Tag Archive for: Donald J. Trump

What I Saw Inside The Supreme Court During Trump’s Historic Visit

WASHINGTON — It was impossible for any member of the press or public to stop their eyes from drifting time to time from the bench to the middle of the nation’s highest court, where the president was quietly making history.

The nine Supreme Court justices carried on completely unfazed by the president’s first-time presence in their courtroom for oral arguments on birthright citizenship. Justices Brett Kavanaugh and Elena Kagan still exchanged a few laughs. Justice Samuel Alito periodically shut his eyes and reclined as far back as his chair would allow as attorneys spoke. Chief Justice John Roberts held to the strictest decorum.

While taking a second glance over the briefs in preparation, I somehow missed the president take his seat. But I immediately heard the murmurs around me as the whole morning’s anticipation reached its peak.

As the chief justice recently reminded a crowd in March, justices are not obligated to carry forward the views of those who appoint them. They’re used to criticism, and there’s no reason to be moved by a president’s attendance, though his criticism has been especially sharp since the majority struck down his tariff policy in February. 

Still, nobody was quite sure how the president’s attendance was going to play out.

Birthright citizenship is a major constitutional question with wide-ranging ramifications. The president has made his views clear about the damage “dumb judges and justices” could do by striking down his executive order and maintaining a policy that incentivises illegal immigration and birth tourism.

Aside from increased security, the president’s morning plans didn’t actually change much as the coequal third branch of government went about its business. Staff started retrieving reporters from the press room and seating them in the courtroom at 9:15 a.m., part of the usual routine. No official word came on the prior night’s Oval Office announcement.

“Is the president in group A, B, or C?” one reporter loudly asked.

The court staff member laughed and paused. “No response,” she replied.

Rumors swirled online the night before about a special seat reserved for the president.

“There’s literally a chair set up at SCOTUS for our presidents to sit in for oral argument,” Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon wrote in response to a reporter on X. “Your separation of powers nonsense is more imitation pearl-clutching hauteur.”

A National Park Service document does reference a black chair for the president in front of the bench, though the president’s attendance is “rare and limited to important ceremonial occasions.”

As previous presidents have done, President Donald Trump attended swearing-in ceremonies during his first term for Kavanaugh and Justice Neil Gorsuch, two of his appointees. Trump floated attending oral arguments for the tariff case in December but ultimately did not.

As reporters lined up before entering the courtroom, a staff member finally acknowledged we “may have heard” of the president’s plans to attend. If he stayed the entire argument, reporters were instructed to remain seated until he left.

When the chief justice announces “the case is submitted” and the buzzer sounds, press typically rush out to start writing, updating editors and appearing on-camera. While the court allows an audio livestream of oral arguments, a COVID-19 protocol that became permanent, it remains a rare institution in Washington where no cameras or electronics are allowed.

Seated in the courtroom, reporters without details of the president’s potential entrance craned their necks to scope out the room. Many of the press seats offer partial visibility into the courtroom, with parts of the bench obstructed by columns. On the busiest days of big cases, reporters seated in the back row behind the curtains are lucky if they can see one or two justices.

Reporters in the first rows whispered who they spotted to those behind. Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick. Attorney General Pam Bondi. In the public section nearest to the press, I spotted John Eastman.

Ten minutes before arguments began, a court staff member offered some details: Trump would be sitting in the front row of the public section. Between the bench and public seating, there are about five rows of chairs reserved for Supreme Court bar attorneys.

A law enforcement official stopped by next to warn members of the press, once again, that we would be kicked out if we stood up during the arguments. The officer declined to share any more about the president’s seat. Court staff can share those details, she said, though she couldn’t.

Just before the court was called into session, the president entered.

“Can she see the president?” another reporter in the neighboring alcove asked, gesturing to the courtroom artist to my right.

I shook my head. Her view of the president’s seat wasn’t ideal, but the artist was managing by leaning to the right with a small pair of theater binoculars. The only problem with the binoculars is that they can’t see through heads, she said.

“The Honorable, the Chief Justice and the Associate Justices of the Supreme Court of the United States,” the marshall called out as the room rose from their seats. “Oyez! Oyez! Oyez! All persons having business before the Honorable, the Supreme Court of the United States, are admonished to draw near and give their attention, for the Court is now sitting. God save the United States and this Honorable Court!”

Reporters lingered just a second longer than usual, milking every moment it was permissible to stand without getting called out by court police. I still couldn’t catch a view of Trump’s face.

At 10 o’clock, the Chief Justice began the usual swearing-in of new attorneys to the bar, and oral arguments began promptly after. A court spokesperson confirmed to the New York Times then that Trump was indeed seated in the courtroom, where reporters had no contact with those outside.

For a rare hour and 20 minutes, the president sat quietly and listened as the justices pressed his solicitor general, John Sauer, with questions. No White House press pool. No cameras. Only the regular Supreme Court pool and a courtroom artist.

Shortly after Sauer concluded, the president stood to leave.

The justices continued, never acknowledging their special guest. But now I could finally catch a glimpse as the president headed for a right side exit between two columns, his silhouette clear against the window as he left.

AUTHOR

Katelynn Richardson

Investigative Reporter

RELATED ARTICLE: Trump Might Lose Historic First SCOTUS Case President Has Ever Attended

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.


All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

EXCLUSIVE: Conservative Group Launches Guerilla Ad Campaign Thanking Trump For D.C. Crackdown

The conservative nonprofit organization Citizens for Sanity launched a guerrilla marketing campaign Thursday in Washington, D.C., praising President Donald Trump for “keeping D.C. safe and calling out the left’s hypocrisy on safety measures,” according to a statement obtained by the Daily Caller.

The campaign follows a series of executive orders from Trump creating a D.C. Safe and Beautiful Task Force to clean up the nation’s capital and declaring an emergency to crack down on crime. The two-week period after Trump’s Aug. 11 takeover saw a 21% lower crime rate than the same period in 2024, according to Metropolitan Police Department data.

Citizens for Sanity aims to “highlight the importance of logic and reason” and “defeat ‘wokeism’ and anti-critical thinking ideologies,” according to their mission statement. The nonprofit employs billboards and other forms of advertising across the country. They have now turned their attention to Washington, D.C., with an ad campaign featuring box trucks, billboards and building projections, according to the statement obtained by the Caller.

One ad, projected on buildings, compares the alleged sentiments of those opposing Trump’s use of D.C. police and the National Guard to his motivations. “The left: ‘DC doesn’t have a crime problem,’” one part says while the second reads, “President Trump: ‘I’ll make sure DC doesn’t have a crime problem.’”

Citizens for Sanity Executive Director Ian Prior issued a statement to the Caller. “President Trump is holding D.C. criminals’ feet to the fire and Citizens For Sanity is proud to launch a campaign that proves strong leadership can keep communities safe. While the Left politicizes public safety measures, President Trump is implementing common-sense policies that put patriotic Americans FIRST.”

A digital ad lists more of the Citizens for Sanity’s depictions of the left on this issue, according to a transcript. These include, “Don’t lock up any of the violent criminals or drug dealers, they have rights too!” and “Stop complaining about the toilet paper being locked up at the grocery store.”

“But President Trump said: ‘Lock up the criminals! Clean up D.C.!’” the transcript reads.

“D.C. went from chaos to cleanup because Trump brought the hammer,” the ad continues. “Turns out crime in D.C. can go down when you have leadership with common sense and a spine.”

Citizens for Sanity will continue the campaign through Friday.

AUTHOR

Derek VanBuskirk

Reporter

RELATED ARTICLES:

DC Mayor Orders Local Cooperation With Federal Crime Crackdown

Trump Suggests He Could Deploy Troops To New Orleans

AOC Blasts Jeffries, Schumer For Dragging Their Feet On Endorsing Socialist Mamdani

ROOKE: Liberals And Cocaine-Lovers Align To Hate On Trump For Saving American Lives

No. 2 GOP Sen Says Republicans Will Move Quickly To Speed Up Confirmation Of Stalled Trump Nominees

History On Trump’s Side In Quest To Gut Congress’ Wasteful Spending, Russ Vought Says

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Tulsi Gabbard Releases Evidence Of ‘Years-Long Coup’ On Trump

Director of National Intelligence (DNI) Tulsi Gabbard on Friday released what she called “overwhelming evidence” showing former President Barack Obama and his national security team “manufactured and politicized intelligence” after President Donald Trump’s 2016 victory.

The newly declassified file arrives after a bruising, years-long saga over allegations that President Donald Trump’s 2016 campaign colluded with Russia to sway the election. Investigators ultimately failed to prove collusion, fueling scrutiny of how the probe was launched and whether federal agencies acted fairly. 

The DNI statement said that this “new assessment was based on information that was known by those involved to be manufactured,” referring to the Steele Dossier, which was a privately funded and unverified report alleging Trump-Russia ties.

The file revealed not only that there was no evidence Trump was acting as a Russian asset, but also no evidence Russia planned to “use cyber means” or “directly manipulate the actual vote count” to sway the election.

The memo accompanying the declassified file accused the DNI and Department of Homeland Security (DHS) of withholding key context, leaving out in their press release that the FBI and NSA had only “low confidence” in blaming Russia for data leaks in September 2016, just weeks before the election.

It nonetheless acknowledged “supporting evidence indicating the Russian government directed hacking of the DNC and [the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee].”

The memo also claimed “Deep State officials in the [intelligence community began] leaking blatantly false intelligence to the Washington Post” in December, after the election.

Those officials told the Post that Russia had used “cyber means” to sway “the outcome of the election” and that the CIA had “concluded in a secret assessment that Russia intervened” to help Trump.

A DNI whistleblower said they “could not concur in good conscience based on the information available” that there was “a decisive Russian preference for then-candidate Donald Trump,” according to the memo.

“This was politicized intelligence that was used as the basis for countless smears seeking to delegitimize President Trump’s victory, the years-long Mueller investigation, two Congressional impeachments, high level officials being investigated, arrested, and thrown in jail, heightened US-Russia tensions, and more,” the statement continued.

“Their goal was to subvert the will of the American people and enact what was essentially a years-long coup with the objective of trying to usurp the President from fulfilling the mandate bestowed upon him by the American people,” Gabbard said. “Their egregious abuse of power and blatant rejection of our Constitution threatens the very foundation and integrity of our democratic republic.”

“No matter how powerful, every person involved in this conspiracy must be investigated and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law, to ensure nothing like this ever happens again,” Gabbard continued. “The American people’s faith and trust in our democratic republic and therefore the future of our nation depends on it. As such, I am providing all documents to the Department of Justice to deliver the accountability that President Trump, his family, and the American people deserve.”

Gabbard called for everyone involved to be investigated and prosecuted, adding that she was “turning over all documents to the DOJ for criminal referral.”

AUTHOR

Derek VanBuskirk

Reporter

RELATED ARTICLES:

OBAMA WAS BEHIND IT ALL: Declassified Evidence of Obama Administration Conspiracy to Subvert President Trump’s 2016 Victory and Presidency

‘Treasonous Conspiracy’: Tulsi Gabbard Calls for Obama to Be Prosecuted over 2016 Election Coup

Note on New Trump-Russia Disclosures

Trump Compares ‘Jeffrey Epstein Hoax’ To Russiagate, Blasts ‘Past’ Supporters

Tulsi Gabbard Accuses Media Of Taking Her Out Of Context After Trump Addresses Iran Assessment

Nancy Pelosi Tells Unassuming Reporter He’d Be ‘Good Candidate’ For Alcatraz Prison

Blue City Sheriffs Scoff At DOJ Request For Information On Illegals

Third Biden Aide Annie Tomasini Pleads The Fifth In House Oversight Probe Into Alleged Cover-Up

RELATED VIDEO: Obama ‘MANUFACTURED’ the RUSSIA HOAX to SABOTAGE the Trump presidency

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permissioon. ©All rights reserved.

EXCLUSIVE: Club For Growth Releases Ad Praising GOP For ‘Big Beautiful Bill’

The Club for Growth, a conservative organization advocating for fiscally conservative policy, praised President Donald Trump and Congressional Republicans in a new digital ad following the passage of the One Big Beautiful Bill.

The new ad called for congratulating House and Senate Republicans who worked to pass the bill, as well as the president.

“America’s back on top. Thank President Trump. Thank Republicans. And keep America winning.”

The ad also touches on the sheer size of the bill, dubbing it a “game changer” and confronting the naysayers: “They said it couldn’t be done. Too big. Too bold. But Trump did it.”

The video also emphasizes the benefits that the tax breaks in the bill offer to small business owners, calling it a “permanent tax relief to help small businesses thrive.

The group launched targeted ad campaigns aimed at persuading lawmakers who remained undecided on the bill, according to its website. Lawmakers included Republican Senators Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, Jerry Moran of Kansas, John Curtis of Utah and Kevin Cramer of Nebraska. Democratic Pennsylvania Sen. John Fetterman was also targeted, as were Republican Reps. Mike Lawler and Nick Lalota of New York and Scott Perry of Pennsylvania. 

The legislation passed the Senate with Murkowski voting in favor and Vice President JD Vance casting a tie-breaking vote. The legislation cleared the House on Thursday and now heads to the president’s desk. The bill seeks to avert an estimated $4.5 trillion tax hike set to take effect at the end of the year.

The legislation eliminates taxes on tips and overtime pay, funds school choice initiatives, and extends the tax cuts enacted during Trump’s first term, delivering on campaign promises made by the president.

AUTHOR

Adriel Perez-Gonzalez

Contributor.

RELATED ARTICLES:

ROOKE: Trump’s Big, Beautiful Bill Contains A Special Present For Americans

Trump’s ‘Big, Beautiful’ Bill Advances To His Desk

America’s Migrant Crisis Summed Up In One Preventable Tragedy

Some Wacky Leftists Want Democrats To Become Even Weirder And Smuttier

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries Warns ‘Thousands Will Die’ If Trump’s Bill Passes

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

‘Two Very Simple Words’: Trump Makes His Stance On Iran Unequivocally Clear

President Donald Trump clarified his demands for the end of the conflict between Israel and Iran.

“Two very simple words, unconditional surrender,” Trump told Jennifer Griffin of Fox News on Wednesday.

“I’ve had it, I give up,” Trump added, referring to Iran. “You know, the three for 40 years they’ve been saying death to America, death to Israel, that to anybody else that they didn’t like. They were bullies. They were schoolyard bullies.”

Trump clarified that “war is very complex” and that “I wouldn’t say that we won anything yet,” but that they “sure as hell made a lot of progress.”

Trump posted Tuesday on Truth Social, calling for “unconditional surrender.”

“We’re not looking for long-term war,” Trump addressed his base on Wednesday at the installation of the White House’s new flag pole. “I only want one thing: Iran can not have a nuclear weapon.”

Trump warned that Iran’s access to a nuclear weapon could result in them using it on the U.S. and other nations, adding that they “would be a terror all over the world.”

“All I’m doing is saying you cannot have a nuclear weapon, and I tried to do it nicely, and then on day 61, I said, ‘Let’s go’ because we can’t let that happen. And I’ve been saying it for 20 years,” Trump concluded.

AUTHOR

Derek VanBuskirk

Reporter.

RELATED ARTICLE: ‘I Will Not Abandon This Post’: Mike Huckabee Texts Trump Saying He Has Biggest Choice Since Truman In 1945

RELATED VIDEO: Israel, Iran, and Clarity Between False Dichotomies

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

America Teeters On Precipice Of ‘Radical Education Reform’ After Trump Shuts Off Lights At ED

President Donald Trump fulfilled a key campaign promise when he signed an executive order to begin dismantling the Department of Education (ED), sending shockwaves throughout an entrenched bureaucracy that has been the face of American education for decades.

Though officially dissolving the ED can only be done through Congress, Democratic officials like California Gov. Gavin Newsom and Minnesota Gov. Tim Walzteachers unions and several education groups have wasted no time in protesting Trump’s actions. Despite the outrage, experts say a full shuttering of the department would bring much-needed changes to a bloated education system that spends over $10,000 per pupil with very little to show for it.

“America is on the precipice of radical education reform and change, where we are empowering parents, and we’re not empowering the bureaucrats anymore,” Norton Rainey, CEO of ACE Scholarships, an organization that gives financial support to children so that they can attend the school of their choice, told the Daily Caller News Foundation. “We’re putting money into the hands of our children, not into administrators, and that’s a good thing for America.”

Trump’s executive order is framed around “returning education to parents and communities,” and directs the Secretary of Education to “take all necessary steps to facilitate the closure of the Department of Education.”

The department excused half of its employees March 11 while Secretary of Education Linda McMahon vowed to end the “bureaucratic bloat” of her department to fulfill Trump’s mandate.

McMahon announced on March 3 that her department’s “final mission” is “to send education back to the states and empower all parents to choose an excellent education for their children.”

“American education can be the greatest in the world,” she continued. “It ought not to be corrupted by political ideologies, special interests, and unjust discrimination. Parents, teachers, and students alike deserve better.”

The main complaints surrounding the Department of Education, stemming from conservative and libertarian critics, is that the agency is unconstitutionalfails to deliver on the promises it makes and that is corrupted by left-wing ideology.

The taxpayer spends about $14,840 per pupil every year, according to figures from World Population Review, though educational achievement does not seem to be improving.

“Increases in education spending do not produce student achievement,” Johnathan Butcher, a senior research fellow for education policy at the Heritage Foundation, wrote in a statement provided to the DCNF. “How we use the spending matters far more — and since centralized policies will not meet the needs of a diverse study body nationwide, interest groups will claim that they need more money in order to make the programs work.”

Numerous reports regarding student test scores have revealed shocking declines in academic performance, one example being the Nation’s Report Card released in January. Its 2024 data showed plummeting reading scores for fourth and eighth grade students and static math scores for students in both grades. The report stated that this was “compounding a decline in the nation’s reading scores that started prior to the pandemic.”

Trump has championed the demise of the department for months, declaring that “we will ultimately eliminate the federal Department of Education” while on the campaign trail in Wisconsin in September.

“Closing the Department of Education would provide children and their families the opportunity to escape a system that is failing them,” Trump said during his speech accommodating his executive order signing on Thursday.

The Department of Education did not respond to the DCNF’s multiple requests for comment.

‘A Product Of Leftist Politics’

In 1979, President Jimmy Carter signed the Department of Education Organization Act, with the office officially established in 1980. Carter stated that though the primary responsibility for education falls to the “states, localities, and private institutions,” the federal government “has for too long failed to play its own supporting role in education as effectively as it could.”

“The Department of Education is a product of leftist politics from the late 1970s,” Butcher continued. “President Jimmy Carter negotiated with teacher unions about its creation, and it has since become a way for special interest groups to identify and claim funding streams from federal taxpayers.”

Federal education projects and grants were already being organized and doled out before the ED, though the department was created to “improve the coordination” of these programs, as well as “supplement and complement” state efforts to improve education.

The office was contested by Republicans from the start, while in the Cato Institute’s policy recommendations for the 108th congress, the think tank cited several Democrats that weren’t fond of the idea, either. Democratic Rep. Benjamin Rosenthal went along with the plan out of “not wanting to embarrass the president,” according to the handbook.

The libertarian think tank also pointed to one House Democrat that spoke to the Wall Street Journal at the time. “The idea of an Education Department is really a bad one,” the anonymous House Democrat told the Journal’s Al Hunt in 1979. “But it’s NEA’s [National Education Association] top priority. There are school teachers in every congressional district and most of us simply don’t need the aggravation of taking them on.”

During his first State of the Union address in 1982, President Ronald Reagan called on Congress to eliminate both the Energy Department and the Education Department.

“The budget plan I submit to you on February 8th will realize major savings by dismantling the Departments of Energy and Education and by eliminating ineffective subsidies for business,” he said.

The ‘Gazillion-Dollar-Question’

Leading libertarian and conservative thought leaders at the Cato Institute, the Heritage Foundation, the Manhattan Institute, the American Enterprise Institute the Center for Education Reform remain convinced that dissolving the ED will not diminish the quality of American education.

Important programs would continue and could even flourish if given more flexibility if their grants were provided “in block grants to the states,” Butcher argued.

“Likewise, student loans should be moved to another agency, and the main adjustment will be to whom or where students make payments,” he continued.

Butcher’s long-term vision for education is that “local schools and state departments of education will not have to keep navigating burdensome federal education regulations or ‘dear colleague letters’ that micromanage local school practices. And this will be one of the largest benefits from closing the federal agency.”

“We do not have the option to send our kids to public school because of a progressive agenda. It’s not an option for a committed Christian family,” Pam Costes, administrator of Spirit Christian Academy, a private school with an alternative education model referred to as a NAUMS inc. university model school, told the DCNF. The institution is “a [private] school that puts the parents into their rightful place,” Costes said, though she is not against public school. Costes emphasized that the partnership between parents and the school are essential to the institution’s model.

During the COVID-19 shutdowns, the school looked to what other academic institutions were doing for guidance and that the school’s leadership was “really good about listening and letting people make their decisions about what they thought was for their family, and allow parents to make those decisions, rather than us,” Costes said.

“We don’t for sure know why some districts are really able to leverage their dollar to get greater growth for their students,” Dr. Marguerite Roza, research professor and director of the Edunomics Lab at Georgetown University, told the DCNF. “But it’s clear that some districts are really quite successful at leveraging their money and getting better outcomes than maybe some of their others.”

Roza agreed with Butcher’s assessment that it is not the amount of funding that seems to make a difference, but how the funding is used. Edunomics has dedicated years of research to measuring states’ return on investment. The professor pointed to several factors that might impact a state’s return on investment, including differing work forces, certifications, “appetite[s] for academics,” poverty levels and pay structures.

Edunomics documents the correlation between state funding and student outcomes, with some data showing that increased spending doesn’t positively relate to increased academic achievement. However, some school districts in certain states within them do show a positive correlation.

The “gazillion-dollar-question” is why some states are more effective at converting their state or federal funding into academic success than others, and that it can’t be attributed to any one factor, Roza said.

The professor emphasized that it is not necessarily a department that leads to improved education, but good policies. She pointed to former President George W. Bush’s’ ‘No Child Left Behind’ policy, which she said was “widely suspected to be responsible” for “some steady improvement in student outcomes,” though other sources say that the policy was “a failed experiment.”

The policy triggered “more focus by states on getting the student outcomes,” Roza argued. No Child Left Behind expired in 2009 but was later officially changed in 2015 to the Every Student Succeeds Act.

A common critique of private schools is that they are not accessible to all students. Organizations like ACE Scholarships and the Commonwealth Foundation, a Pennsylvania-based think tank dedicated to expanding school choice and fighting government overreach, work to ensure that school choice options are available, even for low-income families.

“I think we as taxpayers need to ask ourselves what we are getting from the U.S. Department of Education,” Rachel Langan, a senior education policy analyst at the Commonwealth Foundation, told the DCNF. “What are we getting for all of those tax dollars and is there a better way for those dollars to be spent?”

Langan is a former public-school teacher and described herself as once “very pro-public education” to the DCNF. She pointed to the COVID-19 shutdowns’ effects on education as having changed her perspective.

The policy analyst noted that the “COVID crisis open[ed] the eyes of American parents as to the value they were receiving or not from their public schools.” Langan pointed to the shutdowns as a catalyst for many parents to realize that education could be improved, that school choice options are a necessity and how confusion emerged among parents over funding.

“Where is our money going?” She asked.

The Commonwealth Foundation “would like to see a dollar amount attached to every child in Pennsylvania that would follow that student to the school of their choice, whether that’s a public, private, homeschool, career, technical school or charter school,” Langan continued.

She also referenced that in January, the think tank learned from a Right-to-Know request that there are about 50,000 students who applied for a tax credit scholarship in the state and did not receive one due to Pennsylvania’s state program caps. “There’s 50,000 kids whose families want something better for them who applied for scholarship but because of program caps, they didn’t receive it,” she said.

ACE Scholarships also provides K-12 scholarships to lower-income children. The organization also collaborates with state legislatures to advocate for school choice policies.

“Our belief at ACE is that school choice works,” Rainey told the DCNF. He also noted that ACE financially supports children with partial tuition scholarships for up to $4,000 annually, and that a child’s quality education prepares kids for the “American dream.”

Rainey said that at ACE, they believe every child “should experience the American dream. And we think that it really does begin with education, but sadly, as we all know and we lament about this, our country is not providing the American Dream for too many kids. They’re being left behind. They’re not being educated.”

Rainey pointed to some “exciting” upcoming changes in education, including Texas’ proposed education savings account bill and Trump’s federal tax cut initiative(R

“We believe that when you invest in kids, great things will happen, and that when you change education, that you’re changing everything in their lives,” he said.

AUTHOR

Audrey Streb

Contributor.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Trump Begins Process Of Redistributing Department Of Education’s Duties

‘Fail Our Children’: New Data Shows Just How Badly Student Learning Suffered As Schools Doubled Down On DEI

‘We’ll See Our Scores Go Up’: Linda McMahon Vows To End Bureaucratic Bloat In Education, Fulfill Trump’s Mandate

Blue States Sue Trump Admin Over Education Department Cuts

Department Of Education Warns Schools Nationwide Must Drop DEI Policies Or Lose Federal Funding

JOSHUA MERCER: School Choice Option Should Be Available To All Parents

Missouri Gov. Mike Parson Signs Education Bills That Include School Choice Expansion

School Choice Helps Close Performance Gap For Low-Income Students, Study Finds

MOORE: The American Dream … Is Still Alive

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.


All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

Why Donald J. Trump Deserves the Nobel Peace Prize

Preserving the Abraham Accords amid Terror and Regional Unrest

WATCH: Why Donald J. Trump Deserves the Nobel Peace Prize

In the aftermath of October 7th, many pundits grappled with the timing behind Hamas’s brutal assault on Israel.

Why now? The answer, as perplexing as it may sound, is that Hamas chose this moment to derail the momentum of the Abraham Accords—a monumental shift in Middle East geopolitics engineered by Donald J. Trump.

By inciting chaos and drawing Arab public opinion against Israel, Hamas aimed to halt the growing rapprochement between Israel and Arab states, particularly the looming Saudi deal that could have sealed a historic peace framework.

A Historic Diplomatic Breakthrough

The Abraham Accords, signed in 2020, were nothing short of revolutionary. For decades, Israel’s neighbors refused recognition, insisted on perpetual conflict, and tangled the region in bitter antagonism.

Then, Trump did what many thought impossible: Israel found itself forging diplomatic and economic ties with the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, Morocco, and Sudan.

The world watched in astonishment as historic handshake after handshake redefined the Middle Eastern chessboard. No one expected such a breakthrough in our lifetime, certainly not with the entrenched narratives and alignments that had dominated the Middle East for generations.

These Accords didn’t just bring official recognition; they enabled tangible cooperation, from defense protocols to economic ventures. They shattered long-standing myths and showed that common interests, prosperity, security, and stability, trump old grievances.

But Hamas, tethered to Iranian influence and Qatari funding, saw these diplomatic gains as an existential threat to their narrative. A region at peace, with Israel integrated and welcomed, weakens Iran’s propaganda that Israel stands alone, surrounded by enemies and pariahs. The Abraham Accords effectively cornered Iran, undercutting its attempts to position itself as the leader of anti-Israel resistance and regional dominance.

Under a second Trump administration, the approach to Iran’s nuclear ambitions and regional meddling could pivot dramatically. Trump’s original vision, where NATO allies and Middle Eastern partners step up, share the load, and collaborate in containing both Tehran and transnational terrorism, might reemerge even bolder.

With Saudi Arabia potentially joining the Accords, the Middle East might finally see an epoch of genuine peace and cooperation. Imagine Arab states openly embracing relationships with Israel without fearing Iranian or Qatari retaliation. Such a scenario, once a pipe dream, is now within reach.

A Nobel-Worthy Triumph

Poland’s unwavering solidarity with the U.S. on the Eastern European frontier and Israel’s central role in containing Iranian aggression, these are the new spines of America’s global strategy. Trump’s team, by reaffirming the Abraham Accords and expanding them, could well bring a lasting calm.

If that vision comes to fruition, and the region begins trading in bullets for business, in generational hatred for pragmatic alliance, then perhaps Donald J. Trump has more than earned consideration for a Nobel Prize. When the old enmities fade and cooperation becomes the norm, history might just say: he helped push the seemingly impossible into reality.

RELATED ARTICLE: Trump’s 2024 Victory — and American Restoral.

RELATED VIDEO: Donald Trump hired a young poor homeless Hispanic man Christmas Eve 1982

EDITORS NOTE: This Visegrád 24 column with video is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Who Is Usha Vance the wife Of Trump’s VP Pick? She’s the daughter of immigrants with an impressive resume!

Usha Vance, wife to Trump’s pick for vice president, Republican Ohio Sen. J.D. Vance, has a long and impressive resume, which is likely to fall under increased scrutiny as she and her husband surge into the national spotlight.

A child of immigrants, Usha’s parents emigrated from India and settled in San Diego where they raised her, according to ABC News.

She attended Yale for her undergraduate degree and, after earning her Masters at Cambridge, returned to Yale for law school where she met Vance, he recalled in his memoir “Hillbilly Elegy.”

She built upon a prestigious educational CV with an even more impressive career resume.

She clerked for current Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh when he was on the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in 2014-2015 and then for Supreme Court Justice John Roberts from 2017-2018, according to ABC News.

Following her clerkship for Roberts, she returned to her previous firm, Munger, Tolles & Olson, to serve as a trial lawyer, according to her LinkedIn. She left the firm shortly after Trump announced Vance as his running mate.

“Usha has informed us she has decided to leave the firm,” a Munger, Tolles & Olson spokesperson told Bloomberg Law. “Usha has been an excellent lawyer and colleague, and we thank her for her years of work and wish her the best in her future career.”

In his book, Vance describes Usha as being one of the most blunt people he’s ever met. She had “an extraordinarily direct way of speaking,” he wrote in “Hillbilly Elegy.”

“Where others might have asked meekly, ‘Yeah, maybe you could rephrase this?’ or “Have you thought about this other idea?’ Usha would say simply: ‘I think this sentence needs work’ or ‘This is a pretty terrible argument.’ At a bar, she looked up at a mutual friend of ours and said, without a hint of irony, ‘You have a very small head.’ I had never met anyone like her,” he wrote.

The pair have three children together. Vance credits her as his “spirit guide” in his book. Besides her lengthy list of professional accomplishments, she also served on the board of the Cincinnati Symphony Orchestra, according to LinkedIn.

AUTHOR

ROBERT MCGREEVY

Reporter.

RELATED ARTICLES:

’A Significant Upgrade’: Immigration Hawks Hail Vance As Trump’s VP Pick

EXCLUSIVE: Mike Johnson Answers Whether Garland Will Be Impeached, Outlines Second Trump Term Congressional Agenda

‘You Would Get Booed Off The Stage’: Matt Gaetz Taunts Kevin McCarthy While He’s In Middle Of CNN Interview

Elon Musk plans to give $45 million a month to pro-Trump super PAC, WSJ reports

Republican National Convention (RNC) Opened with a Prayer for the Hostages Held By Hamas, Praying for Israel and Jerusalem

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

‘I Take Responsibility’: Nancy Pelosi Fesses Up To J6 Blunder

Newly released video HBO provided to congressional investigators shows former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi claiming responsibility for the lack of police preparedness on Jan. 6, 2021, in Washington, D.C., while she was fleeing the Capitol.

The video, shot by Pelosi’s daughter Alexandra, shows an irate Pelosi complaining about a lack of accountability for the incident.

“We have responsibility, Terry! We did not have any accountability for what was going on there, and we should have. This is ridiculous!” Pelosi exclaimed.

She then expressed contempt for what she appeared to feel was a late request for National Guard troops to help quell the situation.

“You’re gonna ask me in the middle of the thing, when they’ve already breached the inaugural stuff, ‘should we call the Capitol Police?’ I mean the National Guard. Why weren’t the National Guard there to begin with?”

“They thought that they had sufficient resources …” her Chief of Staff Terri McCullough answered, before Pelosi interjected.

“It’s not a question of how they had … they don’t know! They clearly didn’t know, and I take responsibility for not having them just prepare for more,” Pelosi concluded.

HBO released 45 minutes of footage to congressional investigators after a House Administration subcommittee requested it, according to Politico.

Congressional leaders, including Pelosi, chose not to deploy the National Guard early over concerns of “optics” amid 2020’s Black Lives Matter riots, according to a 2022 GOP report.

Additionally, then-Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Mark Milley’s fear former President Trump would commandeer the military for political reasons allegedly influenced the delay of deploying the National Guard, D.C. National Guard witnesses testified in April.

The FBI and Department of Homeland Security had information beforehand that would suggest impending chaos and violence at the Capitol, but they failed to warn about or recognize it, according to a 2022 Senate report. They also allegedly ignored or downplayed a “massive amount” of intelligence.

“Throughout 2020, the FBI and DHS disseminated written documents detailing the potential for increased violent extremist activity at lawful protests and targeting of law enforcement and government facilities and personnel,” the report read.

“Despite online calls for violence at the Capitol, neither the FBI nor DHS issued a threat assessment or intelligence bulletin warning law enforcement entities in the National Capital Region of the potential for violence,” the report stated.

AUTHOR

ROBERT MCGREEVY

Reporter.

RELATED ARTICLES:

The Silent Insurrection: General Milley’s Hand on January 6 [Declassified.live]

EXCLUSIVE: House Republicans Demand Comms Between Cassidy Hutchinson, Fani Willis’ Office For J6 Investigation

POST ON X:

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

The Myth That Biden Had Nothing to Do With the Prosecutions of Trump

The five criminal and civil prosecutions of former President Donald Trump all prompt heated denials from Democrats that President Joe Biden and Democrat operatives had a role in any of them.

But Biden has long let it be known that he was frustrated with his own Department of Justice’s federal prosecutors for their tardiness in indicting Trump.

Biden was upset because any delay might mean that his rival Trump would not be in federal court during the 2024 election cycle. And that would mean he could not be tagged as a “convicted felon” by the November election while being kept off the campaign trail.

Politico has long prided itself on its supposed insider knowledge of the workings of the Biden administration. Note that it was reported earlier this February that a frustrated Biden “has grumbled to aides and advisers that had [Attorney General Merrick] Garland moved sooner in his investigation into former President Donald Trump’s election interference, a trial may already be underway or even have concluded…”

If there was any doubt about the Biden administration’s effort to force Trump into court before November, Politico further dispelled it—even as it blamed Trump for Biden’s anger at Garland: “That trial still could take place before the election and much of the delay is owed not to Garland but to deliberate resistance put up by the former president and his team.”

Note in passing how a presidential candidate’s legal right to oppose a politicized indictment months before an election by his opponent’s federal attorneys is smeared by Politico as “deliberate resistance.”

Given Politico was publicly reporting six months ago about Biden’s anger at the pace of his DOJ’s prosecution of Trump, does anyone believe his special counsel, Jack Smith, was not aware of such presidential displeasure and pressure?

Note Smith had petitioned and was denied an unusual request to the court to speed up the course of his Trump indictment.

And why would Biden’s own attorney general, Garland, select such an obvious partisan as Smith? Remember, in his last tenure as special counsel, Smith had previously gone after popular Republican and conservative Virginia governor Bob McDonnell.

Yet Smith’s politicized persecution of the innocent McDonnell was reversed by a unanimous verdict of the U.S. Supreme Court. That rare court unanimity normally should have raised a red flag to the Biden DOJ about both Smith’s partiality and his incompetence.

But then again, Smith’s wife had donated to the 2020 Biden campaign fund. And she was previously known for producing a hagiographic 2020 documentary (“Becoming”) about Michelle Obama.

Selecting a special counsel with a successful record of prior nonpartisan convictions was clearly not why the DOJ appointed Smith.

The White House’s involvement is not limited to the Smith federal indictments.

Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis’ paramour and erstwhile lead prosecutor in her indictment of Trump, Nathan Wade, met twice with the White House counsel’s office. On one occasion, Wade met inside the Biden White House.

Subpoenaed records reveal that the brazen Wade actually billed the federal government for his time spent with the White House counsel’s staff—although so far no one has disclosed under oath the nature of such meetings.

Of the tens of thousands of local prosecutions each year, in how many instances does a county prosecutor consult with the White House counsel’s office—and then bill it for his knowledge?

Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s just-completed felony convictions of Trump were spearheaded by former prominent federal prosecutor Matthew Colangelo. He is not just a well-known Democratic partisan who served as a political consultant to the Democratic National Committee.

Colangelo had also just left his prior position in the Biden Justice Department—reputedly as Garland’s third-ranking prosecutor—to join the local Bragg team.

Again, among all the multitudes of annual municipal indictments nationwide, how many local prosecutors manage to enlist one of the nation’s three top federal attorneys to head their case?

So, apparently, it was not enough for the shameless Bragg to campaign flagrantly on promises to go after Trump. In addition, Bragg brashly drafted a top Democratic operative and political appointee from inside Biden’s DOJ to head his prosecution.

Not surprisingly, it took only a few hours after the Colangelo-Bragg conviction of Trump for Biden on spec to start blasting his rival as a “convicted felon.” Biden is delighted that his own former prosecutor, a left-wing judge, and a Manhattan jury may well keep Trump off the campaign trail.

So, it is past time for the media and Democrats to drop this ridiculous ruse of Biden’s White House “neutrality.” Instead, they should admit that they are terrified of the will of the people in November and so are conniving to silence them.

(C) 2024 Tribune Content Agency LLC

AUTHOR

Victor Davis Hanson is a classicist and historian at the Hoover Institution at Stanford University, and author of the book “The Second World Wars: How the First Global Conflict Was Fought and Won.” You can reach him by e-mailing authorvdh@gmail.com. On X:

Donald J. Trump Now Joins The 56 Felons Who Signed The Declaration of Independence

August 2, 1776, is one of the most important but least celebrated days in American history when 56 members of the Second Continental Congress started signing the Declaration of Independence in Philadelphia.

The Declaration of Independence was to present a compelling case that King George III and the British Parliament had broken their own laws, leaving the American colonists no choice but to cut ties and “throw off” British rule.

After sighing The Declaration of Independence they were declared by the British Government as felons.

Marvin L. Simner of Western University wrote,

The penalty for committing an act of treason against the Crown in 1775, as read by British judges sentencing Irish rebels, was as follows:

You are to be drawn on hurdles to the place of execution, where you are to be hanged by the neck, but not until you are dead; for, while you are still living your bodies are to be taken down, your bowels torn out and burned before your faces, your heads then cut off, and your bodies divided each into four quarters, and your heads and quarters to be then at the King’s disposal; and may the Almighty God have mercy on your souls.

Those who signed the Declaration of Independence were well aware of the fact that, by virtue of their signatures, they would be endorsing a treasonous act and, if caught, their punishment would be as described above. Because of the horrendous nature of this punishment, it is not surprising that over the years the 56 delegates who signed this document were often said to be among the most heroic of the early patriots.

Five signers were captured by the British as traitors, and tortured before they died. Twelve had their homes ransacked and burned.

By signing the document, the 56 men risked high treason against the King of England. In essence, they signed their death warrants because that was the penalty.

British officials commissioned propagandists to highlight the declaration’s flaws and rebut the colonists’ complaints. The Declaration divided British domestic opposition, as some American sympathizers thought the Declaration had gone too far, although in British-ruled Ireland it had many supporters.

Fast forward 248 years and we now find that President Donald J. Trump is now a convicted felon and he joins and is counted, with our Founding Fathers, as a convicted felon.

Eugene O’Neill said, “There is no present or future – only the past, happening over and over again – now.”

Karl Marx said, “History repeats itself, first as a tragedy, second as a farce.”

George Santayana said, “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.”

Donald J. Trump, like our Fore Fathers, is an American patriot. Therefore today, courtesy of the traitors from the court house to the White House, he is a felon.

November 5th, 2024 is the last chance for we the people to save our beloved nation from the traitors and return power back to us.

©2024. Dr. Rich Swier. All rights reserved.

RELATED ARTICLES:

President Donald J. Trump’s verdict ‘Marks the fundamental transformation of America into a ‘totalitarian state’!

Why Did the Signers of the Declaration of Independence Engage in this Treasonous Act?

The Signers of the Declaration of Independence

 

Name

State Rep. Date

of Birth

 

Birthplace

Age at Signing  

Occupation

Number of Marriages Number of Children Date of

Death

Age at

Death

Adams, John MA 10/30/1735 Quincy, MA 40 Lawyer 1 5 7/4/1826 90
Adams, Samuel MA 9/27/1722 Boston, MA 53 Merchant 2 2 10/2/1803 81
Bartlett, Josiah NH 11/21/1729 Amesbury,MA 46 Physician 1 12 5/19/1795 65
Braxton, Carter VA 9/10/1736 Newington, VA 39 Plantation 2 18 10/10/1797 61
Carroll, Charles of

Carrollton

MD 9/19/1737 Annapolis, MD 38 Merchant, Plantation 1 7 11/14/1832 95
Chase, Samuel MD 4/17/1741 Somerset Co., MD 35 Lawyer 2 4 6/19/1811 70
Clark, Abraham NJ 2/15/1726 Elizabethtown, NJ 50 Lawyer, Surveyer 1 10 9/15/1794 68
Clymer, George PA 3/16/1739 Philadelphia, PA 37 Merchant 1 8 1/24/1813 73
Ellery, William RI 12/22/1727 Newport, RI 48 Lawyer, Merchant 2 16 2/15/1820 92
Floyd, William NY 12/17/1734 Brookhaven, NY 41 Land Speculator 2 3 8/4/1821 86
Franklin, Benjamin PA 1/17/1706 Boston. MA 70 Scientist, Printer 1 3 4/17/1790 84
Gerry, Elbridge MA 7/17/1744 Marblehead, MA 32 Merchant 1 7 11/23/1814 70
Gwinnett, Button GA c. 1735 Gloucester, England 41 Merchant, Plantation 1 3 5/15/1777 42
Hall, Lyman GA 4/12/1724 Wallingford, CT 52 Physician, Minister 2 1 10/19/1790 66
Hancock, John MA 1/12/1737 Quincy, MA 40 Merchant 1 2 10/8/1793 56
Harrison, Benjamin VA 4/7/1726 Charles City Co., VA 50 Plantation, Farmer 1 7 4/24/1791 65
Hart, John NJ c. 1711 Hunterdon Co, NJ 65 Land owner 1 13 5/11/1779 68
Hewes, Joseph NC 1/23/1730 Kingston, NJ 46 Merchant 10/10/1779 49
Heyward Jr., Thomas SC 7/28/1746 St. Helena Parish, SC 30 Lawyer, Plantation 2 8 3/6/1809 62
Hooper, William NC 6/17/1742 Boston, MA 34 Lawyer 1 3 10/14/1790 48
Hopkins, Stephen RI 3/7/1707 Providence, RI 69 Merchant 2 7 4/13/1785 78
Hopkinson, Francis NJ 10/2/1737 Philadelphia, PA 38 Lawyer, Musician 1 5 5/9/1791 53
Huntington, Samuel CT 7/3/1731 Windham. CT 45 Lawyer 1 2 1/5/1796 64
Jefferson, Thomas VA 4/13/1743 Albemarle Co, VA 33 Lawyer, Plantation,

Scientist

1 6 7/4/1826 83
Lee, Francis

Lightfoot

VA 10/14/1734 Mt. Pleasant, VA 41 Plantation 1 0 1/11/1797 62
Lee, Richard Henry VA 1/20/1732 Stratford, VA 44 Plantation, Merchant 2 6 6/19/1794 62
Lewis, Francis NY 3/21/1713 Llandaff, Wales 63 Merchant 1 7 12/30/1802 89
Livingston, Philip NY 1/15/1716 Albany, NY 60 Merchant 1 9 6/12/1778 62
Lynch Jr., Thomas SC 8/5/1749 Prince George’s Parrish, SC 26 Lawyer 1 0 c. 1779 30
McKean, Thomas DE 3/19/1735 Chester Co., PA 42 Lawyer 2 11 6/24/1817 83
Middleton, Arthur SC 6/26/1742 Charleston, SC 34 Plantation 1 9 1/1/1787 44
Morris, Lewis NY 4/8/1726 West Chester Co.,NY 50 Plantation 1 10 1/22/1798 71
Morris, Robert PA 1/31/1734 Liverpool, England 42 Merchant, Land

Speculator

1 7 5/8/1806 72

 

 

Name

State Rep. Date

of Birth

 

Birthplace

Age at Signing  

Occupation

Number of Marriages Number of Children Date of

Death

Age at

Death

Morton, John PA c. 1724 Ridley Township, PA 52 Farmer 1 8 c. 1777 53
Nelson Jr., Thomas VA 12/26/1738 Yorktown, VA 37 Merchant, Plantation 1 13 1/4/1789 50
Paca, William MD 10/31/1740 Abington, MD 35 Lawyer, Plantation 2 5 10/13/1799 58
Paine, Robert Treat MA 3/11/1731 Boston, MA 45 Lawyer, Scientist 1 8 5/12/1814 83
Penn, John NC 5/6/1740 Carolina Co, VA 36 Lawyer 1 3 9/14/1788 48
Read, George DE 9/18/1733 Northeast MD 42 Lawyer 1 5 9/21/1798 65
Rodney, Caesar. DE 10/7/1728 Dover, DE 47 Plantation, Military 0 0 6/29/1784 55
Ross, George PA 5/10/1730 New Castle, DE 46 Lawyer 1 3 7/14/1779 49
Rush, Benjamin Dr. PA 1/4/1746 Philadelphia, PA 30 Physician 1 13 4/19/1813 67
Rutledge, Edward SC 11/23/1749 Christ Church Parish, SC 26 Lawyer, Plantation 2 3 1/23/1800 50
Sherman, Roger CT 4/19/1721 Newton, MA 55 Lawyer 2 15 7/23/1793 72
Smith, James PA c. 1719 Northern Ireland 57 Lawyer 1 5 7/11/1806 87
Stockton, Richard NJ 10/1/1730 Princeton, NJ 45 Lawyer 1 6 2/28/1781 50
Stone, Thomas MD c. 1743 Charles Co., MD 33 Lawyer 1 3 10/5/1787 44
Taylor, George PA c. 1716 Ireland 60 Merchant 1 2 2/23/1781 65
Thornton, Matthew NH c. 1714 Ireland 62 Physician 1 5 6/24/1803 89
Walton, George GA c. 1741 Cumberland Co, VA 35 Lawyer 1 2 2/2/1804 63
Whipple, William NH 1/14/1730 Kittery, ME 46 Merchant 1 0 11/28/1785 55
Williams, William CT 4/18/1731 Lebannon, CT 45 Merchant 1 3 8/2/1811 80
Wilson, James PA 9/14/1742 Carskerdo, Scotland 33 Lawyer ? 2 7 8/21/1798 55
Witherspoon, John NJ 2/5/1723 Gifford, Scotland 53 Minister 2 12 11/15/1794 71
Wolcott, Oliver CT 11/20/1726 Windsor, CT 49 Lawyer 1 4 12/1/1797 71
Wythe, George VA c. 1726 Elizabeth City Co, VA 50 Lawyer 2 1 6/8/1806 80

Information obtained from:

American Council of Learned Societies. American National Biography. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.

Who Was Who in America: Historical Volume 1607-1896. Chicago: The A.N. Marquis Company, 1963.

ROOKE: D.C. Republicans Prove The Swamp Is As Infested And Useless As Ever

After losing over and over again, state after state, to former President Donald Trump, Nikki Haley finally won a Republican Primary race in the District of Columbia.

If Republican voters were ever in doubt about whether Republicans in D.C. understand them and the issues facing everyday Americans, Haley’s win should solidify in their minds that they don’t. In the 2020 general election, D.C. voters overwhelmingly voted for President Joe Biden. Trump garnered just 5% of the vote in the district. The 2024 GOP primary was more of the same. Only about 2,000 people voted, and of that sampling, Haley won 63% of the vote to Trump’s 33%.

In open primary states, Haley has been able to hang on because Democrats are willing to jump the aisle to side with the “anyone but Trump” option in hopes their failing candidate, Biden, will be able to sneak out a win in November against a candidate adamantly rejected by the Republican base.

However, D.C. is not an open primary. Only registered Republicans can vote in the D.C. primary, making her win an eye-opener for voters about who is running the offices of the most important officials in the country.

Haley is not the base’s choice in Iowa, South Carolina, Michigan, Missouri, Idaho, New Hampshire, etc., but the D.C. political class overwhelmingly supports her. The people who think they know better than the Republican base about what issues and policies are good for them love Haley.

Chair of the D.C. Republican Party Patrick Mara and Chief Revenue Officer (CRO) at National Association of Wholesaler-Distributors Dan Schuberth perfectly encapsulated this point with their quotes about Haley’s win to Politico.

“This universe is a little more sophisticated than just about any universe in any other state,” Mara told the outlet. “I listen to the political podcasts in the morning. I read the newsletters throughout the day. That’s probably, like, half the people showing up at this.”

“You’ve got a really dialed-in political class,” Schuberth, who hosted Haley’s D.C. campaign stop, said. “You know, folks read POLITICO. They read The Hill. Folks here are reading the Washington Post.”

Mara and Schuberth are among the Republicans living inside the D.C. echo chamber who believe that reading mainstream media newsletters and political punditry, knowing all the people working on the campaigns and living in the district gives them a better understanding of what’s good for Americans. In the political class system, they would consider themselves at the top, while a family of six burdened by the economic and social repercussions of their hubris is an uninformed lemming.

Haley’s presidential campaign has been nothing short of a wish list for the old guard of the Republican Party that flies in direct contrast to the new GOP. Middle America does not want to send their boys to fight in another endless war in the desert, where death is inevitable. Parents are disgusted with the state of the U.S. education system, which acts as an indoctrination camp for far-left policies. Working-class Americans can not only see but feel how illegal immigration puts their families at risk, lowers their wages, and makes them compete for jobs that are rightfully theirs.

Trump captures the angst of everyday Americans in the way the Democrats used to do, while Haley campaigns like a Reagan-era Republican devoid of this insight. He stands up for these people, tells them it’s okay to recognize how these policies affect them, and promises to right the wayward ship once he’s back in office.

To disregard this reality the way the GOP political class does is why the base will take two steps forward and one step back. While at the state level, Republicans are fortifying election integrity, fighting back against open borders and killing the infestation of DEI, the D.C. swamp is terrified even to admit these issues are a problem, much less take the fight to the radicals implementing them.

It takes a level of ignorance and arrogance to tell Republican voters they can’t have the safe, prosperous country they grew up in. That their wish to have policies focused on putting Americans first isn’t popular or winnable when Trump beats their preferred candidate, Haley, into the ground in every state, gaining momentum with each victory. He’s a political force not just because of his one-liners and smash-mouth style of campaigning but because he gave a voice to the base when everyone else told them to forget their patriotism, forget their American dream and instead bow down to the global machine ruining their country.

AUTHOR

MARY ROOKE

Commentary and analysis writer.

RELATED ARTICLES:

ROOKE: Biden’s Spy Agency Goes After Conservative Journalist. The America You Grew Up In No Longer Exists

ROOKE: Biden’s Border Crisis Exposed America’s Dirty Foreign Agent Secret

ROOKE: Democrats Are Already Cooking Up New Election Law Shenanigans For 2024

POST ON X:

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

ROOKE: Trump Needs An Ultimate Wingman As His VP — The Pick Couldn’t Be More Obvious

Who former President Donald Trump picks as his running mate is one of the most anticipated announcements in the 2024 election season.

It can’t be just anyone because Trump can’t afford to have another vice president serving in the role who doesn’t wholeheartedly embrace the America First movement. It’s his entire platform. The policies are as important to Trump as they are to the base pushing him through his primary race.

Former Ambassador Nikki Haley, the last obstacle to Trump’s nomination, lost to the “none of these” option on the ballot in Nevada, erasing any doubt that no matter how many “Independents” or “Democrats” show up to vote in the GOP primary, the old Republican Party is dead on arrival.

The base wants Trump. They want him to come back into the executive branch and wreak havoc on the entitled ruling class that jailed political prisoners, sent billions overseas while our economy collapsed, closed down pipelines, pushed DEI over safety and left the U.S. border wide open for terrorists to enter.

To them, it’s 2016 again, but on steroids. Trump’s VP pick needs to reflect this. Enter Vivek Ramaswamy.

After his defeat in Iowa, he dropped out of the race and immediately endorsed Trump for president. On the campaign trail, he’s an asset. He knows how to talk to the base in ways they connect with and want to listen. As far as optics go, Ramaswamy is handsome, and his wife is beautiful. Their family picture is wholesome. His young children mean he’s got skin in the game. Whatever happens to America, happens to them. It’s everything that most politicians wish to portray but can’t because they rely on the corrupt Washington D.C. echo chamber for their image.

Still, similar to how America got former Vice President Mike Pence, Trump needs someone who speaks to the middle. This is where Ramasway will thrive. On the campaign trail, when activists would crash his events, Ramaswamy calmed them and invited them into the fold. Trump needs someone to settle the ruffled feathers for him without diminishing him.

While Trump is the general moving the chess pieces and being the face of the war the base wants to rage, Ramaswamy would be the major ensuring the men follow orders. No one galvanizes the base like Trump, and Ramaswamy seems to know his role would be to support, not overshadow.

While these other candidates for the VP position have shown they can use the power of the America First movement to get elected in their respective states, most of them still lack the understanding that to be effective, Trump can’t be undercut. The movement can’t afford another defector.

On the presidential campaign trail, Ramaswamy took a different approach to all the other candidates. He embraces all the parts of Trump that were good for the American people. He talked about the issues surrounding the former president without demonizing him. It was essentially a masterclass in handling a base scorned by the ruling class.

Most of the Republican candidates seemed to be confused about how to approach Republican voters when it came to the political indictments against Trump. But one thing is sure: the last thing a candidate should do to the people who were forced to eat the pain of the 2020 election and all its integrity issues is to pretend it wasn’t happening.

Ramaswamy came out fighting. He promised to stay off the ballot in Colorado as long the state refused to allow Trump to run as a candidate. He not only pledged to pardon Trump if he was convicted of any of the charges against him, but he vowed to wage war against the people and agencies responsible for the political persecution.

His fellow Republican candidates could be correct in their attacks that Ramaswamy’s presidential campaign was essentially him auditioning for the open vice president position.

But the jokes on them.

The biggest shock is that any of them ran at all. For those outside the D.C. consultant class, there was never anything more obvious than the reality that Trump would always be the nominee. Whether it’s Ramaswamy or not, the important thing Trump’s VP needs to know with every part of him is that he isn’t there to run the country for Trump but to be the enforcer.

AUTHOR

MARY ROOKE

Commentary and analysis writer.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Every Biden Regime Lie Is Coming Home To Roost At The Worst Time

GOP Rep Slaps Down CNN Reporter Who Claims Illegal Immigrants Aren’t Actually Committing Crimes

Fox News Host Tells Haley To Her Face She May ‘Lose Badly’ In Home State

Number Of Migrant Encounters At Southern Border Hits New January Record

‘Let’s Have An Honest Conversation Here’: Beth Van Duyne, Brianna Keilar Spar Over Impeaching Mayorkas

EDITORS NOTE:  This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. All rights reserved.

January 6 Prison Choir Has The Number One Song In The Country

A new song featuring former President Trump topped iTunes’ charts.

The single “Justice for All” debuted March 4 by the J6 Prison Choir, reaching No. 1 on iTunes top songs Saturday, according to Variety.

The track consists of the choir singing “The Star Spangled Banner” behind bars, interspersed with audio of Trump reciting the Pledge of Allegiance. The song concludes with chants of “USA! USA!”

The J6 Prison Choir is composed of prisoners incarcerated for the involvement in the January 6 Capitol riot.

Trump’s contribution was recorded for the project at his Mar-a-Lago residence per the request of a group supporting Jan. 6 prisoners, according to CNN.

The third-time presidential candidate’s 2024 campaign was not motivation for his involvement in this production, advisers claim. Trump has consistently expressed his support for those imprisoned, promising full pardons if he wins re-election and financially supporting some Jan. 6 defendants.

At least 1000 individuals have been arrested for participating in Jan. 6, according to CNBC.

“Justice for All” retails for $1.29 on iTunes. It is also available for play on Apple Music, Spotify and YouTube.

Money raised by the song will be distributed to families of Jan. 6 prisoners via a group organized by conservative commentator Ed Henry, according to Newsmax.

Trump-era White House official Kash Patel was also involved in the project, having released an exclusive music video for the song on The War Room with Steve Bannon.

AUTHOR

JULIANNA FRIEMAN

Contributor.

RELATED ARTICLES:

‘I Feel Betrayed’: QAnon Shaman Defense Attorney Calls For DOJ To Publicly State It Failed To Disclose Footage

Lies The Left Is Telling You About The Culture War

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.


All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

Judge Grants Request To Appoint ‘Special Master’ To Review Trump Raid Documents

U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon decided Monday to grant a request to appoint a “special master” to review the documents taken from former President Donald Trump’s Mar-A-Lago home in the FBI’s raid last month and determine if they were protected by legal privilege.

The Justice Department (DOJ) had reviewed materials seized in the raid and found some of them might be legally privileged. Trump’s attorneys asked Cannon for a “special master,” or third-party attorney, to review the documents contending it was not certain that the department identified all the possibly privileged documents.

Cannon granted Trump’s request, and also temporarily blocked the DOJ from further review of the seized documents.

“The Court hereby authorizes the appointment of a special master to review the seized property for personal items and documents and potentially privileged material subject to claims of attorney/client and/or executive privilege,” Cannon wrote. “Furthermore, in natural conjunction with that appointment, and consistent with the value and sequence of special master procedures, the Court also temporarily enjoins the Government from reviewing and using the seized materials for investigative purposes pending completion of the special master’s review or further Court order.”

Cannon said the court was “unsure” of the DOJ’s claim that its review team had picked out any potentially privileged materials.

Trump’s legal team had argued that the DOJ was politically motivated and would “leak” documents covered by attorney-client privilege.

“Left unchecked, the DOJ will impugn, leak, and publicize selective aspects of their investigation with no recourse for [Trump] but to somehow trust the self-restraint of currently unchecked investigators,” his attorneys wrote.

However, the DOJ had attempted to block the appointment of a special master, citing national security concerns.

“This Order shall not impede the classification review and/or intelligence assessment” to be performed by the DOJ, Cannon wrote.

Cannon unsealed the most detailed list of property seized in the raid yet on Friday, ABC News reported.

AUTHOR

TREVOR SCHAKOHL

Legal reporter. Follow Trevor on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tschakohl

RELATED ARTICLES:

Politico’s new owner pledges ‘nonpartisan’ coverage — while privately praying for Trump’s re-election

MSNBC Host, Guests Melt Down Multiple Times Over Trump ‘Special Master’ Ruling

‘Massive Abuse Of Power’: Intel Committee Rep Vows To Use ‘Power Of The Purse’ To Get Transparency From Biden, DOJ

HANKINSON: It’s Time For Corporate Media To Tell The Truth About America’s Crime Problem

Britain’s Next Prime Minister: Thatcher 2.0?

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved. Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.