Director of product strategy and security for Dominion Voting Systems, Eric Coomer, is an Antifa radical who is a key player in the massive voter fraud in voter tabulating systems.
CONFIRMED: Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger Used Dominion’s Eric Coomer as Witness for the State to Defend LAST MINUTE COMPUTER CHANGES
By Jim Hoft, Gateway Pundit, November 24, 2020:
Dr. Eric Coomer who is responsible for the strategy and Security at Dominion Voting Systems.
But if you search the company’s profile Eric Coomer has since been removed from their page of directors.
This was after Coomer was found to be a Trump-hating Antifa sociopath.
And in 2017 Eric Coomer explained how to alter votes in the Dominion Voting Systems in a Chicago demonstration.
This then is the SECOND VIDEO of top Dominion executive explaining to elections officials how to alter votes with the Dominion machines! This was a separate demonstration in the Chicago area (notice he is wearing a dark jacket and is without the wrist protector.)
According to reports in late September Dominion’s radical Leftist Eric Coomer made a “critical software change” to GA’s Dominion voting machines “without adequate testing or certification from the U.S. Election Assistance Commission”.
This was reported in the Atlanta Journal Constitution.
In GA, during (late?) Sept, Dominion’s radical Leftist Eric Coomer made a “critical software change” to GA’s Dominion voting machines “without adequate testing or certification from the U.S. Election Assistance Commission”. From this 9/29/20 AJC story https://t.co/Mhn8wIcewKpic.twitter.com/GtpN1SzOXF
A group of Georgia attorneys sued the state after news of the last minute changes to the Dominion voting machines. They called for paper ballots to be used instead of the controversial computer voting systems.
Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger called in Dominion’s Eric Commer to testify for him in the state’s defense.
Georgia election officials told a federal judge Monday that they’ll quickly correct a problem with touchscreen voting computers that left off the names of some of the 21 candidates in a special election for the U.S. Senate.
But attorneys suing the state government said they’re alarmed by technical difficulties so close to the time in-person early voting begins on Oct. 12. They want the government to replace the touchscreens with paper ballots filled out by hand.
Software on the state’s 30,000-plus touchscreens will be replaced to prevent an issue where the second column of U.S. Senate candidates sometimes didn’t appear. Those candidates included Republican U.S. Sen. Kelly Loeffler and Democrats Matt Lieberman, Ed Tarver and Raphael Warnock. Another Republican candidate, U.S. Rep. Doug Collins, wasn’t affected because his name appeared in the first column.
“The plaintiffs are flagging this as some apocalyptic scenario on social media, and it’s not. This is a very minor issue,” said Bryan Tyson, an attorney for Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger.
The issue, discovered last week during pre-election equipment testing in Douglas and Richmond counties, occurred when the second column of candidates didn’t appear because of a technical problem with how touchscreens communicated with their underlying Android operating system, said Eric Coomer of Dominion Voting Systems. He said the problem only happened rarely, when users made selections in a specific pattern.
David Cross, an attorney for the plaintiffs, said making a critical software change shows that the state’s voting technology is vulnerable to problems.
“This is far bigger than we originally thought,” Cross told U.S. District Judge Amy Totenberg. “It’s hard to imagine a more concerning scenario.”
He said the software upgrade is being made without adequate security testing or certification from the U.S. Election Assistance Commission. But Coomer said the change is minor and doesn’t require recertification.
Election officials halted testing in the 77 counties where it had begun after they learned about the problem, said Gabriel Sterling, statewide voting system implementation manager.
RELATED TWEET:
BREAKING: KRAKEN RELEASED! Attorney Sidney Powell Files 104 Page BOMBSHELL COMPLAINT of Massive Fraud in Georgia Election – Update: Michigan too https://t.co/bbLLr9stpm
http://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.png00The Geller Reporthttp://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.pngThe Geller Report2020-11-26 07:03:092021-10-07 21:20:16Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger Used Dominion’s Eric Coomer as Witness for the State to Defend LAST MINUTE COMPUTER CHANGES
Mayor Rudy Giulinai asked Phil Waldron, retired Army spending first half of his career just as a cavalry officer, conducting armed reconnaissance counter reconnaissance. Here is an excerpt from the Q & A:
Mayor GIULIANI: I believe that Greg Stenstrom mentioned earlier, the processing of these ballots through machines. There’s a manufacturer’s specified rate of speed that a number of ballots can image, be imaged and processed. These spike anomalies in this chart of Pennsylvania really show where for us to look forensically
GIULIANI: Could you explain at the very beginning what that line means? “Biden injection” at the very very beginning of the chart …..
WALDRON: So at the very beginning of the chart they all have, where there’s a circle that says on election day. What that indicates is there is a spike in loaded votes of 337,000 plus or minus some votes that were added in there. In one big batch. So that was an anomaly in the reporting normally you would expect to see a smooth curve going up. Not any not any big, big spikes, that’s kind of what what Greg was talking about the the anomalies of loading And uploading those those votes. So that big spike that occurs there is a prime indicator of fraudulent voting.
GIULIANI: And that’s 604,000 votes in 90 minutes, is that right?
WALDRON: Correct. This is the 337,000 votes in that period of time
GIULIANI: Yes. And when you look In this entire curve with all these spikes, can you calculate how much of a vote that accounted for Biden and how much for Trump
WALDRON: CLOSE TO 600,000. I THINK OUR FIGURES WERE ABOUT 570 SOME ODD THOUSAND THAT ALL THOSE SPIKES REPRESENTED OVER TIME FOR BIDEN. CORRECT AND HOW MUCH FOR TRUMP? I THINK IT WAS A LITTLE OVER 3200
GIULIANI: Now just just to go back to your original, your original document, this one pager that they all have mail in ballots counted without being observed. Those are the ballots can we’re talking about that when not observed in Allegheny County and In Philadelphia, correct all right 682,770. Now this is the part that is a mystery, mailed ballots sent out 1,823,148 but when you go to the final count of the vote, there are 2,589,242 mail ballots. What happened ….. how do you account for the 700,000 mail ballots that appeared from nowhere.
In its first court victory, a Nevada judge has agreed to let the Trump campaign present its evidence that fraud and illegalities plagued the state’s election, enough to reverse Joe Biden’s win and set an example for other state challenges.
According to Trump officials, the judge set a Dec. 3 hearing date and is allowing 15 depositions. What’s more, the campaign plans to present its evidence that could result in the rejection of tens of thousands of mail in ballots in Democratic Clark County where Biden ballots outnumbered Trump ballots by 91,000 in unofficial results.
“BIG news in Nevada: a Judge has allowed NV Republicans to present findings of widespread voter fraud in a Dec. 3rd hearing. Americans will now hear evidence from those who saw firsthand what happened — a critical step for transparency and remedying illegal ballots. Stay tuned,” White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows tweeted.
American Conservative Union Chairman Matt Schlapp, one of those heading the Nevada case, told Secrets, “it gives us a real chance, if to do nothing else, to begin to show this historic level of fraud.”
BIG news in Nevada: a Judge has allowed NV Republicans to present findings of widespread voter fraud in a Dec. 3rd hearing. Americans will now hear evidence from those who saw firsthand what happened—a critical step for transparency and remedying illegal ballots. Stay tuned.— Mark Meadows (@MarkMeadows) November 25, 2020
Oddly, there has been a virtual news blackout of the Trump court victory. However, there were major headlines on the state Supreme Court’s certification of Biden’s victory Tuesday.
In its court filing from Nov. 17, the Trump team made several allegations of voter fraud, including votes by non-residents and the dead.
But its biggest claim was that the signatures on hundreds of thousands of mail-in ballots were not verified by human officials, as required by law.
What’s more, they found that officials used a machine to verify signatures, apparently against the rules, … (Read more)
Tweets mentioned:
BIG news in Nevada: a Judge has allowed NV Republicans to present findings of widespread voter fraud in a Dec. 3rd hearing. Americans will now hear evidence from those who saw firsthand what happened—a critical step for transparency and remedying illegal ballots. Stay tuned.
Breaking News: NV judge agrees to hear evidence of illegal voting and allow Republicans/Trump campaign to depose those who know about the dirty deeds of campaign 2020. Big News! 🚨🚨 pic.twitter.com/53bbWGD5gY
Noncitizens likely voted at a high enough rate to alter the 2020 Electoral College tally, potentially flipping the states of Arizona and Georgia in the presidential election, according to an analysis by Just Facts, a research group.
That’s significant, and while it wouldn’t be enough to hand the election to President Donald Trump, it potentially could have made a difference. Only U.S. citizens are legally allowed to vote in federal elections.
The revised estimate, as of Monday, shows that Trump could have won 259 electoral votes if noncitizen votes were not counted. But that would likely still leave former Vice President Joe Biden with 279 electoral votes, nine votes more than the 270 needed to win.
The current electoral vote tally stands at 306 for Biden, 232 for Trump. Arizona has 11 Electoral College votes, while Georgia gets 16.
The left is actively working to undermine the integrity of our elections. Read the plan to stop them now. Learn more now >>
Just Facts first released an analysis on Nov. 8, five days after the election, that calculated a lower and upper estimate of the extent of noncitizen voting. That analysis determined that Trump could have won as few as 259 electoral votes—or as many as 285. The latter would have secured a second term.
However, as more mail-in votes were counted, Biden’s lead widened in states such Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Nevada.
Several major media outlets have projected Biden as the president-elect, but the Trump campaign is still litigating in several battleground states. The Trump team has not made noncitizen voting a significant part of its allegations of voter fraud.
The revised study estimated the number of noncitizen votes cast in the states of Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Wisconsin, Nevada, North Carolina, and Pennsylvania—all of which were closely contested on election night.
It estimated that 234,570 noncitizen votes benefited Biden across seven battleground states. That estimate did not change as more votes were counted.
“Based on the latest vote counts and the upper and lower bounds of the study results, Georgia and Arizona would flip to Trump, leaving him with 259 Electoral College votes,” James Agresti, president of Just Facts, told The Daily Signal. “Under the upper bound, Nevada gets really close, with Trump down by 3,858 votes.”
With the exception of Arizona, each of the states in question appeared to be favoring Trump until the early-morning hours of Nov. 4, but began to shift to Biden over several days. North Carolina is the only state of the seven that appears likely to go to Trump.
The Electoral College will cast its vote in 50 states and the District of Columbia on Dec. 14.
The estimate is based on the percentages of noncitizens that voted in previous elections, predicated on a 2014 study by researchers at Old Dominion University in Norfolk, Virginia, that evaluated rates of noncitizen voting in 2008 and 2010, Agresti said, applied only to the seven battleground states.
The Old Dominion study determined 6.4% of noncitizens voted in the 2008 presidential election and 3% in the 2010 congressional midterm elections, with 81% voting Democrat.
The rate was high enough to change the Electoral College vote count in 2008 (although not enough to swing the presidential election) and actually change the outcome of some congressional races, particularly the Senate race in Minnesota that year.
That race was decided in favor of Democrat Al Franken over Republican Norm Coleman by just 312 votes out of more than 2.86 million votes cast.
Agresti noted that illegal noncitizen voting is just “one type of fraud” that could have occurred in the 2020 election.
Asked about the proliferation of mail-in voting and ballot harvesting, he said, “That could certainly make it easier, with fewer checks and balances,” for a larger number of noncitizens to vote.
Last week, USA Today criticized the initial study claiming in a “fact check” column that rated the study as “missing context,” and arguing that it “relies on unverifiable estimates.”
Just Facts issued a rebuttal on Tuesday to what it called a “slanderous ‘fact check’” of its study:
The Just Facts study doesn’t claim to have the precise 2020 numbers, and is clear in its reliance on the Old Dominion study and other sources, such as a 2008 Harvard/YouGov survey, the Government Accountability Office, and the Social Security Administration, to apply data from past elections as the basis for the assumptions of the numbers this year.
Agresti noted that as many as 15% of noncitizens said they were registered to vote, based on survey data cited in the Old Dominion report.
The full extent of noncitizen voting is a problem, as demonstrated in past years in Pennsylvania, said Hans von Spakovsky, the manager of the Election Law Reform Initiative at The Heritage Foundation.
“We don’t know the full extent of the problem, but we know it is a problem,” von Spakovsky, a former member of the Federal Election Commission, told The Daily Signal. “We need to require proof of citizenship from people registering to vote.”
Election fraud is already a problem. Soon it could be a crisis. But election fraud is not the only threat to the integrity of our election system.
Progressives are pushing for nine “reforms” that could increase the opportunity for fraud and dissolve the integrity of constitutional elections. To counter these dangerous measures, our friends at The Heritage Foundation are proposing seven measures to protect your right to vote and ensure fair, constitutional elections.
They are offering it to readers of The Daily Signal for free today.
Get the details now when you download your free copy of, “Mandate for Leadership: Ensuring the Integrity of Our Election System.”
Media has been crowing over Trump’s latest legal setbacks in Pennsylvania, with public personas focusing their scorn on Trump’s attorney, Rudy Giuliani. Former New Jersey governor Chris Christie called him and his legal team a “national embarrassment.” CNN host Chris Cuomo said of Giuliani, “He became a metaphor for the campaign melting into a dark puddle of deception.”
But the all-important state is still in play, despite what the pundits say. Not only did the federal judge in Pennsylvania fail to give a hearing on the evidence before ruling to dismiss Trump’s lawsuit, legal scholars believe Trump has strong legal arguments that may prevail once the lawsuits come before the U.S. Supreme Court. Even more, the Trump team has considerable evidence for election fraud, which could call hundreds of thousands of ballots into question.
‘Winning’ Legal Arguments
Harvard professor and legal scholar Alan Dershowitz — no fan of Trump — believes Trump’s legal team has potentially “winning arguments” in Pennsylvania.
“They have two very strong legal arguments: one, that the courts changed what the legislature did about counting ballots after Election Day,” said Dershowitz on Fox News Futures with Maria Bartiromo on Monday.
“It’s a winning issue in the Supreme Court, and Justice Alito has already hinted that that’s a winning issue,” he noted.
Indeed, Alito’s opinion is shared by Justices Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch, who joined a public statement written by Alito several weeks ago on the lawsuit brought by the Pennsylvania GOP, which contests the state supreme court’s deadline extension for mail-in ballots.
“It would be highly desirable to issue a ruling on the constitutionality of the State Supreme Court’s decision before the election,” Alito wrote in his Oct. 28 statement on Republican Party of Pennsylvania v. Boockvar. “That question has national importance, and there is a strong likelihood that the State Supreme Court decision violates the Federal Constitution.”
That opinion is also shared by Justice Brett Kavanaugh, who made clear in a separate statement that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court overstepped its bounds and usurped the authority of the state legislature.
“[U]nder the U.S. Constitution, the state courts do not have a blank check to rewrite state election laws for federal elections,” Kavanaugh noted in footnote 1 in his Oct. 26 statement on Democratic National Committee v. Wisconsin, a 5–3 case that struck down a federal court’s ruling to extend the deadline for mail-in ballots in Wisconsin.
Thus, four justices are on the record indicating they’ll overturn the Pennsylvania State Supreme Court decision that rewrote state election law. Newly confirmed Justice Amy Coney Barrett, whose judicial philosophy closely matches that of the four conservative justices, is likely to join in on their opinion, leading to a 5–4 ruling striking down the state high court and tossing out the ballots in question.
While media claims only 10,000 mail-in ballots are in question, that number is disputed, as it’s unclear whether mail-in ballots received after 8 p.m. on Election Night were properly segregated from other ballots. If the counties failed to segregate those ballots, another possible remedy by the Supreme Court could be to discount all ballots counted after 8 p.m. on Election Night, when Trump was ahead by approximately 800,000 votes — leaving him the victor to capture the state’s 20 electoral votes.
Another strong legal argument, according to Dershowitz, involves the Equal Protection Clause, which protects voters from being treated differently based on their political affiliation. The Trump team has evidence that Democrats were treated favorably by election officials while Republicans were disadvantaged.
They provided evidence in their amended complaint that half a dozen Pennsylvania counties — in violation of state law — contacted Democrats to cure defective ballots before Election Day while Republican-controlled counties followed the law and did not reach out to GOP voters.
“Democratic-controlled counties violated the mandates of the Election Code and the determinations of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, advantaging voters in Democratic-heavy counties as compared to those in Republican-heavy counties,” reads the amended complaint, going on to explain how Republican voters were unfairly disadvantaged by election officials:
Democratic-controlled counties engaged in pre-canvass activities prior to November 3, 2020, by reviewing received mail-in ballots for deficiencies, such as lacking the inner secrecy envelope or lacking a signature of the elector on the outer declaration envelope. Those offending Counties then would notify those voters in order to allow them to cure their ballot deficiencies by voting provisionally on Election Day or cancelling their previously mailed ballot and issuing a replacement. In other words, those counties provided their mail-in voters with the opportunity to cure mail-in and absentee ballot deficiencies, while Republican-controlled counties followed the law and did not provide a notice and cure process.
The Trump team cited the 2000 case Bush v. Gore as support.
“The right to vote is protected in more than the initial allocation of the franchise,” the complaint notes. “Equal protection applies as well to the manner of its exercise. Having once granted the right to vote on equal terms, the State may not, by later arbitrary and disparate treatment, value one person’s vote over that of another.”
Evidence of Election Fraud
But in a blistering ruling last week, Judge Matthew Brann dismissed these claims, accusing Trump’s legal team of offering “strained legal arguments without merit … unsupported by evidence.”
According to Ellis and Giuliani, however, Brann never heard the evidence.
“His opinion made a judgment on the merits of the evidence, but he hasn’t even seen it,” said Ellis on Greg Kelly’s show on Newsmax. “That’s remarkable for a judge to pretend that he has heard all of this and make a judgment on it when he hasn’t even seen it.”
Brann, a Republican and an Obama appointee, had refused to grant Giuliani an evidentiary hearing.
“I don’t know how the judge could’ve concluded that the facts aren’t substantial when they haven’t even been presented yet,” Giuliani said on Fox News host Lou Dobbs’ show Monday. “Unfortunately, we haven’t yet gotten a fair decision. We will. We’ve got to be a little patient.”
“One fair decision, one good hearing, and this will turn all around,” he added.
In Gettysburg Wednesday, state lawmakers are holding a public hearing, with state senators offering a five-minute opening speech before witnesses who have submitted affidavits testifying to voter fraud take to the podium.
Giuliani will be speaking, and it’s rumored that President Trump will also be making an appearance.
Christine was born in Saigon, Vietnam one year before it fell to the Communists, and has lived in France and the United States. She has degrees from Notre Dame Law School and Oxford University. She is a senior producer and investigative reporter at Church Militant.
http://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.png00Church Militanthttp://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.pngChurch Militant2020-11-25 11:58:382021-10-07 21:20:18Pennsylvania Still in Play
Many US states and countries around the world are imposing another round of economic lockdowns in an effort to combat the coronavirus.
The actions are certain to come with a series of devastating unintended consequences—economic destruction, surging poverty, and mental health deterioration among them—but a new study suggests the lockdowns may not do what they are designed to do: save lives.
A new study published by Frontiers in Public Health concluded that neither lockdowns nor lockdown stringency were correlated with lower death rates.
Researchers analyzed data from 160 countries over the first 8 months of the pandemic, testing several factors—including demographics, public health, economy, politics, and environment—to determine how they are correlated with COVID-19 mortality.
“Stringency of the measures settled to fight pandemia, including lockdown, did not appear to be linked with death rate,” the researchers said.
The researchers found that the criteria most associated with a high death rate was life expectancy, though higher COVID death rates were also observed in certain geographic regions.
“Inherent factors have predetermined the COVID mortality: understanding them may improve prevention strategies by increasing population resilience through better physical fitness and immunity,” the authors said.
On one hand, the findings are astonishing. After all, the lockdowns have resulted in mass collateral damage: a global recession, millions of businesses ravaged, tens of millions of jobs lost, widespread mental health deterioration, a resurgence in global poverty, and surges in suicide.
To look at the destruction lockdowns have wrought only to learn they have failed to effectively slow the spread of the virus is maddening and, frankly, nauseating.
On the other hand, the findings shouldn’t be terribly surprising. Months ago researchers had compiled enough empirical evidence to determine how effective lockdowns were in taming COVID-19.
“…there’s little correlation between the severity of a nation’s restrictions and whether it managed to curb excess fatalities — a measure that looks at the overall number of deaths compared with normal trends,” Bloomberg’s data columnist Elaine He noted back in May.
Since then the evidence has only grown stronger. Sweden, for example, which opted to not lockdown in March, has seen its mortality ranking steadily fall throughout 2020.
In September, as it passed the US, Sweden saw its COVID mortality rate fall to 11th highest in the world. Its rate of 577 COVID deaths per million people was far better than many of its European neighbors who implemented strict lockdowns, such as the United Kingdom, Spain, Belgium, and Italy. Since then, Sweden has fallen further down the list, currently standing at 23rd in the world.
While critics of Sweden’s “lighter touch” strategy point out that its mortality rate is well above that of its Nordic counterparts Norway and Finland, many fail to realize that Norway and Finland have hadless restrictive government policies than Sweden for the majority of the pandemic.
The reality is that lockdowns come with incredible collateral damage but appear to do little if anything to actually slow down the coronavirus. This is precisely why the World Health Organization reversed course in October and began advising nations to refrain from using them.
“Lockdowns just have one consequence that you must never ever belittle, and that is making poor people an awful lot poorer,” Dr. David Nabarro, the WHO’s Special Envoy on COVID-19, observed.
Dr. Michael Ryan, Director of the WHO’s Health Emergencies Programme, offered a similar sentiment.
“What we want to try to avoid … is these massive lockdowns that are so punishing to communities, to society and to everything else,” Ryan said at a briefing in Geneva in October, adding that sometimes they are “unavoidable.”
Despite mounting evidence that lockdowns don’t work and are incredibly harmful, government officials around the world continue to push them. Why? Because lockdowns are designed to save lives and experts are unwilling to admit they are powerless to control the virus.
“One of the great mistakes is to judge policies and programs by their intentions rather than their results,” the famed economist Milton Friedman once warned.
It’s time for the intellectual class to admit a basic reality about lockdowns.
They aren’t just horribly destructive and an affront to liberty. They’re actually failing to save lives.
Jonathan Miltimore is the Managing Editor of FEE.org. His writing/reporting has been the subject of articles in TIME magazine, The Wall Street Journal, CNN, Forbes, Fox News, and the Star Tribune. Bylines: Newsweek, The Washington Times, MSN.com, The Washington Examiner, The Daily Caller, The Federalist, the Epoch Times.
http://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.png00Foundation for Economic Education (FEE)http://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.pngFoundation for Economic Education (FEE)2020-11-25 06:07:442021-10-07 21:20:19Lockdowns Not Linked With Lower COVID Death Rates, New Study Finds
Patrick Colbeck, a former candidate for Governor of Michigan and State Senator in Michigan, who has an Engineering/Computer IT/Technology background tells us how he was engaged as a Michigan Poll Watcher in the Dearborn, Michigan area and saw so many concerns for the voting machines to how they were managing the counting of the votes.
He is in touch with the legal teams to ensure Michigan voting was fair, honest, and transparent!
Patrick J. Colbeck is an aerospace engineer, author, former elected official, and former candidate for governor in Michigan. He was born October 7, 1965, in Dearborn, Michigan. Please visit Patrick’s website: https://letsfixstuff.org/.
http://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.png00Defend The Borderhttp://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.pngDefend The Border2020-11-25 05:10:532021-10-07 21:20:20ELECTION FRAUD IN MICHIGAN: Former State Senator Patrick Colbeck discusses Michigan 2020 Elections [Video]
Venezuelan immigrant Elizabeth Rogliani warns that what Democrats and the political Left are doing in America is the same thing that happened to Venezuela when the socialists took over and the country collapsed. pic.twitter.com/v0sakaWQSd
— Jason Rantz on KTTH Radio (@jasonrantz) June 29, 2020
http://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.png00The Geller Reporthttp://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.pngThe Geller Report2020-11-25 04:40:032021-10-07 21:20:20GSA Letter Forces Biden to Disclose Conflicts of Interest with Himself and His Team to ‘Foreign Nationals, and Other Foreign Agents…’
“We are not on either team.” “I did not vote for Trump”
“The odd thing is the DHS was warned of all this in August.”
” I’ve funded a team of hackers and cybersleuths and other people with odd skills. We’ve been on this since August. One side story we’ll pursue one day is DHS was warned of all this in August and September. We tried very hard to….. but it was all crammed down from high levels.
RION: The experts Byrne is funding is an elite cyber security team that has been hired by the state of Texas to investigate a series of irregularities in the Dallas elections in 2018. The team consisted of members with backgrounds in military intelligence and federal law enforcement, for instance, the electronic irregularities in Dallas 2018 was rooted in Dallas as use of Dominion voting machines.
This group has been on Dominion’s trail over two years.
BYRNE: I’ve been up there since without since August and expanding and funding further and deeper investigations. So we really, I felt, kind of had the answer when everyone woke up November 4 and saying, “what happened?”. We couldn’t quite believe we couldn’t get anyone to listen to us.
RION: Their findings include a detailed list of impossibilities Dominion machines processing more ballots than is physically possible. Real time data showing Biden vote dumps that are statistically impossible and dozens of backdoor ways in which votes by the thousands can be changed, manipulated or deleted.
BYRNE: When you’re talking about, you know, thousands of votes in a row for one candidate. Just to give you. Just to give you the mathematical odds against it. If you’re talking about a group that has a 96% percent affinity for vitamins or go magic which I’m very heavily Biden board. The chance of having 100 votes in a row for Biden if it’s not if the chance of every vote is 96% for Biden, the chance he would have 100 in a row is about 1.6%, the chances you would have 1000 in a row, goes to about a couple quadrillion to one, and the chances that you would have the kinds of numbers we were seeing were there a place where there were 10s of thousands of votes in a row for Biden, the chances are quadrillions of quadrillions of quadrillions against that could ever happen in nature
RION: You didn’t necessarily vote, you did not vote for Donald Trump. You are a libertarian
BYRNE: That’s correct.
RION: And you are doing this, why?
BRYNE: I never voted Democrat or Republican or Democrat in my life. This is about the Constitution. These are goons. If we lose this moment, the Constitution is done. We are never back. We will never have a free and fair election again.
RION: I’ve spoken to your, your guys behind the scenes, they’re very, they seem very knowledgeable and they’ve pulled incredible data and you see a clear pattern between the major swing states in this regard…
BYRNE: It’s more of a clear pattern, we know exactly what happened. its everything – its just just a matter of how quickly can we get it all built up and explained in such a way, it’s absolutely clear there’s no, there’s no, there’s no shades of gray about this,
RION: Byrne says the lecture was 100% rigged and it’s not just real time data proving this.
BYRNE: We have more more than the data we have the data. We have hundreds of affidavits. We’ve been we’ve also had people gathering and organizing that effort. And we have the, the analysis of the equipment itself so that’s really the three buckets. And we’re getting it out but first feeding it to, you know, those who want it, which are basically Sydney’s and Rudy’s people.
I want to emphasize we’re not on other team where we’re independent.
RION: To that end, Byrne as a free agent has been feeding his groups, intel and findings to any group who can use it in court against dominion, it’s supporting anyone who wants to data and
BYRNE: I’m putting it up on my own website which is called the deep capture. I’m putting these different stories and facts and write ups on there so anyone can go there and find them. But this isn’t even close I want to show people that this isn’t even close. If you could freeze time and let this all play out through the courts what would be exposed is 100% clear this whole thing was rigged.
“We are not on either team.” “I did not vote for Trump”
“The odd thing is the DHS was warned of all this in August.”
RION: As the media continue to ignore claims of election fraud. One millionaire has set out to prove their cover up in support of the truth. One America’s Chanel Rion has more.
Patrick Byrne founder and former CEO of overstock.com has long considered himself a libertarian tech entrepreneur. For now finds himself more than entrepreneur, he’s on a mission to save the Republic, from a deadly virus widespread machine, widespread software election fraud. He’s doing this by funding a niche group of experts and the Trump legal team has been listening,
BREAKING: Group files emergency petition in Wisconsin after finding 150,000 potentially fraudulent ballots
By: Just The News, August 24, 2020;
Group files emergency petition in Wisconsin after finding 150,000 potentially fraudulent ballots
“These discrepancies were a direct result of Wisconsin election officials’ willful violation of state law” – Amistad Project’s Phil Kline
The national conservative group Amistad Project filed an emergency petition Tuesday with the Wisconsin Supreme Court challenging the state’s unofficial results in the 2020 presidential election, saying it has identified over 150,000 potentially fraudulent ballots.
Results from the Nov. 3 balloting in the state show…
It ain’t over till it’s over and it’s not even close to being over.
President Donald Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani offered an explanation on why Trump’s legal team issued a statement saying lawyer Sidney Powell is not with the campaign.
“I think it’s because we’re pursuing two different theories,” Giuliani said when he was asked about the situation by Fox News host Lou Dobbs. The Trump legal team, he said, is focused on “misconduct of the election” by state officials in places like Pennsylvania, Michigan, Georgia, and elsewhere.
Giuliani argued that Trump’s constitutional rights were deprived in some of these states, and he predicted that some of their lawsuits will…
President Trump is not abandoning his supporters, and his supporters must not abandon him. President Trump’s lawyers must have the opportunity to present their evidence at the Supreme Court of the United States.
What does GSA being allowed to preliminarily work with the Dems have to do with continuing to pursue our various cases on what will go down as the most corrupt election in American political history? We are moving full speed ahead. Will never concede to fake ballots & “Dominion”.
Lin Wood Drops Late-NightBombshell: “Would someone ask my never-to-be friend Brad Raffensperger @GaSecofState if he has seen this tape of election fraud at State Farm Arena in Fulton Co., GA?”
Lin Wood and Sidney Powell have both been promising big things would be happening in Georgia very soon. It looks like Lin Wood has dropped his first bombshell tonight.
Lin Wood and Sidney Powell have both been promising big things would be happening in Georgia very soon. It looks like Lin Wood has dropped his first bombshell tonight.
In a surprise, late-night tweet, Attorney Lin Wood, who’s been warning Georgia Governor Brian Kemp (R) and GA Secretary…
Some have questioned why the Trump campaign doesn’t give the news media proof of election fraud. There are several reasons:
This evidence for election fraud is for the courts, not the media.
Releasing their affidavits to the press doesn’t help, rather it hurts their case.
The affidavits are meant to be seen by the courts.
Many of the people who have provided sworn affidavits are in fear of their lives.
We will only see these people who provided sworn affidavits when they take the stand.
However, Rudi Giuliani did appeared on NewsNOW from FOX on November 20th. Fox News Now reports:
President Trump’s personal attorney Rudy Giuliani aggressively made the case on Thursday for the Trump campaign’s legal challenge of the 2020 election results, alleging in a fiery news conference that there was a “centralized” plan to carry out voter fraud around the country. This is a different approach than the campaign has recently taken in court, where they have primarily focused on the validity of ballots and counts without asserting fraud.
If you want a good summary of all the ways Facebook is manipulating our minds and monitoring our thoughts, this new website is a good place to start. Launched in August, erasebook has posts diving into topics such as Facebook’s decision to block posts defending Kyle Rittenhouse, or even searches for “Kyle Rittenhouse,” as well as links to fundraising campaigns for Rittenhouse.
Parler’s motivation for launching its erasebook campaign is obvious enough. They want to drive people off Facebook and onto Parler. They’re up against the massive advantage Facebook has in membership, nearly three billion vs just over three million. To compete with Facebook, they’ll also have to add – to name a just a few – groups, live chat, video, and better search functions.
But it is terrific to see a well organized and ongoing assault on one of the most powerful and problematic companies in the history of the world.
http://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.png00Winston 84http://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.pngWinston 842020-11-24 08:48:182021-10-07 21:20:23Parler’s “Erasebook” Makes the Case Against Facebook
The 2020 election has been nerve-wracking, to say the least.
While I figured the Dems would play games, I never in a million years thought they’d take it so far that they made Biden – a bumbling doofus who can’t string a sentence together – the most vote-getting candidate in the history of our entire country.
I think this one tweet here sums that up nicely:
“Hillary didn’t steal enough votes and Biden stole too many !”
But the good news is…while were sweating bullets and worried about how this will all play out, WH insiders say the President is cool as a cucumber, and not worried.
As a matter of fact, he’s very confident, and to make you feel even better, he also says he’s been in a lot tougher spots than this.
From Washington Examiner
Our weekly White House Report Card finds President Trump brushing aside urgings to accept defeat to Joe Biden, instead insisting with confidence that his legal efforts will show that he won the 2020 presidential election.
Several insiders said that while the fight may look difficult, the president has no plans to give up.
“The president is extremely confident and not very bothered,” said one source. “He said that he has been in way tougher spots than this, and he’ll come through again. He’s not worried.”
This is how a real, strong leader behaves.
I know I feel much better after hearing this, and I hope you do as well.
stay strong and keep fighting – it’s not over and we will prevail.
http://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.png00The Geller Reporthttp://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.pngThe Geller Report2020-11-24 05:45:052021-10-07 21:20:23WH Insiders Say Trump is Very Confident, Not Worried…He Says He’s Been in ‘Way Tougher Spots’
BREAKING: The Third Circuit Court of Appeals has granted an expedited review for President Trump’s election lawsuit in Pennsylvania. pic.twitter.com/zwVWgxSzAo
Campaign has just hours to file a brief in the case following the court’s decision
Associated Press, November 23, 2020:
The Third Circuit Court of Appeals granted the Trump campaign’s request for an expedited review of a lower court’s decision to dismiss a lawsuit over voting in Pennsylvania.
Trump campaign attorney Jenna Ellis tweeted the news with an image of the court record Monday morning.
The appeal comes after U.S. District Court Judge Matthew Brann in Pennsylvania threw out the campaign’s lawsuit, which sought an injunction that would stop the certification of the election in Pennsylvania. Most counties in the state are expected to certify their results on Monday.
The Trump campaign argued that the Constitution’s guarantee of equal protection under the law was violated by the state when counties took different measures to inform voters of technical issues that arose with the unprecedented number of mail-in ballots.
Pennsylvania Secretary of State Kathy Boockvar, along with seven counties that were sued by the Trump campaign and where Joe Biden led, argued Trump had already raised similar claims.
The Third Circuit’s order says the Trump campaign has until 4 p.m. local time Monday to file a brief supporting its argument for overturning Brann’s decision. Boockvar has until the same time Tuesday to file theirs.
It remains to be seen whether the Third Circuit will call for oral arguments before issuing a ruling.
http://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.png00The Geller Reporthttp://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.pngThe Geller Report2020-11-24 05:31:022021-10-07 21:20:24Third Circuit Court of Appeals has granted an expedited review for President Trump’s election lawsuit in Pennsylvania
