FULL REPORT: The Spectacular Failure of COVID Shots

“At this point, there is simply no question. The COVID shots are an abysmal failure in every way possible. Again and again, data analyses from around the world show a negative correlation between ‘vaccination’ rates and worsening infection rates and other health trends.” – Dr. Joseph Mercola, The Spectacular Failure of COVID Shots


Here’s an overview of the report The Spectacular Failure of COVID Shots an analysis by Dr. Joseph Mercola:

British data show the COVID shots are an abysmal failure, as COVID infection rates in the U.K. are higher among the “fully vaccinated” in all adult cohorts.

Infection rates are also rising faster among the fully vaxxed than in unvaccinated cohorts of all ages. All in all, these data prove that vaccine passports and mandates are completely pointless.

Data from Scotland show more of the same. Double-jabbed Scots are more likely to be admitted to the hospital for COVID than unvaccinated. Since Omicron became dominant,
COVID case rates are also lower among the unvaccinated than among the single-double- and even triple-jabbed

Internationally, journalists are now starting to try to switch the narrative away from cases, hospitalizations and deaths by pointing out how unreliable these data are. What they don’t admit is that “dangerous misinformants” have highlighted these problems for two years already.

Omicron is blowing huge holes in the pandemic narrative, as it predominantly affects the vaxxed, thus proving mandates and vaccine passports are irrational and useless.

The Scotland Herald by Helen McArdle ,

“Case rates have been lower in unvaccinated individuals than the single, double, or even triple jabbed since Omicron became the dominant variant in Scotland.”

Click here to read the full report: The Spectacular Failure of COVID Shots

CLICK HERE: To view Vaxx failures in 2 graphs from four countries.

©Dr. Rich Swier. All rights reserved.

RELATED ARTICLE: Hospital Takes Dying Patient Off Heart Transplant List Because He’s Unvaccinated

RELATED VIDEO: Dr. David Wiseman: The vaxx contained more than we’re told, and does more than they said

RELATED TWEET:

VIDEO: Fatigue Identified as Major Side Effect of COVID Over-regulation

Thousands of Americans gathered yesterday in Washington, D.C. to protest the federal government’s increasingly unreasonable COVID mandates. One year into President Joe Biden’s term, he has done the opposite of his promise to “shut down the virus, not the country.” Fatigue is a common symptom of COVID-19, but it’s a universal symptom of the ridiculous mask and vaccine mandates that have long outlived their prudence and propriety. As other countries prepare to move on with their lives, President Biden insists that Americans must remain in a prison of our own making.

Strangely, it’s Europe that is leading the way to freedom this time. On Wednesday, British Prime Minister Boris Johnson told the House of Commons that all the country’s COVID restrictions would end this upcoming Thursday. “We must learn to live with COVID in the same way we live with the flu,” added the health secretary. “They have realized that all of these policies that are aimed at slowing the spread of COVID have failed,” said Stanford Professor of Medicine Jay Bhattacharya on “Washington Watch.” COVID “spreads very rapidly despite our best efforts to keep people apart.” Citizens in Great Britain, Spain, and Portugal will once again have the freedom to make their own health decisions. For once, here’s a European trend the U.S. needs to imitate.

Nothing could be further from the contemplation of Biden’s mandarins. Biden failed to excite confidence when challenged in a rare press conference to explain the definition of “fully vaccinated.” Officially, two doses is considered sufficient, but some administration officials advise three doses. Biden sidestepped the question and replied, “every time I speak of it, I say, if you’ve been vaccinated, get your booster shot.” Bhattacharya explained he can’t easily answer that question because it has become “more than just a medical question.” Many cities and states have imposed vaccine mandates for employment and for patronizing restaurants, museums, and libraries. These “essentially make people that are not fully vaccinated second-class citizens,” he said. If the administration redefines “fully vaccinated” to include a booster shot, they create a huge number of second-class citizens with “the snap of a finger.” So it’s a calculation about how much tyrannical invasion of their daily lives the American people are willing to accept.

Underlying Americans’ skepticism of Biden’s vaccine push is the vaccine’s waning effectiveness — both over time and against new variants. “The protection that the booster provides against Omicron is less than the protection that it provided against Delta,” said Bhattacharya. A newly released CDC study from May to November found natural immunity outperforming vaccination alone “by early October,” even before the Omicron variant. It’s not just one study, said Bhattacharya. “The scientific evidence on this is absolutely overwhelming.” Yet the less effective the vaccine becomes, the more President Biden seeks to punish those who resist it.

“Tell people about the scientific evidence. Don’t use it to manipulate people,” Bhattacharya said. “Public trust, once lost, is almost impossible to get back. And public health relies on public trust.” Yet our public health agencies seem to prefer imitating the legacy media in crying “wolf” for a short-sighted advantage.

Meanwhile, “much of Europe is opening up,” said Bhattacharya. “The U.K. is leading the way. There’s no reason the United States shouldn’t be.” Vaccine and mask mandates are far greater violations of personal freedom than a tax on tea. “The right thing is to protect vulnerable people while letting people who are at low risk… just go on with their lives,” he said. The federal government insists people stop living to avoid dying, but that is a false choice Americans should reject.

RELATED ARTICLES:

EXCELSIOR! NY State Supreme Court judge STRIKES DOWN governor’s mask mandate

FULL REPORT: The Spectacular Failure of COVID Shots 

DoD whistle-blowers on vaccines – 500% increase in miscarriages, 300% increase in cancer, 1000% increase in neurological

Natural immunity was more effective than vaccines alone against delta variant, CDC study shows

Missouri AG sues over 30 school districts for enforcing mask mandates

EDITORS NOTE: This FRC-Action column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

POLL: 60% of Americans Would Vote FOR ANYONE but Biden if Election Held Today

My takeaway – 40% (and I think that is inflated) of America is mentally ill.

Poll finds 60 percent would vote against Biden if election was held now

By: Mark Moore, NY Post, January 23, 2022:

Six in 10 Americans would vote for someone other than President Biden if the 2024 presidential election was held today — a rate higher than his predecessors Barack Obama and Donald Trump, according to a poll released Sunday.

Asked if the election were held today, 60 percent said they would “probably” or “definitely” vote for someone else, compared to 36 percent who said they would “definitely” or “probably” re-elect Biden, the survey by Fox News shows.

Fifty-two percent said they would vote for someone other than Trump if it were February 2020, and 51 percent said they would select somebody other than Obama if it were August 2011.

The survey also shows the deep dissatisfaction Americans feel for Biden’s handling of the economy, the COVID-19 pandemic, border security and foreign policy.
Joe Biden.
Only 36 percent said they would “definitely” or “probably” re-elect President Biden.
Rick Loomis/Getty Images

The president’s job disapproval rating is at 52 percent, a slight rise from last month, but a 9 percentage point increase from April, while his approval rating is trending in the opposite direction — from a high of 56 percent in June to 47 percent in this poll.

Asked about Biden’s handling of the economy, 58 percent to 41 percent disapprove. When it comes to the COVID-19 pandemic, 52 percent to 46 percent disapprove; 59 percent to 37 percent disapprove of his handling of border security; and 54 percent to 41 percent disapprove of his handling of foreign policy.
2024 poll.
60 percent said they would “probably” or “definitely” vote for someone else other than President Biden in 2024.
Fox News

As bad as Biden’s approval ratings are, Vice President Kamala Harris’ are worse.

The survey found that 54 percent of Americans disapprove of the job she is doing, and only 43 percent approve.

In June, her approval rating was at 50 percent and her disapproval rating was 47 percent.

Vice President Kamala Harris’ approval ratings are even worse than President Biden’s.

But the overall discontent with the Biden administration doesn’t translate into a significant advantage for congressional Republicans in the 2022 midterm elections.

Forty-four percent said they would vote for the Republican candidate if the election were held today, compared to 43 percent who would go with the Democratic candidate.

Republicans get high marks from voters on their ability to deal with taxes, the federal budget deficit, immigration, crime, and the economy, while Democrats get good grades on climate change, racism, health care, the pandemic and education.
Barack Obama.

Some 51 percent said they would select somebody other than former President Barack Obama if it were August 2011.

But most Americans — 85 percent — said their top concern was inflation and higher prices, above all other issues.

Concerns over high crime came came in second with 81 percent, followed by political divisions at 78 percent, the coronavirus pandemic at 72 percent, North Korean missile tests at 68 percent, the standoff between Ukraine and Russia at 62 percent, migrants at the southern border at 59 percent, voter suppression at 58 percent and voter fraud at 53 percent.

Forty-three percent of Americans believe inflation and high prices will still be plaguing the nation for “more than a year,” while 44 percent think coronavirus will continue to be a major issue for “more than a year.”
Donald Trump.

The poll shows 48 percent blame the federal government’s policies for inflation. Forty-two percent say it’s the result of coronavirus and 9 percent blame both equally.

The poll surveyed 1,001 registered voters between Jan. 16-19.

It has a plus/minus 3 percentage points margin of error.

RELATED ARTICLES:

WATCH Mike Pompeo: There Is One Primary Reason That Putin Is Acting Aggressive During Biden Admin

China flies dozens of warplanes near Taiwan

Republican Rep: We Might ‘Begin To See’ China Invade Taiwan ‘After The Olympics’

China Joins Russian In Ukraine Crisis, As Biden May Deploy Troops To The Area Tensions Dramatically Escalate

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Quick note: Tech giants are shutting us down. You know this. Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Adsense, Pinterest permanently banned us. Facebook, Google search et al have shadow-banned, suspended and deleted us from your news feeds. They are disappearing us. But we are here. We will not waver. We will not tire. We will not falter, and we will not fail. Freedom will prevail.

Subscribe to Geller Report newsletter here — it’s free and it’s critical NOW when informed decision making and opinion is essential to America’s survival. Share our posts on your social channels and with your email contacts. Fight the great fight.

Follow me on Gettr. I am there, click here. It’s open and free.

Remember, YOU make the work possible. If you can, please contribute to Geller Report.

Biden’s handlers are withholding a ‘secret agreement’ with Iran from Congress

Desperate to pursue a policy of appeasement at all costs.

Biden Admin Withholds Secret Iran Agreement From Congress

by Adam Kredo, Washington Free Beacon, January 23, 2022:

The Biden administration is withholding a “secret agreement” with Iran from Congress as negotiations over a revamped nuclear deal continue in Vienna, according to two Republican lawmakers.

Reports emerged late Friday that Russia proposed an interim nuclear deal to Iran with the knowledge of U.S. officials. The deal would reportedly lift some sanctions on Iran in exchange for a limited set of restrictions on the country’s nuclear program. Russia offered the deal to Iran on the sidelines of ongoing negotiations in Vienna, according to NBC News, which first reported on the document. Tehran is said to have rejected the interim deal, saying that it prefers a large-scale agreement that will provide it with billions in cash windfalls. Republican lawmakers say details of the agreement are being kept from Congress.

“Russia sent a secret agreement to Iran,” Rep. Michael McCaul (R., Texas), lead Republican on the House Foreign Affairs Committee, told the Washington Free Beacon on Friday during a press call. “Russia is trying to take the lead now in the negotiations with Iran. This is a secret agreement. We haven’t seen it.”

The existence of this document indicates that the United States and international partners are eyeing an alternative interim agreement with Iran as efforts to ink a revamped version of the 2015 accord stall due to Iran’s increasingly hardline stance. Republicans in Congress say that, during the past year, the Biden administration has ignored requests for briefings on the status of talks and what a new deal will look like. The Free Beacon first reported last week that the Biden administration is obstructing more than a dozen congressional investigations into the negotiations and sanctions relief.

The Biden administration is required to present any new deal to Congress before it is signed due to a 2015 law, the Iran Nuclear Deal Review Act, that was passed after the Obama administration skirted congressional oversight to sign the original accord.

“Reports that the Biden administration is working with the Russians on a secret nuclear agreement with Iran are doubly concerning,” Rep. Mike Gallagher (R., Wis.), a member of the House Armed Services Committee, told the Free Beacon. “First, they create a conflict of interest with Russia as we are trying to prevent an invasion of Ukraine. Second, preemptive sanctions relief, and failure to transmit an interim agreement to Congress, would violate the Iran Nuclear Agreement Review Act. The administration needs to end their simultaneous surrender to Russia and Iran before it’s too late.”…

If a new deal with the United States is reached, Iran will see all economic sanctions imposed on it by the Trump administration removed. This includes sanctions on Iran’s oil sector, a key source of cash for the regime.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Iran-Backed Houthi Terrorists Attack United Arab Emirates

Hamas-linked CAIR demands resignation of Defense Secretary over botched Kabul strike

Germany: Afghan Muslim migrant tries to kill woman because ‘women shouldn’t work,’ says ‘I sent her to paradise’

Switzerland: Crosses to disappear from nation’s largest cemetery because they upset ‘other religions’

UK: Muslim Conservative MP accuses Tory government of firing her for her ‘Muslimness’

‘Palestinian’ Muslim who killed teen: According to Islam ‘it is permitted for me to kill someone who took my lands’

EDITORS NOTE: This Jihad Watch column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

TAKE ACTION: Tell the NCAA Only Biological Women Can Compete in Women’s Sports


Click here to send your email to urge the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Board of Governors to correct its error by changing policy to require that naturally born males only compete athletically as males and naturally born females compete athletically only as females and to reclassify trans sports records out of the male and female categories.


To see this alert in your internet browser and share this article click here.

National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) policy allows males who undergo testosterone suppression to compete athletically as females.  However, studies show that testosterone suppression does NOT make a level playing field for men to compete against women.

The New York Post reports:

Michael Phelps: NCAA’s Lia Thomas issue shows need for level playing field.

Thomas, a transgender swimmer on the women’s team at the University of Pennsylvania, competed for three years as a male. NCAA bylaws permit transgender athletes to compete as women if they have undergone testosterone suppression for a year.

Thomas has been demolishing female competition. There is a chance she could not only win national championships, but compete for all-time NCAA records set by Olympic gold medalists Missy Franklin and Katie Ledecky.

None of Thomas’ teammates have spoken on the record about their opinion on the matter, though some have chosen to do so anonymously to voice their concerns.

“She compares herself to Jackie Robinson. She said she is like the Jackie Robinson of trans sports,” one of Thomas’ teammates told the Washington Examiner last week. “She laughs about it and mocks the situation. Instead of caring or showing that she cares about what she’s doing or what she’s doing to her teammates, she’s not sympathetic or empathetic at all. Lia never addressed our team. She never asked if it was OK. She never asked how we felt. She never tried to explain how she feels. She never has said anything to us as a group. She never addressed anything.”

Policy allowing males to compete athletically as females based on testosterone suppression does not change men into women nor make men physically equal to women.

The National Institute of Health reports:

The muscular advantage enjoyed by transgender women is only minimally reduced when testosterone is suppressed.  

report that the performance gap between males and females becomes significant at puberty and often amounts to 10-50% depending on sport. The performance gap is more pronounced in sporting activities relying on muscle mass and explosive strength, particularly in the upper body. Longitudinal studies examining the effects of testosterone suppression on muscle mass and strength in transgender women consistently show very modest changes, where the loss of lean body mass, muscle area and strength typically amounts to approximately 5% after 12 months of treatment. Thus, the muscular advantage enjoyed by transgender women is only minimally reduced when testosterone is suppressed. Sports organizations should consider this evidence when reassessing current policies regarding participation of transgender women in the female category of sport.

The Guardian reports:

Trans women retain 12% edge in tests two years after transitioning, study finds:

A groundbreaking new study on transgender athletes has found trans women retain a 12% advantage in running tests even after taking hormones for two years to suppress their testosterone. The results, researchers suggest, indicate the current International Olympic Committee guidelines may give trans women an “unfair competitive advantage” over biological women.

The research, published in the British Journal of Sports Medicine, found that before starting their hormone treatment trans women performed 31% more push-ups and 15% more sit-ups in one minute on average than a biological women younger than 30 in the air force – and ran 1.5 miles 21% faster.

Yet after suppressing their testosterone for two years – a year longer than IOC guidelines – they were still 12% faster on average than biological females.

The trans women also retained a 10% advantage in push-ups and a 6% advantage in sit-ups for the first two years after taking hormones, before their advantage disappeared. But the researchers say they “may underestimate the advantage in strength that trans women have over cis women … because trans women will have a higher power output than cis women when performing an equivalent number of push-ups”.

Male athletes pretending to be females are demoralizing girls and ruining women’s sports.  Woke leftists demand that a made up, unnatural, unscientific identity that allegedly makes up .58 percent of the population should be allowed to destroy decades of sports competition by real women who make up 50.52 percent of the population.  This unfairness is grossly disproportional against women.  Testosterone suppression simply cannot restore fairness and safety by having men compete against women.

The leaders of our colleges have been the guardians and custodians of science and history for centuries.  Science and history have supported the sexual differences of male and female for hundreds of years.  Tragically, collegiate leaders succumbed to LGBTQ harassment and wokeness by allowing males to compete athletically against females.

Florida Family Association has prepared an email for you to send to urge the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Board of Governors to correct its error by changing policy to require that naturally born males only compete athletically as males and naturally born females compete athletically only as females and to reclassify trans sports records out of the male and female athletic sports categories.

To send your email, please click the following link, enter your name and email address then click the “Send Your Message” button. You may also edit the subject or message text if you wish.


Click here to send your email to urge the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Board of Governors to correct its error by changing policy to require that naturally born males only compete athletically as males and naturally born females compete athletically only as females and to reclassify trans sports records out of the male and female categories.


For Contact information click here.

RELATED VIDEO: Trans Runner Beats 14k Women in London Marathon

EDITORS NOTE: This Florida Family Association column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Here’s PROOF That Reducing ‘Transwomen’s’ Testosterone Levels Does Not Eliminate Their Edge Over Real Women in Sports

As most know, there’s a contentious debate over whether it’s fair to let men who claim they’re female compete in women’s sports. It’s a debate driven more by emotion than reason, as so many things are.

If a fellow claiming female status trounces woman athletes in a fairly high profile competition — as University of Pennsylvania swimmer “Lia” Thomas (birth name “Will”) did recently — the story makes headlines and raises ire; if such a man falters, as Thomas did quite suspiciously and conveniently even more recently, the story disappears. And each side in the debate often claims vindication based on the most recent result. Yet there is a way to definitively and irrefutably (within the realm of reason) prove that one side is correct.

Sports governing bodies will generally say that a man claiming a Made-up Sexual Status (MUSS or, to use the misnomer, “transgender identity”) may compete with women if he reduces his testosterone levels to the normal female range and maintains this hormonal profile for a certain period of time, perhaps a year, prior to competition. This standard is based on the presupposition that current and recent levels of testosterone — the main male sex hormone and a “naturally occurring steroid” (performance enhancing substance) — constitute the only factor determining whether a man enjoys an athletic advantage.

Now, the number of MUSS men competing in women’s sports is perhaps too small to provide a scientifically meaningful set of data with which to test this hypothesis. Yet it still can be tested because there actually is a trove of data on the relative athletic performances of males and females with identical hormonal profiles. These people are called children.

As MedPage Today wrote last July reporting on a study, “Between the ages of 6 and 10, youths saw similar testosterone levels regardless of sex.” (Prepubescent boys and girls also both have low levels of estrogen.) Consequently, if the MUSS agenda testosterone-suppression theory is correct, young lads should not surpass their female age-mates in sports. But what do the data say?

Examining 10-and-under national records in the aforementioned Thomas’s sport, swimming, reveals that in every case but one, the boys’ individual times are faster. Admittedly, the gap is generally quite narrow at such ages — especially in swimming, which may have the smallest intersex performance disparity of any “physical” sport (e.g., not auto racing or target shooting). But it’s consistently there.

Some may point out here that the average age at which boys enter puberty is now 10 (yes, really; the age has been dropping) and that this may confuse the matter a bit. Yet reviewing eight-and-under swimming records, in this case from the Southern Arizona Aquatic Association, reveals a similar picture: The boys’ individual records are faster in every instance.

The story is the same with 10-and-under and 8-and-under track and field records, though the gap is somewhat greater. Despite prepubescent boys and girls having the same testosterone levels, the boys’ records are better without exception.

Prepubescent boys also have something interesting in common with MUSS men who’ve suppressed their testosterone production: Their bodies once produced high levels of the hormone — in young lads’ case in the womb — but do so no longer. But there’s a difference, too: A MUSS man might have lived with corresponding female-range testosterone levels for a year or less.

Eight-year-old boy athletes have lived with those levels for eight years.

Yet they still outperform their eight-year-old female counterparts. They obviously enjoy advantages either, A, relating to permanent changes induced by earlier testosterone exposure (pelvis width, etc.); and/or, B, relating to less well known qualities bestowed by the male genotype (XY).

Given this, is it even remotely reasonable claiming that grown, low-T MUSS men don’t have an athletic advantage over their female counterparts?

There’s still more to consider. Relative to the two groups’ respective female counterparts, prepubescent boys lack some advantages that MUSS men enjoy and have some disadvantages MUSS men don’t. For example, not having experienced male adolescence — including exposure to high testosterone levels for those many years — they never developed the associated musculature and skeletal size, the latter of which changes not a whit with testosterone reduction. Moreover, since girls enter puberty approximately two years earlier and thus begin developing sooner, boys are generally shorter and slightly lighter than they are by middle childhood’s end.

Nonetheless, there’s still an athletic performance gap between the two groups, favoring the boys.

Given this, does it not follow that an intersex sports performance gap favoring MUSS men over women would not only exist, but be even greater?

Conclusion: Testosterone suppression surely does rob a male athlete of much of his sex-bestowed advantage. Yet it’s clear that it doesn’t rob him of all such advantages.

None of this will matter to emotion-driven people so in thrall to the sexual devolutionary agenda that rationality will seem risible. But to those who’ll yield to reason, it closes the case on the question of MUSS men in women’s sports perhaps as well as Columbo ever could.

Contact Selwyn Duke, follow him on MeWe or Parler, or log on to SelwynDuke.com.

©Selwyn Duke. All rights reserved.

Dr. Robert Malone, Knight in Shining Armor or Controlled Opposition?

“The best way to control opposition is to lead it ourselves.” –  Vladimir Lenin

“A body of men holding themselves accountable to nobody ought not to be trusted by anybody.” –  Thomas Paine

“When once a Republic is corrupted, there is no possibility of remedying any of the growing evils but by removing the corruption and restoring its lost principles; every other correction is either useless or a new evil.” –  Thomas Jefferson

“Unthinking respect for authority is the greatest enemy of truth.” – Albert Einstein

“The ideal subject of totalitarian rule is not the convinced Nazi or the dedicated communist, but people for whom the distinction between fact and fiction, true and false, no longer exists.” –  Hannah Arendt


“Controlled opposition” is a protest movement that is actually being led by government agents. Nearly all governments in history have employed this technique to trick and subdue their adversaries, and America is no different.  We have plenty of them; they are widely employed in every arena of society, they even run organizations claiming to be constitutional conservatives and too often they fool most of the electorate.

Not since 1860 has America been so polarized as it is today.  Back in the 1950s, it was mere nuance that separated the Left from the Right.  Everybody loved Mom, baseball, apple pie, babies and the flag.  Not so much anymore.

Countless physicians, scientists, PhDs and journalists have exposed the menacing and murderous COVID jabs and risked their licenses, their livelihoods and their families to save the lives of their patients and fellow citizens.  One of those brave warriors, is Dr. Peter McCullough who has openly stated that the C-19 virus is a bioweapon and the “vaccines” represent “phase two” of that bioweapon.

The majority of physicians are following the NIH, CDC and FDA protocols and protecting themselves rather than their patients.  Physicians and scientists who abide by the Hippocratic oath and medical freedom are against the experimental mandated jabs, but there are some who are seemingly playing both sides of the fence.

Watch this Dec. 18, 2021 12-minute Bitchute video on mass psychosis by Dr. Malone, and his Jan. 14, 2022 five-minute YouTube video on “Fear Porn.”

Both of these videos are professionally done and tell the truth as we know it.  Yet, they smack of political ads as though the doctor is seeking a particular office.

Dr. Robert Malone

Doctors Robert and Jill Malone live in Madison, VA – just outside of Charlottesville. They own Cielo Azure Lusitanos, a specialized Lusitano horse breeding farm.  These handsome equines are truly magnificent creatures.  The good doctor’s brilliant career has given them a life of luxury and pleasure.

Dr. Malone and mRNA

Dr. Malone, an American virologist and immunologist is a man on a mission who appeared virtually out of nowhere and has taken center stage with countless interviews.  His name has become a household word as a knight in shining armor out to save the world.  But is he?

On his website, twitter and linked In, Dr. Malone credits himself with being the inventor of the mRNA “vaccines,” but Dr. Katalin Karikó and her collaborator Dr. Drew Weissman, along with Moderna founder Derrick Rossi, are more commonly credited with laying the groundwork for mRNA inoculations.  The price paid by both BioNTech and Moderna to license the University of Pennsylvania patent on the modified mRNA base by Kati Karikó and Drew Weissman was $75 million.

It all started when Malone was at the Salk Institute in 1987 and 1988. There, he pioneered in-vitro RNA transfection and also in-vivo RNA transfection (in frog embryos, as well as mice).  In 1989, Malone published a paper titled “Cationic liposome-mediated RNA transfection.”  While this paper is an example of his important contribution to the then-emerging field, it does not make him the inventor of mRNA jabs.

Malone’s research may have been important, but scientific breakthroughs don’t always boast a sole “inventor.” Many scientists are responsible for the technology.  Dr. Malone did not invent the mRNA “vaccines,” but instead the “vaccine technology platform.”

Malone’s Curriculum Vitae

The 17-page curriculum vitae of Dr. Malone tells the story of his many achievements, but the big story is that it shows he is more knowledgeable than anyone else about COVID, the medical industry and government.  He understands the bioweapon and spike protein inside and out.  Please view his history.

Joe Rogan interviewed Dr. Robert Malone for three hours.  If you haven’t listened to it, I’d urge you to take the time, even if you do it piecemeal.  Following is a portion of how Dr. Malone described himself to Rogan within the first eight minutes.

“For the last, I guess, about 20 years I’ve been focused on actually doing stuff, regulatory affairs, clinical development, getting necessary training, etc., completed a fellowship at Harvard University Medical School as a global clinical scholar to round out my CV. I’ve run over 100 clinical trials, mostly in the vaccine space, but also in drug repurposing.

“I’ve been involved in every major outbreak since AIDS; this is kind of what I do.  I’ve won literally billions of dollars in federal grants and contracts. I’m often brought in by National Institutes of Health to serve as a study section chair for awarding $80 to $120 million dollar contracts in vaccines and biodefense.

“I’ve spent countless hours at the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), at the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) meetings. I have multiple friends at the CDC and I work closely with the defense threat reduction agency and it’s one of my favorite clients, teaming partners. I work with the chem biodefense group; there’s other branches but this is not the branch that funded the Wuhan Labs; that’s another branch of Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA).

“I’ve got many friends in the intelligence community so I’m kind of a pretty deep insider in terms of the government. (He has bragged about his deep intel connections.) I know Tony Fauci personally; I’ve dealt with him my whole career. Then we had this particular outbreak, and I was tip of the spear on bringing the Ebola vaccine forward that we now call the Merck Ebola vaccine.  I’m the one that got Merck involved.”  (The emblem/seal for the United States Special Command is literally the “tip of the spear.”)

Early in his career, Dr. Malone created the technology platform that is now the basis of the company called INOVIO Pharmaceuticals.  He stated on the Rogan interview that INOVIO used pulsed electrical fields and they have one of the DNA vaccines for Covid.  When 9/11 happened, the investors pulled back and he went to work for a company called Dynport Vaccine Company. They had the prime systems contract as government speak for all the biodefense products for the Department of Defense (DOD) for advanced development which is to say clinical trials through licensure.

Dr. Malone also claims that early on he took two C-19 jabs and has had terrible adverse effects from it.  However, with all the knowledge he had about this inoculation, I have to wonder if he really took it.

Salk Polio Vaccine

Malone scientifically trained at UC Davis, UC San Diego, and at the Salk Institute Molecular Biology and Virology laboratories as well as spending time in 1989 at Salk working on mRNA vaccines, gene therapy, transient gene therapy and as a drug (the latter two terms coined by Dr. Malone).

The Salk polio vaccine comes in two types: the Salk vaccine, made with a killed virus and the Sabin vaccine, made with a live but weakened, or attenuated, virus.  By 1959, the Salk vaccine had covered 90 countries.  In 1961, Sabin’s live oral polio vaccine came into use.

America’s first polio vaccine led to a growing vaccine crisis.  Cutter and Wyeth’s polio vaccine was reported to have paralyzed and killed several children. It was soon discovered that some lots of Salk polio vaccine made by Cutter and Wyeth had not been properly inactivated, allowing live poliovirus into more than 100,000 doses of vaccine.  (Sound familiar?)

Between 1954 and 1963, close to 98 million Americans received polio vaccinations contaminated with a carcinogenic monkey virus, known as Simian Virus 40 (SV-40). The vaccine caused cancers not only in those who received the vaccine, but it is genetically passed to offspring.

Sanofi Pharmaceuticals was the first worldwide leader in the production of the Salk polio vaccine.  The French drug giant has been convinced of the messenger RNA technology’s promise.

There is a tangled history of mRNA “Vaccines.”  Researchers at the human-genetic-therapies division of the pharmaceutical firm Shire in Lexington, Massachusetts, reasoned that unmodified mRNA could yield a product that was just as effective if the right ‘cap’ structures were added and all impurities were removed. They continued to advance the technology at Translate Bio in Cambridge, to which Shire later sold its mRNA portfolio.  The 2022 Moderna and Pfizer forecasts are $30 billion and $56 billion respectively.

In August 2021, Sanofi announced plans to acquire Translate for $3.2 billion.  US government grants and money distributed by the White House’s Operation Warp Speed to accelerate the development, manufacture and distribution of Covid-19 vaccines were $11 billion. Several recipients failed to come up with the goods by 2021, including Sanofi and GlaxoSmithKline.  Blackrock, owned and run by Democrat Larry Fink, has ownership of 377,284,263 shares of GlaxoSmithKline.

Sanofi Pharmaceuticals is listed on page 31 of The Horrible History of Big Pharma and tells why we cannot leave pharmaceutical companies in the driving seat of the Covid-19 response.

Ebola

Dr. Malone worked with the World Health Organization (WHO) as well as the initial set up of the licensing deal of the Ebola vaccine to Merck & Co. Inc. Pharmaceuticals.

According to Dr. Fauci’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), currently there are no licensed vaccines to prevent Ebola virus disease. However, multiple investigational Ebola vaccines have been tested in numerous clinical trials around the world. NIAID has supported the development of various candidates, including the rVSV-ZEBOV vaccine developed by Merck. This candidate has been administered to people at risk of Ebola virus disease in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) and was previously tested in NIAID-supported clinical trials in West Africa.  Link

Variants/Ebola, China and the DOD

In an interview, Dr. Malone stated, “In my experience, the DOD people who have been involved in this all the way through, are not comfortable with what’s going on and they have been very clear and straightforward to me when I’ve spoken to them, including the colonel who was in charge of the “operation warp speed” project for Moderna.  He called me months ago, set up a zoom, and was very, very plainspoken with me about what he observed.”

Dr. Malone knows the DOD people and spends a lot of time with them and I would bet the DOD knows exactly what is going on in China right now regarding news of a newer variant related to Ebola. Is there a hemorrhagic fever virus going on there or not?  I would guess both Malone and the DOD already know especially since Malone worked with WHO regarding Merck vaccines for Ebola which he brought to fruition.  He has bragged about his deep connection to the intelligence community.

That alone should give anyone pause.

In early January 2022, Dr. Malone was on Steve Bannon’s War Room where he warned of a new disease spreading across Communist China that appears to be an “Ebola-like hemorrhagic fever” super virus caused by mutations arising from mass vaccinations.  “The truth is this (Sars-CoV-2) is not an extremely lethal virus. This is nowhere near Ebola,” Malone commented.

Malone also mentions the fact that Steve Bannon is exposing what is going on in China and whatever the pathogen is, not only is it on the doorstep of Beijing, but three large cities have been shut down because of it threatening the Olympic games.  Listen here to radio host Jeff Rense interview a scientist regarding Dr. Malone and Ebola.

Here comes a new epidemic of fear, the very psychosis that keeps people and school children in their worthless masks.

Malone said, “The governments, together with the Gates Foundation and the World Economic Forum, have performed a series of war game studies over the last 20 years.  They have gotten increasingly sophisticated in those war game studies, but they’ve kind of been biased towards authoritarian outcomes in all these studies, and they brought in other countries for training in how these war games should be run and how they should respond to the threat of a pandemic.

“The number one thing is that they’ve all had some poor assumptions that the pandemic threat agent is extremely lethal.”

Surely, they knew COVID was a very treatable virus, but they used fear and the hospital protocols to engineer a deadly outcome worldwide, especially in America. Only their lethal COVID jabs would save the people!  Until then, they let us die.  Money, depopulation and totalitarian control were the ultimate objectives.

This was all planned and the stakeholders know what is going to happen before they even roll it out.  Yes, planned and executed on the American populace as well as worldwide and for over 20 years.

The CCP COVID Pandemic was predicted over a decade ago by the Rockefeller Foundation.

Their intention was clear: to use the opportunity of the scenario or crisis to shape a “better future” or transform the world into their likeness – a New World Order global totalitarian dictatorship. The Lock Step scenario is described as “a world of tighter top-down government control and more authoritarian leadership, with limited innovation and growing citizen pushback” and is based on a pandemic of a virus (an influenza strain) which infects nearly 20% of the world population and kills 8 million people in 7 months. 

People were growing weary and hateful about masks, so the snakeholders decided to lift that requirement.  Yet, fear has paralyzed rational thinking.  The psychosis of fear is now so embedded that any new variant leads the masses to once again don their face diapers and keep their distance from others.

Vax the Vulnerable

Those who have listened to Dr. Malone believe him to be a saint when he tells people not to allow their children to be jabbed with this “vaccine.”

On Malone’s website, he states his mission, “My mission is to ensure vaccine safety, make sure that children are protected, stop and/or limit the vaccine mandates, to identify and teach about lifesaving treatments for COVID-19 and other pandemics. My goal is to save lives.”

However, that hasn’t stopped him from continually repeating that “the most vulnerable” should be injected.

And why did he tweet the following only six months ago? Surveillance, tracing and testing?  Really Dr. Malone?  Those statements match the NIH, CDC and FDA.

In an October 2021 interview, while in Hawaii, Dr. Malone said, “The breakthroughs on the Delta virus continue to evolve.  It’s fascinating that we’re seeing the Delta virus moving into the population and it will move through Hawaii. There’s no question that it will.  It’s strange that it’s moving from the south into the heavily vaccinated northern states.  The people who are ending up in the hospital once again are the elderly and high-risk populations.  The CDC info that was leaked to the Washington Post a month ago shows that the current vaccines are leaky, that there’s no way they can stop the spread of Delta virus.  The only way that it can even be slowed is with as much vaccination as possible and use of masks.”

What Malone just stated is the party line, the exact line of the stakeholders!

In a previous article, I mentioned Steve Bannon’s November 26th show, where Peter Navarro stated, “There has to be an end immediately to the universal vax policy.  It’s very clear and Dr. Malone can talk about the science of this, and that we are running the risk of creating vaccine resistant mutations. They are proliferating. That could wind up doing great harm to people around the world who, ironically, are vaccinated.  That policy is not working.  The Malone/Navarro doctrine is to vaccinate only the most vulnerable targets. Always remember that we are not really vaccinating people, that is not a vaccination.”

In their Washington Times article of January 12, 2022, Peter Navarro and Dr. Robert Malone are still pushing this vax for the “most vulnerable.”  Who are they…the elderly, often referred to as “useless eaters” by the proponents of depopulation and genocide?  They are the ones most likely to die from this gene therapy jab that attacks the immune system and destroys the ability of the T-cells to fight future invaders.

The most vulnerable Americans are living too long and they’re a drain on Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security. They are also the last generation, mostly baby boomers, who were taught our Constitution and what this country went through to gain her independence and truly become the greatest nation of freedom and liberty.

Depopulation is the goal under UN Agenda 21/30, but the desire to rid our land of the Baby Boomers and replace them with illegal aliens is the ultimate goal and Robert Malone is apparently all for it.  Illegal aliens are allegedly given Ivermectin when they cross the border and are not required to be “vaccinated.”

Conclusion

You may want to listen again to the two Malone videos in the opening salvos of this article.  Will Dr. Malone be chosen for a particular position?  Will he replace Anthony Fauci?  Will he be a presidential advisor? Is he truly the knight in shining armor or is he “controlled opposition?”

Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves.  Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles?  Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit; but a corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit.  Matthew 7:15-17

©Kelleigh Nelson. All rights reserved.

The Truth About Liberal Policies

Many thanks to Laser List member Jeff Walyus for this fantastic rhetorical approach.  I have found it enormously helpful on many occasions.


The truth about liberal policies is that they hurt people.  Let’s look at just the latest examples.

The New York Times made an astounding admission in November. Democrats run the show in Illinois, California, and New York, and have for decades, but blue states are doing worse than red states in many key respects: lack of affordable housing, disparities in education funding, rising economic inequality – all things liberals and Democrats profess to care about and for which they claim to have all the answers.  The New York Times was brutal in its assessment of blue state results:

… blue states are the problem.  Blue states are where the housing crisis is located.  Blue states are where the disparities in education funding are the most dramatic.  Blue states are the places where tens of thousands of homeless people are living on the streets.  Blue states are the places where economic inequality is increasing most quickly in this country.  This is not a problem of not doing well enough.  It is a situation where blue states are the problem.

Let’s take a closer look at one of those blue states, Washington, out on the Left Coast.  America’s schools are following in the footsteps of Seattle to indoctrinate students on racial equity. But Seattle’s efforts to teach racial equity and ethnic studies have been marked by animus, lies, and worsening results.  Academic achievement as measured by state test scores went down after instruction on “power and oppression” was emphasized over math in 2018.  Pass rates for whites and blacks both dropped.  The response of the schools?  More ethnic studies and less math.  Despite having equity programs for decades, Seattle schools had one of the worst black-white student achievement gaps in the nation, as of 2017.  Liberal policies did not make things better.  They made them worse.

Another admission comes from a liberal book author who worked on progressive causes in San Francisco.  Like other west coast cities, San Francisco adopted policies that enabled homelessness, drug dealing, and crime.  All the problems he set about to solve got worse, instead.  He pins the blame on the liberal mindset that labels people victims and makes excuses for their destructive behavior.  San Francisco is where Walgreens closed 15 stores because shoplifting there is so bad and the penalties for it have been reduced.  Do you suppose the people who walked to those stores for their prescriptions are better off now?

Liberals have pushed Child Tax Credits, food stamps, and super-sized Obamacare subsidies, but a recent report shows people can make more from these programs than from work.  These programs disincentivize work and allow people to stay home and not return to the work force.  Maybe, if you’re a Democrat politician, you like the idea of making people more dependent on government and, thus, on you.  But any normal person can see this is not a healthy development and it’s unsustainable.

Democrats want to massively increase federal spending on transportation which they view as systemically racist.  But more mass transit and fewer cars will hurt the poor.  A study found that cars provide urban households with better access to jobs and economic opportunities than other forms of transportation.  Cars reduce neighborhood poverty exposure by 3 to 4 percent.

Liberals love the teachers unions, but collective bargaining agreements for teachers produce worse outcomes for students, especially minority students.  Liberals also love rent control, but it’s well-known rent control produces housing shortages because it destroys the incentive to build new housing.

Rising homelessness.  Out-of-control shoplifting.  Worse educational outcomes.  Fewer economic opportunities.  Not only do liberal policies not work, they actually hurt people.  In their impulse to make a perfect world and end all human suffering, liberals end up making things worse.  This is why you should not support them, no matter how good they make things sound.  They might be good at dazzling rhetoric, but they’re terrible at good governance.  Which would you rather have?

Visit The Daily Skirmish

©Christopher Wright. All rights reserved.

Liberal Media Group Creates pro-Biden ‘Let’s Go Brandon’ Ad and We Can’t Stop Laughing

Laughter is the sun that drives winter from the human face.” – Victor Hugo


It’s time for a little laughter given the bleak winter of 2022 and the Biden presidency. What we didn’t expect is that a liberal media group would bring that laughter to us. Call it “sun in spades”, or for our French speaking readers soleil à la pelle, no pun intended.

MeidasTouch is a liberal PAC that was founded in March of 2020 by BenBrett and Jordan Meiselas with the purpose of stopping the reelection of Donald J. Trump.

MeidasTouch’s slogan is “Because Truth Is Golden.” Ironic isn’t it.

MeidasTouch decided to do a political ad favoring Biden and titled it “Let’s Go Brandon.” Watch:

The problem, after you stopped laughing while watching the ad, is that Biden and his administration have either failed in getting their agenda passed, e.g. Green New Deal, federalizing elections, or have failed to accomplish their agenda when passed, e.g. the Infrastructure Bill which does little for infrastructure and is biased in its funding to blue over red states like Florida.

in an article titled “Okay This Is Beyond NUTS, This Pro-Biden Ad Might be the WORST Ad Ever” wrote:

Yes, the claims it makes are, without exception, dumb and baseless. And yes, it looks absolutely horrific; as Ben Dreyfuss put it on Twitter, “This ad looks like it was made on their phone at 3am by someone drunk in an Uber on their way home.” Bingo.

Those facts are bad enough and would make the ad well worth laughing at. But, even more ridiculously and hilariously, someone thought that bringing up the “Brandon” thing in a pro-Biden ad was a good idea!

Yeah, that’s right. They used “Brandon” as an acronym to try to list out Brandon’s accomplishments, none of with are actually real and almost all of which aren’t exactly the issues Americans care about.

We all know that the symbol of the Democrat Party is a jackass, which is funny enough. But MeidasTouch using Let’s Go Brandon in a pro-Biden political ad takes the proverbial cake.

We agree with Maharishi Mahesh Yogi who said, “The highest state is laughter.” We are definitely in a high state of laughter. If you want another laugh just watch as liberal media personalities slam Biden’s bureaucracy on COVID-19:

Dumb ass best describes MeidasTouch’s ad.

What do you think? Please leave your comments below.

©Dr. Rich Swier. All rights reserved.

RELATED ARTICLES:

FACT CHECK: Aol.’s Absurd Article ‘4 things Biden got right in a bumpy first year’

Biden family received $31 million from Chinese officials with links to China’s Ministry of State Security

These trans TikTok videos are pushing kids over the edge

Social media is fuelling a trans pandemic.


TRIGGER WARNING. GRAPHIC IMAGES

The irony should not be lost on us that a trigger warning is required for an article written for adults about what their kids are watching on the internet. But in the age of social media and trans mass hysteria, this is where we find ourselves.

A brilliant documentary called “The Call is Coming From Inside the House; The Great Awokening” was posted on YouTube on January 16th 2022. Within a few days, it accrued thousands of views. It features extensive footage which has been publicly posted on social media promoting trans identities and trans surgeries, much of which is highly graphic and disturbing.

This documentary compares the recent explosion of trans-identification among our youth to mass hysterias of the past such as the “dancing plague” of the middle ages, and the hysteria of the Salem witch trials, and lays the blame squarely at the feet of social media.

It begins with a general discussion about online social contagion phenomena. During the Covid pandemic, epidemics of  Tourette’s-like tics, and of teens claiming to be suffering from multiple personality disorder, bipolar disorder and many other mental health disorders have come to the attention of concerned medical professionals. There is plenty of footage of teens explaining their self diagnosed conditions on social media in the first part of the documentary.

It has been well recognized for some time that eating disorders can be socially contagious, and there is confronting footage documenting teens posting images online of their cachectic bodies and bullying each other to lose weight.

We parents of transidentifying kids have been shouting from the rooftops for some years about the social contagion that is behind the explosion in numbers. However most health professionals are still refusing to acknowledge this, despite the recent awareness of all these similar socially contagious online phenomena.

The documentary features arresting footage of teens on social media talking about their diverse gender identities and their unique pronouns.  Disturbingly there is even one teen claiming to have multiple personality disorder, and explaining that because most of her “alters” are trans, she is going to transition, despite the fact that she is not trans and does not wish to do so.

We then move on to cover trans surgeries, and this is where the trigger warning really cuts in.  Graphic images of girls as young as 13, posing topless to show off the scars from their “top surgery” –  cosmetic double mastectomies – are genuinely shocking, even to us parents, who have been hardened by our exposure to the trans movement.

There are images of smiling surgeons posing with their young patients, and advertising directly on social media to these adolescents to drum up more business for their grisly trade. One photogenic blonde surgeon is shown smiling approvingly as a young trans-identified woman reels off a list of slang terms used for breast amputation including “divest the chest”, “arrest the breast” and “get riddy that tiddy”. Several surgeons then assure your teen that surgery can be personalized in whatever way is “most affirming” including the complete removal of the nipples, or shaping of nipples into “a Christmas tree, or the Star of David”, or whatever other shape is desired.

Teens are informed by influencers that these surgeries are “customizable” and that they can choose to keep or dispose of any body part as desired.  Various possible mindboggling configurations of genitalia are described. Surgeons are then depicted explaining “nullification”, which involves a male who does not “identify with his genitalia”  having them completely amputated, leaving only smooth skin. (Gender mapper has documented that this surgery may be available to boys as young as 17.

Next there is a discussion and graphic images of “phalloplasty”, a procedure which attempts to construct a phallus for trans-identified females by removing a chunk of flesh from the forearm, rolling it up, and attaching it to the groin.  The complication rate is sky-high and the financial cost astronomical.

An apt analogy is next drawn between transgender surgery and the “lobotomy craze” of the 1950s, which left thousands of patients permanently harmed by the time it petered out.

Finally there is a discussion of regret, with interviews with numerous young people explaining how they had no idea what they were getting into, the pressure to rush into irreversible surgeries, and their profound regrets about what they have done to their bodies.

I caution anyone who chooses to watch this documentary to use their discretion. It is truly shocking – but it is what our kids are freely able to access online. Every parent should watch it if they feel able. However there should be no discretion for any politician, journalist, health professional or teacher who is pushing this harmful, abusive ideology to our children. Any who wish to utter one more word about “acceptance and inclusion”, and about how “affirming” medical transition is, should be forced to watch this documentary and imagine their own daughters walking around their homes, topless, sporting flat, scarred chests.

To close, I will describe the two images which, among all this surreal horror,  had the biggest effect on me.  One shows a smiling young woman posing topless with her surgeon to show off her mastectomy result – multiple self harm scars are clearly visible on her arms and abdomen. The other is a short video of a young woman, also topless with fresh mastectomy scars and missing nipples, explaining in an agitated manner how she is getting “phantom nipple pain” and pleading with whoever has “gotten hold of my nipples and is pinching them to stop the “sick game”. There are no words to describe a society which allows healthy body parts to be removed from young people who are clearly in such severe mental distress.

How have we come to this?

Note: If this documentary is taken down by Youtube, you may be able to find it here.

Republished with permission from the Substack blog of Parents with Inconvenient Truths about Trans (PITT)

COLUMN BY

Anonymous author

In exceptional circumstances, MercatorNet allows contributors to publish articles anonymously. Sometimes the author’s privacy or safety might be at risk. More by Anonymous author

EDITORS NOTE: This MercatorNet column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Wokeness has captured universities, says Jordan Peterson as he resigns

Sick of intellectual corruption, the world’s best-known psychologist abandons academia.


“I recently resigned from my position as full tenured professor at the University of Toronto,” Jordan Peterson wrote in a bombshell op-ed for the National Post last week.

The Rockstar psychologist’s fame long ago outgrew the halls of Canada’s oldest college, where he has researched and lectured since the late 1990s in spite of every slur and scandal.

“I had envisioned teaching and researching at the U of T, full time, until they had to haul my skeleton out of my office,” he writes. “I loved my job.” Nevertheless, Peterson’s title will soon be downgraded to professor emeritus — and how long he lasts in that role is uncertain, judging from his rationale for stepping down.

If the legacy press has been your main lens on Jordan Peterson, you might assume that he’s quitting after one too many pranks or personal attacks. But if you’ve followed the man more closely, you’ll know he has thought in great depth about the decision.

“The appalling ideology of Diversity, Inclusion and Equity is demolishing education and business,” he opens. And yes, Peterson deliberately jumbles the acronym to achieve his preferred spelling: DIE. These three words, now heard in classrooms and boardrooms across North America, have quickly become the Holy Trinity of wokeness.

Put simply, this is what DIE has done to academia, in the words of Peterson:

We are now at the point where race, ethnicity, “gender,” or sexual preference is first, accepted as the fundamental characteristic defining each person … and second, is now treated as the most important qualification for study, research and employment.

How have they driven Peterson from his post? First, he says, DIE is killing the career prospects of some of his brightest students. The students who excel and have the correct sex, skin colour and sexual predilections are fine. But those who deserve to be hired and are white, straight and male mostly graduate to a dead-end road.

“I am academic persona non grata,” Peterson adds, “because of my unacceptable [read: anti-woke] philosophical positions.” For all these reasons, he feels that his job has been rendered morally untenable. “How can I accept prospective researchers and train them in good conscience knowing their employment prospects to be minimal?”

Beyond the practical consequences for his students, Peterson is labouring under the weight of DIE’s deception. While he doesn’t mention Solzhenitsyn, Peterson’s philosophical father clearly haunts the decision he has made. Especially this famous quote: “The simple step of a courageous individual is not to take part in the lie.” Writes Peterson,

All my craven colleagues must craft DIE statements to obtain a research grant. They all lie (excepting the minority of true believers) and they teach their students to do the same. And they do it constantly, with various rationalisations and justifications, further corrupting what is already a stunningly corrupt enterprise.

The problem is greater still for Peterson, since woke ideology has also stretched its tentacles into the accreditation boards of Canada’s graduate clinical psychology training programs. Henceforth, these gatekeepers of the profession will refuse to accredit any program that doesn’t have a “social justice” (read: woke) orientation.

Moreover, Canada has just outlawed so-called “conversion therapy”. Peterson warns that it will therefore become “exceedingly risky for clinicians to do anything ever but agree always and about everything with their clients”. It may even have “doomed the practice of clinical psychology,” he mourns, “which always depended entirely on trust and privacy”.

Rounding off his explanation, Peterson posts an extensive quote from Russian President Vladimir Putin, who curiously weighed in on wokeness late last year. Putin’s words are worth reading in full:

The advocates of so-called ‘social progress’ believe they are introducing humanity to some kind of a new and better consciousness. Godspeed, hoist the flags, as we say, go right ahead. The only thing that I want to say now is that their prescriptions are not new at all. It may come as a surprise to some people, but Russia has been there already.

After the 1917 revolution, the Bolsheviks, relying on the dogmas of Marx and Engels, also said that they would change existing ways and customs, and not just political and economic ones, but the very notion of human morality and the foundations of a healthy society. The destruction of age-old values, religion, and relations between people, up to and including the total rejection of family (we had that, too), encouragement to inform on loved ones — all this was proclaimed progress and, by the way, was widely supported around the world back then and was quite fashionable, same as today. By the way, the Bolsheviks were absolutely intolerant of opinions other than theirs.

This, I believe, should call to mind some of what we are witnessing now. Looking at what is happening in a number of Western countries, we are amazed to see the domestic practices — which we, fortunately, have left, I hope — in the distant past. The fight for equality and against discrimination has turned into aggressive dogmatism bordering on absurdity, when the works of the great authors of the past — such as Shakespeare — are no longer taught at schools or universities, because their ideas are believed to be backward. The classics are declared backward and ignorant of the importance of gender or race.

In Hollywood, memos are distributed about proper storytelling and how many characters of what color or gender should be in a movie. This is even worse than the agitprop department of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union.

Western institutions collapsing in on themselves by embracing a toxic ideology we fought a 45-year Cold War to defeat? No thanks, says JBP — I’ll be pouring more of my time and talent elsewhere.

He has a lot to give. Academia has a lot to lose. And the world has a lot to gain from the resignation of Jordan Peterson.

COLUMN BY

Kurt Mahlburg

Kurt Mahlburg is a writer and author, and an emerging Australian voice on culture and the Christian faith. He has a passion for both the philosophical and the personal, drawing on his background as a graduate… More by Kurt Mahlburg

EDITORS NOTE: This MercatorNet column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

MSNBC commentator says ‘All Your Kids Belong To Us’

The Left is trying to destroy traditional America. Rational Americans must come out in droves in 2022 and 2024 to take down the Left or we will lose this country forever.

The Left: ‘All Your Kids Are Belong To Us’

By The American Conservative, January 20th, 2022

Whoa, whoa, whoa. Progressive commentator Melissa Harris-Perry, in an MSNBC ad:

There’s your bright red line, people. Terry McAuliffe said that parents have no business passing judgment on what their kids are taught at school. This is what so many on the Left believe: that it is their role to liberate children from the troglodytic beliefs of their parents.

They want our kids for themselves. Don’t you get it?

I think this fall, Republican candidates should just run this MSNBC clip over and over, and at the end, just add the slogan: “Had enough? Vote Republican.”

UPDATE: Hello all, I had to spend all the afternoon and evening traveling, and I only just got Internet. I have learned that this Melissa Harris-Perry spot is from 2013. Obviously it might not represent what she thinks today, so I apologize to her if by quoting it, I falsely represented her views today. The clip was massively shared on Twitter yesterday, and it’s worth considering why it sounded plausible and current: because we are watching right now, in real time, in suburban Virginia and elsewhere, the educational establishment — the progressive wing at least, but perhaps I’m being redundant — behave as if they believe that MHP spoke the truth.

Still, I wish I had known this was a 2013 clip. I still would have cited it, because I believe it shows what many on the Left really do believe about kids and parents, but I would have specified its date.

RELATED ARTICLES:

CALIFORNIA: Mom Takes Legal Action Against Teachers Who Allegedly Persuaded 11-Year-Old Daughter She Was A Boy

Denver School Teaches Elementary Schoolers to Support BLM, Be Queer Affirming and to Disrupt Nuclear Family

Dr. Robert Malone Claims COVID Vaccines Can Permanently Damage Children’s Brains, Hearts, Immune Systems

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Quick note: Tech giants are shutting us down. You know this. Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Adsense, Pinterest permanently banned us. Facebook, Google search et al have shadow-banned, suspended and deleted us from your news feeds. They are disappearing us. But we are here. We will not waver. We will not tire. We will not falter, and we will not fail. Freedom will prevail.

Subscribe to Geller Report newsletter here — it’s free and it’s critical NOW when informed decision making and opinion is essential to America’s survival. Share our posts on your social channels and with your email contacts. Fight the great fight.

Follow me on Gettr. I am there, click here. It’s open and free.

Remember, YOU make the work possible. If you can, please contribute to Geller Report.

VIDEO: Ashli Babbitt Pleaded With Police To Stop Antifa False Flag On January 6th, 2021

The Trump supporter jumped up and down, waved hands in frustration at motionless officers:

“Call…help!”

It was cold-blooded murder.

We need real hearings on this democide.

In perhaps her last recorded words, Ashli Babbitt implored police guarding the Speaker’s Lobby on Jan. 6 to call for backup. Brimming with frustration, she jumps up and down after one rioter punched the glass in the double doors right next to police.

Ashli Babbitt Pleaded With Police to Call for Backup Moments Before She Was Shot and Killed

Trump supporter jumped up and down, waved hands in frustration at motionless officers:
“Call…help!”

By Joseph M. Hanneman, The Epoch Times, January 19, 2022:

Just moments before she was shot and killed, Ashli Babbitt confronted the police officers guarding the doors to the Speaker’s Lobby at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, blasting them for allowing rioters to smash the windows and not calling for backup, an analysis of a journalist’s video shows.

The analysis comes on the heels of recent disclosures that Babbitt tried at least four other times to stop the assault on the Speaker’s Lobby. It shows her desperation when the rioters were left unchecked, even smashing a window just inches from a police officer’s head.

In the video—shot by independent journalist Tayler Hansen—Babbitt, 35, is seen trailing rioter Zachary Alam, attempting to get between him and one of three police officers at the Speaker’s Lobby double doors.

Alam, who was arrested by the FBI on Jan. 30, 2021, bashes the window in the double doors twice.

The first time, he grabs one police officer’s shoulder with his left hand, then punches between him and another officer, striking the window, the video shows.

“Chill out! Chill the [expletive] out, bro!” someone shouts. “Hey! Chill out!”

“These guys work for us!” someone in the crowd interjects.

“You gonna shoot him?” another person asks.

A bearded man in a red Trump cap complains that they are not being allowed into the Speaker’s Lobby. “Mother [expletive]! We don’t want to hurt nobody. We just want to go in the House.”

Tried to Dissuade Rioter

Babbitt tries to get in between Alam and one of the officers. She says something to Alam, but he brushes her off. Alam then cranks up his right arm and punches the window next to the officer. Within a few seconds, Babbitt blows up at the officers for allowing the violence and vandalism.

“Call [expletive] help!” Babbitt shouts, jumping up and down in front of the officers. “We’re allowed to be here!”

Babbitt takes a couple steps back. There was no visible reaction from the officers, sparking her anger. “You’re a fraud!” she shouts. “You’re a [expletive] fraud! You’re wrong!”

After walking away, Babbitt can be heard screaming just off camera: “Take it down!” Hansen said he believes she meant for the crowd to calm down.

“You could tell that she was definitely getting upset,” Hansen said while reviewing the video with The Epoch Times. “She was calm when she first got there. Then as the destruction continued and as more people started to fill in and it got more dangerous, that’s when you can tell she was getting really upset.”

Babbitt served as a police officer in the U.S. Air Force during her 14 years of military service. Her husband, Aaron, said her law enforcement experience likely told her something was wrong.

“I believe she saw their inaction as odd or off, and was ultimately confused as to what was happening,” Aaron Babbitt told The Epoch Times. “She was a take-charge kind of person. Her frustrations show that the cops who should’ve been taking charge—weren’t.”

“I’d only seen bits and pieces and never fully put together,” Aaron Babbitt said of the video. “I can hear the confused panic in her voice.”

He said the video makes him sad, since his role as a husband is to protect his wife. He stayed in San Diego to run the couple’s small business while Ashli attended the Trump rally in Washington. She was trapped in the hallway, and claustrophobic.

“She had no friends in that room,” Babbitt said. “I always go back to no one would’ve ever watched out for (her) like I always did. Very helpless.”

Babbitt said he hopes the video analysis gives the public a better understanding of the chaos in the hallway.

“I’ve known something was off with the whole situation from day one,” Babbitt said. “Hopefully this gives other people a different perspective—or at a minimum makes someone take a second look with a different mindset.”

“What I think it was from reviewing the footage and just from knowing what I know about Ashli from the family, is she probably got claustrophobic,” Hansen said, “because more people and more people kept pouring in and she realized she was in a bad situation. So then she pushed her way over to the window area.

“Once that window broke, I think she realized this was going to be bad for the people inside if they were actually able to breach these doors entirely,” Hansen said. “I think she wanted to be the first one through that window so she could kind of safeguard it, honestly. If she can get to the other side of the window where officers are, in her mind she would be safe.”

Hansen said he just discovered an Instagram live-stream video he shot on Jan. 6 that shows Babbitt as she first turned the corner into the Speaker’s Lobby hallway. He said it confirms what he told The Epoch Times on Jan. 17, that Babbitt was friendly with the police officers when she first approached the doors.

“Ashli just walks right up to them and just seems super happy; doesn’t know what she’s about to walk into. She was joking with the cops right before Byrd put a bullet into her.”

Hansen said he first encountered Ashli in the Capitol Rotunda as she entered the building by herself. He next saw her as he emerged from a room with George Washington’s portrait on the wall, then followed her to the Speaker’s Lobby hallway. They were the first two to reach the double doors.

Encounter Started with Calm

“It shows her and me just walking right up to the door with Officer Yetter and all the other cops and she starts talking to them.”

Hansen also captured the moment Lt. Michael Byrd shot Babbitt as she stepped up into the open window frame to the right of the double doors. The bedlam in the hallway quickly turned to panic—and anger.

“There’s an active shooter here! Get her down!” Hansen shouts.

“She needs help! She needs [expletive] help!” someone screams.

A man off camera reaches in at the 38-second mark of the video and check’s Babbitt’s neck for a pulse. “She’s gone, guys.”

“We can’t [inaudible] if you’re here!” a police officer shouts at the crowd. “We’ve got to get EMS here!”

“Back up guys, back up!”

An officer leaning over the stairway railing, shouts, “She’s going to [expletive] die! You want to be next?” he says

“Go, go! Everyone get the [expletive] away!”

RELATED ARTICLE: The January 6 Narrative is Starting to Unravel

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Quick note: Tech giants are shutting us down. You know this. Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Adsense, Pinterest permanently banned us. Facebook, Google search et al have shadow-banned, suspended and deleted us from your news feeds. They are disappearing us. But we are here. We will not waver. We will not tire. We will not falter, and we will not fail. Freedom will prevail.

Subscribe to Geller Report newsletter here — it’s free and it’s critical NOW when informed decision making and opinion is essential to America’s survival. Share our posts on your social channels and with your email contacts. Fight the great fight.

Follow me on Gettr. I am there, click here. It’s open and free.

Remember, YOU make the work possible. If you can, please contribute to Geller Report.

Biden Admin Obstructing Dozens of Congressional Investigations Into Iran Nuclear Talks, Sanctions Relief

The Biden Administration is an absolute disgrace. The damage that they are doing to the stability of the world will be felt for decades. In fact, even if Trump or DeSantis take office in January 2025, will global stability even be salvageable?

Biden Admin Obstructing Dozens of Congressional Investigations Into Iran Nuclear Talks, Sanctions Relief

By Jerusalem Post, January 22, 2022

The Biden administration is obstructing more than a dozen congressional investigations into its diplomacy with Iran and its efforts to unwind sanctions on the hardline regime, according to a year-long foreign policy evaluation conducted by Republican leaders in the House.

The Republican Study Committee, the largest conservative caucus in Congress, disclosed on Thursday that it has sent over a dozen letters to the Biden administration asking for information on the lack of sanctions enforcement in the last year with no satisfactory response. The administration is stonewalling these investigations as it works to keep Republican lawmakers in the dark about the status of negotiations and economic sanctions on Tehran, according to the lawmakers.

One year into President Joe Biden’s administration, “Iran is richer, stronger, and closer to a nuclear weapon” than ever before, the RSC concludes in its latest foreign policy assessment, which awards Biden a failing grade for allowing Iran to greatly expand its atomic weapons program. An advance copy of the RSC’s investigation, led by Chairman Jim Banks (R., Ind.), was provided exclusively to the Washington Free Beacon. The report exposes how the Biden administration has repeatedly broken its promise to enforce U.S. sanctions as it pursues diplomacy with Iran’s anti-American regime.

“It is clear that the Biden administration, while not technically lifting many of President Trump’s sanctions on Iran, is tacitly providing sanctions relief through lack of enforcement, to coax the Iranians to re-enter the failed Iran nuclear deal,” according to the Republican report card. “Unfortunately, such a tactic only hardened Iran’s will to stall in negotiations and step-up provocation.” This includes sponsoring terror attacks during the past year on U.S. outposts and allies in the Middle East.

In compiling the report, Republican leaders held meetings with former high-level national security officials and think tank analysts. The officials helped the RSC detail how the administration has relaxed pressure on Iran and helped the regime claw back from the brink of financial collapse.

When former president Donald Trump left office following the toughest four years of sanctions on Iran in recent history, the country had just $4 billion in accessible cash reserves. One year later, Iran’s foreign currency reserves have increased by 750 percent, congressional leaders determined. Tehran’s illicit oil trade with China, Russia, Syria, Venezuela, and other malign regimes also increased by more than 40 percent during 2021, the Free Beacon first reported this month.

“Despite repeatedly stating that no sanctions relief would be provided to Iran until Iran returned to the failed Iran nuclear agreement, the Biden administration has reneged on that promise by not vigorously enforcing existing penalties, and, in some cases, abusing waiver and license authorities directly benefiting the Iranian regime and its affiliates,” the report states.

As negotiations drag into their second year amid increasing Iranian demands for cash, the regime has implemented “a series of nuclear moves that experts consider ‘irreversible’ in terms of the knowledge needed to move closer to a nuclear weapons threshold capability.” Iran is now enriching uranium, the key component in a bomb, to the unprecedented level of 60 percent purity, which is close to weapons-grade material. This has coincided with a massive rise in the production of uranium metal, another fissile material.

Since Biden took office and made reentering the 2015 nuclear deal a chief priority, Tehran has also blocked international nuclear inspectors from accessing its most contested sites, including military compounds known to house its weapons program. The Biden administration, Republican leaders say, “failed to have the back of these nuclear inspectors as Tehran increasingly diminished monitoring, limited access, and harassed female inspectors.” None of these provocations resulted in punitive measures from the Biden administration.

The United States’ concessions to Iran have been met with increased violence.

Throughout 2021, Iranian-backed terror groups launched a flurry of regional attacks, including a high-profile assassination attempt on Iraq’s prime minister. The Houthi rebels in Yemen, which are armed and directed by Tehran, also doubled their drone attacks in Saudi Arabia last year after the Biden administration removed the group from the U.S. designated terrorist list. Tehran also continued to seize ships in the Persian Gulf and increased rocket attacks on U.S. positions in Syria.

“Biden’s policy of maximum concessions,” the Republican leaders say, “has only made Iran more aggressive in the region.”

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report column is republished with permission. All rights reserved.

Quick note: Tech giants are shutting us down. You know this. Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Adsense, Pinterest permanently banned us. Facebook, Google search et al have shadow-banned, suspended and deleted us from your news feeds. They are disappearing us. But we are here. We will not waver. We will not tire. We will not falter, and we will not fail. Freedom will prevail.

Subscribe to Geller Report newsletter here — it’s free and it’s critical NOW when informed decision making and opinion is essential to America’s survival. Share our posts on your social channels and with your email contacts. Fight the great fight.

Follow me on Gettr. I am there, click here. It’s open and free.

Remember, YOU make the work possible. If you can, please contribute to Geller Report.

How Big Tech Elites Help China Achieve Global Supremacy

Peter Schweizer’s ‘Red-Handed’ exposes Communist China’s Silicon Valley sympathizers

We went from the greatest generation to the absolute worst in three short generations.

The global left has utterly captured the young. morally bankrupt millennial.

How Big Tech elites are helping China achieve global supremacy

By: NY Post, January 23, 2022:

It’s no secret that China wants to surpass the United States in world dominance, yet American elites continue to help the communist’s government’s ambitions rather than treating them as the enemy. In his new book, “Red-Handed,” Peter Schweizer — author of best-sellers such as “Clinton Cash” and “Profiles in Corruption” — outlines the ways top politicians and CEOS get rich off China. In this exclusive excerpt for The Post, he reveals how Big Tech companies have sacrificed privacy and national security in pursuit of Beijing riches.

Blinded by their ambition, Silicon Valley elites are helping Communist China achieve their ultimate goal: “Technology supremacy” over the West.

“Science and technology is a national weapon,” President Xi Jinping has said. “We should seize the commanding heights of technological competition and future development.”

To accomplish this goal, Beijing has created “civilian-military fusion,” which means any technological advance in the civilian market must be applied directly to the military sphere. And they have effectively courted and seduced many powerful people in America’s tech industry to willingly, and sometimes enthusiastically, play along.

In 2015, the Obama Administration held an official State Dinner at the White House for China’s Xi. The East Room was decorated in peach and pink roses. The crowd included two hundred elite guests from the world of government and business. Among them was Mark Zuckerberg, the young-looking cofounder of Facebook, and his wife, Priscilla, who was seven months pregnant. When Zuckerberg finally got his chance to see the guest of honor face-to-face, he made an unusual request: would the communist dictator give his child his Chinese name?

Xi, understandably surprised by the request, declined, saying it was “too great a responsibility.”

It was not the first time the Facebook cofounder had gushed over Chinese officials.

In late 2014, a high-ranking Chinese official named Lu Wei made a trip to Silicon Valley. Lu was a Communist Party hack, the former deputy head of the Propaganda Department of the Communist Party of China. President Xi had recently appointed him to head the “Central Leading Group for Internet Security and Information.” In short, Lu was China’s Internet czar, with the Orwellian job of restricting access to certain ideas and monitoring the flow of information.

The Chinese government had given him plenty of tools to do his job. In 2013, they created a law making it a crime to spread rumors online; if a post deemed untrue received more than five hundred reposts, the original poster could be sentenced to up to three years in prison.

But when Lu visited Facebook’s California headquarters in Menlo Park, Zuckerberg treated him like a VIP. The Facebook head gave him a tour of the new Frank Gehry–designed campus, which boasted the “largest open floor plan in the world.” Later, the two retreated to Zuckerberg’s private office. Lu sat in the CEO’s chair, took a few pictures, and then spotted a familiar book sitting on Zuckerberg’s desk. “The Governance of China” is a 515-page tome containing the speeches and comments of President Xi.

Why was such a book sitting on a capitalist’s desk? Zuckerberg explained to his guest that he bought the book for both himself and his staff as a guide. “I want to make them understand socialism with Chinese characteristics,” he said.

Zuckerberg’s Facebook teamed with Google in 2016 to build an undersea cable that would link San Francisco with Hong Kong, China, and other locations in Asia. The so-called Pacific Light Cable Network would provide better internet and data services to their customers in Asia. But the two American tech superpowers chose to partner with a Chinese company called Dr. Peng Telecom & Media Group to provide the link to Hong Kong.

Dr. Peng was financially backed by the Chinese government’s China Securities Finance Corporation, and worked closely with Huawei and military defense contractors in China. What could possibly go wrong?

The U.S. Federal Communications Commission in 2020 took the unprecedented step of blocking the project. The Facebook-Google cable presented “‘unprecedented opportunities’ for Chinese government espionage,” according to the U.S. Justice Department.

How the tech giants did not see the obvious espionage risk to their plans is a mystery. Or maybe they saw it and did not care.

Schweizer calls out former Google CEO Eric Schmidt, above, for promoting AI work with Beijing.

At the heart of Google’s business strategy is an unquenchable thirst for data, and their dealings in China show they cannot resist tapping any vast resource offered to them.

In 2017, Google announced the opening of an AI research facility in Beijing. The Google AI China Center would include “a small group of researchers supported by several hundred China-based engineers.”

Read the rest….

The head of the venture for Google, Fei-Fei Li, explained, “I believe AI and its benefits have no borders.”

The research at the Google AI China Center includes machine learning that would classify, perceive, and predict outcomes based on massive amounts of data. This is precisely the sort of work that military and intelligence officials would want from AI.
Google’s cooperation with China on AI research occurred the same year that the Chinese Communist Party and government laid out its “artificial intelligence development plan.” A report issued by the Chinese government explains that “AI has become a new focus of international competition,” mastering that technology enhances “comprehensive national power,” and that it would lead to the “great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation.”

Beijing has declared that passing the United States in artificial intelligence is a “national priority.”

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Quick note: Tech giants are shutting us down. You know this. Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Adsense, Pinterest permanently banned us. Facebook, Google search et al have shadow-banned, suspended and deleted us from your news feeds. They are disappearing us. But we are here. We will not waver. We will not tire. We will not falter, and we will not fail. Freedom will prevail.

Subscribe to Geller Report newsletter here — it’s free and it’s critical NOW when informed decision making and opinion is essential to America’s survival. Share our posts on your social channels and with your email contacts. Fight the great fight.

Follow me on Gettr. I am there, click here. It’s open and free.

Remember, YOU make the work possible. If you can, please contribute to Geller Report.