House Rules Package: A Step in the Right Direction

/in , , , , , , , , , /by

Frank Gaffney pointed out on his show yesterday that every major country in the Americas is now in the hands of the Left – Canada, the United States, Mexico, Venezuela, Colombia, Brazil, Peru, and Chile.  That’s really disturbing when you consider how authoritarian leftist governments become.  An island in this sea of misery is the Republican-controlled House of Representatives in the United States which just elected a new Speaker and passed a rules package that will appeal to anyone concerned about the advance of the authoritarian Left in this country.

The full text of the rule package isn’t posted yet on Congress.gov, so what I’m about to tell you is from the House Rules Committee version 3 dated January 6th.  (text – analysis).  Even if some of the details of my summation are not correct, the point will remain the same – the Republican House is standing strongly against misrule by the authoritarian Left.

The first thing that caught my eye in the rules package is the institution of CUTGO – proposals to increase spending in one area must contain equal or greater offsets to spending in other areas.  Put that together with the new rule a 60 percent majority is required in the House to pass tax increases, and you’ve got a start on getting government spending back under control.  The Left always wants to tax and spend.  Half their mischief would go away if government were forced to live within its means like the rest of us.  I also like that this restores the Holman Rule that allows members to offer amendments to reduce the salary of specific abusive federal bureaucrats and to cut specific bloated government programs.  I’d start with no more paycheck for DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas who is single-handedly dismantling the nation’s immigration laws.

Other provisions in the package I like include allowing the public to bring ethics complaints directly against House members, and limiting bills to a single subject.  The latter will make it much easier for members and the public to follow proposed legislation.  Hopefully, this means no more secret deals stuffed into giant bills passed in the middle of the night when nobody knows what’s in them.  What Pelosi said during Obamacare – ‘we have to pass it so you can see what’s in it’ – became standard operating procedure under the Democrats, making a mockery of representative government.

Other ideas I’ve seen floating around I hope made it into the final rules:

  • Requiring the text of legislation to be made available at least 72 hours prior to a vote in the House
  • Ending proxy voting in the House and remote proceedings in committees
  • No more automatic suspensions of the debt ceiling when a budget resolution is adopted.  A separate vote to raise the debt ceiling would be required.
  • No more prohibitions against gender-specific language such as “mother” or “father” on the House floor or in committee.   That’s a deserved poke in the eye to the Woke Left.

Best of all are the investigations.  One will look into the origins of COVID, the government’s involvement in gain-of-function research, COVID vaccines and vaccine mandates.    Others will take up the weaponization of government agencies against the people.  The Justice Department will be investigated for going after ordinary parents as ‘domestic terrorists’ for speaking their minds against leftist policies at school board meetings.  The FBI and other federal agencies will be investigated for their roles in censoring truthful information about COVID and election fraud.  There will also be a Select Committee established to look into the threat the Chinese Communist Party poses to the country – it’s about time.  I also hope the investigation into Hunter Biden and the Biden crime family’s foreign business dealings made the final cut.  I will be following all these investigations very closely.

Finally, I hope somewhere in all this is the restoration of regular order, that is, a return to actual separate appropriations bills with committee hearings – not just the giant take-it-or-leave-it omnibus budget packages we’ve seen under the Democrats in recent years.  Thousand page monstrosities loaded up with all sorts of leftist spending priorities that members can’t possibly read before they vote.

The battle has been joined.  May the House Republicans summon the courage to stick to their principles in the face of the onslaught from the authoritarian Left that is coming.  Democrat operative David Brock has formed a $5 million ‘SWAT team’ to deflect House Republican investigations of the administration.  That’s in addition to another multimillion-dollar ‘war room’ set up by other leftist organizers for the same purpose.  Where do they get all this money?  Big money versus sound principles and representative government – I know what side I’m on.  Do you?

©Christopher Wright. All rights reserved.

Visit The Daily Skirmish and Watch Eagle Headline News – 7:30am ET Weekdays

RELATED ARTICLE: 7 Key Reforms in New House Rules

RELATED TWEET:

RELATED ARTICLE: Republican-led House passes rules package and bill to cut IRS funding

Jim Jordan Will Chair ‘Weaponization of Government’ Select Committee

/in , , , , , , , , , /by

It’s a start…..

HUGE: Conservative Hero Jim Jordan Will Chair “Weaponization of Government” Select Committee

By Cullen Linebarger, TGP, January 9, 2023:

Republicans across America deserve to be thrilled this morning with the news conservative bulldog Congressman Jim Jordan (R-OH) will be leading a select committee investigating the innumerable abuses of power by the Biden Regime. Given Jordan’s impeccable credentials with the right, the Regime better start sweating.

According to the Post Millennial, this “weaponization of government” committee will chiefly focus on four areas: the collusion between the Regime and Big Tech, the politicization of the FBI, the Department of Injustice’s targeting of parents at school board meetings, and Anthony Fauci.  These are the things conservatives have been demanding from Republicans for the past two years.

Here’s the story from the Post Millennial:

“The 118th House of Representatives will see the formation of a new select committee, headed by Jim Jordan, to dig into the abuse of power and the Weaponization of Government. This investigative panel will demand emails and correspondence between the Biden administration and big tech companies, and follows the massive revelations that came to light through the recent release of the Twitter Files.

“The probe into communications between tech giants and President Biden’s aides will look for government pressure that could have resulted in censorship or harassment of conservatives — or squelching of debate on polarizing policies, including the CDC on COVID,” Axios reports.

“If government personnel and agencies do not comply, subpoenas are likely to be issued, per a GOP source. The GOP is committed to digging into “the politicization of the FBI,” which not only includes the work done to discredit accurate reporting from the New York Post in the lead-up to the 2020 presidential election, but the allegations of Russian election interference in the lead-up to the 2016 election.”

Keep reading.

AUTHOR

Pamela Geller

RELATED ARTICLES:

RINO Stooge Dan Crenshaw Is DEFEATED In Race For Chair of the Homeland Security Committee

Now The Left is Trying to Blame All the Post-Vax Sudden Death Headlines on…Climate Change

Colorado Won’t Name 31,000 Foreign Citizens It Sent Voter Registration Info, So Counties Have No Idea If They Voted

TYRANNY: “Physician Misinformation Bill” Goes Into Effect as Law in California, Prevents Doctors From Speaking Freely, Could Lose Their Medical License

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Psychologist Ordered To Undergo Re-Education

/in , , , , , , , , , /by

Criticism of Justin Trudeau, the dictator of Canada, may sound like a lot of fun – but not for Dr. Jordan Peterson, a clinical psychologist, best-selling author, and professor emeritus at the University of Toronto.

Peterson has been told he must submit to “re-education” and social reconditioning after criticizing comrade Trudeau’s Covid-19 travel ban as “‘unconstitutional and vindictive.”

Peterson has dared to speak the truth, including truth-isms like men can never become women just by surgically removing their breasts and taking testosterone – as actress Ellen Page, now calling herself Elliot Page, did in 2020.

Peterson was kicked off Twitter for refusing to use Ellen/Elliott’s new pronouns and not acknowledging that she’s a man – because, of course, she’s not.

Peterson revealed that he has been ordered to undergo six months of coaching to “refine his social media etiquette” and to help him “review, reflect on, and ameliorate (his) professionalism in public statements.”

Peterson first gained prominence in 2016 when he publicly refused to participate in proposed Canadian legislation, which has since become law, that bans “discrimination” based on gender identity or gender expression. His crime was refusing to give in to “compelled speech” that required him to use improper pronouns.

In 2019, as a consequence, Cambridge University withdrew Peterson’s fellowship. In 2020 Penguin Random House in Canada attempted to block the publication of his book, calling him an “icon of white supremacy and hate speech.”

Peterson has endured almost as much bad press and attacks from the cancel culture as Donald Trump. Still, like Trump, he continues to fight on and refuses to bow to the mob. Peterson has a lot on the line, but we hope he refuses to participate in his university’s latest charade.

American conservatives have, and will continue to, welcome him with open arms.

EDITORS NOTE: This Christian Action Network column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

BREAKING: First Age Verification Bill in the U.S. Goes into Effect!

/in , , , , , , , , /by

On January 1st, history was made when the first law in the U.S. requiring pornography sites to verify the age of users, and therefore prevent children from being exposed to pornography, went into effect. House Bill 142 (now Act 440), passed in Louisiana, was sponsored by Rep. Laurie Schlegel with bipartisan support.

Passage of HB 142 is a momentous victory. While U.S. law has long held that pornography must not be distributed to individuals under 18-years-old, until now, this principle has not been applied in the online world.

Although pornography vendors are required to ask for ID of anyone purchasing a pornographic magazine or DVD, there was previously nothing holding pornography websites accountable to verify the age of online users. Online, any child could access hardcore pornography that depicts violent and discriminatory acts.

This contradiction between pornography regulation in the online and offline worlds is a baffling and unacceptable gap in U.S. law – and Louisiana has stepped up as the first state to resolve it! 

Age Verification is Not a Threat to Personal Privacy

A common concern raised about the Louisiana age verification law, and age verification legislation in general, is that it is supposedly a threat to the personal privacy of adult pornography consumers. Not true.

Robust methods for online age verification exist which are very adept at safeguarding personal privacy. The new law explicitly states that websites and third parties which perform age verification “shall not retain any identifying information of the individual after access has been granted to the material.” No data about the user is kept, except for the single fact that she or he is over age 18.

Louisiana has implemented digital identity technology that allows verifiers to accurately identify the age of an individual, while allowing the individual to remain in control of what data she or he shares.

HB 142 does not prescribe a single age verification method but leaves it open to any reasonable method that meets a set of minimum standards, whether it be an in-state or out-of-state product. Therefore, the law is not burdensome for businesses and does not violate the dormant commerce clause. The requirement is the same for any website that targets Louisiana consumers and is similar to age verification required for online alcohol sales or gambling.

One example of a method that does not require ID is technology that estimates age based on the biometrics of the user’s face. The technology is different from facial recognition – it does not identify the face; the sole function is the estimation of age. The image or the biometrics of the face are not stored. This method is therefore analogous to a cashier judging by a customer’s appearance whether she or he is over 18.

There are also age verification methods which employ in-person verification, so that it is the same as having one’s age verified in a shop. For example, in France, an individual can go to the local corner store, present an ID, then receive a token that can be used to access age-restricted websites (including but not limited to pornography websites). The token is not linked to any personally identifiable information.

NCOSE’s Public Policy Team and Law Center assisted Louisiana legislators by providing a legal analysis of HB 142 to ensure it passed Constitutional muster by appropriately safeguarding privacy and not placing undue burden on the adult user or on the business.

Why Age Verification is Important: Scientifically Proven Harms of Underage Pornography Exposure

Age verification legislation is crucial, considering that pornography has been linked to a variety of mental, social, and sexual harms to adolescents.  

Several studies demonstrate pornography consumption is associated with both verbal and physical sexual aggression among adolescents. It has also been linked to more sexist attitudes and gender-stereotypical sexual beliefs.

Adolescent pornography consumption is associated with poor self-image, increased insecurity, lower life satisfaction, psychosomatic symptoms, depressive symptoms, suicidal ideation, and suicide attempts.

Pornography does not depict safe sex practices and research has found that adolescent pornography consumption is associated with having unprotected sex, among other risky sexual behaviors.

Learn more about the research proving pornography’s harms to children by reading our flyer “The Most Dangerous Playground.”  

Beyond Louisiana: The Need for Federal Age Verification Legislation

We could not be more thrilled at the ground-breaking passage of HB 142, now Act 440. We hope to see similar age verification legislation passed at the federal level!  

In the 117th Congressional session, Senator Mike Lee introduced a federal age verification bill, called the Shielding Children’s Retinas from Egregious Exposure on the Net (SCREEN) Act. This is the first time a federal age verification bill has been introduced in the U.S.

Slowly but surely, legislators are realizing the extensive harms that widespread accessibility to internet pornography poses to our children and are pursuing real solutions! 

EDITORS NOTE: This National Center on Sexual Exploitation column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

AG Merrick Garland Falsely Links FIVE Capitol Police Deaths to January 6 Chaos

/in , , , , , , , , /by

In a statement on the second anniversary of the January 6 chaos at the Capitol, U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland honored five Capitol Police officers who, he claimed, died after defending the legislature that day in 2021 — even though none died as a direct result of the chaos.

“Two years ago, the United States Capitol was attacked as lawmakers met to affirm the results of a presidential election,” Garland wrote. “Perpetrators attacked police officers, targeted and assaulted members of the media, and interfered with a fundamental element of our democracy: the peaceful transfer of power from one administration to the next…

“We will never forget the sacrifice of the law enforcement officers who defended the members of Congress and others inside the Capitol that day,” he continued. “And we will never forget the five officers who responded selflessly on January 6 and who have since lost their lives: Officer Brian Sicknick, Officer Howard Liebengood, Officer Jeffrey Smith, Officer Gunther Hashida, and Officer Kyle DeFreytag.”

“Who have since lost their lives.” Since is the operative word. Officer Sicknick died the following day from natural causes unrelated to the events of January 6. The other four officers committed suicide in the weeks after, with no evidence of any cause-and-effect related to that day. But Merrick would have you believe that all 5 officers died as a direct result of the Deep State-instigated chaos of that day.

Meanwhile, he said nothing about the only person who did die as a direct result of the violence that day: unarmed female protester Ashli Babbitt, who was shot by a plainclothes officer as she tried to climb through a broken window in a door inside the Capitol during the chaos.

Merrick Garland

8 Known Connections

Garland Says “Domestic Terrorism” by “White Supremacists” Are Among America’s Leading Problems

On June 15, 2021, Garland announced the unveiling of the Biden administration’s new “First National Strategy for Countering Domestic Terrorism,” an initiative designed to combat what Garland viewed as one of America’s most serious problems: “domestic terrorism” carried out mostly by conservative adherents to a doctrine of “white supremacism.” Below are some of Garland’s remarks from that day, remarks in which he: (a) cast the Trump supporters who had breached the U.S. Capitol on January 6 as uniquely evil; (b) warned of the allegedly enormous threat posed by violent white supremacists; (c) likened such people to genocidal Islamic terrorists; and (d) gave anecdotal examples of past terrorist incidents that had been perpetrated exclusively by whites…

To learn more about Merrick Garland, click here.

RELATED TWEET:

RELATED ARTICLES:

Retired FBI Boss Says Agency Has Lost Independence, Co-opted By Left-Wing DOJ Radicals

Fetterman Appears ‘Completely Lost’ at Swearing-In Ceremony

Mad Max Gets in Shouting Match With GOP on House Floor

Buttigieg on Southwest Tech Issues: ‘I Don’t Run Southwest’

EDITORS NOTE: This Discover the Networks column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Border Crisis: Ten Percent for the Big Guy?

/in , , , , , , , , /by

Big border news today.  Joe Biden announced a new approach to the crisis at the southern border.  Admission for some migrants from Haiti, Cuba, and Nicaragua will be expanded while a return-to-Mexico policy will apply to others.  The return-to-Mexico policy is the part Biden likes to talk up.  But the humanitarian parole program being used to expand entry has already been challenged in court by Florida.

So here’s what can happen: the administration builds acceptance for the idea of expanded parole, then stops returning people to Mexico.  Why am I skeptical Biden really wants to do anything to curb illegal immigration?  Because the administration has already instituted three dozen policy changes opening the border – changes I’ve documented in previous commentaries – and a leopard doesn’t change its spots, that’s why.  The new approach is a way to look tough while maneuvering to open the border further.  That’s the way it looks to me.

Now let’s go back to what I had planned for today:  who’s profiting from the record illegal immigration Biden has brought about and what influence do they have on policy?  Let’s follow the money and see where it leads.

Without question, the Mexican drug cartels are profiting handsomely from Joe Biden’s open borders policies, through drug distribution, sex trafficking, and demanding migrants pay up to cross the border.

The cartels are not the only ones with a racket going.  The shelter and resettlement contractors get hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars to process, transport, house, and administer social services to illegal aliens.  Catholic Charities is one such contractor, but an investigation found 30 more engaged in a mass resettlement operation in collusion with the Biden administration.  The contractors were active in the 2014 border surge under Obama.  An interesting phenomenon then was government officials leaving their posts to get paid big bucks to run the contractors.  The new wrinkle now is that the contractors appear to be crossing the line and instigating more new arrivals so they will have more business.  Texas Governor Greg Abbott has called for an investigation into reports these organizations are actually assisting with illegal border crossings.  How would you like to be some poor woman from Guatemala, get raped on the way up here, and learn that your purpose in life is to make more money for Catholic Charities?

Another pot of money comes from left-wing advocacy groups.  The local sheriff in Arlington County Virginia said she would stop turning illegal alien detainees over to ICE after attending an event put on by pro-immigration groups.  I pulled on the thread of one of these groups a little, and found they have millions of dollars of annual income at their disposal.  The 2019 tax form 990 for Legal Aid Justice showed some of the money came from the Fairfax County Virginia government and lots came from other left-wing groups (Schedule B – p. 2).  Left-wing advocacy groups are drowning in money and some of it is going toward opening the border.  A 2019 book named George Soros, the Koch brothers, Jack Dorsey, Tim Cook, Mark Zuckerberg, and others as among those putting money into this effort.

Could the Biden crime family have found ways to get in on the action?  The answer appears to be yes.  Hunter Biden owned an 8 percent stake in ePlata, a mobile banking platform for illegal aliens.  The Hunter Biden laptop shows he profited from the arrangement and introduced ePlata’s founder to Joe Biden.  More illegal aliens, more mobile banking profits, more dividends for Hunter, and 10 percent for the Big Guy Joe Biden – that’s certainly plausible, unless someone can show me otherwise.

A bribery scandal in Europe suggests things could be worse in America than we currently know.  The scandal involves one-and-a-half million Euros in bribe money from Qatar and Morocco.  The investigation has reached into the European Parliament and the European Commission.  In 2017, a former commissioner then in charge of immigration called for the admission of six million more migrants into European countries.  He is now being investigated in the bribery scandal.  A former Parliament vice-president, also involved in the scandal, is actually awaiting trial on bribery charges.

I heard some years ago from someone in a position to know that government officials in Washington were taking money to look the other way on illegal immigration.  I don’t have proof the Bidens or anyone else in Washington is on the take on this issue.  But I do have a lot of questions.  The point for today is, when you hear open borders crazies talk about the poor, pitiful migrants, don’t take it at face value.  Follow the money.  Who’s getting paid and how much?

©Christopher Wright, 2023. All rights reserved.

Visit The Daily Skirmish and Watch Eagle Headline News – 7:30am ET Weekdays

VIDEO: SCOTUS Update on Case 22-380 Brunson v Adams et al with Raland Brunson

/in , , , , , , /by

This week, on the cusp of J6, Defend Florida is excited to bring on Raland Brunson. Raland is the actual plaintiff on the case that is docketed at SCOTUS. If you recall, two identical cases were filed, one under Loy, the other under Raland.

In this interview, we will cover the case, Q&A’s and hear Raland’s unique insight into the what is next to come. Please mark your calendars for Thursday, January 5th at 9:00 PM EST so you can join the Brunson Charge coalition.

Thank you for being part of this initiative, our country needs you more than ever. Now that you have written your letters, please invite your friends and family to watch so they too can become participants in this historic lawsuit. For instruction on the letter writing campaign, go to The Brunson Charge.

As a reminder, the addresses are: Supreme Court of the United States, Case 22-380 Brunson v Adams et al, 1 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20543

And a copy should be sent to: Loy & Raland Brunson, 4287 South Harrison Blvd., #132, Ogden, Utah 84403

©Defend Florida. All rights reserved.

POLICE STATE: All Vehicles Will Require KILL SWITCH So Government, Police, Can DISABLE YOUR CAR

/in , , , , , , , , , /by

Don’t buy them. Buy an old, used American classic. They’re prettier and more fun anyway. Start preparing for what’s coming.

BIG BROTHER WILL WATCH YOU DRIVE: Disgusting Infrastructure Bill Installs KILL SWITCHES in All New Vehicles, Turns America into a POLICE STATE

By Cullen Linebarger, TGP, January 2, 2023:

Many people view cruising alone down the open road as the ultimate form of freedom. We regret to inform you that liberty will completely evaporate soon unless Congress acts.

The website Motorious reported on Friday that former Georgia Congressman Bob Barr has been sounding the alarm on a terrifying item buried within the Biden-McConnell “infrastructure” legislation, which passed in August 2021. According to Barr, the government will now have the power to shut off your vehicle if they determine you are partaking in any “illegal” activity.

Does anyone really believe the Biden Regime will not abuse this newly obtained power? Of course, they will! Particularly if such power can effectively target those opposed to the Regime’s agenda.

Better not be driving a gas-guzzling vehicle. The Regime might think you are a conservative and leave you stranded in the middle of a highway.

TRENDING: January 6 Book Released: FIRSTHAND TESTIMONY of Harrowing Tragedy from the J-6ers Living It! “The American Gulag Chronicles: Letters from Prison”- Please Purchase a Copy to Support Political Prisoners of Biden Regime!

Yet another reason to remove Biden as soon as possible. Here are the full details from Motorious:

According to an article written by former U.S. Representative Bob Barr, hidden away in the recently passed infrastructure bill, the very one I warned before would negatively impact drivers across the country if it were to pass, is a measure to install vehicle kill switches into every new car, truck, and SUV sold in this country. The regulation likely won’t be enforced for five years, so maybe there’s time to do something about this.

As we’ve seen both in this country and others recently, what constitutes “law-abiding” can change drastically overnight. For example, in September a car was pulled over in New Zealand and the occupants arrested when police discovered the trunk was full of Kentucky Fried Chicken meals.

They were smuggling the fast food to customers in locked-down Auckland, against quarantine measures. Yet not too long before, delivering restaurant orders to people was considered a reputable, legal activity.

It gets even better: Barr points out that the bill, which has been signed into law by President Biden, states that the kill switch, which is referred to as a safety device, must “passively monitor the performance of a driver of a motor vehicle to accurately identify whether that driver may be impaired.”

In other words, Big Brother will constantly be monitoring how you drive. If you do something the system has been programmed to recognize as driver impairment, your car could just shut off, which could be incredibly dangerous.

There is the possibility the kill switch program might measure your driving as impaired, then when you try to start the car up again the engine won’t fire up. That would potentially leave you stranded.

Keep reading.

AUTHOR

Pamela Geller

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Read Hunter Biden’s Laptop Crimes with 459 Statutory Violations—In A Ready for Court Format

/in , , , , , , , , /by

Summary of Hunter Biden’s Influence peddling, drugs, sex, all listed by crimes and statute violations.

Read and share.

This is explosive news presented in a court-ready evidentiary format. Glancing over the laptop the number of crimes is voluminous and disturbing.

How Hunter is not in jail, and his father is POTUS is disturbing as the FBI has had this information for 2 years.

CLICK HERE

Report on the Biden Laptop

analysis by

Marco Polo

Kanekoa News reported,

After a 13-month investigation into Hunter Biden’s Laptop, Marco Polo, a nonprofit led by a former President Donald Trump staffer, released a 630-page report yesterday with 2,020 citations that fully document 459 crimes committed by the Biden family and their business associates.

The detailed report, which was sent to District Attorneys, U.S. Attorneys, and all 535 members of the House and the Senate, includes 140 alleged business-related crimes, 191 sex-related offenses, and 128 drug-related crimes.

The group’s founder Garrett Ziegler told The Sun:

“Our number one goal is to ensure that Republicans don’t waste time.”

“The investigation has been done.”

“This report is a simple but extremely thorough roadmap for who needs to be subpoenaed for which timeframes and for what types of crimes.”

“All we’re seeking is the equal application of the law.”

“So far, this saga has been one of the greatest examples of double standards in American legal history.”

Ziegler and his team use documents, emails, photographs, videos, text messages, calendar items, phone records, voice notes, financial reports, and more found on the Biden Laptop to diligently detail the Bidens’ foreign collusion and money laundering operation.

Marco Polo’s report also reveals that China’s President Xi Jinping played a personal role in “approving meetings” of the Biden family’s joint venture with CEFC China Energy Company Limited (CEFC Energy).

“Prospective meetings between YE and Joe were to be approved by XI Jinping himself, who they called the “No. 1,” and the daily operations were overseen by ZANG Jianjun,” the report says.

Read more.

©Alan Kornman. All rights reserved.

Kick Woke Criminal Justice Reforms to the Curb

/in , , , , , , , /by

The Illinois Supreme Court halted the state’s new law eliminating cash bail pending further litigation.  Good.  Maybe sanity will prevail in the end.  Here’s what no-cash bail laws do:  A New York man was arrested for beating his wife.  He was released on no bail.  Less than 24 hours later, he shot her dead in front of her three children.  The no-bail situation in New York City has gotten so bad, Mayor Eric Adams now calls it ‘catch and release’ and said, “We have to stop passing laws that protect the guilty.”

Eric Adams might finally be telling the truth, but other Democrats who brought you insane ideas like no-bail are now trying to cover up the consequences of their insanity.  In Chicago, the mayor – who condones riots – wants to switch from police scanners to encrypted radio frequencies.  This will prevent journalists from reporting breaking crime stories and the public from learning about threats to their safety.  In Colorado, a Democrat senator’s wife is urging lawmakers to defund the police the sneaky way by reallocating funds to social services.  In case you don’t know, several cities got mugged by the reality of what happens when you defund the police and moved to re-fund their police departments.  But not in Seattle, which has found another sneaky way to defund the police.  The tolerance for riots and disparagement of police professionals caused a number of vacant positions in the police department and the city council voted last month to eliminate 80 of them.

But try as they might, the stupid Democrats can’t cover up the fact that large cities like Chicago, New York, Philadelphia, and Los Angeles are now more dangerous than war zones like Iraq or Afghanistan for young males.  The most dangerous city is actually St. Louis where the progressive prosecutor won’t accept arrests by 300 officers and the mayor won’t authorize pay increases for officers, causing the police department to operate at less than half strength.  Staffing shortages and progressive prosecutors are being blamed for the rise in violent crime in many cities across the country last year.

And Democrats can’t cover up the fact that Target lost $400 million last year to organized retail theft.  Overall, retail theft is up more than 26 percent and is closing in on $100 billion a year.  Houston – and elsewhere – we got a problem.  Walmart is warning it will have to raise prices and close stores, if this keeps up.  The CEO specifically blamed progressive prosecutors and their soft-on-crime policies.  The violence is so bad in North Philly, a gas station owner hired armed security.  Police don’t respond and nobody feels safe, he said.  A restaurant in D.C. is closing down because employees are being attacked and their cars are being broken into.  The insane Democrats who run the city voted late last year to reduce penalties for illegal gun possession, carjacking, robbery, and other crimes.

Another business closed, this one in Portland, another Democrat city that loves riots.  The owner cited “unrelenting criminal behavior” and “escalating safety issues” for employees. “We have no protection, or recourse, against the criminal behavior that goes unpunished,” an open letter posted on the front door said.  Here’s the interesting part:  You hear these progressive prosecutors and other apologists for high crime say, ‘don’t worry about it, insurance will cover any losses.’  Not true.  The owner went on to write: “Do not be fooled into thinking that insurance companies cover losses. We have sustained 15 break-ins … we have not received any financial reimbursement since the 3rd.”

Think about all this the next time the Democrats are flashing you a big smile and asking you to keep them in power.  Better yet, take action now.  The city council in Roanoke recently asked state lawmakers to undo the Democrats’ woke criminal justice reforms and bring back no-knock warrants, traffic stops for broken tail lights and other minor infractions, and holding suspects without bond for violent offenses.  Voters in Democrat-controlled Kansas City, Missouri voted up a constitutional amendment requiring the city to spend more on police.

This is not a situation where reforms swing between competing values on a pendulum.  The Democrats threw the pendulum out the window with their woke criminal justice reforms.  But this is still America and citizens like you can take action so they can’t turn your life into a war zone.

©Christopher Wright. All rights reserved.

Visit The Daily Skirmish and Watch Eagle Headline News – 7:30am ET Weekdays

Texas Supreme Court Rules Against Father Seeking to Prevent ‘Chemical Castration’ of His Son

/in , , , , , , , , , , /by

“The Supreme Court of Texas denied my Mandamus, effectively terminating my parental rights. My children are now subject to being chemically castrated in California. Texas is an empire of child abuse, led by Texas judges.” — Jeffrey Younger, father.

When the law fails you in the most fundamental, rational way, one has no choice but to take whatever action is necessary to right the terrible, horrible harm. The father should escape to a foreign country with his son.

The left has corrupted every institution in this country.

BREAKING: Texas Supreme Court rules against father seeking to prevent ‘chemical castration’ of his son

By: The Post Millennial, December 31, 2022:

“The Supreme Court of Texas denied my Mandamus, effectively terminating my parental rights. My children are now subject to being chemically castrated in California. Texas is an empire of child abuse, led by Texas judges,” he said.

Jeffrey Younger has lost his court case to prevent his ex-wife from taking their son to California, where he could be medically transitioned. Younger has been trying to stop this from happening for years, and has now reached the end of the line. He is prevented by the courts of Texas from protecting his boys from medical mutilation at the hands of their mother, who is a pediatrician. Younger has accused her of using the children to help advertise her “inclusive,” “gender affirming” practice.

“The Supreme Court of Texas denied my Mandamus, effectively terminating my parental rights. My children are now subject to being chemically castrated in California. Texas is an empire of child abuse, led by Texas judges,” he said.

This after Judge Kim Cooks, on October 24, said that both parents should have a “joint managing conservatorship,” which each able to have “a say in his medical treatment,” The Texan reported.

The custody case was before the Supreme Court of Texas, which ruled against Younger. Younger had issued a petition on December 16 to try to retain his parental rights after his ex-wife, Dr. Anne Georgulas, took the boys to California.

California has a law in place, starting on Sunday, that children in that state will not be returned to their home state in the event that the home state would prevent the children from being medically transitioned to present as the opposite sex. Younger wanted the boys brought home.

California Senate Bill 107, proposed by State Senator Scott Wiener and signed into law by Governor Gavin Newsom, will “prohibit the enforcement of an order based on another state’s law authorizing a child to be removed from their parent or guardian based on that parent or guardian allowing their child to receive gender-affirming health care or gender-affirming mental health care.”

Younger’s concern, per his petition, is that in California, his son “would be subjected to transgender procedures deemed to be child abuse by official opinion of the Texas Attorney General.” Texas has laws against the medical gender transition of children and teens.

“The Children would lose the protections of injunctions on the Mother that prevent her from chemically castrating the Children or sexually mutilating them in transgender surgeries,” younger said in his petition, according to The Texan.

Younger was married to pediatrician Georgulas. Georgulas and Younger ended up in court fighting over the children when she believed that James, Younger’s 7-year-old, wanted to live as a girl called Luna.

She petitioned the court to prevent Younger from “from signing Luna up as James for any activities or taking her as James or calling her James or using male pronouns related to Luna at any activities outside the home…”

She further asked the court to prevent Younger from “allowing the children to remain in the presence of anyone who is not calling Luna by her chosen name, ‘Luna,’ not using female pronouns to refer to her and otherwise not affirming Luna.”

Georgulas began to believe James was a girl when he asked for a “girl’s toy” from McDonald’s and wanted to wear dresses, as well as began to emulate the female lead characters in Disney’s Frozen. It was a counselor at the GENecis clinic at the Children’s Hospital Center who advised Georgulas to “socially transition” James, according to court documents. Georgulas was affiliated with that hospital.

Younger, who had joint custody in 2019, was and remains entirely against this course of action. When James is with Younger, he does not ask to be called Luna, does not seek out girls’ clothes. Yet a court determined that Younger must use the pronouns and names the ex-wife demanded.

In a video posted to the dad’s website, James is asked, “You’re a boy right?” Heavy reported.

“No, I’m a girl.”

“Who told you you’re a girl?”

“Mommy.”

The child said Anne also put James in dresses. “She buys me headbands. She gets me hair clips…she paints my nails.”

“Do you think you’re a girl?” The child answered in the affirmative.

Georgulas was awarded custody by the Texas courts in 2021. “Dallas County District Court Judge Mary Brown awarded Georgulas full custody of James. Brown also eliminated the requirement that Jeff Younger be notified about James’ medical procedures, except for instances of hormone suppression therapy, puberty-blocking drugs, and gender reassignment surgery. Under that order, Younger must consent to any decisions made under those categories of procedure,” The Texan reported.

Witnesses who knew the boys and could attest that James did not identify as a girl when left to his own devices, were prevented from testifying in the case. One mother of the boys’ friends said, in testimony she wasn’t allowed to give in 2019, that:

“Over the past year, I have observed that James is blissfully happy as a boy. He loves to march around outside and yell, ‘we are the only boy scout troop’ or ‘I’m the Leader of the wolf pack!’ He is always the ring leader, even though he isn’t the oldest of the group. He loves dressing as a super hero and sword fighting. One day we all walked to a playground near my house and on the way home James slipped in some mud and got his clothes dirty. He asked if he could borrow some of my kids clothes and I could wash his.

“Of course I said, ‘no problem’ and grabbed him a pair of shorts from the chest of drawers and tossed them to him. I said, ‘hang on while I grab a shirt from the closet’. He immediately said, ‘Mrs. Sarah, I don’t need a shirt! It’s hot! And boys don’t have to wear shirts if they don’t want to! Isn’t that awesome!’ He was so cute. I said, ‘yes that is awesome!’ As he ran off to play. I did eventually get him to put on a shirt. It was gray with lizards on it and he loved it! He also likes having his hair cut a certain way but told my son Grayson that his mom wouldn’t let him get it too short even though he wanted it to be spikey.”

The Office of the Attorney General of Texas filed an amicus letter with the courts on December 22, 2022, saying “a trial court has allowed relator’s former partner to move to California with their children over relator’s objection. There, she intends to provide the child with potentially irreversible medical interventions that may constitute child abuse under Texas law, Atty Gen. Op. KP-0401—particularly given that a court has previously found that ‘Mom may have over corrected’ for any symptoms of gender confusion exhibited by their child, Pet. 8 (excerpting order). The trial court clearly abused its discretion in permitting relator’s former partner to remove the children from the State given the ongoing litigation regarding their well-being. And that error may be irremediable on appeal because California has enacted a law that makes it difficult (if not impossible) for Relator to regain custody of his vulnerable child.”

When Younger attemtped to speak out about gender transition at the University of North Texas, he was prevented from doing so by far-left activists who shut the speaking engagement down.

 

AUTHOR

Pamela Geller

RELATED ARTICLE: Inevitable: Now Exercising Is Racist

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

The Brunson Brothers’ Longshot

/in , , , , , , , /by

There’s a headline that one would think would be trumpeted across America but that no mainstream media sees fit to mention. In fact, you have to search for the story, as even few among the alternative media sites have aired it. But the Gateway Pundit has been on top of the story.

In fact, in a GP guest opinion piece, law professor Tim Canova argues that the bombshell lawsuit in question has the power to overturn the 2020 election and presumably even to reinstate Donald J. Trump as President!

Too good to be true? Perhaps.

So what is this lawsuit all about and who is behind it? Fasten your seatbelts!

THE BRUNSON BROTHERS

Allow me to introduce the phenomenal Brunson brothers, with first names as rare and unusual as they themselves are: Loy, Raland, Deron and Gaynor Brunson. These brothers are America-loving patriots hailing from Utah, who formed their own band decades ago as a trumpet quartet. That’s right—all four of them play trumpet professionally. Search for the Brunson Brothers performances online and you’ll be in for a treat.

But that’s not why they should be making headlines now.

You see, Raland Brunson is the plaintiff in a lawsuit the Supreme Court will soon be discussing to decide whether the Court should officially hear their case. That conference is set for January 6th, 2023. Hmmm…January 6th. Does that ring any bells?

The case charges 388 members of Congress with dereliction of duty in violation of their Constitutional Oath for certifying the highly questionable 2020 Presidential Election results, and seeks to remove them all from office…permanently! It’s title is Brunson v Adams; et al. Presumably going by alphabetical order, Raland chose the name of Congresswoman Alma S. Adams (D-NC), as a placeholder for the 388 Congress members named in the suit.

The uniqueness of the case is that it steers clear of any claim that the 2020 Presidential Election was stolen, and instead zeroes in on the fact that in cases of acknowledged signs of election interference, the Constitution requires an appropriate investigation prior to Congressional certification of the vote that determines who will be the next president. But this was not done.

If you think about it, as the Brunson brothers must have, isn’t making sure there was no election hanky-panky the actual reason for the certification process in the first place?

WHERE WAS THE U.S. CONGRESS? UNDER THE TABLES…

Whereas our feckless Congress members willfully turned a blind eye on the election fraud once they finally emerged from the basement where they’d cowered during the faux “insurrection”. Perhaps they just wanted to hurry things up so they could go home, have a drink and get to bed.

After all, it was close to 3am. Plus the false flag “insurrection” gave them cover by distracting people’s attention from the real insurrection—the Soros-funded Color Revolution that members of Congress were about to cement into law through their treasonous “certification.” In effect, they insisted there was no election interference, so why bother investigating? When in fact, our country had undergone a coup d’état in the wee hours of November 3rd, through which the presidency was usurped from the rightful winner, President Donald J. Trump, and handed over to China’s BFF (Best Friend Forever): Sleepy Joe Biden.

Some Senators, however, begged to differ over the certification. On January 2, 2021, U.S. Senators Ted Cruz (R-Texas), Ron Johnson (R-Wis.), John Kennedy (R-La.), and eight others, issued a statement acknowledging serious indications of vote tampering in the election, and urged the appointment of an Electoral Commission “… to conduct an emergency 10-day audit of the election returns in the disputed states. … Accordingly, we intend to vote on January 6 to reject the electors from disputed states as not ‘regularly given’ and ‘lawfully certified’ (the statutory requisite), unless and until that emergency 10-day audit is completed…. We are acting not to thwart the democratic process, but rather to protect it.”

Sadly, but predictably, that proposed protection was rejected by Congress.

So in essence, the Brunson case seeks to turn the clock back and prosecute those in that Congress—all 388 of them—who turned their backs on the Constitution on January 6th and certified, and therefore legitimized, Beijing Biden as president, in spite of massive election “irregularities.”

HOPE SPRINGS ETERNAL

The Brunson lawsuit accuses all members of both houses of Congress who rubber-stamped the questionable results of the 2020 election of violating their Constitutional Oath.

The suit names those who voted against the proposition put forth by Senator Cruz et al., to put the Congressional certification process on hold to allow for an investigation into possible election interference.

The plaintiff argues that refusing to support such an investigation made them derelict in their duty to protect and defend the Constitution.

Should the Supremes agree to hear the case and decide in favor of the plaintiff, the defendants will not only be ousted from Congress, but they may never again hold public office. And lest I forget, among the names listed in the suit are those of Mike Pence, Joe Biden and Kamala Harris. The stuff dreams are made of….

Some believe that if we’re ever to take our country back, it will most likely be through lawfare. Along these lines, the Brunson brothers have done their best to heave a massive time-bomb right into the nest of the Swamp. According to Rob Cunningham, they are seeking “the most historic and consequential judicial remedy in American history.”

TRUMPETS ALL AROUND!

On the bright side, the very fact that a few “ordinary” citizens, none of whom are lawyers, could get the Supreme Court to even consider granting this case a hearing, is both remarkable and remarkably encouraging.  And the fact that they are all four trumpeters has not been lost on some of those commenting on the case. There’s not only the pun on “trump” but also a Biblical resonance. And believers are quick to tell you that God has a sense of humor.

Back in 2007, Pastor Kim Clement uttered an astonishing prophetic claim that God would use Trump as His trumpet, making him America’s president. In fact, Trump mentioned God in his speeches almost as often as Obama referred to himself in his. And now we have four Brunson trumpets getting into the act.

IS THERE A DARK SIDE?

But let’s not neglect the possible dark side.

Recall that when King Croesus of Lydia asked the Oracle at Delphi if he should go to battle against the Persians, he was told if he made war on them “a mighty empire would fall.” The Oracle was right. Here’s the rub: it was his own mighty empire that fell.

The fact that the Court has agreed to discuss the Brunson case on January 6th has inspired some to believe the Justices wish to address the massive wrong enacted against our nation on that fateful day. But oracularly speaking, it could just as easily be interpreted as a harbinger of a second January 6th disappointment: one in which the Court simply refuses to hear the lawsuit, dashing patriots’ hopes once more.

In fact, in a piece published on December 30th, 2022, in UncoverDC, Adam Carter and Tracy Beanz argue that Raland Brunson and his brothers have misunderstood the law and do not realize that the Supreme Court has no authority to remove sitting members of Congress, let alone a sitting president. Says Carter: “Even if the case had merit on all the other issues presented in the lawsuit, SCOTUS does not have the power to grant the remedy being sought.” Meanwhile, I discovered an interview with Loy Brunson hosted by Charlie Ward—a well-known QAnon purveyor of false hope—which is not a good sign.

NAVIGATING THROUGH A DARK TIME

Let’s pause and revisit some history. President Trump called for a peaceful rally on January 6th, 2021 to demonstrate public support for halting premature certification of the questionable voting results in the battleground states. This rally should have succeeded in its purpose, the way Martin Luther King Jr.’s March on Washington in 1963 succeeded in galvanizing public opinion in support of equal civil rights for Blacks.

However, times are not normal, and the J6 rally was seized on by the Left in a devious, irony-laden Satanic inversion, wherein patriots were cast as insurrectionists by the actual insurrectionists and their many abettors.

Here’s a question to ponder: Why would the Supremes, who refused to hear any of the lawsuits brought by the Trump Administration prior to OBiden’s dismal Inauguration, be entertaining the possibility of hearing Brunson v Adams?

We mustn’t forget that the elite powermongers behind our feckless Congress critters are hellbent on enacting their One World Government and will brook no departure from their plans. How might they view an evisceration of Congress—i.e. the culling of their co-conspirators and useful idiots? Does anyone think they’d just shrug their shoulders and walk away if such a plan could even be put into action?

As much as we might cheer the patriotic Brunson Four, we need to realize what a longshot their case is, and to recognize the predicament We the Patriots face. We want our country back. We long for justice. And we need hope. But there may not be a silver bullet.

The Brunson brothers struck a chord by devising a strategy that, if it proved to be a true legal remedy, could lead to great rejoicing in the land by America Firsters. But so that we don’t merely ricochet from disappointment to disappointment, we also need to learn to differentiate between real hope and hopium in our quest for light in our nation’s present darkness.

Some experts have called the Brunson suit a fruitless, unwinnable, pie-in-the-sky case.

Well, if that be so, then let us find other remedies! We the People have been wronged and there must be some redress of our grievances, which is what the Brunson brothers—and I suspect the majority of sane Americans—long for, and what patriots must stand for. And no matter when and how it comes about, I for one will hail it as Divine Intervention!

© 2023 Cherie Zaslawsky – All Rights Reserved

RELATED: Here are the details of both lawsuits.

New Text and Email Evidence: Pelosi Staff Secretly DECREASED Security at U.S. Capitol for Jan 6th

/in , , , , , , , /by

The whole thing was a set-up, a terrible, elaborate set-up to inflict a death blow to our Constitutional Republic.

HUGE: House Republicans Find Text and Email Evidence that Pelosi Staffers Secretly DECREASED Security at US Capitol for Jan 6 – While at Same Time Pelosi Was Organizing Film Crew that Day

By: Jim Hoft, TGP, December 30, 2022:

Rogan O’Handley posted a text message from Nancy Pelosi’s staff secretly editing the J6 security plan for the US Capitol and then telling the House Sergeant at Arms to “please act surprised” when the final draft was published.

The House Sergeant at Arms responded, “I’m startled!” to the request showing his willingness to play along.

This is more evidence that the January 6 disruptions were planned in advance.

Keep reading….

 

AUTHOR

Pamela Geller

RELATED ARTICLES:

IT WAS ALL STAGED! Pelosi Brought in Daughter, Camera Crew to US Capitol Before the Protest, Son-in-Law Was Set Up Outside to Film

Fed-Surrection: Emails, Texts Show Pelosi Office Directly Involved in Failed Jan. 6 Security

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

ELECTION INTEGRITY: New York City Removes 441,083 Ineligible Names from Voter Rolls Thanks to Judicial Watch!

/in , , , , , , , /by

New York City Removes 441,083 Ineligible Names from Voter Rolls Thanks to Judicial Watch!

We just settled a federal election integrity lawsuit against New York City after the city removed 441,083 ineligible names from the voter rolls and promised to take reasonable steps to clean its voter registration lists in the future.

We filed the lawsuit in July after the city failed to clean voter rolls for years. The lawsuit, filed under the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA), pointed out that New York City removed only 22 names under federal law over six years (Judicial Watch v Valentine et al. (No.1:22-cv-03952)).

Our suit detailed how New York City’s “own recent data concedes that there were only 22 total” removals under this provision “during a six-year period, in a city of over 5.5 million voters. These are ludicrously small numbers of removals given the sizable populations of these counties.”

Moreover, the “almost complete failure of Kings, Queens, New York, Bronx, and Richmond Counties, over a period of at least six years, to remove voters” under a key provision of federal law “means that there are untold numbers of New York City registrations for voters who are ineligible to vote at their listed address because they have changed residence or are otherwise ineligible to vote.”

The settlement details how the city responded to our notice about its voting roll deficiencies with a massive clean-up:

[The Board of Elections] notified Judicial Watch that, in February 2022, they removed, pursuant to Section 8(d)(1)(B) of the NVRA, 82,802 registrations in Bronx County, 128,093 in Kings County, 145,891 in New York County, 66,010 in Queens County, and 18,287 in Richmond County, for a total of 441,083 registrations.

[The Board of Elections] notified Judicial Watch that going forward they intend to cancel registrations pursuant to Section 8(d)(1)(B) in each odd-numbered year in the months following a federal election.

Specifically, the city also agrees to track in detail and report its voter roll maintenance efforts through 2025:

For both 2023 and 2025 … the [Board of Elections] will notify Judicial Watch … on or before March 31, by means of separate excel spreadsheets for Bronx County, Kings County, New York County, Queens County, and Richmond County, of the number of removals, including removals pursuant to … the NVRA, made during the previous two years.

The NVRA requires states to “conduct a general program that makes a reasonable effort to remove” from the rolls “the names of ineligible voters” who have died or changed residence. Among other things, the law requires registrations to be cancelled when voters fail to respond to address confirmation notices and then fail to vote in the next two general federal elections. In 2018, the Supreme Court confirmed that such removals are mandatory (Husted v. A. Philip Randolph Inst. (138 S. Ct. 1833, 1841-42 (2018)).

This historic settlement is a major victory for New York voters who will benefit from cleaner voter rolls and more honest elections. We are pleased that New York City officials quickly acted to remove 441,000 outdated registrations from the rolls. We look forward to working together under this federal lawsuit settlement to ensure New York City maintains cleaner rolls for future elections.

We are a national leader in voting integrity and voting rights. As part of our work, we assembled a team of highly experienced voting rights attorneys who stopped discriminatory elections in Hawaii, and cleaned up voter rolls in California, Ohio, Indiana, and Kentucky, among other achievements.

California settled an NVRA lawsuit with us and began the process of removing up to 1.6 million inactive names from Los Angeles County’s voter rolls. Kentucky also began a cleanup of hundreds of thousands of old registrations last year after it entered into a consent decree to end another Judicial Watch lawsuit.

In February 2022, we settled a voter roll clean-up lawsuit against North Carolina and two of its counties after North Carolina removed over 430,000 ineligible names from the voter rolls.

In March 2022, a Maryland court ruled in favor of our challenge to Maryland’s Democratic legislature’s “extreme” congressional redistricting gerrymander.

In May 2022, we sued Illinois on behalf of Congressman Mike Bost and two other registered Illinois voters to prevent state election officials from extending Election Day for 14 days beyond the date established by federal law.

Robert Popper, Judicial Watch senior attorney, leads our election law program. Popper was previously in the Voting Section of the Civil Rights Division of the Justice Department, where he managed voting rights investigations, litigations, consent decrees, and settlements in dozens of states.

Happy New Year!

As we welcome the new year, we recall a few of our successes in 2022:

We made it more likely that voters in North Carolina will have cleaner elections, and we are making headway for voters in Illinois by challenging its election law permitting mail-in ballots to be received as long as two weeks after Election Day.

We scored a win against two unconstitutional California quota mandates for sex, race, ethnicity, and LGBT status requirements for corporate boards.

We continue to uncover unsettling information regarding COVID-19, including the Biden administration’s extensive media plan for a propaganda campaign to push the vaccine.

I anticipate that Judicial Watch will carry its largest and most important caseload in our 29-year history into 2023 and engage our full arsenal of research, investigations and litigation into critically important public policy fronts. For example, uncovering critical race theory in our public institutions:

We successfully settled a civil rights lawsuit that we filed on behalf of a Massachusetts teacher who lost his position as head football coach after raising concerns about the promotion of critical race theory and Black Lives Matter propaganda in his daughter’s seventh-grade history class.

We uncovered critical race theory instructional materials from the U.S. Military Academy, West Point, including a PowerPoint slide with a graphic titled “MODERN-DAY SLAVERY IN THE USA.” We are pursuing similar lawsuits against the U.S. Naval Academy and the U.S. Air Force Academy to see if they are teaching similar racist, anti-American propaganda.

We’re certainly eager to learn more about Hunter Biden and apparent efforts by the administration to block investigations.

After the Allied victory over Hitler in 1945, but before the victory over Japan, Winston Churchill found himself in a similar situation of looking both back and forward. He declared: “We may allow ourselves a brief period of rejoicing, butlet us not forget for a moment the toil and efforts that lie ahead.”

Dark clouds hang over our country, but they only motivate us. As Churchill also observed, “This is no time for ease and comfort. It is time to dare and endure.”

We are grateful that you are with us as we enter 2023. All of us wish you and yours a Happy New Year!

I hope you’ll make a special New Year’s contribution in support of our essential work ahead.

Until next week …

EDITORS NOTE: This Judicial Watch column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

SCOTUS UPDATE: 2020 Election Fraud and National Security Breach Case No. 22-380—Citizens sent 50,000 letters asking the case be heard!

/in , , , , , , , , , /by

Loy Brunson appeared on Defend Florida to give a SCOTUS update on the 2020 Election Fraud and National Security Breach Case No. 22-380.

The 2020 Election Fraud and National Security Breach Case No. 22-380 reads in part:

Mr. [Raland] Brunson filed a pro se civil action in Utah state court against hundreds of members of Congress, President Joseph Biden, Vice President Kamala Harris, and former Vice President Michael Pence. He alleged that before accepting the electoral votes on January 6, 2021, defendants intentionally refused to investigate evidence that the November 2020 presidential election was fraudulent.

Citizens have sent more than 50,000 letters which have been already received by the justices asking that they hear the case.

If you wish to send a letter to the U.S. Supreme court before January 6, 2023 on this case see the sample wording below.

Raj Doraisamy interviews Mr. Raland Brunson on the status of his case:

QUESTIONS PRESENTED

A serious conflict exists between decisions rendered from this Court and lower appeal courts, along with constitutional provisions and statutes, in deciding whether or not the trial court has jurisdiction to try the merits of this case.

This case uncovers a serious national security breach that is unique and is of first impression, and due to the serious nature of this case it involves the possible removal of a sitting President and Vice President of the United States along with members of the United States Congress, while deeming them unfit from ever holding office under Federal, State, County or local Governments found within the United States of America, and at the same time the trial court also has the authority, to be validated by this Court, to authorize the swearing in of the legal and rightful heirs for President and Vice President of the United States. In addition there are two doctrines that conflict with each other found in this case affecting every court in this country. These doctrines are known as the doctrine of equitable maxim and the doctrine of the object principle of justice. Equitable maxim created by this court, which the lower court used to dismiss this case, sets in direct violation of the object principle of justice also partially created by this Court and supported by other appeal courts and constitutional provisions.

These conflicts call for the supervisory power of this Court to resolve these conflicts, which has not, but should be, settled by this Court without delay.

Letter to the United States Supreme Court RE: Brunson v. Alma S. Adams et al – No.: 22-380 

Supreme Court of the United States 

1 First Street, NE 

Washington, DC 20543

Attn:  

Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr. 

Associate Justice Clarence Thomas 

Associate Justice Sonia Sotomayor 

Associate Justice Samuel A. Alito, Jr. 

Associate Justice Elena Kagan. 

Associate Justice Amy Coney Barrett   

Associate Justice Neil M. Gorsuch 

Associate Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh 

Associate Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson 

RE: Brunson v. Alma S. Adams et al – No.: 22-380 

Dear Justices,  

This letter is to express my support of the above referenced case. I am concerned the United States has experienced a national security breach and a violation of every citizen’s greatest power in a Republic: voting. I ask that you stand against the adherence of foreign and domestic enemies and uphold the supreme law of the land by granting this petition. You truly are in a position that represents a court system greater than the world has ever seen. 

I, along with many others, seem to be witnessing our nation being captured and I am left to wonder if it might be by some of these very respondents. I pray for the right and just outcome and I am grateful for your time and consideration.  

Sincerely,

Click here to visit the Brunson Brothers website for updates on their court case.

©Defend Florida. All rights reserved.