I have come here to bury CPAC, not to praise it

CPAC has gone and done it again. They never miss an opportunity to miss an opportunity, and this year is no exception. It’s hard to believe that they could continue their loser’s streak, but they have. They continue to screw up year after year, and manage to outdo themselves every time.

You’d have to be living under a rock to have missed the latest brouhaha concerning CPAC. Milo Yiannopoulos, gay gadfly, British writer, public speaker, and senior editor for Breitbart News, was banned from CPAC in the wake of some truly awful remarks of his that came out after the announcement that he would keynote CPAC. No surprise that it was a Never Trump group behind the attack that quashed Milo’s CPAC gig (and his Simon and Schuster book deal, too). But that is typical of the right — eating our own.

Before I get to CPAC, let me get some things out of the way. First, pedophilia is monstrous, and Milo’s offhand remarks were disgusting. Milo is a victim of his own outrageous self-promotion — he thinks of himself perhaps as a bit of Oscar Wilde, and so he provocatively prattles on and on with the obvious intent to shock others, which, of course, he does. What he said was indefensible and horrible. I don’t know how much of what he says is even true or just sort of street theater, but this time he jumped the shark.

It bears noting that as flippant as he was in his graphic descriptions, Milo was the victim of  the episodes he describes with gay priests and gay adults. That does not excuse what he said. But he was the victim. Yes, he might very well suffer from some kind of PTSD or Stockholm Syndrome, but that is out of my wheelhouse. I’m not a shrink. In everything he described, he is the preyed upon. Do I think he is damaged? Yes, very. Do I think his remarks were a stunning indictment of what can only be described as a predatory gay community? I do.

But I am not here to bury Milo, or to save him. It’s CPAC that needs burying. My battles with CPAC are well known and long fought. I have been unable to speak or hold an event at CPAC for going on seven years now. Every year I ask, every year I am denied. This year was no different. I asked Matt Schlapp whether or not the ban on AFDI at CPAC is still in place, or whether we can reserve a room this year. I told him we wanted to hold an event entitled “Europe’s Present, America’s Future: Why We Need Trump’s Immigration Ban for a Global Freedom Initiative.” We were planning on inviting Geert Wilders, Marine Le Pen, and Kent Ekeroth of the Sweden Democratic Party, as well as other supporters of the immigration ban including Anders Gravers and Lars Hedegaard. Schlapp hemmed and hawed and never got back to me. As a matter of fact, Shlapp invited Milo right after I requested the space.

The CPAC/Geller saga has been running on for years now, but I thought with the election of President Trump, we might have somehow broken the barrier and would be able to move forward from this. I was wrong. CPAC is still CPAC.

Yes, CPAC invited Milo. Schlapp wanted to prove to me and everyone else that the ACU were down with cool kids, standing up for free speech — like, they totally get it — can you dig it? CPAC wanted to show it was brave and cutting edge. Geller is more toxic but look how open-minded we are! But like all false bravado, it crumbled when challenged. I am sure they did not listen to his speeches, or view his YouTube videos, or have a clue as to what Milo said or did. And that would be OK if they were true to their premise for inviting him. Matt Schlapp told NBC News, “the fact there are voices on American campuses that are just shut down. We think those voices are usually voices that stem from the center-right, and we talk about that every year at CPAC, and we think that’s an appropriate thing to talk about.” But of course, Schlapp doesn’t mean it; otherwise, why would I be banned from speaking or holding an event there?

The thing is, Milo is barely a conservative. When he appeared on HBO’s Bill Maher Show last week, Yiannopoulos said that he wasn’t even sure he would call himself conservative. So clearly it wasn’t Milo’s conservative bonafides that got him the keynote spot.

CPAC has twisted itself into some terrible knot — they invited Milo because he was not permitted to speak on college campuses due to his controversial statements, and now they have uninvited him, banned him from speaking there, because of these new controversial statements.

Their years-long ban on me is unconscionable. What is my crime? Standing for the First Amendment? Holding a free speech event in Texas in the wake of the Charlie Hebdo jihad slaughter? Holding an art exhibit that depicted Muhammad? Is CPAC a Muslim convention that adheres to the sharia?

They are shocked at Milo’s comments, but they still have a known Muslim Brotherhood-linked operative on their board: Grover Norquist. Despite all the controversy surrounding Grover for years, they never wavered — is he slipping them a lot of jihad money?

I will repeat what I have said for years: CPAC needs new leadership.

SCHLAPP: We totally reject that. We actually spend a lot of time going through a whole process determining what topics will be discussed. Any CPAC watcher over the last three years can see there is a much more substantive discussion on stage, not just conservative stump speeches one after the other. We believe it is an important responsibility we have to make sure the activists that come from around the country get better educated on these issues.

Does he believe the manure he shoveling?

Politico (of all places) does a pretty good job lambasting CPAC’s identity crisis here. What’s left of the agenda by the CPAC sissies is a bore — look at the agenda.

Matt Schlapp, chairman of the Conservative Political Action Conference, had a clear message when he announced on Saturday that right-wing agitator Milo Yiannopoulos would be highlighting this year’s event. “We think free speech includes hearing Milo’s important perspective,” he tweeted. Yiannopoulos was an unexpected invitee. The central figure in a number of campus controversies, he traffics in shock then spins it as free-speech advocacy. Schlapp had clearly gobbled up the spin.

But not everyone was buying it. The announcement drew immediate protests from prominent conservatives. Peter Wehner, a conservative writer and senior fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center, called the invite “more evidence of the moral decay of conservatism.” Jonah Goldberg of National Review, who greeted the news as “sad and disappointing,” added, “This new big tent is gonna have some wild parties, but leave me off the invite list.”

It’s not hard to see why conservatives might object to Yiannopoulos. Emerging from the alt-right swamps of GamerGate and Breitbart (he calls himself a “fellow-traveller” of the alt-right, a white nationalist, misogynist movement), Yiannopoulos’s reputation hangs on his willingness to make all sorts of anti-woman, anti-Semitic, anti-gay (even though he is gay himself), anti-Islam, anti-everyone comments. His profanity and explicit sexual talk makes him anathema to the Christian right, and he’s never had a word to say about the economic policies that make the supply-side right tick. And this was before folks began to pay attention to his comments criticizing sexual consent and promoting sex with underage teens—comments that ended up getting him disinvited from the conservative conference on Monday.

So, why was he even invited to CPAC in the first place?

The answer has to do with an organization and a movement that have lost their way. CPAC, once the place where American conservatism defined itself, is in disarray because conservatives are in disarray. Having just traded much of their belief system to win an election, they’re finding it hard to reset their ideological compasses. Yiannopoulos is just a symptom. And withdrawing his invitation is not the cure.

[ … ]

There was a historical irony in CPAC’s decision to embrace an offensive, fringe figure like Yiannopoulos. Back in 1964 the American Conservative Union, the organization that runs CPAC, was founded to clean up conservatism’s image, to make it responsible and respectable.

The ACU emerged in the aftermath of Barry Goldwater’s disastrous 1964 presidential bid. Throughout the campaign, Democrats successfully tied Goldwater to the racists in the Ku Klux Klan and the conspiracists in the John Birch Society. For the conservative writers and activists who gathered in Washington D.C. after the election, the extremism charge was an existential problem. If conservatism could be dismissed as a fringe collection of kooks and Klansmen, it could not be an effective force in American politics. So they erected the ACU as a guardian of “responsible conservatism.” The first prohibition: No one could join the board of directors who had ties to the Birch Society.

The ACU was part of a broader effort to police the lines of conservatism, to toss out any groups that might tarnish the right’s image. In the late 1950s,for instance, National Review purged writers with connections to the anti-Semitic rag American Mercury. As William F. Buckley Jr., National Review’s founder, later observed, “Conservatism must be wiped clean of the parasitic cant that defaces it, and repels so many of those who approach it inquiringly.” The ACU, and through it, the CPAC speaker roster, was a place where that parasitic cant could be regularly scrubbed away.

So long as the core of the conservative project held, CPAC operated as a standard annual meeting. Every year, conservatives flocked to D.C. to rub elbows with the politicians and activists who formulated, popularized and enacted the ideas and policies that defined the American right. But as conservatism began to fracture in the mid-2000s, CPAC became a more tumultuous event. The invite list became a battle not just over who spoke when, but how conservatism would be defined—what controversial figures and celebrities it would include, what values and identities it would embrace. Entertainment value began to matter in a way that it hadn’t before, which is how someone like Donald Trump, hardly a conservative leader, came to speak at the 2011 meeting. And there were some Yiannopoulos-esque exclusions:Anti-Islam activist Pamela Geller, who had been a CPAC regular since 2009, was barred in 2013 as conservative activists sought to moderate their image after the 2012 election. She hasn’t been allowed back since. And Chris Christie was left out in the cold in 2013 after hugging Barack Obama during Hurricane Sandy.

CPAC also reflected deeper splits in the conservative coalition. In the late 2000s, as the influence of the religious right waned and libertarians grew more powerful, there were open battles over whether to include gay conservatives and atheists, as these groups became lightning rods for a growing power struggle within the movement. When GOProud, a group of gay conservatives, was allowed to serve as a sponsor in 2010 and 2011, speakers at the event denounced the decision. That opposition led to GOProud’s exclusion in 2012, an exile that lasted until the organization was dissolved in mid-2014. The Log Cabin Republicans had a protracted fight with the organization over sponsorship, which they finally won in 2016. American Atheists likewise were disinvited in 2014, only to be welcomed the next year.

CPAC has spent much of the 2010s extending and revoking invitations, seemingly unsure who, exactly, counts as a conservative. Such was the fate of Yiannopoulos: His invitation was trumpeted as a coup for free speech; his disinvitation as a coup for conservative values. That was hardly the message CPAC had hoped to deliver—that one had to choose between free speech and conservatism—but the organization’s ham-fisted handling of the whole affair ultimately drove them to that choice.

Yet CPAC does not bear all the blame here. If organizers were confused about how someone like Yiannopoulos fits into the conservative movement, they are by no means alone. The rise of Trumpism has scuttled old conservative alliances and values. The right has largely abandoned free trade and open markets. In 2015, CPAC presented a united front against Vladimir Putin; his popularity among Republicans has since surged. Trump himself—profane, scandal-ridden and uninterested in conservative ideas—has become the leader of the Republican Party and a wildly popular figure in conservative circles. The conservative resistance to Trump is vocal but small. Most of the rest of the movement set aside their values to embrace Trump, smashing their ideological compasses in the process.

How were CPAC organizers supposed to know conservatives would be put off by Yiannopoulos? After all, it was largely a small anti-Trump conservative faction that opposed the invitation at first, before the remarks about pedophilia (remarks that Yiannopoulos responded to first with defiance, then contrition, stressing that he had not meant to suggest sexual contact with underage children and teens was acceptable). For Trump supporters—and the vast majority of conservatives support Trump—the distance between the president and Yiannopoulus was not significant. He has said deeply offensive things about women and Muslims. So has Trump. He writes for Breitbart, “the platform of the alt-right.” The site’s former chairman, Steve Bannon, is Trump’s senior counselor and chief strategist. He has criticized sexual consent and celebrates sex with underage teens. Trump starred in an Access Hollywood tape that made clear he wasn’t a huge fan of sexual consent himself, and that he had no qualms with forcing himself on women. Trump and Yiannopoulos are brothers-in-arms in the fight against “political correctness,” drawing heated criticism from liberals and select members of the conservative establishment. Even now it’s not clear that the majority of conservatives were put off by Yiannopoulos’s comments, just that the firestorm had gotten a little too uncomfortable. Looking at it this way, the shocking thing isn’t that Yiannopoulos was invited. It’s that CPAC felt pressured to drop him.

With Trump in the White House and Republicans in control of Congress, conservatives have more political power today than they have had in a decade. Still, conservatism as a political movement is disintegrating, held together not by a shared commitment to ideas like democratic governance, stability or a distinct moral vision, but rather a desire for power. That makes for a movement whose boundaries are blurred beyond recognition and whose standards are impossible to detect. And that is a problem that no disinvitation can fix.

UPDATE: Milos apologizes – his presser:

EDITORS NOTE: This column originally appeared in The Geller Report.

Milo Yiannopoulos 1

VIDEO: Culture Warrior Milo Yiannopoulos Resigns from Breitbart

Milo Yiannopoulos is a man of character. He does the right things for the right reasons.

Milo has resigned as editor of Breitbart Tech after his remarks on sexual relationships between boys and older men went public. This is interesting because academics are promoting pedophilia and they have yet to be dismissed.

Dr. Judith Reisman in her column “They’re mainstreaming pedophilia!” reported in March 2016:

Matt Barber, associate dean of the Liberty University School of Law, and I attended the “B4U-ACT” pedophile conference Aug. 17 [2015]. To eliminate the “stigma” against pedophiles, this growing sexual anarchist lobby wants the American Psychiatric Association (APA) to redefine pedophilia as a normal sexual orientation of “Minor-Attracted Persons.”

[ … ]

In 1973, our “post Kinsey era,” a small APA committee of psychiatrists, quite terrified by homosexist public harassment, agreed to rely on Kinsey’s fraudulent human sexuality “data” to redefine homosexuality as normal, removing it from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) of mental disorders.

[ … ]

To redefine homosexuality as a normal “orientation,” nature not nurture, researchers were told to ignore all data of early sex abuse or other trauma. This hoax was followed by the 1999 U.S. Department of Justice data that found 64 percent of forcible sodomy victims to be boys under age 12. [Emphasis added]

Fast forward to the treatment of Milo Yiannopoulos, a gay man who misspoke. Milo is the target of “homosexist public harassment.” Yiannopoulos tweeted this after the tape of his comments surfaced:

milo pedophilia tweet

Milo’s resignation is a principled move. One that those who are destroying him would never make. Milo stated that he did not want “to allow my poor choice of words to detract from my [Breitbart] colleagues’ important reporting.”

He did what General Flynn did to protect the cause. He must be celebrated for that.

Milo is a cultural warrior who is fighting against those who would bring America down. He gained more and more national attention by using his speaking skills to tell the truth about those who would destroy our culture. America is in a cultural war and Milo has become a wounded warrior in the war against cultural relativism.

We cannot but believe that Milo will rise, like the Phoenix, from the ashes to fight once again. We look forward to his biting commentary and brilliance to shine the light on those who would destroy our uniquely American culture.

Milo, we are with you. One team, one fight!


Dear Senator McCain please follow or get out of the way!

Dear Senator John McCain (R-AZ),

You had your chance to become the leader of the free world. You failed. As General George S. Patton said, “Lead me, follow me, or get out of my way.”

Since you are not President of the United States then you have a duty to follow Donald J. Trump as a Republican, based upon your oath to uphold the Constitution and as an American citizen to allow President Trump to conduct foreign policy as he sees fit.

There is a long standing tradition that members of the Senate do not criticize a sitting President overseas.

Speaking in 1947, Senator Arthur Vandenberg (R-MI), the influential chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee, provided key support to Democratic President Harry S. Truman and admonished his colleagues that “[W]e must stop partisan politics at the water’s edge.”

You are the current chairman of the Senate Armed Forces Committee. You have a duty to speak with President Trump privately on issues important to you but you have no right to suggest the POTUS is a dictator or dictatorial in a foreign land.

President Trump has the power to conduct U.S. foreign policy under Article II Section 2 of the U.S. Constitution:

He shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur; and he shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by Law: but the Congress may by Law vest the Appointment of such inferior Officers, as they think proper, in the President alone, in the Courts of Law, or in the Heads of Departments.

Please remember President Trump took the oath of office which states, ”I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”

Gateway Pundit reports that in a February 2017 recording in what appears to be a conversation between Senator McCain with Russian comedians Vladimir Kuznetsov and Alexei Stoliarov — known as Vovan and Lexus — posing as Prime Minister of Ukraine Volodymyr Groysman in a prank phone call, you discussed key national security issues on U.S. policy towards Ukraine and Russia.

Please understand that President Trump won the election. Therefore you are bound by your oath of office and the rules of the Republican Party to follow the lead of President Trump or get out of the way.


The American People

ronald reagan quote make them feel th heat quote

We MUST deal with the ‘New World’ Generation

For years now, Americans have talked and theorized about the “New World Order” – a term that has been meshed with the much older term “One World Order” – and most today believe that the two terms are now and always have been synonymous. They were not always synonymous however…

new world order generation

‘New World’ generation.

One World Order was the Marxist design for a One World Government under some form of totalitarianism, now labeled a number of “ism’s” like global progressivism or liberal democracy and most often referred to as the New World Order today. The point of origin for the much newer term New World Order came from George H.W. Bush’s famous “thousand points of light” speech.

These two ideas were once diametrically opposing views at their point of origin. Global Communism under a One World Order is not what Bush spoke about in his New World Order speech. Bush took office following Reagan, the fall of the Soviet Empire and the downing of the Berlin Wall. Bush was talking about a new world governed by the “rule of law” and international diplomacy in a world where only one superpower was left standing, The United States of America.

Today, academics and conspiracy theorists have made the two terms appear synonymous, which is why many Americans have no idea who or what to trust. We talk a lot about the intentional muddying of waters in the FIVE STAR rated book, TRUMPED: The New American Revolution. Readers have posted over and over again that “every American must read TRUMPED to possess a full understanding of the war for America ahead.”

For Trump to say he inherited a mess, is a gross understatement. Trump took office after a hundred-years of dismantling America. Nowhere is this more obvious than in a glance at the New World Generation, the so-called millennials, whom we see rioting in the streets across our country today, fighting for all the wrong causes…

Trump entered lawless Post Constitutional Chaos

Since the days of Ozzy and Harriet, when one income would feed and house a family – and parents raised their children – parents are no longer the strongest influence in their kids’ lives. Television, video games, k-12 public indoctrination to “New World” thinking and 60s radicals, now college professors, politicians and judges have more influence over our kids… Other kids have more influence than parents have and if you dare attempt to parent your children, you could end up with your children wards of the state.

Since when is rioting, destroying private or public property, inciting violence and subverting our laws a protected First Amendment Right? It isn’t – it never has been and never should be. But the community organizers in politics, the courts, Hollywood, mass media, education and even many churches have taught our kids that these acts of resistance are a form of protected speech… Imagine that! These acts intended to shut down the free speech of others are now believed to be a form of free speech itself.

We face a New World Generation

Of course, these kids think us old folks are full of racist and bigoted nonsense. That’s what the village that raised them told them, while we were at work and they were in school. They grew up swimming in a sewer of “fake news” – “fake education” – “fake reality” – “fake morals” – “fake justice” – “fake preaching” – “fake political leaders” and “fake parenting.” No wonder they live in a “fake grasp of reality.”

If you have children under age 30, there is a very good chance that your children are part of the New World Generation. The indoctrination that started on the college campus in the 60s now reaches k-12 public education through Federal Education Mandates like Common Core.

The average age of the “resistance” in our streets today is 19… The LGBT and abortion rights groups aside. I am referring to the anarchists causing chaos in cities and town hall meetings across the country. If you think these events are in any way organic in nature, think again. These events are highly organized and well-funded. Leading this community organizing effort are the following organizations. (The full list is far too long to present here.)

The above list could go on for pages and pages, but these are main players in the push-back against Trump’s effort to return America to the rule of constitutional law so that the American people are free to make America great again!

However, the kids they are community organizing into street riots are seldom aware of who or what they are fighting for, or why. They do not just oppose Trump, they oppose every fundamental American foundation.

They cause race riots while claiming to be against racism. They silence the free speech of others, in the name of free speech. They fight against the foundational principles of freedom and liberty, while calling for freedom and liberty. They are horrifically misinformed, but no less sure of themselves and committed to their causes, which are often counter-intuitive to their stated goals.

Addressing the New World Generation

We have a serious problem here… the 2016 election was the last election in which the All-American generations outnumbered the New World Generation in the voting booth. From this point forward, the children raised and indoctrinated into New World Order (really One World Order) ideologies will outnumber the All-American generations at election time.

The people rioting in our streets right now will have the voting power to decide the future of the United States, which they don’t even know is a Constitutional Republic rather than the “liberal democracy” under global Marxism they were taught in school.

As I write, representatives of our Government meet with other globalists in Munich Germany for the Munich Security Conference. If you read the organizational report titled Munich Security Report 2017 – Post-Truth, Post-West, Post-Order – you will see that Trump isn’t just at war with the news media or congressional democrats. It’s Trump against One World Order global leaders put in place by Soros, the Clinton’s, the Obama’s and many others – propped up by McCain, Graham and numerous others in congress.

Quoted from page 6 of the report:

“The Populist and Anti-Globalist Challenge in the West: The Politics of Fear in a Post-Truth World

The past twelve months have been a resounding rejection of the status quo. In several elections and referenda, political outsiders succeeded, while the establishment was dealt major blows. Populist parties are now part of the government in about a dozen Western democracies. And even in countries where populists only received a small share of the vote, they often exert a defining influence by shifting the debate or pressuring mainstream parties to adopt different policy agendas. Economic factors may explain part of the populist rise: incomes for a majority of citizens in industrialized economies have stagnated or fallen between 2007 and 2014.

However, in the US, for instance, analyses show that it was “not economic hardship but anxiety about the future that predicted whether people voted for Trump.”

There is also a cultural backlash against so-called “globalism” from which the populist surge draws. The main dividing line in politics runs less and less between left and right but between a liberal cosmopolitan pole and a populist (or even xenophobic authoritarian) one. Populist parties reject the cultural modernization in Western societies and revolt against what they perceive as threats to the nation, ranging from immigration and cosmopolitan elites to international institutions. They dismiss pluralism and liberalism, essential elements of liberal democracies.

Populists are experts in the politics of agitation, forming an “axis of fear” across the West that exploits insecurities and grievances of the electorate, often by twisting the facts or even by spreading outright lies that speak to the preconceptions of their supporters. And they may not even be punished by voters for not offering solutions.

In his farewell speech, German President Joachim Gauck warned of the dangers for Western democracies: “We should remember that if we only accept as fact what we already believe anyway and if half-truths, interpretations, conspiracy theories and rumors count every bit as much as the truth, then the path is clear for demagogues and autocrats.”

With good reason, the editors of the Oxford Dictionaries proclaimed “post truth” the word of the year 2016. Beyond all the dangers for democracy, this also has a very clear security dimension: If politicians, for instance, lie about crowd sizes, say demonstrably wrong things about previously held positions and suggest that falsehoods are merely “alternative facts,” can citizens and allies trust them on national security issues?”

Note the carefully crafted dialect used to paint pro-Americanism into a “anti-democratic, xenophobic authoritarian, fear-mongering, alternative fact and post-truth” corner labeled racist and bigoted to stomp out the so-called “populist” (aka All-American) backlash against global Marxism. Note that this same terminology is echoed by the entire U.S. News Media in a constant mind-warping drip, drip, drip. It’s the same lies in the same terminology that has been taught to our kids in schools and even in many “new world view” churches for decades now.

McCain’s speech in Munich bordered on both subversion of the new Trump Administration and treason. Comments by Vice President Mike Pence were not much better. It’s clear that despite the election of Donald J. Trump, the global left intends to undermine his administration and keep the train to global Marxism on track.

Our kids simply do not know any better…

If you are a pro-Trump, pro-American greatness voter with kids, odds are good that you have been shouted down by your kids or grandkids for your support of Trump and his pro-American message, aimed to improve the conditions of every American citizen without any regard for race, creed or color. You may have even had the pleasure of being called “racist, xenophobic or Nazi-like” by the very people to whom you gave life.

Trump is right – He cannot fight this war alone!

McCain appears to be leading the global effort to undermine and destroy Trump, an overt act of TREASON in the good ole days when we still followed the Rule of Constitutional Law. Some of Trump’s initial cabinet choices were quickly identified as enemies within and cut loose immediately.

McCain has helpers, like Lindsey Graham and Marco Rubio, along with nearly every Democrat. The news media, academia and the courts are also at war with Trump, whose agenda stands in the way of the Global Commune.

In just the past two days, Trump has sent out a mailer begging for support from the people who elected him, stating point blank that “I cannot do this alone.” A clear warning published last May in the FIVE STAR rated book TRUMPED: The New American Revolution – a book not about Trump or the election, but rather the revolution that would begin upon his election and inauguration.

Tweeting, Facebooking, Tea Partying and prepping isn’t going to be enough to prevent the global powers from destroying Trump and the United States. The people must assemble, unite and commit themselves to coordinated strategic initiatives to protect Trump and his all-American agenda, or he will fail in his effort to make America great again!

According to the cooked books of the 2016 election, some 62,979,636 Americans voted for Donald J. Trump. If they truly want to make America great again and destroy the people who are working to destroy Trump, they must gather for the battle ahead. Trump now knows that he is facing overwhelming odds.

STOP WHINING ABOUT WHAT TRUMP IS DOING… STOP ASKING WHAT TRUMP WILL DO FOR YOU AND START ASKING WHAT YOU CAN DO TO HELP TRUMP! People serious about doing that in a legal and peaceful manner should unite HERE today!

We must protect the American agenda at all cost! But we must also deal with the New World Generation in desperate need of socio-political deprogramming. If we fail to address the next generation of voters, we might win this battle, but soon after, lose the war!


Proponents of ‘Diversity’ Tried to Force My Religious Group Off Campus

How to Win Friends and Influence People (on Social Media)

How Illegal Immigration Hurts Black Americans, According to Civil Rights Commissioner

trump america first

George and the Dragon Slayer

The original story of Saint George and the Dragon dates back to the 7th century, the narrative maintaining that in a fictitious town in Libya there lived a king who chose to appease the evil dragon in the town’s lake that was poisoning the countryside. With the agreement of his subjects, the appeasement involved feeding the dragon two sheep every day. But when there were no more sheep, the King’s subjects started feeding their children to the dragon, chosen by lottery.

When one of the lots fell on the king’s daughter, he told the people they could have all his gold and silver and half his kingdom if his daughter were spared, but the people refused. As his daughter walked to the lake to be fed to the dragon, fate intervened–– Saint George happened to be riding by.

Saint George stabbed the dragon with his lance, then placed a collar around its neck and, with the princess at his side, paraded the wounded monster through the streets of the town. The townspeople were terrified, whereupon Saint George promised to slay the beast if they all converted to Christianity, which they did quite promptly.

What a rich parable––with variations of course––on today’s political scene.


soros puppetsIn my version, the poisonous dragon is radical billionaire George Soros, who has made it his life’s work to poison vibrant democratic systems of government throughout the world in order to actualize his globalist vision of One World Government in which unicorns prance in gorgeous meadows, everyone speaks a polyglot Esperanto, capitalism is destroyed, food and shelter and meaning in life are provided by egomaniacs who know better than everyone else what is good for We the People, and the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, as well as Jesus and Buddha, are all dead because only government is the god worthy of being worshiped.

In an interview with The L.A. Times, Soros admitted the following:

“If truth be known, I carried some rather potent messianic fantasies with me from childhood, which I felt I had to control, otherwise they might get me in trouble.” And when asked by Britain’s Independent newspaper to elaborate on that passage, Soros said, “It is a sort of disease when you consider yourself some kind of god, the creator of everything, but I feel comfortable about it now since I began to live it out.”

In other words, the guy actually believes he is god! That was in 2003, when Mr. Soros was investing a formidable amount of his fortune into defeating President George W. Bush in his run for a second term in office. That effort failed, but the dragon got busy with other things, including making huge investments in organizations that would carry his radical message to new heights: the progressive Media Matters for America with its obsessive pursuit and vilification of conservative media, the Secretary of State Project, focused on electing leftists to that office to oversee the election process, like they did in the 2008 Minnesota Senate race that magically produced absentee ballots which gave the election to Al Franken instead of the popular incumbent Norm Coleman.

Also, as spelled out by journalist Mike Ciandella, the radical National Council of LaRaza, the abortion factory aka Planned Parenthood, the leftist Associated Press, the pay-for-play  Clinton Foundation, as described by Dr. Sebastian Gorka, author of the best-selling book Defeating Jihad: The Winnable War, ACORN known for rampant voter fraud, and the following huge number of leftist groups. And that is not to omit the over-$100 million Mr. Soros has spent on, among other of his fetishes, Obamacare, anti-illegal-immigration groups, and anti-Israel organizations.

Of course there is also Mr. Soros’s overwhelming support for everything Barack Obama. However, he really wasn’t supporting Mr. Obama, but rather himself. I believe that he, Mr. Soros, was the de facto president of the United States from 2008 until 2016. If you follow the money, it is clear that it was the dragon himself who was calling the shots, shaping the policies, and manipulating/pressuring/directing feckless pols like Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid into doing his bidding. We all know how that turned out: an out-of-control immigrant policy, an utterly failed [un[Affordable Care Act, the catastrophic Iran deal, and, ironically––to their ongoing shock, dismay, agony and fury––the rise and sweeping victory of President Donald J. Trump.


Ideologues like Soros are mistakenly thought to be above ego. It’s all about the issue, they’d like us to believe. Bushwa! Men like Soros don’t spend a preponderance of their time, brain power, energy, and money on issues alone without wanting and needing, indeed craving, the adulation and recognition that go along with the success of their efforts. Especially men with messianic fantasies who openly admit to god complexes!

In his wildest dreams, you can be sure that George Soros never expected to have his life’s dreams challenged and ridiculed and lobbied against and successfully undermined by another billionaire with an ego just as big as his own. That’s right…the dragon slayer in this case is none other than President Donald Trump!

It’s as delicious as eating a juicy porterhouse steak to witness the president taking on the bought-and-paid-for media machine Soros has so indulgently nurtured, the planted domestic and foreign policy moles now being summarily fired, the socialized-medicine scheme being virtually overthrown, the global-warming tax-extortion hoax being exposed (the same hoax that, according to Kevin Jackson, Mr. Soros paid Al Gore multimillions to promote), and the defunding of the abortion mill known as Planned Parenthood.

The dragon slayer has been able to accomplish all his in only four weeks! That is because unlike Mr. Soros, President Trump’s vast business experience has given him a leg up in the dragon-slaying department. Many good examples exist in all the Soros-paid-for demonstrations we’ve witnessed since his nemesis became president. The leftist grievance purveyors all gripe about Wall St. and wealth and income-disparity and how the system is “unfair,” while, at the same time grabbing every last cent that the dragon spends to fund their demonstrations, pay for their placards and travel and lodging, provide them with talking points, and do it all over again the next day!

But for all the huffing and puffing and acting-out, there has not been one micrometer of progress in slowing down the dragon-slayer or in diminishing his rising popularity!

Don’t these demonstrators have jobs or go to school? Don’t they realize that the vast public out there––the same public that trounced Barack Obama in the 2010 and 2012 midterms and positively annihilated everything he and his puppet-master Soros stood for in the 2016 election––is witnessing these frenetic temper tantrums, the anarchy, the irrationality, the grown women spewing profanities in front of their children while wearing ridiculous pink pussycat hats, the ignoramuses that can’t even get their talking points straight, the displaced hatred, the obvious projections, and will reflect their disgust in the 2018 midterms by removing progressive politicians from our midst forever?

I found the March for Women particularly ironic since it was clear to me that of the thousands of little girls who attended or witnessed the march, not one ran up to her mother and said: “Mommy, I don’t want to grow up to be beautiful and elegant and speak five languages and be a mother and marry a powerful businessman like Melania Trump, and I don’t want to be beautiful and educated and successful in business and be a mother and marry a successful man like Ivanka Trump…no, Mommy, ugh… I want to be grow up to put on a vagina costume and use swear words like I saw at the march!”

In the same way, I can’t imagine that one little boy in America has told his parents that his goal is to grow up so he can put on a black costume, cover his face, and go on a rampage where he breaks store windows, sets businesses on fire, overturns cars, and then runs away like a coward into the darkness.


protestersThe drumbeat of rage against the machine––the Trump machine––goes on, with media hacks from both network and cable shows melting down left and right, “objective” poseurs like Chris Wallace of Fox News Sunday literally yelling at White House Chief of Staff Reince Priebus, leaving Rush Limbaugh to remind a sputtering Wallace that “the media did not make Donald Trump, and they can’t destroy him.”

Still, the dragon and the media and entities like the Indivisible Team (IT), the Deep State, and Barack Obama himself plow on, intent on destroying the Trump presidency. IT, according to writer Dr. Richard Swier, was established by five former Democrat congressional staffers after President Trump’s victory and immediately launched a website devoted to providing leftists and liberals with strategies for countering the “radical, racist, and sexist” objectives of the president, a daily calendar of national events and calls-to-action, and the group’s signature publication, Indivisible: A Practical Guide for Resisting the Trump Agenda.

If their agenda has so far succeeded, I must have missed it, although one of their recommendations is, as we’ve seen, to disrupt town hall and other meetings with loud, unrelenting yelling, objections, and generally obnoxious behavior.

The Deep State is defined by David Goldman (aka Spengler), columnist for Asia Times Online and author of How Civilizations Die: (And Why Islam Is Dying Too),

as “the secret services in a dictatorship who overthrow governments, manipulate the press, and otherwise eliminate opponents.” A story by Joel Pollak in Breitbart explains that “the Deep State is shorthand for the nexus of secretive intelligence agencies…including the CIA, NSA, Defense Intelligence Agency, and components of the State Department, Justice Department, Department of Homeland Security, and the armed forces.”

So far they have accused President Trump & Co., of, among other things, colluding with the Russians. But every accusation has been thoroughly disproven. At this point––only four weeks in to the new presidency––it’s important to remember that we’re still dealing with the Dragon vis-à-vis Obama’s CIA, NSA, et al. As for the State Dept., the new Secretary, Rex Tillerson, has just fired the top tier of Dragon/Obama loyalists!

Barack Obama is among the defeated and largely discredited leftists who cannot bear to see Donald Trump in power and hard at work dismantling his anti-American agenda.  It is actually painful for leftists like him to see an ebullient Donald Trump making more substantive progress in weeks than their entire “village” did in eight years, in mobilizing thousands of supportive fans in just an hour to attend a massive rally in Melbourne, Florida, and disseminating more hope and optimism in the American public than has been seen in a decade.

According to journalist Paul Sperry, author of The Great American Bank Robbery, the former community organizer is busy scheming to sabotage the Trump presidency.

When Mr. Obama “said he was “heartened” by anti-Trump protests,” Sperry writes,

“he was sending a message of approval to his troops. Troops? Yes, Obama has an army of agitators––numbering more than 30,000––who will fight his Republican successor at every turn of his historic presidency. And Obama will command them from a bunker less than two miles from the White House. He’s doing it through a network of leftist nonprofits led by Organizing for Action.”

Mmmmm… now who do you suppose is funding this seditious effort? According to Sperry, OFA is registered as a 501(c)(4), so “it doesn’t have to disclose its donors, but they’ve been generous.”

Sperry goes on to comment:

“Obama is leaving behind a generation of militant jerks— collectively known as his `family’—to continue to proliferate protests and militate against everything and nothing. These irritating, self-absorbed, belligerent brats will `hands-up, don’t shoot’ themselves into every cobwebbed corner of society, and the liberal media will give them the national bullhorn to amplify their hatred every time.”

As I see it, however, all of these forces, individually or collectively, are simply not as smart, as savvy, as powerful, or as persuasive as President Trump and his minions. My bet has always been and remains on the dragon slayer!

woman march isis symbol

Feminine Spring

The self-appointed female nation, outraged by the words and deeds of the new president, took to the streets on the 21st of January, the day after the inauguration.  Protestors marched in a compact mass estimated at 700,000 to a million in Washington DC, with another million tallied in national and international sister marches. Did anyone question the misnomer of those hand-knit pink pointy eared pussyhats? There’s nothing pussy about the cat’s ears for heaven’s sake, it’s about the fur! What kind of PC turned the erotic anatomical reference into silliness?

So it’s Donald Trump that doesn’t respect women? First, he talked dirty about the private parts he can grab to his liking, and then he called Hillary Clinton a nasty woman in a presidential debate. Too much for nineteen year-old talk poet, Nina Donovan. She returns the compliment multiplied by 10, and earns herself unhoped for fame when Ashley Judd performs Donovan’s Nasty Woman poem before millions, live in DC and broadcast worldwide on TV and social media. Copying Donovan’s black talk, Judd pours out a steady stream of vulgarity that won’t be repeated here. Roughly speaking, it’s a lowdown gitdown catalogue of the female body, its intimate functions and secretions, garnished with complaints and demands, soaked in hatred of Donald Trump and, by extension, of all those testosteroned men. It’s pure trash and the crowd loves it. If the black talk can be explained by a taste for cool, what about the picture of Ashley Judd, pointing her finger in the sign of tawhid, allegiance to Allah unique? That’s cool too these days. Like the one keffieh fits all protests.

This is the background against which we should understand Linda Sarsour’s rôle in a mass movement coalesced under the banner of women’s rights. It is not incidental. She is only one among several co-organizers but the movement marches to her beat. “If you’re in a movement and you’re not following a woman of color, you’re in the wrong movement,” she repeatedly declares, fearing no accusation of racism. And that’s how a feminine population that enjoys maximum rights is mobilized to heave and lug a bushel basket of causes that cancel those rights, and swallow a heavy sprinkling of sharia on the whole kit and caboodle.  In the United States, the forces of Islamic conquest nestle in the bosom of civil rights. Including the “civil” rights of non-citizens: No Borders No Walls. ** The undocumented immigrant is my friend, my neighbor, my family.  We the People posters, including one featuring a woman in an American flag hijab, twist the first words of the preamble to the Constitution into a hymn to diversity.

Multicolor multicultural women haughtily replace the white male Founding Fathers.

Read the entire, richly illustrated and documented article here.

Printemps féminin

Indigné par les faits et gestes du président américain nouvellement élu, le peuple s’est mobilisé comme une seule femme. Une masse compacte de contestataires estimée entre 700,000 et un million a défilé à Washington DC le 21 janvier 2017 et encore un million en sister marches* [marche des sœurs] de par le monde, les femmes coiffées de pussyhat, des bonnets roses tricotés main, aux oreilles dressées en malentendu. Car le terme pussy / chatte n’a rien à voir avec les oreilles pointues du félin. Il s’agit bien entendu des poils. Est-ce par pudeur que la réalité anatomique est traduite en symbole Disney?

l’une des co-organisatrices, Linda Sarsour, américaine d’origine palestinienne, née à Brooklyn, reconnue par les uns comme championne des droits civiques, récusée par d’autres pour ses liens avec le Hamas. Défenseur décomplexé de la shariah, Sarsour milite comme Directrice de l’antenne new-yorkaise de l’Arab American Association créée dans la foulée des attentats du 11 septembre pour protéger les musulmans contre la riposte attendue. Parmi ses missions accomplies : le blocage du programme de surveillance des mosquées new-yorkaises et l’instauration des jours fériés dans les écoles publiques de la ville pour l’Eid al-Fitr et l’Eid al-Adha. La Sarsour toute fière en hijab tweete une offre alléchante :

« Tu sauras que c’est la shariah quand tu ne paies plus d’intérêts sur tes crédits. Chouette, n’est-ce pas? »

C’est dans ce sens que l’on comprendra le rôle de Linda Sarsour dans un vaste mouvement sous la bannière des droits de la femme. Ce n’est pas anecdotique. Elle n’est qu’une des co-organisatrices mais le mouvement marche à son rythme. « Si tu milites dans un mouvement qui n’est pas dirigé par une bronzée [brown woman], déclare-t-elle, tu te trompes de mouvement. » Ainsi une population féminine qui jouit d’un maximum de droits est mobilisée pour prêter main forte à un panier de causes qui annulent ces droits, le tout assaisonné à la shariah.

Lisez l’article avec illustrations, vidéos et références sur le site.


VIDEO: Expert Panel — Voter Fraud Is Real

We convened four of the nation’s top experts on election integrity this week to discuss the very timely topic of voter fraud, and you should watch the webcast to understand what’s really going on out there in our election system.

I thought that Cleta Mitchell, partner and political law attorney at Foley & Lardner LLP, summed it up succinctly when she said: “There is a systematic, well-funded, left wing, liberal, progressive and now Democratic Party open effort to dismantle the election administrative system in our country that over the past century grew up to maintain the integrity of our elections.”

The evidence is stunning. Hans von Spakovsky, manager of the Election Law Reform Initiative, and Senior Legal Fellow for the Meese Center for Legal and Judicial Studies at the Heritage Foundation, said:  “The United States has a long history of voter fraud that has been documented and can make a difference in close a election. Those are the words of the Supreme Court. We started a database and started putting in it cases as we ran across them. All we’re putting in are cases where individuals have been convicted and cases where judge ordered new election. Without much effort on our part, we found 462 case and 742 criminal convictions.”

Our own Robert Popper, Senior Attorney and Head of Election Integrity Project at Judicial Watch, who was in the Justice Department during the Obama Administration, added: “We don’t know the extent of voter fraud activity. The Obama administration made this a political football at the same time the president was giving speeches saying there is no voter fraud.” To the contrary, Popper said, “A Pew Foundation study found 1.8 million deceased registrants on the rolls. Two hundred and twenty six counties in 42 states had more actual voters than registered voters.”

The fourth panelist was Jesse Richman, Political Science & Geography Professor at Old Dominion University, who has been frequently quoted in the press for his study of potential voter fraud. “Many instances of fraud don’t get prosecuted,” he said. “There are limited resources and there’s prosecutorial discretion. If a non-citizen decides to vote it’s difficult to detect. And it doesn’t take much illegal voting to change an outcome.”

This panel comes on the heels of President Trump’s announcement that he wants a national voter fraud investigation. From our perspective this would be the most important civil rights investigation in a generation. These are votes stolen from Americans voting lawfully. If we don’t have clean elections all these debates about policy are for naught.

We have 20 million plus aliens of age who could vote. The left says just a few are voting, Trump says 3.5 million. Obviously the number is somewhere in between. Federal officials could figure this out – probably within weeks.

Whatever the Trump administration does, however, we at Judicial Watch are going to be active – in terms of investigations, lawsuits, and education – on behalf of election integrity.

I encourage you to watch the entire hour-long panel discussion:

make america great again sign child

Band of Mothers ‘Make America Great Again’ Rallies Nationwide on March 25th

This is wonderful!.

A March in Support of our President, our Military/Veterans, and All Our First Responders!

And participants are encouraged to bring items to be donated to our homeless Veterans!

Their goal is $8000 (pretty conservative amount), they raised over $7000 in 23 days!

Click here to support Make America Great Again by Linda Danger

Please consider a donation and a plan to participate.

Please forward and please join this effort. I don’t know if many folks watched the “nasty” women rally in DC after the Inauguration but the things said, with children there, were vulgar, repulsive and dangerous!  Madonna, an old bag, talking about blowing up the White House, in front of children.

Let’s all gather in love and respect for this country, our President, our Military, our Police/First Responders on March 25th, all across this country.  Let’s show the children of America just how proud we are to be Americans!  We are their future, we are their role models, let’s model behavior they will be proud to be a part of!

God Bless the U.S.A. by Lee Greenwood

I’m so proud of America and all her defenders and I know you are too.  Let’s take a stand for her!!!  Get involved!

Beverly Perlson

The Band of Mothers
“Warriors Come From Warriors”

EDITORS NOTE: This column originally appeared in The Geller Report.

trump first solo press conference

President Trump speaks directly to the American people and the people love it!

President Trump held a press conference at the White House as polls show his approval rating has risen to 55%. After the presser the media goes ballistic, the people yawn.

Here are some notable policy comments by President Trump:

  • I’m here today to update the American people on the incredible progress that has been made in the last four weeks since my inauguration.
  • A new Rasmussen poll, in fact, because the people get it, much of the media doesn’t get it, they actually get it but they don’t write it, let’s put it that way, but a new Rasmussen poll came out a short while ago, and it has our approval rating at 55 percent and going up.
  • The stock market has hit record numbers, as you know, and there’s been a tremendous surge of optimism in the business world, which means something different than it used to. Now it means it’s good for jobs.
  • Plants and factories are already starting to move back into the United States, big league, Ford, General Motors.
  • As you know, our administration inherited many problems across government and across the economy. To be honest, I inherited a mess. A mess. At home, and abroad. A mess. Jobs are pouring out of the country. You see what’s going on with all of the companies leaving our country, going to Mexico and other places. Low pay, low wages.
  • Mass instability overseas, no matter where you look. The Middle East, a disaster. North Korea, we’ll take care of it, folks. We’re going to take care of it all. I just want to let you know. I inherited a mess.
  • Beginning on day one, our administration went to work to tackle these challenges. On foreign affairs, we’ve begun enormously productive talks with foreign leaders, much of which you’ve covered, to move forward to security, stability and peace in the most troubled regions of the world, which there are many.
  • We’ve had great conversations with the United Kingdom and meetings, Israel, Mexico, Japan, China and Canada. Really, really productive conversations. I would say far more productive than you would understand. We’ve even developed a new council with Canada to promote women’s business leaders and entrepreneurs.
  • Another mess I inherited. We have imposed new sanctions on the nation of Iran, who has totally taken advantage of our previous administration. And they are the world’s top sponsor of terrorism. And we’re not going to stop until that problem is properly solved, and it’s not now. It’s one of the worst agreements I’ve ever seen drawn by anybody.
  • I’ve ordered plans to begin for the massive rebuilding of the United States military.
  • At home, we have begun the monumental task of returning the government to the people to a scale not seen in many, many years. In each of these actions, I’m keeping my promises to the American people.
  • I’m here following through on what I pledged to do. That’s all I’m doing.
  • This administration is running like a fine-tuned machine.
  • We have withdrawn from the job killing disaster known as Trans-Pacific Partnership. We’re going to have trade deals but we’re going to have one-on-one deals, bilateral. One-on-one deals.
  • We directed the elimination of regulations that undermine manufacturing and called for expedited approval of the permits needed for America and American infrastructure, meaning plants, equipment, roads, bridges, factories.
  • We’ve imposed a hiring freeze on nonessential federal workers.
  • We’ve imposed a temporary moratorium and new federal regulations. We issued a game-changing new rule that says for each one new regulation, two old regulations must be eliminated.
  • We’ve stood up for the men and women of law enforcement, directing federal agencies to ensure they are protected from crimes of violence.
  • We’ve directed the creation of a task force for reducing violent crime in America, including the horrendous situation — take a look at Chicago and others — taking place right now in our inner cities.
  • We’ve ordered the Department of Homeland Security and Justice to coordinate on a plan to destroy criminal cartels coming into the United States with drugs.
  • We’ve undertaken the most substantial border security measures in a generation to keep our nation and our tax dollars safe and are now in the process of beginning to build a promised wall on the southern border.
  • We’ve begun a nationwide effort to remove criminal aliens, gang members, drug dealers, and others who pose a threat to public safety. We are saving American lives every single day.
  • And we’ve even created a new office in Homeland Security dedicated to the forgotten American victims of illegal immigrant violence, which there are many.
  • We’ve taken decisive action to keep radical Islamic terrorists out of our country.
  • I got elected on defending our country. I keep my campaign promises, and our citizens will be very happy when they see the result, they already are.
  • We’re issuing a new executive action next week that will comprehensively protect our country, so we’ll be going along the one path and hopefully winning that. At the same time we will be issuing a new and very comprehensive order to protect our people and that’ll be done sometime next week in the beginning or middle at the latest part.
  • We’ve also taken steps to begin construction of the Keystone pipeline and Dakota Access pipelines, thousands and thousands of jobs, and put new buy American measures in place to require American steel for American pipelines.
  • To drain the swamp of corruption in Washington D.C., I’ve started by imposing a five-year lobbying ban on White House officials, and a lifetime ban on lobbying for a foreign government.
  • We’ve begun preparing to repeal and replace Obamacare.
  • I have kept my promise to the American people by nominating a justice of the United States Supreme Court, Judge Neil Gorsuch, from my list of 20, and who will be a true defender of our laws and our constitution.

President Trump’s comments about the press and media:

  • I’m making this presentation directly to the American people with the media present, which, it’s an honor to have you this morning because many of our nation’s reporters and folks will not tell you the truth and will not treat the wonderful people of our country with the respect that they deserve.
  • Unfortunately, much of the media in Washington, D.C., along with New York, Los Angeles, in particular, speaks not for the people, but for the special interests and for those profiting off a very, very obviously broken system.
  • The press has become so dishonest that if we don’t talk about it, we are doing a tremendous disservice to the American people. Tremendous disservice. We have to talk about it. We have to find out what’s going on because the press, honestly, is out of control. The level of dishonesty is out of control.

Go here to read the full transcript of President Trump’s February 16, 2017 press conference.

The full video of the press conference is courtesy of the White House:

EDITORS NOTE: The featured image is courtesy of NBC News.

indivisable against trump

The Indivisible Team planning to use ‘Aggressive Tactics’ to ‘Destroy’ Trump Presidency

The Indivisible Team (IT) was established by a group of five former Democratic congressional staffers in the immediate aftermath of Donald Trump’s victory over Hillary Clinton in the November 2016 presidential election. One of the five founders, IT board president Ezra Levin, had previously served as associate director of government affairs at the Corporation for Enterprise Development, and as an AmeriCorps VISTA employee in the Homeless Services Division of the San Jose Department of Housing. Another key founder, IT board secretary Angel Padilla, had worked as an immigration policy consultant at the National Council of La Raza, and as an adviser to Rep. Luis Gutiérrez (D-Illinois) from 2009-11.

IndivisibleGuide_2016-12-31_v1-1-232x300Upon its inception, IT’s first order of business was to launch a website devoted to providing leftists and liberals with strategies for countering the “radical, racist, and sexist” objectives of President Trump. This website features a tool kit for local IT organizers, a daily calendar that lists national events and calls-to-action, and most importantly, the group’s signature publication, Indivisible: A Practical Guide for Resisting the Trump Agenda. During December 2016 and January 2017, this Guide was downloaded more than 1 million times.

Rejecting the very legitimacy of Donald Trump’s presidency, the IT Guide portrays him as “the biggest popular-vote loser in history to ever call himself President-Elect.” And because Trump “will attempt to use his congressional majority to reshape America in his own racist, authoritarian, and corrupt image” despite the fact that he “has no mandate” from the voters, IT pledges to “stand indivisibly opposed to Trump and Members of Congress [MoC’s] who would do his bidding.”

The tactics and strategies advanced in the IT Guide are modeled on those of the conservative Tea Party movement that came to prominence during President Barack Obama‘s first term in office. Though the principles of the Tea Party are anathema to IT, the Guide points out that “we saw these activists take on a popular president with a mandate for change and a supermajority in Congress.” “If a small minority in the Tea Party can stop President Obama,” IT reasons, “then we the majority can stop a petty tyrant named Trump.”

Specifically, the IT Guide advises leftists to follow the Tea Party model of being “locally focused” rather than attempting to appeal to people across broad geographic areas, and “almost purely defensive” – meaning that they should expend their energies chiefly on opposing Trump rather than on “developing their own [alternative] policy agenda.” “Defining a proactive agenda,” said IT in December 2016, “is time-intensive, divisive, and, quite frankly, a distraction, since there is zero chance that we as progressives will get to put our agenda into action at the federal level in the next four years.” The goal, therefore, should be to “stall the Trump agenda by forcing [Congressional Republicans] to redirect energy away from their priorities,” on the theory that “a day that they spend worrying about [rowdy IT-affiliated protesters] is a day that they’re not ending Medicare, privatizing public schools, or preparing a Muslim registry.”

A related objective of IT is to “sap Representatives’ will to support or drive reactionary change.” “Every time your MoC signs on to a bill, takes a position, or makes a statement,” says the Guide, “a little part of his or her mind will be thinking: ‘How am I going to explain this to the angry constituents who keep showing up at my events and demanding answers?’”

The IT Guide advises progressive activists to form local groups of people who reside in the same congressional district, to fight “the racism, authoritarianism, and corruption” of the Trump agenda which “explicitly targets immigrants, Muslims, people of color, LGBTQ people, the poor and working class, and women.” “We strongly recommend making a conscious effort to diversify your group,” adds the Guide, “and particularly to center around and defer to communities of people who are most directly affected by the Trump administration’s racism, xenophobia, transphobia, homophobia, and antipathy toward the poor.” As of January 27, 2017, IT claimed that “more than 4,500 local groups” had already been formed “in nearly every congressional district in the country.”

In addition, the IT Guide instructs progressives to attend local “town halls” or public listening sessions held by Republican MoC’s, where they should each try to ask at least one prepared question designed to put the MoC on the defensive. The Guide recommends that the IT members in attendance should: (a) sit separately in different sections of the room, so as to avoid the appearance of collaboration and to “reinforce the impression of broad consensus”; (b) applaud in response to one another’s questions and/or comments; (c) collectively boo in response to things said by the MoC; and (d) “record everything” with a smart phone or video camera, and subsequently post those clips on social media or make them available to reporters.

The IT Guide also encourages activists to attend other local public events where MoC’s sometimes appear, such as parades, infrastructure groundbreakings, etc. To “optimize visibility,” says IT, these confederates should “stick together as a group, wear relatively similar clothing / message shirts, and carry signs in order to be sure that [their] presence is noticeable.” Further, they should “be prepared to interrupt and insist on [their] right to be heard”; chant slogans about an issue of concern; try to speak with reporters who are present at the scene; and threaten to hold local sponsors of the event accountable with bad publicity if they support MoC’s who back the Trump agenda.

Moreover, the IT Guide exhorts progressives to visit their MoC’s District Office, where they can either meet with the MoC directly or with staffers, and to subsequently publicize their visits via social and traditional media. Similarly, IT advocates the use of mass telephone and email campaigns targeting the offices of MoC’s.

On January 2, 2017, Ezra Levin, Angel Padilla, and fellow IT founder Leah Greenberg co-authored a New York Times op-ed introducing their fledgling organization to the American public. While characterizing the Tea Party’s political success as “a disaster for President Obama’s agenda and for our country” because the movement’s “ideas were wrong” and its “often racist rhetoric and physical threats were unacceptable,” the authors noted that the Tea Partiers “understood how to wield political power.” Specifically, said Levin et al, Tea Party activists had “rattled our elected officials” by: (a) waging “a relentless campaign to force Republicans away from compromise and [to] tank Democratic legislative priorities”; (b) “ensur[ing] that legislation that did pass, like the Affordable Care Act, was unpopular from the start”; and (c) “hijack[ing] the national narrative and creat[ing] the impression of broad discontent with President Obama.” The Indivisible Team would seek to use these same tactics against President Trump and the Republicans.


Obama’s Organizing for Action Partners with Soros-Linked ‘Indivisible’ to Disrupt Trump’s Agenda

How Obama is scheming to sabotage Trump’s presidency

EDITORS NOTE: This column originally appeared on Discover The Networks.


Democratic Treachery

“Good news: In two years, we’ll have a new president. Bad news: If we make it that long.

Kathleen Parker, Washington Post, February 13, 2017

“Ladies and gentlemen, we were attacked on Dec. 7, 1941, we were attacked on Sept. 11, 2001, and we were attacked on Nov. 8, 2016. That most recent attack didn’t involve a horrible loss of lives, but it was devastating in its own way.  Our entire intelligence community concluded that Russia hacked our election by deliberately breaking into Democratic National Committee computers and then, drip-by-drip, funneling embarrassing emails through WikiLeaks to undermine Clinton’s campaign…”

Thomas Friedman, New York Times, February 14, 2017

It seems clear that, to the extent they are still hanging around the White House, engaged in presidential transition duties, former Obama administration staffers are doing whatever they can to damage the Trump presidency. They may also be aided by a few “never Trump” Republicans and their allies in the “hanger-on” class.  Whatever the truth of the matter, Washington appears to be all but immobilized with “Trump derangement” and “Russian dirty tricks derangement.”

Thus, after publishing a column under the title, “Democratic Deceit,” it seems only reasonable to follow it up with a column exposing Democratic treachery. Democrats are so deranged over the question of Russian interference in our U.S. elections that some have even suggested that we are experiencing a full-scale assault on our democratic institutions.  There may be some truth in that assessment, but, if so, how did it happen?  When did it start and who started it?

Russian attempts at influencing the outcome of U.S. elections are nothing new, although they rarely, if ever, attempted to help Republicans.  During the Cold War era the Soviet Union carried on an intensive program to influence American public opinion, and hence, the outcome of elections. Their methodology is fully outlined by two veteran journalists, Robert Moss, former editor of Foreign Report, and Arnaud de Borchgrave, former chief foreign correspondent for Newsweek magazine, in their fact-based novel, The Spike (New York: Crown Publishers, 1980).

However, it was not until the declassification of Soviet era KGB archives during the early to mid-‘90s that the full extent of Democratic treachery was exposed.  For example, one archived 1980 KGB document stated that Senator Ted Kennedy (D-MA) offered to condemn President Jimmy Carter’s policy toward the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan in exchange for KGB help in his campaign to unseat Carter.  News accounts of that period prove that Kennedy did, in fact, criticize Carter’s Afghanistan policy.

Even more surprising, Carter himself was willing to jump into bed with the Soviets.  KGB files show that, in the closing days of the 1980 General Election, while Carter trailed Reagan in the national polls, Carter sent a political ally, industrialist Armand Hammer, to a secret meeting with Soviet ambassador Anatoly Dobrynin at the Soviet embassy in Washington.  Hammer asked the Soviets to help Carter win votes in key states by allowing Jewish “refuseniks” to emigrate to Israel.  The Soviets refused to go along with the scheme.

KGB files show that, in January 1984, Carter approached Dobrynin in person.  In an effort to derail Ronald Reagan’s defense buildup, Carter asked for Soviet help in defeating Reagan in his bid for reelection.  It is not known whether the Soviets gave him what he wanted.

But Carter, Kennedy, and Hammer weren’t the only Democrat who sought Soviet political help. Declassified KGB files show that, in 1984, House Speaker “Tip” O’Neill (D-MA) privately told Dobrynin that it was in “everyone’s best interests” if the Soviets would help Democrats keep “that demagogue Reagan” from being re-elected.  O’Neill warned Dobrynin that the “primitive instincts” of this “dangerous man” would plunge the world into war.

It must have amazed Dobrynin that those prominent liberals – Ted Kennedy, Armand Hammer, Jimmy Carter, and Tip O’Neill – all viewed Reagan as more dangerous than any Communist dictator.

Historian Paul Kengor observed that the Soviet archives showed “the lengths to which some on the political left… were willing to go to stop Ronald Reagan.”  In his book, The Crusader: Ronald Reagan and the Fall of Communism, Professor Kengor quotes the text of a May 14, 1983 memorandum uncovered in the declassified Soviet archives by Herbert Romerstein, a well-known authority on the Venona Papers and the Soviet archives.

According to the memorandum, written by Viktor Chebrikov, Chairman of the Committee on State Security of the USSR (KGB), to Yuri Andropov, General Secretary of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the USSR, he (Chebrikov) was visited by former U.S. Senator John Tunney (D-CA) on May 9-10, 1983.  Tunney, a private citizen, was on a highly sensitive mission for his former University of Virginia law school roommate, a close friend and former senate colleague, Sen. Ted Kennedy (D-MA).  The purpose of his mission was to enlist the Kremlin in a grand scheme to defeat Ronald Reagan and other Republicans in the 1984 U.S. elections.

In his memorandum, Chebrikov quoted Tunney as saying that Kennedy was convinced that the chilly relations between the U.S. and the Soviet Union were due to Reagan’s unwillingness to modify his strategic plan to win a final Cold War victory over the Soviet Union. As Tunney described Kennedy’s frustration with the state of American politics, Reagan was able to rely on the results of his highly successful “Reaganomics” policies – reduced inflation, reduced taxes, increased productivity, a healthy business climate, and declining interest rates – to support his political standing with the American people, making it difficult for Democrats to attack him on foreign policy issues.

As Tunney described Kennedy’s view to the Soviet spymaster, the only possible threat to Reagan was rooted in issues related to war and peace and Soviet-American relations.  With the active participation of the Soviets, those issues could become the most critical of Reagan’s 1984 reelection campaign. As Chebrikov wrote to Andropov, “Kennedy believes that, given the current state of affairs… it would be prudent and timely to undertake the following steps” to counter Reagan’s policies:

  1. Kennedy asked Andropov to consider inviting him (Kennedy) to Moscow for a personal meeting in July 1983. The primary purpose of the meeting would be to provide Soviet officials with “talking points” related to problems of nuclear disarmament so that they’d be “better prepared and more convincing during appearances in the USA.”
  1. Kennedy felt that, in order to influence the American people, it would be helpful to have Chairman Andropov submit to a series of television interviews with American TV networks.  He felt that a direct appeal by the General Secretary of the Communist Party to the American people would, without doubt, “attract a great deal of attention and interest in the country.”

Tunney assured Chebrikov that, “if the proposal is recognized as worthy,” Kennedy and his political allies would take the necessary steps to have representatives of the major U.S. networks contact Andropov to schedule interviews.  Specifically, he suggested that the head of ABC, Elton Raul, and “television columnists Walter Cronkite or Barbara Walters could visit Moscow.”

Kennedy also suggested a series of televised interviews, in the U.S., in which members of the Soviet military could convince the American people of the “peaceful intentions of the USSR.”

Chebrikov prepared a memorandum and sent it to Chairman Andropov, and the memorandum found its way into the KGB archives.  It is not known if additional negotiations took place between Kennedy and the Soviets, but one thing is certain: Kennedy did not expect that Reagan would ultimately win the Cold War, that the Soviet empire would disintegrate, or that Americans would one day find themselves reading of his treachery in documents taken from the archives of the KGB.

If Kennedy was unsure of a Democratic victory in 1984, with all the forces of the labor unions, teachers unions, public employee unions, trial lawyers, radical environmentalist, plantation blacks, pro-abortion activists, gays, lesbians, and transvestites at their disposal, how better to insure a Democratic victory than by enlisting the aid of the KGB and the Soviet leadership?  That was Kennedy’s principal motivation, and what a cheap, un-American motivation it was.

If a Republican member of the U.S. Senate, or a senior aide to a Republican president, had engaged in the same kind of treachery, he or she would still be staring out from behind the bars of a federal prison.  Even a retired three-star general, slated for a top post in the White House national security staff, would be forced to resign in disgrace if he engaged in unofficial talks with a senior Russian official… no matter how innocent or insignificant the subject matter of the conversations.  One also wonders how Democrats view the role played by the notorious Sidney Blumenthal who, as a private citizen, gathered bits and pieces of information from across the Middle East and forwarded it, along with policy recommendations, to former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in frequent email exchanges.

If Donald and Melania Trump are now finding Russians hiding under every bed in the White House, it’s because the Democrats invited them in and never got around to showing them the door.

RELATED ARTICLE: Allen West: Folks, what I just witnessed in DC is TREASONOUS

U.S. President-elect Donald Trump gives a thumbs up to the media as he arrives at a costume party at the home of hedge fund billionaire and campaign donor Robert Mercer in Head of the Harbor, New York, U.S., December 3, 2016. REUTERS/Mark Kauzlarich/File Photo

The Left’s ‘Rabid’ Campaign against President Trump Will Fail

I’ve heard that making sausage is a pretty messy, ugly and unpleasant process to witness. Well so is implementing real change in Washington D.C. I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again. I believe God gave us Trump because I do not believe a pro-politician could pull off dismantling so many Leftist sacred cow strongholds at the lighting speed at which Trump is moving.

I remember Bahamian actor Sidney Poitier saying when he came to America he simply pursued his dream, undeterred by supposed limits for blacks. Consequently in 1964, Poitier became the first black to win an Academy Award for Best Actor.

Political outsider Trump is cleaning up the mess, undeterred by corrupt DC establishment procedures designed to continue the status quo. Consequently, we have Scott Pruitt fixing the overreaching anti-business tyranny of the EPA. We have Jeff Sessions who will implement equal justice for all Americans, unlike Obama’s attorneys general. One said he would not prosecuted fellow blacks. The other supports Black Lives Matter’s infamous lie that cops are racist. Leftists’ heads are exploding because new Education Secretary, Betsy DeVos vows to ensure that every child receives a quality education.

While some of the rude, crude and violent illegal actions of Leftist anti-Trump protesters is organic, the vast majority of it is paid for by America hating billionaire, George Soros. From the airport protests to the Women’s March to Black Lives Matter murdering cops and numerous other incidents of chaos in our streets, Soros is the money man behind the curtain. Soros is also tied to the Left’s campaign to impeach Trump

Even before Trump took his oath of office, the Left launched their immoral, unethical and lawless 1,460-day (four-year) plan to destroy Trump. The Left intends to block Trump from implementing everything we elected him to do.

Despite Leftists cautioning their side to tone down their over-the-top hysteria, the Left’s rabid opposition to Trump continues to escalate to absurd levels. It’s a bright sunny day. If Trump comments about it, the Left will try to convince the public that it is raining, and Trump lied about the sun.

I submit that the Left can not tone down their brain-dead emotion-driven foot-stomping temper tantrums because it is who they are. It is like the old joke, “I helped you because you promised not to bite me. Why did you bite me?” The snake replied, “I’m a snake. It’s what I do.”

When Education Secretary Betsy DeVos showed up for work, she was attacked by protesters. One jerk even stood in front of DeVos’ car when she tried to leave. Folks, the Left is going to pull this crap every day for the next 4 years. When Leftists push free speech to breaking the law and destroying public and private property, I say lock their derrieres up! Thank God. Finally, a Republican administration that is doing just that. 

The Left’s goal is to cement their lie that a majority of Americans regret voting for Trump and hate his agenda. In other words, they hope to “Bush” Trump. Relentless unchallenged distortions and lies about President George W. Bush caused his approval to plummet to 33% when he left office. Clearly, the Left has begun their triple-the-intensity campaign to do even worse damage to Trump’s approval.

All seeking to see America made great again (patriots) must pull out all the stops, using their creativity and every tool at their disposal to counter the Left’s tsunami of anti-Trump and anti-Trump agenda lies.

The Left relentlessly and creatively sold us their far-left-radical Trojan Horse disguised in the form of an articulate black man. From Greek columns in the background when he spoke, extra reverb on his microphone to kindergartners mandated to sing of his greatness, the Left practically branded Obama a deity. As part of Black History Month indoctrination, kindergartners were taught to sing, “Barack Obama is the man” and “He’s our man, yes we can!” 

In celebration of capitalism and the entrepreneur spirit, it would be fun to see kids start Trump Lemonade stands.

Folks, the Left still does not get it. They do not understand the Trump Revolution. I realized something was amiss during the campaign. I witnessed thousands of Americans of all stripes from well-dressed white seniors to black bikers covered in tattoos waiting in line, enduring 85 degree Florida heat and sun, hoping to get into the Trump rally at Daytona Beach Convention Center.

If we are relentless in expressing our support for Trump implementing his 100 day plan, the Left’s efforts to “Bush” Trump via chaos in our streets, fake news and violence with fail.

Oh, one last point. I’ve heard concerns that the Left will react violently if we resume Trump rallies. Well, I am sorry folks, but freedom “ain’t” free. As a matter of fact, God has designed life in such a way that anything worth having requires backbone and risks.

Are you guys ready? Great! Let’s roll!


Election Results in the Third Dimension

County-level results from the 2016 U.S. presidential election

Color = winner and margin of victory
Height = total number of votes (all candidates)

Full screen version / See how this map was made

Election maps are telling you big lies about small things

The typical red/blue election map is in some ways deceiving. The one below shows the county-level results for the 2016 election. To look at all the red it would appear Republicans dominated the race. In reality, Democrats received a larger share of the popular vote.

Election 2016 county map

As with most maps that represent information using color, red/blue election maps are great for communicating categorical data (in this case, which candidate won county X?). But they don’t do a very good job conveying magnitude (how important is county X compared to other counties?).

For example, L.A. County alone has a population of over 10 million. That’s more than the combined population of 10 entire states. Maine, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Montana, Delaware, South Dakota, Alaska, North Dakota, Vermont, and Wyoming together have a total population of just over 9 million.

Election cartograms

One alternative that has become popular this year is to map the election results using a cartogram, something Professor Mark Newman at the University of Michigan has been advocating for a long time. His maps deform the shape of each state/county so that each area is sized proportional to its population. The one below also uses a spectrum of colors, rather than just red and blue, to show how close the vote was in each county.

election 2016 cartogram purple
Credit: Mark Newman, University of Michigan

I like cartograms and use them often myself, but they do have shortcomings. Namely, the shapes can become unfamiliar, making it difficult to recognize what the different areas are. Some people also find the deformations weird and uncomfortable to look at.

538 hexagon election cartogram
Credit: FiveThirtyEight

Another possibility is to use a tiled cartogram, like this one by FiveThirtyEight. It’s less weird-looking than a continuous-area cartogram (whether that is a good or bad thing) and the locations are more recognizable. Tiled cartograms work great for quickly summarizing state-level results, as they are used on FiveThirtyEight.

However, it gets increasingly difficult to build maps like this as you move to finer levels of granularity. At the county level, the hexagons would have to be extremely small to get the sizes and shapes right. For all intents and purposes, it would become a continuous-area cartogram like the map above it.

Prism map

A 3D map like the one at the top, sometimes called a prism map is another possibility. By extending each region into the 3rd dimension, it’s possible to show the relative importance of each region while retaining the map’s shape, keeping the areas recognizable. In this case, the height of each county corresponds to its total number of votes, though it could just as easily show population or share of the electoral vote.

election map 3d by county
For a closer look, see the full screen interactive version.


blueshift mapping tool

My latest project is launching soon: Blueshift, a platform for designing and publishing dynamic maps for the web. If you’d like to give it a try, request a pre-launch invitation.

geert wilder PVV party logo

Will Geert Wilders’ anti-Islam, anti-immigration and NExit party win on March 5th?

geert wilders party logo

Geert Wilders

The general election in the Netherlands is less than five weeks away on March 15th, 2017. Geert Wilders’ political polls show his Freedom Party (PVV) has a lead in weekly political polls of 30+ seats over the Liberal party’s (VVD) 26 seats of the current ruling coalition of current PM Mark Rutte in the Hague Parliament, the tweeder kamer, with 150 seats.

Wilders broke with the VVD in 2004 to form his anti-Islam, anti-immigration and NExit party after the assassination in 2002 of Rotterdam Mayor Pym Fortuyn and the November 2004 murder by a Dutch Moroccan Muslim extremist Mohamned Bouyeri of Dutch Film maker Theo Van Gogh for producing a short film, “Submission” scripted with ex pat Somali Dutch VVD politician, now an American, Ayaan Hirsi Ali, on the streets of Amsterdam.

Wilders won an acquittal in 2011 in an Amsterdam district court case on charges of hate speech for his anti Political Islam stands. In 2016 he was convicted without penalty in a show trial brought by Hague prosecutors because of his 2014 local campaign remarks about “fewer and fewer” Moroccans, a reference to the Muslim minority involved with crimes in Holland.

If Wilders can spurt to win the vicinity of 40 seats in the general election a likely impasse could occur about formation of a new ruling coalition with Wilders at the head as PM. That is reflected in the twitter war between Wilders and current PM Mark Rutte. The latter contends that the VVD has ZERO chance of joining such a coalition headed by Wilders. Wilders contends that Rutte can’t dismiss upwards of 2 to 2.5 million Dutch voters that the Freedom Party could receive in the March 15th general elections.

Wilders , unlike Trump believes that taking back border controls rather than building walls will stop the refugee migrant influx in Holland.

60 000 refugees and migrants poured in during the current crisis, forcing the country to open up closed prisons to house them temporarily.

Go Geert Go!!

Anti-Islam Dutch politician Geert Wilders said on Sunday (12 February) that promises by other parties not to work with him would be quickly forgotten if, as exp

American Carnage

The recent discussion on an “appearance of impropriety” once again exposed leftist incompetence. To compare the Trump Organization with the Clinton Foundation is an equivalent of comparing apples to weapons of mass destruction (WMD). Yet, the subject of the Clinton Foundation was widely discussed in my latest book Socialist Lies: from Stalin to the Clintons, Obamas, and Sanders. The topic of this column is the entire anti-American Left that constantly betrays the American Republic by being soft on the Soviets and by acting against the American interests for decades. I’ll convey an elaborate and comprehensive explanation of the left’s politics and make expose a predicament in America vis-a-vis Russia in the 21st century.

So, the November 2016 election-marathon, unexpectedly for many, ended up with President Donald J. Trump. His victory produced an earthquake in the Democrats’ camp. The day after his inauguration the streets of our cities were choked with waves of leftist women in protest against President Trump. What a spectacle it was – hysteria combined with vulgar-arrogant incompetence was showcased in some women’s speeches! Where did those provocateurs come from? They put us, the emigrants from the former Socialist countries, in remembrance of the ideology of Soviet Fascism, the regime we had escaped. President Trump has been demonized as evil incarnate, Hitler, and Nazi. Winston Churchill was right predicting that the fascists will say that their opposition would act like fascists in the future. We saw it the day after President Trump was inaugurated and we weren’t alone.

Rush Limbaugh on January 23, 2017, also warned us, the people who voted for Trump, to be ready. Leftists in the women’s march had begun a war to bring about the impeachment of President Trump. Rush Limbaugh has used the term Femi-Nazi describing the women’s march. Rush was echoing my idea of Soviet Fascism which I have expressed in my four books and numerous columns. My prediction is following:

We can expect a cascade of protests, demonstrations, and complaints by the DNC leaders, who collaborated with Russia during all eight years of Obama’s Administration.  Inflamed protests is their method of defense.

The Ideology of Soviet Fascism

I am a child of Stalinism, I lived through the regime half of my adult life and I called Stalinism: Soviet Fascism. I am also a former Soviet defense attorney and a current writer, who has been writing about Stalin’s Soviet Fascism that infiltrated all strata of the American political and economic systems for the last eight years. As a matter of fact, Socialism and Fascism are twin brothers, two sides of the same coin, the brutal force of compulsion. The recent history left two words of infamy in our inerasable memory—Hitler’s Gestapo and Stalin’s KGB. That agency is the major “achievement” of Stalinism.  Now there is a KGB government in Russia today.

Have you seen Vladimir Putin singing with pride a Soviet song in the company of young people? The song is about the traces the Soviet people left on the future mankind. Yes, I would like to show you the documents that had been prepared by the Soviets for the future of mankind.  Putin is tied to Stalin’s global domination ideology by umbilical cord and history. Stalin’s idea of one world government under the Kremlin’s auspices did not die with the demise of the Soviet Union, because it has been a major agenda of the KGB for all subsequent years and leadership. The ideology translated into expansion, invasion, and occupation of Eastern Europe. The Warsaw Pact testified to that. In 1955, Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev gave the following idea to the members of the Communist Party—drug addiction and narcotics trafficking should be viewed as a strategic operation that would directly weaken the enemy.

The effect of drugs was analyzed by scientists from the Soviet Academy of Sciences and the conclusions were that drug trafficking would be extremely effective and that the most vulnerable countries would be the United States, Canada, France, and West Germany. This study was approved in 1955 by the Soviet Defense Council working in concert with the KGB. It was the first formal Soviet decision to launch narcotics trafficking against the bourgeoisie and especially against the American capitalists. Here is the first part of the document:

“Soviet strategy for revolutionary war is a global strategy… narcotics strategy is a sub-component of this global strategy. …First was the increased training of leaders for the revolutionary movements—the civilian, military, and intelligence cadres. The founding of Patrice Lumumba University in Moscow is an example of one of the early actions taken to modernize the Soviet revolutionary leadership training. The second step was the actual training of terrorists. Training for international terrorism actually began as ‘fighters for liberation’…The third step was international drug and narcotics trafficking. Drugs were incorporated into the revolutionary war strategy as a political and intelligence weapon to use against the bourgeois society and as a mechanism for recruiting agents of influence around the world.” Following the order, the KGB established a drug-cartel in South America, which is still drugging America today…

If the first part of the document gives you the big picture of your future, I’d like you to remember forever the last six words “agents of influence around the world.” Those agents infiltrated all strata of our society from the Democrat Party to commerce, from Academia to Media, from Intel to the educational system, and from the State Department to our Congress. You often meet them, you just haven’t known who they are. And today you are probably surprise watching protesters against Trump around the world… Don’t be surprised, it has been prepared for you—the agenda is to unleash chaos and confusion, to stop development of Western civilization. Moreover, I’d like to show you the pace it has been spread around the world. Here is a proud Soviet statistic:

The Process of Global Development of the Communist Movement

Year      Countries with active communist parties       # of communists globally

1917                              1                                                      400,000

1928                              46                                                    1.7 million

1939                              69                                                    4.2 million

1946                              78                                                  20.0 million

1960                              87                                                  35.0 million

1969                              88                                                  50.0 million

1980                              94                                          over 75.0 million

The above table is taken from my book titled Socialist Lies: From Stalin to the Clintons, Obamas, and Sanders, Xlibris, 2016, p.47.

The document is taken from my book titled What is Happening to America? The Hidden Truth of Global Destruction, Chapter 7, WW III: Recruitments and Drugs, Infiltration and Assassinations, Xlibris, 2012

Yes, I have been writing about an ongoing WW III for the last twenty years. The war was waged by Soviet Fascism against Western civilization across the world and especially against America. It is a multi-faceted war with different fronts from ideology and philosophy to sabotage, obstruction, and application of force. One of the first targets had been Classic Liberalism—the ideological basis of Western civilization. This foundation was irradiated by Soviet Fascism in the 20th century—Harry Truman’s Democratic Party was transformed to the party of Soviet Socialism, which I called Soviet Fascism. There are no more liberals, we are dealing with leftists, fascists or charlatans like Hitler or Stalin. The rest of the history is going on before your eyes. I hope you understand that Saul Alinsky, Marshal Davis, and George Soros (sponsoring 180 leftist entities), Michael Moore, and thousands of other actors, are the main force leading anti-Trump propaganda to paralyze the Republican Congress…

The Policy of Divide and Conquer

When you read all four parts of the Soviet Defense Council document of 1955, you will realize why I changed the term Soviet Socialism to Soviet Fascism. A decent person who knows the danger coming to America has a duty to warn Americans and call a spade a spade. I did. Following the nature of document, the KGB created the mechanism of the long-term strategy of the war in the 1960s. To grasp the policy of Divide and Conquer against America, please read the pamphlet that I cited earlier, in my previous books; the Black Liberation Army Coordinating Committee’s Message to the Black Movement: A Political Statement from the Black Underground.  It was published officially in 1972. I called the brochure produced by the KGB in concert with the Soviet Ideological Department–Communist Manifesto for Black Communities. It brainwashed and poisoned many minds of black youngsters. Read it to see where violence is coming from for the last 3-4 black generations in America.

Just think and research the root causes and the history of the black movement since the 1960s and you’ll be able to see how all the pieces of the puzzle fit together to show the KGB’s activities. You’ll also understand the nature of Black Lives Matter and the recent event in Chicago when four young blacks tortured a mentally deficient white boy. Do you remember Hitler-jugent boys torturing Jewish youngsters in Germany of the 1930s? We are dealing with two major elements of Fascism—race and politics.

The recent riots in UC Berkeley vividly illustrated the idea of fascism against our First Amendment rights. Have you seen professional members of the mob dressed in black, wearing helmets and covering their faces, while setting up a fire, smashing windows, burning property in the best tradition of German Nazis? There were definite signs of fascist violence, politically executed by the comrade-socialists under leftist leadership like had been done by longtime political organizer Robert Creamer, who plotted to stir violence at Trump rallies. The riots in UC Berkeley also remind me of anti-Semitic pogroms in Russia. Watch the battle-spectacle in our Congress. Like parliamentary machinations of the Bolsheviks in the Russian Duma, where they dismantled a Provisional Government and proclaimed the First Socialist Revolution of Russia in 1917, leftist-activists are trying to destroy Trump’s presidency. Stalin’s devoted disciples exposed themselves in America as well. Maybe it is time for the Congress to establish a committee on UN-American activities???!

If you read Stalin’s prediction for America, presented in Socialist Lies, you will grasp the meaning of the ideology of Soviet Fascism, spread to the West by Stalin’s devoted disciples. Blacks in America have some resemblance to the Muslim world, which has not progressed much since the seventh century. This resemblance is very important as Stalin’s ideology and strategy have been applied to all minorities within Russia and outside the country. I showed it in Socialist Lies discussing Soviet Fascism in Chapter 25. All factors mentioned by me, reinforce one another. Only actual knowledge can solve the problem of the 21st century—both the blacks and the Radical Islamist are indoctrinated with the totalitarian ideology of Soviet Fascism. That was done by one of Stalin’s devoted disciple Chairman of the KGB 1968-1982—Yuri Andropov. Listen to what Ion Mihai Pacepa, a former highest ranking officer of the KGB defected to U.S. said:

“KGB chairman Yuri Andropov[i] in February 1972 laughed to me about the Yankee gullibility for celebrities. We’d outgrown Stalinist cults of personality, but those crazy Americans were still naïve enough to revere national leaders. We would make Arafat into just such a figurehead and gradually move the PLO closer to power and statehood. Andropov thought that Vietnam weary Americans would snatch at the smallest sign of conciliation to promote Arafat from terrorist to statesman in their hopes for peace.” – “The KGB’s Man,” The Wall Street Journal, September 22, 2003.

Here is the second conversation Pacepa had with Andropov:

“In 1972 the Kremlin decided to turn the whole Islamic world against Israel and the U.S. As KGB Chairman, Yuri Andropov told me a billion adversaries could inflict far greater damage on America that could a few millions. We needed to instill a Nazi-style hatred for Jews throughout the Islamic world, and to turn this weapon of the emotions into a terrorist bloodbath against Israel and its main supporter the United States. No one within the American/Zionist sphere of influence should any longer feel safe.  – Russian Footprints, by Ion Mihai Pacepa, National Review Online, August 24, 2008.

Don’t be surprised by raising Anti-Semitism in the world—WW III is carrying out all the attributes of Soviet Fascism, Anti-Semitism is the main one. Besides, an expansion in Ukraine continues, people are being killed every day there. Also pay attention to Russia’s aggressive behavior in the Arctic zone to widen its parameters of influence in 2017. Our Secretary of Defense called it correctly “offensive steps.” Russia’s meddling in our election has been obvious since 1972. To get a detail information, just read my book What is Happening to America? Xlibris, 2012. Yet, our Electoral College system has never been infiltrated by Russia, but it has been abused by the Democrats. The election of Barack Obama in 2012 was stolen from Mitt Romney—dead people and illegal aliens were voting, and cyber machinations took place in several states, including Pennsylvania where 58 precincts did not have one vote for Romney…

The Creeping or Crawling Coup de état Against the American Republic

It is not a coincidence that a discussion on “Russian hacking” and Memo-Dossier on Trump came at the same time: in fact, the two are inextricably connected—both produced by the agency known to you as the KGB to help Hillary.  This is the reason I have been writing about the Kremlin, Putin, and ideology of Soviet Fascism the last twenty years and about Stalin’s Political Correctness for the last eight.

“A former Defense Department official under the Obama administration says there is potential for a military coup to remove President Donald Trump from power.” Minutemen, February 3, 2027, It wasn’t news to me, I have been writing about a creeping or crawling coup dé etat for the last eight years. I just called it Obama/Putin joint venture and named it Destruction of the American Republic. I came to this realization after listening some of Obama’s speeches—the resemblance with Stalin’s speeches stunned me, giving a clear vision of a man—a Comrade-Socialist, a community-organizer, who created very rapidly his own cult of personality, where nobody dared to criticize him. The man doesn’t believe in American exceptionalism. The joint venture with Putin was not a coincidence—Obama’s presidency was aimed at destruction of the American Republic. A statement of a former Defense Department official is not a coincidence either—a result of constant politicization of Military, Intel, Judiciary, and Media by Obama.

The destruction of the American Republic was the objective of Stalin’s Doctrine and a major aim of WW III. It was Stalin, who in order to achieve the objectives married Islam with ideology of Socialism/Communism. However, the policy and actions had taken place first outside our borders—the Middle East was invaded and infiltrated. President Obama by implementing American transformation to Socialism on our soil has joined us to the enemy in WW III, widened the destruction and tripled the harm imposed to the American Republic. Moreover, discussing the issues, we should remember that all terrorists groups were established, armed, and coordinated by Russia through the connection of the Muslim Brotherhood with the KGB and GRU, shown and described in Socialist Lies

The Obama/Putin joint venture had a more immediate design to wage a joint war against American Republic domestically and outside the country. If you want to know how it has been done, just read pp. 167-169, Socialist Lies: From Stalin to the Clintons, Obamas, and Sanders, Xlibris, 2016. I’d like to give you my opinion about a list of military collaboration between U.S. and Russia executed under the Obama/Putin joint venture:

  1. Killing of bin-Laden
  2. Invasion of Libya, conspiracy of Obama, Putin, and French Pres. Sarkozy.
  3. Benghazi, murder of the U.S. ambassador Stevens.
  4. “On 6 August 2011, a U.S. Boeing CH-47 Chinook military helicopter was shot down while transporting a quick reaction force attempting to reinforce an engaged unit of Army Rangers in Wardak province, west of Kabul, Afghanistan. The resulting crash killed all 38 people on board—25 American specialist … Fifteen of the Navy SEALs that were killed were members of the Naval… “

All four operations took place in 2011-2012 before the Presidential election 2012 and described in details in Socialist Lies, the last operation in Chapter 15. The domestic campaign against Donald J. Tramp by Obama/Putin joint venture is still going on.  Iran Nuclear Deal was also done under Obama/Putin joint venture—Iran is a major vassal of Russia, a member of Axis under Russian umbrella. An American hostage named Robert Levinson will never again see the light of day—Russia is interested in him. Rep. Tulsi Cabbard is right saying “the U.S. government is quietly supporting terror allies.” I just illustrated the main culprits and the methods used to achieve the destruction of our country. I’d like people to learn this, especially: Paul Ryan and Sen. McCain. The first is too young to conceive a tremendous harm inflicted to our country by the KGB for the last hundred years. The second is too old, and if Stalin’s Gulag in the North Korea did not teach him, nothing can…

The cooperation of the Democrat’s leadership with Russia will never end until the major weaponry of Democrat’s leadership against the Republicans, the Ideology of Soviet Fascism is exposed and defeated publicly. I have been trying to do that for the last twenty years and all these years the politicized leaders of our Intel blocked information about my books and columns. Those incompetent leaders saw a soul in Putin eyes and joined the anti-Trump campaign after his landslide 2016 election. They are also responsible for helping Obama to destroy and transform the political and economic system left to us by our Founding Fathers. And those incompetent leaders have an audacity to lecture President Trump! What a shame!  

Refugees and Immigration

Immigration is one of the fronts in WW III—a device to destroy America from within. Just research the numbers of Muslims admitted by Obama, you will be stunned. That is the reason, I’d like to tell you about myself. I am an immigrant, a political refugee, who legally emigrated from the Soviet Union to the U.S. in 1981 due to the Jackson-Vanik amendment, a waver for the Soviet Jews. I went through a hell of emigration, being a stateless person for more than a year. Hence, I am very sympathetic to any immigrants or refugees who desire to come to America.  The point is the recent travel ban to seven Muslim countries.

Then, in 1974, a precedent had been set up for the prosecuted minorities. In my case it was religion or nationality of the Jewish minorities prosecuted by the majority. As a matter of fact other minorities had been prosecuted as well in the Soviet Union, yet, this waver applied to the Jews. I remind you the existence of my case as a precedent for a reason.  President Trump has promised to admit fifty thousand refugees from Syria instead of Obama’s intent to admit hundred thousand. Yet, I believe that a waver should be applied to the Christian minorities, definitely prosecuted by the Muslim majorities. It is the American obligation as a country of Judeo-Christian foundation to help saving Christians in the war against Western civilization.

In this war, I hope President Donald J Trump will cross the Delaware, take Trenton and make America great again!

To be continued