Tanzanian Cardinal: Better to Starve Than to Embrace Homosexuality

DAR ES SALAAM, Tanzania (ChurchMilitant.com) – An African prelate is warning his people that it’s better to starve than to embrace homosexuality.

In an appeal to Tanzanian lawmakers last month, Cdl. Polycarp Pengo of Dar es Salaam lashed out at Western aid programs that force poor countries to promote LGBT ideology in exchange for development aid.

At a thanksgiving Mass celebrating the November harvest, Cdl. Pengo denounced the threat by post-Christian Western nations to choke off economic and humanitarian aid to Tanzania unless the country decriminalizes homosexual acts and rallied government leaders to stand firm against secularist coercion.

“It is better to die of hunger than to receive aid and be compelled to do things that are contrary to God’s desire,” he declared.

“We cannot accept such displeasing things to God; and if we are starving because we have refused to engage in such acts, then we would rather die with our God.”

Increasingly, Western activists and their allies are injecting LGBT and pro-abortion ideology into foreign policy, pressing developing nations to overthrow traditional religious and cultural norms in favor of post-Christian social re-engineering.

But as Cdl. Pengo demonstrated, multiple Catholic leaders are fighting back.

Pope Francis frequently slams coercive development programs, warning they represent a corrosive “ideological colonization.” In an address to the United Nations earlier this year, the Pope denounced emerging “new rights” that disrespect “social and cultural traditions” and ignore developing nations’ “real needs.”

“Somewhat paradoxically, there is a risk that, in the very name of human rights, we will see the rise of modern forms of ideological colonization by the stronger and the wealthier, to the detriment of the poorer and the most vulnerable,” Francis warned.

Likewise, Culture of Life Africa founder Obianuju Ekeocha is a fierce critic of the new imperialism.

In an interview with the National Catholic Register last year, the Nigerian-born pro-family advocate observed: “The western world has been — and is still — undergoing rapid and radical moral shifts especially with regards to human sexuality, marriage, family and of course the sanctity of human life from conception to natural death.”

Image

Obianuju Ekeocha, founder of Culture of Life Africa.

“These changes have been toxic to society,” Ekeocha reflected, “as casual sex, abortion and contraception have become acceptable in many western countries, just as gender fluidity, same-sex ‘marriage’ and homosexual lifestyles are being supported and normalized by the same wealthy and powerful western leaders who hold and control the purse strings of foreign aid.”

In 2015, 45 prelates from more than three dozen African countries came together to issue a “Common Declaration of the Bishops of Africa and Madagascar,” demanding an end to foreign efforts to cultivate a Culture of Death across Africa under the guise of economic and humanitarian aid.

“By what right do Western NGOs, who only represent their own ideological interests, claim to legally bind African states to their world vision?” they asked. “Why such a programing and will to pollute and pervert, extending throughout the African continent?”

“This is a new type of slavery!” they exclaimed. “We want the dignity of our people to be respected.”

Speaking to his congregation in Dar es Salaam last month, Cdl. Pengo reminded his flock that the stakes involved in their fight run very deep.

“The sin of homosexuality,” he warned, is “contrary to God’s plan in creation,” and was “the cause of destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah.”

COLUMN BY

STEPHEN WYNNE

Stephen hails from the City of Fountains, Kansas City, Missouri. He holds a B.A. in Creative Writing from Pepperdine University, and an E.M.B.A. from the University of Missouri.

His interests include international relations, cultural diplomacy, and theology; he is fascinated by Church history, particularly crisis points such as the Protestant revolt and the rise of modernism. Particular sounds — the crashing of waves, the wind in the trees, the pealing of bells — turn his thoughts toward God.

Stephen likes bullet trains, BBQ, and the works of Hieronymus Bosch. His favorite places include Iceland, Britain and above all, the Netherlands.

He is fueled by prayer and Red Bull, in that order.

RELATED ARTICLES:

This Teacher Was Fired for ‘Misgendering’ a Student. Who Could Be Next?

Child “Drag Queen” Dances At Brooklyn Gay Bar For Money

EDITORS NOTE: This column by Stephen Wynne with images originally appeared on Church Militant. It is republished with permission.

Time for Some Good News

My wife Mary sent me links to the following three articles. “Dear Hollywood: Stop Gaying All the Things, Especially Straight Characters.” The article talks about how Hollywood is making everything about homosexuality, selling the lie that everyone is a closet homosexual. According to Gallop, homosexuals are 3.4% of the population. Leftists have scammed Americans into believing homosexuals are 23 percent and more. Some in Hollywood are campaigning to transform traditional heterosexual characters like Captain America and James Bond into homosexuals. Don’t laugh. It could happen folks.

Forcing Churches to Hire Homosexuals, Transgender Ministers Will Go National” Austin, Texas city council introduced an ordinance forcing churches to hire homosexual and transgender ministers on the grounds that not to do so is discrimination. Other cities are pushing the same ordinance. A few years ago, Houston’s city council attempted the same ordinance. It was defeated. Praise God.

Texas Pastor Council President Dave Welch said, “In the past, we have too often waited and watched from the sidelines, silent. We decided that that is not possible anymore, that’s not acceptable.”

This statement from Pastor Welch is particularly strong, “Forcing churches to violate core convictions is not acceptable. Once government does so, all of our Constitutional protections are essentially gone – all gone, for all of us, across all America.”

It is thrilling to see courageous Christians in Texas fighting back in truth and love. Real Christian love is letting people know when they are going in the wrong direction; telling them that Jesus is the answer. As my late preacher dad said, “You shouldn’t pat people on the back to hell.” Dad instructed his five kids, “Don’t make my funeral about me. Tell people about Jesus.”

When the Supreme Court, in essence, made same sex marriage the law of the land, a millennial family member said to me. “I don’t care if two men want to sleep together. What difference does it make?” I tried to explain to him that SCOTUS’ ruling was a veiled leftist attack on religious freedom, reaching far beyond guys sleeping together. The glazed look in my young relative’s eyes told me he thought I was paranoid, conspiratorial and outdated.

This third article has sane people outraged. “Father Says 6-Year-Old Son Refuses Mom’s Demand to Dress Like a Girl – Now He’s being Charged with ‘Child Abuse’.” Texas father, Jeffery Younger could lose his son for not going along with his wacko ex-wife’s decision to raise their son James as a girl.

James’ father has been legally prohibited from talking to his son about gender or sexuality. Meanwhile, James’ mother plans to start the process of chemically castrating their 6 year old son when James turns 8 years old

Everyday we are confronted with outrageous attacks from leftists (fake news media, Democrats and Hollywood) on our culture, morals, freedoms and values. Sometimes I just don’t feel like talking about it. I am not advocating that we stick our heads in the sand and not deal with it. Passivity has gotten us into this mess; pushed around by aggressive leftist bullies. I am saying that sometimes it is wise to take a break from all the negativity and focus on good things.

The tiny town in West Virginia that Mary and I moved to a year ago had their annual Christmas parade. While Santa and Mrs. Claus waved from their beautiful float equipped with a snow machine, a strong theme of the parade was Jesus is the reason for the season. That was truly refreshing. Support for Trump is high in my tiny town.

My wife Mary enjoys watching Hallmark Christmas movie marathons. As leftists fight to remove Christ from Christmas, I appreciate Hallmark Christmas movies prominently featuring hymns. The movies are predictable. Everyone is well dressed. The settings are beautiful. The boy gets the girl and Mary says it always snows at the end. As corny as that sounds, the movies are a pleasant refreshing safe haven from all the vile garbage shoved into our faces at every turn on TV. So much of TV promotes people behaving badly. Producers are relentless in their mission to normalize deviancy.

Extremely popular, an all-time high of 37 Hallmark Christmas movies will air this holiday season. Their ratings keep rising. That’s good news.

Like many of you, Facebook, censored my articles and even closed down my account right before the midterm election. After jumping through hoops, Facebook restored my account. Mary excitedly signed me up on Trump Town, the new social network Facebook alternative. 

Addison Riddleberger, the founder of the new platform posted on his site. “Welcome to Trump Town – where you won’t be censored, ghosted or banned for supporting the 45th president of the United States.”

This site is great news for conservatives.

More people are beginning to realize that America’s political arena has become a battle of good vs evil. Everyday I remind myself, “Be not afraid nor dismayed by reason of this great multitude; for the battle is not yours, but God’s” (2 Chronicles 20:15). Our duty as loving Christians and patriots is to remain diligent and faithful; spreading truth while courageously and legally pushing back against evil.

I close with wonderful news – a brief video of president Trump’s bold unapologetic biblical speech pushing back against leftists’ war on Christmas. All praise and thanks to God.

EDITORS NOTE: The featured photo is by Jon Tyson on Unsplash.

Getting Our Creation Wrong

Anthony Esolen: The sick need mercy, especially a man at odds with his own body.  But compromise principles? Never.  Jesus never did.


When the Pharisees came to Jesus to ask for what reasons a man might put away his woman, Jesus does not refer to the opinions of Hillel or Shammai, the titans of the previous generation of rabbis – the one liberal, the other conservative.  He goes even behind the law of Moses, which he says does not express the intention of the Creator from the beginning, but which was, in this matter, a concession to the hardness of men’s hearts.

“From the beginning of creation,” he says, echoing the first word of Scripture, “he made them male and female.  And for this reason, a man shall leave his father and mother and cleave unto his woman, and the two shall be one flesh.  So they are no more two, but one flesh.  Then what God has yoked together, let man not put asunder” (Mark 10:6-8; translation mine).  When the disciples, stunned, ask Jesus about it privately, he does not soften his judgment: “Whoever puts away his woman and marries another, commits adultery with her.”

That is as stunning a condemnation as you can find. The Greek verb moichaomai is used in the Septuagint to refer also to unfaithfulness to God, as in the worship of idols.  The association is common in the Old Testament.  If you worship Baal or Moloch or Dagon, you are like a man going after whores.

We must not think that the authors have in mind only an attitude of unfaithfulness.  Baal and Moloch and Dagon are not gods: they are not the Creator.  It is an offense to the Creator to worship them, and stupid to boot, because they are the works of man.  You might take a block of wood and carve an idol or a chamberpot; it does not matter to the wood.  You might take your idol and toss it into the fire to warm your fingers.  How stupid, to worship a thing like that!

To get creation wrong, to fall in adoration of your chamberpot, is as filthy a thing, then, as to go a-whoring, and as stupid and self-destructive; but to go a-whoring, which is what Jesus says a man does when he puts away his woman and marries another, is to get creation wrong, and the Creator.

Here we see the apostasy of our time, tumescent and foolish, in broad daylight.

The Pharisees were seeking a good social custom. Jesus does not refer to custom. He refers to creation, and the intent of the Creator as manifest in the creation.  He points out the plain fact: we are made male and female, and male and female are what they are so that they will come together and become one flesh.

The word one and the idea it expresses are central to Jewish and Christian faith: “Hear, O Israel, the Lord, the Lord your God is one,” not two, and since that is so, we must love the Lord our God with all our heart and soul and mind and strength, not parceling out our love, some to God, and some to Baal or the chamberpot. Because the Lord our God is one and not two, we must love our neighbor as ourself; the same God who made us made him too.

The Kiss by Gustav Klimt, 1907-8 [Österreichische Galerie Belvedere, Vienna]

In none of this do we hear anything about a man’s feelings.  For we are not talking about interior dispositions, but about bodily beings, obvious to all.  The man is for the woman, the woman is for the man.  Indeed, there is no special word, in Hebrew or Greek, to denote “husband” and “wife,” because a man is to be a man for a woman, and a woman to be a woman for a man.

Many languages reflect that ontological fact: in German, a woman who refers to her “Mann” means her husband, and a man who refers to his “Frau,” his “woman,” means his wife.  Early modern English too: the word “wife” in “I now pronounce you man and wife” meant “woman” in the general sense; a “fishwife” is not the wife of a fish, but a woman who sells fish.

That being-for, in the mutuality of sexual distinction and sexual congress, is inscribed in the forms of our bodies. Every sexual sin is in some way an attack on the body and its objective meanings, which are conferred not by man but by God.

If I believe, however, that I am the one who endows my body with its meaning, even if I appeal to feelings over which I think I have no power, I have displaced the Creator.  Nowhere does Scripture suggest that God has created our passions, and nowhere does Jesus suggest that our passions are justified because we happen to have them.

To commit fornication, even with the best will in the world, is to deny the obvious, that the child-making thing is for making a child.  To commit adultery is to tear the one flesh in two.  To riffle through a porn magazine, one-handed, is to turn sex into a disembodied and lonely passion.

Sodom now forges the artillery of attack against the body created by God.  Soon it will be scientists in the grip of ennui and ambition, denying a meaning to “human,” and longing to merge us with the beast or the machine.

The intermediate term between Sodom and the Borg is the madness of the “transgender,” replacing natural sex with the mechanical and pharmaceutical, all to be dictated by the individual will, which says, as in all sins, “I am my own.”  Beneath it all lies a hatred of created reality.  It is either evil or meaningless, mere stuff for our manipulation.

Persons warrant our mercy, especially the sick, and who is sicker than a man at odds with his own body?  Principles, never.  Jesus never gave up one inch to an evil principle.  It is hard for us wretches to be both merciful with men and merciless with evil principles.  Too bad; it is our task.

COLUMN BY

Anthony Esolen

Anthony Esolen

Anthony Esolen is a lecturer, translator, and writer. His latest books are Ten Ways to Destroy the Imagination of Your Child and Out of the Ashes: Rebuilding American Culture. He directs the Center for the Restoration of Catholic Culture at Thomas More College of the Liberal Arts.

EDITORS NOTE: This column with images is republished with permission. © 2018 The Catholic Thing. All rights reserved. For reprint rights, write to: info@frinstitute.orgThe Catholic Thing is a forum for intelligent Catholic commentary. Opinions expressed by writers are solely their own. The featured photo is by Benjaminrobyn Jespersen on Unsplash.

Film Explores ‘Divine Plan’ for Reagan, John Paul to Bring Down Soviet Union

Both men were actors who climbed to prominent positions on the world stage late in life.

Both men were fierce anti-communists who fought to restore religious liberty where it had been suppressed.

Both came close to death during assassination attempts that occurred just six weeks apart.

And both believed they had been spared to play key roles in a “divine plan” at a critical moment in human history.

The partnership between the Catholic pope and the Protestant president in the closing, dramatic years of the 20th century is the subject of an upcoming film that includes interviews with prominent religious figures, Cold War historians, and presidential biographers.

The Divine Plan: Reagan, John Paul II and the Dramatic End of the Cold War” is told as part “graphic thriller,” part stage play, and part documentary exploring the steady chain of communication and interaction among the Reagan White House, the U.S. intelligence community, and the Vatican.

“I wanted to include graphic images because they can convey certain aspects of history that are less well known and more obscure,” Robert Orlando, president and director of Nexus Media, a Princeton, New Jersey-based filmmaking studio, said in an interview with The Daily Signal.

“I didn’t want to use tired footage because I wanted to bring history alive, not just to people who have some familiarity with the subject, but also to younger audiences,” Orlando said.

Orlando, whose past films include “Apostle Paul: A Polite Bribe” and “Silence Patton: First Victim of the Cold War,” produced and directed “The Divine Plan.” He collaborated with Paul Kengor, a political science professor and Reagan biographer, to produce the movie with a wealth of historical material.

Kengor, who appears in the film, is author of “A Pope and a President: John Paul II, Ronald Reagan, and the Extraordinary Untold Story of the 20th Century,” which cites evidence pointing to a possible Soviet role in the assassination attempt on the pope.

A follow-up to that book titled “The Divine Plan” will be released in tandem with the film next spring. Orlando is in discussions with several potential distribution partners for the movie’s release in theaters and on television and home media.

‘No Way Putin Would Have Known’

The film describes how Kengor came across “a rare public statement” by William Clark, Reagan’s former national security adviser, during a 1984 reunion of Army counterintelligence veterans. Clark said he believed the Soviets were behind the assassination attempt on the pope.

Clark apparently left behind a penciled note that suggested a Bulgarian connection to the plot against John Paul II, and that the Bulgarians would not have acted without Soviet direction.

The film notes Russian President Vladimir Putin and his career in the Soviet secret police agency, the KGB.

“Something that’s obviously very intriguing about this is that working in the KGB in the 1980s at the time was a lower ranking lieutenant colonel named Vladimir Putin,” Kengor says of the assassination attempt in the film, adding:

To be clear, there’s no way Putin would have known anything about this. There’s no way he would have been involved. This was the tightest thing the Soviets ever did in their three quarters of century of murder and mayhem. Very few people knew about this.

However, I can’t imagine that today Vladimir Putin, who’s been in charge of the former Soviet Union since 2000 … he surely now knows what happened, and what the role of the KGB and the GRU [the Soviet foreign military intelligence unit] was.

John Paul II acknowledged in private that he suspected the Soviets, but declined to make any public statements because he was concerned about the international fallout, according to the film.

An Aspect of Reagan’s Faith

The pope was shot May 13, 1981, in St. Peter’s Square in Rome; the assassination attempt on Reagan took place on March 30, 1981, outside a hotel in Washington, D.C.

“Reagan always believed in the divine plan,” Orlando said. “He was a man of Christian faith and the assassination attempt galvanized him, because when he came close to death he was afraid he was running out of time, and he actually prayed in the hospital.”

Although Reagan was Protestant, he was in many ways “a cultural Catholic,” Craig Shirley, another Reagan biographer, says in the film.

Reagan’s father was Catholic, but their relationship was strained because of his father’s struggle with alcoholism, the film explains.

“Reagan’s faith came from his mother, who was Protestant. He always believed in a divine plan because his mother told him everything happens for a reason,” Orlando said. “But he had good relationships with Catholics, who did have prominent positions in his administration.”

Several prominent Catholics were connected with the Reagan White House, including William Casey, Reagan’s first CIA director; Richard Allen, his first national security adviser; and Vernon Walters, a retired Army general who was his second ambassador to the United Nations.

Reagan also restored full diplomatic ties with the Vatican for the first time in 117 years, Orlando noted.

“Both Protestants and Catholics would believe in the divine plan,” he said. “There would be a difference in emphasis, but there would be some commonality.”

CIA Shared Satellite Images With Pope

Casey, as CIA director, was instrumental in providing the pope with satellite images of Soviet troop movements and the positioning of Soviet intercontinental ballistic missiles, Orlando told The Daily Signal.

“Apparently, Allen was the one getting the satellite images to Casey so he could take them to the Holy Father, and Casey would come back to Allen and report on the Holy Father’s reaction,” Orlando said, adding:

This is where some of the graphics in the film come into play. When you are talking about satellite images, they can’t all be small and photo-sized. I’m thinking of larger pictures. So, that’s where I came up with the idea of the pope spreading these photos out across the floor. We can’t know exactly how this all went down, but the graphics do convey to viewers how powerful and impactful this moment must have been.

And what did the pope see on those satellite images?

He would have seen Soviet troop movements and how ICBMs were positioned, aimed, and targeted at certain parts of  Europe, the film explains.

The photos also would have provided the pope with images of the Gdansk Shipyard, the birthplace of the Solidarity trade union in Poland that challenged Soviet authority, Orlando said.

“The pope would have been traveling to all of these places within range of Soviet missiles while he was preaching religious freedom,” he said. “This certainly had a powerful impact on him when he made these trips.”

After Allen left the first Reagan administration in January 1982, Casey continued to pursue intelligence sharing with the Vatican.

Allen’s later role, if any, is not discussed in the film. The Daily Signal sought comment from Allen, who cooperated with the filmmakers, but he had not replied as of publication time.

‘Constant Correspondence’

Despite the film’s revelations, many of the letters between John Paul and Reagan remain sealed and will not be disclosed for some time, Shirley says in the movie. For this reason, the full story of their relationship and the alliance between the Vatican and the Reagan White House will not be disclosed for decades, he speculates.

“There was constant correspondence going on between the two, so many letters, telegrams, and electronic communication,” Kengor says in the film. “By the end of 1981, John Paul II and Ronald Reagan had exchanged a dozen or so letters.”

At that time, Reagan had been president for fewer than 12 months.

Robert Barron, founder of  Word on Fire Catholic Ministries and auxiliary bishop of the Archdiocese of Los Angeles, comments in the film on the shared convictions and experiences of the two men.

John Paul certainly would have viewed the attempt on his life “according to the template of the cross and resurrection of Jesus,” Barron says in the film.

“Did it give him a heightened sense of his mission to struggle against what he saw quite correctly as the supreme evil in the world at this time? I’d say yes, absolutely. And that brings him close to Ronald Reagan.”

On the subject of a divine plan, Barron makes the point that “it’s not a zero-sum game” in the sense that “the more God does, the less we do; the more we do, the less God is involved.”

Instead, the bishop says, “God draws our freedom, he lures our freedom, so that he has a plan but he wants us cooperating with it.”

The time John Paul II spent during his youth as an actor and playwright also helped to prepare him for the world stage, Barron says.

“Go to the Vatican and it is a stage set; it’s built for processions and speeches and public displays,” Barron tells viewers.

Reagan and John Paul II met in person on five different occasions over an eight-year period, according to the film.

Their last meeting took place in September 1990, nearly 14 years before Reagan succumbed to pneumonia, complicated by Alzheimer’s disease; the pope, himself gripped by Parkinson’s disease, died in April 2005.


The Daily Signal depends on the support of readers like you. Donate now


COLUMN BY

Portrait of Kevin Mooney

Kevin Mooney

Kevin Mooney is an investigative reporter for The Daily Signal. Send an email to Kevin. Twitter: @KevinMooneyDC.

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Signal column with images is republished with permission. Photo: Nexus Media.

Baby, It’s Politically Correct Outside

Tis the season, not for Christmas or any other religious holiday, but for political correctness. It appears the holidays have triggered a wave of criticism over audio/video classics as heard and seen for years over our airwaves. This is just another example of political correctness running amok.

First there was the TV special, “A Charlie Brown Thanksgiving,” which originally aired in 1973 and won an Emmy Award. For 45 years, it was a beloved holiday classic, but not in 2018 when it was accused of racism. It was recently pointed out that at the dinner-table scene, Franklin, the lone black character, sat on one side of the table alone in a lawn chair, while the other white characters were on the opposite side sitting in regular chairs. Critics today claim this is a very racist scene. To his credit, Charles M. Schulz, created Franklin in 1968, making him one of the first cartoonists to incorporate a black character in his strip. Schulz later claimed he created Franklin after being inspired by Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. So instead of applauding Schulz’s efforts, he is criticized by the PC police in 2018.

Next, we have the 1964 Christmas Classic, “Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer,” narrated by the late great Burl Ives. For 54 years, this film was cherished by children, but not in 2018 where critics today declare it “disturbing.” Santa is accused of racism for not accepting Rudolph due to his red nose, Hermey the Elf is described as a “Sadistic Psychopath,” the elves are accused of inbreeding, and Yukon Cornelius is considered “Mentally Unstable.” I wonder how we overlooked all of this for over 50 years?

In 1969, “Frosty the Snowman” was brought to television and narrated by the late Jimmy Durante with his marvelous gravelly voice. It was inspired by the popular song sung in 1950 by the legendary cowboy-singer Gene Autry. For 49 years the show was enjoyed by millions of children, but again, as with the others, it is not acceptable in 2018. Frosty’s melting scene is now said to give children nightmares as he is “viciously murdered” by an evil magician who wants Frosty’s magic hat. Santa returns to bring Frosty back to life, but it is now being claimed this scene traumatizes young people. Having grown up in the north, and made many a snowman in my day, we all knew they were not real and what would happen when the Spring thaw came, but to be traumatized by this in 2018, it makes you wonder what they are putting in kid’s cereals these days.

Finally, we come to WDOK-FM 102.1 (aka, Star 102) in Cleveland who recently banned the song “Baby, It’s Cold Outside” as it could be construed as promoting male predatory tactics of women, something of keen interest to the #MeToo movement (anyone remember the Justice Brett Kavanaugh hearings?). Although it is not a true Christmas song, it was written in 1944 and played around the holidays. It is primarily sung as a duet between a man and a women. In its 74 year history, there have been dozens of renditions by a variety of artists, including: Ella Fitzgerald and Louis Jordan, Esther Williams and Ricardo Montalbán, Vanessa Williams and Bobby Caldwell, Lee Ann Womack and Harry Connick Jr., Anne Murray and Michael Bublé, Martina McBride and Dean Martin, and many others. Great music, but you won’t hear it anytime soon in Cleveland.

WDOK-FM ran a poll on their Facebook page asking listeners what holiday song should be omitted from their playlist, and out of 600 responses, 94% (564 votes) were in favor of it, but only 6% (36 votes) were against it. So, thanks to a meager 36 people, the radio station dumped the tune. Who-da-thunk-it?

All of these shows and music range in age from 49 to 74 years old, and introduced in the 1940’s, 50’s, the turbulent 60’s, and early 70’s. One cannot help but wonder where was the outrage back then? Were we really so naive and clueless not to see the hidden meanings? Is it possible we were socially mal-adjusted or is there something wrong with today’s sense of right and wrong? Frankly, I think there is something in the water causing this distortion of reality. These classics may not have been the most brilliant artistically, but I do not believe they were deliberately designed to embarrass anyone.

The criticisms of the old television classics appear to be coming from Millennial writers who seem to be making mountains out of mole hills. They either want to create something controversial to boost their readership, or they honestly believe the nonsense they write. Unfortunately, their badgering will likely cause the mainstream media to abandon these holiday classics. I just wonder what they propose to replace them with, perhaps titles such as, “A Charlie Brown LGBT Thanksgiving,” “Rudolph the Red-Nosed Wussy,” “Frosty the Snowflake,” and “Baby, Get Your Ass Out of Here, Can’t You See I’m Texting?”

The far left is confounded by President Trump who is an ardent proponent of Christmas. The fact he likes to say “Merry Christmas” this time of year, as opposed to “Happy Holidays” or “Season Greetings,” drives them crazy. Since there appears to be a resurgence in Christmas, the left is attacking the peripheral aspects of the holidays, hence the attacks on Rudolph, Frosty, et al. They will not be happy until organized religion, particularly Christianity, is removed from our culture. The reality though is this will never happen.

Keep the Faith!

EDITORS NOTE: All trademarks both marked and unmarked belong to their respective companies. The featured photo is by rawpixel on Unsplash.

WARNING: Forcing Churches to Hire Homosexual, Transgender Ministers Will Go National

If the Austin, Texas, ordinance requiring Christian churches to hire homosexual and transgender pastors is not brought down, it’s just a matter of time before that requirement comes to your town.

Along with such requirements will be the collapse of First Amendment protections altogether in America, Texas Pastor Council President Dave Welch warned Thursday.

In comments to the Christian Action Network, Welch said that the difficult decisions that member churches made to stand and fight in Austin is a decision all churches need to make nationally.

“In the past, we have too often waited and watched from the sidelines, silent,” Welch said. “We decided that that is not possible anymore, that’s not acceptable.”

Welch added that waiting and watching puts churches, ministries and God’s people generally at the disadvantage of having to fight back on an issue after it’s largely too late.

The rights of churches and ministries to stand on the Word of God against perverted sexual disorientations and false claims such as transgender sex changes is at stake in Austin, Texas. (WWL-TV photo)

“The bottom line is that a threat to any of our Constitutional protections is a threat to all of our Constitutional rights,” Welch said.

“Forcing churches to violate core convictions is not acceptable,” he added. “Once government does so, all of our Constitutional protections are essentially gone – all gone, for all of us, across all America.”

The way the ordinance makes the issue a matter of forced hiring of homosexual and other LGBTQ person is by adding those identity groups to rules against discrimination, but not adding exemptions for religious beliefs.

This occurred several years ago in Houston.

Many church pastors and leaders began to talk to each other in the Houston area, and the conversation grew across Texas, leading to several major priorities.

One was to ensure that government does not consider itself to have a basis for demanding anything over churches, to rule over them in any area of belief, principle – doctrines to teach and live by.

Churches in the Houston area rose up against the ordinance there, winning a court ruling for a city-wide referendum. The people of Houston handed their liberal city council a major rebuke by voting the ordinance down.

WE WANT TO TURN THE PENDULUM BACK TO CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTIONS

Other cities have put similar non-discrimination ordinances in place – adding LGBTQ designations or “sexual orientation” to the protections regarding race, national origin, sex and age. There have been marginally adequate exemptions in place elsewhere, according to Welch.

“These things are seldom sure until they are interpreted,” he said.

Welch said Texas cities such as Dallas and San Antonio are examples of cities with marginally better religious based exemptions. Austin’s city council put its new ordinance restrictions in place without such exemptions for churches or ministries.

The U.S. Pastor Council, that Welch’s state chapter is part of, is the named filer, or plaintiff, in state and federal lawsuits to change or abolish the city’s ordinance.

According to court clerical offices, there have been no filed responses to those civil cases.

Welch said that his side recognizes the need for patience in the legal process, adding, “as we all know, nothing happens fast in the court system.”

The ultimate hope is to protect the freedoms of churches and ministries to reach out, build up, worship, teach and preach, comfort the broken and call on God with open and unrestricted liberty.

“Our major premise is to put an end to this threat against our churches,” Welch said. “The pendulum has swung too far against our freedoms, so we want to turn the pendulum back to Constitutional protections. Those protections should remain.”

PREVIOUS STORY:

RELATED ARTICLES:

Apocalypse Noun: Teacher Suspended over Gender Spat

Tanzanian cardinal: Reject ideological colonization through foreign aid

EDITORS NOTE: This column with images is republished with permission. The featured photo is by Steve Johnson on Unsplash.

Michigan Lawmakers Urge Fast-Food Chains to Stop Offering ‘Gender-Classified’ Toys

More than a dozen Michigan lawmakers support a resolution in the state’s House of Representatives pressuring fast-food chains like McDonald’s to eliminate “gender-classified” toys from their children’s meals.

State Rep. Leslie Love, D-Detroit, who introduced House Resolution No. 49 on Wednesday, told The Daily Signal in a phone interview that the purpose of her resolution is to stop fast-food chains from reinforcing gender stereotypes.

“I would visit fast-food restaurants and when you go through the drive-thru they always ask if you want a girl’s toy or a boy’s toy, which was really annoying. Just offer people a toy … and move on with it,” she said. “How do we get caught up in gender identity with a toy?”

“We’re telling them [children] in advance … that this toy equals a boy and this toy equals a girl,” Love said. “We’re setting up this prejudice in our children unconsciously, unknowingly. It has become so ingrained that this dysfunction is almost normal.”

The resolution states, “If a customer desires a toy, it should be one of his or her choice without classification by gender. Customers should simply be offered the choice of toy.” Lawmakers even included a written example of how to offer the toy: “Would you like a Transformer or a My Little Pony?”

It goes on to list the negative effects of offering gender-codified fast-food toys—including damage to the imagination and aspirations of children—which it says “numerous studies have highlighted,” warning:

This is a significant issue as billions of these meals are sold every year and this practice can influence and limit children’s imaginations and interests by promoting some toys as only suitable for girls and others only for boys.

“Boys are more likely to play with toys that develop spatial intelligence and reasoning than girls,” the resolution continues, citing a 2015 study by Association for Psychological Science. “These skills are especially important for success in academic and professional domains, including science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM).”

But not everyone sees the issue as a legislative priority in the state:

Others expressed concern that the move represents an increasing encroachment of political correctness into everyday life:

For her part, Love said she has received positive feedback from her constituents on her Facebook page, and that this resolution hasn’t prevented her from being an effective lawmaker.

“It’s not an either/or situation, it’s an and/with situation,” she told The Daily Signal.

Love said she has already tackled many quality-of-life issues, such as pay equity, increasing minimum wage, and improving water quality.

“If not, I would feel bad working on this resolution,” she said.

Love also downplayed concerns about the intrusiveness of her legislation. She said the resolution was meant to give fast-food companies “an opportunity on their own to agree, take a look at their culture, and see how they can do better,” comparing her resolution to resolutions asking companies to put a greater emphasis on recycling.

Love pointed to companies that have already recognized the need to shift away from gender classification.

“Target has said they would stop using that kind of language and stop painting the girl’s section pink and the boy’s section blue.”

The resolution, which currently has 13 Democrat co-sponsors and one Republican co-sponsor, is not legally binding, and would merely constitute a suggestion for fast-food chains to change their current practices. It specifies that copies of its text should be sent to the CEOs of major fast-food chains in the state upon passage.

Love indicated the resolution was assigned to the Commerce Committee, and does not yet know when a vote will take place.

Additionally, Love said she was motivated by the circumstances surrounding this year’s midterm elections, which saw a record number of women elected to Congress.

“Women were really breaking glass ceilings in Detroit,” she said. “Michigan just elected its first female governor, its first openly lesbian attorney general, and it’s first female Democratic secretary of state.”

She also noted that in the wake of the #TimesUp and #MeToo movements, the country has seen more women than ever “having a voice” and “breaking barriers.”

“People are noticing things that we haven’t noticed before. Consciousness has moved forward during this time.“


The Daily Signal depends on the support of readers like you. Donate now


COLUMN BY

Troy Worden

Troy Worden is a member of the Young Leaders Program at The Heritage Foundation.

EDITORS NOTE: This column with images is republished with permission. Photo: Bart Ah You/Zuma Press/Newscom.

VIDEO: Christmas — Celebrating the Birth of Our Savior!

Once again, we, as Americans, honor the birth of Christ. Christmas is here to remind us of the Savior…..let the message ring loud and clear.

RELATED ARTICLES: 

Everything You Need to Know About Your Legal Rights During Christmas

The True Season of Advent by Fr. Jeffrey Kirby

Was Jesus an Historical Figure?

EDITORS NOTE: The featured photo is by Ben White on Unsplash.

A Marriage Message Made in Taiwan

Taiwan was supposed to be the first place in Asia to legalize same-sex marriage. Then, they asked voters. And like countries the world over, the island’s leaders got the same answer: No.

Of the 10 questions on the Taiwanese ballot, none got more attention than the five dealing with LGBT “rights.” “Do you agree that marriage defined in The Civil Code should be restricted to the union between one man and one woman?” voters were asked. An overwhelming portion of the country — 70.1 percent — said yes. Of course, you’ll have a hard time finding the actual number in American newspapers, since our media is doing its best to ignore the landslide. But the message from the country off the east coast of China could not be clearer: there is no significant international movement toward same-sex marriage.

Some people might see the results and think the island has a massive Christian population. They’d be wrong. Less than five percent of the country are Protestants or Catholics. And although they were vocal about their opinion on the issue, the fact of the matter is, most of the world’s population knows how unnatural the idea is. Until 2015, when the Supreme Court forced same-sex on America, LGBT activists here at home insisted the U.S. was outside the mainstream. But the irony is, we’re only outside of the mainstream now that it’s legal! There are 195 countries on this planet, and only 27 of them allow same-sex marriage. That’s 13 percent — hardly the stuff of global consensus.

Besides, not even global consensus is a substitute for truth. And as the Archbishop John Hung Shan-chuan of Taipei told his church’s leaders, no law can change God’s design for marriage. While the Church does not condone discrimination, he said, “We cannot support same-sex ‘marriage’ and same-sex unions,” he insisted. “The legalization is… not in line with our teachings.”

Seven thousand miles away in America, the vote is having an interesting effect on our own debate. In a country where natural marriage is still the popular view, it’s become difficult — if not impossible — to voice those views without backlash. Scott Chen, who was educated in Taiwan, found that out when he posted a message about the vote in Chinese. “Some people think that marriage is a holy union between a man and a woman, I think so too, but that’s your own business.” You can imagine how well that would be taken by the LGBT movement if Chen were an average businessman. They’d demand his resignation. The problem is, Chen isn’t just an average businessman. Three months ago, he was named president of an app facilitating same-sex dating. For how much longer, after this backlash, no one knows.

Chen tried to defend himself. “I said marriage is a holy matrimony between a man and a woman is based on my own personal experience,” he said. “I am a straight man married to a woman I love and I have two beautiful daughters I love from the marriage. This is how I feel about my marriage. Different people have their different feelings about their marriages. You can’t deny my feelings about my marriage.”

Now, we expect that kind of backtracking from a lot of people in corporate America. The problem for believers, however, is that some Christians are doing the same thing. They become so intimidated by the cultural bullies that they put the fear of man above the fear of God. They shrink back and go silent on truth that is found not only in the Bible, but history and science as well. If Christians, who know the truth and are called to speak the truth ignore the truth, then what hope do we have? As a church in this country, we need a clarion call for courage. In a culture where 62 percent of student conservatives are too afraid to share their ideas in class, America is in a crisis situation.

Fortunately, this country has a president who, when it comes to doing and saying the tough things, refuses to be intimidated. That kind of courage breeds courage. It only takes one person — an Isabella Chow — doing something radically brave, to help others find their voice. And before you know it, people like Isabella won’t be standing alone, because tens of thousands of people will be standing with them and behind them, inspired by their bravery. We need more Isabellas in this country — and if we’re going to change anything, we need them now.


Tony Perkins’ Washington Update is written with the aid of FRC senior writers.


RELATED ARTICLES:

Bathroom Policy Needs Some Remodeling

The Skype’s the Limit for Abortion

EDITORS NOTE: This column with images is republished with permission.

The Gospel of Marx? Religious Leaders Call for ‘Redistribution,’ Denounce ‘Pathology of War’

Last month, several dozen religious leaders reaffirmed a number of radical economic propositions contained within the 1973 Chicago Declaration of Evangelical Social Concern.

“Before God and a billion hungry neighbors, we must rethink our values regarding our present standard of living,” proclaims the document. The document goes on to lament the “materialism of our culture and the maldistribution of the nation’s wealth and services.”

According to these leaders, the United States holds a “crucial role in the balance and injustice of international trade and development.” To secure an “abundant life for all of God’s children,” these activists propose “a more just acquisition and redistribution of the world’s resources.”

Good intentions notwithstanding, enactment of their economic agenda would actually stifle the widespread abundance produced by free market capitalism.

This thinly veiled embrace of Marxism initially occurred at the height of the Cold War. In the half-century prior to 1973, many governments elsewhere forcefully enacted a “more just” redistribution. The Soviets outright confiscated private farmland upon coming to power in Russia in 1917. Likewise, China’s communist regime under Mao Zedong began redistributing private land holdings upon coming to power in 1949. In 1959, the regime of Cuba’s Fidel Castro nationalized private businesses and property in the aftermath of the revolution.

Far from being an abstract dispute, the physical and intellectual war between free market capitalism and socialism was intensely raging by 1973.

To affirm the economic pronouncements in the Chicago Declaration would be to reject the reality of the last 45 years. Consider the turnaround the United Kingdom has made following broad privatization in the 1980s, or the booms that came to Vietnam and China as capitalism was adopted. Look at the wealth of Hong Kong, Singapore, and South Korea—some of the freest economies in the world.

Meanwhile, the socialist economies of Spain and Greece continue to flounder while Venezuela degenerates under the burden of Bolivarian revolution.

Far from perpetuating injustice, the expansion of international trade has coincided with a surge in the quality of life for many millions of people. In the words of World Bank Group President Jim Yong Kim, “Over the last 25 years, more than a billion people have lifted themselves out of extreme poverty, and the global poverty rate is now lower than it has ever been in recorded history. This is one of the greatest human achievements of our time.”

Of course, wages in the developing world remain lower than those in more advanced economies. But these wages represent a marked improvement from yesteryear. The transformation in living standards today is eclipsing even the rapid pace of improvement that the West experienced during the Industrial Revolution two centuries ago.

The signatories of this statement decry “a national pathology of war and violence which victimizes our neighbors at home and abroad.”

Yet the United States has sacrificed greatly to defeat Nazism, communism, fascism, terrorism, and imperialism over the past century. We’ve rebuilt war-ravaged countries—including those of former enemies such as Germany and Japan. We’ve made seas across the globe safe for trade. Our investments overseas in countries that welcome foreign capital have directly expanded prosperity across the globe.

And beyond this, our nation liberally shares the concepts that continue to make us an economic powerhouse—notions such as private property rights and the rule of law.

Central planning, a capping of consumer demand, and a redistribution of resources are not the keys to economic “justice.” After years of travelling to impoverished parts of the globe, U2’s Bono bravely shared his altered take on capitalism:

Rock star preaches capitalism—wow. Sometimes I hear myself and I just cannot believe it. But commerce is real … aid is just a stop-gap. Commerce, entrepreneurial capitalism takes more people out of poverty than aid—of course, we know that.

In light of recent history, perhaps now is the time for the heirs of the 1973 declaration to graciously admit their misdiagnosis.

COMMENTARY BY

Portrait of Joel Griffith

Joel Griffith is a research fellow in the Roe Institute at The Heritage Foundation. Twitter: .

RELATED ARTICLES: 

Radical Female Lutheran Pastor Plans on Melting Down Purity Rings to Make Vagina Statue

The Catholic Church’s Biggest Crisis Since the Reformation

The Populist Wave Hits the Catholic Church


The Daily Signal depends on the support of readers like you. Donate now


EDITORS NOTE: This column with images is republished with permission. The featured photo is by Gift Habeshaw on Unsplash.

Introducing the Hubble – Lemaître Law [Big Bang Theory]

Michael Baruzzini on the recognition by science of Fr. George Lemaître, co-discoverer of the Big Bang, who found no conflict between faith and reason.


On October 29, 2018, the International Astronomical Union announced its recommendation that the erstwhile “Hubble Law” be referred to as the “Hubble–Lemaître Law.” The law relates the distances of galaxies to their motion away from Earth. Among other lines of evidence, extrapolating from the law suggests that the entire material cosmos emerged from a single point in the ancient past which expanded into the cosmos we know today, a theory now known as the “Big Bang.”

American astronomer Edwin Hubble, who made measurements of the redshifts of distant galaxies – which are related to their distance and speed away from Earth – has long had his name associated with the discovery. But in fact it was Belgian priest Georges Lemaître who first derived the laws related to the expanding cosmos, and who proposed the universe’s origin from an ancient, singular point; his contribution has been gaining more recognition over recent years, including such gestures as the IAU’s most recent recommendation.

Because modern science and faith are so often alleged to be opposed, it’s good to see a priest, especially a modern priest, recognized for any important contribution to science. But more than merely illustrating that Catholics can find a place in the workings of science, there is something especially and ironically significant in the association of a Catholic clergyman with the theory of the Big Bang.

Big Bang cosmology provides the overarching framework for our contemporary understanding of the entire cosmos as an evolving, historical thing. If it can be said that classical cosmology, with its ordered spheres and geometric neatness, resonated with the Catholic mind in its emphasis on hierarchical order, then the resonance of modern cosmology is with the Catholic instinct for story.

Fr. Lemaître with Albert Einstein, 1927

In modern science, as in the Catholic view, we find not a cosmos of eternal, changeless homogeneity (as in the “Steady State” theory that was the rival to the Big Bang in early 20th century cosmology); nor do we find a confused chaos, with complicated beings arising seemingly from nowhere, as in pagan cosmogonies. Rather, modern science presents a picture in which the rich complexity of the modern universe arises from a causal singularity, from which basic physical forces arise and interact to blossom into the cosmos we know today.

Lemaître himself referred to this ancient singularity as a “Cosmic Egg.” To borrow an analogy used originally for a higher purpose, we might also invoke the image of a tiny seed, which grows to produce great branches, in which the birds of the air make their nests.

On a material level, current science affirms that from the great cosmic seed came the web of galaxies, stars, and planets. In the formation and explosive endings of the life-cycles of uncountable stars, the universe became enriched with the elements that make all the stuff of our world around us possible – including life. Carl Sagan, the religiously skeptical but charismatic popularizer of modern science, liked to say that “we are stardust.” What Sagan, for all his poetic imagery, never quite imagined, however, is that one day, on a small rocky world orbiting one of these points of light, the Author of the whole cosmic story took on that stardust himself and entered bodily into his Creation.

Objections to the Big Bang today often come from a religious direction: how can this account be squared with the biblical presentation of Creation? But originally suspicion of the Big Bang came from the opposite direction: it smacked too much of religion. The Church proclaimed a Creation ex nihilo – a moment before which no moments and nothing material were – and now science seemed to point to the same thing.

In 1978, Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson received the Nobel Prize in Physics for their observation of the “cosmic microwave background,” the first major evidence of the Big Bang event. Penzias would later write of the Big Bang and the origin of the universe, “The best data we have are exactly what I would have predicted, had I nothing to go on but the five books of Moses, the Psalms, the Bible as a whole.”

But let us be careful: it was Lemaître himself who famously warned Pope Pius XII away from too closely identifying the Big Bang with the actual act of Creation. To find Creation is, strictly speaking, beyond the purview of science. Even Thomas Aquinas held that reason alone could not discern whether the universe had a beginning; only revelation could say so. So too science, investigating material causes, can only follow such causes as far as they lead; beyond them, it cannot see.

The Big Bang may have been the beginning, or it may not. Nevertheless, scientifically speaking, the Big Bang represents the singular historical event from which all the material world we know emerges, the one and only point through which all physical histories pass. It is, so far as modern science can say, the beginning of the known cosmos. And there, at its discovery, we find Fr. Lemaître, a priest contributing to science not merely by one important scientific insight among others, but by outlining the most fundamental theory of the history of the physical cosmos.

Religion had always had its own cosmology, its history of Creation. But we find, in an interesting twist, that when science used its own legitimate tools to discover its comprehensive story of the world, that the story was first discovered not by a reasonable atheist freed from the shackles of “superstition,” but by a priest who found no conflict between his ancient faith and the revolutionary findings of the newest science.

COLUMN BY

Michael Baruzzini

Michael Baruzzini

Michael Baruzzini is a freelance science writer and editor who writes for Catholic and science publications, including Crisis, First Things, Touchstone, Sky & Telescope, The American Spectator, and elsewhere. He is also the creator of CatholicScience.com, which offers online science curriculum resources for Catholic students.

EDITORS NOTE: This column with images is republished with permission. © 2018 The Catholic Thing. All rights reserved. For reprint rights, write to: info@frinstitute.orgThe Catholic Thing is a forum for intelligent Catholic commentary. Opinions expressed by writers are solely their own. The featured photo is by Greg Rakozy on Unsplash

Abortion in US Reaches Lowest Level on Record, Report Finds

The pro-life movement had a good year in 2015: Fewer American women reported having abortions than at any other time since abortion was legalized in the U.S., according to a new government report.

Using the most recent data available, the abortion surveillance report published Wednesday by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention shows 638,169 abortions were reported in 2015, a 2 percent drop from the 652,639 abortions reported in 2014.

“This is welcome news. Medicine and technology continue to shape how we view children in the womb and underscores their undeniable humanity,” Melanie Israel, a research associate in the DeVos Center for Religion and Civil Society at The Heritage Foundation, told The Daily Signal.

The abortion rate also dropped 0.3 points during the same time period, dipping from 12.1 abortions per 1,000 women aged 15-44 in 2014 to 11.8 for the same age group in 2015.

CDC began surveillance of legal induced abortions in 1969 and compiles voluntarily reported state data to produce national estimates every year since 1988, according to the agency’s website.

The number of legal abortions skyrocketed in the years following the Supreme Court’s 1973 ruling in Roe v. Wade, which legalized abortion across the country. This trend reached its climax in the 1980s. Since then, the annual number of abortions has been decreasing slowly, rising only slightly between 2006 and 2008 but continuing its downward trend to today.

The CDC report did not indicate a reason for the decline in abortions, but Heritage’s Israel said improved access to pregnancy resource centers and new legislation at the state level likely contributed.

“Thousands of pregnancy resource centers across the country provide services, education, supplies, counseling, and compassionate options—including adoption—to women experiencing tough pregnancies who may feel that abortion is their only choice,”  Israel said in an email to The Daily Signal. “Pro-life legislators across the country are elected to office and pass legislation that protects the health and safety of women and their unborn children.”

The report did not contain data from California, Maryland, or New Hampshire, which opted not to participate.

The report also did not present information about deaths from complications arising from legal abortion in 2015; officials reportedly are analyzing that information.

Six women died as a result of undergoing legal, induced abortion in 2014, according to that year’s surveillance report.

COLUMN BY

Troy Worden

Troy Worden is a member of the Young Leaders Program at The Heritage Foundation.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Abortionist Defends Killing Babies: “A Fetus Needs Permission to Reside in a Uterus”

Hollywood’s One-Sided Narrative on ‘Conversion Therapy’


The Daily Signal depends on the support of readers like you. Donate now


EDITORS NOTE: This column with images is republished with permission. Photo: Willie Deutsch/CrowdSpark/Newscom.

#CatholicMeToo: A Survivor Tells His Story [Video]

Former Oklahoma seminarian discloses abuse for the first time.

By M.H.

I am a 68-year-old university lecturer and administrator who has been away from the Church for half a century. But once, I was a 16-year-old Roman Catholic, fervent in the Faith.

My #CatholicMeToo story comes from that time. In the spring of 1966, I was a student at the now-defunct seminary of St. Francis de Sales in what was then the diocese of Oklahoma City and Tulsa. In late April, while home on break after my sophomore year in the seminary’s high school program, I was introduced to Fr. Francis Albert Mantica, the predator whose self-indulgence shattered my innocence and flatlined my faith.

An unconventional priest in his late 30s, Fr. Mantica hailed from the diocese of Albany, New York, but had moved around through incardination in other dioceses before his assignment to my home parish, St. Patrick’s, as assistant pastor.

He first marked me for prey inside the confessional.

I had confessed I was struggling with a lustful hankering for the next-door neighbor girl. But Mantica made light of my sin by joking about it — the first and only time I recall a humorous comment inside the confessional. He then asked me my name — also a singular moment in my confessional life.

It was then he first employed his recurring thematic phrase of “You wanted me to ask you that, didn’t you?” In the conversation that followed, I revealed that I was a minor seminarian of the parish, and he convinced me that we should meet later to discuss whether I would consider working with him on his pet project.

Father Mantica was in the process of establishing “Youth Village,” a (short-lived) halfway house of sorts for troubled young men. After meeting with him, I agreed to help out over the summer break before beginning my third year at St. Francis de Sales. Once work began, I quickly came to know the predator behind the collar; over the next few months, Fr. Mantica repeatedly propositioned me, exposed himself and badgered me to fondle him. In short, he was relentless.

The harassment began in May after I had joined in efforts to start up the Youth Village project (at that time located in a house at S.W. 29th and Portland in Oklahoma City). His overtures ranged from attempts to “French kiss” me to groping to demands I touch his genitals. An especially traumatic incident occurred in midsummer.

While driving to a location southwest of Oklahoma City, Fr. Mantica exposed himself and pressured me to perform oral sex on him as he drove. When I refused, he insisted I grasp his exposed penis firmly (because it wasn’t masturbation, he said). I regret to say that I complied, and he quickly ejaculated. He tried to normalize the act, saying that when he was in the military, he had engaged in both oral and anal sex many times. As horrific as that instance was, the worst moment, by far, was still to come.

In August, my father died. In his final moments at St. Anthony Hospital in Oklahoma City, Fr. Mantica arrived to administer the sacrament of extreme unction. After my father died, I was overcome by grief, and at that moment, Mantica lunged. He sought to “console” me by attempting to kiss me, to fondle me — to assault me. Pawing at me just steps away from my father’s body, he urged me to reciprocate. But I challenged him, asking if his homosexual behavior was morally right. Without batting an eye, he responded, “It’s not as right as it should be,” and went on to speak of Christ’s love for St. John, “the apostle who Jesus loved.”
Image

Mantica with boys at his New York “Youth Village”

Though annihilated psychologically, emotionally and spiritually, I resisted him. That was the last incident of abuse.

Still, I had been gravely wounded by all that had happened to me since May. Shortly after my father died, the high school department of St. Francis de Sales abruptly closed; reeling from the loss of both my innocence and my father, I decided to take a “leave of absence” from seminary and stay with my mother rather than accepting a transfer out of state.

I enrolled in a public high school, and, for two months, I stewed over what Mantica had done to me. Finally, I resolved to act. I decided to report the whole sequence of abuse to Fr. James Kastner, who had been my spiritual advisor at the seminary. To his credit, he took extensive and accurate notes of my disclosure and took them to Bp. Victor J. Reed.

In October, I accompanied Fr. Kastner to the chancery in Oklahoma City where I met with the diocesan chancellor, Fr. William Garthoeffner. Also in attendance was a St. Patrick’s parishioner who had assisted Mantica in founding Youth Village.

Father Kastner accurately read from his notes, and I answered his questions clearly. I concluded by saying I had no personal animosity toward Fr. Mantica nor a desire for vengeance, but in conscience, I felt that if he was plagued with this particular challenge, he should not be assigned to deal with young men.

After that meeting, I was never informed of any result. Several months later, I asked Fr. Kastner about what happened. His response was vague — something like, “Well, you know, the Church has its own ways of dealing with these things.” And that was the last of it.

Meanwhile, word of my allegations got out, and I became a pariah among many St. Patrick’s parishioners — injury heaped upon injury. I was devastated by the shunning of my fellow parishioners, who refused to believe a priest would do such a thing. It was my first experience with real opprobrium.

Though my pastor and other clergy were very decent to me and ready for me to be transferred to another seminary, within a year, I drifted away from attending Mass. I had already felt like a relic of the past, owing to my love of the Tridentine liturgy, and my rejection by fellow laity proved to be too much. Of course, it would be simplistic of me to blame all my character and behavioral flaws on the events of that summer and the ensuing contempt my disclosure elicited, but somewhere in the stewpot which is me, it is an ingredient.

As for Fr. Mantica, he refused to affirm or deny my charges against him. Apparently, behind a curtain of ecclesiastical silence, the matter was dealt with in a sadly typical fashion. In 1967, Mantica quietly “disappeared” from Oklahoma City. Soon after, he resurfaced in his native diocese of Albany, which in the coming years would develop a reputation as a haven for homosexual clergy under Bps. Edwin Broderick and Howard Hubbard.

Back in New York, Fr. Mantica was allowed to continue working among minors. In May 1968, he launched another “Youth Village” project. Within months, a dozen young men ranging in age from 11 to 23 were living in close quarters with him at a former horse-riding academy in Duanesburg, just outside Schenectady. Some were fatherless; others were from broken homes. All were vulnerable.

In an interview with The Schenectady Gazette in October of that year, Fr. Mantica declared: “I’m concerned about the youth. I always have been.”

“I’m communicating with them,” he added, “trying to have them understand the meaning of brotherly love. These boys are so sensitive, but they’re so beautiful underneath.”

Image

Mantica in later years.

Like its Oklahoma City forerunner, Duanesburg’s Youth Village was short-lived; it closed the next year.

After returning to New York, Fr. Mantica soon developed a reputation for “difference of opinion” with the local hierarchy. By 1968, he had been granted a leave of absence by the Albany diocese.

In the ensuing years, Mantica’s sabbatical became permanent. He wandered away from his priesthood, deeper into darkness; though details are scarce, what is known points to a continuing devolution of his character.

At some point, Mantica embraced New Age/occultic thought. He immersed himself in the work of former Jesuit priest Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, a New Age pioneer silenced for his heretical teaching that man is evolving spiritually toward godhood. Mantica became a member of the Academy of Religion and Psychical Research, an organization focusing on the “intersection” of religion and parapsychology.

Additionally, he eventually involved himself with the Kundalini Research Foundation, a diabolical vehicle for New Age thinking. Reportedly, he went on to author a book titled Corology: The Phenomenon and Evolution of Love as well as other works on human sexuality.

It seems apparent that Mantica must have adopted his own syncretic approach, employing some tortured logic and demented theology to absolve his disordered sexuality — to fulfill his wish to make it “as right as it should be.”

Mantica died in 1997 at the age of 69.

It is no easy task to sort the effects of those months of 1966 in a man closing in on 70. I recall a brief emergency hospital stay when I was diagnosed with gastroenteritis at 18. The doctor suggested I needed to learn to not keep things in, but become more assertive; otherwise, I could likely be subject to other medical issues.

In failing to find a “golden mean,” I became more self-absorbed, more explosive, more judgmental. I took up the martial arts and, despite not being naturally adept, persisted through some tough years to earn a black belt. A failed marriage of five years, a stretch of more beer-drinking than was reasonable and foolishly fortified by my relationships with women, I eventually settled in to a sort of modus vivendi with myself.

In those early, rather unfortunate efforts to define “manhood,” I took some wrong paths in the labyrinth; somehow the remnant of faith has served as Ariadne’s thread to see me back to the light of day.

I have been away from practicing my faith for a half century. But in the past three years, I have spent a good deal of time following Church Militant, LifeSiteNews and other faithful Catholic websites. In spite of the appalling treachery and duplicity of the hierarchy and the mistreatment of faithful clergy and laity, I have the growing conviction I will again be in communion with the authentic Catholic faith which has remained dormant within me for so long.

I have tried not to make this a story of “poor me,” but rather, despite the scars, to add my account to a growing compilation of testimonies that will carry significant weight in the “house cleaning” which is in order. I am grateful for the opportunity to join with others in the #CatholicMeToo movement. For me, it is a moment when I can once again feel a part of Catholicism, experience a sense of healing and offer this as a prayer for the repose of my father’s soul after 52 years.

Church Militant contacted the archdiocese of Oklahoma City for comment on M.H.’s allegations. An archdiocesan spokesperson responded with the following statement:

Fr. Francis A. Mantica was a priest for the Diocese of Albany, N.Y. He worked briefly in the then-Diocese of Oklahoma City and Tulsa from June 1965 to March 1967. In late 1966, the diocese received an allegation of sexual abuse of a minor. After investigation and substantiation of the allegations, Bishop Victor Reed revoked his facilities to serve as a priest in the diocese and asked him to leave the diocese. By letter, Bishop Reed informed Bishop [Edward] Maginn, Auxiliary Bishop of Albany, of the action taken to terminate Mantica’s faculties.

We encourage any victim of past abuse while a minor by clergy or church personnel in the Archdiocese of Oklahoma City to contact the victim assistance coordinator at (405) 720-9878.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Santa Fe archdiocese to file for bankruptcy

Mom Dresses Six-Year-Old Son As Girl, Threatens Dad With Losing His Son For Disagreeing

EDITORS NOTE: This column with images and video by Church Militant is republished with permission.

VIDEO: What I Saw During a First Look at the White House Christmas Decorations

“American Treasures” is the theme of the White House’s 2018 Christmas decorations. Crafted by first lady Melania Trump, the White House decorations stunned once again, with nearly 30 Christmas trees and over 14,000 red ornaments. The Daily Signal was on hand Monday to have a first look at this year’s theme.

In a press release the Office of the First Lady noted, “This year’s theme, ‘American Treasures’ honors the unique heritage of America. Designed by First Lady Melania Trump, the White House shines with the spirit of patriotism.”

The first lady chose to highlight the color red because it symbolizes valor and bravery.

“This is a joyous time of year when we decorate the White House for the Christmas season. Our theme honors the heart and spirit of the American people. Thank you to the many volunteers and staff who worked hard to decorate the halls of the People’s House in Christmas cheer. On behalf of my family, we wish everyone a very Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year,” the first lady said in the press release.

(Photo: The Daily Signal/Thaleigha Rampersad)

(Photo: The Daily Signal/Thaleigha Rampersad)

(Photo: The Daily Signal/Thaleigha Rampersad)

(Photo: The Daily Signal/Thaleigha Rampersad)

(Photo: The Daily Signal/Thaleigha Rampersad)

(Photo: The Daily Signal/Thaleigha Rampersad)

(Photo: The Daily Signal/Thaleigha Rampersad)

(Photo: The Daily Signal/Thaleigha Rampersad)

(Photo: The Daily Signal/Thaleigha Rampersad)

(Photo: The Daily Signal/Thaleigha Rampersad)

(Photo: The Daily Signal/Thaleigha Rampersad)

(Photo: The Daily Signal/Thaleigha Rampersad)

(Photo: The Daily Signal/Thaleigha Rampersad)

(Photo: The Daily Signal/Thaleigha Rampersad)

(Photo: The Daily Signal/Thaleigha Rampersad)

(Photo: The Daily Signal/Thaleigha Rampersad)

(Photo: The Daily Signal/Thaleigha Rampersad)

(Photo: The Daily Signal/Thaleigha Rampersad)

(Photo: The Daily Signal/Thaleigha Rampersad)

(Photo: The Daily Signal/Thaleigha Rampersad)

(Photo: The Daily Signal/Ginny Montalbano)

(Photo: The Daily Signal/Ginny Montalbano)

(Photo: The Daily Signal/Ginny Montalbano)

The first lady also released a video of the decorations:

COLUMN BY

Portrait of Ginny Montalbano

Ginny Montalbano

Ginny Montalbano is a contributor to The Daily Signal. Send an email to Ginny. Twitter: @GinnyMontalbano.


The Daily Signal depends on the support of readers like you. Donate now


EDITORS NOTE: This column with images is republished with permission. Photo: Polaris/SIPA/Newscom.

Yes, Virginia, There Is a War on Christmas

If you think the malls are busy at Christmas, you should see the attorneys! From mangers to pageants, the secular crowd is already gearing up for another flurry of complaints about anything remotely religious. At one Virginia school, the turkey hadn’t even been carved when officials stuck a fork in something else: Christmas carols.

Parents at Robious Middle School were more than a little surprised to get an email telling them that songs mentioning Jesus were suddenly banned. It’s their attempt, staffers say, at being “more sensitive” to the Robious’s “diverse population.” One dad, David Allen, was so bothered that he contacted the school’s choir director. He was told that a few students were “uncomfortable” singing something with Jesus’s name. “It just seems like… everywhere you look everyone’s afraid of stepping on someone’s toes or everything is being so sensitive,” Allen told WWBT. Like a lot of people, he doesn’t understand how the school can “encourage diversity” by being exclusionary.”

Despite the uproar, Fox News’s Todd Starnes says Robious Middle School has no comment. But, as First Liberty Institute attorney Michael Berry points out, they’ll have to answer to someone. As he pointed out in a letter to the Chesterfield County School District,

“Federal courts have upheld the constitutionality of public school holiday programs that include the use of religious music, art, or drama, so long as the material is presented in an objective manner ‘as a traditional part of the cultural and religious heritage of the particular holiday.'”

Remember when Donald Trump was mocked by the liberal media for insisting that he would “make Christmas great again?” “If I become president,” he said on the campaign trail, “we’re going to be saying Merry Christmas at every store.” Shows like “Saturday Night Live” made fun of him for insisting there was a war on Christmas. But guess what? He was right. This is part of the broader purge to remove every reference of God from the public square.

Fortunately, thanks to the Trump administration, people are less afraid of being politically incorrect. They’re standing up and refusing to let a vocal minority take away their God-given freedom! But we still have a long way to go. And it will take more brave parents like David Allen speaking out to change things. Otherwise, as Santa Claus is coming to town — so is censorship!


Tony Perkins’ Washington Update is written with the aid of FRC senior writers.


RELATED ARTICLES:

Liberals Continue War on Christmas, This Time Rudolph Is In Their Cross-hairs

‘How Fast Can You Get To Hell?’ Leftists Come Out in Droves, Attack Melania over Holiday Message

Military Clash Causes Massive Power Outage

EDITORS NOTE: This column with images is republished with permission.