending their own previous legislation, the lawmakers put the veto power into the hands of the Supreme National Security Council (SNSC), a group made up of ministers and military commanders chosen by Iran’s Supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and headed by Iranian President Hasan Rouhani.

“Whatever decision the leader takes in this regard, we should obey in parliament,” said speaker of the parliament Ali Larijani . “We should not tie the hands of the leader.”

However, the lawmakers did reject any inspections of the country’s nuclear program that are not “conventional” visits, effectively banning inspection of military sites.

At the same time, France’s Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius said “at the point where we are, things are not clear [in terms of whether an agreement with Iran] can be reached. There is a need to clarify, make precise and ensure the deal is robust.”

EDITORS NOTE: The featured image is a look inside of a nuclear reactor. Photo: © Reuters.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Iranian Academic Challenges ‘Death to Israel’ Mantra
Iran’s Army Head Vetoes Access to Military Nuclear Sites
US: Iran’s Support for Terror Undiminished
Nuclear Agreement Misleads About Iranian Breakout Time

TAKE ACTION: Say NO to a Nuclear Iran! Be on the right side of history!

/in , /by

Urgent – Write to Your Elected Officials Now.

No Nukes For Iran! We prepared an e-mail and will send it for you to your elected officials. Our system will always allow you to preview the e-mail before it sends it. Make your voice count! It should take less than a minute.

Click: www.ActToImpact.com/iranEmail

Why Is Snapchat More Secure than the Federal Government? by Andrea Castillo

/in , /by

Cyberhawks have seized upon this year’s massive hack of the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) to shove a wolfish surveillance bill in a sheepish cybersecurity bill’s clothing down America’s throat.

But the “Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act of 2015” (CISA) would have done nothing to stop the hack that exposed as many as 14 million federal employees’ personnel records. The pro-NSA crowd’s arguments are obvious nonsense — if anything, the OPM hack clearly demonstrates the danger of trusting incompetent government bureaucracies to manage huge datasets of sensitive personal information.

But amid all of the hubbub, these self-styled champions of strong cybersecurity — who also just happen to be anti-private encryption and pro-surveillance — have neglected to raise one important question: Why did a goofy picture-sharing app implement basic security measures before the central repository for all federal personnel data did?

This week, Snapchat announced that the private picture messaging service was offering two-factor authentication for its users. This basic measure of security helps to verify that the person logging in is indeed the legitimate owner of their account by sending out a text message with a special access code to the owner’s cell phone.

That way, a hacker must obtain both your password and your mobile phone to access and control your account. It’s simple, but simple security solutions can sometimes mean the difference between a foiled infiltration and a very, very bad day for a Snapchat user.

Of course, it is too much to expect the chief steward of federal employee information to implement such a simple policy. As the beleaguered office’s Inspector General reported last fall, OPM does not require multi-factor authentication to access its information systems.

If a careless OPM employee chose a weak and easy-to-guess password, or emailed it in plain text across an insecure channel, or merely left it on a sticky note on his or her desk (as is common practice in the federal government), than any common hacker could potentially access vast amounts of federal data.

In other words, an application for sharing pictures of wild parties and funny cats has better authentication standards than the federal government’s primary steward of millions of current and former federal employees’ and contractors’ addresses, Social Security numbers, financial information, and health records. Oh, and that of our military leadership and intelligence contacts — several of which are embedded deep undercover in dangerous missions — as well.

Hackers also accessed the feds’ cache of Standard Form 86 files for the aforementioned groups, dragging countless family members, friends, and colleagues into the databreach crossfire.

To call this a huge mess would be the second biggest understatement of the year. The biggest? That OPM’s substantial information security vulnerabilities are entirely unacceptable and directly at fault for the hack.

The OPM’s annual information security reports to Congress have admitted “material weaknesses” and “significant deficiencies” for years. The department lacked an IT team with “professional security experience and certifications”until 2013. Disgruntled employees could have merely walked off with this data if they wanted to, since OPM does not “maintain a comprehensive inventory of servers, databases, and network devices.” Nor did the OPM encrypt any of the data that the hackers stole — they might as well have just invited our forward friends in China to sweep in through the front door!

As Ars Technica’s Sean Gallagher concludes, “Considering the overall condition of OPM’s security, it’s no surprise that an attacker — almost any attacker — could gain a foothold inside the agency’s network. But attackers didn’t just gain a foothold, they had practically a free run of the networks.”

It’s true that Snapchat has hardly been a paragon of good cybersecurity in the past, as previous security vulnerabilities, breaches, misleading marketing, and the infamous “Snappening” testify. However, there is another important difference between Snapchat and the OPM that puts the humble app ahead of the mighty federal office: Snapchat has to learn from its mistakes.

As a private service provider in a hotly-competitive market that must keep its users happy to stay afloat, Snapchat moved quickly to get its security house in order after their big mistakes. They hired the former social network security leader for Google and started to build a “culture of security” within the firm.

They may still have a long way to go, but these investments and cultural prioritization are important first steps that demonstrate a proactive sense of ownership in their platform’s security. And of course, if they keep screwing up, they’ll be sued out the nose and go out of business for good.

We see no such sense of urgency with OPM. The agency received what could have been a saving wakeup call in last year, when it was discovered that Chinese hackers had accessed OPM databases in March of 2014.

OPM had the opportunity to implement simple encryption and authentication measures, tighten up their ship, and increase employee education about good data and security practices. No such luck! The office more or less continued on its merry way.

No one was fired back then and it looks like no one will get fired now. It’s government work, after all.

Unfortunately, OPM is hardly the only sucker on cybersecurity in the federal government, as my research for the Mercatus Center has found. This kind of unbelievably poor cybersecurity posture is the norm rather than the exception.

In fact, it’s hard to pick what is scarier: that the federal government operates under the digital equivalent of leaving all of their doors and windows unlocked and wide open, or that these same federal agencies want more power to manage your personal data through CISA.


Andrea Castillo

Andrea Castillo is the program manager of the Technology Policy Program for the Mercatus Center at George Mason University and is pursuing a PhD in economics at George Mason University.

Is Kurdistan Rising?

/in , /by

In the Wall Street Journal Weekend edition, June 20-21, 2015, Yaroslav Trofimov writes of the possible rise of an independent Kurdistan, “The State of The Kurds”. An independent Kurdistan was promised by the WWI Allies in the Treaty of Sevres that ended the Ottoman Empire in 1920. That commitment was dashed by the rise of Turkish Republic under the secularist Kemal Atatürk confirmed in the 1923 Treaty of Lausanne denying an independent Kurdistan in what is now Eastern Turkey. Combined a future Kurdistan encompassing eastern Turkey, Northern Syria, northwest Iran and northern Iraq might comprise a landlocked republic of 30 million with significant energy and agricultural resources. The rise of Kurdistan is reflected in these comments in the Trofimov WSJ review article:

Selahattin Demirtas, Chairman of the HDP party in Turkey:

The Kurds’ existence was not recognized; they were hidden behind a veil. But now, after being invisible for a century, they are taking their place on the international stage. Today, international powers can no longer resolve any issue in the Middle East without taking into account the interests of the Kurds.

Tahir Elçi, a prominent Kurdish lawyer and chairman of the bar in Diyarbakir, Turkey:

In the past, when the Kurds sought self-rule, the Turks, the Persians and the Arabs were all united against it. Today that’s not true anymore—it’s not possible for the Shiite government in Iraq and Shiite Iran to work together against the Kurds with the Sunni Turkey and the Sunni ISIS. In this environment, the Kurds have become a political and a military power in the Middle East.

Elçi, amplifies a concern that Sherkoh Abbas, leader of the Kurdish National Syria Assembly (KURDNAS) has expressed in several NER interviews an articles with him:

The PKK has made important steps to adopt more democratic ways. But you cannot find the same climate of political diversity in [Kurdish] Syria as you find in [northern Iraq], and this is because of PKK’s authoritarian and Marxist background. This is a big problem.

As effective as the KRG government and peshmerga have been in pushing back at ISIS forces threatening the capital of Erbil, the real problem is the divisiveness in the political leadership. That is reflected in the comment of  Erbil province’s governor, Nawaf Hadi cited by Trofimov:

For 80 years, the Arab Sunni people led Iraq—and they destroyed Kurdistan. Now we’ve been for 10 years with the Shiite people [dominant in Baghdad], and they’ve cut the funding and the salaries—how can we count on them as our partner in Iraq?” All the facts on the ground encourage the Kurds to be independent.

That renewed prospect reflects the constellation of  events in Turkey, Syria and Iraq.

The fall of the AKP government in the Turkish Election of June 7, 2015

There was  the  stunning  defeat of the 13 year reign of  the Islamist AKP headed by President Recep Tayyip Erdogan by the trio of secular, nationalist and upstart Kurdish parties, the CHP, HNP and HDP that might form a minority ruling coalition 45 days from the June 7, 2014 parliamentary elections. These minority parties garnered a plurality of 299 seats in the Ankara Parliament.  That is if these parties can coalesce. If not Islamist figurehead President Erdogan seek new elections if they can’t put together a new ruling government.  A Washington, D.C. forum on what the results of the Turkish  election convened by the Foundation for Defense  of Democracies (FDD) forum presented nuanced views. Watch this C-Span video of the FDD forum.

FDD Senior Counselor John Hannah moderated the discussion with former U.S. ambassador to Turkey and FDD Senior Advisor  former US Ambassador to Turkey Eric Edelman and FDD Non-Resident Fellow and former member of Turkish parliament Ayman Erdemir.

John Hannah

June 7 in my opinion was an inspiring performance, a much needed triumph of the spirit of liberal democracy in a Middle East landscape currently inundated with way too much bad news.

For those of us who have watched over the past decade with great dismay the slow drip of Turkey’s democracy being drained away by Erdogan’s creeping Islamism and authoritarianism, we frankly weren’t sure anymore if the Turkish people had this kind of an election in them.

Aykan Erdemir

My take-home message would be that we should not read these elections too much with a progressive, liberal-democratic interpretation. But we should not underemphasize the importance of it either, because ultimately June 7 proved to us that there could be a return from competitive authoritarianism, where an incumbent with huge advantages nevertheless can suffer a relative defeat in the ballot box.

I have always argued that Erdogan’s policies and politics cannot be interpreted within the nation-state borders. Erdogan’s policies right from the start have been transnational; it has always been a Muslim Brotherhood-oriented policy, whether in Syria, Jordan, or Egypt. He is a visionary transnationalist politician.”

Ambassador Edelman

Turkey is a deeply polarized society, and the bad news there is that the AKP is the only party that is competitive across the nation.

Erdogan will not see this vote in any way as inhibiting him in creating an executive presidency. …My suspicion is that Erdogan does not want to see a government formed within the 45-day period set by the constitution and would like to see the country go back to elections. He thinks that if he could apply the ‘keep voting until I get the right answer’ standard, there is a chance he will do better in a second election, get at least a governing majority if not the super-majority.

Dr. Harold Rhode, former Turkish and Islamic Affairs expert in the Office of the Secretary of Defense held a more optimistic view cited in a JNS.org article on the Turkish Elections, “noting that he personally knows pro-American and pro-Israel officials “within the senior leadership of all three of the [non-AKP] parties.”

Syrian YPG Fighters capture Tal Abyad Reuters

Syrian YPG fighters capture Tal-Abyad from ISIS, June 2015. Source: Reuters.

Syrian Kurdish YPG victory at strategic border town of  Tal-Abyad

The second development was the victory by Syrian Kurdish PYG fighters , Christian Assyrian and secular  FSA militias  wresting the strategic border gateway of Tal-Abyad  from  ISIS with support from  US coalition air strikes. This followed the  January 2015 victory in  the siege at the border  city of Kobani. The Syrian PYG, affiliated with the Turkish PKK, a  terrorist group designated by  Turkey, EU and the US, whose leader Abdullah Ocalan is under house arrest in Turkey,  has been assisted  by fighting units of the Iraqi Peshmerga from the adjacent Kurdish Regional Government  (KRG)in northern Iraq.  The third development was the KRG Peshmerga wresting   control  of Kirkuk and its vast  oil field. Kirkuk, as Trofimov noted  is considered  the “Kurdish Jerusalem” .  Not to be outdone by Kurdish compatriots in Syria and Iraq, in mid-May 2015, Iranian Kurdish  Party of Free Life in Kurdistan ( PJAK)  forces in northwestern Iran’s Zagros mountain  fought  Iranian security forces in Mahabad.  Mahabad  was the capital of the short-lived State of Republic  Kurdistan established with Soviet Russian support in  Iran in 1945- 1946.

KRG Delegation meets with resident Obama VO Biden and National Security Council May 2015

Kurdish President Barzani and KRG delegation meet President Obama and VP Biden May 2015.

KRG Meets with President to Free up Arms Deliveries

The KRG quest for independence has been stymied by the Baghdad government of PM Haidar al-Abadi.  The Baghdad  government has not lived up to its agreement reached in December 2014 to provide regular payments to the KRG amounting  to nearly $5.7 billion in exchange for selling 550,000 barrels of oil. The result has been that KRG government  and the 160,000 Peshmerga force have not been paid in months.  More troubling has been the current agreements between the Obama Administration  and  the al-Abadi government for allocation and deliveries of heavy weapons that have not found their way to the highly effective Peshmerga fighting force. This is especially galling given the thousands of Humvees, mobile artillery, anti-tank, main battle tanks and MRAP vehicles abandoned by fleeing Iraqi national security forces in the conquest of Mosul in June 2014 and Ramadi in late May.

A  meeting occurred in Washington in early May 2015 with  KRG President Barzani and senior officials with President Obama, Vice President Biden and members of the National  Security Staff seeking resolution of this impasse.   Michael Knights of the Washington Institute for Near Policy wrote about this in a May 15, 2015 Al Jazeera, article, “A big win for Kurds at the White House”:

From May 3-8, 2015, Washington D.C. hosted a high-powered delegation from the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG). KRG President Massoud Barzani was flanked by Deputy Prime Minister Qubad Talabani, National Security Chancellor Masrour Barzani and Minister of Peshmerga Affairs Mustapha Sayyid Qadr, among other KRG ministers and officials.  [The delegation was originally scheduled for a five minute meeting with President Obama, instead the session lasted an hour].

In particular, the Kurds complained that Washington has allocated too small a proportion of its $1.6bn Iraq Train and Equip Fund (ITEF) assistance to Kurdistan.

Slow and indirect delivery of US weapons systems is a connected concern. Washington has chosen to funnel most weapons shipments via the federal Iraqi Ministry of Defense, the only entity entitled by US law to sign end-user certificates (EUCs) for the weapons.

[…]In reaction to these views, the House Armed Services Committee of the US Congress introduced clauses into the annual National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), the Pentagon’s budget, in an attempt to protect the Kurds’ fair share of US weapons.

The draft NDAA for Fiscal Year 2016 was amended by congress to include a clause (Section 1223) that named the Peshmerga as one of a number of security forces collectively entitled to “not less than 25 percent” of the annual $715m of US support.

Most controversially the amendment would allow the KRG “as a country” to “directly receive assistance from the United States” if Baghdad failed to meet the aforementioned condition, a clause that sparked security threats from Shia militia leaders against US trainers in Iraq.

Baghdad protested the language, and US Vice President Joe Biden signaled one day before the Kurdish delegation landed that “all US military assistance in the fight against [ISIL] comes at the request of the Government of Iraq and must be coordinated through the Government of Iraq”.

[…]

Instead of trying to force the White House to do Kurdistan’s bidding through pressure politics, Barzani seems to have adopted a longer-term view in his dealings with the US on defense.

Section 1223 did not give the Kurds a great deal – sharing a quarter of US material collectively with Sunni Arab paramilitary recipients – but it would have soured relations with the Obama administration at a critical time.

Israeli Support for an Independent Kurdistan

One  Middle East nation that  supports an independent Kurdistan  is Israel . As exemplified by comments from  Israeli Prime Minister  Netanyahu, Israel supports the creation of an independent Kurdistan in  Iraq.  There is a long connection between the Kurds and the Jewish nation. There is  an estimated 150,000 Kurdish Jewish  population in Israel that has fostered  cultural –linguistic exchanges with Iraqi Kurdistan.  Iraqi and Iranian kurds smuggled Iraqi Jews to freedom via Iran, during the days of the late Shah, to Israel and the West.  Iranian Kurds continued that effort despite  the Islamic republic facilitating the departure of Iranian Jews  via Turkey to reach  Israel.  From the 1950’s to the mid-70’s Israel provided covert military training and  equipment  to Iraqi Kurds  against the Ba’athist regime of the late Saddam Hussein.  That ended with a treaty between the late Shah of Iran and Hussein orchestrated by Henry Kissinger in 1975.  During the 1980’s Hussein took his revenge on Iraqi kurds during the  Iran-Iraq War  in a series of genocidal revenge campaigns including a massive gas attack that killed thousands decimating Kurdish villages.   Israel currently hosts the huge U.S. War Reserve Stock for use in Middle East conflicts. Perhaps, the Obama Administration might relent on the current agreements with the Baghdad government and permit transfers from the US War Reserve Stock   in Israel of much needed weapons, equipment and munitions to the Peshmerga in Iraq and the Syrian Kurdish militias fighting ISIS.  Israel is less than several hundred miles from Erbil.

EDITORS NOTE: This column originally appeared in the New English Review. The featured image is of supporters cheering Selahattin Demirtas, co-chair of the pro-Kurdish Peoples’ Democratic Party, HDP, in Istanbul, Turkey, in May, 2015. Source: Emrah Gurel/AP.

Ohio Muslim said he’d “cut off the head of his non-Muslim son if necessary”

/in , , /by

“O you who have believed, do not take your fathers or your brothers as allies if they have preferred disbelief over belief. And whoever does so among you – then it is those who are the wrongdoers.” (Qur’an 9:23)

“You will not find a people who believe in Allah and the Last Day having affection for those who oppose Allah and His Messenger, even if they were their fathers or their sons or their brothers or their kindred.” (Qur’an 58:22)

“There has already been for you an excellent pattern in Abraham and those with him, when they said to their people, ‘Indeed, we are disassociated from you and from whatever you worship other than Allah. We have denied you, and there has appeared between us and you animosity and hatred forever until you believe in Allah alone…’” (Qur’an 60:4)

“Sheffield Lake terrorist suspect said he’d behead his non-Muslim son, FBI reports,” by Ida Lieszkovszky, Northeast Ohio Media Group, June 19, 2015:

CLEVELAND, Ohio — The Sheffield Lake man facing terrorism charges told a FBI informant that if war broke out in the U.S. between Muslims and non-Muslims, he would “cut off the head of his non-Muslim son if necessary,” according to a criminal complaint.

Amir Said Abdul Rahman Al-Ghazi’s comment about his son is revealed in the 33-page complaint filed Friday by the FBI in U.S. District Court.

The complaint also states that when asked by the criminal informant what he thought of videos showing the beheading of U.S. citizens by Islamic State militants, his response was: “You really wanna know what I think? … I support that. … That’s our way of life. … Yeah, I go for this. … I’m uh. … I do this.”

Al-Ghazi, 38, faces charges of supporting a terrorist organization, the Islamic State, also known as ISIS. A federal judge ordered Friday afternoon that Al-Ghazi be held in custody until a hearing on Wednesday.

Al-Ghazi made comments to a total of three FBI informants, according to the complaint, at times stating he thinks it’s okay to behead Christians, Jews, and atheists. Al-Ghazi also referred to Iraqis as his “brothers and sisters,” the complaint states, and told one informant that he had ideas for a terrorist attack in the U.S., including attacking a police station or derailing a train.

But, Al-Ghazi said he wasn’t interested in becoming a martyr, but rather told an informant that he “wanted to get away with it,” the complaint states.

Al-Ghazi also posted on various social media sites including Facebook and Twitter messages in support of ISIS. According to the complaint, he also commented on a message board that “We are all Islamic state citizens. This isn’t some gang in the desert you’re fighting. This is WW3 the beginning has just begun.”

He also told one informant that he was trying to recruit people to join ISIS, the complaint states. He also tried to buy an AK-47 to use in propaganda videos. He told an informant that he already had a ski-mask and a “green screen,” and that he’d already bought a machete. He made references to conducting “cyber jihad.”…

RELATED ARTICLES:

New Jersey Muslim charged with plotting to support the Islamic State

UK city shocked! shocked! by family’s flight to join the Islamic State

Soviet Fascism in the 21st Century: The Soviet Mafia — A Global Criminal Force

/in , /by

We live in a world driven by a hideous ideology: if you do not know this you are blind, deaf, and defenseless. History books teach us a lot, yet sometimes human experiences can give you more than any text books, news reporting, or internet to make sense of world affairs. You need human inside, interpretation of the experiences, and chronology of the events to see the actual picture of the planet divided by this ideology. I am that person. Since I am the eyewitness of both Socialism and Capitalism during the last two centuries. I feel competent to make such an assertion. Therefor I can express with certainty that Obama is not incompetent, stupid, or insane, on the contrary—Obama is very successful in systematically implementing Stalin’s Soviet Mafia, its social engineering and so doing transforming the American Republic into the third world country. Let us remember that he promised to “fundamentally transform the American society.”

I am a child of Stalinism. Growing up, I saw and heard Stalin many times. Studying law, I read his books, articles, and mostly agreed with his ideas. While practicing law as a defense attorney in Estonia, the reality of life crushed my illusions. Later on America took me even further, changing my mind completely and turning me into a writer for the last twenty-five years. I have been exposing Stalin’s fraud and showing how his evil is destroying mankind by inflaming the Muslim world and connecting a fraudulent ideology with violent Islam. I am convinced, it must be done in order to save humanity. The ideology of Stalinism or Soviet Fascism has cost lives to more than 200 millions lives throughout the globe, as the asymmetrical WW III is still going on today in 2015 and can become a hot one any minute.

Reading the following tree words: Russia, Putin, and uranium made my adrenalin boul. A single pound of uranium has the same energy potential as 1500 tons of coal. Think about that for a minute. The combination of those three words was a culmination and confirmation of all my ideas and my verdict on Stalinism and the Soviet Mafia. All my books and articles have been presenting the facts of Stalinist ideology, which are destroying America domestically. There is a direct correlation of how our strength at home affects the peace and stability in the world. The time has come to show how our defeat domestically is inextricably connected to the actual chaos within the entire planet and the identities of the actors producing such chaos.

For the last two-three months the world has experienced multi-faceted events globally and inside of America. Hence the mass media is overwhelmed by five vigorous discussions on the following:

  1. The Clintons, Benghazi, Emails and a book Clinton Cash.
  2. ISIS’s advance in Syria, Iraq, Libya, and beyond
  3. Derailed Amtrak train near Philadelphia
  4. Russian attacks on Ukraine–an opening of the European front.
  5. Corruption within FIFA

I would argue that all five issues have the same root causes and same sources. The policy of Obama’s transformation of America is a continuation of the policy that began much early by another president.

The Clinton Gang

The New York Times on April 23, 2015 has published an international bombshell–a revelation of secret activities in exchange for money by the Clinton Foundation throughout the world. Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation as Russians Pressed for Control of a Uranium Company, by Jo Becker and Mike McIntire. “Beyond mines in Kazakhstan that are among the most lucrative in the world, the sale gave the Russians control of one-fifth of all uranium production capacity in the United States. Since uranium is considered a strategic asset, with implications for national security, the deal had to be approved by a committee composed of representatives from a number of United States government agencies. Among the agencies that eventually signed off was the State Department, then headed by Mr. Clinton’s wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton.”

Following this bombshell came the book Clinton Cash: The Untold Story of How and Why Foreign Governments and Businesses Helped Make Bill and Hillary Rich by Peter Schweizer, May 5, 2015. It was not a revelation for me. For the last twenty years, I have been writing and warning you about Soviet Fascism. Yes, we are dealing with the ideology of Soviet Fascism, fighting Western civilization and its major target–the American Republic. It was March 13, 2015, before both bombshells when I wrote “The Clinton Foundation is much more than what you know about it.” Soviet Fascism in the 21st century, part 20. Moreover, in my article on April 20, published in this e-magazine, discussing current events in the world, I wrote: “Iran is a player, but not the major one in the world–Russia is.” And I am not the only Republican bringing lights to the symptoms of Soviet Fascism in America.

’The Clinton Foundation has come under scrutiny over the past few months with the scandal concerning Hillary Clinton’s personal email server being used for State Department business. This week, Minnesota Representative Michele Bachmann said the Clinton Foundation was nothing more than an international money laundering ring.”

I would say the Clinton Foundation is more than that: it is the eyes and ears of the Kremlin. Writing about America’s politics Vis-a Vis contemporary Russia is my routine for the last few decades and I am constantly addressing the subject of organized crime and the Soviet Mafia to emphasize how the institutionalized corruption spreads across the globe. The recent information on Putin’s money and its scale makes the Clinton’s family appear as the close relatives to the President of Russia by behavior, love of money, and political agenda. That assertion is confirmed by the facts. I have been writing about Bill Clinton for the last several decades, because I know who he really is. The first suspicion came immediately when I saw his picture among the young people in Russia. I knew, because it was a group promoted by the KGB.

Then came the year 1991 and Bill Clinton announced his candidacy for the presidency. The two events that occurred at the time, perhaps will prove and convince you of the validity of my suspicions. Here is the first one:  “On June 9, 1991, two-and-a half months before announcing his candidacy for the U.S. Presidency, Bill Clinton flew to Moscow. The Arkansas Democrat ran the story under the headline “Clinton Has Powerful Buddy in the U.S.S.R.—New Head of KGB.” The True Story of the Bilderberg Group, by Daniel Estulin, TrineDay LLC, 2009, p. 52.

Of course, there were several issues discussed by Bill Clinton and the Chairman of the KGB. Yet, the main one and most important to Clinton was the help of the KGB in the upcoming election in America. Three candidates were fighting for the U.S. presidency in 1992: Vise President George H. Bush, Ross Perrot, and Bill Clinton. Ross Perrot was successfully arguing against both and his rating rose to 35 percent. Under the circumstances, Clinton had no chance to win, he needed Perrot to depart. And… something strange had happened—Ross Perrot had retreated. Bill Clinton was elected as the U.S. President. Today we know the cause of Ross Perrot’s retreat, he received a threat: his daughter will be killed if he stays as a candidate for the U, S. presidency. The big question mark: Who had threatened Ross Perrot?

Only the people who know Soviet Fascism can answer the question. That is why I have been writing about “Sleek Willy” for the last twenty-five years. The Clinton Gang began its criminal deeds in Arkansas, while Governor Bill Clinton had prepared himself for the U.S. presidency. The gang grew tremendously during his presidency. Some were killed, yet, some of those friends ideologically closest had never left the gang and they are still serving the Clinton’s today. The gang infiltrated all spheres of our society, especially our intelligence, resulting in deadly consequences. Some CIA’s officers concluded that we had several chances to kill bin-Laden and failed: bin-Laden had always disappeared as if he knew about our attempts.

Clinton could’ve given an order to kill bin Laden to prevent the attack of 9/11. He did not. Look at this headline: Hank Crumpton, Former CIA Officer: Clinton Wouldn’t Authorize Osama Bin Laden Kill In 1999, The Huffington Post, By Nick Wing, 05/14/2012  “Hank Crumpton, a former CIA officer and top counterterrorism official, said in a recent interview that President Bill Clinton’s White House missed a golden opportunity to take out terrorist leader Osama bin Laden in 1999. CBS’s “60 Minutes.”

Many events during the Clinton administration should be intensely investigated, as well as Clinton’s close friends: Stephanopoulos, John Podesta, Tony Podesta, and Blumenthal—a conduit for Libya. Just be aware of their past and present activities in serving Clinton’s gang in America and around the world. You will be surprised by the strange connection of the “blue dress” and terror in Africa and other continents as well. The result of The Clinton Gang activities introduced the best by WND:

“For decades,” says WND Editor Joseph Farah in “AMERICA’S FIRST CRIME FAMILY”. Bill and Hillary Clinton didn’t mind hurting their enemies – and used the power of the state to do it. They were only too willing to let their friends and supporters pay for their crimes. They used the Internal Revenue Service to go after their enemies, critics and even ex-lovers who posed a threat. They bullied, harassed and intimidated, and, though no one likes to talk about it in polite company, there is indeed an impressive trail of inexplicable deaths that has followed in their wake. The famous “Clinton Body Count” even persuaded Monica Lewinsky not to make unnecessary trouble for the “family.” What an indictment!

By the way, I have been writing about the striking resemblances in politics of the presidents Clinton and Obama since 2006. What is Happening to America? The Hidden Truth of Global Destruction, Xlibris, 2012.

The Obama/Putin Joint Venture–Destruction of the American Republic

I have been writing about this venture for the last eight years, because, like in Clinton’s case, Obama was not a puzzle or mystery to me. I have already described the Stalin’s tricks eight years ago in the above mentioned book. Actually, in the beginning of his reign Stalin gave an order to all Soviet intelligent agencies to mold a Soviet style leaders in all Soviet Republics and in the countries around the globe. This order, as a holy message to all Russian intelligent agencies has never expired since then. In my books, I even listed those Soviet style leaders as agents of influence throughout the world. They are all the members of the Soviet mafia, acting on behave of the mafia and against the interests of their own countries.

There are several examples of Obama/Putin joint venture, when Obama acted to benefit Russia. Benghazi was Obama/Putin joint operation to supply arms to ISIS. I have already gave you a detailed narrative of how it was done. In this respect, I’d like to remind you that Putin was and is a KGB agent X2. That means that he and the six oligarchs in the Russian government had been trained in chess-geopolitics. Putin is counting three, four steps ahead in his agenda against the West. For example to develop and arm ISIS in Syria and save Assad, Putin needed time. To buy time, he offered a trick with VMD and Obama’s “red line” against Syrian government was over—the mafia rules prevailed. The same joint operation took place in killing bin-Laden:

In October (2010), Obama was briefed on the intelligence. His response was cautious, the retired official said. ‘It just made no sense that bin Laden was living in Abbottabad. It was just too crazy. The president’s position was emphatic: “Don’t talk to me about this anymore unless you have proof that it really is bin Laden.”’ The immediate goal of the CIA leadership and the Joint Special Operations Command was to get Obama’s support. They believed they would get this if they got DNA evidence, and if they could assure him that a night assault of the compound would carry no risk. The only way to accomplish both things, the retired official said, ‘was to get the Pakistanis on board’. The Killing of Osama bin Laden Seymour M. Harsh, London Book Review, Vol. 37 No. 10 21 May 2015 pages 3-12 |

My interpretation is that: we have the analogous situation—Putin needed the time to liquidate all the documents from the Russian source in the bin-Laden computer. Obama was giving Putin the needed time by his phony emphatic response. And again I have to repeat—all terrorist groups with different names is a creation of the Russian intelligence in the 21st century, as Arafat, Hamas, the Muslim Brotherhood, and Hezbollah are the Soviet creation of the 20th century—they all have the same DNA in fighting Western civilization. General McChrystal is partially confirming my opinion:

“The fact is the Middle East and North Africa are literally melting down… [The Islamic State] is a very serious threat, but ISIS is a symptom of a much wider threat,” McChrystal, author of the new book Team of Teams: New Rules of Engagement for a Complex World, said on The Steve Malzberg Show.

There is another opinion that also confirms my comparison–a history of the Soviets in the Middle East: “Following the fall of the Soviet Union and the resulting collapse of support for the secular socialist states… The socialist secularist movement lost its backing and its credibility. Movements such as Fatah, based on socialist secularism — and Soviet support– lost power relative to emerging groups that in obliterating the Syria-Iraq border, these forces and particularly the Islamic State had created a core element of the caliphate — a transnational power or, more precisely, one that transcended borders.” A Net Assessment of the Middle East Geopolitical Weekly by George Friedman, JUNE 9, 2015

George Friedman is right talking about the emerging forces that obliterated the Syria-Iraq border. The truth of the matter is that we are dealing with the same force—Soviet/Russian intelligence and their long-term strategy—nothing has changed in Russia, but names. Besides, the Iraqi President al-Maliki was recruited by that intelligence through Iran and acted in accordance with Russian plan, dividing the country by bringing exclusively Shiites to power. I wrote in 2006 “I don’t trust al-Malaki.” We had been betrayed by the Iraqi President, the same way we were by our own—this is the crux of the matter and the answer to the birth of ISIS. Knowledge of Soviet Fascism and the Soviet mafia is a must to understand the current world and to defeat all enemies foreign and domestic.

There is a remarkable coherence and consistency in Obama’s retreat within both domestic and foreign policies. The embodiment of delay and withdrawal emphasized by two powerful words—stand down. Internationally and first it was Benghazi, domestically it was repeated in Baltimore. In Benghazi it helped Russia to arm ISIS. In Baltimore it was an attempt to diminish the power of our police—Stalin’s social engineering in America. Both cases are inextricably connected and benefit Russia and Putin, and totally inconsistent with the American interests.

My books and articles present multiple evidence to confirm my opinion. If you have not heard about my books, it’s because our intelligence has blocked all the Press Releases for my books, since the Clinton presidency. Only my friends or people who accidentally saw the intriguing titles of my books could see them on Amazon.com. To emphasize the significance of knowledge, let me give you the example of the failed American intelligence. Boston has numerous terrorist groups infiltrated by Russian intelligence. Tamerlane Tsarnaev was trained by Russian intelligence during all six months of his stay in Russia. Read this information by the most trusted academician Andrey Peantkovsky in Russia…

The derailment of the train near Philadelphia and corruption of FIFA belong to this section. The entire picture of the criminal deeds of the Soviet mafia has been narrated in my books and articles. In short it is a variety of subversive activities against America and the West to destabilize order and tranquility, to inflict fear and terror. Sabotage is one of the easiest methods and analyzing details in the derailment of the train near Philadelphia, I believe it was a sabotage with attempt to crush the train by disabling the engineer. Snipers are the vanguard in the army of saboteurs. No money can solve the problem of sabotage, only awareness of the Soviet mafia can do it.

Corruption within FIFA is another tentacle of the Soviet mafia’s body. It is a well- known fact in the Soviet/Russian history. Sport, especially Soccer was and is the only real pride of the people in the country. There is nothing else in Russia to elevate the patriotic feelings among the people of Russia. The Soviet mafia is working hard to provide a success in any field to sustain this self-deceptive feeling by hook or by crook. The time has come to expose the old Soviet criminal formation operating around the world. America has a special Law, a legal tool to do just that. Here is the Law:

“RICO law refers to the prosecution and defense of individuals who engage in organized crime. In 1970, Congress passed the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act in an effort to combat Mafia groups.” America should apply the law to confront and expose the Soviet mafia throughout the world. There are several interesting caveats in America’s connected to the Soviet mafia. Jackie Kucinich told an intriguing story to Daily Beast:

”Both Bill Clinton and his family’s charity have been tied to soccer’ governing body, as well as Qatar’s disastrous World Cup bid.

The Clinton global charity has received between $50,000 and $100,000 from soccer’s governing body and has partnered with the Fédération Internationale de Football Association on several occasions, according to donor listings on the foundation’s website.” Corrupt FIFA Has Clinton Foundation Ties; World Cup Host Qatar Gave Millions, By Jackie Kucinich.

I suspect that Clinton helped Obama to make many concessions, downplaying Iranian threat in dealing with Iran’s nukes—Russia’s interest in the deal is obvious. There is another caveat to see how the Soviet mafia operates globally. Obama gave an order to kill terrorist leaders by Drones even if they are citizens of America. I would interprete the event as a desire to prevent the potential witnesses to testify. Today the potential witnesses are dead and can’t testify any longer.

As a matter of fact, many of the terrorist leaders, including ISIS were trained in the former Soviet Muslim Republics and in other Russian satellites like Iran. Several Generals of ISIS prior served in Saddam’s security forces they were trained by the Soviets. Some of them are Chechens and Turkmens (the Soviet identity), and today they have immediate connection with Russian military and intelligence. As you can see the Kremlin and its Soviet mafia are holding a grip on all fronts fighting Western civilization, including a racial tension inside America.

Ukraine–The European Front and ISIS

I have deliberately provided you with the picture from Ukraine. Does it remind you of the events taking place in Ferguson and Baltimore? Yes it does, because killing people and destruction of land is going on across the world and I want you to know the Evil that is committing all the crimes. Boris Nemtsov was my friend, I have been writing about him in my books and articles. He was a conscience and hope of Russia, a decent, honest, and smart leader of the opposition to Putin and…he was assassinated.

“The last report of murdered Russian opposition politician claims Putin spent billions on mercenaries to fight in Ukraine. “The final report of prominent Russian opposition politician and Kremlin critic Boris Nemtsov, who was gunned down on the streets of Moscow in February, was published Tuesday by his former colleagues. It promises to be explosive.

The 64-page report, titled simply “Putin. War,” contains all of the evidence collected by Nemtsov in the final months of his life as he looked into Russia’s role in the ongoing crisis in Ukraine that has so far cost over 6,000 lives. The last report of murdered Russian opposition politician claims Putin spent billions on mercenaries to fight in Ukraine. Read Tomas Hirst, Politics more: Russia Boris Nemtsov Vladimir Putin, MAY 12, 2015.

The Nemtsov report is written in Russian, you may read it here.  Currently Ukraine experiences a very hard time, it is comparable to the destruction of Europe after WWII. Ukraine needs help —a kind of mini Marshal-Plan. Do not expect radical changes overnight in Ukraine, it is a process of implementing new reforms that have already begun. A few days ago Ukraine has passed several new laws, among them is a law opening all classified KGB’s archives. State tune, you’ll learn a lot about Russia and its subversive activities against Ukraine during the past decades.

In addition to that, Ukraine should be prepared for the full scale Russian aggression in the Eastern part of the country. The world can see the escalation on the border with Russia: the number of Russian army now is 9-11 thousand men, drones, heavy artillery, and tanks are coming to the border regularly—the Minsk Agreement has been broken by Russia. There were many options on a financial table and despite the obvious, the recent G-7 group, a-la Obama ignored the most effective and severe sanctions against Russia. This is not a forceful and active policy against the aggressor.

Besides the European front, we have the Middle East and ISIS’s territorial gains with spreading its power to five countries during the last three years. By June 2015, ISIS had executed 10 thousand innocent civilians of all races and religions. Three years have passed by and our Commander in Chief admitted: “We don’t yet have a complete strategy…” for fighting ISIS. This is another surrender– Obama had given Putin the time to organize ISIS and fight against the West in two or more fronts.

The recent Obamas’ decision to send another 3.500 men to Iraq is too little, too late. Iraq is gone, thanks to our Commander in Chief. Doesn’t his policy remind you of Vietnam and incremental adjustment?  Don’t you see the same force united by the same agenda confronting the West and creating a chaos in the globe? Socialism and Islam have an identical agenda—domination of the world. The Soviet mafia has allied and coupled them to fight the West for the last two centuries. I am aware of the WWIII and to prepare you for the future, I have written three books and 48 articles.

Every day we are faced with headlines about terrorism and racism in America. In the recent blog I saw a headline:”

Is Barack Obama Intentionally Seeking to Destroy America?

This article is my answer. It helps you to recognize and identify the leadership of our American Party of the Democrats. The last year and a half of Obama’s presidency will be used to multiply one crises after another to fool and terrorized you. Soviet Fascism has never surrendered—the Evil will fool you by camouflaging and masking its ugly face, as it did in the 1990 in Russia. The same strategy will be implemented in America. The tragedy of killing nine innocent, Black Christians in Charleston SC is the continuation of Stalin’s policy Divide and Conquer by the forces behind the racial tension, orchestrated in America. I hope now you can identify this force that is using mentally unstable people as it has been using them in many shootings before. Where are Woodward and Bernstein? And most importantly where is our FBI?

To be continued www.simonapipko1.com

Ramadan Bomb-A-Thon versus Israeli Life-A-Thon

/in , /by

Today we take a look at the religion of Piece(s) and how the empirical data verifies that during the Islamic Holy month of Ramadan where peace is supposed to be the norm, in actuality, the jihadis attack more aggressively than ever!

We deconstruct this apparent contradiction and expose the Islamic rationale which allows, indeed demands, this increased bellicosity, even during a month of “peace.”

From there we discuss the Temple Mount with Jerusalem Jane as she explains the latest decision of the Israeli government – to allow jihadis from Gaza and the West Bank to travel to the Temple Mount during Ramadan!! And, what could possibly go wrong with that!

RELATED ARTICLES:

Ohio Muslim arrested on terror charges: “We are all Islamic State citizens.”

Northern Ireland: Pastor who said “Islam is satanic” faces six months in jail

Tajik special forces chief who joined Islamic State threatens to behead his brother

ISIS following al-Qaeda’s game plan for a caliphate