Antifa is much in the news these days with their brutal beating of journalist Andy Ngo in Portland. Many Americans assume that Antifa is a new group, but in reality, it is only new, or relatively new, in the United States. Back in 2011, I spoke at an outdoor rally in Stuttgart, Germany, and Antifa was out in force. Hundreds of police were there also, and if they had not been, I would not be writing this today: before I spoke, I was standing in front of the massive police phalanx with some members of the German group that had invited me; among them was a young man who I took to be one of their number until I shook his hand and smiled and he responded, “If it weren’t for all these police here, I would have knifed you by now.”
As the other speakers and I spoke, Antifa members threw rocks, bottles, and manure at us, while screaming things such as “Nazis raus.” This was ironic, as they were behaving much more like Nazis than those they were screaming at. So I decided to address them. In the midst of this barrage, I stood at the front of the stage and addressed the Leftists, while they blew their vuvuzelas and booed to try to drown me out, and kept on throwing things. This is what I said:
I came from the United States of America to stand for freedom, with all free people, against the forces of oppression and darkness which you are representing.
I came here in order to stand with the people who are fighting for the freedoms that make it possible for you to do what you are doing today.
Not the violence and hatred, but to stand and dissent, but you can’t stand to have any kind of rational discussion, you can’t stand having dissent, you have to try to throw bottles, and drown us out, because you are cowards, because you know that you stand for nothing except for oppression and darkness and hatred, and that is why you are there.
And that is why I am here.
You are fronting for the most radically intolerant and hateful ideology on the planet. Everywhere in the world, everywhere in the world, where there are Muslims and non-Muslims, there is conflict because the Muslims attack the non-Muslims. The Qur’an teaches to make war against the unbelievers, and to subjugate them.
And you are already subjugated! You are already their useful idiots. You are already their tools. You are out here in their service.
And you think you’re fighting for freedom. You are fighting for your own slavery!
You are fighting for your own enslavement.
And it will come. It will come to you.
You are fighting for an ideology that denies the freedom of speech, and one day you will wish you had the freedom of speech, and one day, you will wish you had the freedom of speech that you are trying to fight against today.
You are fronting for an ideology that denies the freedom of conscience and will kill you if you disagree, which is exactly what you want to do already.
You are fighting on behalf of an ideology that denies equality of rights for women, and all the women among you will one day be enslaved, if you get what you want.
You are fighting for the destruction of all the freedoms that you enjoy.
You are fighting for the utter defeat of your own selves, and your own life.
You are slaves seeking slavery. You are the oppressed loving your oppression, and thinking that you are standing for freedom.
You are the most foolish, you are the most evil, foolish, people on Earth.
We are standing for the human rights of all people. Of the oppressed Christians in Indonesia, in Pakistan, in Egypt, in the Sudan that you just heard about.
We are standing for the oppressed people who are targeted by Islamic jihad everywhere around the world. In Israel. Everywhere around the world.
RELATED VIDEO: America Under Siege – Civil War 2017.
EDITORS NOTE: This Jihad Watch video and column is republished with permission. All rights reserved.
http://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.png00Jihad Watchhttp://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.pngJihad Watch2019-07-03 05:53:582019-07-04 08:50:14VIDEO: Robert Spencer confronts Antifa in Stuttgart, Germany, in 2011
Shireen is a Yazidi ISIS survivor from Iraq. She was held as a slave by ISIS for three years after her village in Iraq was overrun by the terror group until she was able to escape during a military onslaught on the terror group.
Shireen (we are only allowed to use her first name) was in Israel the past two weeks with a group of other Yazidi ISIS survivors who were brought to the country for a post-trauma course at the initiative of Bar Ilan University and IsraAid.
In the group was Lamiya Aji Bashar, who won the 2016 Sakharov Prize. Lamiya lost an eye when a mine exploded near her during a daring escape. The two girls escaping with her were killed by the same mine.
Bashar now lives in Germany where more than 1,000 Yazidi ISIS survivors now reside. These survivors are assisted there by an incredible man, Mirza Dinnayi, himself a Yazidi who moved to Germany decades ago.
Dinnayi heads an NGO in Germany called Luftbrucke Irak dedicated to helping victims of terror. Dinnayi makes a point of visiting Israel every year. This year, after two years of planning, Dinnayi was able to bring the survivors (most of whom still live in Iraq) to Israel, a country which, out of necessity, has developed tools to deal with post-traumatic stress disorders in terror survivors.
It was a logistics feat, considering that Israel has no diplomatic relations with Iraq.
The dedicated course organizers, Professor Ari Zivotofsky and Dr. Yaakov Hoffman, both from Bar Ilan University, feel they have a moral obligation to study the effects of genocide and to share Israel’s expertise in dealing with it.
I first met up with the group on Friday night, June 28, 2019 in Jerusalem. The girls wanted to meet Jewish people while they were in Israel and experience Jewish culture. It was suggested that they break up into small groups and join families for the traditional Friday night Sabbath meal. The girls were enthusiastic about the plan.
I wasn’t sure what to expect when their tour guide dropped off three girls at my house. Images from the media of shy girls, draped in veils and unable to communicate flooded my imagination. Instead, I was greeted by three beautiful, vivacious and Western-looking young women who couldn’t express their gratitude enough for being welcomed into my home: Shireen, who survived captivity, Talja, a young doctor who escaped to the Kurdish area of Iraq right before ISIS took over her village and her cousin Izzyhana, who is Dinnayi’s daughter and lives in Germany.
Their English was superb and the night flew by, animated by multiple questions and answers on both sides. I was most struck by the survivors’ forward-looking attitudes — all were ready to put the past behind them, get on with their lives and, at the same time, help others with the skills they learned the past two weeks in Israel.
Later, I met Shireen for a more serious interview. Shireen currently lives in a camp in Iraq and volunteers for Springs of Hope, a Clarion partner organization that helps rehabilitate terrorized children started by Israeli Lisa Miara.
Listen below:
Check out the trailer for our upcoming film “Kids: Chasing Paradise” about the radicalization of children by clicking here
Find out what you can do to Prevent Violent Extremism by clicking here
http://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.png00Clarion Projecthttp://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.pngClarion Project2019-07-02 10:18:172019-07-02 10:18:17PODCAST EXCLUSIVE: Yazidi ISIS Survivors in Israel Speak to Clarion
http://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.png00Clarion Projecthttp://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.pngClarion Project2019-07-02 04:47:312019-07-02 04:57:34VIDEO: Extremists Stole My Son – The Psychology of Terrorism
“I just returned from the US-Mexico border in El Paso, Texas where I witnessed firsthand the illegal immigration crisis threatening our nation. Make no mistake: the crisis is real.”
“In fact, I believe every member of Congress should be required to visit the border before spouting off partisan rhetoric on the subject.”
Senator Gruters posted the below video of his trip to the border on the Florida Politics YouTube channel:
Senator Gruters announced that he will be conducting a statewide listening tour later this month with Jacksonville Rep. Cord Byrd to hear directly from Floridians on the issue of immigration.
“I don’t believe we should ever compromise when it comes to enacting common sense policies that promote public safety and uphold the laws of the land,” said Gruters. “I want to hear straight from Floridians and listen to their ideas on what additional reforms they’d like to see the legislature address next session.”
http://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.png00Dr. Rich Swierhttp://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.pngDr. Rich Swier2019-07-01 16:35:062019-07-01 17:36:09FL Senator Joe Gruters Visits U.S. – Mexico Border says ‘Make no mistake: the crisis is real.’
On 11 May, 2019, Andy Ngo was interviewed on Sky News Australia about the on-going harassment and assault campaign against him by Portland Antifa for his journalism critical of the extremist group.
Fast forward to June 30, 2019 when Michelle Malkin published the below video of Andy Ngo being assaulted by Antifa.
Malkin wrote:
This is video from a new angle of the brutal assault on journalist Andy Ngo in Portland, Oregon on June 29, 2019 as police did nothing. It shows the exact moment when an Antifa thug robbed Andy of his GoPro camera and equipment, as well as another Antifa criminal punching Andy in the face with appear to be weighted Oakley assault gloves and frontal views of the Antifa thug who kicked Andy in the groin.
:15 THE ROBBER
:17 ASSAULT GLOVES
:21 KICKER AND PUNCHER
http://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.png00Dr. Rich Swierhttp://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.pngDr. Rich Swier2019-07-01 07:52:102019-07-04 08:49:42VIDEOS: Antifa Is Creating ‘No-Go Zones’ in U.S. Cities
The quintessential example of “Chutzpah” is the young man who kills both of his parents and then pleads for mercy arguing that he is an orphan.
The Democrats have succeeded in providing an even more egregious example of demonstrating chutzpah by betraying their oaths of office and betraying their constituents and, indeed, all Americans.
It is perhaps obvious to state that terrorists cannot plan and carry out attacks in the United States if they are unable to enter the country. Yet prior to September 11, while there were efforts to enhance border security, no agency of the U.S. government thought of border security as a tool in the counterterrorism arsenal. Indeed, even after 19 hijackers demonstrated the relative ease of obtaining a U.S. visa and gaining admission into the United States, border security still is not considered a cornerstone of national security policy. We believe, for reasons we discuss in the following pages, that it must be made one.
The Democrats continue to refuse to provide the funding for DHS to address the border crisis that exists along the dangerous and highly porous U.S./Mexican border while complaining about the conditions in which illegal aliens, particularly alien children, are being housed in detention facilities that were never designed to handle the number of aliens currently being housed within their over-crowded confines.
On June 25, 2019 Fox News reported, “Dem-led House passes $4.5B bill to aid migrants at border, setting up showdown with GOP-led Senate.”
While the Democrats balk at the funding of a border wall that would deter the massive tsunami of unprecedented levels of illegal immigration and drug smuggling, their “leaders” are happy to spend huge sums of tax-payer provided cash on caring for illegal aliens who should not be here in the first place!
Of course I would be remiss if I fail to point out that the money for the border wall and other immigration law enforcement efforts was not provided by the Republicans when they controlled the House of Representatives, either.
Here is how that report began:
The House approved a $4.5 billion supplemental spending bill on Tuesday night to address humanitarian issues at the U.S.-Mexico border and to provide additional funding for food, water, medical services and stronger protections for unaccompanied children, among other things — setting up a showdown between the Democrat-led House and the Republican-led Senate.
The House bill, which passed 230-195, included specifics that would prevent the Trump administration from allowing any funding to go toward beefing up Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) personnel at the border, likely to become a point of contention with Republicans.
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has outrageously and disgustingly compared immigration detention facilities with “Concentration Camps.” In one fell swoop she managed to trivialize the Holocaust, stopping just short of denying that it even happened and comparing valiant immigration law enforcement officers with the Gestapo of Third Reich notoriety.
She co-opted the expression “Never again” that is the rallying cry to make certain that a Holocaust is never again permitted to occur, and has now voted against the spending bill that would fund any ICE- related functions, calling for the total dismantling of ICE, a sentiment echoed by many of her Democrat “fellow travelers.”
That she could make such outrageous remarks difficult enough to accept, but that Pelosi and Nadler, Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee and a Jew, have refused to call her out but actually ran to her defense is beyond any comprehension!
As an American, as a Jew and as a retired INS Agent I am triply infuriated by Ocasio-Cortez’s statements.
To provide a bit of clarity:
The Third Reich used its soldiers to round up citizens of the countries where the concentration camps existed. They were deemed “undesirable.” These troops would pull their victims, men, women and children out of their homes at gun point and transport them to the Nazi concentration camps that are also appropriately referred to as “Death Camps.”
The victims of the Holocaust who were held in the concentration camps were turned into slaves to build the Nazi war machine and, when through overwork and starvation became ill and unable to work, were slaughtered.
Other victims of the Holocaust were used as the subject of barbaric and horrific medical experimentation.
Many concentration camps had crematoria that operated constantly to incinerate the remains of the inmates, most often Jews.
Although the mainstream media has been quick to refer to the illegal aliens being held in immigration detention centers as “migrants” and “immigrants” and “asylum seekers,” they blithely ignore that these individuals are aliens who are illegally present in the Untied States.
Some “Migrant Workers” who toil on American farms are actually United States citizens. The term migrant refers to workers who travel from job to job irrespective of immigration status.
Immigration detention centers exist solely to prevent illegal aliens from being able to gain access to our nation. These aliens are held to protect national security, public safety, public health and the well being of America and Americans.
Most of the aliens who apply for asylum disappear within the interior of the United States when their applications are denied- not because the United States lacks compassion, but because their applications for asylum lack merit.
Many of these hundreds of thousands of illegal aliens are not criminals but should be thought of as economic refugees who will flood America with cheap exploitable labor, thereby displacing American and lawful immigrant workers. Many will seek health care and various costly benefits and education for their children further burdening our public school systems that already lack the resources to provide quality education for hapless American and lawful immigration children.
Some may suffer from dangerous communicable diseases threatening public health. And finally some may well be aliens with criminal histories and/or affiliation with violent gangs and narcotics trafficking organizations. Finally, some may be involved with terrorism and may be “sleeper agents” seeking the opportunity to embed themselves in the United States until called upon to carry out a deadly attack or are tasked with a preparatory assignment to scope our locations, seek to recruit others or commit crimes to fund terrorism. This is not conjecture by are issues that were raised during a series of congressional hearings conducted even before the terror attacks of 9/11.
Yet funding has never been provided to effectively enforce our nation’s immigration laws.
Having raised the nexus between failures of the immigration system and terrorism at the beginning of my commentary, it is important to note that on June 25, 2019 Fox News reported, “Sept. 11 first responders call sit-down with McConnell ‘one of the best meetings we’ve had.’”
Advocates have rallied to keep the bill alive until 2090, the expected lifespan of first responders who developed illnesses from inhaling toxic fumes during recovery efforts and while clearing rubble at the World Trade Center, the Pentagon and Shanksville, Pa. following the terrorist attacks in 2001.
More than 2,000 firefighters, police officers, federal agents and other first responders have died from 9/11-related diseases and that number is expected to climb over time, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s World Trade Center Health Program.
Critics have opposed making the bill open-ended, while advocates have cited the terminal illnesses that many first responders continue to face. More than 40,000 people have applied to the fund and over $5 billion in benefits have been awarded out of the $7.4 billion fund with about 21,000 claims still pending.
The slogan “Never forget” that implores and exhorts us and our leaders to make certain that America is kept safe from future terror attacks, is being completely ignored by politicians who refuse to fund meaningful immigration law enforcement.
These politicians are willfully undermining national security and public safety.
EDITORS NOTE: This FrontPage Magazine column is republished with permission. All rights reserved.
http://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.png00Michael Cutlerhttp://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.pngMichael Cutler2019-07-01 06:54:562019-07-01 07:12:11Dems Determined to Leave America Borderless. And hence, defenseless.
EDITORS NOTE: According to a 2017 article by Free The Slaves:
There are tens of millions of people trapped in various forms of slavery throughout the world today. Researchers estimate that 40 million are enslaved worldwide, generating $150 billion each year in illicit profits for traffickers.
Labor Slavery. About 50 percent toil in forced labor slavery in industries where manual labor is needed—such as farming, ranching, logging, mining, fishing, and brick making—and in service industries working as dish washers, janitors, gardeners, and maids.
Sex Slavery. About 12.5 percent are trapped in forced prostitution sex slavery.
Forced Marriage Slavery. About 37.5 percent are trapped in forced marriages.
Child Slavery. About 25 percent of today’s slaves are children.
Slavery today is a hidden crime, making it harder for the public to see and for those in slavery to call out for help.
Slavery statistics come from the U.N. International Labor Organization, Walk Free and the International Organization for Migration. See our Trafficking and Slavery Fact Sheet for details.
[ … ]
New slavery has two chief characteristics—it’s cheap and it’s disposable. Slaves today are cheaper than ever. In 1850, an average slave in the American South cost the equivalent of $40,000 in today’s money. Today a slave costs about $90 on average worldwide. (Source: Disposable People: New Slavery in the Global Economy. See all Free the Slaves books.)
http://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.png00Vlad Tepes Bloghttp://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.pngVlad Tepes Blog2019-07-01 06:02:192019-07-01 06:16:55VIDEO: Escaped Sex-Slaves Burn Burkas, wish the same for Islamic State
Live Action published the below video with commentary:
“If we make abortion illegal, women will seek dangerous back-alley abortions and deaths will skyrocket.” This is a very common argument used to defend abortion today. But how accurate is it?
Let’s unpack this statement with Dr. Kathi Aultman, former abortionist and Medical Director for Planned Parenthood.
If we make abortion illegal, won’t women have dangerous back alley abortions?
I used to think that legal abortion was necessary to protect women from the dangers of illegal abortion. I not only thought that abortion was necessary, I also believed it was a woman’s right. I used to perform 1st trimester suction abortions and 2nd trimester dismemberment abortions, and I felt I was doing something good for women. I was also a medical director for Planned Parenthood for about 2 years. I even had an abortion myself.
I came to realize that the whole idea of keeping abortion legal to protect women’s safety was a lie. With every abortion, I was harming a woman and killing a child.
There is no such thing as a “safe abortion.” One person is killed, and the other is at risk for serious complications, including death. A woman cannot kill her child and remain unharmed.
Historically speaking, legalizing abortion did not make it less deadly for women. From the 1940’s to the 1970’s, deaths of women due to abortion rapidly declined because of better medicine and increased use of antibiotics, not because abortion was made legal.
The widespread belief that tens of thousands of women were dying from illegal abortions was a lie propagated mainly by two individuals. Their names were Larry Lader and Bernard Nathanson, co-founders of NARAL, the National Abortion Rights Action League. Like me, Bernard Nathanson eventually converted from abortionist to pro-life advocate. He admitted, “When we spoke of [deaths due to illegal abortion], it was always 5,000 to 10,000 per year. I confess I knew the figures were totally false.”
Bernard Nathanson, Aborting America (1979)
In 1960, over a decade before the Supreme Court decision Roe v Wade legalized abortion in all 50 states, the Medical Director of Planned Parenthood at the time, Mary Calderone, made this statement, and I quote, “Abortion is no longer a dangerous procedure. In 1957 there were only 260 deaths in the whole country attributed to abortions of any kind. 90 percent of all illegal abortions are presently being done by physicians.” End quote
“Illegal Abortion as a Public Health Problem” Mary Calderone. 1960 (Paper presented before the Maternal and Child Health Section of the American Public Health Association at the Eighty Seventh Annual Meeting in Atlantic City, N.J. October 19, 1959.
In 1972, the year before Roe v Wade, 39 women died from illegal abortion, and 24 women died from legal abortion. In 1973, the year of Roe v Wade, 19 women died from illegal abortion, and 25 women died from legal abortion. So, in the year that abortion was nationally legalized, more women died from legal abortion than illegal abortion.
The truth is that whether it is legal or illegal, abortion poses long term physical and emotional harm for women, including an increased risk of suicide, future infertility, pregnancy loss, and damage to her internal organs. Women still die from legal abortion today. Tonya Reaves and Cree Erwin are two women who recently died from legal abortions at Planned Parenthood.
Despite legalized abortion, the United States maternal mortality rate is HIGHER than that of nations with MORE restrictive abortion laws. The United States has a maternal mortality rate of around 14 deaths per 100,000 live births, but in Poland, for example, where abortion is illegal except in rare cases, the maternal mortality rate is only 3 deaths per 100,000 live births. Or Malta, where abortion is illegal for any reason, the maternal mortality rate is only 9 deaths per 100,000 live births.
After Roe v Wade, the number of abortions in the United States skyrocketed. As of today, over 60 million children have been legally killed by abortion. The reality is, legalizing abortion has not made abortion safer – it has only led to the deaths of more children and has harmed more women. This doesn’t need to continue, however. If we truly care about the safety of women and their children, then we should make abortion illegal.
http://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.png00Dr. Rich Swierhttp://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.pngDr. Rich Swier2019-06-30 17:44:032019-07-06 06:37:12VIDEO: More women died from LEGAL abortion than illegal abortion the year abortion was legalized.
The Humanitarian Hoax is a deliberate and deceitful tactic of presenting a destructive policy as altruistic. The humanitarian huckster presents himself as a compassionate advocate when in fact he is the disguised enemy.
Harvesting is defined as collecting or obtaining a resource for future use. We commonly equate harvesting with agricultural crops – but in the 21st century harvesting has far more to do with political crops – the resource is votes.
Ballot harvesting is like the Greek hydra – the many headed snake whose heads grew as they were cut off. So, let’s examine the heads of this ballot harvesting Democrat hydra.
Ballot harvesting is defined as the political jargon for a practice in which organized workers or volunteers collect absentee ballots from certain voters and drop them off at a polling place or election office. WHAT?
Let’s review. In ballot harvesting someone picks up someone else’s ballots and drop them off somewhere else? Any voter who has ever voted in person knows that great care is taken to secure the confidentiality of voters and the legitimacy of their votes. Ballots are filled out in the privacy of a voting booth, placed into a secrecy envelope, and then hand delivered by the voter into a machine that automatically pulls the ballot into itself. No one besides the voter touches his ballot – the ballot chain is unbroken.
Voting is the most sacred of rights guaranteed by our Constitution and is protected at every point in the voting process. The idea that organized workers pick up ballots and drop them off at a polling place or election office is equivalent to a broken chain of evidence in a criminal jury trial. When the chain is broken the evidence is inadmissible because it may have been tampered with.
Anyone with a functioning brain cell understands that ballot harvesting is an invitation for voter fraud because the ballot chain is broken.
Ballot harvesting is the first head of the hydra, next are unclean voting rolls. Tom Fitton, executive president of Judicial Watch, has demonstrated that under Obama the voter rolls were not updated, so dead people were still on the rolls, and people who had moved away were still listed, and illegals were voting. This is the second head on the hydra of voter fraud.
In 2012, Obama’s corrupt attorney general Eric Holder actually sued Florida “to block its efforts to purge its voter rolls of dead people and non-U.S. citizens and to stop further attempts before the November 2012 presidential election.”
Tom Fitton just won a huge case in California in which Los Angeles County has sent notices to 1.5 million inactive voters. This is the first step toward removing ineligible voters from the voter rolls. Los Angeles County with over 10 million residents, had allowed more than 20% of its registered voters to remain inactive without removing them from the voter list as required by law. California had not cleaned its voter rolls in 20 years!
Purging inactive voters is critical to the integrity of elections because maintaining accurate voter registration lists insures that eligible voters cast a single ballot in their proper jurisdiction.
The National Voter Registration Act (NVRA) allows states to remove voters who have not voted in two consecutive federal general elections and have failed to respond to a confirmation notice from an elections office. Voters are also removed from the list who are convicted felons, have died, moved to a different jurisdiction, are mentally incompetent, or request removal themselves.
The National Voter Registration Act is often called the “motor voter” law because it provides provisions for voter registration at local Department of Motor Vehicle (DMV) offices. That brings us to the third head on the hydra of voter fraud.
New York recently made it lawful for illegal aliens to receive drivers licenses. This makes it extremely easy to implement the next incremental step for Democrats to harvest votes – allowing illegals to legally vote. EXCUSE ME? Yes, the leftist Democrats leading the party want illegal aliens to vote – of course they do – illegals will vote for Democrats and keep them in power for the foreseeable future.
“In New York, U.S. citizens only need a driver’s license to register to vote and though applicants are required to swear that they are eligible to vote, state election officials told the Post that ‘it’s basically and honor system.’”
HONOR SYSTEM? Illegals are in this country illegally! How can an honor system possibly apply?
The humanitarian hoax of ballot harvesting is an assault on the Constitution because its objective is to make citizenship irrelevant by giving ILLEGAL aliens the same rights as legal citizens. This is how it works.
Democrats wail about inhumane conditions at the southern border. They deliberately ignore the fact that illegal alien parents are responsible for putting their children at risk by attempting to ILLEGALLY enter the United States.
During the Obama years, for twenty months from January, 2009 until November, 2010, the Democrats held both houses of Congress and the presidency. For twenty months they chose to ignore the growing border crisis and its humanitarian consequences. In fact, it was Obama who put illegal alien children in cages.
Now, with an upcoming election, the Democrats find it politically expedient to weep about housing and medical care for illegals. Housing for illegals? Medical care for illegals? What about housing and medical care for legal citizens of the United States who are struggling financially? No matter – the Democrats do not care about legal citizens because their goal is harvesting ballots through illegal immigration.
Remember, harvesting is the practice of collecting or obtaining a resource for future use. Illegal aliens are a bonanza for Democrats because they are the biggest resource for future votes imaginable. Democrats do not care if the massive invasion at the border collapses the welfare system – they want to collapse the system. It is the Cloward and Piven strategy for social chaos and economic collapse that precedes socialism. Let me explain.
President Trump’s America-first presidency and economic policies have been so successful that the Democrats cannot possibly collapse the economy any other way. The mass invasion of illegals into the country serve a dual purpose – collapsing our booming economy and harvesting votes for Democrats.
In case there is anyone who actually believes that having illegal aliens overrun and collapse the U.S. economy is a good thing – let’s talk about what will happen if this invasion is not stopped.
If Democrats are not stopped, and they succeed in ballot harvesting to win the 2020 election, the invasion on our southern border will continue. The massive influx of illegal immigrants will overwhelm and necessarily collapse the social welfare system, then social chaos and riots will follow. When the country becomes ungovernable Martial law will be declared. At that point socialism will be imposed in preparation for the final objective – one world government. The leftist Democrats screaming for open borders and socialism are the useful idiots for the globalist elites who finance their political campaigns and anti-American policies.
Globalists have a singular objective – one world government ruled by themselves of course.
Before any voter is foolish enough to buy into the con of leftist Democrats promoting socialism and open borders let’s examine socialism. First, free stuff is never free. You pay with your freedom. So, let’s discuss freedom.
In socialist countries the government owns all production and is in charge of distributing whatever is produced. There is no private ownership. This means there is no middle class or upward mobility in socialism because there is no private property. The Democrat candidates hawking socialism never mention these critical details.
The humanitarian hoax of ballot harvesting is an insidious power grab by leftist Democrats intent on using illegal aliens for votes. If the leftist Democrats succeed in their power-grab and win the 2020 election, the United States of America will cease to be a free country.
Socialism is just a variation on the feudal structure of a very small ruling elite at the top of the social pyramid and a very large population of slaves at the bottom who service them. There is no middle class in feudalism – there is no freedom – there are only masters and slaves.
Be careful who you vote for in 2020. Leftism is the path to socialism, and socialism is the path to feudalism.
Choose freedom and vote for our America-first President Donald Trump. Choose freedom to protect our sovereignty and precious Constitution that guarantees our liberties – including our property rights. In a free country we belong to ourselves and are not vassals of the state.
EDITORS NOTE: This Goudsmit Pundicity column is republished with permission. All rights reserved.
http://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.png00Linda Goudsmithttp://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.pngLinda Goudsmit2019-06-30 16:37:282019-06-30 16:39:02The Humanitarian Hoax of Ballot Harvesting: Killing America With Kindness
This is a must watch. Really. No kidding. Everyone has to see this confession. Yes, it is 31 minutes. But wow is it ever worth the time.
This is a German woman, originally also a refugee to Germany, who was assisting the Muslim migrants at her own time effort and expense. Then she realized what a pointless scam it was against the German people, and broke the “oath” and went public with her story.
Special thanks on this one to MissPiggy. It is a huge job to do a 31 minute video.
http://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.png00Vlad Tepes Bloghttp://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.pngVlad Tepes Blog2019-06-30 06:45:202019-06-30 06:45:20VIDEO: Confessions of an Ex-Migrant Volunteer in Germany
by Bruce Walker • ChurchMilitant.com — New details emerge on STEM School shootings
HIGHLANDS RANCH, Colo. (ChurchMilitant.com) – Unsealed court records illuminate the motives of the May 7 Colorado school shootings: revenge on classmates who taunted one of the teenage perpetrators, a 16-year-old pre-operative transgender girl who wished to become male.
Outside of conservative media outlets, mainstream coverage of the shooting evaporated once it was revealed the shooters espoused progressive political leanings and sympathies, which included the young woman’s gender dysphoria.
The revelations confirm the shootings that claimed the life of one student and wounded eight others at the STEM School Highlands Ranch were in retaliation for teasing directed at Alec (born Maya) McKinney, 16. She and fellow shooter, Devon Michael Erickson, 18, were both charged as adults for first-degree murder.
McKinney, whose name is redacted in the documents because she is still a minor, said, “He wanted the kids at the school to experience bad things, have to suffer from trauma like he has had to in his life. He wanted everyone in that school to suffer and realize that the world is a bad place.”
The probable cause narrative also depicts McKinney as the key figure in the melee, including allegedly threatening Erickson if he didn’t participate in the spree, and orchestrating the theft of the three handguns and one rifle used in the shooting. The arresting officer stated he was advised that “[redacted] prefers to be called [redacted] and wants to transition from being a female to a male.”
The report, derived from a recorded interview, continues with McKinney’s version of events:
His friend [redacted] messaged him on Snapchat last night and told him not to go to school tomorrow. Devon saved this message because he wanted to show his friends in order to “save them.” [Redacted] also told Devon that he was “super suicidal” and that he wanted to get revenge on a lot of people. [Redacted] stated he was considering killing his mom and siblings as well. Devon tried talking [redacted] out of doing that. [Redacted] told Devon he was going to kill him if he told anyone.
Although Erickson attempts to depict himself as an unwilling accomplice, he proceeds to relate how he acquiesced to several of McKinney’s demands. In fact, Erickson had already left the school campus twice the day of the shooting and had arrived home after leaving the school a third time when McKinney sent him a message to return to school to pick her up.
The narrative continues:
Devon picked [redacted] up and the two returned to Devon’s house. While at the house, Devon described [redacted] as being off and pissed off at a bunch of people. The two hung out in the basement and [redacted] used some cocaine while there. …
A short time later, [redacted] told Devon to follow him and the two went upstairs. [Redacted] asked Devon where his parent’s [sic] safe was. [Redacted] was aware there was a safe containing firearms because the two had previously discussed it a few weeks prior. …
After showing [redacted] the safe, Devon walked towards the door in an attempt to get away. [Redacted] told Devon to get away from the door and threatened to kill him if he didn’t.
After retrieving an ax and crowbar, Erickson told detectives McKinney was able to open the safe door enough to use the crowbar to pry it open.
Inside was a “Glock 21, a Beretta m9, a Ruger 22 rifle, and a Taurus revolver” as well as ammunition. Erickson said he showed McKinney how to load the weapons, and the two imbibed cocaine “because [redacted] threatened him to do so.” Erickson concealed the rifle and one handgun in his guitar case, and McKinney took possession of the other two handguns.
After arriving at the school, Erickson put his guitar case in the back of the classroom and told his teacher he needed to leave class because he was feeling ill. Instead of going to the principal’s office to inform them of the plot, however, he claims he had a panic attack and “went to the bathroom instead.”
When he finally arrived at the office, Erickson told detectives, McKinney was already there. She threatened Erickson once again. The two proceeded to room 107 and the shootings commenced.
In her statement to another detective, McKinney “stated he was born a female and is still in the pre-op transitioning phase. [Redacted] is anatomically a female. … He has been planning a school shooting for a few weeks.”
After writing “the voices win” with nail polish on a closet wall, the pair defaced the car of Erickson’s mother with spray paint before unsuccessfully attempting to set it on fire. Although admitting she fired her guns, McKinney stated she wanted to commit suicide but couldn’t figure out how to deactivate the weapon’s safety mechanism so she could shoot herself.
EDITORS NOTE: This Church Militant column is republished with permission. All rights reserved.
http://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.png00Church Militanthttp://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.pngChurch Militant2019-06-29 17:38:322019-06-29 17:41:10VIDEO: Transgender Teen Sought to Kill Colorado Classmates
The Humanitarian Hoax is a deliberate and deceitful tactic of presenting a destructive policy as altruistic. The humanitarian huckster presents himself as a compassionate advocate when in fact he is the disguised enemy.
Planned Parenthood began in 1916 as the American Birth Control League when Margaret Sanger and her two sisters opened the first birth control clinic in Brooklyn, NY. They distributed birth control, birth control advice, and birth control information. Abortion was illegal and throughout her incumbency Margaret Sanger maintained that abortion would not be necessary if women had access to birth control. In 1942 the name American Birth Control League was changed to Planned Parenthood Federation of America. What happened?
Planned Parenthood began advocating for abortion law reform in the early 1950s. At first they focused on therapeutic abortions – medically necessary abortions in the first trimester before the fetus is viable outside the womb. By the 1960s, Planned Parenthood advocated liberalizing abortion laws to include non-therapeutic abortions.
The first birth control pill was commissioned by Margaret Sanger and funded by suffragist Katherine McCormick, heir to the International Harvester fortune. On May 9, 1960 the FDA approved the pill and women’s reproductive freedom became foundational to the Women’s Liberation Movement, the sexual revolution, and the anti-establishment counterculture movement which supported Planned Parenthood’s rejection of all limits on abortion.
By 1969 Planned Parenthood was demanding total repeal of all abortion laws.
In 1973 the Supreme Court issued its landmark decision in Roe vs Wade and abortion was legalized in America. Women had the right to choose whether to have an abortion, but the right was not absolute because of the competing interests of protecting prenatal life, and also the government’s interest in protecting women’s health. The Court issued restrictions that addressed the complexity of the issue in what is known as a balancing test.
“The Court resolved this balancing test by tying state regulation of abortion to the three trimesters of pregnancy: during the first trimester, governments could not prohibit abortions at all; during the second trimester, governments could require reasonable health regulations; during the third trimester, abortions could be prohibited entirely so long as the laws contained exceptions for cases when they were necessary to save the life or health of the mother.”
In 2019 New York lifted every restriction and legalized all abortions including late term abortions. Seven states and Washington, D.C. followed New York’s horrifying example:
New York
Alaska
Colorado
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
Oregon
Vermont
Washington, D.C.
This unnerving decision means it is legal to abort a viable baby up to birth and even after birth in some cases. Late term abortions are NO ONE’S RIGHT TO CHOOSE – they are legalized murder. A baby just before birth is not a cluster of undifferentiated cells – it is a fully formed viable human being. How did murder become legal in the United States of America?
Planned Parenthood began as Margaret Sanger’s women’s health initiative to provide necessary birth control, birth control advice, and birth control information. It has become radicalized along with the radicalization of the Democrat party which sponsors its initiatives. Why is this important?
One of these initiatives is SIECUS Sexuality Information and Education Council of the United States.
SIECUS was started in 1964 by Dr. Mary Calderone who was the Medical Director for the Planned Parenthood Federation. SIECUS publishes books and journals on sexuality and sex education that are used by professionals, parents, and the public. They have developed curricula for medical schools and college students. SIECUS is responsible for the Guidelines for Comprehensive Education: Kindergarten-12th Grade that are part of the Common Core curriculum taught in public schools throughout America. Here is the problem.
Planned Parenthood is in the education business and is actively indoctrinating American children in their radical views on sex, sexuality, and gender. SIECUS interim president Christine Soyong Harley unapologetically announced the group’s conviction that “Sex ed is a vehicle for social change.” WHAT???
I will repeat: SIECUS interim president stated that sex education is a vehicle for social change and promotes her activism saying:
“While sex education is a necessary sexual health tool, it can (and should) be so much more than that. With sex education, we have a golden opportunity to create a culture shift-tackling the misinformation, shame, and stigma that create the basis for many of today’s sexual and reproductive health and rights issues, like:
Reproductive justice
LGBTQ equality
Sexual violence prevention
Gender equity
Dismantling white supremacy”
Harley goes on to say that they already have the way to do this – it is their Comprehensive Sexuality Education (CSE) that is currently indoctrinating your children K-12! REALLY??
It gets worse. Planned Parenthood is no longer the Sanger sisters’ birth control clinic in their Brooklyn clinic. Planned Parenthood is now a global health provider and the single biggest provider of reproductive health services, including abortion, in the United States. Planned Parenthood is an activist political organization disguised as a women’s health initiative.
“Planned Parenthood consists of 159 medical and non-medical affiliates, which operate over 600 health clinics in the United States. It partners with organizations in 12 countries globally. The organization directly provides a variety of reproductive health services and sexual education, contributes to research in reproductive technology and advocates for the protection and expansion of reproductive rights.”
Planned Parenthood’s international outreach is conducted by Planned Parenthood Global, and by The International Planned Parenthood Federation (IPPF) which has 149 Member Associations working in over 189 countries. So what is the problem?
Planned Parenthood is an active participant in UN Agenda 2030 and its globalized educational programs designed to create a New World Order. Planned Parenthood has a globalist agenda.
Using sex education to indoctrinate children into radical leftist/globalist ideology is a colossal abuse of power and exploitation of young children. What Planned Parenthood considers appropriate sex education is very different from what most parents worldwide consider appropriate especially for young children. Let’s take a look.
This shocking video will help the uninitiated become acquainted with the sinister humanitarian hoax of Planned Parenthood worldwide. Planned Parenthood presents itself as a humanitarian organization dedicated to advancing women’s health while they target your children using perverse sex education as their vehicle to effect seismic social change.
Dr. Duke Pesta has written a scathing assessment of Common Core’s sex ed in “Shocking K-12 Common Core Sexual Education Standards.” Pesta explains that sex education is integrated into every subject taught including English, language, science, math, social studies, and biology. There is no opting out of their perverse sex ed because it crosses all subjects. Pesta writes, “According to child psychologists, the children are not mentally equipped to understand the detailed sexual indoctrination starting in kindergarten, they are indoctrinated in sexual practices that they should never be exposed to.”
Now let’s look at the misleading marketing campaign used by Planned Parenthood’s SIECUS to sell its destructive sexual indoctrination.
“The goal of the National Sexuality Education Standards: Core Content and Skills K-12 is to provide clear, consistent and straightforward guidance on the essential minimum, core content for sexuality education that is age-appropriate for students in grades K-12.”
Sounds great – but then humanitarian hoaxes always do.
The stated goals do not reflect the broader culture shift that is the actual goal of the leftist/globalist sexual education program. Sexual identity is the first thing that is announced in any language anywhere in the world when a baby is born. “It’s a boy!” ”It’s a girl!” There is a minuscule portion of the world’s population that has ambiguous sex organs that would leave the baby’s sexual identity unclear.
The perverse movement to confuse children about their primary identity is a sinister attempt to destabilize society and create social chaos. Social chaos is the prerequisite for imposing a new world order envisioned by the globalist elite. The New World Order is not so new. Bertrand Russel wrote about it in his 1952 classic, The Impact of Science on Society. The New World Order is an internationalized world with one language, one currency, one flag, one language, one educational system, one culture, one country ruled by the globalist elite themselves under the auspices of the United Nations.
The attack on sexuality was articulated decades ago by Tavistock Institute as an effective tactic in their efforts to breakdown the psychological strength of the individual and render him helpless to oppose the rulers of the new world order. The strategy of the Culture War is to attack the infrastructure of American life – family, religion, patriotism, and sexual behavior. Why sexual behavior?
Sexual behavior is a reflection of social norms in society. Monogamous sex in marriage is a commitment that values loyalty to the spouse and family unit. It is also a reflection of the Judeo-Christian moral prohibition against infidelity. Not all couples manage fidelity but it is still considered immoral. The breakdown of the family and the rejection of the moral teachings of religion invite detachment and promiscuous sex. The destruction of traditional morality and the normalization of deviance is a deliberate strategy in the Culture War against America.
The humanitarian hoax of Planned Parenthood is a sinister attack designed to destroy America from within that has gone global with the help of the United Nations and their Agenda 2030. The New World Order is impossible without the breakdown of American society. Planned Parenthood and SIECUS are soldiers in the leftist Culture War against America.
Tactical accusations of white supremacy are foundational to the leftist narrative. They are even part of the destructive sexual education program designed to create chaos in America. This is how it works.
The leftist narrative is designed to collapse American and create catastrophic tensions that will erupt in a race war – the goal of the white supremacy narrative. The race war will lead to anarchy and the country will become ungovernable. At that point Martial law will be declared and the leftist objective of socialism will be imposed.
The problem, of course, is that the leftists are just useful idiots for the globalists. Leaders like Christine Soyong Harley will no longer be useful to the revolution. They are collateral damage. The globalists will then impose one world government which was their goal all along – no more leftists – no more Islamists – no more Planned Parenthood. Just a catastrophic return to feudalism with a very small ruling elite – and the mass population who serve them. There is no middle class in feudalism – no upward mobility – no freedom of any kind. Just masters and slaves as the globalist elite desired.
Planned Parenthood is doing the dirty work of the globalist elite – they are just too arrogant and too angry to notice that they are participating in their own destruction. The noisy leftist Democrats who support Planned Parenthood and promote its destructive agenda are also useful idiots of the globalist elite who fund their pricey political campaigns. The duped Democrats are mercenaries who haven’t figured out that when this war is over they will also be dispensable.
The winner in the fight for the soul of America will be determined by the election outcome in 2020. America-first President Donald Trump is the existential enemy of the leftist/Islamist/globalist axis that is trying to collapse our country and establish a new world order. Do not let them. Do not be fooled by the humanitarian hoax of Planned Parenthood. Vote straight Republican and take back the House so that President Trump can keep America great.
EDITORS NOTE: This Goudsmit Pundicity column is republished with permission. All rights reserved.
http://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.png00Linda Goudsmithttp://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.pngLinda Goudsmit2019-06-29 16:27:162019-06-29 17:04:35The Humanitarian Hoax of Planned Parenthood: Killing America With Kindness
Following is a Summary of Thursday Nights (06/27/19) Winter Haven 912 Guest Speaker, UCF Professor, Jon Matusitz on the subject of Islam. See first attachment for photo & contact info.
He started out by telling us that what he would be presenting is what he presents to his Communications course students in their very first class. There have been many attempts by Muslim students,supporting faculty at USF and CAIR to slander or remove Jon but he is tenured and they haven’t been able to do so (thank God). See 2nd attachment & slanderous YouTube link below.
Islam means Submission. Islam is not only a religion but also a geo-political, theocratic govt. group with a military component to help them in their goal of world conquest.
There are Six Classes in which the 1.8 Billion Muslims around the world can be placed.
Jihadists – those who are actively engaged in a violent world-wide holy war against non-Muslim counties – such as Al Qaeda & its many affiliate groups, ISIS, Boko Haram, al-Nusra Front, etc. etc. CIA and other intelligence agencies estimate there are a minimum of 10 % who belong to these terrorist groups which would amount to 180 + Million violent jihadists around the world.
Fundamentalists – the Imams and their Muslim followers who support the Jihadists with encouragement for Muslims to join the Jihad, become human bomb sacrifices, education/indoctrination of young to hate infidels, help finance the Jihadists, etc. Again this group is estimated to be at least 10% of Islamic population or another 180 + Million. Together these 2 violent and violence advocating and supporting groups total at least 360 M Islamists which is more than the entire population of the Us.
Muslim Conservatives – these are those Muslims who are Sharia Compliant in the way they lead their lives. Therefore, they can not truthfully accept such western civilization laws as the US Constitution. In the event of an Islamic Fatwa or ruling to do so they would join the first two groups in supporting violence and/or disobeying the laws of their host non-Muslim country.
Muslim Human Rights Activists – no sure of the number but these are those who believe in the Islamic Law of Sharia which means they can’t possibly accept the Constitution of the United States for example. He gave examples of how Sharia forces Muslims to live their lives only a certain way including how poorly women are treated under Sharia.
Reformed Muslims – the group led by Dr. M. Zuhdi Jasser in the U.S. that reject Islamic interpretations that call for violence, social injustice and Politicized Islam. They reject bigotry, oppression and violence against all people regardless of ethnicity, gender, religion, sexual orientation, etc. Dr. Matusitz commends this relatively small movement but doesn’t believe it will have much of an impact on Islam as a whole e.g. you can’t reform Islam.
Cultural Muslims – Muslims who don’t really practice their religion but are afraid of being labeled apostates or those who turn against Islam for which they can be executed. Therefore they give the pretense of being Muslims – estimated as approximately 60% of all Muslims – they are then MINOs – Muslims in Name Only
We then had an interesting Q & A session.
“What were his views on how the current Pope seems to believe in interfaith cooperation and coexistence with Islam” – Jon’s answer was – as I Catholic I can state this Pope talks way to much and should stick to matters of the Catholic faith. Instead he goes outside the box because he is a socialist and gets involved in many other issues one of them being this pipe dream that Catholics and other Christians can coexist with Islam.
What has been the impact of Islamic migration into Europe? He gave an example of how open the borders are in Western Europe (e.g. you can travel all the way from Sweden to Spain without a passport or being stopped). Therefore, it is very easy for Islamic terrorists to smuggle in weapons and bomb making stuff. He said that at the current negative growth rate of Europeans of 1.2 babies per child bearing women compared to 4 babies per Muslim woman living in Europe. At the rate they are going Sweden, England, France, Spain & others will all be Islamic states by 2030-40. They will have a caliphate or Islamic state formed by migration, terrorism, high birth rate, compliance with Sharia. He also mentioned the Eastern European countries like Poland & Croatia get it and are keeping them out. These countries had to live as slaves behind the oppressive Iron Curtain of Communism & they don’t want the same thing to happen again under Islam.
He also mentioned that Salafism is gaining in Europe and elsewhere. Salafism is an umbrella term for a modern phenomenon of the endeavor to live in accordance with Islam in the same way as the first three generations of Muslims. Salafist purists try to orient themselves according to Muhammad and his sayings and form a new “Golden Age” of Islam.
Above just captures key points I took notes on but I’m sure I missed some information – I know he briefly talked about Muhammad and the origins of the Quran but I didn’t take notes on exactly what he said – he did say however that the Quran mentions Jesus Christ something like 50+ times and Muhammad by name only 5 times – however, there are hundreds of sayings supposedly by Muhammad in the Hadith which came later and are used as standard procedures by Islamists. It was an excellent and very interesting presentation as always that was thoroughly enjoyed by the audience of WH 912ers.
ABOUT PROFESSOR JON MATUSITZ
Jonathan Matusitz (Ph.D., University of Oklahoma, 2006) is currently a tenured associate professor in the Nicholson School of Communication and Media. His research focuses on the role of communication in terrorism, symbolism in terrorism, the globalization of culture, and health communication. His research methodologies include qualitative interviewing, content analysis, semiotics, and theoretical analysis.
On top of having more than 140 academic publications and over 150 conference presentations, he taught at a NATO-affiliated military base in Belgium in 2010. Originally from Belgium himself, he moved to the United States in 2000.
His first book on terrorism, titled Terrorism & Communication: A Critical Introduction, was published by SAGE in 2013. His second book, Symbolism in Terrorism: Motivation, Communication, and Behavior, was published by Rowman & Littlefield in 2015. His latest book, Online Jihadist Magazines to Promote the Caliphate: Communicative Perspectives, was published by Peter Lang in 2019.
In 2011, Dr. Matusitz’s research was cited by the U.S. Supreme Court. Since 2014, he has collaborated with a representative of the Defence Research & Development Organisation (DRDO), Ministry of Defence, in India to examine suicide terrorism.
Occasionally, Dr. Matusitz is the featured speaker at law enforcement workshops and training sessions. He has delivered presentations on terrorism to agencies such as the Florida Department of Law Enforcement, the Department of Homeland Security, the Transportation Security Administration, and local sheriff’s offices.
Since his tenure at UCF, Dr. Matusitz has received multiple faculty awards. In both 2012 and 2017, he was honored with a prestigious teaching award by the College of Sciences (COS). In 2014, he received a teaching award by the Nicholson School of Communication and Media: the “Excellence in Teaching Award for 2013-2014.” And in 2015, he was the winner of the Excellence in Undergraduate Teaching Award for COS.
Jonathan Matusitz has taught the following courses at UCF: Terrorism and Communication (COM 4416), Symbolism in Terrorism (COM 6425), Communication Research Methods (COM 3311), Qualitative Research Methods (COM 6303), Intercultural Communication (COM 4461), Conflict Management (COM 4462), Group Dynamics (SPC 4426), Nonverbal Communication (SPC 4331), Organizational Communication (COM 3120), Communication and Human Relations (COM 3011), Health Communication (COM 6025), and Honors Fundamentals of Oral Communication (SPC 1600).
RESEARCH INTERESTS
Terrorism and communication
Symbolism in terrorism
Globalization of culture
Globalization of human communication processes
Healthcare and technology
RELATED VIDEOS:
University of Central Florida Professor Jon Matusitz on the subject of Islam.
CAIR Hassan Shibley/Bowden Complicit in Stalking UCF Professor Matusitz
http://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.png00Royal A. Brown IIIhttp://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.pngRoyal A. Brown III2019-06-29 07:32:172019-06-29 16:13:42Summary of Professor Dr. Jon Matusitz’s Presentation on Islam to Winter Haven, Florida 912 Group [+Video]
They didn’t mention Muslims, of course, but there is no doubt whatsoever that this was done to placate them. “In order to create a more welcoming environment to a diverse community we are going to forgo saying the pledge of allegiance before every meeting,” said Councilman Tim Brausen. The newcomers who need to be welcomed in this case are overwhelmingly Muslim, so this is clearly an extreme case of Islamopandering. But no one who cannot pledge allegiance to the United States of America should even be here, much less be pandered to. This shouldn’t even be a question.
“Town eliminates Pledge of Allegiance before city council meetings,” KMOV4, June 27, 2019:
ST. LOUIS PARK, Minn. (KMOV.com) – A long-standing tradition at city council meetings in a Minneapolis suburb will soon come to an end.
Elected leaders in St. Louis Park, Minnesota recently chose to drop the Pledge of Allegiance from their monthly meetings. The change was approved in a 5-0 vote and will take effect on July 15.
“In order to create a more welcoming environment to a diverse community we are going to forgo saying the pledge of allegiance before every meeting,” said Councilman Tim Brausen….
RELATED VIDEO: Democratic Congresswoman Ilhan Omar failed to answer one simple question: did she marry her brother Ahmed Nur Said Elmi? – Rebel Media
EDITORS NOTE: This Jihad Watch column is republished with permission. All rights reserved.
http://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.png00Jihad Watchhttp://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.pngJihad Watch2019-06-29 06:27:032019-06-29 06:30:47Minnesota: City council in Ilhan Omar’s Congressional district drops Pledge of Allegiance to avoid offending Muslims
The college debt “crisis” is a moral question, but it is the opposite of what Elizabeth Warren, Bernie Sanders, AOC, and most of the Democratic presidential field are claiming.
An individual forgiving a debt they voluntarily entered into with a friend or family is noble and Christian and laudable. This sort of debt forgiveness happens routinely. I’ve done it. I’ve had it done.
Government eliminating debt is immoral. Here’s why.
If I loan someone money, and for whatever reason I choose to forgive that debt, that is my right and it is supported in the Bible. It is certainly part of American tradition, and actually may be far broader than that. It is a good and noble act, if I judge it is not enabling bad behavior. It is my choice because it is both my money and I voluntarily made the loan to the person.
But that is not at all what is being contemplated in this debate over forgiveness of student debt by Democratic politicians. First, of course, there is the need to label it a “crisis.” That is always step one for the next terrible government intervention idea.
What causes the confusion, however, is that the language is misleading when politicians say “we” should forgive this huge student debt issue. If they meant themselves as individuals, then terrific. But they most certainly do not. In truth, they intend to benefit and perhaps profit off this, not sacrifice.
Of course the concept is alluring if you are a college student with a lot of debt and know very little of the real world. Most all of us have debt and at times struggle with it. Who would not like their debt wiped out?
But when the “we” is the government, it means that the government will forcibly take one person’s money, to pay off the debt of another person. This is egregious behavior. The person whose money is being taken did not make the loan, consent to the loan, or necessarily even think the loan was a good idea.
The students and their parents voluntarily entered into those debts in return for the college degrees they obtained. They signed on the bottom line to take money to pay for something of value to them, and promised to pay it back. They knew at each step the cost they were incurring.
They were then loaned the money — with the promise they would pay it back — obtained the thing of value with that money, and now they and some politicians want Americans unrelated to the decision to take out the loan and getting value from the product to pay off the debt…while the students keep the thing of value.
This is egregious. But all the media will ever do is interview students with high debt loads and low-paying jobs. That paints a distorted picture, which of course is what it is intended to do.
I have sons who are plumbers. These young men chose not to go to college and take on debt. They work very hard, often in the Florida heat, and they actually make pretty decent money. They have no debt. I have another son working up the management ranks at Publix grocery stores, and he works long and odd hours. And another son who went to college and has nearly paid off his debt, again with a lot of hard work and now runs his own company — as one of my plumber sons does.
They have friends who are working to get nursing degrees and law enforcement training without taking on debt.
Now the politicians looking to make political hay on college debt forgiveness need to explain how it is moral that these people, and the millions like them, should be forced to pay off the debts of those who voluntarily went to college, and voluntarily took on the debt and now have a degree.
They need to explain the morality that nurses, police, firefighters, plumbers, electricians, A/C repairers, roadworkers, carpenters, roofers, block-layers, secretaries, etc. should be forced to pay off strangers’ college debts that they have no association with.
They need to explain how it is moral to force all who went to college ahead of this current crop, who all either paid off their loans or are getting close, to be forced to also pay off the loans of someone else. My wife and I paid off our loans. Sure the debts were smaller, as were the incomes. But it took a few years — while both my wife and I worked nearly full-time during college to keep them low.
If individuals want to forgive loans, that is their right and it is laudable. If banks and creditors want to, that is their right and their choice. But for the government to step in and do it — meaning all working Americans have to chip in — then we have a very different but clear-cut moral issue.
