The Vindication of Archbishop Viganò

When Abp. Carlo Maria Viganò originally released his 11-page testimony in August 2018, Pope Francis stated that he would not dignify it with a response. Yet on May 28, Francis finally broke his silence claiming that he “knew nothing” about McCarrick. This apparent contradiction has set off a firestorm of commentary in the Catholic media. With each passing revelation, Abp. Viganò has been vindicated time and time again. Complicit Clergy has been tracking news which appears to corroborate Viganò’s original allegations. At last count, there are no fewer than 13 occasions in which Abp. Viganò has been vindicated:

This track record should once and for all silence Viganò’s critics who claim he is not telling the truth.

Originally published at Complicit Clergy.

EDITORS NOTE: This Church Militant column is republished with permission.

A School Shooting & Story About Interfaith Friendship

The May 2019 issue of Texas Monthly featured a touching interfaith story surrounding the 2018 Santa Fe High School shooting.

The Santa Fe High School shooting was carried about by a 17-year-old student at the school. Thirteen people were wounded in the attack, ten were killed. Among the fatalities was Sabika Sheikh, an exchange student from Pakistan.

Sabika arrived in Texas as part of the YES exchange program through the U.S. State Department. The program provides scholarships for students from countries with a significant Muslim population to spend one academic year in the U.S.

The news of Sabika’s death was devastating for the Pakistani community. The Pakistani community has always valued an American education, and the chance to send a young daughter abroad is a dream come true. But it also takes an incredible act of faith to let a child into the world to explore it.

Sabika was killed three weeks before she was set to fly back home to celebrate the holidays with her family. Her death, like all other deaths from senseless acts of violence, is heartbreaking.

What happened to Sabika inbetween the time she arrived in America and before the school shooting is a story that was not well known. That piece of the story which is a celebration of her life, her education and the opportunity she had to make new friends and discover a new culture is the missing piece filled in by Texas Monthly’s Skip Hollandsworth.

Beyond the bleakness of a school shooting, Hollandsworth tells the story of an interfaith friendship between Sabika, a Muslim foreign exchange student, and an evangelical Christian girl.

Jaelyn Cogburn was then a 15-year-old freshman, Sabika’s junior by two years. Like Sabika, Jaelyn was new to the school. Typically homeschooled with a Bible-based curriculum, Hollandsworth relays how, that year, Jaelyn felt like God put it in her heart to go to Santa Fe High.

Three months into their remarkable friendship, Sabika requested her scholarship program allow her to shift from living with a Muslim-American host family to a non-Muslim host family so she could fully experience life in America. On December 21, 2018, Sabika spent her first night with her new host family: the Cogburns.

Hollandsworth exquisitely narrates the story of a fast and most unlikely friendship between the two girls from opposite corners of the earth. He paints a portrait of Sabika that gives her life beyond the headlines, diving deep into the world she came from and sharing the journey of her unfolding life in Texas. He shows us what is possible when we approach people with openness and respect, as Jaelyn and her family did for Sabika.

RELATED STORIES:

New Mexico Extremists Were Grooming School Shooters

Are Mass Shootings Like Terrorism?

Education or Indoctrination?

The Equality Act

David Carlin: A gender-bending law, passed by the House, allows the weirdest members of society to inflict their delusions on others, especially our kids.


On May 17, the U.S. House of Representatives passed, by vote of 236 to 173, a bill titled the Equality Act – one of the worst bills (in my humble opinion) ever to pass either house of Congress.  All the NO votes came from Republicans.  The YES votes came from 228 Democrats, plus five Republicans.

The Equality Act, if it becomes law, will amend the Civil Rights Act of 1964.  That famous law, promoted by President Lyndon Johnson and endorsed by Martin Luther King Jr., was mainly aimed at preventing discrimination based on race.  Incidentally, however, it aimed at preventing discrimination based on sex.  (In those far-off days, you may remember, people spoke of something called sex, not something called gender.)

In May of 2016, the Obama administration advised all educational agencies receiving federal funds that the 1964 ban on sex discrimination should be construed to ban discrimination based on gender identity.  According to that construal, LBJ’s 1964 law requires that boys/men who think they are girls/women must be allowed to use facilities hitherto reserved for females and vice versa.

This was, of course, a preposterous interpretation – for did any member of Congress who voted for the 1964 Act, or did LBJ himself when he signed the Act into law, or did Martin Luther King when he encouraged passage of that law, imagine that the act mandated transgender access to restrooms and locker rooms?  This interpretation has subsequently been reversed by the Trump administration.

If the Equality Act becomes law, however, (which it won’t this time around since it will almost certainly not pass the Republican-controlled U.S. Senate), the right to go into the restroom, locker room, etc. that is consistent with one’s “gender identity” will be legally secure.

What particularly irks me is that the principal sponsor of the Equality Act is Rep. David Cicilline, my U.S. Congressman.  He holds a seat that I once ran for and lost (1992).  Later, Patrick Kennedy (Teddy’s son) held that seat.  After Patrick came Cicilline, an openly gay man who, prior to being elected to Congress, was mayor of Providence.  Despite his Italian name, he is not Catholic; he is Jewish, born of a Jewish mother.

The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops opposes the Equality Act, because the strong protections it would give to the rights (or should I say the “rights”?) of LGBTQ persons would pose a threat to freedom of religion and conscience.

The parts of the Equality Act that I am especially concerned about are those having to do with the rights of transgender persons, and I am concerned for four reasons.

1. If the Act becomes law, it will pretty much destroy sports for girls and women. Males who are stronger or taller or faster or heavier will, after declaring themselves to be female, win all the big prizes. Women will have to go back to pie-making contests.

2. For another, trans girls (that is, boys who imagine themselves to be girls) will be able to use locker-room and showers that had hitherto been reserved for girls. In other words, real girls will be subject to great embarrassment (and who knows what else?) in order to accommodate the irrational delusions, or perhaps pranks, of a small number of boys. Adult women using public restrooms will rarely be able to feel perfectly safe – unless of course they happen to carry a gun with them (a gun which the same people who voted for the Equality Act would like to ban them from acquiring).

3. More important, adolescence, which even in the best of times is a period of psychological and emotional tumult for kids, will now be a period of even greater turbulence. How many of you reading this essay would wish to return to the psychological stresses and strains, many of them related to a developing sexuality, that you experienced when you were 12 or 13 or 14 or 15 years old?

Well, kids who are pre-teens today will in a few years have to worry, not just about the perennial things, but about gender identity.  They will lie awake at night wondering, “Am I a boy or a girl?”  In the old days you could answer this question by glancing at what you had between your legs.  That was easy; it made today’s question a non-question.  Now kids will feel enormous pressure to ask themselves, “What is my true gender identity, hidden deep within my soul?”

How cruel of the Left (an anti-Christianity Left) to inflict this notable increment of mental pain on growing kids who, in any case, will experience a significant amount of mental pain.  Cruelest of all are those parents – those monsters of iniquity I should say – who for the sake of being fashionably avant-garde encourage their 6- and 7- and 8-year-olds to claim a gender identity in conflict with their biological sex.

4. Finally, and worst of all, is the “philosophy” that underlies all this, a philosophy that says that nothing is what it is; rather, is what we say it is. Everything is a “construct” – constructed either by society at large or by a societal subgroup or by the sovereign individual. And so we can say that a fetus is not a human being; and kill it.  And we can say that Jews are subhuman; and kill them.  And we can say that Christianity is a false and dangerous religion; and ban it.

I don’t expect that most of us will ever say that 2 plus 2 equals 5.  But I do expect that our government will soon protect the “right” of public school teachers to say that Abraham Lincoln was gay, that George Washington was a woman, and that Jesus Christ did not exist.  After all, what is freedom if we are not free to “construct” our thought-world as we please? And what good is freedom if the weirdest members of society are not free to inflict their delusions on others.

COLUMN BY

David Carlin

David Carlin is a professor of sociology and philosophy at the Community College of Rhode Island, and the author of The Decline and Fall of the Catholic Church in America.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Franklin Graham Calls on People to Pray for Trump This Sunday

MLK’s Niece Applauds Clarence Thomas for Linking Abortion, Eugenics

Missouri Could Become the First State Without an Abortion Clinic

EDITORS NOTE: This Catholic Thing column is republished with permission. © 2019 The Catholic Thing. All rights reserved. For reprint rights, write to: info@frinstitute.org. The Catholic Thing is a forum for intelligent Catholic commentary. Opinions expressed by writers are solely their own.

New Booklet: ‘The History of Muslim Persecution of Christians’

The Freedom Center is pleased to release Robert Spencer’s new booklet: “The History of Muslim Persecution of Christians.”

Description:

One can read, almost daily, of the atrocities and persecution of the ancient Christian communities in the Middle East and beyond at the hands of jihadists. This is not, as some try to claim, just a modern-day phenomenon.  Indeed, the Muslim persecution of Christians goes all the way back to the time of Muhammad.  Following Muhammad’s death, Palestine, Syria and Egypt, once the most heavily populated Christian areas in the world, quickly succumbed to Islamic invasions, and by the eighth century, Muslim armies had conquered all of Christian North Africa and Spain. The David Horowitz Freedom Center’s Robert Spencer has just written a ground breaking new booklet, “The History of Muslim Persecution of Christians” that the Center has published.  This incredible and timely booklet chronicles the history of persecution over the past 1,400 years.

Click here to get your copy of The History of Muslim Persecution of Christians.

The Vortex — Lies, Lies and MORE Lies

TRANSCRIPT

Two stories broke earlier this week that were pretty significant on their own, but when you look at them together, the conclusion is especially noteworthy.

The upshot, Pope Francis is lying when he told a reporter he knew nothing about McCarrick because senior Vatican officials knew all about McCarrick including Donald Wuerl who has gotten caught for the second time lying about all this.

This means everything Archbishop Viganò testified to last August about the Pope, McCarrick and Wuerl lying about and covering up the evil of McCarrick is true, as well as the cover-up being orchestrated by a cabal of homosexual men who are senior clergy in the Church such as Cardinal Edwin O’Brien, Blase Cupich, Joseph Tobin and Kevin Farrell.

First the Pope news: He granted a recent interview to a Mexican reporter who asked him point blank what he knew about McCarrick. His answer: “I said that several times, that I didn’t know, no idea, otherwise I wouldn’t have kept quiet.”

Now that’s curious, very curious. Exactly when has the Holy Father ever said once, much less several times, that he had no idea about McCarrick?

When directly confronted by international media on the plane returning from Ireland last summer about Viganò’s charge that he knew all about McCarrick’s homopredation and ignored it and resurrected his career after Pope Benedict had sidelined him, Francis famously said, “I’m not going to say a single word.”

And then he said journalists should do their jobs and get to the bottom of it. Since that time, the Pope has not said anything about what he knew and when he knew it.

To now try and play this off as if he has been saying all along he knew nothing is simply not true.

In the related piece of news, which in itself is also a pretty big story, McCarrick’s former secretary, Msgr. Anthony Figueiredo, has released confidential correspondence to some select media outlets proving — note the word we use there, proving, as in beyond any shadow of a doubt — that top Vatican clergy knew all about McCarrick and the restrictions placed on him and they all ignored them.

Included in the bunch who knew about McCarrick was, drum roll please, the lying, cheating, scheming Donald Wuerl who was instrumental in getting his former seat as archbishop of Washington, D.C. filled by another member of the homosexual current in the Church, Wilton Gregory.

In fact, it’s a given that Wuerl would have been placed in his position as archbishop of D.C. back in 2006 by McCarrick who needed Wuerl to cover for him.

McCarrick was an evil, homosexual predator, communist infiltrator into the Church who sexually assaulted dozens of seminarians during his climb up the episcopal ladder.

He embezzled enormous sums of money which he used to curry favor with the greedy Vatican clergy who helped his career as well as covering up for him.

As his power and influence grew — through blackmail or secret cash payments and relationships with other wicked prelates — McCarrick simply became the living breathing example of someone who senior clergy considered “too big to fail.”

Somewhere along the line, it was decided that if news ever got out about McCarrick, it would be a PR nightmare for Rome.

So he was allowed to continue. He was instrumental in starting up the Papal Foundation, being the bishops face for their response to original homopredator sex abuse crisis in 2002; he was key in crafting the policy where bishops would never be investigated.

All of this was known, a true inside operation. And the laity were lied to repeatedly, ripped off, deceived and any other verb you can think of by an American hierarchy that was too busy jettisoning tradition and covering up their own homopredator priests to care.

And as Bishop Steven Lopes importantly noted last summer, “We all knew.” Yes, they did — which brings us back to Pope Francis, Donald Wuerl and Archbishop Viganò.

So now let’s tie the two stories together. Wuerl knew all about McCarrick, having been caught publicly now not once, but twice lying about it. Pope Francis knew straight from the mouth of Viganò, who admitted that he knew.

We know from the correspondence just released, as well as other sources, that Wuerl knew. So Wuerl and Pope Francis both knew, and more to the point, when questioned, they lied. They both lied.

And pay close attention to this: The Pope lied — yes, the Pope lied. And not only lied as in the past, but continues the lie. Viganò even came out yesterday and charged him with lying.

One on level, that’s not horribly surprising. He has surrounded himself with liars — liars about sex abuse cover-up; liars about Church teaching; liars about homosexuality; lies, lies and more lies. And yet he himself, while a big one, is not the actual problem. He is as much a symptom of a much larger problem.

A problem that allows a homopredator priest to try and seduce young men in the diocese of Saginaw. A problem that allows an archbishop in Detroit to offer the services of a judge to help kill the investigation through intimidation.

A problem that allows a bishop in Buffalo to cover up a local clergy loaded with homosexual men.

A problem that allows a cardinal in Chicago to keep hidden and unreported that one of his predecessors may very well have been a predatory homosexual himself.

A problem that allows a cardinal in New York to keep in service and lie about a priest who stole enormous sums of money to use for sadomasochistic sex with a gay-for-pay prostitute.

These men, from the top down, have constructed one massive lie, brick by brick and have used the souls of those whose care they are charged with to promote their lie. The Pope is lying. Wuerl is lying.

Our Blessed Lord stood in front of the religious leaders of His time and declared to them that their “father is the devil, and that the devil was a liar and a murderer from the beginning.”

He also said, “For this reason I was born into the world to bear witness to the truth. Whoever hears the truth, hears my voice.”

No faithful Catholic on now seeing all of this revealed for the monstrous evil that it is can fail to act according to his own circumstances of life.

This must be resisted with every ounce of strength you have.

EDITORS NOTE: This Church Militant video is republished with permission.

VIDEO: Interview of Bill Warner by Adrian Norman

Topics covered include:

• The confusion about Islam by the Left.

• What we need to learn from history about Islam.

• The nanny state and the reporting of facts.

• Generational thinking.

• Can Islam ever live at peace?

• How are we becoming Islamized?

Jewish Student claims NYU has allowed ‘extreme antisemitism on campus’

An NYU pro-Palestinian group whose leader blamed Chelsea Clinton for the New Zealand mosque attacks has created a “hostile atmosphere” for the school’s Jewish students, according to a complaint. The student claims NYU allowed “extreme anti-Semitism” to fester on the Greenwich Village campus, claims Senior Adela Cojab, 22, in a complaint filed last week with the US Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights.

This is one of many complaints by Jewish students in a number of ivy league universities in the U.S. who complain of harassment and fear of physical violence by pro Palestinian groups which the school administrations ignore. It appears a number of ivy league universities are hot beds and incubators of antisemitism and it is on the rise. It is important for students, parents and donors to deal with the issue.

Student claims NYU has allowed ‘extreme anti-Semitism’ on campus

By  Sara Dorn

An NYU pro-Palestinian group whose leader blamed Chelsea Clinton for the New Zealand mosque attacks has created a “hostile atmosphere” for the school’s Jewish students, according to a complaint.

The school has allowed “extreme anti-Semitism” to fester on the Greenwich Village campus, claims Senior Adela Cojab, 22, in a complaint filed last week with the US Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights.

The alleged source of the tension is an anti-Israel group, Students for Justice in Palestine, led by Leen Dweik, who went viral last month after she cornered Clinton at an NYU vigil for the New Zealand massacre victims.

Read more.

Canada: Christians Muzzled While Islamists Get Funding

A  proposed law in Canada will result in Christians muzzled. Meanwhile Islamists (including those tied to terrorists) get government funding.

These days we wake up every day to disturbing news in both the U.S. and Canada.

The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) recently released a report titled: Hijacked by Hate: American Philanthropy and the Islamophobia Network in which it claims “hate groups” have used American charities to propagate a message of anti-Muslim bigotry.

According to this report, any critique of Islamism and Islamist activities is deemed racism and bigotry (i.e., “Islamophobic”). This includes any and all legitimate criticism of extremism, terrorism and jihad. According to CAIR, it’s all racism.

Meanwhile in Canada, MP Iqra Khalid — the architect of the divisive M103, the anti-“Islamophobia” motion — announced less than a year ago that the Trudeau Government (due in part to her hard work) would invest $23 million into a multiculturalism program.

The catch:  What is this “multiculturalism program?” Much to our horror, the two groups who are among the recipients of the program’s money are:

If the two above pieces of news were not disturbing enough, there is more troubling news: Legislation has been proposed in the Canadian province of Ontario that would criminalize public displays by Christians deemed hateful to Muslims, the LGBT community and other victim groups designated by the Left.

The bill, Prohibiting Hate-Promoting Demonstrations at Queen’s Park Act, 2019, bans any demonstration, rally or other activity on the grounds of the Ontario Legislative Building that is deemed hateful by the Speaker. The word “hateful” is not defined.

What does this mean in practical terms? Islamists can get a free pass to celebrate a hate fest called Al-Quds Day in a public space, while Christians, who are the most persecuted faith in the world today, are muzzled. There is horrendous persecution of Christians and their places of worship in many parts of the Muslim world, yet if this bill passes, it will be illegal to address this publicly in Ontario.

I have seen ethnic groups get special status, but it amazes me and boggles the mind that one faith always receives special accommodation. And I thought coming to Canada was about freedom of speech and expression.

Have we not learned anything from Europe? The European Court of Human Rights recently became the enforcer of sharia blasphemy laws. The court declared in a ruling that defaming the Islamic prophet Mohammed was prohibited and exceeds the permissible limits of free speech in Europe. (This is in contrast to a ruling by the same court which allowed the insulting of Christianity in 2012.)

If we don’t want to end up with Europe’s level of “free speech,” we must challenge these divide-and-conquer policies to ensure they will not reach their objectives.

This will only happen when Americans and Canadians stand up together and speak out against these tactics.

RELATED STORIES:

CAIR Canada Alters Name to Dodge Islamist Links

Canadian PM Blasts CAIR-Canada for Ties to Hamas

Joined at the Hips: Islamic Relief and Muslim Brotherhood

VIDEO: Steve Bannon Responds to Merkel’s Lies and the Pope’s Fantasies

Below, a former retired head of Mossad on the AfD, from a man considered a legend in Israel.

HEZBOLLAH SLEEPER AGENT CONVICTED OF PLOTTING U.S. TERROR ATTACKS: Lebanese-born terrorist was a naturalized U.S. citizen.

Tensions and hostilities between the United States and Iran have been ramping up and while the news media focuses on how Iran has been operating throughout the Middle East threatening our allies including Israel, the media has ignored that operatives of Hezbollah have, for many years, been operating widely throughout Latin America in conjunction with drug cartels that engage in the smuggling of huge quantities of narcotics into the United States as well as huge numbers of aliens.

This not only provides a major source of revenue for Iran to fund its wide-ranging terrorist operations but to provide Iran with opportunities to move sleeper agents into the United States.

Of course “Sleeper Agents” not unlike aliens in general don’t just enter the United States illegally by running our borders but also enter the U.S. by various other methods, including by being admitted legally at ports of entry.

The issue of “Sleeper Agents” is not a new threat but one that has been of great concern for many years.

On March 21, 2012 the House Committee on Homeland Security that was then chaired by New York Congressman Peter King, conducted a hearing on the topic, Iran, Hezbollah, and the Threat to the Homeland.  The Huffington Post published a report on the hearing, Peter King: Iran May Have ‘Hundreds’ Of Hezbollah Agents In U.S.

I have written a number of previous articles about this clear and immediate threat that Iran poses to U.S. national security and public safety.  One of my recent articles was entitled, Iran Threatens U.S. And Its Allies With “Drugs, Refugees, Bombs And Assassination.”

My commentary today, however, is predicated on a May 17, 2019 Justice Department press release that announced:

Ali Kourani Convicted in Manhattan Federal Court for Covert Terrorist Activities on Behalf of Hizballah’s Islamic Jihad Organization

Ali Kourani Was Trained by Hizballah’s External Terrorist Operations Component and Gathered Intelligence in New York City in Support of Attack-Planning Efforts

That press release began with this statement that noted he also committed immigration law violations:

Yesterday, a jury returned a guilty verdict against Ali Kourani, a.k.a. “Ali Mohamad Kourani,” a.k.a. “Jacob Lewis,” a.k.a. “Daniel,” on all eight counts in the Indictment, which charged him with terrorism, sanctions and immigration offenses for his illicit work as an operative for Hizballah’s external attack-planning component.  Kourani is scheduled to be sentenced on Sept. 27, 2019…

It further stated:

“While living in the United States, Kourani served as an operative of Hizballah in order to help the foreign terrorist organization prepare for potential future attacks against the United States,” said Assistant Attorney General Demers.  “The evidence at trial showed that Kourani searched for suppliers who could provide weapons for such attacks, identified people who could be recruited or targeted for violence, and gathered information about and conducted surveillance of potential targets within our country.  Such covert activities conducted on U.S. soil are a clear threat to our national security and I applaud the agents, analysts, and prosecutors who are responsible for this investigation and prosecution.”

“Ali Kourani was recruited, trained and deployed by Hizballah’s Islamic Jihad Organization to plan and execute acts of terrorism in the United States,” said U.S. Attorney Berman.  “Kourani’s chilling mission was to help procure weapons and gather intelligence about potential targets in the U.S. for future Hizballah terrorist attacks.  Some of the targets Kourani surveilled included JFK Airport and law enforcement facilities in New York City, including the federal building at 26 Federal Plaza in Manhattan.  Today, Kourani has fittingly been convicted for his crimes in a courthouse that stands in the shadow of one of his potential targets.”

I originally wrote about the arrest of Ali Kourani and his alleged cohort, Samer el Debek in my article, Two Alleged Hezbollah Jihadists Arrested In U.S.

I noted in that article that immigration (naturalization) was the key to their terrorist activities.  In point of fact, both men had become naturalized United States citizens before they were tasked by their Hezbollah handlers.

The New York Times reported on this case in the article, Bronx Man Accused of Casing J.F.K. Airport for Potential Hezbollah Attack that included this paragraph:

The man, Ali Kourani, a 32-year-old naturalized citizen from Lebanon, told the F.B.I. in a series of interviews that he believed he had been recruited to join Hezbollah’s Islamic Jihad Organization as part of an effort to develop “sleepers” who lived ostensibly normal lives but could be “activated and tasked” with conducting operations, the complaint said.

The article went on to note:

Mr. Kourani said he had been recruited to join the organization in 2008, in light of his education and because he lived in the United States, the authorities said in the complaint. They said that he had told the authorities that one of his first instructions from his “handler” in Lebanon, a man called Fadi, was to obtain American citizenship as soon as possible, which he did in 2009.

On May 16, 2019 U.S. News and World Report published an article, New Yorker Convicted of Giving Material Support to Hezbollah that included this excerpt:

U.S. Attorney Geoffrey S. Berman said Kourani surveilled terrorism targets in New York City, including Kennedy International Airport and law enforcement facilities including the building housing the FBI.

“Ali Kourani was recruited, trained, and deployed by Hezbollah’s Islamic Jihad Organization to plan and execute acts of terrorism in the United States. Kourani’s chilling mission was to help procure weapons and gather intelligence about potential targets in the U.S. for future Hezbollah terrorist attacks,” Berman said in a release.

Authorities said the Lebanon-born Kourani received sophisticated military training overseas at least twice, including in 2000 at age 16. They said he was trained in the use of a rocket propelled grenade.

Authorities said he came to the U.S. legally in 2003, eventually earning a bachelor’s degree in biomedical engineering in 2009 and a master’s degree in business administration in 2013.

Kourani received the sort of high-tech education, in the U.S., that could certainly assist him in launching terror attacks on American soil.

What has not been reported is an alien who becomes a naturalized citizen my change his/her name at the time that they acquire U.S. citizenship and their U.S. passport will only reflect their new name.  In essence we are permitting aliens to create their own “witness protection program” that provides them with the opportunity to use their new identities to potentially enter countries around the world that may not have admitted them under their original identities.  Furthermore, by having two different passports under two different nationalities and names, they can alternate the passports that they use to acquire airline tickets and gain entry into different countries while successfully covering their tracks not unlike the way that a smuggler may drag a branch behind him in the desert to cover his tracks in the sand.

I have addressed this major vulnerability when I have testified before Congress but it has never been addressed.

Indeed, politicians from both parties are eager to provide pathways to U.S. citizenship to unknown millions of illegal aliens to “solve” the immigration crisis.

As I noted some time ago, Terrorists Value U.S. Citizenshp More Than Our Politicians Do.

EDITORS NOTE: This FrontPage Magazine column is republished with permission.

Abortion Debate Shows How Media Deploys Language Gymnastics to Serve Left-Wing Goals

“Pregnancy Kills. Abortion Saves Lives.”

That was the headline on an absurd opinion article in The New York Times, deploying Orwellian language to turn the abortion debate on pro-lifers and comfort those who support abortion on demand.

While the conversation over Alabama’s new abortion law has drawn out some wild arguments from the left, it’s easy to miss the less obvious ways the media reinforce the pro-abortion side.

The media, cleverly and often subtly, use rhetorical adjustments to reinforce left-wing ideas under the guise of objectivity.

It’s not just on the abortion issue that the media kowtow to the left in the terminology they use in charged public debates.

For instance, The Guardian, a British outlet, recently updated its style guide to reinforce the idea that challenging prevailing left-wing ideas about man-made climate change is fundamentally illegitimate.

Few topics, however, draw out media bias like abortion, where the concerns of pro-life Americans are left on the back page or uncovered, and a magnifying glass is put on anyone who challenges pro-abortion orthodoxy.

Ultimately, media bias regarding abortion is nothing new.

Ross Douthat, a conservative New York Times columnist, wrote in 2012:

Conservative complaints about media bias are sometimes overdrawn. But on the abortion issue, the press’s prejudices are often absolute, its biases blatant, and its blinders impenetrable. In many newsrooms and television studios across the country, Planned Parenthood is regarded as the equivalent of, well, the Komen foundation: an apolitical, high-minded and humanitarian institution whose work no rational person—and certainly no self-respecting woman—could possibly question or oppose.

This is certainly the case today.

Not only is coverage of abortion highly skewed, but it’s clear that the language used to describe it is made to soften the reality of what the practice is, while diminishing the concerns of those who believe fundamental rights are being violated.

NPR, which is of course publicly funded, recently updated its language guidelines for reporters.

Here are some of the terms now off-limits for NPR journalists: pro-life, late-term abortion, fetal heartbeat, partial birth.

Instead they are to use terms such as “intact dilation and extraction” (to describe a partial-birth abortion) and “medical or health clinics that perform abortions” (instead of simply “abortion clinics”).

The phrase “abortion doctor” also would drop off the list of acceptable phrases. Instead, NPR reporters are instructed to list the doctor’s name and write that he “operated a clinic where abortions are performed.”

If anything, the attempt to use more scientific language to describe abortions,such as “intact dilation and extraction” in the place of “partial birth abortion,” at best merely confuses readers as to what actually is being performed.

This point was well made by National Review’s Alexandra DeSanctis, who wrote in a thread on Twitter.

Of course, NPR has also set strict guidelines about how to treat the words “unborn” and “baby,” making sure that reporters never describe, well, unborn babies in anything other than technical language to remove thorny debates about personhood or humanity. NPR instructs its reporters:

The term ‘unborn’ implies that there is a baby inside a pregnant woman, not a fetus. Babies are not babies until they are born. They’re fetuses. Incorrectly calling a fetus a ‘baby’ or ‘the unborn’ is part of the strategy used by antiabortion groups to shift language/legality/public opinion.

Media bias on this issue will become only more pronounced as the “positive good” school of thought about abortion becomes more pronounced on the left than the “safe, legal, and rare” camp.

Regardless of where one stands on the issue of abortion, attempts to dance around prickly questions about life and humanity are unlikely to solve the division.

The media, as is so common today, distinctly reveals its biases and lets slip the mask of objectivity that’s becoming increasingly difficult for Americans to believe.

COMMENTARY BY

Jarrett Stepman is an editor and commentary writer for The Daily Signal and co-host of “The Right Side of History” podcast.Send an email to Jarrett. Twitter:

RELATED ARTICLE: 25 Senators Highlight Pro-Life Protections Ahead of 2020 Spending Bills


A Note for our Readers:

America’s trust in the mainstream media is at a historic low—and rightfully so, given the behavior of many journalists in Washington, D.C. and across the country.

Ever since Donald Trump was elected president, it’s been painfully clear that the mainstream media covers liberals glowingly and conservatives critically.

Why? Because they are determined more than ever to give the government more control over your lives. Restoring your liberty and embracing freedom is the best thing for you and the country.

Americans need an alternative to the mainstream media. That’s why The Daily Signal exists.

The Daily Signal’s mission is to give Americans the real, unvarnished truth about what is happening in Washington and what must be done to save our country.

Our dedicated team of more than 100 journalists and policy experts rely only upon the support of patriots like you.

Your donation helps us fight for access to our nation’s leaders and report the facts.

We do this because you deserve the truth about what’s going on in Washington.

Please make a gift to support The Daily Signal today.

SUPPORT THE DAILY SIGNAL


EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Signal column is republished with permission.

The Media Won’t Say It, but Christians Are the No. 1 Persecuted Group Worldwide

Sri Lanka. April 21. Five hundred wounded, over 300 dead in terrorist attacks.

According to mainstream media and many in the international community, these attacks were another senseless assault on “humanity.” But the destruction of Christian churches on Easter morning was not motivated by generic hatred. We know exactly why these men, women, and children died.

They died for their Christian faith.

On the holiest day in the Christian calendar, three bombs ripped through Christian churches, killing hundreds who had gathered peacefully to celebrate Christ’s resurrection from the dead.

But international leaders have studiously avoided calling this what it is: anti-Christian persecution.

Former President Barack Obama tweeted, “The attacks on tourists and Easter worshippers in Sri Lanka are an attack on humanity.” Hillary Clinton tweeted about “today’s horrific attacks on Easter worshippers and travelers.”

Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi condemned “the horrific blasts in Sri Lanka,” but said nothing about how the violence targeted Christians, and Turkish President Tayyip Erdogan called the attacks “an assault on all humanity.”

All that is true, but it is not enough—especially given the fact that Obama and Clinton expressly mentioned the Jewish and Muslim communities after recent attacks on a synagogue and a mosque.

Post-Sri Lanka, these leaders avoided the word “church” and said nothing about the global Christian community—or about the reality that Christians are now the most persecuted religious group in the world.

In fact, just one day after the bombings, CNN completely ignored the attacks in a series of town halls. Many journalists actually scoffed at the notion that Christians face intense persecution around the globe.

Pointing out the double standard here might strike some as petty scorekeeping. But words matter.

When people acknowledge that Jews or Muslims are persecuted for their beliefs but ignore that Christians are being persecuted for theirs, they give us a grossly inaccurate picture of reality.

The truth is that Christians globally are facing the same hatred that spurred the Sri Lanka attacks. Consider:

  • The Middle East, where since 2011, over 200,000 Coptic Christians from Egypt have been forced to flee their homes, and where two years ago, dozens were murdered in Palm Sunday church bombings. In addition, Syrian Christians fear for their lives, and over a million Iraqi Christians since 2003 have fled to avoid persecution.
  • Africa, where 2 million Nigerians, including many Christians, have been driven from their homes by Islamist extremists, with thousands brutally murdered. In Libya and Somalia, radical Islamist militias openly hunt down and kill Christians. A new wave of attacks in recent weeks by Islamist terrorists in Burkina Faso have targeted and killed Christians there during worship, with far too few Western leaders speaking out.
  • Europe, where last year in France, two Christian churches were desecrated every single day. In Germany, Christians who have fled persecution in the Middle East now face harassment and oppression that is painfully similar to what they left behind.

The Christians who died on Easter in Sri Lanka were not victims of isolated, senseless terrorism. They were victims of a global—and escalating—hatred of Christianity.

Like the millions of other Christians whose lives are increasingly forfeit for their faith, the martyrs of Sri Lanka deserve the truth be told about why they died. The best tribute we can give them is not shock or wistful eulogies. Their enduring legacy should be a new determination—on the part of world leaders everywhere—to promote and defend religious freedom.

President of the European Parliament Antonio Tajani was one of the few world leaders to speak the truth about these attacks and about Christian persecution when he tweeted: “Even on Easter Sunday, there are those who sow hatred and reap death. The attacks in Sri Lanka churches testify to a real genocide perpetrated against Christians. Let us pray for the innocent victims and work towards religious freedom around the world.”

The perpetrators of these attacks are part of a growing genocidal effort worldwide to eradicate Christianity. Only by identifying their motive can we effectively counter and end this brutal agenda.

COMMENTARY BY

Paul Coleman serves as executive director of ADF International. Twitter: .

RELATED ARTICLES:

Why Obama and Clinton Tweeted About ‘Easter Worshippers,’ Not Christians

‘Tolkien’ Paints Vivid Picture of Writer’s Life, but Ignores His Faith

Abortion Debate Shows How Media Deploys Language Gymnastics to Serve Left-Wing Goals


A Note for our Readers:

America’s trust in the mainstream media is at a historic low—and rightfully so, given the behavior of many journalists in Washington, D.C. and across the country.

Ever since Donald Trump was elected president, it’s been painfully clear that the mainstream media covers liberals glowingly and conservatives critically.

Why? Because they are determined more than ever to give the government more control over your lives. Restoring your liberty and embracing freedom is the best thing for you and the country.

Americans need an alternative to the mainstream media. That’s why The Daily Signal exists.

The Daily Signal’s mission is to give Americans the real, unvarnished truth about what is happening in Washington and what must be done to save our country.

Our dedicated team of more than 100 journalists and policy experts rely only upon the support of patriots like you.

Your donation helps us fight for access to our nation’s leaders and report the facts.

We do this because you deserve the truth about what’s going on in Washington.

Please make a gift to support The Daily Signal today.

SUPPORT THE DAILY SIGNAL


EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Signal column is republished with permission.

What did Jesus mean when he said, “for all they that take the sword shall perish with the sword.”

On this Memorial Day 2019 I began to reflect upon my 23-years in the U.S. Army. I have over those years seen many of my comrades in arms give the last full measure of devotion for this nation. While reflecting on their sacrifice I was reminded of Mathew 26:52:53 (KJV):

52 Then said Jesus unto him, Put up again thy sword into his place: for all they that take the sword shall perish with the sword.
53 Thinkest thou that I cannot now pray to my Father, and he shall presently give me more than twelve legions of angels?

All of those who have fallen in war since the first Decoration, now Memorial, Day took up the sword to fight. From the Civil War, to WWI, to the beaches of Omaha and Iwo Jima, to the jungles of Vietnam, to Desert Storm and now Syria and Afghanistan. Christian men, and women, have stood up to take a stand against tyranny.

What does it mean to a Christian soldier when he reads the words of the Son of God about the sword?

In a previous article titled “How many times does the word ‘sword’ appear in the Bible?” I wrote:

The word sword has a special place in the Holy Bible. Most members of the clergy don’t present sermons on this important symbol to their flocks.

Perhaps it is time to revisit the different uses of the sword in the Old (Hebrew) and New Testament.

Bible Gateway lists a total of 406 passages in the Bible that have the word sword. Of these 373 are in the Old (Hebrew) Testament and 33 in the New Testament. From Genesis to Revelations the sword is used as both a weapon and metaphorically to bring Christians to the truth about God’s grace and his promise of life everlasting. But why the sword?

According to Knights Edge:

The sword was called by many the “Queen of the weapons”. There is a lot of merit in this epithet as the sword, throughout the ages possessed beauty in its many forms and the art with which it has been adorned. It took a lot of skill and sophisticated knowledge to make a sword and also, it took a lot of skill and knowledge to know how to wield the sword efficiently.

For Christians it too takes a lot of skill and knowledge to know how to wield the sword of God efficiently.

Was Jesus telling Christians to never take up the sword?

In Matthew 10:34-40 (KJV) Jesus said to his disciples:

34 Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword.
35 For I am come to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter against her mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in law.
36 And a man’s foes shall be they of his own household.
37 He that loveth father or mother more than me is not worthy of me: and he that loveth son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me.
38 And he that taketh not his cross, and followeth after me, is not worthy of me.
39 He that findeth his life shall lose it: and he that loseth his life for my sake shall find it.
40 He that receiveth you receiveth me, and he that receiveth me receiveth him that sent me.

As a Christian, who became a soldier of the United States of America, the words of Jesus have a great impact. The Son, like his Father, tasks us to fight evil, wherever it is found, even within our own families. We must fight evil using the sword, the words of God. This has become more and more clear as Jews and Christians are being persecuted globally.

I asked in my previous column: “It is time for a Ninth Crusade?”

Perhaps it is time for a Ninth Crusade to save Western Civilization. The only nation that can take on this task is a Christian nation, that nation is the United States of America.

For you see in America, in God we trust. Let us all be worthy of Him.

VIDEO: Even Orwell didn’t anticipate the State Sanctioning the Mass Rape & Sex-slavery of its Children

Last night a few people sent in a link of a video that was about the Labour government under Gordon Brown in the UK, having INSTRUCTED THE POLICE NOT TO INVESTIGATE the massive muslim RAPE GANGS in the UK.

Scratching my memory it was Richard and PePo I believe. Thank you to both and anyone else who sent it in.

Both links showed as “Video Unavailable” when I clicked the links.

So I will endeavour to post everything I can about the story here and in future posts.

In other news, Theresa May promises to step down at some point in the future, much like she promised BREXIT I suppose.

More to be posted on this.

Anyone even vaguely interested in knowing the facts behind this crime of all time, should buy and read the book, Easy Meat, on Amazon.com.

Addendum: Some new-normal, Orwellian reporting on an unspecified event where 2 non-specific people are under arrest for something.

Sheffield major incident: Two boys dead as streets cordoned off – police on scene

Two boys, aged 14 and 13, were confirmed dead by South Yorkshire Police, while four children between the ages of seven months and 11-years-old remain in hospital. The cause of death has not been established but two people have been arrested on suspicion of murder.

Emergency services were called to an incident near Hartley Brook Primary Academy in Sheffield at 7.30am this morning. 

Four ambulances and 15 police cars attended the scene, while an air ambulance landed on the school playground. There is a large police cordon in place. 

The incident happened at a property in Gregg House Road in the Shiregreen area in Sheffield. It is believed the property is around 100 metres from the school. 

Officers said that the incident is an isolated one and is no longer live. They also confirmed that family have been informed and are being supported by specially trained officers. 

In summary, 2 people are arrested for an event at a school which killed two boys.

Articles on the Labour Party INSTRUCTING police to NOT INVESTIGATE MUSLIM RAPE GANGS

H/T Wrath off Khan

Reddit list of removed rape gangs in the UK:

H/T NorseRadish

EDITORS NOTE: This Vlad Tepes Blog column is republished with permission.

Disney’s film ‘Aladdin’ about Good Arabs vs Evil Arabs. Sound familiar?

Disney has released their film “Aladdin” much to the chagrin of at least one Muslim group. The film centers on the struggle for power among Arab tribes and has a clear message that the good Arab must defeat the bad Arabs at all cost.

The film portrays a young Arab (Muslim) man of lower class who falls in love with the daughter of the Sultan, Princes Jasmine. It is also about Princes Jasmine wanting to break free from the traditional Arab (Muslim) view of woman as subservient and submissive.

Princes Jasmine want more than anything to be free. Free to do and be who she wants to be. Something that Arab (Muslim) women in general cannot do under Islamic (shariah) law.

Princes Jasmine wants to marry for love, something not generally condoned in the Middle East even today, where young girls are betrothed and married off by families to older men.

The film is also about “Jafar, the Sultan’s Royal Vizier and a cunning and powerful sorcerer who is frustrated with the Sultan’s passive stance on Agrabah’s future, devises a plan to assume the throne himself.” Jafar wants to go to war in order to expand Agrabah’s empire. Princes Jasmine, who has her father’s ear, is against war and becomes an enemy of the evil Arab (Muslim) Jafar.

Sounds like what is happening today in the Middle East.

Watch the trailer:

According to the official Disney Studios “Aladdin” website the film “is the exciting tale of the charming street rat Aladdin, the courageous and self-determined Princess Jasmine and the Genie who may be the key to their future.”

It appears calling any Arab (Muslim) a “street rat” and depicting a young Arab (Muslim) girl as “self-determined” is offensive at least to one group of Muslims. 

In The Blaze article titled “CAIR says ‘Aladdin’ film will worsen Islamophobia and racism because it’s being released under President Trump” Carlos Garcia reports:

The Muslim advocacy group CAIR says that releasing the “Aladdin” film during the presidency of President Donald Trump will worsen racism and Islamophobia, and they want critics to say so.

The Council on American-Islamic Relations says that the story that Aladdin is based on is racist and bigoted.

“The Aladdin myth is rooted by racism, Orientalism and Islamophobia,” read the statement from CAIR.

“To release it during the Trump era of rapidly rising anti-Muslim, anti-immigrant and racist animus only serves to normalize stereotyping and to marginalize minority communities,” it continued.

Read more.

Now Disney Studios is Islamophobic, bigoted and racist?

Anyone who watched “Aladdin” understands why CAIR is so upset. The film is beautifully made, choreographed and filmed to present a view of the Arab world that is not unlike what is happening even today. There are still Arab (Muslim) kings, sheikhs, sultans and tribal leaders. Even former caliphs. Another reason that CAIR may be so upset is that the two lead actors, Naomi Scott (Princess Jasmine) and Mena Massoud (Aladdin) are Christians. Watch this report from MovieGuide.org.

There are still Arabs (Muslims) who are struggling and even stealing just to survive. Their is the wealthy class that looks down upon the lower class and wants, at all cost, to retain their power over the masses. Sound familiar?

Aladdin in not bigoted, racist or Islamophobic. It is a depiction of life in the Middle East, but with a good ending.