The ‘Globalist Elite’ Threat to America by Jim McKinney

/in , , , , , , /by

Make no mistake, this election may make or break America.  We, the American people, face a crisis of national unity, national security, and national survival from an elitist, mythical dream of “globalism.”

Americans are more divided than any time since the war and race riots of the 1960’s. We are fighting among ourselves.  Over 800,000 police serve our communities – but they fear for their lives.  Our own President and Department of Justice accept false accusations against our police. They inspire protest, division, and hatred of those who protect us.  We are losing trust in the FBI, our Justice system, and the Supreme Court to act constitutionally.  We are losing faith in our elected leaders.

Our national security is at grave risk.  Russians threaten us with nuclear weapons.  Iran mocks our armed forces and laughs at billions of dollars in US payoffs for nuclear negotiations.  China spends untold amounts to buy arms and global influence, greatly improving her militarily while threating America and her allies.  200 rich, elitist, communist power brokers, ruling 1.6 billion people in China, will soon rival the US in “global” influence, economic strength and military power.

In 2008, ISIS didn’t exist.  Al Qaeda in Iraq, the fore-runner of ISIS, was on its heels.  In 4 years the ISIS “JV team” became a global terror threat.  Today, ISIS has between 80 and 120 thousand well trained, resourced, experienced, devoted and blood thirsty fighters in multiple countries.  ISIS is growing, not shrinking.  It’s spreading in North Africa, Central Asia, and Western Europe.  The Caliphate is an idea; it’s not a place.  ISIS and its many surrogates hate America.  They will not go way with a bombing campaign.

Our leadership has no effective strategy, it has no commitment, and it has no idea what to do to solve the dilemma it created in the frantic 2011 pre-election withdrawal from Iraq.   The President, with the media’s help, is desperately trying to keep the American people distracted from foreign policy disasters through this election.  Meanwhile, he and his designated successor continually speak of a fictional, peaceful, integrated “global” economic world with open borders and a bright future. 

What does this integrated “global” world do for America? US Tech giants like Google, Microsoft, Apple, and US manufacturers like Ford, GM, GE get cheap labor and open trade borders – not to better this nation, but to better their profits.  They manipulate governments with histories of bad economic managers – not equal and fair trade partners.  And they pay-off corrupt officials to get their way.

America, like the rest of the developed world, is paying the bills with a Federal Reserve credit card.  But our incomes are down.  Our national debt has increased well over 80% in 8 years.  Our growth is staggeringly low, and we have gone from a manufacturing nation to a lower wage service economy in a single generation.  We have increased the numbers of poor in this nation 3 fold in 8 years.  We can’t borrow our way out of debt.  It just doesn’t work.  This is what globalization has done for America.

While we face terrible threats from abroad, our own President encourages internal strife, divisions, and forces tolerance – Forced tolerance is the worst form of intolerance.  His global trade policies and spending increases invite bankruptcy.  He promotes a mythical vision of an integrated world, and a false narrative of his designated heir that contradicts any measure of reality.  Who could do more harm?

Our unity, our security and our survival are at risk.  Make no mistake; to the “global elite” the independence of the American voter is an impediment to their vision of open borders, unrestricted global trade, and massive profits.  Freedom of speech is a problem.  Freedom of religion is a problem.  Freedom of thought is a problem.  “We, the People” are a problem for them.

The “globalist elite” strategy is obvious.  Divide us.  Undermine our security.  Distract us.  Keep us from the polls. Cut faith in the candidate who supports America first, and accuse supporters of intolerance.  They will use our honor, our integrity and our fear against us.  And the “globalist elite,” with immeasurable financial resources, the support of media moguls, naive idealists, and pseudo intellectuals, will win – if we, the American people, allow it.

For our unity, our security and the very survival of the United States of America, we cannot allow them to win.  We, our citizens, must control our future – as intended in the founding of this great Nation – not corporate giants, foreign dictators, international trade bodies or global elitists.  Speak out, get people in the street, out of the pews, in the neighborhood, and on the job – tell your friends to vote to make America united again, vote to make America safe again, and vote to make America great again!  And vote to hold ALL candidates, right and left, accountable to the Constitution of the United States of America.  And fear not, with faith in God, America and the American people will always prevail – he will fight with us!

 

RELATED ARTICLE: Bozell: NBC ‘Guilty of Journalistic Corruption of the Highest Order’

Widers ‘Kafkaesque show trial’ to proceed over ‘fewer Moroccans’ statement

/in , , , , , /by

SkyNews reported that Geert Wilders will stand trial on criminal charges of violating the Dutch hate speech laws,”Geert Wilders hate speech charges upheld in court.” His counsel had filed a motion with the Hague court to dismiss the charges.

The case against Wilders arose  from petitions filed with the Hague prosecutors by Dutch Muslims and leftist allies that his 2014 local campaign remarks of ‘fewer  Moroccans” constituted prosecutable violations of hate speech laws in the Netherlands. Wilders’ counsel has also questioned possible bias in the three judge tribunal. Wilders had been acquitted of similar charges in a trial in the Amsterdam District Court in 2011.

The trial comes at a time where Wilders’ Freedom Party (PVV) has risen near the top of Dutch political polls close behind the ruling coalition of  PM Mark Rutte’s VVD party  in the Hague Parliament. Wilders’ counsel has also questioned the validity of the submitted petitioners that the Hague prosecutors have based their charges.

Sky News reported:

A court has upheld hate speech charges against Dutch far-right MP Geert Wilders over comments he made about Moroccans.

The leader of the Party for Freedom (PVV) sparked outrage when he asked supporters at a rally in 2014 whether they wanted “fewer or more Moroccans in your city and in the Netherlands?”

After the crowd shouted back “fewer” Mr Wilders said: “We’re going to organise that”.

The MP appealed to have the charges thrown out, but his objections were dismissed by The Hague District Court.

The comments triggered more than 6,400 complaints and criticism from within Mr Wilders’ party.

Five organisations and 56 people have registered as victims of the remarks, judges said.

Mr Wilders’ lawyers slammed the trial as a “political case” ahead of parliamentary elections in March.

They argued that the MP had merely “put forward his party’s political programme” and claimed the case could have “far reaching political consequences for democracy”.

At an earlier hearing, Geert-Jan Knoops, defending Mr Wilders, told judges that freedom of expression is “the last freedom Mr Wilders has left”.

But the court said that although politicians are entitled to freedom of expression they should “avoid public statements that feed intolerance.Judge Hendrik Steenhuis said: “Where the border lies between the two will be debated in this trial.”

He added that prosecuting Mr Wilders will “not affect his political freedoms or that of this Freedom Party”.

After the hearing, Mr Wilders claimed he was being prosecuted “for voicing the opinion of millions”.

He added: “The Netherlands is like Turkey. Displeasing political opinions are being silenced in court.”

The MP was previously cleared of five counts of inciting hatred in 2011, after he compared Islam to Nazism.

The comments caused Mr Wilders to be denied entry to the UK in February 2009 on public security grounds.

He attempted to visit anyway and was deported back to the Netherlands.

Mr Wilders later travelled to London after an immigration tribunal overturned the ban imposed by former Home Secretary Jacqui Smith.

The MP’s trial at The Hague District Court will start on 31 October.

Note our tweet regarding this latest development in the second trial of Geert Wilders for alleged hate speech:

The Gathering Storm Clouds: FBI Director Comey Warns Terrorists Heading Our Way

/in , , , , , /by

One mission of our armed services is to work with our allies to locate, engage and eliminate terrorists overseas, while domestically our law enforcement agencies are tasked with protecting America and Americans within our borders. In the wake of the deadly terror attack in San Bernardino, California, I wrote an article, “Fighting the War on Terror Here, There and Everywhere,” in which I took on the false argument that by fighting the terrorists overseas we won’t have to fight them here.

On September 26, 2016, “Business Insider” warned, “FBI director: ISIS’ loss will create a ‘terrorist diaspora’ like we’ve never seen before,” while a day later NBC reported, “FBI’s Comey: Officials Worry About ‘Terrorist Diaspora’ from Syria, Iraq.”

FBI Director Comey is predicting that simply defeating ISIS and other terror organizations overseas, while an achievable objective, would likely have unintended consequences.  He warns that as greater pressure is brought to bear against the terrorists on their turf, they will head for the West, including the United States, to create as much death and destruction as possible.

America’s borders are our first line and last line of defense against these terrorists and transnational criminal organizations. Our borders, however, include far more than the U.S.-Mexican border. Our nation has 50 “Border States.” Any state that lies along the northern or southern borders of the United States is a border state, as are those states that have access to our nation’s 95,000 miles of coastline. Finally, any state that has an international airport must, of necessity, be deemed a border state.

The official report, “9/11 and  Terrorist Travel – Staff Report of the National Commission onTerrorist Attacks Upon the United States” focused specifically on the ability of the terrorists to travel around the world, enter the U.S. and ultimately embed themselves here as they went about their deadly preparations to carry out an attack. The preface of this report begins with the following paragraph:

“It is perhaps obvious to state that terrorists cannot plan and carry out attacks in the United States if they are unable to enter the country. Yet prior to September 11, while there were efforts to enhance border security, no agency of the U.S. government thought of border security as a tool in the counterterrorism arsenal. Indeed, even after 19 hijackers demonstrated the relative ease of obtaining a U.S. visa and gaining admission into the United States, border security still is not considered a cornerstone of national security policy. We believe, for reasons we discuss in the following pages, that it must be made one.”

That report and the “9/11 Commission Report” made it clear that the multiple failures of the immigration system enabled terrorists to enter the U.S. and then embed themselves here in the country so that they could go about their deadly preparations without being detected.

For terrorists, acquiring identity documents and, especially, acquiring lawful immigration status are key to their quest to hide in plain sight. Justifiably, much concern has been expressed by Americans and some of our political leaders about the inability of our officials to vet Syrian refugees while the administration continues to admit ever more such refugees.

It is disconcerting that presidential candidate Hillary Clinton has promised that, if elected, she would greatly increase the number of such refugees she would admit into the U.S.

However, my recent article focuses on the fact that aliens who enter the U.S. without inspection, by running our borders, are not vetted at all, and their entries went unnoticed. My article was aptly titled, “Entry Without Inspection = Entry Without Vetting.”

This serious vulnerability is being ignored by both the administration and presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, who insists that if elected she would provide lawful status and a pathway to U.S. citizenship to unknown millions of such illegal aliens, who entered without inspection. The numbers would be so  huge that no interviews and no field investigations could be conducted.

When sensible people hear storm warnings that hurricanes are headed their way they may board up their windows and stock up on supplies. They may choose to evacuate altogether.

When residents of “Tornado Alley” hear blaring sirens alerting folks that tornadoes are forming, they take appropriate action and head for their storm cellars.

FBI Director Comey has sounded the alarm, but the administration and Hillary Clinton, for inexplicable reasons, continue to turn a blind eye and a deaf ear to his warnings and those of others, such as CIA Director Brennan who has warned that ISIS has embedded terrorists in refugee flows.

The time has long since come and passed for our politicians to set political goals aside and be true leaders whose primary concerns are the safety and well-being of America and Americans by taking to heart the findings and recommendations of the 9/11 Commission.

This includes enhancing border security, ending the Visa Waiver Program and ramping up the enforcement of our immigration laws from within the interior of the U.S. to arrest and remove illegal aliens, as well as weed out fraud in applications for immigration benefits.

‘Born again’ Muslim shoots two Boston police officers

/in , , , /by

Cue the stories about how this has nothing to do with Islam, and about how local mosques are now fearing an “Islamophobic backlash.”

kirkfigueroa

Kirk Figueroa

“5 Investigates: Suspect in Boston police shooting wrote of Islamic ‘rebirth,’ had several aliases,”WCVB, October 13, 2016 (thanks to Robert):

BOSTON —5 Investigates uncovered six aliases used by Kirk Figueroa, the man killed by Boston police after he shot two officers on Wednesday night in East Boston.

He took on an alias as he experienced what he called an Islamic “rebirth” in Africa.

The aliases, along with his seeming obsession with police and security, help make Figueroa a picture of contradictions and confusion: a 33-year-old man who started companies in Florida and other states focused on security and protection who yesterday nearly killed two police officers responding to a domestic violence call.

5 Investigates uncovered a job posting for “Police Protection” for one of those companies, Bailrunners. In it, Figueroa identifies himself as Muhummed Isa Al Mahdi. The ad said Al Mahdi was looking for people interested in helping him “hunt down fugitives and bring them to justice.”

5 Investigates also discovered a posting from Muhummed Isa on a website guide for mosques from October 2012. Isa wrote about his “rebirth as a baby into the Nation of Islam” following a trip to an area of Ethiopia and a mosque in South Africa.

Isa went on, writing that his unique and blessed journey was prepared and guided by Allah.

Most recently, Figueroa was using the name Kocoa Xango on social media, identifying himself as a police constable. His last post under that name came just a few hours before the fatal shooting, posting a video by Michelle Obama and then a picture of himself after getting a haircut….

RELATED ARTICLE: UK: Muslim bus driver put children’s lives at risk by stopping on busy road for prayer

Huma Abedin: The Islamist Ties of Hillary’s Closest Aide

/in , , , , , , /by

Huma Abedin was born in 1976 in Kalamazoo, Michigan. Her father, Syed Abedin (1928-1993), was an Indian-born scholar who in the early 1970s had been affiliated with the Muslim Students Association at Western Michigan University.

Huma’s mother, Saleha Mahmood Abedin, is a sociologist known for her strong advocacy of Sharia Law. A member of the Muslim Sisterhood (i.e., the Muslim Brotherhood‘s division for women), Saleha is also a board member of the International Islamic Council for Dawa and Relief. This pro-Hamas entity is part of the Union of Good, which the U.S. government has formally designated as an international terrorist organization led by the Muslim Brotherhood luminary Yusuf al-Qaradawi.

When Huma was two, the Abedin family relocated from Michigan to Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. This move took place when Abdullah Omar Naseef, a major Muslim Brotherhood figure who served as vice president of Abdulaziz University (AU), recruited his former AU colleague, Syed Abedin, to work for the Institute of Muslim Minority Affairs (IMMA), a Saudi-based Islamic think tank that Naseef was preparing to launch. A number of years later, Naseef would develop close ties to Osama bin Laden and the terrorist group al Qaeda. Naseef also spent time (beginning in the early 1980s) as secretary-general of the Muslim World League, which, as journalist Andrew C. McCarthy points out, “has long been the Muslim Brotherhood’s principal vehicle for the international propagation of Islamic supremacist ideology.” IMMA’s close ties to the Muslim World League are further evidenced by the fact that IMMA’s in-house publication, the Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs (JMMA), has long listed its officialaddress as 46 Goodge Street in London — precisely the same address as that of the Muslim World League’s London office. In one noteworthy article written by Abedin’s mother,JMMA blamed America for having brought the 9/11 attacks upon itself. Another JMMA piece, from 1999, alleged that Jewish Americans who were pro-Israel had been able to “work the [political] system” in the United States to their own advantage, and had been “greatly aided by the American memory of the Holocaust.”

It is vital to note that IMMA’s “Muslim Minority Affairs” agenda was, and remains to this day, a calculated foreign policy of the Saudi Ministry of Religious Affairs, designed, as Andrew C. McCarthy explains, “to grow an unassimilated, aggressive population of Islamic supremacists who will gradually but dramatically alter the character of the West.” For details about this agenda, click here.

At age 18, Huma Abedin returned to the U.S. to attend George Washington University. In 1996 she began working as an intern in the Bill Clinton White House, where she was assigned to then-First Lady Hillary Rodham Clinton. Abedin was eventually hired as an aide to Mrs. Clinton and has worked for her ever since, through Clinton’s successful Senate runs (in 2000 and 2006) and her failed presidential bid in 2008.

From 1997 until sometime before early 1999, Abedin, while still interning at the White House, was an executive board member of George Washington University‘s (GWU) Muslim Students Association (MSA), heading the organization’s “Social Committee.”

It is noteworthy that in 2001-02, soon after Abedin left that executive board, the chaplain and “spiritual guide” of GWU’s MSA was Anwar al-Awlaki, the al Qaeda operative who ministered to some of the men who were among the 9/11 hijackers. Another chaplain at GWU’s MSA (from at least October 1999 through April 2002) was Mohamed Omeish, who headed the International Islamic Relief Organization, which has been tied to the funding of al Qaeda. Omeish’sbrother, Esam, headed the Muslim American Society, the Muslim Brotherhood’s quasi-official branch in the United States. Both Omeish brothers were closely associated with Abdurahman Alamoudi, who would later be convicted and incarcerated on terrorism charges.

From 1996-2008, Abedin was employed by the Institute of Muslim Minority Affairs (IMMA) as the assistant editor of its aforementioned publication, the Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs (JMMA). At least the first seven of those years overlapped with the al Qaeda-affiliated Abdullah Omar Naseef’s active presence at IMMA. Abedin’s last six years at the Institute (2002-2008) were spent as a JMMA editorial board member; for one of those years, 2003, Naseef and Abedin served together on that board.

Throughout her years with IMMA, Abedin remained a close aide to Hillary Clinton. During Mrs. Clinton’s 2008 presidential primary campaign, a New York Observer profile of Abedin described her as “a trusted advisor to Mrs. Clinton, especially on issues pertaining to the Middle East, according to a number of Clinton associates.” “At meetings on the region,” continued the profile, “… Ms. Abedin’s perspective is always sought out.”

When Mrs. Clinton was appointed as President Barack Obama‘s Secretary of State in 2009, Abedin became her deputy chief of staff. At approximately that same point in time, Abedin’s name was removed from the Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs‘ masthead.

Apart from their working relationship, Abedin and Mrs. Clinton have also developed a close personal bond over their years together, as reflected in Clinton’s 2010 assertion that: “I have one daughter. But if I had a second daughter, it would [be] Huma.” In 2011, Secretary Clinton paid a friendly visit to Abedin’s mother, Saleha, in Saudi Arabia. On that occasion, Mrs. Clinton publicly described her aide’s position as “very important and sensitive.”

On July 10, 2010, Huma Abedin, a practicing Muslim, married then-congressman Anthony Weiner in a ceremony officiated by former president Bill Clinton. A number of analysts have noted that it is extremely rare for Islamic women—particularly those whose families have ties to the Muslim Brotherhood—to marry non-Muslims like Weiner, who is Jewish. Indeed, Dr. Anwar Shoeb, the highest-ranking faculty authority at the prestigious College of Sharia and Islamic Studies in Kuwait, formally declared that Abedin’s marriage to Weiner was “null and void” under the dictates of Sharia Law, which explicitly forbids matrimony between a Muslim woman and an “infidel”; in fact, Shoeb classified the Abedin-Weiner union as a form of “adultery.”

Abedin went on maternity leave after giving birth to a baby boy in early December 2011. When she returned to work in June 2012, the State Department granted her an arrangement that allowed her to do earn outside income as a private consultant, even as she remained a top advisor in the Department. This arrangement was made possible when Mrs. Clinton personally signed off on documents—dated March 23, 2012—that changed Abedin’s title from “deputy chief off staff” to “special government employee.” Abedin’s outside clients included the U.S. State Department, Hillary Clinton, the Clinton Foundation, and Teneo (a New York-based global advisory firm co-founded by Doug Band, a former counselor for Bill Clinton).

Abedin did not disclose on her financial report either the special employment arrangement or the $135,000 she earned from it, in violation of a law mandating that public officials reveal significant sources of income. In fact, her title change did not become public knowledge until May 2013. Good-government groups warned of the potential conflict-of-interest inherent in an arrangement where a government employee maintains private clients.

Documents obtained by Judicial Watch in a Freedom Of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit showed that both before and after Mrs. Clinton signed off on the special employment deal for Abedin in March 2012, Abedin repeatedly—for months on end—dodged State Department requests that she disclose financial and employment information about her husband, Anthony Weiner, who had left Congress amid personal scandal in June 2011. For details about Abedin’s repeated failures to comply with those requests, click here.

In June 2012, five Republican lawmakers (most prominently, Michele Bachmann) sent letters to the inspectors general at the Departments of Homeland Security, Justice, and State, asking that they investigate whether the Muslim Brotherhood was gaining undue influence over U.S. government officials. One letter, noting that Huma Abedin’s position with Hillary Clinton “affords her routine access to the secretary [of state] and to policymaking,” expressed concern over the fact that Abedin “has three family members—her late father, mother and her brother—connected to Muslim Brotherhood operatives and/or organizations.” Some other prominent Republicans such as John McCain and John Boehner disavowed the concerns articulated in the letters.

On February 1, 2013—Hillary Clinton’s final day as Secretary of State—Abedin resigned her post as Mrs. Clinton’s deputy chief of staff. Yet she would continue to serve as a close aide to Clinton.

On March 1, 2013, Abedin was tapped to run Clinton’s post-State Department transition team, comprised of a six-person “transition office” located in Washington.

In early March 2015, it was reported that throughout her entire four-year tenure as Secretary of State (SOS), HillaryClinton had never acquired or used a government email account, and instead had transmitted — in violation of government regulations — all of her official government correspondences via a personal email account that was housed on a private server. In addition, Abedin and Mrs. Clinton’s chief of staff, Cheryl Mills, also had email addresses on the secret server while employed at the State Department.

After Hillary Clinton announced in the spring of 2015 that she was running for president (2016), Abedin was named vice chair of the Clinton campaign.

On August 28, 2016, the New York Post published excerpts and photos from sexually explicit texting exchanges in which Weiner had engaged with two women in the summer of 2015. The next day, Huma Abedin announced that she was separating from Weiner. She said in a statement: “After long and painful consideration and work on my marriage, I have made the decision to separate from my husband. Anthony and I remain devoted to doing what is best for our son, who is the light of our life. During this difficult time, I ask for respect for our privacy.”

Huma Abedin’s brother, Hassan Abedin, has ties to the Muslim Brotherhood and is currently an associate editor with the JMMA. Hassan was once a fellow at the Oxford Center for Islamic Studies, at a time when the Center’s board included such Brotherhood-affiliated figures as Yusuf al-Qaradawi and Abdullah Omar Naseef.

Huma’s sister, Heba Abedin (formerly known as “Heba A. Khaled”), is an assistant editor with JMMA, where she served alongside Huma prior to the latter’s departure.

The Russian Connection

/in , , , , /by

Those who are talking about “a New Cold War with Russia” have never read my books and articles. The war against Western civilization began a hundred years ago, after the victory of Socialist Revolution in Russia, 1917. It is a war of Socialism against Capitalism. The war and its variety of different fronts is a reality of our life today, being used as a milestone by the ideology of Socialism against Capitalism —the subject of my writings for the last twenty years. Moreover, it is a global war, involving different religions, races, and ethnicities: from Chechnya to Aleppo, from Paris to Orlando, from Brussels to Boston. And the predator in all of the above is Russia or the former Soviet Union.

New York is one of the world’s capital, a capital of successful capitalism. Donald Trump is a representative of the famous city, a successful and famous capitalist, a face of New York. Russia hates both equally—New York and Trump. Trump is a business man in several businesses revolving around women—his callous remarks about women are expected. The scandalous material about Trump came two days prior to the second presidential debate. More will come. What a coincidence! No. It was a calculated and coordinated effort to sabotage Trump’s presidential possibility—a modus operandi, familiar to former citizens from the socialist country. I call it Stalinism or Soviet fascism—Clinton’s mafia is a conduit of that into America, which is fighting for political power 24/7…

I am a former Russian defense attorney, a Mother and grandmother from New York City. I have heard and seen Donald Trump many times on TV. For me he was as familiar as a neighbor that I had known for the last thirty years. Of course, Trump’s sex talk disturbed me, but I was ready for it. There are serious issues before our country. To grasp the recent state of events, you must know about the war and its participants.

It is for this reason, I tried to focus your attention on the Clinton Mafia in my two preceding articles, as America’s Fifth Column is working in cahoots with Russia against American interests, and the Obama/Putin joint venture is an integral part of it. For your information, the Obama/Putin joint venture had already produced a “successful” transfer of arms in Benghazi and a smooth killing of bin-Laden, and a covering-up of the true cooperation with Russia as a joint operation. The subject of the Russian connection is going on throughout all my four books and articles. For the same reason, I dedicated my two last articles to the Clintons and his strange visit to Moscow in June of 1991, two months before he had announced his run for presidency of the U.S. There are many strange events connected to the Clintons and Russia I discussed in Socialist Lies, Xlibris, 2016 and in What is Happening to America? Xlibris, 2012.

I am a Trump supporter from the start of his candidacy, and my opinion of the Clinton Mafia was revealed twenty-five years ago, when I saw Bill’s picture among young people gathered by the KGB in the Soviet Union. Since then I have been talking about the Russian connection, following the Clintons for the last twenty-five years. Please read my conversation with Rush Limbaugh taking place a few days prior to the 1992 election, pp. 567-574. Baltic Winds: Testimony of A Soviet Attorney, Xlibris, 2002

And that is my main point in WW III—the Russian Connection. It began many decades ago and continues with the Clinton Mafia–Socialist Lies presents the Truth in details. Reading it you will grasp my point of knowledge and memory discussed in the book, which is connected to the article below:

The National Review, Did Britain Fall into Putin’s Trap in Prosecuting a Russian Dissident? By CLAIRE BERLINSKI, May 11, 2016

The author has a legitimate point describing the current predicament in the world: “Having failed to finish off conclusively the Communist system, we are now in danger of integrating the resulting monster into our world. It may not be called Communism anymore, but it has retained many of its dangerous characteristics. . . . Until a Nuremberg-style tribunal passes its judgment on all the crimes committed by Communism, it is not dead and the war is not over.”

From my experience this is absolutely correct! This is the reason I am identifying “the resulting monster” that has become post-Soviet Russia and writing about Soviet Fascism for the last twenty years. Several writers have caught the scent of Fascism about the regime, but nobody researched the issue and identified the ideology I have presented. Reading my books, you will learn the secret of our Libya’s invasion and see how the Clinton Mafia and the Obama/Putin joint venture operate together against the American interests, by implementing the ideology of Soviet Fascism on our soil. Furthermore, the Clinton mafia is leading a network of the media to prevent Trump’s presidency. You can see it today, after the WikiLeaks revelations—an exclusive showdown on the Russian Connection:

BREAKING – WikiLeaks Exposes Hillary’s TREASONOUS Deal With Russia, It’s TERRIFYING, Angry Patriot, October 12, 2016

“Hillary Clinton and her liberal pundit pals reference Russia about every other sentence. They blame Vladimir Putin’s country for email hacking and a myriad of other misdeeds and then try to convince voters he and Donald Trump are embroiled in an epic bromance. Their tactic just backfired—big league! The hacked emails from Hillary’s campaign manager, John Podesta, courtesy of WikiLeaks, revealed a thread of emails detailing an intricate, intimate series of actions between members of Hillary’s election staff, the Clinton Foundation, and representatives of Russia! One of their interactions appears to have involved a quickly processed deal on uranium deposits. Iowa Senator Charles Grassley raised concerns about the deal least June. The uranium deal, which involved 25 percent of Russia’s deposits, was discussed in an email conversation between Clinton Foundation communications head, Maura Pally, and Clinton campaign chief, John Podesta, Breitbart reports.”

Hillary’s treasonous approval of the deal with Russia is obvious and the name of John Podesta, a closest and longest member of the mafia is very important in this respect. Look at the content of his emails, anti-Catholic bigotry and infiltration into the Catholic Church reminiscent of the Soviet System described by me in my four books. Now you know who has inflamed and waged the war against Christianity in America, Mr. O’Reilly was talking about. Infiltration into the Catholic Church was a prime agenda of Stalin—in fact, the Catholic Church practically does not exist in Russia any longer. I described killing and prosecutions of the Russian clergy in Socialist Lies, Xlibris, 2916 and in What is Happening to America, Xlibris, 2012.

I also, presented in the books the members of the Clinton mafia. John Podesta and his brother Tony are the closest ideological members/friends of Bill, they established the Podesta Group.  It is a lobbying and public affairs firm based in Washington, D.C. It was founded in 1988 by brothers John Podesta and Tony Podesta and has a close connection to the Obama government. An interesting fact—Tony Podesta was working at the British Petroleum, when the blast killed the people and destroyed the drilling platform in the Gulf of Mexico. All of the above connections to oil remind me of the KGB playbook used by both Podesta.

Pay attention to the American media! They are in the tank for Hillary—a carbon copy of the old Soviet media serving a one-party system.

Don’t forget about George Soros, sponsoring 187 groups, fighting the Republicans for the last 30 years— all those predators came from the same source. The Obama socialist presidency has brought drastic changes to our country and culture allowing lies and deceits to flourish, like Stalin did. Government corruption grew tremendously during the Obama presidency, becoming an institutional corruption like under Soviet Socialism. I have the impression that Obama is running America by the direction from the Russian Academy of Science, which duplicated the Soviet Socialist negative experiences. Yet, both Podesta and Hillary are blaming Trump in cooperation with Russia!? What a KGB play-book of disinformation, the famous policy of the agency…

There is a couple of words about the Republican Establishment betrayal of the Truth. It began many years ago, when President George H. Bush looked at his watch during a presidential debate in 1992 and with the help of the KGB handed over America to “Slick Willy.” A former CIA Director did not know who Bill Clinton was—a spectacular ignorance of the Republican Establishment! Paul Ryan is just a continuation of the Republican incompetence in 2016. In this crucial time he deprived and divided the Republicans of their leader Donald J. Trump. Shame on him—he has no idea of the existential threat to America coming with Hillary’s presidency…

If Trump had a good consultant on Russia, he could’ve easily exposed the Clinton mafia. Alas, the womanizing activities are diverting attention from the criminality of the Clinton Mafia. Trump also could’ve exposed the KGB playbook about the Tim Kaine connection to the Muslin Brotherhood, of which I wrote a great deal. So, Soviet fascism and WW III are marching along on American soil, to stop it knowledge is a must…

My ideas about Russia and its Ideology are confirmed by the Russian scientist, analyst, a political writer, and human rights advocate Andrey Piontkovsky–Life After Decline July 6, 2016 09:18. For your information, it was this man who told us the story of how the KGB trained Tsarnaev Brother for all six months of his stay in Russia before returning to Boston and committing the terrorist act. Here is Andrey Piontkovsky—Life After Decline:

  “…it has become painfully obvious that the USSR’s policy of perestroika had a clear agenda: The Communist Party and the KGB nomenclature would seek to convert its collective and total political power into huge private fortunes for members of the nomenclature. They did so by tailoring the mafia state to their needs, which was deprived of any market-economy institutions, and, most important, of private property as its foundation. In Russia an “owner” succeeds by exploiting through proximity to, or direct association with, the authorities who control administrative resources (e.g. over a small or not very small segment of the state), and through complete loyalty to the ruling mafia and its honchos, rather than through efficient management and competition.

Criminal Putinomics is incapable of overcoming the addiction to oil money, and even with sky-high oil/gas prices, it would only stagnate for a long period. Any kind of successful development, business initiative, or innovation is totally unthinkable under Putin’s kleptocracy.”

It is a brilliant analysis and solemn verdict to Soviet fascism and the future of Russia. Unfortunately, our academia self-blinded themselves to the ideology of Soviet fascism and wrongly interpreted the collapse of the Soviet Union. It was a collapse of Socialist economy and the Soviet system. Putin and his KGB gang rescued Soviet fascism by using Stalinist Political Correctness. It was our ignorance that gave Russia time to develop Putinism, known to me as the contemporary Soviet fascism. We repeated the mistakes again in the last two decades. I want America to learn her mistakes, because the fate of the world is in her hands… Look at the end of the Piontkovsky piece:

“Eight centuries ago, in 1206 and 1215 (by historical standards almost at the same time), in two places very distant from each other on earth, two political bibles were composed: the Great Yassa of Genghis Khan and the Magna Carta. The choice between an independent, ethnically European Russian Republic of Siberia and a reborn Mongol Empire may again be the choice for the entire world order in the 21st century: the Magna Carta or the Great Yassa. This choice will to a great extent depend on decisions made in Washington, DC.”

To be continued at www.simonapipko1.com.

RELATED ARTICLE: Here are All 25 Answers Hillary Clinton Just Gave About Her Email Server Under Penalty of Perjury

Warning: The Shackles are Off!

/in , , , , , , /by

By Wallace Bruschweiler and William Palumbo

Disclaimer: Like many pundits, despite the unusually dire times and unprecedented corruption in government, we have maintained a definite restrained tone (with great effort) through the duration of the Obama administration.  While it is usually sound advice not to show emotion in written journalism, we believe that if there was ever a time for candor, that time is now. 

  • The Media Has the media bias ever been so blatant?  Is the Republican fifth column even trying to disguise themselves anymore?  Have you ever seen a show trial in the USA such as the second presidential debate?  … the “three-on-one” – the leftist ménage-a-trois dead set against the one man standing up for sanity on the national and international stage?
  • The Shackles This week, following a brazen betrayal by the newsworthy reprobate Paul Ryan, Donald Trump said “the shackles have been taken off me.”  Note well that he did not say the more familiar “the gloves are off;” for taking off gloves calls to mind boxing, which is truly a gentlemanly sport.  “Shackles” are not for gentlemen – they’re for slaves.

We are less than a month away from the most consequential election in generations.  And slaves are what we’ll be rendered if it goes wrong.  Not only will the election decide the fate of the United States, if not the free world.  It will decide whether the United States remains part of the free world.  Consider: Obama has ignored our Constitution for the last eight years; if Hillary appoints the next justices, its death will be official (and “legal”).  Say goodbye to the Bill of Rights.  Laws criminalizing speech exist in much of the world – why should we remain unique?  The same is equally true for second amendment gun rights.

  • Rampant Stupidity Four more years implementing the current agenda spells doom across society – debt, terrorism, illegal immigration, lawlessness, rampant stupidity, stultifying regulations, and an “economy” without a pulse.  An uninterrupted leftist government for another term means a permanent voting majority – a true “one-party state,” a dictatorship – or worse, Bolshevism.  Mass immigration will forever alter the demographics, and the idea of America will be extinguished by continued brainwashing.*

Let’s be blunt:  Hillary’s candidacy does not even pass the laugh test.  She was and should still be under investigation by the FBI for mishandling classified information.  People who were working in national security and intelligence who committed similar offenses to hers are today spending time behind bars.  They are asking themselves: Why me, and not her?  Answer: Because Hillary is above the law.

The FBI’s phony recommendation not to prosecute aside, everybody with half a brain understands that the server was set up so Hillary could sell her influence at the State Department for personal profit.  Hence: the Clinton Foundation scandal, the two-faced policy positions, and the Clintons’ unexplainable wealth amassed since leaving the White House through corruption at the highest political levels.

Hillary’s an excellent, competent crook, but a totally incompetent leader.  She does very well for herself, but terribly for our country.  Despite the fact that she is blatantly pathological, and decades’ worth of reporting to prove it, the shabby media attacks Donald Trump for offensive comments on an eleven year old tape.

  • The Fifth Column Not one to take a challenge to their world-class disrepute lying down, the fifth column in the feckless Republican Party sided with Hillary and the majority of the national media.  Paul Ryan and multiple contemptible colleagues (the so-called RINOs) finally proved once and for all that they were never serious in opposing Obama.  What’s four more Obama years, right Paul?

Indeed, the only reliable ally that Trump has – other than his millions of normal (and deeply concerned) supporters – is Wikileaks.  To distract from the proof of Hillary’s criminality offered by Wikileaks, the administration conjures up an imaginary enemy in the bogeyman, a.k.a. Russia.  Yet who’s to say Wikileaks isn’t fueled by insiders with access, not Russian or other hackers?  Statistically, more than 80% of organizational theft comes from inside sources.

The media, the establishment (in both parties), and their comrades are desperately trying keep us from trusting ourselves.  For them to win, we must accept their constant propaganda.  Trump’s truth, in the crudest form possible, is a threat to them and especially their pockets.

With all the forces lined up against him, it’s worth asking: has the enemy ever been so scared as they are of Donald J. Trump and the movement he has so successfully created?

* Nowadays we often hear of political “indoctrination,” but we prefer the precise, punchy, and historically correct word – brainwashing.  Josef Goebbels showed what was possible when the State controls the media.  He would be proud of the approach taken by today’s totalitarians in America.

It’s official the radical Islamic Muslim Brotherhood is all in for Hillary

/in , , , , , , /by

According to Discover the Networks:

CAIR [Council on American Islamic Relations] promotes a radical Islamic vision, as evidenced by the fact that its co-founder Omar Ahmad told a Fremont, California audience in July 1998: “Islam isn’t in America to be equal to any other faith, but to become dominant. The Koran … should be the highest authority in America, and Islam the only accepted religion on Earth.” In a similar spirit, co-founder Ibrahim Hooper told a reporter in 1993: “I wouldn’t want to create the impression that I wouldn’t like the government of the United States to be Islamic sometime in the future.” In 2003 Hooper stated that if Muslims ever become a majority in the United States, they will likely seek to replace the U.S. Constitution with Islamic law, which they deem superior to man-made law. In the late 1980s, Ihsan Bagby, who would later become a CAIR Board member, stated that Muslims “can never be full citizens of this country,” referring to the United States, “because there is no way we can be fully committed to the institutions and ideologies of this country.”

In 2003 CAIR invested, according to its own Form 990 filed with the Internal Revenue Service, $325,000 from its California offices with the North American Islamic Trust (NAIT). According to Newsweek, authorities say that over the years “NAIT money has helped the Saudi Arabian sect of Wahhabism — or Salafism, as the broader, pan-Islamic movement is called — to seize control of hundreds of mosques in U.S. Muslim communities.” A recent study by the Center for Religious Freedom found that a very large number of American mosques teach hatred of Jews and Christians, coupled with doctrines of Islamic supremacism.

Learn more about CAIR.

CAIR released the results of a nationwide survey of Muslim voters on the upcoming presidential election indicating a likely high turnout of Muslims at the polls on November 8 – more than 70 percent of whom say they will vote for Hillary Clinton – and concern about issues such as civil rights, education, the economy, bullying, a proposed ban on Muslims entering the U.S., and national security.

Here are highlights from CAIR’s survey:

  • 86 percent of registered Muslim voters intend to vote in this year’s presidential election.
  • 12 percent of Muslim voters are still undecided about who to vote for in this presidential election.
  • 72 percent of Muslim voters said they will vote to elect Hillary Clinton, while 4 percent said they will vote for Donald Trump, 3 percent will vote for Jill Stein, and 2 percent will vote for Gary Johnson.
  • The percentage of those Muslim voters who said they are closer to the Democratic Party remained constant, from 66 percent in a similar poll taken in 2012, to 67 percent today, after having increased from 49 percent in a similar poll taken in 2008.
  • Affiliation with the Republican Party remained relatively steady at 6 percent today, 9 percent in 2012 and 8 percent in 2008.
  • 62 percent of respondents said that the Republican Party was unfriendly toward Muslims (compared to 51 percent in 2012), while 2 percent said that the Democratic Party was unfriendly (compared to 6 percent in 2012).
  • The top six most important issues to American Muslim voters are civil rights, education, jobs and the economy, protecting students from bullying and harassment, a proposed ban on Muslims traveling to the U.S., and terrorism and national security.
  • 91 percent of respondents believe that Donald Trump’s proposed temporary ban on Muslim travelers entering the U.S. is the wrong decision and only 3 percent, within the margin of error, believe that it is the right decision.
  • 85 percent of respondents believe that Islamophobia and anti-Muslim sentiment in the U.S. has increased in the past year. Moreover, 30 percent of respondents say they have experienced discrimination or profiling in the past year.
  • 82 percent of Muslim voters support Syrian refugees resettling in the U.S.
  • Almost half of Muslim voters, 47 percent, said that the U.S. did not provide enough support in the past year to combat and defeat the terror group ISIS in Iraq and Syria
  • More than half, 62 percent, of those polled attend a mosque at least once a month.
  • 66 percent of respondents say they have a four-year or graduate degree.

The Muslim Brotherhood and HAMAS linked CAIR is all in for Hillary. What does that tell you?

RELATED ARTICLE: Here are All 25 Answers Hillary Clinton Just Gave About Her Email Server Under Penalty of Perjury

Did Hillary Make Unauthorized Release of Classified Information on Bin Laden Raid?

/in , , , , , , /by

In its initial release of hacked emails from Clinton campaign manager John Podesta last Friday, Wikileaks included an extraordinary document so full of revelations that journalists are still finding new material in its depths.

Among the most explosive are quotes from a Nov. 4, 2013 speech to London Drugs in Toronto, Canada, where she appeared to reveal classified details – including sources and methods – of the hunt for Osama Bin Laden.

In her rambling account of how the “analysts and collectors and good old-fashioned spies were gathering bits and pieces of information,” Mrs. Clinton boasted that the key to allowing the U.S. to track Bin Laden to Abbottabad, Pakistan, was an NSA intercept of a cellphone call from a former Bin Laden bodyguard.

“He had just made a phone call,” she said. “Then we need to follow him. And that is how we found this compound in Abbottabad.”

I suppose Mrs. Clinton figured it was the kind of sexy detail former government officials get paid $250,000 to include in a speech.

The New York Post first noticed the bin Laden information on Sunday, but buried it in a longer account on the Wall Street transcripts.

FoxNews National Security correspondent Catherine Herridge worked her sources at the CIA on Tuesday, but they refused to comment whether the disclosure had been “authorized.”

Without official authorization, the leak by Mrs. Clinton of sources and methods of the Bin Laden investigation would be an open and shut violation of U.S. criminal statutes. For example, 18 U.S. Code §798 punishes anyone who “knowingly and willfully communicates… any classified information… concerning the communication intelligence activities of the United States.”

The U.S. government has indicted former NSA consultant Edward Snowden under the same statute, and has prosecuted a number of intelligence officers in recent years for similar offenses.

The almost casual release of highly classified intelligence information in a paid speech is just another example of Mrs. Clinton’s disregard for our nation’s secrets and her duty to protect them.

The FBI reported that its investigation into Mrs. Clinton’s private email server found 81 email chains that “contained classified information ranging from the CONFIDENTIAL to TOP SECRET/SPECIAL ACCESS PROGRAM levels at the time they were sent between 2009-2013.” Clinton staffers presumably stripped the classified headers off those emails before sending them to Mrs. Clinton, since the FBI found only three emails that still bore classified markings.

Mrs. Clinton, of course, was not the first to reveal classified details of the hunt for Bin Laden.

Just days after the night-time raid that killed Bin Laden, Vice President Joe Biden publicly applauded “our brave Navy SEALs” for killing Bin Laden.

As I wrote in Dark Forces: the Truth About What Happened in Benghazi, Biden’s loose lips outraged then Secretary of Defense Robert Gates, who publicly chastised him for putting family members of the Navy SEALs in danger.

Six weeks later, at an awards ceremony at CIA Headquarters on June 24, 2011, then CIA director Leon Panetta disclosed the specific unit that had carried out the raid and its commander, even though a producer of the Hollywood film Zero Dark Thirty was present. Family members of SEAL Team 6 members on board Extortion 17, the call-sign for a Special Forces helicopter that was shot down by the Taliban on August 6, 2011 in Afghanistan’s Tangi valley, have blamed Biden and Panetta for their revelations.

The 80-page document of “flags” from Hillary Clinton’s previously “secret” paid speeches was compiled by her speaker’s bureau, the Harry Winston Agency (“HWA”), into an alphabetized list of subjects, ranging from “Awkward” to “Wall Street,” and included Hillary’s position statements on “helping corporations.”

In the cover email, sent to John Podesta, Jennifer Pamieri and other top aides in January, Hillary aide Tony Carrk singled out eleven broad areas where Mrs. Clinton’s statements appeared to be at variance with her campaign positions and required “an extra scrub with Policy.”

Carrk apparently didn’t consider the Bin Laden comments noteworthy enough to include in those highlights, which is why it has taken reporters so long to comb through the lengthy attachment.

The Bin Laden comments can be found in a section titled “Government Surveillance.” The staffers at the speaker’s bureau who pulled the quote from her remarks to the Canadian drug group headlined it, “Hillary Clinton Said Bin Laden Was Found By Intercepting A Phone Call, Not From A Walk in Tip.”

Protecting sources and methods is one of the most serious obligations of anyone in government with access to classified information, because divulging them can get people killed.

Mrs. Clinton has shown by her behavior that she is not trustworthy and should not be given access to classified information in the future. That alone should disqualify her from the presidency.

RELATED ARTICLE: Here are All 25 Answers Hillary Clinton Just Gave About Her Email Server Under Penalty of Perjury

RELATED VIDEO: Hillary Clinton – A Career Criminal

EDITORS NOTE: This column originally appeared on the DailyCaller.com website.

Election 2016: The Threat of Immigration Anarchy Hangs in the Balance

/in , , , , , , /by

Election Day is rapidly approaching. In considering what is at stake, it is important to understand that, as I recently noted, “The Three Most Important Issues For 2016: Immigration, Immigration, Immigration.”

Most polls skew how the concerns of the majority of Americans are reported by the media. Most Americans are most concerned about the threats posed by terrorists and criminals.  All too many Americans fear losing their jobs and are concerned about the opportunities that their children will have in these United States. Generally, when polls and surveys are conducted, participants cannot pick more than one item that they consider to be the most important issue. When those polled need to decide what is their biggest worry, they tend to ignore the fact that failures of the immigration system profoundly undermine national security and have a huge impact on nearly every other issue of great concern.

In the Orwellian world of politics and journalism, cities that violate our immigration laws by shielding illegal aliens from detection are referred to as “sanctuary cities.” I addressed the threat that such jurisdictions create in my article, “Terrorism, Enclaves and Sanctuary Cities: How sanctuary cities facilitate the growth of terror enclaves in America.”

In point of fact, on October 3, 2016 the New York Times ran an article with the breathless title, “Millions at Risk of Deportation as Justices Refuse to Rehear Case.”

The “millions at risk” are aliens who either entered the United States without inspection. In the parlance of immigration enforcement personnel, such aliens are referred to as Entrants Without Inspection (EWI).  They were not vetted and their presence in the United States is a violation of our laws that are supposed to prevent the entry of aliens who pose a threat to the safety and/or well-being of Americans.

Such “at risk” aliens also include those who, subsequent to being admitted into the United States, went on to violate the terms of their admission by remaining in the United States beyond their authorized period of admission if they were admitted as non-immigrant (temporary) visitors.  Foreign students who fail to attend school or fail to maintain proper grades are subject to removal.  Aliens who take jobs for which they lack authority are subject to removal, as are aliens who are admitted under the provisions of temporary work visas and fail to report for those jobs or leave those authorized jobs, but remain in the United States without permission.

Finally, aliens who commit a variety of serious crimes may be subject to removal even if they were admitted as lawful immigrants.

Would the New York Times run a report about efforts to get more drunk drivers off the road by saying that stepped-up police efforts to identify and arrest drunk drivers put those drunk drivers “at risk” of arrest? It is more likely they would accurately report that such enforcement programs were aimed at making our roads safer.

Aliens who work illegally, it must be noted, are likely displacing American and/or lawful immigrant workers. In this faltering economy where so many Americans are unemployed and under-employed, a job is a valuable commodity.  Somehow the nonsense spewed by the media makes it appear that there is nothing wrong with aliens who are present in the United States provided that they are working, even if they have stolen the jobs of hard-working Americans.

Additionally, every year hundreds of billions of dollars are wired or otherwise sent from the United States to the home countries of aliens working legally and illegally in the United States, hobbling our economy and driving up our national debt.

Our immigration laws are not about bias, but about protection — protection for America and Americans.

Claiming that Obama sought to “protect” illegal aliens through his executive orders and misuse of “prosecutorial discretion” is as Orwellian as it gets.  The same could be said of “sanctuary cities.”

If our government ought to be protecting anyone, it should be the citizens of the United States. Our government should be seeking to protect victims of crimes committed by aliens who have no right to be present in the United States and American workers who are displaced by foreign workers.

It is essential to note that often the victims of criminal aliens are members of the ethnic immigrant communities in which these criminal aliens live.

When illegal aliens evade the inspections process, there is no record of their entry.  We don’t even know that they are here. This is a matter of national security.

Nevertheless, Hillary Clinton would, if elected president, fill the current vacancy at the Supreme Court presumably with an appointee who would be predisposed to support her proposed massive amnesty program.

There would be no way to interview those millions of illegal aliens or conduct field investigations to verify their identities, entry data and other pertinent facts.

There would be no way to even know if they are actually citizens of the countries they will have claimed to be citizens of. There will be no way to verify their true identities or when they actually entered the United States.  All that the beleaguered adjudications officers of USCIS (United States Citizenship and Immigration Services) would have to go by are the responses that these aliens provided in their applications.

It would be relative child’s play to defraud this system. It was noted by the 9/11 Commission that immigration fraud and visa fraud were the key methods by which terrorists enter the United States and embed themselves.

Having raised the issue of fraud, the Daily Caller ran an article on October 3, 2016 showing that the lack of integrity of the immigration system apparently mirrors the lack of integrity demonstrated repeatedly by Ms. Clinton.  The title of that article was, “EXCLUSIVE: DHS Refuses To Investigate Top Official Who Fast-Tracked Visas For Hillary’s Brother.”

This hard-hitting news report began with this excerpt:

Both the Department of Homeland Security and the Office of Government Ethics have refused to fully pursue an ethics investigation against Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton’s brother, Tony Rodham, and now-Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe, despite findings that DHS official Alejandro Mayorkas gave preferential visa treatment to a company founded by Rodham.

This is likely a breach of federal law.

The DHS’s inspector general determined in 2015 that Deputy Secretary Mayorkas, who at the time served as director of Citizenship and Immigration Services, had improperly involved himself in fast-tracking visa applications under the E-5 investor visa program for Rodham and McAullife’s company GreenTech Automotive, which McAullife was involved in four years before he became the governor of Virginia in 2013.

Federal regulations state that the director of the Office of Governmental Ethics (OGE) “may recommend” that the head of an agency launch an investigation if the OGE director “has reason to believe” a violation has taken place. These regulations also empower the agency to take “appropriate disciplinary or correction action.”

The article concluded this way:

In other words, neither agency filed reports on Mayorkas’ major ethics violations.

Rodham launched GreenTech Automotive in 2010. The company has in large part been financed by EB-5 investors, in addition to receiving millions in support from Mississippi and the U.S. government. The EB-5 funding came through Gulf Coast Management LLC, which Rodham operated. When Hillary Clinton served as secretary of state, Rodham traveled through China funneling investment through Gulf Coast via the EB-5 program into GreenTech.

Still, the company has not sold a single electric car and has only manufactured 25 vehicles, even though it projected the production of 30,000 cars every year since 2014 and after. The type of car GreenTech has produced, called MyCar, can’t go any faster than 25 miles an hour because of regulations.

GreenTech is also currently being investigated by the Securities and Exchange for securities fraud, the details of which are unknown.

Neither the DHS, nor OGE responded to a request for comment from The Daily Caller News Foundation.

For all too many of our corrupt politicians, the lack of integrity to the immigration system is a cash cow.

For terrorists, it is something quite different.

As noted in a Washington Post article written by Bob Woodward, “In Hijacker’s Bags, a Call to Planning, Prayer and Death,” for terrorists, the failures of the immigration system open the doors to terrorists. Take, for instance, these chilling words found in the notebook of Mohamed Atta, the ringleader of the terror attacks of 9/11, quoted in Woodward’s article:

“Oh, God, open all doors for me. Oh God who answers prayers and answers those who ask you, I am asking you for your help. I am asking you for forgiveness. I am asking you to lighten my way. I am asking you to lift the burden I feel.

“Oh God, you who open all doors, please open all doors for me, open all venues for me, open all avenues for me.”

Metaphorically, America’s doors are found at our nation’s 325 ports of entry.  Most of those terrorists were admitted into the United States through those “front doors” and thousands of innocent people were slaughtered.

Those “doors” were also open to the other terrorists who subsequently went on bloody, murderous rampages at Boston, San Bernardino and elsewhere.

Our borders and our immigration laws are our first line of defense and our last line of defense.

EDITORS NOTE: This column originally appeared in FrontPage Magazine.

VIDEO: Paris 2016 ‘Scenes from the Apocalypse’ — The Muslim Migrant Infestation

/in , , , , , , , /by

Culture shock – if you are planning a trip to France, you will have low airfares and hotel costs because quite simply, you will be traveling to a dying nation.  The flood of Muslims into France already has damaged the country almost to a point of no return.

The below video and accompanying photos will show you just one section of the city – the Avenue de Flandres near the Stalingrad Metro Station, a slice of the city that has already experienced the devastation of uncontrolled mass migration of Muslims who share nothing in common with the country in which they have invaded; excuse me, migrated.  The photos are surreal.

Wake-up America because the same plan is unfolding here in our country.  The crime, severe assaults bordering on major and massive civil unrest, the degradation as already experienced across Europe are planned for America.

migrants-paris-3-e1458373835488

Muslim migrants on the Avenue de Flandres, 19th Arrondissement

The Paris you know or remember from adverts or brochures no longer exists. While no part of Paris looks like the romantic Cliches in Hollywood movies, some districts do resemble post-apocalyptic scenes of a dystopian thriller.

This footage, taken with a hidden camera by an anonymous Frenchman in the Avenue de Flandres, 19th Arrondissement, near the Stalingrad Metro Station in Paris as well as areas in close proximity, shows the devastating effects of uncontrolled illegal mass immigration of young African males into Europe. I compiled the clips and used some fitting music.

If it weren’t for the somewhat working infrastructure, the scene might as well have been the setting of movie shooting – or a slum in Mogadishu. The streets are littered in garbage, the sidewalks are blocked with trash, junk and mattresses, thousands of African men claim the streets as their own – they sleep and live in tents like homeless people.

20160916001283460265-original_800x600If no portable toilets are in reach, open urination and defecation are commonplace. Tens of thousands of homeless Illegal immigrants, undocumented or waiting for a decision of their asylum application, waste away trying to pass the time in the city. Although their prospects of being granted asylum as Africans are bleak, they’re hoping for a decision that would grant them an apartment, welfare and make France their new home.

The conditions are absolutely devastating. The police have given up trying to control these areas, the remaining French people avoid the areas at all cost, crime and rape is rampant, just recently mass brawls and riots made the news as fights broke out near the Stalingrad metro station.

If current trends continue and the French become minority in their own capital in even more areas, scenes like this might spread to areas frequented by tourists, forever changing the last romantic parts of Paris that match what most people have in mind when they think of the iconic city.

‘No to wall, Islam or die’ painted on San Antonio church in Arabic

/in , , , , /by

“He said he wasn’t sure if the vandalism had anything to do with Donald Trump’s signature presidential campaign promise to build a wall on the U.S.-Mexico border.”

Sure, and no doubt it also has nothing to do with Islam.

“‘No to wall, Islam or die’ spray painted on San Antonio church entrance,” by Caleb Downs, Dallas Morning News, October 11, 2016:

Police are investigating the defacement of a San Antonio church after vandals spray painted “No to wall” and “Islam or die” next to the entrance of the church.

An unidentified symbol is underneath the words spray painted onto Gethsemane Lutheran Church in the 600 block of Avalon Street, the San Antonio Express-News reports.

Eric Miletti, the pastor of Gethsemane Lutheran Church, told the Express-News he first noticed the graffiti Monday morning.

He said he wasn’t sure if the vandalism had anything to do with Donald Trump’s signature presidential campaign promise to build a wall on the U.S.-Mexico border….

RELATED ARTICLES:

Sweden: Muslim migrants gang-rape wheelchair-bound woman

Huffington Post: “Islam Isn’t Just Compatible With Western Values, It Fully Endorses Them”

Wanted: ‘Infuriated young men’ to join ISIS

/in , , , , , , /by

While the mainstream media will likely report this as a sign that ISIS is not truly Islamic, one can only wonder what is actually being discussed in Europe’s prisons, given the shocking numbers of how many Muslims are imprisoned in Europe.

Keep in mind:

Belgium – 35% of inmates are Muslim
UK – 44% of high-security inmates are Muslim
France – 70% of inmates are Muslim
Spain – 70% of inmates are Muslim
Germany – 30% of inmates “foreign”

“Studie: IS wirft ein Auge auf Europas Gefängnisse”, Krone.at , October 11, 2016:

Study: ISIS is using Europe’s prisons to recruit future jihadists

In Europe’s prisons, radical Islam is becoming more and more of a threat. The prisons have evolved into recruiting centers for jihadists, according to a study by the International Centre for the Study of Radicalisation (UK). The study looked into the developments of 79 jihadists from Belgium, the UK, Denmark, France, Germany, and the Netherlands. 57 percent of those investigated were imprisoned before radicalization. A minimum of 27 percent became radicalized in prison.

The Islamic State’s recruitment is not as focused on colleges or mosques as it is on criminals and those who are from lower economic backgrounds. In prisons it is easy to find “infuriated young men” who are “ripe” for radicalization. Jihadists can fall back on their reliable skills in weapons training and criminal fundraising.

Since 2011, approximately 5000 people from Western Europe traveled to the Middle East to join jihadist groups.

RELATED ARTICLE: Germany: Manhunt on for Muslim migrant who plotted airport jihad massacre

WIKILEAKS: Saudis and Qatar funding the Islamic State — and the Clinton Foundation

/in , , , , , /by

Hillary Clinton, in a leaked document, is quoted as saying:

“While this military/para-military operation is moving forward, we need to use our diplomatic and more traditional intelligence assets to bring pressure on the governments of Qatar and Saudi Arabia, which are providing clandestine financial and logistic support to ISIL and other radical Sunni groups in the region.”

This report adds: “The Clinton campaign has not replied to a Daily Caller inquiry about whether the Clinton Foundation will return donations from these two nations that, according to Hillary Clinton, fund ISIS.”

In another recently leaked communication, Hillary displayed what she really thinks about Muslim refugees by expressing her concerns about “legitimate refugees” because (in her words)  “they can’t possibly vet all those refugees….so they don’t know if, you know, jihadists are coming in along with legitimate refugees. Turkey for the same reason.”

If it weren’t for leaked documents, no one could begin to assess the real Hillary beneath her contrived smiles and hyper-welcoming rhetoric about Muslims and Muslim refugees.

hillary

“Hillary In Leaked Email: Saudi Arabia And Qatar Are Funding ISIS”, by Alex Pfeiffer, The Daily Caller, October 10, 2016:

Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton sent an email to her campaign chairman John Podesta in 2014, who was then-counselor to President Barack Obama, that said Saudi Arabia and Qatar are both giving financial and logistical support to the Islamic State and other extremist Sunni groups, according to a recent Wikileaks release.

Clinton sent the email on August 17, 2014 to Podesta. It was an eight-point plan to defeat ISIS in Iraq and Syria. Clinton’s email said that the United States should support Kurdish forces on the ground with U.S. military advisers and avoid the use of a conventional ground operation.

“While this military/para-military operation is moving forward, we need to use our diplomatic and more traditional intelligence assets to bring pressure on the governments of Qatar and Saudi Arabia, which are providing clandestine financial and logistic support to ISIL and other radical Sunni groups in the region,” Clinton wrote.

The former secretary of state added: “This effort will be enhanced by the stepped up commitment in the [Kurdish Regional Government]. The Qataris and Saudis will be put in a position of balancing policy between their ongoing competition to dominate the Sunni world and the consequences of serious U.S. pressure.”

The email from Clinton to Podesta contains a similar format of previous intelligence reports Clinton ally Sidney Blumenthal would send to the former secretary of state. The Daily Caller has previously reported how Clinton had previously asked aides to remove markings showing Blumenthal wrote the reports before sending them to White House officials.

The August 2014 email that pointed the finger at Saudi Arabia and Qatar does not contain any information linking it to Blumenthal in particular and is sent from one of Clinton’s personal emails. The batch of Wikileaks emails has not been independently verified by TheDC. However, Clinton and her spokesman Brian Fallon did not dispute the legitimacy of leaked speech transcripts released by Wikileaks at Sunday’s debate.

TheDC reached out to the Clinton campaign and asked if they dispute the legitimacy of the email, but they have not responded. The Daily Caller also emailed Blumenthal asking if he authored the memo, and he also did not respond.

Qatar has given between $1 million and $5 million to the Clinton Foundation and Saudi Arabia has donated upwards of $25 million dollars to the Foundation.

The Clinton campaign has not replied to a Daily Caller inquiry about whether the Clinton Foundation will return donations from these two nations that, according to Hillary Clinton, fund ISIS.

In 2010, Clinton’s top aide said that the up to $60 billion weapons transfer of fighter jets and helicopters to Saudi Arabia was a “top priority.” …..

Video: Robert Spencer on why there is no end in sight in the defense against the global jihad
Kenya: Muslims murder six, injure dozens in jihad attack targeting Christians

Islamic Appreciation Month comes to the University of Florida

/in , , , , /by

Islam Appreciation Month has arrived on campus at the University of Florida:

Maria Ilyas, 20, president of Islam On Campus, said the purpose of the event is to clear misconceptions about Islam and Muslims.

“We’re trying to bring an awareness and appreciation to who Muslims are and what Islam is really about….

Another Muslim student also commented:

Daniel Khokar, 18, who identifies as Muslim, said the event means a lot to him because it gives him a sense of belonging.

It is right that every innocent Muslim, as well as any member of any group, should feel a sense of belonging, but a sense of entitlement is not the equivalent of a sense of belonging. There are Hindus, Buddhists, Sikhs, Bahai students too; and there are also Jews on campuses who are treated with contempt and intimidation by jihadist Muslim groups operating right under the noses of university administrators. Shame on the University of Florida for this outright preferential treatment for Muslims over any other group.

Islamic Heritage Month was recently declared in Ontario, also to make Muslims feel better, with the objective of combating “Islamophobia,” despite the fact that no stats bear out that “Islamophobia” is a significant problem. Muslims are the ones attacking Westerners, and despite this fact, the targeting of Muslims remains minimal, which demonstrates the exceptional evolution of the West in terms of tolerance. Sadly, however, blacks and Jews remain by far the greatest groups targeted by hate crimes.

If Muslims collectively want to feel more included, then they would also collectively (and openly) condemn all forms of jihad (stealth and violent), as well as anti-West and anti-Israel hate messages globally, and the hate that is routinely being preached in mosques, Islamic centers and madrassas right on Western soil.

uf-islam-on-campus

“UF’s Islam on Campus to begin celebrating Islam Appreciation Month today”, by Rick Garcia,Florida Alligator, October 11, 2016:

UF’s Islam On Campus is hosting Islam Appreciation Month this fall in lieu of its annual fundraiser.

The month long celebration is starting with Islamapalooza, formerly named Islam Fair, on the Plaza of the Americas today from 10 a.m. until 3 p.m., and it will continue Wednesday from 10 a.m. until 3 p.m. The event will feature booths where students can get henna tattoos, play trivia about Islam and eat falafels, pita and samosas.

Nahal Khamisani, the secretary of Islam On Campus, said they decided to host the monthlong celebration this Fall after renovations to the Stephen C. O’Connell Center prevented them from having the annual Fast-A-Thon fundraiser, which normally happens in the Fall. They plan on hosting the fundraiser in the Spring, but wanted to spread out the organization’s big events, Khamisani said.

“(Islamapalooza) highlights a lot of the cultural aspects of Islam while getting the community at UF excited with incentives like free henna and food,” the 19-year-old UF psychology sophomore said.

Maria Ilyas, 20, president of Islam On Campus, said the purpose of the event is to clear misconceptions about Islam and Muslims.

“We’re trying to bring an awareness and appreciation to who Muslims are and what Islam is really about,” the UF microbiology senior said.

Daniel Khokar, 18, who identifies as Muslim, said the event means a lot to him because it gives him a sense of belonging…….

RELATED ARTICLES:

Muslim arrested for threats at DC airport, causing disturbances in Boston — left Qur’an on steps of public building

Video: Robert Spencer on why there is no end in sight in the defense against the global jihad