Muslim known to FBI arrested for bomb threat against LaGuardia airport

His bomb threat turned out to be false, but it still served to “strike terror in the enemies of Allah” (Qur’an 8:60).

But not to worry, Monroe Police Detective David Lee is on the case: “He does have some issues.” Of course: it’s just another manifestation of the global outbreak of mental illness.

abdurrahman-qadan

Abdurrahman Issam Qadan

“Police: Man claiming to be ISIS supporter makes false bomb threat in Monroe,” by James Nani, Times Herald-Record, October 12, 2016:

VILLAGE OF MONROE – An Oregon man who claimed early Wednesday morning that he was on his way to leave explosives at LaGuardia Airport has been charged with falsely reporting an incident and making terroristic threats.

Abdurrahman Issam Qadan, 26, of Tigard, Ore., was stopped by a Village of Monroe police officer at about 1 a.m. along Route 17M near the entrance of ShopRite, police say. The officer was on patrol and thought the man was acting suspicious, police said.

Qadan told the officer that he had affiliations with ISIS, an acronym for the Islamic State terrorist group. According to police, Qadan said that he had gotten into a fight with his girlfriend while she was driving them to LaGuardia Airport in Queens. Qadan got out of the vehicle with his belongings, which included a duffle bag.

Police say the officer asked where the duffle bag was, and Qadan said he placed it behind the Mobil gas station on Route 17M next to an oil tank. He also said the bag had explosives in it.

Qadan told the officer that he planned to place the bag with explosives at the airport but when he got out of the car he decided to dispose of it behind the gas station instead, police said.

Qadan warned police not to go near the bag because the explosives could explode, police said. The officer also found a laptop and cell phone near the bag, which was leaning against an oil tank.

A state police bomb unit was called to the scene and a perimeter was set up around the gas station. Parts of Route 17M and Route 208 were shut down.

A search by the bomb squad of the items found no explosives. Qadan, later interviewed by investigators with the FBI Joint Terrorist Task Force at the Monroe Police headquarters, admitted he lied about the explosives, according to police.

Monroe Police Det. David Lee said he couldn’t say whether Qadan suffered from any mental issues, but said something did seem off about him.

“He does have some issues,” Lee said….

Lee said Qadan has been on the FBI’s radar in the past.

“They were interested in him before the incident,” Lee said. “He wasn’t a direct target, but there had been other people he had been associated with.”….

RELATED ARTICLES:

UNESCO passes resolution declaring Temple Mount Muslim, not Jewish

Robert Spencer in PJ Media: St. Louis Muslims Put Up Misleading ‘HEY ISIS, YOU SUCK’ Billboard

Widers ‘Kafkaesque show trial’ to proceed over ‘fewer Moroccans’ statement

SkyNews reported that Geert Wilders will stand trial on criminal charges of violating the Dutch hate speech laws,”Geert Wilders hate speech charges upheld in court.” His counsel had filed a motion with the Hague court to dismiss the charges.

The case against Wilders arose  from petitions filed with the Hague prosecutors by Dutch Muslims and leftist allies that his 2014 local campaign remarks of ‘fewer  Moroccans” constituted prosecutable violations of hate speech laws in the Netherlands. Wilders’ counsel has also questioned possible bias in the three judge tribunal. Wilders had been acquitted of similar charges in a trial in the Amsterdam District Court in 2011.

The trial comes at a time where Wilders’ Freedom Party (PVV) has risen near the top of Dutch political polls close behind the ruling coalition of  PM Mark Rutte’s VVD party  in the Hague Parliament. Wilders’ counsel has also questioned the validity of the submitted petitioners that the Hague prosecutors have based their charges.

Sky News reported:

A court has upheld hate speech charges against Dutch far-right MP Geert Wilders over comments he made about Moroccans.

The leader of the Party for Freedom (PVV) sparked outrage when he asked supporters at a rally in 2014 whether they wanted “fewer or more Moroccans in your city and in the Netherlands?”

After the crowd shouted back “fewer” Mr Wilders said: “We’re going to organise that”.

The MP appealed to have the charges thrown out, but his objections were dismissed by The Hague District Court.

The comments triggered more than 6,400 complaints and criticism from within Mr Wilders’ party.

Five organisations and 56 people have registered as victims of the remarks, judges said.

Mr Wilders’ lawyers slammed the trial as a “political case” ahead of parliamentary elections in March.

They argued that the MP had merely “put forward his party’s political programme” and claimed the case could have “far reaching political consequences for democracy”.

At an earlier hearing, Geert-Jan Knoops, defending Mr Wilders, told judges that freedom of expression is “the last freedom Mr Wilders has left”.

But the court said that although politicians are entitled to freedom of expression they should “avoid public statements that feed intolerance.Judge Hendrik Steenhuis said: “Where the border lies between the two will be debated in this trial.”

He added that prosecuting Mr Wilders will “not affect his political freedoms or that of this Freedom Party”.

After the hearing, Mr Wilders claimed he was being prosecuted “for voicing the opinion of millions”.

He added: “The Netherlands is like Turkey. Displeasing political opinions are being silenced in court.”

The MP was previously cleared of five counts of inciting hatred in 2011, after he compared Islam to Nazism.

The comments caused Mr Wilders to be denied entry to the UK in February 2009 on public security grounds.

He attempted to visit anyway and was deported back to the Netherlands.

Mr Wilders later travelled to London after an immigration tribunal overturned the ban imposed by former Home Secretary Jacqui Smith.

The MP’s trial at The Hague District Court will start on 31 October.

Note our tweet regarding this latest development in the second trial of Geert Wilders for alleged hate speech:

Churches asked to Show Video Comparing Party Platforms

WASHINGTON, D.C. /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ — Before Election Day, Family Research Council Action (FRC Action), announced that it plans to finish distributing nearly 4 million voter guides targeting supporters, churches, activist groups, and state/local organizations.

The voter guide outlines how the candidates stand on pivotal issues like Supreme Court nominations, religious liberty, Obamacare, marriage, abortion, taxes, education, the military, and free speech. A short video comparing the two party platforms is being distributed to thousands of churches to show during services prior to Election Day.

“These issues weigh on the minds and hearts of voters,” said Family Research Council Action President Tony Perkins. “It is crucial that voters get the facts before they vote.”

“With the next president selecting up to four Supreme Court justices, this is not a time to seek sanctuary on the sidelines. If we, as Christians, do not take our responsibility to be salt and light and exercise our right to cast an informed vote, we could see a further erosion of our fundamental freedoms,” added Perkins.

“The greatest distinguisher in this election cycle is where the candidates stand on their party’s platform. The GOP has the most conservative platform in recent history while the Democrats have the most liberal. While party platforms are often viewed as political platitudes that have little bearing on how the parties will govern, the reality is the platforms really matter. One study found that Democratic politicians voted about three quarters of the time with their platform while GOP politicians voted nearly 90 percent with theirs,” noted Perkins.

“The platforms are like a rudder on a boat, they guide and provide principles for elected leaders. While the media largely ignores the party platforms after the political conventions, they should play a major role in every voters’ decision-making for 2016,” concluded Perkins.

Click here download a copy of FRC Action’s Voter Guide

Watch a video comparing the 2016 Republican and Democratic Party platforms:

*Candidate positions were compiled from recorded votes and public information sources.

The Gathering Storm Clouds: FBI Director Comey Warns Terrorists Heading Our Way

One mission of our armed services is to work with our allies to locate, engage and eliminate terrorists overseas, while domestically our law enforcement agencies are tasked with protecting America and Americans within our borders. In the wake of the deadly terror attack in San Bernardino, California, I wrote an article, “Fighting the War on Terror Here, There and Everywhere,” in which I took on the false argument that by fighting the terrorists overseas we won’t have to fight them here.

On September 26, 2016, “Business Insider” warned, “FBI director: ISIS’ loss will create a ‘terrorist diaspora’ like we’ve never seen before,” while a day later NBC reported, “FBI’s Comey: Officials Worry About ‘Terrorist Diaspora’ from Syria, Iraq.”

FBI Director Comey is predicting that simply defeating ISIS and other terror organizations overseas, while an achievable objective, would likely have unintended consequences.  He warns that as greater pressure is brought to bear against the terrorists on their turf, they will head for the West, including the United States, to create as much death and destruction as possible.

America’s borders are our first line and last line of defense against these terrorists and transnational criminal organizations. Our borders, however, include far more than the U.S.-Mexican border. Our nation has 50 “Border States.” Any state that lies along the northern or southern borders of the United States is a border state, as are those states that have access to our nation’s 95,000 miles of coastline. Finally, any state that has an international airport must, of necessity, be deemed a border state.

The official report, “9/11 and  Terrorist TravelStaff Report of the National Commission onTerrorist Attacks Upon the United States” focused specifically on the ability of the terrorists to travel around the world, enter the U.S. and ultimately embed themselves here as they went about their deadly preparations to carry out an attack. The preface of this report begins with the following paragraph:

“It is perhaps obvious to state that terrorists cannot plan and carry out attacks in the United States if they are unable to enter the country. Yet prior to September 11, while there were efforts to enhance border security, no agency of the U.S. government thought of border security as a tool in the counterterrorism arsenal. Indeed, even after 19 hijackers demonstrated the relative ease of obtaining a U.S. visa and gaining admission into the United States, border security still is not considered a cornerstone of national security policy. We believe, for reasons we discuss in the following pages, that it must be made one.”

That report and the “9/11 Commission Report” made it clear that the multiple failures of the immigration system enabled terrorists to enter the U.S. and then embed themselves here in the country so that they could go about their deadly preparations without being detected.

For terrorists, acquiring identity documents and, especially, acquiring lawful immigration status are key to their quest to hide in plain sight. Justifiably, much concern has been expressed by Americans and some of our political leaders about the inability of our officials to vet Syrian refugees while the administration continues to admit ever more such refugees.

It is disconcerting that presidential candidate Hillary Clinton has promised that, if elected, she would greatly increase the number of such refugees she would admit into the U.S.

However, my recent article focuses on the fact that aliens who enter the U.S. without inspection, by running our borders, are not vetted at all, and their entries went unnoticed. My article was aptly titled, “Entry Without Inspection = Entry Without Vetting.”

This serious vulnerability is being ignored by both the administration and presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, who insists that if elected she would provide lawful status and a pathway to U.S. citizenship to unknown millions of such illegal aliens, who entered without inspection. The numbers would be so  huge that no interviews and no field investigations could be conducted.

When sensible people hear storm warnings that hurricanes are headed their way they may board up their windows and stock up on supplies. They may choose to evacuate altogether.

When residents of “Tornado Alley” hear blaring sirens alerting folks that tornadoes are forming, they take appropriate action and head for their storm cellars.

FBI Director Comey has sounded the alarm, but the administration and Hillary Clinton, for inexplicable reasons, continue to turn a blind eye and a deaf ear to his warnings and those of others, such as CIA Director Brennan who has warned that ISIS has embedded terrorists in refugee flows.

The time has long since come and passed for our politicians to set political goals aside and be true leaders whose primary concerns are the safety and well-being of America and Americans by taking to heart the findings and recommendations of the 9/11 Commission.

This includes enhancing border security, ending the Visa Waiver Program and ramping up the enforcement of our immigration laws from within the interior of the U.S. to arrest and remove illegal aliens, as well as weed out fraud in applications for immigration benefits.

‘Born again’ Muslim shoots two Boston police officers

Cue the stories about how this has nothing to do with Islam, and about how local mosques are now fearing an “Islamophobic backlash.”

kirkfigueroa

Kirk Figueroa

“5 Investigates: Suspect in Boston police shooting wrote of Islamic ‘rebirth,’ had several aliases,”WCVB, October 13, 2016 (thanks to Robert):

BOSTON —5 Investigates uncovered six aliases used by Kirk Figueroa, the man killed by Boston police after he shot two officers on Wednesday night in East Boston.

He took on an alias as he experienced what he called an Islamic “rebirth” in Africa.

The aliases, along with his seeming obsession with police and security, help make Figueroa a picture of contradictions and confusion: a 33-year-old man who started companies in Florida and other states focused on security and protection who yesterday nearly killed two police officers responding to a domestic violence call.

5 Investigates uncovered a job posting for “Police Protection” for one of those companies, Bailrunners. In it, Figueroa identifies himself as Muhummed Isa Al Mahdi. The ad said Al Mahdi was looking for people interested in helping him “hunt down fugitives and bring them to justice.”

5 Investigates also discovered a posting from Muhummed Isa on a website guide for mosques from October 2012. Isa wrote about his “rebirth as a baby into the Nation of Islam” following a trip to an area of Ethiopia and a mosque in South Africa.

Isa went on, writing that his unique and blessed journey was prepared and guided by Allah.

Most recently, Figueroa was using the name Kocoa Xango on social media, identifying himself as a police constable. His last post under that name came just a few hours before the fatal shooting, posting a video by Michelle Obama and then a picture of himself after getting a haircut….

RELATED ARTICLE: UK: Muslim bus driver put children’s lives at risk by stopping on busy road for prayer

Huma Abedin: The Islamist Ties of Hillary’s Closest Aide

Huma Abedin was born in 1976 in Kalamazoo, Michigan. Her father, Syed Abedin (1928-1993), was an Indian-born scholar who in the early 1970s had been affiliated with the Muslim Students Association at Western Michigan University.

Huma’s mother, Saleha Mahmood Abedin, is a sociologist known for her strong advocacy of Sharia Law. A member of the Muslim Sisterhood (i.e., the Muslim Brotherhood‘s division for women), Saleha is also a board member of the International Islamic Council for Dawa and Relief. This pro-Hamas entity is part of the Union of Good, which the U.S. government has formally designated as an international terrorist organization led by the Muslim Brotherhood luminary Yusuf al-Qaradawi.

When Huma was two, the Abedin family relocated from Michigan to Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. This move took place when Abdullah Omar Naseef, a major Muslim Brotherhood figure who served as vice president of Abdulaziz University (AU), recruited his former AU colleague, Syed Abedin, to work for the Institute of Muslim Minority Affairs (IMMA), a Saudi-based Islamic think tank that Naseef was preparing to launch. A number of years later, Naseef would develop close ties to Osama bin Laden and the terrorist group al Qaeda. Naseef also spent time (beginning in the early 1980s) as secretary-general of the Muslim World League, which, as journalist Andrew C. McCarthy points out, “has long been the Muslim Brotherhood’s principal vehicle for the international propagation of Islamic supremacist ideology.” IMMA’s close ties to the Muslim World League are further evidenced by the fact that IMMA’s in-house publication, the Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs (JMMA), has long listed its officialaddress as 46 Goodge Street in London — precisely the same address as that of the Muslim World League’s London office. In one noteworthy article written by Abedin’s mother,JMMA blamed America for having brought the 9/11 attacks upon itself. Another JMMA piece, from 1999, alleged that Jewish Americans who were pro-Israel had been able to “work the [political] system” in the United States to their own advantage, and had been “greatly aided by the American memory of the Holocaust.”

It is vital to note that IMMA’s “Muslim Minority Affairs” agenda was, and remains to this day, a calculated foreign policy of the Saudi Ministry of Religious Affairs, designed, as Andrew C. McCarthy explains, “to grow an unassimilated, aggressive population of Islamic supremacists who will gradually but dramatically alter the character of the West.” For details about this agenda, click here.

At age 18, Huma Abedin returned to the U.S. to attend George Washington University. In 1996 she began working as an intern in the Bill Clinton White House, where she was assigned to then-First Lady Hillary Rodham Clinton. Abedin was eventually hired as an aide to Mrs. Clinton and has worked for her ever since, through Clinton’s successful Senate runs (in 2000 and 2006) and her failed presidential bid in 2008.

From 1997 until sometime before early 1999, Abedin, while still interning at the White House, was an executive board member of George Washington University‘s (GWU) Muslim Students Association (MSA), heading the organization’s “Social Committee.”

It is noteworthy that in 2001-02, soon after Abedin left that executive board, the chaplain and “spiritual guide” of GWU’s MSA was Anwar al-Awlaki, the al Qaeda operative who ministered to some of the men who were among the 9/11 hijackers. Another chaplain at GWU’s MSA (from at least October 1999 through April 2002) was Mohamed Omeish, who headed the International Islamic Relief Organization, which has been tied to the funding of al Qaeda. Omeish’sbrother, Esam, headed the Muslim American Society, the Muslim Brotherhood’s quasi-official branch in the United States. Both Omeish brothers were closely associated with Abdurahman Alamoudi, who would later be convicted and incarcerated on terrorism charges.

From 1996-2008, Abedin was employed by the Institute of Muslim Minority Affairs (IMMA) as the assistant editor of its aforementioned publication, the Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs (JMMA). At least the first seven of those years overlapped with the al Qaeda-affiliated Abdullah Omar Naseef’s active presence at IMMA. Abedin’s last six years at the Institute (2002-2008) were spent as a JMMA editorial board member; for one of those years, 2003, Naseef and Abedin served together on that board.

Throughout her years with IMMA, Abedin remained a close aide to Hillary Clinton. During Mrs. Clinton’s 2008 presidential primary campaign, a New York Observer profile of Abedin described her as “a trusted advisor to Mrs. Clinton, especially on issues pertaining to the Middle East, according to a number of Clinton associates.” “At meetings on the region,” continued the profile, “… Ms. Abedin’s perspective is always sought out.”

When Mrs. Clinton was appointed as President Barack Obama‘s Secretary of State in 2009, Abedin became her deputy chief of staff. At approximately that same point in time, Abedin’s name was removed from the Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs‘ masthead.

Apart from their working relationship, Abedin and Mrs. Clinton have also developed a close personal bond over their years together, as reflected in Clinton’s 2010 assertion that: “I have one daughter. But if I had a second daughter, it would [be] Huma.” In 2011, Secretary Clinton paid a friendly visit to Abedin’s mother, Saleha, in Saudi Arabia. On that occasion, Mrs. Clinton publicly described her aide’s position as “very important and sensitive.”

On July 10, 2010, Huma Abedin, a practicing Muslim, married then-congressman Anthony Weiner in a ceremony officiated by former president Bill Clinton. A number of analysts have noted that it is extremely rare for Islamic women—particularly those whose families have ties to the Muslim Brotherhood—to marry non-Muslims like Weiner, who is Jewish. Indeed, Dr. Anwar Shoeb, the highest-ranking faculty authority at the prestigious College of Sharia and Islamic Studies in Kuwait, formally declared that Abedin’s marriage to Weiner was “null and void” under the dictates of Sharia Law, which explicitly forbids matrimony between a Muslim woman and an “infidel”; in fact, Shoeb classified the Abedin-Weiner union as a form of “adultery.”

Abedin went on maternity leave after giving birth to a baby boy in early December 2011. When she returned to work in June 2012, the State Department granted her an arrangement that allowed her to do earn outside income as a private consultant, even as she remained a top advisor in the Department. This arrangement was made possible when Mrs. Clinton personally signed off on documents—dated March 23, 2012—that changed Abedin’s title from “deputy chief off staff” to “special government employee.” Abedin’s outside clients included the U.S. State Department, Hillary Clinton, the Clinton Foundation, and Teneo (a New York-based global advisory firm co-founded by Doug Band, a former counselor for Bill Clinton).

Abedin did not disclose on her financial report either the special employment arrangement or the $135,000 she earned from it, in violation of a law mandating that public officials reveal significant sources of income. In fact, her title change did not become public knowledge until May 2013. Good-government groups warned of the potential conflict-of-interest inherent in an arrangement where a government employee maintains private clients.

Documents obtained by Judicial Watch in a Freedom Of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit showed that both before and after Mrs. Clinton signed off on the special employment deal for Abedin in March 2012, Abedin repeatedly—for months on end—dodged State Department requests that she disclose financial and employment information about her husband, Anthony Weiner, who had left Congress amid personal scandal in June 2011. For details about Abedin’s repeated failures to comply with those requests, click here.

In June 2012, five Republican lawmakers (most prominently, Michele Bachmann) sent letters to the inspectors general at the Departments of Homeland Security, Justice, and State, asking that they investigate whether the Muslim Brotherhood was gaining undue influence over U.S. government officials. One letter, noting that Huma Abedin’s position with Hillary Clinton “affords her routine access to the secretary [of state] and to policymaking,” expressed concern over the fact that Abedin “has three family members—her late father, mother and her brother—connected to Muslim Brotherhood operatives and/or organizations.” Some other prominent Republicans such as John McCain and John Boehner disavowed the concerns articulated in the letters.

On February 1, 2013—Hillary Clinton’s final day as Secretary of State—Abedin resigned her post as Mrs. Clinton’s deputy chief of staff. Yet she would continue to serve as a close aide to Clinton.

On March 1, 2013, Abedin was tapped to run Clinton’s post-State Department transition team, comprised of a six-person “transition office” located in Washington.

In early March 2015, it was reported that throughout her entire four-year tenure as Secretary of State (SOS), HillaryClinton had never acquired or used a government email account, and instead had transmitted — in violation of government regulations — all of her official government correspondences via a personal email account that was housed on a private server. In addition, Abedin and Mrs. Clinton’s chief of staff, Cheryl Mills, also had email addresses on the secret server while employed at the State Department.

After Hillary Clinton announced in the spring of 2015 that she was running for president (2016), Abedin was named vice chair of the Clinton campaign.

On August 28, 2016, the New York Post published excerpts and photos from sexually explicit texting exchanges in which Weiner had engaged with two women in the summer of 2015. The next day, Huma Abedin announced that she was separating from Weiner. She said in a statement: “After long and painful consideration and work on my marriage, I have made the decision to separate from my husband. Anthony and I remain devoted to doing what is best for our son, who is the light of our life. During this difficult time, I ask for respect for our privacy.”

Huma Abedin’s brother, Hassan Abedin, has ties to the Muslim Brotherhood and is currently an associate editor with the JMMA. Hassan was once a fellow at the Oxford Center for Islamic Studies, at a time when the Center’s board included such Brotherhood-affiliated figures as Yusuf al-Qaradawi and Abdullah Omar Naseef.

Huma’s sister, Heba Abedin (formerly known as “Heba A. Khaled”), is an assistant editor with JMMA, where she served alongside Huma prior to the latter’s departure.

It’s official the radical Islamic Muslim Brotherhood is all in for Hillary

According to Discover the Networks:

CAIR [Council on American Islamic Relations] promotes a radical Islamic vision, as evidenced by the fact that its co-founder Omar Ahmad told a Fremont, California audience in July 1998: “Islam isn’t in America to be equal to any other faith, but to become dominant. The Koran … should be the highest authority in America, and Islam the only accepted religion on Earth.” In a similar spirit, co-founder Ibrahim Hooper told a reporter in 1993: “I wouldn’t want to create the impression that I wouldn’t like the government of the United States to be Islamic sometime in the future.” In 2003 Hooper stated that if Muslims ever become a majority in the United States, they will likely seek to replace the U.S. Constitution with Islamic law, which they deem superior to man-made law. In the late 1980s, Ihsan Bagby, who would later become a CAIR Board member, stated that Muslims “can never be full citizens of this country,” referring to the United States, “because there is no way we can be fully committed to the institutions and ideologies of this country.”

In 2003 CAIR invested, according to its own Form 990 filed with the Internal Revenue Service, $325,000 from its California offices with the North American Islamic Trust (NAIT). According to Newsweek, authorities say that over the years “NAIT money has helped the Saudi Arabian sect of Wahhabism — or Salafism, as the broader, pan-Islamic movement is called — to seize control of hundreds of mosques in U.S. Muslim communities.” A recent study by the Center for Religious Freedom found that a very large number of American mosques teach hatred of Jews and Christians, coupled with doctrines of Islamic supremacism.

Learn more about CAIR.

CAIR released the results of a nationwide survey of Muslim voters on the upcoming presidential election indicating a likely high turnout of Muslims at the polls on November 8 – more than 70 percent of whom say they will vote for Hillary Clinton – and concern about issues such as civil rights, education, the economy, bullying, a proposed ban on Muslims entering the U.S., and national security.

Here are highlights from CAIR’s survey:

  • 86 percent of registered Muslim voters intend to vote in this year’s presidential election.
  • 12 percent of Muslim voters are still undecided about who to vote for in this presidential election.
  • 72 percent of Muslim voters said they will vote to elect Hillary Clinton, while 4 percent said they will vote for Donald Trump, 3 percent will vote for Jill Stein, and 2 percent will vote for Gary Johnson.
  • The percentage of those Muslim voters who said they are closer to the Democratic Party remained constant, from 66 percent in a similar poll taken in 2012, to 67 percent today, after having increased from 49 percent in a similar poll taken in 2008.
  • Affiliation with the Republican Party remained relatively steady at 6 percent today, 9 percent in 2012 and 8 percent in 2008.
  • 62 percent of respondents said that the Republican Party was unfriendly toward Muslims (compared to 51 percent in 2012), while 2 percent said that the Democratic Party was unfriendly (compared to 6 percent in 2012).
  • The top six most important issues to American Muslim voters are civil rights, education, jobs and the economy, protecting students from bullying and harassment, a proposed ban on Muslims traveling to the U.S., and terrorism and national security.
  • 91 percent of respondents believe that Donald Trump’s proposed temporary ban on Muslim travelers entering the U.S. is the wrong decision and only 3 percent, within the margin of error, believe that it is the right decision.
  • 85 percent of respondents believe that Islamophobia and anti-Muslim sentiment in the U.S. has increased in the past year. Moreover, 30 percent of respondents say they have experienced discrimination or profiling in the past year.
  • 82 percent of Muslim voters support Syrian refugees resettling in the U.S.
  • Almost half of Muslim voters, 47 percent, said that the U.S. did not provide enough support in the past year to combat and defeat the terror group ISIS in Iraq and Syria
  • More than half, 62 percent, of those polled attend a mosque at least once a month.
  • 66 percent of respondents say they have a four-year or graduate degree.

The Muslim Brotherhood and HAMAS linked CAIR is all in for Hillary. What does that tell you?

RELATED ARTICLE: Here are All 25 Answers Hillary Clinton Just Gave About Her Email Server Under Penalty of Perjury

WikiLeaks emails show the true face of the Clinton campaign by Rodney Pelletier

“It’s an amazing bastardization of the faith”

DETROIT (ChurchMilitant.com) – A new release of Hillary Clinton campaign emails shows contempt for faithful Catholics.

The newest Wikileaks document dump is made up of nearly 2,000 emails between Clinton and her campaign chairman John Podesta, bringing the number of revealed Podesta emails to more than 5,000.

The email in question, sent April 11, 2011 and titled “Re: Conservative Catholicism,” shows a discussion among Podesta, Director of Communication Jennifer Palmieri and John Halpin of the liberal Center for American Progress (CAP).

hillary-catholics-email

Halpin writes to Podesta, “Many of the most powerful elements of the conservative movement are all Catholic (many converts) from the SC [Supreme Court] and think tanks to the media and social groups.”

It continues, “It’s an amazing bastardization of the faith. They must be attracted to the systematic thought and severely backwards gender relations and must be totally unaware of Christian democracy.”

Podesta answers, “Excellent point. They can throw around ‘Thomistic’ thought and ‘subsidiarity’ and sound sophisticated because no one knows what the hell they’re talking about.”

Palmieri interjects, “I imagine they think it is the most socially acceptable politically conservative religion. Their rich friends wouldn’t understand if they became evangelicals.”

ABOUT RODNEY PELLETIER

Rodney Pelletier is a staff writer for ChurchMilitant.comFollow Rodney on Twitter: @RodPelletier

RELATED ARTICLE: Here are All 25 Answers Hillary Clinton Just Gave About Her Email Server Under Penalty of Perjury

Did Hillary Make Unauthorized Release of Classified Information on Bin Laden Raid?

In its initial release of hacked emails from Clinton campaign manager John Podesta last Friday, Wikileaks included an extraordinary document so full of revelations that journalists are still finding new material in its depths.

Among the most explosive are quotes from a Nov. 4, 2013 speech to London Drugs in Toronto, Canada, where she appeared to reveal classified details – including sources and methods – of the hunt for Osama Bin Laden.

In her rambling account of how the “analysts and collectors and good old-fashioned spies were gathering bits and pieces of information,” Mrs. Clinton boasted that the key to allowing the U.S. to track Bin Laden to Abbottabad, Pakistan, was an NSA intercept of a cellphone call from a former Bin Laden bodyguard.

“He had just made a phone call,” she said. “Then we need to follow him. And that is how we found this compound in Abbottabad.”

I suppose Mrs. Clinton figured it was the kind of sexy detail former government officials get paid $250,000 to include in a speech.

The New York Post first noticed the bin Laden information on Sunday, but buried it in a longer account on the Wall Street transcripts.

FoxNews National Security correspondent Catherine Herridge worked her sources at the CIA on Tuesday, but they refused to comment whether the disclosure had been “authorized.”

Without official authorization, the leak by Mrs. Clinton of sources and methods of the Bin Laden investigation would be an open and shut violation of U.S. criminal statutes. For example, 18 U.S. Code §798 punishes anyone who “knowingly and willfully communicates… any classified information… concerning the communication intelligence activities of the United States.”

The U.S. government has indicted former NSA consultant Edward Snowden under the same statute, and has prosecuted a number of intelligence officers in recent years for similar offenses.

The almost casual release of highly classified intelligence information in a paid speech is just another example of Mrs. Clinton’s disregard for our nation’s secrets and her duty to protect them.

The FBI reported that its investigation into Mrs. Clinton’s private email server found 81 email chains that “contained classified information ranging from the CONFIDENTIAL to TOP SECRET/SPECIAL ACCESS PROGRAM levels at the time they were sent between 2009-2013.” Clinton staffers presumably stripped the classified headers off those emails before sending them to Mrs. Clinton, since the FBI found only three emails that still bore classified markings.

Mrs. Clinton, of course, was not the first to reveal classified details of the hunt for Bin Laden.

Just days after the night-time raid that killed Bin Laden, Vice President Joe Biden publicly applauded “our brave Navy SEALs” for killing Bin Laden.

As I wrote in Dark Forces: the Truth About What Happened in Benghazi, Biden’s loose lips outraged then Secretary of Defense Robert Gates, who publicly chastised him for putting family members of the Navy SEALs in danger.

Six weeks later, at an awards ceremony at CIA Headquarters on June 24, 2011, then CIA director Leon Panetta disclosed the specific unit that had carried out the raid and its commander, even though a producer of the Hollywood film Zero Dark Thirty was present. Family members of SEAL Team 6 members on board Extortion 17, the call-sign for a Special Forces helicopter that was shot down by the Taliban on August 6, 2011 in Afghanistan’s Tangi valley, have blamed Biden and Panetta for their revelations.

The 80-page document of “flags” from Hillary Clinton’s previously “secret” paid speeches was compiled by her speaker’s bureau, the Harry Winston Agency (“HWA”), into an alphabetized list of subjects, ranging from “Awkward” to “Wall Street,” and included Hillary’s position statements on “helping corporations.”

In the cover email, sent to John Podesta, Jennifer Pamieri and other top aides in January, Hillary aide Tony Carrk singled out eleven broad areas where Mrs. Clinton’s statements appeared to be at variance with her campaign positions and required “an extra scrub with Policy.”

Carrk apparently didn’t consider the Bin Laden comments noteworthy enough to include in those highlights, which is why it has taken reporters so long to comb through the lengthy attachment.

The Bin Laden comments can be found in a section titled “Government Surveillance.” The staffers at the speaker’s bureau who pulled the quote from her remarks to the Canadian drug group headlined it, “Hillary Clinton Said Bin Laden Was Found By Intercepting A Phone Call, Not From A Walk in Tip.”

Protecting sources and methods is one of the most serious obligations of anyone in government with access to classified information, because divulging them can get people killed.

Mrs. Clinton has shown by her behavior that she is not trustworthy and should not be given access to classified information in the future. That alone should disqualify her from the presidency.

RELATED ARTICLE: Here are All 25 Answers Hillary Clinton Just Gave About Her Email Server Under Penalty of Perjury

RELATED VIDEO: Hillary Clinton – A Career Criminal

EDITORS NOTE: This column originally appeared on the DailyCaller.com website.

VIDEO: Paris 2016 ‘Scenes from the Apocalypse’ — The Muslim Migrant Infestation

Culture shock – if you are planning a trip to France, you will have low airfares and hotel costs because quite simply, you will be traveling to a dying nation.  The flood of Muslims into France already has damaged the country almost to a point of no return.

The below video and accompanying photos will show you just one section of the city – the Avenue de Flandres near the Stalingrad Metro Station, a slice of the city that has already experienced the devastation of uncontrolled mass migration of Muslims who share nothing in common with the country in which they have invaded; excuse me, migrated.  The photos are surreal.

Wake-up America because the same plan is unfolding here in our country.  The crime, severe assaults bordering on major and massive civil unrest, the degradation as already experienced across Europe are planned for America.

migrants-paris-3-e1458373835488

Muslim migrants on the Avenue de Flandres, 19th Arrondissement

The Paris you know or remember from adverts or brochures no longer exists. While no part of Paris looks like the romantic Cliches in Hollywood movies, some districts do resemble post-apocalyptic scenes of a dystopian thriller.

This footage, taken with a hidden camera by an anonymous Frenchman in the Avenue de Flandres, 19th Arrondissement, near the Stalingrad Metro Station in Paris as well as areas in close proximity, shows the devastating effects of uncontrolled illegal mass immigration of young African males into Europe. I compiled the clips and used some fitting music.

If it weren’t for the somewhat working infrastructure, the scene might as well have been the setting of movie shooting – or a slum in Mogadishu. The streets are littered in garbage, the sidewalks are blocked with trash, junk and mattresses, thousands of African men claim the streets as their own – they sleep and live in tents like homeless people.

20160916001283460265-original_800x600If no portable toilets are in reach, open urination and defecation are commonplace. Tens of thousands of homeless Illegal immigrants, undocumented or waiting for a decision of their asylum application, waste away trying to pass the time in the city. Although their prospects of being granted asylum as Africans are bleak, they’re hoping for a decision that would grant them an apartment, welfare and make France their new home.

The conditions are absolutely devastating. The police have given up trying to control these areas, the remaining French people avoid the areas at all cost, crime and rape is rampant, just recently mass brawls and riots made the news as fights broke out near the Stalingrad metro station.

If current trends continue and the French become minority in their own capital in even more areas, scenes like this might spread to areas frequented by tourists, forever changing the last romantic parts of Paris that match what most people have in mind when they think of the iconic city.

‘No to wall, Islam or die’ painted on San Antonio church in Arabic

“He said he wasn’t sure if the vandalism had anything to do with Donald Trump’s signature presidential campaign promise to build a wall on the U.S.-Mexico border.”

Sure, and no doubt it also has nothing to do with Islam.

“‘No to wall, Islam or die’ spray painted on San Antonio church entrance,” by Caleb Downs, Dallas Morning News, October 11, 2016:

Police are investigating the defacement of a San Antonio church after vandals spray painted “No to wall” and “Islam or die” next to the entrance of the church.

An unidentified symbol is underneath the words spray painted onto Gethsemane Lutheran Church in the 600 block of Avalon Street, the San Antonio Express-News reports.

Eric Miletti, the pastor of Gethsemane Lutheran Church, told the Express-News he first noticed the graffiti Monday morning.

He said he wasn’t sure if the vandalism had anything to do with Donald Trump’s signature presidential campaign promise to build a wall on the U.S.-Mexico border….

RELATED ARTICLES:

Sweden: Muslim migrants gang-rape wheelchair-bound woman

Huffington Post: “Islam Isn’t Just Compatible With Western Values, It Fully Endorses Them”

Wanted: ‘Infuriated young men’ to join ISIS

While the mainstream media will likely report this as a sign that ISIS is not truly Islamic, one can only wonder what is actually being discussed in Europe’s prisons, given the shocking numbers of how many Muslims are imprisoned in Europe.

Keep in mind:

Belgium – 35% of inmates are Muslim
UK – 44% of high-security inmates are Muslim
France – 70% of inmates are Muslim
Spain – 70% of inmates are Muslim
Germany – 30% of inmates “foreign”

“Studie: IS wirft ein Auge auf Europas Gefängnisse”, Krone.at , October 11, 2016:

Study: ISIS is using Europe’s prisons to recruit future jihadists

In Europe’s prisons, radical Islam is becoming more and more of a threat. The prisons have evolved into recruiting centers for jihadists, according to a study by the International Centre for the Study of Radicalisation (UK). The study looked into the developments of 79 jihadists from Belgium, the UK, Denmark, France, Germany, and the Netherlands. 57 percent of those investigated were imprisoned before radicalization. A minimum of 27 percent became radicalized in prison.

The Islamic State’s recruitment is not as focused on colleges or mosques as it is on criminals and those who are from lower economic backgrounds. In prisons it is easy to find “infuriated young men” who are “ripe” for radicalization. Jihadists can fall back on their reliable skills in weapons training and criminal fundraising.

Since 2011, approximately 5000 people from Western Europe traveled to the Middle East to join jihadist groups.

RELATED ARTICLE: Germany: Manhunt on for Muslim migrant who plotted airport jihad massacre

WIKILEAKS: Saudis and Qatar funding the Islamic State — and the Clinton Foundation

Hillary Clinton, in a leaked document, is quoted as saying:

“While this military/para-military operation is moving forward, we need to use our diplomatic and more traditional intelligence assets to bring pressure on the governments of Qatar and Saudi Arabia, which are providing clandestine financial and logistic support to ISIL and other radical Sunni groups in the region.”

This report adds: “The Clinton campaign has not replied to a Daily Caller inquiry about whether the Clinton Foundation will return donations from these two nations that, according to Hillary Clinton, fund ISIS.”

In another recently leaked communication, Hillary displayed what she really thinks about Muslim refugees by expressing her concerns about “legitimate refugees” because (in her words)  “they can’t possibly vet all those refugees….so they don’t know if, you know, jihadists are coming in along with legitimate refugees. Turkey for the same reason.”

If it weren’t for leaked documents, no one could begin to assess the real Hillary beneath her contrived smiles and hyper-welcoming rhetoric about Muslims and Muslim refugees.

hillary

“Hillary In Leaked Email: Saudi Arabia And Qatar Are Funding ISIS”, by Alex Pfeiffer, The Daily Caller, October 10, 2016:

Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton sent an email to her campaign chairman John Podesta in 2014, who was then-counselor to President Barack Obama, that said Saudi Arabia and Qatar are both giving financial and logistical support to the Islamic State and other extremist Sunni groups, according to a recent Wikileaks release.

Clinton sent the email on August 17, 2014 to Podesta. It was an eight-point plan to defeat ISIS in Iraq and Syria. Clinton’s email said that the United States should support Kurdish forces on the ground with U.S. military advisers and avoid the use of a conventional ground operation.

“While this military/para-military operation is moving forward, we need to use our diplomatic and more traditional intelligence assets to bring pressure on the governments of Qatar and Saudi Arabia, which are providing clandestine financial and logistic support to ISIL and other radical Sunni groups in the region,” Clinton wrote.

The former secretary of state added: “This effort will be enhanced by the stepped up commitment in the [Kurdish Regional Government]. The Qataris and Saudis will be put in a position of balancing policy between their ongoing competition to dominate the Sunni world and the consequences of serious U.S. pressure.”

The email from Clinton to Podesta contains a similar format of previous intelligence reports Clinton ally Sidney Blumenthal would send to the former secretary of state. The Daily Caller has previously reported how Clinton had previously asked aides to remove markings showing Blumenthal wrote the reports before sending them to White House officials.

The August 2014 email that pointed the finger at Saudi Arabia and Qatar does not contain any information linking it to Blumenthal in particular and is sent from one of Clinton’s personal emails. The batch of Wikileaks emails has not been independently verified by TheDC. However, Clinton and her spokesman Brian Fallon did not dispute the legitimacy of leaked speech transcripts released by Wikileaks at Sunday’s debate.

TheDC reached out to the Clinton campaign and asked if they dispute the legitimacy of the email, but they have not responded. The Daily Caller also emailed Blumenthal asking if he authored the memo, and he also did not respond.

Qatar has given between $1 million and $5 million to the Clinton Foundation and Saudi Arabia has donated upwards of $25 million dollars to the Foundation.

The Clinton campaign has not replied to a Daily Caller inquiry about whether the Clinton Foundation will return donations from these two nations that, according to Hillary Clinton, fund ISIS.

In 2010, Clinton’s top aide said that the up to $60 billion weapons transfer of fighter jets and helicopters to Saudi Arabia was a “top priority.” …..

Video: Robert Spencer on why there is no end in sight in the defense against the global jihad
Kenya: Muslims murder six, injure dozens in jihad attack targeting Christians

Islamic Appreciation Month comes to the University of Florida

Islam Appreciation Month has arrived on campus at the University of Florida:

Maria Ilyas, 20, president of Islam On Campus, said the purpose of the event is to clear misconceptions about Islam and Muslims.

“We’re trying to bring an awareness and appreciation to who Muslims are and what Islam is really about….

Another Muslim student also commented:

Daniel Khokar, 18, who identifies as Muslim, said the event means a lot to him because it gives him a sense of belonging.

It is right that every innocent Muslim, as well as any member of any group, should feel a sense of belonging, but a sense of entitlement is not the equivalent of a sense of belonging. There are Hindus, Buddhists, Sikhs, Bahai students too; and there are also Jews on campuses who are treated with contempt and intimidation by jihadist Muslim groups operating right under the noses of university administrators. Shame on the University of Florida for this outright preferential treatment for Muslims over any other group.

Islamic Heritage Month was recently declared in Ontario, also to make Muslims feel better, with the objective of combating “Islamophobia,” despite the fact that no stats bear out that “Islamophobia” is a significant problem. Muslims are the ones attacking Westerners, and despite this fact, the targeting of Muslims remains minimal, which demonstrates the exceptional evolution of the West in terms of tolerance. Sadly, however, blacks and Jews remain by far the greatest groups targeted by hate crimes.

If Muslims collectively want to feel more included, then they would also collectively (and openly) condemn all forms of jihad (stealth and violent), as well as anti-West and anti-Israel hate messages globally, and the hate that is routinely being preached in mosques, Islamic centers and madrassas right on Western soil.

uf-islam-on-campus

“UF’s Islam on Campus to begin celebrating Islam Appreciation Month today”, by Rick Garcia,Florida Alligator, October 11, 2016:

UF’s Islam On Campus is hosting Islam Appreciation Month this fall in lieu of its annual fundraiser.

The month long celebration is starting with Islamapalooza, formerly named Islam Fair, on the Plaza of the Americas today from 10 a.m. until 3 p.m., and it will continue Wednesday from 10 a.m. until 3 p.m. The event will feature booths where students can get henna tattoos, play trivia about Islam and eat falafels, pita and samosas.

Nahal Khamisani, the secretary of Islam On Campus, said they decided to host the monthlong celebration this Fall after renovations to the Stephen C. O’Connell Center prevented them from having the annual Fast-A-Thon fundraiser, which normally happens in the Fall. They plan on hosting the fundraiser in the Spring, but wanted to spread out the organization’s big events, Khamisani said.

“(Islamapalooza) highlights a lot of the cultural aspects of Islam while getting the community at UF excited with incentives like free henna and food,” the 19-year-old UF psychology sophomore said.

Maria Ilyas, 20, president of Islam On Campus, said the purpose of the event is to clear misconceptions about Islam and Muslims.

“We’re trying to bring an awareness and appreciation to who Muslims are and what Islam is really about,” the UF microbiology senior said.

Daniel Khokar, 18, who identifies as Muslim, said the event means a lot to him because it gives him a sense of belonging…….

RELATED ARTICLES:

Muslim arrested for threats at DC airport, causing disturbances in Boston — left Qur’an on steps of public building

Video: Robert Spencer on why there is no end in sight in the defense against the global jihad

The Media are Instruments of Evil as Evidenced by their Hypocrisy

Did you hear about the blockbuster interview with a woman named Juanita Broaddrick? She’s the woman who says Governor Bill Clinton raped her in 1978, and then two weeks later, Hillary Clinton threatened her into silence.

Yeah, didn’t think you’d heard about it — or if you have heard about it, you barely heard about it.

TRANSCRIPT

Did you hear about the blockbuster interview with a woman named Juanita Broaddrick? She’s the woman who says Governor Bill Clinton raped her in 1978, and then two weeks later, Hillary Clinton threatened her into silence.

Yeah, didn’t think you’d heard about it — or if you have heard about it, you barely heard about it.

How about Paula Jones, Kathleen Willey, Gennifer FLowers and, of course, Monica Lewinsky? In the latter case, Lewinsky was a White House intern, so Bill engaging in sex with her was tantamount to sexual harassment because of the authority he had over her. Clinton got impeached over his lies to prosecutors in the case involving Lewinsky.

And the reason we are bringing this all up again isn’t to rehash the trash; it’s to point out two things, using this now, once again timely topic, to do so: (1) the hypocrisy of the media, and (2) the unfitness of Hillary Clinton to be president.

While the media is all over Trump for his lewd, disgusting, vulgar, indefensible, filthy comments, they exercised no such rush to judgment over Bill Clintons actual actions. Trump’s words bring down the indignation of the media elite. Bill’s actions elicit a collective yawn from the same folks.

Bill is a serial rapist, adulterer, etc. In the wake of the revelations about Bill and his actions, the Clintonistas rushed to their allies in the media, and at every possible turn kept repeating and repeating it’s just sex, who cares? No big deal. Everybody does it.

When it was revealed that Clinton had perjured himself before the special prosecutor, lied to them under oath that the whole country watched on TV (remember “depends on what the meaning of the word ‘is’ is”?), his surrogates once again went on all the Sunday Morning mainstream media shows and said, “Who cares? It’s just sex.”

So Bill got a pass for not only raping Broaddrick, having sex with an intern (which would have gotten any CEO in the United States immediately fired), and perjuring himself, because the media was happy to parrot the worn-out phrase: “It’s just sex.”

Media elites also — especially — turned a blind eye to Hillary’s specially set-up, infamous war room during their time in Arkansas, where she managed what she called “Bimbo Eruptions” — episodes where any of the numerous victims of Bill would begin to emerge — and Hillary would get to them and threaten them into silence.

None, absolutely none of this raised an eyebrow of any in the media; after all, it’s just sex, and Hillary is just “standin’ by her man,” as came up in the famous CBS News 60 Minutes interview, where Bill and Hill did a rare joint interview when Bill’s sexual problems threatened to sink his 1992 campaign.

So Bill is a serial adulterer and perjurer at best — and a rapist most likely; Hillary enables every bit of this and blasts the female victims, is greatly aided and abetted in her work by the media, which gave her the platform to launch her now infamous “vast right-wing conspiracy” attack — and yet Trump is the one who is somehow unfit for the presidency.

Fast forward to the present, and Hillary has lied to Congress multiple times, destroyed evidence, set up an entire shadow effort through their foundation to get money from foreign nationals to exercise influence peddling, lied to parents of Americans killed in Benghazi, dead partly from her inaction, lied to America about the cause of the Benghazi attack — and Trump is somehow unfit to be president.

Perhaps Trump is unfit to be president, but Hillary is unfit to be a free citizen. The woman should be in jail for her crimes. And in all this the media are complicit. This is why trust of the media is lower than trust in either Hillary or Trump — and that’s a bar so low it’s almost in the gutter.

The media control the minds of Americans who have willingly allowed themselves to develop snapshot/instagram/meme/bumper-sticker intellects. It has become media for the masses. When the intellect is softened, evil moves in and sets up shop. And when the controllers of the media are of evil mind themselves, supporters of intrinsically moral evils, then they can fill people’s minds night and day, non-stop, round the clock, 24/365 with their spiritual poison. And they have.

What has happened in the secular world is what has happened in the Church. Too many Catholics have simply accepted the nonsense that passes for “catechesis” and “evangelization” unquestioningly and without thought. The world and politics and the media will go their own way. But the Church belongs to Christ, and He will not allow it to continue imploding the way we see the secular world doing today.

Hillary will win because the world has become drenched in evil and hypocrisy and it will elect its own, and there is no longer any way to purge these from society, because they have become too commonplace. Mankind controls society, but God controls the Church, so there is a lesson for Catholics to be learned in all this: Hypocrisy and double dealing and sound-bite frilly theology, appealing to emotions and ignoring the intellect — what the vulgar media has become expert in — will not always last in the Church.

Society has no way of cleansing itself, but God does have ways to cleanse the Church, as He has shown in times past. That cleansing may very well be carried out through what we are seeing unfold right now politically.

Persevere in the Faith. Pray for final perseverance. Only those who persevere will receive the victor’s crown.

RELATED ARTICLE: Here are All 25 Answers Hillary Clinton Just Gave About Her Email Server Under Penalty of Perjury

EDITORS NOTE: Originally published at ChurchMilitant.com.