Fitna Archives - Page 72 of 113

Tag Archive for: Fitna

‘Thousands’ of Islamic State supporters in the U.S.

November 27, 2015/in Immigration, National Security, Policy, Politics, Religion/by Jihad Watch

This is no surprise: the Islamic State bases its appeal to Muslims upon a claim of Islamic authenticity. Despite many claims to the contrary, moderates have not actually mounted any large-scale or effective refutation of that claim.

“Islamic State Radicalizes ‘Thousands’ in United States,” by Daniel Wiser, Daily Caller, November 25, 2015:

The Islamic State has likely radicalized thousands of people in the United States, according to a new report, raising concerns that supporters of the terrorist group could be plotting domestic attacks similar to the recent shootings and bombings in Paris.

The Threat Knowledge Group, an organization led by the counterterrorism experts Sebastian and Katharine Gorka, has compiled a list of 82 individuals in the United States who were affiliated with the Islamic State (also known as ISIS or ISIL) and apprehended by law enforcement officials, including those who traveled or attempted to travel to Iraq and Syria, launched domestic attacks, or participated in recruiting or fundraising.

The Gorkas note in a new report that almost one third of these individuals had plotted attacks against Americans on U.S. soil in the last 18 months. Sebastian is also an adviser to the Department of Defense, while Katharine has authored several publications about the terrorist threat to the U.S. homeland.

Through Islamic State propagandists on Twitter and other social media sites, the terrorist group has been able to attract hundreds more supporters in the United States, they said.

Ali Shukri Amin, a 17-year-old Virginia resident and Islamic State supporter who was sentenced to 11 years in prison in August, used his Twitter account with 4,000 followers to raise funds for the group and encourage friends to join it overseas.

Ahmad Musa Jibril, an Islamist preacher in Dearborn, Michigan, who has also spent time in jail for money laundering and tax evasion, also points to the terrorist group’s online reach. Jibril has more than 38,000 Twitter followers, though he has not tweeted since last July and may have found other methods of communication. He is reported to have a large following among foreign fighters in Iraq and Syria.

“Based on the evidence available, the number of ISIS supporters in the United States measures in the thousands, rather than hundreds,” the Gorkas said in their report.

“Whether ISIS will launch an attack on the scale of the Paris attack is unknown, but it is clear that the United States is a primary target for ISIS and that ISIS has the necessary supporters in place and the financial means to carry out such an attack,” they continued. “The challenges of screening incoming refugees may further exacerbate the problem.”…

RELATED ARTICLES:

New Islamic State video taunts U.S.: “Islam’s enemies” will be destroyed by “the flames of war”

Obama calls Syrian refugees “pilgrims,” promises “highest security checks”

After calling Islamic State “contained,” Obama now says it poses “serious threat to all of us”

November 27, 2015/in Must Read, National Security, Policy, Politics, Religion/by Jihad Watch

He has no plan. He has no coherent strategy. He doesn’t take the threat from the Islamic State seriously. All he cares about is presenting the appearance of doing something about the Islamic State, so that his party doesn’t suffer electoral losses as a result of his disastrous non-strategy.

“Two Weeks After Calling Islamic State ‘Contained,’ Obama Says It Poses ‘Serious Threat to All of Us,’” by Alyssa Canobbio, Daily Caller, November 24, 2015 12:53 pm

During Thursday’s joint press briefing, President Obama changed his stance on the threat of the Islamic State and said that the terrorist group poses a serious threat.

“This is an important moment for our nations and for the world. This barbaric terrorist group, ISIL or Daesh, and its murderous ideology pose a serious threat to all of us. It cannot be tolerated. It must be destroyed and we must do it together,” Obama said.

A few weeks prior Obama had said in an interview that the terror group was not gaining strength and was contained.

“I don’t think they are gaining strength. What is true is that from the start our goal has been first, to contain and we have contained them. They have not gained ground in Iraq and in Syria they will come in, they leave, but you don’t see the systematic march by ISIL across the terrain,” Obama said in an interview with ABC’s George Stephanopoulos….

RELATED ARTICLES:

Ex-envoy: Obama brought ‘radical Muslim values’ into White House

Islamic State underground lair littered with U.S. made guns and ammo, copies of the Qur’an

Hagel breaks with Obama: “You can’t confuse your allies and your adversaries by saying Assad must go”

EDITORS NOTE: The featured image is courtesy of ABC News.

Putin: Turkish leadership purposefully supports Islamization of country

November 27, 2015/in Featured, National Security, Policy, Politics, Religion/by Jihad Watch

Putin has also accused Erdogan of being an “accomplice of terrorists.” Hard to deny that.

Turkey’s rapid re-Islamization under Erdogan has been documented by Robert Spencer here at Jihad Watch for a decade or more now. For Putin to target Turkey’s Islamist shift demonstrates yet again the Russian leader’s clarity and toughness, as juxtaposed with the West’s politically correct myopia and ineptitude.

Think back to June 2013, when Putin blasted Obama and Cameron for supporting so-called “moderates” in Syria, who were shown on video eating the organs of their slain enemies. Or his equally strong rejection of Western military intervention in Syria. Or his call to the West to unite in defending persecuted Christians in the Middle East and Africa. And of course his recent UN address, when he castigated the Western leaders responsible for the rise of ISIS and the refugee crisis, shaming them with the question, “Do you realize what you have done?”

For those who might be concerned, based on his remarks below that Islam is “a great world religion,” that Putin is becoming soft on the jihad threat, recall that Putin does not hesitate to employ decisive use of power when required to shut down the Islamic threat. A prime example is the rounding up of 300 Muslim jihadists at a prayer meeting in 2013. Can you imagine anything like that happening in America? Certainly not under the current administration.

Turkey’s downing of a Russian fighter jet — which at least one analyst believes was premeditated — locks it squarely in Russia’s cross-hairs, and its rapid re-Islamization only makes the bulls-eye even larger.

“Putin: Turkish Leadership purposefully supports Islamization of Country,” TASS via Pravoslavie, November 25, 2015:

Russian President Vladimir Putin has said that the current leadership of Turkey purposefully supports the country’s Islamization. “The problem is not in the tragedy we faced yesterday (the Su-24 incident), the problem is much deeper,” the Russian leader told reporters. “We see — and not only we, I assure you that the entire world sees that — that the current leadership of Turkey has been for a number of years pursuing a purposeful policy of support and the Islamization of the country.”

Putin noted that Islam was a great world religion, which was one of the traditional religions, including in Russia. “We ourselves support Islam and will continue doing so, but the point at issue is the support of a more radical branch. And that in itself creates a very unfavorable environment, the atmosphere that one cannot see at first sight,” Putin said.

Russian nationals staying in Turkey may be facing serious danger, the Russian president warned.

“After yesterday’s event, we cannot rule out other incidents and if they happen, we will have to respond somehow. Our citizens in Turkey can, certainly, be in serious danger,” Putin said, adding that he supported Foreign Ministry recommendations urging Russians not to visit Turkey.

“After such tragic events as the downing of our plane and the pilot’s death, this is a forced measure and the Foreign Ministry is right to warn our nationals of the dangers,” Putin said.

Putin’s words follow the downing of a Russian Su-24 bomber by a Turkish F-16 fighter jet on Tuesday morning. Ankara claims the Russian warplane had violated Turkey’s air space while the Russian Defence Ministry says the Su-24 was flying above Syria.

Both pilots ejected but one was killed by gunfire from the ground. The other was rescued by Russian and Syrian forces and brought to Russia’s air base in the area.

Russia’s Federal Tourism Agency has asked the country’s tour operators to suspend selling holiday packages to Turkey. Some 10,000 Russian vacationers are currently there.

VIDEO: Democratic Party TV Ad Objects to Use of Term ‘Radical Islam’

November 26, 2015/in Must Read, National Security, Policy, Politics, Religion/by Clarion Project

A new ad by the Democratic National Committee strikes out at Republican presidential candidates for using the term “radical Islam,” saying that using the term is “equating Islam, all Muslims, with terrorists.”

In the ad, the DNC also objects the use of the terms “radical Islamic terrorism,” “radical Muslims” and “radical Islamic jihadists” by Republican presidential candidates, saying, “It’s oversimplifications and it’s wrong.”

The reason why the term “radical Islam” is used is precisely to make the distinction between this type of Islam and Islam itself. (While most of us learned about the purpose of adjectives in grade school grammar classes, it seems that members of the DNC were absent for that class.)

Moreover, the claim that using the term “radical Islam” amounts to indicting “all Muslims” as terrorists is equally absurd.

Insulting the audience further, the ad shows a clip of former Republican President George W. Bush saying, “We do not fight against Islam. We fight against evil” and “The war against terrorism is not a war against Muslims.”

No Republican presidential candidate who has used the term “radical Islam” — much less the majority of the Americans who agree with this use of the term “radical Islam” – intends to indict an entire faith group for the behavior of some of its members.

To wit, in America, the number of hate crimes against Muslims actually decreased during the past year. And in France, a Pew poll suggested the approval ratings of Muslims in France increased in the months after the Charlie Hebdo attack. Significantly, the increased approval rating was manifest in all political strata, from those identifying as left to moderate and right. (French people saying they held “favorable” or “mostly favorable” attitudes towards Muslims numbered 85, 82 and 65 percent, respectively.)

We have all heard the argument that terrorism has nothing to do with Islam. As recently as November 19, less than a week after Islamist terrorists perpetrated the horrific attacks on Paris, Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton tweeted, “Let’s be clear: Islam is not our adversary. Muslims are peaceful and tolerant people and have nothing whatsoever to do with terrorism.”

Facile platitudes such as these, as well as the blatant distortion that using the term “radical Islam” is equivalent to calling all Muslims terrorists does an extreme disservice to humanity, Muslims and non-Muslims alike, both of whom are in the crosshairs of a fanatical ideology that seeks their destruction.

Just days before the DNC’s ad appeared, King Abdullah of Jordan warned, “We are facing a Third World War against humanity” if the civilized world does not “act fast to tackle” the Islamic State and similar terrorist groups.

What the DNC refuses to admit, King Abdullah stated clearly, “This is a war, as I said repeatedly, within Islam,” noting that over 100,000 Muslims have been murdered by the Islamic State over the past two years (including in “atrocities like-minded groups” have pertetrated in Africa and Asia.)

In a recent landmark speech, UK’s Prime Minister David Cameron called out U.S. President Barack Obama for failing to name Islamist extremism and calling it instead “violent extremism.”

“Barack, you said it and you’re right — every religion has its extremists,” Cameron countered. “But we have to be frank that the biggest problem we have today is the Islamist extremist violence that has given birth to ISIL [ISIS], to al-Shabab, to al-Nusra, al Qaeda and so many other groups.”

In response to Obama’s failure to name the ideology behind current terrorism, Maajid Nawaz, a former Islamist who now is on the forefront of those advocating against this ideology, asks, “What happens if you don’t name the Islamist ideology and distinguish it from Islam?”

Nawaz says what will come back to Muslims is exactly the attitude the DNC is advocating against. “You’re sending out the message to the vast majority of Americans: There’s an ideology you must challenge, but you don’t tell them what it’s called. What are they going to assume? The average American is going to think, ‘Yeah, I’ve got to challenge an ideology — it’s called Islam.’”

Nawaz added, “You’re only going to increase anti-Muslim hatred, increase the hysteria, like ‘he who must not be named’ — the Voldemort effect, I call it — by not naming the ideology. Because the average guy out there is going to assume the president is talking about the religion itself.

“But if you distingiush Islamist extremism and say, ‘Look, Islam’s a religion. We’re not going to tell you whether Islam is good or bad, peaceful or not. We’re not going to define that for you. What we can say is you mustn’t try to impose that on anyone else. If you do, that’s called Islamism, and that’s what we have a problem with.’”

In the long run, failing to name this treacherous enemy will almost certainly mean the battle against it will be lost. In truth, bombs can only destroy people, but they are ineffective against ideology, which can always fourish in newer and younger groups of people.

In his speech, Cameron stated, “Our new approach is about isolating the extremists from everyone else, so that all our Muslim communities can be free from the poison of Islamist extremism.”

Naming “radical Islam” for the ideology it is, is the first step towards fighting this scourge on all civilization as we know it.

Meira Svirsky is the editor of ClarionProject.org

RELATED ARTICLES:

Reps Endorse Bill to Name Brotherhood as Terror Entity

Hate Crimes in US Against Muslims Decrease – FBI Report

Governors of 27 States Say They Oppose Syrian Refugees in US

How the Paris Attacks Increase the Threat to America

PORTLAND, MAINE: Somali Immigrants Kill Christian Man In Most Gruesome Way

Congressional Fact Sheet on Muslim Migration to U.S.

November 26, 2015/in Culture War, Hot Topics, Immigration, National Security, Policy, Politics, Religion/by Ann Corcoran

You’ve heard me mention several times that on the day before the Paris Islamic terror attack, Don Barnett and I briefed staff of Congressmen and Senators on Capitol Hill on the UN/US Refugee Admissions Program. The briefing was organized by ACT for America. Again, this was before Paris and the whole refugee world was turned on its head.

House of Representatives Briefing

November 12, 2015

~Refugee definition: The 1951 Refugee Convention spells out that a refugee is someone who “owing to a well-founded fear of being persecuted for reasons of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group or political opinion, is outside the country of his nationality, and is unable to, or owing to such fear, is unwilling to avail himself of the protection of that country.”

However, there has been an intentional expansion of the definition. (Unaccompanied Alien Children is an example).

~The Refugee Act of 1980 created the Refugee Admissions Program (USRAP) presently being administered to resettle approximately 70,000 refugees each year (in recent years) to the US.

~The Obama Administration increased the projected ceiling to 85,000 for FY2016. 10,000 of those slots are earmarked for Syrian refugees presently being referred to the US by the UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) which says it has selected 20,000 for consideration so far.

~When the President sends his “Determination” to Congress in advance of the fiscal year (two weeks in advance is required!) it is accompanied by a report (Proposed Refugee Admissions for Fiscal Year 2016). There is supposed to be a legally required consultation with Congress.

~There will be large increases this year from Africa including (but not limited to) DR Congo, Eritrea and Sudan. The largest number of refugees arriving in recent years are from: Burma (Myanmar), Bhutan/Nepal, Iraq, and Somalia. We admitted 120,000 Iraqis since 2007.

~In FY2015, we admitted 1,682 Syrian refugees, less than 40 were Christians/other minorities.

~In 2014, the United States took in 67% of the refugees resettled around the world. The next closest country was Canada with 9.9%.

~The UNHCR refers most of our refugees. The Department of Homeland Security is charged with doing the security screening. The Dept. of State (Bureau of Population, Refugees and Migration) works with nine major refugee contractors who along with the State Dept. determine their placement in America. The Dept. of Health and Human Services (Office of Refugee Resettlement) provides grants and additional federal funding mostly through those nine non-profit agencies.

~The anticipated cost to the US Treasury of the resettlement process (not including welfare/Medicaid/education costs) is projected to be just short of $1.2 billion for FY2016.

~The nine non-profit agencies contracted to resettle refugees include: US Conference of Catholic Bishops, Lutheran Immigration and Refugee Service, Episcopal Migration Ministries, World Relief (Evangelicals), Church World Service, Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society, International Rescue Committee, Ethiopian Community Development Council, and the US Committee for Refugees and Immigrants.

~There are 312 subcontractors working under the nine major contractors in 185 locations around the country. There are 24 offices located around the country for the processing of Unaccompanied Alien Children. A placement site map is available on line (attached).

~The states receiving the highest number of refugees in FY2015 were in descending order: TX, CA, NY, PA, FL, GA, MI, AZ, WA, and NC.

~States receiving no refugees in 2014 or 2015 were: WY, MT. Delaware received none in 2014.

~State and local elected officials have virtually no say in the resettlement process. This is especially so in the so-called Wilson-Fish states where the state doesn’t even have a refugee office under state government and the program is completely run through the US State Department and a non-profit organization. Those states are: AL, AL, CO, ID, KY, LA, MA, NV, ND, SD, TN, VT and San Diego County.

~Refugees are a special class of legal immigrant which permits them to receive virtually all forms of welfare upon arrival.

~Grassroots opposition is growing throughout the US to the resettlement process mostly due to the lack of transparency and the fear of Islamic radicals who might get in through the program.

Some points regarding the proposed Syrian resettlement and the European migration crisis:

~Only about 50% of the migrants flooding Europe today are Syrians. The next highest number are from Afghanistan.

~These are a mix of asylum seekers and economic migrants. Asylum seekers must prove that just as refugees, they fear returning to their homelands for fear of persecution (escaping war per se has never been a part of the refugee definition).

~We are not expected to get refugees from the European flow (Malta exception). Ours will come through UN referrals from mostly UNHCR camps and regional offices.

~The refugee resettlement contractors (NGOs mentioned above) working with the US State Department began advocating several years ago for the resettlement of 15,000 Syrians per year for each of the next 5 years. They then modified their request to 65,000 Syrians before Pres. Obama leaves office. Subsequently they have demanded 100,000 Syrians before 2017.

~Earlier 14 US Senators wrote to the President asking for 65,000 Syrians. A total of 84 Senators and Members of Congress have subsequently urged the President to speed up security screening.

~FBI Director James Comey has told Congress that Syrians cannot be thoroughly screened because the Administration has no access to data (biographic or biometric) on most of them.

This post is filed in our category entitled ‘where to find information’ which now contains 401 previous posts.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Agenda 2030: UN sets goal for sustainable development, has 15 years to get it done

Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL) straddling the fence again on refugees/immigration; bring in children and old women

EDITORS NOTE: The featured image is of the Zaatari refugee camp in Jordan, one of the camps from which the UNHCR is choosing Syrian refugees to migrate to the United States.

Dallas mayor ‘more fearful’ of white men than Syrian Muslim refugees

November 26, 2015/in Culture War, Featured, Immigration, National Security, Policy, Politics, Religion/by Jihad Watch

“We have got to build a coalition of Middle Eastern states and we need to reach out. They’re Muslims and we have got to use the words carefully to show them that we care about them. ISIS is no more Islamic than the Nazi senior staff was Christian.”

The Nazi senior staff didn’t claim to be Christian, but had a fascination with Germanic neo-paganism. Certainly even nominally Christian Nazis didn’t quote Christian scripture to justify their murderous policies.

“And so we have got to differentiate between the two.” Why haven’t Muslims been able to do that so as to stop the 30,000 young Muslims who have traveled from 100 countries around the world to join the Islamic State?

Anyway, this claim that “young white men” are more dangerous than Islamic jihadists is a new theme that must be circulating on the Left. Ohio Senator Sherrod Brown just said it, and now Mike Rawlings. It most likely derives from a widely-heralded study that was published last summer, claiming that “right-wing extremism” was a bigger threat to the U.S. than jihad, based on the number of Americans killed by each since 9/11. Not only does this study skew the results by leaving out 9/11, but it also ignored the many, many foiled jihad plots in the U.S. since 9/11. Also, right-wing extremists like Dylann Roof, the murderer in Charleston, South Carolina, killed because of their paranoid fantasies, but were not part of any movement with an articulated agenda or goal, while Islamic jihadists are members of or ideologically aligned with groups that have declared their intention to destroy the U.S. and the free world. Islamic jihad groups are determined to kill as many Americans as possible and conquer free societies, and swallowing Brown’s nonsense here will result in the deaths of many Americans.

“Dallas mayor ‘more fearful’ of white men than Syrian refugees,” by Jessica Chasmar, Washington Times, November 24, 2015 (thanks to David):

Dallas Mayor Mike Rawlings said he’s more afraid of white men committing mass shootings than Syrian refugees committing acts of terrorism in the U.S.

“ISIS wants us to demonize these Syrian refugees, want us to alienate these children,” Mr. Rawlings, a white Democrat, told MSNBC Saturday, referring to the Islamic State terror group by its acronym. “We have got to build a coalition of Middle Eastern states and we need to reach out. They’re Muslims and we have got to use the words carefully to show them that we care about them. ISIS is no more Islamic than the Nazi senior staff was Christian. And so we have got to differentiate between the two. Fight the fight that we need to do.

“These are evil human beings that are doing terrible things and we need to target our aggression and our plans against them, not children and not refugees,” he said.

Mr. Rawlings is welcoming refugees despite Texas Gov. Greg Abbott asking to keep refugees out of the state. Mr. Rawlings said he and Mr. Abbott are both concerned about safety, but disagree about the risk of refugees.

“I am more fearful of large gatherings of young white men that come into schools, theaters and shoot people up, but we don’t isolate young white men on this issue,” Mr. Rawlings said….

RELATED ARTICLES:

PORTLAND, MAINE: Somali Immigrants Kill Christian Man In Most Gruesome Way

In Texas, Leftist community organizers target governor over Syrian refugee stance

Global Jihad? Never Heard of It: Berkeley’s Bazian Still Hyping ‘Islamophobia’

SDSU: Muslim Brotherhood-linked student group rallies not against jihad terror, but against “Islamophobia”

The Muslim Holy War comes to America’s College Campuses

November 26, 2015/in Culture War, Education, Featured, Policy, Politics, Religion/by The Peoples Cube

The above posters and stickers were plastered all over five major American campuses in the second week of November – two universities in D.C. and three in Southern California – making fun of local anti-Israel groups, Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP) and Muslim Students Association (MSA), pointing out their support for Jew-hatred and violent jihad.

While the identities of those who designed the posters and put them up around the campuses can be neither confirmed nor denied, the responsibility for the campaign was claimed by the David Horowitz Freedom Center here and here. In addition, FreedomPost.us posted a one-minute video with the posters (below) in their story, If You’re A Hamas-Supporting Anti-Israel College In SoCal Or DC, These Posters Are On Your Campus.

The University of California Los Angeles newspaper, THE DAILY BRUIN, responded with an article Offensive posters targeting SJP resurface on campus for third time. The UCLA couldn’t wait to reveal its bias and went for the jugular already in the first word of the title. Rather than attempting to look into the MSA and SJP who like to harass Jews at UCLA, the article offered them the pulpit from which they predictably gunned for the messenger.

SJP outreach director, Ani Der-Grigorian, concluded that the reason SJP and MSA were being grouped together was not their shared hatred of Israel, but Islamophobia. She also complained that UCLA officials have done little in response to the posters and that they “haven’t sat down with us about how unsafe this makes our members feel.” No one bothered to wonder if their own anti-Semitic activities ever made any of the UC Jewish students “feel unsafe.”

The UCLA article states that “Felipe Bris Abejon, SJP education and resources director and first-year political science student, said he was the first to notice the posters on Bruin Walk around 10 a.m., when he found one stuck to the bottom of his shoe.” There was no explanation as to whether the poster stuck to his shoe as a result of repeatedly kicking the wall on which it was displayed, or it crept from behind and attacked the shoe with malicious intentions, but the very fact that it was documented to be stuck to the SJP education and resources director’s shoe is clearly “offensive.”

In Washington, D.C., The American University newspaper, The Eagle, published a tearful article titled, Islamophobic posters found on campus made Muslim students feel unsafe.

“I had people calling me [on Sunday], telling me that they were legitimately scared,” said Aman Abdelhamid, the president of AU’s Muslim Students Association chapter, who claims she felt “severely troubled” by the posters. “The posters…had really strong implications, really threatening messages.”

One might think that Abdelhamid was “severely troubled” after seeing Palestinian children with knives being raised to stab Jews. Or that she felt shocked and ashamed after learning that her fellow president of a Muslim Students Association, Anwar Al-Awlaki, later became an Al-Qaeda leader and was killed in Yemen by an American drone strike. Against all expectations of human decency, however, it appears that Abdelhamid felt “severely troubled” and “threatened” only because all of the above became suddenly exposed.

The article, which initially dismissed the information in the posters as false, has since been edited and appended this notable correction at the bottom: “An earlier version of this article misattributed the New York Times article and stated that Anwar al-Awlaki was not president of an MSA chapter. He was, at Colorado State.” One might think that would change the entire narrative. It didn’t.

Ntebo Mokuena, president of the local chapter of Students for Justice in Palestine, who personally took down some of the posters while being escorted by the campus police, also made similar statements, claiming that some of the local students “offered to walk with Muslim students who did not feel safe traveling alone.”

No word on whether Jewish students have ever been offered the same aid and comfort during the anti-Semitic events that the MSI and SJP regularly hold on the same American University campus.

Laith Shakir, treasurer of AU’s SJP chapter, posted the pictures of the posters on Facebook, saying that they “spew Islamaphobic hate speech” and that he is glad a Public Safety officer “is currently patrolling the campus, finding and documenting these posters they’ve identified as inflammatory and hateful.”

“Not only is all of the information presented here categorically false,” writes Shakir, “it also propagates an exhausted talking point: if you are (or even just look) Muslim, and you’re involved in campus organization, you must also be involved in a terrorist group. Thus, Muslims and people who ‘look Arab’ are inextricably linked to violent extremism. The promoted hashtag [StopTheJihadOnCampus] isn’t trying to just “stop the jihad” (which, itself, is a nonsensical phrase); instead, it’s trying to eradicate anyone who could conceivably be labeled as Arab or Muslim from organizing on campus.”

One might think that at a time when unhinged Islamic terrorism is making everyone in America and around the world feel “unsafe,” reasonable Muslim individuals with a conscience, a modicum of decency, and respect for their host country would pause, step back, and abstain from “organizing” anything except the opposition to such terrorism.

One might also think that “organizing” against international Islamic terrorism would take priority over all other “organizing” for any morally upright Muslim activist who claims that “terrorism gives Islam a bad name.”

What should one then make of those Muslim activists who, instead, jump into action and promote their religion by capitalizing on public fears, panic, and confusion, thus riding the tidal wave of terrorism to which they claim they have no connection, while declaring themselves to be the “victims” and complaining about “feeling unsafe”?

An unbiased observer would probably tell them to calm down and get off that wave. That would certainly help you stop feeling “unsafe.” That would also help you stop looking like a lout without a trace of conscience, reason, decency, and respect for your host country.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Muslim Brotherhood-linked student group rallies not against jihad terror, but against “Islamophobia”

Global Jihad? Never Heard of It: UC Berkeley’s Bazian Still Hyping ‘Islamophobia’

CNN Erases Israel

EDITORS NOTE: This column was originally posted on The Peoples Cube.

Militant Media and the ‘Global War on Terror’

November 26, 2015/in Must Read, National Security, Policy, Politics/by Revolution Television

The secret is revealed. The CIA funded and armed the world’s deadliest terrorist groups, including ISIS/ISL, al Qaeda, and others, now expanding like a plague loosed from Pandora’s box.

This unnerving fact, unraveling the fraud in global politics, was purportedly “slipped” by Vice President Joe Biden on November 19, 2015. Almost instantly thereafter deeper truths were heralded internationally by Hawaii Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard, as detailed below.

Curiously, all of these new revelations broke at the same time these authors published outrageous new evidence indicting radical Revisionist Zionists tied to the Obama Administration implicating Rahm Emanuel, the past White House Chief of Staff, his brother Ari Emanuel–the entertainment industry’s most powerful image builder and Hollywood “head hunter” directing the William Morris Endeavor (“WME”) agency, and their father, Dr. Benjamin M. Emanuel, who served the Irgun, a hardline Zionist terrorist organization condemned by British authorities and the 1946 Zionist Congress.

Shockingly, it was Ari Emanuel’s WME who booked the Eagles of Death Metal band to play at the Bataclan Theatre–the bloodiest scene of the Friday-the-13th Paris attacks. From this evidence it is obvious that the owners of the Bataclan worked with WME to stage the show knowing there was an extremely high probability of planned bloodshed, because the Bataclan’s owner since “9/11″ 2015, is none other than the world’s wealthiest anti-Semite and anti-Zionist–the radical Islamic Emir Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani of Qatar, widely known to be funding ISIS/ISIL, al Qaeda, and other terrorist groups.

COMPELLING NEW EVIDENCE IN BREAKING NEWS

This stunning evidence linking the “Death Metal” show producers to the Bataclan massacre is corroborated by statements made independently by production team survivor Shawn London (during an interview with Jim Hutchinson on JimOnLight.com), as well as Russia’s RT interviewee, Pierre Janaszak, who works in the music industry and viewed the massacre from the balcony, and later while hiding in the band’s dressing room. Janaszak was the sole survivor in that room, and observed that one of the three presumably Islamic radical gunmen was unmistakably French.

More compelling, the Eagles of Death Metal “front house” audio engineer, Mr. London, was incredulous to the fact that the two Bataclan security guards stationed at the front door where the terrorists entered and opened fire on the crowds, inexplicably survived the massacre and were shocked to see Mr. London had gotten out alive. That experience caused London to question the entire event, implying that it may Bataclan security, and possibly even the Paris police and higher-ups, had foreknowledge.

Mr. London said that just before the shooting started, a third security guard was positioned in front of the stage. He was supposed to help handle a couple of misbehaving youth. But suddenly he, and two other security guards in the front of the stage area, just walked away, left their responsibilities, seconds before the massacre began.

Later, London said he was shocked to see the Bataclan’s front door security guardsmen had gotten out alive. “I don’t know,” he said. “I’m not trying to make any, (he stuttered and stammered uncharacteristically at this point of the interview). . . . accusations that they had something to do with it, but it was really strange they got out through the front where nobody else was getting out. They were out before I got out. I just don’t understand. It’s confusing to me. . . We were with them all day. Most of the day, when the doors were open.”

“They weren’t very nice either,” Mr. London continued. “Usually security guards are pretty cool with us. They smile and talk. These guys didn’t say a word. . . . It was just odd that they were out of the building before we all made it out. And they were at the stage position while this was going on.”

The fact that the police did not show up for so long, fifteen to twenty minutes into the massacre, with the security guards employed by Qatar’s radical Islamic allied Lagardère Group having disappeared most timely before the shootings, leaves everyone having to consider the high probability that Bataclan security, and the lax Paris police, had foreknowledge and were complicit in the massacre.

Vice Media, exposed previously by these authors for falsely reporting on Monkey Island–the hepatitis B virus lab most responsible for spreading AIDS worldwide (as shown in this Special Hollywood Spin Report on Ebola), published the first interview with the full band following the Paris attacks. The Vice program was heavily promoted by the corporate-controlled media.

Alternatively, this independent investigation report presents the sixth in our series that even the CIA/FBI’s COINTELPRO Internet “trolls” have uncharacteristically neglected.

This report addresses more than the “fallout,” per se, of the Paris attacks. This articles presents the “spin-out” from the Paris attacks. That is, the manner in which the terrorist “dog” is being “wagged” by the Militant Media “tail.”

The media is intentionally concealing and diverting from what is now most obvious: Civilization is being defrauded by a single global racketeering enterprise that is: (1) coordinating at least two terrorist organizations, one operating from Washington, DC, and the other from Doha, Qatar; and (2) orchestrating the media to broadcast messages knowingly diverting the eyes of the world to Syria and France and away from the true source of the terror.

What else would spin-doctors now claim, besides Washington having made a “mistake” backing “moderate” terrorists to eject Assad from Syria, now that the Obama administration has been caught in the act of funding and arming ISIS, and through double-agents in the world of “news and entertainment” concealing and diverting from the parties most responsible for this global genocide.

REVEALING THE CIA’S FUNDING AND ARMING OF “MODERATE” TERRORISTS

One day before the Paris attacks, Vice President Joe Biden, addressing Harvard University students at the John F. Kennedy Jr. Forum at the Institute of Politics, candidly revealed that “[O]ur biggest problem is our allies – our allies in the region . . . so determined to take down Assad and essentially have a proxy Sunni-Shia war, . . . [t]hey poured hundreds of millions of dollars and tens [of] thousands of tons of weapons into anyone who would fight against Assad; except that the people who were being supplied were Al Nusra and Al Qaeda and the extremist elements of jihadis coming from other parts of the world.

“Now you think I’m exaggerating,” Biden continued, “take a look… Now we have . . . put together a coalition of our Sunni neighbors, because America can’t once again go into a Muslim nation and be seen as the aggressor – it has to be led by Sunnis to go and attack a Sunni organization.

And that is precisely what Russian President Putin had been saying–facts ignored by all mainstream media sources in the West for a long time, as Russia implicated America’s covert action and infiltration into terrorist organizations and involvements in weapons transfers from Libya and elsewhere to Syria.

Biden informed his audience that America’s Sunni allies were responsible for funding and arming anti-Zionist extremists in Syria. Biden named Turkey, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE, specifically. Yet he failed to mention who was greasing America’s palm–Qatar–a blatant diversion since most of the financing for Syrian terrorism by ISIS/ISIL has come from that most anti-Semitic nation, in alliance with the CIA, while monarch Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani invests heavily in Europe, America and China.

RUSSIAN PROPAGANDA CITES AL JAZERRA TO BLAME AMERICA

“We have press reports that the CIA was a major conduit for the transfer of weapons from Libya to Syria,” reported Tina Jennings of the Russia Insider. “[A] role, no doubt, facilitated by US Ambassador Christopher Stevens who was killed in Benghazi by unknown extremists,” Jennings added.

“We are also told that the US assisted in the logistics of delivering a Saudi-bankrolled transfer of Croatian weapons in 2012 to Syrian ‘rebels.’ According to the BBC: “The CIA is also reported to have been instrumental in setting up the alleged secret airlift of weapons from Croatia.

And here is The Telegraph‘s take on things:

“The shipments were allegedly paid for by Saudi Arabia at the bidding of the United States, with assistance on supplying the weapons organised through Turkey and Jordan, Syria’s neighbors.”

These weapons were later caught on video in the hands of Ahrar al-Sham, which today is a target of US airstrikes inside Syria. The New York Times went further:

“With help from the CIA, Arab governments and Turkey have sharply increased their military aid to Syria’s opposition fighters in recent months, expanding a secret airlift of arms and equipment for the uprising against President Bashar al-Assad, according to air traffic data, interviews with officials in several countries and the accounts of rebel commanders.”

“From offices at secret locations, American intelligence officers have helped the Arab governments shop for weapons, including a large procurement from Croatia, and have vetted rebel commanders and groups to determine who should receive the weapons as they arrive, according to American officials speaking on the condition of anonymity.”

“Exactly how does that exonerate Americans from delivering weapons to ‘Al Nusra and Al Qaeda’”, questioned Jennings rhetorically. “Biden’s comments . . . were a bombshell that will be heard across the globe. They will fundamentally undermine Obama’s attempts to arm ‘moderate rebels’ and assemble a coalition that includes the very same Sunni Arab states that have helped create ISIL.”

Now, if that were true, neglecting for the sake of argument the “bigger picture” of one mob directing both sides of every conflict (i.e., through “Controlled Opposition”), then what Russia wants everyone to know is precisely what U.S. Congresswoman and Co-Chair of the Democratic National Convention, Tulsi Gabbard, prescribes to mitigate damages from the illegal secret war the CIA has been administering for the West in Syria and elsewhere.

Confusing? Yes. Secretly defrauding? Yes, again. Informative? You bet! The confusing and diverting manner in which the spin doctors are administering “damage control” and at the same time advancing the overall mission to move civilization toward “globalization” featuring One World Government and “One World Peacekeeping Force” is transparent among those informed with accurate intelligence. We are witnessing and documenting the “magician’s slight-of-hand-routine” in global governance. What Russian and American officials main mission is for the Militant Media exercises a “protection racket” to keep people believing one side or the other, never realizing that both sides are controlled by one mob trading in arms and terror.

REP. TULSI GABBARD DIRECTS BI-PARTISAN COALITION TO STOP THE COVERT ACTION IN SYRIA

We wondered whether Rep. Gabbard grasped the “bigger picture,” so we called and e-mailed her office and press secretary in Honolulu and Washington hoping that the honorable veteran Hawaii Army National Guard major, who served in Kuwait and on the House Foreign Affairs and Homeland Security committees, might respond to our evidence the Paris attacks were staged by U.S. and Qatar agents. By press time, the Congresswoman, who was on a fact finding and diplomatic mission in Paris, had not replied.

Consistent with these author’s evidence of there being one secret enterprise administering at least two terrorist organizations from Washington and Doha, as well as the corporate-controlled Militant Media in the West, and state-controlled Militant Media in Russia and China, Rep. Gabbard output a press release on November 19, 2015, stating much more than Joe Biden did. “The U.S. is waging two wars in Syria,” the Congresswoman wrote. “The first is the war against ISIS and other Islamic extremists, which Congress authorized after the terrorist attack on 9/11. The second war is the illegal war to overthrow the Syrian government of Assad.”

Although we applaud Rep. Gabbard’s heroic admission that the CIA had proceeded illegally, we are unclear as to whether “Tulsi” knows her efforts at legislative re-direction is consistent with the spin required for damage control. What else should America admit other than having made a “mistake.” Someone needed to step forward and cause America to back-off to save face, now Biden admitted what he did, and “the cat is out of the bag.”
“The war to overthrow Assad is counter-productive,” the Congresswoman published honestly and in good faith, “because it actually helps ISIS and other Islamic extremists achieve their goal of overthrowing the Syrian government of Assad and taking control of all of Syria—which will simply increase human suffering in the region, exacerbate the refugee crisis, and pose a greater threat to the world. Also, the war to overthrow Assad is illegal because Congress never authorized it.”

Congressman Austin Scott joined Rep. Gabbard and wrote, “Our primary mission should be the war against ISIS, al Qaeda, and radical Islamic extremists that have operations both inside and outside of Syria and Iraq. Those groups have carried out attacks on American allies, and are currently threatening attacks on our homeland. This represents a clear and present danger to our citizens, and I support eliminating these radical Islamic terrorists through any means necessary. Working to remove Assad at this stage is counter-productive to what I believe our primary mission should be.”

What if “eliminating these radical Islamic terrorists” requires exposing the Secret Government that directed the Obama White House and CIA to coordinate the Friday-the-13th attacks on Paris with complicit agents and financing from Qatar?

GABBARD’S 10 REASONS TO STOP THE WAR AGAINST ASSAD

“Here are 10 reasons the U.S. must end its war to overthrow the Syrian government,” Tulsi Gabbard’s press release stated. Between each is our analysis and commentary:

“1. Because if we succeed in overthrowing the Syrian government of Assad, it will open the door for ISIS, al-Qaeda, and other Islamic extremists to take over all of Syria. There will be genocide and suffering on a scale beyond our imagination. These Islamic extremists will take over all the weaponry, infrastructure, and military hardware of the Syrian army and be more dangerous than ever before.”

In other words, we must admit having made a huge mistake in supposedly securing freedom and democracy in the Middle East. The “Emperor wears no clothes”–our National Security Agency (NSA) has been caught fueling political instability, international insecurity, and martial law globally. We must now repent from covertly opposing Assad’s fascist government killing masses of people in Syria, to have Qatar lead the financing of radical Muslim terrorists killing masses of people in Syria. Either option will cause massive deaths in Syria, and mass movements of populations from Syria, and immigration problems globally.

And this disturbing reality is curiously timed perfectly to justify Donald Trump’s controversial anti-immigration policies, and French President François Hollande’s knee-jerk directive to close France’s borders in the wake of the Paris attacks. (In other words, there is more here than meets the lens of the Militant Media.)

“2. Because overthrowing the Syrian government of Assad is the goal of ISIS, al-Qaeda, and other Islamic extremist groups. We should not be allying ourselves with these Islamic extremists by helping them achieve their goal because it is against the security interests of the United States and all of civilization.”

Although painfully accurate, this candid concern forecasts armed troops from the Global Alliance combating ISIS and al-Qaeda terrorists allied against Assad, since: (1) Qatar and other global military-industrialists will continue funding and arming the “radical” terrorists (as opposed to the “moderate” terrorists) in Syria, and Assad will more rapidly lose his control of Syria when the CIA stops fueling the “counter-terrorism” program for America’s “defense.”

“3. Because the money and weapons the CIA is providing to overthrow the Syrian government of Assad are going directly or indirectly into the hands of the Islamic extremist groups, including al-Qaeda affiliates, al-Nusra, Ahrar al-Sham, and others who are the actual enemies of the United States. These groups make up close to 90 percent of the so-called opposition forces, and are the most dominant fighters on the ground.”

Precisely why we forecast a worsening “catch-22″– armed combat troops on the streets representing the Global Alliance combating the enemies created by the global industrialists.

“4. Because our efforts to overthrow Assad have increased and will continue to increase the strength of ISIS and other Islamic extremists, thus making them a bigger regional and global threat.”

Alternatively, now that America is virtually insolvent, already spread too thin militarily while war against China looms in the Pacific, the Cold War is heating up with Russia, and the only option is to create a One World Peacekeeping Force to combat radical religious menaces further destabilizing populations, we must increase defense spending, heighten border security, and protect our energy industry, or otherwise Judeo-Christianity will be brought to its knees by radical Islam.

“5. Because this war has exacerbated the chaos and carnage in Syria and, along with the terror inflicted by ISIS and other Islamic extremist groups fighting to take over Syria, continues to increase the number of Syrians forced to flee their country.”

Correct again. But the border insecurity and immigration dilemma will increase in either case. In Hawaii, for example, Governor Ige has invited Syrian refugees to paradise! This is both a hoax and hypocrisy given the fact that: (1) native Hawaiian’s have been culturally and genocidally damaged by America’s illegal military occupation of the former sovereign island nation.

Approximately 60 percent of the living Kanaka men are in jail. What was once a 500,000 strong native population has dwindled to less than 8,000 living in the State of Hawaii. The Hawaiian culture, the most artistically expressive and loving in aboriginal history, has been Westernized and commercialized to the max. And to what result? In recent months, armed police have directed assaults against throngs of jobless homeless victims of poverty in and around downtown Honolulu. The once pristine Ala Moana Harbor adjacent the Hilton Hawaiian Village Resort in Waikiki looks like the trash dump neighboring Kenya. Ige promises Syrian refugees will do well here?

“6. Because we should learn from our past mistakes in Iraq and Libya that U.S. wars to overthrow secular dictators (Saddam Hussein and Muammar Gaddafi) cause even more chaos and human suffering and open the door for Islamic extremists to take over in those countries.”

Learning from “past mistakes” requires two things traditionally neglected: (1) acknowledging the mistakes, who made them, and why they were made; and (2) public education through mainly the media, schools and workplaces. Not only is the media and academia financially controlled by those who made “the mistakes,” but these agents and agencies invested in chaos have a conflicting interest to conceal their mistakes so people, and generations to come, never awaken from this nightmare.

“7. Because the U.S. has no credible government or government leader ready to bring order, security, and freedom to the people of Syria.”

Indeed, American exceptionalism and military bullying is dwindling, leaving China and Russia more credible, diplomatically powerful, and exclusively capable of applying sustainable productive pressure on Assad and his government to secure his bloody fascist dictatorship.

“8. Because even the ‘best case’ scenario—that the U.S. successfully overthrows the Syrian government of Assad—would obligate the United States to spend trillions of dollars and the lives of American service members in the futile effort to create a new Syria. This is what we have been trying to do in Iraq for twelve years, and we still have not succeeded. The situation in Syria will be much more difficult than in Iraq.”

Agreed. The entire context of geopolitics in the Middle East is explosive and insurmountable so long as the corporate-controlled media–the Militant Media–foments war-mentality, terror, and terrorism through every television set, movie screen, and classroom. Every culture is being indoctrinated into war-making, not peace keeping and community building. The media is the terrorist, and neglected peace resource, being used to contrive and sustain war.

“9. Because our war against the Syrian government of Assad is interfering with our being one-pointedly focused on the war to defeat ISIS, al-Qaeda, and the other Islamic extremists who are our actual enemy.”

If bringing peace to the Middle East was truly our focus, then why would any reasonably intelligent person focus “one-pointedly” on war-making with anyone? Again, the military-mentality is overwhelmingly, painfully, fearfully, and regularly reinforced using images of death and property damage to impact most powerfully We The People and mental midgets–terrorists and trouble-makers indoctrinated to hate and destroy rather than love and prosper.

“10. Because our war to overthrow the Assad government puts us in direct conflict with Russia and increases the likelihood of war between the United States and Russia and the possibility of another world war.”

True. But isn’t that part of the plan? Produce World War III directing Russia and China against Anglo-American allies to dispose of over-population and result in One World Government, One World Peacekeeping Force, One World Bank, One World Court, One World Health Organization, and One World Economy?

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION

The evidence before us is that the Paris attacks were staged, scripted, administered, and misrepresented. The timing of the aforementioned events corroborates the official malfeasance and conspiracy reality. Just as the Islamic State (ISIS/ISIL) was being exposed as a contrived enemy, American and Qatari funding of ISIS and Western Intelligence agencies’ involvements were acknowledged by U.S. officials and condemned by Russian propagandists.

On the home front, debate to block immigration and tighten border security, as France did instantly following the Paris attacks, provides further evidence of a coordinated international attack on civility. In addition, interviews from eye witnesses at the Bataclan massacre compound the evidence that the event was staged and produced with foreknowledge by governments and security officials.

Today, the main players not only wield the military and war industry, they also control the media. They deliver propaganda–the messages output to cause confusion rewarded in profit as civilization is railroaded into a “national security” state of chaos.

Corporate fascism, terrorism, and blood baths also create depopulation, which reduces the Oligarchy’s risk of revolution against the central bankers and political parties, popular uprisings by citizens of every nation awakening to their manipulation and enslavement.

Everyone is affected by this demonic and psychopathic racketeering enterprise, the only cure for which is to:

(1) Set examples by indicting the responsible agents and agencies operating within complicit governments, the U.S. and Qatar, on probable cause of funding and arming mass murderers, and complicity in committing genocide. The aforementioned evidence is available and useful for these proposed prosecutions. To do less would further discredit America and Qatar, and would assure continued terrorism and mass murder;

(2) Boycott, and ideally block, all mainstream Militant Media news sources redirecting civilization to independent news and intelligence providers unlikely to be corrupted and complicit in the consumer fraud and organized crime. This would send an instant dramatic message favoring civility, by suspending the social and behavioral programming underlying aggression, pubic manipulation, and subversion of ethics and basic human values for peace, prosperity, and sustainability.

RELATED INTELLIGENCE

1) United States arms, fees, and heals Islamic State of Iraq and Levant (ISIL). Senator McCain secretly illegally entering Syria to meet with ISIL to coordinate strategy on that warfront. CLICK HERE.

2) Wag the Dog film produced by Rupert Murdoch’s Warner Bros. spins the Militant Media’s manipulation of reality on behalf of political opportunists. CLICK HERE and HERE.

3) Frustrated by intelligence failures, as the ones cited in this article, the Defense Department decided to dramatically expand its ‘black world’ (i.e., covert) operations. As reported in 2002 by William M. Arkin, military affairs analyst, Donald Rumsfeld influenced the Defense Science Board in their Summer Study on Special Operations and Joint Forces in Support of Countering Terrorism. The classified “outbrief” was drafted to guide defense agencies on counter-terrorism that “requires new strategies, postures and organization.” The board recommended the creation of Super-Intelligence Support Activity–an organization it dubs the Proactive, Preemptive Operations Group, (P2OG)–to bring together CIA and military covert action, information warfare, intelligence, and covert deception.

Among other things, this body would launch secret operations aimed at “stimulating reactions” among terrorists and states possessing weapons of mass destruction — that is, for instance, prodding terrorist cells into action and exposing themselves to “quick-response” attacks by U.S. forces.
Such tactics would hold “states/sub-state actors accountable” and “signal to harboring states that their sovereignty will be at risk,” the briefing paper declared.

The operation was purportedly administered by one hundred “highly specialized people with unique technical and intelligence skills such as information operations, PSYOP, network attack, covert activities, SIGINT, HUMINT, SOF, influence warfare/deception operations.” This secret group is believed to have constituted a new, elite “Proactive Preemptive Operations Group (P2OG),” reporting to the National Security Council with an annual budget of $100 million.

4) U.S. Recruited Japanese entertainment corporation Sony to help in propaganda war against islamic states and Russia. CLICK HERE.

Quoting from the article, “Sony Pictures Entertainment CEO Michael Lynton is on the board of trustees of the RAND Corporation, an organization specializing in research and development for the United States military and intelligence sector. The Sony Archives show the flow of contacts and information between these two major US industries, whether it is RAND wanting to invite George Clooney and Kevin Spacey to events, or Lynton offering contact to Valerie Jarrett (a close advisor to Obama) or RAND desiring a partnership with IMAX for digital archiving. With this close tie to the military-industrial complex it is no surprise that Sony reached out to RAND for advice regarding its North Korea film The Interview… The Sony documents also show Sony being in possession of a brochure for an NSA-evaluated online cloud security set-up called INTEGRITY.

WikiLeaks published this leaked story including Sony data detailing influential ties to the White House and ‘Military-Industrial Complex.’ The intelligence demonstrates how the government and entertainment corporations have teamed up to run a massive psychological operation on the American people.

The Wikileaks archive reveals that the government is actively working with the corporate media to produce the sort of propaganda required to shape the foreign policy of the United States.

5) A related story concerns “The CIA’s Nest of Vipers at Sony Pictures” and involves “Virtuous War” making. The June 7, 2001, publication details the “mapping” of the Military-Industrial-Media-Entertainment Network.” Quoting from this source linked HERE:

In the Mojave Desert, off the shores of San Francisco Bay, in the hills of southern Germany, next door to Disneyworld and in the heart of Hollywood, the United States armed forces are preparing for the next war. They are fought by the military in the same manner as they are viewed by citizens, on real-time networks and by live-feed videos, on the PC and the TV, actually and virtually. Enabled by smart technologies yet constrained by political and humanitarian imperatives, a new form of high-tech, low-risk warfare is emerging, Virtuous War. In Virtuous War, James Der Derian takes the reader on a roadtrip through the future of war, where cyborg combat technologies, video games, TV news stories, Army training exercises, and Hollywood movies all blur and converge in a new military-industrial-media-entertainment network. He shows us a world in which CNN and Disney are as much a part of the battlefield as Lockheed Martin and the Pentagon, where Marine fire-teams train with the video game “Doom”, and entertainment executives design Army war-games. All the while Derian offers tremendous insight on the questions that arise as the tail of technology wags the dog of war.”

6) More recently, on March 19, 2013, the Military-Industrial- Media-Entertainment Network was further unveiled by Google/YouTube (CLICK HERE). Quoting this intelligence:

“Technology in the service of virtue has given rise to a global form of virtual violence: Virtuous War. In the 21st century, the Military-Industrial-Media-Entertainment-Network (aka The MIME-NET) has become the ‘fifth-dimension’ of U.S. hegemony. Fought in the same manner they are represented through real-time global surveillance, media dissimulation, and network-centric warfare, virtuous war deters, disciplines and destroys the “enemy” at a distance. An all-too-real matrix, MIME-NET, seamlessly merges the production, representation, and execution of war. We learn how to kill but not take responsibility for it; we encounter ‘death’ but not its tragic consequences; we now face not just the confusion but the pixelation of war and game on the same screen.” This information features
Professor James Der Derian, of the University of Sydney. He “takes the viewer on a journey through deserts real and virtual to find the ghosts in the 21st century war-machine.”

7) The Militant Media, or the “Military–industrial–media complex,” as Wikipedia describes it:

“The military–industrial–media complex is an offshoot of the military–industrial complex. Organizations like Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting have accused the military industrial media complex of using their media resources to promote militarism, which, according to Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting’s hypothesis, benefits the defense resources of the company.

General Electric (which owns, but is in the process of divesting, 49% of NBC) is a subcontractor for the Tomahawk cruise missile and Patriot II missile both of which were used extensively during the Persian Gulf War.^[1] General Electric also manufactures components for the B-2 stealth bomber and B-52 bomber and the E-3 AWACS aircraft which were also used extensively during the conflict. During the first Gulf War, General Electric received $2 billion in defense contracts related to weapons which would be used in Gulf War and the 2003 invasion and subsequent occupation of Iraq by Coalition Forces.”

Here is an adjunct to our main points:

“Paradoxical Psychological Manipulation is a technique often used by the military and the media.

A powerful strategy of clandestine brainwashing is to send a communication with two, paradoxical messages.

“Even intelligent people can be taken in by this brainwashing technology of paradoxical messaging. An example of this phenomenon is a current operation by the Advertising Council.

In June of 2003, the Ad Council was stating its overall purpose in this way: “We marshall [sic] the volunteer forces of advertising agencies and media companies to affect [sic] positive social change.” As of December, 2003, they have corrected their statement to read: “We marshal the volunteer forces of advertising agencies and media companies to effect positive social change.” You can, in the example below, interpret “effect positive change” to mean “brainwash people into fearful submission.”

One of the Council’s current operations is called the “Campaign for Freedom.” If you believe the Council,

“The initiative is designed to assist Americans during the war on terrorism through the development and distribution of timely and relevant public service messages. This first round of PSAs for the campaign has been created to celebrate our nation’s freedom and remind Americans about the importance of freedom and the need to protect it for future generations.”

“According to research, Americans are looking for messages that will inform, involve and inspire them during the war on terrorism. This inspirational campaign is advertising’s gift to America on the occasion of its birthday, Independence Day.” All of the ads conclude with the powerful tagline, “Freedom. Appreciate it. Cherish it. Protect it.”

We recommend you examine all six Ad Council “messages” to see the paradoxical communications in each.

8) View also:

http://www.infopeace.org/911/index.cfm?id=5

http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a441602.pdf

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b9434BoGkNQ

ADDITIONAL REFERENCE

Wolf in Sheep’s Clothing: Why Qatar Want to be Friends with Russia

ABOUT THE AUTHORS:

LEONARD G. HOROWITZ, D.M.D., M.A., M.P.H., D.N.M. (HON.), D.M.M. (HON.)

Dr. Leonard G. Horowitz is the world’s most prolific, best credentialed, and most controversial drug industry critic.

This music industry revolutionary, natural medicine expert, pharmaceutical industry whistleblower, and intelligence industry analyst has published eighteen books, five documentary films, and dozens of peer-reviewed scientific articles.

After receiving his Doctor of Medical Dentistry degree from Tufts University, and a Master of Public Health degree from Harvard University, Dr. Horowitz went on to publish the first of three American bestsellers, Emerging Viruses: AIDS & Ebola–Nature, Accident or Intentional?. This book is largely credited by Centers for Disease Control (CDC) officials for prompting the global vaccination risk awareness movement. Dr. Horowitz’s monumental text caused several governments to reconsider their “immunization” policies, and it became the center of political debate in 2008 when Barack Obama’s minister, Rev. Jeremiah Wright, credited Horowitz and this book for evidencing HIV/AIDS as a genocidal weapon of mass depopulation targeting Africans and African Americans courtesy of covert U.S. military contractors named in the book.

Dr. Horowitz’s second bestseller, Healing Codes for the Biological Apocalypse, prompted a revolution in the music and natural healing industries.

The retired dentist and naturopathic physician’s consumer health guidebook, Healing Celebrations: Miraculous Recoveries Through Ancient Scripture, Natural Medicine and Modern Science, pioneered the protocol adopted by thousands of natural healers and doctors worldwide.

His 2007 decryption of Leonardo da Vinci’s most famous drawing revealed the mathematics of LOVE: The Real da Vinci CODE; and his follow-up text, the most monumental of his 30-year career, The Book of 528: Prosperity Key of LOVE, reveals “God’s creative technology,” available for revolutionizing music, recording artistry, healthcare, environmental resource protection and restoration, along with civilization’s transformation as an “enlightened species” choosing peaceful sustainable collaboration versus murderous degenerative competition and lethal consumption.

From Dr. Horowitz’s books, video productions, and documentary films, Hollywood filmmakers have drawn many ideas, including those expressed the movies INCEPTION, I Am Legand, the X-File Movie, and several others.

International acclaim and widespread acceptance of the doctor’s works revealing Solfeggio frequency physics and metaphysics has prompted the “528LOVERevolution,” which Dr. Horowitz and his partner, journalist and activist, Sherri Kane, has commercialized in the rapidly growing 528RadioNetwork.com and through his private television station, LOVE528TV.net, formed following Google/YouTube’s censorship of more than 150 of the doctor’s DVD productions.

Dr. Horowitz’s and Sherri Kane’s 528Radio.com broadcasts “medicinal music” transposed into the “LOVE frequency” of 528Hz, that resonates the sound of buzzing bees, and 528nm of greenish-yellow light at the heart of rainbows, precisely why grass is green and fills the air with electron-energized oxygen vibrating in the energy of LOVE/528.

Dr. Horowitz’s film presentation, the 528KEY movie, provides an explanation of the great opportunity provided by the 528 frequency for advancing unprecedented benefits to civilization.

INVESTIGATIVE JOURNALIST SHERRI KANE

If you do a Google search on Sherri Kane, you will probably notice she has been widely defamed by a seemingly large group of racist, anti-Semitic, and sexist men who obviously feel their lives spent on the Internet libeling her is a profitable pastime.

Here are some political reasons why:

Sherri Kane is America’s gutsiest investigative journalist, news commentator, psycho-social analyst, and political activist, specializing in uncovering what predators do to women, children, and even animals. She exposes human and animal rights violators, child sex traffickers, and human slavery networks, several involving high ranking government officials.

Sherri does not hesitate to investigate, analyze, and vet the dark world of government and intelligence agencies’ corruption, and agents’ complicity in organized crimes. She refutes the propaganda published to manipulate and damage people, and exposes what is being concealed by the FBI/CIA’s COINTELPRO (that was supposed to have stopped abusing people and depriving human rights in 1976 by Acts of Congress). Sherri delves into conspiracy realities so dark that very few people dare to study them.

For instance, you may have heard of the political fracas involving certain members of Congress, a high ranking official in the Republican Party, and the mysterious disappearances and abuses of children at “Boys Town” in Nebraska, called “The Franklin Cover-up.” Thanks to Ms. Kane’s heroic investigative reporting, the matter has now been exposed as “The Franklin Double-coverup.”

You may recall the Gulf Oil Crisis, maybe even the extensive coverage Jesse Ventura and TruTV gave to the “Conspiracy Theory” implicating Halliburton, BP, and TransOcean in the intentional explosion and environmental devastation in the Gulf of Mexico. Ms Kane sourced the story and appears on the segment.

Sherri wrote the foreword to Dr. Horowitz’s music-industry-transforming book, The Book of 528: Prosperity Key of Love, and co-produced and is co-starring in Dr. Horowitz’s controversial docu-comedy PHARMAWHORES: The SHOWTIME Sting of Penn & Teller, winner of the 2010 Accolade Award for “Uniqueness in Documentary Film-making.”

Ms. Kane is the Vice President of Medical Veritas online journal, has published works in newspapers, magazines and many websites, and has been interviewed worldwide including on Al Jazeera’s A9 Turkey, The Veritas Show, the BBC’s Talk Radio Europe, Late Night In The Midlands, WAC Connecticut, LA Talk Radio, and many others. She co-hosts the Hollywood Spin series of film reviews with Dr. Horowitz viewed on RevolutionTelevision.net and Vimeo’s Revolution Television Channel. Ms. Kane also co-hosted The HOROKANE Hour on LNM Radio Network with Dr. Horowitz, and co-wrote Space Pearl Harbor, reviewed in the 39-minute news program seen HERE.

Sherri is currently collaborating with Dr. Horowitz on various projects including Healthy World Organization (HWO), the alternative to the corrupt World Health Organization (WHO), HealthyWorldAffiliates.com, and advancing the power of “528 Hz” frequency for global healing, as experienced at 528Records.com, 528Radio.com, and 528Revolution.com.

E-mail inquiries to SherriKane@gmail.com.

See more at: http://www.waronwethepeople.com/militant-media/#sthash.m21fCTVG.dpuf

Reversing the Muslim Tide

November 25, 2015/in Culture War, Immigration, National Security, Policy, Politics, Regulation, Religion/by Paul R. Hollrah

In the days following the horrific slaughter of innocent men, women, and children by radical Islamists in Paris, small groups of Syrian refugees have been detained in unlikely ports of entry throughout the western hemisphere. Eleven Syrian refugees, traveling with fake passports, were detained in Paraguay; 5 Syrians, traveling with stolen Greek passports, were arrested in Honduras; 3 Syrian men, traveling with fake Greek passports, were arrested on the Caribbean Island of St. Maarten after traveling through Brazil, the Dominican Republic, and Haiti; and 8 Syrians were arrested after making it as far as the INS border checkpoint at Laredo, Texas,

Is it my imagination, or is there a pattern developing here? Is it pure coincidence that so many Syrians were detained in unlikely western hemisphere locations while trying to enter the U.S. illegally? Could it be that they were acting under orders from ISIS to make their way into the U.S. for purposes of committing acts of terrorism? And if these four insurgencies were detected, how many others went undetected?

In the meantime, Barack Obama’s plan to import more than 100,000 Islamic refugees per year has drawn strong opposition across the country. While Republican presidential candidates argue that the 10,000 Syrian refugees now destined for resettlement should be barred from entering the U.S. until a fail-safe vetting formula can be developed, Democrats argue that U.S. immigration officials should simply trust the refugees to answer truthfully when asked whether or not they represent an existential threat to the American people.

In light of a great many vicious terror attacks, both here and abroad, the American people are understandable frightened and are unwilling to accept additional large numbers of Muslims into our country. Unfortunately, members of Congress, on both sides of the aisle, fail to recognize that the question of whether or not to admit additional Muslims has already been decided in the negative. What I have suggested in recent columns is that, if the intent of the current law is unclear, the Congress should rewrite sections of the Communist Control Act of 1954, a statute that has not been overturned by the courts and is still in force, to read as follows:

SEC. 1. PURPOSE. The Congress hereby finds and declares that certain organizations exist within our borders which, although purporting to be political or religious in nature, are in fact instrumentalities of foreign political or religious entities or ideologies whose purpose it is to overthrow the Government of the United States by any available means, including force and violence. Such organizations operate as authoritarian dictatorships within our borders, demanding for themselves the rights and privileges generally accorded to all political parties and religious denominations, but denying to all others the liberties guaranteed to them by the U.S. Constitution.

SEC. 2. PROSCRIBED ORGANIZATIONS. Any political or religious organization as described herein, or any successors or affiliates of such organizations, regardless of the assumed name, whose object or purpose it is to overthrow the government of the United States, or to force the political or religious conversion of its people by force or violence, or threats thereof, are not entitled to any of the rights, privileges, and immunities attendant upon legal bodies created under the jurisdiction of the laws of the United States or its political subdivisions; and whatever rights, privileges, and immunities heretofore granted to said religious or political organizations, or any subsidiary or affiliate organizations, by reason of the laws of the United States or any political subdivision thereof, are hereby rescinded.

This amendment to the Communist Control Act of 1954 would serve to reinforce provisions of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, Public Law 414, which effectually bars any and all Muslims from either entering or residing in the United States. That law, otherwise known as the McCarran-Walter Act, is still on the books. And while it has not been enforced by recent administrations, Democrat or Republican, it is sufficient to protect the American people from attacks such as those carried out on September 11, 2001, and subsequent atrocities.

Chapter 2, Section 212, of the McCarran-Walter Act contains numerous provisions which bar Muslims from legally entering or residing in the United States. For example, Islam permits Islamic men to marry up to four wives. And although fewer than 2% of Muslim men have multiple wives, the practice of polygamy is permitted under Islamic law. Section 212(11) of the McCarran-Walter Act prohibits all aliens who are polygamists, or who practice polygamy, or who advocate the practice of polygamy, from entering or residing in the United States.

Section 212(19) of the Act bars entry to any alien who seeks to procure, or has sought to procure, or has procured a visa or other documentation, or seeks to enter the United States by fraud, or by willfully misrepresenting a material fact.

Section 212(27) of the Act bars all aliens “who the consular officer or the Attorney General knows, or has reason to believe, seek to enter the United States solely, principally, or incidentally, to engage in activities which would be prejudicial to the public interest, or endanger the welfare, safety, or security of the United States.”

Section 212(28) of the Act denies access to all aliens who are anarchists, or who have at any time been members of or affiliated with, any organization that advocates or teaches the overthrow of the government of the United States by force, violence, or other unconstitutional means.

In addition, the McCarran-Walter Act contains provisions for a reporting system whereby all aliens are required to report their current address to the INS each year. It also establishes a central index of aliens in the U.S. for use by security and enforcement agencies… much as Donald Trump and Dr. Ben Carson have suggested.

Section 212 of the Act makes irrelevant any current debate or legislative proposal that would restrict or delay the entry of large numbers of Middle Eastern refugees. Section 212 concludes by saying, “Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may, by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or non-immigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate.”

In other words, under the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, Muslims are prohibited from obtaining visas to enter or immigrate to the United States, and it gives Obama the authority to do exactly what the American people want him to do… i.e. suspend any further immigration of Muslim refugees to the United States.

Muslim immigration is prohibited under McCarran-Walter because the Koran and Sharia Law require complete submission to Islam, which is antithetical to the U.S. Constitution. All those who subscribe to the Koran as their guiding principle, by definition, subscribe to Islam and its form of government. Most liberals and Democrats insist that Muslims cannot be prohibited from entering the U.S. because Islam, as a religion, is a protected class under the 1^st Amendment to the Constitution. However, Islam is not merely another religious denomination. Islam is a complete social, political, economic, legal, judicial, and military system with a religious component. As such, it is totally incompatible with principles embodied in the U.S. Constitution. Islam does not, and cannot, merit 1^st Amendment protections.

When the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 was sent to President Harry Truman for his signature, he vetoed the bill. However, his veto was overridden by a vote of 278 to 113 in the House and 57 to 26 in the Senate. Speaking in support of a veto override, Senator Pat McCarran (D-NV), a principal author of the Act, said what any Republican of today might say. He said, “I believe that this nation is the last hope of Western civilization, and if this oasis of the world shall be overrun, perverted, contaminated, or destroyed, then the last flickering light of humanity will be extinguished. I take no issue with those who would praise the contributions which have been made to our society by people of many races, of varied creeds and colors. However, we have in the United States today hard-core, indigestible blocs which have not become integrated into the American way of life, but which, on the contrary, are its deadly enemies.”

He concluded by saying, “Today, as never before, untold millions are storming our gates for admission and those gates are cracking under the strain. The solution to the problems of Europe and Asia will not come through a transplanting of those problems en masse to the United States. I do not intend to become prophetic, but if the enemies of this legislation succeed in riddling it to pieces, or in amending it beyond recognition, they will have contributed more to promote this nation’s downfall than any other group since we achieved our independence as a nation.”

How prophetic! The enemies of America have been highly successful in “riddling our system to pieces,” and never before has the “last flickering light of humanity” been in greater danger of being extinguished than it is today. What is needed is not a temporary halt to immigration by the “hard-core, indigestible blocs” that now threaten us, but a reversal of the immigration that has taken place since the McCarran-Walter Act became law in 1953. So long as radical Islamists insist upon achieving world domination through acts of unspeakable violence, and so long as so-called “moderate” Muslims merely look on as bystanders, peace-loving peoples must insist that Muslims settle their age-old differences in total isolation, in their own barren lands.

If and when a new immigration bill comes before Congress for a veto override, Republicans would be well advised to resurrect the wise counsel of their 1953 colleague, Pat McCarran.

CNN Fails to ‘Vet’ Radical Muslim Guest

November 25, 2015/in Immigration, Must Read, Policy, Politics, Religion/by Jihad Watch

Over at PJ Media today I discuss CNN “journalist” Christiane Amanpour’s manifest bias and hypocrisy:

CNN’s Christiane Amanpour believes “we can all afford to be human” regarding the Syrian refugees. Recently, she condemned the U.S. and other countries for not letting them enter the homeland, despite FBI Director James Comey’s testimony explaining that vetting this population is literally impossible.

Apparently, “discerning” does not qualify as a human trait to Amanpour. Because soon after she offered her ill-considered, slanderous logic equating “responsible” with “heartless,” she employed this advice in her own decision-making — and she was taken.

Amanpour demonstrated exactly how Islamic radicals have learned to take advantage of those bearing her viewpoint.

Last Thursday, Amanpour invited Dalil Boubakeur, chairman of the Grand Mosque of Paris, to a sit-down interview. During the interview, Boubakeur strongly denounced the Islamic State (ISIS) and called for military action against it. He then declared that the barbarous terror group behind the Paris attacks had nothing to do with Islam:

Our religion is not one of violence, of jihadism, of terrorism, of women who kill. In what page of Qur’an is that written that a woman must take bombs inside her body to explode and kill other people? In what part of Qur’an is that said? In what page of Qur’an is it said that we shall kill innocent people? Young people?

Boubakeur then lamented that “little by little,” the Islamic State had won over the young Muslims of Europe. He declared that it was a “great error … not only of Muslims, but of the world to accept this.”

Then, Boubakeur called on Muslims in France to assimilate:

[It is] very important [for] French Muslim people to express their French nationality, their French taste, their French values, their French [rejection] of what is the danger for them, France, and for our religion also.

Had Amanpour recognized vetting as rational behavior — and understood her own viewpoint as reckless and irresponsible — then she would have known that Boubakeur’s insistence on “assimilation” could be nothing but a preposterous, exploitative lie considering his past behavior.

Homeland security expert Patrick Poole reported on Boubakeur’s rejection of Islamic “assimilation” with Western values in PJ Media last January. Boubakeur certainly does not oppose ISIS’s — or, in general, Islam’s — embrace of violence when he isn’t on Amanpour’s set:

[I]n 2006 at the height of the Danish Cartoon crisis, Boubakeur had published an article denouncing the cartoons and concluded by issuing a warning to all those — including Charlie Hebdo — who would publish caricatures of Mohammed, saying: “He who sows the whirlwind shall reap the whirlwind.”

Stop drawing Muhammad, and start abiding by Sharia blasphemy laws … or else.

Boubakeur, rather than being the assimilation-supporting, violence-spurning moderate Amanpour wanted him to be, is guilty of fanning the violence that resulted in deadly riots across the globe and ended in the horrific slaughter at Charlie Hebdo’s offices.

Boubakeur’s interview answers were no doubt music to the ears of Amanpour, as they matched the narrative she pushed in her September op-ed published by CNN wherein she castigated the U.S. for not taking more Syrian refugees. In the op-ed, Amanpour described the following as “heartwarming”:

… ordinary citizens, the responsible media, and generous governments all opening their arms to welcome a modern, yet biblical tide of humanity, fleeing war and persecution to safety here in Europe.

She scolded the U.S. and Canada:

… countries with big hearts, deep pockets and a habit of projecting their humanitarian values [are] unwilling to actually help end the war that would stop this exodus.

The U.S., she lamented:

… has only accepted fewer than 1,500 Syrian asylum seekers over the course of the war.

Amanpour did not address in her piece the real reason why many in the U.S. and elsewhere are reluctant to take in large numbers of these refugees: the prospect of Islamic jihadis being among them.

The Islamic State boasted last February that they would soon inundate Europe with 500,000 refugees. The Lebanese education minister recently warned that there were 20,000 active jihadis among the Syrian refugees in camps in his country. An Islamic State operative boasted in September, shortly after the migrant influx into Europe began, that among the flood of refugees, 4,000 terrorists had already entered Europe.

None of that information made it into Amanpour’s piece. She likely is confident that Obama administration officials will be able to “vet” the refugees they admit into the U.S., as they have repeatedly promised to do….

She must understand now that to heed her call, to bring in those refugees in large numbers, might make her temporarily feel good about how tolerant and multicultural she is, but will be cold comfort to the rest of us when the bombs start exploding.

Read the rest here.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Tunisia: Islamic jihadists murder at least 12 with bomb on bus full of presidential guards

Roman Catholic bishop Robert Barron advocates strategy of submission to the Islamic State

Canadian Military thrown out of barracks to make room for Muslim refugees

November 24, 2015/in Culture War, Immigration, National Security, Policy, Politics, Religion/by Ann Corcoran

The new hard Left Canadian government is hell-bent on bringing in 25,000 Syrians in a little over a month. Apparently unable to find housing for them, they will be housed in military barracks across Canada.

From CTV News:

Soldiers and military personnel at a Kingston, Ont. base are being asked to clear their barracks to make room for an early wave of Syrian refugees arriving in just over a week, CTV News has learned.

Multiple residences at CFB Kingston are being cleared for Nov. 30 to house the refugees, according to an internal memo obtained by CTV News.

The orders will also affect some officer cadets attending the Royal Military College, many of whom are nearing exams.

Where will the military be resettled? CTV News continues….

Trudeau, Canadian Prime Minister.

And while the memo warns of the fast-approaching deadline, it does not indicate where military personnel will be resettled.

However, it does say a place will be found for the personnel.

The notice comes just two days after Minister of Immigration and Refugees John McCallum reaffirmed the government’s plan to resettle 25,000 Syrian refugees by the end of 2015.

There is more, read it all! The story mentions “health” concerns, so it appears they are a little worried about containing some potentially contagious diseases. Lucky Canadian citizens!

Note in the story that the UN is picking their refugees, so the vast majority will be Sunni Muslims.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Syrian refugees: Empathy wanes in U.S. and UK as more voters say shut borders

German Jewish group says migration of Muslims into Germany must be “limited”

Maine governor working to stem the flow of welfare to migrants/asylum seekers

Senator Rand Paul cites KY refugee terrorists/Boston bombers on radio talk show, angers Left

PODCAST: Spreading the Muslim Holy War in the name of ‘Humanity’

November 24, 2015/in Commentary, National Security, Policy, Politics, Religion, Video/by Jerry Gordon

Listen to an extraordinarily informative Lisa Benson Show for National Security that aired Sunday November 22, 2015 on KKNT960The Patriot in the aftermath of the ISIS jihad in Paris. Lisa Benson and New English Review Senior Editor Jerry Gordon and special guest Richard Cutting co-hosted this show.

Our guests were:

Morten Storm – Storm is a former Muslim convert and apostate who became a double agent for Danish Security and Intelligence Service and CIA who penetrated Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula targeting the late Anwar al Awlaki. He is the author of Agent Storm: My Life Inside al Qaeda and the CIA and been frequently, interviewed on Fox News and CNN. Storm picked up on a private discussion this past week with more than 100 callers including members of the National Security Task Force of America launching a “know your Imam” campaign. He did that this past weekend. In the private NSTFA call he stressed not to be complacent about additional ISIS attacks in Belgian, France and major EU countries now inundated with hundreds of thousands of refugees and migrants, especially young men in detention camps.

Dr. S. Jill Bellamy – was interviewed by both Cutting and Gordon in a segment on possible ISIS Chemical and Biological agent threats to Europe and the US. Bellamy is a recognized international expert on biological warfare and is a member of the United Nations Counter Terrorism Task Force. She has previously developed and run NATO sponsored policy programs on biological terrorism and has published extensively in related fields. Her papers have appeared in the National Review, The Washington Post, The Washington Times, Le Monde, Le Temps, New English Review and the Jerusalem Post. Over the past twenty five years she has worked in non-proliferation and counter terrorism. She has developed and run nuclear and biological war games and scenarios supported by European Ministries of Defense. Currently she advises governments on national strategic stockpiling and force protection. She is the founding Director of Warfare Technology Analytics. Bellamy suggested that French Premier Valls expressions of concerns over possible use of CBW by ISIS in terror attacks in the West were reflective of recent uses of chemical weapons by the Islamic State in Syria . She suggested that was reflected in confirmed reports on mustard gas against both Syrian Kurdish YPG and Iraqi Peshmerga forces, as well as Sarin gas that may have been used to kill hundreds of civilians in a suburb near Damascus in 2013. Those reports led to the Hague based Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons that removed only a fraction of the Assad Regimes stockpile. She pointed out that ISIS ,and other Islamic terror groups like al Nusrah and Hezbollah, wouldn’t refrain from using CBW, as they simply consider them another weapon in their inventory. She said they would have no compunction against the use of such silent killers given the burning alive of a downed Jordanian pilot. That would extend to using the hoards of teeming refugees in UN camps in Turkey, Jordan and Lebanon as the equivalent of human weaponized vectors to spread disease and pathogens causing a pandemic. She also responded to queries about major silent killers Anthrax, Smallpox and botulinum toxin developed by the Syria Scientific Research Center that might fall into the hands of ISIS and other terror groups like Hezbollah. It has been reported that ISIS may have established laboratories and acquired research scientific personnel which could pose a threat to the EU and the US. Bellamy covered the extent of protection against these silent killers under US and international vaccine stockpile programs.

Nidra Poller provided an eye witness report of what was unfolding in France. Poller is a Lisa Benson Show Advisory Board Member, American writer and translator, resident of Paris, France, since 1972, contributor to The Wall Street Journal, National Review, FrontPage Magazine, The New York Sun and New English Review, author of the forthcoming, The Black Flag of Jihad stalks la Republique. Poller spoke of her experiences in Paris following the November 13th massacres and the November 18th St. Denis banlieuse battle that resulted in the deaths of the alleged Belgian born ‘mastermind’ Abdelhamid Abaaoud, his French born cousin Hasna Ait Boulahcen and third, as yet to be identified suicide bomber. In a New English Review/ Iconoclast post, “Bonjour Tristesse”, she considered them as “punk’ jihadis akin to those who burned vehicles banlieuse nightly in Paris and other French cities for weeks in 2005. She spoke of the muted aftermath following the recent terror events in Paris and the myopia of the international media following these stories forgetting about rallies in July 2014 at which the ISIS banners were prominent in rallies condemning Israel during Operation Defensive Edge fighting Hamas at the statue of Marianne, the symbol of France, at la place de la Republique. She also returned to the theme of, Humanitarian Jihad, a chapter in her latest book, to describe how the conflict in Syria with ISIS and other terror groups had sent hundreds of thousands refugees and illegal migrants bursting the open borders of Europe’s Schengen system . She said that was an unwarranted intrusion of national sovereignty and western values with reports of destructive behavior by migrant Muslim young men in reception centers in EU countries. She said that was triggered by the EU and international response to the imagery a drowning victim, Aylan Kurdi, a three year old Syrian Kurdish child from an overloaded a life raft provided by Turkey headed for the Greek Island of Leros.

EDITORS NOTE: This podcast originally appeared in the New English Review.

VIDEO: Top Clinton Aide lovefest with Muslim Migrants

November 24, 2015/in Elections, Immigration, National Security, Policy, Politics, Religion, Video/by Dr. Richard M. Swier, LTC U.S. Army (Ret.)

Best-selling author and award winning video journalist James O’Keefe has just released undercover video of two related events dealing with Syrian refugees. The first of these is at a Hillary Clinton fundraiser for women, where top Clinton aide Huma Abedin states that we cannot turn the Syrian refugees away. While attendees were told not to record Abedin’s statements, our undercover reporter secretly videoed them anyway. The other footage is of Syrian refugees in Greece expressing their support of Hillary Clinton.

Last week, Project Veritas released footage of three Syrian refugees in Greece who were caught on hidden camera talking about using fake passports to get to Europe and the US. They talked about using the same route as one of the terrorists who perpetrated the attack in Paris last week. One also added that that is how a lot of Syrians come to the US and that there are a lot of Syrians in France.

In the second video of this series, Project Veritas Action ties the Syrians in Greece to the Hillary Clinton campaign. Last Wednesday evening, the Clinton campaign held a fundraiser for women in Manhattan. After the audience was warned not to record or post video of the event, an undercover Project Veritas Action journalist managed to obtain footage of Abedin’s speech as well as her responses to informal questions afterwards.

From the stage, Abedin spoke of a life-long Republican who allegedly stated, “You know what I realized when I started listening to Ben Carson and Donald Trump and Ted Cruz? You have to prove you are a Christian to be a refugee in this country.”

“We are a country of immigrants,” continued Abedin. “We welcome people and when you listen to the Republicans – and this is my battle cry – it is really scary on the other side.”

After her speech, our undercover journalist asked Abedin to promise that if Clinton is elected, “she is going to do everything she can to let these Syrians in.”

“Absolutely right,” responded Abedin. “…We need to have leadership on this…we cannot turn these people away.”

The video then moves to Greece, where two undercover journalists suggest to the Syrian refugees who are possibly traveling under fake documents that they must hate Hillary Clinton. “No, we don’t hate Hillary Clinton,” one responded. When asked to confirm, they stated that they like Clinton.

“Due to our videos, there are multiple ongoing investigations into the use of illegal foreign campaign donations and the voter registration of illegal immigrants by the Clinton and other Democrat campaigns,” stated Project Veritas Action president James O’Keefe. “Perhaps that’s why Clinton supports Syrian refugees. Or perhaps the reason is far more nefarious.”

Radical Muslim Properly Defined

November 23, 2015/in Culture War, National Security, Policy, Politics, Religion/by Dave Gaubatz

Going back as far as 11 Sep 2001, I have been listening to media heads, politicians, and self proclaimed counter-terrorism experts worldwide explain to the masses what a Radical Muslim is and how they became radicalized. I have listened, analyzed, and self educated myself for over 2 decades on the issue of the terms radical and radicalized.

During my hundreds of visits to mosque in America, listening to Islamic scholars, Muslim worshipers and from studying the material provided to Muslims in a mosque I have for the best part of 2 decades that the terms radical and radicalized have been falsely defined by people who should know and who for decades have been leading innocent people astray of the true definitions.

I will not use several pages to discuss issues that do not relate to the terms radical and radicalized. The simpler written is the best for all to understand. If our media, politicians, and counter-terrorism professionals are providing false information about these two very important terms, do we expect liberals to provide accurate definitions?

Okay, follow me with my basic definitions of radical and radicalized. If at the end you still do not fully understand then please contact me at davegaubatz@gmail.com and I will help clarify.

1. Radical Muslim: This term in describing a Muslim who kills innocent people, rapes and kills young girls, advocates the hatred of Israel and the Jewish people, straps on suicide vests and kill innocent people, carry out shootings and explosive attacks on people at civil and innocent events, advocates killing Christians worldwide, desires in their hearts an Islamic caliphate worldwide and have the law of the land be controlled by Sharia law, and who believes 100% that their Prophet Mohammed was a perfect human and a man to be put upon a pedestal as an example of good to all, are not Radical Muslims.

The people and their actions, beliefs, and followers of Mohammed 100% in their daily lives are not radical, they are just Muslims. These people are not being misguided by the true form of Islam, they know the actions and objectives they follow and advocate is exactly what the Quran teaches and what Prophet Mohammed advocated for them his entire life and beyond. These people are the perfect examples of a Muslim carrying out each and every aspect of Sharia law and never questioning the teachings of the Quran and Mohammed. These people have studied Islam for many years and are closer to Mohammed than any other people on earth. Some become ‘Pure Muslims’ at an early age and for some it takes longer. Few people will reach the utopia of Islam. possibly as low as 1 in a 1000 achieve this goal, but when they do they are the light of Islam and their numbers will be in the millions. They will flourish across all lands to form an Islamic caliphate under Sharia law.

2. A Useful Analogy: When a young boy dreams of becoming a professional major league baseball player, he knows it will take years of study and practice to elevate himself to the highest level of baseball. He will start in little league, make it to the junior high and high school levels and most people who love baseball and desire to make it to the major leagues seldom make it past high school. They have lost their love of the game and no longer want to spend their free time practicing the finer arts of baseball at a higher level.

There are a few who continue after high school and make it to a minor league program of baseball. Many linger here for years and do not have the desire, talent or willingness to make it to the highest level of baseball (Major League Baseball). You must answer a question now. Are the boys who after many years of self sacrifice and study who make it to the Major League Radical baseball players or are they boys and men who fully understand all aspects of baseball and can now play and teach others? These professional players know in their hearts and minds what real baseball is and they understand the rules and regulations by heart and are at a utopia place in their lives.

In order for the world to understand and defeat Islamic based terrorism we must come to terms with the facts that Islam, the Quran, Prophet Mohammed and Sharia law is not an ideology of peace and caring for humanity, but rather an ideology of hate and violence as the rules and regulations laid out by Mohammed were meant to be. Mohammed did not desire for Muslims and Islam to be associated with love, but instead advocated for the worldwide dominance of Islam and violence was to be used to achieve this goal.

Hopefully by now we are beginning to understand just because a person comes to a point in his or her life that they now understand completely and have a desire as Mohammed did to spread Islam through violence does not mean they are being radical. They are the ‘Pure Muslims’ of the world who have accepted the clear and apparent aspects of the evils of Islam and Mohammed and are willing to give their lives in order to spread evil across the world. Essentially Islam is a form of following Satan. Readers must get it out of their minds that Islam has anything to do with peace and that Mohammed was a peaceful man. Islam is aligned with Nazism and the leader of Nazis known as Hitler.

3. A Radicalized Muslim: Day after day we are forced to listen to the media, politicians, and counter-terrorism professionals describe to us how a person goes through various steps to become ‘radicalized’. I consider their misunderstanding of Islam and Muslims to be a far greater national security threat than all Islamic based terrorists combined. These people who should have a better understanding of Islam are misleading the world when they say a person who just bombed innocent people for instance in Paris became radicalized. These Muslims did not become radicalized. They became ‘Pure Muslims’ because they have studied harder than their peers to understand and carry out the objectives of their Prophet Mohammed.

If my analysis of what a radical Muslim is or how the term radicalized is misleading, who are the millions of people who relate to Islam, but never make it to the Utopia level of fully understanding Islam and becoming ‘Pure Muslims’? These people are the apostates of Islam. They do not fully accept Islam, Sharia law, or the total teachings and understand of Prophet Mohammed. These are people that ‘Pure Muslims’ are killing in large numbers around the world.

Mosques are the little league fields, high school fields, minor league fields and for some the path to the major leagues. The objectives of all Imams teaching at mosques is to get their followers to become ‘Pure Muslims’ by accepting the real truths of Islam and what Prophet Mohammed desired. Mosques are the breeding grounds for the practicing of pure evil by pure Muslims.

Interfaith Dialogue — A Bridge Too Far

November 23, 2015/in Culture War, National Security, Policy, Politics, Religion/by Dr. Richard M. Swier, LTC U.S. Army (Ret.)

In this new monograph, adapted from Annex 1 of his superb recent book, Catastrophic Failure: Blindfolding America in the Face of Jihad, Senior Fellow at the Center for Security Policy Stephen Coughlin explains what’s really behind the so-called ‘interfaith dialogue movement’ and how the Muslim Brotherhood has co-opted the well-meaning but misguided intentions of the Catholic Church in particular. Mr. Coughlin’s expertise in the nexus between Islamic Law (shariah) and Islamic terrorism informs his exposure of the manipulative Brotherhood strategy to use the interfaith dialogue arena as an opportunity to edge Catholics toward a dislocation of faith so as to pave the way for the insinuation of shariah into American faith communities and society in general.

Author Stephen Coughlin introduces the problem in this brief video:

At a time when Vatican policy seems to many to have become unmoored from the traditional doctrinal teachings of the Church in ways advanced by the permissive environment of the interfaith dialogue movement, including tolerance of anti-Constitutional, anti-Western, shariah-based Islamic principles as well as those who promote them, this publication hits home hard. As Mr. Coughlin points out, it is intellectually impossible to adhere faithfully to Church doctrine and yet grant acceptance to principles that are fundamentally opposed to such precepts at the same time. Only a dislocation of Catholic faith could allow such moral equivalence. Ultimately, as he argues, the objective of Islamic supremacists is the prioritization of interfaith relationships over advocacy on behalf of fellow Christians being slaughtered elsewhere by the co-religionists of their Muslim interfaith partners—in other words, the neutralization of the Catholic faith community as a serious obstacle to the encroachment of shariah.

In praise of this new Center publication, Center for Security Policy President Frank Gaffney said,

While the interfaith dialogue movement presents itself as a laudable effort to ‘bridge’ the distance between faiths, those more familiar with the doctrine of the Muslim Brotherhood know that the actual agenda of too many such efforts is, in fact, modeled after the well-known dictum of Sayyid Qutb, who candidly reminded Muslims that such a ‘bridge’ is ‘only so that the people of Jahiliyyah [society of unbelievers] may come over to Islam.

The Center for Security Policy/Secure Freedom is proud to present this monograph as a superb addition to its Civilization Jihad Reader Series. “Bridge-Building” to Nowhere: The Catholic Church’s Case Study in Interfaith Delusion is available for purchase in kindle and paperback format on Amazon.com.

Click here to purchase this newly released monograph in Kindle format.

Click here to purchase this newly released monograph in paperback format.

Click here for a full PDF of the monograph.

ABOUT THE CENTER FOR SECURITY POLICY

The Center for Security Policy is a non-profit, non-partisan national security organization that specializes in identifying policies, actions, and resource needs that are vital to American security and then ensures that such issues are the subject of both focused, principled examination and effective action by recognized policy experts, appropriate officials, opinion leaders, and the general public. For more information visit www.SecureFreedom.org

Tag Archive for: Fitna

COMPELLING NEW EVIDENCE IN BREAKING NEWS

REVEALING THE CIA’S FUNDING AND ARMING OF “MODERATE” TERRORISTS

RUSSIAN PROPAGANDA CITES AL JAZERRA TO BLAME AMERICA

REP. TULSI GABBARD DIRECTS BI-PARTISAN COALITION TO STOP THE COVERT ACTION IN SYRIA

GABBARD’S 10 REASONS TO STOP THE WAR AGAINST ASSAD

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION

MORE ARTICLES IN THIS SERIES:

ADDITIONAL REFERENCE

ABOUT THE AUTHORS:

LEONARD G. HOROWITZ, D.M.D., M.A., M.P.H., D.N.M. (HON.), D.M.M. (HON.)

INVESTIGATIVE JOURNALIST SHERRI KANE

Where will the military be resettled? CTV News continues….