No, Trump Should Not Accept the Results of a Possibly Stolen Election

Crooks on the left, cowards on the right. Where do we go to find integrity?

One of the most talked about parts of last night’s final presidential debate was Donald Trump’s statement that he’d let us know on election night if he’d accept the balloting results. An NBC commentator expressed her bubble-headed opinion that the statement lost him the election. Worse still, “conservative” commentator John Podhoretz wrote that Trump’s comment was “a shocking and cravenly irresponsible thing to say, the sort of thing that threatens to rend our national fabric, and for that alone, Trump has earned his place in the history of American ignominy.” But Podhoretz’ criticism is what’s shocking and cravenly irresponsible — and reflective of profound ignorance.

Are some of us living in an alternate-reality universe? We just saw NYC’s Democrat election commissioner, Alan Schulkin, caught on video admitting “there’s a lot of vote fraud,” as he talked about how people are “bussed” around to vote illegally. This was followed by a Project Veritas sting video showing a Democrat operative slug named Scott Foval giving advice on how to commit the fraud, saying that it has been going on for 50 years and that it “doesn’t matter what the friggin’ legal and ethics people say, we need to win this m****rf****r.” There was also the WikiLeaks released email showing that Clinton allies, also Democrats, presumably, believe that Obama forces committed vote fraud in 2008. Then there’s another WikiLeaks email in which Clinton campaign manager John Podesta wrote that “if you show up on Election Day with a drivers [sic] license with a picture [and 12 states and D.C. allow illegals  to get licenses], attest that you are a citizen, you have a right to vote in Federal elections.” Add to this the 2012 Pew study showing that approximately “24 million — one of every eight — voter registrations in the United States are no longer valid or are significantly inaccurate. More than 1.8 million deceased individuals are listed as voters. [And] [a]pproximately 2.75 million people have registrations in more than one state,” and what does it add up to?

That the John Podhoretzes of the world are, through their cowardice and sins of omission, hurting our republic.

Reality # 1: There is vote fraud.

Reality # 2: Since there’s vote fraud, it’s possible an election — especially a close one — could be stolen.

Yet the three-little-monkey coward-cons think that, somehow, it’s noble and healthy to view a possibly stolen election and say “Nothing to see here; move along.” Maybe if we pretend hard enough, everything will be okay.

I have no idea how Trump’s statement will play out, given that he didn’t explain the matter well and we have coward-cons doing the jobs (real) Americans wouldn’t do, but I suspect the average person doesn’t share Podhoretz’ concern over violation of a twisted view of propriety. But here’s the answer I would have given debate moderator Chris Wallace when he stated, to Trump, that we have a “tradition” in this country of a peaceful transfer of power:

Yes, sir, and we have another American tradition: it’s called the “rule of law.” And when you suspect an election has been stolen, and allow it to go unanswered, you become complicit in the undermining of our rule of law. Moreover, vote fraud that swings an election thwarts the people’s will. You may not care about that. Hillary Clinton certainly doesn’t care about that. But if I have reasonable suspicion that the Nov. 8 contest has been stolen, I will stand against the thwarting of the rule of law and the people’s will — even if I’m the only person in America to do it.

In addition, what is Wallace talking about? Trump isn’t proposing that tanks roll into Washington, D.C., and forcibly extract usurpers of power. He’s talking about what has happened before — most recently when Democrat Al Gore contested the 2000 election — and what Hillary Clinton wouldn’t hesitate to do if she thought it would benefit her. And did the punditry say that Gore rent America’s fabric and earned his place in the history of American ignominy?

I cannot tell you how disgusting I find the coward-cons’ cravenness. It is, sadly, a common failing of man to prefer to rationalize, or stick one’s head in the sand, than to face up to tough challenges and hard truths. This is the mentality causing coward-cons to tell Sheriff Joe Arpaio not to look into Obama’s birth certificate and judges to refuse to hand down anti-establishment rulings for fear of opening “that can of worms.” But tolerating criminality gets you more criminality. This is, mind you, a hallmark of Third World nations. Corruption is rife, tolerated, and many pretend it isn’t going on. You want to descend fully into Third Worldism? Listen to the coward-cons.

What the coward-cons miss, in their infinite lack of wisdom, is that unanswered corruption means our national fabric is already being rent.  And their prescription is to allow corruption to fester, to grow, to become status quo? It’s as with cancer: attacking it early involves some pain, perhaps enduring nauseating treatments or an operation to excise a malignant tumor. But ignoring it, refusing to face reality, means a metastasis that will consume the whole body and lead, ultimately, to death. Tolerate a bit of visible rending now — or risk having nothing left to rend later.

The coward-cons are the people who get elected to office…and then get nothing done; they’re the weak sisters who never saw a culture-war battle they couldn’t lose. If you suspect your vote has been negated by electoral fraud, would you want those charged with ensuring the system’s integrity to look the other way? Or would you want the matter sifted to the very bottom?

If the coward-cons would choose the former, then they’ve earned their place in the history of American ignominy.

Contact Selwyn Duke, follow him on Twitter or log on to SelwynDuke.com

ISIS Leader ‘Vote Hillary’ — Those who vote for Donald Trump are ‘infidels’ and ‘goat f—-ers’

World News Daily Report published the following:

isis-hillary

Amadh Abu Makmud Al-alwani

Top ISIS leader now believed to be the number two behind the terrorist organization, Amadh Abu Makmud Al-alwani, put up a video this week following the second presidential debate asking American Muslim voters to support Hillary Clinton.

The controversial video that was taken down by YouTube only hours after it was uploaded showed top ISIS leader Amadh Abu Makmud Al-alwani threatening those who would decide to vote for Donald Trump and calling them “infidels” and “goat f—-ers”.

“ All Muslims who will show support for the dog-faced Trump are guilty of masiya (mortal sin) ”

– ISIS No.2 leader, Amadh Abu Makmud Al-alwani

He also claimed that even if Hillary was a woman and a “two face devil”, had the “charm of a pig” and was “treacherous as the snake”, that the Democratic presidential hopeful was at least in league with the “allied countries of the Islamic state” such as Turkey, Saudi Arabia and Qatar.

Supporting the “dog-faced” Trump

Al-alwani also warned all Muslims not to take his warnings lightly and that supporters of Trump would be severely punished on earth and in Jannah (afterlife).

“Trump is a dog, he is the scum of the earth. He boasts that he will take our oil and join Russia, Syria and the Shia Iranians against us in our holy fight” he added, visibly angry.

Read more.

DOCUMENTARY FILM: Hillary Clinton Body Count — Serial Killer for President!

This is the definitive documentary on the Hillary and Bill Clinton killing spree that has been ongoing since they burst onto the scene in Arkansas. A trail of dead and mysterious deaths surround the Clinton’s and I document 114 and more deaths in this film that they are directly connected to. Hill and Bill are Illuminati puppets, that are killing off anyone who might expose the 4th branches operations.

Bill and Hillary are some of the most proficient serial killers of all time and need to be put into prison immediately.

Please enjoy the film!

RELATED VIDEOS:

What Really Happened Article: http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/RAN…

Bill Clinton Leaving Ron Brown’s Funeral: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pr8Y9…

VIDEO: Full Final Presidential Debate with Louder with Crowder Commentary

You are watching the Louder with Crowder Live streaming of the FINAL presidential debate. Enjoy the commentary and play along with the drinking game if you dare.

EDITORS NOTE: Watch more Louder with Crowder videos at http://louderwithcrowder.com. Follow Steve on Twitter: https://twitter.com/scrowder, like him on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/stevencrowde… and follow him on Vine: https://vine.co/u/1136892885917368320

Former Bernie Sanders Super PAC Director Unhappy with Lack of Support from Bernie Sanders Team

WASHINGTON, DC /PRNewswire/ – New World Order Politics interviews the founder and former chief director Cary Lee Peterson, an American lobbyist about his past works as the treasurer and chief director for Ready for Bernie Sanders 2016 (renamed Americans Socially United due to FEC regulations for presidential candidates) speaks out on the aftermath of his patriotic pursuit to exploit a very seasoned, yet very unpopular senator from New England.

Cary Peterson (36) comments, “Two years ago I was a regional director for National Independent American Party and I believed in Sanders’ policy and politics. I went to the mattresses with the executive board over the issue. He seemed like a great candidate for this year’s election. As a citizen of the U.S. we’re entitled to finding the best prospects for the job. You can’t sit and complain about who’s in office if you did nothing to help the best candidates come forward. That’s our given right as citizens.”

Despite his history as a philanthropist and a United Nations supporters for climate change, Peterson was first headlined in the mainstream media by an alleged smear article from an indie news blogger who claimed the ‘Sanders PAC conned James Bond‘ following the leak of a donation made by actor Daniel Craig. Peterson’s response to the less-than-positive media exposure while featured on Al Jazeera political talk show was that the journalist’s story was “half brilliance and half bullsh*t“, stating that some of the content in the article from Beckel about the PAC was relevant but much of the content about Peterson’s personal life was an outright lie.

American’s Socially United was active from June 2015 through March 2015. They amassed nearly three million members and followers among a social media compilation that provoked millennial voters to gain awareness for Senator Bernie Sanders’ presidential candidacy. The organization reported to United States Federal Election Commission that data was stolen and compromised in March 2016, preventing necessary reports to be filed and that they are working with FEC to get up to date as soon as possible.

The statement from the organization filed at FEC by Peterson this month stated that the dispute letter from legal counsel at Bernie 2016, Inc. was addressed and resolved in June 2016, which was nearly four month prior to the alleged media attack from Public Integrity against the PAC about not being pursuant to FEC regulations or the cease and desist letter from Bernie 2016.

New World Order Politics is a webcast that focuses on global political issues that raise the unquestionable and ignored topics that many believe to be conspiracies or cover-ups generated by the evolution for new world order and those trying to stop it.

NPR sends ‘self-described caffeine addicted 90s hip-hop head’ to report on Montana Muslim Migration

shereen-marisol-meraji

Shereen Marisol Meraji, NPR resident expert on Islam and self-described “caffeine addicted 90s hip-hop head.”

Sheesh! Just like the 60 Minutes ‘story’ I couldn’t bring myself to watch, I can’t listen to this B.S. from race- baiting NPR reporter SHEREEN MARISOL MERAJI. See her bio.

I traveled to Montana and met the truly wonderful people (the same ones she is disparaging) in the Flathead this past summer who have legitimate concerns about how the UN/US Refugee Admissions Program could bring unwanted change (dumped on them from Washington) to their beautiful rural community in far Northwest Montana.

(Do our tax dollars help fund biased NPR? If so, let’s make it our aim in January (when Trump is elected) to cut any funds they still get from us, the taxpayers, for next year.And stop listening to NPR!)

Ms. Meraji reports that everything she heard in Montana that was critical of Islam is “fiction.”  So what makes her an Islamic scholar?  Here is how she describes herself at her twitter page:

Exploring race and identity with @nprcodeswitch and reporting on everything in between. Persia-Rican Zumba dancing caffeine addicted 90s hip-hop head.

Alrighty then…sounds like an expert.

By the way, her disparagement of Act for America should make anyone who is not already a member, run over to their website and join right now!

Here is Act for America! Join now!

Despite the GOP’s Epic Failure to Reach Black Voters, I’m Still Voting for Donald Trump in November

What the hell is going on with Blacks in this Republican Party? My phone has been ringing off the hook since last week with people from across the country asking me to explain the unexplainable.

Memo to my readers: I DON’T WORK FOR THE REPUBLICAN PARTY. But, it seems everyone wants to call me to get an understanding or insight into the inner workings of some of the strategies coming out of this party from the party’s “so-called” Black operatives.

First, in order to be an operative, by definition, you must know how to operate. These Blacks have little to no significant campaign experience and have absolutely no understanding of messaging and communications.

Last week, I was with a Black nationally syndicated radio talk show host who is extremely liberal. He asked why the party has not brought on people like me to help with their efforts with the Black community, as opposed to suing people like me? I told him to call the party and ask them that same question.

But then he said something very interesting.

“They don’t want people like you [referring to me] who know what they are doing,” he said. “They want people who they can control.”

I thought that was extremely insightful.

Part of a true operative’s background is a thing called experience. Only through experience can one know what to do, as well as what not to do. By this party constantly bringing on people with no relevant experience, they are setting their Black surrogates up for failure.

I guess this explains why I have been receiving phone calls from all over the country, especially from North Carolina, Ohio, and Florida. It seems like these Black staffers have received orders from the party to go into the Black community and ask Blacks to vote Republican, but not for Trump.

Yep, you heard me correctly!

Memo to Black Republicans: the Black community doesn’t make a distinction between Trump and the Republican Party; they are one in the same. You can’t have steak without meat, you can’t have basketball without the ball, you can’t watch TV without a TV.

How in the world do you go into the Black community and tell them that you are not supporting Trump’s campaign for the presidency on the Republican ticket and then turn around and ask them to vote Republican down ballot?

What these Black Republicans are doing is akin to asking a person to buy a Big Mac hamburger from McDonald’s without the beef. I know, I know, that doesn’t make sense and it’s impossible; well then, you get my point, thus I rest my case.

I unapologetically support Trump, because of the balance of the Supreme Court, my belief that amnesty for illegals will further exacerbate the Black unemployment rate, and our party’s establishment needs to be totally shaken up! We need totally new leadership from top to bottom on every level of the party.

To me, all the other issues swirling around Trump is mere background noise.

Here’s another memo to Black Republicans: If you are not supporting Trump, then why are you taking money from an organization, the Republican National Committee, whose sole purpose is to get Donald Trump elected as president?

Are you that desperate for money that you are willing to sell your political soul for thirty pieces of silver?

If you are not supporting Trump, then have some principle and resign immediately.

One of the fundamental tenets of marketing as it applies to getting consumers to switch brands, i.e., from Democrat to Republican, is “messenger credibility.”

How can you go into the Black community with credibility and ask for them to vote for Republicans down ballot, but don’t support the person at the top of the ticket? Would you support your local NAACP branch and try to distance yourself from the group’s national officers? I don’t think so.

These staffers should be embarrassed to ask Black folks to buy a product that they themselves don’t even believe in. Do they really think that Blacks are that stupid?

If I have to choose between making money and keeping my integrity, I will always choose keeping my integrity. I can always make more money, but I can’t get more integrity.

To be honest with you, the party should fire all those involved in this diabolical scheme. This should not be allowed to stand. How can the party justify paying someone who is in opposition to its very raison d’etre?

Not one of these Black staffers has publically endorsed Donald Trump; nor can you find in any public statements or in their media appearances indicating their support for Trump. When they have been challenged about this by the media, they quickly deflect to the point that they work for the party, not the Trump campaign. Again, you can’t have one without the other. The party and Trump are joined at the hip at this point.

This is why these Blacks have absolutely no credibility when they go into the Black community. If they don’t even believe in the product they are selling, so how can they convince others to believe in it?

EDITORS NOTE: This column originally appeared in BlackPressUSA.

Where is Elliot Richardson? Loyalty over Integrity and the Future of Our Nation!

History is repeating itself, but no one is watching.  The executive branch of government is tipping balance of power, and nothing is said.  The United States is in Constitutional crisis, but nobody cares.  The future of our Nation hangs in the balance, but we are surrounded by media yes-men and cowards.  We need men and women of integrity to step up and defend rule of law, regardless of the political risk, or we will fail as a nation.

Where is Elliot Richardson when we need him most?

On August 9th, 1974, President Richard M. Nixon resigned from office over the Watergate political scandal.  For the benefit of younger generations, here is the background (or just google it):

The White House staff attempted, and almost succeeded in protecting Republican political operatives.  On June 17, 1972, just months prior to the 1972 general election, 5 men broke into the Democratic National Committee (DNC) HQ at the Watergate Hotel.  After a long investigation under two special prosecutors, evidence indicated that Nixon used the Department of Justice (DOJ), FBI, the CIA and the IRS to investigate and intimidate political opponents.  Facts also showed the administration attempted to cover-up the bungled burglary.

Although there was no evidence Nixon knew about the burglary in advance, taped discussions indicated an effort to undermine Congress and manage the media, and the fall-out.  After extensive media scrutiny, and televised Congressional hearings, a number of key Republicans’ committed to Constitutional “balance of power” over political party loyalties turned against the President.  Nixon abdicated his office in disgrace rather than be impeached.

One key decision brought this Constitutional crisis to its historic outcome.  Elliot Richardson, the Attorney General (AG), a Republican, long-time friend, legal counsel, and advisor to Nixon, chose personal integrity and loyalty to the Constitution over loyalty to the party and President.  When Congressional testimony uncovered the tape-recording system in the White House, Special Prosecutor Archibald Cox subpoenaed the tapes.  Nixon refused to turn them over, claiming executive privilege.

On October 20th, 1973, the President ordered Richardson, the head of the DOJ, to fire Cox and halt the subpoena.  Richardson had promised Congress he would not interfere with the investigation.  Under great pressure from the White House, and his political party, Richardson refused.  That very night he resigned his position as the senior law enforcement officer of the United States, and kept his oath to uphold the Constitution for the good of the nation.

Cox was fired, but the media and public out-cry from the “Saturday Night Massacre” forced a new special prosecutor to be appointed.  Had Richardson not acted with integrity and respect for the Constitution, the tapes, the scandal, the corruption may have been successfully covered-up.  As Nixon said later, Watergate would have been “a blip” on an otherwise successful term of office.

Since Watergate, politicians have feared using the Justice Department to politically protect the President, dreading a repeat of Watergate.  Even Bill Clinton, impeached for lying under oath to Congress, did not use the Department of Justice to shield himself – he just ignored it.  That is, until now.

Fast forward 50 years.  The Obama Administration disregard for the separate but equal legislative branch, and DOJ willingness to prosecute or protect politically motivated actions are staggering.  Here are just a few examples:

AG Holder ignored subpoenas for documents in the investigation of the death of a U.S. border agent over questionable U.S. government gun sales TO CRIMINAL GANGS.  The administration’s IRS political appointees targeted opponents of the President’s Democratic Party to stop or delay organizing legitimate political groups.  The Secret Service smeared the chairman of its own Congressional Oversight Committee in an effort to embarrass him.

The President and his staff misled the American public over the first murder of a US Ambassador in 50 years.  Congressional investigators uncovered personal statements proving that then Secretary of State Clinton lied about the reasons for the terror attack in Benghazi, Libya, just weeks before the 2012 election.  Investigators uncovered a data system in the Secretary of State’s private home, outside of government security controls.  Congress subpoenaed the server and its documents to further the investigation.  In televised Congressional hearings, presidential candidate Clinton claimed she destroyed no official work related emails.  Clinton claimed she sent no classified information from that server.

An FBI investigation concluded Clinton’s staff deleted at least 10,000 work related emails, and many more are unknown.  The FBI concluded that the she, and her staff had sent and received classified information on the server, some too highly sensitive to provide redacted versions.  As Secretary of State, she was the responsible classification authority, whether they were marked classified or not is irrelevant.  The FBI concluded that staffers destroyed the server and information after the subpoena was issued.  The FBI facilitated the destruction of evidence for devices of key staff members in exchange for their “cooperation.”   The FBI did not recommend any further action against Clinton.

However, the DOJ and FBI diligently investigated and prosecuted former CIA director GEN David Petreaus for mishandling classified – a realization uncovered while the FBI investigated a personal affair with his biographer.  The difference between Petreaus and Clinton, one wonders?  Petreaus admitted to his mistakes; Clinton takes no responsibility for her actions – it’s harder to prosecute a liar.  Coincidentally, Petreaus would have been a formidable candidate against Clinton this election.

The Director of the FBI, the DOJ, and the President himself not only failed to hold Secretary Clinton accountable, they have propped up her campaign for the Presidency.  Obama has claimed executive privilege and refused to respond to questions on the IRS, Benghazi, or classified emails.  Sound familiar?

These issues are not about a 1972 political break-in.  They are about the deaths of loyal Americans, and the executive branch tipping the balance of power in its favor.  The executive branch has the responsibility to enforce the laws.  To many citizens, the DOJ’s actions in these cases appear selective, blatantly political and highly questionable.  Do you want the next President to continue to ignore Congress, and use law-enforcement as a political tool?  If the DOJ enforces laws selectively, how long will our institutions last?  What will become of our justice system?  These issues are about the abuse of power, they are not about Democratic or Republican policies.

Not since Watergate has the White House been so entangled in political deception and disrespect for the elected representatives of our people.    Where is the Washington Post?  Where are the investigative journalists?  Where are the intellectuals that understand the risks to a nation where the elite are above the law?  Which political leader will choose integrity and loyalty to the Constitution over loyalty to their party and their candidate?  Who will have the courage to resign over abuse of power?

Where is Elliot Richardson?

Trump Leads Clinton In America’s Most Accurate Election Poll

LOS ANGELES, California /PRNewswire/ — Republican candidate Donald Trump holds a one-point lead over Democratic rival Hillary Clinton ahead of tonight’s final debate, according to the new IBD/TIPP Presidential Election Tracking Poll.

After more than a week of blistering attacks from Democrats, celebrities and the press, Donald Trump has managed to pull ahead of Hillary Clinton by 1 percentage point — 41.3% to 40% — in a four-way matchup.

Libertarian candidate Gary Johnson got 8% and Green Party candidate Jill Stein got 6%.

Daily updates of the IBD/TIPP poll – a collaboration between Investor’s Business Daily (IBD) and TechnoMetrica Market Intelligence (TIPP) – start tomorrow and continue through the election.

Results will be published each morning by 6:00AM (ET) at Investors.com/poll.

America’s Most Accurate Pollster

IBD/TIPP has been the most accurate pollster in recent presidential elections.

In 2004 and 2008, IBD/TIPP had the smallest deviation from the certified results, and across the last three presidential races, IBD/TIPP has the lowest average divergence.

In the 2012 race, polling analyst Nate Silver, then of the New York Times’ blog FiveThirtyEight.com, ranked 23 presidential polling organizations using his own methodology and called IBD/TIPP “the most accurate” tracking poll for the year.

For more information and the latest IBD/TIPP poll results, visit Investors.com/poll.

ABOUT THE IBD©/TIPP POLL

The IBD/TIPP poll is a collaboration between Investor’s Business Daily and TechnoMetrica Market Intelligence. Each month, the IBD/TIPP Economic Optimism Index is the earliest take on consumer confidence and predicts with good reliability monthly changes in sentiment in well-known polls by The Conference Board and the University of Michigan. Both the IBD/TIPP Economic Optimism Index and IBD/TIPP Presidential Election Tracking Poll are national surveys based on randomly selected live interviews via cell phone and landlines.

For more information, go to www.tipponline.com. To license the IBD/TIPP Poll, please contact: IBDlicensing@investors.com.

ABOUT INVESTOR’S BUSINESS DAILY (IBD)

Investor’s Business Daily is a leading financial news and research organization recognized for providing stock screens, comparative performance ratings and unique commentary helping investors zero in on top performing growth stocks.  IBD offers individual and professional investors a comprehensive lineup of cross-platform products, all based on a powerful investing system that has dramatically outperformed the S&P 500.  IBD’s website, Investors.com, offers tools, analysis and research for investors of all levels: IBD University learning center, IBD TV market videos and the IBD Stock Checkup®.  IBD also hosts popular investment summits and provides Home Study programs based on the top-performing growth strategy, CAN SLIM.  IBD was founded April 9, 1984 by William J. O’Neil, who also originated CAN SLIM.

© 2016 Investor’s Business Daily, Inc.  All rights reserved. Investor’s Business Daily, IBD, CAN SLIM and their corresponding logos are registered trademarks of Investor’s Business Daily, Inc.

FACT: Socialism Kills More Babies than War by Chelsea Follett

Recent reports that infants now die at a higher rate in Venezuela than in war-torn Syria were, sadly, unsurprising – the results of socialist economics are predictable. Venezuela’s infant mortality rate has actually been above Syria’s since 2008.

The big picture, fortunately, is happier. The global infant mortality rate has plummeted. Even Syria and Venezuela, despite the impact of war and failed policies, saw improvements up to as recently as last year. From 1960 to 2015, Syria’s infant mortality rate fell by 91% and Venezuela’s by 78%. This year (not reflected in the graph above or below), Syria’s rate rose from 11.1 per 1,000 live births to 15.4, while Venezuela’s shot up from 12.9 to 18.6. Meanwhile, infant mortality rates have continued to fall practically everywhere else, and have declined even faster in countries that enjoy more freedom and stability. Consider Chile.

Chile’s infant mortality rate in 1960 was actually above that of both Venezuela and Syria. It managed to outperform Syria by the mid-1960s, but was still woefully behind its richer northern cousin, Venezuela.  In the early 1970s, Chile’s progress slowed to a crawl as its elite flirted with socialist policies. Once its government abandoned socialism and began economic reforms in the mid-1970s, the pace of progress sped up again, and soon Chile’s infants were safer than Venezuela’s. Today, Chile’s infant mortality rate is similar to that of the United States.

There is a lesson to be learned from these data points: economic policy matters. While Venezuela’s socialism has managed to kill more infants than a full-blown war in Syria, Chile’s incredible success story shows us that by implementing the right policies, humanity can make rapid progress and better protect the youngest, most vulnerable members of society. Today it is hard to believe that infants in Chile were once more likely to die within a year than their contemporaries in Venezuela and Syria.

What about your country? For every 1,000 infants born, how many die and how many live to see their first birthday? Explore the data for yourself, and consider using HumanProgress.org’s new tool, Your Life in Numbers, to see your country’s progress in infant survival and other areas since you were born.

This first appeared at Cato at Liberty.

Chelsea Follett

Chelsea Follett

Chelsea Follet works at the Cato Institute as a Researcher and Managing Editor of HumanProgress.org.

I Have Two Words for Donald Trump –– Harry Truman!

As everyone knows, history repeats itself, or as the late great Peter Allen sang, “Everything old is new again.”

Once upon a time, Democrat president Harry Truman effectively ended World War II by dropping the first nuclear bombs ever detonated on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, on August 6, 1945, resulting in multi-thousands of deaths. It was a decision that promised to end his presidency.

All the political experts––pundits, writers, radio newscasters––agreed that the unassuming former haberdasher who became the unlikely choice of VP in the election of 1944 didn’t have the charisma of the man whose shoes he had stepped into after President Franklin Delano Roosevelt died of a stroke just three months after his fourth presidential inauguration, and that Truman’s war-mongering act was not only antithetical to the values of peace-loving Americans who were exhausted by World War II’s profound losses in bodies and blood, but that it would ultimately condemn him to political ignominy.

But when Truman ran for a second term in 1948, Americans turned out in record numbers for the plain-spoken, decisive Missourian whose action, they recognized, spared the deaths of thousands of American troops, and voted overwhelmingly against the smooth-talking Republican, Governor Thomas Dewey of New York.

As it turned out, all the “expert” predictions of the media were dead wrong!

So arrogantly confident were Truman’s naysayers––sound familiar?–– that a political writer of The Chicago Daily Tribune wrote an article declaring Dewey’s victory before the results were in, and the hapless publisher ran with the story!

PLUS Ç̇A CHANGE…

Today, like yesteryear, the world is an extremely dangerous place, but the predictions are strikingly similar. We now have the ultimate political hack, Hillary Clinton, a woman of remarkably little accomplishment given her over-40 years in the public spotlight, running against the ultimate non-politician, a billionaire businessman and TV personality who has racked up mountains of impressive accomplishments in his over-40 years in his public life.

And sure enough, the same kind of leftist media that covered up FDR’s wheelchair confinement––and JFK’s serial affairs, and Bill Clinton’s predatory sexual appetite, and Barack Obama’s startling ignorance, starting with those 57 U.S. states––is now covering for Hillary’s failures, crimes, and signs of serious illness (as reported by Edward Klein, author of “Guilty as Sin: Uncovering New Evidence of Corruption and How Hillary Clinton and the Democrats Derailed the FBI Investigation.”

But as Trump continues to draw huge and enthusiastic crowds and to smash all GOP records for individual donors, and as the always-reliable Rasmussen Report shows him ahead of Hillary nationwide by a 42% to 37% margin, the media, ala the orders of their globalist bosses, are quadrupling their efforts to bring him down.

It’s relevant here that much of the media don’t even conceal their biases, as proven by this report, revealing that in the current election season, these colossal phonies have forked over almost $400,000 to Hillary’s campaign!

Actual journalist and author David Kupelian spells out in detail the incestuous nature of the relationships between the media and Democrats––and he names names, including George Stephanopoulos, Donna Brazile, Jay Carney, Samantha Power, Ronan Farrow, Jane Pauley, on and on and on, all deeply complicit in the left’s agenda.

In addition to the Rasmussen, poll, here are highlights from the PPD (People’s Polling Daily) poll a couple of days ago which had Donald Trump (DT) being +1.8 overall:

  1. DT from +16 yesterday to +21 today among independents
  2. DT increase from 10% to 13% in African-American support
  3. DT 4-point increase in female support from 33% to 37% with Hillary’s margin over Trump declining 3 points to +11. (DT’s margin with males remained at +17.)

And here are poll results after the second debate:

trump-graphic

A RELENTLESS ASSAULT

A major attack from the left came after a video emerged a few weeks ago, rumored to be the dirty work of Republican Speak of the House and saboteur Paul Ryan––influenced, no doubt, by Ryan’s über-leftist wife, Janna––of Trump and Access Hollywood host Billy Bush engaging in quite typical locker-room talk that included some scatological language about women.

Trump immediately apologized, but that wasn’t good enough for the Democrats, who are now in full panic mode about losing the election.

Remember when these hypocrites cheered at the Academy Awards ceremony in 2006 when “It’s Hard Out Here for a Pimp” won for best original song? As Rush Limbaugh reminded his audience, even the sanctimonious Michelle Obama felt obliged to remind America not only how vile Mr. Trump is but how exquisitely virtuous she is. But uh oh. Rush then cited Michelle Obama’s double standard, particularly, saying: “How about some of the rappers that talk about their b****** and their hos [that] have performed such lyrics in the White House?”

And Rush reminded Michelle Obama that her idol and “role model” and BFF, Beyoncé’s lyrics were a lot worse than anything Mr. Trump said. (Frankly, they’re too pornographic for me to reprint here).

It’s helpful to remember that a major motive of the media in blanketing the airways with All Trump All the Time is to deflect attention away from the Wikileaks releases that expose Hillary as hopelessly corrupt, and to keep the public from seeing this devastating exposé by John Perazzo that includes Hillary’s:

  • Espionage
  • Scandals of the Clinton Foundation
  • Aiding and abetting the horrific Iran Deal
  • Helping Russia to gain 20% of U.S. uranium
  • Central role in the Benghazi murders of our Ambassador and three other servicemen
  • Ties to radical Islamists
  • On and on and on and on

As mentioned, devastating!

Next came the Bimbo Barrage where two, then four, about nine women in all came forward to say that 12 years before, or 20, or 30, Trump kissed or groped them. Mr. Trump denied everything and to the utter chagrin on the craven media, he presented cold hard proof that these pathetic women were lying and lying again, not just Jessica Leeds, but Rachel Crooks and Kristin Anderson and Summer Zervos, to name just a few of these wannabes whose lust seems to be primarily for fame.

But even as the media continue to cover for Hillary, there is every indication that their onslaught on Trump is failing.

Yes, a poll here and there has Hillary ahead. But as writer and former Navy SEAL Jim O’Neill writes, “…after days, weeks, months of Trump’s record-breaking rallies in locations all across the nation, we are supposed to believe that Clinton leads Trump in the polls. Excuse me? What planet are these polls being taken on?”

O’Neill says that outcomes are predictable “if you poll mainly Democratic respondents and go light on the Republicans,” and he cites Democratic strategist Pat Caddell who famously outed the `news’ service Reuters for cooking their numbers to favor Clinton, and the list goes on.”

He further states that “the reasons for skewed poll numbers are twofold: (1) to discourage Trump supporters, and (2) to serve as cover for the massive voter fraud that is planned for November 8th. Everybody and their cousin knows it is coming our way—the only question is to what degree; how bad will it be? Pretty bad I suspect—the globalists are pulling out all the stops on this one.”

THE EXPERTS IN VOTER FRAUD

If there is one thing Democrats specialize in, it is voter fraud. In fact, you can leave it to Democrats to:

Here, broadcaster Lou Dobbs explains what  the rigged system is all about and concludes that “the Clinton cartel emits the foulest stench of all,”

And here, a hidden camera catches workers for the Clinton campaign approving destruction of GOP Voter Registration Forms.

Yet another video by Project Veritas founder James O’Keefe records a top Democrat admitting voter fraud is common, saying: “There’s thousands of absentee ballots. I don’t know where they came from….in some neighborhoods, they bus people around to vote … they take them from poll site to poll site…they don’t vet people who get IDs to see who they really are.”

O’Keefe then releases not one but two explosive videos, the first detailing how Hillary and the Democratic National Committee incites violence at Trump rallies, the better to embed in voters’ minds an association between Trump and violence, and the second in which Democrat operatives explain how to commit voter fraud on a massive scale.

Again, Dobbs says that voter fraud is breathtaking and then documents his claim, citing:

  • In Indiana, state police are investigating voter registration fraud in 56 of the state’s 92 counties.
  • In Virginia, 1,000 illegal aliens were registered to vote between 2008 and 2012. Also dead people.
  • 40 illegals recently voted in Philadelphia…also dead people.

Political operative Ed Rollins said that the Democrats have a “master plan for fraud” and Republicans don’t have one to match it for prevention.

In Illinois and Pennsylvania, we have proof of Democrats stuffing ballots to steal the election. But that is the proverbial tip of the iceberg.

And let’s not omit this explosive video that features Hillary’s thugs plotting to incite violence at Trump rallies. Do not fail to click on this link….it is as damning as damning gets!

And here, Michael Snyder presents 10 stunning examples of the all-out attempt being made to sabotage the Trump campaign. “We always knew that politics in America is a dirty game, and that the Clintons are the dirtiest players in the game,” Snyder says. “…we always knew that the mainstream media was going to be in Clinton’s corner…[and] completely abandon any pretense of objectivity…but what he didn’t anticipate was blatant and widespread sabotage of his campaign from within his own party.”

Activist John Eidson provides yet more ironclad evidence that Democrats are the undisputed champions of voter fraud.

While Democrats claim that election fraud is rare, you can click here to see pictures of Democrat officials indicted for election fraud in multiple states—Michigan, Missouri, New Hampshire, Alabama, Texas, Massachusetts, Arkansas, Florida, Indiana, New York, Georgia, Mississippi, North Carolina and Illinois. Each of these cases represent the tip of a massive iceberg.

Compounding the problem of Democrats rigging the election––as they’ve been rigging them for years––is the massive flood of new immigrants, hundreds of thousands of them illegal, from Muslim nations, all of whom Democrats are only too eager to provide with phony voter ID cards.

Robert Spencer, author, key figure of the counter-jihad movement in the U.S., and expert on radical Islam, cites recent statistics to bolster that case. Currently, “at 42.4 million, there are now more immigrants, legal and illegal, in America than ever before, fueled by a massive flood from Muslim nations.”

According to The Center for Immigration Studies, countries sending the largest numbers of immigrants from 2010 to 2014 include: “Saudi Arabia (up 93 percent), Bangladesh (up 37 percent), Iraq (up 36 percent), Egypt (up 25 percent), and Pakistan, India, and Ethiopia (each up 24 percent).”

Yet Hillary wants to increase the number of Syrian refugees entering the United States by 550%!

While she admitted that neither Jordan nor Turkey, two Muslim nations, could distinguish between non-threatening immigrants and jihadists, she claimed she would be up to the task. Right. This from the woman who said that “Muslims…have nothing whatsoever to do with terrorism.” Which is why Spencer writes “that a Hillary Clinton presidency would be…an unmitigated disaster for the United States.”

For the record, here is a listing of where to report Voter Fraud in every state.

fraud-report

TRUMP’S CHALLENGE

Leftists as they are, members of today’s media betray their admiration of Trump when they marvel that he has run his campaign garnering more than $2 billion of free press. Of course, he has spent quite a few millions of his own money crisscrossing the country––sometimes to four states in one day––and for limited but effective advertising and staff.

Now it is time for him to use his billions––not millions––(1) to hire to top-notch poll monitors in every precinct possible, but particularly in traditionally blue states where voter fraud is and always has been epidemic, and (2) to hire the best and the brightest legal eagles who are ready on the spot to issue subpoenas and take other legal actions to insure every suspicious action/machine/undue influence is challenged––and followed up on in court!

No matter how crooked, dishonest, and defamatory his opponents have been to this point, they are far from finished. The left has an entire repertoire of false flags, photo-shopped videos, fabricated slanders, scurrilous lies, and vile slurs that they never tire of using against their opponents. It’s not beyond them, as John Snyder reports, for Obama to threaten war with Russia, the better for him to shut down the election and declare himself Emperor-in-Chief!

None of them intimidate or slow down Donald Trump; in fact, it appears that they energize him and motivate him to carry his Make America Great Again mission to ever wider audiences.

We, too, his supporters and admirers, must be equally tireless as the last weeks of this campaign wind up. And we must remind everyone we know to consider the formidable things Mr. Trump has done even before he becomes President.

According to Bebe Coe Bertino, who describes herself as an alternate California delegate for President Trump, an evangelical voter, and at the top of the Basket of Deplorables, “what Donald Trump has accomplished in the 16 months since he announced for the presidency” is both astounding and unprecedented. In just little over a year, he has:

  • Single handedly defeated the [old] Republican party,
  • Single handedly debunked and disemboweled any value of the news media, which now has an all-time high level of distrust and disrespect,
  • Single handedly disclosed the fraud perpetrated on the American public by Hillary
  • Unified the silent majority in a way that should be patently frightening to liberals,
  • Exposed the entire establishment for who they are and whipped them into pure panic…

Bertino goes on to cite Trump’s outreach to the African-American community, addressing the “mass cop shootings, riots in our streets, double-digit inflation, bombs blowing up in our cities, targeted police, #BLM, a skyrocketing jobless rate, no economic growth, privately owned land being seized by the federal government, the worst racial tension in my lifetime, no God in schools, more abortions than ever, illegal aliens pouring into our country, sick veterans receiving no care, and a debt that doubled in seven years to $19 trillion.”

The silent majority is now “simply the majority,” Ms. Bertino concludes, “and no longer silent. Donald Trump changed all of that, single-handedly, and within one year.”

In his own words, Mr. Trump explains here why the upcoming vote “is a struggle for the survival of our nation.”

“For those who control the levers of power in Washington and from the global special interests, they partner with people who do not have your good in mind. Our campaign represents an existential threat like they’ve never seen. This is not simply another four-year election. This is a crossroads in the history of our civilization that will determine if We the People reclaim control over our government.”

To paraphrase Jim O’Neill: I personally believe Trump will win, and possibly in a landslide!

AN URGENT REMINDER to everyone going to the polls on November 8th: WEAR RED.

WHY? Because Democrats are now rushing to register dead people, illegal aliens, felons, etc. Wearing RED to the polls will assure that no media outlet can overcome the VISIBLE support for TRUMP/PENCE.

Take photos and videos in district after district to prove that Hillary could NOT have won these ALL RED districts!

OperationRed2016

http://operationred2016.com/

Sidebar

According to https://steemit.com/trump/@majes/social-media-facts-trump-clinton

 

SIDEBAR: According to Blockchain, Trump crushes Hillary on Social Media:

 

FACT #1:
Trump has nearly three times the amount of followers on Facebook.
Trump: 12,174,358 likes.
Clinton: 4,385,959 likes.

Fact #2:
Trump’s live stream videos compared to Hillary’s:
Trump Live Stream Post – 21 hours ago: 135,000 likes, 18,167 shares, 1.5 million views
Clinton Live Stream Post – 25 hours ago: 9,000 likes, 0 shares, 121,000 views. That does not look good at all for her!

Fact #3:
Trump has 18.6 million twitter followers.
Clinton has only 6.1 million.
Most of Clinton’s supporters are actually fake. According to the Washington Examiner, 41 percent of Clinton’s “followers” are not even real people.
In contrast, The Daily Caller says that Trump’s followers are 90% real with 90% of them having a previous voting record.

Fact #4:
Trump averages 160,000 viewers per live stream.
Clinton averages 400 viewers per live stream.
Wow. That is bad. Trump also gets 5,000 percent more eyeballs focused on the screen than Clinton. Yep. She really is that boring to the folks.

Fact #5:
Instagram.
Trump has 6,200,000 followers.
Clinton has 800,000 followers.
Instagram is a platform with mostly all pictures and not much substance – exactly what Hillary supporters love. And still she does very poorly in that medium.

Fact #6:
On Reddit.
Trump: 297,696 subscribers
Clinton: 21,429 subscribers

Trump has more subscribers than Clinton on every major social media outlet but what is most telling is that there are nearly three times as many people subscribed to “Hillary for Prison” than are subscribed to the “Hillary for President” page!

The best part is that the DNC’s emails from WikiLeaks has proven that Clinton pays people to support her online. Trump supporters on the other hand actually like him and follow him on Social media.

Obama administration fears Trump win, approves 100 Muslim refugees for NW Arkansas

The Obama Administration is moving fast to get as many new refugee sites open as possible before January in case Donald Trump is elected.

Arkansas, like West Virginia and Montana, has received very few refugees over the years, but all that will change with the Dept. of State’s (DOS) approval of a new resettlement agency that will ‘welcome’ 100 refugees beginning next month.

All of the new sites*** are needed because Obama has ‘determined’ that the US will admit a huge increase (to 110,000) in the number of refugees admitted to your towns and cities in FY2017.

The Obama DOS is on a crash program now to get as many placed in your towns as they can by Inauguration Day in January (in case Trump is elected) and place as many in the pipeline as they can making it more difficult for a new administration to put the breaks on.

There is only one entity that could slow the flow and they can do it next month and that is Congress (if there is a will)!  Congress (not Obama!) has the ultimate power to DEFUND the large increase in the number of refugees coming in. These contractors, like this new one in Northwest Arkansas have virtually zero money of their own!

The story, here, and below demonstrates how impotent Arkansas’s governor is to do anything to stop the migration to the state.

From KATV Little Rock:

NORTHWEST ARKANSAS (TALK BUSINESS & POLITICS) — The questions surrounding refugees from the Middle East and other parts of the world will soon come to Arkansas as Canopy Northwest Arkansas works to bring 100 or more refugees from around the world to the region.

emily-linn

Emily Linn

[….]

In response to news publicity about the global refugee crisis, concerned residents in Northwest Arkansas (NWA) began meeting in January and formed Canopy Northwest Arkansas, a 501(c)3 non-profit with the mission of settling refugees in NWA.

“We consulted with refugee agencies operating nationally and we learned that there’s a need for new communities to open up to refugees. So we started looking into what it might look like for refugees to come to NWA and what we found is that our community has an incredible capacity to welcome refugees and help them really thrive here,” said Emily Linn, director of Canopy Northwest Arkansas.

Linn cited the growing economy in NWA as a reason refugees would do well.

Here comes the poultry industry! Surely, the Chamber of Commerce is not far behind. (I always wonder if they tell the incoming refugees that they are going to a meat or poultry plant town).

“We have great jobs for folks who don’t even speak English, for example, in the manufacturing or poultry processing industry or agriculture. We also have great jobs and we have a need for people to come and work in very high skilled jobs,” she said. “For instance, we have a brand new hospital opening up in Springdale, Arkansas Children’s and the Washington Regional Hospital is growing and expanding, and there’s a need for very highly educated individuals as well, and so we have this wide variety of employment options.”

I keep seeing this nonsense about skilled labor in the refugee flow. It is bogus. If there are doctors and engineers etc. in the flow they must become re certified in the U.S. which is a long and expensive process. The closest any refugee doctor will get to a hospital is scrubbing the floors at night.

Canopy is a subcontractor of LIRS (see my previous post this morning, here).

Canopy Northwest Arkansas partners with the Lutheran Immigration and Refugee Service (LIRS), one of nine national resettlement agencies that contract with the State Department to run the refugee resettlement program. LIRS is the agency that will assign refugees to Canopy after the refugees go through an extensive screening process, sometimes lasting more than two years.

Continue reading here.  I see no evidence, at least in this story, that there is any pocket of resistance in Northwest Arkansas.

***Here are some of the new sites we have learned about in recent weeks being set up to accommodate, among other ethnic groups, a large number of Syrian Sunni Muslims.  We heard that there are 47 of these new target sites:

Asheville, NC
Rutland, VT
Reno, NV
Ithaca, NY
Missoula, MT
Aberdeen, SD
Charleston, WV
Fayetteville, AR
Blacksburg, VA
Pittsfield, MA
Northhampton, MA
Flint, MI
Bloomington, IN
Traverse City, MI
Watertown, NY (maybe)

I just created a new ‘tag’ and I should have done it a long time ago, will try to keep it up going forward—New resettlement sites.  For new readers, here is the old list of sites Apparently the feds are not updating the list because they likely don’t want you to know where all of the new offices are located. Secrecy is the watchword of refugee resettlement in America!

RELATED ARTICLES:

Mormon church is getting on the refugee resettlement bandwagon

World’s most vulnerable: are we responsible for them all?

DOS Syrian resettlement pace would bring total in 2017 to over 20,000

Hijrah! A documentary to be released in December

350 refugees a day entering US (less than three weeks in to the fiscal year); Texas is numero uno!

THE HILLARY VIRUS: Corrupting our Government, One Agency at a Time

There is no shortage of serious issues swirling around Hillary Clinton that call into question her judgment, her integrity and, ultimately, her fitness to be the next president of the United States.

I have come to the conclusion that an excellent analog for Hillary would be a virus.

The term “virus” has been defined thusly:

virus |ˈvīrəs|

noun

1 an infective agent that typically consists of a nucleic acid molecule in a protein coat, is too small to be seen by light microscopy, and is able to multiply only within the living cells of a host: [ as modifier ] : a virus infection.

• an infection or disease caused by a virus.

• a harmful or corrupting influence: the virus of cruelty that is latent in all human beings.

2 (also computer virus) a piece of code that is capable of copying itself and typically has a detrimental effect, such as corrupting the system or destroying data.

As noted above, there are two basic forms of viruses, pathogens and computer viruses.  Hillary acts as both a pathogen and a computer virus.

Hillary, not unlike a parasitic virus, has for decades, lived off the “host,” in this case, the United States and those who engage in apparent “Play for pay” schemes, pay outrageously exorbitant honoraria and speakers fees or contribute to the Clinton Foundation.

On February 13, 2014 the Clinton Foundation posted a press release, “Clinton Foundation And Gates Foundation Partner To Measure Global Progress For Women And Girls.”

Bill Gates has been the prime force behind the effort to bring virtually unlimited quantity of foreign high tech workers into the United States through the H-1B visa program and by other means, to supplant hundreds of thousands of American workers.  The press release focused on “Women and girls” on the global level.

It is disconcerting that Hillary’s spotlight was on women and girls around the world and not American citizens of both genders.

This relationship between Hillary and the United States is not symbiotic but parasitic.  America and Americans have certainly not found any benefit in her actions but have suffered from it.

In considering the analog of “Hillary the Computer Virus” we need only to review how this sort of virus is defined:

“a piece of code that is capable of copying itself and typically has a detrimental effect, such as corrupting the system or destroying data.”

Does that not neatly encapsulate Hillary’s e-mail scandal and other issues?

Not unlike a computer virus, Hillary has corrupted the State Department, the Justice Department, the FBI and divisions of the DHS that enforce and administer our immigration laws.  She has also sought to destroy data in the form of massive numbers of e-mails.  Her decision to destroy those e-mails and pulverize electronic devises with hammers is, to this retired federal agent, a coverup and provides evidence of intent and knowledge that her treatment of highly classified information represented malfeasance.

Think of the drug dealer who flushes drugs down the toilet as law enforcement officers enter his house with a warrant, or the criminal who dumps guns, drugs or other contraband out of his car as police cars  chase him.

Hillary’s use of a private e-mail server and non-secure personal electronic devices were in apparent violation of two federal statues:

Title 18 U.S. Code § 1924 – Unauthorized removal and retention of classified documents or material:

(a) Whoever, being an officer, employee, contractor, or consultant of the United States, and, by virtue of his office, employment, position, or contract, becomes possessed of documents or materials containing classified information of the United States, knowingly removes such documents or materials without authority and with the intent to retain such documents or materials at an unauthorized location shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than one year, or both.

(b) For purposes of this section, the provision of documents and materials to the Congress shall not constitute an offense under subsection (a).

(c) In this section, the term “classified information of the United States” means information originated, owned, or possessed by the United States Government concerning the national defense or foreign relations of the United States that has been determined pursuant to law or Executive order to require protection against unauthorized disclosure in the interests of national security.

Title 18 U.S. Code § 793 – Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information:

(f) Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer—

Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.

The key phrase, through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody, is essentially what James Comey referenced when, on July 5, 2016 he presided over a news conference wherein he  read from a prepared statement in which, he stated she was “extremely careless” in handling highly sensitive material.  Yet he had recommended against indicting her.

His contrived excuse for not recommending she be indicted was that she did not intend to violate the law and did not act with criminal intent.

Generally, law enforcement agencies only provide investigative findings to prosecutors and prosecutors decide independently whether to prosecute.

Criminal intent or knowledge are not elements of the criminal statute however, her destruction of massive numbers of e-mails provides evidence of her understanding that she violated these important laws.

On October 15, 2016 The Weekly Standard report, “An Attempted Hillary Email Coverup?” began with this paragraph:

A senior State Department official repeatedly pressed the FBI to change the classification of emails stored on Hillary Clinton’s private server, according to FBI interview summaries set to be released in the coming days. Patrick Kennedy, the undersecretary of state for management, discussed providing additional overseas slots for the FBI in exchange for revisions to classifications of the sensitive emails.

This was apparently done in furtherance of a coverup to protect Hillary from criminal charges. This was an obvious effort to corrupt the integrity of both the FBI and State Department.

The critical nature of sensitive material is delineated in this excerpt contained in Executive Order 13526- Classified National Security Information that Barak Obama signed on December 29, 2009:

(1) “Top Secret” shall be applied to information,the unauthorized disclosure of which reasonably could be expected to cause exceptionally grave damage to the national security that the original classification authority is able to identify or describe.

(2) “Secret” shall be applied to information, the unauthorized disclosure of which reasonably could be expected to cause serious damage to the national security that the original classification authority is able to identify or describe.

On June 30, 2016 CNN reported, “Bill Clinton meeting causes headaches for Hillary.”  My article, “Loretta Lynch’s Private Meeting With Bill Clinton Prior to Release of Benghazi Report” began with these two paragraphs:

On Tuesday, June 29, 2015 ABC News-15 based in Arizona reported, “US Attorney General Loretta Lynch, Bill Clinton meet privately in Phoenix before Benghazi report.”

According to the report the meeting was not a chance encounter but was apparently an arranged and totally inappropriate meeting between Bill Clinton and Loretta Lynch on board her government airplane.

At the time three issues were pending, the issue of Hillary’s e-mails, the impending release of the Benghazi Report, and allegations about the Clinton Foundation as reported in the August 24, 2016 International Business Times article, “Clinton Foundation Investigation Update: Key Details About Financial And Political Dealings.”

Finally, Hillary Clinton’s massive legalize program for unknown millions of illegal aliens would lack integrity and would undermine the DHS legal immigration system and national security and jobs for beleaguered Americans.

As reported by Fox News, Hillary told bankers she wants to open trade and open our borders.

This, once again raises the issue of integrity.  The term “integrity” includes the phrase, “upholding territorial integrity and national sovereignty.”

integrity |inˈtegritē|

noun

1 the quality of being honest and having strong moral principles; moral uprightness: he is known to be a man of integrity.

2 the state of being whole and undivided: upholding territorial integrity and national sovereignty.

• the condition of being unified, unimpaired, or sound in construction: the structural integrity of the novel.

• internal consistency or lack of corruption in electronic data: [ as modifier ] : integrity checking.

On October 13, 2016 Breitbart reported on Senator Sessions describing Hillary’s support for open borders as a “Smoking Gun” that proves she is determined to prevent the creation of an effective legal immigration system.

EDITORS NOTE: This column originally appeared in FrontPage Magazine.

VIDEO: Trump Backs Term Limits for Congress

Donald Trump just endorsed passing a constitutional amendment slapping Term Limits on Congress.  He’s now the second presidential candidate to endorse U.S. Term Limits’s ultimate goal.

“Not only will it end government corruption, but it will end the economic stagnation in our country,” he just announced.

We have the momentum.  Lobbying for Term Limits to be included in the presidential debates has paid on off massively.  Term Limits and our push for the Term Limits convention will get more attention than ever.

And, if you haven’t already, please sign the National Term Limits Amendment petition by clicking here.

We need as many Americans to publicly support Term Limis as possible.  We are battling state by state to call for the Term Limits Convention.  Every signer counts!

Finally, please feel free to forward this column and the links to this important national petition to everyone you know!

RELATED ARTICLE: Liberal DC Suburb Could Resurrect Term Limits Movement

Explosive Project Veritas undercover video reveals Clinton camp mischief

Remember the “violent protests” that shut down a planned Trump rally in Chicago in March? Or the anti-Trump protests that closed a road to a Trump event in Arizona?

There was nothing spontaneous about them. They were just following “a script of engagement” written by paid Clinton campaign operatives, according to an explosive new undercover video from James O’Keefe and his investigative team at Project Veritas.

I thought I was beyond being shocked by this campaign. But the Project Veritas exposé of a well-orchestrated strategy to smear Donald Trump using paid thugs and Soviet-style provocations, is just beyond belief.

Key to the strategy is a political “black operations” specialist named Scott Foval, the National Field Director for a left-wing activist group called Americans United for Change.

In undercover video shot by Project Veritas, Foval boasts of having local operatives ready to execute campaign dirty tricks all over the country.

“The [Clinton] campaign pays the DNC, DNC pays Democracy Partners, Democracy Partners pays the Foval Group, The Foval Group goes and executes the s**t,” Foval tells the undercover reporter.

One tactic Foval used with success was “bird dogging,” planting activists at Trump rallies to provoke violence. The goal was to show that Trump supporters were extremists, prone to violence, a theme Mrs. Clinton herself has sounded repeatedly.

The more extreme tactic was to organize protests, as Foval boasted of having done in Chicago, to prevent Trump from even holding a planned rally.

Is it unprecedented in U.S. political history? Probably not. But it sure makes the Watergate break-in and the deletion of 18 minutes of White House tapes by Richard Nixon look like amateur hour.

“It doesn’t matter what the friggin’ legal and ethics people say, we need to win this motherf–ker,” Foval says. “We’re starting anarchy here.”

Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich called it “a direct assault on democracy and the rule of law” in an interview with Sean Hannity on Monday night.

If we still had a national media whose mission was to inform the public, this story should be dominating the news cycle.

Foval goes on to describe in detail how he coordinated his anti-Trump storm-trooper actions with the Clinton campaign and a broad array of left-wing groups, including the Alliance for Change, Alliance for Retired Americans, the DNC, and Mrs. Clinton’s Super-PAC, Priorities USA.

“The campaigns and DNC cannot coordinate with Priorities, but I guaran-damn-tee you that the people who run the Super PACs all talk to each other, and we and a few other people are the hubs of that communication.”

Congressional committees should be calling on the FBI to investigate what appears to prima facie evidence criminal collusion between the Clinton campaign, the Clinton Super PAC, and the political dirty tricks operations run by Foval and chief strategist, Robert Creamer.

Creamer is the husband of Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-Ill) and founded Democracy Partners in 2011, a group that brings together different left-wing organizations and coordinates their actions to meet Clinton campaign goals.

“Wherever Trump and Pence are gonna be we have events,” Creamer explains to the undercover reporter. “We have a call with the [Clinton] campaign every day to go over the focuses that need to be undertaken.”

Already, the DNC appears to have gone into panic mode. Foval has been fired by Americans United for Change, the activist group.

This is the type of undercover investigation that Mike Wallace at 60 Minutes once did. The fact that an unaffiliated, non-profit group now must raise funds to pursue this type of investigation shows how corrupt our corporate media have become.

EDITORS NOTE: This column originally appeared on The Hill.