My Conversation with Rush Limbaugh

/in , , , /by

When I came to the U.S. in the early 80’s, I didn’t know the language. It was a tough time for me—as a professional speaker, I was unable to construct a simple sentence. English is a very subtle and complicated language. Besides a new culture that was strange to me and a different political system, the inability to communicate was a terrifying state of existence for me. I was desperate to assimilate and my failure to communicate was holding me back. Anxious, I listened to the radio all day and night, even sleeping with the radio to learn the language.

Somewhere toward the end of the 80’s, I found a station where a pleasant voice described the uniqueness of the American republic. I liked this voice, its fluency and his idea, a new idea for me—the uniqueness of the American republic. I learned the name of the man—Rush and was ready to listen to him the next day. Alas, I had lost the station.  I was very disappointed, but continued looking for Rush. Finally, in 1988 Rush came to New York, where I lived at the time and ever since Rush has become part of my every-day life. Moreover, I called Rush and had a conversation with him, pp. 571-574, Baltic Winds Testimony of a Soviet Attorney, XLIBRIS, 2002.

During my first years in America, I was in love with radio and TV, charmed by their professionalism, substance, and quick response to any occasion, let alone perfect English. I’d been especially overwhelmed by the investigative reports—they reminded me of reports from the department of investigation in the KGB.  The Soviet press had never had access to any classified information.  American democracy provided the media with incredible power.  And what excellent writing skills the journalists possessed!  I envied them.

But something had changed along the way.  Instead of reporting the facts, the media were looking primarily for sensation, to stir up human feelings, to excite or scare, to make more money—covering inconsequential episodes and overlooking significant events.  So I asked myself how a reporter or commentator could arrive at an accurate judgment without the truth.  It appeared the media had been deceived the same way that the American people had and, not knowing the truth, had to attract the public with sensations.  In doing so, our media had become a twin brother to the former Soviet media—empty in substance.  It had always irritated me when listening to a reporter called Zhirinovsky, a hard-liner nationalist. Wouldn’t it be more appropriate to call him a Stalinist? At least the word would bring a sense of reality and a warning…. What could be worse than the deceived media in democracy!

The one person who stood out from the chorus of America’s deceived believers was Rush Limbaugh, a real American patriot. I thought I should talk to him. And I did. It was not an easy matter to get through to his show by phone, but God was with me and finally after twenty or so minutes, I got the opportunity to talk to Rush. I was so nervous to speak to him that I am afraid he did not understand the significance of my information. I was talking about Soviet involvement in the anti-war movements around the world and about Soviet Health Care, which was worth nothing. I also told him that Clinton was a member of the anti-war movement and gave me the impression that he worked with the KGB.

It was 1992; America was campaigning for a new president. My dislike of Clinton had overwhelmed me to such a degree that I could not remain silent. And despite my poor English, I dared to call Rush Limbaugh. He was the only person I could trust—his awareness of Clinton’s danger coincided with mine. So in talking with him I went straight ahead and warned him and his listeners about the Soviet infiltration and other negative features of Soviet Socialism.

Each new fact about Clinton, moreover, pointed to the veracity of my first impression. He had been an activist in the antiwar movement and, once visiting Moscow, lived with a Russian family. My God, he had lived with the family of a KGB member, or maybe even with two of them—a husband and a wife. It was the only possible explanation—for nobody else in the Soviet Union in the ‘70s would have been trusted to accommodate a foreigner but the family of KGB members. Though there was another scenario of Clinton’s staying in Moscow—the Hotel National, my attitude toward him has not changed. Like the Hotel Europeyskay in Leningrad, the Hotel National served as a roof for the KGB to deal with recruiting the foreigners.

I didn’t like Clinton’s pictures of the ‘60s and ‘70s in Moscow either. He reminded me of a member of the Komsomol, that reservoir of human resources for the KGB. The American media, busy with his womanizing activities, never opened the curtain on the possibility that Clinton was affiliated with the KGB. When he, himself, explained his participation in the antiwar movement in Oxford, saying he “only organized teachers,” no one from the media asked who’d given him that assignment. I suspected the KGB had. I had known the KGB’s modus operandi in using human weaknesses while recruiting foreigners—to supply “girls,” obtain compromising pictures, and then blackmail. And that scenario generated in me an aggressive stance against Clinton.

The ‘passport file’ story eventually validated my suspicions—it was well grounded, something beyond intuition. There were two critical aspects in the passport episode; first, the fact that pages from Clinton’s passport were missing; second, the information they contained. The concept of a passport in America differs totally from that in the rest of the world. An especially critical importance was attached to passports issued by all Socialist bloc countries.

Somebody in the State Department had taken the initiative to remove pages from Clinton’s passport. Or had he done it himself? Where had he traveled? And why had he concealed those trips? Taken together, the passport story revealed the typical KGB fingerprint to me—handwriting on the wall.

What pain I went through when an attorney from the Bush Administration actually apologized for seeking information concerning Clinton’s passport file! I could not believe it. People in the administration were not aware of the KGB obsession with obtaining information about others and concealing its own! I was crushed. There was no alternative for me—I had to vote for Bush. Moreover, I couldn’t discuss my thoughts with my Romanian friend and that disturbed me immensely. For me, Clinton’s presidency presented a catastrophic threat to national security of this country. And that terrified me. As an emotional wreck in an agony of suspense, I glued my eyes to the TV, watching the endless excitement and jubilation of the American people, especially women, ready to vote for Clinton. My poor women were fooled and used again! They had no idea of what they were doing to their children, their families, and to our country . . .

What Vlad had warned me about the Soviet Union had come to America—charlatans turned into heroes, decent people accused of crime. There was an atmosphere of Soviet socialist morality all around. I had to expose it!

In the morning I was unable to write my book; the sense of urgency tore me apart, and in the afternoon, when Rush began talking about Clinton’s character, I knew that my time to speak out had arrived. Nothing could stop me.

As I understood the word “character” in English, it has a broad connotation, something equating a human’s individuality, with references from past and present behaviors and therefore a possible intimation of future ones. If the word “personality” primarily referred to an appearance, a “character” in my view reflected substance—thoughts, moral qualities, and ability to see the real world—the core of a human being. If a personality is a private domain, a character is a public one.

A human being without character resembled a house without a roof and windows. In Clinton’s case, the issue of character had identified the absence of that essence in the man. He had no individuality or character and was ready to imitate or wear any appropriate mask if necessary. But how could I convince Limbaugh and his audience?

Talking on national radio scared me. I had to choose my every word. Besides, I would have, at best, three minutes, no more, to put my ideas together. Instead of writing down some thoughts, the force of urgency drove me to the phone. Eagerness and nervousness are not a good combination, but I had no time to think. My hand, trembling, dialed the number. Busy signals followed for thirty or forty minutes and I redialed over and over again. My throat was dry, and my hands trembled, but I redialed unyieldingly. I had a goal.

Suddenly the busy signals stopped and a polite male voice performed an inquisition, screening and tormenting me with dozens of questions. I had to prove my point. I did. He was a smart man, and I passed the test. I don’t remember Rush’s words as he presented me. Nervously I began talking about the ‘sixties and ‘seventies:

“The Soviet Union fully participated in the Vietnam War. It helped the North Vietnamese with weaponry, grains, and the Soviet pilots fought air battles against the Americans. As a party to that war, the Soviets were interested in winning, and, for that reason, the KGB infiltrated the antiwar movement around the world and later led it. It’s not a secret anymore. The Russian newspapers today are filled with new revelations about the real Soviet participation in the Vietnam War. The point is that the KGB orchestrated many activities within the antiwar movement, and people from the movement worked with the KGB.” Rush stopped me, asking something, I don’t remember what. Full of desire to make my point, I disregarded his words and continued.

“Character is very important. When Clinton came to Moscow he was already a member of the peace movement.” I wanted to

say that he already knew whom he was dealing with. By his own admission, he “organized teachers in Oxford,” carrying out somebody’s assignment. I wanted to show his duplicity and arrogance, his affiliation with the KGB prior to the Moscow visit, but I couldn’t say it so bluntly. Though extremely anxious and nervous, I nevertheless, restrained myself from screaming: The Soviet mafia is coming to America! Nobody would comprehend what the term meant. Besides, the American public had not the remotest idea of who Primakov or Zhirinovsky was. There was only one way to expose the Soviet connection—I had to stay in the parameters of the familiar three letters—KGB.

“The point is that the KGB orchestrated all the activities and the antiwar movement was headed by the KGB,” I said.

“Did you know Clinton personally?” Rush asked me.

“No. But all Soviet people knew about the KGB and its involvement in the antiwar movement worldwide.” I knew I hadn’t presented my case well. I was nervous and afraid that a commercial break would interrupt me. And it did. Rush asked me to hold on. My head was spinning, thoughts running wildly through my mind. How could I prove my point? How could I squeeze so much into such a short span of time?

After the break Rush again asked me about the connection between character and the issue. There was no time to talk about the defining battles still going on around the world between capitalism and socialism. And there were no written words in front of me. The only thing I could hear was the clock ticking.

“I’m not an economist, but I’ve studied Marxism a great deal. Economy is not only about unemployment figures. Economy is a concept with two ideologically possible approaches—it’s a market economy, which is called capitalism, or a government-controlled economy. I can tell you, when I listen to Clinton—what he’s talking about and what he’s promising the United States—I have come to the conclusion that he very deeply inhaled utopian Soviet socialism.” I couldn’t talk over the national radio about Stalinism and its tactics. Again, I was losing sight of how to make my point because I couldn’t openly say what I had in mind. I was frustrated at my inability to cope with the situation and formulate the answers. That frustration and a choking back of tears changed the tone of my voice.

“He’s promising, and he’s lying. He’s promising national health care—I know what this means, I ran from this health care. He’s talking about an economy controlled by the government. The consequences of this approach you now see in the former Soviet Union—its economy is bankrupt. That’s why I would say that, while Mr. Clinton maybe didn’t understand what he was doing in the ‘sixties and ‘seventies, today, twenty years later, he’s proved that he has shared his point of view with the Soviet apparatchiks. He’s acting as a regular Soviet apparatchik.” I wanted to caution the audience regarding the Soviet connection. But in addition to the obscurity of the subject, I lacked the necessary words and didn’t know which ones to use to alarm, to warn, or to alert. Unable to cope with the language, I lost control and almost crying, shouted in anguish.

“He’s promising, and he’s lying. It’s all too familiar to me, and that’s why I want to alert the American people—think before you vote, think before you vote . . .” I don’t remember anything but a devastating feeling of defeat when the conversation ended. October 29, 1992. Rush repeated the conversation October 30th, 1992…

Rush Limbaugh past away February 17. 2021.

God blessed us all with Rush Limbaugh! His teachings will serve generations carrying on his legacy. Rest in peace Rush!

©Simona Pipko. All rights reserved.

Stealing the West’s Cultural Heritage

/in , , , , , /by

 

My new Freedom Center pamphlet offers a defense of Western culture – and of America.

To order Stealing the West’s Cultural Heritage, CLICK HERE.

Here is Sara Dogan’s Foreword to the pamphlet:

Foreword

It has become fashionable of late among the leftist elites to accuse the West of pilfering its treasures — both physical resources and intellectual innovations — from native and minority cultures. The clear moral lesson, we are to understand, is that there is nothing particularly noteworthy or exceptional about Western culture and by extension about America. Instead, we should feel deep shame that our ancestors expropriated the physical and intellectual capital of the peoples we conquered.

In this timely and illuminating new pamphlet, “Stealing the West’s Cultural Heritage,” Jihad Watch director Robert Spencer addresses this lie head-on, first debunking the work of “Middle East expert” Diana Darke who claims in a recent book that some of Christian Europe’s most exquisite structures including Notre-Dame and St. Mark’s were inspired by Islamic mosques. Spencer eviscerates Darke’s claims, showing how the architectural timeline she presents is at odds with the origins and growth of Islam.

Spencer then turns his attention to the wider question of why scientific exploration and innovation exploded in Christian cultures but stalled in Muslim ones. He concludes that the difference lies in the two faiths’ differing conceptions of God. Christians believe that God created the laws of science and mathematics so that humans could study them and understand his divine creation, whereas Islam views God as capricious, and thus not bound to govern the universe according to consistent and observable laws.

This pamphlet is part of the Freedom Center’s ongoing efforts to rectify the onslaught of historical fabrications being taught both in our nation’s K-12 schools and our colleges and universities. Already, the New York Times’ widely discredited “1619 Project,” which seeks to prove that “Out of slavery — and the anti-black racism it required — grew nearly everything that has truly made America exceptional” is being taught as truth in classrooms across America.

“Stealing the West’s Cultural Heritage” is an urgent and essential read for both students of history and those who wish to understand how the academic left is adopting a false and dishonest narrative to undermine Western heritage.

Sara Dogan
National Campus Director
David Horowitz Freedom Center

And you can read it here.

VIDEO: A Utopian Anal Swab for Covid? You have got to be kidding me.

/in , , , , , , /by

No, this is not political satire, it is happening in the CCP. Covid has a 99+% recovery rate but is being used to strike fear in the hearts of we the people. Is this just another way for tyrants to show how to make us submit to them? As government power grows the rights of we the people shrink.

In a WebMD article titled China Using Anal Swabs for COVID Testing Ralph Ellis reported:

Jan. 28, 2021 — China is not giving up on nasal or throat testing, but the country has adopted a new method for detecting the coronavirus: anal swabs.

Anal testing is being used so far only on select groups, mainly high-risk cases and people in quarantine. Some people who have been subjected to anal testing include passengers arriving in Beijing and a group of more than 1,000 schoolchildren and teachers who were thought to have been exposed to the virus, Forbes reported.

The use of anal swabs is limited because it’s invasive and inconvenient. If a stool sample cannot be obtained, a saline-soaked cotton swab about 1-2 inches long is inserted into the anus, with the sample tested for active traces of the virus.

Read more.

From face masks to social distancing to nose swabs to shutting downs businesses to anal swabs. When will this madness ever end? Government control of we the people is both using Covid as the cause in order for government to take control of every aspect of our lives.

It is time to say enough is enough.

©Dr. Rich Swier. All rights reserved.

RELATED VIDEO: Drive-Thru Anal Swab for Covid-19? The Deep State’s ‘Great Reset’ takes its next logical step.

VIDEO: White House coronavirus adviser stumbles, struggles to explain similar virus numbers despite differing lockdown approaches

/in , , , , /by

Sweden was right.

But the failed, despotic Democrats have dug in and now want to make multiple masks mandatory.

White House coronavirus adviser struggles to explain similar virus numbers despite differing lockdown approaches

White House COVID-19 adviser Andy Slavitt appeared not to be able to explain why some states that don’t have strict responses to the pandemic, such as Florida, seemingly fare no worse than largely locked-down states like California.

By: Michael Lee, Washington Examiner, February 18, 2021:

“There’s so much of this virus that we think we understand, and we think we can predict, that’s just a little beyond our explanation,” Slavitt said when asked by MSNBC why Florida and California have similar COVID-19 numbers despite differences in policy responses. “What we do know is the more careful people are, the more they mask and social distance, and the quicker we vaccinate, the quicker it goes away and the less it spreads.”

Slavitt noted that variants make the virus hard to predict and warned that the country needs to remain vigilant.

“We’ve got to get better visibility into variants. We don’t know what role they play,” Slavitt said. “As we all have learned by this time, this is a virus that continues to surprise us. It’s very hard to predict, and, all around the country, we’ve got to continue to do a better job, and I think we are, but we’re not done yet.”

California has implemented the strictest lockdown policies in the country, according to a Wallet Hub analysis, while Florida remains one of the least restrictive states.

Despite frequent criticism of Gov. Ron DeSantis’s approach, the governor has shown little sign he plans on backing down. In a fiery speech Monday, DeSantis slammed updated CDC guidance that called for some schools to remain closed to in-person instruction and vowed to keep the doors to Florida’s schools open.

“What the CDC put out, 5 p.m. on a Friday afternoon, I wonder why they would do it then, was quite frankly a disgrace. It would require, if you actually follow that, closing 90% of schools in the United States,” DeSantis said. “We are open, we remain open, and we are not turning back.”

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved. Quick note: Tech giants are snuffing us out. You know this. Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Adsense permanently banned us. Facebook, Twitter, Google search et al have shadowbanned, suspended and deleted us from your news feeds. They are disappearing us. But we are here. Help us fight. Subscribe to Geller Report newsletter here — it’s free and it’s critical NOW more than ever. Share our posts on social and with your email contacts.

Biden Defends Hitler’s Concentration Camps: ‘Nazi Germany Just Had Different Norms’

/in , /by

WASHINGTON, D.C.—In a recent presidential town hall on CNN, Biden appeared to excuse the treatment of Jews in Hitler’s concentration camps due to “differences in cultural norms.”

“Listen, folks– I was just on the phone with Adolf and I was like, ‘Hey, man! You know that whole thing with the camps? You and I may not see eye to eye on those things. That’s OK, Jack! Different norms!'”

“The thing that struck me about President Biden’s town hall — aside from a few completely innocent and harmless missteps — is just how empathetic and compassionate our new president is,” said CNN Anchor Don Lemon. “Frankly, I would rather have a president who defends concentration camps with compassion than one who attacks them with a mean and nasty tone. That’s really what matters here.”

Biden’s performance at the town hall is being universally praised in the media as “adorable,” “sweet,” “comforting,” and “mostly true.”

Uighur Muslims in China also released a statement saying: “Wow–this guy really seems to care. That makes us feel so much better!”

When questioned by several human rights groups about the President’s statements, Biden’s press secretary promised to “circle back.”

RELATED ARTICLE: Journalists Cheer As Jen Psaki Announces The Gulags Will Be Run By A Woman Of Color

EDITORS NOTE: This political satire column by The Babylon Bee is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Journalists Cheer As Jen Psaki Announces The Gulags Will Be Run By A Woman Of Color

/in , /by

WASHINGTON, D.C.—Journalists around the nation erupted in boisterous cheers when White House Press Secretary, Jen Psaki, announced that the gulags will be run by a woman of color.

The announcement came as a result of an unscripted moment when a reporter relayed to Psaki a question from a concerned citizen back home, “What is President Biden doing for my small business?”

Psaki didn’t miss a beat showing how clearly prepared she was for such a hard-hitting question.

“First and foremost, Joe Biden nominated a woman of color to run the forced labor camps, what many experts in this administration are referring to affectionately as the gulags.”

The journalists began hooting, hollering, clapping, and erupting into chants of “Four More Years” when Psaki’s announcement dropped that dissidents and undesirables accused of wrongthink would be sent to forced labor camps run by a woman of color.

At publishing time, children being kept in immigration detention centers were reportedly “glad” to hear news that I.C.E. may be folded into the progressive new gulag system.

RELATED POLITICAL SATIRE:

Party Of Love And Progress Rejoices Over Death Of Political Opponent

Disney Announces New Movie Telling Sympathetic Feminist Origin Story Of Xenomorph Queen

Elon Musk Rescues Texans With Giant Flamethrower Mech

Biden Defends Hitler’s Concentration Camps: ‘Nazi Germany Just Had Different Norms’

New York Times Calls For Banning Coffee Shops After Learning People Can Have Uncensored Conversations There

EDITORS NOTE: This political satire column by The Babylon Bee is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Machiavelli’s Troika: Pelosi – Schumer – McConnell

/in , , , , /by

“One who deceives will always find those who allow themselves to be deceived.” – Niccolo Machiavelli

It’s likely true that since the beginning of human civilization, those who govern will use trickery to distract the governed from what really deserves their attention.  It is certainly true in modern history, and it is true today.

  • The Warren Commission was established in November 1963, and concluded nearly ten months later in September 1964. Almost 60 years later, the public is still unsure who and what was behind the assassination of JFK.  But the investigation and subsequent controversy unquestionably served one purpose: to distract the public from the early stages of the war in Vietnam.
  • Following the attacks of September 11, 2001 and the undeniable failures of U.S. intelligence to identify and prevent the terrorists from carrying out their assault, the government established the 9/11 Commission to investigate how it happened. It lasted from November 2002 through August 2004 – almost 2 years.  Not only did this distract from the opening stages of the war in Iraq, but to some extent it also covered up the shortcomings in the intelligence community.  Many of these problems (compartmentalized information jealously kept and not shared, lack of communication, etc.) persist today.

Enter the Trump era.  From the beginning, lifelong politicians in Washington distrusted President Donald J. Trump and sought to remove him from power.

  • It began with the Russian collusion investigation, a three-year ordeal that only vindicated President Trump and raised questions about the Obama-era CIA, FBI, DIA, NSA, and DOJ.
  • Next it was the first Trump impeachment, led by Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Chairman Adam Schiff. If anything was proved during this sham, it was that indeed Joe and Hunter Biden were acting with blatant conflicts of interest in Ukraine.  Trump was again vindicated and exonerated, but the public had successfully been distracted and sidetracked from Biden’s scandals while the burden of prosecution was turned on Trump.

Though unsuccessful in their impeachment efforts, the Democrats did manage (through greatly questionable means) to unseat Trump in the 2020 election.

  • Following the incident at the Capitol building on January 6, 2021, when some well-meaning Trump supporters and many agent provocateurs of dubious allegiance illegally entered Congress, Pelosi, accompanied by her compatriots in the Senate – Chuck Schumer and Mitch McConnell – seized the opportunity to try to impeach Trump on his way out the Presidential door.

A distraction’s value is measured in how long it persists and the extent to which it deflects the attention of the marks (in these cases, the American public).

  • The second sham impeachment, which ended with the same result as the first, threatened to be prolonged by the calling of witnesses. The procession of witnesses to the non-existent crime could have taken weeks.  But the Republicans, in a rare wise moment, threatened to call as their first witness Nancy Pelosi.  Pelosi, as well as Schumer in the Senate, was briefed well in advance of January 6th that trouble was brewing.  President Trump had offered the protection of the National Guard, but his gestures went ignored.  Facing the exposure of their profound hypocrisy, Democrats decided to forego the calling of witnesses.

Now, the Machiavellian leaders in Congress have devised yet another ruse to avert the gaze of Americans from their misdeeds.

  • Pelosi has announced the establishment of a 9/11 Commission-like study of the January 6th We’ll call it the “January 6th Commission” for convenience.  Unlike the previous two failed impeachments, the commission can be prolonged indefinitely.  The RINO Mitch McConnell, a Republican whose wife is linked financially to China, even signaled that Trump, now a private citizen, is “still liable to be tried and punished in the ordinary tribunals of justice.”

This all begs the question of “Why?”  For the reader’s consideration, here are some real issues that politicians in Congress on both sides of the aisle likely want to keep out of focus:

  • The Biden presidency, an administration led by a senile figurehead compromised by innumerable conflicts of interest, yet supported by the establishment.
  • The sham election, so full of inconsistencies and blatant criminality that a significant percentage of the population believes it was stolen (75% of Republicans and nearly 50% of Americans).
  • The China threat, COVID, and economy/family destroying lockdowns.
  • The militarization of Washington, D.C. The total soldiers on the streets of our capital outnumber those in Iraq and Afghanistan combined.  Is there any bigger red flag that we’re living in the world’s biggest banana republic of all time?

With so much fundamentally wrong in our government today, will the public ignore the distractions and concentrate on the real problems?  Or will Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer, and Mitch McConnell manage once again, through legerdemain and emotional manipulation, to keep the people frantic, guessing, and divided?

They’re trying to run out the clock.  Keep your eyes on the ball.

COLUMN BY

Wallace Bruschweiler & William Palumbo

©All rights reserved.

RELATED VIDEOS:

The Deep State’s Toxic TV and Internet.

Democrats Are PUSHING America To CIVIL WAR | Breakdown | Huckabee

VIDEO: Rush Is Home In Glory

/in , , , , /by

His lord said to him, “Well done, good and faithful servant; you have been faithful over a few things, I will make you ruler over many things. Enter into the joy of your lord.”  – Matthew 25:23

“And he believed in the Lord; and he counted it to him for righteousness.” –  Genesis 15:6

The King of talk has gone home to glory!  There’s no one who can replace the nearly 33 years of Rush Hudson Limbaugh III, America’s talk radio host extraordinaire.  Amazing guy…and although he was someone we might not always agree with, we loved him throughout his three decades of conservative radio truth.

In 1993, Rush was the invited guest at the National Rifle Association yearly convention in Nashville, Tennessee. As members, we went to see this great fellow speak.  It was held in the Grand Old Opry Land Hotel and gloriously we had front row tables.  We loved it…an amazing event and a wonderful speech from the man who loved freedom.

Here is the video from that speech, and I know you’ll enjoy it as much as we did back then.

The Subs

Mark Steyn, Ken Matthews, Todd Herman and a couple others have substituted for Rush while he’s had cancer treatments, and all of them have been stellar in replacing the King of talk radio.  If you’ve listened to them, you learned a lot as they were chosen by Rush as stand ins.

November 3rd, we lost one of the best presidents we’ve had in decades, and now we’ve lost one of the finest talk show hosts in America…God called Rush home too early for us, but perfectly timed for the Lord.  God’s will is always perfect, and surely the banquet in heaven for this wonderful Christian man is a glorious event as are all those who come home to the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.

Will substitutes for Rush continue to fill in for the number one voice of freedom and liberty?  I would hope so.  No one can fill the Limbaugh shoes, but a number of wonderful people can help us through these times of trial and I know Rush would love his program to continue.

Bo Snerdley

Bo, whose real name is James Golden, is a call screener, producer, and engineer for the syndicated Rush Limbaugh radio talk show. Since 2001 he has been a Producer/Executive for Premiere Networks, the largest radio syndication company in the United States.

James Golden along with Autry Pruitt and their many friends will continue the work of Rush Limbaugh in areas outside of radio.  They have come together to launch a new web-destination: MAGA.BLACK.

The site, MAGA.BLACK promotes conservative values and specifically focuses on the African-American community.  The founders have long advocated on behalf of the conservative values promoted by Rush Limbaugh and President Trump.

Love of Truth

Forty-four million listeners tuned in every day…and it was Rush who told those listeners to help General Michael Flynn with his legal defense fund.  Over 10,000 hits per minute went through the Flynn legal defense fund, and shut it down for a few minutes.  Even Rush’s website, which had never been shut down from hits, went down shortly after he called for support for the General.  Amazing what he did to help!  God bless him!

Yes, Rush was the education teacher…and how many times we heard young adults call into his show and say they had listened since childhood because their parents tuned in.  A great teacher…that’s what we’ve lost, a one in a million fellow that will never be replaced…but God gave him to us for 33 years and for that the nation has been blessed.

Goodbye Rush!

No doubt, Rush’s last breath here was his next breath in the presence of the King of Glory who no doubt said to him, “Well done, good and faithful servant.”

Pray for Kathryn, for the Limbaugh family and for all of the people who loved this man and will miss him and pray for our nation…that’s what Rush would have us do.

©Kelleigh Nelson. All rights reserved.

Muslim ‘Refugee’ Working as Anti-Rape Trainer is Arrested for Rape

/in , , , , , /by

He taught other Muslim Afghans how to behave against women – then he himself raped a colleague on the night shift- empowered by Leftists, Democrats, feminists who say nothing but work to import more rape jihad.

The Qur’an teaches that Infidel women can be lawfully taken for sexual use (cf. its allowance for a man to take “captives of the right hand,” 4:3, 4:24, 23:1-6, 33:50, 70:30). The Qur’an says:

“O Prophet, tell your wives and your daughters and the women of the believers to bring down over themselves of their outer garments. That is more suitable that they will be known and not be abused. And ever is Allah Forgiving and Merciful.” (33:59)

The implication there is that if women do not cover themselves adequately with their outer garments, they may be abused, and that such abuse would be justified. (source: Robert Spencer)

This behavior is justified in the Qur’an. Islamic scholar Robert Spencer explains:

“Why did they not produce four witnesses? Since they produce not witnesses, they verily are liars in the sight of Allah.” — Qur’an 24:13

Because of the Qur’an-derived stipulation that sexual crimes can only be established by the testimony of four male Muslim witnesses, along with the Sharia provision that women’s testimony is not admissible in cases involving sex, it is not at all unknown that women are in prison for being victims of rape: their own charge against the perpetrator becomes self-incriminating when he refuses to confess and there are not four witnesses.

In Islamic law, it is normal: the seizure of Infidel girls and their use as sex slaves is sanctioned in the Qur’an. According to Islamic law, Muslim men can take “captives of the right hand” (Qur’an 4:3, 4:24, 33:50). The Qur’an says: “O Prophet! Lo! We have made lawful to you your wives to whom you have paid their dowries, and those whom your right hand possesses of those whom Allah has given you as spoils of war” (33:50). 4:3 and 4:24 extend this privilege to Muslim men in general. The Qur’an says that a man may have sex with his wives and with these slave girls: “The believers must win through, those who humble themselves in their prayers; who avoid vain talk; who are active in deeds of charity; who abstain from sex, except with those joined to them in the marriage bond, or whom their right hands possess, for they are free from blame.” (Qur’an 23:1-6)

A survivor of a Muslim rape gang in the UK has previously said that her rapists would quote Quran to her, and believed their actions justified by Islam. Thus it came as no surprise when Muslim migrants in France raped a girl and videoed the rape while praising Allah and invoking the Qur’an. And the victim of an Islamic State jihadi rapist recalled: “He told me that according to Islam he is allowed to rape an unbeliever. He said that by raping me, he is drawing closer to God…He said that raping me is his prayer to God.”

The Qur’an teaches that Infidel women can be lawfully taken for sexual use (cf. its allowance for a man to take “captives of the right hand,” 4:3, 4:24, 23:1-6, 33:50, 70:30). The Qur’an says: “O Prophet, tell your wives and your daughters and the women of the believers to bring down over themselves of their outer garments. That is more suitable that they will be known and not be abused. And ever is Allah Forgiving and Merciful.” (33:59) The implication there is that if women do not cover themselves adequately with their outer garments, they may be abused, and that such abuse would be justified.

In this case, victim was eight years old. This could possibly have been because the perpetrators’ reverence for Muhammad led them to think of children as sexual objects. Islamic apologists in the West routinely deny that Muhammad consummated his marriage with (i.e., raped) Aisha when she was nine, and go through all sorts of contortions to deny the evidence of the texts, but the fact that child marriage is accepted in wide swaths of the Islamic world, even by the directorate of religious affairs (Diyanet) in once-“moderate” albeit now rapidly re-Islamizing Turkey, most clearly shows their dishonesty. The Diyanet wouldn’t approve of child marriage if it weren’t Islamic, as it explains in its own defense. And child marriage has abundant attestation in Islamic tradition and law.

“Islam has no age barrier in marriage and Muslims have no apology for those who refuse to accept this” — Ishaq Akintola, professor of Islamic Eschatology and Director of Muslim Rights Concern, Nigeria

“There is no minimum marriage age for either men or women in Islamic law. The law in many countries permits girls to marry only from the age of 18. This is arbitrary legislation, not Islamic law.” — Dr. Abd Al-Hamid Al-‘Ubeidi, Iraqi expert on Islamic law

There is no minimum age for marriage and that girls can be married “even if they are in the cradle.” — Dr. Salih bin Fawzan, prominent cleric and member of Saudi Arabia’s highest religious council

“Islam does not forbid marriage of young children.” — Pakistan’s Council of Islamic Ideology

Here’s the google translation of the Fraiitider article (Thanks to the Religion of Peace:):

Taught other Afghans “how to behave” against women – then he himself raped a colleague on the night shift

Published 16 February 2021 at 14.08

Domestic. A 24-year-old Afghan man is today sentenced by the Court of Appeal for having raped a colleague in the home care service during a night shift. The man previously worked at an HVB home where he was responsible for teaching other so-called refugee children Swedish rules and how to behave towards women.

The 24-year-old called the criminal charges “pure conspiracies” – until he learned of “certain forensic findings”. Then he claimed instead to have masturbated and had mutual intercourse with the woman in the office.

He also told of a dream he had that “a mouse or rat has entered my clothes and eats on my penis”.

However, the district court did not believe that explanation and sentenced the Afghan to two years in prison. And now the Court of Appeal has upheld the verdict.

The Afghan, who himself came to Sweden as an “unaccompanied refugee child”, previously worked at an HVB residence in Timrå. In a local tenant magazine, he was highlighted in 2016 and told how he was responsible for teaching other Afghans about how it works in Sweden, what rules apply and “how to behave” towards women. He explained that for many it came as a shock to come to Sweden and realize that women have rights.

On 11 August 2020, a rape was committed in the home care service’s premises on Gröndalsvägen in Tumba. During a night shift, a woman was raped orally, vaginally and anal by a male colleague. It all took place in an office, which was used by the staff for coffee and rest.

During a break at work, the woman fell asleep on a sofa in the office. She woke up to the man lying between her and the back of the sofa.

“She explained at once that she was not going to have sex with him, but he hugged her harder and harder. He said, ‘Don’t say that.’ “He put his body weight on her. She was lying on her back. In vain she tried several times to push him away with all her might. She finally gave up”, it is stated in the minutes of the verdict.

The woman was new to the job and at first did not dare to tell what had happened. It therefore took three weeks before she made a report. It was only after entrusting herself to a co-worker, who had reacted to the changing mood between the man and the woman in the workplace, that she informed her boss.

The police report was made on September 4 and on September 8, the 24-year-old was arrested.

Police secured DNA evidence
At first, the man denied the crime and claimed that no sexual intercourse had taken place. He called the charges against him “pure conspiracies” – until he realized that the police could have secured DNA evidence.

Then he began to change his story. In an attempt to explain why his semen could be on the spot, he claimed that the woman had undressed naked, asked for a massage and made approaches.

– She has touched me all over my body and you can investigate that she has touched me all over my body. She has touched me in intimate parts, he stated.

He is said to have found the woman’s behavior “unacceptable”, but still been “sucked, inflamed and hot” by her alleged approaches – to then have fallen asleep in the middle of it all and woke up with his underwear and work pants pulled down to half her thighs. He believed that the woman could have “done something” while he slept.

He also said he masturbated in the office a few nights before the rape.

“A rat eats on my penis”
During an interrogation, the Afghan suddenly wanted to tell a story.

– What happens when I sleep, I sleep deeply and dream that a mouse or rat has entered my clothes and eats on my penis. And then I wake up and scream and take off all my clothes.

However, he could not answer whether he had this dream during the night in question.

After being prosecuted, he wanted a supplementary hearing to be held. He then gave a new version of the course of events and claimed that he and the plaintiffs had carried out two voluntary intercourses, both initiated by the woman. That he had not told this before would be due to “that he was shocked and scared and already had a bad experience with the police. He was also afraid of the plaintiff’s boyfriend who threatened to kill him. He also has a wife and a newborn child; the situation was sensitive ”.

Receives minimum sentence and avoids deportation The
district court found that the woman’s story won “considerable support from another investigation” and sentenced the 24-year-old for rape. The sentence was two years’ imprisonment, but the sentence could have been longer.

The fact that the woman was exposed to the crime at her workplace can be seen as an aggravating circumstance, and the district court held that a longer prison sentence had been justified. Two judges also wanted to see the sentence extended by six months, but since the prosecutor did not demand a longer sentence, the sentence was two years, which is the minimum for rape.

The man must also pay damages of SEK 115,000 to the woman.

No request for deportation was made, which means that the Afghan may remain in Sweden after serving his sentence.

The Court of Appeal rules
After the verdict, the man wanted to replace his public defender with the left-wing lawyer Viktor Banke. However, the district court found no factual basis for this request, which was thus denied.

The 24-year-old appealed the verdict and today the Court of Appeal announced that the district court’s verdict is upheld.

Unaccompanied refugee children
The convict is a citizen of Afghanistan. He came to Sweden as an “unaccompanied child” and was registered in 2011 in Timrå. Today he lives in Järfälla. He states that he is married, but with the Swedish Tax Agency he is registered as unmarried.

Orignal By: Friatider

Onsdag 17 februari 2021

Undervisade andra afghaner i “hur man beter sig” mot kvinnor – sen våldtog han själv kollega på nattpasset
Publicerad 16 februari 2021 kl 14.08

Inrikes. En 24-årig afghan döms idag av hovrätten för att ha våldtagit en kollega i hemtjänsten under ett nattskift. Mannen jobbade tidigare på ett HVB-hem där han ansvarade för att lära andra så kallade flyktingbarn svenska regler och hur man beter sig sig mot kvinnor.
Gilla artikeln på Facebook

24-åringen kallade brottsanklagelserna för “rena konspirationer” – tills han fick vetskap om “vissa forensiska fynd”. Då påstod han sig istället ha onanerat och haft ömsesidiga samlag med kvinnan på kontoret.

Han berättade också om en dröm han haft om att “en mus eller råtta har gått in i mina kläder och äter på min penis”.

Tingsrätten trodde dock inte på den förklaringen och dömde afghanen till två års fängelse. Och nu har hovrätten fastställt domen.

Afghanen, som själv kom till Sverige som “ensamkommande flyktingbarn”, arbetade tidigare på ett HVB-boende i Timrå. I en lokal hyresgästtidning lyftes han år 2016 fram och berättade hur han hade ansvar för att lära andra afghaner om hur det fungerar i Sverige, vilka regler som gäller och “hur man beter sig” mot kvinnor. Han förklarade att det för många blev en chock att komma till Sverige och inse att kvinnor har rättigheter.

Den 11 augusti 2020 begicks en våldtäkt i hemtjänstens lokaler på Gröndalsvägen i Tumba. Under ett nattskift våldtogs en kvinna oralt, vaginalt och analt av en manlig kollega. Det hela skedde på ett kontor, som användes av personalen för fika och vila.

Under en rast på jobbet somnade kvinnan på en soffa på kontoret. Hon vaknade av att mannen låg mellan henne och soffryggen.

“Hon förklarade på en gång att hon inte tänkte ha sex med honom, men han kramade henne allt hårdare. Han sade: ‘Säg inte så.’ Han lade sin kroppstyngd på henne. Hon låg på rygg. Förgäves försökte hon flera gånger trycka bort honom med all sin kraft. Hon gav till slut upp”, står det i referatet i domen.

Kvinnan var ny på jobbet och vågade först inte berätta vad som hänt. Det dröjde därför tre veckor innan hon gjorde en anmälan. Det var först efter att ha anförtrott sig till en arbetskamrat, som hade reagerat på den förändrade stämningen mellan mannen och kvinnan på arbetsplatsen, som hon informerade sin chef.

Polisanmälan gjordes den 4 september och den 8 september häktades 24-åringen.

Polisen säkrade DNA-bevis
Till en början nekade mannen till brott och hävdade att inget sexuellt umgänge hade förekommit. Han kallade anklagelserna emot honom för “rena konspirationer” – tills han fick klart för sig att polisen kunde ha säkrat DNA-bevis.

Då började han ändra sin historia. I ett försök att förklara varför hans sperma kunde finnas på platsen påstod han att kvinnan hade klätt av sig naken, bett om massage och gjort närmanden.

– Hon har rört mig över hela kroppen och ni kan utreda att hon har rört mig över hela kroppen. Hon har rört mig på intima delar, uppgav han.

Han ska ha funnit kvinnans beteende ”oacceptabelt”, men dock blivit ”sugen, påtänd och varm” av hennes påstådda närmanden – för att sedan ha somnat mitt i alltihop och vaknat med kalsongerna och arbetsbyxorna neddragna till halva låren. Han menade att kvinnan kunde ha ”gjort något” medan han sov.

Han sade sig dessutom ha onanerat på kontoret några nätter innan våldtäkten.

”En råtta äter på min penis”
Under ett förhör ville afghanen plötsligt berätta en historia.

– Det som händer när jag sover, sover jag djupt och drömmer om att en mus eller råtta har gått in i mina kläder och äter på min penis. Och då vaknar jag och skriker och tar av mig alla kläderna.

Han kunde dock inte svara på om han haft denna dröm under den aktuella natten.

Efter att åtal väckts ville han att ett kompletterande förhör skulle hållas. Han gav då en ny version av händelseförloppet och påstod att han och målsäganden hade genomfört två frivilliga samlag, båda initierade av kvinnan. Att han inte berättat detta tidigare, skulle bero på ”att han var chockad och rädd och hade sedan tidigare dålig erfarenhet av polisen. Han var också rädd för målsägandens pojkvän som hotat att döda honom. Han har också en fru och ett nyfött barn; situationen var känslig”.

Får minimistraff och slipper utvisning
Tingsrätten fann att kvinnans berättelse vann ”beaktansvärt stöd av annan utredning” och dömde 24-åringen för våldtäkt. Påföljden blev två års fängelse, men strafftiden kunde ha blivit längre.

Att kvinnan utsattes för brottet på sin arbetsplats kan ses som en försvårande omständighet, och tingsrätten menade att ett längre fängelsestraff hade varit motiverbart. Två nämndemän ville också se straffet förlängt med sex månader, men eftersom åklagaren inte yrkat på längre strafftid blev påföljden två år, vilket är minimum för våldtäkt.

Mannen ska också betala ett skadestånd på 115.000 kronor till kvinnan.

Det gjordes inget yrkande om utvisning, vilket innebär att afghanen får vara kvar i Sverige efter avtjänat straff.

Hovrätten fastställer
Efter domen ville mannen byta ut sin offentlige försvarare mot vänsteradvokaten Viktor Banke. Tingsrätten fann dock ingen saklig grund för denna begäran, som därmed nekades.

24-åringen överklagade domen och idag meddelade hovrätten att tingsrättens dom står fast.

Ensamkommande flyktingbarn
Den dömde är medborgare i Afghanistan. Han kom till Sverige som ”ensamkommande barn” och folkbokfördes 2011 i Timrå. Idag är han bosatt i Järfälla. Han uppger sig vara gift, men hos Skatteverket är han registrerad som ogift.

RELATED VIDEO: Islam, Slavery and Kafirs

RELATED ARTICLE: Biden’s Iran Disaster: Iran-Backed Militia Fires Rockets At US Base In DEADLY Rocket Attack In Iraq

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Top Ten Fastest Growing Conservative Websites Identified

/in , , , , /by

One of my favorites, Gateway Pundit, is near the top of the list.

Who needs Fox News and who needs Twitter*** just put these sites on your daily reading and watch list and you will be the best informed citizen in your neighborhood. But, just being well-informed doesn’t cut it.

Do not spend all of your time becoming a super-reader because you have work to do!  You have to be a community organizer for America First! from the bottom up!

My Community Organizing 101 series for patriots was launched last weekend (and it is for any and all issues, not just for how to organize on refugee/immigration issues).

Community Organizing 101 is also available on my sidebar under a photo of Obama giving instructions to his fellow Marxists.

What do we do now? Fight Back Locally!

So here are the top ten fastest growing conservative media outlets. Sorry the list is not very clear, go to Gateway Pundit for a clearer image.

Top five are OANN, Newsmax, The Gateway Pundit, The Epoch Times, and The Federalist.

CLICK HERE TO SEE THE LIST OF TOP TEN CONSERVATIVE WEBSITES.

*** As you know Twitter suspended me, took away all of my followers (there were 13,500 remaining before they wiped them out), and now won’t allow me to deactivate my account—-Why?  because I am suspended with no access to it.

EDITORS NOTE: This Frauds, Crooks and Criminals column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Biden Signs Executive Order Allowing People To Keep Their Guns As Long As The Barrel Is Tied In A Knot

/in , /by

WASHINGTON D.C.—In what Democrats are calling a “brilliant compromise for gun safety,” President Biden has signed an executive order allowing everyone to keep as many guns as they want– as long as the barrels are tied in a knot.

“Come on, man! I’m not against the 2nd Amendment!” said Biden to the bust of Cesar Chavez in his office. “You have my word– no one is coming to take your guns away. You want guns, you can keep ’em! All we ask is that you tie a giant knot in the barrel just like Daffy Duck did to Elmer Fudd. It’s real simple!”

Biden’s order will require all gun owners to provide photographic evidence of them twisting their guns into a square knot or a lovely bow. If the guns ever need to be used, Americans can simply take their firearm to a gunsmith to be straightened out again.

Anyone suspected of being a member of QAnon will be required to tie their gun in a triple-knot.

RELATED POLITICAL SATIRE:

Americans Call For More Trump Impeachment Trials As Long As It Keeps Congress Occupied

All Republican Senators Switch To Mullets Thanks To Trend-Setting Ted Cruz

Texans Forced To Cut Open Cattle With Lightsabers And Climb Inside For Warmth

People Who Moved To Texas From California Finally Feeling At Home Now That Power Is Out

Man Asks That You Respect His Preferred Adjectives

Ignorant Senator Shares New York Times Article Thinking It’s Real

EDITORS NOTE: This political satire column by The Babylon Bee is republished with permission. All rights reserved.

VIDEO: Something Evil This Way Comes

/in , , , , , , , /by

Last night Tucker Carlson did a fine segment on the stupidity of wind.

Make SURE that you watch the short video in the article, which is superb!

My only beef is that Tucker repeatedly called industrial wind projects “wind farms.” There is nothing being farmed, other than subsidies. The lobbyists purposefully coined the phrase “wind farm” to deceive non-aware citizens into thinking an industrial wind project is pastoral and environmentally benign.

Both are false, as industrial wind projects are environmentally destructive. (E.g. see here.)

They are also typically a net economic liability to host communities. (E.g. see here.)

Further, industrial wind facilities are a net burden on the electric grid — the backbone of our modern society (and the Texas situation is one of numerous examples).

Stunningly, this is actually a desirable consequence for those pushing wind, as their real objective is to undermine our way of life. (E.g. carefully read Bill McKibben, the journalist — not scientist — who is the leader of the environmental movement.)

Lastly, there is zero genuine scientific proof that wind turbines are of any consequential benefit regarding climate change. In fact there is substantial evidence that they are a climate detriment! (E.g. see here.)

Please get educated about energy realities, as this is just a small part of the enormous devastation that will result from Green New Deal type policies. Please pass this onto your social contacts.

©John Droz, Jr. All rights reserved.

BLM Violent Riot Expert John Sullivan Was Paid by CNN and NBC for His Films of Capitol Riot

/in , , , , , , /by

And while the likes of yours truly*** and other conservatives are suspended or banned at Twitter, a judge agreed with  Sullivan’s defense attorney who said it was too much punishment if Sullivan was banned from using social media like Facebook and Twitter because as his defense attorney argued that such a prohibtion was “wildly excessive and insensitive to the role that Facebook and Twitter play in the lives of many young people.”

It is how they reach their friends, he whined.

Here is Politico trying so hard to white wash Sullivan’s Black Lives Matter instigator role at the US Capitol on January 6th.

Remember this:

“Let’s burn this shit down!”

Judge refuses to ban Capitol riot suspect from Twitter and Facebook

A federal magistrate judge has turned down prosecutors’ effort to block a man accused of participating in the Capitol riot from using Twitter and Facebook, but ordered him to end his involvement with a business he founded that the Justice Department says promotes and glorifies violent protests.

The defendant, John Sullivan of Utah, has maintained that he attends raucous demonstrations as a journalist, sharing videos through his Insurgence USA website and social media platforms. Sullivan’s defense attorney even filed invoices with the court showing that CNN and NBC each paid Sullivan’s firm $35,000 last month for rights to video he filmed of chaotic scenes outside and inside the Capitol, including the deadly shooting of protester Ashli Babbitt by a U.S. Capitol Police officer.

[….]

Sullivan’s politics remain murky. He has described himself as an opponent of Trump and a backer of Black Lives Matter. However, BLM activists in Utah have disowned him, saying he seemed intent on provoking violence at protests.

[….]

However, prosecutors contend that Sullivan is not a mere bystander or chronicler of protests. Instead, they say, he actively encourages violence, telling viewers how to make Molotov cocktails and evade identification by police. He was arrested last month on charges stemming from the Jan. 6 riot, including interfering with police during a civil disorder. Sullivan was later hit with an additional charge: obstruction of Congress.

At a hearing on Tuesday afternoon on Sullivan’s release conditions, Washington-based Magistrate Judge Robin Meriweather split the difference between prosecutors seeking to eliminate Sullivan’s presence on the United States’ most popular social media platforms and a defense lawyer who decried what he said was an assault on his client’s constitutional rights.

“I am rejecting the broader prohibition on Twitter and Facebook and encrypted social media platforms,” Meriweather said, also ordering that Sullivan be taken off of 24-hour location monitoring via GPS.

He is just hanging out at home chatting with his friends on Twitter and Facebook, etc.

However, the judge said Sullivan “is to no longer work for Insurgence USA,” will have his internet use monitored by probation officials, and will be banned from using any social media platforms to incite riots, violent protests, armed conflict or violence. He’s also under home detention.

More here.

For me the fundamental question is why had no one (Pelosi, McConnell) asked for National Guard troops to arrive before January 6th when supposedly the FBI knew in advance that violence was planned for the 6th.

I don’t know which is more frightening: either the FBI didn’t know in advance, or FBI warnings were ignored. 

*** Get this!  My Twitter account is suspended because I refused to give them more information about myself.

So, naturally, I figured since it is suspended and they have removed all of my followers, I would simply quit and delete my account.

Guess what!  I am not permitted to “deactivate” my account because I am suspended.  

RELATED TWEET:

EDITORS NOTE: This Frauds, Crooks and Criminals column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

France Leading the West Against American Wokeism

/in , , , , /by

In this terrible, morally inverted world the Democrats have deconstructed for us, the French are exposing American immorality, oppression and disunity.

France Might Yet Lead the West Against Wokeism

By CONRAD BLACK, Special to the Sun | February 15, 2021

President Macron of France has now warned his countrymen of the menace of American academic and media “woke” thinking and of identity politics as a formula for social oppression and disunity.

France is officially focused entirely on the integration of its entire population into a cosmopolitan French whole, and in a peculiar arc of alliance between nationalist academics, intellectuals, and conservative politicians, all are warning against the importation of what they regard as degenerate and self-destructive American academic faddishness.

France has been warned by its leaders from Right to Left to beware of what is effectively referred to as the latest manifestation of American madness (a phenomenon the French profess to have identified many times since the Marquis de LaFayette assisted General George Washington in securing the surrender of the British at Yorktown in 1781).

The French president became so exercised by comments in the New York Times critical of what was described as the repression by France of Muslims that he telephoned and upbraided a senior Times officer for misrepresenting his policy of “universalism,” which he declared to be the unification of all citizens regardless of their ethnicity or sectarian attachment.

In October, he had announced a series of measures to combat “radical Islamism,” including placing direct government control on mosques, requiring that Muslim clergy are trained and certified in France, and banning Muslim apparel that disguises identity and overstates a religious affiliation.

Monsieur Macron has dismissed the criticism of Amnesty International and others. Large numbers of eminent French academics and journalists have supported the president and been severely critical of what they regard as the moral disintegration of America. France will not be a party to any notion of white self-criticism on grounds of privilege and is unabashed in its expressed belief that the West and France, in particular, has been a civilizing influence in the world, though certainly not without fault.

The new head of the Paris Opera, one of the greatest in the world, Alexander Neef, has been criticized for issuing a statement to Opera personnel urging diversity. Because Neef spent 10 years very successfully at the Toronto Opera Company, he is alleged by many in France to have inhaled and become somewhat intoxicated by spurious American notions of white self-hate.

Mr. Neef defends himself cogently, but the fact that even exalted French academics and the apparent majority of French intellectual society and the French press dislike and resist contemporary American concepts of sharply formulated white self-criticism may be taken as the beginning of a countercultural trend.

I have predicted here before that in dealing with Islamic-related problems in the West, we would be led by the French. For better or worse, France is the most experienced Western country in managing Arab questions — from 1848 to 1963, Algeria was not a colony but a Department (province) of France itself.

France was also for many years the colonial power in both Morocco and Tunisia, and it governed many other Arabs in Africa as well as, between 1919 and 1948, Syria and Lebanon. There were more than 1 million ethnic French in Algeria when that country was granted independence after a brutal war between 1954 and 1962, in which approximately 750,000 people died (about as many as in the U.S. Civil War).

At the end of that conflict, the French leader, General Charles de Gaulle, had little choice but to admit to France not only the returning French but also those Arabs who had been loyal to friends, to prevent their outright massacre at the hands of the Algerian revolutionary leaders. This was the quick launch of the Muslim presence in France and is the explanation for why there are more Muslim Arabs in France than in any other entirely European country (about 3.5 million, or 5.4% of the population).

This fact and the worldly, cynical, and somewhat feline nature of the French is the reason that country has in some respects been the most advanced Western nation in adjusting to the demographic advances of Muslims in the West and the rise of Muslim militancy in the world.

The French, almost since Julius Caesar began their transformation from a race of barbarous Gauls to the forerunners of the ultra-sophisticated French civilization and culture of modern times, have been a nation that could intellectually rationalize almost anything.

The people who said when the Nazis invaded on May 10, 1940, in the words of Premier Paul Reynaud, “We will fight to the last man and the last cartridge,” and when the succeeding government signed a dishonorable armistice with Germany just five weeks later, the byword was “Better Hitler than Blum” (a French Jewish politician), have no trouble explaining radical policy changes.

To admire or even understand the French one should like cats — the French, too, are elegant, highly intelligent, self-preoccupied, and unselfconscious. Because it was thrust upon them and because their national character when severely challenged is less hesitant to take radical measures than the Anglo-Saxons, I have always been confident that they would show the way forward in managing the delicate and complicated relationship between Western and Islamic societies.

The country of Cardinal Richelieu, Louis XIV, Robespierre and the Committee of Public Safety, Napoleon, and de Gaulle knows its mind. Once threatened in their enjoyment of their splendidly rich and beautiful land with its magnificent food, wine, and culture, the French would not pause over the niceties of the country’s purported ideals of “liberty, equality, and fraternity”; would not be hobbled or inhibited by Anglo-Saxon notions of fairness or propriety, and with a minimum of temporizing, the French could surely be relied upon to act decisively where others wobbled and fidgeted.

France has acted boldly to assimilate its Muslim population, mainly concentrated in urban ghettos. The French education system has gone to great lengths to assimilate these people to French values and culture without interfering with their religious freedom (apart from suppressing overt subversion by the Muslim clergy). Prodigious efforts have been made to improve their standard of living and incentivize them to see and respond to the allure of the country where they reside.

Since the shocking attacks of Charlie Hebdo and other incidents five and six years ago, the combination of the positive measures and the often heavy-handed imposition of public security has reduced the incidence of racial and sectarian violence, though there was a revival last autumn, to which Mr. Macron has responded forcefully, with an eye on the presidential election next year.

France has shaken the world many times in its history and is frequently insouciant about the consequences of its political actions. Some of its security measures and intellectual attitudes may be too authoritarian for the advanced English-speaking countries, but the bold self-confidence of its rulers and always influential and prestigious cultural and media leaders are a model that should be useful in conducting the West out of its present profound torpor of self-doubt and self-dislike.

Quick note: Tech giants are snuffing us out. You know this. Facebook, Twitter, Google et al have shadowbanned, suspended and in some cases deleted us from your news feeds. They are disappearing us. But we are here. Subscribe to Geller Report newsletter here— it’s free and it’s critical NOW more than ever.

Everett Stern, Famed Whistleblower, Announces Run For United States Senate

/in , , , , /by

WEST CHESTER, Pa./PRNewswire/ — Everett Stern, a famed whistleblower who has spent a career exposing fraud and corruption and bringing to light the presence of dangerous fringe groups in America, announced today that he is a candidate for the United States Senate.  Stern, 36, a Republican, is running for the seat being vacated by Senator Pat Toomey in 2022.

“Protecting and defending the interests of the United States of America is my life’s passion and the central purpose of my career,” Stern said.  “Now I want to take that dedication to the United States Senate and be a relentless voice for the benefit of the people of Pennsylvania.”

Stern is the founder and CEO of private intelligence agency Tactical Rabbit.  Part of the company’s work has included gathering inside information on radical political groups including the anti-law enforcement group FTP and the white supremacist organization Sovereign American.  Intelligence gathered by Stern’s efforts was passed on to federal law enforcement.

In 2011, Everett Stern gained international notoriety when he brought to light the illegal efforts of his then-employer, HSBC Bank, to launder money and assist nations involved in supporting terrorism and drug trafficking.  Stern’s work resulted in the bank being fined a record almost two billion dollars.

“The people of Pennsylvania deserve a leader who will fight for them against the most powerful special interests, the most entrenched politicians, and a corrupt system whose leaders have forgotten that they answer to the people,” Stern said.  “There’s never been a time when bold, unafraid new leadership has been more badly needed.”

For more information on Everett Stern, please visit his campaign website, www.everettstern.com.

©All rights reserved.