It’s Official! Climate PSYOP replaces COVID PSYOP – Global ‘boiling’ replaces ‘warming’ – NYT declares end of summer vacations

NYT: ‘Climate change’ May Make Summer Vacation A Thing of the Past!

NYT warns of “scorching heat…fires, floods, tornadoes and hail storms”- August 5, 2023“This year, everything from scorching heat to fires, floods, tornadoes and hail storms driven by climate change have disrupted the plans of travelers around the world. A summer getaway remains a powerful desire, but it’s at a tipping point…For decades, science has confirmed that unabated climate change will cause more misery, more hardship and cost millions of lives in the years to come. We’re getting a taste of the results this summer. Our relationship to travel has reached a tipping point. What happens when we can’t just vacation through it?”

Watch: Morano on Fox & Friends – The climate ‘psychological operation’ is beginning – NYT claiming vacations are a thing of the past due to climate is an attempt to restrict ‘freedom of movement’

Morano: “This is the COVID PSYOP ending and the climate PSYOP beginning. This is the New York Times signaling that the ruling class is telling us that vacations are now a thing of the past. They’re trying to set our mindset to give up on vacations. And they’re giving up our freedom of movement…What the New York Times is claiming is that somehow people have to stay home, and it is literally in the article suggesting people need to huddle around their air conditioners at home because the weather is too extreme — because our previous travel has made the earth uninhabitable. this is insane, unscientific, silly.”

RELATED ARTICLES:

‘It is terrifying’: UN chief declares: ‘The era of global boiling has arrived’ – ‘The era of global warming has ended’ – ‘Children swept away by monsoon rains’

Flashback: UN Picks former president of Socialist International As New Secretary-General (Antonio Guterres)

Top climate scientists rubbish claims July was the hottest month ever – Public being ‘misinformed on a massive scale’

Meteorologist Dr. Ryan Maue mocks study claiming heatwaves were ‘virtually impossible’ without ‘climate change’ – ‘I guess politicizing the weather means we have to suspend disbelief and erase the past’

No, the Earth Did Not have an ‘Unprecedented and Terrifying … All-Time High Temperature’ on July 4th – Not the hottest in 100,000 years – NOAA & AP back away from claim

Analysis: Antarctic sea ice extent ‘record low’ due to ‘wind patterns’ – ‘Sea ice is actually thicker than normal’ as ‘the ice edge’ being ‘squeezed closer together’ – Sea ice volume ‘is NOT lowest on record’

Extreme Weather Expert Pielke Jr. rips Wash Post claim of hottest ‘world record’ ocean temp – ‘No it is not a world record. It’s not even highest at that station in past 6 years’

Extreme Weather Expert Dr. Roger Pielke Jr.:  “Science journalism is broken. No it is not a world record. It’s not even the highest at that station in the past 6 years. When did journalists and editors stop doing journalism and start turning incorrect but viral Tweets into headlines? Recipe for misinformation.”

Florida Meteorologist Jeff Berardelli told CNBC:  “These buoys that are inside Florida Bay — so that’s to the north of the Florida Keys and to the South Florida peninsula — they’re all in very shallow, murky, dark water…it’s contaminated with sediment, the water temperatures are reflective of the fact that darker surfaces absorb more heat…“it’s not really comparable to most water measurements…“there are no official records that are kept on water temperature.”

Even though CNBC debunked the ‘hot tub’ ocean temperature claims, its sister organization MSNBC went full alarmist, ignoring CNBC reporting. See: MSNBC Warns of ‘Boiling Seas’ from Climate Change – MSNBC warned Monday of “boiling seas” due to climate change, citing ocean readings of 100ºF off the coast of Florida. Never shy about employing incendiary rhetoric, MSNBC seems to have forgotten that while the boiling point of water is 100º Celsius, it is actually 212º on the Fahrenheit scale.

LA Times says quiet part out loud: ‘Would an occasional blackout help solve climate change?’ – ‘We might not have a choice’

Climate Depot’s Marc Morano: “The LA Times question is not theoretical. Blackouts are happening globally due to the inhuman climate agenda demanding an end to reliable and affordable fossil fuel energy.” See:Bloomberg News: ‘South Africa Beats Climate Goal as Blackouts Slash Emissions’ – ‘Unintentional…power plant breakdowns are reducing industrial activity’

Watch: Morano debunks Media Hysteria on heatwaves & ‘Global BOILING’ – O’Connor Tonight

Depot Ranked #2 in 2023 Survey of Top 11 ‘Climate Deniers’: ‘Morano’s influence in shaping public opinion on climate change is significant’ – 2023 ‘Climate Denial’ Ranking by the website Before The Flood

Watch: Morano on Fox News w/ Jesse Watters on how arsonists are responsible for ‘climate’ wildfires – Not ‘climate change’ – ‘There are other forces at work’

Fox News Channel – Jesse Watters Primetime – Broadcast July 28, 2023 – Are arsonists responsible for global wildfires? ‘The Green Fraud’ author Marc Morano says there are ‘other forces at work’ as wildfires rage across the planet on ‘Jesse Watters Primetime.’

Watch: Morano on Real America’s Voice TV: RFK Jr. had ‘a red-pill moment’ on climate agenda – He now realizes ‘the same sausage that the UN,WHO & WEF make for COVID claims were also made for climate claims’

Watch: Fox host Stuart Varney challenges Morano over heatwave-climate link

Watch: Morano’s 1-hour Updated Great Reset & Climate Lockdown Speech – ‘This is the Sovietization of America to meet climate compliance rules!’ – Presented in person in Tucson Arizona

Copyright © 2023 Climate Depot, All rights reserved.

Democrat Mayor Pleads Guilty to 140 Counts of Child Pornography, Said Pete Buttigieg Was His Mentor

Makes sense of the Democrat fetish with sexualizing children, child sex trafficking and drag for kids.

By  and , CNN • August 3, 2023

The former mayor of a Maryland college town pleaded guilty Wednesday to 140 charges stemming from child pornography possession and distribution, prosecutors said.

Patrick Wojahn had served as the mayor of College Park for about eight years before his resignation and arrest in March.

Wojahn pleaded guilty to 60 counts of distribution of child pornography, 40 counts of possession of child pornography, and 40 counts of possession of child pornography with the intention to distribute, according to a Wednesday news release from Prince George’s County State’s Attorney’s Office.

Read more.

Former College Park mayor pleads guilty to child porn charges

Patrick Wojahn pleaded guilty to 140 child pornography offenses as part of an agreement that calls for him to spend 30 years in prison

By  • August 2, 2023

The former mayor of College Park pleaded guilty to 140 child pornography charges as part of a deal with Prince George’s County prosecutors that will have him spend 30 years behind bars.

Patrick Wojahn, 47, was indicted by a grand jury in March on 80 counts of possession and intent to distribute child pornography, and then again in a superseding indictment in May on 140 counts, according to online court records. He pleaded guilty to every count of that second indictment — 60 counts of distribution of child pornography, 40 counts of possession of child pornography and 40 counts of possession of child pornography with the intent to distribute — in Prince George’s County Circuit Court on Wednesday.

Read more.

This was reported back in March 2023:

Maryland mayor facing child porn charges previously said Pete Buttigieg was his mentor

College Park, Maryland, Mayor Patrick Wojahn was charged with 56 counts of child pornography

By Cameron Cawthorne , Houston Keene | Fox News August

Fox News correspondent Gillian Turner has the latest as President Biden faces criticism over the handling of the country’s drug crisis as fentanyl poisonings sweeps across America on ‘Special Report.’

The Maryland mayor charged on Thursday with 56 child pornography-related charges has visited the White House several times since President Biden took office and previously described Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg as his mentor.

College Park, Maryland, Mayor Patrick Wojahn resigned Wednesday night ahead of being arrested by Prince George’s County police Thursday on 40 counts of possession of child pornography and 16 counts of distributing child pornography

Wojahn, a Democrat, said in his resignation letter that he would “cooperate with law enforcement” and did not wish to serve as a distraction.

Keep reading.

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLES:

Drag Performers Sue over Texas Bill That Would Prevent ‘Sexually Explicit Displays’

Germany: Police cover up the rape of a 15-year-old schoolgirl by a Muslim migrant

Shocking Photo of Jill Biden at ‘Mannys’ Drag Queen Event

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Parents need to wake up to the danger of trans ideology, says child psychiatrist

This is an excerpt from the introduction to Lost in Trans Nation: A Child Psychiatrist’s Guide Out of the Madness, the latest book by American psychiatrist Miriam Grossman.


When I graduated from medical school, I took an oath. I stood up, raised my right hand, and vowed to prevent disease whenever I could. At the time, I expected to go to war against cancer and schizophrenia. But after forty years, I’ve realized my most challenging fight is not against dangerous diseases, but dangerous ideas.

The beliefs that man and woman are human inventions, that the sex of a healthy newborn is arbitrarily and often incorrectly “assigned,” and that as a result the child requires “affirmation” through risky medical interventions—these ideas are divorced from reality and therefore hazardous, especially to children. They are, in fact, a mockery of twenty-first-century science and cause immeasurable harm to young people and their families. I know, because I’m a psychiatrist and they’re my patients.

I don’t have the words to describe the sorrow of parents I know whose young daughter was removed by a government agency, placed in foster care, and started on testosterone. Their crime? Insisting she’s a girl. Or the anguish of a young man I see, who sought castration to become his “authentic self” and now, after the fact, regrets it. Or the rage of a twenty-something woman going through menopause due to “gender-affirming” removal of her reproductive organs.

Are these atrocities really happening in our country? They sure are, and you must protect your loved ones from joining the multitude of victims.

I discovered how children were being indoctrinated with gender ideology while writing my 2009 book You’re Teaching My Child WHAT? I wanted parents to know that the powerful sex ed industry has agendas that undermine the health and safety of children. Widely used curricula and teen-friendly websites promoted sexual freedom, not sexual health, placing students’ well-being at risk.

In the final chapter, I cautioned parents about “Genderland,” comparing it to the upside-down world of Alice in Wonderland:

Parents, fasten your seatbelts. If what you’ve learned so far about sex education horrifies you, and you believe it can’t get any worse, I caution you: it can and it does…. Welcome to Genderland, where the madness of sex education reaches a peak, and everything you know is turned on its head.

The disaster is here. We are in a freefall down a black hole, with no landing in sight. Girls who claim to be boys and boys girls are almost as common, it seems, as teenagers with acne. But it should come as no surprise: after years of bombardment with the notion that the “gender binary” is false and oppressive, and encouragement to explore whether they’re male, female, both, or neither, lo and behold, the number of teens with recent-onset discomfort with their sex is up 4,000 percent.

In 2004, there were two clinics in the entire world for these exceedingly rare cases. Now there are at least one hundred clinics in the US alone, and preteen girls learn from American Girl’s guide Body Image, “If you haven’t gone through puberty yet, the doctor might offer medicine to delay your body’s changes, giving you more time to think about your gender identity.”

And how does a girl do that? She might flatten her developing breasts with a tight elastic binder she can easily find—at Walmart, Target, or at school.’ She goes through the day in pain, feeling lightheaded and short of breath. She may “pack” her underwear to create a bulge emulating the look of a penis. A boy might shave his arms, legs, and chest to erase signs of masculinity. To achieve a flat, feminine crotch he’ll push his testicles into his inguinal canals, then tape his penis and scrotum together behind his legs.” This maneuver can cause severe pain, infection, and testicular torsion-an acute condition requiring emergency surgery.

I know, it’s hard to believe, but that’s what’s going on. The gender utopians have colonized not only super-liberal Berkeley, but Knoxville and Plano. I know the devastation that results and consider it a duty to warn and educate parents, grandparents, aunts, and uncles—anyone with a child in their lives-about the mess we are in.

I want the following truths—recognized by everyone on the planet aside from gender studies professors and grad students until about two weeks ago–to be acknowledged in the first pages of this book: Sex is not assigned at birth; it’s established at conception. Brains always match the bodies to which they are attached; we are not Legos or Mr. Potato Heads that might be improperly assembled. Sex is binary. Sex is permanent. Males cannot become females and females cannot become males.

Doctors, therapists, and others who lead young people to believe otherwise are guilty of malfeasance. They must be stopped and held responsible for the damage inflicted on children and families.

Having said that, I will also state outright that there are individuals for whom living a life consistent with their biology is a life of torture. We do not understand the condition from which they suffer, but it is real and unrelenting. I firmly believe their chronic disembodiment is a disorder of the mind and that they deserve our compassion and respect. Hormones and surgery? Maybe, but we cannot predict with accuracy in whom the benefit will outweigh the harm.

My book is not about those extraordinarily rare people, who have been written about for almost 100 years. It is about the kids whose new identities are the result of a hysteria fueled by the Internet, social media, Hollywood, and the gender medical and government establishment that mushroomed out of the ideology I discovered in sex education fifteen years ago.

For me this is a black-and-white issue. Most things in life are nuanced, but this is not one of them. This is—and here’s a word you don’t expect from a doctor–evil. It’s evil to indoctrinate children and young adults with falsehoods and to drive a wedge between them and their loving parents. It’s evil to encourage them on a path that leads to harm. And it’s evil to describe it all as a journey to authenticity, and to entice children with glitter and rainbows.

We are a nation lost in trans madness; the price we are paying is staggering. This is a guide out of the madness. If you’re a parent, you needed it yesterday, because the crusaders are at your door, they’ve already conquered Disney and Target, your kids’ school, camp, and pediatrician.

I wrote this book to arm you for battle against the blitz of transgenderism, because no family is immune. Yes, “battle” and “blitz”: I use military terms intentionally. The trans issue is not a debate with reasonable and moral people on both sides, it’s a war. It’s a destructive, cult-like crusade that targets your children 24/7; there’s hardly a place that’s free from indoctrination, slogans, flags, and emojis. You must gird yourselves with knowledge, confidence, and support and oppose the onslaught as much as possible.

A mother consulted with me about her twelve-year-old daughter. She told me when she goes to websites to learn more about her daughter’s struggles, she feels physically ill. “I can’t go on,” she told me, “I have to stop. Reading about what they do to kids, sterilizing them, I feel sick.”

“That’s a fitting response,” I told her. “You should feel sick. I do, too.”

Decent people have a visceral reaction when they learn children are being harmed. You will be troubled by what you read in the pages ahead; you will probably need to take a break. Well, join the club. Take care of yourself, then come back and do what you must to protect your child, all children, from a perilous social movement that erases “male” and “female” and aims to revolutionize what it means to be human.

This is an edited extract from the recently published book Lost in Trans Nation: A Child Psychiatrist’s Guide Out of the Madness by Miriam Grossman MD, with a foreword by Jordan B. Peterson, Skyhorse Publishing Inc. Dr Grossman’s website is here. Her Twitter handle is @Miriam_Grossman

This is an excerpt from the introduction to Lost in Trans Nation: A Child Psychiatrist’s Guide Out of the Madness, the latest book by American psychiatrist Miriam Grossman.

AUTHOR

MIRIAM GROSSMAN

RELATED ARTICLES:

NBC News accidentally debunks transgender ideology

Canada: Muslims to stage ‘Million Person March’ to protest Trudeau’s push for homosexual indoctrination in schools

EDITORS NOTE: This MercatorNet column is republished with permission. ©All right reserved.

HOLLAND: New logo of the Dutch Tax Service is the Gender Queer Flag

Just as in your country, the USA, over here in The Netherlands the folks in charge are pushing Woke ideology through our throats. My God, I think I have to puke.

The flag of the Biblical town of Sodom is now everywhere. It’s not just that many citizens hang the colorful flag from their windows, and that restaurants and shops proudly wave it everywhere. No, the museums, the vehicles of the street cleaners, the public transport, the plastic bags of the largest supermarket chain Albert Heijn, the largest Dutch bank ING.. They all carry this flag. It’s everywhere now.

Even the Dutch Tax Agency has incorporated the flag of Sodom in their new logo on Twitter.

Seeing this flag everywhere, instead of our national flag or the weapon of my city of Amsterdam, it gives me the impression that we are living now under an evil occupation!

To make it absolutely clear that I remain a TOLERANT Dutchman: It’s my position that I think that what adult people do, with mutual consent, in their bedroom, behind a closed door, is absolutely their own business.

But I object to same sex marriage and transsexuality for the reason that it’s against tradition and faith, and children can become the victims.

We must protect our children!

To understand what is happening watch the Nazi propaganda documentary, “Der Triumph des Willens” (Triumph of the Will) about the rally in Nuremburg.

What is incredible is that hundreds of thousands of Germans are raising their hands in the Nazi salute.

One asks the obvious question: how could EVERYBODY be so duped and naïve? You’ve answered it for us.

©2023. Matthys van Raalten. All rights reserved.

RELATED ARTICLE: Denmark Adopts More Cautious Approach to Treat Gender Dysphoria in Children

RELATED U.S.A. VIDEO: Comedians’ Routine Filled With More Trans Truth Than Jokes

RELATED U.S.A. TWEET:

It appears that Pfizer employees had a special batch of vaxx just for them, not the same as the public was made to take

Thank you M: The Gateway Pundit – Pfizer Executive Can’t Provide Definitive Answer Why Its COVID-19 Vaccine Causes Myocarditis and Pericarditis During Australian Hearing


Pfizer Under Question

The company was very reluctant to attend the committee hearing and also reluctant to supply a straight answer, automatically falling back on their ‘safe and effective’ mantra to dodge answering the question.

Already, this Senate Hearing revealed that Pfizer is rewriting history on transmission of infection.

We’re supposed to conveniently forget they said “get it to protect others, to save grandma” and “when you’re vaccinated the virus stops with you”.

They’re hiding behind their indemnity contract with our government and dodging responsibility.

ATAGI and the Australian governments must stop pushing these unsafe and ineffective shots and drop the destructive mandates now.


Why Can’t Moderna Provide These Answers?

During last night’s Senate hearing into our COVID 19 Vaccine Discrimination Bill representatives from Moderna couldn’t provide the numbers of serious adverse reactions from their COVID mRNA injection.


Australia – Malcolm Roberts questioned Pfizer representatives last night in a Senate Hearing


Pfizer can’t explain why their Covid Vax causes myocarditis – Senate Estimates 3.8.23


A tough day for Pfizer Australia in Senate hearings today.


Australian politicians grill Pfizer and Moderna execs over COVID jab heart injuries

[…]Representatives from the two Big Pharma companies refused to give direct answers to questions about the vaccines causing myocarditis and pericarditis.

[…]Pfizer employees received a separate batch of Covid shots

[…]Contracts between Pfizer and Australian government ‘remain confidential’


Pharma-Funded TGA Downplays Pfizer Adverse Events

RELATED VIDEO: WHO stats show excess deaths are 10M over what can be accounted for by Covid19

RELATED ARTICLE: Two verifiable anecdotes are the mathematical proof that vaccines cause SIDS and autism

EDITORS NOTE: This Vlad Tepes Blog column posted by Eeyore is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Gavin Newsom’s Office Funded Illegal, Secret Chinese Biolab Found With Infectious Material, Viral Agents

“I’ve been in government for 25 years. I’ve never seen anything like this,” said Nicole Sieba, Reedley City Manager, to Your Central Valley.

Last week I wrote about the discovery of a secret China-linked biolab in an ostensibly empty warehouse outside Fresno California. Covertly operating for a year, it was shut down by the Fresno County Department of Public Health. From October 2022 until the warehouse at 850 I Street in Reedley was operating a biological lab.

The CDC found infectious material and myriad diseases including malaria , Rubella, HIV, chlamydia, E. Coli, streptococcus pneumonia, hepatitis B and C, and herpes 1 and 5 at the site which was listed as an empty building. Apart from vast array of diseases found, the lab also had 900 genetically engineered mice designed to catch and carry various COVID strains living in vile conditions with another 175 found dead.

Why would Gavin Newsom subsidize an illegal bioagent  lab run by a shady Chinese company?

Illegal Chinese biolab was subsidized by Gavin Newsom

BY DAVID STROM August 03, 2023

Last week I wrote about the discovery of a secret China-linked biolab in an ostensibly empty warehouse outside Fresno California.

It was, needless to say, a disturbing story. We aren’t talking about some sterile, well-controlled biological research facility that hadn’t kept up with all its paperwork.

No, this was a hidden lab piled with chemicals, boxes, refrigerators with chemicals and 20 deadly viruses, and genetically engineered mice that had been bred to catch and spread human viruses like COVID-19. It was in an ostensibly abandoned warehouse, and when the inspectors showed up the lab equipment had been hastily turned off before whoever was working there disappeared.

The power was off, but the freezers were still cold. People disappeared quickly, leaving behind a lot of documents in Chinese and a “President” who is available only by email from China. The president claimed the lab was merely storing defunct equipment, but there were live genetically engineered mice and the viruses stored in freezers.

[ … ]

The latest twist to all this is that the company that originally owned the equipment before it was acquired by the current “owner,” Prestige Biotech, was named Universal Meditech, and Universal Meditech was subsidized by Gavin Newsom’s Office of Business and Economic Development.

[ … ]

There is remarkably little news coverage of this story–The Daily Mail did a report on the findings at the lab and printed some disturbing images gleaned from court documents. But the MSM in the United States has mostly ignored the story.

Read more.

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLES:

Illegal, Secret Chinese Bio-Agent Lab In Calif Raided by FBI, CDC, INFECTIOUS BACTERIAL, VIRAL AGENTS Found MALARIA, RUBELLA, HIV, Chlamydia, E. Coli, Streptococcus Pneumonia, Hepatitis B and C, Herpes

Newsom Sets Up Presidential Fundraising Effort, Speculates 2024 Run

RELATED VIDEO: Governor Gavin Newsom Unveils California’s New Budget Plan

RELATED TWEET:

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

‘What Is a Woman?’ Katie McCoy’s New Book Provides Biblical Clarity

Conversations surrounding gender and sexuality are seemingly inescapable these days, and Christians today are increasingly being labeled as “hateful” by those who disagree with a biblical worldview. In these contentious times, it is more necessary than ever that Christians approach these topics both biblically and lovingly.

Despite the ubiquity of these topics, many Christians shy away from the conversation for fear of being “canceled” or for lack of knowledge about what has become a complicated battlefield of ideas. However, Christians must join the discussion because gender ideology is causing real harm to the most vulnerable among us: children.

Although gender ideology has a detrimental effect on children of both sexes, it is having an outsized effect on young women. As our culture’s answer to the question “What is a woman?” becomes more and more uncertain, young women are being inundated with contradictory ideologies that lead to harmful physical consequences. At her March 2022 confirmation hearing, Ketanji Brown Jackson epitomized our culture’s confusion when the future Supreme Court justice declined to define the word “woman.”

Katie McCoy’s new book “To Be a Woman” is an important contribution to the conversation about how Christians can answer the day’s toughest questions about sexuality and gender with love, compassion, grace, and wisdom. McCoy sheds light on what has become a difficult topic, specifically addressing how young women are disproportionately affected.

If we are going to respond to our culture with love and knowledge, we must first properly understand the basics of the conversation we are undertaking. McCoy seeks to explain the “confusion over female identity and how Christians can respond” with a five-part model: the How, the Why, the Where, the What, and the Who.

The How addresses the social catalysts that have created an environment that cultivates disorder and confusion about gender and sexuality. The “epidemic” that has become known as rapid-onset gender dysphoria (ROGD) affects young women more frequently than young men, and the influence of online resources that encourage ROGD means that the standard of care is causing increasingly more harm.

The Why analyzes the ingredients and ideologies that have combined to create a world that sustains these influences and discussions. From the rise of the postmodern worldview to the growing distrust of society and authority and, more importantly, the separation of God from culture, our society has broken down the fundamental attributes of gender, and this has become a harmful recipe that results in “toxic, dangerous, and corrosive” behavior.

The Where presents the science behind “treatment” for rapid-onset gender dysphoria and how the validation of gender identity leads to harmful physical consequences that society views as “loving treatments.” However, these validations, ranging from fake periods to new pronouns, attempt to separate the connection between biology and gender, to which McCoy responds well by clarifying, “Gender is distinct from biology, but it is still derived from biology.”

The What breaks down the biological differences between the sexes that are so stark they cannot be ignored. Contemplating the many physiological and neurobiological differences present in human anatomy helps readers navigate the labyrinth of gender topics and remind us that we should be in awe of and not overwhelmed by the complexity that God created in us.

The Who connects the meaning of gender and womanhood to the context of the Bible and the healing that society needs to undergo in order to repair women’s relationships with their physical bodies. Commenting that “maleness and femaleness have a purpose,” McCoy brings the discussion back to God’s plan for humanity and reflects on the deeper meaning of being “made in His image.”

Chapter Six rounds out the conversation by offering more evidence on why the topic of womanhood ought to be important to Christians and places this conversation in the reality of the family unit and everyday life.

In the final chapter, McCoy charges Christians to have compassion and love for others. God commands His people in Leviticus 19 to “love your neighbor as yourself.” Christians are called to follow these commandments given by God even when it is difficult.

With so much confusion and ambiguity plaguing our society’s conversations about gender and sexuality, it is important for Christians to maintain a solid understanding of the battle of ideas that is taking place. Katie McCoy provides a straightforward and clear introduction to the topic that can help believers navigate these conversations effectively and graciously.

AUTHOR

Abigail Odom

Abigail Odom is an intern at Family Research Council.

RELATED PODCAST: Confusion, Feminism, and What it Really Means to Be a Woman

EDITORS NOTE: This Washington Stand column is republished with permission. All rights reserved. ©2023 Family Research Council.


The Washington Stand is Family Research Council’s outlet for news and commentary from a biblical worldview. The Washington Stand is based in Washington, D.C. and is published by FRC, whose mission is to advance faith, family, and freedom in public policy and the culture from a biblical worldview. We invite you to stand with us by partnering with FRC.

Leftists Attack, Then Blame Responding Conservatives as Culture War Aggressors

Old dogs sometimes do learn new tricks. And President Joe Biden is so pleased with his latest attainment — criticizing Senator Tommy Tuberville (R-Ala.) for delaying military promotions over the Pentagon’s illegal abortion policy — that he is showing it off just about everywhere. This month, Biden has bashed Tuberville’s courageous, one-man stand at a joint press conference with the president of Finland, a speech about “Bidenomics,” and a Civil Rights Symposium.

Tuberville, the president keeps insisting, is “jeopardizing our national security over domestic social issues.” Biden also suggested Tuberville was stubbornly refusing to negotiate, saying, “I’d be willing to talk to him [Tuberville] if I thought there was any possibility he would change his ridiculous position on this.”

Biden’s factually challenged attack doesn’t even approximate the spirit of the actual situation. “I’ve said all along, Tuberville wrote in June, “that I will drop my hold on unanimous consent under only two conditions: Democrats can follow the law or change the law.” In reality, the Biden administration is the party guilty of injecting domestic culture wars into the national security conversation, when last year it decided the Department of Defense (DOD) would cover abortion-related expenses, in violation of federal law. And the Biden administration is the party guilty of stubbornly refusing to modify its policy to allow military promotions to continue.

“All Tommy Tuberville is doing is standing up for the law,” remarked Senator Mike Lee (R-Utah).

Yet Tuberville is the one under attack.

This is not an isolated phenomenon. Examples abound of left-wing ideologues blaming conservatives for culture wars started by the Left.

The ongoing controversy over PEPFAR reauthorization illustrates the same pattern. The President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) is a successful, bipartisan program combatting HIV and AIDS among Africa’s poorest inhabitants. The program’s five-year, $30 million reauthorization expires in September, and pro-life groups are now urging against a straight reauthorization, without additional pro-life protections. Naturally, the Left is blaming conservatives for politicizing a previously bipartisan policy.

In a lengthy report, The Washington Post painted a dire picture, suggesting Republicans were jeopardizing the future of PEPFAR over “allegations that the program’s funding is being used to indirectly support abortions — claims that health advocates, Democrats and PEPFAR officials say are baseless.” The 54-paragraph article devotes three clauses to describing pro-life concerns with PEPFAR. Meanwhile, its “experts” allege that “it’s really about the larger politics around abortion, electoral politics, and the partisan divide,” “populism, nationalism, and polarization have undermined domestic collective action and solidarity,” and “it’s just dumbfounding to me that the charge has been taken seriously.” According to their narrative, pro-life stalwart Rep. Chris Smith (R-N.J.) is a villain who switched positions to oppose PEPFAR.

Whether it’s at The New York TimesPolitico, or Voice of America, the rest of the Democrats’ cheer squad is chanting in unison with this mischaracterization.

There’s more to the story they aren’t telling. In 2021, President Biden rescinded the Protecting Life in Global Health Assistance Policy (PLGHA), which opened the door for organizations that carry out or promote abortion to obtain PEPFAR funding. Then in September 2022, the State Department published a document titled, “Reimagining PEPFAR’s Strategic Direction.” Under this strategic “reimagining” — on which Congress never voted — “PEPFAR will integrate HIV programming into strengthened public health systems to manage … sexual reproductive health, rights, and services ….” It would also “strengthen coordination between PEPFAR and other U.S. government global health and development programs, including for … sexual and reproductive health and rights … LGBTQI+, and human rights” (emphasis added). In other words, the Biden administration has unilaterally reinvented PEPFAR as a vehicle to promote abortion and its radical LGBT agenda.

Pro-life opposition to PEPFAR began after the State Department published it “reimagining” strategy. But the Left and the media are accusing pro-lifers of politicizing the issue.

Another controversy is over the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), an annual, must-pass bill to fund the military. The version passed by House Republicans included amendments which banned taxpayer funding of gender transition procedures, pornographic books in DOD schools, flying Pride flags on military property, and the creation or funding of DEI offices.

Yet again, Democrats depicted Republicans as culture war aggressors. National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan responded that an “extreme group of Republicans” — the bill passed 219-210 with four Democrats voting in favor — had passed “a set of amendments that try to mix domestic social debates with … the security needs of our nation,” and that these amendments were “never getting to the president’s desk.” Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) called the House-passed NDAA “race to the bottom … partisan legislation that has zero chance of passing.” The Senate passed a version of the NDAA that includes none of these amendments, and the two chambers will have to iron out their differences in conference.

But one feature gives away the game: all of these Republican amendments aim to prohibit the military from doing things it shouldn’t be doing, and which for centuries it didn’t do. These amendments would have been meaningless 30 years ago when the military did none of these things. The Biden administration, aided by a Democrat-controlled Congress from 2021-2022, initiated, expanded, or un-moth-balled (from the Obama era) these policies. House Republicans are merely endeavoring to claw back a tiny fraction of the woke expansion.

And Republicans are taking fire for trying to restore normalcy in the military.

This pattern is not restricted to the federal government. In recent years, state legislators have acted to protect children from gender reassignment procedures and LGBT indoctrination in schools. They have enacted protections for women’s private spaces from male intrusion and women’s sports from male domination. They have protected conscience rights, official ID documentation, and curriculum from trans ideology. Each legislative measure responds to leftist aggression attempting to politicize and dominate a new aspect of life. As thanks, left-wing advocacy groups slander these state legislators, depicting them as hateful bigots who “attack LGBTQ rights.”

No, it’s LGBT ideologues who are attacking the very fabric of society.

Progressives expand the culture war into a new aspect of life, conservatives mobilize a response to restore normalcy, and the media behaves as if conservatives were the Mongol Horde of culture wars. Like naturally-occurring spirals or Fibonacci sequences, once this pattern is recognized, it suddenly begins to appear everywhere. The Left behaves like the child who punches his brother while mom’s back is turned, then pays his third sibling to tell his version of events.

Alas, this tripartite pattern should surprise no one who is acquainted with the meaning of the words “progressive” and “conservative,” and who is acquainted with the Left’s revolutionary roots. Swallowing false accusations is simply part of the price the defenders of civilization must pay. But it doesn’t mean that we have to shut our eyes to the fixed game the Left tries to play.

AUTHOR

Joshua Arnold

Joshua Arnold is a staff writer at The Washington Stand.

RELATED ARTICLES:

FBI Forced to Turn Over Docs on Targeting Catholics and Parents

‘What Is a Woman?’ Katie McCoy’s New Book Provides Biblical Clarity

RELATED TWEET:

EDITORS NOTE: This Washington Stand column is republished with permission. All rights reserved. ©2023 Family Research Council.


The Washington Stand is Family Research Council’s outlet for news and commentary from a biblical worldview. The Washington Stand is based in Washington, D.C. and is published by FRC, whose mission is to advance faith, family, and freedom in public policy and the culture from a biblical worldview. We invite you to stand with us by partnering with FRC.

Education Game-Changer Follow-up

How You Can Do the Same Thing in Your State

I received a LOT of positive feedback (and essentially nothing negative) from my recent post: Education Game-ChangerThank you for your support!

It was also gratifying that several people asked me to outline how this came about so they could do something similar in their state. In response, I put together the sanitized version below. (If you want more details, email me.)

BTW, from here on I’m assuming that readers know WHY it’s important to fix the Scientific Method and Critical Thinking deficiencies in our K-12 schools. This commentary is about HOW I was able to make good progress in fixing these. If you want a refresher on the WHY part, please read my Education Report.

Here are some suggestions to improve your chances of winning the exceptionally important fight to resurrect the Scientific Method (and fixing the Critical Thinking omission is similar) in our K-12 schools:

1 – Dropping the Scientific Method (and not teaching Critical Thinking) are not isolated, unrelated matters. These actions are part of a broader plan to purposefully undermine American education. Carefully read my Education Report for details.

It is extremely important to appreciate the connections to both of these with the Framework and NGSS. The more you understand that, the better the success you’ll have in winning both of these challenges.

2 – Expect that the opposition will put forward some predictable “justifications” for scrapping the Scientific Method. It is imperative to master the answers to these, in advance. See my earlier Substack commentary where five (5) likely objections are made and each one is politely and effectively answered.

3 – Know where the power lies. In almost every state, there is a State Board of Education (SBOE) that oversees the state’s K-12 Education Department. There are usually 15± members on this Board.

Getting even just a few of these fired up on this issue can be extremely helpful. Two to four educated and committed Board members will usually be enough to sway the entire Board!

The SBOE is key as it determines the subject standardsapproves textbooks, and oversees statewide exams — for all K-12 courses and for ALL K-12 students (public, private, and home-schooled).

4 – An additional level of power in most states is the State Legislature. They often have the authority to mandate that the state Education Department teach (or not teach) certain things.

Check out the education-related statutes in your state to see what they have already legislated — and consider submitting a bill to mandate something about the Scientific Method (and Critical Thinking).

5 – The more allies that you can develop, the better. Parents, some teachers, scientists, engineers, conservative organizations, farmers, business owners, etc. are the most likely candidates.

Your goal is to get these people to write statewide op-eds, letters to the editor, contact State Board of Election members, Legislators, etc. More publicity is good!

6 – I’d be glad to assist. E.g., I’ve put together a 30-minute slide presentation that helps explain what needs to be done and why. If you can get your state education department leaders interested, I can give this as an online presentation to them.

7 – Take advantage of the reality that you have a winning hand here! Most citizens remember being taught the Scientific Method and they are in favor of it. However, they are unaware that it is now scrapped. Inform them of this!

Likewise, the public is supportive of Critical Thinking. They need to be told that not only it is not happening, but children are being taught the opposite — robotic conformity.

The bottom line is that there are few things more important to our survival than what our children are being taught EVERY day. Since (so far) almost no US conservative organizations have prioritized fixing the curriculum, it is left to citizens to get informed and then speak up to insist that this be fixed.

Margaret Meade has two relevant quotes: “Children must be taught how to think, not what to think” and “Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world; indeed, it’s the only thing that ever has.”

The Left wants you to give up and to believe that there is nothing you can do. Are you going to capitulate to that bullying nonsense?

©2023. John Droz, Jr. All rights reserved.

Kept Husband and Private-Jet Connoisseur Kerry Ripped for Demanding Agriculture Emission Cuts: ‘Bankrupt Every Farmer in America’

John Kerry’s deranged ‘Green’ policies are wreaking havoc on American families. And Kerry flies around the world on private jets to promote this crap. Kerry has been wrong on practically everything, but he continues to exert significant power in American and global affairs. Watch below.

Kerry made controversial comments during speech in May

By Fox News, July 31st, 2023

Kerry ripped for demanding agriculture emission cuts: ‘Bankrupt every farmer in America’

U.S. Special Presidential Envoy for Climate John Kerry was blasted on social media over the weekend by critics who accused him of trying to destroy the agriculture industry in order to achieve “net zero” emissions.

“Agriculture contributes about 33% of all the emissions of the world, depending a little bit on how you count it, but it’s anywhere from 26 to 33, and we can’t get to net zero, we don’t get this job done unless agriculture is front and center as part of the solution,” Kerry told a climate change summit in May.

Read more.

AUTHOR

RELATED TWEETS:

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

The era of ‘global boiling’ has arrived, and dissidents will have to walk the plank

In the northern hemisphere, July has been hot. Very hot. Along the rim of the Mediterranean, more than 40 people have died and wildfires are raging. In Death Valley, California, the thermometer hit 50C (122F) on several days. Phoenix smashed the record for consecutive days above 110 F (43.3C) as of yesterday – 31. The previous record was 18 days.

The headlines have been incendiary. CNN describes the heat wave as “the hottest in around 120,000 years”. Scientific American goes the whole enchilada and says, “July 2023 Is Hottest Month Ever Recorded on Earth”.

“The extreme weather which has affected many millions of people in July is unfortunately the harsh reality of climate change and a foretaste of the future,” said World Meteorological Organization’s Secretary-General Petteri Taalas. “The need to reduce greenhouse gas emissions is more urgent than ever before. Climate action is not a luxury but a must.”

Even more dramatic was a speech from UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres. “The era of global warming has ended; the era of global boiling has arrived.”

Why is this happening? Mr Guterres echoes the media consensus. “For scientists, it is unequivocal – humans are to blame.”

Is it really so unequivocal? Are there no other explanations, no dissidents, no one marching out of step with the consensus?

The Monthly Global Lower Troposphere v6.0 Anomaly report shows that at the end of June 2023, the global average temperature anomaly was almost 0.4 ℃ compared to the base period 1991-2020. There’s no evidence of a heat wave there. Check again soon for the July results.

There are scientists with impeccable credentials who don’t even believe that this is “unprecedented”. A lot of journalists seem incapable of assessing lurid claims of global warming. For instance, a headline in the Washington Post on July 25 read: “South Florida ocean tops 100 degrees; could be world record”. The next day WaPo quietly dropped the words “world record”. Why? Its journalists had “discovered” “another extraordinary sea surface temperature near South Florida in 2017”. In other words, they hadn’t bothered to fact check their own hysteria.

As climate scientist Roger Pielke Jr tweeted in response: “Science journalism is broken. No, it is not a world record. It’s not even the highest at that station in the past 6 years. When did journalists and editors stop doing journalism and start turning incorrect but viral Tweets into headlines? Recipe for misinformation.”

It is folly to shut one’s ears to alternative explanations. As the WaPo motto says, “Democracy dies in darkness”.

But this is what the scientific establishment and the media are doing, even to scientists with impeccable credentials.

The International Monetary Fund was responsible for the most recent cancelling disgrace.

A co-winner of last year’s Nobel Prize in Physics, Dr John Clauser, had been scheduled to deliver a presentation by Webex on climate models to the IMF when his talk was suddenly “postponed”, i.e., cancelled. It was titled, “Let’s talk – How much can we trust IPCC climate predictions?” Given the IMF’s policy on climate change, it’s surprising that he was scheduled to give this talk in the first place.

Dr Clauser is a highly accomplished scientist in the field of quantum mechanics. He has also done some leading-edge analysis on the role of clouds in climate. So, when somebody like him comes out swinging at the UN/IPCC/climate establishment/mainstream media climate narrative, a lot of people are going to feel threatened. If you can’t take on somebody like him in a debate about science, your only alternative is to ignore him, hoping that most people don’t notice.

He criticized the awarding of the 2021 Nobel Prize in Physics for work in the development of computer models predicting global warming and told President Biden that he disagreed with his climate policies. That must have made some people nervous. He sent shockwaves through the climate establishment with remarks he made in May to the CO2 Coalition, a group of dissident scientists:

“The popular narrative about climate change reflects a dangerous corruption of science that threatens the world’s economy and the well-being of billions of people. Misguided climate science has metastasized into massive shock-journalistic pseudoscience. In turn, the pseudoscience has become a scapegoat for a wide variety of other unrelated ills. It has been promoted and extended by similarly misguided business marketing agents, politicians, journalists, government agencies, and environmentalists.

“In my opinion, there is no real climate crisis. There is, however, a very real problem with providing a decent standard of living to the world’s large population and an associated energy crisis. The latter is being unnecessarily exacerbated by what, in my opinion, is incorrect climate science.”

Dr Clauser’s real “mistake,” however, was to give a brief talk at the Korea Quantum Conference in Seoul on June 26. His assessment of the media consensus on climate change was blistering.

Like everyone else, he is worried by “fake news”. “The current world I observe is literally awash, saturated, with pseudoscience, with bad science, with scientific misinformation and disinformation, and what I will call ‘techno-cons’,” he said. “Techno-cons are the application of scientific disinformation for opportunistic purposes.”

However, his audience must have been shocked to learn that he regards the popular narrative about climate change as part of a culture of “scientific disinformation”. “I believe that climate change is not a crisis,” he declared.

There are many other credible scientists who don’t agree with the IPCC – which Dr Clauser has denounced as “one of the worst sources of dangerous misinformation”. Many of them belong to organizations such as the CO2 Coalition. They’re accomplished and credible professionals too. There is no true consensus on climate change.

A consensus manufactured by expelling dissidents is bogus.

The IMF could have easily allowed Dr Clauser to speak as a representative of intelligent alternative viewpoints. By suddenly cancelling his presentation, its officials revealed their fear and lack of confidence in having their ideas being seriously challenged by someone who knows what he’s talking about.

By the way, if the IMF cancels dissident scientists, how do they treat dissident economists? “The strength of the Fund comes from its talented and diverse employees,” according to an IMF statement. Except, perhaps, if they think differently. Cancelling Clauser undermines the credibility of the whole organization.

Given the very high stakes in the debate over climate change, isn’t it time to stop pretending that the IPCC is 100% correct? Isn’t it time to have a “red team/blue team” open debate between scientists on climate change? Isn’t it time to have an honest review of the basic science of Earth’s climate?

With virtual meeting software, this wouldn’t be so difficult to arrange. There’s enough time to hold this meeting before COP28 starts in late November to give it a solid foundation.

It’s a safe bet that the current leadership at the UN and IPCC will not take a leadership role in organizing this debate. But I will agree with one point that Mr Guterres made in his warning: “Leaders must lead.” If you are that leader, please stand up and get moving! The world depends on your courage and integrity, whoever you are.

AUTHOR

FABIANO MICOLI

Fabiano Micoli has a B.Eng. (mechanical), MBA, and B.Ed. (math and physics). He writes from Toronto.

EDITORS NOTE: This MercatorNet column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

How Refreshing: An Actual Debate on Transgenderism on Capitol Hill

“I am a detransitioner. Another way to put that would be I used to think I was born in the wrong body, and the adults in my life, whom I trusted, affirmed my belief. And this caused me lifelong, irreversible harm. I speak to you today as the victim of one of the biggest medical scandals in the history of the United States of America. I speak to you in the hope that you will have the courage to bring the scandal to an end and ensure that other vulnerable teenagers, children, and young adults don’t go through what I went through…

“This needs to stop. You alone can stop it. Enough children have already been victimized by this barbaric pseudoscience. Please let me be your final warning.”

These are the words of courageous Californian teenager Chloe Cole, who testified last week during a debate on transgenderism that took place on Capital Hill.

“A debate?” you may ask.

Debates were those old-fashioned, long-form conversations in which two opposing points of view were expressed side-by-side, so that listeners might discern which side presented the stronger case.

They were a favourite format for cable news shows like CNN’s CrossfireHannity & Colmes of Fox News, or MSNBC’s The Cycle.

One day in the recent past, however, all of those shows were cancelled and replaced with productions that shunned debate in favour of monologues or conversations with trusted allies.

Shortly after, social media platforms like Facebook, Twitter and YouTube also decided debate was no longer allowed. “Content moderation” quickly took its place. Soon, anyone with a heterodox opinion on abortion, homosexuality, Donald Trump, gender, Christianity or even censorship itself was censored — or at least rendered functionally invisible.

In no time at all, the narrative shifted from “censorship is not taking place, you paranoid quack” to “misinformation is dangerous and must not be allowed”.

With this short history lesson in view, it was deeply refreshing to see misinformation — err, debate — allowed to take place at last Thursday’s hearing on The Dangers and Due Process Violations of ‘Gender-Affirming Care’.

Holding forth

Hosted by the House Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution and Limited Government, the hearing prompted a two-and-a-half-hour debate between representatives from both the Republican and Democratic sides of the transgender issue.

Besides Chloe Cole, five other witnesses were called to testify, including a former swimmer, a family clinician, a women’s rights solicitor, the mother of a girl who identifies as a boy, and an LGBT rights activist and lawyer.

Like any good debate, both sides of the issue had a chance to present their views. The result was a reminder of why such debates are rarely allowed in public anymore — namely, because the side of sanity effortlessly presented the best case.

Paula Scanlan, a former swim teammate of the infamous Lia Thomas at UPenn, explained how her traumatic past of sexual abuse was resurrected when she was repeatedly forced to change in front of a well-hung man in the women’s locker rooms.

A clinician and director at the Family Research Council, Dr. Jennifer Bauwens, warned that so-called “gender-affirming care” lacked a solid evidence base due to its sudden appearance and rise in popularity.

Bauwens said her discipline “is not operating as a helping profession” but “is actively causing harm” for gender-confused children. “We’ve plowed ahead with practices that break ethical research and practice boundaries,” she warned.

May Mailman, a senior fellow at the Independent Women’s Law Center, addressed the legal implications of transgender ideology in women’s sports. “Gender ideology destroys women and girls by dissolving legal protections for women in athletics,” she explained.

Mailman cited well-known studies that “make clear that testosterone suppression can never completely eliminate the athletic advantage of males who have experienced puberty”.

A mother, Miriam Reynolds, described how she came to affirm her daughter as a boy. “The signs had been there all along, we just didn’t understand them,” she said, explaining that her daughter had refused to wear pink, was the only girl on the boys football team, and her best friends were all boys. Reynolds recounted the family’s journey to Texas for transgender surgery for their teenager, insisting the process was slow and free of coercion.

Shannon Minter, the Legal Director of the National Center for Lesbian Rights, argued the puberty blockers and hormone treatments used on gender dysphoric children are “safe and effective”, and that “transgender adolescents who receive the care they need have the same mental health outcomes as their non-transgender peers”.

Closed off

Just as intriguing as the testimony of the six witnesses were the reactions of the Congressional representatives.

Before the hearings even began, Democratic New York Rep. Jerry Nadler decided,

“What we are witnessing today is nothing less than a taxpayer-funded platform for Congressional Republicans to bully transgender kids who are already some of the most vulnerable members of our community.”

House Democrats’ chief deputy whip Sheila Jackson Lee of Texas expressed a similar sentiment, apologising to the witnesses “for a hearing that frightens me”.

To the amusement of many, Democratic Tennessee Rep. Steve Cohen unwittingly re-invented female locker rooms by arguing that women should have their own space within female locker rooms so they are not forced to undress in front of men.

And Democratic Pennsylvania Rep. Mary Gay Scanlon was ultimately proven wrong in her early assertion that the hearing was “a callous and reckless misuse of this committee’s time”.

What she meant was that the hearing was a “debate”.

It’s just been a while since she witnessed one.

AUTHOR

KURT MAHLBURG

Kurt Mahlburg is a writer and author, and an emerging Australian voice on culture and the Christian faith. He has a passion for both the philosophical and the personal, drawing on his background as a graduate architect, a primary school teacher, a missionary, and a young adult pastor.

RELATED TWEET:

EDITORS NOTE: This MercatorNet column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

The U.S. Military Is Quietly Using A Little-Known Program To Enable Child Sex Changes

The U.S. military is quietly making accommodations for military families with children or dependents seeking gender transition help through a little-known program initially meant to assist families with special needs members.

Through the Exceptional Family Member Program (EFMP), the military has allowed special assignments for servicemembers so their dependents can access gender transition services, and could take additional steps to facilitate transition, according to media reports, Department of Defense (DOD) statements and the policies themselves. Current DOD guidance leaves open the possibility servicemembers with gender dysphoric dependents could be eligible for exceptions to policy under the EFMP, but there is a provision in the House’s draft defense bill that could make it illegal.

Republican Rep. Ralph Norman of South Carolina introduced an amendment, included in the draft text of the National Defense Authorization Act for fiscal year 2024, that would prohibit DOD from making accommodations for gender transition services under the EFMP.

The House agreed to the amendment by a vote of 220-210.

“In my opinion, this misuse of funds is absolutely against the spirit of the law. Gender transitioning is not covered under any of the criteria for identifying individuals eligible for EFMP,” Norman said in a statement to the Daily Caller News Foundation.

“Allowing ANY type of gender transition procedures through the EFMP goes against the intention for the program — which is to provide vital resources for service members’ families with special needs and chronic conditions,” he added.

No companion amendment exists in the Senate version, however, imperiling the provision’s chances of making it into the final legislation.

In 2021, a measure that would have “expand[ed] protections” for dependents with a diagnosis of gender dysphoria failed.

Democratic Rep. Jimmy Panetta of California introduced a bill expanding protections under EFMP to explicitly include “gender dysphoria” as a “medical or educational special need,” allowing servicemembers to request duty assignments or extra medical support for dependents diagnosed with the disorder. It would have effectively banned the services from stationing troops with transgender dependents in stations within the U.S. or abroad where the law bans gender transition services, according to a summary.

The Air Force was the only service openly expanding EFMP to include gender transition accommodations. At the time, EFMP policy and implementation varied between the Air Force, Navy and Army sometimes down to the installation level, according to a DOD article.

But, DOD has regulatory authority to create or change the criteria for considering an individual’s special needs, according to the law creating the DOD’s Office of Special Needs. Services have the ability to build on to what the Secretary of Defense mandates.

The Secretary of Defense issued revised instruction in late June meant to synchronize the EFMP between services but did not explicitly address gender dysphoria. Language outlining an eligible dependent family member remains largely unchanged.

But a research report published after the policy was unveiled does tie the EFMP to gender transition services.

“Dependent family members diagnosed with gender dysphoria,” as characterized in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, “could also be eligible to enroll in EFMP,” according to a Congressional Research Service report. Gender dysphoria would fall alongside other “current and chronic” mental health condition requiring inpatient or intensive outpatient mental health treatment where families “may access additional family support services,” the report stated.

Support services can include information and referrals, case management and maintaining school liaisons for dependents up to 21 years old, according to the policy.

While EFMP coordinators can make travel recommendations “solely based on the availability of specific medical needs for the health and safety of the enrolled family members,” they are not the final authority in those decisions, Cmdr. Nicole Schwegman, a Pentagon spokesperson, told the DCNF.

In addition, “the provision of medical care is not a component of EFMP,” Schwegman said. TRICARE, the military’s health plan, already covers several gender transition treatments and procedures.

In theory, at least, any military family with a member who can get an official diagnosis of gender dysphoria would be eligible for an EFMP.

“Right now, transgender dependents can and are enrolled in the EFMP,” the Modern Military Association (MMA) wrote.

“Many people falsely assume ‘gender-affirming care’ means giving kids hormones and surgeries,” MMA wrote, but for young children it still “includes having access to specialists who understand what they’re going through and can provide the youth and their family appropriate mental and emotional support.”

The EFMP could be used to make it easier for children to access specialists and medical care, according to MMA.

“All servicemembers and dependents who are confused about sexual identity deserve compassion and competent psychological care.  Under DoD regulations, however, the military’s medical system has been directed to provide medical advice and treatments only in the one-way direction of transition,” Elaine Donnelly, founder of the Center for Military Readiness, told the DCNF.

Data on the number of military families taking advantage of the program was not available at the time of posting. As of early July, the Air Force confirmed it granted 15 relocations under “exceptions to policy (ETP) for members experiencing a range of racial- and LGBTQ+-related discrimination” since 2021, without specifying whether the waivers were allowed under EFMPs, Military.com reported.

None of the other services is tracking family locations, public affairs officers told the outlet.

In 2017, when TRICARE began offering sex change interventions, at least 2,500 children of military parents put in for gender dysphoria benefits through TRICARE insurance, according to a study published in JAMA Pediatrics. About 900 received the puberty blocker GnRH-a or sex change hormones.

This article has been updated with comment from a Pentagon spokesperson.

AUTHOR

MICAELA BURROW

Investigative reporter, Defense.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Is Gender Mutilation the New Face of Brands?

A Matter Of Political Will’: Biden And A GOP Senator Are Duking It Out Over Abortion, And Neither One Is Backing Down

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.


All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

Oklahoma Governor Signs ‘Women’s Bill Of Rights’ Defining ‘Female’ And ‘Mother’

Republican Oklahoma Gov. Kevin Stitt has signed a bill into law which defines the words “female” and “mother” in order to “bring clarity, certainty, and uniformity” to state laws.

The bill’s sponsor, state Sen. Jessica Garvin, told the Daily Caller in January that the bill would protect women from men invading their single-sex spaces.

“There are states where there have been men who have been incarcerated, and then they decided to identify as female. That has obviously been problematic because it turns out some of these men have sexually abused women while incarcerated,” Garvin said.

The bill stipulates that biological men cannot receive government grants meant for women and prohibits men from using female restrooms, prisons, rape shelters, locker rooms and other spaces.

The bill defines the word “mother” as, “the female parent of a child or children.” The word “woman” is defined as, “a natural person who is female.”

“The state, any political subdivision, or any state agency or department including but not limited to public school districts that collects vital statistics for the purpose of gathering accurate public health, crime, economic or other data shall identify any natural person who is part of the collected data as either male or female as defined in Section 62 of Title 25 of the Oklahoma Statutes,” the bill continues.

Republican Senator Cyndi Hyde-Smith of Mississippi introduced a Women’s Bill of Rights in February 2023, after a similar resolution failed in May 2022. The bill would define “mother,” “woman,” “sex,” along the same lines as Oklahoma’s bill.

“One of the many problems with these radical notions to redefine male and female is that they end up doing more harm than good,” Hyde-Smith said. “Our resolution simply affirms the biological differences between males and females under federal law, ensuring that womanhood is not erased by the ‘woke’ left’s reckless attempts to be inclusive.”

AUTHOR

SARAH WEAVER

Social issues reporter.

RELATED ARTICLE: Teacher Says She Was Fired For Attending Drag Show. Pastor From School Cites ‘Godly Rule

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. All rights reserved.

Energy Industry Fears White House Will Declare COVID-Like ‘Climate Emergency’

 

They promoted lie after lie on Covid and got away with murder, literally. Why wouldn’t work for the fetish hoax on climate?

“Every single prediction they’ve ever made has been wrong… They still haven’t, after 30 years, shown us that human emissions of CO2 drive global warming.”

Energy Industry Fears White House Will Declare COVID-Like ‘Climate Emergency’

By Jack Phillips, The Epoch Times, July 30, 2023:

Some energy industry groups are expressing concern that the White House will declare a COVID-19-like emergency—but for the climate instead.”They’re leaning to that direction,” U.S. Oil and Gas Association President Tim Stewart told Just the News in an article published on July 30. “If you grant the president’s emergency powers to declare a climate emergency, it’s just like COVID.”

An emergency declaration on the climate could give the president “vast and unchecked authority to shut down everything from communications to infrastructure,” said Mr. Stewart, who has been a critic of the Biden administration.

Infrastructure around water and electricity could be affected by such a decision, he said.

“They can literally do exactly what they did in COVID,” Mr. Stewart said. “If you disagree with the climate emergency, [speech] can be shut down. We really need to be paying attention to that because that power could be extended indefinitely until the ‘climate emergency’ is over. Who knows how long that would last.”

The White House press office didn’t respond by press time to a request by The Epoch Times for comment about whether the administration might be preparing such a declaration.

President Joe Biden and other administration officials have said that the United States and the world are in the midst of a “climate crisis” and have used language describing it as an emergency. So far, Mr. Biden has stopped short of declaring an emergency, although some Democrats and environmental groups have pushed the idea.

Keep reading.

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLES:

New CDC Director Announces ANNUAL COVID Shot, To Be Finalized in September

New Facebook Files reveal lengths WH was willing to go to try to control COVID narrative on social media

RELATED VIDEO: Crimes Against Humanity have been committed. Millions harmed & killed by failed public health response.

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Copyright © 2024 DrRichSwier.com LLC. A Florida Cooperation. All rights reserved. The DrRichSwier.com is a not-for-profit news forum for intelligent Conservative commentary. Opinions expressed by writers are solely their own. Republishing of columns on this website requires the permission of both the author and editor. For more information contact: drswier@gmail.com.