Tommy Robinson and the Death of Britain

Sharia justice in the UK. My latest in FrontPage:

As Tommy Robinson headed into court for his sentencing Thursday, he wore a t-shirt that read: “Convicted of Journalism.” And it’s true. Tommy Robinson is heading back to jail for doing what journalists routinely do: ask questions of defendants heading into courtrooms. The gaggle of establishment media journalists who peppered Tommy himself with questions as he entered the court have not been arrested.

British authorities claimed that Tommy Robinson had prejudiced the outcome of the trial of several members of a Muslim rape gang. This is arrant nonsense: the trial had been completed, and Tommy was asking them what they thought of their having been convicted. There was, however, a gag order on the proceedings, and it was on the basis of the claim that Tommy violated that gag order that he is now back in prison.

Why was the gag order put into place? The obvious reason is that the British government and law enforcement authorities are deeply embarrassed by their abysmal record in dealing with Muslim rape gangs. In just one city, Rotherham, British officials “described their nervousness about identifying the ethnic origins of perpetrators for fear of being thought as racist; others remembered clear direction from their managers not to do so.”

Nor did this happen only in Rotherham; all over the country, authorities let Muslim rape gangs run rampant for fear of being charged with “racism” and “Islamophobia” if they did anything about them. That is just what happened to Tommy Robinson when he dared to call attention to these gangs and the Islamic motivation behind their activities. The Muslim rape gangs went unreported, unprosecuted, and in general unstopped because of far-Left organizations including Hope Not Hate, Faith Matters, and Tell Mama, which waged relentless war against anyone and everyone who spoke out about this issue. They demonized as “Islamophobic,” “hateful” and “bigoted” anyone who said that there were Muslim rape gangs at all, and that they had to be stopped. They led the campaign to ban Pamela Geller and me from entering the country, when one of the events we had discussed going to was a rally against the Muslim rape gangs.

Hope Not Hate has scrubbed the evidence, but it used to be possible to search for “grooming” (as these gangs are usually called “grooming gangs” in the British media) at Hope Not Hate’s site. You would have seen that the vast majority of the articles mentioning this practice were attacking those who were calling attention to it and protesting against it.

The lives of tens of thousands of British girls are ruined today because of fascist “anti-hate” crusaders Nick Lowles and Matthew Collins of Hope Not Hate, Fiyaz Mughal of Faith Matters and Tell Mama, and their friends, supporters, and allies. Yet it is Tommy Robinson who is in prison. If Britain were even close to being a sane society today, Lowles, Mughal, and company, not Tommy Robinson, would be being subjected to scorching criticism, and there would be a thorough public reevaluation of how much the Left’s alliance with Islamic supremacism and smear campaign against foes of jihad terror has harmed the nation and its people.

But Britain is not a sane society today, and these sinister individuals — Lowles, Mughal, and the rest of them — continue to wield their considerable power and influence in British society. If Britain is ever to recover itself and stave off chaos, civil war and Sharia, Lowles, Collins, Mughal and others like them must be decisively repudiated and removed from all positions of influence, and their organizations exposed for what they are.

Instead, Tommy Robinson is back to jail, with a sentence that could be a death sentence at the hands of Muslim inmates who threatened and menaced him when he was in prison before.

The British government is clearly making an example of him in order to try to deter more Britons from protesting against its policies of mass Muslim immigration and its covering up of crimes perpetrated by Muslims in the name of Islam and in accord with its teachings. This conviction and sentencing shows not Tommy Robinson’s contempt of court, but the contempt of the British government for its own citizens, and particularly for the victims of Muslim rape gangs.

Britain has become a shabby little police state in which it is illegal to criticize Islam and mass Muslim migration in Britain today. Its death as a free society is by its own hand.

RELATED ARTICLES:

UK poll: 31% believe Islam poses a threat to the British way of life, Mirror laments rise of “Islamophobia”

Video: Ilhan Omar says “Palestinian” movement against Israel is “non-violent”

The Qatar Supporter Advising Kamala Harris

EDITORS NOTE: This Jihad Watch column is republished with permission. All rights reserved.

VIDEO: The Vortex — More Cover-Up. This time from Catholic (FAKE) News Agency.

TRANSCRIPT

One of our chief goals here at Church Militant is help viewers understand not just specific things going wrong in the Church, but how none of these things are occurring in a vacuum.

They’re all related, and we make it part of our mission to help you understand the context and the bigger picture so when you see a specific story, you don’t see it in isolation, but understand how it feeds into the larger crisis.

Why are we committed to this “contextual” journalistic approach? Because the Church is burning to the ground, and loyal sons need to step up and fight for Our Mother because, at the end of the day, all that matters is souls — saving souls, sacrificing yourself to save souls. Everything else is passing.

Right now, the Church is severely compromised, deeply compromised, in Her divinely appointed commission to fight against the gates of Hell and rescue souls. It’s run by a corrupt gay mafia.

So we are dedicated to exposing that rot within the Church and connecting the dots for you on how one seemingly singular story is never just singular.

Taking the case of the archdiocese of Detroit and its bungled handling of the Fr. Perrone case we reported on last week, there are a host of other related stories spewing forth from this one, and each of those angles also needs to be presented.

For example, let’s look at the coverage the story has gotten in the Catholic media world.

Late last week, CNA — Catholic News Agency — did an interview with the Detroit priest behind the pressing of the charges against Fr. Perrone, Msgr. Michael Bugarin.

Bugarin had earlier granted a highly inappropriate interview to the Associated Press and produced and handed out a press release that went all over the world saying the charge against Perrone was “credible.”

When we confronted him in the back of Fr. Perrone’s parish handing out the statements, those statements had the word “credible” in them.

But, after getting severe blowback for doing that, he all of a sudden seems to have forgotten the word “credible” in his interview with CNA.

In fact, CNA made special mention in its article that he avoided the word “credible.”

And now we see two different stories emerge here — each one worth its own fleshing out.

First, why did not CNA directly challenge Bugarin on not sticking to the word “credible”?

After all, just a few days earlier, he had announced it to the whole world and it was seen even in this Fox News ticker — his specific doing because he’s the man in charge of these cases for Abp. Allen Vigneron.

This is why we say, in separate storylines, that the Catholic establishment media cannot be trusted.

They don’t ever ask the hard question because they cannot afford to tick off the Establishment and bishops who they depend on. They let him completely off the hook — on purpose.

Bugarin issued a statement, destroying the reputation of Fr. Perrone around the globe and yet CNA didn’t think of pressing him on that point.

That article, as a result, like so many articles in CNA are little else than public relations statements for bishops and their staffs who need to switch into damage control.

One by one, case by case, story by story, CNA and other Catholic establishment media are being revealed as nothing more than shills for the bishops.

Now, the second storyline is this: Why did Bugarin give this interview — and related, why did he back off the use of the word “credible”?

He felt perfectly fine telling the entire planet the charges were credible just a few days earlier.

He and the phony independent review board of the archdiocese had accepted the charge as “credible” and felt fine signing off on the press release as did the archbishop — as did the attorneys.

The entire Detroit bureaucracy accepted the smearing of Fr. Perrone as perfectly acceptable. But they all did so without letting him claim his own innocence, which he did to the Associated Press

As we said last week, Church Militant has known the identity of the accuser for weeks. Because of that, we also know that the claim of abuse is 40 years old, that it came from a “repressed memory.”

Does Msgr. Bugarin and the archbishop not think that information is relevant enough to include in a press release for around the world.

They don’t have to release the accuser’s name. We know it and haven’t. But that doesn’t mean you still can’t talk about the circumstances. And why didn’t CNA ask about all these circumstances in their softball interview?

Whenever bishops or the establishment get “caught,” they run to CNA types to do an “interview,” which is little else than reliable cover for them.

What did Bugarin offer in that interview that was new or more clarifying? Nothing.

So why grant the interview? Why did CNA do the interview? Bugarin certainly wouldn’t sit down with Church Militant and do an interview.

He just got “caught” in the back of Perrone’s parish last Sunday because he didn’t have a choice since he was there to hand out fliers condemning Fr. Perrone without the investigation being completed.

He has not served the archbishop well. He needs to go — be fired or resigned.

CNA should have asked all these questions, raised all these points — but they didn’t.

No one in charge at CNA thought one little bit about any of this, and that fact is its own story. What’s the point of touting yourself as a news outfit, when you don’t know how to do news?

This is just one more example of why we say Church Militant can be trusted and the Catholic establishment media can’t.

Why hasn’t any, not one single Catholic establishment media outfit, reported Church Militant’s exclusive interview with McCarrick victim James Grein that he was sexually assaulted by Cdl. Joseph Bernardin.

Because for those fake news outfits to pick up on a Church Militant exclusive would give us credibility from them, and that is the absolute last thing they can afford to do.

CNA and other Catholic establishment media are specifically “fake news” because they make the deliberate decision to leave out relevant information.

For example, in this case, the head guy at CNA is JD Flynn, who is a canon lawyer with zeroexperience as a journalist who was picked by the bishops’ establishment to run the show there.

They have a reliable man in place to get their word out whenever they need him to.

And in the matter of this story, JD Flynn knows good and well the implication of Bugarin using misleading language about Fr. Perrone, which is why he never directed or edited out anything about Bugarin’s use of the term.

There’s never just one cockroach when a system is corrupt; it takes joint effort from many different quarters.

And in the case of Fr. Perrone, there is a confederation between a compromised review board, Abp. Vigneron and his point man and now the Catholic (not) News Agency rushing to shore up their actions and provide cover for them.

These bishops and their staffs cannot be trusted; and neither can their fake news outfits.

EDITORS NOTE: This Church Militant video is republished with permission. All rights reserved.

Mexican Flag Over ICE Facility Is NOT The Fringe Of The Democratic Party

Another GOP ad is writing itself as Democrat-supporting protesters took down an American flag over an ICE facility in Colorado, defaced it and raised it upside down, vandalized a Blue Lives Matter flag and then raised the Mexican flag above the federal facility. The Mexican flag.

I would like to say these are just fringe extremists, but are they?

A leading Democrat presidential contender, U.S. Sen. Kamala Harris (from California) calls this basic, at one point  bipartisan law enforcement “crimes against humanity.” Sure, that’s not overboard at all. And it’s not like she was California Attorney General or anything in charge of law enforcement. She is obviously not fringe. In fact, most of the Democratic candidates have come out opposed to the ICE law enforcement actions and for de facto open borders.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (also from California, naturally) the second most powerful leader in the country and most power Democrat at the moment, is openly advising people here illegally who have retainer warrants on them how to avoid arrest by ICE agents. She has the ability to move legislation changing the law if she does not like it. But instead, she is helping people violate the law — which last I knew means she is an accessory to crime, along with endless other Democratic officeholders, such as the new mayor of Chicago, who are doing the same thing. Again, not at all on the fringe.

No, this is more mainstream Democratic Party, at least among leadership if not rank-and-file.

In fact, you are hard-pressed to find a Democratic leader who will condemn it.

Former Colorado Gov. John Hickenlooper, who is running for the 2020 Democrat presidential nomination, was asked Sunday if the protesters should be condemned. He refused to say they should be.

“Well, I certainly respect the American flag, and my whole life I’ve been fighting to make this country…and to make sure this country welcomes everybody, and that this flag represents everyone,” Hickenlooper said on “America’s News HQ.”

When pressed on whether he would say they were wrong and shouldn’t do it, the best he could muster was: “I think there are better ways to unite us.”

I realize the knee-jerk reaction of the Democratic Party today is that if Trump says up, they say down; if he says black they say white; if he says cancer is bad they say he’s a racist (because that’s just the default comeback when stymied.)

But this is an amazing position.

Long, long ago, in the ancient days of the Republic when Barack Obama was president, ICE conducted these actions all the time. Obama defended himself against the activists masquerading as journalists on Telemundo by saying he had to, because he’s “not a king.” It’s good to know he actually realized that. His Department of Homeland Security chief, Jeh Johnson, said these law enforcement actions are right because all of the judicial appeals have been exhausted and these people are in the country illegally. It’s the frickitydiddle law.

Further, some of these illegal immigrants have also committed other crimes while here. Because lawless sanctuary cities by Democrats will not hold a criminal if ICE has a retainer on them, these criminals need to be rounded up by ICE through special law enforcement actions. But Pelosi and other Democrats (who were fine with Obama doing the exact same thing) are actively working to help criminals avoid law enforcement.

Incredible. If Democrats keep acting like this, the GOP won’t even need people to message for them. They can simply run on Democrats’ words and actions — previously listed in this space in terrifying detail — and let the justifiable fear of lawlessness take its natural course.

Oh, and use the picture of the defaced American flag and Mexican flag over a federal facility. Democrats will huff and puff that they don’t approve of that. Why should anyone believe them? Their actions on this issue mean they are totally aligned with the sentiment and the people who did it.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Trump Puts Limit on Asylum Claims at Border

Fake News Covers for Migrant Crimes

Is Texas Democrat Exploiting Loophole by Coaching Migrants to Lie?

I Went to a Socialism Conference. Here Are My 6 Observations.

RELATED VIDEO: Protesters Remove U.S. Flag, Replace It With Mexican Flag Outside ICE Facility In Aurora.

EDITORS NOTE: This Revolutionary Act column is republished with permission. All rights reserved.

Can You Keep a Secret? So Can Your Daughter’s School.

Imagine sending your daughter off to school only to find out that she was headed for an abortion appointment instead. Then imagine this: her teachers knew and never told you. In California, parents don’t have to imagine it. Thanks to a new undercover video, they know — it’s already happening.

It’s unreal footage, even by the ACLU’s standards. When the meeting between state teachers and the far-Left group was leaked, most people had a hard time believing it. And that, the team at Our Watch said, was the point. “[We] know what it’s like to say, ‘Okay, well, I heard somebody said this is happening, but I want to see it for myself.'” So the organization sent someone into a training session and pushed “record.” What they caught was a coordinated effort to keep parents in the dark about one of the most dangerous decisions a teenager could ever make.

“Regardless of how old the student is,” ACLU attorney Ruth Dawson starts off (at 21:08 of this video), “they can walk into a doctor’s office and consent to services without their parental consent. Those services are pregnancy and prenatal care, contraception and emergency contraception, abortion — and for these there is no parental notification.” As school officials, Dawson goes on, “I think a good way to think about this is that these are services that California has decided are so important that… students really need to be able to access them.” So no matter what, she said, “Young people have the right to leave school and seek confidential medical services without the consent or notification of their parents and guardians.”

But Dawson didn’t stop there. Every school, she argued, has a responsibility to keep these secrets — at all costs. “The key thing to remember here is about Confidential Medical Release. The right belongs to the young person. It doesn’t belong to the parent. It doesn’t belong to the school. The right lies with the young person. The most important piece of this is that schools cannot share this information with parents or guardians. Also no parent calls. So a teacher or attendance office can’t call home and say, ‘So-and-so was out at the doctor’s office receiving [whatever procedure]. Did you know about this?’ You cannot do that.” In fact, Dawson goes on, California schools should be in the habit of covering up these appointments on the district record.

Teacher: “So are they considered absent?”

ACLU: “I think it qualifies as, like, an excused absence.”

Teacher: “But once they’re absent, the school calls automatically.”

ACLU: “Right, so I think what has to happen is that the school must develop a policy so that doesn’t happen. When it comes to online attendance tracking, it gets a little trickier, because schools — as everyone in this room knows — have to report attendance.”

Administrator: “Because attendance is financial…”

ACLU: “Right. But if you say [it’s] medical, that’s actually a violation of the student’s privacy rights. If you say ‘unexcused absence’ and penalize them, that’s a violation of state law. So what the heck are you supposed to do? Some districts do things, like, they’ll say the student was with an administrator… and they won’t answer further questions. It’s a little tricky though, which is why it’s more of an art than a science… But saying it was an ‘excused absence’ does not, like, directly violate the law.”

Since when has falsifying state records not violated the law? What if there’s a medical emergency while a girl is off getting her excused-absence abortion? Can you imagine the liability issues if a parent found out the school not only knew about the appointment but covered it up? “No, it turns out, she wasn’t ‘with an administrator.’ She was taking the life of your future grandchild.” This is a world where giving a teenager a Tylenol without asking could launch a thousand lawsuits. Yet somehow, it’s okay to send them on a deadly field trip that destroys one life and forever alters the other without ever calling home?

Amazingly, the video doesn’t stop there. Dawson’s encore for the free lesson in abortion deception is a dose of radical sex ed. She goes through the state’s controversial new guidelines, taking great pains to remind teachers that even when it comes to the most extreme material (which one parent insists is so graphic, he could be brought up on charges for showing it to a child), it’s illegal for parents to opt students out. “In grades K-12, no matter where you teach sex ed… no matter whether you’re teaching fifth graders or twelfth graders, all of that has to be inclusive of LGBTQ…” Schools, she insists, “may not facilitate a selective opt-out just of the queer stuff. We’ve heard, unfortunately, from a lot of parents who say, ‘I want my kid to learn sex ed — it’s important. However, none of the gay stuff. They can’t do that. Practically, it should be impossible.”

By now, you shouldn’t need convincing that your involvement in the local school district matters. If you do, this video is more than enough proof that the Left is targeting your children. But if there’s one thing the ACLU, Planned Parenthood, and every other liberal is afraid of, it’s engaged parents. There’s a reason they’re hosting these hush-hush trainings and passing laws to keep moms and dads in the dark. They understand that the more you know, the harder you’ll fight. And in a world where the other side will do anything to get to our children, that’s exactly what we need — fighters.


Tony Perkins’ Washington Update is written with the aid of FRC senior writers.


RELATED ARTICLES:

Planned Parenthood Lives Up to Its Bloodthirsty and Racist Reputation

Hollywood Tries to Mainstream Abortion. 21 TV and Movie Characters Have Aborted Babies This Year

California Public Schools Promote Polyamory for Preteens

Trump Admin: No Greater Friend than Israel

EYE ON JACKSONVILLE: Letting perverts off the hook. A big cultural change!

Lloyd “Scoop” Brown has been writing on Eye on Jacksonville about the lack of arrests locally. It’s a big issue and one that we hope Sheriff Mike Williams will look into.

Today I read that men are “having fun” with themselves in the library and many incidents have been reported. Yet very few arrests have been made. The reason: If they are clothed, they can’t be arrested. They can only be banned from the library.

What the heck is going on with our laws? This is an outrage.

As a mom to two grown children, I vividly remember an incident that happened when they were young. I lived in Arlington at the time and had just pulled into Albertson’s parking lot. A man was in a car across from our parking space and he was having a lot of fun with himself. My daughter asked me, “What’s that man doing, Mommy?” I mumbled something and ran around the mini van to pull them out and run inside the store. That was the days when cell phones didn’t exist. I told the store manager about the man and he called the police. We stood inside the store and watched and waited for the police to show up. They did. When they approached the car, he was fully clothed and they told him to exit the car. He zipped up his pants and exited the car. They threw him against the car and arrested him. He was put inside the police cruiser and taken down town for booking. His image even showed up in the local newspaper. I am sure he was ashamed of himself.

What has changed? A man inside a library playing fondly with himself twenty years later is allowed to leave the library and move on to another one or a park or a gas station or a bathroom in a restaurant.

If we wonder what the heck is going on in our country, take a look at the laws and the law makers and you will find out. We are letting criminals and sick people off the hook. If they were treated as criminals, maybe the world would be a better place to raise our children.

If you feel the way I do, why not contact Sheriff Mike Williams and ask him what he can do about this nasty mess happening in our libraries. It’s time for everyone to become an activist. If not, you have no one to blame for the way our world is — than yourself.

Contact Sheriff Williams here.

Disgusting activities in the face of our children. No excuses!

EDITORS NOTE: This Eye on Jacksonville column is republished with permission. All rights reserved.

Adding ‘P’ for Pedophile to LGBT

EDITORS NOTE: In an April 1977 report, co-authored by Ruth Bader Ginsberg, professor at the Columbia Law School and Brenda Feigen-Fasteau, former director of the American Civil Liberties Union’s women’s rights project, titled “SEX BIAS IN THE U.S. CODE A Report of the United States Commission on Civil Rights” recommended 18 U.S.C. §2032 be changed as follows:

Eliminate the phrase “carnal knowledge of any female, not his wife who has not attained the age of sixteen years” and substitute a Federal, sex-neutral definition of the offense patterned after S. 1400 §1633: A person is guilty of an offense if he engages in a sexual act with another person, not his spouse, and (1) compels the other person to participate: (A) by force or (B) by threatening or placing the other person in fear that any person will imminently be subjected to death, serious bodily injury, or kidnapping; (2) has substantially impaired the other person’s power to appraise or control the conduct by administering or employing a drug or intoxicant without the knowledge or against the will of such other person, or by other means; or (3) the other person is, in fact, less than 12 years old. 


Matthew Hanley: If brazen attempts succeed in normalizing pedophilia, many people may finally come to reject the sexual revolution outright.


I don’t want to write about pedophilia. You don’t want to read about it.  But the threat of pedophilia becoming acceptable isn’t going away. The sudden embrace of transgenderism didn’t come from nowhere. And it isn’t going to stop there, as I argued in this space not long ago.

Targeting children comes in two general phases. The first involves bombarding them with LGBT messaging in schools. Or now, on public television (PBS) cartoons in which an 8-year-old Aardvark named Arthur and his peers are portrayed as pleased that his male teacher is “marrying” another male.

Other offenses in this category include Drag Queen Story Time at public libraries, which now seem to be cropping up all over the country. Scary to say, but chances are your local librarian may also be a monster-enabler – or at least too feeble a frog to jump out of water that is now well past the boiling point.

Drag Queen Story Time typically gives a platform to gay males (some are even convicted sex offenders) to abuse children by encouraging them to flout reality and to explore gender “fluidity.” Who thinks that is a good idea? Relatively few, in all likelihood.  But that doesn’t tell us how many otherwise decent people are unwilling to draw a line in the sand.

Appeals to “tolerance” show their true colors when they are enlisted to support the blatant grooming of children – grooming being a term we used to be happily unacquainted in this abusive context.  Such grooming also presents some commonality with certain elements in Islam; I refer to authorities in the UK willfully ignoring the systematic rape of local girls by Muslim “grooming” gangs for decades.

In short, a great many people in positions of authority are so keen on protecting both Islam and homosexuality that even the grotesque abuse of youngsters must be swept under the rug.

Sure, one could say that not all LGBT folks are on board with pedophilia.  But a larger point is in play: when the goal is rationalizing LGBT behavior, the very innocence of children must be targeted. Concepts of normality, morality, and virtue must be radically inverted because they stand as a rebuke to the depravity we must now esteem with “pride” – or else!

The second phase involves attempts to accommodate or actually espouse pedophilia. This can take the form of classifying it as a clinical condition, which amounts to a plea for exculpation; after all, no blame is attached to the person who comes down with Parkinson’s or pneumonia.  But it can also be couched in terms of advancing “rights,” breaking down barriers, and allowing “love” to win out.

Indeed, influential medical bodies seem to be biding their time to classify pedophilia not as a disease but as just another sexual orientation.  One that is unchangeable, you understand – because according to current dogma, anything that goes against human nature and common decency is unchangeable.

This would essentially amount to adding a P to LGBT.  Another P, I should specify; not Pansexual, which is already included in the ever expanding LGBTQIAP+ acronym. (Look it up – and ask: what does the “+” exclude?)  We all know what that would mean: “hate” would be the only thing standing in the way of legitimizing pedophilia.

So which is it: a disease one haplessly contracts, or a legitimate orientation that is unjustly oppressed? Who cares; doesn’t matter; whatever “argument” will do. Innocence will be targeted.

Pedophilia-friendly messaging can be found on TV and on stage; a recent play appearing in Chicago and London portrays pedophilia in a sympathetic light.  It can be found on social media and even in academic journals; one such journal published in 2018 a convicted pedophile’s contention that “child-adult sexual relations” should be seen as virtuous.

Benedict XVI recently asserted that, “Part of the physiognomy of the Revolution of ‘68 was that pedophilia was then also diagnosed as allowed and appropriate.” He sheds a bright light on the disturbing developments during this past half-century. But this matter goes all the way back to the confrontation between Christianity and the paganism of antiquity, which was fine with treating children as sexual objects.

Christianity reversed the prevailing approval of such practices, which makes our current crisis even more troubling because it entails the paganization of the Church and not just the de-Christianization of Western society.

So we now contend with bishops (in the UK) actively endorsing curricula developed by gay activists, while dodge ball is derided by some educational authorities on the grounds that it inappropriately treats kids as “human targets.” As if kids throwing balls at each other on the playground is of more concern than insidiously targeting them via perverted indoctrination.

It’s curious that, even on the heels of revelations that some of the Catholic hierarchy are in the business of perpetuating homosexual predation, there are nonetheless actors out there saying that maybe such targeting, grooming, and abusing of youngsters is not really such a bad thing after all.  

Apparently the task for those in the driver’s seat of our post-decency culture is to strike the right balance: condemn Christianity for its views on sexuality, and also for the violation against those norms by its pastors, while promoting such transgressions in the wider world – in just the right doses as the timing of our ongoing collapse permits.

We are not just dealing with a simple or abstract disagreement here.  We are dealing with dangerous people and disastrous ideas.  Perhaps the ever more brazen attempts to target children will lead people to see how one transgression logically leads to the next, and reject the sexual revolution outright.

But our degradation runs so deep, our divide is so unbridgeable, that talk of some sort of pending civil war is not rash. Nobody wants that, but if we can’t push back against the ongoing – indeed accelerating – targeting of children, we’ll have lost without firing a shot.

COLUMN BY

Matthew Hanley

Matthew Hanley is senior fellow with the National Catholic Bioethics Center. With Jokin de Irala, M.D., he is the author of Affirming Love, Avoiding AIDS: What Africa Can Teach the West, which recently won a best-book award from the Catholic Press Association. The opinions expressed here are Mr. Hanley’s and not those of the NCBC.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Normalization of Pedophilia Goes Mainstream, Child Molesters Rebranded as ‘Minor Attracted Persons’

Fears Grow Over Academic Efforts to Normalize Pedophilia

REPORT: Homosexual Behavior & Pedophilia

Embattled Crookston diocese reaches $5m abuse settlements, will release depositions and files

EDITORS NOTE: This Catholic Thing column is republished with permission. © 2019 The Catholic Thing. All rights reserved. For reprint rights, write to: info@frinstitute.org. The Catholic Thing is a forum for intelligent Catholic commentary. Opinions expressed by writers are solely their own.

VIDEO: Comments by Computing Forever on President Trump’s Social Media Summit

Computing Forever published the following video with commentary on President Trump’s Social Media Summit:

For those wishing to support Computing Forever’s work his please clicking here or on Subscribe Star or donate via PayPal. Like Computing Forever on Facebook.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Trump’s Social Media Summit Spotlights Anti-Conservative Bias by Tech Giants

Leftists Slam Trump Social Media Summit

Trump to Lean on Social Media Giants to Curb Censorship

While banning or shadowbanning foes of jihad terror, Twitter refuses to ban Hamas

CAIR-LA leader trashes American Independence Day and claims US runs “concentration camps”

RELATED VIDEO: Democratic Party Candidate for president Elizabeth Warren’s “Yes, Yes” to ending Israel’s “Occupation.”

Clarion Intel EXCLUSIVE: Nationwide Militant Islamist Network

This Clarion Intel exclusive report documents an Islamist movement in America composed of terrorist, paramilitary and criminal components.

Executive Summary

An Islamist movement in America composed of terrorist, paramilitary and criminal components is increasingly anticipating a nationwide armed uprising which will be sparked by a confrontation with police and/or white supremacists, according to Clarion Intelligence Network’s sources.

The nationwide movement, consisting largely of African-American prison converts, includes multiple Islamist groups connected to a violent organization named “Ummah” playing the biggest role.

Other components of this Islamist movement include Salafi extremists, Sufi extremists and more “mainstream” Muslim Brotherhood-type Sunnis such as Brooklyn Imam Siraj Wahhaj.

This racially-focused Islamist movement is focused on developing Islamist-dominated neighborhoods and communes. The objective is to create insular enclaves that minimize opposing influences and maximize the difficulties facing law enforcement in monitoring the communities.

A central theme of this movement is that minorities in the U.S., especially Muslims and black people, must prepare for an inevitable uprising against law enforcement, white supremacists and their “Zionist conspirators.”

They believe there will be a confrontation that unites Islamists, who will then ally with non-Muslim political partners to fight against the supposedly racist and tyrannical U.S. government and its shadowy puppeteers.

This sense of impending conflict has heightened as race issues have become more prominent in politics as well as in issues surrounding white supremacy, anti-Muslim extremism, anti-police bigotry and political violence. The Clarion Project has dubbed this mutually-reinforcing radicalism the “War of the Extremes.”

Many members of this Islamist movement are involved in criminal activity with the approval of imams, including illegally selling guns (oftentimes stolen from personal homes) for profit.

Sources in multiple Muslim communities say that members of security teams from radical mosques and organizations are involved in the gun trade, especially in Pennsylvania and Michigan.

The criminal elements, particularly when it comes to firearms trafficking and martial arts training, come together despite their ideological differences.

As discussed in the lengthy expose below, this Islamist movement includes—but is not limited to:

  • A nationwide paramilitary and organized crime group known as “The Ummah,” with a history of terrorism-related activity
  • Brooklyn Imam Siraj Wahhaj’s black Islamist coalition
  • A Sufi jihadist network that extends into Africa
  • The United Muslim Movement founded by music producer and songwriter Kenny Gamble, now known as Luqman Abdul Haqq
  • Jammat ul-Fuqra, a cult that claims to have 22 “Islamic villages” in America and is led by radical cleric in Pakistan linked to terrorist groups in Southeast Asia
  • The U.S. Muslim Brotherhood/pro-Hamas network

 “The Ummah”

The largest and arguably the most dangerous component of this Islamist movement is “The Ummah,” a group whose leaders have been involved in acts of terrorism, attacking police officers and extensive criminal activity.

The FBI describes Ummah as a “nationwide radical fundamentalist Sunni group.” In a criminal complaint, the FBI says:

“Their primary mission is to establish a separate, sovereign Islamic state (“The Ummah”) within the borders of the United States, governed by Shariah law. The Ummah is to be ruled over by Jamil Abdullah Al-Amin, formerly known as H. Rapp Brown.”

The exact number of mosques loyal to Ummah is not known.

In 1995, it was estimated that Ummah was affiliated with 30-40 mosques in the United States and about 20-30,000 followers, which is more than the Nation of Islam led by Louis Farrakhan.

In 2000, it was reported that Al-Amin’s Ummah had over 28 mosques.

Ummah’s Spiritual Leader

Ummah’s spiritual leader, Jamil Abdullah Al-Amin (formerly famous as  H. Rapp Brown in the 1960s), is a ferociously anti-American imam currently serving a life sentence for shooting two police officers in Georgia in 2000.

Al-Amin was a member of the Black Panthers when he was known as H. Rapp Brown (birth name: Hubert Gerold Brown).

In 1967, Al-Amin was charged with arson and inciting a riot after encouraging protestors in Maryland to become violent and destructive. He went so far as to say that black people were “going to burn America down” if their demands were not met. The charges were subsequently reduced to misdemeanors.

He went to prison from 1971 to 1976 after he tried to rob a bar in New York City and got into a shootout with police.

While in prison, an extremist group named Dar Ul-Islam preached to him. He converted to Islam and adopted the name of Jamil Abdullah Al-Amin. Dar Ul-Islam was known for its violent and criminal activity, including paramilitary training and essentially setting up a militia.

After prison, he moved to Atlanta.

On August 7, 1995, he was arrested for allegedly shooting a suspected drug dealer in Atlanta, where Al-Amin led his Community Mosque. He was found with a pistol and booked on two weapons-related charges because the weapon was concealed and unlicensed.

At that time, Al-Amin was the chairman of Atlanta’s Council of Imams and described as a “revered imam, a spiritual leader of the second largest community of traditional Muslims in the United States.”

In 1996, he was under investigation for suspected links to over a dozen murders. Police believed he was basically acting as a mafia leader. His alleged victims were those who had crossed him, business competitors or people who “knew too much” to be allowed to live.

In May 1999, police pulled Al-Amin over when he was driving a stolen car. He got away because he pretended to be a police officer by showing a police badge from Alabama.

He was charged in September 1999 and then failed to show up for court in January 2000.

On March 16, 2000, two Georgia police officers attempted to arrest Al-Amin. He opened fire on them, murdering one and wounding the other. He then fled to White Hall, Alabama, where he was later arrested.

After his arrest, two of his followers robbed three banks in retaliation.

Top Ummah Leader in Detroit

Luqman Ameen Abdullah, a top Ummah leader and imam of Masjid ul-Haqq in Detroit, was killed in a shootout in Detroit in 2009.

He was recorded talking about impending terrorist attacks on federal targets and planning to leave the U.S. so he could lead Ummah operations from abroad. In 2009, his mosque had to relocate after they were evicted from another spot in Detroit for failing to pay property taxes. Abdullah was determined to violently retaliate.

When the police entered the Ummah mosque after the eviction, they found that the mosque was essentially an indoor training camp. The criminal complaint against Abdullah and 10 of his co-conspirators explains:

Luqman Abdullah calls his followers to an offensive jihad, rather than a defensive jihad. He regularly preaches anti-government and anti-law enforcement rhetoric.

Abdullah and his followers have trained regularly in the use of firearms, and continues to train in martial arts and sword fighting.

 Abdullah encourages the members of the Masjid Al-Haqq, many of whom are convicted felons, to carry a firearm, and information obtained during the course of this investigation indicates that many of Abdullah’s followers are usually armed…

…Members and former members of the Masjid Al-Haqq have stated they are willing to do anything Abdullah instructs and/or preaches, even including criminal conduct and acts of violence.”

The Sutra squad—the mosque’s security team—was the most trained element. These armed devotees regularly practiced in firearms, martial arts, boxing, kickboxing, sword-fighting and other forms of self-defense.

Shell casings were found on the basement floor of the mosque, where large holes could be seen in the concrete wall that was used as a shooting range. The combat training took place in the mosque basement and was specifically focused on fighting law enforcement and gangs who threatened mosque members.

Inside the part of the mosque that served as Abdullah’s apartment, the police found two guns, close to 40 knives and martial arts weapons.

The Justice Department put together a criminal complaint against Abdullah and 10 of his Ummah co-conspirators. When they tried to arrest him, he opened fire and killed a police dog.

Ummah: The Revival of Dar Ul-Islam

Ummah is essentially an alternative name for group Dar Ul-Islam (DUL).

In the criminal complaint against Abdullah it says that Abdullah privately told associates that Ummah is just another name for (the supposedly defunct) DUL.

Abdullah said that DUL/Ummah is led by an imam in New York. He said that Ummah wasn’t using the name of DUL in order to confuse the U.S. government.

Dar Ul-Islam split due to the birth of Jammat ul-Fuqra–now known as Muslims of the Americas (MOA) — a mostly African-American apocalyptic cult loyal to a radical Islamist cleric in Pakistan named Sheikh Mubarak Ali Gilani, who has sent at least two of his sons to the U.S. and Canada in order to lead MOA after he dies.

Gilani’s critics believed he was an agent of Pakistani intelligence sent to infiltrate DUL. Fuqra was also competing with the Saudi-funded Wahhabists and the Nation of Islam for African-American converts.

The breaking point came in 1974. At the time, DUL was also using the name of Ikhwanul Muslimeen, or Muslim Brotherhood (not to be confused with the international Muslim Brotherhood organization headquartered in Egypt).

At Masjid Al-Yasin, the Brooklyn mosque where DUL was headquartered, Gilani’s supporters got into a shootout with DUL members opposed to him. Four people died in that incident.

One group within DUL pledged allegiance to Gilani and claimed the mantle of DUL, including the owner of Masjid Yasin mosque and leader of DUL, Imam Yahya Abdul-Karim.

In 1982, Abdul-Karim declared that DUL was over and replaced by the “international Jama’at al Fuqra” led by Gilani.

Imam Jamil Al-Amin led the other faction, which was opposed to Gilani.

In 1974, Al-Amin moved to Atlanta. In 1983, this remaining DUL faction chose Al-Amin as their national imam. In 1987, his DUL faction began calling themselves the National Islamic Community. The name was changed again later to the National Ummah, though the National Islamic Community name continued to be used and acknowledged as DUL’s successor.

In 2008, the year before he was killed, Imam Luqman Abdullah, his son, Mujahid Carswell, and others talked about taking the formal pledge of allegiance (bayat) to Abdullah, which involved signing a piece of paper with 24 points.

The pledge was to Dar Ul-Islam and its leading imam. The form said that this imam is “represented” by other imams, including Abdullah. Signatories agree to follow the representing imam and “do jihad with them.”

Child Radicalization and Abuse

A credible informant inside of the Detroit mosque “saw Luqman Abdullah discipline children inside the mosque by beating them with sticks on their hands, knees, and legs, until they were covered with bruises, including a boy Abdullah beat so badly with sticks that he was unable to walk for several days.”

Abdullah indoctrinated children at Ummah’s mosques, according to the complaint. It mentions an incident at one Georgia mosque:

“At one point, Abdullah spoke to the Gainesville Ummah Imam’s children, who were between approximately 9 and 11 years old. Abdullah told them stories about his shooting people with a 9mm gun. Abdullah said that he sometimes carries two handguns and said that he had shot a lot of people.”

In May 2009, Abdullah “stated he had participated in training camps, which were located in various states, with Jawallah (soldier) scouts.”

The Jawala Scouts were first exposed by Joe Kaufman of Americans Against Hate. The group trains boys as young as seven years old who are dressed in military fatigues. The Jawala Scouts were founded by Kenny Gamble’s United Muslim Movement and the Sankore Institute (see below).

Support for Terrorism and  Terrorist Groups

Abdullah and his associates seemed to be obsessed with murdering cops and violently overthrowing the U.S. government. References were made to members’ having shot cops, gang members and other rival members.

Abdullah likewise claimed to have shot a number of people, describing two such shootings in detail.

In fact, attacking police officers, FBI agents and other government personnel is a necessity for them.

Ummah also encourages members to support foreign terrorist groups. At one point, Abdullah said that bombing buses filled with civilians is impermissible, but on February 6, 2009, Abdullah delivered a sermon that disparaged Jews and Christians and justified suicide bombings.

He preached that Muslims should support “Sheikh Osama Bin Laden,” the Taliban and Hezbollah. He also urged attendees to plan concrete actions against the “kuffar.”

A Jihadi Mafia

Ummah is also an organized crime group. A single criminal complaint against Abdullah and 10 of his accomplices listed practically every kind of crime, including arming felons; committing arson in order to defraud an insurance company; stealing cars, computers, cigarettes and TV sets; drug trafficking; armed robberies and trying to assemble explosives.

At one point, Abdullah even told an accomplice that he should sell his counterfeit goods out of his mosque in Detroit.

Abdullah said such crimes are justified because they are part of jihad and advancing the cause of Allah. He and others pointed to a story in the Quran about Muslims in Mecca and Medina robbing and stealing from caravans and donating a portion to the Islamic cause.

On August 19, 2009, Abdullah again justified the crimes by citing a hadith (saying of the prophet) where he claimed Mohammed says theft is permissible as long as a Muslim prays and is in a good state.

Ummah isn’t the only Islamist group to find ways of justifying crimes as permissible under Sharia Law.

The “Blind Sheikh,” Omar Abdel-Rahman, who was one of the most influential clerics in the jihadist world when he was alive, preached that Muslims could rob banks in order to finance the jihad. Islamists also have justified drug trafficking by claiming they are only selling it to non-Muslims.

Crimes against governments and institutions that the jihadists view as hostile towards Islam have been justified for decades.

The Islamist Enclave Movement

Another key focus for Ummah and the other groups in this report is building communities. These communities then become insular enclaves where outside and opposing influences are minimized and difficulties in monitoring by law enforcement are maximized.

These communities form their own security teams to protect members from gangs, criminals and law enforcement. So much emphasis is placed on limiting the police presence that Abdullah told his followers to call him if they need help instead of the police. Our sources say that this is a common practice in the black Islamist communities.

Abdullah explained that the Islamists must buy homes near their mosques in order to incrementally achieve autonomy. He cited the examples of the Amish and Mormons, though obviously with a criminal, anti-American twist:

“If you get enough property, like, ‘Hey, leave them alone … You get enough where you demand your rights,” he explained.

He repeatedly said that police would be too afraid to take action against such enclaves, fearing that they’ll “take it to the streets” and war could erupt. Abdullah cited his own ability to get away with crimes as proof that the police are afraid of him and that Allah is blessing him.

Abdullah claimed that one time a police officer in Detroit arrested a member of Ummah who was carrying a gun. Once the officer found out he was a member of Abdullah’s Masjid al-Haqq, he let him go.

In 2008, Abdullah “discussed having small Islamic States separate from the nation of the United States,” according to the complaint.

At an April 24-25, 2009 conference of the Al-Ummah National Shura hosted by Imam Abdullah at his Detroit mosque, he again reiterated that Muslims need to work towards creating separate Islamic governments on U.S. soil.

A Nationwide Network

Abdullah traveled to meet and strategize with other Ummah members across the country. The complaint mentions some of his trips to Gainesville, Georgia; Atlanta, Georgia; Herndon, Virginia; Montgomery, Alabama; Flint, Michigan and Chicago, Illinois.

Abdullah told an associate that other Ummah leaders are in Las Vegas, Nevada; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania and Cleveland, Ohio.

The complaint directly says that the imam of the Ummah-affiliated Muslim House in Flint, Michigan was involved in Abdullah’s car theft ring. In May 2009, Abdullah also met with an Ummah-affiliated imam in Alabama who had been shot by the police.

Imam Siraj Wahhaj’s Muslim Alliance for North America

The Muslim Alliance in North America (MANA) is another major component of the black Islamist movement. It has links to Ummah and a history of pursuing enclaves and paramilitary capabilities.

According to an affiliated leader, MANA was “birthed” due to an initiative from Imam Jamil Al-Amin and Ummah.

The “emir” of MANA is Imam Siraj Wahhaj, the radical leader of the Masjid At-Taqwa mosque in Brooklyn. The mosque and Wahhaj’s security team have a history of advocating violent jihad, paramilitary training (including preparations to fight and disarm cops) and associating with terrorists.

Wahhaj received major attention recently when terrorist training camps formed by some of his children were found in New Mexico and Alabama.

Though Wahhaj’s children formed their own cult/terrorist group that diverged from Wahhaj’s teachings, the foundational Islamist ideology and modus operandi is representative of Wahhaj and this Islamist movement.

Wahhaj is described by our sources as the most powerful African-American imam in America and one of the top “mainstream” Muslim leaders. Activist and sharia apologist Linda Sarsour calls Wahhaj her “mentor, motivator and encourager.”

“The Muslims in Pennsylvania love Imam Siraj. If Imam Siraj went there and told them to blow something up, they would do it like that [snaps fingers]. And not just in Pennsylvania, but in New York City,” a former member of Wahhaj’s mosque told Ryan Mauro of the Clarion Project and Martin Mawyer of the Christian Action Network.

He described Wahhaj as having an army of devotees across the country, many of whom carry arms, hate cops, have violent histories and believe in the enclave initiative.

Former Ummah Imam Luqman Abdullah was a member of MANA’s governing body until he was killed in the 2009 shootout. MANA characterizes his death as an “execution” at the hands of the U.S. government. To date, Wahhaj and MANA have never condemned Abdullah or Ummah.

Wahhaj and MANA’s leadership is also directly connected to the U.S. Muslim Brotherhood network like the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), forming a bridge between Wahhaj’s African-American Islamist constituency and the Muslim Brotherhood/Hamas-linked groups that tend to be led by Arabs.

CAIR relentlessly portrays law enforcement and the U.S. government as engaged in a “war on Islam” and terror suspects as manipulated innocents. Ummah is a beneficiary of this strategy.

There may not be proof that CAIR and the other Muslim Brotherhood entities are privately preparing the violent overthrow of the U.S. government, but they have never denounced the radicalism of Ummah.

Quite the opposite, they’ve joined MANA in elevating Imam Abdullah as an innocent martyr who was deliberately murdered by the vicious U.S. government and minority-hating cops.

CAIR’s Links to Ummah

The criminal complaint against Imam Abdullah and his accomplices reveals a previously unknown link between Ummah and CAIR.

One of Abdullah’s indicted accomplices was his oldest son, Mujahid Carswell (also known as Mujahid Abdullah).

In February 2009, Carswell told an associate that he had moved to Windsor, Canada. Notably, Imam Abdullah had privately said that the majority of Ummah’s funding was coming from Canada, a fact that he tried to keep known only to his inner circle.

According to the complaint:

“Carswell said he goes to a large masjid [mosque] in Windsor and the people there are serious and organized. The mosque is also affiliated with CAIR. Carswell said he trains approximately sixty children, ages 8 to 18, in martial arts at the mosque.”

The Justice Department made a point of mentioning Ummah’s link to CAIR. They did not have to include that detail. They obviously saw it as significant and necessary to explain Ummah’s activities at the CAIR-linked mosque.

Here’s what else the complaint had to say about Carswell:

“He has no prior felony convictions. He is known to carry a .40 caliber handgun and to be a member of the Sutra [security] team at the mosque…[Source] has observed Mujahid Carswell ‘training’ children as young as 7 years old in martial arts, and beating them with his hands and with a stick to instill bravery and obedience in them.

“Mujahid Carswell has expressed a willingness to participate in firearms training with [source] on multiple occasions. [Source] related having seen Mujahid Carswell use toilet bowl cleaner to clean up blood in the basement of the Masjid Al-Haqq following a murder [source] witnessed there.”

In describing Ummah’s Detroit mosque to an associate, Carswell said that people had different roles. One of them was to be the “butcher” who may need to murder someone without anyone knowing about it.

Carswell moved back and forth between the U.S. and Canada while trafficking in stolen goods like laptops and fur coats. He also sold cocaine. He privately said that Ummah had low-level sources in law enforcement who would help them by looking up license plates for them.

Carswell worked with another Ummah member in Windsor, Canada named Mohammad Phillistine, also known as Mohammad Al-Sahli and Mohammad Palestine. Imam Abdullah described him as a businessman who helped financed the group and “a soldier and a warrior.”

This linkage between Carswell and the CAIR-linked mosque in Canada may help explain CAIR’s self-damning behavior after Imam Abdullah’s death.

Imam Abdullah’s funeral was attended by over 1,000 people in Detroit. CAIR and its fellow Muslim Brotherhood entities immediately turned on their spin machine and went into overdrive in order to create a controversy around the death.

The executive-director of CAIR’s Michigan branch, Dawud Walid, vouched for Imam Abdullah’s innocence, saying, “I knew him [Abdullah] for a long time and he was an essential part of that West Side Detroit community.”

The CAIR official said, “The entire investigation and subsequent killing of Imam Abdullah was nothing less than a cover-up and a fraud engineered on the part of the government.”

“This is a historically unprecedented killing of a Muslim leader in the U.S. by the FBI,” Walid claimed.

Walid made it sound like Abdullah’s death was a pre-meditated murder, claiming there was no evidence that he violently resisted or posed a threat.

As for Abdullah’s killing of a police dog, Walid suggested that he was merely defending himself.

In the aftermath, an attorney with CAIR-Michigan, Lena Masri, helped Abdullah’s family file a lawsuit against the U.S. government. CAIR also worked with Ummah-allied leaders in Michigan to turn Abdullah’s death into a rallying call for Muslim unity against law enforcement.

Other community leaders involved included Imam Abdul-Latif Azom of the Masjid Al-Falah mosque in Detroit and Imam Abdullah El-Amin of the Detroit Muslim Center. The Nation of Islam’s Final Call newspaper also promoted the coalition’s protests.

Another link between Ummah and CAIR is Imam Siraj Wahhaj’s MANA coalition, which included Imam Abdullah as a member of its governing body. The coalition includes organizations allied to Ummah and intertwined with CAIR and other Brotherhood entities.

Wahhaj is a former member of CAIR’s advisory board and continues to speak at CAIR events, including fundraisers. He’s held multiple leadership positions in the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA), CAIR’s fellow Brotherhood entity.

Other Links Between Ummah and the U.S. Muslim Brotherhood Network

In 1993, Al-Amin’s National Ummah, Imam W. Deen Mohammad’s organization and two other Islamist groups—the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) and Islamic Circle of North America (ICNA)— formed a new umbrella called the Islamic Shura Council.

ISNA was identified by federal prosecutors as an “entity” of the Muslim Brotherhood, as well as designated as an “unindicted co-conspirator” in the Holy Land Foundation trial, a Brotherhood charity whose officials were found guilty of financing the terror group Hamas.

While Ummah and Imam W. Deen Mohammad’s organization could rally the African-American Muslim community, ISNA was more oriented towards Arabs.

ICNA, a radical group with a “moderate” veneer, originated with the Jammat-e-Islami group of Pakistan. It was more oriented towards Southeast Asians and also linked to the Muslim Brotherhood.

Throughout the 1990s, Al-Amin participated in events including fundraisers for CAIR and similar groups. His extremism was a known fact—nevertheless, these groups chose to promote him as a partner and leader for Muslim-Americans.

For example, in 1994—while Ummah was in a coalition with ISNA and ICNA—Al-Amin said, “When we begin to look critically at the Constitution of the United States, we see that in its main essence it is diametrically opposed to what Allah has commanded.”

In a 1995 interview, he said, “Tyranny and oppression is worse than slaughter … ‘Fight them wherever you might find them.’ That’s a command from Allah.”

After he was arrested, the U.S. Muslim Brotherhood groups began a political assault on the U.S. government in the media. Despite the overwhelming evidence against him, the top Muslim-American groups asserted his innocence, continued to honor him and fundraised for his legal defense.

CAIR, ISNA, the Muslim American Society and American Muslim Council said in a joint statement, “The charges against Imam Jamil are especially troubling because they are inconsistent with what is known of his moral character and past behavior as a Muslim.”

The executive-director of CAIR and (despite their differences) Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan visited Al-Amin in prison.

The Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC) likewise helped fundraise for Al-Amin’s defense in 2001. The MPAC leader at that time expressed solidarity with Al-Amin as “our brother” at least six times in a single fundraising speech.

The hysteria over his case was so much that Dr. Daniel Pipes, one of the top experts on Islamic extremism, referred to Al-Amin as “The Muslim O.J.”

Dr. Pipes wrote:

“Incredibly, rather than condemn Al-Amin’s 35-year history of ideological extremism, political violence and personal criminality, the Islamic organizations praised his ‘moral character.’

Rather than collect money to help pay educational expenses for Officer Kinchen’s two young, fatherless daughters, they raised money for Al-Amin’s legal defense fund.

Sadly, it looks like Jamil Al-Amin has turned into the Muslim version of O.J. Simpson. His admirers seem to care much less about justice than about his vindication.”

Sufi Extremist Network in Pennsylvania

Our sources state that this militant black Islamist movement also includes a very radical Sufi network based in (but not limited to) Pennsylvania: The Sankore Institute of Islamic African Studies International (SIIASI).

SIIASI is an extremely radical group led by a Sufi cleric who moved to the U.S. from Sudan and now lives in Mali.

The SIIASI website currently hosts a video featuring its leader, Muhammad Shareef, inviting supporters to Mali.

According to SIIASI’s website, Sankore Institute is linked to Ummah.

Imam Shareef says, “[O]ne of the first things I did was answer the invitation of Imam Jamil al-Amin … our growing community confederated with his national Ummah community” in 1999.”

There was then a meeting in the United Kingdom with Sufi Imam Hamza Yusef. The result of Al-Amin’s initiative was the creation of the Muslim Alliance in North America (MANA), Shareef recalls.

Shareef is a co-founder of MANA and a member of its governing body.

Our sources say that SIIASI is involved in the arming of felons and paramilitary training. This was previously known because pictures were posted of its members with swords and rifles.

Many SIIASI members are felons who are barred from handling firearms. The organization also said that it is “active in the area of prison reform and outreach as it pertains to Muslim inmates.”

SIIASI is also linked to the Jawala Scouts, which is accused of indoctrinating boys and giving them basic combat training while dressing them in military fatigues.

In a 2010 article, Shareef condemned “pacifist ‘imams’ who deny the obligation to jihad and who have deluded their followers into fruitless activity of supporting democratic constitutional government.”

The group has also urged Muslims to wage “litigation jihad” against the U.S. government.

SIIASI’s mosque in Pittsburgh, Masjid an-Nur (Light of the Age Mosque), was raided by the FBI on June 30, 2006.

One member of the mosque for three years, Larry M. Williams (also known as Hasan Ali), was arrested outside of the building. He was charged for being a felon in possession of a pistol and for failing to register as a sex offender, as was required after he was convicted of rape. He was also convicted for committing a robbery in Washington.

The raid was immediately condemned by Imam Siraj Wahhaj’s MANA coalition that included Ummah official Luqman Abdullah. The Islamic Council of Greater Pittsburgh likewise came to the defense of the radical group.

SIIASI’s Broader Network

SIIASI’s website has a section for its broader “confederation.”

The website doesn’t hide the group’s links to Ummah. It lists Imam Jamil Al-Amin as a coalition member and also lists the MANA coalition led by Imam Siraj Wahhaj.

SIIAI’s “confederation” page lists the Mosque of Islamic Brotherhood in Harlem, New York; the Islamic Revivalist Movement mosque in Cleveland, Ohio; the Nigerian Muslim Forum in the United Kingdom; the Native American Republic of Lakotah in South Dakota; the Mexica Movement and the Jericho Movement(which has extremist partners of its own).

SIIASI also lists the “Caribbean Emirates.” It is unclear what this is, but it may be the Jamaat al-Muslimeen extremist group based in Trinidad.

Masjid Uthman Dan Fodiyo, Philadelphia, PA

Last month, the Clarion Intelligence Network exclusively reported on a growing scandal centered around a Philadelphia mosque named Masjid Uthman Dan Fodiyo.

The scandal involves underage marriage, polygamy, spousal abuse and child abuse. Our report included new testimony from a young woman who was directly affected by the mosque’s extremism.

This mosque was formed in 2012. Our sources described it as the “sister mosque” of SIIASI’s Light of the Age Mosque, also known as Masjid An-Nur, located in Pittsburgh.

The Philadelphia mosque follows a radical Qadiri Sufi ideology that idolizes an African imam, Uthman Fodio, from modern-day Nigeria who died in 1817. He was a Sufi jihadist best known for his involvement in the Sokoto jihad in West Africa that established the Sokoto Caliphate in 1809.

By focusing on Fodio’s example, the mosque promotes violent jihad, Islamist conquest and theocratic caliphates.

According to our sources, the mosque’s membership also honors Ummah spiritual leader Imam Jamil Abdullah Al-Amin as a political prisoner and Imam Luqman Abdullah as a martyr.

This claim is supported by a Facebook post from May 4 that praises Imam Al-Amin as the “Last REAL Amerikkkan Sunni Imam.”

Islamists often refer to the U.S. to some variation of “AmeriKKKa” to equate the country with white supremacy (KKK) to infer that it is at war with black people, Muslims and other minorities.

On October 4, 2018, Masjid Uthman Dan Fodiyo’s guest lecturer was Amir Khalil Abdullahi.

Our sources say that Abdullahi now regularly teaches at the mosque, holding classes that typically consist of about six men, 10 women and 20 children. Abdullahi’s preaching is anti-American and in line with Ummah’s ideology. In the post shown, Abdullahi refers to the “Amerikkkan white supremacist system.”

Abdullahi is a friend of convicted ISIS terrorist named Edward Archer, who shot and killed a Philadelphia police officer in January 2016. Abdullahi stood by him after the news broke.

The anti-police bigotry is apparent in this post, in which he urges Muslims to stand by their “brother” like the police, who “have a fraternity you know a brotherhood!”

Masjid Al-Mumin, Pittsburgh, PA

Masjid Uthman Dan Fodiyo also has a branch  in Pittsburgh called the Nur uz Zamaan Institute.

That institute is led by Imam Naeem Abdullah, who leads a mosque in Pittsburgh called Masjid Al-Mumin and hosts a radio show.

The branch says it collaborates with Masjid al-Mumin in Pittsburgh to strengthen ties between black Muslims in the U.S. and those in Africa, specifically in Gambia.

The institute teaches that Muslims must perform a “migration” so they can consolidate into communities on U.S. soil:

“On one level we must make immigration from all methodologies and foreign influences which do not have the best interests of the African-American Muslim at heart.

“We will no longer champion the causes of other Muslims to the detriment of our causes and interests … We understand that many will call us nationalists and we do not care…

“…We also realize that we must migrate on a physical level. We have to establish places of worship as we described above and then we have to move near those places of worship and establish our communities upon that foundation. Moving near our place of worship means that we must own the property in which we live…

“…In the same way that every major city in the United States has areas like “Chinatown” and “Little Italy”, we have to have a “Muslimtown” or a “Madinah” which supports the culture and tradition of Islam in all of its personal and communal aspects.

“This “Muslimtown” can be one square block or it can be a whole neighborhood or city. There is no minimum requirement as far as its size.”

Imam Naeem Abdullah was caught preaching anti-Semitism in January. He has also said that the 9/11 attacks and other acts of terrorism are “false flags” perpetrated by the enemies of Islam.

This imam has admitted to having once shared a house in New York with Tarik Shah, a martial artist and convicted Al-Qaeda terrorist. He described Shah as “one of my wazirs [deputies].”

One of the Pittsburgh imam’s books about sharia (Islamic) law regarding divorce and child custody has concerning content.

It preaches against “seeking the help of the disbelievers (kuffars) against a believer” and more specifically quotes an Islamic verse saying not to take Jews and Christians as friends, allies or protectors, especially against another Muslim.

The imam also condemns using “the courts of the disbelievers” for legal action against other Muslims and sharing any incriminating or private information about Muslims with outsiders. Obviously, this would include telling law enforcement about extremist or criminal activity.

“Thus, it is prohibited (haram) to expose those things which are considered private among the Muslims to those who disbelieve. This ruling is applicable regardless if you are talking about a family, community or an entire nation,” he says.

It is also forbidden to “secure the custody of your children using the system of the disbelievers.”

Even testifying in court or pledging allegiance to anything other than Islam is a “false oath” and a “major sin.”

The imam of Masjid Al-Mumin and the Nur uz Zamaan Institute in Pittsburgh uses the real-life example of an unidentified woman who commits some of the “greatest crimes in Islam” during a divorce and child custody battle. She alleged that the husband physically abused her. The imam is dismissive of her claim.

The imam condemns the woman (who he calls Fulaanah, a pseudonym) for her actions against her husband (Abdullah, also a pseudonym):

“She disobeyed Allah by leaving the marital home before the divorce was complete (without necessity). She has broken family ties.

She has sought the help of the disbelievers against a believer.  Fulaanah is attempting to subvert the Islamic order of child custody by inducing the government of the disbelievers to award her full custody of her children regardless of her marital status.

 She is also seeking to take Abdullah’s wealth from him by force in order to support herself. She has taken several false oaths to achieve her goals.

And lastly, she has turned Muslims against each other by tale-bearing and spreading false and negative information against her ex-husband Abdullah.”

Disturbingly, according to his bio, he has been a volunteer teacher and counselor for the New York Department of Corrections.

Masjid An-Nur, Camden, NJ

Masjid Uthman Dan Fodiyo’s website shows it has held an event about the “Black Muslim Agenda” at Masjid An-Nur in Camden, New Jersey.

Kenny Gamble’s United Muslim Movement

As mentioned above, Imam Luqman Abdullah told associates about his involvement in the Jawala Scouts’ training camps.

The Jawala Scouts are linked to Kenny Gamble, now known as Luqman Abdul Haqq, a music producer who is a senior leader in Imam Siraj Wahhaj’s MANA coalition.

Senior Ummah official Imam Luqman Abdullah was also on MANA’s governing body, as previously stated, thus linking Gamble/Haqq to Ummah.

“King Kenny” of Philadelphia International Records is accused by some of “build[ing] a black Muslim enclave” in the area.

Joe Kaufman, chairman of Americans Against Hate, first discovered Gamble’s radical associations, including to the Jawala Scouts and SIIASI.

Gamble founded the United Muslim Movement, which includes two mosques in Philadelphia: The United Muslim Masjid and the United Muslim Islamic Center.

The leadership of Gamble’s United Muslim Masjid has overlapped with the leadership of CAIR’s Pennsylvania branch.

Jammat ul-Fuqra

Jammat ul-Fuqra, now known as Muslims of the Americas (MOA), is a mostly African-American apocalyptic cult loyal to a radical Sufi cleric in Pakistan named Sheikh Mubarak Ali Gilani. As explained above, one faction of Dar Ul-Islam followed Gilani and had/has a rivalry with Imam Al-Amin.

Declassified FBI reports refer to MOA as a “terrorist organization” that is “armed and dangerous.”

The chief executive of MOA, Hussein Adams, is the son of convicted MOA terrorist Barry Adams who led a 1991 plot to set off bombs in Toronto and kill thousands of Hindus and Indians and bystanders (including Muslims). Our sources say Barry Adams remains a top “incognito” leader in MOA and leads the group’s operations in Trinidad and Venezuela.

MOA has a history of terrorist activity, including directly plotting and perpetrating attacks from the 1970s into the early 1990s. It even had a 101-acre terrorist training camp in Colorado that was searched in 1992 and found to have weaponry, including material for explosives, hidden in tunnels.

Declassified government documents state MOA still engages in paramilitary training and sends money to Pakistan for Sheikh Gilani to distribute to allied terrorist groups in Kashmir and perhaps elsewhere.

The group is headquartered at a 70-acre compound in upstate New York that it calls “Islamberg.” We have released footage of women at “Islamberg” getting basic guerilla training in the 2001-2002 timeframe.

secret video made by Gilani in the early 1990s explicitly stated that he tasked MOA with offering “training camps” to aspiring jihadists, including non-MOA members.

MOA claims to have 22 such “Islamic villages” on U.S. soil. Clarion Project has a special website, FuqraFiles.com, about the group and these villages.

MOA has continually been the subject of counter-terrorism and criminal investigations since its formation.

FBI documents from as late as December 2016, obtained by the Clarion Projectconfirm that MOA engages in paramilitary training inside and outside of its “Islamic villages.” The FBI documents refer to MOA as being a “terrorist organization” that is “armed and dangerous.”

The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives confirmed in 2017 that its investigation into MOA’s weapons trafficking and arming of felons is ongoing.

FBI documents from 2003 state that MOA operates a large network of front businesses, especially security companies, and has links to Al-Qaeda affiliates overseas. FBI documents from 2003-2007 said:

“The MOA [Fuqra] is now an autonomous organization which possesses an infrastructure capable of planning and mounting terrorist campaigns overseas and within the U.S.”

MOA has been getting closer and closer to CAIR. Our sources say that MOA members are increasingly involved in both MOA and the militant black Islamist movement.

They say that a reconciliation with Ummah and the Sufi extremists like the Sankore Institute is strongly desired.

According to MOA’s cultish ideology, the final apocalyptic battle with Islam’s enemies is to erupt after the death of Sheikh Gilani. At least two of his sons are in the U.S. and Canada to prepare for the succession. MOA believes it will play a special role in this prophetic war.

Current and former MOA-affiliated sources tell us that the group would likely help Ummah or other Islamist militants if the anticipated uprising against law enforcement, the U.S. government and the perceived enemies of Islam were to commence.

Likewise, Ummah and other Islamist militants would offer aid to MOA if a confrontation resulted due to raids on their “Islamic villages.”

These sources say that it is possible that MOA could split after Sheikh Gilani dies, with a faction joining Ummah and similar groups in hopes of strengthening Dar Ul-Islam.

Conclusion

The activity, size and potential of this militant Islamist network truly make it a serious threat.

Its popularity and infrastructure dwarfs that of any designated terrorist group in the U.S. This is partly due to its strategic restraint and its relatively “moderate” image when contrasted with ISIS and Al-Qaeda’s open calls to kill any American civilian.

While this Islamist movement is less extreme than Al-Qaeda and ISIS (even though it shares similar goals), it is more extreme, violent and criminal than the U.S. Muslim Brotherhood groups who are more prominent and do not advocate violence on American soil.

For violent Islamists like Ummah who want to wage jihad on U.S. soil, this space between ISIS/Al-Qaeda-type Islamism and Muslim Brotherhood-type Islamism is the sweet spot.

The Dar Ul-Islam legacy movement isn’t seeking to completely unify their ranks. It’s grown to accept some minor level of ideological diversity within its Islamist framework.

For Ummah leaders, this is not just a recognition of reality, but reflects a decision to pursue decentralization, name alterations, organizational fronts and other deceptions to blind any monitors.

Before he died in 2009, Imam Luqman Abdullah told an associate that Ummah—dropping the name of Dar Ul-Islam—no longer sought unity. A confederation is preferable. He thought that a network with overlapping layers and many moving targets is more likely to disorient and thwart law enforcement and ultimately defeat the U.S. government and other perceived enemies of Islam.

This militant black Islamists’ desire is an achievable goal and one with truly dangerous consequences for homeland security and the stability of the United States.

The threat is intensified by the fact that this movement has learned over the decade and gotten smarter. Violent jihadism on U.S. soil is now a more palpable force and the current political environment—the “War of the Extremes”—is particularly conducive for the conflagration that these militants anticipate and seek — as many Islamists see it: the fulfillment of Islamic End Times prophecies.

VIDEO: A Sneak Peek of Hollywood’s Hypocrisy — Watch “The Dark Side of Hollywood”

A Strange Thing is happening with big entertainment companies like Netflix, Disney, and Amazon… To find out what, don’t miss FRC’s new ad on the dark side of Hollywood.


Tony Perkins’ Washington Update is written with the aid of FRC senior writers.


RELATED ARTICLES:

USA Soccer Kicks Politics into Overdrive

On Life, the Science Is Deafening

VIDEO: British Warship Thwarts Iranian Attempt to Seize UK Oil Tanker

A British warship thwarted an attempt by Iran to capture a British oil tanker in the Persian Gulf on Wednesday, July 10, 2019.

While a (manned) U.S. reconnaissance aircraft hovered above, gunboats from Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) began approaching the ship. The boats were intercepted by a British warship which had been operating five miles behind the tanker.

While Iran has denied that the gunboats were in the process of trying to capture the British tanker, the day before Iranian President Hassan Rouhani threatened Britain that there would be “repercussions” after a British ship detained an Iranian oil tanker in Gibraltar.

The detained tanker was attempting to deliver crude to Syria in violation of European Union sanctions.

The incident is the latest in a series of Iranian provocations against the West and its allies (see map and infographic below).

Meanwhile, Watch Clarion Security Analyst and Shillman Fellow Ryan Mauro on I24 News as he weighs in on Iran’s recent and alarming announcement that they have upped their level of uranium enrichment in violation of the 2015 nuclear agreement with the world’s powers.

RELATED STORIES:

How Will Trump Tackle the Russia-Iran Alliance?

Trump Calls Off Strike Against Iran; Here’s the Bigger Picture

Will Iran’s Cat-and-Mouse Strategy Backfire?

Facebook Adopts new Policy Allowing Death Threats against ‘Dangerous Individuals and Organizations’

And judging by Facebook’s treatment of foes of jihad terror and Sharia oppression of women and others, they are likely to find themselves on the “Dangerous Individuals” list.

This new policy incites the violent and hateful among Facebook’s 2 billion users to threaten to kill people whose points of view dissent from the Leftist agenda.

The descent to fascist authoritarianism is swift, isn’t it?

Facebook Issues New Policy Saying It’s Acceptable to Post Death Threats Against Me,” by Paul Joseph Watson, Summit News, July 9, 2019:

Facebook has issued a new policy update saying it’s acceptable to post death threats and incite violence against me, despite this being a crime in the United Kingdom.

No, I’m not joking.

Community Standards update published by Facebook states (emphasis mine); “Do not post: Threats that could lead to death (and other forms of high-severity violence) of any target(s) where threat is defined as any of the following:

Statements of intent to commit high-severity violence; or

Calls for high-severity violence (unless the target is an organization or individual covered in the Dangerous Individuals and Organizations policy)….”

Back in May, Facebook and Instagram banned me under the justification that I was a “dangerous individual”. They provided no evidence whatsoever that I had behaved in a “dangerous” manner or violated any of their policies.

Facebook has designated me a “dangerous individual” and now says it’s acceptable for its users to issue death threats against me.

This is a crime in the United Kingdom under the 1988 Malicious Communications Act which states, “Any person who sends to another person a letter, electronic communication or article of any description which conveys….a threat….is guilty of an offence.”

The largest social media company in the world with over 2 billion users literally says its fine to incite violence against me, despite this being illegal.

They are painting a target on my back.

Innumerable individuals have already sent death threats to me via Facebook….

RELATED ARTICLE: Twitter unveils new ban on language “dehumanizing religious groups”

EDITORS NOTE: This Jihad Watch column is republished with permission. All rights reserved.

WHAT MCCARRICK INVESTIGATION? Key witnesses, victims and whistleblowers have not been interviewed.

by Fr. John Lavers  •  ChurchMilitant.com.

It has been a year since public and credible allegations were first made against the former Cdl. McCarrick, known now as just Theodore McCarrick. 

Last year it was the archdiocese of New York that first made public the allegations against McCarrick, and since then, what has happened?

Who is (or was) leading the internal investigation against McCarrick within the archdiocese? What is the current status of the investigation? Has the investigation against McCarrick been closed? And if so, why? Why have primary (and still living) victims and witnesses of McCarrick’abuse not been interviewed by so-called “Church investigators”?

Those senior clerics in the United States who have had continuous and direct contact with McCarrick — have they been interviewed? One person who should be interviewed is the former Cardinal-Archbishop of Washington, Donald Wuerl. Wuerl was the person who helped McCarrick find alternate accommodations in the Washington, D.C. area following sanctions placed on McCarrick by Pope Benedict. Furthermore, it was Wuerl who also arranged accommodations for McCarrick at a monastery in rural Kansas, where McCarrick now lives after being removed from the clerical state.

Therefore, the question remains, why hasn’t Cdl. Wuerl been interviewed?

However, if we turn back and focus on McCarrick for the moment, there are a host of questions that remain unanswered. For example, has McCarrick’s computer, cell phone and tablet, along with all of his emails, been examined? And if not, why not?

Who is gathering McCarrick’s written correspondence? The Church, even in the modern world, has an extensive paper trail on file that is properly recorded within diocesan officesincluding the Office for the Papal Nuncio to the United States, the Congregation for Bishops and the Secretary of State in Rome. Again, who is in charge of gathering this information for review and analysis?

Within the United States alone, there should be at the very least active and ongoing McCarrick investigations taking place within the archdiocese of New York, the archdiocese of Washington, the archdiocese of Newark, as well as the whole of the ecclesiastical province of Newark. 

But there is not — and why not? 

Turning to various U.S. Catholic seminaries, especially those within the dioceses mentioned above, we know from public accounts that McCarrick would regularly visit these seminaries and invite young boys and young men to his beach house on the Jersey Shore and would sleep with them in the same bedWho is looking into McCarrick’s activities within these seminaries on the U.S. East Coast? Have any these seminaries started or conducted any kind of internal investigation into previous allegations made by former seminarians or conducted any kind of review in relation to McCarrick’s contact with them?

If an investigation has been done, what are the results of the investigation or review? Was there any criminal activity by McCarrick discovered during the investigation, and what was done about it? Where are the reports? And who has access to them?

Like many other predatory priests in the past, such men had access to large sums of money, and McCarrick is no different. So who is conducting the financial audit and analysis of McCarrick’s holdings? Who is conducting the all-important financial investigation into his activities? Who is examining the people who gave McCarrick large amounts of money and why? As well, who has McCarrick given money to and why? Does McCarrick still control or have access to these large sums of money … and, if so, what is he doing with it?  

During his time as a senior cleric within the Church, McCarrick was instrumental in promoting many bishops. All these records of those bishops appointed over the last 20-plus years need to be reviewed and those bishops themselves need to be placed under a higher level of scrutiny pertaining to their relationship with McCarrick.

Finally, there is McCarrick himself. Who has interviewed him? How many times has he been interviewed, and by whom? Does he still have access to communications? Is he currently in contact with people, and who are they?

As time waits for no one, the longer there is no action in pursuing a truly comprehensive investigation against McCarrick, it will become more challenging. Documents pertaining to McCarrick have already begun to disappear, be misplaced, lost or “accidentally destroyed,” thus making a paper-based investigation more difficult. The key witnesses, victims and whistleblowers associated with the McCarrick affair have not been interviewed. Over time their recall and evidence will become more difficult in building a profile of McCarrick’s deedsHowever, their individual pain and trauma suffered at the hands of McCarrick will remain with them for the rest of their lives.

To date, McCarrick continues to proclaim his innocence. Officials in Rome have declared that they are looking into McCarrick’s history. Then again, the amount of information and raw data that remains yet undiscovered within various diocesan offices as well as other locations is truly outstanding. The volumes of information not recovered and the long list of people who have not been interviewed in relation to the McCarrick affair remains the question everyone is asking: Why has the investigation into McCarrick not happened?

About Fr. John Lavers

Father John Lavers led the 2012 investigation into various unethical and immoral activities by seminarians at a U.S. seminary and various diocese.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Gravest Crisis in 2,000 Years of Church History

10,000 March for Life in Ireland

Buttigieg: The ‘Atheist Rap Bro’ Weaponizing Christianity.

EDITORS NOTE: This Church Militant column is republished with permission. All rights reserved.

VIDEO: Google working towards de-platforming Breitbart, selling data to foreign intel

Posted by Eeyore.

“We don’t need more laws. Just enforce the ones already on the books”.

We at Vlad Tepes have been saying this for years and years about nearly all the problems facing the West today. We already have the tools. Its that they are ignored, or more often, selectively enforced to an antithetical agenda to the West.

Ted Cruz on the outrageous situation of social media policies:

The Humanitarian Hoax of Tommy Robinson’s Conviction: The Death of Free Speech

The Humanitarian Hoax is a deliberate and deceitful tactic of presenting a destructive policy as altruistic. The humanitarian huckster presents himself as a compassionate advocate when in fact he is the disguised enemy.

The conviction of journalist Tommy Robinson is a humanitarian hoax that has destroyed free speech in England and threatens free speech worldwide. What does this have to do with America?

Tommy Robinson is a British journalist who has been reporting on Muslim rape gangs throughout England that have been raping little English school girls with impunity for decades. The savagery of their acts, and that British authorities are covering up this massive atrocity against the innocent, is extremely destabilizing to British society. Civilized people reject the protection of perpetrators at the expense of victims.

For civilized people, Tommy Robinson is the heroic whistleblower who exposed the horror of Muslim rape gangs and their unspeakable acts of barbarity in England. British society experiences enormous confusion and cognitive dissonance because British authorities protect Muslim rape gangs and embolden them by prohibiting the reporting of their heinous acts of savagery. Why is this happening?

Let’s sort this out by examining the reasons in numerical order.

1. Tolerism

Tolerism is defined by Howard Rotberg in his 2014 book, Tolerism: The Ideology Revealed, as “excessive leniency to opinions of certain groups, and excessive intolerance to the opinions of other groups.” Rotberg explains that the breakdown of Western society is a direct result of Leftist tolerists who insist that tolerance is more valuable than justice.

The once free Britain has reduced itself to a dhimmi nation by tolerating its sharia compliant Muslim population at the expense of its native Christian population. Make no mistake, there is an Islamic religious war being waged worldwide that seeks to eliminate competing religions and establish a global Islamic caliphate ruled by religious sharia law. Britain’s leaders are tolerists insisting that tolerating Muslim rape gangs in the name of cultural diversity is more important than justice for its victims. Tolerism is Britain’s fatally flawed political ideology providing victory to the Muslim Brotherhood, the multi-national organization that has declared Islamic religious war on the West.

Anyone who still questions the global intentions of the Muslim Brotherhood should read its 1991 An Explanatory Memorandum: From the Archives of the Muslim Brotherhood in America the general strategic goals for the group in North America.

Populism rejects the twisted logic of political tolerism and embraces the common sense warning of Austrian/British 20th century philosopher Sir Karl Popper:

“If we extend unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not prepared to defend a tolerant society against the onslaught of the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them. . . . We should therefore claim, in the name of tolerance, the right not to tolerate the intolerant.”

The British court’s decision values tolerance over justice. Why would they do that?

2. Leftist/Islamist Alliance

In America the Leftist/Islamist alliance is trying to destabilize and overthrow duly elected populist President Donald Trump. POTUS is the consummate whistleblower in America, exposing the staggering malfeasance of the Washington swamp and the Leftists, Islamists, and globalists who live there.

Leftists in America ignore, “Islamic tenets of misogyny, homophobia, antisemitism, pedophilia, gang raping non-Muslim little girls, female genital mutilation, and wife beating as long as these sharia-compliant Muslims are anti-American anti-Trumpers. Any anti-American anti-Trump Islamist is welcomed into the Leftist tribe because they are all warriors in the Culture War against America. America-first President Donald Trump is the existential enemy of the Culture War and the target of the Leftist/Islamist alliance.”

In England, the Labor party is equivalent to the Leftist Democrat party in America, both prefer globalism to national sovereignty. In England, the Labor/Islamist alliance is trying to destabilize England and create chaos to subvert the will of the people and stop the implementation of BREXIT.

So, what do President Trump and Tommy Robinson have in common? Tommy Robinson is the whistleblower in England and the existential enemy of the leftist Labor party that prefers tolerism to justice. Why?

Tommy Robinson and President Trump are claiming, in the name of tolerance, the right not to tolerate the intolerant.

3. Tolerism vs Justice

What is the goal of tolerism in England and America? Why do Leftists in America and Labor in England ignore the obvious violations of the laws and norms in their Judeo-Christian countries and surrender their culture to the savagery and barbarism of Islamic sharia norms?

Tolerism is a paradox because tolerists selectively decide what to tolerate. Whistleblowing and truth telling about Muslim rape gangs is not tolerated – it is criminalized. So, a two-tier system of justice is established that prohibits anti-Muslim speech and protects anti-Christian and antisemitic speech. Why?

If you want to know the motive, look at the result. The effects of this egregious double standard is that anti-Christian burning of churches, and antisemitism including defacing synagogues is rampant and unpunished in England. If the British courts continue to protect sharia compliant Muslim perpetrators and their criminal acts at the expense of native Britains, social chaos will result. Remember, seismic social change requires social chaos.

Tommy Robinson and President Trump, each in his own way, is exposing the truth of tolerism and its global anti-American, anti-British attacks on our sovereignty and shared Judeo-Christian norms. Their separate efforts continue to unravel the ongoing deceitful multi-national efforts fomenting the social chaos necessary to impose a globalized New World Order.

Sir Karl Popper warned us about tolerism. George Orwell warned us that, “During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.”

4. Freedom of Speech

Every tyrannical regime the world has ever known begins its reign of terror by eliminating freedom of speech. Lenin did it, Trotsky did it, Hitler did it, now Leftists in England and in America are doing it by disingenuously relabeling free speech as hate speech. There is no freedom without freedom of speech which is why speech is universally the first freedom eliminated by despots.

The same tolerist Culture War being waged against America by the Leftist/Islamist alliance is attacking England. Leftism and Islamism have common cause to destroy the status quo even though their ultimate objectives will make them inevitable enemies. The Islamists are fighting for a global religious Islamic caliphate. The Leftists/Labor are fighting to destroy the national sovereignty and cultural identities of their respective countries in preparation for socialism in America, and a unified European State in England.

The irony, of course, is that members of the Leftist/Labor/Islamist alliance are all useful idiots for the globalist elite who finance and foment their lawlessness. The alliance members are just too arrogant to realize they are participating in their own destruction.

Seismic social change requires social chaos. The Leftist/Labor/Islamic alliances in the United States and England are providing the necessary social chaos for the globalists who fully intend to impose a New World Order – an internationalized world ruled by themselves under the corrupt auspices of the United Nations. There is no humanitarianism in the conviction of whistleblower Tommy Robinson. His conviction is part of the coordinated attack on free speech and a free and sovereign England imposed by the globalist elite using tolerism and the unholy Labor/Islamist alliance.

July 8, 2019 will be recorded as the day free speech died in Britain, the day Tommy Robinson was convicted for reporting the crime of Muslim rape gangs in England. The only law that Tommy Robinson broke was the Islamic supremacist sharia law forbidding criticism of Islam. Islamic sharia law does not consider the raping of little English school girls to be a crime – the prohibition is against criticizing and reporting it. England has reduced itself to a grotesque dhimmi nation willing to sacrifice its own little girls in a globalist power grab that requires social chaos.

The humanitarian hoax of tolerism that convicted Tommy Robinson must not be allowed to silence him permanently. Hopefully, populist President Donald Trump will grant Tommy Robinson humanitarian asylum in the United States where he can still expose the realities of an Islamicized England. Britain is, after all, the proverbial canary in the expansionist Islamist coal mine.

RELATED VIDEO: Truth – A Revolutionary Act – Tommy Robinson’s Court Appeal. EDITORS NOTE: Click on the video and then click on “Watch On YouTube.” When you get to YouTube click on “I Understand and Wish to Proceed” in order to view the video.

EDITORS NOTE: This Goudsmit Pundicity column is republished with permission. All rights reserved.

QUESTIONS THE CANDIDATES MUST ANSWER: And the one question that will expose those who actually hate you.

The first two Presidential primary debates are behind us but before Election Day there will be many, many more to come.

Typically the news media not only broadcast the debates but are quick to report on the statements and responses made by the candidate participants.

However, what receives little attention are the questions that were asked and the questions that were not asked by the journalist-moderators. This is a new version of “don’t ask – don’t tell!”

The importance of questions cannot be underestimated. My dad sagely told me that the only “dumb” question is the one you don’t ask.

The French philosopher Voltaire famously opined that you should judge a person’s intelligence by the questions he asks.

As an agent, my ability to ask the right question at the right time was a vital skill and one that I worked at for my entire career.

The questioning of an individual in a formal setting comes in two forms, the initial question and the follow-up question(s). I compare this to boxing. The initial question is not unlike the jab while the follow-up question is like the punch to the jaw and may actually score the knockout.

During the first two Democratic Primary debates many issues were raised that actually have relevance to the immigration crisis, yet this connection was never made.

Inasmuch as the “war on terror” continues and the “all clear” has not sounded and is not likely to sound for quite some time, I would want to start out by asking each and every candidate for any significant political office, but particularly for the Presidency, if he/she had read the 9/11 Commission Report and the companion report, 9/11 and  Terrorist Travel in their entirety.

The 9/11 Commission was convened specifically to learn from our mistakes to protect America and Americans from future terror attacks.

The President of the United States is also the Commander-in-Chief of our armed forces and is also of all federal law enforcement agencies.

Any serious candidate for the Presidency must consider those reports to be “required reading.”

The preface of the report 9/11 and Terrorist Travel begins with the following:

It is perhaps obvious to state that terrorists cannot plan and carry out attacks in the United States if they are unable to enter the country. Yet prior to September 11, while there were efforts to enhance border security, no agency of the U.S. government thought of border security as a tool in the counterterrorism arsenal. Indeed, even after 19 hijackers demonstrated the relative ease of obtaining a U.S. visa and gaining admission into the United States, border security still is not considered a cornerstone of national security policy. We believe, for reasons we discuss in the following pages, that it must be made one.

It went on to state:

Although there is evidence that some land and sea border entries (of terrorists) without inspection occurred, these conspirators mainly subverted the legal entry system by entering at airports.

In doing so, they relied on a wide variety of fraudulent documents, on aliases, and on government corruption. Because terrorist operations were not suicide missions in the early to mid-1990s, once in the United States terrorists and their supporters tried to get legal immigration status that would permit them to remain here, primarily by committing serial, or repeated, immigration fraud, by claiming political asylum, and by marrying Americans. Many of these tactics would remain largely unchanged and undetected throughout the 1990s and up to the 9/11 attack.

Thus, abuse of the immigration system and a lack of interior immigration enforcement were unwittingly working together to support terrorist activity. It would remain largely unknown, since no agency of the United States government analyzed terrorist travel patterns until after 9/11. This lack of attention meant that critical opportunities to disrupt terrorist travel and, therefore, deadly terrorist operations were missed.

Here is yet another excerpt:

Terrorists in the 1990s, as well as the September 11 hijackers, needed to find a way to stay in or embed themselves in the United States if their operational plans were to come to fruition. As already discussed, this could be accomplished legally by marrying an American citizen, achieving temporary worker status, or applying for asylum after entering. In many cases, the act of filing for an immigration benefit sufficed to permit the alien to remain in the country until the petition was adjudicated. Terrorists were free to conduct surveillance, coordinate operations, obtain and receive funding, go to school and learn English, make contacts in the United States, acquire necessary materials, and execute an attack.

This then lays the groundwork for these followup questions:

  1. Given the above-noted, how could any serious candidate call for permitting aliens to enter the United States without vetting and then permit them to apply for political asylum?
  2. How could you insist on a massive amnesty program to provide unknown millions of illegal aliens with lawful status even though there are no resources to interview all of these aliens, let alone conduct field investigations?
  3. We have seen terrorists easily commit immigration fraud, what would you do to address this vulnerability. Indeed, the candidates who demand the dismantling of ICE need to be pointedly asked how they could justify such a dangerous tactic?

On April 30, 2019 the Justice Department issued a press release, Jordanian National Pleads Guilty to Conspiracy to Bring Aliens into the United States, which noted that in 2017 the smuggler smuggled aliens from Yemen, a “Special Interest Country” into the United States without inspection from Monterrey, Mexico to Piedras Negras in Texas.

On April 12, 2017, the Washington Times reported, Sharafat Ali Khan smuggled terrorist-linked immigrants.

During the debate Bernie Sanders stated that there are individuals fleeing from Honduras because of gangs. He made it clear that he would permit all of these aliens to enter the United States and apply for asylum. He was never challenged as to how he would prevent the gang members from Honduras or any other country, for that matter, from entering the United States where they easily ply their violent, sociopathic “trades” often targeting the members of the ethnic immigrant communities.

Mr. Sanders should read the transcripts of several hearings on the issue of transnational gangs:

On June 20, 2017 the House Homeland Security Committee, Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and Intelligence conducted a field hearing on Long Island in Central Islip, New York, on the topic, Combating Gang Violence On Long Island: Shutting Down The MS-13 Pipeline.

On June 21, 2017 the Senate Judiciary Committee held a hearing on “The MS-13 Problem: Investigating Gang Membership, its Nexus to Illegal Immigration, and Federal Efforts to End the Threat.”

On November 21, 2013 the Washington Times reported, Mexican drug cartels exploit asylum system by claiming ‘credible fear.’

The report quoted Bob Goodlatte, the then-Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee:

It’s outrageous that members of Mexican drug cartels and others involved in illicit activity are so easily able to exploit our asylum laws and live in the U.S. virtually undetected,” said Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte, Virginia Republican.

Our asylum laws are in place to help individuals who are facing truly serious persecution in their country,” he said. “However, dangerous criminals are gaming the system by claiming they have a ‘credible fear’ of persecution when often they’ve been the perpetrators of violence themselves.

Concerns about the lack of integrity to this system were the focus of two House Judiciary Committee hearings conducted as a result of Chairman Goodlatte’s concerns:

Asylum Abuse: Is it Overwhelming our Borders?

Asylum Fraud: Abusing America’s Compassion?

Of course while one of the hearings focused on how asylum abuse was overwhelming our borders, in reality, asylum abuse is overwhelming the entire immigration system throughout the entire United States of America.

At the conclusion of my recent interview on Fox & Friends First to discuss the border crisis, I asked the rhetorical question that should be asked of all of the candidates:

“Would you board an airliner if you saw several of your fellow passengers sneak past the TSA at the airport?- Why then are we being forced to live among millions of aliens who ran our borders and evaded a similar vetting process conducted at ports of entry?”

At the conclusion of my recent interview on Fox & Friends First to discuss the border crisis, I asked the rhetorical question that should be asked of all of the candidates, “Would you board an airliner if you saw several of your fellow passengers sneak past the TSA at the airport?- Why then are we being forced to live among millions of aliens who ran our borders and evaded a similar vetting process conducted at ports of entry?”

EDITORS NOTE: This FrontPage Magazine column is republished with permission. All rights reserved.