VIDEOS: What Really Happened on Maui and President Trump’s Response

While in the U.S. Army I was stationed on the island or Oahu, Hawaii for five years.

As the Deputy Inspector General of the U.S. Army Pacific Command I had the opportunity to travel to all of the Hawaiian islands, including Maui, to meet with their National Guard men and women who served our nation.

My heart goes out to the Hawaiian people and those families who lost loved ones during these horrific fires on Maui.

The below videos tell the story and point out who really cares about Hawaiians, Maui and its citizens.

WATCH:

Biden Has “No Comment” On Devastating Maui Fire Death Toll!

‘Not now’: Biden skirts questions on Maui disaster, walks away from press

President Donald J. Trump Gives Message to the People of Maui

In a Public News article titled Renewables Mania And Woke Dogma Behind Hawaii Fire, Not Climate Change MICHAEL SHELLENBERGER wrote,

New York Times spreads disinformation about climate change and fires

Climate change caused the fire that ravaged Hawaii, according to the New York Times. “Climate Change Turned Lush Hawaii Into A Tinderbox,” it reported. “The explanation is as straightforward as it is sobering: As the planet heats up, no place is protected from disasters.”

But the cause of the strong winds, which pushed the wildfires into the city of Lahaina, was Hurricane Dora, and the best available science shows no increase in hurricanes at global or national levels.

It’s true that there’s been a 31% decline in average yearly rainfall in Hawaii since 1990, according to researchers. The La Niña weather pattern, which usually leads to significant rainfall, has brought less precipitation over the last 40 years.

But other changes are more difficult to tie to rising global temperatures, such as the fact that larger storms have been moving northward, resulting in less rainfall. And only 16% of Maui County, where most of the wildfires were burning, has been in severe drought, with another 20% in moderate drought.

What’s more, it’s been human-made changes to the landscape, including the reversion of former sugar cane farms, which had been irrigated, to invasive grasses, which are quick to ignite. “The landscape is just covered with flammable stuff,” one expert told the Times. “All of the conditions just came together.”

Read full article.

WATCH: What Really Happened in Maui?

©2023. Dr. Rich Swier. All rights reserved.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Environmentalists Blocked Release Of Water To Fight Maui Fires

Maui Fires: Natural Disaster or Deliberate Devastation?

Hawaiian Electric focused obsessively on renewable energy while only spending $245,000 on wildfire safety

Obama Still Scolds Americans for Offering ‘Thoughts and Prayers’ During Maui Tragedy

Lahaina, a Modern-Day Pearl Harbor

Biden Announces Trip To Hawaii Nearly Two Weeks After Fires Began

Hawaiian Electric shares slide more on Maui wildfires

RELATED TWEETS:

China-Led Economic Group Pushes Forward With Plans To Topple American Dominance

With destructive Democrats as their domestic arm, the Communist Chinese will make easy work of the end of the American century.

China-Led Economic Group Pushes Forward With Plans To Topple American Dominance

The top two issues during the August 22-24 Brics meeting are a possible expansion of the group and the oft-discussed but mostly elusive idea of creating a denomination, possibly backed by gold.

By: NY Sun, August 15, 2023:

By: Benny Avni, NY Sun, August 14, 2023:

Can the Beijing-dominated group known as Brics successfully challenge America’s decades-long dominance of the global economy?

In 2001, Goldman Sachs’s chief economist, Jim O’Neill, predicted that as a group Brazil, Russia, India, and China would within a decade surpass the world’s top economies. Next week the group, which was later organized under the acronym Brics, adding South Africa, will meet at Johannesburg for its most-anticipated annual gathering to date.

The top two issues during the August 22-24 meeting are a possible expansion of the group and the oft-discussed but mostly elusive idea of creating a denomination, possibly backed by gold. This would help members and others to bypass what is currently the dominant coin in world trade: the greenback.

The International Monetary Fund, though, could prove to be a roadblock to backing any new currency with gold, as a senior research faculty member at the American Institute for Economic Research, Thomas Hogan, observed in the Sun. That’s because the Second Amendment to the IMF’s articles of agreement “specifically forbids the use of gold as a currency denominator” by member nations.

Meanwhile, as part of Brics, Communist China has created financial institutions to compete with global bodies like the IMF and World Bank, and Beijing’s institutions increasingly dominate lending in countries known as “the global south.” South Africa, which holds the rotating Brics presidency in 2023, is allying with Moscow and Beijing. The rest of the security-challenged continent is following Pretoria’s cue.

Brics’ China-based New Development Bank is “allowed to operate on the international scene equivalent to other international organizations, even though it has only a narrow membership” of the five countries, a former World Bank president, David Malpass, told Bloomberg Television, adding, “I think there has to be a rethinking of the international financial system to give less dominance to Russia and China.”

America “is a world power, and should seek peace through strength,” Mr. Malpass tells the Sun. Yet, Washington seems to eschew rethinking multilateralism. Instead, it actively encourages African countries to associate with Brics, even at the expense of America-dominated institutions like the World Bank and the IMF.

“We have long stood for the proposition that countries should be able to freely associate with other countries in any groupings that they want,” Secretary Blinken told reporters in June, when asked about the upcoming Brics meeting.

As a group, Brics is far from united politically. India, for one, is a member of the “quad,” which along with America, Australia, and Japan was formed to counter China’s expansionism. This week Chinese and Indian representatives met in an apparently unsuccessful attempt to reduce military tensions on their joint border in the Himalayas.

Keep reading.

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLES:

Home Prices Drop in China at Faster Pace

China Is Hiding More and More Data From the Rest of the World

China Shadow Bank Misses Dozens of Payments

The idea of a BRICS common currency is almost ’embarrassing,’ the economist who named the group says

Reshaping Global Dynamics: BRICS Summit 2023 And Emergence Of New Geopolitical Era – Analysis

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Reporters Question if Biden Needs to Stop Insisting Hunter ‘Did Nothing Wrong’

Of course, Bribery Biden insists his bagman of a son Hunter did nothing wrong. If he concedes that point, then he self incriminates. Hunter was acting as a conduit for his criminal father. If Hunter did something wrong, which is now fact not theory, then “10% for the big guy’ is guilty.

Jake Tapper hits Joe Biden for defense of Hunter: Should he quit saying publicly son ‘did nothing wrong’?

CNN host Jake Tapper questioned President Biden’s judgment amid his repeated claims that son Hunter had “done nothing wrong” in his business dealings.

While interviewing Rep. Dan Goldman , D-N.Y., on his Sunday show, Tapper brought up the latest developments in the Hunter Biden probe, with the appointment of federal prosecutor David Weiss to special counsel, before moving on to Biden’s defense of his son during his legal troubles.

Tapper noted the president had repeatedly said his son has “done nothing wrong” in media interviews leading up the appointment of the special counsel.

“I understand this is a dad talking about his son,” Tapper acknowledged. “But it’s also the President of the United States talking about a potential defendant in a case that his Justice Department is prosecuting. Also, he was about to plead guilty to some of the things he did wrong. Does the president need to stop publicly saying his son did nothing wrong?”

Read more.

AUTHOR

RELATED TWEET:

RELATED ARTICLES:

ALAN DERSHOWITZ: The Hunter Biden Special Counsel Appointment Is Blatantly Illegal

NEW BOMBSHELL BANK DOCS: Bidens Got Another $20 MILLION in Bribery Payments from Russia, Kazakhstan, Ukraine, Newly Released Bank Records Show

Devon Archer’s Full Biden Story

Here is The Personal Letter Joe Biden Wrote To Devon Archer

Devon Archer Exposes Exactly What Hunter was Selling — Joe Biden

Devon Archer Testimony: Joe Biden 𝐋𝐈𝐄𝐃, Was on Hunter’s Business Calls “20+ Times,” “In The Actual Business of Influence Peddling”

DOJ Backs Down From Attempt To Jail Key Hunter Biden Witness Before House Testimony After Republican Claim of Obstruction

Biden Bribery Ignored But Trump And His Maintenance Guy Slapped With New Charges, Republicans Furious, ‘We Cannot Allow This to Stand’

FOREIGN AGENT IN THE WHITE HOUSE: Hunter’s Corrupt Plea Deal Lays Out Just How Much He Got From Chinese, Ukrainian, Romanian Ops

BOMBSHELL: Senator Grassley Releases FBI Document Showing Joe BIDEN was Involved in $5,000,000 Ukraine Bribery Scheme

“Bidens Do The Crime, But Not The Time”

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Who Will Stop the Current Madness?

n the perceptive and trenchant article below Victor Davis Hanson offers a flawless prescription for what ails America.

He quotes Leo Amery who was a British Conservative M.P. who served as First Lord of the Admiralty and Colonial Secretary during the 1920s, but it is for aiming at Neville’s Chamberlain’s government, sitting on the Treasury Bench, Oliver Cromwell’s famous lines delivered to the Long Parliament on April 20th. 1653 for which he will always be remembered: “You have sat too long here for any good you have been doing. Depart, I say, and let us have done with you. In the name of God, go.”

On May 7th. 1940 the debate in the House of Commons in which Amery spoke those words started quietly enough but it turned out to be one of the most significant debates in British history. As it progressed Chamberlain knew his government was in peril. Although he won the debate by a decent margin a hundred of his own M.P.s either voted against him or abstained. On the evening of May 10th. Winston Churchill became prime minister. Earlier that day Hitler’s powerful mechanized army had invaded Belgium, Luxembourg and Holland and was on its way to France.

Only the Royal Navy had the might to challenge Nazi Germany. The British Expeditionary Force and the Royal Air Force were outnumbered. France would be defeated by the end of June at which point a triumphant Hitler and his Nazis bestraddle a subjugated Europe. Britain stood alone but something had happened in that damp grey island, something that no one had anticipated. The British parliament at the eleventh hour in a revolt of conscience snatched power away from the men of Munich and summoned to the colors the one man who, for almost a decade despite being mocked and ridiculed, had foretold and warned against everything that had come to pass. Within two months Winston Churchill rallied his countrymen and became the world’s symbol of resistance to Nazi tyranny. He would lead his country to victory with his indispensable allies after six long and devastating years of world war.

Casting his eye across the bludgeoned American political landscape and witnessing the lawlessness and devastating wreckage committed against us, our constitution and our American way of life by the determined and treacherous leftocracy of the Democrat Party of which Joe Biden is an ornament, Professor Hanson asks who will speak for America the way Churchill and Leo Amery spoke for Britain in its hour of lethal danger. Who, indeed?

Who Will Say No More to the Current Madness?

By: Victor Davis Hanson | Aug 11, 2023

Britain slept in the 1930s as an inevitable war with Hitler loomed.

A lonely Winston Churchill had only a few courageous partners to oppose the appeasement and incompetence of his conservative colleague Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain.

One of the most stalwart truth-tellers was a now little remembered politico and public servant — Leo Amery, a polymath and conservative member of Parliament.

Yet in two iconic moments of outrage against the Chamberlain government’s temporizing, Amery galvanized Britain and helped end the government’s disastrous policies.

In the hours after Hitler invaded Poland on September 1, 1939, there was real doubt whether Chamberlain would honor its treaty and declare war on Germany.

A Labour Party member, surrogate Arthur Greenwood, got up in the House of Commons to announce that he would be speaking for Labour on behalf of his ill party leader Clement Attlee.

Immediately Amery interrupted, shouting out, “Speak for England, Arthur!”

He was met with overwhelming applause and soon public acclamation.

After all, Amery was a political voice in the wilderness warning that neither his own party nor the opposition Labour party was speaking or acting for the real interest of the British people.

Amery, a shocked Greenwood, and others had finally had enough of the partisan nonsense, and demanded the nation unite against Nazi Germany.

Hours later, Britain declared war on Germany, the first major power to do so.

On a second iconic occasion on May 7, 1940, Amery voiced even stronger views — again, widely held by the public, but rarely voiced by the timid political class.

The inept Chamberlain government had just lost a winnable Norway campaign to Germany.

Amery responded with a blistering attack on the incompetence of the conservative Chamberlain administration by quoting Oliver Cromwell’s hallmark 1653 order to the Long Parliament: “You have sat too long here for any good you have been doing. Depart, I say, and let us have done with you. In the name of God, go.”

Three days later after Amery’s speech and the invasion of France, an ill Chamberlain and most of his advisors resigned. Churchill became prime minister. The rest is history.

We need a voice like Amery’s. Like Britain from 1939 to 1940, America is in existential danger.

The Biden administration has utterly destroyed the southern border — and immigration law with it.

Biden green lighted 7 million illegal aliens swarming into the U.S. without legal sanction or rudimentary audit.

China spies inside and over the U.S. with impunity. Beijing has never admitted to its responsibility for the gain-of-function COVID virus that killed a million Americans.

President Joe Biden printed $4 trillion at exactly the wrong time of soaring post-COVID consumer demand and supply shortages. No wonder he birthed the worst inflation in 40 years.

In response, interest rates tripled, gas prices doubled.

Our military is thousands of recruits short. It lacks sufficient munitions.

Following Biden’s humiliating pullout from Afghanistan, vast troves of arms were abandoned in Kabul. Billions more in scarce weapons were sent to Ukraine.

The Pentagon’s woke agenda trumps meritocracy in promotions and advancement.

Our enemies — Russia, China, Iran, North Korea — are on the move, while the U.S. seems listless.

The Biden renegade Department of Justice, CIA and FBI have become weaponized. Ideology, politics, and race — not the law — more often guide their investigations, intelligence operations and enforcement.

The downtowns of our once majestic major cities are becoming unlivable.

They are mired in refuse and trash, violent crime and homelessness. Stores and businesses leave. Millions each year flee the blue urban coasts to the red west and south.

To even say there are still two biological genders, that global warming may not be entirely manmade or necessarily destroying the planet, or that class, not race, is the proper barometer of inequality is to face ostracism and career cancellation.

Keep reading.

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLES:

Democrats’ Indictment Frenzy Could Come Back To Bite Them

The Decline and Fall of the American Empire

RELATED VIDEO: Newt Gingrich: We are drifting towards the greatest Constitutional crisis since the 1850s

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Trump Will Present ‘Irrefutable Report’ That Will Result in ‘Complete EXONERATION’ of Charges in GA

Former President Donald Trump claims the DoD and Space Force have the “real” results from the 2020 presidential election.

Trump says he will present an ‘Irrefutable Report’ next Monday that will result in ‘complete EXONERATION’ of charges in GA

By Summer Lane, RSBN, August 15, 2023

President Trump stated on Tuesday that he was preparing to present the results of a report on alleged 2020 presidential election fraud next Monday that would result in “complete EXONERATION” on the heels of his fourth indictment in Georgia.

He wrote on Truth Social, “A Large, Complex, Detailed but Irrefutable REPORT on the Presidential Election Fraud which took place in Georgia is almost complete & will be presented by me at a major News Conference at 11:00 A.M. on Monday of next week in Bedminster, New Jersey.”

Late Monday evening, President Trump was indicted for a fourth time this year on 41 charges related to allegedly attempting to “overturn” election results in 2020. The charges were brought against him in Georgia by Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis.

Trump continued in his statement, “Based on the results of this CONCLUSIVE Report, all charges should be dropped against me & others – There will be a complete EXONERATION! They never went after those that Rigged the Election. They only went after those that fought to find the RIGGERS!”

Since announcing his intent to run for reelection in the 2024 presidential race to the White House, the president has faced a revolving door of indictments, beginning early in 2023 in Manhattan (34 counts), and followed by indictments in Miami (37 counts), Washington, D.C. (four counts), and now, Fulton County, Georgia (41 counts).

Trump pointed out this week, “Why didn’t they Indict 2.5 years ago? Because they wanted to do it right in the middle of my political campaign. Witch Hunt!”

The latest Georgia indictment additionally leveled charges at 18 other defendants, including Rudy Giuliani and John Eastman. The filing also colorfully accused Trump and/or defendants of making “false statements,” harassing Fulton County election worker Ruby Freeman, and the “Solicitation of the Vice President of the United States,” among other accusations.

Read more.

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLES:

CIA SUED for working with the Biden campaign to produce ‘Dirty 51’ intel letter calling Hunter’s laptop disinformation

Democrats’ Indictment Frenzy Could Come Back To Bite Them

Engineers Discover Nationwide Cellular Network That Gives The Federal Government Access to Election Systems at Precinct Level

White House Defends Biden’s Narrative, Reporters Question if Biden Needs to Stop Insisting Hunter “Did Nothing Wrong”

RELATED TWEETS:

RELATED VIDEO: Newt Gingrich: We are drifting towards the greatest Constitutional crisis since the 1850s

RELATED TWEETS:

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Two Princeton, MIT Scientists Say EPA Climate Regulations Based on a ‘Hoax’

It was never about climate, the biggest political fraud in history. Power, money, and control. The destructive Democrats condemn industry, technology, the intellect, and want to return us to the state of grunting sub animals digging the soil with our bare hands.

You have to wonder what its going to take for Americans to wake up to the party of treason.

The greatest hoax of the modern age, rivaled by election fraud and COVID with hundreds of millions of victims, not to mention countries, economies, whole sectors of industry.

Two Princeton, MIT Scientists Say EPA Climate Regulations Based on a ‘Hoax’

By: The Epoch Times, August 14, 2023:

Two prominent climate scientists have taken on the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) new rules to cut CO2 emissions in electricity generation, arguing in testimony that the regulations “will be disastrous for the country, for no scientifically justifiable reason.”

Citing extensive data to support their case, William Happer, professor emeritus in physics at Princeton University, and Richard Lindzen, professor emeritus of atmospheric science at Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), argued that the claims used by the EPA to justify the new regulations are not based on scientific facts but rather political opinions and speculative models that have consistently proven to be wrong.

“The unscientific method of analysis, relying on consensus, peer review, government opinion, models that do not work, cherry-picking data and omitting voluminous contradictory data, is commonly employed in these studies and by the EPA in the Proposed Rule,” Mr. Happer and Mr. Lindzen stated. “None of the studies provides scientific knowledge, and thus none provides any scientific support for the Proposed Rule.”

“All of the models that predict catastrophic global warming fail the key test of the scientific method: they grossly overpredict the warming versus actual data,” they stated. “The scientific method proves there is no risk that fossil fuels and carbon dioxide will cause catastrophic warming and extreme weather.”

Climate models like the ones that the EPA is using have been consistently wrong for decades in predicting actual outcomes, Mr. Happer told The Epoch Times. He presented A table to the EPA to illustrate his point.

“That was already an embarrassment in the ‘90s, when I was director of energy research in the U.S. Department of Energy,” he said. “I was funding a lot of this work, and I knew very well then that the models were overpredicting the warming by a huge amount.”

He and his colleague argued that the EPA has grossly overstated the harm from CO2 emissions while ignoring the benefits of CO2 to life on Earth.

Many who have fought against EPA climate regulations have done so by arguing what is called the “major questions doctrine,” that the EPA does not have the authority to invent regulations that have such an enormous impact on Americans without clear direction from Congress. Mr. Happer and Mr. Lindzen, however, have taken a different tack, arguing that the EPA regulations fail the “State Farm” test because they are “arbitrary and capricious.”

“Time and again, courts have applied ‘State Farm’s’ principles to invalidate agency rules where the agency failed to consider an important aspect of the problem, or cherry-picked data to support a pre-ordained conclusion,” they stated. The case they referred to is the 2003 case of State Farm v. Campell (pdf), in which the Supreme Court argued that “a State can have no legitimate interest in deliberately making the law so arbitrary that citizens will be unable to avoid punishment based solely upon bias or whim.”

Keep reading.

AUTHOR

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

65 Jihadis Identified as ‘National Security Risks’ were Granted Entry into the U.S. after the Fall of Afghanistan

Is the Biden regime really just catastrophically incompetent, or did this operation go according to plan? It does so much to weaken the United States, can it be said with any certainty that this wasn’t another such operation?

EXCLUSIVE – 65 Afghan terrorists were let into the U.S. after Biden’s chaotic withdrawal: Prisoner freed by the Taliban and men who planted IEDs got through dire vetting processes

by Wills Robinson, DailyMail.com, August 13, 2023

Militants who left fingerprints on IEDs meant to kill Americans in Afghanistan and a prisoner freed by the Taliban were among more than 65 terrorists allowed into the United States after the catastrophic withdrawal.

Most of them could still be roaming the country, and the government cannot track them down.

The damning revelations made in a new book add to the laundry list of blunders from the Biden administration during and after the disastrous evacuation of Kabul in August 2021.

It has been two years since the two weeks of carnage at Hamid Karzai International Airport that led to the deaths of 13 American service members, hundreds of Afghans, and thousands left behind.

Yet the evidence of the U.S. government’s disastrous handling of the departure of troops after 20 years and the evacuation of allies is still coming to light.

Sixty-five individuals identified as ‘national security risks’ were granted entry into the U.S. in the 12 months after the withdrawal, Jerry Dunleavy and James Hasson write in Kabul: The Untold Story of Biden’s Fiasco and the American Warriors Who Fought to the End.

The book also reveals how the Biden administration missed two chances to prevent the Kabul suicide attack and the dire impact of putting the Taliban in charge of security.

The dangerous individuals let into the U.S. included multiple men whose DNA was found on explosives defused by American forces.

Another was a prisoner ‘liberated’ by the Taliban while they were running riot across the war-torn country on the way to Kabul.

Despite assurances the Taliban wouldn’t surge to power and the US-backed Afghan government would hold, the capital toppled as the Western military left.

An Afghan-American interpreter even identified many Taliban fighters on the tarmac, ready to board flights bound for the U.S….

Read full article.

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLES:

Afghanistan cable warned Biden Kabul would fall after US withdrawal: Rep. Michael McCaul

Dem senator accuses Trump of leaving Biden with ‘bad options’ for disastrous Afghanistan withdrawal

A Final Word On Barack Obama

EDITORS NOTE: This Jihad Watch column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Judicial Watch Statement on Special Counsel to Investigate Bidens

Washington, D.C. – Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton made the following statement regarding the appointment of U.S. Attorney David Weiss as special counsel by Attorney General Merrick Garland to investigate Biden family finances:

Attorney General Garland folded today, stopped ignoring DOJ regulations, and finally appointed a special counsel to investigate Hunter Biden and (indirectly) President Joe Biden for their corrupt family business dealings.

But appointing U.S. Attorney Weiss as special counsel, a man who tried to unethically slide Hunter’s corrupt plea deal past a federal judge, is a sick joke. In fact, Mr. Weiss should be under investigation for his dishonest statements to Congress and his compromised, sweetheart plea deal for Hunter Biden.

Given the powerful and unrefuted testimony before Congress by senior IRS investigators that the criminal investigation of Hunter was obstructed by the Justice Department (when Weiss was nominally running the investigation) in order to protect Joe Biden, Weiss is the last person who should be special counsel.

Congress should speed up and escalate its investigations of Biden corruption, as the Justice Department is ethically broken.

In the meantime, Judicial Watch will continue its leadership role investigating and exposing the worsening Biden corruption crisis through numerous FOIA and other federal and state legal actions.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Biden Corruption Update

Breaking: Special Counsel for Hunter Biden Not What it Seems!

Hearing Set in Judicial Watch Lawsuit Seeking Videos and Emails from January 6 Protest at Capitol

Judicial Watch Sues National Archives for Records of Its Role in Trump Records Dispute

Mexican Cartels Get Ammo, Guns, Money from U.S.

EDITORS NOTE: This Judicial Watch column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Trump Indicted In Georgia Election Interference Case

Former President Donald Trump was indicted for the fourth time late Monday night.

A grand jury ruled Trump and several of his allies should be indicted in relation to alleged efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election in Georgia.

Nineteen people were indicted in the 98-page document. Trump was indicted alongside Rudy Giuliani, John Eastman, Mark Meadows and others.

The former president was charged with violating Georgia’s “Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations” (RICO) Act, Solicitation of Violation of Oath by Public Officer, Conspiracy To Commit Impersonating a Public Officer, Conspiracy To Commit Forgery in the First Degree, Conspiracy To Commit False Statements and Writings, Conspiracy To Commit Filing False Documents, Conspiracy To Commit Forgery in the First Degree, Conspiracy To Commit False Statements and Writings, Filing False Documents, Solicitation of Violation of Oath by Public Officer, and False Statements and Writings.

The indictment reads, “Defendant Donald John Trump lost the United States presidential election held on November 3, 2020. One of the states he lost was Georgia. Trump and the other Defendants charged in this Indictment refused to accept that Trump lost, and they knowingly and willfully joined a conspiracy to unlawfully change the outcome of the election in favor of Trump. That conspiracy contained a common plan and purpose to commit two or more acts of racketeering activity in Fulton County, Georgia, elsewhere in the State of Georgia, and in other states.”

The Fulton County grand jury handed up their decision after hours at 8:58 pm. The decision was signed by the judge and filed by the clerk, who said the decision could be revealed late Monday night. The front page of the indictment showed the jury decided to hand up 10 indictments.

Trump has also previously been indicted on charges relating to documents retained at Mar-a-Lago, alleged actions pertaining to Jan. 6 and allegedly paying hush money to former porn star Stormy Daniels.

The Georgia election investigation began over two years ago, with District Attorney Fani T. Willis launching a probe into Trump’s conversation with Georgia’s Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger. In a January 2021 phone call, Trump allegedly told Raffensperger “to find” enough votes for him to win in the state, according to a transcript published by The Washington Post.

The Trump campaign issued a statement after the grand jury handed up their decision.

“Like Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg, Deranged Jack Smith, and New York AG Letitia James, Fulton County, GA’s radical Democrat District Attorney Fani Willis is a rabid partisan who is campaigning and fundraising on a platform of prosecuting President Trump through these bogus indictments. Ripping a page from Crooked Joe Biden’s playbook, Willis has strategically stalled her investigation to try and maximally interfere with the 2024 presidential race and damage the dominant Trump campaign. All of these corrupt Democrat attempts will fail.”

Earlier Monday, Trump maintained he did not “tamper with the election, “arguing that those who “tampered with it were the ones that rigged it.”

This is a breaking story and will be updated as more information becomes available. 

AUTHOR

DIANA GLEBOVA

White House correspondent.

RELATED TWEET:

RELATED ARTICLES:

Democrats’ Indictment Frenzy Could Come Back To Bite Them

Joe DiGenova to Newsmax: DA Willis ‘Terrorist in Prosecutor’s Uniform’

Networks Heap 342 Mins on Third Trump Indictment, 71x More Than Biden Family Malfeasance

Jury Hands Up 10 Indictments In 2020 Georgia Election Case

RELATED TWEETS:

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Engineers Discover Nationwide Cellular Network That Gives The Federal Government Access to Election Systems at Precinct Level

Over the past two and a half years, a slow but steady exposing of “evidence” not opinion or theory has been uncovered, and then revealed to the public regarding gross and multi-dimensional election fraud. As I have previously written, there are still many election fraud deniers, and many comfortably numb folks who are content living in their self-made bubble. But there is now a growing number of citizens angry and even more given the increasing evidence as to the fraud perpetrated upon Americans in the last two elections.

The below article is a report which The Gateway Pundit has produced with still additional sobering evidence.

The following quote from the article should be an alarming declaration to you: “This incestuous collaboration between the Department of Homeland Security, the Election Assistance Commission, leftist/globalist funding, foreign companies, and their private partners, allowed for the real-time monitoring of all election data, and more importantly, the ability to change the results.”

Report: Engineers Discover Nationwide Cellular Network Connects Election Equipment and Gives Federal Government Access to Election Systems at Precinct Level

Report via Joe Hoft

Guest post by David and Erin Clements

A growing majority of Americans know the 2020 election was fraudulent. Many analysts who have been studying election integrity have concluded that there had to be a two-way connection between local election electronics (electronic poll pads, tabulators, election management systems, voter databases, etc.) and a centralized data collection system responsible for monitoring and manipulating the election. Fingers have rightly been pointed at all-inclusive election management software, the Albert Sensor systemScytl and Edison, and the Election Infrastructure Information Sharing and Analysis Center (EI-ISAC).

This incestuous collaboration between the Department of Homeland Security, the Election Assistance Commission, leftist/globalist funding, foreign companies, and their private partners, allowed for the real-time monitoring of all election data, and more importantly, the ability to change the results.

While experts could understand the functional capabilities of how these programs manipulate elections at the county and state levels, one area of mystery remained.  Experts could not fully explain how systems within individual precincts which are supposedly “air-gapped” were adding votes in real-time – such as KnowInk poll pads in Texas that added hundreds of votes to the 2022 midterm election after the polls had closed.  To accomplish election fraud at individual polling places, it is necessary to have an air-interface with the supposedly “air-gapped” equipment networked at the polling place.

A year-long research project led by an election integrity investigator from Utah, Sophie Anderson, and communications engineer, Dr. Charles Bernardin, has uncovered the mechanism that is being used to connect our election equipment at polling places across the nation.  Anderson and Bernardin met while working together in several overlapping election integrity efforts. After submitting a countless number of public documents requests from multiple federal, state, and local governments, and working with other grassroots researchers, the team realized that the federal government has indeed created a nationwide network that is capable of collecting and changing real-time voting data at polling places across the country from a central location. The private network tool is called FirstNet, and like so many things that have proven detrimental to American liberty – it was sold as a tool to ensure public safety.  

WHAT IS FIRSTNET?

The idea of a national cellular network dedicated to public safety was hatched in the wake of 9/11 when congested cell networks proved to be a bottleneck for first responders. In 2012, Congress created the First Responder Network Authority under the Department of Commerce to oversee the build-out of “FirstNet.” The original intent provided by its sponsors was that FirstNet would serve police, fire, and EMT services.  However, the scope was soon expanded to include all “critical infrastructure” – which included water, energy, and transportation infrastructure. (https://www.digi.com/solutions/by-technology/firstnet )

Curiously, just days before Barack Obama left office, his administration’s Department of Homeland Security used the specter of “Russian interference” in the 2016 election as an excuse to declare election systems to be a part of that critical infrastructure.  As a result, the stage was set to roll election systems into FirstNet.

The original plan to build FirstNet was to create a separate network with nationwide coverage that used a dedicated cellular band portion known as Band 14. Years and billions of dollars later, AT&T had built out the FirstNet Band 14 network with the coverage shown in the map below.

[ … ]

THE PUSH TO CONNECT ELECTION SYSTEMS TO FIRSTNET

Just because the FirstNet cellular network was now available to be used for election systems, didn’t mean all local jurisdictions would connect. Some of them would need to be pushed. Coincidentally, public discussion of using the Election Assistance Commission’s (EAC) influence to push election jurisdictions nationwide to connect to FirstNet took place at a two-day Election Assistance Commission (EAC) Board of Advisers meeting in April 2019. The full transcript of the meeting is here.

The Board of Advisors supposedly exists to assist the EAC in setting standards and guidelines to help states comply with the Help America Vote Act (HAVA) through their certification program. Oddly enough, almost two years prior to this meeting, the accreditations for both election equipment testing labs, Pro V&V and SLI Compliance, had lapsed. This lapse in accreditation effectively shut down the ability of all states to legally certify their election systems as required by HAVA. No vendors, anyone in the EAC, or anyone on their Board of Advisors appeared to have noticed this indefensible oversight.  As a result, most of the country’s election systems were not legally “certified” for the 2020 election.

Read the full article.

©2023. Lyle J. Rapacki, Ph.D. All rights reserved.

RELATED ARTICLES:

FirstNet Band 14 Spectrum Secures Reauthorization From FCC

FirstNet Band 14 coverage serves about half of U.S. rural population, FirstNet Authority reports

Biden Admin Urges Colleges To Continue To Racially Discriminate Following SCOTUS Ruling On Affirmative Action

The Biden administration urged colleges and universities on Monday to continue to racially discriminate in an effort to make their student body diverse, following the Supreme Court’s ruling on affirmative action.

The Supreme Court ruled in June that Harvard University and the University of North Carolina’s use of race-based admissions policies were unconstitutional, halting the practice across higher education institutions. The U.S. Department of Education’s (DOE) Office for Civil Rights and the U.S. Department of Justice’s Civil Rights Division released guidance encouraging universities to skirt the decision by weighing “ways a student’s background, including experiences linked to their race, have shaped their lives and the unique contributions they can make to campus.”

“For higher education to be an engine for equal opportunity, upward mobility, and global competitiveness, we need campus communities that reflect the beautiful diversity of our country,” U.S. Secretary of Education Miguel Cardona said in a statement. “The resources issued by the Biden-Harris Administration today will provide college leaders with much-needed clarity on how they can lawfully promote and support diversity, and expand access to educational opportunity for all following the Supreme Court’s disappointing ruling on affirmative action.”

The guidance notes that through the admissions process, schools can consider how applicants’ backgrounds, such as their experiences with racial discrimination or the racial composition of their neighborhoods, can “position them to contribute to campus in unique ways.”

“For example, a university could consider an applicant’s explanation about what it means to him to be the first Black violinist in his city’s youth orchestra or an applicant’s account of overcoming prejudice when she transferred to a rural high school where she was the only student of South Asian descent,” the guidance states.

Institutions are encouraged to partner with K-12 schools to create pathway programs, and may give preferential treatment to students in the program during the admissions process if they were admitted to the program based on non-racial criteria, the guidance states.

Colleges and universities are able to target programs and areas in an effort to recruit students to contribute to a diverse student body, the guidance states. The guidance explains that schools can reach out directly to schools that predominately serve students of color and those by limited financial means in an effort to recruit applicants.

“By ensuring that the group of applicants they ultimately consider for admission includes a robust pool of talented students from underrepresented groups, institutions better position themselves to attain the student body diversity and related educational benefits they seek,” the guidance states.

The guidance also encourages universities to create race-affiliated groups, such as clubs or activities, to encourage students to “celebrate their shared identities, interests, and experiences.” If clubs, seminars or activities have a race-related theme, it must be open to all regardless of race, the guidance states.

“We stand ready to support institutions that recognize that such diversity is core to their commitment to excellence, and that pursue lawful steps to promote diversity and full inclusion,” the guidance states.

AUTHOR

REAGAN REESE

Contributor.

RELATED ARTICLE: Biden Official Casts Doubt On Ending Legacy Admissions After SCOTUS Ruling

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.


All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

‘Bud Light Them’: Skittles Sparks Outrage After Strange Pro-LGBTQ Packaging

We’ve got another Bud Light on our hands, ladies and gents!

After putting out some strange pro-LGBTQ packaging, Skittles is getting blasted with lash back from Americans who have now turned sour on the candy. In fact, they’re now gloriously calling for a Bud Light-style boycott on the rainbow brand.

Skittles’ parent company, the Wrigley Company (which is owned by Mars Incorporated), sparked outrage after switching up the traditional rainbow packaging for messages and illustrations that promote the LGBTQ community. Now black and white, the packaging features phrases such as “Black Trans Lives Matter” and “Joy is Resistance.”

Designed in a collaboration with the Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation, this is the fourth year that Skittles has worked with the organization to promote LGBTQ sentiment.

And the backlash towards Skittles has been great ever since:

I can’t help but to chuckle at this whole thing.

Since we’ve been going through the Bud Light disaster with their fiasco with Dylan Mulvaney, the left has been pushing back on our argument of “stop pushing this stuff on our kids” with “it’s a beer though, not for kids” … so what’s their response now?

You literally have candy (all kids’ first true love) out here pushing LGBTQ messaging on children now, and they’ve been doing it for years at this point. So, lefties, I have to ask you … why are you supporting this stuff being pushed on kids?

Sounds a bit creepy to me, just sayin’.

AUTHOR

ANDREW POWELL

Contributor.

RELATED ARTICLE: Disney Continues To Collapse As Multiple Revenue Streams Spiral Down The Toilet

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

1 in 4 High School Students Identify as Homosexual

Almost Half Students at Ivy League University Identify as LGBTQ+ — Doubling the Share.

The poison fruit of radical LGBT education in schools.

At one Ivy, The number of heterosexual students went down 25.2% and homosexual students went up 26% from Fall 2010 to Spring 2023.

1 in 4 high school students identifies as LGBTQ

By Lexi Lonas, The Hill, April 27, 2023:

About 1 in 4 high school students identifies as LGBTQ, according to a report the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) released on Thursday, using data from 2021.

In 2021, 75.5 percent of high school students identified as heterosexual, the CDC’s Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System (YRBSS) found.

Among high school students, 12.2 percent identified as bisexual, 5.2 percent as questioning, 3.9 percent as other, 3.2 percent as gay or lesbian and 1.8 percent said they didn’t understand the question.

The CDC says the number of LGBTQ students went from 11 percent in 2015 to 26 percent in 2021.

The health organization said a potential reason for the increase in LGBTQ students could be from their wording around students who are questioning their sexuality.
Pompeo slams Biden Iran prisoner swap deal as ‘very dangerous’
Harris appears to slam GOP lawmakers for making it ‘more difficult for people to vote’

“Increases in the percentage of LGBQ+ students in YRBSS 2021 might be a result of changes in question wording to include students identifying as questioning, ‘I am not sure about my sexual identity (questioning),’ or other, ‘I describe my sexual identity in some other way,’” the report reads.

Among the high school students, 57 percent have had no sexual contact in their lives, 34.6 percent had sexual contact with someone of the opposite sex, 6 percent had sexual contact with both sexes and only 2.4 percent had sexual contact with only the same sex.

The CDC surveyed 17,508 students in 152 schools across the country……

And this…..

Nearly 40% of students at Brown University identify as LGBTQ+ — doubling the share from 2010

By Alex Oliveira, NY Post, July 10, 2023:

The number of Brown University students identifying as LGBTQ+ has doubled since 2010, according to a new poll from the university’s student paper.

About 38% of students at the Ivy League school identified as either homosexual, bisexual, queer, asexual, pansexual, questioning, or other — more than five times the national rate for adults not identifying as straight.

A similar poll conducted at the school just over 10 years ago found that 14% of the student body identified as being part of the LGBTQ+ community.

The poll was conducted by the Brown Daily Herald, an independent student newspaper at the Rhode Island school, and released in June as a part of a Pride Month special issue.

It is unclear how many students were polled in the survey.

As of fall 2022, Brown had an undergraduate enrollment of 7,222 students and another 3,515 in its graduate and medical programs.

Keep reading.

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLES:

‘I Make Love To Men Daily’: Obama’s Letters To His Ex

CNN publishes a ‘guide to neopronouns,’ embraces genderless pronouns like ‘leaf, leafself, sun, star’

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

The Decline and Fall of the American Republic

“This is what it looks like when a country descends into madness.”J. B. Shurk


A Country Descending into Madness

By: J. B. Shurk, American Thinker, August 2023:

This is what it looks like when a country descends into madness.  Two standards of “justice” preclude any justice at all.

Hillary Clinton kept top-secret information on a home-brew private server that was infiltrated by malicious foreign actors, and she suffered no legal consequence — even after having destroyed Blackberry devices and other subpoenaed evidence of criminal culpability.  President Trump keeps personally declassified documents in his home, and the FBI sends a SWAT team into Mar-a-Lago so that Merrick Garland’s goons can throw Trump in prison.

Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama conspired with the Intelligence Community to frame Donald Trump as a Russian spy and remove him from office, and not a single perpetrator involved in that incendiary plot has been indicted.  Trump correctly points out that mail-in ballot fraud irreparably marred the 2020 election, and the violent thugs in control of D.C. level criminal charges against him that could lead to his execution.  Clinton and Obama participated in a wide-ranging international conspiracy that falsely blamed Hillary’s election loss on the Russians — further dividing the American populace by preying on its fears and prejudices, while escalating tensions with a hostile nuclear State.  Trump exercises his constitutional right to free speech, and prosecutors who swore an oath to uphold the Constitution instead betray their duties in order to persecute a political enemy.

There is no shortage of these abrasively hypocritical comparisons.  Since 2016, the D.C. Uniparty and permanent Deep State have hyperventilated about Trump starting WWIII, destroying the economy, locking up his enemies, and using the powers of his office to enrich himself.  None of that happened.  He was the “peace president” who brought wealth back to the middle class, while taking no salary for his public service.  His reward?  Unending attacks from the corrupt FBI, an avalanche of legal bills, and D.C.’s obsession with throwing him in the gulag for life.

Fake President Biden, on the other hand, has engaged in every crime, indecency, and reckless behavior that the Deep State swore Trump would commit.  Biden uses unconstitutional executive orders as only a dictator would.  He steadily marches America toward nuclear war with Russia.  He has been caught red-handed trading political favors for bribes from both foreign allies and adversaries.  He censors Americans’ speech, punishes them for their beliefs, accuses half the country of being “domestic enemies,” and seizes the firearms of law-abiding citizens.  He destroys the value of Americans’ savings through “green” energy–induced inflation.  He floods American towns with illegal aliens leaving organized crime, exotic diseases, and overdose deaths in their wake.  He celebrates Antifa domestic terrorists who burn down small businesses, churches, and pregnancy clinics while threatening Americans who get in their way.  And unlike President Trump — who regretfully showed restraint by not pursuing charges against Clinton, Obama, Comey, Brennan, and so many other Russia Hoax conspirators — the O’Biden White House has worked nonstop to incarcerate Trump and every other perceived political enemy

The D.C. Uniparty warned that Donald Trump would act as a tyrant, flout the law, fleece citizens of their paychecks, and make the world a more dangerous place.  He did not.  However, his illegitimate successor — Deep State stooge Joe Biden — has done all of these things.  Incurious, imbecilic reporters cannot see the irony.

Outside a few islands housing journalistic resistance fighters, the free press is dead.  The media whores on the Deep State payroll never apologized for parroting Russia Hoax lies for years.  Even after abundant evidence has demonstrated that the Biden Crime Family took payoffs from officials in Ukraine, China, Romania, and elsewhere, the press still pretends it is Donald Trump who somehow deserved impeachment for engaging in an imaginary quid pro quo undermining the United States.  And the press orchestrated a conspiracy of silence over the 2020 election’s obvious mail-in ballot fraud — a lawless vote-dumping racket made possible only because federal health authorities were illegally using taxpayer dollars to fund bioweapon research in a Chinese lab that — surprise, surprise — miraculously released a human-engineered COVID virus at exactly the right time to upend Trump’s almost certain re-election.

Keep reading.

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLES:

VDH: “The Coup We Never Knew”

‘A Black Sheep’: Hunter Biden Probe Is Least Of Dems Worries Ahead Of 2024 Election

Many Democrats are less worried about Hunter Biden’s legal troubles than they are about other factors that challenge his campaign to win reelection in 2024, according to The New York Times on Saturday.

Democratic officials, operatives and pollsters are more concerned with President Joe Biden’s age, low approval rating and the lack of confidence the American public has in him improving the economy, according to the Times. Hunter Biden pleaded not guilty last month after tossing out a plea agreement that would have the president’s son plead guilty to two federal misdemeanor charges related to unpaid taxes and one felony charge over his possession of a firearm while being addicted to narcotics.

“There are plenty of things that keep Democrats up at night when it comes to 2024, and this is not one of them,” Matt Bennett, co-founder of the centrist Democratic organization Third Way, told the Times. “Billy Carter is not the reason that Ronald Reagan won 49 states in 1980.”

The current Real Clear Politics (RCP) average for Biden’s approval rating, according to polls collected from July 19 to August 10, sits at 41.2%, while his disapproval rating is higher at 54.2%.

“I haven’t seen polling, and I have not been asked to do polling, on that,” Matt Barreto, who conducts polling for Biden, said to the Times about Americans’ concerns with Hunter Biden. “Americans are totally focused right now on who is going to improve their economic output.”

Inflation reached its highest point since December 1981 in June 2022, totaling 9.1% year-over-year. Inflation has steadily declined since then, reaching 3.0% in June but then ticking back up to 3.2% in July.

In order to combat the record-high inflation, the Federal Reserve has raised interest rates 11 times since March 2022. The current federal funds rate sits in the range of 5.25% and 5.50%, the highest level since 2001.

The U.S. credit rating was downgraded on Aug. 1 from “AAA” to “AA+” by top credit agency Fitch Ratings, with the agency citing a decline in credit trustworthiness for the U.S. government as debt balloons. Fitch forecasted a recession in the fourth quarter of 2023, extending into the first quarter of 2024.

“The dominant position of swing voters has been, the Hunter Biden stuff is family, personal,” Sarah Longwell, a Republican consultant who conducts focus groups on voters, told the Times. “We asked a swing-voting group about Hunter, and they were saying things like, ‘Every family has someone like this, a black sheep.’”

The White House did not immediately respond to a request to comment from the Daily Caller News Foundation.

AUTHOR

WILL KESSLER

Contributor.

RELATED ARTICLES:

The American Companies That Aren’t Actually American Anymore

‘The Attorney General Has Egg On His Face’: Former FBI Agent Sounds Off On Hunter Biden Special Counsel

‘Clearly Diluted’: Critics See Massive Holes In Biden’s New China Restrictions

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.


All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.